1
|
Topsakal V, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Bruce IA, Dazert S, Hagen R, Lassaletta L, Mlynski R, Raine CH, Rajan GP, Schmutzhard J, Sprinzl GM, Staecker H, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Zernotti M, van de Heyning P. Minimally Traumatic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Expert Opinion in 2010 and 2020. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12101551. [PMID: 36294690 PMCID: PMC9605439 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to discover expert opinion on the surgical techniques and materials most likely to achieve maximum postoperative residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant (CI) surgery and to determine how these opinions have changed since 2010. A previously published questionnaire used in a study published in 2010 was adapted and expanded. The questionnaire was distributed to an international group of experienced CI surgeons. Present results were compared, via descriptive statistics, to those from the 2010 survey. Eighteen surgeons completed the questionnaire. Respondents clearly favored the following: round window insertion, slow array insertion, and the peri- and postoperative use of systematic antibiotics. Insertion depth was regarded as important, and electrode arrays less likely to induce trauma were preferred. The usefulness of dedicated soft-surgery training was also recognized. A lack of agreement was found on whether the middle ear cavity should be flushed with a non-aminoglycoside antibiotic solution or whether a sheath or insertion tube should be used to avoid contaminating the array with blood or bone dust. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates how beliefs about CI soft surgery have changed since 2010 and shows areas of current consensus and disagreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Brussels Health Campus, University Hospital Brussels (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Jette, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), University of Antwerp, 2610 Edegem, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-2477-6882; Fax: +32-2477-6880
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- London Canada Health Sciences Centre, Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON N6G 2M3, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear & Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Iain A. Bruce
- Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M15 6JA, UK
| | - Stefan Dazert
- St. Elisabeth Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery “Otto Körner”, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Christopher H. Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
| | | | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Hinrich Staecker
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Shin-ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), University of Antwerp, 2610 Edegem, Belgium
| | | | - Paul van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), University of Antwerp, 2610 Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van de Heyning P, Gavilán J, Godey B, Hagen R, Hagr A, Kameswaran M, Li Y, Manoj M, Mlynski R, O’Driscoll M, Pillsbury H, Raine CH, Rajan G, Schmutzhard J, Staecker H. Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy. J Int Adv Otol 2022; 18:196-202. [PMID: 35608486 PMCID: PMC10682809 DOI: 10.5152/iao.2022.21470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to find out how candidacy criteria have evolved differently across the globe. METHODS Candidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed. RESULTS Candidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantation and cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness are becoming more frequent. CONCLUSION Standardized outcome measurement instruments need to be applied to provide access to the hearing world to all patients with hearing loss who would benefit from cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Javier Gavilán
- Madrid Hospital La Paz Paseo de la Castellana, Madrid, Spain
| | - Benoît Godey
- CHU - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, ENT Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Yongxin Li
- Capital Medical University, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Shi, China
| | - Manikoth Manoj
- Calicut ENT Super Speciality Institute and Research Center, Kerala, India
| | | | - Martin O’Driscoll
- Central Manchester University Hospitals Ellen Wilkinson Building, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Harold Pillsbury
- UNC Ear & Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher H. Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Center, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Luzern HNO-klinik Kantonspital Luzerner, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | - Hinrich Staecker
- Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van de Heyning P, Mertens G, Topsakal V, de Brito R, Wimmer W, Caversaccio MD, Dazert S, Volkenstein S, Zernotti M, Parnes LS, Staecker H, Bruce IA, Rajan G, Atlas M, Friedland P, Skarzynski PH, Sugarova S, Kuzovkov V, Hagr A, Mlynski R, Schmutzhard J, Usami SI, Lassaletta L, Gavilán J, Godey B, Raine CH, Hagen R, Sprinzl GM, Brown K, Baumgartner WD, Karltorp E. Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:4225-4233. [PMID: 33788034 PMCID: PMC8486706 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06525-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to visualize and diagnose soft tissues. Hearing implant (HI) recipients are likely to require at least one MRI scan during their lifetime. However, the MRI scanner can interact with the implant magnet, resulting in complications for the HI recipient. This survey, which was conducted in two phases, aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of MRI scans for individuals with a HI manufactured by MED-EL (MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). METHODS A survey was developed and distributed in two phases to HEARRING clinics to obtain information about the use of MRI for recipients of MED-EL devices. Phase 1 focused on how often MRI is used in diagnostic imaging of the head region of the cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Phase 2 collected safety information about MRI scans performed on HI recipients. RESULTS 106 of the 126 MRI scans reported in this survey were performed at a field strength of 1.5 T, on HI recipients who wore the SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI. The head and spine were the most frequently imaged regions. 123 of the 126 scans were performed without any complications; two HI recipients experienced discomfort/pain. One recipient required reimplantation after an MRI was performed using a scanner that had not been approved for that implant. There was only one case that required surgical removal of the implant to reduce the imaging artefact. CONCLUSION Individuals with either a SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI from MED-EL can safely undergo a 1.5 T MRI when it is performed according to the manufacturer's safety policies and procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Griet Mertens
