1
|
Chandan S, Ramai D, Mozell D, Facciorusso A, Diehl DL, Kochhar GS. Adverse events of the single-operator cholangioscopy system: a Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:1035-1038. [PMID: 38316225 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The SpyGlass (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass, USA) single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) system is generally considered to be safe but adds additional risks to those associated with standard ERCP. METHODS We evaluated adverse events (AEs) associated with the SpyGlass system reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database between January 2016 and August 2023. RESULTS From the database, 2311 device problems (SpyGlass DS, 1301; SpyGlass DS II, 1010) were reported. An optical problem was the most reported issue (SpyGlass DS, 83; SpyGlass DS II, 457). Patient-related events were found in 62 of 1743 reports (3.5%): 33 with the SpyGlass DS and 29 with the SpyGlass DS II. The most common AEs were bleeding/hemorrhage followed by perforation; infection, fever, or sepsis; and pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS Our findings add to the existing literature and provide a fuller picture of potential problems associated with the SpyGlass SOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Daniel Mozell
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (NYC Health and Hospitals/Elmhurst), Elmhurst, New York, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - David L Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diehl DL, Sangwan V, Johal AS, Khara HS, Confer B. Comparing a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle with a 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:931-937. [PMID: 38141686 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) sampling is being increasingly used. We performed a prospective randomized trial to compare specimen adequacy of a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle with a 22-gauge FNB Franseen tip needle for EUS-LB sampling. METHODS Forty-two consecutive patients referred for EUS-LB sampling were prospectively randomized to a 19-gauge or 22-gauge FNB needle. When the specimen with the 22-gauge needle was macroscopically inadequate, an additional pass with the 19-gauge needle was done. Bilobar EUS-LB sampling was performed with heparinized wet suction using 1 pass and 3 actuations per lobe. Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables. RESULTS Biopsy sampling was performed for abnormal liver enzymes in 95.5% of patients (57% women; average age, 51 years). Five patients undergoing sampling with the 22-gauge FNB needle had macroscopically inadequate specimens and required additional biopsy sampling with the 19-gauge FNB needle. Mean preprocessing length of the longest tissue core was 21.5 ± 6.3 mm with a 19-gauge FNB needle compared with 9.4 ± 5.5 mm with the 22-gauge FNB needle (P < .001). Postprocessing specimens were significantly longer with 19-gauge than with 22-gauge FNB needles (17.4 mm vs 6.8, P < .001). There were no adverse events, and postprocedure pain and discomfort was similar in both groups (14% for 19-gauge vs 10% for 22-gauge, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS Liver core biopsy sampling using the 19-gauge FNB needle is superior to the 22-gauge FNB needle in terms of length of longest core and aggregate specimen length. Considerably more fragmentation of the 22-gauge cores occurs during tissue processing. No increased postprocedure pain or AEs were found with the 19-gauge needle. A 19-gauge FNB needle is preferred to the 22-gauge FNB needle for EUS-LB. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04806607.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vikas Sangwan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amitpal S Johal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bradley Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knabe M, Maselli R, Cesbron-Metivier E, Hollerbach S, Petruzziello L, Prat F, Khara HS, Pioche M, Hartmann D, Cesaro P, Barbaro F, Berger A, Spada C, Diehl DL, May A, Ponchon T, Repici A, Costamagna G. Endoscopic powered resection device for residual colonic lesions: the first multicenter, prospective, international clinical study. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:778-786. [PMID: 38042207 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic resection is standard treatment for adenomatous colorectal lesions. Depending on lesion morphology and resection technique, recurrence can occur. Scarred adenomas are challenging to resect and may require surgical management. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of an endoscopic powered resection (EPR) system for scarred adenomatous colorectal lesions. METHODS This single-arm, prospective, multicenter study was conducted from January 2018 to January 2021 at 12 sites. Patients with persistent flat or sessile colorectal lesions were enrolled. Primary end points were technical success (the ability of the device to resect the lesion[s] without use of other resection devices without device-related serious adverse events [AEs]) and safety (the occurrence of AEs through 90 days). Secondary end points included endoscopic confirmation of resection completeness, occurrence of colon stenosis, disease persistence, and diagnostic value of resected specimens. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were in the intention-to-treat/safety analysis population. Primary analysis was performed on 45 per-protocol (PP) patients with 48 lesions. All PP patients were solely treated by using the EPR device. Technical success was achieved in 44 (98%) patients. Three (5%) serious AEs occurred: 2 delayed self-limited bleeds and 1 perforation. Nonserious AEs included 4 (6%) cases of mild intraprocedural bleeding. Completeness of resection and histopathologic diagnosis of tissue specimens were achieved in all patients. Twenty-one (46.7%) patients had disease persistence after the first treatment, and there was no colon stenosis. CONCLUSIONS EPR is safe and effective for benign, persistent, large (>20 mm), scarred colorectal adenomas and should be considered as an alternative treatment in lieu of surgery. A persistence rate of 46.7% indicates that >1 treatment is necessary for effective endoscopic treatment. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04203667.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mate Knabe
- Centrum Gastroenterology Bethanien (CGB), Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Stephan Hollerbach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle, Celle, Germany
| | - Lucio Petruzziello
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italia
| | - Frédéric Prat
- Endoscopy Unit, Beaujon Hospital, Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Dirk Hartmann
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Diabetology, Gastroenterology and Oncology, Katholisches Klinikum Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Paola Cesaro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Barbaro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italia
| | - Arthur Berger
- CHU Bordeaux, Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italia
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrea May
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oncology and Pneumology, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diehl DL. Phase analysis: a novel and useful application of artificial intelligence in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:839-840. [PMID: 38649225 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen B, Diehl DL. Functional luminal imaging probe assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis stricture followed by optical-haptic dilation with a dilating cap. VideoGIE 2024; 9:224-225. [PMID: 38766396 PMCID: PMC11099340 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nadeem D, Taye M, Still MD, McShea S, Satterfield D, Dove JT, Wood GC, Addissie BD, Diehl DL, Johal AS, Khara HS, Confer BD, Still CD. Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Upper Endoscopy in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)03159-6. [PMID: 38692518 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) promote weight loss by suppressing appetite, enhancing satiety, regulating glucose metabolism and delaying gastric motility. We sought to determine whether GLP-1 RA use could impact sedated medical procedures like esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). METHODS We conducted a retrospective study on 35,183 patients who underwent EGD between 2019 and 2023, 922 of which were using a GLP-1-RA. Data were collected regarding demographics, diabetes status, retained gastric contents during EGD (RGC), incidence of aborted EGD, and necessity for repeat EGD. RESULTS GLP-1 RA use was associated with a fourfold increase in the retention of gastric contents (p<0.0001), fourfold higher rates of aborted EGD (p<0.0001), and twice the likelihood of requiring repeat EGD (p=0.0001), even after stratifying for presence of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1 RA use can lead to delayed gastric emptying, affecting EGD adequacy regardless of the presence of diabetes, and may warrant dose adjustment to improve safety and efficacy of these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danial Nadeem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center.
