1
|
Gutmann M, Ertl IE, Herek P, Vician P, Pirker C, Nössing C, Brettner R, Lemberger U, Grausenburger R, Batlogg K, Baumfried O, Prantl I, Singh N, Laukhtina E, Oszwald A, Wasinger G, Compérat E, Berger W, Shariat SF, Englinger B. Clofarabine Has a Superior Therapeutic Window as compared to Gemcitabine in Preclinical Bladder Cancer Models. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00115-9. [PMID: 38755094 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Current standard-of-care systemic therapy options for locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer (BC), which are predominantly based on cisplatin-gemcitabine combinations, are limited by significant treatment failure rates and frailty-based patient ineligibility. We previously addressed the urgent clinical need for better-tolerated BC therapeutic strategies using a drug screening approach, which identified outstanding antineoplastic activity of clofarabine in preclinical models of BC. To further assess clofarabine as a potential BC therapy component, we conducted head-to-head comparisons of responses to clofarabine versus gemcitabine in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of BC, complemented by in silico analyses. In vitro data suggest a distinct correlation between the two antimetabolites, with higher cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, especially against several nonmalignant cell types, including keratinocytes and endothelial cells. Accordingly, tolerance of clofarabine (oral or intraperitoneal application) was distinctly better than for gemcitabine (intraperitoneal) in patient-derived xenograft models of BC. Clofarabine also exhibited distinctly superior anticancer efficacy, even at dosing regimens optimized for gemcitabine. Neither complete remission nor cure, both of which were observed with clofarabine, were achieved with any tolerable gemcitabine regimen. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that clofarabine has a better therapeutic window than gemcitabine, further emphasizing its potential as a candidate for drug repurposing in BC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared the anticancer activity of clofarabine, a drug used for treatment of leukemia but not bladder cancer, and gemcitabine, a drug currently used for chemotherapy against bladder cancer. Using cell cultures and mouse models, we found that clofarabine was better tolerated and more efficacious than gemcitabine, and even cured implanted tumors in mouse models. Our results suggest that clofarabine, alone or in combination schemes, might be superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gutmann
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Iris E Ertl
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paula Herek
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Petra Vician
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christine Pirker
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Nössing
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Brettner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ursula Lemberger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Reinhard Grausenburger
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kai Batlogg
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Oliver Baumfried
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Isabella Prantl
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Neha Singh
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - André Oszwald
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Walter Berger
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Englinger
- Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kläger J, Schmidinger M, Oszwald A, Wasinger G, Fajkovic H, Compérat E. Metastatic Translocated Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Kidney Transplant Patient - a Case Report and Review of the Literature. Int J Surg Pathol 2024; 32:594-600. [PMID: 37415400 PMCID: PMC11025305 DOI: 10.1177/10668969231185070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
TFEB-altered renal cell carcinomas are rare tumours. Here, we report the exceptional case of such a tumour in the setting of solid organ transplantation and with already metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. The primary tumour occurred in the native kidney and only focally showed biphasic morphology whereas the metastasis, among others to the transplant kidney, showed nonspecific, albeit different morphology, but both had consistent TFEB translocation. Treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab together with the multi-kinase inhibitor lenvatinib achieved partial response 14 months after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Kläger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | - André Oszwald
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wasinger G, Cussenot O, Compérat E. Clinical Management of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1650. [PMID: 38730601 PMCID: PMC11083518 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) has emerged as a distinct entity with significant clinical implications in prostate cancer (PCa) management. Despite historically being considered an extension of invasive PCa, IDC-P shows unique biological characteristics that challenge traditional diagnostic and therapeutic settings. This review explores the clinical management of IDC-P. While the diagnosis of IDC-P relies on specific morphological criteria, its detection remains challenging due to inter-observer variability. Emerging evidence underscores the association of IDC-P with aggressive disease and poor clinical outcomes across various PCa stages. However, standardized management guidelines for IDC-P are lacking. Recent studies suggest considering adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies in specific patient cohorts to improve outcomes and tailor treatment strategies based on the IDC-P status. However, the current level of evidence regarding this is low. Moving forward, a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of IDC-P and its interaction with conventional PCa subtypes is crucial for refining risk stratification and therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huebner NA, Wasinger G, Rajwa P, Resch I, Korn S, Rasul S, Baltzer P, Prüger L, Rauschmeier A, Seitz C, Comperat E, Shariat SF, Grubmüller B. Clinical parameters for the prediction of occult lymph node metastasis in patients with negative PSMA-PET. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:115.e9-115.e16. [PMID: 38246806 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depending on the risk of LN metastasis ePLND at RP is recommended. As ePLND has potential side effects, and diagnostics have improved substantially, our objective was to evaluate the performance of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a contemporary cohort with preoperative negative PSMA-PET. METHODS Patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (CaP), undergoing RP and ePND at our center with preoperative negative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET were included. The Accuracy of the nomogram was assessed using ROC analysis. The association of clinical parameters with the presence of LN metastasis was assessed using logistic regression. Specimen of prostate and LNs in patients with false negative PSMA-PET were additionally stained for AR and PSMA expression and assessed by IHC. RESULTS The study included 108 patients, 28% intermediate- and 72% high-risk. Twelve patients harbored occult LN metastasis. Accuracy of the nomogram was 0.62. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed a NPV of 89%. IHC showed expression of PSMA and AR in the primary and LN metastasis in all patients. On logistic regression analysis only DRE (OR 2.72; 95%CI 1.01-7.35; P = 0.05) and percentage of cores with significant CaP (OR 1.29; 95%CI 1.05-1.60; P = 0.02) showed a significant association with LN metastasis. CONCLUSION The currently used nomogram is suboptimal in detecting patients with occult LNM. While the cut-off value to perform ePLND can be increased slightly following a negative PSMA-PET scan, more accurate methods of identifying these patients are needed. Whether ePLND can have a therapeutic benefit, as opposed to a diagnostic only, needs to be re-evaluated in the PSMA-PET era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Working Group for Diagnostic imaging in Urology (ABDU), Austrian Association of Urology (ÖGU), Vienna, Austria.
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Irene Resch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Korn
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pascal Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Larissa Prüger
- Department of Urology, Hospital Weinviertel Korneuburg, Korneuburg, Austria
| | | | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Working Group for Diagnostic imaging in Urology (ABDU), Austrian Association of Urology (ÖGU), Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology and Division of Medical Oncology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Bernhard Grubmüller
- Department of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oszwald A, Wasinger G, Zisser L, Compérat E. Update on classification of oncocytic neoplasms of the kidney. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:239-244. [PMID: 36660966 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review provides a summary of recent developments in classification of renal oncocytic neoplasms that were incorporated in the fifth edition WHO classification of renal tumors, released in 2022. RECENT FINDINGS Besides the distinct entities of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, the WHO now acknowledges a heterogeneous group of oncocytic tumors of the kidney that can be reported as 'oncocytic renal neoplasms of low malignant potential'. Case series by multiple institutions have revealed recurrent patterns of morphological features, protein marker expression, and genetic alterations within these neoplasms that may permit further subclassification in the future. SUMMARY The new classification system provides pathologists with the opportunity to simplify the diagnostic workup and reporting of morphologically equivocal oncocytic neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lucia Zisser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aubreville M, Stathonikos N, Bertram CA, Klopfleisch R, Ter Hoeve N, Ciompi F, Wilm F, Marzahl C, Donovan TA, Maier A, Breen J, Ravikumar N, Chung Y, Park J, Nateghi R, Pourakpour F, Fick RHJ, Ben Hadj S, Jahanifar M, Shephard A, Dexl J, Wittenberg T, Kondo S, Lafarge MW, Koelzer VH, Liang J, Wang Y, Long X, Liu J, Razavi S, Khademi A, Yang S, Wang X, Erber R, Klang A, Lipnik K, Bolfa P, Dark MJ, Wasinger G, Veta M, Breininger K. Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images - The MIDOG challenge. Med Image Anal 2023; 84:102699. [PMID: 36463832 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The density of mitotic figures (MF) within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of MF by pathologists is subject to a strong inter-rater bias, limiting its prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support experts but have been observed to strongly deteriorate when applied in a different clinical environment. The variability caused by using different whole slide scanners has been identified as one decisive component in the underlying domain shift. The goal of the MICCAI MIDOG 2021 challenge was the creation of scanner-agnostic MF detection algorithms. The challenge used a training set of 200 cases, split across four scanning systems. As test set, an additional 100 cases split across four scanning systems, including two previously unseen scanners, were provided. In this paper, we evaluate and compare the approaches that were submitted to the challenge and identify methodological factors contributing to better performance. The winning algorithm yielded an F1 score of 0.748 (CI95: 0.704-0.781), exceeding the performance of six experts on the same task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christof A Bertram