- ENT Department, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem/Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vedat Topsakal
- ENT Department, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem/Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ruben de Brito
- Hospital for Rehabilitation of Cranio-Facial Anomalies, Bauru-Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco D Caversaccio
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Bochum St. Elisabeth University Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Mario Zernotti
- Córdoba Sanatorium Allende, Servicio de Otorrinolaryingologia (Servicio ORL), Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Lorne S Parnes
- London Health Sciences Center-University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- Department of Otorinolaryngology, Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, USA
| | - Iain A Bruce
- Pediatric ENT Department, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, Australia.,Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Sciences Center, Lions Hearing Clinic, Subiaco, Australia
| | - Peter Friedland
- Ear Sciences Center, Lions Hearing Clinic, Subiaco, Australia
| | - Piotr H Skarzynski
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Nadarzyn/Kajetany, Poland.,Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Serafima Sugarova
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Vladislav Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Universität Rostock "Otto Körner", Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Rostock, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Benoit Godey
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear and Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rajan G, Tavora-Vieira D, Baumgartner WD, Godey B, Müller J, O'Driscoll M, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski P, Usami SI, Adunka O, Agrawal S, Bruce I, De Bodt M, Caversaccio M, Pilsbury H, Gavilán J, Hagen R, Hagr A, Kameswaran M, Karltorp E, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Yongxin L, Lorens A, Manoj M, Martin J, Mertens G, Mlynski R, Parnes L, Pulibalathingal S, Radeloff A, Raine CH, Rajeswaran R, Schmutzhard J, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stephan K, Sugarova S, Zernotti M, Zorowka P, Van de Heyning P. Hearing preservation cochlear implantation in children: The HEARRING Group consensus and practice guide. Cochlear Implants Int 2017; 19:1-13. [DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1379933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gunesh Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Murdoch, Australia
| | - Dayse Tavora-Vieira
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Murdoch, Australia
| | - Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
- Medizinische Universität Wien, Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, Wien, Austria
| | - Benoit Godey
- CHU – Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Joachim Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum Großhadern, München, Germany
| | - Martin O'Driscoll
- Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester Auditory Implant Center, The Ellen Wilkinson Building, Devas Street, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Piotr Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | | | - Oliver Adunka
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iain Bruce
- Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester Auditory Implant Center, The Ellen Wilkinson Building, Devas Street, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Marco Caversaccio
- Universitätsklinik für HNO, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Harold Pilsbury
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohren-Krankheiten, Universität Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Saud University KSU, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohan Kameswaran
- Madras ENT Research Foundation (MERF), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Eva Karltorp
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Kompis
- Universitätsklinik für HNO, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vlad Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Li Yongxin
- Capital Medical University, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Artur Lorens
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Manikoth Manoj
- ENT Super Speciality Institute and Research Center, Calicut, India
| | | | | | - Robert Mlynski
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie Otto Körner, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Lorne Parnes
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Andreas Radeloff
- King Saud University KSU, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Universitätsklinik für Hals- Nasen- Ohrenheilkunde Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Landesklinikum St. Pölten, HNO Abteilung, St. Pölten, Austria
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, USA
| | - Kurt Stephan
- Universitätsklinik für Hör-, Stimm- und Sprachstörungen, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Serafima Sugarova
- Capital Medical University, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | | | - Patrick Zorowka
- Universitätsklinik für Hör-, Stimm- und Sprachstörungen, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mistry SG, Carr S, Martin J, Strachan DR, Raine CH, Fyrmpas G. Cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia – Our experience and a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int 2017; 18:180-185. [DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1296986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep G. Mistry
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, UK
| | - Simon Carr
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, UK
| | - Jane Martin
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, UK
| | - David R. Strachan