| | - Mahdi Taye
- Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine
| | | | - Shannon McShea
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - Daniel Satterfield
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - James T Dove
- Center for Obesity and Metabolic Research, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - G Craig Wood
- Center for Obesity and Metabolic Research, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - Benyam D Addissie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - Amitpal S Johal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - Bradley D Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center
| | - Christopher D Still
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iqbal U, Yodice M, Ahmed Z, Anwar H, Arif SF, Lee-Smith WM, Diehl DL. Safety and efficacy of EsoFLIP dilation in patients with esophageal dysmotility: a systematic review. Dis Esophagus 2024:doae036. [PMID: 38659256 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doae036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Esophageal manometry is utilized for the evaluation and classification of esophageal motility disorders. EndoFlip has been introduced as an adjunctive test to evaluate esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility. Treatment options for achalasia and EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO) include pneumatic dilation, myotomy, and botulinum toxin. Recently, a therapeutic 30 mm hydrostatic balloon dilator (EsoFLIP, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been introduced, which uses impedance planimetry technology like EndoFlip. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EsoFLIP in the management of esophageal motility disorders. A systematic literature search was performed with Medline, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to November 2022 to identify studies utilizing EsoFLIP for management of esophageal motility disorders. Our primary outcome was clinical success, and secondary outcomes were adverse events. Eight observational studies including 222 patients met inclusion criteria. Diagnoses included achalasia (158), EGJOO (48), post-reflux surgery dysphagia (8), and achalasia-like disorder (8). All studies used 30 mm maximum balloon dilation except one which used 25 mm. The clinical success rate was 68.7%. Follow-up duration ranged from 1 week to a mean of 5.7 months. Perforation or tear occurred in four patients. EsoFLIP is a new therapeutic option for the management of achalasia and EGJOO and appears to be effective and safe. Future comparative studies with other therapeutic modalities are needed to understand its role in the management of esophageal motility disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umair Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Wellspan York Hospital, York, PA, USA
| | - Michael Yodice
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Zohaib Ahmed
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Hafsa Anwar
- Department of Medicine, Capital Health Regional Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Wade M Lee-Smith
- Department of University Libraries, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kamal AN, Wang CHJ, Triadafilopoulos G, Diehl DL, DuCoin C, Dunst CM, Falk G, Iyer PG, Katzka DA, Konda VJA, Muthusamy R, Otaki F, Pleskow D, Rubenstein JH, Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Smith MS, Sujka J, Swanstrom LL, Tatum RP, Trindade AJ, Ujiki M, Wani S, Clarke JO. A Delphi Method for Development of a Barrett's Esophagus Question Prompt List as a Communication Tool for Optimal Patient-physician Communication. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 58:131-135. [PMID: 36753462 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND METHODS The question prompt list content was derived through a modified Delphi process consisting of 3 rounds. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts "What general questions should patients ask when given a new diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus" and "What questions do I not hear patients asking, but given my expertise, I believe they should be asking?" Questions were reviewed and categorized into themes. In round 2, experts rated questions on a 5-point Likert scale. In round 3, experts rerated questions modified or reduced after the previous rounds. Only questions rated as "essential" or "important" were included in Barrett's esophagus question prompt list (BE-QPL). To improve usability, questions were reduced to minimize redundancy and simplified to use language at an eighth-grade level (Fig. 1). RESULTS Twenty-one esophageal medical and surgical experts participated in both rounds (91% males; median age 52 years). The expert panel comprised of 33% esophagologists, 24% foregut surgeons, and 24% advanced endoscopists, with a median of 15 years in clinical practice. Most (81%), worked in an academic tertiary referral hospital. In this 3-round Delphi technique, 220 questions were proposed in round 1, 122 (55.5%) were accepted into the BE-QPL and reduced down to 76 questions (round 2), and 67 questions (round 3). These 67 questions reached a Flesch Reading Ease of 68.8, interpreted as easily understood by 13 to 15 years olds. CONCLUSIONS With multidisciplinary input, we have developed a physician-derived BE-QPL to optimize patient-physician communication. Future directions will seek patient feedback to distill the questions further to a smaller number and then assess their usability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afrin N Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City
| | - Chih-Hung Jason Wang
- Department of Pediatrics and Department of Health Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford
| | - George Triadafilopoulos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Danville
| | - Christopher DuCoin
- Department of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
| | - Christy M Dunst
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Oregon Clinic Center for Advanced Surgery
| | - Gary Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Vani J A Konda
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Raman Muthusamy
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fouad Otaki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Douglas Pleskow
- Division of Gastroenterology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MN
| | - Joel H Rubenstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Barrett's Esophagus Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, MS
| | - Michael S Smith
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai West and Mount Sinai Morningside Hospitals, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| | - Joseph Sujka
- Department of Surgery, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL
| | - Lee L Swanstrom
- Insitute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU-Strasbourg (Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire), Strasbourg, FR
| | - Roger P Tatum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Michael Ujiki
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - John O Clarke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Iqbal U, Li J, Diehl DL, Confer BD. "Two for one": histologic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori during EUS-guided liver biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:289-290. [PMID: 37423538 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Umair Iqbal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jianhong Li
- Anatomic Pathology, Clinical Pathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bradley D Confer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Persaud AB, Diehl DL. Training endosonographers in needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: Is there still a need? Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:965-967. [PMID: 37977673 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alana B Persaud
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schwiter R, Rocha H, Johns A, Savatt JM, Diehl DL, Kelly MA, Williams MS, Buchanan AH. Low adenoma burden in unselected patients with a pathogenic APC variant. Genet Med 2023; 25:100949. [PMID: 37542411 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genomic screening can improve clinical outcomes, but presentation of individuals with risk for polyposis identified via genomic screening is unknown. To inform assessment of clinical utility of genomic screening for polyposis risk, clinical presentation of individuals in an unselected health care system cohort with an APC pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant causative of familial adenomatous polyposis are described. METHODS Electronic health records of individuals with an APC P/LP variant identified via the MyCode program (MyCode APC+) were reviewed to assess adenoma burden and compare it among individuals with a clinical diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis and matched variant-negative controls. RESULTS The prevalence of APC P/LP variants in this health care cohort is estimated to be 1 in 2800. Twenty-four MyCode APC+ individuals were identified during the study period. Median age at result disclosure was 53 years. Rate of clinical polyposis was 8%. Two of six participants with a classic region variant and none of those with an attenuated region variant had polyposis. MyCode APC+ participants did not differ from controls in cumulative adenoma count. CONCLUSION APC P/LP variant prevalence estimate in the MyCode cohort is higher than prior published prevalence rates. Individuals with APC P/LP variants identified via genomic screening had a low adenoma burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather Rocha
- Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | - Alicia Johns
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | | | - David L Diehl
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Davison JM, Goldblum JR, Duits LC, Khoshiwal AM, Bergman JJ, Falk GW, Diehl DL, Khara HS, Smolko C, Arora M, Siegel JJ, Critchley-Thorne RJ, Thota PN. A Tissue Systems Pathology Test Outperforms the Standard-of-Care Variables in Predicting Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2023; 14:e00631. [PMID: 37622544 PMCID: PMC10684217 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Objective risk stratification is needed for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) to enable risk-aligned management to improve health outcomes. This study evaluated the predictive performance of a tissue systems pathology [TSP-9] test (TissueCypher) vs current clinicopathologic variables in a multicenter cohort of patients with BE. METHODS Data from 699 patients with BE from 5 published studies on the TSP-9 test were evaluated. Five hundred nine patients did not progress during surveillance, 40 were diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma (HGD/EAC) within 12 months, and 150 progressed to HGD/EAC after 12 months. Age, sex, segment length, hiatal hernia, original and expert pathology review diagnoses, and TSP-9 risk classes were collected. The predictive performance of clinicopathologic variables and the TSP-9 test was compared, and the TSP-9 test was evaluated in clinically relevant patient subsets. RESULTS The sensitivity of the TSP-9 test in detecting progressors was 62.3% compared with 28.3% for expert-confirmed low-grade dysplasia (LGD), while the original diagnosis abstracted from medical records did not provide any significant risk stratification. The TSP-9 test identified 57% of progressors with nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) ( P < 0.0001). Patients with NDBE who scored TSP-9 high risk progressed at a similar rate (3.2%/yr) to patients with expert-confirmed LGD (3.7%/yr). The TSP-9 test provided significant risk stratification in clinically low-risk patients (NDBE, female, short-segment BE) and clinically high-risk patients (IND/LGD, male, long-segment BE) ( P < 0.0001 for comparison of high-risk classes vs low-risk classes). DISCUSSION The TSP-9 test predicts risk of progression to HGD/EAC independently of current clinicopathologic variables in patients with BE. The test provides objective risk stratification results that may guide management decisions to improve health outcomes for patients with BE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon M. Davison
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Lucas C. Duits
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Gary W. Falk
- Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahmed Z, Ramai D, Merza N, Badal J, Iqbal U, Arif SF, Al-Hillan A, Varughese T, Lee-Smith W, Nawras A, Alastal Y, Khara HS, Confer BD, Diehl DL, Adler DG. Safety and Efficacy of Powered Non-Thermal Endoscopic Resection Device for Removal of Colonic Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology Res 2023; 16:254-261. [PMID: 37937229 PMCID: PMC10627355 DOI: 10.14740/gr1638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic mucosal resection is a frequently employed method for removing colonic polyps. Nonetheless, the recurrence of these polyps over a healed submucosal base can complicate the extraction of leftover lesions through standard procedures. EndoRotor®, a non-thermal device specifically designed for endoscopic mucosal resection, has recently been assessed for its utility in removing colonic polyps, non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus, and pancreatic necrosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the safety and efficacy of EndoRotor® in resecting scared or recurrence colonic polyps. Methods We conducted an exhaustive review of existing literature using databases such as Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until January 2023. Our aim was to find all studies that assessed the safety of non-thermal endoscopic resection devices in removing colonic polyps. The primary outcome we focused on was the rate of technical success. Secondary outcomes that we considered included the frequency of remaining lesions and instances of adverse events. To analyze these data, we used comprehensive meta-analysis software. Results Our analysis incorporated three studies comprising 54 patients who underwent resection of 60 lesions. The combined technical success rate was 93.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 77.7-98.6%, I2 = 25.5%). In patients who had another endoscopic examination, 20 were found to have a residual lesion. After the initial session, the combined rate of remaining lesions was 39.8% (95% CI: 15.3-70.8%, I2 = 74.5%). There were eight occurrences of intraoperative bleeding and four instances of bleeding post-procedure. The combined rate of intraoperative bleeding was 13.2% (95% CI: 6.7-24.3%, I2 = 0%), and post-procedure bleeding stood at 8.5% (95% CI: 3.4-19.8%, I2 = 0%). Only one major bleeding event was recorded, and no cases of perforation were reported. Conclusion Our research indicates that the EndoRotor® effectively removes scarred colonic polyps, though the rate of remaining lesions is significant, potentially necessitating several sessions for a thorough removal. There is a need for broader prospective studies, mainly randomized controlled trials, to further assess EndoRotor®'s efficiency and safety in eliminating colonic polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zohaib Ahmed
