1
|
Goodyear CS, Patel A, Barnes E, Willicombe M, Siebert S, de Silva TI, Snowden JA, Lim SH, Bowden SJ, Billingham L, Richter A, Carroll M, Carr EJ, Beale R, Rea D, Parry H, Pirrie S, Lim Z, Satsangi J, Dunachie SJ, Cook G, Miller P, Basu N, Gilmour A, Hodgkins AM, Evans L, Hughes A, Longet S, Meacham G, Yong KL, A'Hearne MJ, Koh MBC, Burns SO, Orchard K, Paterson C, McIlroy G, Murray SM, Thomson T, Dimitriadis S, Goulston L, Miller S, Keillor V, Prendecki M, Thomas D, Kirkham A, McInnes IB, Kearns P. Immunogenicity of third dose COVID-19 vaccine strategies in patients who are immunocompromised with suboptimal immunity following two doses (OCTAVE-DUO): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Rheumatol 2024:S2665-9913(24)00065-1. [PMID: 38734019 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00065-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The humoral and T-cell responses to booster COVID-19 vaccine types in multidisease immunocompromised individuals who do not generate adequate antibody responses to two COVID-19 vaccine doses, is not fully understood. The OCTAVE DUO trial aimed to determine the value of third vaccinations in a wide range of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies. METHODS OCTAVE-DUO was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial investigating humoral and T-cell responses in patients who are immunocompromised following a third vaccine dose with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, and of NVX-CoV2373 for those with lymphoid malignancies. We recruited patients who were immunocompromised from 11 UK hospitals, aged at least 18 years, with previous sub-optimal responses to two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 (1:1:1 for those with lymphoid malignancies), stratified by disease, previous vaccination type, and anti-spike antibody response following two doses. Individuals with lived experience of immune susceptibility were involved in the study design and implementation. The primary outcome was vaccine-specific immunity defined by anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (Roche Diagnostics UK and Ireland, Burgess Hill, UK) and T-cell responses (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK) before and 21 days after the third vaccine dose analysed by a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN 15354495, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2021-003632-87, and is complete. FINDINGS Between Aug 4, 2021 and Mar 31, 2022, 804 participants across nine disease cohorts were randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (n=377), mRNA-1273 (n=374), or NVX-CoV2373 (n=53). 356 (45%) of 789 participants were women, 433 (55%) were men, and 659 (85%) of 775 were White. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies measured 21 days after the third vaccine dose were significantly higher than baseline pre-third dose titres in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median 1384 arbitrary units [AU]/mL [IQR 4·3-7990·0] compared with median 11·5 AU/mL [0·4-63·1]; p<0·001). Of participants who were baseline low responders, 380 (90%) of 423 increased their antibody concentrations to more than 400 AU/mL. Conversely, 166 (54%) of 308 baseline non-responders had no response after the third dose. Detectable T-cell responses following the third vaccine dose were seen in 494 (80%) of 616 participants. There were 24 serious adverse events (BNT612b2 eight [33%] of 24, mRNA-1273 12 [50%], NVX-CoV2373 four [17%]), two (8%) of which were categorised as vaccine-related. There were seven deaths (1%) during the trial, none of which were vaccine-related. INTERPRETATION A third vaccine dose improved the serological and T-cell response in the majority of patients who are immunocompromised. Individuals with chronic renal disease, lymphoid malignancy, on B-cell targeted therapies, or with no serological response after two vaccine doses are at higher risk of poor response to a third vaccine dose. FUNDING Medical Research Council, Blood Cancer UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl S Goodyear
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Amit Patel
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eleanor Barnes
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michelle Willicombe
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Stefan Siebert
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Thushan I de Silva
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John A Snowden
- Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sean H Lim
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sarah J Bowden
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lucinda Billingham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alex Richter
- Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Miles Carroll
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen Parry
- Department of Haematology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundations Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah Pirrie
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zixiang Lim
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Gordon Cook
- National Institute for Health Research Leeds MIC, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Miller
- British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Neil Basu
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashley Gilmour
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Hodgkins
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lili Evans
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ana Hughes
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stephanie Longet
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP (Saint-Etienne), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, CNRS, Lyon, France
| | - Georgina Meacham
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kwee L Yong
- Cancer Institute, Department of Haematology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Mickey B C Koh
- Infection and Immunity Clinical Academic Group, St George's, University of London and Department of Haematology, St George's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Siobhan O Burns
- Clinical Immunology, Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead, London, UK; Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Hampstead, London, UK
| | - Kim Orchard
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Caron Paterson
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Graham McIlroy
- Department of Haematology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundations Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sam M Murray
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tina Thomson
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Lyndsey Goulston
- National Institute of Health Research, Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Samantha Miller
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Victoria Keillor
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Maria Prendecki
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - David Thomas
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amanda Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Iain B McInnes
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pamela Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bartlett JM, Xu K, Wong J, Pond G, Zhang Y, Spears M, Salunga R, Mallon E, Taylor KJ, Hasenburg A, Markopoulos C, Dirix L, van de Velde CJ, Rea D, Schnabel CA, Treuner K, Bayani J. Validation of the Prognostic Performance of Breast Cancer Index in Hormone Receptor-Positive Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients in the TEAM Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1509-1517. [PMID: 38345755 PMCID: PMC11016895 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer face a prolonged risk of recurrence even after adjuvant endocrine therapy. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is significantly prognostic for overall (0-10 years) and late (5-10 years) distant recurrence (DR) risk in N0 and N1 patients. Here, BCI prognostic performance was evaluated in HR+ postmenopausal women from the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 3,544 patients were included in the analysis (N = 1,519 N0, N = 2,025 N+). BCI risk groups were calculated using pre-specified cutoff points. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to assess the prognostic significance of BCI risk groups based on DR. Hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox models with and without clinical covariates. RESULTS For overall 10-year DR, BCI was significantly prognostic in Ni0 (N = 1,196) and N1 (N = 1,234) patients who did not receive prior chemotherapy (P < 0.001). In patients who were DR-free for 5 years, 10-year late DR rates for low- and high-risk groups were 5.4% and 9.3% (N0 cohort, N = 1,285) and 4.8% and 12.2% (N1 cohort, N = 1,625) with multivariate HRs of 2.25 (95% CI, 1.30-3.88; P = 0.004) and 2.67 (95% CI, 1.53-4.63; P < 0.001), respectively. Late DR performance was substantially improved using previously optimized cutoff points, identifying BCI low-risk groups with even lower 10-year late DR rates of 3.8% and 2.7% in N0 and N1 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The TEAM trial represents the largest prognostic validation study for BCI to date and provides a more representative assessment of late DR risk to guide individualized treatment decision-making for HR+ patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M.S. Bartlett
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Keying Xu
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenna Wong
- Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California
| | - Gregory Pond
- Department of Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
| | - Yi Zhang
- Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California
| | - Melanie Spears
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | | | - Karen J. Taylor
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Luc Dirix
- St. Augustinus Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kai Treuner
- Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California
| | - Jane Bayani
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taylor C, Dodwell D, McGale P, Hills RK, Berry R, Bradley R, Braybrooke J, Clarke M, Gray R, Holt F, Liu Z, Pan H, Peto R, Straiton E, Coles C, Duane F, Hennequin C, Jones G, Kühn T, Oliveros S, Overgaard J, Pritchard KI, Suh CO, Beake G, Boddington C, Davies C, Davies L, Evans V, Gay J, Gettins L, Godwin J, James S, Kerr A, Liu H, MacKinnon E, Mannu G, McHugh T, Morris P, Nakahara M, Read S, Taylor H, Ferguson J, Scheurlen H, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Ingle J, Valagussa P, Veronesi U, Anderson S, Tang G, Fisher B, Fossa S, Valborg Reinertsen K, Host H, Muss H, Holli K, Albain K, Arriagada R, Bartlett J, Bergsten-Nordström E, Bliss J, Brain E, Carey L, Coleman R, Cuzick J, Davidson N, Del Mastro L, Di Leo A, Dignam J, Dowsett M, Ejlertsen B, Francis P, García-Sáenz JA, Gelber R, Gnant M, Goetz M, Goodwin P, Halpin-Murphy P, Hayes D, Hill C, Jagsi R, Janni W, Loibl S, Mamounas E, Martín M, McIntosh S, Mukai H, Nekljudova V, Norton L, Ohashi Y, Piccart M, Pierce L, Raina V, Rea D, Regan M, Robertson J, Rutgers E, Salgado R, Slamon D, Spanic T, Sparano J, Steger G, Toi M, Tutt A, Viale G, Wang X, Wilcken N, Wolmark N, Yu KD, Cameron D, Bergh J, Swain S, Whelan T, Poortmans P. Radiotherapy to regional nodes in early breast cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 14 324 women in 16 trials. Lancet 2023; 402:1991-2003. [PMID: 37931633 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01082-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy has become much better targeted since the 1980s, improving both safety and efficacy. In breast cancer, radiotherapy to regional lymph nodes aims to reduce risks of recurrence and death. Its effects have been studied in randomised trials, some before the 1980s and some after. We aimed to assess the effects of regional node radiotherapy in these two eras. METHODS In this meta-analysis of individual patient data, we sought data from all randomised trials of regional lymph node radiotherapy versus no regional lymph node radiotherapy in women with early breast cancer (including one study that irradiated lymph nodes only if the cancer was right-sided). Trials were identified through the EBCTCG's regular systematic searches of databases including MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and meeting abstracts. Trials were eligible if they began before Jan 1, 2009. The only systematic difference between treatment groups was in regional node radiotherapy (to the internal mammary chain, supraclavicular fossa, or axilla, or any combinations of these). Primary outcomes were recurrence at any site, breast cancer mortality, non-breast-cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality. Data were supplied by trialists and standardised into a format suitable for analysis. A summary of the formatted data was returned to trialists for verification. Log-rank analyses yielded first-event rate ratios (RRs) and confidence intervals. FINDINGS We found 17 eligible trials, 16 of which had available data (for 14 324 participants), and one of which (henceforth excluded), had unavailable data (for 165 participants). In the eight newer trials (12 167 patients), which started during 1989-2008, regional node radiotherapy significantly reduced recurrence (rate ratio 0·88, 95% CI 0·81-0·95; p=0·0008). The main effect was on distant recurrence as few regional node recurrences were reported. Radiotherapy significantly reduced breast cancer mortality (RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·80-0·94; p=0·0010), with no significant effect on non-breast-cancer mortality (0·97, 0·84-1·11; p=0·63), leading to significantly reduced all-cause mortality (0·90, 0·84-0·96; p=0·0022). In an illustrative calculation, estimated absolute reductions in 15-year breast cancer mortality were 1·6% for women with no positive axillary nodes, 2·7% for those with one to three positive axillary nodes, and 4·5% for those with four or more positive axillary nodes. In the eight older trials (2157 patients), which started during 1961-78, regional node radiotherapy had little effect on breast cancer mortality (RR 1·04, 95% CI 0·91-1·20; p=0·55), but significantly increased non-breast-cancer mortality (1·42, 1·18-1·71; p=0·00023), with risk mainly after year 20, and all-cause mortality (1·17, 1·04-1·31; p=0·0067). INTERPRETATION Regional node radiotherapy significantly reduced breast cancer mortality and all-cause mortality in trials done after the 1980s, but not in older trials. These contrasting findings could reflect radiotherapy improvements since the 1980s. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wheelwright S, Matthews L, Jenkins V, May S, Rea D, Fairbrother P, Gaunt C, Young J, Pirrie S, Wallis MG, Fallowfield L. Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study. Trials 2023; 24:670. [PMID: 37838682 PMCID: PMC10576350 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The LOw RISk DCIS (LORIS) study was set up to compare conventional surgical treatment with active monitoring in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Recruitment to trials with a surveillance arm is known to be challenging, so strategies to maximise patient recruitment, aimed at both patients and recruiting centres, were implemented. METHODS Women aged ≥ 46 years with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-high-grade DCIS were eligible for 1:1 randomisation to either surgery or active monitoring. Prior to randomisation, all eligible women were invited to complete: (1) the Clinical Trials Questionnaire (CTQ) examining reasons for or against participation, and (2) interviews exploring in depth opinions about the study information sheets and film. Women agreeing to randomisation completed validated questionnaires assessing health status, physical and mental health, and anxiety levels. Hospital site staff were invited to communication workshops and refresher site initiation visits to support recruitment. Their perspectives on LORIS recruitment were collected via surveys and interviews. RESULTS Eighty percent (181/227) of eligible women agreed to be randomised. Over 40% of participants had high anxiety levels at baseline. On the CTQ, the most frequent most important reasons for accepting randomisation were altruism and belief that the trial offered the best treatment, whilst worries about randomisation and the influences of others were the most frequent most important reasons for declining. Most women found the study information provided clear and useful. Communication workshops for site staff improved knowledge and confidence but only about half said they themselves would join LORIS if eligible. The most common recruitment barriers identified by staff were low numbers of eligible patients and patient preference. CONCLUSIONS Recruitment to LORIS was challenging despite strategies aimed at both patients and site staff. Ensuring that recruiting staff support the study could improve recruitment in similar future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN27544579, prospectively registered on 22 May 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Wheelwright
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RX, UK.
| | - Lucy Matthews
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RX, UK
| | - Valerie Jenkins
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RX, UK
| | - Shirley May
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RX, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Claire Gaunt
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Jennie Young
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sarah Pirrie
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Matthew G Wallis
- Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - Lesley Fallowfield
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barnes E, Goodyear CS, Willicombe M, Gaskell C, Siebert S, I de Silva T, Murray SM, Rea D, Snowden JA, Carroll M, Pirrie S, Bowden SJ, Dunachie SJ, Richter A, Lim Z, Satsangi J, Cook G, Pope A, Hughes A, Harrison M, Lim SH, Miller P, Klenerman P, Basu N, Gilmour A, Irwin S, Meacham G, Marjot T, Dimitriadis S, Kelleher P, Prendecki M, Clarke C, Mortimer P, McIntyre S, Selby R, Meardon N, Nguyen D, Tipton T, Longet S, Laidlaw S, Orchard K, Ireland G, Thomas D, Kearns P, Kirkham A, McInnes IB. SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses and clinical outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-suppressive disease. Nat Med 2023; 29:1760-1774. [PMID: 37414897 PMCID: PMC10353927 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02414-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immune responses and infection outcomes were evaluated in 2,686 patients with varying immune-suppressive disease states after administration of two Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Overall, 255 of 2,204 (12%) patients failed to develop anti-spike antibodies, with an additional 600 of 2,204 (27%) patients generating low levels (<380 AU ml-1). Vaccine failure rates were highest in ANCA-associated vasculitis on rituximab (21/29, 72%), hemodialysis on immunosuppressive therapy (6/30, 20%) and solid organ transplant recipients (20/81, 25% and 141/458, 31%). SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were detected in 513 of 580 (88%) patients, with lower T cell magnitude or proportion in hemodialysis, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and liver transplant recipients (versus healthy controls). Humoral responses against Omicron (BA.1) were reduced, although cross-reactive T cell responses were sustained in all participants for whom these data were available. BNT162b2 was associated with higher antibody but lower cellular responses compared to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. We report 474 SARS-CoV-2 infection episodes, including 48 individuals with hospitalization or death from COVID-19. Decreased magnitude of both the serological and the T cell response was associated with severe COVID-19. Overall, we identified clinical phenotypes that may benefit from targeted COVID-19 therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Barnes
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl S Goodyear
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michelle Willicombe
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Gaskell
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stefan Siebert
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Thushan I de Silva
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sam M Murray
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - John A Snowden
- Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Miles Carroll
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Pirrie
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah J Bowden
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Susanna J Dunachie
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alex Richter
- Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zixiang Lim
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- National Institute for Health Research, Leeds MIC, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ann Pope
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ana Hughes
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Molly Harrison
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sean H Lim
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Miller
- British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Paul Klenerman
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Neil Basu
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashley Gilmour
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sophie Irwin
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Georgina Meacham
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas Marjot
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Peter Kelleher
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, School of Medicine Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maria Prendecki
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Candice Clarke
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Paige Mortimer
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Stacey McIntyre
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Rachael Selby
- Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Naomi Meardon
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dung Nguyen
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tom Tipton
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephanie Longet
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen Laidlaw
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kim Orchard
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Georgina Ireland
- UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - David Thomas
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Pamela Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Amanda Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Iain B McInnes
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stein R, Makris A, Macpherson I, Hughes-Davies L, Marshall A, Dotchin G, Cameron DA, Kiely BE, Wilson C, Armstrong A, Earl HM, Poole CJ, Tsang J, Naume B, Rea D, Ohnstad H, Hall PS, McIntosh SA, Shinkins B, McCabe C, Morgan A, Bartlett JMS, Dunn JA. Abstract OT3-32-01: OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-ot3-32-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Multi-parameter tumor gene expression assays (MPAs) are used to estimate individual patient risk and guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence for MPA use in postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer has been provided by the RxPONDER trial interim analysis but this relies on the absence of superiority in an analysis where >50% of events were unrelated to breast cancer. There is much uncertainty about MPA use for premenopausal patients. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) is a prospective international randomized controlled trial designed to validate MPAs as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population.
Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded study with an adaptive two-stage design. The trial recruits women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumor Score (ROR_PT) >60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) tumor are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression for all participants unless they experience a chemotherapy-induced menopause. Adjuvant abemaciclib is permitted. The trial will be analyzed for (1) non-inferiority of recurrence according to randomization and (2) cost-effectiveness. The key secondary outcome is non-inferiority of recurrence for patients with low ROR_PT score tumors. The efficacy analyses will be performed Per Protocol using Invasive Breast Cancer Free Survival (IBCFS) as the primary outcome measure to limit the risk of a false non-inferiority conclusion. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 8 years will permit demonstration of up to 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment with at least 83% power, assuming 5-year IBCFS is 87% with standard management. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment, building on experience from the feasibility study which found that a multidisciplinary approach is important for recruitment success. OPTIMA is strongly supported by a patient group which has helped design all patient documents and which is represented on the TMG.
Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017 and has continued to recruit throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall recruitment as of 1 July 2022 was 2814 (2593 from UK, 221 from Norway). Patient characteristics are well balanced between the trial arms. Currently 95% of randomized participants are eligible for inclusion in the PP analysis. 66% of the MPA-directed arm participants have been allocated to endocrine therapy only. The test failure rate is < 1%.
Conclusion: OPTIMA will provide robust unbiased evidence on test-directed chemotherapy safety for both postmenopausal and premenopausal women with 1-3 involved nodes as well as for patients with 4-9 involved nodes and for patients treated with abemaciclib.
Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501) and in Norway by KLINBEFORSK and the Norwegian Cancer Society. Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.
Trial Inquiries: OPTIMA@warwick.ac.uk
Patient characteristics
Citation Format: Robert Stein, Andreas Makris, Iain Macpherson, Luke Hughes-Davies, Andrea Marshall, Georgina Dotchin, David A. Cameron, Belinda E. Kiely, Caroline Wilson, Anne Armstrong, Helena M. Earl, Christopher J. Poole, Janice Tsang, Bjørn Naume, Daniel Rea, Hege Ohnstad, Peter S. Hall, Stuart A. McIntosh, Bethany Shinkins, Christopher McCabe, Adrienne Morgan, John MS Bartlett, Janet A. Dunn. OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-32-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Stein
- 1National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals, London, England, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Makris
- 2Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, England, United Kingdom
| | - Iain Macpherson
- 3University of Glasgow - Institute of Cancer Sciences, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrea Marshall
- 5Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, United Kingdom
| | | | - David A. Cameron
- 7The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Cancer Research, EDINBURGH, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Belinda E. Kiely
- 8NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caroline Wilson
- 9Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield, England, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Armstrong
- 10The Christie Hospital, Manchester, England, United Kingdom
| | - Helena M. Earl
- 11University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
| | | | - Janice Tsang
- 13LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Wong Chuk Hang, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Bjørn Naume
- 14Department for Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Rea
- 15University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), England, United Kingdom
| | | | - Peter S. Hall
- 17University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Christopher McCabe
- 20Institute of Health Economics & University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adrienne Morgan
- 21Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice, England, United Kingdom
| | - John MS Bartlett
- 22University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
| | - Janet A. Dunn
- 23University of Warwick, Coventry, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bartlett JMS, Xu K, Wong J, Pond GR, Zhang Y, Spears M, Salunga R, Mallon E, Taylor KJ, Hasenburg A, Markopoulos C, Dirix L, Seynaeve C, van de Velde CJ, Rea D, Schnabel CA, Treuner K, Bayani J. Abstract P2-11-10: Validation of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) prognostic models optimized for late distant recurrence in postmenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer in the TEAM trial. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p2-11-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Women with HR+ breast cancer experience a persistent risk of distant recurrence (DR) even after completion of 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, with more than 50% of DR occurring after 5 years (late DR). The prognostic genomic signatures currently being used in the clinic were not developed or optimized specifically for late DR. We have previously shown that the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) and BCIN+ prognostic models were significantly prognostic for risk of overall (0-10y) and late (5-10y) distant recurrence (DR) in N0 and N1 HR+ patients in the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial. Here, the prognostic performance of the BCI and BCIN+ models with alternative cut-points optimized for late DR were evaluated in patients from the TEAM trial, who were free from DR for at least 5 years.
Methods: BCI testing was performed blinded to clinical outcome. The pre-specified alternative cut-points 4.4 and 1.8 for BCI and BCIN+ models were determined previously from Trans-aTTom and IDEAL studies, respectively (ESMO 2021). Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of BCI/BCIN+ risk groups based on DR. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: 1285 HR+ N0 (median age 69.2, 54.2% T1, 92.5% G2-3, 21.3% chemotherapy) and 1762 N1 (median age 68.5, 49.7% T1, 80.8% G2-3, 42.6% chemotherapy) patients who remained free from DR at 5 years post randomization were included in the current analysis. For N0 patients, BCI identified 439 (34%) and 846 (66%) patients as low and high-risk with late 10-year DR rates of 3.8% (95% CI: 1.5-6.0%) and 9.1% (95% CI: 6.8-11.4%), respectively (HR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.4-5.0; p=0.0025). For N1 patients, BCIN+ identified 287 (16%) and 1475 (84%) patients as low and high-risk with late 10-year DR rates of 3.4% (95% CI: 1.2-5.5%) and 12.3% (95% CI: 10.4-14.2%), respectively (HR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.8-6.9; p< 0.0001). Similar results were observed in the HER2- patients. Notably, BCI/BCIN+ remained a statistically significant prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis after controlling for age, tumor size, grade, treatment. (Table).
Conclusions: Compared to the original BCI/BCIN+ models, the optimized BCI and BCIN+ models showed improved prognostic performance for identifying low-risk patients with a very low risk of late DR (< 4%), for both N0 and N1 patients. These results provide further validation of BCI clinical utility as an aid in the decision-making for extended endocrine therapies for HR+ breast cancer, particularly in patients with N1 disease that may be spared extended endocrine treatment.
Table
Citation Format: John MS Bartlett, Keying Xu, Jenna Wong, Gregory R. Pond, Yi Zhang, Melanie Spears, Ranelle Salunga, Elizabeth Mallon, Karen J. Taylor, Annette Hasenburg, Christos Markopoulos, Luc Dirix, Caroline Seynaeve, Cornelis J.H. van de Velde, Daniel Rea, Catherine A. Schnabel, Kai Treuner, Jane Bayani. Validation of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) prognostic models optimized for late distant recurrence in postmenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer in the TEAM trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Keying Xu
- 2Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto. Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenna Wong
- 3Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego
| | | | - Yi Zhang
- 5Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company
| | - Melanie Spears
- 6Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto. Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ranelle Salunga
- 7Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company; Diagnostics Oncology Research & Development
| | - Elizabeth Mallon
- 8Department of Pathology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Karen J. Taylor
- 9University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- 10University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christos Markopoulos
- 11National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Luc Dirix
- 12Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals & CORE, MIPRO, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Daniel Rea
- 15Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences. College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Jane Bayani
- 18Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McIntosh SA, Coles CE, Dodwell D, Elder K, Foster J, Gaunt C, Kirkham A, Lyburn I, Morgan J, Pinder SE, Pirrie S, Potter S, Roberts T, Sharma N, Stobart H, Southgate E, Taylor-Phillips S, Wallis M, Rea D, Paramasivan S. Abstract P6-05-17: Recruitment challenges in a UK surgical de-escalation study: preliminary qualitative research findings from the SMALL trial. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p6-05-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background SMALL (ISRCTN 12240119) is a novel UK phase III multicentre randomised trial comparing vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) to surgery for small screen-detected breast cancers with biologically favourable characteristics. Acceptance by the clinical community and recruitment to SMALL was anticipated to be challenging as it involves randomisation, surgical de-escalation and minimally-invasive percutaneous treatment (VAE). A QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) has therefore been integrated throughout SMALL’s recruitment period, with the aim of optimising recruitment and informed consent. Methods The QRI in SMALL has involved the analysis of: a) screening log data b) written views from recruiters on the two treatments and their advantages/disadvantages c) in-depth semi-structured interviews with members of the Trial Management Group (TMG) and clinician-recruiters and d) audio-recordings of recruitment discussions with potentially eligible patients. Recruitment challenges were identified and addressed through the provision of written recruitment tips documents, and group and individual feedback sessions with recruiters. Results There was widespread support for the concept of the SMALL trial within the clinical community. Recruiters recognised the pioneering role of SMALL as the only current surgical de-escalation randomised trial in screen-detected breast cancer. Key recruitment challenges revolved around i) healthcare professionals (HCPs) who met patients early in the pathway providing information indicating that they were being referred for surgery (without mentioning SMALL or VAE), ii) concerns around the balance of de-escalation/escalation of different treatment modalities (e.g. some clinicians may prefer to de-escalate radiotherapy in preference to surgery in low-risk patients), iii) challenges in articulating equipoise in a surgical de-escalation trial, iv) patient preferences (primarily for surgery) and recruiter discomfort in exploring/addressing such preferences and v) fewer eligible patients than anticipated. QRI actions to overcome these issues included developing a tips document for HCPs meeting patients early in the pathway, highlighting the need to refrain from making treatment recommendations. A more generic tips document was also developed emphasising the importance of the early introduction of the study, provision of balanced information about both treatments, encouraging recruiters to engage with patients’ concerns and preferences, and adequate explanation of randomisation. Group and individual feedback sessions focussed on two key areas – articulating equipoise through balanced information provision, and considering optimal ways to explore patient preferences where they are expressed. Despite the many set-up and recruitment challenges that arose from opening at the start of the pandemic, SMALL has recruited 142 patients to date from 23 sites, with an approached to randomised patient ratio of ~50%. Conclusion SMALL is a novel surgical de-escalation study in breast cancer, which will provide critical evidence to support reductions in treatment of good prognosis disease. Using a range of qualitative methodology, the QRI has identified both broad support for the study within the clinical community, but has also identified barriers to recruitment at both clinician and patient level. These challenges have been addressed employing a range of methods, and the recruitment level and approach/randomised ratio shows the overall acceptability of this study to patients. Further work will involve interviews with patients, with a focus on their views on de-escalation, and further recruiter feedback sessions. Taken together, theis data will help inform the development and design of future de-escalation and treatment optimisation studies in breast cancer. SMALL is funded by the UK NIHR HTA programme, award 17/42/32
Citation Format: Stuart A. McIntosh, Charlotte E. Coles, David Dodwell, Kenneth Elder, Jessica Foster, Claire Gaunt, Amanda Kirkham, Iain Lyburn, Jenna Morgan, Sarah E. Pinder, Sarah Pirrie, Shelley Potter, Tracy Roberts, Nisha Sharma, Hilary Stobart, Elizabeth Southgate, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Matthew Wallis, Daniel Rea, Sangeetha Paramasivan. Recruitment challenges in a UK surgical de-escalation study: preliminary qualitative research findings from the SMALL trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-05-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Iain Lyburn
- 8Gloucestershire University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - Sarah E. Pinder
- 10School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, London, England, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
McIntosh SA, Coles CE, Dodwell D, Elder K, Foster J, Gaunt C, Kirkham A, Lyburn I, Morgan J, Paramasivan S, Pinder SE, Pirrie S, Potter S, Roberts T, Sharma N, Stobart H, Southgate E, Taylor-Phillips S, Wallis M, Rea D. Abstract OT3-20-02: SMALL: Open Surgery versus Minimally invasive vacuum-Assisted excision for smaLL screen-detected breast cancer – a UK phase III randomised multi-centre trial. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-ot3-20-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Mammographic screening programmes reduce breast cancer mortality, but detect many small tumours with favourable biological features which may not progress during a woman’s lifetime. Screen-detected cancers are treated with standard surgery and adjuvant therapies, with associated morbidities. There is a need to reduce overtreatment of good prognosis tumours and numerous studies have evaluated the omission of radiotherapy in this context. However, there is little evidence to support surgical de-escalation, although percutaneous minimally invasive treatment approaches have been described. Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is in widespread use for management of benign lesions and lesions of uncertain malignant potential. SMALL (ISRCTN 12240119) is designed to determine the feasibility of using this approach for treatment of small invasive tumours detected within the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme (BSP). Methods: SMALL is a phase III multicentre randomised trial comparing standard surgery with VAE for screen-detected good prognosis cancers. The main eligibility criteria are age ≥47 years, unifocal grade 1 tumours with maximum diameter 15mm, which are strongly ER/PR+ve and HER2-ve, with negative clinical/radiological axillary staging. Patients are randomised 2:1 in favour of VAE or surgery; with no axillary surgery in the VAE arm. Completeness of excision is assessed radiologically, and if excision is incomplete, patients undergo open surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy are mandated in the VAE arm but may be omitted following surgery. Co-primary end-points are: 1. Non-inferiority comparison of the requirement for a second procedure following excision 2. Single arm analysis of local recurrence (LR) at 5 years following VAE Recruitment of 800 patients will permit demonstration of 10% non-inferiority of VAE for requirement of a second procedure. This ensures sufficient patients for single arm analysis of LR rates, where expected LR free survival is 99% at 5 years, with an undesirable survival probability after VAE of 97%. To ensure that the trial as a whole only has 5% alpha, the significance level for each co-primary outcome is set at 2.5% with 90% power. The Data Monitoring Committee will monitor LR events to ensure these do not exceed 3% per year. Secondary outcome measures include time to ipsilateral recurrence, overall survival, complications, quality of life and health economic analysis. A novel feature of SMALL is the integration of a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI), which aims to optimise recruitment to the study. Recruitment challenges are identified by analysing recruiter/patient interviews and audio-recordings of trial discussions, and by review of trial screening logs, eligibility and recruitment data and study documentation. Solutions to address these are developed collaboratively, including individual/group recruiter feedback and recruitment tips documents. Results: SMALL opened in December 2019, but recruitment halted in 2020 for 5 months due to COVID-19. At 7st July 2022, 142 patients had been randomised from 26 centres, with a randomisation rate of approximately 45%, and a per site recruitment rate of 0.4-0.5 patients/month, approaching the feasibility recruitment target of 144 patients. Drawing from preliminary QRI findings and insights from patient representatives, a recruitment tips document has been circulated (on providing balanced information about treatments, encouraging recruiters to engage with patient preferences, and explaining randomisation). Individual recruiter feedback has commenced, with wider feedback delivered across sites via recruitment training workshops. Conclusion: Despite pandemic-related challenges, SMALL has an excellent recruitment rate to date and is expected to have a global impact on treatment of breast cancer within mammographic screening programmes. SMALL is funded by the UK NIHR HTA programme, award 17/42/32