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, UK
| | - Christopher H. Raine
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, UK
| | - Georgios Fyrmpas
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mistry SG, Carr SD, Tapper L, Meredith B, Strachan DR, Raine CH. Inside implant criteria or not? - Detection of non-organic hearing loss during cochlear implant assessment. Cochlear Implants Int 2016; 17:276-282. [PMID: 27808008 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1249993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The diagnosis of non-organic hearing loss (NOHL) is a difficult but important issue during the assessment process for cochlear implantation (CI). We aim to identify the key factors in identifying patients with NOHL during CI assessment and present our local screening protocol for NOHL. METHODS A retrospective review of patients referred to the Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service (YAIS) between 2003 and 2015 who were subsequently diagnosed with NOHL during the assessment. Patient demographic data, audiological and functional assessments were assessed. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were included in the study. Mean age was 43 years (range 14-82 years). Male to female ratio was 1:1.7. Indicators of possible NOHL included a sudden deterioration in hearing (n = 21; 66%), mismatches in observed behaviour and either pure-tone audiogram (PTA) (n = 27; 84%) or functional testing (n = 20; 80%) and stapedial reflexes below reported audiological thresholds (n = 12; 46%). A mismatch in functional hearing and PTA was seen in 72% of patients. Patients with suspected NOHL were referred for further objective testing. All 23 patients who underwent objective testing had better hearing levels compared to reported hearing thresholds thus placing them outside of implant criteria. Five candidates were found to have normal hearing thresholds. DISCUSSION NOHL can present a significant challenge to the implant team, particularly in the subgroup with a pre-existing organic hearing loss with non-organic overlay. We discuss the common features in this cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS To facilitate the identification of patients with NOHL, the YAIS has developed a screening protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep G Mistry
- a Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary , Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ , UK
| | - Simon D Carr
- a Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary , Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ , UK
| | - Lynne Tapper
- a Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary , Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ , UK
| | - Benjamin Meredith
- a Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary , Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ , UK
| | - David R Strachan
- a Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary , Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ , UK
| | - Christopher H Raine
- a Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary , Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ , UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lorens A, Skarzynski H, Rivas A, Rivas JA, Zimmermann K, Parnes L, Lassaletta L, Gavilán J, Bodt MD, van de Heyning P, Martin J, Raine CH, Rajeswaran R, Kameswaran M, Manoj M, Pulibalathingal S. Patient management for cochlear implant recipients in audiology departments: A practice review. Cochlear Implants Int 2016; 17:123-8. [PMID: 27078519 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2015.1115188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine and evaluate the time clinics needed to complete the sub-processes involved in the first-fitting and follow-up fitting of people with a cochlear implant. METHODS Eight HEARRING clinics completed a questionnaire recording how long it took to complete the sub-processes involved in first-fitting and follow-up fitting cochlear implant recipients. The mean times of clinics and procedures were then compared. RESULTS Questionnaires on 77 patients were completed. Clinics varied widely on time spent on each sub-process in both first- and follow-up fittings. Total first-fitting times were similar across clinics. Follow-up fitting times varied more across clinics although this may have been due to differences in questionnaire interpretation. DISCUSSION If a patient management plan can help increasingly busy cochlear implant clinics provide high-quality care more efficiently, essential first steps are determining which procedures are generally performed and how long their performance takes. Until reliable data are gathered, constructing a patient management plan or reaping the potential benefits of its use will remain elusive; clinics will have to find what solutions they can to meet rising workload demands. CONCLUSION The variation in time spent on each sub-process may suggest that some clinics have more efficient workflow procedures. Compiling a best practice for each process could be instrumental in creating a professional process management plan that would increase efficiency without sacrificing quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artur Lorens
- a Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing , Kajetany , Poland
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- a Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing , Kajetany , Poland
| | | | | | | | - Lorne Parnes
- c London Health Science Centre , London , Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Manikoth Manoj
- h ENT Super Specialty Institute and Research Center , Calicut , India