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nooraldin Merza
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Joyce Badal
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Umair Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | - Alsadiq Al-Hillan
- Gastroenterology Department, Corewell Health/Willam Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Tony Varughese
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Wade Lee-Smith
- University of Toledo Libraries, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Ali Nawras
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Yaseen Alastal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Harshit S. Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Bradley D. Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David L. Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Douglas G. Adler
- Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Porter Adventist Hospital, Centura Health, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Makar M, Iqbal U, Sinha A, Berger A, Khara HS, Confer BD, Johal AS, Khurana S, Diehl DL. Changing Trends in Liver Biopsy Practices: A Single-Center Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e46424. [PMID: 37927687 PMCID: PMC10621875 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction To assess the trends for liver biopsy (LB) indications, technique, and histopathologic diagnosis, we retrospectively evaluated liver biopsies in two one-year periods, separated by a decade. Methods A pathology database query was performed for all parenchymal LB in patients over 18 years (11/2017 to 10/2018) and compared to those performed over a one-year period, a decade ago. We identified 427 parenchymal liver biopsies in the recent group and 166 in the decade-old group. Results Elevated liver enzymes are the most common indication for LB. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common diagnosis compared to 10 years ago, when it was viral hepatitis. Routes of LB were significantly different between the two groups, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) (80.3% vs 0; p<0.0001), computed tomography-guided (0 vs 42.8%, p<0.0001), percutaneous by gastroenterologists (0% vs 29.5%, p<0.0001), and transjugular-LB (15.1% vs 17.6%, p<0.0001). The adequacy of the tissue for pathological diagnosis was similar, and there was no difference in adverse events. Conclusion At our institution, practice patterns have changed significantly for liver biopsy. There has been an increase in liver biopsy volume, and EUS guidance has become the most common approach for liver biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Makar
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, USA
| | - Umair Iqbal
- Internal Medicine, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Danville, USA
| | - Ayusa Sinha
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, USA
| | - Andrea Berger
- Biostatistics, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, USA
| | - Bradley D Confer
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, USA
| | - Amitpal S Johal
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Health System, Danville, USA
| | - Sandeep Khurana
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ramdeen SL, Ajayeoba OO, Gabrielsen JD, Diehl DL. Endoscopically guided sutured gastropexy: a novel treatment of gastric volvulus. VideoGIE 2023; 8:401-403. [PMID: 37849782 PMCID: PMC10577362 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Video 1An overview of the case, background information on gastric volvulus, 3-dimensional models of the different types of gastric volvuli, and novel endoscopic and surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjhai L Ramdeen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Olumide O Ajayeoba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Jon D Gabrielsen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Othman MO, Diehl DL, Khara HS, Jawaid S, Yang D, Draganov PV. Multicenter prospective evaluation of an overtube endoluminal interventional platform for colorectal polypectomy. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E519-E526. [PMID: 37206694 PMCID: PMC10191729 DOI: 10.1055/a-2057-4286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic removal of complex colorectal polyps (≥ 2 cm) can be technically challenging. A dual balloon endoluminal overtube platform (DBEP) was developed to facilitate colonoscopic polypectomy. The study purpose was to evaluate clinical outcomes with the DBEP for complex polypectomy. Patients and methods This was an observational, prospective, multicenter Institutional Review Board-approved study. Between January 2018 and December 2020, safety and performance data were collected intra-procedurally and at 1 month post-procedure in patients undergoing intervention with the DBEP at three US centers. The primary endpoint was device safety and technical success of the procedure. Secondary endpoints included navigation time, total procedure time, and user feedback assessment post-procedure. Results A total of 162 patients underwent colonoscopy with the DBEP. Of these, 144 (89 %) underwent 156 interventions successfully with DBEP (44.5 % endoscopic mucosal resection, 53.2 % hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)/ESD, 1.3 % other). In 13 patients (8 %), device challenges contributed to unsuccessful intervention. One mild device-related adverse event (AE) occurred. Procedural AE rate was 8.3 %. Median lesion size was 2.6 cm [range 0.5-12]. The investigators felt that navigating the device was easy/somewhat easy in 78.5 % of successful cases. Median total procedure time was 69 minutes [range, 19-213], median navigation time to lesion was 8 minutes [range, 1-80], And median polypectomy time was 33.5 minutes [range, 2-143]. Conclusions Endoscopic colon polyp resection with the DBEP was safe with a high technical success rate. The DBEP has the potential to provide enhanced scope stability and visualization, traction, and a conduit for scope exchange. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed O. Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center Houston, Texas, United States
| | - David L. Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology Geisinger Health System Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Harshit S. Khara
- Division of Gastroenterology Geisinger Health System Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Salman Jawaid
- Division of Gastroenterology Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology University Florida Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology University Florida Gainesville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ragheb JG, Simons-Linares CR, Pluskota C, Confer B, Butler R, Diehl DL, Khara HS, Johal AS, Walsh RM, Chahal P. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound for assessment of locoregional recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after surgical resection. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E401-E408. [PMID: 37102183 PMCID: PMC10125777 DOI: 10.1055/a-2046-4984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Up to 80 % of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma develop locoregional recurrence after primary resection. However, the detection of recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (RPDAC) after pancreatic surgery can be challenging because of difficulty distinguishing locoregional recurrence from normal postoperative or post-radiation changes. We sought to evaluate the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), in detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma recurrence after surgical resection and its impact on the clinical management of patients. Patients and methods This was a retrospective study of all pancreatic cancer patients who underwent EUS post-resection at two tertiary care centers between January 2004 and June 2019. Results Sixty-seven patients were identified. Of these, 57 (85 %) were diagnosed with RPDAC, resulting in change in clinical management of 46 (72 %) patients. EUS identified masses not seen on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography in seven (14 %). Conclusions EUS is useful in detecting RPDAC after pancreatic surgery and can lead to significant impact on clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan G. Ragheb
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, United States
| | - C. Roberto Simons-Linares
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Christopher Pluskota
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals, Elyria, Ohio, United States
| | - Bradley Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Robert Butler
- Department of Quantitative Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - David L. Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Harshit S. Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Amitpal S. Johal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - R. Matthew Walsh
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Prabhleen Chahal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Diehl DL, Mehta MJ, Khalid A, Shafqet MA, Khara HS, Confer B. Flexible endoscopic incisional therapy for Zenker's diverticulum (FEIT-Z) is an effective treatment for surgical failures or non-operative patients. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8863-8868. [PMID: 35578048 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09318-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) occurs mostly in the elderly, who often have significant comorbidities, and poor neck hyperextension, putting them at high risk for surgical management while also increasing the potential of technical failure. Flexible endoscopic incisional therapy for Zenker's diverticulum (FEIT-Z) offers a safe approach to this problem with high technical and clinical success rates. There are limited data on its use following a failed surgical approach or in patients unfit for a surgical approach. The aim of this study was to assess clinical and technical outcomes of FEIT-Z in patients who were non-operative candidates or refused or failed surgical management. METHODS Patients who underwent FEIT-Z from January 2015 to February 2019 at a tertiary referral center were included. Patient demographics, prior ZD surgical history, procedural data, dysphagia scores, clinical success, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Univariable analysis was performed to assess differences between pre- and post-FEIT-Z dysphagia scores. RESULTS 30 patients undergoing FEIT-Z were included. Seven had a prior failed ZD surgical approach, 6 refused surgical management, and 17 were deemed to be non-operative candidates based on medical comorbidities. Mean age was 78.4 (± 12.1) and 36.7% were male. Technical success of FEIT-Z was 96.7%. There was a significant improvement in dysphagia scores after FEIT-Z: 2.3 (± 0.64) vs. before, 0.4 (± 0.76) (p < 0.001). Long-term clinical success was achieved in 73.3% of patients. Adverse events were seen in 23.3% of patients; however, these were graded as mild in 85.7% of patients. One microperforation was managed with antibiotics. CONCLUSION FEIT-Z is a safe procedure with low adverse events and a high rate of technical and clinical success. FEIT-Z can be done in patients who fail previous surgical treatment, refuse a surgical approach, or are not surgical candidates due to medical comorbidity or other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 North Academy Ave., MC 21-11, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
| | - Minesh J Mehta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 North Academy Ave., MC 21-11, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Ammara Khalid
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 North Academy Ave., MC 21-11, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Muhammad A Shafqet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 North Academy Ave., MC 21-11, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 North Academy Ave., MC 21-11, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Bradley Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 North Academy Ave., MC 21-11, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shally L, Saeed K, Berglund D, Dudash M, Frank K, Obradovic VN, Petrick AT, Diehl DL, Gabrielsen JD, Parker DM. Clinical and financial outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic heller myotomy for treatment of achalasia. Surg Endosc 2022:10.1007/s00464-022-09652-6. [PMID: 36220985 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09652-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies analyzing short-term outcomes for per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) have shown excellent clinical response rates and shorter operative times compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Despite this, many payors have been slow to recognize POEM as a valid treatment option. Furthermore, comparative studies analyzing long-term outcomes are limited. This study compares perioperative and long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and reimbursement for POEM and LHM at a single institution. METHODS Adult patients who underwent POEM or LHM between 2014 and 2021 and had complete preoperative data with at least one complete follow up, were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, success rate, operative time, myotomy length, length of stay, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, anti-reflux medication use, cost and reimbursement were compared. RESULTS 58 patients met inclusion with 25 undergoing LHM and 33 undergoing POEM. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics. Treatment success (Eckardt ≤ 3) for POEM and LHM was achieved by 88% and 76% of patients, respectively (p = 0.302). POEM patients had a shorter median operative time (106 min. vs. 145 min., p = 0.003) and longer median myotomy length (11 cm vs. 8 cm, p < 0.001). All LHM patients had a length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 day vs. 51.5% for POEM patients (p < 0.001). Both groups showed improvements in dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation, Eckardt score, GERD HRQL, RSI, and anti-reflux medication use. The improvement in dysphagia score was greater in patients undergoing POEM (2.30 vs 1.12, p = 0.003). Median hospital reimbursement was dramatically less for POEM ($3,658 vs. $14,152, p = 0.002), despite median hospital costs being significantly lower compared to LHM ($2,420 vs. $3,132, p = 0.029). RESULTS POEM is associated with a shorter operative time and LOS, longer myotomy length, and greater resolution of dysphagia compared to LHM. POEM costs are significantly less than LHM but is poorly reimbursed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Shally
- Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, 525 Pine St, Scranton, PA, 18510, USA.
