Survival outcomes and toxicity of adjuvant immunotherapy after definitive concurrent chemotherapy with proton beam radiation therapy for patients with inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant immunotherapy (IO) following concurrent chemotherapy and photon radiation therapy confers an overall survival (OS) benefit for patients with inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (LA-NSCLC); however, outcomes of adjuvant IO after concurrent chemotherapy with proton beam therapy (CPBT) are unknown. We investigated OS and toxicity after CPBT with adjuvant IO versus CPBT alone for inoperable LA-NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 354 patients with LA-NSCLC who were prospectively treated with CPBT with or without adjuvant IO from 2009 to 2021. Optimal variable ratio propensity score matching (PSM) matched CPBT with CPBT + IO patients. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the effect of IO on disease outcomes.

RESULTS

Median age was 70 years; 71 (20%) received CPBT + IO and 283 (80%) received CPBT only. After PSM, 71 CPBT patients were matched with 71 CPBT + IO patients. Three-year survival rates for CPBT + IO vs CPBT were: OS 67% vs 30% (P < 0.001) and PFS 59% vs 35% (P = 0.017). Three-year LRFS (P = 0.137) and DMFS (P = 0.086) did not differ. Receipt of adjuvant IO was a strong predictor of OS (HR 0.40, P = 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.56, P = 0.030), but not LRFS (HR 0.61, P = 0.121) or DMFS (HR 0.61, P = 0.136). There was an increased incidence of grade ≥3 esophagitis in the CPBT-only group (6% CPBT + IO vs 17% CPBT, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

This study, one of the first to investigate CPBT followed by IO for inoperable LA-NSCLC, showed that IO conferred survival benefits with no increased rates of toxicity.

Hybridizing mechanistic mathematical modeling with deep learning methods to predict individual cancer patient survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

We present a study where predictive mechanistic modeling is used in combination with deep learning methods to predict individual patient survival probabilities under immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. This hybrid approach enables prediction based on both measures that are calculable from mechanistic models (but may not be directly measurable in the clinic) and easily measurable quantities or characteristics (that are not always readily incorporated into predictive mechanistic models). The mechanistic model we have applied here can predict tumor response from CT or MRI imaging based on key mechanisms underlying checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and in the present work, its parameters were combined with readily-available clinical measures from 93 patients into a hybrid training set for a deep learning time-to-event predictive model. Analysis revealed that training an artificial neural network with both mechanistic modeling-derived and clinical measures achieved higher per-patient predictive accuracy based on event-time concordance, Brier score, and negative binomial log-likelihood-based criteria than when only mechanistic model-derived values or only clinical data were used. Feature importance analysis revealed that both clinical and model-derived parameters play prominent roles in neural network decision making, and in increasing prediction accuracy, further supporting the advantage of our hybrid approach. We anticipate that many existing mechanistic models may be hybridized with deep learning methods in a similar manner to improve predictive accuracy through addition of additional data that may not be readily implemented in mechanistic descriptions.

Inhibition of MER proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase by an antisense oligonucleotide enhances treatment efficacy of immunoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy (immunoradiotherapy) has been increasingly used for treating a wide range of cancers. However, some tumors are resistant to immunoradiotherapy. We have previously shown that MER proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MerTK) expressed on macrophages mediates resistance to immunoradiotherapy. We therefore sought to develop therapeutics that can mitigate the negative impact of MerTK. We designed and developed a MerTK specific antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) and characterized its effects on eliciting an anti-tumor immune response in mice.

METHODS

344SQR cells were injected into the right legs on day 0 and the left legs on day 4 of 8-12 weeks old female 129sv/ev mice to establish primary and secondary tumors, respectively. Radiation at a dose of 12 Gy was given to the primary tumors on days 8, 9, and 10. Mice received either anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4 or/and MerTK ASO starting from day 1 post tumor implantation. The composition of the tumor microenvironment and the level of MerTK on macrophages in the tumor were evaluted by flow cytometry. The expression of immune-related genes was investigated with NanoString. Lastly, the impact of MerTK ASO on the structure of the eye was histologically evaluated.

RESULTS

Remarkably, the addition of MerTK ASO to XRT+anti-PD1 and XRT+anti-CTLA4 profoundly slowed the growth of both primary and secondary tumors and significantly extended survival. The ASO significantly reduced the expression of MerTK in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), reprograming their phenotype from M2 to M1. In addition, MerTK ASO increased the percentage of Granzyme B+ CD8+ T cells in the secondary tumors when combined with XRT+anti-CTLA4. NanoString results demonstrated that the MerTK ASO favorably modulated immune-related genes for promoting antitumor immune response in secondary tumors. Importantly, histological analysis of eye tissues demonstrated that unlike small molecules, the MerTK ASO did not produce any detectable pathology in the eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

The MerTK ASO can significantly downregulate the expression of MerTK on TAMs, thereby promoting antitumor immune response. The combination of MerTK ASO with immunoradiotherapy can safely and significantly slow tumor growth and improve survival.

Definitive Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Thyroid Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Local consolidative radiotherapy (LCT) for oligometastatic disease is a promising paradigm improving outcomes for various malignancies but has been underexplored for metastatic thyroid cancer. We hypothesize that LCT to distant sites with definitive RT doses can yield favorable outcomes and defer systemic therapy escalation for these patients.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We reviewed 96 thyroid cancer patients who received 175 LCT courses from 2010-2022 to 228 metastatic sites, including: thorax (45%), bone (40%), brain (6%), head/neck (5%), and abdomen (3%). Common prescriptions were 50-55Gy/4-5fxs or 56-70Gy/8-10fxs for lung; 52.5-60Gy/15fxs for mediastinum; and 18-24Gy/1fx or 27-30Gy/3fxs for bone. RECIST v1.1 and CTCAE v5.0 were used to define progression and toxicities, respectively. Outcomes were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier and associations examined via Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Median age was 63 years (range: 26-92), with 62 oligometastatic cases (total 1-5 sites) and 34 oligoprogressive (with 1-5 growing sites). Primary disease was controlled in all patients, with 39% receiving post-op RT and 66% prior RAI. Histologies included papillary (40%), anaplastic (25%), follicular (12%), medullary (9%), Hurthle (7%), and poorly-differentiated (7%). Median time from initial diagnosis to LCT was 3 yrs (IQR 1-8), and median follow-up from 1st LCT was 21 mos (IQR 9-51). Patients received an average 2 LCT courses (range 1-8) treating 1-4 sites. Median survival (OS) from 1st LCT was 9 yrs (95% CI = 5-14). On multivariable analysis (MVA), worse OS was associated with anaplastic histology (HR 4.6, p<.01), but longer OS was associated with prior RAI (HR 0.33, p = .02) and oligometastatic disease (HR 0.3, p = .01). For anaplastic histology, median OS was 1.2 years vs. 9.3 years for non-anaplastic; 3-yr OS was 36% vs. 88% (log-rank, p<.01). Five-year OS for oligometastatic cases was 75% vs 53% for oligoprogressive (log-rank, p = .04). Median progression free survival (PFS) from 1st LCT was 15.5 mos (95% C I = 11-20). On MVA for all LCT courses, time to any progression (TTP) was negatively associated with anaplastic histology (HR 1.7, p = .02) and 2nd or higher LCT course (HR 1.45, p = .05), but favorably associated with thoracic site (HR 0.49, p<.01). Following later LCT courses, median TTP was 11 mos vs 17 mos for initial LCT course (log-rank, p = .03). After LCT to lung/chest, TTP was 18.6 mos vs 9.5 mos for non-thoracic sites (log-rank, p<.01). Only 6% of failures occurred at previously treated lesions. Most LCT courses (67%) were without ongoing chemotherapy, while 25% entailed continuing the same regimen and 9% had planned treatment post-RT. There were 2 Grade 3 toxicities (pneumonitis and esophagitis) and no Grade 4-5 events.

CONCLUSION

With high local control rates and minimal toxicity, LCT can be a feasible strategy to defer systemic therapy escalation for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive thyroid cancer.

Potentiating Local and Abscopal Antitumor Efficacy through Radiation with FAP-CD40 DARPin and Anti-PD1 Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Although the advent of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) has changed the facet of oncology, about 70% of patients develop resistance. CD40 is a potent costimulatory molecule that drives dendritic cells (DCs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) to prime T-cells. Clinically, agonistic CD40 antibodies have demonstrated antitumor activity, but dose-limiting toxicities have impaired efficacy. Radiation (RT), especially at higher doses, activates DCs and TAMs, but also upregulates Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). The upregulated FAP expression can be harnessed for the design of targeted drug delivery to the TME. The FAP-CD40 DARPin is a molecule that utilizes FAP and CD40 binding domains to selectively cross-link and activate CD40 in the tumor, thus avoiding systemic CD40 activation. This study aimed to evaluate if RT combined with a murine FAP-CD40 (mFAP-CD40) and ICI could improve survival and local and abscopal responses in a pre-clinical lung adenocarcinoma model. Human FAPxCD40 (MP0317) is being evaluated in Phase I trials.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The 344SQ-P tumor cells were bilaterally injected into the right and left hind legs of 129Sv/Ev mice to establish primary and secondary tumors respectively. When primary tumors reached ∼7mm in diameter, they were irradiated with 12 Gy x 3 fractions, while secondary tumors were monitored. mFAP-CD40 (5mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally at 2, 7, and 11 days after the last fraction of RT. A backbone of α-PD1 ICI was given twice per week starting with RT for 5 shots total. Mice were euthanized when tumors reached 14mm in diameter. Lungs were collected at experimental endpoints, fixed, and enumerated for metastases.

