AB1180 COVID-19 HAD DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACTS ON RA SYMPTOMS AND FUNCTION BY SEX AND AGE: RESULTS FROM THE CANADIAN EARLY ARTHRITIS COHORT (CATCH)

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Canadians with RA faced considerable uncertainty due to greater risk of infection, hospitalization, changing access to RA medications, and very limited access to in-person RA care. Further, to reduce transmission of the virus and COVID-related hospitalizations, stringent mitigation measures were implemented across the country to greatly reduce social contacts including curfews, limits on private gatherings and business closures. Little is known about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated mitigation efforts in RA. We hypothesized that women and younger adults with RA would report greater impairments in HRQL.

Objectives

To compare changes in HRQL prior-to and during the COVID-19 pandemic by sex and age groups in real-world RA patients seen in routine practice settings.

Methods

Data were from patients in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) who completed a study visit in the year prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (Mar 2019 through Feb 2020) and a repeat assessment during the pandemic period (Mar 2020 – Jan 2022). RA disease activity was assessed using the RA Flare Questionnaire, a validated patient-reported measure of current RA disease symptoms (pain, stiffness, fatigue) and function (physical, participation). An RA-FQ score ≥ 20 was used to classify RA symptoms consistent with an RA inflammatory flare. HRQL was assessed using PROMIS-29 Adult Profiles. We compared changes in mean Physical (PHS) and Mental Health (MHS) scores, and the proportion of patients with impairments in each domain (i.e., scores ≥ 55 for pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep and ≤45 for physical function and participation) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic across sex and age groups (<40, 40-64, ≥65 years).

Results

The 938 CATCH participants in the analytic sample with data available at both time periods had a mean (SD) age of 60 (13) and RA symptom duration of 5.8 (3.7) years; 72% were women, 88% were white, and 64% reported >high school education. Most (80%) were in CDAI REM/LDA at the most recent visit prior to start of pandemic. The proportion of patients with RA-FQ ≥20 were similar at both time periods. While physical and emotional RA symptom impacts remained stable in men prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, women reported significant increases in anxiety and depression during the pandemic period. Younger RA patients <40 reported increases in depression, and older RA patients (65+) reported increases in anxiety and greater impacts on participation.

Conclusion

Our results illustrate that while the proportions of patients with high inflammatory disease activity were similar prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed disproportionate impacts on HRQL by sex and age with a higher proportion of women, adults <40, and those ≥65 years of age experiencing greater impairments in several HRQL domains.

Table 1.DomainWomen (N = 673)Men (N=265)Age <40 (N=84)Age 45-64 (N=492)Age 65+ (N= 362)BeforeDuringBeforeDuringBeforeDuringBeforeDuringBeforeDuringRA Flare >20%17%21%19%18%13%7%18%21%18%21%Anxiety34%*42%*23%23%42%55%32%35%28%*35%*Depression28%*34%*22%20%25%*42%*28%28%24%30%Fatigue36%38%24%23%43%43%36%33%26%32%Pain47%52%48%45%39%48%46%49%49%54%Physical function54%57%46%46%40%40%49%50%59%62%Participation42%47%34%36%37%38%40%41%40%*49%*Sleep30%34%18%22%26%29%29%33%23%28%

*p <0.05

Acknowledgements

CATCH is supported through unrestricted research grants from: Amgen and Pfizer Canada since 2007; AbbVie since 2011; Medexus since 2013; Sandoz Canada since 2019; Fresenius Kabi Canada since 2021 and; Organon Canada since 2021. Previous funding from Janssen Canada (2011-16); UCB Canada and Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada (2011-18); Hoffman La Roche (2011-21); Sanofi Genzyme (2016-17); Eli Lilly Canada (2016-20); Merck Canada (2017-21) and Gilead Sciences Canada (2020-21)

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0720 Adult Onset Still’s Disease: Points to Consider

Background

Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is a rare and complex autoinflammatory disease of unknown etiology. AOSD has a heterogeneous presentation which can lead to diagnostic uncertainty with prolonged time prior to treatment. NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, conventional DMARDs, and biologics are used in the management of AOSD with varying results. Furthermore, factors associated with de-escalation of therapies remain unclear.

Objectives

To review the literature and create a consensus on points to consider in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of AOSD.

Methods

A scoping review of the AOSD literature over the last 15 years was performed. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched and studies included if they provided information regarding the epidemiology, differential diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, complications, prognosis, and initial, chronic, and refractory treatment approaches in AOSD. Following narrative information synthesis, a meeting was held with experienced clinicians across Canada for the creation of a consensus on points to consider in AOSD.

Results

The annual incidence and prevalence of AOSD is observed to be between 0.16 to 0.62 per 100,000 and 3.9 to 6.9 per 100,000, respectively. AOSD most commonly affects young adults and women. Women are more likely to have severe complications from AOSD including macrophage activation syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The Yamaguchi criteria remains the most widely used diagnostic tool with a sensitivity of 96.2% and specificity of 92.1%. Common presentation manifestations include intermittent high fevers (>39.0 degrees Celsius), arthralgias/arthritis, pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, and a maculopapular rash. Other manifestations can variably involve the cardiovascular, respiratory, and GI systems. Common laboratory abnormalities include leukocytosis with neutrophilia, elevated ESR and CRP, elevated ferritin, and transaminitis. AOSD patients are most commonly ANA and Rf negative. Initial treatment includes NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and conventional DMARDs. Disease refractory to initial therapy is managed through IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors such as Anakinra or Tocilizumab. Elevated ESR, pericarditis, and non-response to corticosteroids are some of the factors associated with refractory and chronic disease requiring advanced therapies and long term follow-up.

Conclusion

AOSD is a multi-faceted autoinflammatory disease with a diverse presentation profile. Clinicians are recommended to consider AOSD, following exclusion of infections, malignancies, and autoimmune diseases, as a cause for fever of unknown etiology. Our review provides points to consider in the diagnosis and management of AOSD following expert consensus.

References

[1]Gerfaud-Valentin M, Maucort-Boulch D, Hot A, Iwaz J, Ninet J, Durieu I, et al. Adult-onset still disease: manifestations, treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors in 57 patients. Medicine. 2014 Mar;93(2).

[2]Sfriso P, Priori R, Valesini G, Rossi S, Montecucco CM, D’Ascanio A, et al. Adult-onset Still’s disease: an Italian multicentre retrospective observational study of manifestations and treatments in 245 patients. Clinical rheumatology. 2016 Jul;35(7).

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0913 INCREASED HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS PATIENTS WHO HAVE DIGITAL ULCERS

Background

Systemic sclerosis is a multi-system autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, and vasculopathy which manifests as pulmonary arterial hypertension and digital ulcers. Digital ulcers are debilitating and painful lesions most commonly present in the digit tips or extensor surfaces of the hands leading to significant morbidity and decreased quality of life. SSc patients with digital ulcers may require increased support and therefore may have greater healthcare resource utilization compared to those patients without digital ulcers.

Objectives

We assessed the impact of DUs on resource utilization including hospitalizations, outpatient visits and procedures within a large SSc Canadian registry.

Methods

A cohort of patients with SSc and digitals ulcers was derived from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group registry and matched to controls individually based on sex, age (±3 years), SSc subtype, and disease duration (±2 years). Eligible patients met the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria (confirmed by an experienced rheumatologist), were 18 years of age, had completed the Resource Utilization Questionnaire (RUQ), and had active digital ulcers at two consecutive annual visits (baseline study visit and at 1st year). The Medgser Disease Severity Scale was used to assess ulcer disease severity. Unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses compared the association between DUs and resource utilization.

Results

RUQs in 104 SSc patients with active DUs at two consecutive annual visits were compared with 104 patients without DUs matched 1:1 for age, sex, disease subtype and duration. Over one year, DUs were associated with a higher number of tests (p˂0.05) and visits to health professionals, especially to a rheumatologist (p˂0.0001) and internist (p=0.003), a greater need for an accompanying person (p˂0.05) and aids purchased/received (p˂0.05). Having DUs was associated with more severe disease, even after excluding the peripheral vascular domain from a total DSS (9.7±4.5 vs 5.6±2.7, p˂0.0001). After adjustment for disease severity in other organs, the presence of DUs remained a significant predictor of more frequent physician visits and more tests (all˂0.05) by linear regression analysis.

Conclusion

SSc patients with DUs utilized significantly more healthcare resources per annum even after adjustment for disease severity in other organ systems.

References

[1]Khimdas S, Harding S, Bonner A, Zummer B, Baron M, Pope J, Canadian Scleroderma Research Group. Associations with digital ulcers in a large cohort of systemic sclerosis: results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group registry. Arthritis care & research. 2011 Jan;63(1):142-9.

[2]Nihtyanova SI, Brough GM, Black CM, Denton CP. Clinical burden of digital vasculopathy in limited and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2008 Jan 1;67(1):120-3.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0888 NON-SURGICAL LOCAL TREATMENTS FOR DIGITAL ULCERS IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Background

Digital ulcers(DUs) in systemic sclerosis(SSc) represent a major clinical challenge. There are no recommendations for the local management of SSc-DUs. Systemic therapy is considered the standard of care. However, there is a strong rationale for local approaches to DU by avoiding side effects from systemic therapies. The World Scleroderma Foundation DU Working Group intends to develop evidence-based recommendations for DU management including local, non-surgical treatment(ln-sT).

Objectives

To summarise the literature on the safety and efficacy of ln-sT for SSc-DUs.

Methods

A systematic literature review(SLR) of papers describing the use of ln-sT for DU in SSc was performed up to May 2021 according to the PICO framework. References were independently screened by two reviewers who independently assessed the full text of eligible articles and extracted data.

Results

Among 790 retrieved references, 12 were included. Median(range) number of patients per study was 9(7–84), mean age ranging from 37 to 62.5 years. In 5(41%) studies a control group was included. Background systemic therapies are summarized in Table 1. The most studied treatment was botulin toxin A(BTA). It was used as hand injection in 3 studies (median dose ranging from 90 to 150 U) and as 50 U single finger injection in 1 study. Healing rate after a median time of 8-49 weeks ranged from 71% to 100%. In 2 studies a reduction in VAS pain was observed from 20% to 100%. Transient muscle weakness was the most common side effect in 10% of patients. Amniotic(Am) and hydrocolloid membranes(HyM) were used in 1 study each. They were associated with a good healing rate, statistically significant for the HyM. Tadalafil 2% cream was studied in 1 study and was associated with a reduction in the median DU number from 1.6 to 1 per patient after a median time of 4 weeks and a reduction by 1.4 point in the 10-mm VAS scale. Vitamin E gel was shown to be associated with a statistically significant reduction in the healing time compared to SoC alone in 1 RCT(13.2 ± 2.7 versus 20.9 ± 3.6 weeks, P=<0.001). Low-level light therapy, hydrodissection and corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shock wave(ESW) were evaluated in 1 study each. They were all associated with positive outcomes which was statistically significant only for the ESW. The only negative trial examined dimethyl sulfoxide and was associated with local toxicity.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies.

TreatmentType of studyPatientsBaseline DUBackground therapy (%) ETA CCB APA PG ARB ACE-I PDE-5i ISFollow-up (weeks)Healing rate(%)*Pain Reduction (VAS/10)ComparatorHydrodissection and corticosteroid injectionP1202334.4Rheumatoid ArthritisTadalafil 2% Vitamin E gelRRCT15131.6(1)3.5±2.30462700130704 241(1)Reduced time to heal**1.4SoCAmHyMRP67310001002800002817033143810090**SoCBTAMedian 90 U per handHigh-concentration hand100 U non-dominant handSingle finger 50 URRPP772010314571140718558551008514201001414718 4981277717510020%100%Untreated CHLow-level light therapyP8102537025378100ESWP9493355661144441**1.31Dimethyl sulfoxideDBRCT84No change, skin toxicity with 70% formulation

*Unless otherwise stated. **Statistically significant. ARB= angiotensin receptor antagonist. ACEi= ACE inhibitors. APA= anti-platelet agents. CCB= calcium channel blockers. CH= contralateral hand. DBRCT= double blind randomized-controlled trial. ETA = endothelin antagonist. IS= immunosuppression. PG= prostaglandins. PDE-5i= Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors. P = prospective. R = retrospective. SoC= standard of care (as per local protocol).

Conclusion

Our SLR supports interest to develop ln-sTs for SSc-DUs. The number of studies is limited and mainly case reports and small single studies are present. Treatments were well tolerated and there was evidence of efficacy for BTA, vitamin E, ESW and HyM in refractory DUs. The evidence is not robust and confounding factors (vasodilators background therapies) could impact on the findings. Future research is indicated to conduct larger, well-designed studies.

Disclosure of Interests

Corrado Campochiaro: None declared, Yossra A. Suliman: None declared, Michael Hughes Speakers bureau: Actelion pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work., Jan Schoones: None declared, Dilia Giuggioli: None declared, Pia Moinzadeh Speakers bureau: speaking fees from Actelion pharmaceuticals and Boehringer Ingelheim, Nancy Maltez: None declared, Laura Ross: None declared, Murray Baron: None declared, Lorinda Chung: None declared, Yannick Allanore: None declared, Christopher P Denton: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur, Tracy Frech: None declared, Daniel Furst: None declared, Dinesh Khanna Speakers bureau: Janssen and Eicos Sciences, Inc., Thomas Krieg: None declared, Masataka Kuwana Speakers bureau: Speakers fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nippon Shinyaku, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and Consultant fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Kissei, Mochida, outside of the submitted work., Marco Matucci-Cerinic: None declared, Janet Pope: None declared, Alessia Alunno: None declared

POS0898 SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL ULCERS IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Background

Management of digital ulcers (DUs) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a major clinical challenge. To date, systemic therapy is generally considered as the ‘standard of care’ for significant SSc-DUs. However, there is a strong rationale to develop local approaches to DUs, to avoid side effects from systemic therapies. World Scleroderma Foundation DU Working Group intends to develop practical, evidence-based recommendations for DU management including local, Surgical Treatment (L-ST).

Objectives

To summarize the literature on the safety and efficacy of L-ST for SSc-DUs.

Methods

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted up to May 2021. According to the PICO framework, eligibility criteria were defined and original research articles about surgical treatment of SSc DUs in adult patients were included. References were independently screened by 2 reviewers who assessed the full text of eligible articles and extracted data.

Results

Thirteen eligible articles out of 790 total publications were identified (Table 1). Due to the paucity of randomized controlled trials of surgical treatments for SSc-DU, we included retrospective studies and case series with at least 4 patients. Autologous fat (adipose tissue AT) grafting was the surgical modality mostly identified (7 studies of which 1 RCT and 6 prospective open label single arm). The healing rate (HR) with autologous fat grafting (4 studies) ranged from 66-100 %. In the RCT, two age and sex matched groups were included, adipose tissue (AT)group (n=25 pts) and sham procedure (SP) group (n=13), DU healing was reported in 23/25 in AT group versus 1/13 in the SP group in 8 wks, (p<0.0001), 12 pts in the SP group, received rescue AT injection, all of them healed after 8 wks. Three studies reported autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction(SVF) grafting and the HR ranged from 32-60%, followed up to 12 months. Transient edema and paresthesia were reported in 2 studies, and amputation in 2 ulcers in 1 study, and no complications were reported in other studies. Surgical sympathectomy was reported in 3 studies, with a median healing rate of 81%. Bone marrow derived cell transplantation in a single study showed 87% healing rate over (4-24 wks). Two surgical studies (of direct microsurgical revascularization N=4, and microsurgical arteriolysis, N=6), showed 100% healing of ulcers, no complications reported.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the extracted studies.

StudydesignPatients (n)Baseline DU (n)Background therapy (%)Follow-upOutcomeHealed ulcers(%) Adipose tissue graftAutologous fat graftp9.15PG, CCB—100ETA 26PDE-5i 138-12 wks66Adipose tissue graftingRCT25 case13- Ctr25-case13- CtrPG- 100CCB 1008 wks92-case7-CtrAdipose tissue implantp1515no therapy7 wks100Adipose tissue graftp129PG,CCB-100ETA6 month88adipose derived SVFp1215PDE-5i, ccb, PG allowed22m6Adipose derived SVFp1215CCB 50ETA166 m63 Adipose derived SVFp1819CCB 50PG 27ETA 5IS 7124 wks32SympathectomySympathectomyR611CCB-10020 m81SympathectomyR1335PGCCBAPA35Sympathectomy, vascular bypass (+vein graftR1726Ccb 35APA 47PDE-i5 589 m100Bone marrow derived cells transplantation)p88PG-6236 m87Direct microsurgical revascularizationR44m100Limited microsurgical arteriolysisR61712 m100

SVF =stromal vascular fraction P = prospective. R = retrospective. RCT= double blind randomized-controlled trial. ETA = endothelin antagonist. CCB= calcium channel blockers. APA= anti-platelet agents. PG= prostaglandins. ARB= angiotensin receptor antagonist. ACEi= ACE inhibitors. PDE-5i= PDE-5 inhibitors. IS= immunosuppression. M=median. SoC= standard of care. HR= healing rate

Conclusion

Our SLR has identified several surgical modalities for SSc-DUs. L-STseemed generally effective and safe for DU healing, thus Significant methodological issues emerged including small numbers of pts, lack of comparator, failure to report confounders such as background therapies and variable follow up. Future research is warranted to rigorously investigate surgical interventions for Dus.

Disclosure of Interests

Yossra A. Suliman: None declared, Corrado Campochiaro: None declared, Michael Hughes Speakers bureau: speaking fees from Actelion pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work, Jan Schoones: None declared, Dilia Giuggioli: None declared, Nancy Maltez: None declared, Pia Moinzadeh Speakers bureau:: speaking fees from Actelion pharmaceuticals and Boehringer Ingelheim, Laura Ross: None declared, Lorinda Chung: None declared, Yannick Allanore: None declared, Murray Baron: None declared, Christopher P Denton: None declared, Oliver Distler Shareholder of: Consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from and/or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three calendar years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Speakers bureau: Consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from and/or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three calendar years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from and/or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three calendar years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Grant/research support from: Consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from and/or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three calendar years: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Tracy Frech: None declared, Daniel Furst: None declared, Dinesh Khanna Speakers bureau: Janssen and Eicos Sciences, Inc., Paid instructor for: Janssen and Eicos Sciences, Inc., Consultant of: Janssen and Eicos Sciences, Inc., Thomas Krieg: None declared, Masataka KUWANA Speakers bureau: Speakers fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nippon Shinyaku, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and Consultant fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Kissei, Mochida, outside of the submitted work., Paid instructor for: Speakers fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nippon Shinyaku, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and Consultant fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Kissei, Mochida, outside of the submitted work., Consultant of: Speakers fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nippon Shinyaku, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and Consultant fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Kissei, Mochida, outside of the submitted work., Marco Matucci-Cerinic: None declared, Janet Pope: None declared, Alessia Alunno: None declared

POS1361 THE CANADIAN RESEARCH GROUP OF RHEUMATOLOGY IN IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY (CanRIO): A NATIONWIDE MULTI-CENTER PROSPECTIVE COHORT

Background

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) have altered the landscape of cancer therapy. However, toxicities are common and up to 80% of patients will develop immune-related adverse events (irAE), including rheumatic irAEs (Rh-irAE), which can often limit their cancer treatment. Our knowledge of clinical manifestations and optimal management of patients with Rh-irAE continues to evolve as these agents are being used to treat a wider variety of cancers. Currently available data is limited to retrospective case series and case reports. There is also scarce data on the use of ICI in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (PAD) as these patients are often excluded from clinical trials.