| | - Kashif Saeed
- Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Derek Berglund
- Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Mark Dudash
- Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Katie Frank
- Department of Population Health and Sciences, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Vladan N Obradovic
- Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Anthony T Petrick
- Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Jon D Gabrielsen
- Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - David M Parker
- Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tyberg A, Raijman I, Gaidhane M, Trindade AJ, Shahid H, Sarkar A, Samarasena J, Andalib I, Diehl DL, Pleskow DK, Woods KE, Gordon SR, Pannala R, Kedia P, Draganov PV, Tarnasky PR, Sejpal DV, Kumta NA, Parasher G, Adler DG, Patel K, Yang D, Siddiqui U, Kahaleh M, Joshi V. First interobserver agreement of optical coherence tomography in the bile duct: A multicenter collaborative study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1065-E1072. [PMID: 35979031 PMCID: PMC9377829 DOI: 10.1055/a-1779-5027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a new technology available for evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. It allows under-the-surface visualization and preliminary studies have confirmed standardized characteristics associated with malignancy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the first interobserver agreement in identifying previously agreed upon OCT criteria and diagnosing of malignant versus benign disease. Patients and methods Fourteen endoscopists were asked to review an atlas of reference clips and images of eight criteria derived from expert consensus A total of 35 de-identified video clips were then evaluated for presence of the eight criteria and for final diagnosis of malignant versus benign using the atlas as reference Intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis was done to evaluate interrater agreement. Results Clips of 23 malignant lesions and 12 benign lesions were scored. Excellent interobserver agreement was seen with dilated hypo-reflective structures (0.85) and layering effacement (0.89); hyper-glandular mucosa (0.76), intact layering (0.81), and onion-skin layering (0.77); fair agreement was seen with scalloping (0.58), and thickened epithelium (0.4); poor agreement was seen with hyper-reflective surface (0.36). The diagnostic ICC for both neoplastic (0.8) and non-neoplastic (0.8) was excellent interobserver agreement. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 51 %, ranging from 43 % to 60 %. Conclusions Biliary OCT is a promising new modality for evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Interobserver agreement ranged from fair to almost perfect on eight previously identified criteria. Interobserver agreement for malignancy diagnosis was substantial (0.8). Further studies are needed to validate this data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Tyberg
- Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| | - Isaac Raijman
- Baylor St Lukes Medical Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Monica Gaidhane
- Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| | - Arvind J. Trindade
- Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
| | - Haroon Shahid
- Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| | - Avik Sarkar
- Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| | - Jason Samarasena
- University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
| | - Iman Andalib
- Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, New York, United States
| | - David L. Diehl
- Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Douglas K. Pleskow
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Kevin E. Woods
- Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Lumberton, North Carolina, United States
| | - Stuart R. Gordon
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - Prashant Kedia
- Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Peter V. Draganov
- University of Florida, Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | | | | | | | - Gulshan Parasher
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
| | - Douglas G. Adler
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Kalpesh Patel
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Dennis Yang
- University of Florida, Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Uzma Siddiqui
- University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| | - Viren Joshi
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Iqbal U, Diehl DL. Do surgery residents and gastroenterology fellows learn colonoscopy at different rates? Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:308-309. [PMID: 35715238 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Umair Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
- David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kichler AJ, Diehl DL. Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading rectal tumors using a multiband ligation endoscopic mucosal resection technique. VideoGIE 2021; 7:53-57. [PMID: 35146224 PMCID: PMC8819476 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Kichler
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shinn B, Boortalary T, Raijman I, Nieto J, Khara HS, Kumar SV, Confer B, Diehl DL, El Halabi M, Ichkhanian Y, Runge T, Kumbhari V, Khashab M, Tyberg A, Shahid H, Sarkar A, Gaidhane M, Bareket R, Kahaleh M, Piraka C, Zuchelli T, Law R, Sondhi A, Kedia P, Robbins J, Calogero C, Bakhit M, Chiang A, Schlachterman A, Kowalski T, Loren D. Maximizing success in single-session EUS-directed transgastric ERCP: a retrospective cohort study to identify predictive factors of stent migration. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:727-732. [PMID: 33957105 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (the EDGE procedure) is a simplified method of performing ERCP in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. The EDGE procedure involves placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) into the excluded stomach to serve as a conduit for passage of the duodenoscope for pancreatobiliary intervention. Originally a multistep process, urgent indications for ERCP have led to the development of single-session EDGE (SS-EDGE) with LAMS placement and ERCP performed in the same session. The goal of this study was to identify predictive factors of intraprocedural LAMS migration in SS-EDGE. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective review that included 9 tertiary medical centers across the United States. Data were collected and analyzed from 128 SS-EDGE procedures. The primary outcome was intraprocedural LAMS migration. Secondary outcomes were other procedural adverse events such as bleeding and perforation. RESULTS Eleven LAMS migrations were observed in 128 procedures (8.6%). Univariate analysis of clinically relevant variables was performed, as was a binary logistic regression analysis of stent diameter and stent dilation. This revealed that use of a smaller (15 mm) diameter LAMS was an independent predictor of intraprocedural stent migration (odds ratio, 5.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-22.24; P = .021). Adverse events included 3 patients who required surgery and 2 who experienced intraprocedural bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Use of a larger-diameter LAMS is a predictive factor for a nonmigrated stent and improved procedural success in SS-EDGE. Although larger patient cohorts are needed to adequately assess these findings, performance of LAMS dilation and fixation may also decrease risk of intraprocedural LAMS migration and improve procedural success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna Shinn
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tina Boortalary
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Jose Nieto
- Borland Groover Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - S Vikas Kumar
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - David L Diehl
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maan El Halabi
- Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Thomas Runge
- Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mouen Khashab
- Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amy Tyberg
- Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Haroon Shahid
- Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Avik Sarkar
- Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Monica Gaidhane
- Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Romy Bareket
- Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Cyrus Piraka
- Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Ryan Law
- University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Arjun Sondhi
- University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Justin Robbins
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cristina Calogero
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mena Bakhit
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Austin Chiang
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Thomas Kowalski
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Loren
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ching-Companioni RA, Johal AS, Confer BD, Forster E, Khara HS, Diehl DL. Single-pass 1-needle actuation versus single-pass 3-needle actuation technique for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a randomized prospective trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:551-558. [PMID: 33771557 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Several reports have validated EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling (EUS-LB) as safe and effective. Nineteen-gauge EUS aspiration (FNA) or core (fine-needle biopsy [FNB]) needles are used, but different needle techniques can yield variable outcomes. Some data show that 1 pass (single liver puncture) with 1 actuation (1 to-and-fro needle movement) may be enough to obtain a satisfactory specimen. However, there has not been a head-to-head comparison of single versus multiple needle actuations for EUS-LB. METHODS This was a prospective randomized trial of EUS-LB in 40 patients comparing tissue yields and adequacy using 1 pass, 1 actuation (1:1) versus 1 pass 3 actuations (1:3) of an FNB needle. The primary outcome was number of complete portal triads (CPTs). Secondary outcomes were length of the longest piece, aggregate specimen length, number of cores >9 mm, and adverse events (AEs). Computerized randomization determined selection (either 1:1 or 1:3 with fanning technique). Sample lengths were measured before pathologic processing. RESULTS Both groups had similar demographics and indications for EUS-LB. All biopsy samples were adequate for pathologic interpretation. Compared with 1:1, biopsy sampling with 1:3 yielded more CPTs (mean [standard deviation], 17.25 [6.2] vs 24.5 [9.88]; P < .008) and longer aggregate specimen length (6.89 cm [1.86] vs 12.85 cm [4.02]; P < .001). AEs were not statistically different between the techniques. No severe AEs were noted. CONCLUSIONS EUS-LB using the 1:3 technique produced longer liver cores with more CPTs than the 1:1 technique with an equivalent safety profile. Two needle passes are more likely to provide tissue adequacy according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000040101.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael A Ching-Companioni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Diseases Center, Panama City, Florida, USA; Department of Medicine, Gulf Coast Regional Medical Center, Panama City, Florida, USA
| | - Amitpal S Johal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bradley D Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Erin Forster