RESULTS

For FAP detection in the TME, we first conducted an IHC analysis on 344SQ-P tumors harvested 11 days post RT. Although 5 Gy x 3 was superior to 12 Gy x 3 in upregulating FAP expression compared to unirradiated controls (P = 0.0088), we chose the 12 Gy x 3 dose for subsequent experiments due to its superiority in releasing tumor antigens, priming T-cells, and promoting abscopal responses. In our bilaterally established murine groups, we have recorded the following median survival days: Control = 23; RT = 26; RT+α-PD1 = 33; mFAP-CD40+α-PD1 = 23; and RT+mFAP-CD40+α-PD1 (Triple therapy) = 44 days. These results were further buttressed by the difference in average tumor growth observed between groups; whereby there was a significant delay in tumor growth of both primary (P<0.0001) and secondary tumors (P<0.0001) of the Triple therapy group compared to either RT+α-PD1 or mFAP-CD40+α-PD1 dual therapies. In addition, the Triple therapy cohort had a significantly lower count of lung metastases vs. control (P = 0.0007) and vs. mFAP-CD40+α-PD1 (P = 0.0246) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

mFAP-CD40 DARPin with RT and α-PD1 proved efficacious to control primary and secondary tumors in a murine lung carcinoma model with no detected toxicities.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy for early-stage or isolated lung parenchymal recurrent node-negative non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but regional or distant relapses, or both, are common. Immunotherapy reduces recurrence and improves survival in people with stage III NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy, but its utility in stage I and II cases is unclear. We therefore conducted a randomised phase 2 trial of SABR alone compared with SABR with immunotherapy (I-SABR) for people with early-stage NSCLC.

METHODS

We did an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial comparing SABR to I-SABR, conducted at three different hospitals in TX, USA. People aged 18 years or older with histologically proven treatment-naive stage IA-IB (tumour size ≤4 cm, N0M0), stage IIA (tumour size ≤5 cm, N0M0), or stage IIB (tumour size >5 cm and ≤7 cm, N0M0) as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8 staging system or isolated parenchymal recurrences (tumour size ≤7 cm) NSCLC (TanyNanyM0 before definitive surgery or chemoradiotherapy) were included in this trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1; using the Pocock & Simon method) to receive SABR with or without four cycles of nivolumab (480 mg, once every 4 weeks, with the first dose on the same day as, or within 36 h after, the first SABR fraction). This trial was unmasked. The primary endpoint was 4-year event-free survival (local, regional, or distant recurrence; second primary lung cancer; or death). Analyses were both intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03110978) and is closed to enrolment.

FINDINGS

From June 30, 2017, to March 22, 2022, 156 participants were randomly assigned, and 141 participants received assigned therapy. At a median 33 months' follow-up, I-SABR significantly improved 4-year event-free survival from 53% (95% CI 42-67%) with SABR to 77% (66-91%; per-protocol population, hazard ratio [HR] 0·38; 95% CI 0·19-0·75; p=0·0056; ITT population, HR 0·42; 95% CI 0·22-0·80; p=0·0080). There were no grade 3 or higher adverse events associated with SABR. In the I-SABR group, ten participants (15%) had grade 3 immunologial adverse events related to nivolumab; none had grade 3 pneumonitis or grade 4 or higher toxicity.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with SABR alone, I-SABR significantly improved event-free survival at 4 years in people with early-stage treatment-naive or lung parenchymal recurrent node-negative NSCLC, with tolerable toxicity. I-SABR could be a treatment option in these participants, but further confirmation from a number of currently accruing phase 3 trials is required.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb and MD Anderson Cancer Center Alliance, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health through Cancer Center Core Support Grant and Clinical and Translational Science Award to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

NLRP3 agonist enhances radiation-induced immune priming and promotes abscopal responses in anti-PD1 resistant model

Radiotherapy (XRT), a well-known activator of the inflammasome and immune priming, is in part capable of reversing resistance to anti-PD1 treatment. The NLRP3 inflammasome is a pattern recognition receptor which is activated by both exogenous and endogenous stimuli, leading to a downstream inflammatory response. Although NLRP3 is typically recognized for its role in exacerbating XRT-induced tissue damage, the NLRP3 inflammasome can also yield an effective antitumor response when used in proper dosing and sequencing with XRT. However, whether NLRP3 agonist boosts radiation-induced immune priming and promote abscopal responses in anti-PD1 resistant model is still unknown. Therefore, in this study, we paired intratumoral injection of an NLRP3 agonist with XRT to stimulate the immune system in both wild type (344SQ-P) and anti-PD1 resistant (344SQ-R) murine-implanted lung adenocarcinoma models. We found that the combination of XRT + NLPR3 agonist enhanced the control of implanted lung adenocarcinoma primary as well as secondary tumors in a radiological dose-dependent manner, in which 12Gyx3 fractions of stereotactic XRT was better than 5Gyx3, while 1Gyx2 did not improve the NLRP3 effect. Survival and tumor growth data also showed significant abscopal response with the triple therapy (12Gyx3 + NLRP3 agonist + α-PD1) in both 344SQ-P and 344SQ-R aggressively growing models. Multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1b, IL-4, IL-12, IL-17, IFN-γ and GM-CSF) were elevated in the serum of mice treated with XRT + NLRP3 or triple therapy. The Nanostring results showed that NLRP3 agonist is capable of increasing antigen presentation, innate function, and T-cell priming. This study can be of particular importance to treat patients with immunologically-cold solid tumors whom are also refractory to prior checkpoint treatments.

Durable control of metastases in an HLA-A2+ patient with refractory melanoma after low-dose radiotherapy in combination with MAGE-A4 T cell therapy: a case report

There is no currently approved adoptive cellular therapy for solid tumors. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) can enhance intratumoral T cell infiltration and efficacy. This case report describes a 71-year-old female patient with rectal mucosal melanoma that had developed metastases to liver, lung, mediastinum, axillary nodes, and brain. After systemic therapies had failed, she enrolled in the radiation sub-study of our phase-I clinical trial exploring the safety and efficacy of afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel), genetically engineered T cells with a T cell receptor (TCR) targeting the MAGE-A4 tumor antigen in patients with advanced malignancies (NCT03132922). Prior to the infusion of afami-cel, she received concurrent lymphodepleting chemotherapy and LDRT at 5.6 Gy/4 fractions to the liver. Time to partial response was 10 weeks, and duration of overall response was 18.4 weeks. Although the patient progressed at 28 weeks, the disease was well controlled after high-dose radiotherapy to liver metastases and checkpoint inhibitors. As of the last follow-up, she remains alive over two years after LDRT and afami-cel therapy. This report suggests that afami-cel in combination with LDRT safely enhanced clinical benefit. This provides evidence for further exploring the benefit of LDRT in TCR-T cell therapy.

Nanoparticle-enhanced proton beam immunoradiotherapy drives immune activation and durable tumor rejection

The combination of radiation therapy (RT) and immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment option in oncology. Historically, x-ray radiation (XRT) has been the most commonly used form of RT. However, proton beam therapy (PBT) is gaining recognition as a viable alternative, as it has been shown to produce similar outcomes to XRT while minimizing off-target effects. The effects of PBT on the antitumor immune response have only just begun to be described, and to our knowledge no studies to date have examined the effect of PBT as part of a combinatorial immunoradiotherapeutic strategy. Here, using a 2-tumor model of lung cancer in mice, we show that PBT in tandem with an anti-PD1 antibody substantially reduced growth in both irradiated and unirradiated tumors. This was accompanied by robust activation of the immune response, as evidenced by whole-tumor and single-cell RNA sequencing showing upregulation of a multitude of immune-related transcripts. This response was further significantly enhanced by the injection of the tumor to be irradiated with NBTXR3 nanoparticles. Tumors of mice treated with the triple combination exhibited increased infiltration and activation of cytotoxic immune cells. This triple combination eradicated both tumors in 37.5% of the treated mice and showed robust long-term immunity to cancer.

The role of tumor metabolism in modulating T-Cell activity and in optimizing immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment and revitalized efforts to harness the power of the immune system to combat a variety of cancer types more effectively. However, low clinical response rates and differences in outcomes due to variations in the immune landscape among patients with cancer continue to be major limitations to immunotherapy. Recent efforts to improve responses to immunotherapy have focused on targeting cellular metabolism, as the metabolic characteristics of cancer cells can directly influence the activity and metabolism of immune cells, particularly T cells. Although the metabolic pathways of various cancer cells and T cells have been extensively reviewed, the intersections among these pathways, and their potential use as targets for improving responses to immune-checkpoint blockade therapies, are not completely understood. This review focuses on the interplay between tumor metabolites and T-cell dysfunction as well as the relationship between several T-cell metabolic patterns and T-cell activity/function in tumor immunology. Understanding these relationships could offer new avenues for improving responses to immunotherapy on a metabolic basis.

Abstract 2415: NBTXR3 radio-enhancing nanoparticle achieves a more robust antitumor immune response when combined with proton radiotherapy than photon radiotherapy

Introduction: Immunoradiotherapy combining radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade, has achieved impressive treatment outcomes. We have previously demonstrated that photon (XRT) and proton (PRT) localized radiotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint blockade and NBTXR3, a radioenhancing nanoparticle, could induce a systemic antitumor immune response. However, no studies have compared the treatment efficacy of PRT and XRT immunoradiotherapy. Here, we compared the capabilities of PRT and XRT when combined with NBTXR3 and PD1 blockade for inducing an antitumor immune response.

