1
|
Nakajima EC, Simpson A, Bogaerts J, de Vries EGE, Do R, Garalda E, Goldmacher G, Kinahan PE, Lambin P, LeStage B, Li Q, Lin F, Litière S, Perez-Lopez R, Petrick N, Schwartz L, Seymour L, Shankar L, Laurie SA. Tumor Size Is Not Everything: Advancing Radiomics as a Precision Medicine Biomarker in Oncology Drug Development and Clinical Care. A Report of a Multidisciplinary Workshop Coordinated by the RECIST Working Group. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300687. [PMID: 38635935 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiomics, the science of extracting quantifiable data from routine medical images, is a powerful tool that has many potential applications in oncology. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Working Group (RWG) held a workshop in May 2022, which brought together various stakeholders to discuss the potential role of radiomics in oncology drug development and clinical trials, particularly with respect to response assessment. This article summarizes the results of that workshop, reviewing radiomics for the practicing oncologist and highlighting the work that needs to be done to move forward the incorporation of radiomics into clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Richard Do
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - Elena Garalda
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Frank Lin
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Lesley Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Scott A Laurie
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bou-Samra P, Muhammad N, Chang A, Karsalia R, Azari F, Kennedy G, Stummer W, Tanyi J, Martin L, Vahrmeijer A, Smith B, Rosenthal E, Wagner P, Rice D, Lee A, Abdelhafeez A, Malek MM, Kohanbash G, Barry Edwards W, Henderson E, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Orosco R, Gibbs S, Farnam RW, Shankar L, Sumer B, Kumar ATN, Marcu L, Li L, Greuv V, Delikatny EJ, Lee JYK, Singhal S. Intraoperative molecular imaging: 3rd biennial clinical trials update. J Biomed Opt 2023; 28:050901. [PMID: 37193364 PMCID: PMC10182831 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.28.5.050901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Significance This third biennial intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) conference shows how optical contrast agents have been applied to develop clinically significant endpoints that improve precision cancer surgery. Aim National and international experts on IMI presented ongoing clinical trials in cancer surgery and preclinical work. Previously known dyes (with broader applications), new dyes, novel nonfluorescence-based imaging techniques, pediatric dyes, and normal tissue dyes were discussed. Approach Principal investigators presenting at the Perelman School of Medicine Abramson Cancer Center's third clinical trials update on IMI were selected to discuss their clinical trials and endpoints. Results Dyes that are FDA-approved or currently under clinical investigation in phase 1, 2, and 3 trials were discussed. Sections on how to move benchwork research to the bedside were also included. There was also a dedicated section for pediatric dyes and nonfluorescence-based dyes that have been newly developed. Conclusions IMI is a valuable adjunct in precision cancer surgery and has broad applications in multiple subspecialties. It has been reliably used to alter the surgical course of patients and in clinical decision making. There remain gaps in the utilization of IMI in certain subspecialties and potential for developing newer and improved dyes and imaging techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Bou-Samra
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Najib Muhammad
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Austin Chang
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Ritesh Karsalia
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Feredun Azari
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Gregory Kennedy
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Walter Stummer
- University of Muenster, Department of Neurosurgery, Muenster, Germany
| | - Janos Tanyi
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Linda Martin
- University of Virginia, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | | | - Barbara Smith
- Harvard University, School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Eben Rosenthal
- Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Patrick Wagner
- Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - David Rice
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Amy Lee
- Seattle’s Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | | | - Marcus M. Malek
- Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Gary Kohanbash
- The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | | | - Eric Henderson
- Dartmouth College, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States
| | | | - Ryan Orosco
- The University of New Mexico Medical Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Summer Gibbs
- Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | | | - Lalitha Shankar
- National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Baran Sumer
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Anand T. N. Kumar
- Harvard University, School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Laura Marcu
- University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, United States
| | - Lei Li
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States
| | - Victor Greuv
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, United States
| | - Edward J. Delikatny
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - John Y. K. Lee
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Sunil Singhal
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Address all correspondence to Sunil Singhal,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Treviño M, Birdsong G, Carrigan A, Choyke P, Drew T, Eckstein M, Fernandez A, Gallas BD, Giger M, Hewitt SM, Horowitz TS, Jiang YV, Kudrick B, Martinez-Conde S, Mitroff S, Nebeling L, Saltz J, Samuelson F, Seltzer SE, Shabestari B, Shankar L, Siegel E, Tilkin M, Trueblood JS, Van Dyke AL, Venkatesan AM, Whitney D, Wolfe JM. Advancing Research on Medical Image Perception by Strengthening Multidisciplinary Collaboration. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 6:6491257. [DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Medical image interpretation is central to detecting, diagnosing, and staging cancer and many other disorders. At a time when medical imaging is being transformed by digital technologies and artificial intelligence, understanding the basic perceptual and cognitive processes underlying medical image interpretation is vital for increasing diagnosticians’ accuracy and performance, improving patient outcomes, and reducing diagnostician burn-out. Medical image perception remains substantially understudied. In September of 2019, the National Cancer Institute convened a multidisciplinary panel of radiologists and pathologists together with researchers working in medical image perception and adjacent fields of cognition and perception for the “Cognition and Medical Image Perception Think Tank.” The Think Tank’s key objectives were: to identify critical unsolved problems related to visual perception in pathology and radiology from the perspective of diagnosticians; to discuss how these clinically relevant questions could be addressed through cognitive and perception research; to identify barriers and solutions for transdisciplinary collaborations; to define ways to elevate the profile of cognition and perception research within the medical image community; to determine the greatest needs to advance medical image perception; and to outline future goals and strategies to evaluate progress. The Think Tank emphasized diagnosticians’ perspectives as the crucial starting point for medical image perception research, with diagnosticians describing their interpretation process and identifying perceptual and cognitive problems that arise. This paper reports the deliberations of the Think Tank participants to address these objectives and highlight opportunities to expand research on medical image perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Treviño
- National Cancer Institute, United States of America
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, United States of America
| | - George Birdsong
- Emory University School of Medicine, United States of America
| | | | - Peter Choyke
- National Cancer Institute, United States of America
| | | | - Miguel Eckstein
- University of California, Santa Barbara, United States of America
| | - Anna Fernandez
- National Cancer Institute, United States of America
- Booz Allen Hamilton, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bonnie Kudrick
- Transportation Security Administration, United States of America
| | | | | | | | - Joseph Saltz
- Stony Brook University, United States of America
| | | | - Steven E Seltzer
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Behrouz Shabestari
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, United States of America
| | | | - Eliot Siegel
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Mike Tilkin
- American College of Radiology, United States of America
| | | | | | | | - David Whitney