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Confer BD, Iqbal U, Diehl DL. Comparison of pancreatic cystic fluid glucose and carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of pancreatic mucinous cysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:201-202. [PMID: 34148575 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley D Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Umair Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Runge TM, Chiang AL, Kowalski TE, James TW, Baron TH, Nieto J, Diehl DL, Krafft MR, Nasr JY, Kumar V, Khara HS, Irani S, Patel A, Law RJ, Loren DE, Schlachterman A, Hsueh W, Confer BD, Stevens TK, Chahal P, Al-Haddad MA, Mir FF, Pleskow DK, Huggett MT, Paranandi B, Trindade AJ, Brewer-Gutierrez OI, Ichkhanian Y, Dbouk M, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA. Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE): a retrospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2021; 53:611-618. [PMID: 32882722 DOI: 10.1055/a-1254-3942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP; EDGE) is an alternative to enteroscopy- and laparoscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy. Although short-term results are promising, the long-term outcomes are not known. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the rates of long-term adverse events after EDGE, with a focus on rates of persistent gastrogastric or jejunogastric fistula; (2) to identify predictors of persistent fistula; (3) to assess the outcomes of endoscopic closure when persistent fistula is encountered. METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective study involving 13 centers between February 2015 and March 2019. Adverse events were defined according to the ASGE lexicon. Persistent fistula was defined as an upper gastrointestinal series or esophagogastroduodenoscopy showing evidence of fistula. RESULTS 178 patients (mean age 58 years, 79 % women) underwent EDGE. Technical success was achieved in 98 % of cases (175/178), with a mean procedure time of 92 minutes. Periprocedural adverse events occurred in 28 patients (15.7 %; mild 10.1 %, moderate 3.4 %, severe 2.2 %). The four severe adverse events were managed laparoscopically. Persistent fistula was diagnosed in 10 % of those sent for objective testing (9/90). Following identification of a fistula, 5 /9 patients underwent endoscopic closure procedures, which were successful in all cases. CONCLUSIONS The EDGE procedure is associated with high clinical success rates and an acceptable risk profile. Persistent fistulas after lumen-apposing stent removal are uncommon, but objective testing is recommended to identify their presence. When persistent fistulas are identified, endoscopic treatment is warranted, and should be successful in closing the fistula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Runge
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Austin L Chiang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas E Kowalski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Theodore W James
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jose Nieto
- Borland Groover Clinic, Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy Center, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew R Krafft
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown West Virginia, USA
| | - John Y Nasr
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown West Virginia, USA
| | - Vikas Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shayan Irani
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Arpan Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ryan J Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - David E Loren
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alex Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William Hsueh
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown West Virginia, USA
| | - Bradley D Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tyler K Stevens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Prabhleen Chahal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mohammad A Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Fahad Faisal Mir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconness Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas K Pleskow
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconness Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew T Huggett
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Bharat Paranandi
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Olaya I Brewer-Gutierrez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yervant Ichkhanian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mohamad Dbouk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Harshit S Khara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Jon D Gabrielsen
- Division of Foregut and Bariatric Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - David L Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Ryan D Horsley
- Division of Foregut and Bariatric Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Diehl DL. Artificial intelligence applications in EUS: the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:1131-1132. [PMID: 33685626 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mendoza Ladd A, Diehl DL. Artificial intelligence for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The future is promising. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:1283-1295. [PMID: 33833482 PMCID: PMC8015296 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i13.1283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a worldwide public health concern. Despite extensive research efforts toward improving diagnosis and treatment, the 5-year survival rate at best is approximately 15%. This dismal figure can be attributed to a variety of factors including lack of adequate screening methods, late symptom onset, and treatment resistance. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains a grim diagnosis with a high mortality rate and a significant psy-chological burden for patients and their families. In recent years artificial intelligence (AI) has permeated the medical field at an accelerated pace, bringing potential new tools that carry the promise of improving diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases. In this review we will summarize the landscape of AI in diagnosis and treatment of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Mendoza Ladd
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX 79905, United States
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mittal C, Diehl DL, Draganov PV, Jamil LH, Khalid A, Khara HS, Khullar V, Law R, Lo SK, Mathew A, Mirakhor E, Sedarat A, Sharma N, Sharzehi S, Tavakkoli A, Thaker A, Thosani N, Yang D, Zelt C, Wagh MS. Practice patterns, techniques, and outcomes of flexible endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a retrospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2021; 53:346-353. [PMID: 32663877 DOI: 10.1055/a-1219-4516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Flexible endoscopic myotomy has been increasingly performed for Zenker's diverticulum using various endoscopic techniques and devices. The main aims of this study were to assess practice patterns and compare outcomes of endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum. METHODS Procedures performed at 12 tertiary endoscopy centers from 1/2012 to 12/2018 were reviewed. Patients (≥ 18 years) with Zenker's diverticulum who had dysphagia and/or regurgitation and underwent endoscopic myotomy were included. Outcomes assessed included technical success, clinical success, and adverse events. RESULTS 161 patients were included. Traditional endoscopic septotomy was performed most frequently (137/161, 85.1 %) followed by submucosal dissection of the septum and myotomy (24/161, 14.9 %). The hook knife (43/161, 26.7 %) and needle-knife (33/161, 20.5 %) were used most frequently. Overall, technical and clinical success rates were 98.1 % (158/161) and 78.1 % (96/123), respectively. Adverse events were noted in 13 patients (8.1 %). There was no significant difference in technical and clinical success between traditional septotomy and submucosal dissection groups (97.1 % vs. 95.8 %, P = 0.56 and 75.2 % vs. 90.9 %, P = 0.16, respectively). Clinical success was higher with the hook knife (96.7 %) compared with the needle-knife (76.6 %) and insulated tip knife (47.1 %). Outcomes were similar between centers performing > 20, 11 - 20, and ≤ 10 procedures. CONCLUSIONS Flexible endoscopic myotomy is an effective therapy for Zenker's diverticulum, with a low rate of adverse events. There was no significant difference in outcomes between traditional septotomy and a submucosal dissection approach, or with centers with higher volume, though clinical success was higher with the hook knife.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetan Mittal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Laith H Jamil
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, William Beaumont hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
| | - Ammara Khalid
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Vikas Khullar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Simon K Lo
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Abraham Mathew
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Ebrahim Mirakhor
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Alireza Sedarat
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Neil Sharma
- Parkview Health System and Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
| | - Setareh Sharzehi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Anna Tavakkoli
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Adarsh Thaker
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Christina Zelt
- Parkview Health System and Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
| | - Mihir S Wagh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Diehl DL, Khara HS, Akhtar N, Critchley-Thorne RJ. TissueCypher Barrett's esophagus assay impacts clinical decisions in the management of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E348-E355. [PMID: 33655033 PMCID: PMC7892269 DOI: 10.1055/a-1326-1533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The TissueCypher Barrett's Esophagus Assay is a novel tissue biomarker test, and has been validated to predict progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of TissueCypher on clinical decision-making in the management of BE. Patients and methods TissueCypher was ordered for 60 patients with non-dysplastic (ND, n = 18) BE, indefinite for dysplasia (IND, n = 25), and low-grade dysplasia (LGD, n = 17). TissueCypher reports a risk class (low, intermediate or high) for progression to HGD or EAC within 5 years. The impact of the test results on BE management decisions was assessed. Results Fifty-two of 60 patients were male, mean age 65.2 ± 11.8, and 43 of 60 had long segment BE. TissueCypher results impacted 55.0 % of management decisions. In 21.7 % of patients, the test upstaged the management approach, resulting in endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) or shorter surveillance interval. The test downstaged the management approach in 33.4 % of patients, leading to surveillance rather than EET. In the subset of patients whose management plan was changed, upstaging was associated with a high-risk TissueCypher result, and downstaging was associated with a low-risk result ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions TissueCypher was used as an adjunct to support a surveillance-only approach in 33.4 % of patients. Upstaging occurred in 21.7 % of patients, leading to therapeutic intervention or increased surveillance. These results indicate that the TissueCypher test may enable physicians to target EET for TissueCypher high-risk BE patients, while reducing unnecessary procedures in TissueCypher low-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L. Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Harshit S. Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Nasir Akhtar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yang D, Perbtani YB, Wang Y, Rumman A, Wang AY, Kumta NA, DiMaio CJ, Antony A, Trindade AJ, Rolston VS, D'Souza LS, Corral Hurtado JE, Gomez V, Pohl H, Draganov PV, Beyth RJ, Lee JH, Cheesman A, Uppal DS, Sejpal DV, Bucobo JC, Wallace MB, Ngamruengphong S, Ajayeoba O, Khara HS, Diehl DL, Jawaid S, Forsmark CE. Evaluating learning curves and competence in colorectal EMR among advanced endoscopy fellows: a pilot multicenter prospective trial using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:682-690.e4. [PMID: 32961243 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data on colorectal EMR (C-EMR) training are lacking. We aimed to evaluate C-EMR training among advanced endoscopy fellows (AEFs) by using a standardized assessment tool (STAT). METHODS This multicenter prospective study used a STAT to grade AEF training in C-EMR during their 12-month fellowship. Cumulative sum analysis was used to establish learning curves and competence for cognitive and technical components of C-EMR and overall performance. Sensitivity analysis was performed by varying failure rates. AEFs completed a self-assessment questionnaire to assess their comfort level with performing C-EMR at the completion of their fellowship. RESULTS Six AEFs (189 C-EMRs; mean per AEF, 31.5 ± 18.5) were included. Mean polyp size was 24.3 ± 12.6 mm, and mean procedure time was 22.6 ± 16.1 minutes. Learning curve analyses revealed that less than 50% of AEFs achieved competence for key cognitive and technical C-EMR endpoints. All 6 AEFs reported feeling comfortable performing C-EMR independently at the end of their training, although only 2 of them achieved competence in their overall performance. The minimum threshold to achieve competence in these 2 AEFs was 25 C-EMRs. CONCLUSIONS A relatively low proportion of AEFs achieved competence on key cognitive and technical aspects of C-EMR during their 12-month fellowship. The relatively low number of C-EMRs performed by AEFs may be insufficient to achieve competence, in spite of their self-reported readiness for independent practice. These pilot data serve as an initial framework for competence threshold, and suggest the need for validated tools for formal C-EMR training assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yu Wang
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Amir Rumman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher J DiMaio