- Institute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Klopfleisch
- Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Francesco Ciompi
- Computational Pathology Group, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frauke Wilm
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Marzahl
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Taryn A Donovan
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Schwarzman Animal Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Maier
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jack Breen
- CISTIB Center for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nishant Ravikumar
- CISTIB Center for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Youjin Chung
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Jinah Park
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Ramin Nateghi
- Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Fattaneh Pourakpour
- Iranian Brain Mapping Biobank (IBMB), National Brain Mapping Laboratory (NBML), Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | - Mostafa Jahanifar
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK
| | - Adam Shephard
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK
| | - Jakob Dexl
- Fraunhofer-Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Maxime W Lafarge
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jingtang Liang
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Shannxi, China
| | - Yubo Wang
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Shannxi, China
| | - Xi Long
- Histo Pathology Diagnostic Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingxin Liu
- Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China
| | - Salar Razavi
- Image Analysis in Medicine Lab (IAMLAB), Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - April Khademi
- Image Analysis in Medicine Lab (IAMLAB), Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sen Yang
- Tencent AI Lab, Shenzhen 518057, China
| | - Xiyue Wang
- College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andrea Klang
- Institute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karoline Lipnik
- Institute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pompei Bolfa
- Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis
| | - Michael J Dark
- College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mitko Veta
- Medical Image Analysis Group, TU Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Katharina Breininger
- Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Al Jalali V, Wasinger G, Rasul S, Grubmueller B, Wulkersdorfer B, Balber T, Mitterhauser M, Simon J, Hacker M, Shariat S, Egger G, Zeitlinger M. Consecutive PSMA and AR PET imaging shows positive correlation to AR and PSMA protein expression in primary hormone naïve prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.122.264981. [PMID: 36657982 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: The present study set out to investigate if PET imaging can be used as a potential substitute for immunohistochemical analysis of tumor samples in prostate cancer (PC) patients. Correlation between imaging signals of two PET tracers and the corresponding target structures was assessed. The first tracer was [68Ga]Ga-PSMAHBED-CC([68Ga]PSMA), which is already implemented in clinical routine. The second tracer was [18F]-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone([18F]FDHT) which binds to the androgen receptor (AR). The AR is particularly interesting in PC, since the AR expression status and its shift during therapy might directly influence patient care. Methods: This prospective, explorative clinical study included 10 newly diagnosed PC patients. Each patient received a [68Ga]PSMA-PET/MRI- and [18F]FDHT-PET/MRI-scan prior to prostatectomy. Cancer standardized uptake values (SUV) were determined and related to background SUVs. Following prostatectomy, tumor tissue was sampled and AR and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression determined. AR and PSMA expressions were evaluated quantitively with QuPath and additionally with a four-tiered rating system. Correlation between imaging signals and marker expression was statistically assessed. Results: For [18F]FDHT, the SUVmax/SUVbackground ratio showed a significant, strong correlation (P-value=0.019, r=0.72) with AR optical density of the correlating tissue sample. The correlation between PSMA optical density and the [68Ga]PSMA SUVmax/SUVbackground ratio was not significant (P-value=0.061), yet a positive correlation trend could be observed (r=0.61). SUVmax/SUVbackground ratios were higher for [68Ga]PSMA (34.9±24.8) compared to [18F]FDHT (4.8±1.2). In line with this findings, the tumor detection rate of the Ga-PSMA-PET scan was 90%, but only 40% for the [18F]FDHT-PET scan. The four-tiered rating of PSMA staining intensity yielded very homogenous results with values of 3+ for most subjects (90%). The AR staining was rated with 1+ in two patients (20%), with 2+ in four patients (40%) and with 3+ in four patients (40%). Conclusion: [18F]FDHT-PET may be useful for monitoring AR expression and alterations of AR expression during treatment of PC patients. This may facilitate early detection of treatment resistance and allows for adaptation of therapy to prevent cancer progression. [18F]FDHT-PET is inferior to [68Ga]PSMA-PET for primary PC diagnosis, but the correlation between [68Ga]PSMA SUVs and PSMA expression is weaker compared to [18F]FDHT and the AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Al Jalali