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Killan CF, Royle N, Totten CL, Raine CH, Lovett RES. The effect of early auditory experience on the spatial listening skills of children with bilateral cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79:2159-65. [PMID: 26520909 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Revised: 09/25/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Both electrophysiological and behavioural studies suggest that auditory deprivation during the first months and years of life can impair listening skills. Electrophysiological studies indicate that 3½ years may be a critical age for the development of symmetrical cortical responses in children using bilateral cochlear implants. This study aimed to examine the effect of auditory experience during the first 3½ years of life on the behavioural spatial listening abilities of children using bilateral cochlear implants, with reference to normally hearing children. Data collected during research and routine clinical testing were pooled to compare the listening skills of children with bilateral cochlear implants and different periods of auditory deprivation. METHODS Children aged 4-17 years with bilateral cochlear implants were classified into three groups. Children born profoundly deaf were in the congenital early bilateral group (received bilateral cochlear implants aged ≤3½ years, n=28) or congenital late bilateral group (received first implant aged ≤3½ years and second aged >3½ years, n=38). Children with some bilateral acoustic hearing until the age of 3½ years, who subsequently became profoundly deaf and received bilateral cochlear implants, were in the acquired/progressive group (n=16). There were 32 children in the normally hearing group. Children completed tests of sound-source localization and spatial release from masking (a measure of the ability to use both ears to understand speech in noise). RESULTS The acquired/progressive group localized more accurately than both groups of congenitally deaf children (p<0.05). All three groups of children with cochlear implants showed similar spatial release from masking. The normally hearing group localized more accurately than all groups with bilateral cochlear implants and displayed more spatial release from masking than the congenitally deaf groups on average (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Children with bilateral cochlear implants and early experience of acoustic hearing showed more accurate localization skills, on average, than children born profoundly deaf.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine F Killan
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
| | - Nicola Royle
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | - Catherine L Totten
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gavilan J, Adunka O, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brill S, Bruce I, Buchman C, Caversaccio M, De Bodt MT, Dillon M, Godey B, Green K, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Hagr A, Han D, Kameswaran M, Karltorp E, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Li Y, Lorens A, Martin J, Manoj M, Mertens G, Mlynski R, Mueller J, O'Driscoll M, Parnes L, Pulibalathingal S, Radeloff A, Raine CH, Rajan G, Rajeswaran R, Schmutzhard J, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski P, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stephan K, Sugarova S, Tavora D, Usami SI, Yanov Y, Zernotti M, Zorowka P, de Heyning PV. Quality standards for bone conduction implants. Acta Otolaryngol 2015. [PMID: 26223816 DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1067904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
CONCLUSION Bone conduction implants are useful in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss for whom conventional surgery or hearing aids are no longer an option. They may also be used in patients affected by single-sided deafness. OBJECTIVES To establish a consensus on the quality standards required for centers willing to create a bone conduction implant program. METHOD To ensure a consistently high level of service and to provide patients with the best possible solution the members of the HEARRING network have established a set of quality standards for bone conduction implants. These standards constitute a realistic minimum attainable by all implant clinics and should be employed alongside current best practice guidelines. RESULTS Fifteen items are thoroughly analyzed. They include team structure, accommodation and clinical facilities, selection criteria, evaluation process, complete preoperative and surgical information, postoperative fitting and assessment, follow-up, device failure, clinical management, transfer of care and patient complaints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oliver Adunka
- b 2 The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery , Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- c 3 London Health Sciences Centre , London-Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- d 4 Ear Science Institute Australia, University of Western Australia , Subiaco, Australia
| | | | - Stefan Brill
- f 6 Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic and Polyclinic, Würzburg University , Würzburg, Germany
| | - Iain Bruce
- g 7 Manchester Auditory Implant, Central Manchester University Hospitals , Manchester, UK
| | - Craig Buchman
- h 8 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- i 9 Bern University Hospital, University Clinic for Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck Surgery , Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Meg Dillon
- h 8 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Benoit Godey
- k 11 University Hospital of Rennes , Rennes, France
| | - Kevin Green
- g 7 Manchester Auditory Implant, Central Manchester University Hospitals , Manchester, UK
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- f 6 Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic and Polyclinic, Würzburg University , Würzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- l 12 King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University KSU , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Demin Han
- m 13 Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, PR China
| | | | - Eva Karltorp
- o 15 Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Kompis
- i 9 Bern University Hospital, University Clinic for Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck Surgery , Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vlad Kuzovkov
- p 16 St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute , St. Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Yongxin Li
- m 13 Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, PR China
| | - Artur Lorens
- q 17 Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing , Kajetany, Poland
| | - Jane Martin
- r 18 Bradford Royal Infirmary , Bradford, UK
| | - Manikoth Manoj
- s 19 ENT Super Specialty Institute and Research Center , Kozhikode, India
| | | | - Robert Mlynski
- t 20 Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic and Polyclinic, Rostock Medical University , Rostock, Germany
| | - Joachim Mueller
- u 21 Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic and Polyclinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University , Munich, Germany
| | - Martin O'Driscoll
- g 7 Manchester Auditory Implant, Central Manchester University Hospitals , Manchester, UK
| | - Lorne Parnes
