Bispecific sigma-1 receptor antagonism and mu-opioid receptor partial agonism: WLB-73502, an analgesic with improved efficacy and safety profile compared to strong opioids

Opioids are the most effective painkillers, but their benefit-risk balance often hinder their therapeutic use. WLB-73502 is a dual, bispecific compound that binds sigma-1 (S1R) and mu-opioid (MOR) receptors. WLB-73502 is an antagonist at the S1R. It behaved as a partial MOR agonist at the G-protein pathway and produced no/unsignificant β-arrestin-2 recruitment, thus demonstrating low intrinsic efficacy on MOR at both signalling pathways. Despite its partial MOR agonism, WLB-73502 exerted full antinociceptive efficacy, with potency superior to morphine and similar to oxycodone against nociceptive, inflammatory and osteoarthritis pain, and superior to both morphine and oxycodone against neuropathic pain. WLB-73502 crosses the blood-brain barrier and binds brain S1R and MOR to an extent consistent with its antinociceptive effect. Contrary to morphine and oxycodone, tolerance to its antinociceptive effect did not develop after repeated 4-week administration. Also, contrary to opioid comparators, WLB-73502 did not inhibit gastrointestinal transit or respiratory function in rats at doses inducing full efficacy, and it was devoid of proemetic effect (retching and vomiting) in ferrets at potentially effective doses. WLB-73502 benefits from its bivalent S1R antagonist and partial MOR agonist nature to provide an improved antinociceptive and safety profile respect to strong opioid therapy.

Results from two-year rodent oral carcinogenicity studies of cizolirtine, a substance-P and calcitonin gene-related peptide release modulator

Cizolirtine is a substance-P and calcitonin gene-related peptide release modulator developed for the treatment of pain and urinary incontinence. To assess its carcinogenic potential, cizolirtine was administered by oral route once daily for up to 104 weeks to CD-1 mice at doses of 40, 90, or 200 mg/kg/day, and to Han Wistar rats at doses of 40, 90 or 200 mg/kg/day to males and 40, 110 or 160 mg/kg/day to females. There were treatment-related neoplastic findings both in mice and rats. In mice, administration of cizolirtine was associated to an increase in skin fibrosarcomas and sarcomas among high-dose males, considered secondary to increased aggression and specific to the animal model. In rats, there was an increased incidence of liver adenomas in males and females, and carcinomas in males, in association with an increased incidence of hepatocyte hypertrophy, vacuolation and clear cell foci, and considered related to sustained long-term enzyme induction resulting in increased liver metabolism and associated hypertrophic changes. The observed neoplastic findings in mouse skin and rat liver after life-time oral administration of cizolirtine are considered related to rodent-specific non-genotoxic mechanisms of questionable relevance to man.

Comparative In vitro Metabolism of Enflicoxib in Dogs, Rats, and Humans: Main Metabolites and Proposed Metabolic Pathways

Background

Enflicoxib is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug of the coxib family characterized by a long-lasting pharmacological activity that has been attributed to its active metabolite E-6132.

Objectives

The aim of this work was to explore enflicoxib biotransformation in vitro in humans, rats and dogs, and to determine its metabolic pathways.

Methods

Different in vitro test systems were used, including hepatocytes and liver and non-hepatic microsomes. The samples were incubated with enflicoxib and/or any of its metabolites at 37°C for different times depending on the test system. The analyses were performed by liquid chromatography coupled with either radioactivity detection or high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Results

Enflicoxib was efficiently metabolized by cytochrome P-450 into three main phase I metabolites: M8, E-6132, and M7. The non-active hydroxy-pyrazoline metabolite M8 accounted for most of the fraction metabolized in all the three species. The active pyrazol metabolite E-6132 showed a slow formation rate, especially in dogs, whereas metabolite M7 was a secondary metabolite formed by oxidation of M8. In hepatocytes, diverse phase II metabolite conjugates were formed, including enflicoxib glucuronide, M8 glucuronide, E-6132 glucuronide, M7 glucuronide, and M7 sulfate. Metabolite E-6132 was most probably eliminated by a unique glucuronidation reaction at a very low rate.