Methods: 344SQR cells were inoculated in the right and left hindlimbs of 129Sv/Ev mice on day 0 and day 4 to establish primary and secondary tumors, respectively. Mice were divided into five treatment groups: 1) untreated control; 2) XRT+αPD1; 3) NBTXR3+XRT+αPD1; 4) PRT+αPD1; 5) NBTXR3+PRT+αPD1. The primary tumors were intratumorally injected with NBTXR3 nanoparticles on day 7, followed by two fractions of 12 Gy XRT or PRT on days 8 and 9 (total dose of 24 Gy). Two hundred μg of αPD1 was given to the mice on days 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 through intraperitoneal injection. We assayed whole tumor RNAs with a Nanostring pan-cancer immune panel to profile the tumor immune microenvironment changes. In addition, immune cells extracted from the tumors were analyzed with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). The survivor mice treated with the NBTXR3+PRT+αPD1 were rechallenged with 344SQR and 344SQP cells.

Results: PRT+ αPD1 resulted in significantly better control of the primary tumors than XRT+ αPD1. No significant difference was observed in the volume of the secondary tumors treated with XRT+ αPD1 and the control. In contrast, PRT+ αPD1 resulted in a pronounced abscopal effect. Adding NBTXR3 to XRT+ αPD1 and PRT+ αPD1 improved the control of both the primary and secondary tumors. In addition, NBTXR3+PRT+αPD1 achieved significantly slower growth of the two tumors and more prolonged survival than NBTXR3+XRT+αPD1. Remarkably, NBTXR3+PRT+αPD1 eradicated both primary and secondary tumors in 40% of the treated mice, while no mice were cured by NBTXR3+XRT+αPD1. Nanostring analysis and scRNAseq revealed better activation and infiltration of antitumoral immune cells to the two tumors when treated with PRT than XRT. The survivor mice treated with NBTXR3+PRT+αPD1 effectively rejected tumor growth after rechallenge with 344SQR and 344SQP cells.

Conclusions: When combined with NBTXR3, PRT with αPD1 exhibited significantly better treatment efficacy than XRT with αPD1. The superior efficacy of NBTXR3+PRT+αPD1 is accompanied by a more robust immune activation and immune cell infiltration in irradiated and unirradiated tumors.

Citation Format: Yun Hu, Sébastien Paris, Narayan Sahoo, Qi Wang, Qianxia Wang, Hampartsoum B. Barsoumian, Jordan Da Silva, Célia Bienassis, Ailing Huang, Nahum Puebla-Osorio, Saumil Gandhi, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen, Jing Wang, Maria A. Cortez, James W. Welsh. NBTXR3 radio-enhancing nanoparticle achieves a more robust antitumor immune response when combined with proton radiotherapy than photon radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2415.

Inhibition of STAT6 with Antisense Oligonucleotides Enhances the Systemic Antitumor Effects of Radiotherapy and Anti-PD-1 in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Diverse factors contribute to the limited clinical response to radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), among which is the ability of these tumors to recruit a retinue of suppressive immune cells-such as M2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAM)-thereby establishing an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that contributes to tumor progression and radio resistance. M2 TAMs are activated by the STAT6 signaling pathway. Therefore, we targeted STAT6 using an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) along with hypofractionated RT (hRT; 3 fractions of 12 Gy each) to primary tumors in three bilateral murine NSCLC models (Lewis lung carcinoma, 344SQ-parental, and anti-PD-1-resistant 344SQ lung adenocarcinomas). We found that STAT6 ASO plus hRT slowed growth of both primary and abscopal tumors, decreased lung metastases, and extended survival. Interrogating the mechanism of action showed reduced M2 macrophage tumor infiltration, enhanced TH1 polarization, improved T-cell and macrophage function, and decreased TGFβ levels. The addition of anti-PD-1 further enhanced systemic antitumor responses. These results provide a preclinical rationale for the pursuit of an alternative therapeutic approach for patients with immune-resistant NSCLC.

Five-year overall survival with ipilimumab and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for metastatic disease

PURPOSE

Ipilimumab plus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) demonstrate satisfactory short-term clinical benefit and low toxicities in metastatic cancers. Here, we report the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with metastatic disease treated with this combined-modality therapy in a phase II trial (NCT02239900).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

SABR was delivered to patients with metastatic lesions in the liver and lung either during the first dose (concurrent) or 1 week after the second dose (sequential) of ipilimumab (every 3 weeks for 4 cycles). SABR was administered to liver or lung metastases as 50 Gy in 4 fractions or 60 Gy in 10 fractions, considering the tumor location. The OS rates at 12, 36, and 60 months were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; subgroup analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS by SABR-targeted lesions (liver/lung) were performed by log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were enrolled in this long-term follow-up analysis. At the median follow-up time of 15.32 months (range, 0.97-82.13 months), the median PFS was 6.52 months (95% CI, 5.86-7.14) and the median OS was 15.32 months (95% CI,13.03-17.23). The 12-, 36-, and 60-month OS rates were 61%, 23%, and 15%, respectively. There was a significant difference in OS between cohorts (P = 0.039), with a stronger response observed in lung-treated subgroups. Patients who had received sequential fractions (50 Gy/4f) to the lung had improved OS compared to those who had received sequential fractions (18.29 vs 8.9 months, P = 0.043) to the liver. Subgroup analysis of SABR-targeted lesions showed that lung-targeted groups had significantly longer PFS (6.87 months vs. 5.63 months, P = 0.034) and OS (18.67 months vs. 13.63 months, P = 0.013) compared to liver-targeted groups. The sequence did not affect the outcomes of PFS and OS. Exploratory analyses showed that SABR-targeted lesions and smoking history comprised an independent risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated 5-year OS data from the phase II trial demonstrate the long-term clinical benefit of ipilimumab and SABR, which warrants further research and cumulative data.

NLRP3 agonist enhances radiation-induced immune priming and promotes abscopal responses in anti-PD1 resistant model

Radiotherapy (XRT), a well-known activator of the inflammasome and immune priming, is in part capable of reversing resistance to anti-PD1 treatment. Although NLRP3 is typically observed for its role in exacerbating XRT-induced tissue damage, the NLRP3 inflammasome can also be protective and augment the effect of XRT when used in proper dosing and sequencing. However, whether NLRP3 agonist boosts radiation-induced immune priming and promote abscopal responses in anti-PD1 resistant model is still unknown. Therefore, in this study, we paired intratumoral injection of an NLRP3 agonist with XRT to stimulate the immune system in both wild type (344SQ-P) and anti-PD1 resistant (344SQ-R) murine-implanted lung adenocarcinoma models. We found that the combination of XRT + NLPR3 agonist enhanced control of implanted lung adenocarcinoma primary as well as secondary tumors in a radiological dose-dependent manner, in which 12Gy x 3 fractions of stereotactic XRT was better than 5Gy x 3, while 1Gy x 2 did not improve the NLRP3 effect. Survival and tumor growth data also showed significant abscopal response with the triple therapy (12Gyx3 + NLRP3 agonist + α-PD1) in both 344SQ-P and 344SQ-R aggressively growing models. Multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1b, IL-4, IL-12, IL-17, IFN-γ and GM-CSF) were elevated in the serum of mice treated with XRT + NLRP3 or triple therapy. The Nanostring results showed that NLRP3 agonist is capable of increasing antigen presentation, innate function, and T-cell priming. This study can be of particular importance to treat patients with immunologically-cold solid tumors whom are also refractory to prior checkpoint treatments.

Radiation Therapy Modulates Tumor Physical Characteristics to Reduce Intratumoral Pressure and Enhance Intratumoral Drug Delivery and Retention

Purpose

High intratumoral pressure, caused by tumor cell-to-cell interactions, interstitial fluid pressure, and surrounding stromal composition, plays a substantial role in resistance to intratumoral drug delivery and distribution. Radiation therapy (XRT) is commonly administered in conjunction with different intratumoral drugs, but assessing how radiation can reduce pressure locally and help intratumoral drug administration and retention is important.

Methods and Materials

344SQ-parental or 344SQ-anti-programmed cell death protein 1-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells were established in 129Sv/Ev mice, and irradiated with either 1 Gy × 2, 5 Gy × 3, 8 Gy × 3, 12 Gy × 3, or 20 Gy × 1. Intratumoral pressure was measured every 3 to 4 days after XRT. Contrast dye was injected into the tumors 3- and 6-days after XRT, and imaged to measure drug retention.

Results

In the 344SQ-parental model, low-dose radiation (1 Gy × 2) created an early window of reduced intratumoral pressure 1 to 3 days after XRT compared with untreated control. High-dose stereotactic radiation (12 Gy × 3) reduced intratumoral pressure 3 to 12 days after XRT, and 20 Gy × 1 showed a delayed pressure reduction on day 12. Intermediate doses of radiation did not significantly affect intratumoral pressure. In the more aggressive 344SQ-anti-programmed cell death protein 1-resistant model, low-dose radiation reduced pressure 1 to 5 days after XRT, and 12 Gy × 3 reduced pressure 1 to 3 days after XRT. Moreover, both 1 Gy × 2 and 12 Gy × 3 significantly improved drug retention 3 days after XRT; however, there was no significance detected 6 days after XRT. Lastly, a histopathologic evaluation showed that 1 Gy × 2 reduced collagen deposition within the tumor, and 12 Gy × 3 led to more necrotic core and higher extracellular matrix formation in the tumor periphery.

Conclusions

Optimized low-dose XRT, as well as higher stereotactic XRT regimen led to a reduction in intratumoral pressure and increased drug retention. The findings from this work can be readily translated into the clinic to enhance intratumoral injections of various anticancer agents.

