Therapeutic Outcome of Multidisciplinary Treatment in Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Background

There is little established evidence regarding treatment strategies for unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aimed to clarify the situation of multidisciplinary treatment for unresectable BTC in the 2000s when there was no international standard first-line therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 315 consecutive patients with unresectable BTC who had been treated at seven tertiary institutions in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan between 1999 and 2008.

Results

The unresectable factors were as follows: locally advanced, 101 cases (32.1%); hematogenous metastases, 80 cases (25.4%); and peritoneal dissemination, 30 cases (9.5%). Chemotherapy or radiation therapy was administered to 218 patients (69.2%). The best supportive care was provided in 97 cases (30.8%). The most common regimen was gemcitabine monotherapy, followed by gemcitabine combination therapy and S-1 monotherapy. The 1- and 2-year survival rates of all patients were 34.6% and 12.2%, respectively. The median survival time (MST) was 8 months in all patients. The 1-year survival rate was 65%, and the MST was 12 months among the locally advanced patients, whereas patients with peritoneal dissemination had the worst outcome; the 1-year survival rate was 7%, and the MST was 5 months. Among treated 90 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, patients who received chemoradiotherapy (n = 24) had a significantly better outcome than those who received chemotherapy alone (MST: 20 vs. 11 months, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Unresectable BTC has heterogeneous treatment outcomes depending on the mode of tumor extension and location. Multidisciplinary treatment seems useful for patients with locally advanced BTC, whereas patients with metastatic disease still have a poor prognosis.

Differential Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using Detective Flow Imaging Endoscopic Ultrasonography

The differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) using B-mode endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is challenging. Detective flow imaging (DFI) offers the potential for detecting low-flow vessels in the pancreas, thus enhancing diagnostic accuracy. This retrospective study aimed to investigate DFI-EUS findings of SPLs and analyze their differential diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cancer. We included 104 patients with pathologically confirmed SPLs who underwent EUS between April 2021 and June 2023. Expert endosonographers, blinded to the patients' clinical data, evaluated images obtained through B-mode, eFLOW, and DFI-EUS. The frame rate and vessel detection sensitivity were compared between eFLOW and DFI, and the diagnostic criteria for pancreatic cancer were established. The visualization rate for vessels in SPLs was significantly higher with DFI-EUS (96%) compared to eFLOW (27%). Additionally, DFI showed a superior frame rate, sensitivity (99%), and accuracy (88%) for detecting pancreatic cancer, although with a modest specificity (43%). On DFI-EUS, characteristics such as hypovascularity, peritumoral vessel distribution, or spotty vessel form were suggestive of pancreatic cancer. DFI-EUS significantly improved the visualization of vascular structures within the SPLs, highlighting its efficacy as a diagnostic modality for pancreatic cancer.

Clinical course of small gastric subepithelial lesion less than 20 mm diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are treated as malignant gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs), and resection is recommended. However, small gastric SELs < 20 mm with no malignant features are monitored without histopathological examination, and the frequency of malignancy is unknown. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological findings and clinical course of gastric SELs < 20 mm measured by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with small gastric SELs < 20 mm diagnosed using EUS at a tertiary referral center between 2009 and 2021. The clinical course after diagnosis using EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 333 patients with small gastric SELs, 104 patients with 105 lesions underwent EUS-FNA. The pathological diagnosis was confirmed in 87 patients. GISTs were the most common pathology (47%). Among the 87 patients, 43 underwent therapeutic interventions, including tumor resection and chemotherapy. In groups of tumor resection, the pathological tumor size on the resected specimen was significantly larger than the size measured by EUS (19.5 mm vs 15.0 mm, P < 0.001), and 37% of resected SELs were 20 mm or over. No recurrence was observed after tumor resection during a mean follow-up period of 40 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 40% of small gastric SELs were malignant tumors, such as GIST, with most of them requiring treatment. Additionally, considering that the EUS measurement is 5 mm smaller than the pathological tumor diameter, further examinations, such as systematic EUS-FNA, may be required for SEL, including those smaller than 20 mm.

Novel 8-wire basket catheter is useful for endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones up to 10 mm: A multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Endoscopic treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones involves the use of basket or balloon catheters; however, what is the appropriate device remains controversial. In this study we aimed to prospectively evaluate the usefulness of a novel 8-wire helical basket (8WB) catheter made of Nitinol for the removal of CBD stones ≤10 mm.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective trial. Patients with CBD stones ≤10 mm were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete stone removal within 10 min using the 8WB. The number of cases was determined using a previous study of stone removal by a conventional basket catheter as a historical control.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were enrolled and 139 were ultimately included in the analysis. Patients with a single stone were the most common (84 cases, 60.4%), with a median maximum stone diameter of 5 mm. The median stone removal time using the 8WB was 6 min. The complete stone removal rate was 95.0% (132/139). Adverse events were observed in 14 patients (10.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel 8WB catheter is useful in the treatment of CBD stones ≤10 mm, presenting a high complete stone removal rate in this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCT1032200324.

Novel peroral cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy for difficult stones

Miwa and colleagues report on their experience with a newly developed peroral cholangioscope that is effective for the removal of difficult stones in the common bile duct and the cystic duct. The scope offers a large working channel and a high mobility bending section, increasing the efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

Early Tumor Shrinkage and Depth of Response as Predictors of Survival for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of JCOG1113

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) reflect outcomes of chemotherapy in various cancers. This study evaluated the association of ETS and DpR with clinical outcomes using data from JCOG1113, which demonstrated the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) for chemotherapy-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 354 (289 with measurable target lesions) patients enrolled in JCOG1113 were divided into ETS-unachieved and ETS-achieved groups (≥20% tumor reduction at week 6) and DpR-low and DpR-high groups (≥40% maximum shrinkage) until 12 weeks after enrollment. The impact of ETS and DpR on survival outcome was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients in the ETS-achieved and DpR-high groups were similar between the 2 treatment arms. The hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the ETS-achieved group were 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.93) and 0.60 (95%CI, 0.44-0.81), respectively. The HRs of PFS and OS for the DpR-high group were 0.67 (95%CI, 0.48-0.94) and 0.64 (95%CI, 0.46-0.90), respectively. In the subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analysis, most patients in the ETS-achieved group in the GC arm did not experience disease progression after 12 weeks from the landmark.