Objectives

To describe the clinical presentation, management and early outcomes of patients exposed to ICI with Rh-irAE or PAD recruited and followed prospectively from multiple sites across Canada.

Methods

Adult patients with Rh-irAE from cancer immunotherapy (CTLA-4, PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitors) or those with PAD exposed to cancer immunotherapy are prospectively recruited across 9 academic sites in Canada. Standardized clinical and biologic data are also collected. We describe clinical characteristics and management of patients recruited between January 2020 and October 2021, stratified based on the presence or absence of PAD.

Results

103 patients were recruited from 9 sites. From those, 85 had Rh-irAE, 47 had pre-existing musculoskeletal and rheumatic diseases, and 20 had other PAD. The most frequent Rh-irAE were joint manifestations (n = 73). Other Rh-irAE included muscle symptoms (n = 7), connective tissue disease (n = 6), vasculitis (n=2) and sarcoid (n = 3). Prednisone was the most common treatment (n = 53). Intraarticular corticosteroids were used in 7 patients. Eleven patients required conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) and only one required biologic DMARD to control the Rh-irAE. Anti-PD-1 therapies were the most used ICI (56.3%), followed by combination therapy (35.9%). Response to index immunotherapy at 6 months was available for 21 patients. Most patients had partial response (57.1%) and only 4 patients had tumor progression (19.1%). The ICI was permanently discontinued due to an irAE in 21 patients (38.1% with PAD and 61.9% without PAD). There were no deaths related to Rh-irAE.

Conclusion

The initial sample of the CanRIO prospective national cohort suggests that demographic characteristics and tumor representation in people with PAD and without PAD is similar. Patients with PAD are less likely to receive combination therapy (n= 12 vs. n=25) and are less likely to have tumor progression on ICI (n=1) compared to those without PAD (n=3). Selection bias is noted in this initial sample since half of recruited patients have PAD. The CanRIO cohort provides valuable insight into real-world spectrum and management of Rh-irAE secondary to immunotherapy for cancer.

Disclosure of Interests

Shahin Jamal Grant/research support from: CanRIO has received financial support from BMS and Organon, Lourdes Gonzalez Arreola: None declared, Julia Tan: None declared, Carrie Ye: None declared, Janet Roberts: None declared, Aurore Fifi-Mah: None declared, Marie Hudson: None declared, Sabrina Hoa: None declared, Janet Pope: None declared, Ines Colmegna: None declared, C. Thomas Appleton: None declared

OP0308-HPR MORE THAN HALF OF RA PATIENTS WITH A LIFETIME HISTORY OF MOOD DISORDERS WERE ANXIOUS AND DEPRESSED DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: RESULTS FROM THE CANADIAN EARLY COHORT (CATCH) STUDY

Background

A growing number of studies indicate the considerable mental health impacts of the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic in the general population as chronic stress is a risk factor for the development of depression and anxiety. Mood disorders are more prevalent in RA and a history of anxiety or depressive disorders increases the risk of recurrence in the future.

Objectives

To compare trends in prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms, prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic in RA patients with and without a lifetime history of mood disorders.

Methods

Data were from RA patients diagnosed and treated for RA in rheumatology clinics across Canada enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) Study. We estimated monthly trends in prevalence of clinically significant levels of anxiety and depression (PROMIS Depression and Anxiety 4a score 55+) from all visits between Mar 2019 and Jan 2022 and compared monthly trends in anxiety and depression in the year prior to (Mar 2019- Feb 2020) and during the pandemic (Mar 2020 to Jan 2022) stratified by lifetime history of mood disorders.

Results

4,148 visits were completed from Mar 2019 to Jan 2022 in 1,644 RA patients with a mean (SD) age of 60 (14) and disease duration of 6 (4) years. 73% were women, 84% white, 60% had completed some post-secondary education, and 77% were in CDAI REM/LDA at the visit closest to the start of pandemic. 253 (15%) reported a lifetime history of depression and 217 (13%) a lifetime history of anxiety; 8% reported prior treatment for either.

Patients with a history of mood disorders had higher levels of depression and anxiety prior-to and during the pandemic compared with patients without a history of mood disorders (Table 1). Proportions were highest during COVID waves in all and were substantially higher and more variable in people with a previous history of mood disorders as compared to those without a history (Figure 1). While depressive symptoms peaked early in the pandemic, anxiety increased with each wave, peaking in Wave 3 (May-Jun 2021).

Table 1.

Prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic in RA patients with and without a history of mood disorders.

Period Prevalence (monthly range)DepressionAnxietyNo historyPrior HistoryNo HistoryPrior HistoryN observations35276213610538Prepandemic (3/19 - 2/20)21%(14%-30%)51%(29%-64%)27%(20%-35%)58%(31%-89%)Pandemic (3/20 - 1/22)22%(15%-29%)53%(33%-78%)28%(20%-43%)59%(33%-80%)Figure 1.

During the first 22 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the proportion of patients with depression and anxiety increased in all groups. More than half of those with a history of emotional distress had clinically significant levels of depression and anxiety; proportions were highest during COVID waves in all and were substantially higher in people with previous history as compared to those without a history (see Figure 1). Whereas depressive symptoms peaked early in the pandemic, anxiety increased with each wave, peaking in Wave 3 (May-Jun 2021).

Conclusion

Symptoms of anxiety and depression were common in Canadian adults with RA prior to and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas others have found that high levels of depression and anxiety occurred early in the pandemic but declined fairly rapidly in the general population1, emotional distress was not attenuated over time in this large cohort of RA patients. Individuals reporting lifetime history of mood disorders were more than twice as likely to report anxiety and depression, with depression peaking early in the pandemic and anxiety growing with each successive wave in the first year. The results demonstrate the importance of applying a lifetime perspective as previous episodes of anxiety and depression may be an important marker of increased vulnerability and recurrence in RA patients, particularly during the pandemic.

References

[1]Fancourt D et al. Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8:141-9.

Acknowledgements

CATCH is supported through unrestricted research grants from: Amgen and Pfizer Canada since 2007; AbbVie Corporation since 2011; Medexus since 2013; Sandoz Canada since 2019; Fresenius Kabi Canada since 2021 and; Organon Canada since 2021. Previous funding from Janssen Canada (2011-16); UCB Canada and Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada (2011-18); Hoffman La Roche Limited (2011-21); Sanofi Genzyme (2016-17); Eli Lilly Canada (2016-20); Merck Canada (2017-21) and; Gilead Sciences Canada (2020-21)

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0721 From Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease to Identifiable Disease: Precursors of Systemic Sclerosis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Background

The pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis is characterized by derangements of the innate and adaptive immune systems, and inflammatory pathways leading to autoimmunity, chronic cytokine production, and chronic inflammation. Diagnosis is rooted in meeting established criteria. However, in pre-clinical states criteria is not fulfilled but biochemical and autoimmune derangements are present. Understanding the underlying processes responsible for disease pathogenesis in pre-clinical states, which place patients at increased risk for the development of established connective tissue diseases, presents a prognostic opportunity, and could enable timely treatment leading to limiting disease progression.

Objectives

We aim to describe the role of the innate and adaptive immune system in the pre-clinical states of UCTD-risk-SSc and prescleroderma, the underlying immune dysregulation in these pre-clinical states, and the evolution of antibodies from nonspecific antinuclear antibodies to specific prior to SLE development.

Methods

Our search strategy was developed alongside an experienced information specialist. We searched the databases EMBASE and MEDLINE with restrictions for the English language. Reference lists of all primary studies and review articles were searched for additional references. Studies reported in full-text and abstract formats were included.

Results

Multiple cytokines are observed to increase along a disease spectrum from UCTD-risk-SSc to classified SSc and include sICAM-1, CCL2, CXCL8, ang-2, CXCL16, e-selectin, and IL-13. The mechanism of action of these cytokines includes transmigration of lymphocytes endothelium, innate immune cell activation and signal propagation, and extracellular matrix deposition. The progressive nature of cytokine increase through a spectrum from pre-clinical to clinical emphasizes disease evolution and enables the discernment of patients who may warrant early intervention. Furthermore, there are disease markers which are observed to be predictive of established SSc and include sIL-2Rα, PIIINP, CXCL4, CXCL10, and CXCL11. Pre-clinical SLE is characterized by an evolving IFN signature and progressive SLE-specific antibody formation prior to disease classification.

Conclusion

The coordinated dysregulation of the innate and adaptive immune systems, and inflammatory signalling pathways leads to the pathogenesis of connective tissue disease. Our improved understanding of these underlying aberrations in pre-clinical stages of disease will serve to better identify patients at increased risk.

References

[1]Valentini G, Pope JE. Undifferentiated connective tissue disease at risk for systemic sclerosis: Which patients might be labeled prescleroderma? Autoimmunity reviews. 2020 Nov;19(11):102659.

[2]Lambers WM, Westra J, Bootsma H, de Leeuw K. From incomplete to complete systemic lupus erythematosus; A review of the predictive serological immune markers. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 2021;51(1):43–8.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0900 SYSTEMIC PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF DIGITAL ULCERS IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Background

Digital ulcers (DU) are common in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and associated with reduced survival, high morbidity and poor quality of life. Recommendations have previously been proposed for DU management yet there remains significant unmet patient need. Therefore the World Scleroderma Foundation DU Working Group intends to develop practical evidence based recommendations for DU management.

Objectives

To summarise data on efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for SSc DU.

Methods

A systematic literature review to May 2021 was performed. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare (OVID) and Academic Search Premier databases were searched for original studies on adult patients with SSc DU treated with systemic pharmacological treatment. Based on the PICO framework, eligibility criteria were defined and references were independently screened by two reviewers. Reviewers independently assessed the full text of eligible articles. Owing to interstudy heterogeneity narrative summaries were used to present data.

Results

The search strategy identified 1271 references of which 45 eligible articles were included. Seventeen studies were randomised placebo controlled trials (RCT) pertaining to PDE5 antagonists (PDE5i) (n=3), endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) (n=3), prostanoids (n=7), antiplatelet agents (n=1) and other (n=3) (Table 1). No head to head RCT was retrieved. All other studies were observational studies (OBS). Studies were highly heterogeneous with application of differing definition of DU, variable study eligibility criteria, clinical endpoints and follow up periods. This limited the calculation of effect size and comparison across studies.

Table 1.

Characteristics of placebo controlled randomised controlled trials

Author YearInterventionnFollow upOutcomeFavours interventionHachulla 2016Sildenafil8312 weeksTime to DU healing-Andrigueti 2017Sildenafil4112 weeksDU healing+Shenoy 2010Tadalafil246 weeksNew DU+Khanna 2016Macitentan55416 weeksNew DU-Matucci-Cerinic 2011Bosentan18832 weeksNew DU Time to healing of DU+-Korn 2004Bosentan12212 weeksNew DU+Kawald 2008IV iloprost5012 monthsDU healing-Wigley 1992IV iloprost3510 weeksDU healing+Wigley 1994IV iloprost739 weeks50% reduction in DU score-Seibold 2017Treprostinil14820 weeksNet DU burden-Vayssairat 1999Beraprost10725 weeks% patients with new DU-Denton 2017Selexipag7412 weeksNumber of new DU DU healing-Lau 1993Cicaprost334 weeksNumber of DU-Abou-Raya 2008Atorvastatin844 monthsNumber of DU+Au 2010Cyclophosphamide15812 monthsNumber of patients with DU-Beckett 1984Dipyridamole / aspirin412 yearsChange in general SSc-Nagaraja 2019Riociguat1732 weeksNet DU burden-

+ significantly superior to comparator

- non significantly different from comparator

DU: digital ulcers IV: intravenous SSc: systemic sclerosis

Several RCT found improved DU healing with treatment: two with PDE5i, one with iloprost and one showed improved DU healing and prevention with atorvastatin. Two RCT demonstrated effective prevention of new DU with bosentan. OBS studies with a total of 621 patients showed variable improvements in the healing of DU with CCB, PDE5i, ERA, statins, N-acetylcysteine, prostanoids and ketanserin and prevention of new DU with ERA.

Regarding safety, all treatments were generally tolerated with few serious adverse events. Treatment was ceased in 6.25-17.5% of patients in RCT due to treatment related side effects.

Conclusion

Despite several studies assessing the efficacy and safety of systemic pharmacological treatment of SSc DU, it is not possible to draw solid conclusions due to study heterogeneity. Small RCT have shown treatment benefit with PDE5i, iloprost and atorvastatin. Large studies demonstrated effective prevention of new DU with bosentan. Our results highlight the urgent need for improved clinical trial design to generate more robust evidence and novel therapies to guide the management SSc DU.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the World Scleroderma Foundation.

Disclosure of Interests

Nancy Maltez: None declared, Laura Ross: None declared, Michael Hughes Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Pfizer outside of the submitted work., Jan Schoones: None declared, Murray Baron: None declared, Lorinda Chung Consultant of: Eicos, Corrado Campochiaro: None declared, Yossra A. Suliman: None declared, Dilia Giuggioli: None declared, Pia Moinzadeh Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Yannick Allanore: None declared, Christopher P Denton: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur., Consultant of: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur., Grant/research support from: Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143), Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur., Tracy Frech: None declared, Daniel Furst: None declared, Dinesh Khanna Consultant of: Eicos Sciences Inc, Janssen, Thomas Krieg: None declared, Masataka Kuwana Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nippon Shinyaku, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Kissei, Mochida outside of the submitted work., Marco Matucci-Cerinic: None declared, Janet Pope: None declared, Alessia Alunno: None declared

Prenatal mental and physical health, behaviours, and maternity care experiences during the COVID-19

Background

During pregnancy, women's mental and physical health, health behaviours, and experiences of maternity care can have significant implications for obstetric, maternal and child outcomes. These factors can be impacted by adverse life-events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim

This study examined pregnant women's mental and physical health, health behaviours, and experiences of maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

An international online survey was conducted in June and July 2020. Pregnant women self-reported levels of general stress, pregnancy-specific stress and COVID-19 related stress. Women also self-reported their mental and physical health, general health behaviours and COVID-19 related health behaviours. Maternity care experiences were reported using closed and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses were used for quantitative and qualitative data respectively.

Results

573 pregnant women from 15 countries participated. Women reported high levels of pregnancy-specific and COVID-19-related stress, and low levels of mental and physical health, during the pandemic. Women reported distress related to restrictions implemented in their maternity care that limited in-person interactions with healthcare professionals and partner attendance at antenatal appointments. Lack of information on COVID-19 and pregnancy also led to uncertainty for women about pregnancy and birth. Encouragingly, pregnant women reported high levels of adherence to public health advice and healthy prenatal behaviours.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic is having significant adverse effects on the mental and physical health of pregnant women. Population level interventions targeting pregnancy- and pandemic-specific stress are needed to better support the mental and physical health of women during the on-going pandemic and minimise adverse outcomes for women and children.

Key messages

The COVID-19 pandemic is significantly adversely impact the mental and physical health of pregnant women, indicating need for population level interventions for prenatal mental and physical health. Restrictions in maternity care and uncertainty about COVID-19 impacts are key determinant of adverse prenatal physical and mental health outcomes.

OP0262-HPR THE NEURO-QOL UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION SCALE: NEW OPPORTUNITIES TO MORE RELIABLY AND PRECISELY MEASURE SELF-REPORTED HAND FUNCTION AND SELF-CARE ACTIVITIES IN PEOPLE WITH RA

Background:

RA is an inflammatory disease that results in pain and loss of function, especially in the hands and wrists. Brief self-assessment tools that can reliably and precisely quantify hand/wrist function are needed to assess inflammatory activity when a physical exam is not feasible and to capture day-to-day experience of living with RA. Neuro-QoL is part of the PROMIS family of self-report measures created using a patient-centred approach and IRT methodology. The Neuro-Qol Upper Extremity Function (UEF) scale measures ability across fine motor and ADLs involving digital, manual and reach-related function and self-care. Little is known about its performance in RA.

Objectives:

To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of the 8-item Neuro-QoL UEF in RA. We hypothesized scores would be strongly (r>.70) associated with MHAQ, MD-HAQ, and PROMIS PF, moderately (r=.4 to .7) to symptoms, disease activity, and QoL indicators, and be responsive to change in disease activity and PF.

Methods:

Data were from the 0 and 6-month visits of adults with early RA (sx <1 yr) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort, a prospective real-world study at 16 sites across Canada. Participants completed the Neuro-QoL UEF, MHAQ, MDHAQ, PROMIS-29, and PT Global at each visit. Rheumatologists recorded joint counts and MD Global. To evaluate content validity, we examined descriptive statistics across CDAI disease activity levels, and Pearson correlations between the Neuro-QOL UEF, legacy measures, CRP & ESR. Responsiveness was assessed by correlating change scores from visits 0-6 between Neuro-QoL UEF, disease activity and legacy PF scores.

Results:

The 262 participants were mostly white (83%) women (71%) with a mean (SD) age of 55 (13). Summary statistics at 6-months are shown in Table 1. Neuro-QOL UEF was moderately-strongly correlated with MHAQ, MDHAQ, PROMIS-PF (|r|=.63-.75) and moderately correlated with pain and stiffness, (|r|=.59, -.64), and CDAI, SDAI, PT&MD Global, TJ & SJ (|r|=.39-.58). Neuro-QOL UEF was moderately correlated with PROMIS QoL domains Pain, Fatigue, Anxiety, Depression, Sleep & Participation (|r|=.39-.60).

Table 1.

Summary statistics of physical function and RA disease activity indices at 6 months.

MeanSDMdn25%75%(Min, Max)Physical FunctionNeuro-Qol UEF46.59.753.837.553.8(21.8, 53.8)MHAQ (0-3)0.290.430.130.000.38(0.00, 2.25)MD-HAQ (0-10)1.391.640.700.002.00(0.00, 8.00)PROMIS-PF46.48.546.239.556.0(23.3, 56.0)RA Disease ActivityCDAI9.39.96.03.013.0(0.0, 56.0)SDAI10.710.96.83.115.2(0.0, 57.0)Patient Global3.02.5315(0, 10)MD Global1.82.2103(0, 9)Swollen Joints (28)2.13.7002(0, 20)Tender Joints (28)2.43.9103(0, 24)

Neuro-QOL scores decreased in a dose-response manner across worsening CDAI DA states reflecting increasing impairment (Table 2). Persons with HDA reported the highest disability, scoring nearly 0.5 SD lower on the Neuro-QoL UEF than PROMIS PF. Change from baseline to 6 months in Neuro-QoL UEF was moderately correlated with changes in PROMIS PF, MHAQ, PT Global, and CDAI (|r|=.44-.65). The mean change and range from 0-6 months in Neuro-QoL was significantly larger than in PROMIS (8.9 [95% CI 7.5, 10.4] vs. 5.4 [95% CI 4.4, 6.4])(see Figure).

