Effect of US contrast agents on spectral velocities: in vitro evaluation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of ultrasonographic (US) contrast agents on measurements of peak velocity with spectral Doppler US in stenotic and nonstenotic flow states.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nonpulsatile flow was established in a flow phantom with 0%, 50%, 75%, and 90% stenoses. SH U 508A, perflenapent emulsion, and perfluorohexane emulsion were the contrast agents evaluated. Before and after administration of each contrast agent, two peak velocity measurements obtained proximal to, at the site of, and distal to the stenosis in each vessel model were averaged. The percentage difference in peak velocity after contrast agent administration was calculated for each site interrogated. The mean, SD, and coefficient of variation of the percentage difference in peak velocity were calculated.

RESULTS

Percentage differences in peak velocity after contrast agent administration at different sample volume sites were not significantly different irrespective of the degree of stenosis or the contrast agent evaluated.

CONCLUSION

The contrast agents evaluated do not produce a statistically significant increase in peak velocity. If this result is corroborated in clinical practice, contrast agents can be used without reevaluating existing Doppler US thresholds for stenosis.

Computed radiography dual energy subtraction: performance evaluation when detecting low-contrast lung nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom

A dedicated chest computed radiography (CR) system has an option of energy subtraction (ES) acquisition. Two imaging plates, rather than one, are separated by a copper filter to give a high-energy and low-energy image. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of conventional computed radiography to that of ES obtained with two radiographic techniques. One soft tissue only image was obtained at the conventional CR technique (s = 254) and the second was obtained at twice the radiation exposure (s = 131) to reduce noise. An anthropomorphic phantom with superimposed low-contrast lung nodules was imaged 53 times for each radiographic technique. Fifteen images had no nodules; 38 images had a total of 90 nodules placed on the phantom. Three chest radiologists read the three sets of images in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study. Significant differences in Az were only found between (1) the higher exposure energy subtracted images and the conventional dose energy subtracted images (P = .095, 90% confidence), and (2) the conventional CR and the energy subtracted image obtained at the same technique (P = .024, 98% confidence). As a result of this study, energy subtracted images cannot be substituted for conventional CR images when detecting low-contrast nodules, even when twice the exposure is used to obtain them.

Establishing minimum performance standards, calibration intervals, and optimal exposure values for a whole breast digital mammography unit

Methods are developed to establish minimum performance standards, calibration intervals, and criteria for exposure control for a whole breast digital mammography system. A prototype phantom was designed, and an automatic method programmed, to analyze CNR, resolution, and dynamic range between CCD components in the image receptor and over time. The phantom was imaged over a 5 month period and the results are analyzed to predict future performance. White field recalibration was analyzed by subtracting white fields obtained at different intervals. Exposure effects were compared by imaging the prototype phantom at different kVp, filtration (Mo vs Rh) and mAs. Calcification detection tests showed that phantom images, obtained at 28 kVp with a Mo/Mo anode/filter and low mAs technique, often could not depict Al2O3 specks 0.24 mm in diameter, while a 28 kVp Mo/Rh, higher mAs technique usually could. Stability of the system tested suggests that monthly phantom imaging may suffice. Differences in CCD performance are greater (12%) than differences in a single CCD over time (6%). White field recalibration is needed weekly because of pixel variations in sensitivity which occur if longer intervals between recalibration occur. When mean glandular dose is matched, Rh filtration gives better phantom performance at 28 kVp than Mo filtration at 26 kVp and is recommended for clinical exposures. An aluminum step wedge shows markedly increased dynamic range when exit exposure is increased by using a higher energy spectrum beam. Phantoms for digital mammography units should cover the entire image receptor, should test intersections between components of the receptor, and should be automatically analyzed.

Mammography film processor replenishment rate: bromide level monitoring

The effects of the mammography film processing replenishment rate on contrast and speed are studied sensitometrically. Two experiments studied decreasing replenishment rates in the Kodak RP developer and quantified changes in the developer by measuring bromide ion concentrations. First, values of NaBr concentration from 1.7 to 8.4 g/L, achieved by reducing the replenishment rate, were tested with sensitometry strips. Second, the developer replenishment rate of a high volume dedicated mammography processor was reduced by one-third, to 20 cm3/1560 cm2, so that the NaBr concentration rose from 2.0 to 12.36. Sensitometric results for four film types and patient films were tested for changes from standard values as NaBr concentration was restored to 3.31 g/L. Fifty-five clinical images obtained at 7.3-9.3 NaBr g/L were compared to their matching previous films, with NaBr levels of 2-3 g/L, for contrast and visibility of the skin line. For the range of the NaBr ion from 1.7 to 7 g/L, no significant sensitometric differences were found. Above 7 g/L, different film types had different sensitometric results. From 7.3 to 9.3 NaBr g/L, 47.5% of the clinical films reviewed by four radiologists had less contrast compared to previous films. Dedicated mammography processors with high film volume (i.e., those that do not have excessive oxidation or foreign dye problems) can operate at lower replenishment rates than are currently employed. All common mammography film types are stable at these lower replenishment rates up to 7.0 NaBr g/L.

Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography

OBJECTIVE

Viewing conditions can affect diagnostic performance differently depending on background optical densities. We quantified detection accuracy when viewing calcifications in glandular tissue under recommended viewing conditions versus accuracy with lower view box luminance and higher ambient lighting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A phantom with adipose, 50% adipose and 50% glandular, and glandular-simulating material was imaged, and images were interpreted by five medical imaging physicists using two lighting conditions: the recommended one, high view box luminance (4365 nits) with low ambient light (25 lx), and a suboptimal one, low view box luminance (1763 nits) with moderate ambient lighting (290 lx). Then, a dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System breast composition pattern type 4) unfixed cadaveric breast with numerous native calcifications was imaged 28 times. Nineteen of the films had added clusters of simulated calcifications. Three radiology fellows, each with 11 months of training in mammography, identified the added calcification clusters in the images under the two lighting conditions. Changes in phantom analysis and accuracy of the clinical diagnosis were compared for each lighting condition.