CONCLUSION

As on-treatment markers, ETS and DpR were effective tools. ETS was clinically useful, because it can be used to evaluate the outcomes of treatment early at a specific time.

Development of a nomogram to predict survival in advanced biliary tract cancer

The prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients remains poor due to limited efficacy of chemotherapy and difficulties in management. Thus, prediction of survival is crucial for the clinical management of advanced BTC. The aim was to develop and validate a nomogram to predict 6-month and 12-month survival in advanced BTC patients treated with chemotherapy. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to construct a nomogram in a training set (JCOG1113, a phase III trial comparing gemcitabine plus S-1 [GS] and gemcitabine plus cisplatin, n = 351). External validity of the nomogram was assessed using a test set (JCOG0805, a randomized, phase II trial comparing GS and S-1 alone, n = 100). Predictive performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. The constructed nomogram included lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, albumin, and C-reactive protein. Uno's concordance index was 0.661 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.629-0.696) in the training set and 0.640 (95% CI 0.566-0.715) in the test set. The calibration plots for 6-month and 12-month survival showed good agreement in the two analysis sets. The present nomogram can facilitate prediction of the prognosis of advanced BTC patients treated with chemotherapy and help clinicians' prognosis-based decision-making.

Endoscopic Resection with One-Port Placement: A Newly Developed Technique for the Safe Management of Advanced Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) without laparoscopic assistance (pure EFTR) is an emerging, less invasive treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the technique has seldom been performed outside China because of concerns regarding pneumoperitoneum, maintenance of endoscopic view, and endoscopic suturing. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection with one-port placement (EROPP) for gastric GISTs.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 17 patients with gastric GISTs originating from the muscularis propria who underwent EROPP between 2019 and 2022. One camera port was inserted in the umbilicus before initiating the endoscopic procedure to maintain intra-abdominal pressure, which was monitored and adjusted via this port. While allowing for conversion to laparoscopic surgery if needed, EFTR was performed as follows: (1) circumferential incision of the mucosal and submucosal layers around the lesion was performed by typical endoscopic submucosal dissection; (2) an intentional perforation and subsequent seromuscular resection was made using dental floss and an endo-clip for traction; and (3) closure of the gastric full-thickness defect was performed with an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) after peroral retrieval of the specimen. We retrospectively assessed the short-term outcomes and safety.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed successfully without conversion to laparoscopic surgery. The median size of the resected tumors was 23 mm (range, 8-35 mm), the median resection time was 36 min (range, 22-95 min), and closure time was 18 min (range, 10-45 min). The rates of en bloc and complete resection were 100% and 88%, respectively. In 2 cases, another port was added to aspirate the leaking fluid or check the condition of the endoscopic closure. All gastric defects were endoscopically closed, mainly using OTSCs. The recovery course for all patients was uneventful, and no adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

EROPP is a safe and minimally invasive treatment for gastric GISTs and appears to be suitable for introducing EFTR procedures.

Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy

Background and Aim

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is widely used in the management of biliary obstructions; however, literature on guidewire manipulation is lacking. This study aimed to assess the utility and optimal conditions of the loop technique for guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2015 and January 2022 were included in this study. Patient characteristics and procedural details were retrospectively analyzed. Guidewire manipulations were classified as conventional technique or loop technique, based on the shape of the guidewire tip.

Results

A total of 52 patients (Median age: 73 years, 38 male and 14 female) underwent EUS-HGS. The median guidewire insertion time was 49 s and the median overall procedure time was 20.5 min. The initial guidewire direction was toward the peripheral side in 23 patients (44%). Technical success rate of the EUS-HGS was 100%. Twenty patients (38%) underwent the procedure using the loop technique and 32 (62%) with the conventional technique. In the logistic regression analysis, an angle between the bile duct and needle of >70° was independently associated with use of the loop technique (OR 9.84; 95% CI: 2.24-43.13; P <0.01).

Conclusion

This study revealed the utility of the loop technique in EUS-HGS. This technique is recommended if the bile duct is punctured at an angle >70°.

Nanvuranlat, an L-type amino acid transporter (LAT1) inhibitor for patients with pretreated advanced refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC): Primary endpoint results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study

494

Background: LAT1 is a transporter ( SLC7A5) of L-type amino acid. Overexpression in cancer cells supports aggressive proliferation. High expression of LAT1 in tumor specimens has been identified as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with various cancer types, including BTC. The efficacy and safety of nanvuranlat (JPH203), a first-in-class, single agent that selectively inhibits LAT1, was evaluated in patients with pretreated, advanced, refractory BTC in a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Methods: Patients with four different subtypes of advanced BTC were enrolled: intrahepatic (IHC), extrahepatic (EHC), gallbladder (GBC) and ampulla of Vater (AVC). All were refractory to or intolerant of standard chemotherapy and other investigational medicines. Patients were pre-classified as non-rapid acetylators via N-acetyltransferase 2 ( NAT2), to maximize efficacy/safety by minimizing the metabolism of nanvuranlat. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by blinded independent center review (BICR), using RECIST 1.1. Results: At data cut-off (February 28, 2022), 211 BTC patients were consented at 14 centers in Japan. Using NAT2 testing for classification, a total of 106 patients were randomized (2:1) to nanvuranlat (n = 70) or placebo (n = 36). Nanvuranlat met its primary endpoint and demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS by BICR in comparison with the placebo group (Hazard Ratio = 0.557; 95% CI, 0.3435 – 0.9029; one-sided p = 0.0164). The disease control rate (DCR) in the nanvuranlat group was approximately 25% (average = 24.6%) across all BTC subtypes, while it was 11.4% in the placebo group. Grade 3 adverse events were reported in 30.0% for nanvuranlat vs 22.9% for placebo. Treatment-related adverse event rates were respectively 41.4% and 57.1% in the nanvuranlat and placebo groups. No patient had adverse events leading to nanvuranlat treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, or death. Conclusions: The study met the primary endpoint. LAT1 inhibitor monotherapy with nanvuranlat demonstrated useful clinical efficacy in patients with four different subtypes of pre-treated, advanced, refractory BTC. Safe and highly tolerated profile was also documented. Clinical trial information: UMIN000034080 .