Table 2.

Mean scores (95% CI) at 6 months by CDAI level.

REMLDAMDAHADNeuroQol UEF52.8 (51.8, 53.7)48.1 (46.6, 49.7)42.0 (39.4, 44.6)33.8 (30.5, 37.1)MHAQ (0-3)0.05 (0.02, 0.09)0.19 (0.14, 0.24)0.45 (0.34, 0.57)0.90 (0.63, 1.17)MD-HAQ (0-10)0.31 (0.17, 0.46)1.11 (0.90, 1.32)2.15 (1.71, 2.59)3.56 (2.56, 4.56)PROMIS-PF52.8 (51.4, 54.2)46.8 (45.3, 48.2)42.3 (40.4, 44.2)38.0 (34.4, 41.6)

Conclusion:

Clinicians, researchers, and patients benefit from practical self-report tools that reliably and precisely monitor hand function in RA. Results offer initial evidence of validity and responsiveness and support use of Neuro-QoL UEF to self-assess inflammatory activity in the hands and day-to-day experiences of living with RA.

Acknowledgements:

The CATCH study was designed and implemented by the investigators and financially supported through unrestricted research grants from: Amgen and Pfizer Canada - Founding sponsors since January 2007; AbbVie Corporation and Hoffmann-LaRoche since 2011; Medexus Inc. since 2013;, Merck Canada since 2017, Sandoz Canada, Biopharmaceuticals since 2019,Gilead Sciences Canada since 2020 and Fresenius Kabi Canada Ltd. since 2021. Previously funded by Janssen Biotech from 2011-2016, UCB Canada and Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada from 2011-2018, Sanofi Genzyme from 2016-2017, and Eli Lilly Canada from 2016-2020.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0172 BRENTUXIMAB VEDONTIN FOR SKIN INVOLVEMENT IN REFRACTORY DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS, INTERIM RESULTS OF A PHASE IIB OPEN-LABEL TRIAL

Background:

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease affecting multiple organs causing morbidity and mortality. Treatments targeting SSc skin often have limited success. The presence of CD30+ lymphocytes in skin biopsies and increased levels of serum CD30 have been reported in SSc patients1. This could constitute a new therapeutic target.

Objectives:

To explore the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin, a chimeric anti-CD30 antibody drug conjugate, in patients with severe active diffuse cutaneous SSc who failed multiple treatments.

Methods:

This Phase IIb, single center, open-label, investigator-initiated trial will recruit 10 patients. Brentuximab vedotin 0.6 mg/Kg was infused intravenously every 3 weeks for 48 weeks. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, meeting the 2013 ACR/EULAR SSc classification criteria, modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) ≥15 with <5 years since the first non-Raynaud’s symptom and/or skin worsening despite immunosuppression. Patients were allowed to continue their standard of care medications for SSc except for rituximab. Patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary SSc involvement, severe infections, significant peripheral neuropathy, or active malignancy were excluded. The primary objective was a decrease in mRSS of ≥8 at 48 weeks. The main secondary endpoint was MRSS at 24 weeks. Differences were assessed by paired t tests. Data were compared to 16 age, disease duration, mRSS and past/present use of immunosuppressors-matched controls (ratio 2-3:1) from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) registry.

Results:

Eight of 10 patients have been recruited to date; two are in the first 8 weeks and one was withdrawn at her request after developing influenza at week 12. Five subjects (60% female) have reached week 24, and 3 have completed 48 weeks. The mRSS is shown in Table 1. The ΔMRSS for patients treated with brentuximab between weeks 0 and 24 was 8.2 ([CI 95% 2.8, 13.6], p = 0.013) and from 0 to 48 was 15.3 ([CI 95% 8.2, 22.5], p = 0.012). Whereas, the ΔMRSS for the CSRG controls was 3.1 ([CI 95% -2, 8.2], p = 0.211) at 48 weeks. Assuming that mRSS would at least be the same from week 24 to 48 in the 2 cases who are between 24 and 48 weeks with brentuximab, we compared the 5 cases vs controls (Figure 1). ΔMRSS for Brentuximab was 12.2 ([CI 95% 5.9, 18.5], p = 0.006. No cases have developed a peripheral neuropathy and only one SAE (influenza).

Table 1.N (SD)NAgeDisease durationmRSS week 0mRSS week 24mRSS week 48mRSS week 48**Case560.2 (9.3)4.5 (2.1)33 (5.2)24.8 (6)15.7 (3)20.8 (8.3)Control1658.5 (8.3)4.9 (2.1)31.3 (5.9)N/D28.1 (7.5)28.1 (7.5)p0.7310.7750.559N/D0.0130.079

mRSS = modified Rodnan skin score, N/D = no data, ** = comparisons including 5 cases, assuming stability in MRSS from week 24 to 48 in cases 5 and 6

Figure 1.

Conclusion:

Brentuximab vedontin already achieved the primary endpoint at 24 weeks, after half of the intended recruitment sample reached this landmark. A comparison with CSRG controls showed that mRSS only decreased significantly in patients treated with brentuximab. This interim report suggests that brentuximab vedontin might effectively improve skin involvement in patients with diffuse SSc and severe skin involvement.

References:

[1]Mavalia C, Scaletti C, Romagnani P, et al. Type 2 helper T-cell predominance and high CD30 expression in systemic sclerosis. Am J Pathol. 1997;151(6):1751-8.

Acknowledgements:

We would like to acknowledge the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group, Louise Vanderhoek, Sara Macdonald Hewitt and Jillian Bylsma for their collaboration

Disclosure of Interests:

Andreu Fernandez-Codina Consultant of: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Atheneum consulting, Tatiana Nevskaya: None declared, Janet Pope Speakers bureau: Actelion, Amgen, Abbie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Medexus, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Teva, UCB., Consultant of: Actelion, Amgen, Abbie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Medexus, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Teva, UCB., Grant/research support from: Actelion, Amgen, Abbie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Medexus, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Teva, UCB.

AB0419 ACCESS TO TREATMENT FOR RAYNAUD’S PHENOMENON AND DIGITAL ULCERS FOR PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS DOESN’T FOLLOW EULAR/EUSTAR GUIDELINES

Background:

Patients with Raynaud’s Phenomenon (RP) from systemic sclerosis (SSc) may experience severe complications. Digital ulcers (DUs), occur in approximately half the patients with SSc, and cause hand dysfunction, severe pain, and decreased quality of life. DUs lead to increased healthcare utilization and systemic economic burden through hospitalizations, ED visits, and ambulatory services (1). However, access to medications such as PDE5 inhibitors and prostacyclins that are within the EULAR/EUSTAR SSc guidelines (2) in a country with global health care but patchy pharmacare such as Canada has not been studied.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the access to treatment of medications for RP and DU in patients with SSc in Canadian provinces through identifying the provincial and private insurance coverage of PDE5 inhibitors (PDE5i) and prostanoids, the timelines and procedures of requesting these medications, and the process of administering IV prostanoids if required for patient care.

Methods:

We designed an online survey and collected data through the Survey Monkey platform. The survey was administered to rheumatologists affiliated with the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) from December 2020 to January 2021. Responders were asked to report if the province or private insurance automatically provided PDE5i for patients with RP and DU or if a dedicated process was required to attain these medications. Additionally, responders were asked to describe the process of administering Iloprost, Epoprostenol and Alprostadil and the barriers inherent to their administration. Of note, there is no DIN number for Iloprost in Canada so every time it is used there must be an application to Health Canada.

Results:

The survey was completed by 100% of CSRG researchers (17/17), representing 8 provinces in Canada. None of the provincial governments provided coverage for PDE5i without special requests that were adjudicated on a case by case basis with approximately half the provinces paying for PDE5i upon special request if a patient was eligible for provincial drug insurance (ex elderly, youths, low income families). Two provinces, Quebec and Saskatchewan, provided PDE5i “all the time”. Whereas NS, MB, ON, BC, and AB provided them “sometimes”; NFLD provided them “never”. Provincial governments and private insurance fulfilled requests “within 1 month” 62% of the time and the other requests took longer to be answered. Private insurance approved coverage with special request in AB, MB, QC, ON, and NS. Respondents described administration of IV prostanoids as “inconsistent”, requiring “a lot of work”, and that patients in most jurisdictions be admitted as in-patients for provinces to cover these medications.

Conclusion:

Most jurisdiction within Canada do not provide coverage for PDE5i and the process to obtain access for patients is delayed, non-uniform, and often not approved. Intravenous prostanoid infusions are difficult to obtain and have system barriers. Advocacy and cost effectiveness data should be used to advocate for access to medications that are recommended within SSc recommendations.

References:

[1]Morrisroe K, et al. Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: their epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and associated clinical and economic burden. Arthritis research & therapy. 2019 Dec;21(1):1-2.

[2]Kowal-Bielecka O, et al. Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2017 Aug 1;76(8):1327-39.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0447 PREVALENCE OF PRIMARY BILIARY CIRRHOSIS IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS AND SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME OVER TIME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background:

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a rare slowly progressive autoimmune disease characterized by inflammatory destruction and fibrosis of intrahepatic bile ducts. It is known to coexist together with rheumatological conditions such as Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). There is a wide range in reported prevalence of disease overlap with these entities; however, the exact prevalence rates remain unclear.

Objectives:

The objectives were to determine the prevalence of: 1) PBC in patients with SS and SSc (and the subsets of limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc)), 2) SSc and SS in patients with PBC, and 3) to analyze changes in frequency over time. SSc occurs in 3/10,000 and PBC in 4-40/10,000 but these rare autoimmune diseases are known to coexist together. We speculated that there could be more cases diagnosed due to increasing availability of standardized antibody tests such as ANA, centromere antibodies, ENA and mitochondrial antibodies.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was performed using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases up till June 16, 2020. Only full text articles in the English language with at least 40 patients were included. Cohorts, case series, cross-sectional studies, correspondences and registries with reported prevalence rates of both PBC in patients with SS and SSc as well as SSc and SS in patients with PBC were included. Data on frequency of co-existent diseases was studied by year of publication to determine if prevalence changed over time using linear regression. We used the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist to assess the quality of the studies.

Results:

Of 2876 citations identified, 67 were included in the analysis (n=33 for PBC, 15 for SSc, 18 for SS and 1 for SSc/SS). STROBE checklist scores ranged from 7-21. The prevalence of PBC was 5% in patients with SSc. Within the subsets, the prevalence of PBC in lcSSc was 8% and in dcSSc was 1%. In patients with SS, the prevalence of PBC was 4%. The prevalence of SSc overall in those with PBC was 5% and, within the subsets was 6% in lcSSc and 0% in dcSSc. The prevalence of SS in PBC was 18%. There was also no significant association between year of publication and prevalence. There was a lack of standardized definitions so misclassification may have occurred.

Conclusion:

PBC is increased in SSc but mostly in the lcSSc subset. SS in PBC is common at nearly 1 in 5. Over the years, there was no change in the prevalence of PBC in SSc indicating stability over time.

Acknowledgements:

Meagan Stanley, Western University Librarian.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

POS0474 SUBSTANTIAL IMPACT OF AUTOANTIBODY ENRICHMENT ON OUTCOMES IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH ABATACEPT: DATA FROM A LARGE POOLED ANALYSIS OF 4 RCTS

Background:

Biomarkers are commonly used as prognostic tools in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and have additional potential to guide treatment decisions. Previous clinical trials of abatacept (ABA) such as the Early AMPLE trial (eAMPLE) and real-world data suggest differential treatment effects of ABA based on the presence of biomarkers and disease stage.1-4

Objectives:

To supplement evidence of enhanced efficacy of ABA among patients with enriched autoantibody biomarkers and early disease stage by applying key inclusion criteria from the eAMPLE trial retrospectively to historic ABA RCTs.

Methods:

Individual patient data (IPD) from four early-RA ABA trials (AGREE [NCT00122382], AMPLE [NCT00929864], AVERT [NCT01142726], AVERT-2 [NCT02504268]) were pooled. Patients were defined as enriched at baseline if they had: 1) RA disease duration ≤ 12 months, 2) DAS28-CRP ≥ 3.2, 3) ≥ 3 times the upper limit of normal on an anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) test, and 4) were rheumatoid factor positive (RF+). Patients were grouped according to treatment status (ABA [monotherapy or with methotrexate (MTX)] or non-ABA [MTX or adalimumab (ADA) plus MTX]). Outcomes included DAS28-CRP mean change from baseline to week 24, DAS28-CRP remission and ACR 20/50/70 at week 24. IPD mixed-effects meta-regressions were estimated with trial fixed effects, main effects and interaction of enrichment status and treatment type, trial-level random effects on the interaction, and baseline DAS28-CRP score for DAS28-CRP outcomes. These regressions were conducted in the full population and among ABA patients only. Sensitivity analyses defining enrichment using only criteria 3 and 4 were also conducted.

Results:

2,087 patients [1,328 (64%) enriched, 759 (36%) non-enriched] were included (AGREE 492 [24%], AMPLE 509 [24%], AVERT 339 [16%], AVERT-2 747 [36%]). Disease duration, RF+, and anti-CCP values differed as expected between the two groups, while DAS28-CRP was high regardless of enrichment status (Table 1). Among ABA-treated patients, outcomes were more favorable for enriched patients compared to non-enriched patients across all outcomes, either statistically or directionally (Figure 1, ABA treatment arm only analysis). The differences in outcomes between enriched vs. non-enriched patients were larger for ABA than for comparators across all outcomes with the exception of ACR 50, where the difference was directionally consistent (Figure 1, ABA vs. comparator analysis). The relative odds of improved efficacy of ABA vs. comparators ranged from 37% to 87% for remission and ACR responses. The results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis using only anti-CCP and RF seropositivity to define enrichment.

Figure 1.

Analysis results

Conclusion:

This post-hoc study corroborates previous evidence of improved outcomes among ABA-treated, seropositive early RA patients by applying eAMPLE inclusion criteria retrospectively to ABA RCTs. The findings support a differential treatment effect for costimulation blockade using ABA among enriched and double antibody positive early RA patients, suggesting a potential for patient-tailored RA treatment approaches.

References:

[1]Buckner J, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10).

[2]Huizinga T, et al Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2015;74:234-235.

[3]Harrold L, et al, Rheumatol Ther. 2019 Jun;6(2):217-230.

[4]Sokolove J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016 Apr;75:709–714.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

All patientsNon-enriched patientsEnriched patientsAbataceptComparatorsAbataceptComparatorsN = 2,087N = 385N = 374N = 784N = 544DemographicsAge (years)49.3 ± 12.949.4 ± 12.650.6 ± 12.948.6 ± 12.549.2 ± 13.5Female79.3%81.3%83.4%77.2%77.9%Disease characteristicsDisease duration (months)8.5 ± 12.519.9 ± 15.918.3 ± 15.12.4 ± 2.82.4 ± 2.9RF Positive91.0%74.2%76.1%100%100%Anti-CCP Positive81.8%52.2%47.3%100%100%DAS28-CRP Score5.71 ± 1.135.72 ± 1.195.66 ± 1.205.68 ± 1.095.76 ± 1.08

Comparators included MTX and MTX+ADA.

Acknowledgements:

This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb.

Disclosure of Interests:

Kaleb Michaud Grant/research support from: Pfizer Aspire grant, Sarah (Sang Hee) Park Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Karissa Lozenski Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, John Vaile Shareholder of: Amgen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Vadim Khaychuk Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Janet Pope Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, BI, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, BI, Celltrion, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, Sandoz, Teva, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Philip G Conaghan Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Flexion Therapeutics, Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer

POS1459-HPR IDENTIFYING MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN THE RA FLARE QUESTIONNAIRE SCORES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

The RA-FQ is a patient-reported measure of current disease activity in RA that can be used to identify disease flares. The RA-FQ queries pain, physical function, fatigue, stiffness, and participation and yields a score from 0-50. We previously reported on reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Objectives:

To identify changes in RA-FQ that represent minimal and meaningful improvement or worsening from the perspective of people with RA, treating rheumatologists, and in relation to disease activity indices. We hypothesized that

Methods:

Data were from adults with early RA (sx <1 year) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort, a prospective study of real-world patients treated across Canada. Participants completed the RA-FQ, Patient Global, and RA transition item since last visit (a little vs. a lot better or worse or same) between consecutive 3- and 6-month visits. Rheumatologists recorded joint counts, MD Global, and change in RA. We compared mean change across improvement and worsening using patient anchors and disease activity indicators.

Results:

The 808 adults were mostly white (84%) women (71%) with a mean (SD) age of 55 (15) and moderate-high CDAI level (85%) at enrollment. Most (79%) reported their RA had changed; 59% were better and 20% worse. Patients who were a lot worse had a mean increase of 8.9 points whereas those who rated themselves as a lot better had a -6.0 decrease on the RA-FQ (Figure 1). Minimal worsening and improvement were associated with 4.7 and -1.8 change in RA-FQ scores, respectively, while patients who rated their RA unchanged had stable RA-FQ scores (Table 1).

Similar changes were evident in CDAI, SDAI, and DAS indices (Table 1). Larger differences were observed with patient vs. physician global scores and tender vs. swollen joints. Across measures, the change associated with worsening was greater than for improvement. Results supported all prespecified hypotheses ab.

Table 1.