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University Vienna, Austria, Austria
| | | | - Sazan Rasul
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Grubmueller
- Department of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | | | | | | | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Gerda Egger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Zeitlinger
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Compérat E, Oszwald A, Wasinger G, Shariat S, Amin M. Update on Flat and Papillary Urothelial Lesions: Genitourinary Pathology Society Consensus Recommendations. Surg Pathol Clin 2022; 15:629-640. [PMID: 36344180 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2022.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The reporting recommendations on "flat and papillary urothelial neoplasia," published in 2 position articles by the Genitourinary Pathology Society in July 2021, was a collective contribution of 38 multidisciplinary experts aiming to clarify nomenclature, classification of flat and papillary urothelial neoplasia and controversial issues. In this review, we discuss some of these recommendations including nomenclature, practical approaches, and their importance for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
| | - André Oszwald
- Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mahul Amin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Urology, USC, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Büttner FA, Winter S, Stühler V, Rausch S, Hennenlotter J, Füssel S, Zastrow S, Meinhardt M, Toma M, Jerónimo C, Henrique R, Miranda-Gonçalves V, Kröger N, Ribback S, Hartmann A, Agaimy A, Stöhr C, Polifka I, Fend F, Scharpf M, Comperat E, Wasinger G, Moch H, Stenzl A, Gerlinger M, Bedke J, Schwab M, Schaeffeler E. A novel molecular signature identifies mixed subtypes in renal cell carcinoma with poor prognosis and independent response to immunotherapy. Genome Med 2022; 14:105. [PMID: 36109798 PMCID: PMC9476269 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-022-01105-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease comprising histologically defined subtypes. For therapy selection, precise subtype identification and individualized prognosis are mandatory, but currently limited. Our aim was to refine subtyping and outcome prediction across main subtypes, assuming that a tumor is composed of molecular features present in distinct pathological subtypes. Methods Individual RCC samples were modeled as linear combination of the main subtypes (clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), chromophobe (chRCC)) using computational gene expression deconvolution. The new molecular subtyping was compared with histological classification of RCC using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n = 864; ccRCC: 512; pRCC: 287; chRCC: 65) as well as 92 independent histopathologically well-characterized RCC. Predicted continuous subtypes were correlated to cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the TCGA cohort and validated in 242 independent RCC. Association with treatment-related progression-free survival (PFS) was studied in the JAVELIN Renal 101 (n = 726) and IMmotion151 trials (n = 823). CSS and PFS were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results One hundred seventy-four signature genes enabled reference-free molecular classification of individual RCC. We unambiguously assign tumors to either ccRCC, pRCC, or chRCC and uncover molecularly heterogeneous tumors (e.g., with ccRCC and pRCC features), which are at risk of worse outcome. Assigned proportions of molecular subtype-features significantly correlated with CSS (ccRCC (P = 4.1E − 10), pRCC (P = 6.5E − 10), chRCC (P = 8.6E − 06)) in TCGA. Translation into a numerical RCC-R(isk) score enabled prognosis in TCGA (P = 9.5E − 11). Survival modeling based on the RCC-R score compared to pathological categories was significantly improved (P = 3.6E − 11). The RCC-R score was validated in univariate (P = 3.2E − 05; HR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.8–5.08) and multivariate analyses including clinicopathological factors (P = 0.018; HR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.14–4.04). Heterogeneous PD-L1-positive RCC determined by molecular subtyping showed increased PFS with checkpoint inhibition versus sunitinib in the JAVELIN Renal 101 (P = 3.3E − 04; HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36 − 0.75) and IMmotion151 trials (P = 0.047; HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48 − 1). The prediction of PFS significantly benefits from classification into heterogeneous and unambiguous subtypes in both cohorts (P = 0.013 and P = 0.032). Conclusion Switching from categorical to continuous subtype classification across most frequent RCC subtypes enables outcome prediction and fosters personalized treatment strategies.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01105-y.