Comparison of clinical features by primary sites in patients with biliary tract cancer who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy: An exploratory analysis of JCOG1113

548

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include gallbladder cancer (GBC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC), and ampulla of Vater cancer (AV). Although it was previously reported that there were differences in clinical features individually, the reported data were limited to data from some subgroup analyses of recent randomized controlled trials. JCOG1113 (UMIN000010667) showed the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine plus cisplatin in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with advanced BTCs. We aimed to compare clinical features among the primary sites of BTCs using JCOG1113 data. Methods: Among the 354 pts enrolled in JCOG1113, 352 pts were included in this analysis except for 2 pts without BTCs. We compared the patient characteristics and treatment outcomes, such as OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), among the four primary sites. Results: Of the 352 pts, 137 pts (38.9%), 94 pts (26.7%), 108 pts (30.7%) and 13 pts (3.7%) had GBC, IHCC, EHCC, and AV, respectively. GBC was more common in females (58.4%) than males, in contrast to the other primary sites. The percentage of pts with metastatic disease for GBC was the highest (78.1%) and involved multiple metastatic organs (41.6%), in contrast with the other primary sites. The median OS for GBC, IHCC, EHCC and AV were 12.6 months (reference), 15.7 months (hazard ratio [HR]; 0.749, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.559-1.005), 16.3 months (0.704, 0.532-0.934) and 11.5 months (1.148, 0.633-2.080), respectively. The median PFS for GBC, IHCC, EHCC and AV were 5.7 months (reference), 6.2 months (0.843, 0.644-1.104), 8.7 months (0.636, 0.489-0.826) and 4.1 months (1.506, 0.851-2.665), respectively. The ORRs for GBC, IHCC, EHCC and AV were 34.4%, 28.9%, 34.4%, and 0.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Except for AV which included a few patients in this trial, GBC showed a poorer prognosis compared with the other primary sites. Furthermore, it was more likely to include metastatic disease and multiple metastases, and this is likely one of the causes of the poorer prognosis. [Table: see text]

Combination Therapy With Lenvatinib and Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients With Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Up-To-Seven Criteria and Child-Pugh Class A Liver function: A Pilot Study

Background

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined lenvatinib (first-line systemic therapy) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with beyond up-to-seven criteria and Child-Pugh Class A liver function (CP A B2-HCC).

Methods

Twenty-two patients with CP A B2-HCC were enrolled in the study. The patients had no history of systemic treatment. For the initial lenvatinib administration in this study, all of the patients had an adequate course of treatment (no less than two weeks) and were administered the recommended dose. Of them, 13 were treated by means of lenvatinib monotherapy (monotherapy group), while the 9 patients with no contraindication to RFA operation and who had consented to RFA received initial lenvatinib plus subsequent RFA (combination group). The clinical outcomes that were considered to evaluate the treatments included tumor response, prognosis (recurrence and survivals), and possible adverse events (serum liver enzymes and clinically visible complications).

Results

The combination group exhibited a higher object response rate (9/9, 100%) as best tumor response than the monotherapy group (10/13, 76.9%). Longer progression-free survival (PFS) (12.5 months) and overall survival (OS) (21.3) were demonstrated in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (PFS: 5.5 months; OS:17.1 months). The combination group achieved a higher PFS rate (1-year: 74.1%) and OS rate (2-year: 80%) than the monotherapy group (1-year PFS rate: 0%; 2-year OS rate: 25.6%; for PFS, p<0.001; for OS, p=0.022). The treatment strategy was the independent factor for PFS (HR: 18.215 for monotherapy, p =0.010), which was determined by Cox regression analysis, suggesting that a combination strategy may reduce tumor progression when compared to the use of lenvatinib alone. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences that were observed in terms of adverse events, with the exception of ALT elevation (p=0.007) in the combination group.

Conclusion

Our newly proposed combination therapy may potentially be effective and safe for CP A B2-HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria. A larger scale, multicenter, prospective study is warranted to confirm our findings.

Novel clip device for prevention of bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy

Objectives

Recently, a novel clip device, SureClip^® (Micro‐Tech Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China), has been developed, which improved rotation and reopening performance. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the SureClip^® in prophylactic closure of the mucosal break after endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for ampullary neoplasm.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients who underwent EP for ampullary neoplasms between October 2009 and March 2020. Prophylactic closure after resection was performed using the conventional clip between 2014 and 2018, and with the SureClip^® after 2019. The baseline characteristics, techniques, outcomes, and complications of EP were analyzed.

Results

The median age of the patients (25 males and 15 females) was 70 years. The en block resection rate was 82.5% and the curative resection rate was 80.0%. Histologically, 11 (27.5%) patients had malignancy. Prophylactic closure was performed in 29 (72.5%) patients (17 conventional clips, 12 SureClip^®). Complications occurred in 18 (45.0%) patients, including postprocedure bleeding in 9 (22.5%) patients. However, no postprocedure bleeding was observed in the patients who received prophylactic closure using the SureClip^® (p = 0.038). All other factors were not significantly correlated with postprocedure bleeding. The duration of hospital stay after EP was significantly shorter in patients treated with the SureClip^® compared to those treated with a conventional clip or without clips (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In the present study, prophylactic clipping of the mucosal break using the SureClip^® was effective in preventing bleeding after EP.