Citation Format: Stuart A. McIntosh, Charlotte E. Coles, David Dodwell, Kenneth Elder, Jessica Foster, Claire Gaunt, Amanda Kirkham, Iain Lyburn, Jenna Morgan, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Sarah E. Pinder, Sarah Pirrie, Shelley Potter, Tracy Roberts, Nisha Sharma, Hilary Stobart, Elizabeth Southgate, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Matthew Wallis, Daniel Rea. SMALL: Open Surgery versus Minimally invasive vacuum-Assisted excision for smaLL screen-detected breast cancer – a UK phase III randomised multi-centre trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-20-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Iain Lyburn
- 8Gloucestershire University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | - Sarah E. Pinder
- 11School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, London, England, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sgroi DC, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Piper T, Salunga R, Ahmed I, Doos L, Thornber S, Taylor KJ, Brachtel E, Pirrie S, Schnabel CA, Rea D, Bartlett JMS. Correlative studies of the Breast Cancer Index (HOXB13/IL17BR) and ER, PR, AR, AR/ER ratio and Ki67 for prediction of extended endocrine therapy benefit: a Trans-aTTom study. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:90. [PMID: 36527133 PMCID: PMC9758861 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01589-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple clinical trials demonstrate consistent but modest benefit of adjuvant extended endocrine therapy (EET) in HR + breast cancer patients. Predictive biomarkers to identify patients that benefit from EET are critical to balance modest reductions in risk against potential side effects of EET. This study compares the performance of the Breast Cancer Index, BCI (HOXB13/IL17BR, H/I), with expression of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and androgen receptors (AR), and Ki67, for prediction of EET benefit. METHODS Node-positive (N+) patients from the Trans-aTTom study with available tissue specimen and BCI results (N = 789) were included. Expression of ER, PR, AR, and Ki67 was assessed by quantitative immunohistochemistry. BCI (H/I) gene expression analysis was conducted by quantitative RT-PCR. Statistical significance of the treatment by biomarker interaction was evaluated by likelihood ratio tests based on multivariate Cox proportional models, adjusting for age, tumor size, grade, and HER2 status. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate correlations between BCI (H/I) versus ER, PR, AR, Ki67 and AR/ER ratio. RESULTS EET benefit, measured by the difference in risk of recurrence between patients treated with tamoxifen for 10 versus 5 years, is significantly associated with increasing values of BCI (H/I) (interaction P = 0.01). In contrast, expression of ER (P = 0.83), PR (P = 0.66), AR (P = 0.78), Ki67 (P = 0.87) and AR/ER ratio (P = 0.84) exhibited no significant relationship with EET benefit. BCI (H/I) showed a very weak negative correlation with ER (r = - 0.18), PR (r = - 0.25), and AR (r = - 0.14) expression, but no correlation with either Ki67 (r = 0.04) or AR/ER ratio (r = 0.02). CONCLUSION These findings are consistent with the growing body of evidence that BCI (H/I) is significantly predictive of response to EET and outcome. Results from this direct comparison demonstrate that expression of ER, PR, AR, Ki67 or AR/ER ratio are not predictive of benefit from EET. BCI (H/I) is the only clinically validated biomarker that predicts EET benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis C Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital East, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
- Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Kai Treuner
- Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Yi Zhang
- Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ikhlaaq Ahmed
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lucy Doos
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah Thornber
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Elena Brachtel
- Molecular Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital East, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Pirrie
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John M S Bartlett
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Robertson JF, Coleman RE, Cheung KL, Evans A, Holcombe C, Skene A, Rea D, Ahmed S, Jahan A, Horgan K, Rauchhaus P, Littleford R, Amy Cheung S, Cullberg M, de Bruin EC, Koulai L, Lindemann JP, Pass M, Rugman P, Schiavon G, Deb R, Finlay P, Foxley A, Gee JM. Correction: Proliferation and AKT Activity Biomarker Analyses after Capivasertib (AZD5363) Treatment of Patients with ER+ Invasive Breast Cancer (STAKT). Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:5469. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
12
|
Jafri M, Kristeleit H, Misra V, Baxter M, Ahmed S, Jegannathen A, Jain A, Maskell D, Barthakur U, Edwards G, Walter HS, Walshaw R, Khan M, Borley A, Rea D. Eribulin Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: The UK Experience - A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Oncology 2022; 100:666-673. [PMID: 36044833 PMCID: PMC9808648 DOI: 10.1159/000526140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study examined real-world data from patients who received eribulin for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) collected from 14 hospitals across the UK. METHODS Anonymized data were collected retrospectively from patients with MBC who had received eribulin. The data included the hormone-receptor status, histological diagnosis, age, prior chemotherapy, response to eribulin, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 577 patients analyzed, the median age was 56 years, and most patients (73%) were estrogen-receptor positive. The median OS was 288 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 261-315), and the PFS was 117 days (95% CI: 105-129). The median OS was higher among older patients (≥65 vs. <65 years: 325 days [95% CI: 264-385] vs. 285 days [95% CI: 252-317]; p = 0.028). The median OS was also higher in patients who received eribulin after fewer prior lines of chemotherapy (≤2 vs. >2 prior: 328 days [95% CI: 264-385] vs. 264 days [95% CI: 229-298]; p = 0.042). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION These retrospective data suggest that eribulin can be successfully used in older patients with MBC. Eribulin treatment was more effective in earlier-line settings, which, while predictable, supports consideration of eribulin as a second-line treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Jafri
- Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK,*Mariam Jafri,
| | - Hartmut Kristeleit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vivek Misra
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Baxter
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Samreen Ahmed
- Medical Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Apurna Jegannathen
- Clinical Oncology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Ankit Jain
- Medical Oncology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - David Maskell
- Clinical Oncology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Urmila Barthakur
- Clinical Oncology, Taunton and Somerset Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | | | - Harriet S. Walter
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Richard Walshaw
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Madeha Khan
- Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Annabel Borley
- Clinical Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK,Medical Oncology, University of Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bartlett J, Xu K, Wong J, Pond G, Zhang Y, Spears M, Salunga R, Mallon E, Taylor K, Hasenburg A, Markopoulos C, Dirix L, Seynaeve C, van de Velde C, Rea D, Schnabel C, Treuner K, Bayani J. 138MO Prognostic performance of Breast Cancer Index (BCI) in postmenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer in the TEAM trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
14
|
Badr NM, McMurray JL, Danial I, Hayward S, Asaad NY, Abd El-Wahed MM, Abdou AG, Serag El-Dien MM, Sharma N, Horimoto Y, Sircar T, Vidya R, Hoar F, Rea D, Jones JL, Stevens A, Spooner D, Merard R, Lewis P, Hunter KJ, Berditchevski F, Shaaban AM. Characterization of the Immune Microenvironment in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Using Multiplex Immunofluorescence. Pathobiology 2022; 90:31-43. [PMID: 35705026 DOI: 10.1159/000524549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer with a poorly characterized immune microenvironment. METHODS We used a five-colour multiplex immunofluorescence panel, including CD68, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FOXP3 for immune microenvironment profiling in 93 treatment-naïve IBC samples. RESULTS Lower grade tumours were characterized by decreased CD4+ cells but increased accumulation of FOXP3+ cells. Increased CD20+ cells correlated with better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and increased CD4+ cells infiltration correlated with better overall survival. Pairwise analysis revealed that both ER+ and triple-negative breast cancer were characterized by co-infiltration of CD20 + cells with CD68+ and CD4+ cells, whereas co-infiltration of CD8+ and CD68+ cells was only observed in HER2+ IBC. Co-infiltration of CD20+, CD8+, CD4+, and FOXP3+ cells, and co-existence of CD68+ with FOXP3+ cells correlated with better therapeutic responses, while resistant tumours were characterized by co-accumulation of CD4+, CD8+, FOXP3+, and CD68+ cells and co-expression of CD68+ and CD20+ cells. In a Cox regression model, response to therapy was the most significant factor associated with improved patient survival. CONCLUSION Those results reveal a complex unique pattern of distribution of immune cell subtypes in IBC and provide an important basis for detailed characterization of molecular pathways that govern the formation of IBC immune landscape and potential for immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahla M Badr
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
| | - Jack L McMurray
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Irini Danial
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Steven Hayward
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nancy Y Asaad
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
| | | | - Asmaa G Abdou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
| | - Marwa M Serag El-Dien
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
| | - Nisha Sharma
- Breast Unit, Level 1 Chancellor Wing, St James Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Yoshiya Horimoto
- Department of Breast Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tapan Sircar
- Breast Department, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Raghavan Vidya
- Breast Department, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Fiona Hoar
- City Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals, Department of General and Breast Surgery, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Louise Jones
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Paul Lewis
- School of Management, Bay Campus, Swansea University., Swansea, UK
- Medical School, Institute of Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Fedor Berditchevski
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abeer M Shaaban
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Buske C, Dreyling M, Alvarez-Larrán A, Apperley J, Arcaini L, Besson C, Bullinger L, Corradini P, Giovanni Della Porta M, Dimopoulos M, D'Sa S, Eich HT, Foà R, Ghia P, da Silva MG, Gribben J, Hajek R, Harrison C, Heuser M, Kiesewetter B, Kiladjian JJ, Kröger N, Moreau P, Passweg JR, Peyvandi F, Rea D, Ribera JM, Robak T, San-Miguel JF, Santini V, Sanz G, Sonneveld P, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Wendtner C, Pentheroudakis G, Passamonti F. Managing hematological cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO-EHA Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100403. [PMID: 35272130 PMCID: PMC8795783 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has created enormous challenges for the clinical management of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), raising questions about the optimal care of this patient group. METHODS This consensus manuscript aims at discussing clinical evidence and providing expert advice on statements related to the management of HMs in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an international consortium was established including a steering committee, which prepared six working packages addressing significant clinical questions from the COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation strategies to specific HMs management in the pandemic. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Hematology Association, statements were discussed and voted upon. When a consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements to develop consensual clinical guidance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The expert panel agreed on 33 statements, reflecting a consensus, which will guide clinical decision making for patients with hematological neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Buske
- Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
| | - M Dreyling
- Department of Medicine III at LMU Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - A Alvarez-Larrán
- Hematology Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Apperley
- Centre for Haematology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - L Arcaini
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - C Besson
- Service d'Hématologie Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France; UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - L Bullinger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumorimmunology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Corradini
- Hematology Division, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Giovanni Della Porta
- Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - M Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S D'Sa
- UCLH Centre for Waldenström and Neurohaematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H T Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | - R Foà
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - P Ghia
- Strategic Research Program on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Laboratory of B Cell Neoplasia, Division of Molecular Oncology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - M G da Silva
- Department Of Hematology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - J Gribben
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - R Hajek
- Department of Hematooncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - C Harrison
- Clinical Director - Haematology, Haemostasis, Palliative Care, Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Heuser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - B Kiesewetter
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J J Kiladjian
- Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques, Paris, France
| | - N Kröger
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - P Moreau
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - J R Passweg
- Hematology Division, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - F Peyvandi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - D Rea
- University Medical Department of Hematology and Immunology, France Intergroupe des Leucémies Myéloïdes Chroniques (Fi-LMC), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - J-M Ribera
- Clinical Hematology Department, ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - T Robak
- Department of Hematology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - J F San-Miguel
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Centro de Investigación Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - V Santini
- MDS Unit, Hematology, DMSC, AOUC, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - G Sanz
- Hematology Department, Hospital Univesitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia; CIBERONC, IS Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Sonneveld
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Haematology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany
| | - C Wendtner
- Munich Clinic Schwabing, Academic Teaching Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - F Passamonti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bradley R, Braybrooke J, Gray R, Hills RK, Liu Z, Pan H, Peto R, Dodwell D, McGale P, Taylor C, Francis PA, Gnant M, Perrone F, Regan MM, Berry R, Boddington C, Clarke M, Davies C, Davies L, Duane F, Evans V, Gay J, Gettins L, Godwin J, James S, Liu H, MacKinnon E, Mannu G, McHugh T, Morris P, Read S, Straiton E, Jakesz R, Fesl C, Pagani O, Gelber R, De Laurentiis M, De Placido S, Gallo C, Albain K, Anderson S, Arriagada R, Bartlett J, Bergsten-Nordström E, Bliss J, Brain E, Carey L, Coleman R, Cuzick J, Davidson N, Del Mastro L, Di Leo A, Dignam J, Dowsett M, Ejlertsen B, Goetz M, Goodwin P, Halpin-Murphy P, Hayes D, Hill C, Jagsi R, Janni W, Loibl S, Mamounas EP, Martín M, Mukai H, Nekljudova V, Norton L, Ohashi Y, Pierce L, Poortmans P, Pritchard KI, Raina V, Rea D, Robertson J, Rutgers E, Spanic T, Sparano J, Steger G, Tang G, Toi M, Tutt A, Viale G, Wang X, Whelan T, Wilcken N, Wolmark N, Cameron D, Bergh J, Swain SM. Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer treated with ovarian suppression: a patient-level meta-analysis of 7030 women from four randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:382-392. [PMID: 35123662 PMCID: PMC8885431 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00758-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For women with early-stage oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, adjuvant tamoxifen reduces 15-year breast cancer mortality by a third. Aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen in postmenopausal women but are ineffective in premenopausal women when used without ovarian suppression. We aimed to investigate whether premenopausal women treated with ovarian suppression benefit from aromatase inhibitors. METHODS We did a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials comparing aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, exemestane, or letrozole) versus tamoxifen for 3 or 5 years in premenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer receiving ovarian suppression (goserelin or triptorelin) or ablation. We collected data on baseline characteristics, dates and sites of any breast cancer recurrence or second primary cancer, and dates and causes of death. Primary outcomes were breast cancer recurrence (distant, locoregional, or contralateral), breast cancer mortality, death without recurrence, and all-cause mortality. As distant recurrence invariably results in death from breast cancer several years after the occurrence, whereas locoregional recurrence and new contralateral breast cancer are not usually fatal, the distant recurrence analysis is shown separately. Standard intention-to-treat log-rank analyses estimated first-event rate ratios (RR) and their confidence intervals (CIs). FINDINGS We obtained data from all four identified trials (ABCSG XII, SOFT, TEXT, and HOBOE trials), which included 7030 women with ER-positive tumours enrolled between June 17, 1999, and Aug 4, 2015. Median follow-up was 8·0 years (IQR 6·1-9·3). The rate of breast cancer recurrence was lower for women allocated to an aromatase inhibitor than for women assigned to tamoxifen (RR 0·79, 95% CI 0·69-0·90, p=0·0005). The main benefit was seen in years 0-4 (RR 0·68, 99% CI 0·55-0·85; p<0·0001), the period when treatments differed, with a 3·2% (95% CI 1·8-4·5) absolute reduction in 5-year recurrence risk (6·9% vs 10·1%). There was no further benefit, or loss of benefit, in years 5-9 (RR 0·98, 99% CI 0·73-1·33, p=0·89) or beyond year 10. Distant recurrence was reduced with aromatase inhibitor (RR 0·83, 95% CI 0·71-0·97; p=0·018). No significant differences were observed between treatments for breast cancer mortality (RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·82-1·24; p=0·94), death without recurrence (1·30, 0·75-2·25; p=0·34), or all-cause mortality (1·04, 0·86-1·27; p=0·68). There were more bone fractures with aromatase inhibitor than with tamoxifen (227 [6·4%] of 3528 women allocated to an aromatase inhibitor vs 180 [5·1%] of 3502 women allocated to tamoxifen; RR 1·27 [95% CI 1·04-1·54]; p=0·017). Non-breast cancer deaths (30 [0·9%] vs 24 [0·7%]; 1·30 [0·75-2·25]; p=0·36) and endometrial cancer (seven [0·2%] vs 15 [0·3%]; 0·52 [0·22-1·23]; p=0·14) were rare. INTERPRETATION Using an aromatase inhibitor rather than tamoxifen in premenopausal women receiving ovarian suppression reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Longer follow-up is needed to assess any impact on breast cancer mortality. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