- c 3 London Health Sciences Centre , London-Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Andreas Radeloff
- f 6 Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic and Polyclinic, Würzburg University , Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Gunesh Rajan
- d 4 Ear Science Institute Australia, University of Western Australia , Subiaco, Australia
| | | | | | - Henryk Skarzynski
- q 17 Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing , Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr Skarzynski
- q 17 Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing , Kajetany, Poland
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- w 23 Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten , St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- x 24 Kansas University Center for Balance and Hearing Disorders , Kansas City, USA
| | - Kurt Stephan
- v 22 Innsbruck University Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic , Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Serafima Sugarova
- p 16 St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute , St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dayse Tavora
- d 4 Ear Science Institute Australia, University of Western Australia , Subiaco, Australia
| | - Shin-Ichi Usami
- y 25 Shinshu University School of Medicine , Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Yuri Yanov
- p 16 St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute , St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Mario Zernotti
- z 26 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorium Allende , Cordoba, Argentina
| | - Patrick Zorowka
- v 22 Innsbruck University Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic , Innsbruck, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Allwood LJ, Raine CH, Becconsall K, Khan MS, Gill C. Bilingualism and cochlear implants--issues and answers? Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 50:177-85. [PMID: 7610957 DOI: 10.1159/000424456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L J Allwood
- Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service, ENT Department, Bradford Royal Infirmary, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Killan CF, Killan EC, Raine CH. Changes in children's speech discrimination and spatial release from masking between 2 and 4 years after sequential cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 2015; 16:270-6. [PMID: 25655134 DOI: 10.1179/1754762815y.0000000001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To document changes in speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and spatial release from masking (SRM) for sequentially implanted children at 2 and 4 years after they received their second cochlear implant (CI2). METHODS Participants were 17 children who consistently used two sequentially implanted and optimally programmed CIs. SRTs were measured monaurally in quiet and binaurally in noise using the adaptive McCormick toy discrimination test. Speech signals were presented from 0° azimuth and noise from 0°, +90° or -90° azimuth. SRM was calculated from SRTs in noise. Measurements were made at 2 and 4 year post-CI2. RESULTS There were significant improvements over time in SRTs in quiet, SRTs in noise and SRM. SRTs in quiet improved more for CI2 than for the first implant (CI1). SRTs in noise and SRM improved more when noise was presented closest to CI1 than when closest to CI2. Performance became more symmetrical over time. DISCUSSION Despite prolonged periods of unilateral auditory deprivation sequentially implanted children exhibited continued improvement in SRT and SRM. These results are valuable in setting expectations for and counselling families of children considering sequential CIs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Prowse SJ, Raine CH. Response to: Stew, B.T., Al-Hussaini, A. & Clarke, J. RE: an analysis of emerging antimicrobial resistance in an ENT outpatient department: a comparison of three hundred and forty-nine swabs taken in 2007 with five hundred and seventy-four swabs in 2012. Clin Otolaryngol 2014; 39:397. [PMID: 25418820 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S J Prowse
- Department of ENT Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- J Martin
- Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Affiliation(s)
- J Müller
- Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic and Polyclinic, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prowse SJ, Marsh P, Raine CH. An analysis of emerging antimicrobial resistance in an ENT outpatient department: a comparison of three hundred and forty-nine swabs taken in 2007 with five hundred and seventy-four swabs in 2012. Clin Otolaryngol 2014; 39:63-6. [PMID: 24472618 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S J Prowse
- Department of ENT Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner W, Caversaccio M, de Bodt M, Gavilan J, Godey B, Green K, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Han DM, Kameswaran M, Karltorp E, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Levevre F, Li Y, Manikoth M, Martin J, Mlynski R, Mueller J, O'Driscoll M, Parnes L, Prentiss S, Pulibalathingal S, Raine CH, Rajan G, Rajeswaran R, Rivas JA, Rivas A, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stephan K, Usami S, Yanov Y, Zernotti ME, Zimmermann K, Lorens A, Mertens G. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngol 2013:3-13. [PMID: 24328756 DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2013.869059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
CONCLUSION The comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system presented in this paper is suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. If adopted as a universal reporting standard, as it was designed to be, it should prove highly beneficial by enabling future studies to quickly and easily compare the results of previous studies and meta-analyze their data. OBJECTIVES To develop a comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. METHODS The HEARRING group discussed and reviewed a number of different propositions of a HP classification systems and reviewed critical appraisals to develop a qualitative system in accordance with the prerequisites. RESULTS The Hearing Preservation Classification System proposed herein fulfills the following necessary criteria: 1) classification is independent from users' initial hearing, 2) it is appropriate for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing, 3) it covers the whole range of pure tone average from 0 to 120 dB; 4) it is easy to use and easy to understand.