The influence of major hepatectomy on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: An exploratory subset analysis of JCOG1113

419

Background: JCOG1113 (UMIN000001685) is a randomized phase III trial in patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) that shows the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) regarding overall survival (OS). Previous reports suggest that a history of major hepatectomy (MH) may affect dose intensity and adverse event (AE) frequency and reduce treatment efficacy in chemotherapy due to impairment of liver function and drug metabolism. We thus investigated whether a history of MH affects the frequency of AEs and treatment efficacy in recurrent BTC pts in JCOG1113. Methods: Among the 354 pts enrolled in JCOG1113, 76 recurrent pts with recurrence after surgery were included in this analysis. We compared the frequency of AEs, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS of GC vs. GS in pts treated with MH vs. non-major hepatectomy (NMH). Results: Of the 76 pts, 17 on GC and 13 on GS were included in the MH group, while 20 on GC and 26 on GS were included in the NMH group. The primary sites were only intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the MH group, and there were no differences between the groups regarding sex, performance status, biliary drainage, or site of recurrence. The hazard ratio (HR) of GS to GC for PFS was 0.74 (95% CI 0.35–1.56) in the MH group and 0.97 (95% CI 0.52–1.82) in the NMH group. The hazard ratio (HR) of GS to GC for OS was 0.99 (95% CI 0.418–2.36) in the MH group and 1.17 (95% CI 0.59–2.33) in the NMH group. The median PFS and OS for GS in the MH group were 12.2 months and 21.5 months. These were longer than the 6.8 months and 15.1 months in the original results for GS in JCOG1113. Regarding AEs, Grade 3-4 AEs, specifically neutrophil count decreased (73.1%/92.3%), platelet count decreased (3.9%/15.4%), and rash (7.7%/15.4%), were more common in MH pts than NMH pts on GS. On GC, AEs in the MH and NMH pts did not show any consistent trends. The relative dose intensities (RDIs) of gemcitabine (70.7%/62.5%) and S-1 (70.4%/54.5%) were lower in MH pts than NMH pts on GS. The RDIs of gemcitabine (67.4%/63.0%) and cisplatin (73.6%/65.0%) were slightly lower in MH pts than NMH pts on GC. Conclusions: For pts with a history of MH, some AEs increased, and the RDIs were lower, especially that of S-1 for GS. On the other hand, the HR for PFS suggests that GS may be more effective than GC in MH pts.

Tissue harmonic versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors: Prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

This prospective multicenter study aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of tissue harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (TH-EUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) for differentiating pancreatic carcinoma from other pancreatic tumors.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic tumors were prospectively enrolled between August 2013 and December 2014. To assess the accuracy of TH-EUS and CH-EUS, we compared four parameters of TH-EUS (fuzzy edge, irregular periphery, hypoechogenicity, and heterogeneous internal echogenicity) and four parameters of CH-EUS (hypoenhancement and heterogeneous enhancement in the early and late phases, respectively) to investigate which parameter of each method was most suitable to diagnose pancreatic carcinomas. Interobserver agreement and the diagnostic ability of pancreatic carcinoma using TH-EUS and CH-EUS were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients were enrolled. For the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, interobserver agreement by experts and nonexperts was 0.33-0.50 and 0.35-0.50 for TH-EUS, respectively, and 0.72-0.74 and 0.20-0.54 for CH-EUS, respectively. Irregular periphery was the most accurate diagnostic parameter among TH-EUS findings for differentiating pancreatic carcinomas, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 95.0%, 42.9%, and 78.9%, respectively. Late phase hypoenhancement was the most accurate diagnostic parameter among CH-EUS findings for differentiating pancreatic carcinomas, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 90.8%, 74.6%, and 85.8%, respectively. The accuracy of CH-EUS (late phase hypoenhancement) for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma was significantly higher than that of TH-EUS (irregular periphery) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In comparison with TH-EUS, CH-EUS increased the diagnostic ability and reproducibility for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. UMIN (000011124).

A prospective multicenter study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using a 22-gauge Franseen needle for pancreatic solid lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIM

While encouraging data of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using a 22-gauge Franseen needle have been reported, large-scale data of per pass and quantitative analyses are still lacking.

METHODS

This was a multicenter prospective study of EUS-FNB using the 22-gauge Franseen needle for a pancreatic solid lesion. Cytological and histological analyses per pass were evaluated and semi-quantitative analyses were performed on core tissue and blood contamination. Primary end-point was diagnostic accuracy per session. Prognostic factors were analyzed for diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, core tissue, and blood contamination.

RESULTS

A total of 629 passes were performed in 244 cases at 14 centers between 2018 and 2019. The median tumor size was 29 mm, and the puncture was transduodenal in 43%. The median pass number was 2. Diagnostic accuracy per session, at a first pass, and per pass were 93%, 90%, and 88%. In 198 cases with pancreatic cancer, diagnostic sensitivity per session, at a first pass, and per pass were 94%, 89%, and 89%. The rates of core tissue score of 4 and blood contamination score of 3 were 50% and 47%. The adverse event rate was 1.6%. In the multivariate analysis, tumor size ≤20 mm (odds ratio [OR] of 0.46, P = 0.03), transduodenal puncture (OR of 0.53, P = 0.04), and suction (OR of 0.16, P = 0.01) were associated with lower diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The EUS-FNB using the 22-gauge Franseen needle for pancreatic solid lesions showed high per pass and overall diagnostic accuracy.

Multiple-line Chemotherapy for a Patient with Unresectable Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm of the Pancreas

A 74-year-old woman with a cyst in her pancreatic tail was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography confirmed a large cystic lesion with irregular wall thickening, abdominal lymph node swelling, and ascites. We diagnosed her with an unresectable mucinous cystic neoplasm, since ascites cytology revealed adenocarcinoma. The patient received chemotherapy up to the fifth line for 55.2 months. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and modified FOLFIRINOX achieved a partial response with a progression-free survival time of 12.1 and 20.4 months, respectively. The overall survival time from the beginning of first-line chemotherapy was 69.4 months.

Impact of Renal Function on S-1 + Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of Data From 2 Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVES

S-1 monotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although renal dysfunction increases S-1 monotherapy toxicity, its effect in S-1 with concurrent RT remains unknown. We evaluated the effect of renal function on the safety of S-1 with RT for LAPC.

METHODS

We performed an integrated exploratory post hoc analysis of data from 2 prospective studies (JCOG1106 and LAPC-S1RT), where patients with LAPC received RT (50.4 Gy/28 fraction for 5.5 weeks) and concurrent S-1 (40 mg/m2 per dose, twice daily on the day of irradiation). We split the patients into high creatinine clearance (CCr; ≥80 mL/min) and low CCr (<80 mL/min) groups and compared the findings to determine treatment safety.

RESULTS

The high and low CCr groups showed a median of 97.5 (range, 80.0-194.6) and 64.4 (range, 50.0-78.3) mL/min, respectively. The low CCr group presented more adverse reactions (ARs) of grade 3 or higher and gastrointestinal ARs of grade 2 or higher than the high CCr group (30.8% vs 15.8% and 51.9% vs 36.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ARs associated with concurrent S-1 and RT increases in patients with low CCr; therefore, ARs should be duly considered in such patients.

Trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial to verify the non-inferiority of a partially covered self-expandable metal stent to an uncovered self-expandable metal stent for biliary drainage during neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer with obstructive jaundice (PUN-NAC trial)

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAC/NACRT) for resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic cancers was recently performed to improve clinical outcomes and led to good results, although it remains controversial whether NAC/NACRT is beneficial for resectable pancreatic cancer. A few recent studies revealed longer patency and lower cost related to the stent occlusion of a metal stent than those of a plastic stent during NAC/NACRT. It also remains controversial which type of self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is the most suitable for patients with resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic cancer during NAC/NACRT: an uncovered SEMS (USEMS), a fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) or a partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS). So far, two randomised controlled trials indicated that a USEMS and an FCSEMS were similar in preoperative stent dysfunction and adverse event rate. Thus, we aimed to verify the non-inferiority of a PCSEMS to a USEMS in this multicentre randomised controlled trial.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a multicentre randomised controlled trial, for which we will recruit 100 patients with resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and distal biliary obstruction scheduled for NAC/NACRT from 13 high-volume institutions. Patients will be randomly allocated to the PCSEMS group or USEMS group. The primary outcome measure is the preoperative biliary event rate. Data will be analysed after completion of the study. We will calculate the 95% CIs of the incidence of preoperative biliary events in each group and analyse whether the difference between them is within the non-inferiority margin (10%).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the institutional review board of Hokkaido University Hospital. The results will be submitted for presentation at an international medical conference and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000041737; jRCT1012200002.

A Prospective Multicenter Study of "Inside Stents" for Biliary Stricture: Multicenter Evolving Inside Stent Registry (MEISteR)

Background: Endoscopic biliary stent placement is the standard of care for biliary strictures, but stents across the papilla are prone to duodenobiliary reflux, which can cause stent occlusion. Preliminary studies of “inside stents” placed above the papilla showed encouraging outcomes, but prospective data with a large cohort were not reported. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter registry of commercially available inside stents for benign and malignant biliary strictures. Primary endpoint was recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO). Secondary endpoints were technical success of stent placement and removal, adverse events, and stricture resolution. Results: A total of 209 inside stents were placed in 132 (51 benign and 81 malignant) cases with biliary strictures in 10 Japanese centers. During the follow-up period of 8.4 months, RBO was observed in 19% of benign strictures. The RBO rate was 49% in malignant strictures, with the median time to RBO of 4.7 months. Technical success rates of stent placement and removal were both 100%. The adverse event rate was 8%. Conclusion: This prospective multicenter study demonstrated that inside stents above the papilla were feasible in malignant and benign biliary strictures, but a randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm its superiority to conventional stents across the papilla.

Hemoperitoneum due to a ruptured right gastroepiploic artery following non-interventional endoscopic ultrasonography: a case report

Endoscopic ultrasonography has become a routine procedure in clinical practice and is widely accepted as a safe procedure. Previous studies have reported that severe bleeding rarely occurs even when performing fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Severe hemorrhage following non-interventional endoscopic ultrasonography has never been reported. We herein report a case of hemorrhagic shock due to hemoperitoneum caused by a ruptured right gastroepiploic artery consequent to a diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography. The patient was administered two antithrombotic agents. An extensive diagnostic workup contributed to the correct diagnosis, which led to a successful treatment by transcatheter arterial embolization. Endoscopists should be aware of this rare, but potentially fatal, adverse event of endoscopic ultrasonography.

Comparison of gemcitabine-based chemotherapies for advanced biliary tract cancers by renal function: an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113

JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) (UMIN000001685), and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) was not inferior to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC). However, poor renal function often results in high toxicity of S-1. Therefore, we examined whether GS can be recommended for patients with low creatinine clearance (CCr). Renal function was classified by CCr as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula: high CCr (CCr ≥ 80 ml/min) and low CCr (80 > CCr ≥ 50 ml/min). Of 354 patients, 87 patients on GC and 91 on GS were included in the low CCr group, while there were 88 patients on GC and 88 patients on GS in the high CCr group. The HR of overall survival for GS compared with GC was 0.687 (95% CI 0.504–0.937) in the low CCr group. Although the total number of incidences of all Grade 3–4 non-haematological adverse reactions was higher (36.0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.0002), the number of patients who discontinued treatment was not different (14.1% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.679) for GS compared with GC in the low CCr group. This study suggests that GS should be selected for the treatment of advanced BTC patients with reduced renal function.

Randomized phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with versus without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial, JCOG1106

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is a treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy is uncertain. The aim of this randomized, multicentre phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy to determine the significance of induction chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm A) or induction chemotherapy followed by the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm B). Patients in Arm A underwent radiotherapy with concurrent S-1. Patients in Arm B received induction gemcitabine for 12 weeks, and thereafter, only patients with controlled disease underwent the same chemoradiotherapy as Arm A. After chemoradiotherapy, gemcitabine was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in both arms. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

Amongst 102 patients enrolled, 100 were eligible for efficacy assessment. The probability of survival was greater in Arm B in the first 12 months, but the trend was reversed in the following periods (1-year survival 66.7 vs. 69.3%, 2-year survival 36.9 vs. 18.9%). The hazard ratio was 1.255 (95% confidence interval 0.816-1.930) in favour of Arm A. Gastrointestinal toxicity was slightly more frequent and three treatment-related deaths occurred in Arm A.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that the chemoradiotherapy using S-1 alone had more promising efficacy with longer-term survival, compared with induction gemcitabine followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000006811.