Conclusion

The phase I metabolism of enflicoxib was qualitatively very similar among rats, humans and dogs. The low formation and glucuronidation rates of the active enflicoxib metabolite E-6132 in dogs are postulated as key factors underlying the mechanism of its long-lasting pharmacokinetics and enflicoxib's overall sustained efficacy.

Pharmacology of enflicoxib, a new coxib drug: Efficacy and dose determination by clinical and pharmacokinetic-guided approach for the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs based on an acute arthritis induction model

Enflicoxib is a newly developed NSAID of the coxib class. The optimal therapeutic dose to be confirmed in the field studies was established using a combination of pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. First, a PK study was performed to determine the plasmatic profile of enflicoxib and its active pyrazol metabolite in dogs. Thereafter, two studies using a urate crystal‐induced acute arthritis model allowed to correlate efficacy with plasmatic concentrations. Finally, a population PK model was developed to establish the Minimum Effective Concentration (MEC) and the Maximum Tolerated Concentration (MTC). Enflicoxib plasma concentrations were highest for the first 48 h. Thereafter, pyrazol metabolite concentrations were higher and persisted up to the end of the study. No reduction on the lameness (CLS) or pain scores (PS) was observed in the first hours after enflicoxib administration so no MEC could be established for the parent compound. Both CLS and PS were greatly reduced when the pyrazol metabolite achieved concentrations of 411 ng/ml or higher, so this concentration was established as the MEC for the pyrazol metabolite. Enflicoxib MTC was established at 6723 ng/ml whereas for the pyrazol metabolite it was 4258 ng/ml. The population PK model showed that a loading enflicoxib dose of 8 mg/kg followed by weekly maintenance doses of 4 mg/kg would achieve stable concentrations of the pyrazol metabolite within the therapeutic window (between the MEC and the MTC), and it was considered the most adequate posology to be confirmed in the field clinical studies for the treatment of canine osteoarthritis.

Pharmacokinetics of enflicoxib in dogs: Effects of prandial state and repeated administration

The pharmacokinetics of enflicoxib were evaluated in both a bioavailability study and a multi‐dose safety study in Beagle dogs. When administered at 8 mg/kg, the oral bioavailability (F) of enflicoxib was 44.1% in fasted dogs, but F increased to 63.4% under post prandial conditions. Enflicoxib is rapidly metabolised. After the first 48 h, the plasma levels of its pyrazol metabolite were much higher and persistent than those of the parent compound. Following intravenous administration, the total body plasma clearance of enflicoxib was of 140 ml/h/kg and the volume of distribution based on the terminal phase was 4 L/kg. Plasma protein binding for both compounds was approximately 99%. The blood to plasma ratio for the pyrazol metabolite showed saturable kinetics with higher blood cell affinity at lower total blood concentrations which ranged from 2.49 to 0.95 for concentrations from 1 to 15 µg/ml. Enflicoxib and its pyrazol metabolite exhibited dose‐proportional pharmacokinetics for single oral doses of 8–40 mg⁄kg and for multiple oral doses of 4–20 mg⁄kg. After 7 months of repeated weekly administrations, pre‐dose plasma concentrations (C_min,ss) remained constant throughout the study, with no trend to any significant over‐accumulation. The mean terminal elimination half‐life (t_½) was 20 h for enflicoxib and 17 days for the pyrazol metabolite. The pharmacokinetic profile of enflicoxib and its pyrazol metabolite in dogs supports the proposed dosing regimen in which doses are separated by 1 week.