- University of California, Berkeley, United States of America
| | - Jeremy M Wolfe
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kaufmann TJ, Smits M, Boxerman J, Huang R, Barboriak DP, Weller M, Chung C, Tsien C, Brown PD, Shankar L, Galanis E, Gerstner E, van den Bent MJ, Burns TC, Parney IF, Dunn G, Brastianos PK, Lin NU, Wen PY, Ellingson BM. Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:757-772. [PMID: 32048719 PMCID: PMC7283031 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A recent meeting was held on March 22, 2019, among the FDA, clinical scientists, pharmaceutical and biotech companies, clinical trials cooperative groups, and patient advocacy groups to discuss challenges and potential solutions for increasing development of therapeutics for central nervous system metastases. A key issue identified at this meeting was the need for consistent tumor measurement for reliable tumor response assessment, including the first step of standardized image acquisition with an MRI protocol that could be implemented in multicenter studies aimed at testing new therapeutics. This document builds upon previous consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) in high-grade gliomas and defines a protocol for brain metastases (BTIP-BM) that addresses unique challenges associated with assessment of CNS metastases. The "minimum standard" recommended pulse sequences include: (i) parameter matched pre- and post-contrast inversion recovery (IR)-prepared, isotropic 3D T1-weighted gradient echo (IR-GRE); (ii) axial 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo acquired after injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent and before post-contrast 3D T1-weighted images; (iii) axial 2D or 3D T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery; (iv) axial 2D, 3-directional diffusion-weighted images; and (v) post-contrast 2D T1-weighted spin echo images for increased lesion conspicuity. Recommended sequence parameters are provided for both 1.5T and 3T MR systems. An "ideal" protocol is also provided, which replaces IR-GRE with 3D TSE T1-weighted imaging pre- and post-gadolinium, and is best performed at 3T, for which dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion is included. Recommended perfusion parameters are given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jerrold Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Raymond Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Terry C Burns
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ian F Parney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gavin Dunn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Departments of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wheeler DA, Takebe N, Hinoue T, Hoadley KA, Cardenas MF, Hamilton AM, Laird PW, Wang L, Johnson A, Dewal N, Miller V, Piñeyro D, Castro de Moura M, Esteller M, Shen H, Zenklusen JC, Tarnuzzer R, McShane LM, Tricoli JV, Williams PM, Lubensky I, O'Sullivan-Coyne G, Kohn EC, Little RF, White J, Malik S, Harris L, Weil C, Chen AP, Karlovich C, Rodgers B, Shankar L, Jacobs P, Nolan T, Hu J, Muzny DM, Doddapaneni H, Korchina V, Gastier-Foster J, Bowen J, Leraas K, Edmondson EF, Doroshow JH, Conley BA, Ivy SP, Staudt LM. Molecular Features of Cancers Exhibiting Exceptional Responses to Treatment. Cancer Cell 2021; 39:38-53.e7. [PMID: 33217343 PMCID: PMC8478080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
A small fraction of cancer patients with advanced disease survive significantly longer than patients with clinically comparable tumors. Molecular mechanisms for exceptional responses to therapy have been identified by genomic analysis of tumor biopsies from individual patients. Here, we analyzed tumor biopsies from an unbiased cohort of 111 exceptional responder patients using multiple platforms to profile genetic and epigenetic aberrations as well as the tumor microenvironment. Integrative analysis uncovered plausible mechanisms for the therapeutic response in nearly a quarter of the patients. The mechanisms were assigned to four broad categories-DNA damage response, intracellular signaling, immune engagement, and genetic alterations characteristic of favorable prognosis-with many tumors falling into multiple categories. These analyses revealed synthetic lethal relationships that may be exploited therapeutically and rare genetic lesions that favor therapeutic success, while also providing a wealth of testable hypotheses regarding oncogenic mechanisms that may influence the response to cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Wheeler
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Naoko Takebe
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - Katherine A Hoadley
