1
|
Ferryman K, Goldenberg AJ, Sabatello M. Moving to Equity in the All of Us Research Program. Am J Bioeth 2024; 24:115-117. [PMID: 38394025 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2307255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
|
2
|
Iwashyna TJ, Ferryman K, Drabo EF, Jackson JW, Crews DC. Comment on Yang and Moss Commentary. Chest 2023; 164:e178-e179. [PMID: 38070968 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.07.4224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore J Iwashyna
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Kadija Ferryman
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Berman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Emmanuel F Drabo
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - John W Jackson
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Deidra C Crews
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kane O, Ferryman K. Applying the Ethical Data Practices Framework to Digital Therapeutics. Am J Bioeth 2023; 23:53-56. [PMID: 37879027 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2256280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Odia Kane
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | - Kadija Ferryman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kadija Ferryman
- From the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (K.F.); Genomics England and the Alan Turing Institute, London (M.M.); and the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (M.G.)
| | - Maxine Mackintosh
- From the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (K.F.); Genomics England and the Alan Turing Institute, London (M.M.); and the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (M.G.)
| | - Marzyeh Ghassemi
- From the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (K.F.); Genomics England and the Alan Turing Institute, London (M.M.); and the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (M.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferryman K. Bounded Justice, Inclusion, and the Hyper/Invisibility of Race in Precision Medicine. Am J Bioeth 2023:1-7. [PMID: 37220019 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
I take up the call for a more nuanced engagement with race in bioethics by using Creary's analytic of bounded justice and argue that it helps illuminate processes of racialization, or racial formation, specifically Blackness, as a dialectical processes of both invisibility and hyper-visibility. This dialectical view of race provides a lens through which the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of genetics and genomics field can reflect on fraught issues such as inclusion in genomic and biomedical research. Countering or interrupting racialization in precision medicine can involve asking how marginalized groups are made invisible or hyper-visible in various aspects of the research process. Incorporating these kinds of questions into biomedical research inclusion efforts could lead to potentially powerful engagements with marginalized groups and could provide the opportunity for stakeholders to engage with the ways that racialization can happen in real-time and might undermine good intentions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mathews DJH, Ferryman K, Faden R. Designing Health Care Artificial Intelligence That Comports With the Values of Patients-Children Are People Whose Voices Must Be Heard. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2310605. [PMID: 37126351 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Debra J H Mathews
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kadija Ferryman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ruth Faden
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ferryman K, Brems JH. How Materialized Oppression Contributes to Bioethics. Am J Bioeth 2023; 23:1-5. [PMID: 37011350 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2186628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
|
8
|
Tomko C, Clouse E, Haney K, Galai N, Footer K, Ferryman K, Smith KC, Sherman SG. A study protocol to explore and implement community-based point-of-care COVID-19 testing for women who use drugs in Baltimore, Maryland: The CARE study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277605. [PMID: 36542613 PMCID: PMC9770432 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Women who use drugs (WWUD) experience structural vulnerabilities (e.g., housing, food insecurities) and comorbidities that elevate their susceptibility to more severe COVID-19 symptoms or fatality compared to similarly-aged women who do not use illicit drugs. Testing is a cornerstone of effective COVID prevention, however, entrenched barriers to healthcare utilization means that WWUD may have diminished accessing to COVID testing. The CARE (COVID Action Research Engagement) study first examines predisposing and enabling factors that predict COVID testing uptake over six months (baseline, 3-, and 6-month follow-up) among a cohort of WWUD (N = 250) in Baltimore, Maryland, providing a nuanced and holistic understanding of how to meaningfully engage WWUD in COVID testing. Then, point-of-care COVID testing will be implemented on a mobile outreach van affiliated with a local community-based organization primarily serving WWUD; anonymous surveys of mobile outreach guests (N = 100) will assess feasibility and acceptability of this integrated testing. The study is grounded in the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. We hypothesize that point-of-care COVID testing integrated into a low-barrier harm reduction service, such as a mobile outreach program, will be an enabling environment for COVID testing uptake in part by reducing structural impediments to testing and will be highly feasible and acceptable to participants. Strengths, limitations, and plans for results dissemination are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Tomko
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Emily Clouse
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Katherine Haney
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Noya Galai
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Katherine Footer
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kadija Ferryman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Katherine Clegg Smith
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Susan G. Sherman
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brems JH, Ferryman K, McCormack MC, Sugarman J. Ethical Considerations Regarding the Use of Race in Pulmonary Function Testing. Chest 2022; 162:878-881. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kadija Ferryman
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
The use of machine learning (ML) in healthcare raises numerous ethical concerns, especially as models can amplify existing health inequities. Here, we outline ethical considerations for equitable ML in the advancement of healthcare. Specifically, we frame ethics of ML in healthcare through the lens of social justice. We describe ongoing efforts and outline challenges in a proposed pipeline of ethical ML in health, ranging from problem selection to postdeployment considerations. We close by summarizing recommendations to address these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Y Chen
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Emma Pierson
- Microsoft Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02143, USA
| | - Sherri Rose
- Center for Health Policy and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | | | - Kadija Ferryman