Twenty six-week repeat dose oral rat toxicity study of cizolirtine, a substance-P and calcitonin gene-related peptide release modulator

Cizolirtine, a substance-P and calcitonin gene-related peptide release modulator developed for the treatment of pain and urinary incontinence, was orally administered for 26-weeks to rats at dosages of 20, 60 and 200 mg/kg/day. Clinical signs were limited to post-dosing salivation and brown staining on head and muzzle. There were slight decreases in bodyweight gain and slight increases in water consumption among cizolirtine-treated animals. Slight increases in plasma alkaline phosphatase activity, and cholesterol and phospholipid concentrations were observed in mid- and/or high-dose animals. Low urinary volume, pH and sodium and potassium outputs were observed after 12-weeks, and low urinary pH, low sodium and high potassium outputs at end of treatment. Increased relative (to bodyweight) liver weight was observed in high-dose animals. Treated males and high-dose females showed a dose-related increase in the incidence and severity of periacinar hepatocytic hypertrophy and midzonal/periacinar hepatocytic fat vacuolization. Increased incidences of hepatic clear cell foci were observed in all cizolirtine-treated male groups and, to a lesser extent, in treated females. Ovaries of treated females showed a dose-dependent increased incidence of absent corpora lutea and, occasionally, follicular cysts. The dosages of 20 and 60 mg/kg/day were considered as the No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Levels for males and females, respectively.

Co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib: preclinical and clinical evaluation of a novel analgesic

INTRODUCTION

Pain management is a major unmet need due to the suboptimal efficacy and undesirable side effects of current analgesics. Multimodal therapies recruiting complementary mechanisms of action may help address this. Co-crystals incorporating two active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) constitute an innovative approach to multimodal therapy, particularly if modification of the physicochemical properties of constituent APIs can be translated into clinical benefits.

AREAS COVERED

The preclinical and clinical profiles of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib (CTC), a novel API-API co-crystal (1:1 molecular ratio of rac-tramadol.hydrochloride and celecoxib) are described.

EXPERT OPINION

CTC may provide a relevant addition to pain therapy due to its: i) unique co-crystal structure conferring differentiated intrinsic dissolution profiles on constituent APIs, ii) modified clinical pharmacokinetics (slower absorption of tramadol and faster absorption of celecoxib) compared with commercially available single-entity reference products (in agreement with modified dissolution rates), iii) superior benefit-risk ratio compared with reference products (suggested by preclinical synergistic antinociceptive effects, without potentiation of adverse effects), and iv) efficacy in a phase 2 trial of moderate to severe pain following extraction of ≥2 impacted third molars requiring bone removal, where CTC doses containing low doses of APIs exerted a significant effect. Phase 3 studies are currently ongoing.

The Effect of Food on Tramadol and Celecoxib Bioavailability Following Oral Administration of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib (CTC): A Randomised, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib (CTC), in development for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain, is a first-in-class co-crystal containing a 1:1 molecular ratio of two active pharmaceutical ingredients; rac-tramadol·HCl and celecoxib. This randomised, open-label, crossover study compared the bioavailability of both components after CTC administration under fed and fasting conditions.

METHODS

Healthy adults received single doses of 200 mg CTC under both fed and fasting conditions (separated by a 7-day washout). Each dose of CTC was administered orally as two 100 mg tablets, each containing 44 mg tramadol·HCl and 56 mg celecoxib. In the fed condition, a high-fat, high-calorie meal [in line with recommendations by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] was served 30 min before CTC administration. Tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol and celecoxib plasma concentrations were measured pre- and post-dose up to 48 h. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects (18 female/18 male) received one or both doses of CTC; 33 provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data under fed and fasting conditions. For tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol, fed-to-fasting ratios of geometric least-squares means and corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) values for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and extrapolated area under the plasma concentration-time curve to infinity (AUC∞) were within the pre-defined range for comparative bioavailability (80-125%). For celecoxib, Cmax and AUC∞ fed-to-fasting ratios (90% CIs) were outside this range, at 130.91% (116.98-146.49) and 129.34% (121.78-137.38), respectively. The safety profile of CTC was similar in fed and fasting conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

As reported for standard-formulation celecoxib, food increased the bioavailability of celecoxib from single-dose CTC. Food had no effect on tramadol or O-desmethyltramadol bioavailability.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

152052 (registered with the Therapeutic Products Directorate of Health Canada).

Pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib: findings from a four-way randomized open-label phase I clinical trial

Aim

We compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of co‐crystal of tramadol–celecoxib (CTC) vs. each reference product (alone and in open combination) after single (first dose) and multiple dosing.

Methods

Healthy adults aged 18–50 years received, under fasted conditions, 15 twice‐daily doses of the following treatments (separated by ≥14‐day washout): 200 mg immediate‐release (IR) CTC (equivalent to 88 mg tramadol and 112 mg celecoxib; treatment 1); 100 mg IR tramadol (treatment 2), 100 mg celecoxib (treatment 3); and 100 mg IR tramadol and 100 mg celecoxib (treatment 4). The treatment sequence was assigned by computer‐generated randomization. PK parameters were calculated using non‐compartmental analysis. Parameters for CTC were adjusted according to reference product dose.

Results

A total of 30 subjects (20 males, mean age 35 years) were included. Multiple‐dose tramadol PK parameters for treatments 1, 2 and 4, respectively, were 551, 632 and 661 ng ml⁻¹ [mean maximum plasma concentration (C_max)]; 4796, 4990 and 5284 ng h ml⁻¹ (area under the plasma concentration–time curve over the dosing interval at steady state); and 3.0, 2.0 and 2.0 h (median time to C_max at steady state). For treatments 1, 3 and 4, multiple‐dose celecoxib PK parameters were 445, 536 and 396 ng ml⁻¹; 2803, 3366 and 2897 ng h ml⁻¹; and 2.0, 2.0 and 3.0 h. Single‐dose findings were consistent with multiple‐dose data. Types of adverse events were consistent with known reference product safety profiles.

Conclusion

After single (first dose) and multiple dosing, PK parameters for each active pharmaceutical ingredient in CTC were modified by co‐crystallization compared with reference products alone or in open combination.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib: Results of a four-way randomized open-label phase I clinical trial in healthy subjects

Aims

Co‐crystal of tramadol–celecoxib (CTC) is a novel co‐crystal molecule containing two active pharmaceutical ingredients under development by Esteve (E‐58425) and Mundipharma Research (MR308). This Phase I study compared single‐dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of CTC with those of the individual reference products [immediate‐release (IR) tramadol and celecoxib] alone and in open combination.

Methods

Healthy adults aged 18–55 years were orally administered four treatments under fasted conditions (separated by 7‐day wash‐out period): 200 mg IR CTC (equivalent to 88 mg tramadol and 112 mg celecoxib; Treatment 1); 100 mg IR tramadol (Treatment 2); 100 mg celecoxib (Treatment 3); and 100 mg IR tramadol and 100 mg celecoxib (Treatment 4). Treatment sequence was assigned using computer‐generated randomization. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis with parameters for CTC adjusted according to reference product dose (100 mg).

Results

Thirty‐six subjects (28 male, mean age 36 years) participated. Tramadol PK parameters for Treatments‐1, –2 and –4, respectively, were 263, 346 and 349 ng ml^–1 (mean maximum plasma concentration); 3039, 2979 and 3119 ng h ml^–1 (mean cumulative area under the plasma concentration–time curve); and 2.7, 1.8 and 1.8 h (median time to maximum plasma concentration). For Treatments 1, 3 and 4, the respective celecoxib PK parameters were 313, 449 and 284 ng ml^–1; 2183, 3093 and 2856 ng h ml^–1; and 1.5, 2.3 and 3.0 h. No unexpected adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

PK parameters of each API in CTC were modified by co‐crystallization compared with marketed formulations of tramadol, celecoxib, and their open combination.