Analysis of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin or gemcitabine plus S-1: An exploratory analysis of JCOG1113

301

Background: JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of gemcitabine (GEM) plus S-1 (GS) compared with GEM plus cisplatin (GC) regarding overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Although the non-inferiority of GS to GC was demonstrated, the difference in the nature of tumor shrinkage effects between GC and GS is not clear. Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) are considered as on-treatment markers that reflect the anti-tumor effect to chemotherapy and have been reported to be associated with survival in metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are few studies assessing ETS or DpR in advanced BTC. Therefore, we evaluated the association between ETS, DpR, and clinical outcomes in JCOG1113. Methods: We conducted an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113, which included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC. ETS was defined as tumor reduction in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions at week 6 when compared with that at baseline. DpR was defined as the maximum tumor shrinkage observed until 12 weeks from enrollment. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for ETS and DpR were estimated from week 6 and 12 (landmarks) after enrollment, respectively. Multivariable analyses for PFS and OS, adjusted for baseline factors, were performed using a stratified Cox regression model. Results: Of the 354 registered patients in JCOG1113, 277 patients in the ETS group and 230 patients in the DpR group were included in this study. Seventy-seven patients (27.8%) achieved ETS ≥ 20% (ETS high group) and 52 patients (22.6%) achieved DpR ≥ 40% (DpR high group). The proportion of ETS high group (GC, 25.4%; GS, 30.4%) and DpR high group (GC, 21.2%; GS, 24.1%) was similar between the arms. The patient characteristics of ETS high group were not different between GC and GS. The hazard ratio (HR) of the ETS high group compared with the ETS low group for PFS and OS was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–1.00) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.60–1.07), respectively. The impact of ETS was higher in GC (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43–0.95) than GS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.60–1.28) in PFS. The HR of DpR high group compared with DpR low group for PFS and OS was 0.75 (95% CI 0.55–1.03) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.57–1.09), respectively. The impact of DpR was higher in GC (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40–0.998) than GS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.57–1.37) in PFS. ETS and DpR were significantly associated with both PFS and OS in the multivariable analyses. Conclusions: ETS and DpR may be useful as on-treatment markers associated with PFS and OS in patients with advanced BTC, especially in those treated with GC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000010667.

Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Monotherapy vs. Gemcitabine with an EPA-Enriched Oral Supplement in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is often associated with cachexia. It had been reported that eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) improve cachexia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine with an EPA-enriched oral supplement in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This open-label phase II study consisted of patients (pts) who were randomly categorized into the EPA group (1,000 mg/m² gemcitabine was administered on day 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks while an EPA-enriched oral supplement (prosure®, EPA 1.056 mg per pack) was taken daily at the maximum of two packs or the gemcitabine monotherapy group with an allocation ratio of 2:1. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the 1-year survival estimating 10% addition.

RESULTS

Randomized 68 pts were examined (EPA: 45, gemcitabine: 23). The 1-year survival probability of the EPA group was 35% while the gemcitabine group was 19%. The median survival times were 8.2 and 9.7 mo, respectively. The hazard ratio for EPA group was 0.79 [95% CI 0.46-1.37]; (P = 0.40). The toxicities were mild and insignificant in both groups. More beneficial effects of EPA in survival were observed in men, pancreatic body-tail and low C-reactive protein patients.

CONCLUSION

An EPA-enriched oral supplement may be effective in advanced pancreatic cancer.

nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV in post-gemcitabine metastatic pancreatic cancer: Randomized phase 2 trial in Japanese patients

BACKGROUND

In the NAPOLI-1 phase 3 trial, liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) +5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) significantly increased mPFS versus 5-FU/LV (3.1 vs. 1.5 months [unstratified HR = 0.56, p = 0.0001]) in patients with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine-based therapy. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated nal-IRI+5-FU/LV tolerability (Part 1), safety, and efficacy (Part 2; outcomes reported here) in Japanese patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs. ≥90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dl vs. <4.0 g/dl). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA19-9 response, and QoL. The ITT population comprised all randomized patients.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics differed between nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 40) and 5-FU/LV (n = 39) arms, including baseline hepatic lesions (63% vs. 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs. 51%), and post-study anticancer therapy (55% vs. 72%). Investigator-assessed mPFS increase with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant versus 5-FU/LV (2.7 vs. 1.5 months, HR = 0.60). Independently assessed mPFS showed similar trends (1.7 vs. 1.6 months, HR = 0.79). mOS was 6.3 months with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and not reached with 5-FU/LV. ORR increased significantly with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV (18% vs. 0, rate difference 17.5). Commonly reported grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs. 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs. 0), and diarrhea (17% vs. 3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator-assessed PFS and ORR were observed with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02697058).

Clinical outcome of a highly flexible duodenal stent for gastric outlet obstruction: A multicenter prospective study

Background and Aim

Endoscopic duodenal stenting for patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has been widespread; however, clinical trials evaluating the structures of duodenal stents are lacking. Thus, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of a highly flexible duodenal stent for GOO patients.

Methods

A prospective study of duodenal stenting for GOO patients from five hospitals between August 2017 and August 2018 was performed. WallFlex Duodenal Soft were used in all procedures. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as an improvement in the GOO scoring system.

Results

The study enrolled 31 patients (12 women, 19 men) with GOO, with a median age of 70 (range 52–90) years. Primary diseases were pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, biliary tract cancer, and others in 14, 10, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. The technical success rate was 97%, and the clinical success rate was 87%. Simultaneous biliary drainage was performed in 19% of patients. Adverse events occurred in three patients. Chemotherapy was given in 41% of clinically successful cases, and the median overall survival time after stent placement was 82 days (range, 30–341 days), and. Stent dysfunction occurred in 30% of clinically successful cases (stent ingrowth in seven and stent overgrowth in one patient). The median time to stent dysfunction was 157 days (range, 11–183 days). Six patients were treated with additional stent placement after dysfunction.

Conclusion

Placement of a highly flexible duodenal stent is an effective and safe treatment for patients with GOO (UMIN‐CTR 000028783).