- Department of Technology, Culture, and Society, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA
| | - Marzyeh Ghassemi
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
- Institute for Medical and Evaluative Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ferryman K. Addressing health disparities in the Food and Drug Administration's artificial intelligence and machine learning regulatory framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 27:2016-2019. [PMID: 32951036 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The exponential growth of health data from devices, health applications, and electronic health records coupled with the development of data analysis tools such as machine learning offer opportunities to leverage these data to mitigate health disparities. However, these tools have also been shown to exacerbate inequities faced by marginalized groups. Focusing on health disparities should be part of good machine learning practice and regulatory oversight of software as medical devices. Using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s proposed framework for regulating machine learning tools in medicine, I show that addressing health disparities during the premarket and postmarket stages of review can help anticipate and mitigate group harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kadija Ferryman
- Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cesare N, Oladeji O, Ferryman K, Wijaya D, Hendricks‐Muñoz KD, Ward A, Nsoesie EO. Discussions of miscarriage and preterm births on Twitter. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2020; 34:544-552. [PMID: 31912544 PMCID: PMC7496231 DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experiences typically considered private, such as, miscarriages and preterm births are being discussed publicly on social media and Internet discussion websites. These data can provide timely illustrations of how individuals discuss miscarriages and preterm births, as well as insights into the wellbeing of women who have experienced a miscarriage. OBJECTIVES To characterise how users discuss the topic of miscarriage and preterm births on Twitter, analyse trends and drivers, and describe the perceived emotional state of women who have experienced a miscarriage. METHODS We obtained 291 443 Twitter postings on miscarriages and preterm births from January 2017 through December 2018. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was used to identify major topics of discussion. We applied time series decomposition methods to assess temporal trends and identify major drivers of discussion. Furthermore, four coders labelled the emotional content of 7282 personal miscarriage disclosure tweets into the following non-mutually exclusive categories: grief/sadness/depression, anger, relief, isolation, annoyance, and neutral. RESULTS Topics in our data fell into eight groups: celebrity disclosures, Michelle Obama's disclosure, politics, healthcare, preterm births, loss and anxiety, flu vaccine and ectopic pregnancies. Political discussions around miscarriages were largely due to a misunderstanding between abortions and miscarriages. Grief and annoyance were the most commonly expressed emotions within the miscarriage self-disclosures; 50.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.1, 52.2) and 16.2% (95% CI 15.2, 17.3). Postings increased with celebrity disclosures, pharmacists' refusal of prescribed medications and outrage over the high rate of preterm births in the United States. Miscarriage disclosures by celebrities also led to disclosures by women who had similar experiences. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that increase in discussions of miscarriage on social media are associated with several factors, including celebrity disclosures. Additionally, there is a misunderstanding of the potential physical, emotional and psychological impacts on individuals who lose a pregnancy due to a miscarriage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Cesare
- Department of Global HealthSchool of Public HealthBoston UniversityBostonMAUSA
| | - Olubusola Oladeji
- Department of Global HealthSchool of Public HealthBoston UniversityBostonMAUSA
| | - Kadija Ferryman
- Department of Technology, Culture, and SocietyTandon School of EngineeringNew York UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Derry Wijaya
- Department of Computer ScienceBoston UniversityBostonMAUSA
| | - Karen D. Hendricks‐Muñoz
- Department of PediatricsVirginia Commonwealth University School of MedicineRichmondVAUSA,Children's Hospital of RichmondRichmondVAUSA
| | - Alyssa Ward
- Children's Hospital of RichmondRichmondVAUSA
| | - Elaine O. Nsoesie
- Department of Global HealthSchool of Public HealthBoston UniversityBostonMAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Horowitz CR, Ferryman K, Negron R, Sabin T, Rodriguez M, Zinberg RF, Böttinger E, Robinson M. Race, Genomics and Chronic Disease: What Patients with African Ancestry Have to Say. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2018; 28:248-260. [PMID: 28238999 DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Variants of the APOL1 gene increase risk for kidney failure 10-fold, and are nearly exclusively found in people with African ancestry. To translate genomic discoveries into practice, we gathered information about effects and challenges incorporating genetic risk in clinical care. METHODS An academic-community-clinical team tested 26 adults with self-reported African ancestry for APOL1 variants, conducting in-depth interviews about patients' beliefs and attitudes toward genetic testing- before, immediately, and 30 days after receiving test results. We used constant comparative analysis of interview transcripts to identify themes. RESULTS Themes included: Knowledge of genetic risk for kidney failure may motivate providers and patients to take hypertension more seriously, rather than inspiring fatalism or anxiety. Having genetic risk for a disease may counter stereotypes of Blacks as non-adherent or low-literate, rather than exacerbate stereotypes. CONCLUSION Populations most likely to benefit from genomic research can inform strategies for genetic testing and future research.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaplan B, Caddle-Steele C, Chisholm G, Esmond WA, Ferryman K, Gertner M, Goytia C, Hauser D, Richardson LD, Robinson M, Horowitz CR. A Culture of Understanding: Reflections and Suggestions from a Genomics Research Community Board. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2017; 11:161-165. [PMID: 28736408 PMCID: PMC5830277 DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
There has been limited community engagement in the burgeoning field of genomics research. In the wake of a new discovery of genetic variants that increase the risk of kidney failure and are almost unique to people of African ancestry, community and clinical leaders in Harlem, New York, formed a community board to inform the direction of related research. The board advised all aspects of a study to assess the impact of testing for these genetic variants at primary care sites that serve diverse populations, including explaining genetic risk to participants. By reflecting on the board's experiences, we found that community voices can have tangible impact on research that navigates the controversial intersection of race, ancestry, and genomics by heightening vigilance, fostering clear communication between researchers and the community, and encouraging researchers to cede some control. Our reflections and work provide a strong justification for longitudinal community partnerships in genomics research.