RESULTS

On mammograms of the phantom, both speck and fibril identification were degraded by an average of 1.4 objects for the adipose-simulating section (with its darker optical density). For medium optical densities, found in the section with the simulation of 50% glandular and 50% adipose tissue, suboptimal lighting conditions had little or no effect on speck and fibril identification. For sections of the phantom that simulated glandular tissue, an average of 0.6 specks or fibers were not seen when lighting was suboptimal. With the dense cadaveric breast, the fraction of added calcification clusters detected by the three observers improved by an average of 17% when low luminance viewers and high ambient light were replaced with recommended viewing conditions; individual scores of the observers improved significantly: p values ranged from .02 to .05.

CONCLUSION

Luminance of the view box and ambient lighting significantly affect detection of calcifications in dense breasts when images are interpreted by radiologists with about 1 year of training in mammography. Detection of calcifications in phantoms is primarily degraded for adipose tissue with its darker optical density. However, when lighting conditions are suboptimal, some observers also have trouble detecting calcifications in glandular tissue with its low optical density.

Detection of simulated lung nodules with computed radiography: effects of nodule size, local optical density, global object thickness, and exposure

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We quantified differences in the detection of simulated lung nodules on computed radiographs on the basis of variations in nodule size, local contrast, body habitus (global contrast), and exposure.

METHODS

A step-wedge phantom was developed to simulate the attenuation ranges of the lung, retrocardiac, and subdiaphragmatic regions of the adult human chest. Additional Lucite wedges were used to simulate two different body thicknesses and to provide variable structural noise. Soft-tissue-equivalent nodules of 3-mm and 5-mm diameter that resulted in 10% differences in attenuation from lung equivalence were embedded in lung-equivalent material. By superimposing the sheets in various positions, 84 unique nodule configurations containing eight nodules per image were exposed on a computed radiography system. Computed radiographs were acquired at two different exposures approximating standard exposure and underexposure. For each resulting phantom image, seven observers scored the presence or absence of a nodule within individual cells of a 5 x 5 grid matrix.

RESULTS

True-positive fractions for 3-mm-diameter nodules were very low across all conditions. True-positive fractions for 5-mm-diameter nodules varied from 0.23 to 0.98. Significant differences in the conspicuity of 5-mm nodules depended on differences in phantom thickness and differences in the locations of nodules within lung-, retrocardiac-, or subdiaphragmatic-equivalent regions. Accuracy in detecting nodules was significantly lower at lower exposures when nodules were located in the subdiaphragmatic-equivalent region.

CONCLUSION

On computed radiographs, small nodules (5-mm diameter) can be reliably detected when they are located in areas of high or moderate surrounding local contrast, such as the lung or mediastinal regions. Detection of nodules decreases in regions of lower optical density corresponding to the subdiaphragmatic regions of the chest. The decrease in nodule detectability is greatest under conditions that simulate large body thickness and underexposure.

Mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: reducing the rate of insufficient specimens

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to reduce the rate of insufficient specimens from fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of impalpable mammographically detected breast lesions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Our previous rate of insufficient specimens for FNAC was 27%. We implemented the following strategies to reduce this rate and improve accuracy: retraining of radiologists in FNAC procedures, more vigorous sampling, on-site evaluation of specimens by cytopathologist or cytotechnologist, exclusive use of stereotaxic guidance, stereotaxic equipment calibration program, and verification of initial needle placement.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients with impalpable abnormalities who underwent FNAC with the new protocol, six (8%) had insufficient specimens for cytologic diagnosis: Four were incorrectly judged to contain sufficient material at the time of FNAC, one refused to complete the FNAC, and one had a vasovagal reaction. Of the six cases with insufficient specimens, four were benign at biopsy, one was malignant, and one was determined to be benign on the basis of mammographic stability.

CONCLUSION

Modification of techniques and implementation of a quality assurance program can significantly improve the insufficient specimen rate for FNAC. Correlation of mammographic and cytologic findings also improves the management of these cases.

Validation of volume flow measurements in blood vessels with quantitative color velocity imaging using a physiologic model of the circulation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Color velocity imaging-quantitative (CVI-Q) is a new sonographic technique designed to measure volume flow (VF) in blood vessels. We attempted to validate VF measurements with CVI-Q in an in vitro model of the circulation.

METHODS

We validated CVI-Q in a flow phantom mimicking physiologic conditions by connecting isolated porcine arteries 4-14 mm in diameter to a calibrated perfusion roller pump generating pulsatile flow with porcine blood. Pump flow was varied stepwise from 0 to 1,000 ml/min. CVI-Q VF measurements were performed using a 7.5-MHz linear array transducer. VF results then were compared with pump flow calibration values through linear regression.

RESULTS

A good correlation (r2 = .98-.99, slope = 0.88-1.02) was obtained from 0 to 400-600 ml/min. The degree of correlation depended on vessel diameter, with linearity being maintained over a somewhat larger range in medium-sized vessels. At higher flows, variability increased significantly.

CONCLUSION

VF measurements with CVI-Q are accurate in a physiologic flow range. At supraphysiologic flow rates, as are encountered within arteriovenous fistulae, CVI-Q may give inaccurate results. Awareness of possible pitfalls and limitations of the technique is important for obtaining accurate and reproducible results.

Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign vs malignant outcomes

The positive predictive value of mammography is between 20% and 25% for clustered microcalcifications. For very early cancers there is often a lack of concordance between mammographic signs and pathology. This study examines the usefulness of computer texture analysis to improve the accuracy of malignant diagnosis. Texture analysis of the breast tissue surrounding microcalcifications on digitally acquired images during stereotactic biopsy is used in this study to predict malignant vs benign outcomes. 54 biopsy proven cases (36 benign, 18 malignant) are used. The texture analysis calculates statistical features from gray level co-occurrence matrices and fractal geometry for equal probability and linear quantizations of the image data. Discriminant models are generated using linear discriminant analysis and logistic discriminant analysis. Results do not differ significantly by method of quantization or discriminant analysis. Jackknife results misclassify 2 of 18 malignant cases (sensitivity 89%) and 6 of 36 benign cases (specificity 83%) for logistic discriminant analysis. From this preliminary study, texture analysis appears to show significant discriminatory power between benign and malignant tissue, which may be useful in resolving problems of discordance between pathological and mammographic findings, and may ultimately reduce the number of benign biopsies.

Mammography fixed grid versus reciprocating grid: evaluation using cadaveric breasts as test objects

In this study we use unfixed cadaveric breasts to obtain mammography images with fixed and reciprocating grids. Sheets of acrylic, containing one or more clusters of simulated calcifications and masses, were superimposed on two fresh cadaveric breasts (3.4 and 6.5 cm thick), and were imaged with a fixed grid and a reciprocating grid. Six radiologists, working independently, attempted to identify the number of clusters and/or masses in 114 images containing 139 clusters of simulated calcifications and 42 simulated masses. Thirty-four of these images were normal, containing no lesions. For the thinner breast, no statistically significant difference was found in the detection of clusters of calcifications in the images produced with the fixed grid compared to those produced with the reciprocating grid. However, for the detection of calcifications in images of the thicker breast, sensitivity of 74% for detection of calcifications when a fixed grid was used was significantly less than sensitivity of 86% when a reciprocating grid was used (P = 0.006). The mass detection sensitivity was 91% for images made with a fixed grid compared to 96% for images made with a reciprocating grid, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.346). The use of cadaveric breasts as test objects was well accepted by radiologists. Only for the thick cadaveric breast were differences between the two grids significant, and these differences were restricted to the task of finding calcifications.

Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom

OBJECTIVE

Radiographic exposure has been thought to have little impact on the diagnostic quality of chest computed radiography because of automatic digital control of global optical density. The objectives of this study were to compare images obtained with two different exposures in computed radiography with conventional and asymmetric screen-film images of the chest for the detection of simulated lung nodules by use of receiver operating characteristic analysis and to relate differences in observer performance to parameters of image noise measured for each receptor condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At 110 kVp (fixed), exposures for the two screen-film systems were those necessary to achieve adequate optical densities over the lung and mediastinal regions of an anthropomorphic phantom. The two exposures used for the computed radiographs corresponded to the exposure used for the conventional chest screen-film system and an exposure 22% lower. An anthropomorphic phantom constructed of materials matched to the muscle, lung, and bone attenuation of a muscular adult man was used. Soft-tissue-equivalent plastic nodules of various sizes were secured at multiple sites on the phantom to simulate lung nodules. The chest phantom was imaged in 50 configurations with a total of 70 superimposed nodules. The perceptual performances of five radiologists were compared by use of receiver operating characteristic analysis. The signal-to-noise ratio in the mediastinum and the coefficient of variation of noise were measured for all four image conditions by use of a step wedge technique to provide an explanation for differences in diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in the detection of lung nodules between the two screen-film systems or between the conventional screen-film images and the standard-exposure computed radiographs. However, there was a significant decrease in nodule detection on computed radiographs obtained at a reduced exposure; this result was associated with a 21% decrease in the signal-to-noise ratio.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that underexposure of computed radiographs decreases the detection of low-contrast objects such as lung nodules. Although consistent global optical density on computed radiographs is achieved over a wide range of exposures, the alterations in signal-to-noise ratio that result from underexposure can reduce the diagnostic quality of computed radiographs.

Strategies for developing effective computer-assisted instruction: a computer-based teaching module on color Doppler US

Computer-assisted instruction is an effective method for teaching visually oriented subjects such as ultrasonography. Although many different forms of instructional strategy can be effective, the process of designing a teaching program should follow the same general procedures, regardless of the format. The first step is to consider the subject material and the target audience; this helps to determine the style of the computer-user interaction (eg, whether the program should be more interactive or dissertative in nature). Teaching objectives should be carefully defined and resources for development identified. Before actually writing the program, the authors should carefully define a lesson plan and develop a set of specifications for implementation. Finally, the program should be tested thoroughly before it is put to use, and the effectiveness of the instruction should be evaluated.

Acceptance testing prone stereotactic breast biopsy units

When the Mammography Quality Standards Act becomes law in October, 1994, stereotactic breast biopsy units may require yearly physicist calibration. Upright stereotactic units can be easily tested using conventional mammography procedures and a gelatin phantom containing simulated calcifications, but prone units are difficult to assess because of the under-table tube configuration. The two current manufacturers of these units have made different design decisions which affect each unit's calibration. There are a number of important distinctions between screening and prone biopsy units. For the two currently available prone units, a pronounced heel effect makes ion chamber position critical. Focal spot measurements are particularly difficult on one unit because there is no light field. The fixed grid on the other unit must be tested with a flood film. Physicists who inspect these units before their clinical use should be aware of variations needed by this equipment for specific acceptance tests.

Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences

OBJECTIVE

A mammography unit with both a molybdenum anode and a rhodium anode, filtered with molybdenum and rhodium, respectively, was evaluated to determine which types of women would benefit from the dose savings of the rhodium combination despite some loss of contrast.

SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS

In 100 women, the molybdenum anode and molybdenum filtration (Mo/Mo) were used to obtain mammograms of the right breast, and the rhodium anode and rhodium filtration (Rh/Rh) were used for mammograms of the left breast. All mammograms were obtained at 26 kVp. All milliampere-second values used to radiograph the breasts of these women were recorded. Mammograms of 54 women (30 with previous mammograms available), representing the four types of breasts as defined by the American College of Radiology, were interpreted by three radiologists. Each mammogram was assigned a grade for breast type, preference (Rh/Rh, Mo/Mo, or previous mammograms), contrast, and sharpness.

RESULTS

Overall, mammograms obtained by using the Mo/Mo combination were preferred. However, for images of types 3 and 4 breasts, Rh/Rh was preferred twice as often as it had been for mammograms of types 1 and 2 breasts. The mean glandular dose for all breast types when the Rh/Rh combination was used was 42% of the dose used for the Mo/Mo combination. For a 6-cm-thick dense breast, the Rh/Rh combination required 40% of the dose required for the Mo/Mo combination.

CONCLUSION

Mammograms obtained with the Rh/Rh combination carried an overall decrease in contrast and mean glandular dose. However, for young women and some women with large dense breasts, the Rh/Rh mammograms were equivalent to or better than the mammograms obtained with the Mo/Mo combination. Effective use of Rh/Rh units requires careful selection of women based on age or the amount of glandular tissue seen on previous mammograms.

Use of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular blood flow measurements: a validation study for potential neurologic endovascular applications

PURPOSE

To conduct a validation study of a Doppler guide wire for potential neuroendovascular applications.

METHODS

A 12-MHz, 0.018-inch Doppler guide wire was evaluated in eight swine under various blood flow conditions using two types of in vivo cerebrovascular models (physiologic and arteriovenous shunting). Flow conditions were mechanically and pharmacologically altered. Doppler average peak velocity was compared with volumetric blood flow, and flow profile corrections were calculated and analyzed. Qualitative aspects of the Doppler guide wire spectra were also assessed.

RESULTS

Plots of average peak velocity versus volumetric blood flow showed excellent linear relationships (r2 > 0.94), which were maintained at high flow conditions (average peak velocity, 99 to 236 cm/sec; volumetric blood flow, 392 to 889 mL/min). Values of flow profile correction varied from 0.43 to 0.94 and showed no consistent relationship to changes in volumetric blood flow.

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent correlation between average peak velocity and volumetric blood flow over a wide range of blood flow conditions and the additional qualitative information of the Doppler guide wire spectra establish a foundation for clinical implementation. The unpredictable variations of flow profile corrections remain obstacles for calculating volumetric blood flow based on Doppler guide wire average peak velocity.

Mammography quality assurance from A to Z

Quality assurance (QA) refers to all planned, systematic activities that instill confidence that quality mammography is being performed. Quality control (QC) refers only to the technical aspects of the examination. Standardized labeling of mammograms and the format for mammographic reports are important parts of a QA program; recommendations for both have been published by the American College of Radiology. Minimum staff for a mammography service consists of a scheduler, technologist(s), medical physicist, and radiologist. The scheduler asks the patient questions to ensure that the appropriate examination is performed, gives the patient instructions, and asks the patient to complete a history questionnaire including a release form to obtain earlier mammograms. One certified, licensed technologist is designated to perform QC, which includes maintaining darkroom, screen, and view box cleanliness; reviewing processor performance, checked with sensitometer, densitometer, and phantom images; repeat analysis; analysis of fixative retained in film, darkroom fog, screen-film contact, and adequacy of compression; and visual inspection of equipment. A certified medical physicist performs equipment acceptance testing and annual QC visits thereafter. The radiologist oversees all aspects of the QA program, including selecting and regularly observing the technologists, selecting and meeting with the physicist, communicating results, ensuring patient follow-up, and assessing patient outcome data. The radiologist is ultimately responsible for image quality and the standard of patient care.

Mammography focal spot measurement with a star pattern: techniques to avoid inaccuracies

The increased emphasis on mammography acceptance testing and quality control make the star pattern test an essential component of the procedure for diagnosing poor resolution due to large focal spots. In this paper procedures for calculating magnification and the correct angle of the star pattern to use are described. The preferred placement of the star pattern in the field and proper exposure technique is also discussed.

Effect of poor control of film processors on mammographic image quality

With the increasingly stringent standards of image quality in mammography, film processor quality control is especially important. Current methods are not sufficient for ensuring good processing. The authors used a sensitometer and densitometer system to evaluate the performance of 22 processors at 16 mammographic facilities. Standard sensitometric values of two films were established, and processor performance was assessed for variations from these standards. Developer chemistry of each processor was analyzed and correlated with its sensitometric values. Ten processors were retested, and nine were found to be out of calibration. The developer components of hydroquinone, sulfites, bromide, and alkalinity varied the most, and low concentrations of hydroquinone were associated with lower average gradients at two facilities. Use of the sensitometer and densitometer system helps identify out-of-calibration processors, but further study is needed to correlate sensitometric values with developer component values. The authors believe that present quality control would be improved if sensitometric or other tests could be used to identify developer components that are out of calibration.