Quantitative monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy

According to cancer genome sequences, more than 90% of cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) harbor active KRAS mutations. Digital PCR (dPCR) enables accurate detection and quantification of rare mutations. We assessed the dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ct-DNA) in patients with advanced PDAC undergoing chemotherapy using dPCR. KRAS G12/13 mutation was assayed by dPCR in 47 paired tissue- and ct-DNA samples. The 21 patients were subjected to quantitative ct-DNA monitoring at 4 to 8-week intervals during chemotherapy. KRAS mutation was detected in 45 of those 47 patients using tissue DNA. In the KRAS mutation-negative cases, next-generation sequencing revealed KRAS Q61K and NRAS Q61R mutations. KRAS mutation was detected in 23/45 cases using ct-DNA (liver or lung metastasis, 18/19; mutation allele frequency [MAF], 0.1%-31.7%; peritoneal metastasis, 3/9 [0.1%], locally advanced, 2/17 [0.1%-0.2%]). In the ct-DNA monitoring, the MAF value changed in concordance with the disease state. In the 6 locally advanced cases, KRAS mutation appeared concurrently with liver metastasis. Among the 6 cases with liver metastasis, KRAS mutation disappeared during the duration of stable disease or a partial response, and reappeared at the time of progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was longer in cases in which KRAS mutation disappeared after an initial course of chemotherapy than in those in which it was continuously detected (248.5 vs 50 days, P < .001). Therefore, ct-DNA monitoring enables continuous assessment of disease state and could have prognostic utility during chemotherapy.

Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 - 1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea.

RESULTS

Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC [median OS: 13.4 months with GC and 15.1 months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority]. The median PFS was 5.8 months with GC and 6.8 months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm.

CONCLUSIONS

GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.

Differential diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the differential diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPLs).

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with GPLs (17 with gallbladder cancer, 19 with benign polyps) who underwent CEUS were enrolled in the study. The mean age of patients was 65.7 ± 12.6 years. Perflubutane-based contrast agent and high-mechanical index mode, which can eliminate the background B-mode and provide precise visualization of tumor vessels, were used for CEUS, and two blinded readers evaluated the images, retrospectively.

RESULTS

Patient age and size of malignant GPLs (72.4 ± 9.4 years and 23.4 ± 7.5 mm) were significantly greater than those for benign lesions (59.6 ± 12.3 years and 12.4 ± 2.9 mm) (P < 0.01, respectively), and the receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the cut-off value as over 65 years and 16 mm. Univariate analysis showed that heterogeneity in B-mode (80% [12/15]), sessile shape (76% [13/17]), dilated vessel (71% [12/17]), irregular vessel (82% [14/17]), and heterogeneous enhancement (59% [10/17]) on CEUS were significantly correlated with malignant GPLs (P < 0.01, respectively). On CEUS, the diagnostic criterion for malignant GPLs was defined as having one or more of the above four features because of the highest accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for malignant GBLs were 88%, 68%, and 78% for patient age; 76%, 89%, and 83% for size of GPLs; 80%, 68%, and 74% for B-mode; and 94%, 89%, and 92% for CEUS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS is useful for the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign GPLs.

The influence of renal function on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: An exploratory subgroup analysis of JCOG1113

368

Background: JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial to evaluate gemcitabine (GEM) plus S-1 (GS) versus GEM plus cisplatin (GC) regarding overall survival (OS) for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) (UMIN000001685) and the non-inferiority of GS was demonstrated. It is necessary to consider renal function using cisplatin or S-1 because cisplatin has renal toxicity, and the toxicity of S-1 is affected by renal function. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of renal function on the efficacy and safety of GC and GS in JCOG1113. Methods: All enrolled patients (pts) in JCOG1113 (n = 354) were analyzed. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve pts with recurrent or unresectable biliary tract adenocarcinoma, ECOG-PS of 0–1, CCr > 50 ml/min, and adequate organ function. Renal function was classified into two groups by creatinine clearance (CCr) as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula; high CCr (CCr ≥ 80 ml/min) or low CCr (80 > CCr ≥ 50 ml/min). The impact of renal function on OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using the Cox regression model. The adverse events (AEs) were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Eighty-eight pts on GC and 88 pts on GS were included in the high CCr group, and 87 pts on GC and 91 pts on GS were included in the low CCr group. There were no differences between the groups regarding, sex, PS, primary site, biliary drainage, operation, or recurrence, except for age. The hazard ratio (HR) of GS to GC for OS was 1.12 (95% CI 0.81–1.56) in the high CCr group and 0.80 (95% CI 0.58–1.11) in the low CCr group. The HR of GS to GC for PFS was 1.06 (95% CI 0.78–1.44) in the high CCr group and 0.69 (95% CI 0.50–0.94) in the low CCr group. Grade 3-4 AEs of white blood cell count decreased (35.3%/23.6%), anemia (29.4%/7.9%) and platelet count decreased (18.8%/10.1%) were more common in GC than GS in the low CCr group. In contrast, the incidence of all grade 3-4 non-hematological AEs was higher (36.0%/11.8%) in GS than GC in the low CCr group ( p = 0.0002). Conclusions: GS was better in terms of OS, PFS, and hematological toxicities than GC in the low CCr group. GS might be recommended for the population with lower renal function in the treatment for advanced BTC.

Impact of renal function on the efficacy and safety of S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

301

Background: S-1 is an oral agent consisting of a mixture of tegafur which is a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine (DHP) and potassium oxonate. Serum concentration of 5-FU increases in case of renal dysfunction due to decrease of DHP excretion into urine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of renal function to the efficacy and safety of S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: This study was an integrated exploratory analysis of JCOG1106 and LAPC- S1RT, in which pts with LAPC received RT (50.4Gy/28 fr over 5.5 weeks) and concurrent S-1 (40 mg/m2/dose, bid. on the day of irradiation). Eligibility criteria for this study were pts who received both irradiation and S-1 at least once without induction chemotherapy, and who had creatinine clearance (CCr) ≥ 50 ml/min at the time of registration. We assigned pts into high (≥ 80 ml/min) and low (< 80 ml/min) CCr groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ≥ Grade 3 adverse reactions (ARs). Secondary endpoints were the incidence of ≥ Grade 2 gastrointestinal ARs (GI-ARs) defined as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and mucositis oral, relative dose intensity of S-1, CA19-9 response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Fifty and 59 pts were included in this study from JCOG1106 and LAPC-S1RT, respectively. Median age was 65 years old (range: 31–80), and 57 pts were male. Median CCr was 80.4 ml/min. High CCr group included 57 pts and the median was 97.5 ml/min (range 80.0–194.6), and low CCr group included 52 pts and the median was 64.4 ml/min (range 50.0–78.3). Low CCr group tended to have more ≥ Grade 3 ARs and ≥ Grade 2 GI-ARs compared to high CCr group (30.8% vs. 15.8% and 51.9% vs. 36.8%). However, no evident tendencies were observed in other secondary endpoints. Multivariable analysis showed risk ratio of low CCr group for ≥ G3 ARs was 1.493 [95% CI: 0.710–3.145], although risk ratio of females was 2.486 [95% CI: 1.043–5.924]. Conclusions: Our study indicated that renal dysfunction may increase adverse reactions in the treatment of S-1 with concurrent RT for LAPC, and we should pay attention to renal function and consider for dose reduction.