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ertl IE, Lemberger U, Ilijazi D, Hassler MR, Bruchbacher A, Brettner R, Kronabitter H, Gutmann M, Vician P, Zeitler G, Koren A, Lardeau CH, Mohr T, Haitel A, Compérat E, Oszwald A, Wasinger G, Clozel T, Elemento O, Kubicek S, Berger W, Shariat SF. Molecular and Pharmacological Bladder Cancer Therapy Screening: Discovery of Clofarabine as a Highly Active Compound. Eur Urol 2022; 82:261-270. [PMID: 35393162 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The heterogeneity of bladder cancers (BCs) is a major challenge for the development of novel therapies. However, given the high rates of recurrence and/or treatment failure, the identification of effective therapeutic strategies is an urgent clinical need. OBJECTIVE We aimed to establish a model system for drug identification/repurposing in order to identify novel therapies for the treatment of BC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A collection of commercially available BC cell lines (n = 32) was comprehensively characterized. A panel of 23 cell lines, representing a broad spectrum of BC, was selected to perform a high-throughput drug screen. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Positive hits were defined as compounds giving >50% inhibition in at least one BC cell line. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Amongst >1700 tested chemical compounds, a total of 471 substances exhibited antineoplastic effects. Clofarabine, an antimetabolite drug used as third-line treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, was amongst the limited number of drugs with inhibitory effects on cell lines of all intrinsic subtypes. We, thus, reassessed the substance and confirmed its inhibitory effects on commercially available cell lines and patient-derived cell cultures representing various disease stages, intrinsic subtypes, and histologic variants. To verify these effects in vivo, a patient-derived cell xenograft model for urothelial carcinoma (UC) was used. Well-tolerated doses of clofarabine induced complete remission in all treated animals (n = 12) suffering from both early- and late-stage disease. We further took advantage of another patient-derived cell xenograft model originating from the rare disease entity sarcomatoid carcinoma (SaC). Similarly to UC xenograft mice, clofarabine induced subcomplete to complete tumour remissions in all treated animals (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS The potent effects of clofarabine in vitro and in vivo suggest that our findings may be of high clinical relevance. Clinical trials are needed to assess the value of clofarabine in improving BC patient care. PATIENT SUMMARY We used commercially available cell lines for the identification of novel drugs for the treatment of bladder cancer. We confirmed the effects of one of these drugs, clofarabine, in patient-derived cell lines and two different mouse models, thereby demonstrating a potential clinical relevance of this substance in bladder cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris E Ertl
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ursula Lemberger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dafina Ilijazi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Melanie R Hassler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Bruchbacher
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Brettner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hannah Kronabitter
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Gutmann
- Department of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Petra Vician
- Department of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerhard Zeitler
- Department of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Koren
- CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Thomas Mohr
- Department of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - André Oszwald
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Clozel
- OWKIN, New York City, NY, USA; Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olivier Elemento
- Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stefan Kubicek
- CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | - Walter Berger
- Department of Medicine I, Institute of Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Compérat E, Oszwald A, Wasinger G, Wacquet J, Rouprêt M, Cussenot O. PD-L1 (SP142) testing is concordant between Benchmark Ultra and Bond-III stainers. World J Urol 2021; 39:4067-4071. [PMID: 34515825 PMCID: PMC8571218 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03828-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Atezolizumab is an inhibitor of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), used to treat advanced or metastatic bladder cancer, and in trials for non-invasive disease. In order to be eligible for treatment, patients require a PD-L1 immune cell score ≥ 5%, using the Ventana SP142 PD-L1 assay. Many laboratories do not have access to the required Ventana Benchmark Ultra stainer, and it is unclear if the assay performs similarly on other stainers. In this study, we compare SP142 assay results between Ventana Benchmark Ultra and Leica Bond-III stainers. Methods Serial sections of 90 samples of transurethral bladder resections (comprising 51 pTaHG, 8 pTis, 18 pT1, 10 pT2 tumors) were stained using the SP142 PD-L1 antibody on Ventana Benchmark Ultra and Leica Bond-III stainers, manually scored, and compared using accuracy and Cohen’s kappa measures. Results Both devices yielded highly concordant PD-L1 immune cell scores (accuracy 0.84, Cohen’s κ 0.732). Moreover, we found similar tumor cell (TC) PD-L1 scores using both stainers, and a trend towards greater TC scores in pT2 stage samples (p = 0.05). Conclusion This study is the first to compare the SP142 antibody in bladder cancer on two different stainers. Our results indicate that both Benchmark Ultra and Bond-III stainers yield highly concordant results using the SP142 PD-L1 antibody.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Compérat
- GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France. .,Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, Rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.