NBTXR3 improves the efficacy of immunoradiotherapy combining nonfucosylated anti-CTLA4 in an anti-PD1 resistant lung cancer model

The efficacy of immunoradiotherapy consisting of radiation therapy and immune checkpoint blockade relies on effectively promoting the systemic antitumor immune response's activation while simultaneously reducing local factors favoring immune suppression. We previously demonstrated that NBTXR3, a nanoparticle radioenhancer, significantly improved immune responses in a murine anti-PD1-resistant metastatic lung cancer model. We hypothesize that radioactivated-NBTXR3 addition to anti-PD1 and a second-generation anti-CTLA4 could improve treatment effectiveness. To test this hypothesis, we inoculated mice with 344SQR cells in the right and left legs to establish primary and secondary tumors. The primary tumors were intratumorally injected with NBTXR3 nanoparticles on day 7, followed by three fractions of 12 Gy radiation on days 8, 9, and 10. The secondary tumors received two fractions of 1Gy radiation on days 13 and 14. Multiple rounds of anti-PD1, anti-CTLA4 or nonfucosylated anti-CTLA4 were given to the mice. Immune profiling of the tumors revealed that the combination of NBTXR3 with immunoradiotherapy significantly upregulated the activities of a wide range of antitumor immune pathways and reduced the abundance of regulatory suppressor T cells. This combination effectively eradicated the primary and secondary tumors and increased animal survival to 75%. Remarkably, previously treated with NBTXR3-containing treatment, the survivor mice exhibited a long-lasting antitumor memory immune response. This data provides compelling evidence of the efficacy of NBTXR3 to synergize with the immunoradiotherapy approach when combined with an anti-PD1 and multiple checkpoints such as a second generation anti-CTLA4 and show the potential for clinical uses of antitumor immunomodulatory effects of NBTXR3.

Bone morphogenetic proteins, activins, and growth and differentiation factors in tumor immunology and immunotherapy resistance

The TGF-β superfamily is a group of secreted polypeptides with key roles in exerting and regulating a variety of physiologic effects, especially those related to cell signaling, growth, development, and differentiation. Although its central member, TGF-β, has been extensively reviewed, other members of the family—namely bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), activins, and growth and differentiation factors (GDFs)—have not been as thoroughly investigated. Moreover, although the specific roles of TGF-β signaling in cancer immunology and immunotherapy resistance have been extensively reported, little is known of the roles of BMPs, activins, and GDFs in these domains. This review focuses on how these superfamily members influence key immune cells in cancer progression and resistance to treatment.

The potential of biology-guided radiation therapy in thoracic cancer: A preliminary treatment planning study

Purpose

We investigated the feasibility of biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT), a technique that utilizes real-time positron emission imaging to minimize tumor motion uncertainties, to spare nearby organs at risk.

Methods

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) therapy, and BgRT plans were created for a paratracheal node recurrence (case 1; 60 Gy in 10 fractions) and a primary peripheral left upper lobe adenocarcinoma (case 2; 50 Gy in four fractions).

Results

For case 1, BgRT produced lower bronchus V40 values compared to VMAT and IMPT. For case 2, total lung V20 was lower in the BgRT case compared to VMAT and IMPT.

Conclusions

BgRT has the potential to reduce the radiation dose to proximal critical structures but requires further detailed investigation.

Pulsed radiotherapy to mitigate high tumor burden and generate immune memory

Radiation therapy (XRT) has a well-established role in cancer treatment. Given the encouraging results on immunostimulatory effects, radiation has been increasingly used with immune-check-point inhibitors in metastatic disease, especially when immunotherapy fails due to tumor immune evasion. We hypothesized that using high-dose stereotactic radiation in cycles (pulses) would increase T-cell priming and repertoire with each pulse and build immune memory in an incremental manner. To prove this hypothesis, we studied the combination of anti-CTLA-4 and Pulsed radiation therapy in our 344SQ non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma murine model. Primary and secondary tumors were bilaterally implanted in 129Sv/Ev mice. In the Pulsed XRT group, both primary and secondary tumors received 12Gyx2 radiation one week apart, and blood was collected seven days afterwards for TCR repertoire analysis. As for the delayed-Pulse group, primary tumors received 12Gyx2, and after a window of two weeks, the secondary tumors received 12Gyx2. Blood was collected seven days after the second cycle of radiation. The immunotherapy backbone for both groups was anti-CTLA-4 antibody to help with priming. Treatment with Pulsed XRT + anti-CTLA-4 led to significantly improved survival and resulted in a delayed tumor growth, where we observed enhanced antitumor efficacy at primary tumor sites beyond XRT + anti-CTLA-4 treatment group. More importantly, Pulsed XRT treatment led to increased CD4+ effector memory compared to single-cycle XRT. Pulsed XRT demonstrated superior efficacy to XRT in driving antitumor effects that were largely dependent on CD4+ T cells and partially dependent on CD8+ T cells. These results suggest that combinatorial strategies targeting multiple points of tumor immune evasion may lead to a robust and sustained antitumor response.

Combining a nanoparticle-mediated immunoradiotherapy with dual blockade of LAG3 and TIGIT improves the treatment efficacy in anti-PD1 resistant lung cancer

BACKGROUND

While improvements in immunoradiotherapy have significantly improved outcomes for cancer patients, this treatment approach has nevertheless proven ineffective at controlling the majority of malignancies. One of the mechanisms of resistance to immunoradiotherapy is that immune cells may be suppressed via the myriad of different immune checkpoint receptors. Therefore, simultaneous blockade of multiple immune checkpoint receptors may enhance the treatment efficacy of immunoradiotherapy.

METHODS

We combined NBTXR3-enhanced localized radiation with the simultaneous blockade of three different checkpoint receptors: PD1, LAG3, and TIGIT, and tested the treatment efficacy in an anti-PD1-resistant lung cancer model in mice. 129 Sv/Ev mice were inoculated with fifty thousand αPD1-resistant 344SQR cells in the right leg on day 0 to establish primary tumors and with the same number of cells in the left leg on day 4 to establish the secondary tumors. NBTXR3 was intratumorally injected into the primary tumors on day 7, which were irradiated with 12 Gy on days 8, 9, and 10. Anti-PD1 (200 µg), αLAG3 (200 µg), and αTIGIT (200 µg) were given to mice by intraperitoneal injections on days 5, 8, 11, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42.

RESULTS

This nanoparticle-mediated combination therapy is effective at controlling the growth of irradiated and distant unirradiated tumors, enhancing animal survival, and is the only one that led to the destruction of both tumors in approximately 30% of the treated mice. Corresponding with this improved response is robust activation of the immune response, as manifested by increased numbers of immune cells along with a transcriptional signature of both innate and adaptive immunity within the tumor. Furthermore, mice treated with this combinatorial therapy display immunological memory response when rechallenged by the same cancer cells, preventing tumor engraftment.

CONCLUSION

Our results strongly attest to the efficacy and validity of combining nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy and simultaneous blockade of multiple immune checkpoint receptors and provide a pre-clinical rationale for investigating its translation into human patients.

Local Therapy for Oligoprogressive Disease: A Systematic Review of Prospective Trials

OBJECTIVES

The successes of local therapy for oligometastatic cancers cannot be extrapolated to oligoprogressive disease (OPD) because they are distinct clinical entities. Given the limited prospective data on OPD to date, summative analyses are urgently needed.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for this PRISMA-guided systematic review were as follows. First, only prospective data were included. Second, progression had to have occurred on active/ongoing systemic therapy. Third, the number of progressing areas of disease had to be explicitly listed and ≤5 in number. Fourth, all progressing sites had to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy/surgery/non-radiation ablative procedures).

RESULTS

Eight trials met criteria (summing 290 patients), the vast majority of which utilized stereotactic radiotherapy as the local modality (most commonly, 19-20 Gy in 1 fraction, 27-33 Gy in 3 fractions, or 35-50 Gy in 5 fractions). A study on NSCLC demonstrated that stereotactic radiotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to historical values with systemic therapy alone. Two additional studies on EGFR-mutated NSCLC also showed acceptable PFS with local therapy, particularly in patients who oligoprogressed on osimertinib. The only randomized trial analyzed herein showed that local therapy improved PFS for NSCLC but not breast cancer. Two trials in castration-resistant prostate cancer illustrated that a substantial proportion of patients did not require any changes in hormonal therapy and/or delayed the need to change systemic therapies. Lastly, two trials of renal cell carcinoma showed high (90-100%) local control and median PFS of 9 months, and potentially a prolonged time to change systemic therapy. Lastly, from all patients in all trials, local therapy was tolerated well, with only 7 instances of grade 3+ toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited data, local therapy for OPD is safe and yields encouraging short-term preliminary outcomes, but trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are required for more robust conclusions.

Abstract 5516: Nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy combined with triple blockade of PD1, LAG3, and TIGIT enhances anti-tumor immune activation

Introduction: Checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has been a game-changer for cancer therapy, but most cancers do not respond. Part of the problem is that cancers employ multiple checkpoints; thus, targeting multiple checkpoint receptors simultaneously may yield increased benefit. Previously, we found that radiotherapy (XRT) in concert with a radiation-enhancing nanoparticle (NBTXR3) and PD1 blockade significantly improved tumor control both at the irradiative site and in remote, unirradiated tumors in a mouse model of anti-PD1 (αPD1)-resistant lung cancer (344SQR). Here, we tested whether blockade of TIGIT, LAG3, and PD1 in combination with NBTXR3-enhanced XRT could improve antitumor immune responses in our 344SQR tumor model.

Methods: Fifty thousand 344SQR cells were inoculated in the right and left hindlimbs of 129Sv/Ev mice on day 0 and day 4 to establish primary and secondary tumors, respectively. Mice were divided into six treatment groups: 1) untreated; 2) XRT+αPD1; 3) NBTXR3+XRT+αPD1; 4) NBTXR3+XRT+αPD1+αLAG3; 5) NBTXR3+XRT+αPD1+αTIGIT; and 6) NBTXR3+XRT+αPD1+αLAG3 +αTIGIT. Primary tumors were intratumorally injected with NBTXR3 nanoparticles on day 7 and received 3 fractions of 12 Gy X-ray radiation on days 8, 9, and 10. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, composed of αPD1 (200 μg), αLAG3 (200 μg), and αTIGIT (200 μg), were intraperitoneally administered to the mice on days 5, 8, 11, 14. The expression of 770 immune-related genes were measured via NanoString from the RNA extracted from the primary and secondary tumors on day 21.