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Antony
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Vineet S Rolston
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Lionel S D'Souza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | | | - Victoria Gomez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rebecca J Beyth
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Antonio Cheesman
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dushant S Uppal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Divyesh V Sejpal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Juan C Bucobo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Olumide Ajayeoba
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Salmaan Jawaid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher E Forsmark
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Dbouk M, Brewer Guiterrez O, Trindade AJ, Diehl DL, Kwon RS, Thosani NC, Khara HS, Benias PC, Kerdsirichairat T, Canto MI. Initial multicenter experience with nitrous oxide cryoballoon for treatment of flat duodenal adenomas (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:240-246. [PMID: 32511958 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EMR is the preferred endoscopic therapy for duodenal adenomas (DAs) but is associated with an overall adverse event rate of 26%. Cryotherapy using a Cryoballoon Focal Ablation System (CbFAS) can safely and effectively eradicate esophageal intestinal metaplasia. We report our first experience with cryoballoon ablation for treatment of flat DAs. METHODS This was an American, multicenter, retrospective study involving 5 centers. DAs (Paris 0-IIa and 0-IIb) were treated with nitrous oxide for 5 to 12 seconds using CbFAS. Follow-up EGD was performed at 3 to 12 months. RESULTS Seventeen DAs (mean size, 22.7 ± 14.3 mm; 12 tubular, 5 tubulovillous) from 13 patients (mean age, 66.5 ± 9.99 years; 61.5% males) were included in the study. Thirteen of 17 DAs (76.5%) had failed previous treatment, and 4 of 17 (23.5%) were treatment naÏve. All procedures were technically successful and achieved a >50% decrease in size after cryoballoon ablation There was no increase in size or progression of disease for any lesions. Overall, treatment was completed in 15 of 17 patients, and recurrence-free survival was achieved in 12 of 17 (71%) after a median follow-up of 15.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6.8-19.4). The median cryoablation time per polyp was 4 minutes (IQR, 1-7.5 minutes), and the median total procedure time was 25 minutes (IQR, 22-30.5 minutes). There were no intra- or postprocedural adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Nitrous oxide cryoballoon ablation of nonpolypoid DAs is feasible, with promising safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Dbouk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Olaya Brewer Guiterrez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nirav C Thosani
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Petros C Benias
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Tossapol Kerdsirichairat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Parvataneni S, Khara HS, Diehl DL. Bouveret syndrome masquerading as a gastric mass-unmasked with endoscopic luminal laser lithotripsy: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:5701-5706. [PMID: 33344563 PMCID: PMC7716301 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bouveret syndrome, also known as gallstone ileus, is a rare form of gastric outlet obstruction accounting for 1%-3% of cases. This condition is most often reported in females. The diagnosis can be challenging and is often missed due to atypical presentations, which occasionally mimic gastric outlet obstruction symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite and hematemesis. The symptoms vary with stone size. Larger stones are managed with a surgical approach, but this carries increased morbidity and mortality. Over the past decade, the endoscopic approach has emerged as an alternative mode of treatment, but it is generally unsuccessful in the management of larger-sized stones. A literature review revealed cases of successful endoscopic treatment requiring multiple sessions for stone sizes measuring up to about 4.5 cm. Here we present a unique case of an elderly patient with Bouveret syndrome with a 5 cm stone mimicking a gastric mass and causing gastric outlet obstruction, who was successfully managed in a single session using a complete endoscopic approach with laser lithotripsy.
CASE SUMMARY An 85-year-old female patient presented with 1-month history of intermittent abdominal pain, vomiting, decreased appetite and weight loss. An abdominal computed tomography showed a 4.5 cm × 4.7 cm partially calcified mass at the gastric pylorus causing gastric outlet obstruction. Endoscopy showed an ulcerated fistulous opening and a large 5 cm impacted gallstone in the duodenal bulb. Endoscopic nets and baskets were used in an attempt to remove the stone, but this approach was unsuccessful. Given her advanced age, poor physical condition and underlying comorbidities, she was deemed to be high-risk for surgery. Thus, a minimally invasive approach using endoscopic laser lithotripsy was attempted and successfully treated the stone. Post-procedure, the patient experienced complete resolution of her symptoms with no complications and was able to tolerate her diet. She was subsequently discharged home at 48 h, with an uneventful recovery.
CONCLUSION In our paper we describe Bouveret syndrome and highlight its management with a novel endoscopic approach of laser lithotripsy in addition to various other endoscopic approaches available to date and its success rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swetha Parvataneni
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geisinger Lewistown Hospital, Lewistown, PA 17044, United States
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Advanced Endoscopy, Geisinger Health system, Danville, PA 17822, United States
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hajifathalian K, Ichkhanian Y, Dawod Q, Meining A, Schmidt A, Glaser N, Vosoughi K, Diehl DL, Grimm IS, James T, Templeton AW, Samarasena JB, Chehade NEH, Lee JG, Chang KJ, Mizrahi M, Barawi M, Irani S, Friedland S, Korc P, Aadam AA, Al-Haddad M, Kowalski TE, Smallfield G, Ginsberg GG, Fukami N, Lajin M, Kumta NA, Tang SJ, Naga Y, Amateau SK, Kasmin F, Goetz M, Seewald S, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S, Mahdev S, Mukewar S, Sampath K, Carr-Locke DL, Khashab MA, Sharaiha RZ. Full-thickness resection device (FTRD) for treatment of upper gastrointestinal tract lesions: the first international experience. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1291-E1301. [PMID: 33015330 PMCID: PMC7508667 DOI: 10.1055/a-1216-1439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) provides a novel treatment option for lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection techniques. There are limited data on the efficacy and safety of FTRD for resection of upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) lesions. Patients and methods This was an international multicenter retrospective study, including patients who had an endoscopic resection of an upper GIT lesion using the FTRD between January 2017 and February 2019. Results Fifty-six patients from 13 centers were included. The most common lesions were mesenchymal neoplasms (n = 23, 41 %), adenomas (n = 7, 13 %), and hamartomas (n = 6, 11 %). Eighty-four percent of lesions were located in the stomach, and 14 % in the duodenum. The average size of lesions was 14 mm (range 3 to 33 mm). Deployment of the FTRD was technically successful in 93 % of patients (n = 52) leading to complete and partial resection in 43 (77 %) and 9 (16 %) patients, respectively. Overall, the FTRD led to negative histological margins (R0 resection) in 38 (68 %) of patients. A total of 12 (21 %) mild or moderate adverse events (AEs) were reported. Follow-up endoscopy was performed in 31 patients (55 %), on average 88 days after the procedure (IQR 68-138 days). Of these, 30 patients (97 %) did not have any residual or recurrent lesion on endoscopic examination and biopsy, with residual adenoma in one patient (3 %). Conclusions Our results suggest a high technical success rate and an acceptable histologically complete resection rate, with a low risk of AEs and early recurrence for FTRD resection of upper GIT lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Hajifathalian
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Yervant Ichkhanian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Qais Dawod
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Alexander Meining
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nicholas Glaser
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kia Vosoughi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - David L. Diehl
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Theodore James
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Adam W. Templeton
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Jason B. Samarasena
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Nabil El Hage Chehade
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - John G. Lee
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Kenneth J. Chang
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Meir Mizrahi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Advanced Endoscopy, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States
| | - Mohammed Barawi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ascension St. John hospital, Detroit, Michigan, United States
| | - Shayan Irani
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United Stats
| | - Shai Friedland
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Paul Korc
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, California, United States
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Mohammad Al-Haddad
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | | | - George Smallfield
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia United States
| | - Gregory G. Ginsberg
- Gastroenterology Division, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Norio Fukami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
| | - Michael Lajin
- SHARP Grossmont Hospital, La Mesa, California, United States
| | - Nikhil A. Kumta
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
| | - Shou-jiang Tang
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States
| | - Yehia Naga
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States
| | - Stuart K. Amateau
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Franklin Kasmin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Martin Goetz
- Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Seewald
- Centre of Gastroenterology, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | | | - Srihari Mahdev
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Saurabh Mukewar
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Kartik Sampath
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - David L. Carr-Locke
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Reem Z. Sharaiha
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ajayeoba OO, Diehl DL. Pneumatic dilation for achalasia: new techniques to improve an old procedure. VideoGIE 2020; 5:449-450. [PMID: 33102993 PMCID: PMC7570200 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
38
|
Lennon AM, Buchanan AH, Kinde I, Warren A, Honushefsky A, Cohain AT, Ledbetter DH, Sanfilippo F, Sheridan K, Rosica D, Adonizio CS, Hwang HJ, Lahouel K, Cohen JD, Douville C, Patel AA, Hagmann LN, Rolston DD, Malani N, Zhou S, Bettegowda C, Diehl DL, Urban B, Still CD, Kann L, Woods JI, Salvati ZM, Vadakara J, Leeming R, Bhattacharya P, Walter C, Parker A, Lengauer C, Klein A, Tomasetti C, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N. Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention. Science 2020; 369:eabb9601. [PMID: 32345712 PMCID: PMC7509949 DOI: 10.1126/science.abb9601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 296] [Impact Index Per Article: 74.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cancer treatments are often more successful when the disease is detected early. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of multicancer blood testing coupled with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging to detect cancer in a prospective, interventional study of 10,006 women not previously known to have cancer. Positive blood tests were independently confirmed by a diagnostic PET-CT, which also localized the cancer. Twenty-six cancers were detected by blood testing. Of these, 15 underwent PET-CT imaging and nine (60%) were surgically excised. Twenty-four additional cancers were detected by standard-of-care screening and 46 by neither approach. One percent of participants underwent PET-CT imaging based on false-positive blood tests, and 0.22% underwent a futile invasive diagnostic procedure. These data demonstrate that multicancer blood testing combined with PET-CT can be safely incorporated into routine clinical care, in some cases leading to surgery with intent to cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | | | - Isaac Kinde