Testing mammography equipment: evolution over a 4-year period

The results of quality control (QC) tests on 70 mammography units in Southern California from 1986 to 1990 are reported. Thirteen facilities, selected because they housed all of the mammography units in three communities involved in a National Institutes of Health research project, had their units tested twice at an interval of 1 year. Fourteen self-selected units were also tested twice at intervals ranging from 1-3 years. Forty-three self-selected units in 31 additional facilities had testing only once. All 70 units underwent measurement of focal spot size or resolution, tube output, half-value layer (HVL), automatic exposure control (AEC) accuracy, relative kVp accuracy, mean glandular dose, and imaging of several test objects. The test results for the units tested once showed no significant differences compared to those tested twice. For the latter, once the units were tested and determined to be acceptable, retesting showed differences only in overall film optical density, dose, and AEC performance.

Mammography screen-film selection: individual facility testing technique

Variations in tube output, film processing, and radiologist's preferences affect the screen-film combination that is appropriate for any particular mammographic facility. A technique to test a variety of screen-film combinations for screening mammography is described. Films are selected for testing because of their densitometric characteristics. Dose and clinical reliability are established with phantoms before the screen-film combinations are used to image consecutive patients having bilateral examinations. The mammograms selected for evaluation are those with similar optical density ranges, and which also may be compared to available previous mammograms or which have unusual mammographic findings. All radiologists reading mammograms at a facility independently score the selected cases. Scores of "unacceptable," "acceptable," or "outstanding" are assigned to four basic imaging characteristics: sharpness, contrast, visibility of skin line, and noise. Interobserver variations by this method require normalization, unlike ROC analysis which is not applicable for this data because of the absence of proved pathologic diagnoses. The testing of 5 films and two screens using 42 patient examinations required 2 h of time from each radiologist. It took 7 h of the physicist's time to pretest the 5 films, select the 42 acceptable examinations for testing by the radiologists, and summarize the data.

A new electronically enhanced biopsy system: value in improving needle-tip visibility during sonographically guided interventional procedures

Sonographically guided fine-needle biopsy procedures are hampered by poor visibility of the needle tip. This study was performed to evaluate a new system for placing needles under sonographic guidance. The Biosponder needle (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, WA) incorporates a specialized stylet with a passive sensor at its tip. When an ultrasound pulse is detected by the sensor, an electrical signal is transmitted to the sonographic unit by a battery-powered electronic module connected to the stylet and to the scanner. This signal is converted into a bright, flashing marker on the screen at the precise location of the needle tip. The Biosponder system, which uses 20- or 22-gauge needles, was compared with a 20-gauge Turner needle (Cook, Bloomington, IN) in 18 patients with masses or fluid collections and two patients requiring nephrostomy tube placement. The tip of the Turner needle could not be localized precisely in any patient. The shaft of the Turner needle was seen clearly in 13 patients, poorly in three, and was not visualized at all in four patients. Excluding four instances of mechanical failure, the Biosponder system allowed precise localization of the needle tip in every patient and was consistently rated as easier to use than the Turner needle. We conclude that the Biosponder needle, with its precise tip localization and ease of use, is a valuable tool for sonographically guided needle placement.

New and future developments in screen-film mammography equipment and techniques

Two improvements in mammography equipment during the last 4 years will greatly affect the practice of mammography during the next decade: dose reduction and improved testing equipment for monitoring the quality of mammography. The increased use of digital radiography has stimulated studies comparing digital mammography with screen-film mammography. Some digital algorithms for detecting clusters of calcifications may have application in screening mammography within the next decade.

Recommendations on performance characteristics of diagnostic exposure meters: report of AAPM Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Task Group No. 6

Task Group 6 of the Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) was appointed to develop performance standards for diagnostic x-ray exposure meters. The recommendations as approved by the Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Committee and the Science Council of the AAPM are delineated in this report and provide specifications on meter precision, calibration accuracy, calibration reference points, linearity, energy dependence, exposure rate dependence, leakage, amplification gain settings, directional dependence, the stem effect, constancy checks, and calibration intervals. The report summarizes recommendations for meters used in mammography, general purpose radiography including special procedures, computed tomography, and radiation safety surveys for x-ray radiography.

Endoluminal catheter-assisted transcervical US of the human embryo. Work in progress

To enhance visualization of anatomic structures of the human embryo, the authors used a commercially available catheter-based ultrasound (US) transducer (12.5 MHz) introduced through the cervix and into the endometrial cavity of seven women about to undergo voluntary termination of first-trimester pregnancy. The authors term this technique endoluminal catheter-assisted transcervical (ELCAT) sonography. In none of the patients did the US catheter rupture the fluid-filled chorionic/amniotic cavity. The duration of pregnancy ranged from 5.2 to 10.0 menstrual weeks. The most prominent anatomic structures visualized were the heart and neural tube. As an investigational technique, ELCAT US can be used to image anatomic structures of the developing human embryo.

Detection of renal stones with real-time sonography: effect of transducers and scanning parameters

Three experiments with a variety of transducers and scanning parameters were designed to investigate if renal stones could be detected with greater certainty by using particular transducers or scanning parameters. First, the lateral resolution, derived from the -6-dB size of the beam profile, was measured at various depths for five transducers commonly used for renal sonography. Second, an in vitro test object was constructed from bovine liver, porcine kidneys, and two renal calculi to access gray-scale map effects on shadow visibility before and after storage in the digital scan converter. The third experiment combined 15 lithotripsy patients with known renal stones with 16 patients in whom the results of renal sonography and other radiographic procedures suggested renal calculi. The group of 15 patients was scanned several times with the transducers and gray-scale maps studied earlier, and the group of 16 patients was scanned only with one transducer and one gray-scale map. On radiographs, 12 of the 16 patients did not have renal calculi. Sonograms of the test object showed that low-contrast images were best for detection of posterior shadows. Three radiologists interpreted the 31 sonograms with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 86% for detecting renal stones. For the 15 cases of renal stones scanned with a variety of transducers, the three radiologists found that annular-array transducers depicted stone shadowing with less ambiguity than mechanical sector transducers did 81% of the time.