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Saeed H, Nichani J, Melling C, Raine CH, Khan I, Martin JM, Bullough R, Green KM, Jones SA, Bruce IA. Feasibility of cochlear implantation in Mucopolysaccharidosis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77:1255-8. [PMID: 23773334 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2013] [Revised: 05/04/2013] [Accepted: 05/07/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of rare inherited metabolic disorders resulting from deficiencies of particular enzymes involved in the breakdown of glycosaminoglycans. Amongst the manifestations of MPS within the head and neck patients may develop conductive, mixed or sensorineural hearing loss. OBJECTIVE The main objective of this paper is to describe the management of profound sensorineural hearing loss in children with Mucopolysaccaridosis. The primary outcome measures for this case series were improvement in auditory performance and speech perception scores following cochlear implantation. Secondary outcome measures included surgical complications. METHODS We carried out a casenote review of the first two cases of cochlear implantation (CI) to rehabilitate profound sensory neural hearing loss in Mucopolysaccharidoses. Improvement in auditory performance was measured by categories of auditory performance (CAP) score, speech reception score (SRS) and the IHR McCormick toy discrimination test. RESULTS Both patients with MPS had demonstrable benefit from CI in terms of auditory performance and speech perception. The first patient improved from pre-operatively only managing to recognise environmental sounds to understanding conversation without lip-reading with a familiar talker. Following CI, the second patient can discriminate speech in noisy environments to a degree, without lip-reading. No peri-operative complications were noted in either patient. CONCLUSION As the medical management of the MPS has progressed there is likely to be a corresponding increase in survival. This increased life-expectancy will likely lead to greater numbers of patients with MPS surviving long enough to develop profound hearing loss. Likewise, when considering the risks and benefits of quality of life interventions such as CI in patients with MPS, it is more likely that the risks of surgery and general anaesthesia will be considered acceptable. Clinicians managing such patients will need to be aware of these developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Saeed
- Manchester Auditory Implant Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Van de Heyning P, Adunka O, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brill S, Bruce I, Buchman C, Caversaccio M, Dillon M, Eikelboom R, Eskilsson G, Gavilan J, Godey B, Green K, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Han D, Iwasaki S, Kameswaran M, Karltorp E, Kleine Punte A, Kompis M, Kuthubutheen J, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Li Y, Lorens A, Manikoth M, Martin J, Mlynski R, Mueller J, O'Driscoll M, Parnes L, Pillsbury H, Prentiss S, Pulibalathingal S, Raine CH, Rajan G, Rajeswaran R, Riechelmann H, Rivas A, Rivas JA, Senn P, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stephan K, Sugarova S, Usami SI, Wolf-Magele A, Yanov Y, Zernotti ME, Zimmerman K, Zorowka P, Skarzynski H. Standards of practice in the field of hearing implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 14 Suppl 2:S1-5. [DOI: 10.1179/1467010013z.00000000093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
20
|
|
21
|
Carr S, Strachan DR, Summerfield AQ, Kitterick PT, Tapper L, Raine CH. Outcomes with bilateral cochlear implantation following sudden dual sensory loss after ethylene glycol poisoning. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 12:173-6. [DOI: 10.1179/146701011x13013939326892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
22
|
Raine CH, Strachan DR, Gopichandran T. How We Do It: Using a surgical navigation system in the management of the ossified cochlea. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 4:96-101. [DOI: 10.1179/cim.2003.4.2.96] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
23
|
Stacey PC, Raine CH, O'Donoghue GM, Tapper L, Twomey T, Summerfield AQ. Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training for adult users of cochlear implants. Int J Audiol 2010; 49:347-56. [DOI: 10.3109/14992020903397838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
24
|
Raine CH, Craddock L, Lutman ME. UK appraisal of clinical and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implantation by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Cochlear Implants Int 2010; 11 Suppl 1:138-42. [PMID: 21756599 DOI: 10.1179/146701010x12671177647623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C H Raine
- ENT UK, YCIS, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The thickness and quality of the skin overlying a cochlear implant is important for its integrity. It should be thick enough to protect the implant and prevent flap breakdown yet should not be so thick that it impedes the electronic signal or causes difficulty wearing the coil because of loss of the magnetic coupling. The principle of this study was to devise a method to assess the thickness of skin over a cochlear implant receiver stimulator package and prospectively measure this thickness during the first year following surgery. All patients studied were implanted with MED-EL COMBI 40+ implants. The first cohort consisted of 35 adults; the second 23 children. Various methods of measurement were assessed. In this study the principle of the Hall Effect electrode was used to measure the magnetic flux density of the magnet within the receiver stimulator package. Following standardization, results showed that skin thickness significantly thinned in the adult group before stabilizing. This was less obvious in children, probably due to the effect of the skin thickening as the child grows. Knowledge of skin thickness has implications relating to the functioning of an implant and avoiding potential flap related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Raine
- Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Goodyear PWA, Raine CH, Firth AL, Tucker AG, Hawkins K. The Bradford bone-anchored hearing aid programme: impact of the multidisciplinary team. J Laryngol Otol 2006; 120:543-52. [PMID: 16834803 DOI: 10.1017/s002221510600106x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2005] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact on implant survival, abutment skin reaction and patient satisfaction in patients implanted with a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA), following the introduction of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) in 1997.Design and methods: Part prospective and retrospective analysis. Implant survival and cause of failures were recorded along with abutment skin reaction (graded as none, mild, moderate and severe, according to the amount of wound care required). Patient satisfaction and quality of life were assessed using a questionnaire enquiring about several aspects of the use and benefits of their BAHA.Setting and participants: Eighty patients treated at the Bradford Royal Infirmary between 1991 and 2005. The unit is a recognized tertiary referral centre.Results and conclusions: Twelve out of 80 implants failed, giving an overall failure rate of 15 per cent. Kaplan–Meier survival curves show a steady decrease in implant survival. The MDT had a positive effect on implant survival and adverse skin reactions, with a higher proportion of patients experiencing no reaction after its introduction. There was a 92.5 per cent response rate to the questionnaire. Overall patient satisfaction was high, both before and after the introduction of the MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P W A Goodyear
- Department of Otolaryngology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gibbin KP, Raine CH, Summerfield AQ. Cochlear implantation – United Kingdom and Ireland surgical survey. Cochlear Implants Int 2006; 4:11-21. [DOI: 10.1002/cii.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
28
|
Raine CH. How We Do It: Our approach to the ossified cochlea. Cochlear Implants Int 2005; 6:85-9. [DOI: 10.1179/cim.2005.6.2.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
29
|
Abstract
A case of familial prolonged QT interval and congenital sensorineural hearing loss is described emphasising the diagnostic and management implications. Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome is important because of its potential association with sudden death in children with congenital sensorineural deafness. It is known to be associated with mutations of the genes KCNQ1 (KVQTI) and KCNE1 (Isk). The underlying molecular abnormality leads to cardiac and cochlear dysfunction through a potassium channel defect. All children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss who have suffered unexplained syncopal attacks or convulsions should be screened for this syndrome. There is also a strong case for including a 12 lead ECG as part of the investigative work up of all children with congenital sensorineural deafness in whom a firm aetiology has not been established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Chorbachi
- Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8DA, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Raine CH, Martin J. Cochlear and middle ear implants: advances for the hearing impaired. Hosp Med 2001; 62:664-8. [PMID: 11762095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
We have entered into an era of surgical audiology with cochlear and middle ear implants. With both devices there are distinct phases of patient management--patient selection, surgery, programming and rehabilitation. These phases and issues relating to the implants themselves are considered in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Raine
- Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford BD9 6RJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Raine CH, Krzyston MJ, Amr M, Hydrick L. Improvement in severe insulin resistance with frequent injections of lispro insulin. J Natl Med Assoc 1999; 91:410-3. [PMID: 10643214 PMCID: PMC2608473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Extreme insulin resistance is common in obese African Americans with type 2 diabetes. This case report describes an obese African-American woman who was treated with subcutaneous injections of lispro insulin every 2 hours with resultant decrease of mean daily blood glucose from 264.7 mg/dL to 111 mg/dL and in insulin requirement from 479 U/24 hours to 60 U/24 hours. This case demonstrates that extreme insulin resistance is reversible in the short term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Raine
- Diabetes Control Center, Orangeburg, SC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
There is general agreement that the delivery of topical nasal medication by sprays is suboptimal. This study examines the distribution of spray to the anterior end of the middle turbinate as a guide to the distribution to the middle meatus by means of an endoscopic photographic comparison using dyed aqueous nasal spray. The technique was found to be reproducible. The effect of vigorously inhaling whilst spraying was studied by means of a randomized crossover trial and was found to have no significant effect. This technique could be used in conjunction with other means of assessing intranasal distribution when assessing improved topical nasal drug delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J Homer
- Department of Otolaryngology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM, Ramsden RT, Raine CH. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 1998; 118:313-26. [PMID: 9655204 DOI: 10.1080/00016489850183386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The performance of cochlear implant patients may be related to intracochlear, histopathological factors. We have performed detailed post-mortem examinations of five human, implanted cochleas and for each electrode correlated the psychophysical threshold, comfortable level and dynamic range with spiral ganglion cell survival, presence of fibrous tissue and/or new bone, and distance between the centers of the electrode bands and Rosenthal's canal. The psychophysical parameters were strongly interrelated. Threshold and comfort levels correlated with the distance between the electrodes and Rosenthal's canal. Threshold levels also correlated with the presence of intracochlear fibrous tissue and new bone, especially with the former. The dynamic range showed a negative correlation with intracochlear pathology, especially with new bone. Comfort levels and dynamic range were related to spiral ganglion cell survival. The distance between the electrodes and the modiolus increased with increasing levels of fibrous tissue and new bone. Spiral ganglion cell survival was decreased with increasing levels of fibrous tissue and new bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kawano