17
|
McIntosh SA, Coles CE, Conefrey C, Dodwell D, Elder K, Foster J, Gaunt C, Kirkham A, Lyburn I, Morgan J, Paramasivan S, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Potter S, Roberts T, Sharma N, Stobart H, Southgate E, Taylor-Phillips S, Wallis M, Rea D. Abstract OT1-06-02: SMALL - Open surgery versus minimally invasive vacuum-assisted excision for small screen detected breast cancer: A phase 3 randomised trial. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-ot1-06-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:. Mammographic screening programmes have been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality. However, they detect many small tumours with favourable biological features which may not progress during a woman’s lifetime. These are treated with standard surgery and adjuvant therapies, which have associated morbidities. Thus, there is a need to reduce overtreatment of good prognosis tumours found by screening. Minimally invasive treatment approaches have been described but there is no prospective randomised evidence to support their routine use. Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is in widespread use for management of benign lesions and lesions of uncertain malignant potential. SMALL (ISRCTN 12240119) is designed to determine the feasibility of using this approach for treatment of small invasive tumours detected within the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme (BSP). Methods:. SMALL is a phase III multicentre randomised trial comparing standard surgery with VAE for screen-detected good prognosis breast cancers. The main eligibility criteria are age ≥47 years, screen-detected unifocal grade 1 tumours with maximum diameter 15mm, which are strongly ER/PR+ve and HER2-ve, with negative clinical/radiological axillary staging. Patients are randomised 2:1 in favour of VAE or surgery; with no axillary surgery in the VAE arm. Completeness of excision is assessed radiologically, and if excision is incomplete, patients undergo open surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy are mandated in the VAE arm but may be omitted following surgery. Co-primary end-points are:1.Non-inferiority comparison of the requirement for a second procedure following excision2.Single arm analysis of local recurrence (LR) at 5 years following VAE. Recruitment of 800 patients over 4 years will permit demonstration of 10% non-inferiority of VAE for requirement of a second procedure. This ensures sufficient patients for single arm analysis of LR rates, where expected LR free survival is 99% at 5 years, with an undesirable survival probability after VAE of 97%. To ensure that the trial as a whole only has 5% alpha, the significance level for each co-primary outcome is set at 2.5% with 90% power. The Data Monitoring Committee will monitor LR events to ensure these do not exceed 3% per year. Secondary outcome measures include time to ipsilateral recurrence, overall survival, complications, quality of life and health economic analysis. A QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) is integrated throughout SMALL to optimise recruitment and informed consent. Recruitment challenges are identified by analysing recruiter/patient interviews and audio-recordings of trial discussions, and by review of screening, eligibility and recruitment data and study documentation. Solutions to address these are developed collaboratively, including individual/group recruiter feedback and recruitment tips documents. Results:. SMALL opened in December 2019, but recruitment halted in 2020 due to suspension of the NHS BSP for 5 months due to COVID-19. As of 1st July 2021, 55 patients had been approached in 10 centres, with 33 patients randomised (randomisation rate 60%). A further 23 centres are in set-up, with 8 suspended due to the pandemic. Drawing from preliminary QRI findings and insights from patient representatives, a recruitment tips document has been circulated (on introducing and discussing SMALL, providing balanced information. on treatment options and explaining randomisation). individual recruiter feedback has commenced, with wider feedback planned shortly. Conclusion:. Despite pandemic-related challenges, SMALL has an excellent recruitment rate to date and is expected to have a global impact on treatment of breast cancer within mammographic screening programmes. SMALL is funded by the UK NIHR HTA programme, award 17/42/32
Citation Format: Stuart A McIntosh, Charlotte E Coles, Carmel Conefrey, David Dodwell, Kenneth Elder, Jessica Foster, Claire Gaunt, Amanda Kirkham, Iain Lyburn, Jenna Morgan, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Sarah Pinder, Sarah Pirrie, Shelley Potter, Tracy Roberts, Nisha Sharma, Hilary Stobart, Elizabeth Southgate, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Matthew Wallis, Daniel Rea. SMALL - Open surgery versus minimally invasive vacuum-assisted excision for small screen detected breast cancer: A phase 3 randomised trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-06-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Claire Gaunt
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Iain Lyburn
- Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
| | - Jenna Morgan
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sarah Pirrie
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tracy Roberts
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nisha Sharma
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Hilary Stobart
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Daniel Rea
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hills RK, Oesterreich S, Metzger O, Dabbs D, Pan H, Braybrooke J, Gray R, Peto R, Bradley R, Straiton E, Berry R, Rea D, Cameron D, Cuzick J, Regan M, Dowsett M, Sestak I, Bergh J, Swain SM, Bartlett J. Abstract PD14-08: Effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in lobular compared to ductal carcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of 9328 women with central histopathology, and 7654 women with e-Cadherin status. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd14-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In post-menopausal women with hormone receptor (HR) positive early breast cancer, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are more effective than tamoxifen as endocrine therapy. However, some trial reports indicate greater benefit from AIs in lobular than ductal cancers. Invasive lobular cancer can be identified using conventional microscopy and/or immunohistochemistry for e-Cadherin status. We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis to explore possible differential treatment benefits for AI vs tamoxifen in women with lobular vs ductal hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Methods: Individual patient data were collected from three randomised controlled trials (BIG 01-98, TEAM and ATAC) of AI vs tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer, as well as results of central pathology review and e-Cadherin expression. Central pathology and e-Cadherin data were available on 9328 and 7654 women. Local pathology data was available for TEAM, BIG 01-98. Data were analysed using the same methodology as the previous EBCTCG meta-analysis of AI vs tamoxifen: results of different methods of diagnosing ductal vs lobular cancer were cross tabulated, and outcomes analysed using log-rank methods, yielding event rate ratios (RR) and confidence intervals. Interactions were evaluated using standard tests for heterogeneity; the primary outcomes were time to any invasive breast cancer recurrence, and time to distant recurrence. Results: Rates of lobular cancer were higher when assessed by central pathology (BIG 01-98 16%; ATAC 16%; TEAM 12%) than e-Cadherin (15% vs 14% vs 9%). Methods agreed in over 80% of cases classified as ductal using either pathology or e-Cadherin, while the agreement rate for lobular cancers was only about 50%. A similar pattern was seen comparing local pathology with either central pathology or e-Cadherin. Consequently, analyses were stratified by pathology and e-Cadherin both separately and together. Consistent with the previous meta-analysis there was a significant reduction in recurrence for AI compared to tamoxifen (RR 0.73 (0.61-0.87) p=0.0004). Exploration of interaction found no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect on recurrence by pathology (ductal HR 0.76 (0.64-0.89); lobular HR 0.76 (0.50-1.15) interaction p>0.99; nor by e-Cadherin status (interaction p=0.9). No significant interactions were seen on other endpoints. Conclusion: Analyses of three large trials of adjuvant AI vs tamoxifen found discordance in identifying patients with lobular carcinoma by local or central pathology or e-Cadherin status, indicating variability in the consistency of diagnosis. The trials included showed a benefit for AI over tamoxifen in line with the previous meta-analysis, but with no evidence of differential efficacy in lobular compared to ductal carcinomas, however measured. These data cannot rule out smaller quantitative interactions or differences in site of recurrence: however, in contrast to earlier reports, this meta-analysis of the totality of the data does not identify ductal/lobular cancer as a predictive marker for differential endocrine treatment benefit.
Citation Format: Robert K Hills, Steffi Oesterreich, Otto Metzger, David Dabbs, Hongchao Pan, Jeremy Braybrooke, Richard Gray, Richard Peto, Rosie Bradley, Ewan Straiton, Richard Berry, Daniel Rea, David Cameron, Jack Cuzick, Meredith Regan, Mitch Dowsett, Ivana Sestak, Jonas Bergh, Sandra M Swain, John Bartlett, Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in lobular compared to ductal carcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of 9328 women with central histopathology, and 7654 women with e-Cadherin status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Rea
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mitch Dowsett
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ivana Sestak
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - John Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Quagliariello V, Buccolo S, Iovine M, Maurea C, Rea D, Barbieri A, Maurea N. Sacubitril-valsartan improves radial and longitudinal strain and ejection fraction in C57Bl/6 mice treated with doxorubicin through NLRP3 mediated pathways and reduction of cytokine storm. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab289.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): Ricerca Corrente grant, Ministero della Salute (it)
Background
Doxorubicin-mediated adverse cardiovascular events are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in breast cancer patients. Sacubitril-valsartan (LCZ 696) is a combination drug, made up of neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan, used for the treatment of heart failure in patients with a reduced ejection fraction.
Hypothesis
we hypothesized that LCZ 696, administered during doxorubicin, could improve cardiac functions in preclinical models
Methods
C57Bl/6 mice were untreated (Sham, n = 6) or treated for 10 days with doxorubicin i.p at 2.17 mg/kg (DOXO, n = 6), LCZ-696 at 60 mg/kg (LCZ, n = 6) or doxorubicin combined to LCZ-696 (DOXO-LCZ, n = 6). Before and after treatments, ejection fraction (EF) and radial and longitudinal strain were analyzed through transthoracic echocardiography (Vevo 2100). After treatment, mice were sacrificed and cardiac tissues were treated for determination of NLRP3 inflammasome, Myd88, NF-kB and cytokines involved in heart failure and arrhythmias (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL17-α, IL-18, IFN-γ, TNF-α, G-CSF, and GM-CSF).
Results
LCZ 696 improved significantly the EF and prevented the reduction of radial and longitudinal strain after 10 days of treatment with doxorubicin. No significant differences were observed for IVS;d-D, LVID;d-D, LVPW;d-D, LV Mass, LV Vol; d, LV Vol;s between the experimental groups. A reduced expression of NLRP3, MyD88 and NF-kB in cardiac tissues was seen in DOXO-LCZ group compared to DOXO mice (p < 0.001). Cardiac expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, G-CSF and GM-CSF were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) after treatment with LCZ-696 indicating anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective properties.
Conclusion
LCZ-696 improves cardiac functions in mice treated with doxorubicin. Biochemically, these effects are mediated by the downregulation of NLRP3 inflammasome-related pathways and cytokines involved in doxorubicin-mediated heart failure and cardiomyopathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Quagliariello
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - S Buccolo
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - M Iovine
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - C Maurea
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - D Rea
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - A Barbieri
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - N Maurea
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Quagliariello V, Passariello M, Rea D, Barbieri A, Buccolo S, Iovine M, Bonelli A, Caronna A, Botti G, De Lorenzo C, Maurea N. Ipilimumab and Nivolumab exertes cardiotoxic and pro-fibrotic effects in mice through the overexpression of NLRP3 inflammasome, chemokines and leukotrienes. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several strategies based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been developed for cancer therapy, opening to advantages in cancer outcomes. However, several ICIs-induced side effects emerged in these patients, especially a rare but clinically significant cardiotoxicity with high rate of mortality.
Purpose
We studied cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory properties of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in cellular and preclinical models
Methods
Co-cultures of human cardiomyocytes and hPBMCs were exposed to Ipilimumab or Nivolumab at 100 nM; cell viability and expression of leukotrienes, NLRP3 inflammasome, MyD88 (myddosome) and p65/NF-kB were performed. C57 mice were untreated (Sham; n=6) or treated with Ipilimumab (IPI, n=6) (15 mg/kg); analysis of fractional shortening, ejection fraction, radial and longitudinal strain were made before and after treatments through 2D-echocardiography (Vevo 2100). Expression of NLRP3, MyD88, p65/NF-kB, leukotrienes and 12 cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL17-α, IFN-γ, TNF-α, G-CSF, and GM-CSF) have been analyzed in murine myocardium.
Results
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab induced cell death and apoptosis in cardiomyocutes. Both ICIs increased NLRP3, MyD88 and p65/NF-kB expression compared to untreated cells, however the most pro-inflammatory and cardiotoxic effects were seen after exposure to Ipilimumab. Mice treated with Ipilimumab showed a significant decrease of fractional shortening and radial strain compared to untreated mice. Metabolic studies clearly indicates that ipilimumab increases leukotrienes production and NLRP3 expression in heart tissues, probably due to increased iROS content (iROS are key inductors of leukotrienes expression). High expression of IL-6, IL-1 and IL-17 were also seein in mice treated with ipilimumab (p<0,001).
Conclusions
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab exert cytotoxic effects mediated by NLRP3 inflammasome, leukotrienes and pro-inflammatory cytokines in heart tissues.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Ministero della Salute, Ricerca Corrente Project
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Quagliariello
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | | | - D Rea
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - A Barbieri
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - S Buccolo
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - M Iovine
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - A Bonelli
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - A Caronna
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - G Botti
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Scientific Direction, Naples, Italy
| | | | - N Maurea
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Quagliariello V, Bonelli A, Paccone A, Buccolo S, Iovine M, Rea D, Cerrone F, Botti G, Maurea N. The combination of a neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril) and angiotensin-II receptor blocker (valsartan) improves ejection fraction and longitudinal strain in mice treated with doxorubicin through NLRP3. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Doxorubicin-mediated- adverse cardiovascular events are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in breast cancer patients. Sacubitril-valsartan (LCZ 696) is a combination drug, made up of neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan, used for the treatment of heart failure in patients with a reduced ejection fraction.
Purpose
Here, we aim to assess whether LCZ 696, administered during doxorubicin, reduces in vitro anticancer drugs-related cardiotoxicity compared to Valsartan (V), used as a control drug.
Methods
Human fetal cardiomyocytes (HFC cell line) were exposed to subclinical concentration of doxorubicin (at 200 nM) alone or in combination with LCZ-696 (100 mM) for 72 h. After the incubation period, we performed the following tests: determination of cell viability, through analysis of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity, study of lipid peroxidation (quantifying cellular Malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal), intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. Moreover, pro-inflammatory studied were also performed (activation of NLRP3 inflammasome; expression of TLR4/MyD88; mTORC1 Fox01/3a; transcriptional activation of p65/NF-κB and secretion of cytokines involved in cardiotoxicity (Interleukins 1β, 8, 6). C57Bl/6 mice were untreated (Sham, n=6) or treated for 10 days with doxorubicin (DOXO, n=6), LCZ-696 (LCZ, n=6) or doxorubicin combined to LCZ-696 (DOXO-LCZ, n=6). DOXO was injected intraperitoneally. Ejection fraction, radial and longitudinal strain were analyzed through transthoracic echocardiography (Vevo 2100). Cardiac tissue expression of NLRP3 inflammasome, Myd8, NF-kB and chemokines and cytokines were quantified after treatments through ELISA method.