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Maria F Cardenas
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Alina M Hamilton
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | | | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Ninad Dewal
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA
| | | | - David Piñeyro
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, Badalona, 08916 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Manuel Castro de Moura
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, Badalona, 08916 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Manel Esteller
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, Badalona, 08916 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain; Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Physiological Sciences Department, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), 08007 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Hui Shen
- Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
| | | | - Roy Tarnuzzer
- Center for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Paul M Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21701, USA
| | - Irina Lubensky
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - Elise C Kohn
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Richard F Little
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Jeffrey White
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Shakun Malik
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Lyndsay Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Carol Weil
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Chris Karlovich
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21701, USA
| | - Brian Rodgers
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Paula Jacobs
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Tracy Nolan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Jianhong Hu
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Donna M Muzny
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Viktoriya Korchina
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Jay Bowen
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
| | | | - Elijah F Edmondson
- Pathology and Histology Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Frederick, MD 21701, USA
| | - James H Doroshow
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Barbara A Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Louis M Staudt
- Center for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Conley BA, Staudt L, Takebe N, Wheeler DA, Wang L, Cardenas MF, Korchina V, Zenklusen JC, McShane LM, Tricoli JV, Williams PM, Lubensky I, O’Sullivan-Coyne G, Kohn E, Little RF, White J, Malik S, Harris LN, Mann B, Weil C, Tarnuzzer R, Karlovich C, Rodgers B, Shankar L, Jacobs PM, Nolan T, Berryman SM, Gastier-Foster J, Bowen J, Leraas K, Shen H, Laird PW, Esteller M, Miller V, Johnson A, Edmondson EF, Giordano TJ, Kim B, Ivy SP. The Exceptional Responders Initiative: Feasibility of a National Cancer Institute Pilot Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:27-37. [PMID: 32339229 PMCID: PMC7781457 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor molecular profiling from patients experiencing exceptional responses to systemic therapy may provide insights into cancer biology and improve treatment tailoring. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of identifying exceptional responders retrospectively, obtaining pre-exceptional response treatment tumor tissues, and analyzing them with state-of-the-art molecular analysis tools to identify potential molecular explanations for responses. METHODS Exceptional response was defined as partial (PR) or complete (CR) response to a systemic treatment with population PR or CR rate less than 10% or an unusually long response (eg, duration >3 times published median). Cases proposed by patients' clinicians were reviewed by clinical and translational experts. Tumor and normal tissue (if possible) were profiled with whole exome sequencing and, if possible, targeted deep sequencing, RNA sequencing, methylation arrays, and immunohistochemistry. Potential germline mutations were tracked for relevance to disease. RESULTS Cases reflected a variety of tumors and standard and investigational treatments. Of 520 cases, 476 (91.5%) were accepted for further review, and 222 of 476 (46.6%) proposed cases met requirements as exceptional responders. Clinical data were obtained from 168 of 222 cases (75.7%). Tumor was provided from 130 of 168 cases (77.4%). Of 117 of the 130 (90.0%) cases with sufficient nucleic acids, 109 (93.2%) were successfully analyzed; 6 patients had potentially actionable germline mutations. CONCLUSION Exceptional responses occur with standard and investigational treatment. Retrospective identification of exceptional responders, accessioning, and sequencing of pretreatment archived tissue is feasible. Data from molecular analyses of tumors, particularly when combining results from patients who received similar treatments, may elucidate molecular bases for exceptional responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara A Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lou Staudt