Results: CPIs+NBTXR3-enhanced radiation significantly promoted the upregulation of mRNA transcripts involved in innate immunity, the humoral response, B cell function, dendritic cell (DC) function, and antigen processing within primary, irradiated tumors relative to untreated controls. No additional increase in immune gene activity in the irradiated tumors was observed when LAG3, TIGIT, or both were blocked in addition to PD1. However, within the non-irradiated tumors, triple blockade of PD1, LAG3, and TIGIT in concert with NBTXR3+XRT produced elevations in multiple immune-related pathways that were significantly higher than those produced by other treatment combinations. These pathways included both adaptive and innate immunity; B, T, and natural killer (NK) cell, and DC function; and antigen processing.

Conclusions: Simultaneous inhibition of LAG3 and TIGIT in tandem with PD1 blockade and NBTXR3-enhanced radiotherapy promotes immune activation at the irradiated site. In addition, abscopal immune responses are improved with blockade of LAG3 and TIGIT. These results suggest that blockade of multiple immune checkpoints in parallel with NBTXR3-mediated radiotherapy may be effective in metastatic cancers.

[Y.H. and B.G. contributed equally to this work.]

Citation Format: Yun Hu, Genevieve Bertolet, Sebastien Paris, Hampartsoum Barsoumian, Jordan DA SILVA, Saumil Gandhi, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen, Maria A. Cortez, James W. Welsh. Nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy combined with triple blockade of PD1, LAG3, and TIGIT enhances anti-tumor immune activation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5516.

A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Cancer Oligometastases

PURPOSE

It is crucial to economically justify the use of promising therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastatic disease (OMD). The goal of this systematic review was to summatively evaluate publications that analyzed the cost-effectiveness of SABR for OMD.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using PRISMA-guided methodology, PubMed and EMBASE were searched for modeling-based cost effectiveness (CE) studies for various forms of limited metastatic disease. Only full publications that specifically compared SABR with a systemic therapy-based approach were included.

RESULTS

Of 9 studies, 4 pertained to OMD with mixed histologies, 2 to oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer, 1 to pulmonary OMD, 1 to liver OMD, and 1 to low-volume oligorecurrent castration-sensitive prostate cancer. All but one investigation illustrated that SABR was cost-effective for the studied population (or a subpopulation); of these studies, the incremental CE ratios (ICERs) for SABR (when reported) ranged from $28,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to $55,000/QALY. Of studies that reported the probability of SABR being cost-effective at common willingness-to-pay values, the median (range) probability of achieving CE was roughly 61% (30-88%) at a $50,000/QALY threshold and 78% (31%-100%) at a $100,000/QALY threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that SABR is a cost-effective approach for OMD, which has implications for value-based oncologic practice and construction of future health policies. However, re-assessment is required in the context of modern systemic therapies (e.g. immunotherapy) as well as long-term follow-up of existing and newly reported randomized trials. Prudent patient selection remains the single most important factor influencing the CE of SABR for OMD.

Quantifying the rate and predictors of occult lymph node involvement in patients with clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

It is essential to evaluate the risk of occult lymph node (LN) disease in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially because delivering stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) assumes no occult spread. This study was designed to assist clinicians in roughly quantifying this risk for cN0 NSCLC.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cN0 cM0 lung squamous cell or adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and LN dissection without neoadjuvant therapy. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with pN + disease.

RESULTS

109,964 patients were included. For tumors with size ≤1.0, 1.1-2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0, 4.1-5.0, 5.1-6.0, 6.1-7.0, and >7.0 cm, the pN + rate was 4.4, 7.7, 12.9, 18.0, 20.2, 22.5, 24.4, and 26.4%, respectively. When examining patients with more complete LN dissections (defined as removal of at least 10 LNs), the respective values were 6.6, 11.5, 17.6, 25.3, 26.8, 29.7, 30.7, and 31.6%. Moderately-poorly differentiated disease and adenocarcinomas were associated with a higher rate of pN + disease (p < .001 for both). For every cm increase in tumor size, the relative occult nodal risk increased by 10-14% (p < .001). For every elapsed day from initial diagnosis, the relative risk increased by ∼1% (p < .001). Graphs with best-fit lines were created based on tumor size, histology, and differentiation to aid physicians in estimating the pN + risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide study can allow clinicians to roughly estimate the rate of occult LN disease in cN0 NSCLC. These data can also assist in guiding enrollment on randomized trials of SABR ± immunotherapy, individualizing follow-up imaging surveillance, and patient counseling to avoid post-diagnosis delays.

Novel Use of Low-Dose Radiotherapy to Modulate the Tumor Microenvironment of Liver Metastases

Despite multiple therapeutic approaches, the presence of liver metastases carries a guarded prognosis, urgently necessitating further clinical and scientific research to develop curative interventions. The liver is an immunoprivileged organ that suppresses the effectiveness of immunotherapies in patients with hepatic metastases. Cancer immunotherapies have been successfully bolstered by low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT), which is capable of reprogramming the tumor microenvironment (TME) from an immunosuppressive to an immunostimulatory one. Likewise, LDRT may be able to revoke the immune privilege enjoyed by the liver, permitting successful immunotherapies there. Here, we first review challenges that face the treatment of liver metastases. We next outline emerging preclinical and clinical evidence supporting enhanced systemic tumor control of LDRT in the context of cancer immunotherapy. Finally, we will discuss the rationale of combining liver-directed LDRT with immunostimulatory strategies to overcome immune resistance and achieve better clinical response. This notion is supported by a recent case study in which a patient who had progressed following T cell therapy experienced a complete response after LDRT to the liver.

A radioenhancing nanoparticle mediated immunoradiation improves survival and generates long-term antitumor immune memory in an anti-PD1-resistant murine lung cancer model

Background

Combining radiotherapy with PD1 blockade has had impressive antitumor effects in preclinical models of metastatic lung cancer, although anti-PD1 resistance remains problematic. Here, we report results from a triple-combination therapy in which NBTXR3, a clinically approved nanoparticle radioenhancer, is combined with high-dose radiation (HDXRT) to a primary tumor plus low-dose radiation (LDXRT) to a secondary tumor along with checkpoint blockade in a mouse model of anti-PD1-resistant metastatic lung cancer.

Methods

Mice were inoculated with 344SQR cells in the right legs on day 0 (primary tumor) and the left legs on day 3 (secondary tumor). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-PD1 (200 μg) and anti-CTLA4 (100 μg) were given intraperitoneally. Primary tumors were injected with NBTXR3 on day 6 and irradiated with 12-Gy (HDXRT) on days 7, 8, and 9; secondary tumors were irradiated with 1-Gy (LDXRT) on days 12 and 13. The survivor mice at day 178 were rechallenged with 344SQR cells and tumor growth monitored thereafter.

Results

NBTXR3  +  HDXRT  +  LDXRT  +  ICIs had significant antitumor effects against both primary and secondary tumors, improving the survival rate from 0 to 50%. Immune profiling of the secondary tumors revealed that NBTXR3  +  HDXRT  +  LDXRT increased CD8 T-cell infiltration and decreased the number of regulatory T (Treg) cells. Finally, none of the re-challenged mice developed tumors, and they had higher percentages of CD4 memory T cells and CD4 and CD8 T cells in both blood and spleen relative to untreated mice.

Conclusions

NBTXR3 nanoparticle in combination with radioimmunotherapy significantly improves anti-PD1 resistant lung tumor control via promoting antitumor immune response.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12951-021-01163-1.

Early prediction of clinical response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in human solid tumors through mathematical modeling

Background:

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy of cancer has led to markedly improved survival of a subset of patients in multiple solid malignant tumor types, yet the factors driving these clinical responses or lack thereof are not known. We have developed a mechanistic mathematical model for better understanding these factors and their relations in order to predict treatment outcome and optimize personal treatment strategies.

Methods:

Here, we present a translational mathematical model dependent on three key parameters for describing efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in human cancer: tumor growth rate (α), tumor-immune infiltration (Λ), and immunotherapy-mediated amplification of anti-tumor response (µ). The model was calibrated by fitting it to a compiled clinical tumor response dataset (n = 189 patients) obtained from published anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 clinical trials, and then validated on an additional validation cohort (n = 64 patients) obtained from our in-house clinical trials.

Results:

The derived parameters Λ and µ were both significantly different between responding versus nonresponding patients. Of note, our model appropriately classified response in 81.4% of patients by using only tumor volume measurements and within 2 months of treatment initiation in a retrospective analysis. The model reliably predicted clinical response to the PD-1/PD-L1 class of checkpoint inhibitors across multiple solid malignant tumor types. Comparison of model parameters to immunohistochemical measurement of PD-L1 and CD8+ T cells confirmed robust relationships between model parameters and their underlying biology.

Conclusions:

These results have demonstrated reliable methods to inform model parameters directly from biopsy samples, which are conveniently obtainable as early as the start of treatment. Together, these suggest that the model parameters may serve as early and robust biomarkers of the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor therapy on an individualized per-patient basis.