Results
LCZ 696 co-incubated with doxorubicin exerts cardioprotective effects, enhancing cell viability of 48–54.6% compared to only doxorubicin-treated cells (p<0,001 for all); LCZ 696 reduced significantly the cardiotoxicity through MyD88/NF-KB/cytokines axis and mTORC1 Fox01/3α mediated mechanisms. In preclinical study, LCZ 696 improved significantly the EF and prevented the reduction of radial and longitudinal strain after 10 days of treatment with doxorubicin. A reduced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, NLRP3, MyD88 and NF-kB in heart tissues was also seen in DOXO-LCZ group compared to DOXO mice (p<0.001)
Conclusion
We demonstrated, for the first time, that the LCZ696 exerts direct effects in cardiomyocytes and preclinical models during doxorubicin exposure, turning on a new light on its possible use in cancer patients to reduce cardiovascular side effects.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Ministero della Salute, Ricerca Corrente project
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Quagliariello
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - A Bonelli
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - A Paccone
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - S Buccolo
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - M Iovine
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - D Rea
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - F Cerrone
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| | - G Botti
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Scientific Direction, Naples, Italy
| | - N Maurea
- National Cancer Institute G.Pascale Foundation IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bradley R, Braybrooke J, Gray R, Hills R, Liu Z, Peto R, Davies L, Dodwell D, McGale P, Pan H, Taylor C, Anderson S, Gelber R, Gianni L, Jacot W, Joensuu H, Moreno-Aspitia A, Piccart M, Press M, Romond E, Slamon D, Suman V, Berry R, Boddington C, Clarke M, Davies C, Duane F, Evans V, Gay J, Gettins L, Godwin J, James S, Liu H, MacKinnon E, Mannu G, McHugh T, Morris P, Read S, Straiton E, Wang Y, Crown J, de Azambuja E, Delaloge S, Fung H, Geyer C, Spielmann M, Valagussa P, Albain K, Anderson S, Arriagada R, Bartlett J, Bergsten-Nordström E, Bliss J, Brain E, Carey L, Coleman R, Cuzick J, Davidson N, Del Mastro L, Di Leo A, Dignam J, Dowsett M, Ejlertsen B, Francis P, Gnant M, Goetz M, Goodwin P, Halpin-Murphy P, Hayes D, Hill C, Jagsi R, Janni W, Loibl S, Mamounas EP, Martín M, Mukai H, Nekljudova V, Norton L, Ohashi Y, Pierce L, Poortmans P, Raina V, Rea D, Regan M, Robertson J, Rutgers E, Spanic T, Sparano J, Steger G, Tang G, Toi M, Tutt A, Viale G, Wang X, Whelan T, Wilcken N, Wolmark N, Cameron D, Bergh J, Pritchard KI, Swain SM. Trastuzumab for early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 13 864 women in seven randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:1139-1150. [PMID: 34339645 PMCID: PMC8324484 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00288-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trastuzumab targets the extracellular domain of the HER2 protein. Adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy for patients with early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer reduces the risk of recurrence and death, but is associated with cardiac toxicity. We investigated the long-term benefits and risks of adjuvant trastuzumab on breast cancer recurrence and cause-specific mortality. METHODS We did a collaborative meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials assessing chemotherapy plus trastuzumab versus the same chemotherapy alone. Randomised trials that enrolled women with node-negative or node-positive, operable breast cancer were included. We collected individual patient-level data on baseline characteristics, dates and sites of first distant breast cancer recurrence and any previous local recurrence or second primary cancer, and the date and underlying cause of death. Primary outcomes were breast cancer recurrence, breast cancer mortality, death without recurrence, and all-cause mortality. Standard intention-to-treat log-rank analyses, stratified by age, nodal status, oestrogen receptor (ER) status, and trial yielded first-event rate ratios (RRs). FINDINGS Seven randomised trials met the inclusion criteria, and included 13 864 patients enrolled between February, 2000, and December, 2005. Mean scheduled treatment duration was 14·4 months and median follow-up was 10·7 years (IQR 9·5 to 11·9). The risks of breast cancer recurrence (RR 0·66, 95% CI 0·62 to 0·71; p<0·0001) and death from breast cancer (0·67, 0·61 to 0·73; p<0·0001) were lower with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone. Absolute 10-year recurrence risk was reduced by 9·0% (95% CI 7·4 to 10·7; p<0·0001) and 10-year breast cancer mortality was reduced by 6·4% (4·9 to 7·8; p<0·0001), with a 6·5% reduction (5·0 to 8·0; p<0·0001) in all-cause mortality, and no increase in death without recurrence (0·4%, -0·3 to 1·1; p=0·35). The proportional reduction in recurrence was largest in years 0-1 after randomisation (0·53, 99% CI 0·46 to 0·61), with benefits persisting through years 2-4 (0·73, 0·62 to 0·85) and 5-9 (0·80, 0·64 to 1·01), and little follow-up beyond year 10. Proportional recurrence reductions were similar irrespective of recorded patient and tumour characteristics, including ER status. The more high risk the tumour, the larger the absolute reductions in 5-year recurrence (eg, 5·7% [95% CI 3·1 to 8·3], 6·8% [4·7 to 9·0], and 10·7% [7·7 to 13·6] in N0, N1-3, and N4+ disease). INTERPRETATION Adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy for early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer reduces recurrence of, and mortality from, breast cancer by a third, with worthwhile proportional reductions irrespective of recorded patient and tumour characteristics. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
23
|
Bartlett JMS, Bayani J, Kornaga E, Xu K, Pond GR, Piper T, Mallon E, Yao CQ, Boutros PC, Hasenburg A, Dunn JA, Markopoulos C, Dirix L, Seynaeve C, van de Velde CJH, Stein RC, Rea D. Comparative survival analysis of multiparametric tests-when molecular tests disagree-A TEAM Pathology study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:90. [PMID: 34238931 PMCID: PMC8266887 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00297-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiparametric assays for risk stratification are widely used in the management of both node negative and node positive hormone receptor positive invasive breast cancer. Recent data from multiple sources suggests that different tests may provide different risk estimates at the individual patient level. The TEAM pathology study consists of 3284 postmenopausal ER+ve breast cancers treated with endocrine therapy Using genes comprising the following multi-parametric tests OncotypeDx®, Prosigna™ and MammaPrint® signatures were trained to recapitulate true assay results. Patients were then classified into risk groups and survival assessed. Whilst likelihood χ2 ratios suggested limited value for combining tests, Kaplan-Meier and LogRank tests within risk groups suggested combinations of tests provided statistically significant stratification of potential clinical value. Paradoxically whilst Prosigna-trained results stratified Oncotype-trained subgroups across low and intermediate risk categories, only intermediate risk Prosigna-trained cases were further stratified by Oncotype-trained results. Both Oncotype-trained and Prosigna-trained results further stratified MammaPrint-trained low risk cases, and MammaPrint-trained results also stratified Oncotype-trained low and intermediate risk groups but not Prosigna-trained results. Comparisons between existing multiparametric tests are challenging, and evidence on discordance between tests in risk stratification presents further dilemmas. Detailed analysis of the TEAM pathology study suggests a complex inter-relationship between test results in the same patient cohorts which requires careful evaluation regarding test utility. Further prognostic improvement appears both desirable and achievable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M S Bartlett
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Jane Bayani
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Kornaga
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Translational Laboratories, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Keying Xu
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Greg R Pond
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Tammy Piper
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Cindy Q Yao
- Informatics & Computational Biology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Informatics & Computational Biology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Dept of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - J A Dunn
- University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Luc Dirix
- St. Augustinus Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Robert C Stein
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ewies A, Ahmed I, Al-Azzawi F, Pitkin J, Gupta P, Persic M, Sahu B, Elgobashy A, Barraclough L, Woodman J, Babrah J, Bowden S, Stocken D, Billingham L, Sundar S, Rea D. Folic acid supplementation in postmenopausal women with hot flushes: phase III randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 2021; 128:2024-2033. [PMID: 33982872 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether folic acid supplementation ameliorates hot flushes. DESIGN Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. SETTING Nine hospitals in England. POPULATION Postmenopausal women experiencing ≥50 hot flushes weekly. METHODS Women (n = 164) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive folic acid 5 mg tablet or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Participants recorded frequency and severity of hot flushes in a Sloan Diary daily and completed Greene Climacteric and Utian Quality of Life (UQoL) Scales at 4-week intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The change in daily Hot Flush Score at week 12 from randomisation based on Sloan Diary Composite Score B calculation. RESULTS Data of 143 (87%) women were available for the primary outcome. The mean change (SD) in Hot Flush Score at week 12 was -6.98 (10.30) and -4.57 (9.46) for folic acid and placebo group, respectively. The difference between groups in the mean change was -2.41 (95% CI -5.68 to 0.87) (P = 0.149) and in the adjusted mean change -2.61 (95% CI -5.72 to 0.49) (P = 0.098). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated an increased benefit in the folic acid group regarding changes in total and emotional UQoL scores at week 8 when compared with placebo. The difference in the mean change from baseline was 5.22 (95% CI 1.16-9.28) and 1.88 (95% CI 0.23-3.52) for total and emotional score, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study was not able to demonstrate that folic acid had a statistically significant greater benefit in reducing Hot Flush Score over 12 weeks in postmenopausal women when compared with placebo. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Folic acid may ameliorate hot flushes in postmenopausal women but confirmation is required from a larger study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaa Ewies
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Ahmed
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - F Al-Azzawi
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - J Pitkin
- London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Gupta
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Persic
- University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - B Sahu
- Princess Royal Hospital, Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - A Elgobashy
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | | | - J Woodman
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - J Babrah
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Bowden
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - L Billingham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Sundar
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Rea
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pimentel I, Chen BE, Lohmann AE, Ennis M, Ligibel J, Shepherd L, Hershman DL, Whelan T, Stambolic V, Mayer I, Hobday T, Lemieux J, Thompson A, Rastogi P, Gelmon K, Rea D, Rabaglio M, Ellard S, Mates M, Bedard P, Pitre L, Vandenberg T, Dowling RJO, Parulekar W, Goodwin PJ. The Effect of Metformin vs Placebo on Sex Hormones in Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.32. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:192-198. [PMID: 33527137 PMCID: PMC7850529 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metformin has been associated with lower breast cancer (BC) risk and improved outcomes in observational studies. Multiple biologic mechanisms have been proposed, including a recent report of altered sex hormones. We evaluated the effect of metformin on sex hormones in MA.32, a phase III trial of nondiabetic BC subjects who were randomly assigned to metformin or placebo. METHODS We studied the subgroup of postmenopausal hormone receptor-negative BC subjects not receiving endocrine treatment who provided fasting blood at baseline and at 6 months after being randomly assigned. Sex hormone-binding globulin, bioavailable testosterone, and estradiol levels were assayed using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Change from baseline to 6 months between study arms was compared using Wilcoxon sum rank tests and regression models. RESULTS 312 women were eligible (141 metformin vs 171 placebo); the majority of subjects in each arm had T1/2, N0, HER2-negative BC and had received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Mean age was 58.1 (SD=6.9) vs 57.5 (SD=7.9) years, mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.3 (SD=5.5) vs 28.9 (SD=6.4) kg/m2 for metformin vs placebo, respectively. Median estradiol decreased between baseline and 6 months on metformin vs placebo (-5.7 vs 0 pmol/L; P < .001) in univariable analysis and after controlling for baseline BMI and BMI change (P < .001). There was no change in sex hormone-binding globulin or bioavailable testosterone. CONCLUSION Metformin lowered estradiol levels, independent of BMI. This observation suggests a new metformin effect that has potential relevance to estrogen sensitive cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Pimentel
- Vall d`Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bingshu E Chen
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen’s University–Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Lois Shepherd
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen’s University–Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy Whelan
- Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Vuk Stambolic
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ingrid Mayer
- Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Julie Lemieux
- CHA-Hopital Du St-Sacrement, Hopital Enfant Jesus Site, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Priya Rastogi
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Karen Gelmon
- BCCA–Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Daniel Rea
- Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Sutton, UK
| | | | - Susan Ellard
- BCCA-Cancer Centre for the Southern Interior, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Mihaela Mates
- Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe Bedard
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Ryan J O Dowling
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy Parulekar
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group , Queen’s University–Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Pamela J Goodwin
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute at Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Earl HM, Hiller L, Dunn J, Macpherson I, Rea D, Hughes-Davies L, McAdam K, Hall P, Mansi J, Wheatley D, Abraham JE, Caldas C, Gasson S, O'Riordan E, Wilcox M, Miles D, Cameron DA, Wardley A. Optimising the Duration of Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Early Breast Cancer in the UK. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:15-19. [PMID: 32723485 PMCID: PMC7382576 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H M Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
| | - L Hiller
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - I Macpherson
- University of Glasgow, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - D Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Hughes-Davies
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - K McAdam
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Peterborough City Hospital, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, UK
| | - P Hall
- Edinburgh University Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J Mansi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College Medical School, London, UK
| | - D Wheatley
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - J E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - C Caldas
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Gasson
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - E O'Riordan
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK
| | - M Wilcox
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK
| | - D Miles
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - D A Cameron
- Edinburgh University Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Wardley
- The NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility at The Christie, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Turner NC, Kingston B, Kilburn LS, Kernaghan S, Wardley AM, Macpherson IR, Baird RD, Roylance R, Stephens P, Oikonomidou O, Braybrooke JP, Tuthill M, Abraham J, Winter MC, Bye H, Hubank M, Gevensleben H, Cutts R, Snowdon C, Rea D, Cameron D, Shaaban A, Randle K, Martin S, Wilkinson K, Moretti L, Bliss JM, Ring A. Circulating tumour DNA analysis to direct therapy in advanced breast cancer (plasmaMATCH): a multicentre, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:1296-1308. [PMID: 32919527 PMCID: PMC7599319 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30444-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy. METHODS We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182634; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804. FINDINGS Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96-99% (n=800, kappa 0·89-0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83-98) overall and 98% (87-100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0-23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9-49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6-48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3-17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1-33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were raised gamma-glutamyltransferase (13 [16%] of 80 patients; cohort A); diarrhoea (four [25%] of 20; cohort B); fatigue (four [22%] of 18; cohort C); and rash (five [26%] of 19; cohort D). 17 serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients, and there was one treatment-related death caused by grade 4 dyspnoea (in cohort C). INTERPRETATION ctDNA testing offers accurate, rapid genotyping that enables the selection of mutation-directed therapies for patients with breast cancer, with sufficient clinical validity for adoption into routine clinical practice. Our results demonstrate clinically relevant activity of targeted therapies against rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, confirming these mutations could be targetable for breast cancer treatment. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, and Puma Biotechnology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C Turner
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Breast Unit, Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Belinda Kingston
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Lucy S Kilburn
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sarah Kernaghan
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Andrew M Wardley
- National Institute for Health Research Manchester Clinical Research Facility, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Rebecca Roylance
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Olga Oikonomidou
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Mark Tuthill
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Matthew C Winter
- Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hannah Bye
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Michael Hubank
- National Institute for Health Research Centre for Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | | | - Ros Cutts
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Claire Snowdon
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Cameron
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Abeer Shaaban
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Sue Martin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Katie Wilkinson
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Laura Moretti
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Judith M Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Alistair Ring
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Earl H, Hiller L, Vallier AL, Loi S, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Rea D, Howe D, Raynes K, Higgins HB, Wilcox M, Plummer C, Mahler-Araujo B, Provenzano E, Chhabra A, Gasson S, Balmer C, Abraham JE, Caldas C, Hall P, Shinkins B, McCabe C, Hulme C, Miles D, Wardley AM, Cameron DA, Dunn JA. Six versus 12 months' adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: the PERSEPHONE non-inferiority RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-190. [PMID: 32880572 PMCID: PMC7505360 DOI: 10.3310/hta24400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for people with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early, potentially curable breast cancer. Twelve months' trastuzumab, tested in registration trials, was adopted as standard adjuvant treatment in 2006. Subsequently, similar outcomes were demonstrated using 9 weeks of trastuzumab. Shorter durations were therefore tested for non-inferiority. OBJECTIVES To establish whether or not 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months' in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer using a primary end point of 4-year disease-free survival. DESIGN This was a Phase III randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING The setting was 152 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4088 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who it was planned would receive both chemotherapy and trastuzumab took part. INTERVENTION Randomisation (1 : 1) to 6 months' or 12 months' trastuzumab treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES The primary end point was disease-free survival. The secondary end points were overall survival, cost-effectiveness and cardiac function during treatment with trastuzumab. Assuming a 4-year disease-free survival rate of 80% with 12 months' trastuzumab, 4000 patients were required to demonstrate non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab (5% one-sided significance, 85% power), defining the non-inferiority limit as no worse than 3% below the standard arm. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using a within-trial analysis and a lifetime decision-analytic model. RESULTS Between 4 October 2007 and 31 July 2015, 2045 patients were randomised to 12 months' trastuzumab and 2043 were randomised to 6 months' trastuzumab. Sixty-nine per cent of patients had ER-positive disease; 90% received anthracyclines (49% with taxanes; 41% without taxanes); 10% received taxanes without anthracyclines; 54% received trastuzumab sequentially after chemotherapy; and 85% received adjuvant chemotherapy (58% were node negative). At 6.1 years' median follow-up, with 389 (10%) deaths and 566 (14%) disease-free survival events, the 4-year disease-free survival rates for the 4088 patients were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 88.1% to 90.8%) in the 6-month group and 90.3% (95% confidence interval 88.9% to 91.5%) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1.10, 90% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.26; non-inferiority p = 0.01), demonstrating non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab. Congruent results were found for overall survival (non-inferiority p = 0.0003) and landmark analyses 6 months from starting trastuzumab [non-inferiority p = 0.03 (disease-free-survival) and p = 0.006 (overall survival)]. Six months' trastuzumab resulted in fewer patients reporting adverse events of severe grade [365/1929 (19%) vs. 460/1935 (24%) for 12-month patients; p = 0.0003] or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity [61/1977 (3%) vs. 146/1941 (8%) for 12-month patients; p < 0.0001]. Health economic analysis showed that 6 months' trastuzumab resulted in significantly lower lifetime costs than and similar lifetime quality-adjusted life-years to 12 months' trastuzumab, and thus there is a high probability that 6 months' trastuzumab is cost-effective compared with 12 months' trastuzumab. Patient-reported experiences in the trial highlighted fatigue and aches and pains most frequently. LIMITATIONS The type of chemotherapy and timing of trastuzumab changed during the recruitment phase of the study as standard practice altered. CONCLUSIONS PERSEPHONE demonstrated that, in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer, 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months'. Six months' treatment resulted in significantly less cardiac toxicity and fewer severe adverse events. FUTURE WORK Ongoing translational work investigates patient and tumour genetic determinants of toxicity, and trastuzumab efficacy. An individual patient data meta-analysis with PHARE and other trastuzumab duration trials is planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52968807, EudraCT 2006-007018-39 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00712140. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Hiller
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Anne-Laure Vallier
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit - Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shrushma Loi
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Karen McAdam
- Department of Oncology, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luke Hughes-Davies
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Donna Howe
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Kerry Raynes
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Helen B Higgins
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Chris Plummer
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Betania Mahler-Araujo
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elena Provenzano
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anita Chhabra
- Pharmacy, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sophie Gasson
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Claire Balmer
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Jean E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter Hall