- Center for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Naoko Takebe
- Developmental Therapeutics Clinic, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David A Wheeler
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria F Cardenas
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Viktoriya Korchina
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Lisa M McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul M Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Irina Lubensky
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Elise Kohn
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard F Little
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey White
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shakun Malik
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bhupinder Mann
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carol Weil
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Roy Tarnuzzer
- Center for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chris Karlovich
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Brian Rodgers
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paula M Jacobs
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tracy Nolan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sean M Berryman
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Julie Gastier-Foster
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Jay Bowen
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Kristen Leraas
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Hui Shen
- Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | | | - Manel Esteller
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, Badalona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | - Elijah F Edmondson
- Pathology and Histology Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | | | - Benjamin Kim
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaufmann TJ, Smits M, Boxerman J, Huang R, Barboriak DP, Weller M, Chung C, Tsien C, Brown PD, Shankar L, Galanis E, Gerstner E, van den Bent MJ, Burns TC, Parney IF, Dunn G, Brastianos PK, Lin NU, Wen PY, Ellingson BM. Response to Letter to Editor. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1706-1707. [PMID: 32823280 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jerrold Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Raymond Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Terry C Burns
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ian F Parney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gavin Dunn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Departments of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Hu LS, Erickson BJ, Gerstner ER, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Barboriak DP, Huang RH, Wick W, Weller M, Galanis E, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Shankar L, Jacobs P, Chung C, van den Bent MJ, Chang S, Al Yung WK, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Gilbert MR, Rosen BR, Ellingson BM, Schmainda KM. Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1262-1275. [PMID: 32516388 PMCID: PMC7523451 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40-50 ms at 1.5 T, 20-35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
- Representative of the American Society of Functional Neuroradiology (ASFNR)
| | - Chad C Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Bradley J Erickson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Timothy J Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Raymond H Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Paula Jacobs
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - W K Al Yung
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Representative of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Psychiatry, and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
- Representative of the Ivy Consortium for Early Phase Clinical Trials