Spearman’s correlation coefficients of PsAQoL with the other parameters for construct validity

DomainA Lot Better(N=346; 43%)A Little Better(N=132; 16%)The Same(N=174; 21%)A Little Worse(N=94; 12%)A Lot Worse(N=62; 8%)Δ95% CISDΔ95% CISDΔ95% CISDΔ95% CISDΔ95% CISDRA-FQ Total (0-50)-6.0(-7.1, -4.9)10.3-1.8(-3.2, -0.3)8.4-0.1(-1.3, 1.1)8.14.7(2.9, 6.6)9.18.9(5.1, 12.7)15.0 Pain-1.2(-1.4, -0.9)2.4-0.4(-0.8, 0.0)2.30.0(-0.2, 0.3)1.81.3(0.8, 1.7)2.22.0(1.2, 2.9)3.3 Physical Function-1.3(-1.6, -1.1)2.4-0.3(-0.6, 0.1)2.10.0(-0.3, 0.3)2.10.9(0.4, 1.4)2.41.8(0.8, 2.7)3.7 Fatigue-1.1(-1.4, -0.8)2.6-0.4(-0.7, 0.0)1.90.0(-0.3, 0.3)2.10.7(0.3, 1.1)2.11.3(0.5, 2.1)3.2 Stiffness-1.1(-1.4, -0.9)2.4-0.4(-0.7, 0.0)2.0-0.1(-0.4, 0.2)2.01.1(0.6, 1.5)2.21.8(1.0, 2.7)3.3 Participation-1.2(-1.5, -1.0)2.5-0.1(-0.5, 0.3)2.1-0.1(-0.4, 0.2)2.20.8(0.4, 1.3)2.22.0(1.1, 2.8)3.4Disease ActivityCDAI*-5.3(-6.3, -4.3)9.1-3.3(-5.4, -1.3)11.5-0.8(-2.0, 0.5)8.11.7(-0.1, 3.5)8.86.8(3.7, 9.8)12.0SDAI-5.6(-6.8, -4.4)9.2-3.5(-6.1, -0.9)12.2-1.9(-3.6, -0.2)8.91.5(-0.7, 3.7)9.24.7(1.0, 8.4)12.2DAS28-CRP-0.7(-0.8, -0.6)1.01-0.5(-0.7, -0.2)1.2-0.2(-0.4, 0.0)1.00.3(0.1, 0.5)1.00.5(0.2, 0.9)1.2Patient Global (0-10)-1.3(-1.5, -1.0)2.7-0.5(-0.9, -0.1)2.1-0.1(-0.4, 0.2)2.11.3(0.8, 1.8)2.42.9(2.1, 3.6)3.1MD Global (0-10)-1.2(-1.4, -1.0)1.9-0.7(-1.1, -0.3)-0.1-0.1(-0.4, 0.2)1.90.1(-0.3, 0.5)2.80.7(0.0, 1.5)2.8Swollen Joints (28)-1.4(-1.7, 1.0)3.2-1.0(-1.8, -0.2)4.6-0.4(-0.9, 0.0)3.00.0(-0.7, 0.7)3.41.3(0.2, 2.5)4.6Tender Joints (28)-1.5(-1.9, -1.1)3.9-1.3(-2.2, -0.3)5.50.0(-0.7, 0.6)4.30.3(-0.7, 1.2)4.52.2(0.8, 3.5)5.4

Conclusion:

In this large cohort of adults with ERA, the RA-FQ was responsive to change and generally distinguish between minimal and meaningful improvement and worsening. These data add to a growing evidence demonstrating robust psychometric properties of the RA-FQ and offer initial guidance about the amount of change associated with improvement or worsening, supporting its use in RA care, research and decision-making.

Acknowledgements:

The CATCH study was designed and implemented by the investigators and financially supported through unrestricted research grants from: Amgen and Pfizer Canada - Founding sponsors since January 2007; AbbVie Corporation and Hoffmann-LaRoche since 2011; Medexus Inc. since 2013;, Merck Canada since 2017, Sandoz Canada, Biopharmaceuticals since 2019,Gilead Sciences Canada since 2020 and Fresenius Kabi Canada Ltd. since 2021. Previously funded by Janssen Biotech from 2011-2016, UCB Canada and Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada from 2011-2018, Sanofi Genzyme from 2016-2017, and Eli Lilly Canada from 2016-2020.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0207 REAL-WORLD RETENTION OF JAK INHIBITORS IS LONGER THAN BDMARDS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are both recommended post conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) therapy failure in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the data on long-term durability are limited.

Objectives:

The objective of this study is to analyze a database of patients at the Western University, Rheumatology Center who initiated a bDMARD or JAKi and compare the proportion and characteristics of patients associated with retention of a drug class.

Methods:

This was a single-center study of 215 adult RA patients (82.76 % females, age 59.8 ± 12.0 years, disease duration 15.5 ± 10.0 years; table 1) failing multiple csDMARDs prior to initiating either bDMARDs (TNF inhibitors, abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab) or JAKi, between June 2014 (when tofacitinib was approved in Canada) and April 2020. All patients enrolled had failed traditional DMARDs, including methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and/or leflunomide. Durability and predictors of discontinuation were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses for all treatment trials, and for patients receiving bDMARDs/JAKi as a first line after csDMARDs failure.

Results:

In 215 patients, there were 320 treatment events (148 bDMARDs, 172 JAKi) and 142 discontinuations (53.5% bDMARDs, 46.5% JAKi). Figure 1 represents the Kaplan-Meier survival curve for time to therapy discontinuation in 215 patients receiving bDMARDs vs JAKi. The Cox proportional hazards model was significant with better retention for JAKi, with a hazard ratio (HR) for treatment discontinuation of JAKi compared with bDMARDs of 0.676 (95% CI 0.47-0.97, p=0.034), adjusted for gender, age, disease duration, and line of therapy (Table 1). Moreover, the analysis revealed better retention for both groups as first line advanced therapy compared to later lines of therapy; 57.6% of JAKi and 31.1% of bDMARDs were used as first line advanced therapy. HR for treatment discontinuation for first line vs later lines of therapy was 0.593 (95% CI 0.40-0.88, p=0.01), adjusted for drug class, gender, age, and disease duration (Table 1). The most common reasons for discontinuations were inefficacy (60%), side effects (22%), or other reasons (18%). Inefficacy (58% vs 62%, p=0.8) and side-effects (16% vs 27%, p=0.4) were equally common for bDMARDs and JAKi. Sex, age at treatment onset, and RA duration did not predict discontinuation by Cox regression analyses, and after sub-grouping into bDMARDs and JAKi.

Conclusion:

EULAR guidelines have placed bDMARDs equal to JAKi as post csDMARD failure therapy in active RA. However, this study demonstrates that JAKi has a greater durability than biologics regardless of gender, age, disease duration, and line of therapy. Therefore, JAKi may be considered as a preferable method of treatment post csDMARD failure in active RA.

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for (A) time to discontinuation of therapy in all RA patients receiving bDMARDs versus JAKi; P-value represents Cox regression adjusted for gender, age, disease duration, and line of therapy (B) time to discontinuation of therapy in patients using bDMARDs/JAKi as first line of advanced therapy; P-value represents Cox regression adjusted for drug class, gender, age, and disease duration

Table 1.

Patient demographics and hazard ratios for discontinuation of bDMARDs versus JAKi by Cox regression model

CharacteristicJAKi (N=172)bDMARD (N=148)MeanAge (years)60.958.559.8Sex (% F)77.888.582.8Disease duration (years)15.315.815.5Line of advanced therapy (% first line)57.631.145.3Drug used (%)Tofacitinib: 93.5Rituximab: 26.4Etanercept: 19.6Adalimumab: 17.6Predictors of Drug DiscontinuationHR (95% CIs)P valuesCrude ModelJAKi vs bDMARDs0.60 (0.43, 0.84)0.003Adjusted modelJAKi vs bDMARDs0.68 (0.47, 0.97)0.034Male vs female0.77 (0.46, 1.31)0.342Age1.01 (0.99, 1.03)0.123RA duration0.99 (0.97, 1.01)0.500Treatment line 1 vs >10.59 (0.40, 0.88)0.010

Disclosure of Interests:

Karla Machlab: None declared, Samir M. Iskandar: None declared, Tatiana Nevskaya: None declared, Louise Vanderhoek: None declared, Jillian Bylsma: None declared, Sara Hewitt: None declared, Janet Pope Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, BI, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, BI, Celltrion, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, Sandoz, Teva, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics

POS0531 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH BASELINE HYPERTENSION IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: DATA FROM A REAL-WORLD LARGE INCIDENT COHORT

Background:

It is not well understood why hypertension (HTN) is so common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Reported prevalence of HTN in RA patients ranges from 4-73%.(1)

Objectives:

This study explored the prevalence of HTN at time of RA diagnosis and which demographic, behavioural and clinical factors were associated with HTN.

Methods:

Data from the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH), a prospective inception cohort of patients with RA <1 year duration, were used to analyze baseline demographic, behavioural and clinical characteristics associated with HTN, which was reported by physicians. Univariate logistic regression models were created to explore associations with baseline HTN. A multivariate logistic regression model was built based on goodness of fit indicated by likelihood ratio tests. Variables included in the model were age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), education, smoking, alcohol servings, seropositivity, disease activity and comorbidities.

Results:

In total, 2052 subjects were included with mean (±SD) age of 55 (±14) years and symptom duration 5.60(5.47, 5.73) months, 71% of subjects were female and 85% were Caucasian. HTN was reported in 26% of subjects at baseline. Hypertensive subjects were older and more likely to be male. Other factors significantly associated with HTN at baseline were lower education, ever smoking, high BMI, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, worse RA disease activity, longer duration of RA symptoms, being seropositive, as well as the use of NSAIDs and/or corticosteroids (Table 1). In multivariable analysis HTN was associated with older age, overweight and obese BMI, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Expression of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies was inversely associated with HTN (Table 1). Other RA disease factors and treatments were not significantly associated with HTN on multivariable analysis.

Table 1.

Results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses exploring the association between baseline characteristics and HTN in early RA.

Univariate Logistic RegressionMultivariable Logistic RegressionVariableCrude OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)Socio-Demographic20-39 years old0.15 (0.07, 0.26)0.14(0.05, 0.34)40-59 years oldReference60-79 years old2.81 (2.26, 3.50)2.26(1.65, 3.11)80-99 years old5.87 (3.36,10.25)3.80(1.53, 9.41)Female0.55 (0.45, 0.68)1.10(0.78, 1.54)Lifestyle/BehaviouralNormal weight (18.5- 24.9kg/m2)ReferenceOverweight (25-29.9 kg/m2)2.33(1.74, 3.11)1.63(1.10, 2.43)Obese (30+ kg/m2)3.19(2.38, 4.27)2.84(1.91, 4.23Ever-smoking1.41(1.15, 1.73)1.02(0.75, 1.40)Post-secondary education0.58(0.47, 0.71)0.88(0.65, 1.20)Clinical CharacteristicsSymptom duration0.99(0.99, 0.99)1.00(1.00, 1.00)DAS-281.09(1.09, 1.17)1.02(0.92, 1.13)ACPA+0.68(0.56, 0.85)0.64(0.44, 0.92)Corticosteroid use pre-baseline1.37(1.04, 1.81)OmittedNSAID use at baseline0.68(0.55, 0.84)OmittedDiabetes5.62(4.09, 7.73)3.20(1.99, 5.15)Hyperlipidemia4.75(3.74, 6.03)2.80(1.94, 4.02),CVD15.59(3.35, 72.64)Omitted

DAS-28; Disease activity score 28, ACPA; Anti-citrullinated protein antibody, CVD; Cardiovascular disease. Pre-baseline is 29 to 365 days before entering the cohort. Baseline is within 28 days before entering the cohort. Omitted variables either failed likelihood ratio test or were colinear. Additional variables tested but found insignificant: race, alcohol servings, depression, RF+, and use of DMARDs.

Conclusion:

Approximately 1 in 4 diagnosed with RA had HTN reported by their rheumatologists, which is similar to that of the general population. This suggests that increased risk of HTN in RA patients may develop as RA disease or treatment time progresses. Factors that may be predictive of this excess risk will be explored in further analysis.

References:

[1]Panoulas VF, Metsios GS, Pace AV, et al. Hypertension in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:1286-98.

Acknowledgements:

The CATCH study was designed and implemented by the investigators and financially supported through unrestricted research grants from: Amgen and Pfizer Canada - Founding sponsors since January 2007; AbbVie Corporation and Hoffmann-LaRoche since 2011; Medexus Inc. since 2013;, Merck Canada since 2017, Sandoz Canada, Biopharmaceuticals since 2019,Gilead Sciences Canada since 2020 and Fresenius Kabi Canada Ltd. since 2021. Previously funded by Janssen Biotech from 2011-2016, UCB Canada and Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada from 2011-2018, Sanofi Genzyme from 2016-2017, and Eli Lilly Canada from 2016-2020.

Disclosure of Interests:

Brook Hadwen: None declared, Saverio Stranges: None declared, Neil Klar: None declared, Kuriya Bindee: None declared, Janet Pope Speakers bureau: UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB;, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Susan J. Bartlett Consultant of: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Gilles Boire Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Louis Bessette Speakers bureau: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis, Consultant of: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis., Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis., Carol Hitchon Grant/research support from: Pfizer and UCB Canada, Glen Hazlewood: None declared, Edward Keystone Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Consultant of:: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion, Myriad Autoimmune, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Samsung Bioepsis, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead Sciences, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, PuraPharm, Sanofi, Orit Schieir: None declared, Carter Thorne Speakers bureau: Medexus/Medac, Consultant of: Abbvie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Pfizer, Abbvie, Celgene, CaREBiodam, Novartis, Diane Tin: None declared, Marie-France Valois: None declared, Vivian Bykerk Consultant of: Amgen, BMS, Gilead, Sanofi-Genzyme/Regeneron, Scipher, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, UCB, NIH, Lillian Barra: None declared

When is an Offset Not an Offset? A Framework of Necessary Conditions for Biodiversity Offsets

Biodiversity offsets have become a widely accepted means of attempting to compensate for biodiversity loss from development, and are applied in planning and decision-making processes at many levels. Yet their use is contentious, and numerous problems with both the concept and the practice have been identified in the literature. Our starting point is the understanding that offsets are a kind of biodiversity compensation measure through which the goal of no net loss (or net gain) of biodiversity can be at least theoretically achieved. Based on a typology of compensation measures distinguishing between habitat protection, improvement (including restoration, habitat creation and improved management practices) and other compensation, we review the literature to develop a framework of conditions that must be met if habitat protection and improvement initiatives can be truly considered offsets and not merely a lesser form of compensation. It is important that such conceptual clarity is reflected in offset policy and guidance, if offsets are to be appropriately applied and to have any chance of fully compensating for biodiversity loss. Our framework can be used to support the review and ongoing development of biodiversity offset policy and guidance, with the aim of improving clarity, rigour and therefore the chances that good biodiversity outcomes can be achieved.

A molar pregnancy in an embryo donor cow

A 6-year-old Hereford embryo donor cow was referred to Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine for a mass in the tip of her left uterine horn. The cow had recently undergone an embryo collection which yielded unfertilized, degenerated ova. Transrectal palpation and ultrasound revealed a multi-locular mass enveloped by two separate compartments that resembled an amniotic and allantoic cavity within the uterus. Tissue was collected via a uterine flush and submitted for histopathology. The tissue was determined to be placenta, confirming the diagnosis of a molar pregnancy. Following treatment, the cow was able to produce numerous viable embryos. Molar pregnancies are rare and characterized by abnormal growth of trophoblastic cells leading to formation of intrauterine cystic masses. It is important to routinely perform an ultrasonographic examination of the cow's reproductive tract approximately 30 days following non-surgical in vivo embryo collections to detect and treat unwanted conditions such as pregnancy and cystic conditions.

OP0249 LONG-TERM EXTENSION RESULTS OF RISE-SSC, A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF RIOCIGUAT IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (DCSSC)

Background:

RISE-SSc (NCT02283762) was a multicenter Phase IIb trial of riociguat in pts with early (duration ≤18 months) dcSSc and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) 10−22 units. Pts were randomized double-blind to placebo or riociguat 0.5–2.5 mg t.i.d. for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint, mRSS change from baseline to Week (Wk) 52, did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08, riociguat vs placebo), but there were favorable trends in some other outcomes.

Objectives:

To present open-label long-term extension (LTE) results of RISE-SSc.

Methods:

Pts who completed Wk 52 of double-blind therapy could enter LTE on riociguat. Endpoints included mRSS, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs).

Results:

Of 60 pts randomized to riociguat and 61 to placebo, 42 (riociguat−riociguat group) and 45 (former placebo group), respectively, entered LTE. At LTE start, mean±SD mRSS was 16.4±3.2 and 16.3±4.2 units, and mean disease duration was 8.9±7.8 and 8.9±5.8 months, in the riociguat−riociguat and former placebo groups, respectively. Other demographics/disease characteristics were also comparable. Median duration of riociguat treatment was 1092 d in riociguat−riociguat pts and 649 d in former placebo pts. Throughout the study, mRSS decreased in both groups (Figure 1). From Wk 52 to last visit, mRSS fell by −3.02±5.51 in riociguat−riociguat patients and −3.96±5.43 in former placebo pts. Rates of mRSS regression (decrease by >5 units and ≥25% from Wk 52 to last visit) and of % declines in mRSS were similar in the two groups (Figure 2). mRSS progression (increase by >5 units and ≥25% from Wk 52 to last visit) occurred in 1 pt (2%) in each group. During the entire study, rescue therapy agents were used in 15 (36%) riociguat−riociguat pts and 17 (38%) former placebo pts. AEs were reported from Wk 52 to last visit in 82 pts (94%): 40 (95%) riociguat−riociguat and 42 (93%) former placebo. Most common AEs overall: nasopharyngitis (24%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (17%), diarrhea (15%), and hypotension (14%). AEs of special interest (dizziness, postural dizziness, or hypotension) occurred in 5 riociguat−riociguat pts (12%) and 4 former placebo pts (9%). SAEs were reported in 21 (24%) pts: 10 (24%) riociguat−riociguat pts and 11 (24%) former placebo pts, with no SAE reported in >1 patient, no SAEs of special interest, and no deaths.

Conclusion:

During LTE riociguat treatment, mRSS decreased in both groups from Wk 52 onwards and mRSS progression was uncommon. Riociguat had acceptable safety, similar to the main study, with no new safety signal.

Acknowledgments:

RISE-SSc was jointly funded by Bayer AG and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Disclosure of Interests:

Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos, Grant/research support from: NIH NIAID, NIH NIAMS, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Corbus, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Mitsubishi Tanabi, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB Pharma, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Masataka Kuwana Grant/research support from: Acetelion, Consultant of: Acetelion, Bayer, Chugai, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring and Reata Pharmaceuticals. He was a member of the SENSCIS trial Steering Committee (Boehringer Ingelheim), Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: BMS, Inventiva, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Actelion, Bayer AG, BMS, BI, Melanie Wosnitza Employee of: Bayer AG, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared, Gabriella Szücs: None declared, Wendy Stevens: None declared, Viginia Steen Grant/research support from: The associated affiliation has received grants/research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Eicos, Galapagos, Immune Tolerance Network, Reata, Consultant of: Virginia Steen has acted as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Eicos, Forbius, Chiara Stagnaro: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, Richard Silver: None declared, Elena Schiopu: None declared, Valeria Riccieri: None declared, Frank Kramer Employee of: Bayer AG, Sindhu Johnson Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merck, Bayer, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ikaria, Osamu Ishikawa: None declared, Tomonori Ishii: None declared, Eric Hachlla: None declared, Ellen De Langhe Consultant of: member of advisory board for Boehringer, László Czirják Consultant of: Actelion, BI, Roche-Genentech, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer AG, Radim Bečvář Consultant of: Actelion, Roche, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche

FRI0258 CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE, SURVIVAL AND PREDICTORS OF PULMONARY HYPERTENSION IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS SUBSETS: PAH IS NOT INCREASED IN LIMITED VS DIFFUSE PATIENTS BY ADJUSTED COMPETING RISK ANALYSIS

Background:

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc), thought to be more commonly found in limited cutaneous (lcSSc) compared to diffuse (dcSSc) subset. Since lcSSc has a better prognosis, it is unclear whether a higher occurrence of PH in lcSSc reflects survival bias.