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
A case of facial nerve paralysis secondary to acute suppurative parotitis is described. This is a rare complication in the absence of malignant processes in the parotid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y T Pang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, West Yorkshire, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Khan S, Raine CH, Becconsall K. Comparison of a promontory stimulation test using a transtympanic needle electrode with a test using an ear canal electrode. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166:190-2. [PMID: 7668631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S Khan
- Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, England
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Raine CH, Hussain SS, Khan S, Setia RN. Anomaly of the facial nerve and cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166:430-1. [PMID: 7668738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of preoperative damage to the facial nerve in cochlear implantation is very low. The course of the facial nerve is not routinely evaluated preoperatively, but variations in its course can restrict access to the round window and impede implantation. In 5 of 42 operations, direct visualization of the round window was not possible. In 1 patient there was an obvious congenital bifurcation. Successful implantation was made possible by mobilizing the nerve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Raine
- Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service, Bradford Royal Infirmary, England
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Inhalation of a foreign body is a serious event. The number of foreign bodies that become impacted in the larynx is small and requires urgent recognition. We describe the case of a six-month-old baby with an impacted open safety pin in the larynx. The sharp end of the safety pin was upwards and had penetrated the anterior end of the left vocal fold. We discuss the management and describe our method of removal of the foreign body. Tracheostomy was not required in this case and the child had an uneventful recovery. A brief review of the literature is included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S S Hussain
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Adeno-tonsillectomy and tonsillectomy are frequently performed and haemorrhage remains an important post-operative complication. A prospective study of 1090 patients undergoing surgery over a 12-month period was undertaken investigating whether the following factors influenced post-operative haemorrhage: age and sex of patients, method of tonsillectomy, haemostasis and premedication, month of operation and experience of surgeon. A significantly higher incidence of post-operative haemorrhage occurred in the group aged 16-25 years and significantly more males suffered post-operative haemorrhage. This haemorrhage more frequently occurred in the warmer months of May to July. Guillotine tonsillectomy was found to be as effective as dissection and no higher incidence of post-operative haemorrhage was recorded. Method of haemostasis, surgical experience and premedication did not influence the outcome. We conclude that the guillotine used in controlled circumstances is as safe as dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Roberts
- Department of Otolaryngology, North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Laryngeal tuberculosis is now a rare disease. We report 6 patients presenting within a 10-year period (1976-1986). Symptoms and signs often mimic carcinoma or chronic non-specific laryngitis. Greater clinical awareness and a chest radiograph prior to direct laryngoscopy may alert the clinician to the possibility of tuberculosis. The diagnosis is established by laryngeal biopsy.
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Abstract
Wound infections are a significant complication following major oncological head and neck surgery. In view of the controversy surrounding the use of chemoprophylaxis a controlled trial was designed. Intravenous Augmentin (amoxycillin and clavulanic acid) was shown to reduce significantly (P less than 0.025) the incidence of postoperative sepsis.
Collapse
|
42
|
Bartzokas CA, Raine CH, Stell PM, Corkill JE, Withana N, Trafford-Jones GM. Bacteriological assessment of patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 1984; 9:99-103. [PMID: 6467649 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1984.tb01480.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
The use of chemoprophylaxis in major Head and Neck surgery is controversial. Prior to conducting a prospective trial a controlled microbiological monitoring of 32 patients was performed to determine a suitable antibiotic for prophylaxis. Wound infection occurred in 22 (68%) patients with fistulae occurring in 10 of these patients (45.5%). Pre-operative cultures were of limited value in predicting subsequent sepsis. Gram-negative aerobic bacilli were the commonest group of pathogens (34.4%) isolated post-operatively. From projected resistance profiles of pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria amoxycillin and clavulanic acid (Augmentin, Beecham Pharmaceuticals) was chosen as a suitable antibiotic.
Collapse
|
43
|
Campbell IT, Morton RP, Cole JA, Raine CH, Shapiro LM, Stell PM. A comparison of the effects of intermittent and continuous nasogastric feeding on the oxygen consumption and nitrogen balance of patients after major head and neck surgery. Am J Clin Nutr 1983; 38:870-8. [PMID: 6417996 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/38.6.870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Ten patients were fed by nasogastric tube for 5 days after major surgery of the head and neck. Five were fed by continuous infusion 24 h/day using an enteral nutrition pump and five were fed comparable quantities by 2-h bolus administration between 0600 and 2200 h. Those fed by bolus had lower resting oxygen consumption on the 4th and 5th postoperative days and better cumulative nitrogen balance over the 5 days than the continuously fed group. It appears that metabolically it may be better to use an intermittent feeding regimen than a continuous one when feeding patients postoperatively via a nasogastric tube.
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Abstract
A rare case of dysphagia, caused by ectopic gastric mucosa situated in the upper esophagus, is reported.
Collapse
|
46
|
|