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Litière S, Isaac G, De Vries EGE, Bogaerts J, Chen A, Dancey J, Ford R, Gwyther S, Hoekstra O, Huang E, Lin N, Liu Y, Mandrekar S, Schwartz LH, Shankar L, Therasse P, Seymour L. RECIST 1.1 for Response Evaluation Apply Not Only to Chemotherapy-Treated Patients But Also to Targeted Cancer Agents: A Pooled Database Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1102-1110. [PMID: 30860949 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The mode of action of targeted cancer agents (TCAs) differs from classic chemotherapy, which leads to concerns about the role of RECIST in evaluating tumor response in trials with TCAs. We investigated the performance of RECIST using a pooled database from 50 clinical trials with at least one TCA. METHODS We examined the impact of the number of target lesions (TLs) on within-patient variability of tumor response. The prognostic effect of TL response (at 12 weeks or on study on the basis of a maximum five TLs) on survival was studied through landmark and time-dependent Cox models adjusted for baseline tumor load, occurrence of new lesions, or unequivocal progression of nontarget disease. RESULTS Data were obtained from 23,259 patients with cancer (36% lung, 28% colorectal, 11% breast, and 25% other); 15,620 received TCAs, predominantly transduction or angiogenesis inhibitors, as a single agent (37%), combined with other TCAs (7%), or as chemotherapy (56%); 28% received chemotherapy only; and 5% received best supportive care or placebo. A total of 17,222 patients contributed to the analyses. Within-patient variability decreased with increasing number of TLs, similarly for TCAs (with/without chemotherapy) and chemotherapy only. Mixed responses occurred proportionally in all treatment classes. Landmark analyses showed an ordinal relationship between percentage change from baseline to 12 weeks and overall survival, and demonstrated a clear distinction between tumor shrinkage and progressive disease according to RECIST. Time-dependent analysis showed no marked improvement in the ability to predict survival on the basis of TL tumor growth compared with nontarget progression or new lesion occurrence, regardless of treatment. Similar results were seen for major tumor types and different classes of TCAs. CONCLUSION This work reinforces that RECIST version 1.1 perform well for response assessment of TCAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Litière
- 1 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gaëlle Isaac
- 1 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Jan Bogaerts
- 1 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alice Chen
- 3 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Robert Ford
- 5 Clinical Trials Imaging Consulting, Belle Mead, NJ
| | | | - Otto Hoekstra
- 7 Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Nancy Lin
- 8 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Yan Liu
- 1 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- 10 Columbia University Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Román LS, Menon BK, Blasco J, Hernández-Pérez M, Dávalos A, Majoie CBLM, Campbell BCV, Guillemin F, Lingsma H, Anxionnat R, Epstein J, Saver JL, Marquering H, Wong JH, Lopes D, Reimann G, Desal H, Dippel DWJ, Coutts S, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Yavagal D, Ferre JC, Roos YBWEM, Liebeskind DS, Lenthall R, Molina C, Al Ajlan FS, Reddy V, Dowlatshahi D, Sourour NA, Oppenheim C, Mitha AP, Davis SM, Weimar C, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Cobo E, Kleinig TJ, Donnan GA, van der Lugt A, Demchuk AM, Berkhemer OA, Boers AMM, Ford GA, Muir KW, Brown BS, Jovin T, van Zwam WH, Mitchell PJ, Hill MD, White P, Bracard S, Goyal M, Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJH, van Walderveen MAA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle J, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PL, van Rooij WJJ, van den Berg JS, van Hasselt BA, Aerden LA, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JC, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder TH, Heijboer RJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach Z, Marquering HA, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Beenen LF, Zech M, Kowarik M, Seifert C, Schwaiger B, Puri A, Hou S, Wakhloo A, Moonis M, Henniger N, Goddeau R, van den Berg R, Massari F, Minaeian A, Lozano JD, Ramzan M, Stout C, Patel A, Tunguturi A, Onteddu S, Carandang R, Howk M, Koudstaal PJ, Ribó M, Sanjuan E, Rubiera M, Pagola J, Flores A, Muchada M, Meler P, Huerga E, Gelabert S, Coscojuela P, van Zwam WH, Tomasello A, Rodriguez D, Santamarina E, Maisterra O, Boned S, Seró L, Rovira A, Molina CA, Millán M, Muñoz L, Roos YB, Pérez de la Ossa N, Gomis M, Dorado L, López-Cancio E, Palomeras E, Munuera J, García Bermejo P, Remollo S, Castaño C, García-Sort R, van der Lugt A, Cuadras P, Puyalto P, Hernández-Pérez