Collapse
|
16
|
Sanderson SC, Linderman MD, Suckiel SA, Diaz GA, Zinberg RE, Ferryman K, Wasserstein M, Kasarskis A, Schadt EE. Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 24:14-20. [PMID: 26036856 PMCID: PMC4795230 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS) is increasingly offered to ostensibly healthy individuals. Understanding the motivations and concerns of research participants seeking out personal WGS and their preferences regarding return-of-results and data sharing will help optimize protocols for WES/WGS. Baseline interviews including both qualitative and quantitative components were conducted with research participants (n=35) in the HealthSeq project, a longitudinal cohort study of individuals receiving personal WGS results. Data sharing preferences were recorded during informed consent. In the qualitative interview component, the dominant motivations that emerged were obtaining personal disease risk information, satisfying curiosity, contributing to research, self-exploration and interest in ancestry, and the dominant concern was the potential psychological impact of the results. In the quantitative component, 57% endorsed concerns about privacy. Most wanted to receive all personal WGS results (94%) and their raw data (89%); a third (37%) consented to having their data shared to the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). Early adopters of personal WGS in the HealthSeq project express a variety of health- and non-health-related motivations. Almost all want all available findings, while also expressing concerns about the psychological impact and privacy of their results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia C Sanderson
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael D Linderman
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - George A Diaz
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randi E Zinberg
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Melissa Wasserstein
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Kasarskis
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric E Schadt
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hartzler A, McCarty CA, Rasmussen LV, Williams MS, Brilliant M, Bowton EA, Clayton EW, Faucett WA, Ferryman K, Field JR, Fullerton SM, Horowitz CR, Koenig BA, McCormick JB, Ralston JD, Sanderson SC, Smith ME, Trinidad SB. Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records. Genet Med 2013; 15:792-801. [PMID: 24030437 PMCID: PMC3909653 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2013] [Accepted: 07/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrating genomic information into clinical care and the electronic health record can facilitate personalized medicine through genetically guided clinical decision support. Stakeholder involvement is critical to the success of these implementation efforts. Prior work on implementation of clinical information systems provides broad guidance to inform effective engagement strategies. We add to this evidence-based recommendations that are specific to issues at the intersection of genomics and the electronic health record. We describe stakeholder engagement strategies employed by the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network, a national consortium of US research institutions funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute to develop, disseminate, and apply approaches that combine genomic and electronic health record data. Through select examples drawn from sites of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network, we illustrate a continuum of engagement strategies to inform genomic integration into commercial and homegrown electronic health records across a range of health-care settings. We frame engagement as activities to consult, involve, and partner with key stakeholder groups throughout specific phases of health information technology implementation. Our aim is to provide insights into engagement strategies to guide genomic integration based on our unique network experiences and lessons learned within the broader context of implementation research in biomedical informatics. On the basis of our collective experience, we describe key stakeholder practices, challenges, and considerations for successful genomic integration to support personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Hartzler
- The Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Luke V. Rasmussen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Marc S. Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murray Brilliant
- Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Erica A. Bowton
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Schools of Medicine and Law, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - William A. Faucett
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kadija Ferryman
- Department of Anthropology, New School for Social Research, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julie R. Field
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stephanie M. Fullerton
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Carol R. Horowitz
- Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Barbara A. Koenig
- Institute for Health and Aging, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jennifer B. McCormick
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Health Care Policy Research and Biomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - James D. Ralston
- Group Health Permanente and Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Saskia C. Sanderson
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maureen E. Smith
- Center for Genetic Medicine and Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Feinburg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Susan Brown Trinidad
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|