Funding:

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Andrew Sabin Family Fellowship, Center for Radiation Oncology Research, Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, and institutional funds from the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. We have also received Cancer Center Support Grants from the National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672 to the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and P30CA072720 the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey). This research has also been supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation Grant DMS-1930583 (ZW, VC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1R01CA253865 (ZW, VC), 1U01CA196403 (ZW, VC), 1U01CA213759 (ZW, VC), 1R01CA226537 (ZW, RP, WA, VC), 1R01CA222007 (ZW, VC), U54CA210181 (ZW, VC), and the University of Texas System STARS Award (VC). BC acknowledges support through the SER Cymru II Programme, funded by the European Commission through the Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) COFUND scheme and the Welsh European Funding Office (WEFO) under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). EK has also received support from the Project Purple, NIH (U54CA210181, U01CA200468, and U01CA196403), and the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (16-65-SING). MF was supported through NIH/NCI center grant U54CA210181, R01CA222959, DoD Breast Cancer Research Breakthrough Level IV Award W81XWH-17-1-0389, and the Ernest Cockrell Jr. Presidential Distinguished Chair at Houston Methodist Research Institute. RP and WA received serial research awards from AngelWorks, the Gillson-Longenbaugh Foundation, and the Marcus Foundation. This work was also supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute to SHC (R01CA109322, R01CA127483, R01CA208703, and U54CA210181 CITO pilot grant) and to PYP (R01CA140243, R01CA188610, and U54CA210181 CITO pilot grant). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Safety and clinical activity of intratumoral MEDI9197 alone and in combination with durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background

MEDI9197 is an intratumorally administered toll-like receptor 7 and 8 agonist. In mice, MEDI9197 modulated antitumor immune responses, inhibited tumor growth and increased survival. This first-time-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated MEDI9197 with or without the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced solid tumors.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients had at least one cutaneous, subcutaneous, or deep-seated lesion suitable for intratumoral (IT) injection. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. Patients received IT MEDI9197 0.005–0.055 mg with or without RT (part 1), or IT MEDI9197 0.005 or 0.012 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous with or without RT (part 3), in 4-week cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1. Exploratory endpoints included tumor and peripheral biomarkers that correlate with biological activity or predict response.

Results

From November 2015 to March 2018, part 1 enrolled 35 patients and part 3 enrolled 17 patients; five in part 1 and 2 in part 3 received RT. The maximum tolerated dose of MEDI9197 monotherapy was 0.037 mg, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cytokine release syndrome in two patients (one grade 3, one grade 4) and 0.012 mg in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg with DLT of MEDI9197-related hemorrhagic shock in one patient (grade 5) following liver metastasis rupture after two cycles of MEDI9197. Across parts 1 and 3, the most frequent MEDI9197-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fever (56%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (21%). The most frequent MEDI9197-related grade ≥3 events were decreased lymphocytes (15%), neutrophils (10%), and white cell counts (10%). MEDI9197 increased tumoral CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells, inducing type 1 and 2 interferons and Th1 response. There were no objective clinical responses; 10 patients in part 1 and 3 patients in part 3 had stable disease ≥8 weeks.

Conclusion

IT MEDI9197 was feasible for subcutaneous/cutaneous lesions but AEs precluded its use in deep-seated lesions. Although no patients responded, MEDI9197 induced systemic and intratumoral immune activation, indicating potential value in combination regimens in other patient populations.

Trial registration number

NCT02556463.

Pulsed Radiation Therapy to Improve Systemic Control of Metastatic Cancer

Radiation therapy (RT) is emerging as an interventional modality in the cancer-immunity cycle, augmenting the activation of an adaptive immune response against tumors. RT, particularly in combination with immunotherapy, can enhance immune memory effects and shape the tumor-directed T-cell populations. However, a single cycle of RT delivered to a limited number of polymetastatic lesions is rarely sufficient to achieve systemic control. We hypothesize that several rounds of RT, akin to several rounds of immunotherapeutic drugs, is likely to provide greater clinical benefit to patients with metastatic disease. We propose that the repeated exposure to tumor antigens released by “pulsed-RT” (i.e., treating 2-4 tumor lesions with 3 irradiation cycles given one month apart) may amplify the adaptive immune response by expanding the tumor-specific T-cell receptor repertoire, the production of high-affinity tumor antibodies, and the generation of memory lymphocytes and thereby improve immune control of systemic disease.

Financial relationships between industry and principal investigators of US cooperative group randomized cancer clinical trials

Financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) could bias the potentially practice-changing oncologic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of tomorrow. This investigation characterized the FCOIs of the principal investigators (PIs) of all currently accruing trials of the four (adult) cooperative groups of the National Clinical Trials Network. For our study, the PI list was first compiled, and each name was then searched in the CMS Open Payments database. For each transaction (general payments (GPs) or research funding (RF)), the amount/number/source of payments was recorded. Results showed that from 2014 to 2019, the 91 PIs collectively accepted nearly one-third of a billion dollars ($10 477 023 GPs and $320 096 233 RF). The mean and median GP was $6505 and $945, respectively, and $301 693 and $49 824 RF, respectively. Multivariable Gamma regression analysis revealed that higher GP sums were associated with RCTs involving any type of systemic therapy, and higher RF sums with medical oncologist PIs, trials with phase III components, and RCTs involving radiotherapy (P < .05 for all). Both higher-volume GPs and RF were predicted by PIs having accepted payment(s) from the manufacturer of the drug utilized in their RCT (P < .001 GP, P = .008 RF). Taken together, the main message of this investigation is that FCOIs may be particularly high in PIs of phase III systemic therapy trials, especially if the PI accepted payments from the manufacturer of the drug utilized in their trial. Such RCTs should be thoroughly scrutinized by medical journals, the FDA, and insurance companies for potential "industry bias" that could influence the integrity of their conclusions.

High-dose irradiation in combination with non-ablative low-dose radiation to treat metastatic disease after progression on immunotherapy: Results of a phase II trial

AIM

To report early findings from a phase II trial of high-dose radiotherapy (HD-RT) with or without low-dose RT (LD-RT) for metastatic cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had metastatic disease that progressed on immunotherapy within 6 months. Patients were given either HD-RT (20-70 Gy total; 3-12.5 Gy/f), or HD-RT + LD-RT (0.5-2 Gy/f up to 1-10 Gy total) to separate lesions, with continued immunotherapy. Radiographic response was assessed per RECIST 1.1 and Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC). Primary endpoints: (1) 4-month disease control (DCR, complete/partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease [SD]) or an overall response (ORR, CR/PR) at any point in ≥10% of patients, per RECIST 1.1; (2) dose-limiting toxicity within 3 months not exceeding 30%. Secondary endpoint was lesion-specific response.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients (NSCLC, n = 38; melanoma n = 21) were analyzed (39 HD-RT and 35 HD-RT + LD-RT). The median follow-up time was 13.6 months. The primary endpoint was met for 72 evaluable patients, with a 4-month DCR of 42% (47% [16/34] vs. 37% [14/38] in HD-RT + LD-RT vs. HD-RT, P = 0.38), and 19% ORR at any time (26% [9/34] vs. 13% [5/38] in HD-RT + LD-RT vs. HD-RT, P = 0.27). Three patients had toxicity ≥grade 3. LD-RT lesion response (53%) was improved compared to nonirradiated lesions in HD-RT + LD-RT (23%, P = 0.002) and HD-RT (11%, P < 0.001). T- and NK cell infiltration was enhanced in lesions treated with LD-RT.

CONCLUSIONS

HD-RT plus LD-RT safely improved lesion-specific response in patients with immune resistant solid tumors by promoting infiltration of effector immune cells into the tumor microenvironment.

Considerations for Clinical Trials Testing Radiotherapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Metastatic Disease

Metastatic cancer is inherently heterogeneous, and patients with metastatic disease can experience vastly different oncologic outcomes depending on several patient- and disease-specific characteristics. Designing trials for such a diverse population is challenging yet necessary to improve treatment outcomes for metastatic-previously thought to be incurable-disease. Here we review core considerations for designing and conducting clinical trials involving radiation therapy and immunotherapy for patients with metastatic cancer.

Results of a Phase 1/2 Trial of Chemoradiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Radiotherapy Dose in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Importance

Effective treatment options for locally advanced esophageal cancer are limited, and rates of local recurrence after standard chemoradiotherapy remain high.

Objective

To evaluate toxic effects, local control, and overall survival rates after chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose to the gross tumor and nodal disease for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A phase 1/2, single-arm trial was conducted in 46 patients from April 28, 2010, to April 9, 2015 (median follow-up, 52 months [range, 2-86 months]), at a tertiary academic cancer center. Outcomes of the study patients were compared with those of 97 similar patients treated at the same institution from January 10, 2010, to December 5, 2014, as part of the interim analysis. Statistical analysis was performed from December 15, 2018, to February 12, 2019.

Interventions

Chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose (50.4 Gy to subclinical areas at risk and 63.0 Gy to the gross tumor and involved nodes, all given in 28 fractions) with concurrent docetaxel and capecitabine or fluorouracil.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Toxic effects, local (in-field) control, and overall survival rates.

Results

All 46 patients (11 women and 35 men; median age, 65.5 years [range, 37.3-84.4 years]) received per-protocol therapy, as intensity-modulated photon therapy (39 [85%]) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (7 [15%]); 11 patients (24%) ultimately underwent resection. No patients experienced grade 4 or 5 toxic effects; the 10 acute grade 3 toxic events were esophagitis (4), dysphagia (3), and anorexia (3) and the 3 late grade 3 toxic events were all esophageal strictures. The actuarial local recurrence rates were 22% (95% CI, 11%-35%) at 6 months, 30% (95% CI, 18%-44%) at 1 year, and 33% (95% CI, 20%-46%) at 2 years. Overall, 15 patients (33%) experienced local failure, at a median interval of 5 months (range, 1-24 months). The median overall survival time was 21.5 months (range, 2.3-86.4 months). Exploratory comparison with a 97-patient contemporaneous institutional cohort receiving standard-dose (non-simultaneous integrated boost) chemoradiotherapy showed superior local control (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92; P = .03) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P = .02) in the group that received chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose for locally advanced esophageal cancer is well tolerated, with encouraging local control, and thus warrants further study.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01102088.