M, Jiménez M, Martínez-Piñeiro A, Lucente G, Dávalos A, Chamorro A, Urra X, Obach V, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Cervera A, Amaro S, Llull L, Codas J, Balasa M, Navarro J, Ariño H, Aceituno A, Rudilosso S, Renu A, Majoie CB, Macho JM, San Roman L, Blasco J, López A, Macías N, Cardona P, Quesada H, Rubio F, Cano L, Lara B, Dippel DW, de Miquel MA, Aja L, Serena J, Cobo E, Albers GW, Lees KR, Arenillas J, Roberts R, Minhas P, Al-Ajlan F, Brown MM, Salluzzi M, Zimmel L, Patel S, Eesa M, Martí-Fàbregas J, Jankowitz B, Serena J, Salvat-Plana M, López-Cancio E, Bracard S, Liebig T, Ducrocq X, Anxionnat R, Baillot PA, Barbier C, Derelle AL, Lacour JC, Richard S, Samson Y, Sourour N, Baronnet-Chauvet F, Stijnen T, Clarencon F, Crozier S, Deltour S, Di Maria F, Le Bouc R, Leger A, Mutlu G, Rosso C, Szatmary Z, Yger M, Andersson T, Zavanone C, Bakchine S, Pierot L, Caucheteux N, Estrade L, Kadziolka K, Leautaud A, Renkes C, Serre I, Desal H, Mattle H, Guillon B, Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Daumas-Duport B, De Gaalon S, Derkinderen P, Evain S, Herisson F, Laplaud DA, Lebouvier T, Lintia-Gaultier A, Wahlgren N, Pouclet-Courtemanche H, Rouaud T, Rouaud Jaffrenou V, Schunck A, Sevin-Allouet M, Toulgoat F, Wiertlewski S, Gauvrit JY, Ronziere T, Cahagne V, van der Heijden E, Ferre JC, Pinel JF, Raoult H, Mas JL, Meder JF, Al Najjar-Carpentier AA, Birchenall J, Bodiguel E, Calvet D, Domigo V, Ghannouti N, Godon-Hardy S, Guiraud V, Lamy C, Majhadi L, Morin L, Naggara O, Trystram D, Turc G, Berge J, Sibon I, Fleitour N, Menegon P, Barreau X, Rouanet F, Debruxelles S, Kazadi A, Renou P, Fleury O, Pasco-Papon A, Dubas F, Caroff J, Hooijenga I, Godard Ducceschi S, Hamon MA, Lecluse A, Marc G, Giroud M, Ricolfi F, Bejot Y, Chavent A, Gentil A, Kazemi A, Puppels C, Osseby GV, Voguet C, Mahagne MH, Sedat J, Chau Y, Suissa L, Lachaud S, Houdart E, Stapf C, Buffon Porcher F, Pellikaan W, Chabriat H, Guedin P, Herve D, Jouvent E, Mawet J, Saint-Maurice JP, Schneble HM, Turjman F, Nighoghossian N, Berhoune NN, Geerling A, Bouhour F, Cho TH, Derex L, Felix S, Gervais-Bernard H, Gory B, Manera L, Mechtouff L, Ritzenthaler T, Riva R, Lindl-Velema A, Salaris Silvio F, Tilikete C, Blanc R, Obadia M, Bartolini MB, Gueguen A, Piotin M, Pistocchi S, Redjem H, Drouineau J, van Vemde G, Neau JP, Godeneche G, Lamy M, Marsac E, Velasco S, Clavelou P, Chabert E, Bourgois N, Cornut-Chauvinc C, Ferrier A, de Ridder A, Gabrillargues J, Jean B, Marques AR, Vitello N, Detante O, Barbieux M, Boubagra K, Favre Wiki I, Garambois K, Tahon F, Greebe P, Ashok V, Voguet C, Coskun O, Guedin P, Rodesch G, Lapergue B, Bourdain F, Evrard S, Graveleau P, Decroix JP, de Bont-Stikkelbroeck J, Wang A, Sellal F, Ahle G, Carelli G, Dugay MH, Gaultier C, Lebedinsky AP, Lita L, Musacchio RM, Renglewicz-Destuynder C, de Meris J, Tournade A, Vuillemet F, Montoro FM, Mounayer C, Faugeras F, Gimenez L, Labach C, Lautrette G, Denier C, Saliou G, Janssen K, Chassin O, Dussaule C, Melki E, Ozanne A, Puccinelli F, Sachet M, Sarov M, Bonneville JF, Moulin T, Biondi A, Struijk W, De Bustos Medeiros E, Vuillier F, Courtheoux P, Viader F, Apoil-Brissard M, Bataille M, Bonnet AL, Cogez J, Kazemi A, Touze E, Licher S, Leclerc X, Leys D, Aggour M, Aguettaz P, Bodenant M, Cordonnier C, Deplanque D, Girot M, Henon H, Kalsoum E, Boodt N, Lucas C, Pruvo JP, Zuniga P, Bonafé A, Arquizan C, Costalat V, Machi P, Mourand I, Riquelme C, Bounolleau P, Ros A, Arteaga C, Faivre A, Bintner M, Tournebize P, Charlin C, Darcel F, Gauthier-Lasalarie P, Jeremenko M, Mouton S, Zerlauth JB, Venema E, Lamy C, Hervé D, Hassan H, Gaston A, Barral FG, Garnier P, Beaujeux R, Wolff V, Herbreteau D, Debiais S, Slokkers I, Murray A, Ford G, Muir KW, White P, Brown MM, Clifton A, Freeman J, Ford I, Markus H, Wardlaw J, Ganpat RJ, Lees KR, Molyneux A, Robinson T, Lewis S, Norrie J, Robertson F, Perry R, Dixit A, Cloud G, Clifton A, Mulder M, Madigan J, Roffe C, Nayak S, Lobotesis K, Smith C, Herwadkar A, Kandasamy N, Goddard T, Bamford J, Subramanian G, Saiedie N, Lenthall R, Littleton E, Lamin S, Storey K, Ghatala R, Banaras A, Aeron-Thomas J, Hazel B, Maguire H, Veraque E, Heshmatollah A, Harrison L, Keshvara R, Cunningham J, Schipperen S, Vinken S, van Boxtel T, Koets J, Boers M, Santos E, Borst J, Jansen I, Kappelhof M, Lucas M, Geuskens R, Barros RS, Dobbe R, Csizmadia M, Hill MD, Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Wright MR, Kamal NR, Andersen L, Randhawa PA, Stewart T, Patil S, Minhas P, Almekhlafi M, Mishra S, Clement F, Sajobi T, Shuaib A, Montanera WJ, Roy D, Silver FL, Jovin TG, Frei DF, Sapkota B, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Williams D, Tampieri D, Poppe