- Edinburgh University Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bethany Shinkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Claire Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - David Miles
- Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Andrew M Wardley
- NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - David A Cameron
- Edinburgh University Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Janet A Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chatterjee S, Basu N, Crichton K, Steven J, Stevens A, Rea D. P139: Uptake of Cyclin Dependant Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDKi) - A retrospective audit at University Hospital Birmingham trust (UHB) (audit approval number: Carms15507). Eur J Surg Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
30
|
Conefrey C, Donovan JL, Stein RC, Paramasivan S, Marshall A, Bartlett J, Cameron D, Campbell A, Dunn J, Earl H, Hall P, Harmer V, Hughes-Davies L, Macpherson I, Makris A, Morgan A, Pinder S, Poole C, Rea D, Rooshenas L. Strategies to Improve Recruitment to a De-escalation Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study of the OPTIMA Prelim Trial in Early Breast Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:382-389. [PMID: 32089356 PMCID: PMC7246331 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS De-escalation trials are challenging and sometimes may fail due to poor recruitment. The OPTIMA Prelim randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN42400492) randomised patients with early stage breast cancer to chemotherapy versus 'test-directed' chemotherapy, with a possible outcome of no chemotherapy, which could confer less treatment relative to routine practice. Despite encountering challenges, OPTIMA Prelim reached its recruitment target ahead of schedule. This study reports the root causes of recruitment challenges and the strategies used to successfully overcome them. MATERIALS AND METHODS A mixed-methods recruitment intervention (QuinteT Recruitment Intervention) was used to investigate the recruitment difficulties and feedback findings to inform interventions and optimise ongoing recruitment. Quantitative site-level recruitment data, audio-recorded recruitment appointments (n = 46), qualitative interviews (n = 22) with trialists/recruiting staff (oncologists/nurses) and patient-facing documentation were analysed using descriptive, thematic and conversation analyses. Findings were triangulated to inform a 'plan of action' to optimise recruitment. RESULTS Despite best intentions, oncologists' routine practices complicated recruitment. Discomfort about deviating from the usual practice of recommending chemotherapy according to tumour clinicopathological features meant that not all eligible patients were approached. Audio-recorded recruitment appointments revealed how routine practices undermined recruitment. A tendency to justify chemotherapy provision before presenting the randomised controlled trial and subtly indicating that chemotherapy would be more/less beneficial undermined equipoise and made it difficult for patients to engage with OPTIMA Prelim. To tackle these challenges, individual and group recruiter feedback focussed on communication issues and vignettes of eligible patients were discussed to address discomforts around approaching patients. 'Tips' documents concerning structuring discussions and conveying equipoise were disseminated across sites, together with revisions to the Patient Information Sheet. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study illuminating the tension between oncologists' routine practices and recruitment to de-escalation trials. Although time and resources are required, these challenges can be addressed through specific feedback and training as the trial is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Conefrey
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - J L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R C Stein
- National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - S Paramasivan
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - A Marshall
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Cameron
- The University of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Western General Hospital, EH4 University Cancer Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Campbell
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Dunn
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - H Earl
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - P Hall
- The University of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Western General Hospital, EH4 University Cancer Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - V Harmer
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - I Macpherson
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Makris
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - A Morgan
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK
| | - S Pinder
- King's College London, Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Poole
- Arden Cancer Centre, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - D Rea
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Rooshenas
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Robertson JFR, Coleman RE, Cheung KL, Evans A, Holcombe C, Skene A, Rea D, Ahmed S, Jahan A, Horgan K, Rauchhaus P, Littleford R, Cheung SYA, Cullberg M, de Bruin EC, Koulai L, Lindemann JPO, Pass M, Rugman P, Schiavon G, Deb R, Finlay P, Foxley A, Gee JMW. Proliferation and AKT Activity Biomarker Analyses after Capivasertib (AZD5363) Treatment of Patients with ER + Invasive Breast Cancer (STAKT). Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:1574-1585. [PMID: 31836609 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The STAKT study examined short-term exposure (4.5 days) to the oral selective pan-AKT inhibitor capivasertib (AZD5363) to determine if this drug can reach its therapeutic target in sufficient concentration to significantly modulate key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and tumor proliferation. PATIENTS AND METHODS STAKT was a two-stage, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, "window-of-opportunity" study in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ invasive breast cancer. Stage 1 assessed capivasertib 480 mg b.i.d. (recommended monotherapy dose) and placebo, and stage 2 assessed capivasertib 360 and 240 mg b.i.d. Primary endpoints were changes from baseline in AKT pathway markers pPRAS40, pGSK3β, and proliferation protein Ki67. Pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic properties were analyzed from blood sampling, and tolerability by adverse-event monitoring. RESULTS After 4.5 days' exposure, capivasertib 480 mg b.i.d. (n = 17) produced significant decreases from baseline versus placebo (n = 11) in pGSK3β (H-score absolute change: -55.3, P = 0.006) and pPRAS40 (-83.8, P < 0.0001), and a decrease in Ki67 (absolute change in percentage positive nuclei: -9.6%, P = 0.031). Significant changes also occurred in secondary signaling biomarker pS6 (-42.3, P = 0.004), while pAKT (and nuclear FOXO3a) also increased in accordance with capivasertib's mechanism (pAKT: 81.3, P = 0.005). At doses of 360 mg b.i.d. (n = 5) and 240 mg b.i.d. (n = 6), changes in primary and secondary biomarkers were also observed, albeit of smaller magnitude. Biomarker modulation was dose and concentration dependent, and no new safety signals were evident. CONCLUSIONS Capivasertib 480 mg b.i.d. rapidly modulates key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and decreases proliferation marker Ki67, suggesting future potential as an effective therapy in AKT-dependent breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Anthony Skene
- Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Ali Jahan
- King's Mill Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Martin Pass
- IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Rugman
- IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Rahul Deb
- Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, Clark RE, Cortes JE, Deininger MW, Guilhot F, Hjorth-Hansen H, Hughes TP, Janssen JJWM, Kantarjian HM, Kim DW, Larson RA, Lipton JH, Mahon FX, Mayer J, Nicolini F, Niederwieser D, Pane F, Radich JP, Rea D, Richter J, Rosti G, Rousselot P, Saglio G, Saußele S, Soverini S, Steegmann JL, Turkina A, Zaritskey A, Hehlmann R. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2020; 34:966-984. [PMID: 32127639 PMCID: PMC7214240 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 728] [Impact Index Per Article: 182.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has profoundly changed over the past 7 years. Most patients with chronic phase (CP) now have a normal life expectancy. Another goal is achieving a stable deep molecular response (DMR) and discontinuing medication for treatment-free remission (TFR). The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically evaluate and update the evidence to achieve these goals since its previous recommendations. First-line treatment is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; imatinib brand or generic, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib are available first-line). Generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment in CP. Various contraindications and side-effects of all TKIs should be considered. Patient risk status at diagnosis should be assessed with the new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS)-score. Monitoring of response should be done by quantitative polymerase chain reaction whenever possible. A change of treatment is recommended when intolerance cannot be ameliorated or when molecular milestones are not reached. Greater than 10% BCR-ABL1 at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed. Allogeneic transplantation continues to be a therapeutic option particularly for advanced phase CML. TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy. Treatment discontinuation may be considered in patients with durable DMR with the goal of achieving TFR.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aniline Compounds/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
- Clinical Decision-Making
- Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
- Dasatinib/therapeutic use
- Disease Management
- Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/antagonists & inhibitors
- Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/genetics
- Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/metabolism
- Gene Expression
- Humans
- Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/mortality
- Life Expectancy/trends
- Monitoring, Physiologic
- Nitriles/therapeutic use
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
- Pyrimidines/therapeutic use
- Quality of Life
- Quinolines/therapeutic use
- Survival Analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hochhaus
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum, Jena, Germany.
| | - M Baccarani
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R T Silver
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - C Schiffer
- Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - J F Apperley
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | - R E Clark
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - J E Cortes
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - M W Deininger
- Huntsman Cancer Center Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - F Guilhot
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - H Hjorth-Hansen
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - T P Hughes
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - J J W M Janssen
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - D W Kim
- St. Mary´s Hematology Hospital, The Catholic University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - F X Mahon
- Institut Bergonie, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - J Mayer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - F Pane
- Department Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico Secondo, Naples, Italy
| | - J P Radich
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - D Rea
- Hôpital St. Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - G Rosti
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - P Rousselot
- Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France
| | - G Saglio
- University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - S Saußele
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - S Soverini
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - A Turkina
- National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - A Zaritskey
- Almazov National Research Centre, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - R Hehlmann
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
- ELN Foundation, Weinheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hayward S, Gachehiladze M, Badr N, Andrijes R, Molostvov G, Paniushkina L, Sopikova B, Slobodová Z, Mgebrishvili G, Sharma N, Horimoto Y, Burg D, Robertson G, Hanby A, Hoar F, Rea D, Eckhardt BL, Ueno NT, Nazarenko I, Long HM, van Laere S, Shaaban AM, Berditchevski F. The CD151-midkine pathway regulates the immune microenvironment in inflammatory breast cancer. J Pathol 2020; 251:63-73. [PMID: 32129471 DOI: 10.1002/path.5415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The immune microenvironment in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is poorly characterised, and molecular and cellular pathways that control accumulation of various immune cells in IBC tissues remain largely unknown. Here, we discovered a novel pathway linking the expression of the tetraspanin protein CD151 in tumour cells with increased accumulation of macrophages in cancerous tissues. It is notable that elevated expression of CD151 and a higher number of tumour-infiltrating macrophages correlated with better patient responses to chemotherapy. Accordingly, CD151-expressing IBC xenografts were characterised by the increased infiltration of macrophages. In vitro migration experiments demonstrated that CD151 stimulates the chemoattractive potential of IBC cells for monocytes via mechanisms involving midkine (a heparin-binding growth factor), integrin α6β1, and production of extracellular vesicles (EVs). Profiling of chemokines secreted by IBC cells demonstrated that CD151 increases production of midkine. Purified midkine specifically stimulated migration of monocytes, but not other immune cells. Further experiments demonstrated that the chemoattractive potential of IBC-derived EVs is blocked by anti-midkine antibodies. These results demonstrate for the first time that changes in the expression of a tetraspanin protein by tumour cells can affect the formation of the immune microenvironment by modulating recruitment of effector cells to cancerous tissues. Therefore, a CD151-midkine pathway can be considered as a novel target for controlled changes of the immune landscape in IBC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Hayward
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mariam Gachehiladze
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Palacký Univerzity, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Nahla Badr
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Pathology, Menoufia University School of Medicine, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Regina Andrijes
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Guerman Molostvov
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Liliia Paniushkina
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Barbora Sopikova
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Palacký Univerzity, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Zuzana Slobodová
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Palacký Univerzity, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Giorgi Mgebrishvili
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Palacký Univerzity, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Nisha Sharma
- Breast Unit, St James Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Yoshiya Horimoto
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Andrew Hanby
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology (LICAP) Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Fiona Hoar
- Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals, Department of General and Breast Surgery, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bedrich L Eckhardt
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia.,Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naoto T Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Irina Nazarenko
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heather M Long
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Steven van Laere
- Translational Cancer Research Unit Center for Oncological Research, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Abeer M Shaaban
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Fedor Berditchevski
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Turner N, Kingston B, Kilburn L, Kernaghan S, Wardley AM, Macpherson I, Baird RD, Roylance R, Stephens P, Oikonomidou O, Braybrooke JP, Tuthill M, Abraham J, Winter MC, Bye H, Hubank M, Snowdon C, Rea D, Cameron D, Shaaban A, Randle K, Wilkinson K, Moretti L, Bliss JM, Ring A. Abstract GS3-06: Results from the plasmaMATCH trial: A multiple parallel cohort, multi-centre clinical trial of circulating tumour DNA testing to direct targeted therapies in patients with advanced breast cancer (CRUK/15/010). Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-gs3-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing may provide a more current assessment of the genetic profile of advanced breast cancer (BC) compared with analysis of the primary tumour, with repeat advanced disease biopsy conducted infrequently in routine clinical practice. The plasmaMATCH trial was designed to assess the clinical utility of using ctDNA testing to select patients for targeted therapies.
Methods: The plasmaMATCH trial was an open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort platform trial, consisting of ctDNA testing in ~1000 patients with advanced BC, with patients recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts with therapies matched to mutations identified in ctDNA (A: ESR1 mutation - extended-dose fulvestrant 500mg every 2 weeks, B: HER2 mutation - neratinib +/- fulvestrant (standard dosing), C: AKT1 in ER positive BC -capivasertib + fulvestrant (standard dosing), D: AKT1 in ER negative BC or PTEN inactivating mutation - capivasertib). A fifth cohort (E) recruited patients with triple negative BC with no actionable mutation to receive olaparib + AZD6738, and will be reported separately. Each cohort had a specific phase II single arm design. ctDNA testing was conducted with two technologies: digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) at a central laboratory prospectively in all patients, and error corrected sequencing with Guardant360 prospectively from part-way through recruitment and retrospectively for the remaining patients. Tumour sequencing from an advanced disease biopsy was conducted retrospectively, not influencing cohort entry. The primary endpoint for Cohorts A-D is confirmed objective response rate by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, safety and frequency of mutations identified in ctDNA screening.
Results: Entry into ctDNA testing for Cohorts A-D was closed on 26/Apr/2019 with 1044 patients registered. ctDNA screening results were received for 1033 patients (99%), with 142 patients entered into Cohorts A-D (A 84, B 21, C 18, D 19). Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and sequencing results was high (individual gene level agreement 95.5%-99.4%, kappa 0.89-0.93). Predefined efficacy criteria were met in Cohorts B (neratinib for HER2 mutations) and C (capivasertib for AKT mutations), with exploratory analysis of Cohort D identifying activity of capivasertib in AKT1 mutations (Table 1). Efficacy criteria were not met in Cohort A (extended-dose fulvestrant for ESR1 mutations). Adverse events were consistent with prior reports, with extended-dose fulvestrant well tolerated.
Table 1: Efficacy results from plasmaMATCHMutationCohortConfirmed response rate, % (95%CI; n/N)Median PFS (IQR), monthsAll patientsFirst 16 evaluable patients*ESR1A8.1% (3.0-16.8; 6/74)-2.2 (1.7-5.3)HER2B25.0% (8.7-49.1; 5/20)25.0% (7.3-52.4; 4/16)5.4 (3.4-9.1)AKT1C22.2% (6.4-47.6; 4/18)18.8% (4.0-45.6; 3/16)10.2 (3.2-18.2)AKT basketD10.5% (1.3-33.1; 2/19)12.5% (1.6-38.3; 2/16)3.4 (1.8-5.5)AKT133.3% (4.3-77.7; 2/6)--PTEN0 % (0/13)--*Predefined cohort efficacy thresholds for response were set: 13/78 (A); 3/16 (B, C, D)
Conclusion: Circulating tumour DNA testing offers accurate tumour genotyping, sufficient for routine clinical practice. This approach can be used to identify patients with rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, who have clinically relevant response rates with matched targeted therapies.
Citation Format: Nicholas Turner, Belinda Kingston, Lucy Kilburn, Sarah Kernaghan, Andrew M Wardley, Iain Macpherson, Richard D Baird, Rebecca Roylance, Peter Stephens, Olga Oikonomidou, Jeremy P Braybrooke, Mark Tuthill, Jacinta Abraham, Matthew C Winter, Hannah Bye, Michael Hubank, Claire Snowdon, Daniel Rea, David Cameron, Abeer Shaaban, Katrina Randle, Katie Wilkinson, Laura Moretti, Judith M Bliss, Alistair Ring, on behalf of the plasmaMATCH Trial Management Group. Results from the plasmaMATCH trial: A multiple parallel cohort, multi-centre clinical trial of circulating tumour DNA testing to direct targeted therapies in patients with advanced breast cancer (CRUK/15/010) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Turner
- 1The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lucy Kilburn
- 3Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Kernaghan
- 3Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew M Wardley
- 4The NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Iain Macpherson
- 5The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Richard D Baird
- 6Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Roylance
- 7University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Stephens
- 8Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Olga Oikonomidou
- 9Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy P Braybrooke
- 10University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Tuthill
- 11Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Matthew C Winter
- 13Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Bye
- 14The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hubank
- 15The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Snowdon
- 3Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rea
- 16University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - David Cameron
- 9Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Abeer Shaaban
- 16University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina Randle
- 17Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Wilkinson
- 3Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Moretti
- 3Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith M Bliss
- 3Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alistair Ring
- 14The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bartlett J, Sgori D, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Piper T, Shalunga R, Ahmed I, Doos L, Thornber S, Brachtel E, Pirrie S, Schnabel C, Rea D. Abstract P2-11-02: Breast Cancer Index predicts benefit from extended endocrine therapy in HR+ breast cancer. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-11-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Optimizing the duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients diagnosed with early stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer requires improved approaches to individualize disease profile and to reduce any unnecessary treatment burden for patients. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend 10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for most patients unless there are characteristics of low risk disease. However, approximately 2/3rds of patients have favorable long-term outcomes after completing 5 years of adjuvant therapy. Therefore, consideration of the risk-benefit profile for each patient is critical to identify who may be spared extended endocrine therapy (EET) and its associated toxicities, and which patients will benefit from an additional 5 years of endocrine therapy. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression-based signature that stratifies patients based on the risk of overall (0-10y) and late (post-5y) distant recurrence (DR) and predicted the likelihood of benefit from extended endocrine therapy in MA.17. The translational-aTTom (Trans-aTTom) study is a multi-institutional, prospective-retrospective study to validate the predictive ability of BCI by HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) status for EET benefit in early stage HR+, N0 and N+ breast cancer. Methods: Patients treated in the aTTom (Adjuvant Tamoxifen - To Offer More?) trial with available primary tumor tissue were eligible. Biospecimens were retrospectively collected from aTTom study sites and centrally assessed for ER, PR and HER2 status. Median follow-up was 12.6 years. Primary and secondary endpoints were recurrence-free interval (RFI) and disease-free interval (DFI), respectively. Statistical significance level was set at 0.0336 as per statistical analysis plan. Weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with time-varying coefficients were used to test the predictive activity of BCI by HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) status (High vs Low). Likelihood ratio test based on Cox regression was used to evaluate treatment by biomarker interaction. Results: Archived tumor specimens from 3328 patients were collected across 62 aTTom trial sites, representing 48% of the parent trial population. Central testing and assessment of ER, PR, HER2, and BCI resulted in 2445 HR+ patients (1367 N0, 789 N+, 289 nodal status unknown) in the overall cohort. At final analysis, the study remained underpowered for evaluating BCI predictive performance in the overall cohort due to an observed limited effect size that was smaller than planned and did not recapitulate the parent aTTom trial. However, evaluation of BCI predictive performance in the updated N+ subset (N=789) showed that patients classified as BCI(H/I)-High (N=404, 51%) experienced a statistically significant benefit from 10y vs 5y of tamoxifen (9.7% RFI: HR=0.33 [95% CI 0.14-0.75]; P=0.016), whereas those classified as BCI(H/I)-Low showed no significant benefit (-1.2% RFI; HR=1.11 [95% CI 0.76-1.64]; P=0.58). A statistically significant interaction between continuous BCI(H/I) and treatment was demonstrated (P = 0.036) adjusted for age, tumor size and grade, whereas no significant interaction was observed between treatment and quantitative ER (P=0.939) or PR (P=0.138) expression. Conclusion: BCI by high H/I expression was predictive of endocrine response and identified a subset of HR+, N+ patients with significant benefit from 10 vs. 5 years of tamoxifen therapy. These data provide further validation, consistent with previous MA.17 data, for BCI as a predictive biomarker of benefit from extended endocrine therapy. Findings from the Trans-aTTom strengthen the clinical validity of BCI for prediction of endocrine response and its clinical utility in optimizing duration of endocrine therapy.