Objectives:

To compare the cumulative PH incidence in disease subsets, after accounting for death as a competing event, in a large multi-center SSc cohort.

Methods:

Cumulative incidence of PH was studied in 1431 Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) database patients (57% lcSSc; follow-up 3.5±2.9 years, range 1-14) by Fine-Gray analysis, unadjusted and adjusted for sex, age and SSc-related autoantibodies (SAS 9.4). Survival curves, predictors of PH development and survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses (SPSS 25.0). Subgroup analysis was performed for PAH.

Results:

157 SSc patients had PH (including 117 PAH), either confirmed by RHC or postmortem. Compared to those without PH, lcSSc-PH patients had longer disease and older age at SSc diagnosis, while dcSSc-PH patients - more severe peripheral vascular and gastrointestinal involvement. The cumulative incidences of PH/PAH were similar in dcSSc and lcSSc after accounting for death in the adjusted competitive risk model (Table 1; Fig.1). 47% of PH- and 42% of PAH-patients died over a FU period. Male gender (p<0.0001) and anti-Scl-70 (p<0.001) were associated with earlier PH development, while older age (p=0.006) - with PAH (Table 2). ACA-negativity and older age predicted worse PH prognosis.

Figure 1.

Cumulative incidence curves for PH (A) and PAH (B).

Conclusion:

Cumulative incidence of PH, after accounting for death as competing event, was comparable in SSc subsets. Vigilance should be considered in males, Scl-70 positive and late age-onset SSc.

Table 1.

Sub-distribution Hazard ratio of incident PH and PAH.

PHPAHHazard ratio (95% CIs)P valuesHazard ratio (95% CIs)P valuesCrude ModelDcSSc vs lcSSc2.03 (1.13, 3.66)0.01861.60 (0.82, 3.16)0.1710Adjusted modelDcSSc vs lcSSc1.82 (0.93, 3.57)0.08181.57 (0.69, 3.59)0.2812Female vs male0.98 (0.42, 2.32)0.96602.10 (0.51, 8.65)0.3040Age1.00 (0.99, 1.02)0.70411.01 (0.98, 1.03)0.5498AntibodiesACA vs negative0.95 (0.46, 1.96)0.89911.08 (0.50, 2.35)0.8391ATA vs negative1.93 (0.84, 4.42)0.11980.59 (0.13, 2.73)0.4970Anti-RNAP vs negative1.24 (0.45, 3.43)0.68411.77 (0.58, 5.44)0.3181

Disclosure of Interests:

Tatiana Nevskaya: None declared, Yuxuan Jiang: None declared, Mianbo Wang: None declared, Murray Baron: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB

THU0363 EFFECTS OF NINTEDANIB IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS-ASSOCIATED ILD (SSC-ILD) AND NORMAL VERSUS ELEVATED C-REACTIVE PROTEIN (CRP) AT BASELINE: ANALYSES FROM THE SENSCIS TRIAL

Background:

In the SENSCIS trial in patients with SSc-ILD, nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over 52 weeks. Elevated CRP is a marker of an inflammatory phenotype and has been associated with a greater rate of decline in FVC and higher mortality in patients with SSc.

Objectives:

To assess the effects of nintedanib in subgroups by CRP at baseline in the SENSCIS trial.

Methods:

Patients with SSc-ILD with onset of first non-Raynaud symptom <7 years and ≥10% fibrosis of the lungs on HRCT were randomised to receive nintedanib or placebo. We analysed the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks, the proportion of patients with an absolute increase in FVC ≥3% predicted (proposed as the minimal clinically important difference for improvement in FVC in patients with SSc-ILD), and absolute change from baseline in mRSS at week 52 in subgroups with normal vs elevated high-sensitivity CRP (≤4.99 vs >4.99 mg/L) at baseline.

Results:

Of patients with available data, 78/270 (28.9%) and 74/261 (28.4%) in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, had CRP >4.99 mg/L at baseline. Compared with patients with lower CRP, those with CRP >4.99 mg/L included a similar proportion of patients who were ATA-positive (61.8% vs 60.2%, respectively), a greater proportion with diffuse cutaneous SSc (63.2% vs 49.3%) and had a higher mean mRSS (13.7 vs 10.2) and lower mean FVC % predicted (68.6% vs 73.9%). The adjusted annual rate of decline in FVC in the placebo group was numerically greater in patients with CRP >4.99 than ≤4.99 mg/L at baseline (-106.6 [SE 27.6] vs -83.0 [17.1] mL/year). The effect of nintedanib vs placebo on reducing the rate of decline in FVC was numerically more pronounced in patients with CRP >4.99 than ≤4.99 mg/L at baseline but the treatment-by-time-by-subgroup interaction p-value did not indicate heterogeneity in the effect of nintedanib between subgroups (p=0.70) (Figure). In the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, the proportions of patients with an absolute increase in FVC ≥3% predicted at week 52 were 20.4% and 15.0% in those with CRP ≤4.99 mg/L and 24.4% and 14.9% in those with CRP >4.99 mg/L at baseline (treatment-by-subgroup interaction p=0.59); adjusted mean changes in mRSS at week 52 were -2.2 (SE 0.3) and -2.1 (0.3) in those with CRP ≤4.99 mg/L (difference -0.1 [95% CI -1.0, 0.8]) and -2.3 (0.5) and -1.0 (0.5) in those with CRP >4.99 mg/L at baseline (difference -1.2 [-2.7, 0.2]; treatment-by-visit-by-subgroup interaction p=0.20).

Conclusion:

In the SENSCIS trial, the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks in the placebo group was numerically greater in patients with elevated CRP at baseline. Nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in FVC both in patients with normal and elevated CRP at baseline, with a numerically greater effect in patients with elevated CRP.

Disclosure of Interests:

Gabriela Riemekasten Consultant of: Cell Trend GmbH, Janssen, Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Speakers bureau: Actelion, Novartis, Janssen, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Lesley Ann Saketkoo Grant/research support from: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, United Therapeutics, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Eicos Sciences, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Martin Aringer Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Lorinda Chung Grant/research support from: United Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Eicos Sciences, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Corinna Miede Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Susanne Stowasser Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Martina Gahlemann Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Margarida Alves Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc./Civi Biopharma, Inc., Grant/research support from: Dr Khanna was supported by NIH/NIAMS K24AR063120, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Horizon Therapeutic, Galapagos, Roche/Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB

SAT0127 REAL-WORLD PREDICTORS OF STARTING DIFFERENT ADVANCED DMARD TREATMENTS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION FROM THE CANADIAN EARLY ARTHRITIS COHORT (CATCH) GROUP

Background:

RA patients with inadequate DMARD response may be treated with a TNF inhibitor (TNFi), non-TNFi or janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) [1].

Objectives:

Compare characteristics of real-world early RA (ERA) patients starting TNFi, non-TNFi, and JAKi post DMARD failure.

Methods:

Data were analyzed from early RA patients (symptoms < 1 year) enrolled in CATCH who started TNFi, non-TNFi or JAKi as first line advanced therapy from 2014 to 2019. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and chi-square tests summarized and compared secular trends and patient characteristics initiating each class of therapy. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were done.

Results:

246 participants started advanced therapy during the study period; (75%) female, mean(SD) age 50(14) years. First line prescriptions for JAKi increased and TNFi decreased (Fig. 1). Those receiving JAKi had longer disease duration, fewer tender joints, and lower DAS28, CDAI, ESR, MD global (all p <0.05) (Table 1). The strongest predictor of starting JAKi was province (Ontario where access is preferential for JAKi and biosimilar TNFi) (Table 2). Those prescribed TNFi had shorter disease duration, younger age, fewer comorbidities, and treatment location outside Ontario (Table 1,2). Those starting non-TNFi had higher DAS28; predictors included older age, higher education, and more comorbidities (Table 1,2).

Table 1.

Characteristics prior to starting advanced therapy

VariableTotal Sample(N = 246)JAKi(N = 61)TNFi(N = 153)Non-TNFi(N = 32)p-value£Disease duration (months) mean (SD)39 (34.1)50.8 (39.3)32.5 (29.1)48 (38.6)0.0006DAS28 (ESR - CRP if ESR was missing) mean (SD)4.2 (1.4)3.6 (1.4)4.3 (1.4)4.8 (1.5)0.0012CDAI mean (SD)21.5 (14.8)16.5 (13.7)22.9 (14.8)24.8 (14.9)0.0089Tender joint count (0-28), median (IQR)§4 (7)2 (6)5 (8)6 (9)0.0224ESR median (IQR)§13 (20)12 (13)13 (20)28.0 (23.5)0.0448MD Global (0-10) mean (SD)4.2 (2.7)3.2 (2.7)4.4 (2.6)4.8 (2.8)0.0030

§IQR: 75 – 25 percentile

£p-value: ANOVA for continuous variable, chi-square for categorical

Table 2.

Multinomial regression for initiating advanced DMARD therapy

Disease stage & Clinical Disease ActivityAdvanced DMARDAdjusted for Age, sex, education, comorbidityFullyAdjustedφNon-TNF vs TNFJAK vsTNFNon-TNF vs TNFJAK vsTNFAge1.01 (0.98, 1.05)1.01 (0.99, 1.04)1.01 (0.97, 1.05)1.02 (0.99, 1.05)Women vs Men1.98 (0.71, 5.58)1.33 (0.63, 2.80)2.35 (0.76, 7.27)1.72 (0.73, 4.02)Education(< HS vs ≥ HS)2.92 (1.28, 6.63)1.49 (0.78, 2.86)2.83 (1.12, 7.15)2.08 (0.97, 4.47)RDCI baseline1.35 (1.01, 1.81)1.21 (0.95, 1.53)1.30 (0.95, 1.78)1.23 (0.94, 1.60)Private Insurance(No vs Yes)NINI1.26 (0.47, 3.40)0.99 (0.44, 2.25)RF PositiveNINI1.47 (0.56, 3.85)1.84 (0.82, 4.12)CDAININI1.01 (0.98, 1.04)0.97 (0.94, 1.00)RegionQuebec vs Ontario (ON)NINI0.59 (0.20, 1.72)0.44 (0.20, 0.94)West vs ONNINI1.32 (0.29, 5.98)0.11 (0.01, 0.99)

φAdjusted for; baseline age, sex, education, RDCI; province; RF positive in first year; private insurance; CDAI at visit prior to initiation

Conclusion:

Patient and physician related factors (location of practice) determined which advanced therapeutic was prescribed. JAKi use is increasing in ERA.

Reference:

[1]Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Published Online First: 22 January 2020

Disclosure of Interests:

Madina Weiler: None declared, Orit Schieir: None declared, Marie-France Valois: None declared, Susan J. Bartlett Consultant of: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Louis Bessette Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilles Boire Grant/research support from: Merck Canada (Registry of biologices, Improvement of comorbidity surveillance)

Amgen Canada (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Abbvie (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Pfizer (CATCH, Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse)

Hoffman-LaRoche (CATCH)

UCB Canada (CATCH, Clinical nurse)

BMS (CATCH, Clinical nurse, Observational Study Protocol IM101664. SEROPOSITIVITY IN A LARGE CANADIAN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT)

Janssen (CATCH)

Celgene (Clinical nurse)

Eli Lilly (Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse), Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Glen Hazlewood: None declared, Carol Hitchon Grant/research support from: UCB Canada; Pfizer Canada, Edward Keystone Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion,

Crescendo Bioscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly

Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, UCB., Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Diane Tin: None declared, Carter Thorne Consultant of: Abbvie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer

, Speakers bureau: Medexus/Medac, Vivian Bykerk: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB

FRI0575 BIOMARKER ANALYSIS FROM THE RISE-SSC STUDY OF RIOCIGUAT IN EARLY DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (DCSSC)

Background:

RISE-SSc (NCT02283762) was a multicenter, double-blind, Phase IIb study of riociguat in early dcSSc. Primary endpoint was change in mRSS from baseline to Wk 52.

Objectives:

Exploratory, descriptive analyses of riociguat target engagement and effects on disease biomarkers in RISE-SSc and their relationship with effects on the primary endpoint. All biomarker p-values are for information only.

Methods:

Pts with dcSSc (duration ≤18 mo; modified Rodnan skin score [mRSS] 10–22 units) were randomized to riociguat 0.5−2.5 mg tid (n=60) or placebo (n=61). Biomarkers of target engagement (cGMP), inflammation and/or vascular/endothelial function (e.g. high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP], soluble platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 [sPECAM-1], soluble E-selectin, chemokine ligand 4 [CXCL-4]), and fibrosis (e.g. alpha-smooth muscle cell actin [alphaSMA], pro-collagen mRNA expression) were measured in plasma, serum, and skin biopsies at baseline and Wk 14.

Results:

Mean±SD change from baseline in mRSS was –2.09±5.66 (n=57) with riociguat and –0.77±8.24 (n=52) with placebo (p=0.08). From baseline to Wk 14, plasma cGMP rose by mean (SD) 94% (78%) (n=52) with riociguat and 10% (39%) (n=52) with placebo (nominal p<0.001). Serum sPECAM-1 and CXCL-4 fell with riociguat vs placebo; changes in hsCRP or E-selectin differed little between groups (Fig 1). Pts with higher baseline sPECAM-1 showed larger mRSS reductions with riociguat vs placebo than pts with lower levels (nominal interaction p=0.004). In baseline skin biopsies, 34% and 31% of pts in the riociguat and placebo groups, respectively, had no alphaSMA-positive cells; other pts had +ve cells (alphaSMA counts 0.1–99.5, median 2.5), a potential indicator of higher disease activity. Pts with +ve baseline alphaSMA counts showed a reduction of mRSS with riociguat vs placebo (Fig 2). Skin collagen mRNA expression biomarkers in skin biopsies showed no differences between groups.

Conclusion:

Primary study endpoint (change in mRSS) was not met. Plasma cGMP rose with riociguat, confirming engagement with the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway. Serum sPECAM-1 (marker of endothelial activation) and CXCL-4 (marker of progressive SSc) fell with riociguat; hsCRP and E-selectin did not. Some serum and skin biomarkers of higher disease activity at baseline were associated with a greater effect of riociguat on skin fibrosis.

Acknowledgments:

RISE-SSc was jointly funded by Bayer AG and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Disclosure of Interests:

Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche, Frank Kramer Employee of: Bayer AG, Josef Höfler Employee of: Josef Höfler is an employee of Staburo GmbH, Munich, Germany, contracted by Bayer AG to perform the biomarker analyses, Mercedeh Ghadessi Employee of: Bayer AG, Peter Sandner Employee of: Bayer AG, Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: BMS, Inventiva, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Actelion, Bayer AG, BMS, BI, Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Masataka Kuwana Grant/research support from: Acetelion, Consultant of: Acetelion, Bayer, Chugai, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring and Reata Pharmaceuticals. He was a member of the SENSCIS trial Steering Committee (Boehringer Ingelheim), Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Radim Bečvář Consultant of: Actelion, Roche, László Czirják Consultant of: Actelion, BI, Roche-Genentech, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer AG, Ellen De Langhe Consultant of: member of advisory board for Boehringer, Eric Hachlla: None declared, Tomonori Ishii: None declared, Osamu Ishikawa: None declared, Sindhu Johnson Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merck, Bayer, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ikaria, Kaisa Laapas Employee of: Partly in-sourced to Bayer, Valeria Riccieri: None declared, Elena Schiopu: None declared, Richard Silver: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, Chiara Stagnaro: None declared, Viginia Steen Grant/research support from: The associated affiliation has received grants/research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Eicos, Galapagos, Immune Tolerance Network, Reata, Consultant of: Virginia Steen has acted as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Eicos, Forbius, Wendy Stevens: None declared, Gabriella Szücs: None declared, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared, Melanie Wosnitza Employee of: Bayer AG, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc./Civi Biopharma, Inc., Grant/research support from: Dr Khanna was supported by NIH/NIAMS K24AR063120, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Horizon Therapeutic, Galapagos, Roche/Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB

FRI0245 PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS IS NEARLY ALWAYS ACCOMPANIED BY A LOW DIFFUSING CAPACITY

Background:

Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis; SSc) has high morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is common with a high mortality (1). SSc patients are screened with pulmonary function tests (diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; DLCO) (2).

Objectives:

The DLCO%predicted was analyzed comparing patients with and without PAH to determine if it is always low at time of PAH diagnosis.

Methods:

The Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) database was used containing more than 1300 SSc patients with a mean disease duration of 8 years. All patients with at least one follow up visit and DLCO recorded at least twice were eligible for enrolment into this nested case control study. Diagnosis of PH was verified using several algorithms within the database including R heart catheterization, use of PH medications and physician response of ‘yes’ to question has this patient been diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension. Sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for DLC0%predicted <50% and presence of PH/PAH.

Results:

At time of PH diagnosis, the mean DLCO% predicted was 47% (N=30) vs no PH 73% (N=960) P<0.0001, and proven documented PAH also showed the differences (PAH, N=22 DLCO% predicted 51% vs. PAH negative (N=968) DLCO% pred 72%, P<0.0001) (Table 1). The OR of a DLCO%predicted less than 60 was 4.7 for PAH and 7.6 for PH (both P<0.001) and even higher if DLCO<50% (OR 11.5 for PH and 7.6 for PAH). Table 2 shows the PPV of DLCO at varying levels.

Table 1.

DLCO comparison between PH+ and PH- SSc patients and between PAH+ and PAH- SSc patients, at the time of diagnosis.

PH+(n=30)PH-(n=960)P-valuePAH+(n=22)PAH- (n=968)P-valuemean±SD47.17±17.5372.74±20.79<0.000151.23±17.5572.44±20.99<0.0001Range18-8113-14725-8113-147Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in SSc-PH and -PAH for DLCO at various cut points.

ORPPVSpecificityNPVSensitivityDLCO<50%11.5 (CI 95% 5.4-24.8),p<0.000113.2%87.0%98.7%63.3%PHDLCO<60%7.6 (CI 95% 3.3-17.2), p<0.00017.9%73.3%98.9%73.3%DLCO>80%0.06 (CI 95% 0.008-0.46), p=0.0070.3%64.5%95.5%3.3%DLCO<50%7.6 (CI 95% 3.2-17.9), p<0.00018.3%86.4%98.8%54.5%PAHDLCO<60%4.7 (1.9-11.3), p<0.0015.0%72.7%98.9%63.6%DLCO>80%0.1 (0.01-0.7), p=0.0180.3%64.8%96.8%4.5%

Conclusion:

A low DLCO is associated with a high odds of PH/PAH in SSc and the NPV is very high at both DLCO<50% predicted and <60% predicted. This may aid in determining who should recieve a right heart catheterization in SSc patients.