Breast sonography

Sonographic equipment for breast imaging has continued to improve, and the role of breast sonography has evolved to that of an indispensable adjunct to mammography. Breast sonography is not useful for screening for breast cancer in any age group. Its main use is for the differentiation of cystic vs solid palpable and mammographically visible masses. If strict sonographic criteria are used for a simple cyst, the diagnostic accuracy approaches 100%. Sonographic diagnosis of a simple cyst precludes the need for further workup, including aspiration, biopsy, or followup. This article emphasizes the technical aspects of breast sonography, especially those factors that alter the diagnostic information on the images. These factors can be especially problematic in differentiating cysts and solid masses, the most common diagnostic use of breast sonography. Selection of equipment depends largely on the requirements of a specific practice. Optimally, the sonographic equipment is located close to where mammography is performed, and the sonographic and mammographic findings are interpreted together.

Increased radiation dose at mammography due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening

Four single-emulsion films introduced over the past 2 years--Du Pont Microvision, Fuji MiMa, Konica CM, and Eastman Kodak OM--were compared with Eastman Kodak OM SO-177 (Min-RE) film to evaluate their varying effects on mean glandular dose of reciprocity law failure due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening as a result of increased radiation exposure to improve penetration of glandular tissue. Exposures over 1.3 seconds led to increased radiation doses of 20%-30%. Delays in processing of 6 hours decreased processing speed by 11%-32% for all films except Du Pont Microvision. Optical density increases of 0.40 required 20%-30% more skin exposure for all five films. Optimal viewing densities were also evaluated and found to be different for each of the five films. Mammographers need to be aware of these differences in mammographic films to achieve maximum contrast at mammography.

Assurance of consistent peak-velocity measurements with a variety of duplex Doppler instruments

To assess the need for quality control when measuring peak velocities with Doppler ultrasonography, 17 duplex Doppler instruments from six manufacturers were compared by using a flow phantom that had been calibrated for peak velocities ranging from 23 to 75 cm/sec. Variations in peak-velocity measurements among machines averaged 23% when tested at the same flow rate with a Doppler flow phantom, indicating that scientific articles that document peak velocities for various disease processes should be accompanied by equipment calibration data. Doppler string and flow phantoms were compared, and each was found to have deficiencies. Techniques for quality assurance procedures for Doppler measurements are given that should achieve consistent peak-velocity measurements on serial scans of patients undergoing treatment for vascular conditions.

New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose

Five types of film (Kodak OM, Kodak OM-SO177, Konica CM, Dupont Microvision, and Fuji MiMa) exposed in combination with seven different intensifying screens (Min R, Min R Medium, Siemens Orthox MA, Kyokka HR Mammo Fine, Agfa Gevaert Detail S (old and new), and Konica Monarch) were processed for either 90 sec (at 33.3 degrees C) or 3 min (at 35.0 degrees C). The films imaged a Computerized Imaging Reference System phantom with additional detail test objects placed on its surface to produce four groups of objects with which to evaluate resolution and contrast. For objects that tested resolution, the Kyokka HR Mammo Fine (Fuji) screen was statistically significantly superior; for objects that tested contrast, the Konica Monarch screen was statistically significantly superior. Extended processing did not affect Dupont and Kodak OM film as much as it affected the other films. It did affect contrast for the other films tested. The mean glandular doses from gridless exposures ranged from 32 to 80 mrad (0.32-0.80 mGy) over all film/screen/processing combinations for a 4.5-cm-thick test object. Several new film/screen combinations can provide images superior to the Kodak Min R/OM combination at a reduced radiation dose. The Kyokka HR Mammo Fine (Fuji) screen was found statistically superior in radiographic resolution of mammographic test objects and the Konica Monarch screen was found to be superior in defining contrast.

Diagnosis of breast calcifications: comparison of contact, magnified, and television-enhanced images

Matched contact and microfocal-spot-magnified images of 31 breasts, each containing a cluster of microcalcifications within a biopsy-proved benign (n = 21) or malignant (n = 10) lesion, were evaluated. Each matched set consisted of one image magnified 1.5 or 2.0 times by a microfocal spot; one contact film-screen mammogram; and one television-digitized, enhanced, and optically magnified contact film-screen mammogram. Three experienced mammographers and three senior diagnostic radiology residents with 2 weeks of training in mammography interpreted the calcifications. The average area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for the experienced mammographers was 0.60 for contact radiographs, 0.61 for the television-digitized images, and 0.69 for the microfocal-spot-magnified radiographs. The less experienced senior residents scored below a random choice, 0.44, for the television-digitized images; 0.51 for contact radiographs; and 0.69 for the microfocal-spot-magnified radiographs. We conclude that when evaluating microcalcifications, radiologists without extensive experience in mammography should not substitute television-digitized and enhanced contact mammograms for microfocal-spot-magnified mammograms; rigorous clinical evaluation is needed before this system is accepted for clinical use.