Citation Format: John Bartlett, Dennis Sgori, Kai Treuner, Yi Zhang, Tammy Piper, Ranelle Shalunga, Ikhlaaq Ahmed, Lucy Doos, Sarah Thornber, Elena Brachtel, Sarah Pirrie, Catherine Schnabel, Daniel Rea. Breast Cancer Index predicts benefit from extended endocrine therapy in HR+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Bartlett
- 1Ontario Institute of Cancer Research, Ontario, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Yi Zhang
- 3Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - Tammy Piper
- 4University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ikhlaaq Ahmed
- 5University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Doos
- 5University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Thornber
- 5University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sarah Pirrie
- 5University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel Rea
- 5University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bayani J, Kornaga EN, Crozier C, Jang GH, Bathurst L, Kalatskaya I, Trinh QM, Yao CQ, Livingstone J, Boutros PC, Spears M, McPherson JD, Stein LD, Rea D, Bartlett JM. Identification of Distinct Prognostic Groups: Implications for Patient Selection to Targeted Therapies Among Anti-Endocrine Therapy–Resistant Early Breast Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol 2019; 3:1-13. [DOI: 10.1200/po.18.00373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hormone receptor–positive breast cancer remains an ongoing therapeutic challenge, despite optimal anti-endocrine therapies. In this study, we assessed the prognostic ability of genomic signatures to identify patients at risk for recurrence after endocrine therapy. Analysis was performed on the basis of an a priori hypothesis related to molecular pathways, which might predict response to existing targeted therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS A subset of patients from the Tamoxifen Versus Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00279448 and NCT00032136, and NCT00036270) pathology cohort were analyzed to determine the prognostic ability of mutational and copy number aberration biomarkers that represent the cyclin D/cyclin-dependent kinase (CCND/CDK), fibroblast growth factor receptor/fibroblast growth factor (FGFR/FGF), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/ATK) pathways to inform the potential choice of additional therapies to standard endocrine treatment. Copy number analysis and targeted sequencing was performed. Pathways were identified as aberrant if there were copy number aberrations and/or mutations in any of the predetermined pathway genes: CCND1/CCND2/CCND3/CDK4/CDK6, FGFR1/FGFR2/FGFR2/FGFR4, and AKT1/AKT2/PIK3CA/PTEN. RESULTS The 390 of 420 samples that passed quality control were analyzed for distant metastasis–free survival between groups. Patients with no changes in the CCND/CDK pathway experienced a better distant metastasis–free survival (hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.45 to 2.61; P < .001) than those who possessed aberrations. In the FGFR/FGF and PI3K/AKT pathways, a similar outcome was observed (hazard ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.92; P = .017] and 1.34 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.81; P = .053], respectively). CONCLUSION We show that aberrations of genes in these pathways are independently linked to a higher risk of relapse after endocrine treatment. Improvement of the clinical management of early breast cancers could be made by identifying those for whom current endocrine therapies are sufficient, thus reducing unnecessary treatment, and secondly, by identifying those who are at high risk for recurrence and linking molecular features that drive these cancers to treatment with targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Bayani
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth N. Kornaga
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cheryl Crozier
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gun Ho Jang
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren Bathurst
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irina Kalatskaya
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Billerica, MA
| | - Quang M. Trinh
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cindy Q. Yao
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Paul C. Boutros
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Spears
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lincoln D. Stein
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Rea
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John M.S. Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bromley HL, Mann GB, Petrie D, Nickson C, Rea D, Roberts TE. Valuing preferences for treating screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Cancer 2019; 123:130-137. [PMID: 31689678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammographic screening reduces breast cancer mortality but may lead to the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk breast cancers. Conservative management may reduce the potential harm of overtreatment, yet little is known about the impact upon quality of life. OBJECTIVES To quantify women's preferences for managing low-risk screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), including the acceptability of active monitoring as an alternative treatment. METHODS Utilities (cardinal measures of quality of life) were elicited from 172 women using visual analogue scales (VASs), standard gambles, and the Euro-Qol-5D-5L questionnaire for seven health states describing treatments for low-risk DCIS. Sociodemographics and breast cancer history were examined as predictors of utility. RESULTS Both patients and non-patients valued active monitoring more favourably on average than conventional treatment. Utilities were lowest for DCIS treated with mastectomy (VAS: 0.454) or breast conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiotherapy (VAS: 0.575). The utility of active monitoring was comparable to BCS alone but was rated more favourably as progression risk was reduced from 40% to 10%. Disutility for active monitoring was likely driven by anxiety around progression, whereas conventional management impacted other dimensions of quality of life. The heterogeneity between individual preferences could not be explained by sociodemographic variables, suggesting that the factors influencing women's preferences are complex. CONCLUSIONS Active monitoring of low-risk DCIS is likely to be an acceptable alternative for reducing the impact of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in terms of quality of life. Further research is required to determine subgroups more likely to opt for conservative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Bromley
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands, UK; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - G Bruce Mann
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Dennis Petrie
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Australia
| | - Carolyn Nickson
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University Hospital of Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - Tracy E Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Quagliariello V, Coppola C, Rea D, Maurea C, Barbieri A, Botti G, Maurea N. Cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of empagliflozin during treatment with doxorubicin: A cellular and preclinical study. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz268.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
39
|
Detriche G, Zhang Y, Esposito B, Rea D, Messas E, Mirault T, Ait Oufella H. P3110Tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib increases atherosclerosis burden in ApoE knock-out mice. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In 2001, imatinib, the 1st generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), dramatically improved the treatment and survival of the patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, the emergence of imatinib-resistant patients led to the development of 2nd generation TKIs. Nilotinib demonstrated increased efficacy to control CML disease over imatinib and is now recommended as first-line therapy. But arterial occlusive adverse events (AOE) occurs in patients treated with nilotinib and not with imatinib. Mechanisms leading to AOE with nilotinib is not well understood. AOE are dominated by ischemic heart disease and lower extremity arterial disease. Moreover, we demonstrated that CML patients with cardiovascular risk factors are at high risk to rapidly develop AOE with nilotinib.
Purpose
To evaluate the impact of nilotinib in a pre-clinical model of atherosclerosis.
Methods
ApoE Knock-Out mice (8-week-old) were treated with either placebo (N=10), imatinib (IMA) 200mg/kg/day (N=10) or nilotinib (NILO) 100mg/kg/day (N=10) by daily feeding and a high-fat diet for 12 weeks. Heart and aorta were harvested after sacrifice, for histology staining and immunochemistry. Splenocytes were cultured from collected spleens, and Interleukin (IL) 12p70 and IL10 measured by ELISA.
Results
Mice treated with nilotinib showed an increase of atherosclerotic plaque size at the aortic sinus level: 462.1x103 μm2 vs. 344.4x103 μm2 with imatinib or 394.9x103 μm2 with placebo (p<0.05) and at the thoracoabdominal aorta level (p<0.05). Plaques had greater infiltration of macrophages: 33.0±3.4% with nilotinib vs. 7.3±1.3% with imatinib and 12.6±1.1% with placebo (p<0.001) and a larger necrotic nucleus 33.0±3.4% with nilotinib vs. 7.3±1.3% with imatinib or 12.6±1.1% with placebo (p<0.001). Nilotinib modulated the systemic immune response by increasing IL-12p70 and by decreasing IL-10 production by splenocytes after stimulation by LPS-IFNγ whereas IL10 increase was observed with imatinib.
Plaque size (aortic sinus)
Conclusion
Nilotinib has a pro-atherogenic effect in a pre-clinical model of atherosclerosis and increases the monocyte/macrophage pro-inflammatory response. Further experiments are required to identify pathways activated by nilotinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Detriche
- European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Vascular medicine department, Paris Descartes university, Sorbone Paris Cité, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Y Zhang
- Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), INSERM UMR-S970, Paris, France
| | - B Esposito
- Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), INSERM UMR-S970, Paris, France
| | - D Rea
- Hopital Saint-Louis, Hematology department, Paris, France
| | - E Messas
- European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Vascular medicine department, Paris Descartes university, Sorbone Paris Cité, APHP, Paris, France
| | - T Mirault
- European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Vascular medicine department, Paris Descartes university, Sorbone Paris Cité, APHP, Paris, France
| | - H Ait Oufella
- Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), INSERM UMR-S970, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Maurea N, Quagliariello V, Coppola C, Rea D, Barbieri A, Arra C, Botti G. P5716Cardioprotective anti inflammatory effects of empaglifozin in doxorubicin induced cardiotoxicity: the role of leukotriene B4 and interleukin 1. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Empagliflozin (EMPA), a selective inhibitor of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), reduces the risk of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death in type 2 diabetic patients.
Purpose
We studied the putative cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of EMPA in Doxorubicin (DOXO)-Induced cardiotoxicity.
Methods
For this purpose, we tested the effects of EMPA (at 100 or 500 nM) alone or in combination with DOXO (20 μM) in HL-1 adult cardiomyocytes evaluating: mitochondrial viability, lipid peroxidation (quantifying cellular Malondialdehyde [MDA] and 4-hydroxynonenal [4-HNA]), Leukotriene-B4 expression, p65-NF-κB activation and Interleukin 1β, 8 and 6 secretion. Preclinical studies were also performed in C57BL6 mice, dividing them in 4 groups (n=6): Sham (untreated mice), EMPA (mice treated with EMPA at 10 mg/kg/day, administrated orally for 7 days); DOXO (mice treated with DOXO at 2.25 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneally administered for 7 days); EMPA-DOXO (pre-treatment with EMPA for 3 days and 7 days of co-administration EMPA and DOXO). As predictor of cardiotoxicity, the Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) was measured using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography. Cardiac lysates were processed for analysis of pro-inflammatory interleukins.
Results
We demonstrated that EMPA, co-incubated with DOXO, increases cardiomyocyte viability of 33,6 and 82% at 100 and 500 nM, respectively (compared to only DOXO treated cells). EMPA inhibits the lipid peroxidation by decreasing MDA and 4-HNA production of around 23,6 and 28,7%, at 100 nM and of 47,8 and 52,1% at 500 nM, respectively, compared to untreated cells (p<0,01 for all). Moreover, EMPA has anti-inflammatory activity reducing the Leukotriene B4 and p65-NFkb expression of 37,4% and 31% at 100 nM and of 58,4 and 64,3% at 500 nM, respectively (all compared to only DOXO treated cells). EMPA also decreased the expression of Interleukin 1β (of 28,5 and 68,8%), Interleukin-8 (of 21,2 and 57,3%) and Interleukin-6 (of 28,1 and 49,8%) at 100 and 500 nM, respectively, compared to only DOXO exposed cells (p<0,05 for all). In our in vivo studies, after 7 days with DOXO, the GLS decreased. Interestingly, in mice treated with EMPA/DOXO, we observed that EMPA prevents the GLS's reduction: GLS was −19.24±1.5 (p<0,01) vs DOXO alone, indicating cardioprotective effects. In DOXO-EMPA groups the cardiac IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 were reduced of 48, 54,4 and 58%, compared to only DOXO group (p<0,001 for all).
Conclusion
EMPA has strong anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects in DOXO-Induced cardiotoxicity and these effects are mainly mediated by a reduction of the lipid peroxidation, Leukotriene-B4 and NF-κB activation bringing to a strong inhibition of the Interleukin 1β, 8 and 6 production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Maurea
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - V Quagliariello
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - C Coppola
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - D Rea
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Barbieri
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - C Arra
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - G Botti
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Maurea N, Quagliariello V, Passariello M, Coppola C, Rea D, Barbieri A, Arra C, Scherillo M, Iaffaioli RV, Botti G, De Lorenzo C. P1537Cardiotoxicity induced by the combinatorial treatment based on the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab associated to trastuzumab. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The immunotherapy has revolutionized the world of oncology in the last decades with considerable advantages in terms of overall survival in cancer patients. A combination therapy based on the co-administration of Pembrolizumab (an antibody against PD-1) and Trastuzumab (the humanized anti-Her2 mAb) was recently proposed in clinical trials for the treatment of Trastuzumab-resistant advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Although immunotherapies are frequently associated with a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events, the cardiac toxicity has not been properly studied.
Purpose
We studied, for the first time, the putative cardiotoxic effects of Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab turning the light on the pro-inflammatory effects of this novel combined therapy
Methods
Cell viability, intracellular calcium quantification and pro-inflammatory assays (analyzing the production of Interleukin 1β, 6 and 8 as well as the expression of p65/NFkB and Leukotriene B4) were performed in human fetal cardiomyocytes in vitro. Preclinical studies were also performed in vivo on C57BL6 mice untreated (Sham) or treated with Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab alone or in combination by analyzing (in cardiac tissue extracts) the same markers of inflammation used in cellular studies.
Results
Combination therapy leads to an increase of the intracellular calcium overload (more than 3 times compared to untreated cells) and to a reduction of the cardiomyocytes viability (of more than 65 and 20–25%, compared to untreated and Pembrolizumab or Trastuzumab treated cells, respectively) thus indicating cardiotoxic effects. Notably, combination therapy increases the inflammation of cardiomyocytes enhancing significantly the production of p65/NFkB and Interleukins. Moreover, in in vivo studies on mice, the association of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab shows pro-inflammatory effects in cardiac tissue by stimulating the Interleukin 1β, 8 and 6 expression of 40–50% more than the single treatments; the expression of p65/NFkB and Leukotriene B4 was also increased indicating pro-inflammatory effects.