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Andrew Warren
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Third Rock Ventures, LLC, 29 Newbury Street Boston, MA 02116, USA
| | | | - Ariella T Cohain
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | - Fred Sanfilippo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | | | - Christian S Adonizio
- Geisinger, 100 N. Academy Avenue Danville, PA 17822, USA
- Geisinger Cancer Institute, 100 N. Academy Avenue Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Hee Jung Hwang
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Kamel Lahouel
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Joshua D Cohen
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Christopher Douville
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Aalpen A Patel
- Geisinger, 100 N. Academy Avenue Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Leonardo N Hagmann
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | - Nirav Malani
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Shibin Zhou
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Geisinger, 100 N. Academy Avenue Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Bobbi Urban
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | - Lisa Kann
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Julie I Woods
- Geisinger, 100 N. Academy Avenue Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Carroll Walter
- Geisinger, 100 N. Academy Avenue Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Alex Parker
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Christoph Lengauer
- Thrive Earlier Detection Corp., 38 Sidney Street Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Third Rock Ventures, LLC, 29 Newbury Street Boston, MA 02116, USA
| | - Alison Klein
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Cristian Tomasetti
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- The Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mok SRS, Diehl DL, Confer BD, Johal AS, Khara HS. The 22-gauge core needle is not optimal for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Endoscopy 2020; 52:157. [PMID: 31991474 DOI: 10.1055/a-1031-9504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shaffer R S Mok
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - David L Diehl
- Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | | | - Amitpal S Johal
- Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Diehl DL, Mehta M, Shafqet MA, Confer B, Khan Y, Khara HS, Johal AS. Splenic biopsy as an unintended consequence of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a cautionary tale. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:195-196. [PMID: 31442394 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Muhammad A Shafqet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bradley Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yakub Khan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amit S Johal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Iqbal U, Khara HS, Hu Y, Kumar V, Tufail K, Confer B, Diehl DL. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9:16-23. [PMID: 31898587 PMCID: PMC7038736 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_70_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is characterized by epigastric pain and postprandial vomiting secondary to mechanical obstruction. Management of GOO is usually focused on alleviating the symptoms of obstruction and can be achieved by surgical gastrojejunostomy or enteral stenting. Recent studies have shown success with EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) in the management of GOO but data is limited. We, therefore, conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-GE in the management of GOO. A comprehensive literature review was conducted by searching the Embase and PubMed databases from inception to January 2019 to identify all studies that evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-GE in GOO. Our primary outcome was to evaluate technical success and clinical success. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the need for reintervention and adverse events of the procedure. Twelve studies including 285 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success was achieved in 266 patients with a pooled technical success of 92% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88%-95%). Clinical success was achieved in 90% of the patients (95% CI: 85%-94%). Recurrence of symptoms or unplanned reintervention was needed in 9% of the patients (95% CI: 6%-13%) and adverse events were reported in 12% of the patients (95% CI: 8%-16%). The heterogeneity tests among studies were nonsignificant with I2 = 0. EUS-GE is a safe and efficacious treatment modality for the management of benign and malignant GOO. Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate its utility in GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umair Iqbal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Yirui Hu
- Geisinger Medical Center, Biomedical and Translational Informatics Institute, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Vikas Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Kashif Tufail
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Bradley Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yang D, Aihara H, Perbtani YB, Wang AY, Aadam AA, Tomizawa Y, Hwang JH, Zou B, Natov NS, Siegel A, Khoshknab MP, Khashab MA, Ngamruengphong S, Khara HS, Diehl DL, Maniere T, Andrawes S, Benias P, Kumta NA, Ramay F, Kim RE, Samarasena J, Chang K, Hashimoto R, Tharian B, Inamdar S, Lan G, Sethi A, Nosler MJ, Tabash A, Othman MO, Draganov PV. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasia: a multicenter North American experience. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E1714-E1722. [PMID: 31803823 PMCID: PMC6887644 DOI: 10.1055/a-1010-5663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Rectal lesions traditionally represent the first lesions approached during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in the West. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of rectal ESD in North America. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective analysis of rectal ESD between January 2010 and September 2018 in 15 centers. End points included: rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse events, comparison of pre- and post-ESD histology, and factors associated with failed resection. Results In total, 171 patients (median age 63 years; 56 % men) underwent rectal ESD (median size 43 mm). En bloc resection was achieved in 141 cases (82.5 %; 95 %CI 76.8-88.2), including 24 of 27 (88.9 %) with prior failed endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). R0 resection rate was 74.9 % (95 %CI 68.4-81.4). Post-ESD bleeding and perforation occurred in 4 (2.3 %) and 7 (4.1 %), respectively. Covert submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) was identified in 8.6 % of post-ESD specimens. There was one case (1/120; 0.8 %) of recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 weeks; IQR: 19-76 weeks). Older age and higher body mass index (BMI) were predictors of failed R0 resection, whereas submucosal fibrosis was associated with a higher likelihood of both failed en bloc and R0 resection. Conclusion Rectal ESD in North America is safe and is associated with high en bloc and R0 resection rates. The presence of submucosal fibrosis was the main predictor of failed en bloc and R0 resection. ESD can be considered for select rectal lesions, and serves not only to establish a definitive tissue diagnosis but also to provide curative resection for lesions with covert advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA,Corresponding author Dennis Yang, MD 1329 SW 16th StreetRoom #5252GainesvilleFL 32608USA+1-352-627-9002
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Y. Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yutaka Tomizawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Baiming Zou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Nikola S. Natov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Amanda Siegel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Harshit S. Khara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David L. Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Thibaut Maniere
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrook, QC, Canada
| | - Sherif Andrawes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Petros Benias
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Nikhil A. Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fariha Ramay
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Raymond E. Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jason Samarasena
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Rintaro Hashimoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Tharian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Gloria Lan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Abdalaziz Tabash
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed O. Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Background and Aims Advanced adenomas and scarred lesions pose difficulties for the endoscopist because of the need for complete resection and accurate pathologic staging, which cannot be afforded by standard resection techniques. Endoscopic full-thickness resection, first described in Europe for treatment of early adenocarcinoma or scarred lesions in the colon, allows potentially curative en bloc resection in patients who may be at a high risk for surgery. We describe our endoscopic approach and histologic outcomes with use of a commercially available endoscopic full-thickness resection device (FTRD) (Ovesco Endoscopy, Tubingen, Germany). Methods We report our experience using the FTRD for advanced polyps in patients referred to our tertiary care center. Three patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing FTRD from December 2018 to February 2019. Demographic, endoscopic, and histologic data were collected. Results All patients underwent successful full-thickness resection of the adenocarcinoma, and histopathologic examination showed negative lateral and deep margins. No immediate or delayed adverse events occurred during an average 2-month follow-up period. Conclusions Full-thickness resection with an over-the-scope fitted FTRD is safe and effective in the management of advanced colonic neoplastic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad A Shafqet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carla R Caruso
- Department of Pathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Maeng D, Wall B, Hassen D, Diehl DL. Upstream and downstream revenue of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound determined with an episode-of-care approach. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E1316-E1321. [PMID: 31673600 PMCID: PMC6805194 DOI: 10.1055/a-0990-9458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has clinical advantages that can lead to improved patient outcome. This study seeks to characterize and quantify the upstream and downstream healthcare utilizations and revenues. Patients and methods A retrospective claims data analysis of upper gastrointestinal EUS procedures was conducted at a large health system. Types of care and total revenues associated with each episode of care were characterized by descriptive statistics. Comparisons were made between patients who had Medicare Advantage and commercial plans as well as those with and without cancer diagnoses during the downstream period. Results A total of 436 cases were identified. The most frequent downstream healthcare utilizations consisted of radiology (31 %), pathology services (28 %), and high-revenue services including chemotherapy and inpatient admissions. The most common upstream utilizations included radiology (18 %) and lab services (22 %). Average total downstream revenue was $ 34 231 (95 %CI: $ 28 561 - $ 39 901) per case, and average total upstream revenue was $4373 (95 %CI: $3227 - $ 5519). Average total revenue per case did not differ significantly between Medicare Advantage and commercial plan members. However, patients who were diagnosed with cancer at or immediately following EUS (20 %) were associated with significantly higher total revenue compared to those without cancer diagnosis ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions This episode-of-care approach to quantifying the revenue impact of upper gastrointestinal EUS to the providers suggests there are substantial downstream as well as upstream revenues associated with upper gastrointestinal EUS procedures, driven by patients who are diagnosed with cancer by the EUS procedures and subsequently require oncologic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Maeng
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Beth Wall
- Olympus Corporation of the Americas, Center Valley, PA, USA
| | - Dina Hassen