Digital mammography. A comparison of two digitization methods

A preliminary study of 40 different radiodense breasts digitized with a Fuji high resolution BAFBr:EU2+ imaging plate enabled us to establish acceptable enhancement procedures with a Fuji Computer Radiology 201 system. Screen-film images of 36 of these breasts were also digitized and enhanced on a Damon DETECT TV system. Three radiologists specializing in mammography reviewed each pair of images. For the 20 normal examinations, both digital methods were considered equivalent in image quality, while for the 16 cases containing pathology (masses and/or calcifications) the TV system was considered to provide the best image quality twice as often as the laser scanned system. The radiologists rejected both methods of enhancement for 8% of the images. Despite cost differences between the two systems, both have equal capability in penetrating dense breasts. However, both systems have several significant deficiencies which preclude their clinical use. At the present time, there is no objective justification for using either system for breast imaging other than in an experimental capacity.

A review of mammography test objects for the calibration of resolution, contrast, and exposure

Mandated and voluntary accreditation and quality control programs for mammography require the use of standardized mammography test objects. We evaluated eleven commercially available test objects and three prototype test objects, comparing them with respect to their resolution targets, contrast targets, and the dose they required when imaged by the same automatic exposure meter. Ion chamber and/or thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements of exposure were made with each test object, while attenuation was measured for seven. Measurements of dosage using acrylic (5 test objects) and tissue equivalent epoxy (9 test objects) showed as much as a 400% variation in the radiation supplied by the same automatic exposure device when differences in thicknesses of test objects were normalized. Speck visibility was as dependent on the composition of the specks and of the surrounding material as on the size of the specks. Contrast targets were adequate in only three test objects. Optical density differences between images of a 4-cm-thick breast and of different test object materials, also 4 cm in thickness, exposed to the same radiation, imply that untested acrylic or epoxy resin materials should not used in the calibration of automatic exposure controls.

Frequency measurements in real-time US equipment: variations from expected values

The frequency responses of nine real-time mechanical probes and two pulsed Doppler probes from four manufacturers were measured. The reflected frequency was measured in a clinical environment by evaluating the pulser, transducer assembly, and receiver as a system. Two independent systems were used for these measurements: a spectrum analyzer and a data acquisition system that computed the fast Fourier transform of the reflected waveform. Results showed that probe frequency (calibrated by the manufacturer in the transmit mode with a hydrophone) was as much as 30% higher than that found by means of frequency measurement procedures with the probe attached to the ultrasound system and evaluated in the receive mode. Such large discrepancies indicate that if acceptance testing of the frequency spectrum is not performed at a clinical facility, prolonged clinical evaluation of new equipment should be arranged.

Breast sonography: technique, equipment, and normal anatomy

In order to interpret breast sonograms successfully, it is necessary to understand the technical factors that affect the image. It is especially important to be aware of the effects of focal zone, power, time gain compensation, and gray scale selection on cyst/solid differentiation, the primary indication for breast sonography. Adequate breast examinations can be performed with either high-frequency automated whole-breast ultrasound units or hand-held instruments with a transducer operating at 5 MHz or greater frequency, and with a depth of focus of no more than 3 cm. Familiarity with the normal breast sonogram, including the variations in the relative amounts of parenchyma, connective tissue, and fat that occur with increasing age and parity, is essential for the identification, characterization, and localization of abnormalities.

Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten

Gridless screen-film mammography at 23 kVp with a W anode (inherent filtration: 0.1 mm A1, added filtration: 0.025 mm Mo) can achieve contrast identical to that achieved with gridless film-screen mammography at 27 kVp with a Mo anode (inherent filtration: 1.0 mm Be, added filtration: 0.025-mm Mo). However, W-anode film-screen mammograms obtained at 23 kVp require more radiation than Mo-anode film-screen mammograms obtained at 27 kVp. The lack of contrast of W-anode film-screen images produced at the same kVp as Mo-anode images was verified clinically and with a low contrast test object imaged over a range of densities. A step wedge test object was then used to match contrast between Mo- and W-anode gridless film-screen images at various kVp. The low contrast test object images verified the contrast equivalence of images obtained at 23 kVp for a W anode and 27 kVp for a Mo anode. A comparison of the two kVp for different anode materials was tested clinically on ten patients. The clinical and low contrast test object experiments were reviewed by three radiologists specializing in mammography.

Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise

Six different combinations of film-processor temperature (33.3 degrees C, 35 degrees C), development time (22 sec, 44 sec), and chemistry (Du Pont medium contrast developer [MCD] and Kodak rapid process [RP] developer) were each evaluated by separate analyses with Hurter and Driffield curves, test images of plastic step wedges, noise variance analysis, and phantom images; each combination also was evaluated clinically. Du Pont MCD chemistry produced greater contrast than did Kodak RP chemistry. A change in temperature from 33.3 degrees C (92 degrees F) to 35 degrees C (95 degrees F) had the least effect on dose and image contrast. Temperatures of 36.7 degrees C (98 degrees F) and 38.3 degrees C (101 degrees F) also were tested with extended processing. The speed increased for 36.7 degrees C but decreased at 38.3 degrees C. Base plus fog increased, but contrast decreased for these higher temperatures. Increasing development time had the greatest effect on decreasing the dose required for equivalent film darkening when imaging BR12 breast equivalent test objects; ion chamber measurements showed a 32% reduction in dose when the development time was increased from 22 to 44 sec. Although noise variance doubled in images processed with the extended development time, diagnostic capability was not compromised. Extending the processing time for mammographic films was an effective method of dose reduction, whereas varying the processing temperature and chemicals had less effect on contrast and dose.

Medical pattern recognition pitfalls in a clinical setting: renal cell carcinoma survival prediction

Three studies to predict renal cell carcinoma patient survival from tumor textures found in digitized early venous phase arteriograms were successful individually. However, when the three methods were compared, they were not consistent and no single method was clinically useful. The first study predicted 5 yr survival of 37 patients with 87% accuracy. The second study added 29 patients to the data base; the poor survival of the 21 patients who died within 5 yr of diagnosis was predicted with 80.9% accuracy. When 27 of these cases were redigitized with a laser scanner, average survival prediction accuracy was 78%. In these studies, digitization hardware, radiographic technique, normalization methods, window selection, and contrast medium distribution all contributed to differences in the statistics separating poor from good patient survival.