References:

[1]Mukerjee D et al (2003) Prevalence and outcome in systemic sclerosis associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: application of a registry approach. Ann Rheum Dis 62(11):1088-93

[2]Khanna D et al (2013) Recommendations for screening and detection of connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Arthritis Rheum 65(12):3194-201

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

FRI0030 MORE THAN HALF OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED RA PATIENTS ARE NOT CONVINCED OF THE NECESSITY OF RA MEDICINES: ASSOCIATIONS WITH RA CHARACTERISTICS, SYMPTOMS, AND FUNCTION IN THE CANADIAN EARLY ARTHRITIS COHORT (CATCH)

Background:

Although DMARDs are essential for early aggressive control of RA to reduce symptoms and disability, medication adherence is variable. Beliefs about the necessity of medications and safety concerns predict adherence and are modifiable.

Objectives:

To examine associations among RA medication necessity beliefs and concerns, sociodemographics, RA characteristics, symptom level and function in newly diagnosed RA patients.

Methods:

Baseline data were analyzed from participants in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) who enrolled between 2017-2020 and completed the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) and PROMIS-29. All met ACR1987 or 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and had active RA at enrollment. BMQ Necessity (N) and Concerns (C) scores were classified ashigh(≥20) orlow(<20) and categorized into: Accepting (↑N ↓C); Ambivalent (↑N↑C); Sceptical (↓N↑C); and 4) Indifferent (↓N↓C). Groups were compared using ANOVA and chi-square tests.

Results:

The 362 patients were mostly white (83%) women (66%) with a mean (SD) age of 56 (15), symptom duration of 6 (3) months, and 32% were obese (BMI≥30). More than half (56%) were DMARD-naive or minimally exposed. Mean N and C scores were similar between men and women; 54% were classified asIndifferent, 31%Accepting, 9%Ambivalent,and 6%Sceptical.

As compared to those classified asAccepting, moreIndifferent participantssmoked, had a healthy weight, lower TJCs, and trend for lower CDAI (Table). Groups were similar by sociodemographics, symptom duration, and DMARD/steroid use, except fewerIndifferentpatients received MTX.Indifferentpatients had statistically and meaningfully lower patient global, depression, anxiety, fatigue and pain interference, and higher function and participation scores (Table).

Conclusion:

Many new RA patients had low medication necessity beliefs and concerns, and only 31% had high necessity beliefs and low concerns around diagnosis. Lifestyle and lower CDAI, TJCs, symptoms and functional impacts were associated with RA medication indifference. Identifying medication indifference can prompt discussions about medication beliefs/concerns to facilitate shared decision-making and adherence.

Disclosure of Interests:

Viviane Ta: None declared, Orit Schieir: None declared, Marie-France Valois: None declared, Glen Hazlewood: None declared, Carol Hitchon Grant/research support from: UCB Canada; Pfizer Canada, Louis Bessette Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Diane Tin: None declared, Carter Thorne Consultant of: Abbvie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Medexus/Medac, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Gilles Boire Grant/research support from: Merck Canada (Registry of biologices, Improvement of comorbidity surveillance)

Amgen Canada (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Abbvie (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Pfizer (CATCH, Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse)

Hoffman-LaRoche (CATCH)

UCB Canada (CATCH, Clinical nurse)

BMS (CATCH, Clinical nurse, Observational Study Protocol IM101664. SEROPOSITIVITY IN A LARGE CANADIAN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT)

Janssen (CATCH)

Celgene (Clinical nurse)

Eli Lilly (Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse), Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Edward Keystone Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion, Crescendo Bioscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, UCB., Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Vivian Bykerk: None declared, Susan J. Bartlett Consultant of: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie

AB0598 THE INCREASING USE OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS IN EARLY SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Background:

Immunosuppression (IS) remains the main treatment for progressing skin involvement, active interstitial lung disease (ILD) and underlying inflammatory joint (IJ) or muscle disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Objectives:

This study investigated the pattern and trends in immunosuppressive agent use in patients with early SSc diagnosed before and after 2007 to determine whether the changes in the preferred type and combination of IS, timing and predictors of administration took place over the past decade.

Methods:

397 SSc patients from Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG) database (183dcSSc, 214 lcSSc) who had baseline and follow-up visits within 3 years (1.8±0.8) after disease onset were included: 82% females, age at diagnosis 53±13 years, disease duration 1.6±0.8 years. Organ involvement was assessed by modified Rodnan skin score, Medsger Disease Severity Score (DSS) and CSRG definitions using bivariate, chi-squared, ANOVA, and adjusted regression analyses.

Results:

115 dcSSc patients (63%) and 62 lcSSc (29%) received IS, most commonly methotrexate (MTX) (72% dcSSc and 52% lcSSc), followed by mycophenylate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC). Within the patients receiving IS, monotherapy prevailed (77% dcSSc and 68% lcSSc); CYC and azathioprine were the preferred choice of IS more frequently in lcSSc compared to dcSSc (p<0.006 and p<0.02, respectively). In dcSSc, IS were predominantly prescribed at years 2 and 3 after the onset of first non-Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) manifestation, when about half of the patients received IS. The proportion of lcSSc patients receiving IS was significantly lower and distributed more equally through the first three years. After 2007, dcSSc patients received IS more often (74% vs 50%, p=0.001), especially MTX (p=0.02) and MMF (p<0.05), and earlier (peaked at 2 years after disease onset)(Table 1).

Table 1.

Proportion of patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment at each year after disease onset in SSc diagnosed before and after 2007.

Years after the first non-RP symptomlcSScBefore 2007After 2007Total N of pts seen at each year% receiving immune suppressivesTotal N of pts seen at each year% receiving immune suppressivesP-value113154717>0.92242182180.7723491410714>0.9dcSSc1242940430.2862512665650.00013624563540.325

IS administration was associated with male gender, ILD, a-Scl-70 positivity, ACA-negativity and IJ disease in lcSSc, and with ACA-negativity and a higher mRSS in dcSSc. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that IS treatment could be predicted by ACA-negativity in lcSSc patients (Exp(B) 0.317, p=0.012) and younger age in dcSSc patients (Exp(B) 0.974, p=0.002).

Conclusion:

Over the past decade, there has been a trend to prescribe IS more often, especially MTX, and earlier in dcSSc patients. MMF has gained favour over CYC. Autoantibody status was the most consistent predictor whether a patient is likely to take IS over the course of the disease.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ryan Park: None declared, Tatiana Nevskaya: None declared, Murray Baron: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB

OP0333 RISK FACTORS OF ANTIMALARIAL-INDUCED RETINOPATHY IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND OTHER AUTOIMMUNE CONDITIONS

Background:

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) are effective antimalarial (AM) medications for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). AM-induced retinopathy is a well-recognized irreversible complication with variable incidences [1]. Few studies have compared the AM-induced retinopathy between rheumatologic conditions.

Objectives:

To describe the pattern of AM-associated retinopathy, including diagnosis of SLE as a risk factor.

Methods:

A chart review was conducted at an urban Canadian center. Each patient was classified as SLE, based on ACR criteria, or non-SLE. Minimum duration of AM use was 3 months. AM-induced retinopathy was classified as possible or definite, and was determined based on characteristic visual field loss, abnormal retinal imaging, and eye specialists’ opinion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine factors associated with definite AM-induced retinopathy. Sensitivity analyses included inclusion of possible AM-induced retinopathy and stratification of analysis by diagnosis and by CQ versus HCQ.

Results:

Of the 680 patients, 282 patients had SLE and the remaining had RA (N=224), cutaneous lupus (N=41), or other connective tissue diseases (N=131). Patients with SLE tended to be younger, female, and had relatively more CQ and total AM exposure (Table 1). Definite AM-induced retinopathy was observed in 12 patients, 11 of whom had SLE and 7 had chloroquine exposure (Figure 1). The earliest toxicity occured after 5.4 years of AM use, and prevalence beyond 5 years was 2.7%.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics. Data represented as N (%) or means (SD)

SLE (N=282)Non-SLE (N=398)*Total (N=680)PAge40.1 ± 1551 ± 13.846.5 ± 15.35.72×10-21Female258 (91%)333 (84%)591 (87%)4.19×10-3AM duration (years)11.5 ± 8.17.3 ± 6.29.1 ± 7.33.52×10-11CQ ever35 (12%)21 (5%)56 (8%)1.41×10-3

*other connective tissue diseases and RA

In univariate logistic regression (Table 2), a diagnosis of SLE (P=7.95×10-3; OR= 16.1; 95% confidence interval (CI)= [2.1, 125]), and cumulative CQ dose (P=1.13×10-2; OR= 1.002; 95% CI=[1.000, 1.003]) were significantly associated with definite AM-induced retinopathy. When possible retinopathy was included in the analysis, both SLE (P=7.27×10-3; OR=3.12, 95% CI=[1.39, 7.00]) and CQ cumulative dose (P= 6.16×10-7; OR= 1.002; 95% CI=[1.001, 1.003]) remained significant. Total AM duration and hypertension also had significant associations. In multivariate analysis, diagnosis of SLE was significantly associated with ocular toxicity (P=1.49×10-2; OR=14.2; 95%CI: [1.83-127]) after adjusting for CQ/HCQ dosages, age, sex, weight, hypertension and renal impairment.

Table 2.

Univariate logistic regression for risk of AM-induced retinopathy. Data represented as N (%) or mean ± SD

Definite retinopathyPossible or definite retinopathyNo retinopathy N=668RetinopathyN=12PNo retinopathy N=652RetinopathyN=28PAge46.5 ± 15.343.2 ± 14.30.45246.4 ± 15.447.1 ± 12.40.832Female580 (87%)11 (92%)0.626567 (87%)24 (86%)0.848Weight (kg)76.5 ± 19.567.3 ± 12.80.09876.5 ± 19.573.5 ± 17.80.424SLE Diagnosis271 (41%)11 (92%)0.008263 (40%)19 (68%)0.006AM duration (years)9 ± 7.411.7 ± 5.80.2158.9 ± 7.312.8 ± 6.80.007AM> 5 years417 (63%)0-250 (40%)1 (3%)0.006HCQ dose (mg/kg/day)5.2 ± 15.55.9 ± 1.50.8915.2 ± 15.65.3 ± 1.40.971HCQ total dose (g)1042 ± 913.81235 ± 10320.4711340 ± 9141187 ± 9550.404CQ total dose (g)46 ± 205.1225± 2910.01137.6 ± 174)318 ± 5296.16×10-7Renal Impairment100 (15%)2 (17%)0.88399 (15%)3 (11%)0.506Hypertension298 (45%)5 (42%)0.832285 (44%)18 (64%)0.038Diabetes61 (9%)1 (8%)0.92459 (9%)3 (11%)0.765

Conclusion:

The risk of AM-induced retinal toxicity increases after 5 years of use. SLE patients may be at increased risk due to longer treatment duration, AM choice, and underlying disease processes.

References:

[1]Petri M, Elkhalifa M, Li J. 15 Frequency of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy in the hopkins lupus cohort. Lupus Science & Medicine 2019;6:doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-lsm.15

Disclosure of Interests:

Hsin Yen Liu: None declared, Gemma Cramarossa: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB

OP0263-HPR MAJOR STRESSORS IN THE YEAR PRIOR TO RA DIAGNOSIS: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES ONE YEAR LATER

Background:

Stress is implicated in RA onset and poorer prognoses through changes in neuro-endocrine and autoimmune function. Although many people with RA link disease onset to recent stressful life events, results from retrospective studies are unclear.

Objectives:

To describe the incidence of major stressors(+STRESS) in year prior to diagnosis and compare characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of newly diagnosed RA patients with and without+STRESSat 0 and 12 months.

Methods:

Data were from early RA patients (symptoms <1 yr) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) from 2007-17 who met 1987/2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and had ≥12 months of follow-up. Patients reported major psychological (death, divorce/separation, family, financial, other) and physical (motor vehicle accident, surgery, major illness/infection, other) stressors in previous year. We used independent t-tests and chi square to compare characteristics by stressors at baseline, and multivariable regression to examine the impact of+STRESSon disease activity and PROs at 1 year, adjusting for age, sex, education, fibromyalgia, and SJC.

Results:

The 1933 adults were mostly female (72%), with a mean (SD) age of 55 (15) years. 52% reported 1+ stressors in previous year; family (48%), financial stress (36%), death (35%), surgery (28%), and major illness (26%) were the most common stressors. Patients with +STRESS were more likely to be women, younger, have more comorbidities including fibromyalgia, and higher mean DAS28. Patients with +STRESS also had significantly higher mean pain, fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, patient global, and HAQ scores at baseline.

At 1 year, SJC and the proportion in DAS28 REM was similar between groups. However, PROs (pain, HAQ, Fatigue, Pt Global, Depression, Poor Sleep) remained higher in+STRESS, with evidence of an additive effect for number of stressors and having both physical and psychological stressors (Table). The greatest impacts were on mood, sleep disturbance, and fatigue.

Conclusion:

In this pan-Canadian early RA cohort, more than half reported 1+ stressful life events in the year prior to diagnosis. Individuals reporting major stressors had significantly worse pain, patient global, disability, depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance at diagnosis; 1 year later, though disease activity was similar between groups, the effects of +STRESS on PROs persisted. Early RA patients with recent major stressors may benefit from emotional support and stress reduction to optimize how they feel and function.

Mean (SD) or N (%)No Stress(N=928; 48%)Physical(N=131; 7%)Psychological(N=658; 34%)Both(N=216; 11%)Age56 (15)56 (15)53 (14)52 (15)Women622 (67%)82 (63%)512 (78%)174 (81%)College Education464 (50%)76 (58%)345 (52%)126 (58%)Rheum Dis Comorbid Index1.1 (1.2)1.4 (1.4)1.1 (1.3)1.4 (1.3)OA or Spinal pain168 (18%)35 (27%)117 (18%)55 (25%)Fibromyalgia diagnosis15 (2%)2 (2%)13 (2%)11 (5%)Symptom duration (months)5.6 (3.0)5.7 (3.0)5.9 (3.0)5.9 (3.0)DAS28 – mean5.0 (1.4)5.1 (1.5)5.0 (1.5)5.2 (1.4)MTX ±csDMARDs679 (73%)100 (76%)489 (74%)166 (77%)Oral Steroids295 (32%)40 (31%)215 (33%)55 (25%)Pain (0-10)5.3 (2.8)5.5 (2.9)5.7 (2.8)6.2 (2.8)HAQ-DI1.0 (0.7)1.2 (0.7)1.1 (0.7)1.3 (0.7)Fatigue (0-10)4.7 (3.1)5.0 (3.0)5.7 (2.9)5.9 (2.9)Patient Global (0-10)5.6 (2.9)6.0 (2.9)6.0 (2.9)6.4 (3.0)Depression (SF12 MCS < 45.6)329 (35%)54 (41%)356 (54%)123 (57%)Poor sleep (0-10)4.5 (3.4)4.8 (3.3)5.3 (3.2)6.0 (3.1)

Disclosure of Interests:

Nicole Andersen: None declared, Orit Schieir: None declared, Marie-France Valois: None declared, Gilles Boire Grant/research support from: Merck Canada (Registry of biologices, Improvement of comorbidity surveillance)

Amgen Canada (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Abbvie (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Pfizer (CATCH, Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse)

Hoffman-LaRoche (CATCH)

UCB Canada (CATCH, Clinical nurse)

BMS (CATCH, Clinical nurse, Observational Study Protocol IM101664. SEROPOSITIVITY IN A LARGE CANADIAN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT)

Janssen (CATCH)

Celgene (Clinical nurse)

Eli Lilly (Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse), Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Glen Hazlewood: None declared, Louis Bessette Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Carol Hitchon Grant/research support from: UCB Canada; Pfizer Canada, Diane Tin: None declared, Carter Thorne Consultant of: Abbvie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer

Speakers bureau: Medexus/Medac, Edward Keystone Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion,

Crescendo Bioscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly

Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, UCB., Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Vivian Bykerk: None declared, Susan J. Bartlett Consultant of: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie

FRI0024 HOW OFTEN DOES REACHING TARGET MISS THE MARK? LONGITUDINAL PATTERNS OF REMISSION IN REAL-WORLD EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Background:

Early diagnosis and rapid initiation of DMARDs following a treat-to-target approach have made remission a realizable goal for many with RA. Yet, some patients are unable to sustain remission over time.

Objectives:

To describe longitudinal patterns of remission and identify predictors of sustained vs transient remission in real-world early RA patients.

Methods:

Data were from the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH), a prospective study of early RA patients (symptoms < 1 year) treated in rheumatology clinics across Canada from 2007- 2019. The sample was limited to patients with active disease at enrolment who later reached remission (SDAI<=3.3) and were followed for 12-24 months thereafter. Patients were classified as in sustained remission (Pattern 1) or transient remission with transient remission patients divided into those who transitioned from REM to LDA only (Pattern 2) and those who transitioned from REM to MDA or HDA (Pattern 3), over FU. Multi-adjusted multinomial regression was used to identify predictors of transient remission patterns.

Results:

The study included 1,419 (46%) CATCH participants that reached remission. At enrolment, most (70%) were female, mean(sd) SDAI was high (27(15)) and 92% were treated with csDMARDs. Only 47% remained in sustained remission by 12-months and, only 40% by 24 months (Pattern 1) (Figure). Among patients with transient remission patterns, transitions to LDA only (Pattern 2) were more common than to MDA/HDA over FU (Pattern 3) (Fig 1). Older age, female sex, smoking, higher comorbidity index and positive serology, were significantly associated with transient remission patterns (Table). There were also borderline significant associations between transient remission patterns and longer time to remission, lack of early MTX treatment and reducing treatment after remission (Table).

Table .

Adjusted Multinomial Regression Results of Predictors of Transient Remission Patterns over 24-Month Follow Up

Pattern 2 vs, Pattern 1OR (95% CI)Pattern 3 vs. Pattern 1OR (95% CI)Age1.01 (1.00, 1.02)1.01 (0.99, 1.02)Women vs Men1.78 (1.33, 2.39)1.63 (1.09, 2.44)Current smoker1.57 (1.09, 2.28)1.53 (0.95, 2.47)RDCI at baseline1.11 (0.99, 1.25)1.30 (1.13, 1.50)Seropositive1.38 (1.03, 1.85)1.21 (0.81, 1.80)MTX first 3 months1.18 (0.85, 1.63)0.76 (0.51, 1.12)Time to remission (months)1.01 (1.00, 1.01)1.01 (1.00, 1.02)Treatment reduction after REM vs. No Change1.33 (0.96, 1.86)1.01 (0.99, 1.02)

  Pattern 1: Sustained REM

  Pattern 2: Transient REM: Transitions to LDA only

  Pattern 3: Transient REM: Transitions to MDA/HDA

   RDCI: Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (range 0-9)

  Treatment reduction: Change from biologic or JAK to csDMARD(s) OR reduction in number of csDMARDs OR change from MTX +/- csDMARDs to non-MTX csDMARD

Figure.