| | - André Oszwald
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Justine Wacquet
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, Rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, AP-HP, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France.,Department of Urology, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 75020, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Artificial intelligence has made an entrance into mainstream applications of daily life but the clinical deployment of artificial intelligence-supported histological analysis is still at infancy. Recent years have seen a surge in technological advance regarding the use of artificial intelligence in pathology, in particular in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS We review first impressions of how artificial intelligence impacts the clinical performance of pathologists in the analysis of prostate tissue. Several challenges in the deployment of artificial intelligence remain to be overcome. Finally, we discuss how artificial intelligence can help in generating new knowledge that is interpretable by humans. SUMMARY It is evident that artificial intelligence has the potential to outperform most pathologists in detecting prostate cancer, and does not suffer from inherent interobserver variability. Nonetheless, large clinical validation studies that unequivocally prove the benefit of artificial intelligence support in pathology are necessary. Regardless, artificial intelligence may soon automate and standardize many facets of routine work, including qualitative (i.e. Gleason Grading) and quantitative measures (i.e. portion of Gleason Grades and tumor volume). For the near future, a model where pathologists are enhanced by second-review or real-time artificial intelligence systems appears to be the most promising approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oszwald A, Wasinger G, Larnaudie L, Varinot J, Sebe P, Cussenot O, Compérat E. Pathological reporting of cystectomy lymph nodes: a retrospective analysis of experience in Paris. World J Urol 2021; 39:4029-4035. [PMID: 33743060 PMCID: PMC8571145 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03630-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Pathological evaluation of pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (PLND) is important for management of cystectomy patients. However, challenges such as unclear interobserver variability of LN counting remain. Here, we assess interobserver variability of LN measures and their clinical utility, with a focus on variant histology. Methods We retrieved radical cystectomy cases with PLND between 2010 and 2016 and reevaluated pathological parameters; number of total and metastatic LN, LN density (LND), length of metastatic LN and metastases, extranodal extension (ENE). Results We report 96 patients: median age of 71a, 34 cases pN+, 36 cases with any extent of variant histology, median follow-up 10 months. Perivesical LN were only rarely identified, but frequently metastatic (4/9). Variant histology (34 cases) frequently exhibited LN metastasis (53% of pN+ cases). Interobserver variance was poor for total LN (kappa = 0.167), excellent for positive LN (0.85) and pN staging (0.96), and mediocre for LND (0.53). ROC analysis suggests that both LND and the sum of LN metastasis length may predict outcome (AUC 0.83 and 0.75, respectively). Conclusion Our study confirms the notion of LND as a prognostic measure, but cautions due to strong interobserver variance of LN counts. The sum length of LN metastases could be a measure that is independent of LN counts. We find that microscopically identified perivesical LN merit particular attention. In summary, our study highlights current challenges in pathological reporting of PLND, confirms previous observations and forms a basis for further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Oszwald
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Laura Larnaudie
- Department of Pathology, GRC n°5 Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Justine Varinot
- Department of Pathology, GRC n°5 Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Sebe
- Department of Urology, La Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- CeRePP, 75020, Paris, France.,Department of Urology, GRC n°5 Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. .,Department of Pathology, GRC n°5 Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France. .,CeRePP, 75020, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|