Focal spot size measurements with pinhole and slit for microfocus mammography units

Many mammography units now have microfocal spots ranging in size from 0.09 to 0.4 mm for magnification radiography. On site measurements of these focal spots are not possible without invasive procedures if National Equipment Manufactures Association (NEMA) specifications are to be followed. This paper describes a method to perform such measurements expeditiously (1.5 h) and noninvasively. We describe how this method differs from NEMA test specifications, and report the test results of 22 units from ten manufacturers. Six of the focal spots were larger than the manufacturer's specifications which were based on current NEMA standards. Emphasis is placed on the need for verifiable standards for mammography x-ray systems.

The technology of mammography. Misunderstood and underutilized

This article reviews milestones in the technological development of mammography since 1970. Mammography is particularly underutilized as a screening procedure for breast cancer and the reasons for its continued inappropriate and under use are explored. Although there are some known barriers to increased utilization among the female adult population, the majority of barriers reside within the domain of referring physicians. Remedies to address the low referral rates for screening mammography are outlined for federal agencies, radiology groups, mammography equipment companies, medical schools, and philanthropic groups. Until the developers of technological procedures such as mammography appreciate that the application of a technology and its appropriate utilization by professionals and the public are important to consider when the technology is developed, utilization rates may not do justice to the technology's potential.

Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast

Three test objects simulating different mammographic problems were imaged with a new low-dose dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination and a standard screen film combination, with and without a moving grid, at 28 and 32 kVp, and with 0.3- and 0.5-mm focal spots. The new combination reduced exposure by 50%, but it failed to equal the other combination in the depiction of simulated microcalcifications, even when a different brand of film-processing chemicals was used. Compared with the standard screen-film combination exposed without a grid, the new combination exposed with a grid resulted in a superior image of dense parenchyma without an increase in dose. Furthermore, when the exposure time was decreased by 25% (rather than 50%), dense breasts were imaged with greater penetration by the new combination. A clinical trial of the new combination in 200 patients showed prominent quantum mottle and reduced contrast in regions of dense parenchyma. In addition, the skin and subcutaneous tissue were often poorly depicted with both standard and high-intensity illumination.

Evaluation of radiation dose, focal spot, and automatic exposure of newer film-screen mammography units

Fifteen recently introduced mammographic units representing eight different models and manufacturers were evaluated to see whether the equipment performance equaled claims made by the manufacturers. Focal-spot size was measured by pinhole and slit methods. Eight automatic exposure control systems on five models were tested by measuring the optical density produced by imaging at 28 and 30 kVp, with and without a grid and with test objects of varying thicknesses of BR12 epoxy material. Comparable mean glandular dose for a 4-cm-thick BR12 test object was measured for 13 of the units under manual or automatic exposures. Nominal focal-spot size was larger than stated for six of the 15 large focal spots and for seven of the 12 microfocal spots. Comparable doses under automatic exposure control varied more than 100% between units from different manufacturers, while the doses of units from the same manufacturer varied less than 20%. Automatic exposure control systems were operational in eight of the 15 units, but four of these eight were found to be out of calibration. There are considerable performance variations that need to be evaluated before acceptance and use of new mammographic equipment.

Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management

Breast ultrasound (US) was performed, with either an automated or a hand-held unit or both, on 1,212 patients. Of 612 asymptomatic patients, 118 (19.3%) had solitary cysts; ten (1.6%), multiple cysts; and 29 (4.7%), benign masses; however, US depicted only one (0.2%) nonpalpable mammographically undetected carcinoma. In 513 patients with palpable masses (n = 396) and with mammographically detected masses (n = 117), US was useful in avoiding an unnecessary biopsy in 113 (22.0%), leading to aspiration of a cyst in 26 (5.1%), monitoring multiple cysts in 31 (6.0%), avoiding aspiration of a solid mass in 65 (12.7%), supporting biopsy of an equivocal solid mass in 91 (17.7%), and demonstrating a nonpalpable mammographically detected carcinoma in six (1.2%). In 224 patients with either palpable or mammographically visible masses who underwent both methods of US, the 4.5-MHz or 3.9-MHz automated unit depicted the abnormality in 119 (53.1%) and the 7.5-MHz hand-held unit, in 171 (76.3%). Of 18 cancers evaluated with both methods, all were detected with the hand-held unit and only 12 were seen with the automated unit.

Diagnostic effects of edge sharpening filtration and magnification on digitally subtracted renal images

The improved appearance of digital radiographs filtered to improve local contrast and sharpen edges has not increased acceptance of these images by radiologists. Furthermore, many radiologists assert that correct diagnosis is not improved with these filtered images. This study was designed to test this assertion for digital subtraction angiograms (DSA) of renal images. Four experiments are described. First, phantom studies identified filters and their parameters thought likely to be acceptable and useful in diagnosing renal images formed by DSA. Second, these filters and parameters were then tested on medical images to assess their acceptance by radiologists. Third, display modes of windowing, positive/negative presentation, and magnification were varied for filtered and unfiltered images to assess preferences of radiologists. Fourth, filtered and unfiltered magnified images were used to test improved diagnosis. In the final experiment, 148 images from 33 renal studies (15 normal, 18 abnormal) were magnified, gray level windowed, and filtered. Diagnosis was not improved by the two edge sharpening filters tested.