Conclusion
Combination therapy based on Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab leads to significant cardiac pro-inflammatory effects mediated by overexpression of NFkB/p65 and Leukotriene B4 related pathways
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Maurea
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - V Quagliariello
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Passariello
- Federico II University of Naples, Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Naples, Italy
| | - C Coppola
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - D Rea
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Barbieri
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - C Arra
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Scherillo
- Azienda Ospedaliera “G. Rummo”, Azienda ospedaliera San Pio, Cardiologia Interventistica, Naples, Italy
| | - R V Iaffaioli
- Association for Multidisciplinary Studies in Oncology and Mediterranean Diet, Naples, Italy
| | - G Botti
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - C De Lorenzo
- Federico II University of Naples, Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Maurea N, Quagliariello V, Passariello M, Coppola C, Rea D, Barbieri A, De Lorenzo C, Monti G, De Laurentiis M, Ascierto P, Botti G. Cardiotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects induced by the association of immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in preclinical models. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz253.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
43
|
Morgan J, Potter S, Sharma N, McIntosh SA, Coles CE, Dodwell D, Elder K, Gaunt C, Lyburn ID, McIntosh SA, Morgan J, Paramasivan S, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Potter S, Rea D, Roberts T, Sharma N, Stobart H, Taylor-Phillips S, Wallis M, Wilcox M. The SMALL Trial: A Big Change for Small Breast Cancers. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:659-663. [PMID: 31160130 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Morgan
- University of Sheffield, FU32, The Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - S Potter
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK; Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - N Sharma
- Breast Unit, St James Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - S A McIntosh
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| | | | | | - K Elder
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - C Gaunt
- CRCTU, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - S Pirrie
- CRCTU, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | - D Rea
- University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | - N Sharma
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - H Stobart
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, UK
| | | | - M Wallis
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Wilcox
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cheng VWT, Heetun A, Robinson T, Coles CE, Palmieri C, Rea D, Copson ER. The Breast Cancer Trainees Research Collaborative Group: A New Multidisciplinary Network to Facilitate Breast Cancer Research. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 32:e16-e18. [PMID: 31358346 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- V W T Cheng
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - A Heetun
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Somers Cancer Sciences Building, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | | | - C E Coles
- Oncology Centre, CRUK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - C Palmieri
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - D Rea
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - E R Copson
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Somers Cancer Sciences Building, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chander G, Rea D, Shaaban A, Jafri M. The Use of Pertuzumab for Breast Cancer Patients in the Neoadjuvant Setting Presenting to a Tertiary Centre. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
46
|
Earl HM, Hiller L, Vallier AL, Loi S, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Harnett AN, Ah-See ML, Simcock R, Rea D, Raj S, Woodings P, Harries M, Howe D, Raynes K, Higgins HB, Wilcox M, Plummer C, Mansi J, Gounaris I, Mahler-Araujo B, Provenzano E, Chhabra A, Abraham JE, Caldas C, Hall PS, McCabe C, Hulme C, Miles D, Wardley AM, Cameron DA, Dunn JA. 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (PERSEPHONE): 4-year disease-free survival results of a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2019; 393:2599-2612. [PMID: 31178152 PMCID: PMC6615016 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30650-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant trastuzumab significantly improves outcomes for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. The standard treatment duration is 12 months but shorter treatment could provide similar efficacy while reducing toxicities and cost. We aimed to investigate whether 6-month adjuvant trastuzumab treatment is non-inferior to the standard 12-month treatment regarding disease-free survival. METHODS This study is an open-label, randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Patients were recruited from 152 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, aged 18 years or older, and with a clear indication for chemotherapy, by a computerised minimisation process (1:1), to receive either 6-month or 12-month trastuzumab delivered every 3 weeks intravenously (loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by maintenance doses of 6 mg/kg) or subcutaneously (600 mg), given in combination with chemotherapy (concurrently or sequentially). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed by intention to treat, with a non-inferiority margin of 3% for 4-year disease-free survival. Safety was analysed in all patients who received trastuzumab. This trial is registered with EudraCT (number 2006-007018-39), ISRCTN (number 52968807), and ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00712140). FINDINGS Between Oct 4, 2007, and July 31, 2015, 2045 patients were assigned to 12-month trastuzumab treatment and 2044 to 6-month treatment (one patient was excluded because they were double randomised). Median follow-up was 5·4 years (IQR 3·6-6·7) for both treatment groups, during which a disease-free survival event occurred in 265 (13%) of 2043 patients in the 6-month group and 247 (12%) of 2045 patients in the 12-month group. 4-year disease-free survival was 89·4% (95% CI 87·9-90·7) in the 6-month group and 89·8% (88·3-91·1) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1·07 [90% CI 0·93-1·24], non-inferiority p=0·011), showing non-inferiority of the 6-month treatment. 6-month trastuzumab treatment resulted in fewer patients reporting severe adverse events (373 [19%] of 1939 patients vs 459 [24%] of 1894 patients, p=0·0002) or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity (61 [3%] of 1939 patients vs 146 [8%] of 1894 patients, p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION We have shown that 6-month trastuzumab treatment is non-inferior to 12-month treatment in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, with less cardiotoxicity and fewer severe adverse events. These results support consideration of reduced duration trastuzumab for women at similar risk of recurrence as to those included in the trial. FUNDING UK National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena M Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Louise Hiller
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Anne-Laure Vallier
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit-Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shrushma Loi
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Karen McAdam
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK
| | - Luke Hughes-Davies
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adrian N Harnett
- Department of Oncology, James Paget University Hospital, Norfolk, UK; Department of Oncology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Mei-Lin Ah-See
- Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Richard Simcock
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS, Brighton, UK
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sanjay Raj
- Department of Oncology, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Mark Harries
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Donna Howe
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Kerry Raynes
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Helen B Higgins
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Chris Plummer
- Department of Cardiology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Janine Mansi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Betania Mahler-Araujo
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elena Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anita Chhabra
- Pharmacy, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jean E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter S Hall
- Cancer Edinburgh Research Centre, The Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Claire Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - David Miles
- Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Andrew M Wardley
- Research & Development, The NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, ManchesterAcademic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David A Cameron
- Cancer Edinburgh Research Centre, The Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Janet A Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Quagliariello V, Passariello M, Coppola C, Rea D, Barbieri A, Scherillo M, Monti MG, Iaffaioli RV, De Laurentiis M, Ascierto PA, Botti G, De Lorenzo C, Maurea N. Cardiotoxicity and pro-inflammatory effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab. Int J Cardiol 2019; 292:171-179. [PMID: 31160077 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The immunotherapy has revolutionized the world of oncology in the last decades with considerable advantages in terms of overall survival in cancer patients. The association of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab was recently proposed in clinical trials for the treatment of Trastuzumab-resistant advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Although immunotherapies are frequently associated with a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events, the cardiac toxicity has not been properly studied. PURPOSE We studied, for the first time, the putative cardiotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects of Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab. METHODS Cell viability, intracellular calcium quantification and pro-inflammatory studies (analyses of the production of Interleukin 1β, 6 and 8, the expression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4) were performed in human fetal cardiomyocytes. Preclinical studies were also performed in C57BL6 mice by analyzing fibrosis and inflammation in heart tissues. RESULTS The combination of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab leads to an increase of the intracellular calcium overload (of 3 times compared to untreated cells) and to a reduction of the cardiomyocytes viability (of 65 and 20-25%, compared to untreated and Pembrolizumab or Trastuzumab treated cells, respectively) indicating cardiotoxic effects. Notably, combination therapy increases the inflammation of cardiomyocytes by enhancing the expression of NF-kB and Interleukins. Moreover, in preclinical models, the association of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab increases the Interleukins expression of 40-50% compared to the single treatments; the expression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4 was also increased. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab leads to strong cardiac pro-inflammatory effects mediated by overexpression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4 related pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Quagliariello
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - M Passariello
- CEINGE - Biotecnologie Avanzate S.C.a.R.L., Naples, Italy
| | - C Coppola
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - D Rea
- Animal Facility, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - A Barbieri
- Animal Facility, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - M Scherillo
- Azienda ospedaliera San Pio, Cardiologia Interventistica ed UTIC, Azienda Ospedaliera "G.Rummo" di Benevento, Napoli, Italy
| | - M G Monti
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - R V Iaffaioli
- Association for Multidisciplinary Studies in Oncology and Mediterranean Diet, Piazza Nicola Amore, Naples, Italy
| | - M De Laurentiis
- Breast Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - G Botti
- Scientific Direction, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - C De Lorenzo
- CEINGE - Biotecnologie Avanzate S.C.a.R.L., Naples, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples "Federico II", Napoli, Italy.
| | - N Maurea
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kleinhenz MD, Gorden PJ, Smith JS, Schleining JA, Kleinhenz KE, Juarez JR, Rea D, Coetzee JF. Effects of transdermal flunixin meglumine on experimentally induced lameness in adult dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2019; 102:6418-6430. [PMID: 31030917 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Lameness is a common animal health condition with significant production and welfare implications. The transdermal formulation of flunixin meglumine is the only approved drug for pain control in cattle in the United States. Thirty adult dairy cows were enrolled in a study to determine the effect of transdermal flunixin on cattle with induced lameness. Cows were allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups, with 10 cows per group: lameness and flunixin (L+F), lameness and placebo (L+P), or sham induction and placebo (S+P). An arthritis-synovitis was induced in the distal interphalangeal joint of the left hind lateral digit, using 20 mg of amphotericin B, 6 h before the application of treatment. Cows enrolled into the sham induction group had 4 mL of isotonic saline injected into the joint. Cows were dosed with transdermal flunixin at 3.33 mg/kg (1 mL/15 kg), or a placebo at 1 mL/15 kg, every 24 h for 3 d. The first treatment of flunixin or placebo was considered the start of the study, identified as time 0 h. Data were collected from all cows for 120 h following the initial treatment application. Outcome measures included plasma cortisol; substance P; visual lameness assessment; mechanical nociception threshold (MNT), presented as difference between left and right feet; infrared thermography (IRT), presented as difference between left and right feet; and gait analysis using a pressure mat. Cortisol concentrations were lower for the L+F group starting at 1.5 h after drug administration. Substance P levels showed no evidence for treatment differences among groups. Differences between the left hind MNT and right hind MNT were detected, with S+P having the lowest difference at -0.04 kilograms-force (kgf; 95% CI: -1.86 to 1.78 kgf), and L+P having the highest at -2.96 kgf (95% CI: 1.55 to 4.36 kgf). The L+F group was intermediate at -2.08 kgf (95% CI: 0.89 to 3.27 kgf). Similarly, when the difference between the maximum temperatures of the coronary band were examined via IRT, the L+P group had the highest difference at 1.64°C (95% CI: 1.02 to 2.26°C), with the L+F and S+P groups measuring 0.57°C (95% CI: 0.06 to 1.08°C) and 0.53°C (95% CI: -0.2 to 1.25°C) respectively. We found no evidence for differences among treatment groups when analyzing force, contact pressure, step impulse, or stride length. Based on differences in MNT, IRT, and cortisol, transdermal flunixin is an effective analgesic agent for induced lameness. Multiple doses of transdermal flunixin may be required to be clinically effective, based on MNT and IRT data. Further investigation of transdermal flunixin and its analgesic effects is warranted in naturally occurring lameness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Kleinhenz
- Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - P J Gorden
- Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - J S Smith
- Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - J A Schleining
- Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - K E Kleinhenz
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - J R Juarez
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - D Rea
- Castle Veterinary Group, Downpatrick, Northern Ireland BT30 9JF
| | - J F Coetzee
- Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gray R, Bradley R, Braybrooke J, Liu Z, Peto R, Davies L, Dodwell D, McGale P, Pan H, Taylor C, Barlow W, Bliss J, Bruzzi P, Cameron D, Fountzilas G, Loibl S, Mackey J, Martin M, Del Mastro L, Möbus V, Nekljudova V, De Placido S, Swain S, Untch M, Pritchard KI, Bergh J, Norton L, Boddington C, Burrett J, Clarke M, Davies C, Duane F, Evans V, Gettins L, Godwin J, Hills R, James S, Liu H, MacKinnon E, Mannu G, McHugh T, Morris P, Read S, Wang Y, Wang Z, Fasching P, Harbeck N, Piedbois P, Gnant M, Steger G, Di Leo A, Dolci S, Francis P, Larsimont D, Nogaret JM, Philippson C, Piccart M, Linn S, Peer P, Tjan-Heijnen V, Vliek S, Mackey J, Slamon D, Bartlett J, Bramwell VH, Chen B, Chia S, Gelmon K, Goss P, Levine M, Parulekar W, Pater J, Rakovitch E, Shepherd L, Tu D, Whelan T, Berry D, Broadwater G, Cirrincione C, Muss H, Weiss R, Shan Y, Shao YF, Wang X, Xu B, Zhao DB, Bartelink H, Bijker N, Bogaerts J, Cardoso F, Cufer T, Julien JP, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, van de Velde C, Carrasco E, Segui MA, Blohmer JU, Costa S, Gerber B, Jackisch C, von Minckwitz G, Giuliano M, De Laurentiis M, Bamia C, Koliou GA, Mavroudis D, A'Hern R, Ellis P, Kilburn L, Morden J, Yarnold J, Sadoon M, Tulusan AH, Anderson S, Bass G, Costantino J, Dignam J, Fisher B, Geyer C, Mamounas EP, Paik S, Redmond C, Wickerham DL, Venturini M, Bighin C, Pastorino S, Pronzato P, Sertoli MR, Foukakis T, Albain K, Arriagada R, Bergsten Nordström E, Boccardo F, Brain E, Carey L, Coates A, Coleman R, Correa C, Cuzick J, Davidson N, Dowsett M, Ewertz M, Forbes J, Gelber R, Goldhirsch A, Goodwin P, Hayes D, Hill C, Ingle J, Jagsi R, Janni W, Mukai H, Ohashi Y, Pierce L, Raina V, Ravdin P, Rea D, Regan M, Robertson J, Sparano J, Tutt A, Viale G, Wilcken N, Wolmark N, Wood W, Zambetti M. Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: a patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2019; 393:1440-1452. [PMID: 30739743 PMCID: PMC6451189 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33137-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2018] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing the dose intensity of cytotoxic therapy by shortening the intervals between cycles, or by giving individual drugs sequentially at full dose rather than in lower-dose concurrent treatment schedules, might enhance efficacy. METHODS To clarify the relative benefits and risks of dose-intense and standard-schedule chemotherapy in early breast cancer, we did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of trials comparing 2-weekly versus standard 3-weekly schedules, and of trials comparing sequential versus concurrent administration of anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were recurrence and breast cancer mortality. Standard intention-to-treat log-rank analyses, stratified by age, nodal status, and trial, yielded dose-intense versus standard-schedule first-event rate ratios (RRs). FINDINGS Individual patient data were provided for 26 of 33 relevant trials identified, comprising 37 298 (93%) of 40 070 women randomised. Most women were aged younger than 70 years and had node-positive disease. Total cytotoxic drug usage was broadly comparable in the two treatment arms; colony-stimulating factor was generally used in the more dose-intense arm. Combining data from all 26 trials, fewer breast cancer recurrences were seen with dose-intense than with standard-schedule chemotherapy (10-year recurrence risk 28·0% vs 31·4%; RR 0·86, 95% CI 0·82-0·89; p<0·0001). 10-year breast cancer mortality was similarly reduced (18·9% vs 21·3%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·83-0·92; p<0·0001), as was all-cause mortality (22·1% vs 24·8%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·83-0·91; p<0·0001). Death without recurrence was, if anything, lower with dose-intense than with standard-schedule chemotherapy (10-year risk 4·1% vs 4·6%; RR 0·88, 95% CI 0·78-0·99; p=0·034). Recurrence reductions were similar in the seven trials (n=10 004) that compared 2-weekly chemotherapy with the same chemotherapy given 3-weekly (10-year risk 24·0% vs 28·3%; RR 0·83, 95% CI 0·76-0·91; p<0·0001), in the six trials (n=11 028) of sequential versus concurrent anthracycline plus taxane chemotherapy (28·1% vs 31·3%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·80-0·94; p=0·0006), and in the six trials (n=6532) testing both shorter intervals and sequential administration (30·4% vs 35·0%; RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·74-0·90; p<0·0001). The proportional reductions in recurrence with dose-intense chemotherapy were similar and highly significant (p<0·0001) in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative disease and did not differ significantly by other patient or tumour characteristics. INTERPRETATION Increasing the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy by shortening the interval between treatment cycles, or by giving individual drugs sequentially rather than giving the same drugs concurrently, moderately reduces the 10-year risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer without increasing mortality from other causes. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
50
|
Bromley HL, Petrie D, Mann GB, Nickson C, Rea D, Roberts TE. Valuing the health states associated with breast cancer screening programmes: A systematic review of economic measures. Soc Sci Med 2019; 228:142-154. [PMID: 30913528 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Policy decisions regarding breast cancer screening and treatment programmes may be misplaced unless the decision process includes the appropriate utilities and disutilities of mammography screening and its sequelae. The objectives of this study were to critically review how economic evaluations have valued the health states associated with breast cancer screening, and appraise the primary evidence informing health state utility values (cardinal measures of quality of life). A systematic review was conducted up to September 2018 of studies that elicited or used utilities relevant to mammography screening. The methods used to elicit utilities and the quality of the reported values were tabulated and analysed narratively. 40 economic evaluations of breast cancer screening programmes and 10 primary studies measuring utilities for health states associated with mammography were reviewed in full. The economic evaluations made different assumptions about the measures used, duration applied and the sequalae included in each health state. 22 evaluations referenced utilities based on assumptions or used measures that were not methodologically appropriate. There was significant heterogeneity in the utilities generated by the 10 primary studies, including the methods and population used to derive them. No study asked women to explicitly consider the risk of overdiagnosis when valuing the health states described. Utilities informing breast screening policy are restricted in their ability to reflect the full benefits and harms. Evaluating the true cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening will remain problematic, unless the methodological challenges associated with valuing the disutilities of screening are adequately addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Bromley
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - Dennis Petrie
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - G Bruce Mann
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carolyn Nickson
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University Hospital of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - Tracy E Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
| |
Collapse
|