The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: An exploratory subgroup analysis of JCOG1113

349

Background: JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) in overall survival (OS). In the final analysis, GS demonstrated non-inferiority to GC in OS and was considered as a new option of standard of care for advanced BTC. However, there are few reports on the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced BTC. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced BTC. Methods: Among all enrolled patients in JCOG1113, ≥ 75 years old patients were included in this exploratory subgroup analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of age at baseline on OS and PFS. Clinically relevant adverse events (AEs) were defined as any of grade 2 or more fatigue, appetite loss, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, and diarrhea, and were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Among all enrolled patients, 155 patients in GC and 139 patients in GS were included in < 75 years old cohort and 20 patients in GC and 40 patients in GS were included in ≥ 75 years old cohort.The HR of ≥ 75 years old cohort to < 75 years old cohort for OS was 0.96 (95% CI 0.71–1.30) in all enrolled patients. The HR of ≥ 75 years old cohort to < 75 years old cohort for OS was 1.26 (95% CI 0.77–2.04) in GC, and 0.84 (95% CI 0.56–1.24) in GS. The HR of ≥ 75 years old cohort to < 75 years old cohort for PFS was 1.01 (95% CI 0.63–1.61) in GC, and 0.78 (95% CI 0.54–1.12) in GS. Clinically relevant AEs were 36.1% in < 75 years old cohort and 25.0% in ≥ 75 years old cohort in GC, and 29.5% in < 75 years old cohort and 32.5% in ≥ 75 years old cohort in GS. Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients were comparable to non-elderly patients. Clinical trial information: 000010667.

TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (GRAPE trial)

BACKGROUND

In our previous randomised phase 2 study for patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer, S-1 plus leucovorin improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 alone. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 centres in Japan and Korea. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed during first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or recurred during or after post-operative gemcitabine-based adjuvant treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either S-1 (40-60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or TAS-118 (S-1 40-60 mg plus leucovorin 25 mg, twice daily for 1 week in a 2-week cycle). The primary end-point was OS.

RESULTS

A total of 603 patients were randomised, and 300 and 301 patients received TAS-118 and S-1, respectively. There was no difference in OS between groups (median OS for TAS-118 versus S-1, 7.6 months versus 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-1.16]; P = 0.756). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with TAS-118 than S-1 (median, 3.9 months versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]; P = 0.009). There were interactions between Japan and Korea (P = 0.004) and between unresectable and recurrent disease (P = 0.025) in OS. Incidence, profile and severity of adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

TAS-118 did not improve OS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer compared to S-1. Further studies are needed to find patients who have benefit from adding leucovorin to S-1.

Multicenter study of endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: E-POD hilar study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) is often recommended in preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), but endoscopic biliary stent (EBS) is also used in the clinical practice. We conducted this large-scale multicenter study to compare ENBD and EBS in this setting.

METHODS

A total of 374 cases undergoing PBD including 281 ENBD and 76 EBS for hilar MBO in 29 centers were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) accounted for 69.8% and Bismuth-Corlette classification was III or more in 58.8% of the study population. Endoscopic PBD was technically successful in 94.6%, and adverse event rate was 21.9%. The rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis was 16.0%, and non-endoscopic sphincterotomy was the only risk factor (odds ratio [OR] 2.51). Preoperative re-intervention was performed in 61.5%: planned re-interventions in 48.4% and unplanned re-interventions in 31.0%. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was placed in 6.4% at the time of surgery. The risk factors for unplanned procedures were ECC (OR 2.64) and total bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL (OR 2.18). In surgically resected cases, prognostic factors were ECC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57), predraiange magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (HR 1.62) and unplanned re-interventions (HR 1.81). EBS was not associated with increased adverse events, unplanned re-interventions, or a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective analysis did not demonstrate the advantage of ENBD over EBS as the initial PBD for resectable hilar MBO. Although the technical success rate of endoscopic PBD was high, its re-intervention rate was not negligible, and unplanned re-intervention was associated with a poor prognosis in resected hilar MBO.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: A Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG1113, FUGA-BT)

205

Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, GC is considered to be toxic because of nausea, vomiting, and appetite loss, and inconvenient due to requiring hydration before and after administration. GEM plus S-1 (GS) was reported to be promising with preferable efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile (UMIN000001685). This phase III study aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC in terms of overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable biliary tract adenocarcinoma (gallbladder, intrahepatic biliary tract, extrahepatic biliary tract, or ampulla of Vater), an ECOG-PS of 0–1, and adequate organ function. In the GC arm, 1 g/m2 of GEM and 25 mg/m2 of cisplatin was infused on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. In the GS arm, 1 g/m2 of GEM was infused on days 1 and 8, and S-1 60, 80, or 100 mg/day according to body-surface area was administered from days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was OS and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), clinically relevant AEs defined as any of grade 2 or more fatigue, appetite loss, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, and diarrhea. The sample size was calculated to be 350 with a one-sided alpha of 5%, a power of 80%, non-inferiority margin of 1.155 in terms of hazard ratio (HR). Results: From May 2013 to March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. The non-inferiority of GS to GC was demonstrated (median OS: 13.4 months (m) in GC and 15.1 m in GS, HR 0.95; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78 to 1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority). Median PFS was 5.8 m in GC and 6.8 m in GS (HR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.70-1.07). RR was 32.4% in GC and 29.8% in GS. Preliminary AEs data demonstrated that both treatments were generally well tolerated, although clinically relevant AEs were observed 34.7% in GC and 31.2 % in GS. Conclusions: GS demonstrated non-inferiority to GC in OS with good tolerability and was considered as new convenient option of standard of care without hydration for advanced BTC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000010667.