Immunotherapy combined with high- and low-dose radiation to all sites leads to complete clearance of disease in a patient with metastatic vaginal melanoma

A 73-year-old woman with metastatic vaginal mucosal melanoma that had progressed on ipilimumab and nivolumab experienced clinical and radiographic complete response to dual checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy given in combination with high-dose plus low-dose radiation. General characteristics and treatment options in this disease are highlighted.

Use of Multi-Site Radiation Therapy for Systemic Disease Control

Metastatic cancer is a heterogeneous entity, some of which could benefit from local consolidative radiation therapy (RT). Although randomized evidence is growing in support of using RT for oligometastatic disease, a highly active area of investigation relates to whether RT could benefit patients with polymetastatic disease. This article highlights the preclinical and clinical rationale for using RT for polymetastatic disease, proposes an exploratory framework for selecting patients best suited for these types of treatments, and briefly reviews potential challenges. The goal of this hypothesis-generating review is to address personalized multimodality systemic treatment for patients with metastatic cancer. The rationale for using high-dose RT is primarily for local control and immune activation in either oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease. However, the primary application of low-dose RT is to activate distinct antitumor immune pathways and modulate the tumor stroma in efforts to better facilitate T cell infiltration. We explore clinical cases involving high- and low-dose RT to demonstrate the potential efficacy of such treatment. We then group patients by extent of disease burden to implement high- and/or low-dose RT. Patients with low-volume disease may receive high-dose RT to all sites as part of an oligometastatic paradigm. Subjects with high-volume disease (for whom standard of care remains palliative RT only) could be treated with a combination of high-dose RT to a few sites for immune activation, while receiving low-dose RT to several remaining lesions to enhance systemic responses from high-dose RT and immunotherapy. We further discuss how emerging but speculative concepts such as immune function may be integrated into this approach and examine therapies currently under investigation that may help address immune deficiencies. The review concludes by addressing challenges in using RT for polymetastatic disease, such as concerns about treatment planning workflows, treatment times, dose constraints for multiple-isocenter treatments, and economic considerations.

A mathematical model for the quantification of a patient's sensitivity to checkpoint inhibitors and long-term tumour burden

A large proportion of patients with cancer are unresponsive to treatment with immune checkpoint blockade and other immunotherapies. Here, we report a mathematical model of the time-course of tumour responses to immune-checkpoint inhibitors. The model takes into account intrinsic tumour-growth rates, the rates of immune activation and of tumour–immune-cell interactions, and the efficacy of immune-mediated tumour killing. For 124 patients, four cancer types and two immunotherapy agents, the model reliably described the immune responses and final tumour burden across all different cancers and drug combinations examined. In validation cohorts from four clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitors (with a total of 177 patients), the model accurately stratified the patients according to reduced or increased long-term tumour burden. We also provide model-derived quantitative measures of treatment sensitivity for specific drug–cancer combinations. The model can be used to predict responses to therapy and to quantify specific drug–cancer sensitivities in individual patients.

Phase 1/2 Trial of Pembrolizumab and Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy for Limited-Stage SCLC

INTRODUCTION

Few advancements in treating limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) have been made in decades. We report here a phase 1/2 trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and pembrolizumab.

METHODS

This single-center, open-label phase 1/2 study recruited adults with LS-SCLC or other neuroendocrine tumors and good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤ 2). The primary end point was safety, as assessed by dose-limiting toxicities. Concurrent CRT consisted of etoposide and a platin with 45 Gy radiotherapy (30 twice daily). Prophylactic cranial irradiation (25 Gy, 10 fractions) was given at the physician's discretion. Pembrolizumab was started concurrently with CRT and continued for up to 16 cycles. The phase 1 portion consisted of a 3 + 3 design. Toxicity was assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, overall survival, and tumor response as measured by the immune-related response criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were screened, and 40 were enrolled. All completed radiation therapy and received greater than or equal to one cycle of pembrolizumab. A total of 27 (61%) received percutaneous coronary intervention. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the phase 1 portion. There were no grade 5 toxicities, but there were three grade 4 events (two neutropenia, one respiratory failure). Pneumonitis rate was 15% (three grade 2 and three grade 3). All 17 esophagitis events (42.5%) were grades 1 to 2. At median follow-up time of 23.1 months, the median progression-free survival time was 19.7 months (95% confidence interval: 8.8‒30.5) and the median overall survival time was 39.5 months (95% confidence interval: 8.0‒71.0).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent CRT and pembrolizumab for LS-SCLC was well tolerated and yielded favorable outcomes, providing a basis for randomized studies.

Pembrolizumab with or without radiotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy might augment systemic antitumoral responses to immunotherapy. In the PEMBRO-RT (phase 2) and MDACC (phase 1/2) trials, patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly allocated immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) with or without radiotherapy. When the trials were analysed individually, a potential benefit was noted in the combination treatment arm. However, owing to the small sample size of each trial, differences in response rates and outcomes were not statistically significant but remained clinically notable. We therefore did a pooled analysis to infer whether radiotherapy improves responses to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for the PEMBRO-RT and MDACC trials were patients (aged ≥18 years) with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and at least one unirradiated lesion to monitor for out-of-field response. In the PEMBRO-RT trial, patients had previously received chemotherapy, whereas in the MDACC trial, patients could be either previously treated or newly diagnosed. Patients in both trials were immunotherapy-naive. In the PEMBRO-RT trial, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) and stratified by smoking status (<10 vs ≥10 pack-years). In the MDACC trial, patients were entered into one of two cohorts based on radiotherapy schedule feasibility and randomly assigned (1:1). Because of the nature of the intervention in the combination treatment arm, blinding to radiotherapy was not feasible in either trial. Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously (200 mg every 3 weeks) with or without radiotherapy in both trials. In the PEMBRO-RT trial, the first dose of pembrolizumab was given sequentially less than 1 week after the last dose of radiotherapy (24 Gy in three fractions), whereas in the MDACC trial, pembrolizumab was given concurrently with the first dose of radiotherapy (50 Gy in four fractions or 45 Gy in 15 fractions). Only unirradiated lesions were measured for response. The endpoints for this pooled analysis were best out-of-field (abscopal) response rate (ARR), best abscopal disease control rate (ACR), ARR at 12 weeks, ACR at 12 weeks, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The intention-to-treat populations from both trials were included in analyses. The PEMBRO-RT trial (NCT02492568) and the MDACC trial (NCT02444741) are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

FINDINGS

Overall, 148 patients were included in the pooled analysis, 76 of whom had been assigned pembrolizumab and 72 who had been assigned pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy. Median follow-up for all patients was 33 months (IQR 32·4-33·6). 124 (84%) of 148 patients had non-squamous histological features and 111 (75%) had previously received chemotherapy. Baseline variables did not differ between treatment groups, including PD-L1 status and metastatic disease volume. The most frequently irradiated sites were lung metastases (28 of 72 [39%]), intrathoracic lymph nodes (15 of 72 [21%]), and lung primary disease (12 of 72 [17%]). Best ARR was 19·7% (15 of 76) with pembrolizumab versus 41·7% (30 of 72) with pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 2·96, 95% CI 1·42-6·20; p=0·0039), and best ACR was 43·4% (33 of 76) with pembrolizumab versus 65·3% (47 of 72) with pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy (2·51, 1·28-4·91; p=0·0071). Median progression-free survival was 4·4 months (IQR 2·9-5·9) with pembrolizumab alone versus 9·0 months (6·8-11·2) with pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·67, 95% CI 0·45-0·99; p=0·045), and median overall survival was 8·7 months (6·4-11·0) with pembrolizumab versus 19·2 months (14·6-23·8) with pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy (0·67, 0·54-0·84; p=0·0004). No new safety concerns were noted in the pooled analysis.

INTERPRETATION

Adding radiotherapy to pembrolizumab immunotherapy significantly increased responses and outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. These results warrant validation in a randomised phase 3 trial.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Role of Mitochondria in Cancer Immune Evasion and Potential Therapeutic Approaches

The role of mitochondria in cancer formation and progression has been studied extensively, but much remains to be understood about this complex relationship. Mitochondria regulate many processes that are known to be altered in cancer cells, from metabolism to oxidative stress to apoptosis. Here, we review the evolving understanding of the role of mitochondria in cancer cells, and highlight key evidence supporting the role of mitochondria in cancer immune evasion and the effects of mitochondria-targeted antitumor therapy. Also considered is how knowledge of the role of mitochondria in cancer can be used to design and improve cancer therapies, particularly immunotherapy and radiation therapy. We further offer critical insights into the mechanisms by which mitochondria influence tumor immune responses, not only in cancer cells but also in immune cells. Given the central role of mitochondria in the complex interactions between cancer and the immune system, high priority should be placed on developing rational strategies to address mitochondria as potential targets in future preclinical and clinical studies. We believe that targeting mitochondria may provide additional opportunities in the development of novel antitumor therapeutics.

Bone morphogenetic protein 7 promotes resistance to immunotherapy

Immunotherapies revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the immune system to target cancer cells. However, most patients are resistant to immunotherapies and the mechanisms underlying this resistant is still poorly understood. Here, we report that overexpression of BMP7, a member of the TGFB superfamily, represents a mechanism for resistance to anti-PD1 therapy in preclinical models and in patients with disease progression while on immunotherapies. BMP7 secreted by tumor cells acts on macrophages and CD4⁺ T cells in the tumor microenvironment, inhibiting MAPK14 expression and impairing pro-inflammatory responses. Knockdown of BMP7 or its neutralization via follistatin in combination with anti-PD1 re-sensitizes resistant tumors to immunotherapies. Thus, we identify the BMP7 signaling pathway as a potential immunotherapeutic target in cancer.

The mechanisms underlying resistance to immunotherapy are still poorly understood. Here, the authors show that BMP7, a molecule part of the TGF-beta superfamily, suppresses proinflammatory antitumor responses and may represent a target for overcoming resistance to PD1 inhibitors.