Distribution of Disease Activity States over 12-24 After First Achieving SDAI REM

Conclusion:

Results of this large longitudinal analysis of real-world data suggests that < 50% of patients that reach remission sustain remission for 12-24months. Closer monitoring of patients with prognostic indicators for transient remission and additional research focusing on why remission is lost may help improve the rates of sustained remission.

References:

[1]Ajeganova S, Huizinga T. Sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis: latest evidence and clinical considerations. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2017;9(10):249-62.

Disclosure of Interests:

Orit Schieir: None declared, Glen Hazlewood: None declared, Susan J. Bartlett Consultant of: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Marie-France Valois: None declared, Louis Bessette Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilles Boire Grant/research support from: Merck Canada (Registry of biologices, Improvement of comorbidity surveillance)

Amgen Canada (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Abbvie (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Pfizer (CATCH, Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse)

Hoffman-LaRoche (CATCH)

UCB Canada (CATCH, Clinical nurse)

BMS (CATCH, Clinical nurse, Observational Study Protocol IM101664. SEROPOSITIVITY IN A LARGE CANADIAN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT)

Janssen (CATCH)

Celgene (Clinical nurse)

Eli Lilly (Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse), Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Carol Hitchon Grant/research support from: UCB Canada; Pfizer Canada, Edward Keystone Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion, Crescendo Bioscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, UCB., Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Carter Thorne Consultant of: Abbvie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Medexus/Medac, Diane Tin: None declared, Vivian Bykerk: None declared

SAT0049 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EARLY AND ESTABLISHED RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN TIME TO ACHIEVING CDAI BUT NOT FATIGUE LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY AND REMISSION: DATA FROM THE OBRI REGISTRY

Background:

Previous studies have shown that early diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is important for achieving comprehensive disease control and have identified established disease as an independent predictor of worse clinical outcomes. However, it is not clear whether these differences are driven by patient-reported or objective outcome measures.

Objectives:

The aim of this analysis was to compare the time to achieving low disease activity (LDA) and remission based on both objective and patient-reported outcomes in people with early vs. established RA followed in routine clinical care.

Methods:

RA patients enrolled in the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) registry that were not in a low disease state at baseline based on the CDAI, SJC28, PtGA, pain and fatigue criteria below, and had at least six months of follow-up, were included in the analysis. LDA was defined as CDAI≤10, SJC28≤2, TJC28≤2, PtGA≤2cm, pain≤2cm, fatigue≤2cm, and MDGA≤2cm; remission was defined as CDAI≤2.8, SJC28≤1, TJC28≤1, PtGA≤1cm, pain≤1cm, fatigue≤1cm, and MDGA≤1cm. Between group (early vs. established) differences in time to first LDA/remission were assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test.

Results:

A total of 986 patients were included, 347 (35%) with early RA and 639 (65%) with established RA. At baseline, patients with early RA were significantly younger (55.8 vs. 58.3 years) and were less likely to have a comorbidity (94.5% vs. 97.5%) or an erosion (26.7% vs. 62.6%), be RF-positive (65.6% vs. 74.2%), use bDMARDs (7.5% vs. 26.6%), and be non-smokers (38.9% vs. 47.3%).

Time to achieving LDA based on CDAI (HR [95%CI]: (1.23 [1.07,1.43]), SJC28 (1.32 [1.15,1.51]), TJC28 (1.18 [1.02,1.36]), MDGA (1.28 [1.10,1.49]), PtGA (1.23 [1.05,1.44]), and pain (1.29 [1.09,1.52]) were significantly shorter in early RA compared to established RA. Similarly, time to achieving remission based on CDAI (HR [95%CI]: (1.50 [1.22,1.84]), SJC28 (1.35 [1.17,1.55]), MDGA (1.25 [1.06,1.47]), PtGA (1.22 [1.02,1.47]), and pain (1.37 [1.14,1.65]) were significantly shorter in early RA. However, no differences were observed in time to remission based on TJC28 (1.12 [0.96,1.31]) and either LDA or remission based on fatigue (LDA (1.10 [0.94,1.30]); remission (1.09 [0.92,1.31]).

Adjustment for age, gender, presence of comorbidities, and baseline scores did not alter the results.

Conclusion:

Time to achieving low disease state or remission based on various objective and patient-reported measures is significantly shorter in early compared to established RA with the exception of fatigue.

Disclosure of Interests:

Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Mohammad Movahedi Consultant of: Allergan, Emmanouil Rampakakis: None declared, Angela Cesta: None declared, John Sampalis: None declared, Claire Bombardier Grant/research support from: Dr Bombardier reports sources of funding for Ontario Best Practice Research Initiative Research grants from Abbvie, Janssen, Amgen, Medexus, Merck, Pfizer, and Novartis outside of the submitted work. Consulting Agreements: Abbvie, Covance, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi and Novartis outside of the submitted work. Advisory Board Membership: Hospira, Sandoz, Merck, Pfizer and Novartis outside of the submitted work.

FRI0032 REGIONAL AND WIDESPREAD PATTERNS OF NON-ARTICULAR PAIN ARE COMMON AT RA DIAGNOSIS AND CONTRIBUTE TO POOR OUTCOMES AT 12 MONTHS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF PAIN PATTERNS IN CANADIANS WITH RA

Background:

Persistent pain can occur in early RA patients, despite improvement in synovitis and may be due to coexisting non-articular pain (NAP). Though NAP is often attributed to fibromyalgia and widespread NAP, regional NAP syndromes may be more common and under-recognized.

Objectives:

To describe patterns of NAP, predictors of persistent NAP and impact on outcomes in the first year following early RA diagnosis.

Methods:

Data were from participants enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) between2017-2019who completed 0,6,12-month evaluations with patient-reported outcomes [PROs] and clinical data available. We used the McGill Body Pain Diagram (BPD) to classify patients as experiencing no NAP, regional (RP:1-2 regions) or widespread NAP (WP:3-5 regions). Multinomial regression was used to identify baseline predictors of persistent RP and WP at 12-months. Multi-adjusted GEE with linear and logit links were used to estimate time-varying associations of NAP patterns with outcomes updated at each time point.

Results:

Study included 421 participants: 66% were female, with a mean(sd) age 56 (14); 72% were seropositive and 90% were treated with MTX ± csDMARDs as initial therapy. NAP at baseline was common (55%), with majority (62%) reporting regional NAP. NAP prevalence was 33% at 12 months (Figure). Female sex and baseline depressive symptoms were independent predictors of widespread NAP at 12 months while poorer function and lack of early MTX treatment independently predicted regional NAP, at 12 mos. Regional and widespread NAP were associated with lower likelihood of remission in adjusted models that accounted for changes in NAP and remission over time (Table).

Figure.

Point prevalence of regional and widespread NAP at baseline, 6 and 12 months.

Table .

Results of Multi-Adjusted GEE Logistic Regression showing Regional and Widespread NAP is associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving Stringent Remission Targets

Conclusion:

NAP is commonly reported in early RA pts seen in real world settings. Regional NAP was more common than WSP at all time-points, but both NAP patterns were associated lower odds of achieving remission targets by 12 months. These data support considering the role of NAP when assessing RA treatment efficacy during clinical visits and warrant different treatment approaches to reduce symptoms in RA patients receiving target-based care.

Disclosure of Interests:

Vivian Bykerk: None declared, Orit Schieir: None declared, Marie-France Valois: None declared, Louis Bessette Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilles Boire Grant/research support from: Merck Canada (Registry of biologices, Improvement of comorbidity surveillance)

Amgen Canada (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Abbvie (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Pfizer (CATCH, Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse)

Hoffman-LaRoche (CATCH)

UCB Canada (CATCH, Clinical nurse)

BMS (CATCH, Clinical nurse, Observational Study Protocol IM101664. SEROPOSITIVITY IN A LARGE CANADIAN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT)

Janssen (CATCH)

Celgene (Clinical nurse)

Eli Lilly (Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse), Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Glen Hazlewood: None declared, Carol Hitchon Grant/research support from: UCB Canada; Pfizer Canada, Edward Keystone Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion,

Crescendo Bioscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly

Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, UCB., Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Diane Tin: None declared, Carter Thorne Consultant of: Abbvie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Medexus/Medac, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Susan J. Bartlett Consultant of: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie

SAT0252 INCREASED MORTALITY FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Background:

Individuals with giant cell arteritis (GCA) are at increased risk of serious morbidity including cardiovascular disease and stroke. Yet the risk of mortality among individuals with GCA have produced conflicting reports1.

Objectives:

Our aim was to evaluate excess all-cause mortality among individuals with GCA relative to the general population over time.

Methods:

We performed a population-based study in Ontario, Canada, using health administrative data among all individuals 50 years and older. Individuals with GCA were identified using a validated case definition (81% PPV, 100% specificity). All Ontario residents aged 50 and above who do not have GCA served as the General Population comparators. Deaths occurring in each cohort each year were ascertained from vital statistics. Annual crude and age/sex standardized all-cause mortality rates were determined for individuals with and without GCA between 2000 and 2018. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated to measure relative excess mortality over time. Differences in mortality between sexes and ages were also evaluated.

Results:

Population denominators among individuals 50 years and older with GCA and the General Population increased over time with 12,792 GCA patients and 5,456,966 comparators by 2018. Annual standardized mortality rates among the comparators steadily declined over time and were significantly lower than GCA morality rates (Figure). Annual GCA mortality rates fluctuated between 42-61 deaths per 1000 population (with overlapping confidence intervals) during the same time period. SMRs for GCA ranged from 1.28 (95% CI 1.08,1.47) at the lowest in 2002 to 1.96 (95% CI 1.84, 2.07) at the highest in 2018. GCA mortality rates and SMRs were highest among males and younger age groups.

Conclusion:

Over a 19-year period, mortality has remained increased among GCA patients relative to the general population. GCA mortality rates were higher among males and more premature deaths were occurring at younger age groups. In our study, improvements to the relative excess mortality for GCA patients over time (mortality gap) did not occur. Understanding cause-specific mortality and other factors are necessary to inform contributors to premature mortality among GCA patients.

References:

[1]Hill CL, et al. Risk of mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;46(4):513-9.

Figure.

Acknowledgments: :

This study was supported by a CIORA grant

Disclosure of Interests:

Lillian Barra: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Priscila Pequeno: None declared, Jodi Gatley: None declared, Jessica Widdifield: None declared

SAT0457 PREVALENCE OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN OSTEOARTHRITIC PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background:

There is controversy regarding the relationship between osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP). While OA may be associated with increased bone mineral density (BMD) due to increased weight, evidence exists that the incidence of OP may be increased in patients with OA.

Objectives:

To determine whether the prevalence of OP is increased in patients with OA, compared to age and sex-matched populations.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic literature review using the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, including articles that that analysed the frequency, rate, prevalence, incidence, risk, or excess risk of OP in patients with OA compared to age and sex-matched comparison groups (controls). Articles with fewer than 200 participants, and those without controls were excluded. Two reviewers conducted title and abstract screening.

Results:

Of 2772 unique articles, 49 articles were chosen for full article screening, and 4 articles met the inclusion criteria of our present study. Data from 2 and 4 studies used OP in men and women, respectively. Other articles reported on BMD and not OP so they were excluded. In women, 998 participants with OA were compared with 1903 controls. The pooled estimate of the odds ratio for prevalence of OP vs general matched population was not statistically different (Figure 1). In men, 136 participants with OA were compared with 682 controls. The results did not show a statistically significant different in the frequency of OP in OA in men (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Prevalence of OP in women with OA compared to controls

Figure 2.

Prevalence of OP in men with OA compared to controls

Conclusion:

The frequency of OP in participants with OA was the same in both men and women compared to the matched controls.

References:

[1]Chang, C. B., Kim, T. K., Kang, Y. G., Seong, S. C., & Kang, S. B. (2014). Prevalence of osteoporosis in female patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 29(10), 1425-1431.

[2]Liu, G., Peacock, M., Eilam, O., Dorulla, G., Braunstein, E., & Johnston, C. C. (1997). Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporosis International, 7(6), 564-569.

[3]Schneider, D. L., Barrett-Connor, E., Morton, D. J., & Weisman, M. (2002). Bone mineral density and clinical hand osteoarthritis in elderly men and women: the Rancho Bernardo study. The Journal of Rheumatology, 29(7), 1467-1472.

[4]Schneider, D. L., Bettencourt, R., & Barrett-Connor, E. (2006). Clinical utility of spine bone density in elderly women. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 9(3), 255-260.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ali Ahmadi Pirshahid: None declared, Dongkeun Kim: None declared, Yueyang Li: None declared, Timothy Varghese: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB

SAT0053 ESTIMATING REAL-WORLD UNMET NEEDS FOR REACHING REMISSION IN THE FIRST YEAR FOLLOWING EARLY RA DIAGNOSIS: RESULTS FROM THE CANADIAN EARLY ARTHRITIS COHORT (CATCH)

Background:

Several composite RA disease activity indices are commonly used in clinical practice and research. Different disease activity indices however can be inconsistent in classifying remission (REM).

Objectives:

1) Compare remission prevalence across 4 common RA indices; 2) compare changes in remission across indices; and, 3) Identify predictors of persistent active disease across all indices, in real-world early RA patients over 1 year follow up.

Methods:

Data were from patients with early RA (symptoms < 1 year) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) between 2007 and 2018. Participants had active disease at enrolment, were treated with csDMARDs and completed standardized clinical assessments every 3-months. Remission status was assessed using 4 indices: 1) DAS28< 2.6 OR DAS28CRP < 2.5, 2) CDAI ≤ 2.8, 3) SDAI≤ 3.3, and 4) ACR/EULAR Boolean remission – SJC28, TJC28, CRP, PGA all ≦1. T-tests/ chi-squared tests were used to compare differences in remission prevalence by 1 year, and changes in remission before and after a QI program. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of persistent active disease on all 4 indices.

Results:

1202 adults were eligible for this analysis. At enrolment, 877 (73%) were women, mean (sd) age was 55 (14), average disease activity was high (DAS28 5.1 (1.4); CDAI 27 (14); SDAI 29 (15)). Prevalence of remission by 12-months follow up was 14-21% higher when estimated with the DAS28 compared with CDAI, SDAI and Boolean criteria, and 378 (31%) did not achieve remission according to any of the 4 indices (Fig 1). Improvement in remission after a QI program however was similar across all 4 indices(~+15-17%). In adjusted logistic regression, Persistent active disease across all measures was most strongly associated with positive serostatus and smoking in men, and with obesity and more tender joints in women. Pain and lower education were predictors in BOTH men and women (Table 2)

Table 1.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Predicting Persistent Active Disease by 12-months across ALL RA indices

Conclusion:

In the absence of a single “best measure” that also takes in to account the patient’s perspective, we estimate unmet needs for achieving remission in the first year of follow up in 1 in 3 ERA patients who did not achieve remission by ANY of the 4 indices.

References:

[1] Kuriya B, Sun Y, Boire G, Haraoui B, etal. Remission in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Comparison of New ACR/EULAR Remission Criteria to Established Criteria.J Rheumatol2012;39:1155-1158.

Disclosure of Interests:

Orit Schieir: None declared, Susan J. Bartlett Consultant of: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Marie-France Valois: None declared, Louis Bessette Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilles Boire Grant/research support from: Merck Canada (Registry of biologices, Improvement of comorbidity surveillance)

Amgen Canada (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Abbvie (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Pfizer (CATCH, Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse)

Hoffman-LaRoche (CATCH)

UCB Canada (CATCH, Clinical nurse)

BMS (CATCH, Clinical nurse, Observational Study Protocol IM101664. SEROPOSITIVITY IN A LARGE CANADIAN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT)

Janssen (CATCH)

Celgene (Clinical nurse)

Eli Lilly (Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse), Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Glen Hazlewood: None declared, Carol Hitchon Grant/research support from: UCB Canada; Pfizer Canada, Edward Keystone Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion,

Crescendo Bioscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly

Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, UCB., Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Carter Thorne Consultant of: Abbvie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer

, Speakers bureau: Medexus/Medac, Diane Tin: None declared, Vivian Bykerk: None declared

FRI0037 ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PREDICTED BY HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE AT ONE YEAR

Background:

Patients with RA are at greater risk of mortality than the general population. Higher HAQ disability has been associated with hospitalizations and mortality in established RA; whether HAQ disability predicts mortality in early RA (ERA) is unknown.

Objectives:

The objective of this study is to analyze how well the HAQ can predict future mortality in patients with early RA.

Methods:

Data were from adult early RA patients (symptoms <1 year) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) between 2007 and 2017; who initiated treatment with 1 or more DMARDs and had completed HAQ data at baseline and 1 year. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and chi-square tests were used to summarize and compare baseline patient characteristics including sociodemographic variables, RA characteristics and comorbidities amongst deceased and non-deceased patients. Discrete-time proportional hazards models were used to estimate crude and multi-adjusted associations between HAQ at baseline and 1 year, respectively, with all-cause mortality in each year of follow up.

Results:

This study included 1724 patients with early RA; mean age was 55 years and 72% were female. In 10 years of follow up, 62 deaths (2.4%) occurred. Deceased patients had higher HAQ scores and DAS28 scores at baseline and at 1 year versus the non-deceased group. Age, male sex, lower education, smoking, more comorbidities, higher baseline disease activity and steroid use were associated with mortality in unadjusted survival models (Table 1). Contrary to HAQ at baseline, the association between all-cause mortality and HAQ at 1 year remained significant even after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, disease activity, smoking, education, seropositivity, symptom duration and steroid use in adjusted survival models (Table 2).

Table 1.

Unadjusted survival model: Association of each variable with all-cause mortality

Baseline VariableUnadjustedHazard OR95% CISocio-DemographicAge (years)1.101.07 – 1.13Female0.370.22 – 0.62Caucasian (white or European)1.010.46 – 2.24Aboriginal1.710.61 – 4.76Education > high school degree0.480.28 – 0.82Current Smoker1.811.01 – 3.24Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (0-9)1.601.36 – 1.87RA CharacteristicsSymptom duration (months)0.990.91 – 1.08Seropositivity in first year1.110.55 – 2.23DAS28 ESR or CRP if ESR is missing1.261.06 – 1.51Oral Steroid use1.751.03 – 2.98Table 2.