Food effects on the pharmacokinetics of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg film-coated tablets: a single-dose, randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Doxylamine succinate, an ethanolamine-based antihistamine, is used in the short-term management of insomnia because of its sedative effects. The data available on the pharmacokinetic profile of doxylamine in humans are limited, notwithstanding that this drug has been marketed in European countries for more than 50 years. In fact, no data on the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxylamine are available.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxylamine following a single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg in healthy human subjects under fed and fasting conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center, randomized, single-dose, laboratory-blinded, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a phase I clinical unit.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg (equivalent to 17.4 mg of doxylamine base) was administered to healthy volunteers under either fed conditions (high-fat, high-calorie food intake) or fasting conditions in each study period. The drug administrations were separated by a wash-out period of seven calendar days. Plasma samples were collected for up to 60 hours postdose, and plasma doxylamine concentrations were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events, standard laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiography.

RESULTS

In total, 24 healthy subjects (12 male and 12 female) were included in the study. Doxylamine succinate 25 mg tablets exhibited similar oral bioavailability of doxylamine in the fasting state (mean maximum plasma drug concentration [C(max)] 118.21 ng/mL, coefficient of variation [CV] 19.2%; mean area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to time t [AUC(t)] 1746.97 ng · h/mL, CV 31.6%) and in the fed state (mean C(max) 120.99 ng/mL, CV 15.0%; mean AUC(t) 1712.20 ng · h/mL, CV 26.7%). No statistically significant between-treatment differences were observed for any of the pharmacokinetic parameters under study. The fed : fasting ratios of the geometric least squares means with corresponding 90% confidence intervals for C(max) and AUC(t) were within the range of 80-125%.

CONCLUSION

High-fat, high-calorie food intake does not affect the kinetics of doxylamine in healthy subjects. The drug was safe and well tolerated by the subjects in this study.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of a novel sigma-1 receptor antagonist in three randomized phase I studies

AIM

To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects of a novel, highly selective, sigma-1 receptor antagonist (S1RA).

METHODS

Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluated single oral doses (5-500 mg, study 101; 500-800 mg, study 106) and multiple doses (50-400 mg once daily for 8 days, study 102) of S1RA. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse event reporting, clinical laboratory, physical examinations, vital signs and electrocardiography, including Holter monitoring. Pharmacodynamic assessments included computerized cognitive testing. Plasma samples were analyzed using validated HPLC-MS/MS methods.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-five subjects were enrolled. Single and multiple doses were safe and well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. The most common side effects were headache and dizziness. The highest single doses were associated with some mild to moderate transient CNS effects. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. There were no clinically significant changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG), 24 h Holter monitoring, or in vital signs and laboratory assessments. Subjective CNS pharmacodynamics evaluations showed no relevant differences vs. placebo. Cognitive testing showed no effects on visual memory, executive function, attention or somnolence, while revealing some transient slowing of response for simple reaction time and choice reaction time at 2 h following the administration of higher doses. A fast absorption, rapid distribution and slow elimination were observed (t(max) 0.75-2.0 h, t(1/2) compatible with once a day administration) and steady-state was reached. No gender differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

S1RA exhibited an acceptable safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile in healthy subjects over the dose range studied.

Pharmacological properties of S1RA, a new sigma-1 receptor antagonist that inhibits neuropathic pain and activity-induced spinal sensitization

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The sigma-1 (σ(1) ) receptor is a ligand-regulated molecular chaperone that has been involved in pain, but there is limited understanding of the actions associated with its pharmacological modulation. Indeed, the selectivity and pharmacological properties of σ(1) receptor ligands used as pharmacological tools are unclear and the demonstration that σ(1) receptor antagonists have efficacy in reversing central sensitization-related pain sensitivity is still missing.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The pharmacological properties of a novel σ(1) receptor antagonist (S1RA) were first characterized. S1RA was then used to investigate the effect of pharmacological antagonism of σ(1) receptors on in vivo nociception in sensitizing conditions and on in vitro spinal cord sensitization in mice. Drug levels and autoradiographic, ex vivo binding for σ(1) receptor occupancy were measured to substantiate behavioural data.