The Effects of Time to Treatment Initiation for Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in the United States

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of time from diagnosis to treatment (TTI) on survival in patients with nonmetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stages 1 to 3 NSCLC between 2004 and 2013. Patients with missing survival status/time, unknown TTI, or receipt of palliative therapy were excluded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, logistic regression, and recursive partitioning analysis were performed to determine associated variables and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1,393,232 patients met inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 36 months. The median TTI increased between 2004 and 2013 from 35 to 39 days (P < .001). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, TTI groups 31 to 60 days, 61 to 90 days, and > 90 days were independently related to poorer overall survival (OS) compared with TTI 1 to 30 days (hazard ratio, 1.04, 1.10, and 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.06, 1.07-1.12, and 1.11-1.17, respectively; P < .001 for all). Recursive partitioning analysis revealed that TTI of ≤ 45 days was the most optimal threshold for survival (P < .001); patients with TTI ≤ 45 days had a median OS of 70.2 months (95% CI, 69.3-71.1 months) versus 61.5 months (95% CI, 60.5-62.4) (P < .001). There were significant disparities by age, race, ethnicity, and income for delayed (> 45 days) TTI (P < .001 for all). Subgroup analysis revealed that stage 1 and 2 patients with TTI > 45 days had a higher risk of mortality compared with TTI ≤ 45 days (hazard ratio, 1.15 and 1.05; 95% CI, 1.12-1.17 and 1.01-1.09, respectively) (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased TTI is independently associated with poorer survival in non-metastatic NSCLC. TTI ≤ 45 days is a clinically targetable time frame associated with improved outcomes and ought to be considered for patients with lung cancer undergoing definitive therapy.

Radiation-induced lymphopenia during chemoradiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer is linked with age, lung V5, and XRCC1 rs25487 genotypes in lymphocytes

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

We investigated clinical and genetic factors associated with severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) in a randomized clinical trial of photon vs. proton radiation, with chemotherapy, for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

XRCC1 rs25487 was genotyped in lymphocytes from serial peripheral blood samples. Severe RIL was defined as absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 0.3 × 10⁹ cells/L. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify independent risk factors, which were then used to group patients for risk of severe RIL.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis of the 178 patients in this analysis showed that older age, larger tumors, higher lung V5 and mean lung dose, and higher heart V5 and mean heart dose were associated with severe RIL during treatment (P < 0.05). The XRCC1 rs25487 AA genotype was also associated with increased risk of severe RIL during treatment (AA vs. others: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.665, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.089-2.500, P = 0.018). Multivariate analyses showed that older age (HR = 1.031, 95% CI 1.009-1.054, P = 0.005), lung V5 (HR = 1.039, 95% CI 1.023-1.055, P < 0.0001), and AA genotype (AA vs. others, HR = 1.768, 95% CI 1.165-2.684, P = 0.007) were independently associated with higher incidence of severe RIL. These three risk factors (age ≥ 56 years, lung V5 ≥ 51% and XRCC1 rs25487 AA) distinguished patients at different risk of developing severe RIL (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, lung V5 and XRCC1 rs25487 AA were all linked with risk of severe RIL. Our predictive risk model may be helpful for identifying patients at high risk of severe RIL so that treatment can be modified.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locoregional Recurrences After Prior Chemoradiation for Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as salvage therapy for locally recurrent esophageal cancer. We hypothesized that SBRT would provide durable treated tumor control with minimal associated toxicity in patients with progressive disease after definitive radiation, chemotherapy, and surgical resection. Methods: This single-institution retrospective study assessed outcomes in patients who received SBRT for locoregional failure of esophageal cancer after initial curative-intent treatment. Only patients who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (≥41.4 Gy) for esophageal cancer were selected. Subsequent surgical resection was optional but institutional follow-up by an oncologist was required. The primary endpoints of this study were gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicity, scored with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. A secondary outcome, treated-tumor control, was assessed with RECIST v1.1. Results: Nine patients (11 locoregional recurrences) treated with SBRT were reviewed, with a median follow-up time of 10.5 months. Most patients initially presented with T3 (88.9%), N1 (55.6%), moderately differentiated (66.7%) adenocarcinoma (88.9%), and had received a median 50.4 Gy delivered over 28 fractions with concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. Median time to recurrence was 16.3 months. Median total dose delivered by SBRT was 27.5 Gy (delivered in five fractions). Two patients experienced acute grade 1 fatigue and vomiting. No patient experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity. One patient experienced failure in the SBRT treatment field at 5.8 months after treatment and six patients developed distant failure. The median progression-free survival time for SBRT-treated tumors was 5.0 months, and median overall survival time was 12.9 months. Conclusions: This single-institution study demonstrated the feasibility of SBRT for locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer with minimal treatment-related toxicity and high rates of treated tumor control. Prospective studies identifying ideal salvage SBRT candidates for locoregional failure as well as validating its safety are needed.

SHP-2 and PD-L1 Inhibition Combined with Radiotherapy Enhances Systemic Antitumor Effects in an Anti-PD-1-Resistant Model of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1, have emerged as promising therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, approximately 80% of patients do not respond to immunotherapy given alone because of intrinsic or acquired resistance. Radiotherapy (XRT) can overcome PD-1 resistance and improve treatment outcomes, but its efficacy remains suboptimal. The tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, expressed in some cancers and in immune cells, has been shown to negatively affect antitumor immunity. Our hypothesis was that SHP-2 inhibition in combination with anti-PD-L1 would enhance immune-mediated responses to XRT and synergistically boost antitumor effects in an anti-PD-1-resistant mouse model. We treated 129Sv/Ev mice with anti-PD-1-resistant 344SQ NSCLC adenocarcinoma with oral SHP099 (a SHP-2 inhibitor) combined with XRT and intraperitoneal anti-PD-L1. Primary tumors were treated with XRT (three fractions of 12 Gy each), whereas abscopal (out-of-field) tumors were observed but not treated. XRT in combination with SHP099 and anti-PD-L1 promoted local and abscopal responses, reduced lung metastases, and improved mouse survival. XRT also increased SHP-2⁺ M1 tumor-associated macrophages in abscopal tumors (P = 0.019). The addition of SHP099 also associated with a higher M1/M2 ratio, greater numbers of CD8⁺ T cells, and fewer regulatory T cells. This triple-combination therapy had strong antitumor effects in a mouse model of anti-PD-1-resistant NSCLC and may be a novel therapeutic approach for anti-PD-1-resistant NSCLC in patients.

Interaction between lymphopenia, radiotherapy technique, dosimetry, and survival outcomes in lung cancer patients receiving combined immunotherapy and radiotherapy

AIM

Immune function (e.g. absolute lymphocyte count (ALC)) and modifiable predictors thereof (e.g. volume of the heart/lungs receiving low-dose radiation) impact outcomes of cancer patients, but this has not been well-studied in the immunotherapy era. This investigation of metastatic lung cancer assessed the interaction of dosimetric parameters (e.g. lung/heart V5), radiotherapy technique (e.g. stereotactic (SBRT) or traditional radiotherapy), lymphopenia, and survival outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were collected from three institutional phase I/II trials of combined immunotherapy and lung irradiation. SBRT referred to 50 Gy/4 fractions or 60 Gy/10 fractions, and traditional RT as 45 Gy/15 fractions. Blood collections were standardized on the first and last day of radiotherapy and each cycle of immunotherapy. Statistics included multivariable linear regression to identify variables associated with ALC decline, Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall and progression-free survival (PFS), and Cox multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of the 165 patients was 21 months. The only factor independently predictive of ALC decline was traditional RT (p < 0.001). Therefore, the analysis was repeated for traditional RT and SBRT separately; lung V5 was associated with lymphopenia for traditional RT (p < 0.001) but not SBRT (p = 0.12). Pre-radiotherapy ALC was independently associated with PFS in both cohorts (p < 0.05 for both); post-RT ALC predicted for PFS in the traditional RT (p = 0.048) but not the SBRT (p = 0.90) group. Neither heart nor lung V5 was independently associated with PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with immunotherapy, SBRT may better preserve lymphocytes (and hence improve outcomes) than traditional RT. When administering traditional RT, constraining the lung V5 may indirectly impact outcomes by means of ALC preservation.

Modeling the Impact of Cardiopulmonary Irradiation on Overall Survival in NRG Oncology Trial RTOG 0617

PURPOSE

To quantitatively predict the impact of cardiopulmonary dose on overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We used the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0617 dataset. The model building procedure was preregistered on a public website. Patients were split between a training and a set-aside validation subset (N = 306/131). The 191 candidate variables covered disease, patient, treatment, and dose-volume characteristics from multiple cardiopulmonary substructures (atria, lung, pericardium, and ventricles), including the minimum dose to the hottest x% volume (Dx%[Gy]), mean dose of the hottest x% (MOHx%[Gy]), and minimum, mean (Mean[Gy]), and maximum dose. The model building was based on Cox regression and given 191 candidate variables; a Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold of 0.0003 was used to identify predictors. To reduce overreliance on the most highly correlated variables, stepwise multivariable analysis (MVA) was repeated on 1000 bootstrapped replicates. Multivariate sets selected in ≥10% of replicates were fit to the training subset and then averaged to generate a final model. In the validation subset, discrimination was assessed using Harrell c-index, and calibration was tested using risk group stratification.

RESULTS

Four MVA models were identified on bootstrap. The averaged model included atria D45%[Gy], lung Mean[Gy], pericardium MOH55%[Gy], and ventricles MOH5%[Gy]. This model had excellent performance predicting OS in the validation subset (c = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of death due to cardiopulmonary irradiation was accurately modeled, as demonstrated by predictions on the validation subset, and provides guidance on the delivery of safe thoracic radiotherapy.