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA,Corresponding author Dina Hassen, MPP 100 N. Academy AveDanvillePA 17822USA+1-570-214-9451
| | - David L. Diehl
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ching-Companioni RA, Diehl DL, Johal AS, Confer BD, Khara HS. 19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2019; 51:1059-1065. [PMID: 31342474 DOI: 10.1055/a-0956-6922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is a safe and effective method for accomplishing parenchymal liver biopsy. The aim of this study was to compare a 19 G aspiration needle (FNA) with a 19 G Franseen-tip core biopsy needle (FNB) for EUS-LB. METHODS This was a prospective, parallel group, randomized trial comparing the tissue yields and adequacy of a 19 G FNA needle vs. a 19 G FNB needle for EUS-LB. The primary outcome was length of the longest piece of liver core specimen. Secondary outcomes were aggregate specimen length, number of complete portal triads (CPTs), and adverse events. One transgastric pass and one transduodenal pass were performed with the same needle in each patient. Specimen lengths were measured before and after histological processing. RESULTS 40 patients referred for EUS-LB were randomized to either the FNA group (n = 20) or the FNB group (n = 20). Both groups had similar patient characteristics. FNB biopsies yielded longer mean (standard deviation) specimen lengths (pre-processing mean 2.09 cm [0.41] vs. mean 1.47 cm [0.46], and post-processing mean 1.78 cm [0.66] vs. mean 1.05 cm [0.42]; both P < 0.001), a longer aggregate specimen length (pre-processing mean 15.78 cm [5.19] vs. 10.89 cm [4.38]; P = 0.003), and more CPTs (mean 42.6 25 vs 18.1 [9.3]; P < 0.001) compared with the FNA needle. There were no severe adverse events or difference in adverse event rate between the two needles. Post-biopsy pain was noted in 37.5 %. CONCLUSION EUS-LB using the FNB needle delivered longer liver biopsy specimens with more CPTs than the regular (non-core) needle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael A Ching-Companioni
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Amitpal S Johal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Bradley D Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hao J, Critchley-Thorne R, Diehl DL, Snyder SR. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Of An Adenocarcinoma Risk Prediction Multi-Biomarker Assay For Patients With Barrett's Esophagus. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2019; 11:623-635. [PMID: 31749626 PMCID: PMC6818671 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s221741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a quantitative multi-biomarker assay (the Assay) that stratifies patients with Barrett’s Esophagus (BE) by risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and can be used to guide clinical decisions, versus the current guidelines (standard of care [SOC]) for surveillance and treatment of BE. Patients and methods Markov decision modeling and simulation were used to compare cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from the perspective of a US health insurer with care delivered by an integrated health system. Model assumptions and disease progression probabilities were derived from the literature. Performance metrics for the Assay were from an independent clinical validation study. Cost of the Assay was based on reimbursement rates from multiple payers. Other costs were derived from Geisinger payment data. Results Base-case model results for a 5-year period comparing the Assay-directed care to the SOC estimated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $52,483/QALY in 2012 US dollars. Assay-directed care increased the use of endoscopic treatments by 58.4%, which reduced the progression to HGD, EAC and reduced EAC-related deaths by 51.7%, 47.1%, and 37.6%, respectively, over the 5-year period. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the probability of the Assay being cost-effective compared to the SOC was 57.3% at the $100,000/QALY acceptability threshold. Conclusion Given the model assumptions, the new Assay would be cost-effective after 5 years and improves patient outcomes due to improvement in the effectiveness of surveillance and treatment protocols resulting in fewer patients progressing to HGD and EAC and fewer EAC-related deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Hao
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Susan R Snyder
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Confer BD, Walker JT, Khurana S, Unzueta A, Khara HS, Johal AS, Diehl DL. EUS-guided liver biopsy: the type of needle matters. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90:321-322. [PMID: 31327346 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley D Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John T Walker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sandeep Khurana
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alberto Unzueta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amitpal S Johal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Diehl DL. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound for postoperative fluid collections: a surgeon's best friend. Endoscopy 2019; 51:711-712. [PMID: 31344733 DOI: 10.1055/a-0958-2276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dua KS, DeWitt JM, Kessler WR, Diehl DL, Draganov PV, Wagh MS, Kahaleh M, Wong Kee Song LM, Khara HS, Khan AH, Aburajab MM, Ballard D, Forsmark CE, Edmundowicz SA, Brauer BC, Tyberg A, Buttar NS, Adler DG. A phase III, multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial on the performance of a novel esophageal stent with an antireflux valve (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90:64-74.e3. [PMID: 30684601 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) when deployed across the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) can lead to reflux with risks of aspiration. A SEMS with a tricuspid antireflux valve (SEMS-V) was designed to address this issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this stent. METHODS A phase III, multicenter, prospective, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients with malignant dysphagia requiring SEMSs to be placed across the GEJ. Patients were randomized to receive SEMSs with no valve (SEMS-NV) or SEMS-V. Postdeployment dysphagia score at 2 weeks and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire score at 4 weeks were measured. Patients were followed for 24 weeks. RESULTS Sixty patients were randomized (SEMS-NV: 30 patients, mean age 67 ± 13 years; SEMS-V: 30 patients, mean age 65 ± 12 years). Baseline dysphagia scores (SEMS-NV, 2.5 ± .8; SEMS-V, 2.5 ± .8) and GERD-HRQL scores (SEMS-NV, 11.1 ± 8.2; SEMS-V, 12.8 ± 8.3) were similar. All SEMSs were successfully deployed. A similar proportion of patients in both arms improved from advanced dysphagia to moderate to no dysphagia (SEMS-NV, 71%; SEMS-V, 74%; 95% confidence interval, 1.93 [-17.8 to 21.7]). The dysphagia scores were also similar across all follow-up time points. Mean GERD-HRQL scores improved by 7.4 ± 10.2 points in the SEMS-V arm and by 5.2 ± 8.3 in the SEMS-NV group (P = .96). The GERD-HRQL scores were similar across all follow-up time points. Aspiration pneumonia occurred in 3.3% in the SEMS-NV arm and 6.9% in the SEMS-V arm (P = .61). Migration rates were similar (SEMS-NV, 33%; SEMS-V, 48%; P = .29). Two SEMS-V spontaneously fractured. There was no perforation, food impaction, or stent-related death in either group. CONCLUSIONS The SEMS-V was equally effective in relieving dysphagia as compared with the SEMS-NV. Presence of the valve did not increase the risks of adverse events. GERD symptom scores were similar between the 2 stents, implying either that the valve was not effective or that all patients on proton pump inhibitors could have masked the symptoms of GERD. Studies with objective evaluations such as fluoroscopy and/or pH/impedance are recommended. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02159898.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kulwinder S Dua
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - John M DeWitt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - William R Kessler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Mihir S Wagh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Louis M Wong Kee Song
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abdul H Khan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Murad M Aburajab
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Darren Ballard
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Chris E Forsmark
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Steven A Edmundowicz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Brian C Brauer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Amy Tyberg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Najtej S Buttar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yang D, Trindade AJ, Yachimski P, Benias P, Nieto J, Manvar A, Ho S, Esnakula A, Gamboa A, Sethi A, Gupte A, Khara HS, Diehl DL, El Chafic A, Shah J, Forsmark CE, Draganov PV. Histologic Analysis of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Through the Needle Microforceps Biopsies Accurately Identifies Mucinous Pancreas Cysts. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1587-1596. [PMID: 30471456 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS It is a challenge to accurately assess pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) and determine their risk. We compared the yield of tissue acquired with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided microforceps (through the needle tissue biopsy [TTNB]) with that of samples collected by EUS-guided fine-needle-aspiration (EUS-FNA), and the accuracy of analyses of each sample type in the diagnosis of mucinous PCLs. METHODS We performed a prospective open-label study of 114 consecutive adults (56.1% women; mean age, 64.2 y) undergoing EUS-FNA evaluation of PCLs (mean size, 35 mm) at 7 centers, from June 20, 2016, through August 31, 2018. Samples were collected from each cyst by FNA and microforceps; samples collected by FNA were analyzed by cytology and samples collected by TTNB were analyzed by histology. Acquisition yield was defined as the percentage of specimens collected that were adequate for cytologic or histologic analysis. Diagnoses of mucinous cysts were made based on identification of pancreatic mucinous epithelium by cytology analysis of FNA samples or histologic analysis of TTNB samples. Surgical specimens were used as the reference standard when available. RESULTS The EUS-guided microforceps were successfully inserted into 97.4% (111 of 114) of PCLs. Tissue acquisition yield was significantly higher with TTNB (95 of 114; 83.3%) than FNA (43 of 114; 37.7%) (P < .001). Sixty-one PCLs were determined to be mucinous based on TTNB analysis (53.5%) vs 11 with FNA analysis (9.6%) (P < .001). Among PCLs categorized as equivocal, based on the level of carcinoembryonic antigen, TTNB analysis found 50% (41 of 82) to be mucinous and FNA analysis found 8.5% (7 of 82) to be mucinous (P < .001). Findings from analyses of samples collected by TTNB were 100% concordant with findings from histologic analysis of surgical specimens (14 of 14), whereas only 3 of 14 findings from analysis of samples collected by FNA were in agreement with findings from surgical specimens (21.4%) (P < .001). Four of 5 mucinous PCLs with advanced neoplasia (80%) were detected with TTNB compared with none with FNA (P = .04). Self-limited intracystic bleeding occurred in 7 patients (6.1%), and acute pancreatitis in 6 patients (5.3%). CONCLUSIONS In a multicenter prospective study of patients undergoing EUS-FNA for evaluation of PCLs, we found TTNB collection of tissues for histologic analysis to be safe and feasible, with an acquisition yield of 83.3%. Histologic analysis of samples collected by TTNB identified a larger proportion of mucinous PCLs compared with cytologic analysis of samples collected by FNA-even among samples categorized as equivocal, based on the level of carcinoembryonic antigen. More samples collected by TTNB than FNA were found to have advanced neoplasia. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02979509.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Patrick Yachimski
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Petros Benias
- Division of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Jose Nieto
- Borland-Groover Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Amar Manvar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Sammy Ho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Ashwini Esnakula
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Anthony Gamboa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Columbia University, Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Anand Gupte
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Harshit S Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Abdul El Chafic
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Janak Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Christopher E Forsmark
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|