KEY RESULTS

Formalin-induced nociception (both phases), capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity and sciatic nerve injury-induced mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity were dose-dependently inhibited by systemic administration of S1RA. Occupancy of σ(1) receptors in the CNS was significantly correlated with the antinociceptive effects. No pharmacodynamic tolerance to the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effect developed following repeated administration of S1RA to nerve-injured mice. As a mechanistic correlate, electrophysiological recordings demonstrated that pharmacological antagonism of σ(1) receptors attenuated the wind-up responses in spinal cords sensitized by repetitive nociceptive stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings contribute to evidence identifying the σ(1) receptor as a modulator of activity-induced spinal sensitization and pain hypersensitivity, and suggest σ(1) receptor antagonists as potential novel treatments for neuropathic pain.

Comparative bioavailability between two tramadol once-daily oral formulations

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profile and oral bioavailability of Tramadol Contramid once-daily (o.d.) 200 mg tablets (Labopharm, Canada) with that of Zytram 200 mg tablets (Zambon, Spain), following single-dose administration in 26 healthy volunteers. The study had an open, randomized, crossover design with a 7-day wash-out. Data from 24 subjects were used for the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Racemic tramadol and racemic O-demethyltramadol (M1) were assayed in plasma using a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. Primary PK parameters estimated were AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), C(max), C(24 h), and T(max). Results were compared using an ANOVA, and the residual variability thereby obtained was used to construct the classical 90% confidence intervals. The parametric Schuirmann's test was also performed. T(max) was analyzed by a nonparametric approach. For both racemic tramadol and racemic O-demethyltramadol, the ANOVA showed a statistically significant formulation effect. Significantly higher values were obtained for Tramadol Contramid o.d. for all PK parameters, except for T(1/2). For Tramadol Contramid o.d., mean tramadol plasma levels were maintained at a plateau level above 200 ng/ml from 4 to 16 h after dose, while for the reference formulation, that level was sustained from 4 to only 6 h. Consistent results for both formulations were obtained for the metabolite. At the end of the dosing interval, plasma tramadol and O-demethyltramadol concentrations were 39% and 49% higher, respectively, for Tramadol Contramid o.d. than those for Zytram (p < 0.0001). Tramadol Contramid o.d. could be considered suprabioavailable to Zytram o.d.

Enantioselective HPLC determination of E-6087, a new COX-2 inhibitor, in human plasma: Validation and pharmacokinetic application

E-6087 is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory compound that selectively inhibits cyclooxygenase-2. Because E-6087 has a chiral center, this compound is a racemic mixture of two stereoisomers, (+)-(R)-E-6087 (E-6231) and (-)-(S)-E-6087 (E-6232). A normal-phase liquid-chromatographic method for the enantioselective determination of E-6087 in human plasma was developed and validated. The samples were extracted using solid-phase extraction cartridges containing C(18) sorbent, and the extracts were redissolved in absolute ethanol and injected into the chromatographic system. The enantiomeric separation was achieved on a chiral stationary-phase column of derivatized amylose, and the enantiomers were quantified by fluorescence detection. The method was validated for drug concentrations ranging from 5 to 400 ng/ml for both enantiomers. No peaks interfering with the quantification of enantiomers were observed. The limit of quantification was 5 ng/ml, with precision expressed as a coefficient of variation lower than 10.6% and accuracy expressed as relative error lower than 12.2%. The utility of this method was demonstrated by analysis of plasma samples from healthy volunteers given an oral dose of rac-E-6087. Peak plasma levels of E-6231 were higher than levels obtained for E-6232. Results were consistent with those obtained with a conventional reversed-phase method used for determination of the racemic compound.