Multivariable discrete-time survival models: HAQ baseline vs 1 year

ModelModel 1:Crude(Time + HAQ-DI)Model 2:Adjusted for age + sexModel 3:Adjusted for Model 2 + DAS28 + RDCIModel 4:Adjusted for Model 3 + education, smoking, seropositivity, symptom duration and oral steroids useModel 5:Adjusted for Model 3 + smoking, symptom duration onlyHAQ-DI (0-3) (at baseline)1.461.02 – 2.091.370.96 – 1.951.250.81 – 1.941.320.85 – 2.041.300.84 – 2.00HAQ-DI (0-3) (at 1 year)2.581.78 – 3.722.401.63 – 3.521.751.10 – 2.771.871.16 – 3.021.731.09 – 2.74

*Hazard OR, 95% CI

~HAQ-DI: (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index); RDCI: Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index; DAS28: Disease Activity Score

Conclusion:

Higher HAQ at 1 year was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in a large early RA cohort suggesting that poorer disease control and function in the first year of RA contributes to higher mortality.

Disclosure of Interests:

Safoora Fatima: None declared, Orit Schieir: None declared, Marie-France Valois: None declared, Susan J. Bartlett Consultant of: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Abbvie, Louis Bessette Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilles Boire Grant/research support from: Merck Canada (Registry of biologices, Improvement of comorbidity surveillance)

Amgen Canada (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Abbvie (CATCH, clinical nurse)

Pfizer (CATCH, Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse)

Hoffman-LaRoche (CATCH)

UCB Canada (CATCH, Clinical nurse)

BMS (CATCH, Clinical nurse, Observational Study Protocol IM101664. SEROPOSITIVITY IN A LARGE CANADIAN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT)

Janssen (CATCH)

Celgene (Clinical nurse)

Eli Lilly (Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse), Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Glen Hazlewood: None declared, Carol Hitchon Grant/research support from: UCB Canada; Pfizer Canada, Edward Keystone Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celltrion,

Crescendo Bioscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Genentech Inc, Gilead, Janssen Inc, Lilly

Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, UCB., Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Diane Tin: None declared, Carter Thorne Consultant of: Abbvie, Centocor, Janssen, Lilly, Medexus/Medac, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Medexus/Medac, Vivian Bykerk: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB

THU0189 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NINTEDANIB IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE-RELATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE TREATED WITH DMARDS AND/OR GLUCOCORTICOIDS AT BASELINE

Background:

In the INBUILD trial in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs, nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) vs placebo over 52 weeks in the overall population and in the subgroup with autoimmune disease-related ILDs. Patients taking stable doses of medications to treat RA or CTD were eligible, but the protocol excluded enrolment of patients treated with azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, or oral glucocorticoids >20 mg/day.

Objectives:

Assess the influence of DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baseline on the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with progressive autoimmune disease-related ILDs.

Methods:

In patients with progressive autoimmune disease-related ILDs in the INBUILD trial, the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) and adverse events (AEs) over 52 weeks of treatment (or until 28 days after last trial drug intake for patients who discontinued drug before week 52) were assessed in subgroups by use of DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids (any dose) at baseline (yes/no).

Results:

170 patients in the INBUILD trial (82 nintedanib, 88 placebo) had autoimmune disease-related ILDs (89 RA-ILD, 39 SSc-ILD, 19 MCTD-ILD, 23 other). The baseline characteristics of patients taking (n=131) and not taking (n=39) DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids are shown in the Table. All but 1 patient taking glucocorticoids at baseline was taking <20 mg/day. The mean (SE) annual rate of decline in FVC in the placebo group was numerically greater in patients taking vs not taking DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baseline (Figure). The effect of nintedanib vs placebo on reducing the rate of decline in FVC was numerically more pronounced in patients taking vs not taking DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baseline, but the treatment-by-subgroup-by-time interaction p-values did not indicate heterogeneity in the effect of nintedanib between subgroups (Figure). In patients taking vs not taking DMARDs and/or corticosteroids at baseline, respectively, diarrhoea was reported in 59.4% and 77.8% of patients treated with nintedanib and 28.4% and 23.8% of patients treated with placebo. Serious AEs were more frequent in patients taking vs not taking DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baseline in both the nintedanib (39.1% vs 16.7%) and placebo (35.8% vs 19.0%) groups.

Conclusion:

In the INBUILD trial, the rate of FVC decline was numerically greater in placebo-treated patients who were taking DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baseline than in those who were not. The rate of FVC decline was slower in patients treated with nintedanib than placebo both in patients who were and were not taking DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baseline. Nintedanib had an acceptable safety profile both in patients who were and were not using DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baseline.

DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids at baselineYes (n=131)No (n=39)Male, %51.930.8FVC, mL, mean (SD)2372 (718)2188 (619)ILD diagnosis, %RA-ILD60.325.6SSc-ILD15.348.7MCTD-ILD10.712.8Other13.712.8Biologic DMARDs, %15.3–Non-biologic DMARDs, %46.6–Glucocorticoids, %87.8–

Disclosure of Interests:

Martin Aringer Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Clive Kelly Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Roche, John Belperio: None declared, Alexandra James Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Carl Coeck Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Manuel Quaresma Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Eric Matteson Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, TympoBio, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Speakers bureau: Simply Speaking

FRI0545 A META-ANALYSIS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS TEMPORALLY AND ACROSS REGIONS

Background:

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an immune-mediated disease of the large vessels, and occurs in adults over 50 years old1. It is the most commonly seen form of chronic vasculitis and is associated with significant rates of morbidity2. This meta-analysis examines the geographical and temporal epidemiology of GCA, including incidence, prevalence and mortality.

Objectives:

To identify changes in incidence rate, prevalence, and mortality rate over time

To compare these rates between geographic regions around the world

Methods:

A systematic review of the English literature was conducted using the EMBase, Scopus and PubMed databases. Articles were included if they were cohort or cross-sectional studies with 50 or more patients with GCA and reported on population, location and time-frame parameters. Articles on mortality were included if they compared mortality to age and gender matched population. Review articles, case-control studies and case series were excluded. Two reviewers extracted data and a third verified inclusion of studies. Study quality was assessed by using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. Mortality rate was standardized across cohorts to deaths per 1000 people per year.

Results:

Of the 3569 citations identified by the literature search, 107 were included in analysis. The pooled incidence of GCA internationally was 10.00 [9.22, 10.78] cases per 100 000 people over 50 years old (Figure). This incidence was highest in Scandinavia 21.57 [18.90, 24.23], followed by North and South America 10.89 [8.78, 13.00], Europe 7.26 [6.05, 8.47], and Oceania 7.85 [1.48,17.19]. Nine studies reported prevalence. Pooled prevalence from these 9 was 51.74 [42.04,61.43] cases per 100 000 people over 50 years old. Overall, pooled mortality was 20.44 [17.84,23.03] deaths/1000 per year. Mortality had a generally decreasing trend over the years of publication.

Conclusion:

The incidence of GCA varies regionally almost 3-fold. Likely genetic and environmental factors may explain this trend. Incidence and prevalence are important for tracking the efficacy and side effects of current therapies, as well as planning for the costs of biologic treatment.

References:

[1] Floris A, Piga M, Cauli A, Salvarani C, Mathieu A. Polymyalgia rheumatica: an autoinflammatory disorder?. RMD Open. 2018;4(1):e000694. Published 2018 Jun 4. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000694

[2] Crow RW, Katz BJ, Warner JE, et al. Giant cell arteritis and mortality. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(3):365–369. doi:10.1093/gero na/gln030

Acknowledgments:

Both Daniel Semenov and Katherine Li equally contributed and sharing first authorship

Funding in part was from the Canadian Rheumatology Association summer studentship

Disclosure of Interests:

Daniel Semenov: None declared, Katherine Li: None declared, Matthew Turk: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB

SAT0145 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF UPADACITINIB MONOTHERAPY IN MTX-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH EARLY ACTIVE RA RECEIVING TREATMENT WITHIN 3 MONTHS OF DIAGNOSIS: A POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF THE SELECT-EARLY

Background:

Early treatment of RA within the therapeutic window(0-3 months from symptom onset), has been associated with improved clinical outcomes and physical function. However, ≤42% of RA patients(pts) visit a rheumatologist within 90 days of symptom onset1,2.

Objectives:

To assess safety and efficacy of Upadacitinib(UPA), an oral, reversible, potent JAK-1 selective inhibitor3, in pts with moderate to severely active RA who were MTX-naïve or had an inadequate response to csDMARDs/bDMARDs4-6.

Methods:

In SELECT–EARLY, MTX-naïve pts with active RA and poor prognosis were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily UPA monotherapy at 15 or 30 mg or weekly MTX (titrated up to 20 mg/week through Week 8). Efficacy (including ACR, DAS28(CRP), CDAI responses and change in mTSS) and safety outcomes from a post-hoc analysis of patients who received treatment within 90 days from diagnosis are reported here. The statistical significance defined asp<0.05was exploratory in nature.

Results:

A total of 270 pts commenced treatment within 90 days from RA diagnosis (median: 44 days [11, 89]). Pts in each arm were mostly female (70%), had moderately to severely active RA with mean DAS28(CRP) =5.9±1.02, had structural joint damage (mean mTSS =7.7±21.5) and were seropositive for both ACPA and RF at baseline (72%)4. At Week 24, compared to MTX, significantly greater proportions of pts receiving UPA 15 or 30 mg monotherapy achieved efficacy outcomes including ACR20, 50 and 70 responses, DAS28CRP<2.6, CDAI≤2.8 or Boolean remission. Improvements in physical function (HAQ-DI) and decrease in pain were also significantly greater in pts receiving UPA 15 and 30 mg vs MTX at Week 24. Treatment with UPA was also associated with a greater inhibition of structural joint damage compared with MTX (Figure 1). Safety outcomes were consistent with the full study and the integrated safety analysis (all phase 3 studies of UPA). Compared to MTX, higher frequencies of serious infections and herpes zoster were reported in both UPA groups. There were 2 deaths in total (UPA 30 mg: 1 due to cardiovascular death and 1 due to pneumonia and sepsis) (Figure 2).

Conclusion:

In RA pts, early initiation of treatment with UPA 15 mg and 30 mg monotherapy within 3 months from diagnosis was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy, including remission and inhibition of progression of structural joint damage compared to MTX. The safety profile was consistent with the overall study and the integrated phase 3 safety analysis7. UPA seems to be a promising treatment option for more patients to reach their treatment targets of remission or low disease activity when treated within 3 months of diagnosis.

References:

[1]Raza K et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(10):1822-5.

[2]Stack RJ et al. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024361.

[3]Parmentier et al. BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:23.

[4]van Vollenhoven R et al, Arth Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (s10) [Abs ACR2018].

[5]Burmester GR et al. Lancet 2018;391:2503-12.

[6]Genovese MC et al, Lancet 2018;391:2513-24.

[7]Cohen S et al, Ann Rheum Dis [Abs EULAR2019].

Disclosure of Interests:

Meliha C Kapetanovic: None declared, Maria Andersson Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Alan Friedman Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc, Employee of: AbbVie Inc, Tim Shaw Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Yanna Song Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Daniel Aletaha Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Maya H Buch Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Consultant of: Pfizer; AbbVie; Eli Lilly; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Merck-Serono; Sandoz; and Sanofi, Ulf Müller-Ladner Speakers bureau: Biogen, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB

FRI0130 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF NATURAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE TREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune condition affecting almost 1% of the general population (1). Pharmacological management has been the mainstay of treatment for RA and includes DMARDs and biologics. Despite these therapies, anywhere from 28-90% of patients with RA use complementary and alternative medicine (2). These non-pharmacological therapies range from dietary interventions to supplements to nonprescription therapies.

Objectives:

To determine the efficacy of non-pharmacological, orally-ingested interventions on clinically-relevant endpoints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods:

We systematically reviewed EMBASE and MEDLINE electronical databases from inception until Feb 23, 2019 for relevant articles. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed oral, non-pharmacological interventions (e.g. diets, vitamins, oils, herbal remedies, fatty acids, supplements, etc.) in adult patients with RA, that presented clinically-relevant outcomes (defined as pain, fatigue, disability, joint counts, and/or disease indices) were included.

Clinical outcome data was extracted by two independent authors as difference from baseline measurement. Therapies with at least 3 RCTs which presented data on the same clinical outcome were meta-analyzed using a pooled random effects model using RevMan 5.

Results:

A total of 4423 unique articles were independently assessed by two authors, of which 72 articles met our inclusion criteria. Thirteen different interventions were studied more than once, and six interventions had clinical outcomes reported in at least 3 trials. However, only vitamin D and fatty acids met criteria for meta-analysis.

Pooled random effects models suggested vitamin D supplementation improved HAQ scores from baseline (mean difference = -0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.17 to -0.02; p=0.01) but had no effect on DAS28 scores (Table 1).

Table 1.

Mean differences from baseline of various clinical outcomes in RA patients taking vitamin D or fatty acid supplementation compared to control group.

Clinical OutcomeTotal PatientsMean Difference (95% CI)P-valueVitamin DHAQ573-0.10 (-0.17 to -0.02)0.01DAS28174-0.30 (-0.71 to 0.11)0.15Fatty AcidsTJC661-2.05 (-2.83 to -1.27)0.04SJC582-0.35 (-0.96 to 0.26)0.26RAI234-1.82 (-4.69 to 1.05)0.21Pain756-0.61 (-1.02 to -0.20)0.004Patient Global484-0.26 (-0.59 to 0.07)0.12Physician Global382-1.08 (-1.98 to -0.18)0.02HAQ277-0.13 (-0.18 to -0.09)<0.001DAS28543-0.19 (-0.36 to -0.01)0.03

Fatty acid supplementation improved total joint counts, pain, physician global assessment scores, HAQ, and DAS28 from baseline (Table 1). There were significantly more patients who achieved ACR20 criteria (Relative Risk Ratio = 2.73, 95% CI 1.62-4.58; p<0.001) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Forest plot of studies in which RA patients taking fatty acids achieved ACR20 criteria.https://account-congress.eular.org/Modules/Abstract/Submission/summary.aspx

Conclusion:

From our meta-analysis, vitamin D and fatty acids supplementation showed statistically significant improvement in some clinical outcomes in patients with RA; however, the degree of improvement is unlikely to be clinically significant.

Overall, many trials were of low quality and had high risks of bias including inadequate reporting of data. Further clinical trials that are well-designed and fully powered are still needed to confirm the efficacy of many supplements and diets in RA.

References:

[1]Myasoedova E, Crowson CS, Kremers HM, Therneau TM, Gabriel SE. Is the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis rising?: results from Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1955-2007.Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(6):1576–1582. doi:10.1002/art.27425

[2]Efthimiou P, Kukar M, Mackenzie CR. Complementary and alternative medicine in rheumatoid arthritis: no longer the last resort!.HSS J.2010;6(1):108–111. doi:10.1007/s11420-009-9133-8

Disclosure of Interests:

Yideng Liu: None declared, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Matthew Turk: None declared

An evidence-based strategy to screen for pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend screening all systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with yearly echocardiograms. There is a paucity of evidence to support these guidelines.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can a prediction model identify SSc patients with a very low probability of PAH and therefore not requiring annual screening echocardiogram?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a case-control study of 925 unselected SSc subjects nested in a multi-centered, longitudinal cohort. The probability of PAH for each subject was calculated using the results of multivariate logistic regression models. A cut-off was identified for the estimated probability of PAH below which no subject developed PAH (100% sensitivity).

RESULTS

Study subjects were predominantly female (87.5%), with mean (SD) age 58.6 (11.7) years and disease duration of 18.2 (12.2) years. Thirty-seven subjects developed PAH during 5407.97 person-years of observation (incidence rate 0.68 per 100 person-years). Shortness of breath (SOB), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and NT-proBNP were independent predictors of PAH. All SSc-PAH cases had a probability of PAH of >1.1%. Subjects below this cut-off, none of whom had PAH, accounted for 46.2% of the study population.

INTERPRETATION

A simple prediction model identified subjects at very low probability of PAH who could potentially forego annual screening echocardiogram. This represents almost half of SSc subjects in a general SSc population. This study, which is the first evidence-based study for the rational use of follow-up echocardiograms in an unselected SSc cohort, requires validation. The scoring system is freely available online at http://pahtool.ladydavis.ca.

Mammalian target of rapamycin is activated in the kidneys of patients with scleroderma renal crisis

Objectives:

Scleroderma renal crisis is a rare but serious complication affecting 2%–15% of patients with systemic sclerosis. Despite treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, outcomes for scleroderma renal crisis patients are still poor. The cellular signaling mechanisms in scleroderma renal crisis are not yet known. Mammalian target of rapamycin, comprised of the subunits mTORC1 and mTORC2, has been shown to be activated in vascular lesions of renal transplant patients with anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome. Given the similarities between the pathophysiology of scleroderma renal crisis and anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome, we hypothesized that the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway would also be activated in the renal vasculature of patients with scleroderma renal crisis.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed renal biopsies of five patients with scleroderma renal crisis in the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group cohort. Immunostaining was performed using anti-P-S6RP antibodies to evaluate the phosphorylation of mTORC1, and anti-Rictor and anti-S473 to determine activation of mTORC2.

Results:

Four of the five patients showed mTORC1 activation in arteriolar endothelial cells, and three of the five patients showed mTORC1 activation in the arterial endothelial cells. Two of four samples showed Rictor expression in the arteriolar and arterial endothelial cells, showing mTORC2 activation. There was no expression of mTORC1 or mTORC2 in samples from two healthy controls.

Conclusion:

We demonstrate that both mTORC1 and mTORC2 are activated in renal biopsies with typical histologic features of scleroderma renal crisis. Dual mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are currently available and in development. These findings could inform further research into novel treatment targets for scleroderma renal crisis.

Prostate-specific antigen velocity in a prospective prostate cancer screening study of men with genetic predisposition

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.429.

Prostate-specific antigen velocity in a prospective prostate cancer screening study of men with genetic predisposition

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA-velocity (PSAV) have been used to identify men at risk of prostate cancer (PrCa). The IMPACT study is evaluating PSA screening in men with a known genetic predisposition to PrCa due to BRCA1/2 mutations. This analysis evaluates the utility of PSA and PSAV for identifying PrCa and high-grade disease in this cohort.

METHODS

PSAV was calculated using logistic regression to determine if PSA or PSAV predicted the result of prostate biopsy (PB) in men with elevated PSA values. Cox regression was used to determine whether PSA or PSAV predicted PSA elevation in men with low PSAs. Interaction terms were included in the models to determine whether BRCA status influenced the predictiveness of PSA or PSAV.

RESULTS

1634 participants had ⩾3 PSA readings of whom 174 underwent PB and 45 PrCas diagnosed. In men with PSA >3.0 ng ml-l, PSAV was not significantly associated with presence of cancer or high-grade disease. PSAV did not add to PSA for predicting time to an elevated PSA. When comparing BRCA1/2 carriers to non-carriers, we found a significant interaction between BRCA status and last PSA before biopsy (P=0.031) and BRCA2 status and PSAV (P=0.024). However, PSAV was not predictive of biopsy outcome in BRCA2 carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

PSA is more strongly predictive of PrCa in BRCA carriers than non-carriers. We did not find evidence that PSAV aids decision-making for BRCA carriers over absolute PSA value alone.