AY, Dowlatshahi D, Wong JH, Mitha AP, Subramaniam S, Hull G, Lowerison MW, Sajobi T, Salluzzi M, Wright MR, Maxwell M, Lacusta S, Drupals E, Armitage K, Barber PA, Smith EE, Morrish WF, Coutts SB, Derdeyn C, Demaerschalk B, Yavagal D, Martin R, Brant R, Yu Y, Willinsky RA, Montanera WJ, Weill A, Kenney C, Aram H, Stewart T, Stys PK, Watson TW, Klein G, Pearson D, Couillard P, Trivedi A, Singh D, Klourfeld E, Imoukhuede O, Nikneshan D, Blayney S, Reddy R, Choi P, Horton M, Musuka T, Dubuc V, Field TS, Desai J, Adatia S, Alseraya A, Nambiar V, van Dijk R, Wong JH, Mitha AP, Morrish WF, Eesa M, Newcommon NJ, Shuaib A, Schwindt B, Butcher KS, Jeerakathil T, Buck B, Khan K, Naik SS, Emery DJ, Owen RJ, Kotylak TB, Ashforth RA, Yeo TA, McNally D, Siddiqui M, Saqqur M, Hussain D, Kalashyan H, Manosalva A, Kate M, Gioia L, Hasan S, Mohammad A, Muratoglu M, Williams D, Thornton J, Cullen A, Brennan P, O'Hare A, Looby S, Hyland D, Duff S, McCusker M, Hallinan B, Lee S, McCormack J, Moore A, O'Connor M, Donegan C, Brewer L, Martin A, Murphy S, O'Rourke K, Smyth S, Kelly P, Lynch T, Daly T, O'Brien P, O'Driscoll A, Martin M, Daly T, Collins R, Coughlan T, McCabe D, Murphy S, O'Neill D, Mulroy M, Lynch O, Walsh T, O'Donnell M, Galvin T, Harbison J, McElwaine P, Mulpeter K, McLoughlin C, Reardon M, Harkin E, Dolan E, Watts M, Cunningham N, Fallon C, Gallagher S, Cotter P, Crowe M, Doyle R, Noone I, Lapierre M, Coté VA, Lanthier S, Odier C, Durocher A, Raymond J, Weill A, Daneault N, Deschaintre Y, Jankowitz B, Baxendell L, Massaro L, Jackson-Graves C, Decesare S, Porter P, Armbruster K, Adams A, Billigan J, Oakley J, Ducruet A, Jadhav A, Giurgiutiu DV, Aghaebrahim A, Reddy V, Hammer M, Starr M, Totoraitis V, Wechsler L, Streib S, Rangaraju S, Campbell D, Rocha M, Gulati D, Silver FL, Krings T, Kalman L, Cayley A, Williams J, Stewart T, Wiegner R, Casaubon LK, Jaigobin C, del Campo JM, Elamin E, Schaafsma JD, Willinsky RA, Agid R, Farb R, ter Brugge K, Sapkoda BL, Baxter BW, Barton K, Knox A, Porter A, Sirelkhatim A, Devlin T, Dellinger C, Pitiyanuvath N, Patterson J, Nichols J, Quarfordt S, Calvert J, Hawk H, Fanale C, Frei DF, Bitner A, Novak A, Huddle D, Bellon R, Loy D, Wagner J, Chang I, Lampe E, Spencer B, Pratt R, Bartt R, Shine S, Dooley G, Nguyen T, Whaley M, McCarthy K, Teitelbaum J, Tampieri D, Poon W, Campbell N, Cortes M, Dowlatshahi D, Lum C, Shamloul R, Robert S, Stotts G, Shamy M, Steffenhagen N, Blacquiere D, Hogan M, AlHazzaa M, Basir G, Lesiuk H, Iancu D, Santos M, Choe H, Weisman DC, Jonczak K, Blue-Schaller A, Shah Q, MacKenzie L, Klein B, Kulandaivel K, Kozak O, Gzesh DJ, Harris LJ, Khoury JS, Mandzia J, Pelz D, Crann S, Fleming L, Hesser K, Beauchamp B, Amato-Marzialli B, Boulton M, Lopez-Ojeda P, Sharma M, Lownie S, Chan R, Swartz R, Howard P, Golob D, Gladstone D, Boyle K, Boulos M, Hopyan J, Yang V, Da Costa L, Holmstedt CA, Turk AS, Navarro R, Jauch E, Ozark S, Turner R, Phillips S, Shankar J, Jarrett J, Gubitz G, Maloney W, Vandorpe R, Schmidt M, Heidenreich J, Hunter G, Kelly M, Whelan R, Peeling L, Burns PA, Hunter A, Wiggam I, Kerr E, Watt M, Fulton A, Gordon P, Rennie I, Flynn P, Smyth G, O'Leary S, Gentile N, Linares G, McNelis P, Erkmen K, Katz P, Azizi A, Weaver M, Jungreis C, Faro S, Shah P, Reimer H, Kalugdan V, Saposnik G, Bharatha A, Li Y, Kostyrko P, Santos M, Marotta T, Montanera W, Sarma D, Selchen D, Spears J, Heo JH, Jeong K, Kim DJ, Kim BM, Kim YD, Song D, Lee KJ, Yoo J, Bang OY, Rho S, Lee J, Jeon P, Kim KH, Cha J, Kim SJ, Ryoo S, Lee MJ, Sohn SI, Kim CH, Ryu HG, Hong JH, Chang HW, Lee CY, Rha J, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, Yan B, Dowling R, Yassi N, Oxley TJ, Wu TY, Silver G, McDonald A, McCoy R, Kleinig TJ, Scroop R, Dewey HM, Simpson M, Brooks M, Coulton B, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Steinfort B, Faulder K, Priglinger M, Day S, Phan T, Chong W, Holt M, Chandra RV, Ma H, Young D, Wong K, Wijeratne T, Tu H, Mackay E, Celestino S, Bladin CF, Loh PS, Gilligan A, Ross Z, Coote S, Frost T, Parsons MW, Miteff F, Levi CR, Ang T, Spratt N, Kaauwai L, Badve M, Rice H, de Villiers L, Barber PA, McGuinness B, Hope A, Moriarty M, Bennett P, Wong A, Coulthard A, Lee A, Jannes J, Field D, Sharma G, Salinas S, Cowley E, Snow B, Kolbe J, Stark R, King J, Macdonnell R, Attia J, D'Este C, Saver JL, Goyal M, Diener HC, Levy EI, Bonafé A, Mendes Pereira V, Jahan R, Albers GW, Cognard C, Cohen DJ, Hacke W, Jansen O, Jovin TG, Mattle HP, Nogueira RG, Siddiqui AH, Yavagal DR, von Kummer R, Smith W, Turjman F, Hamilton S, Chiacchierini R, Amar A, Sanossian N, Loh Y, Devlin T, Baxter B, Hawk H, Sapkota B, Quarfordt S, Sirelkhatim A, Dellinger C, Barton K, Reddy VK, Ducruet A, Jadhav A, Horev A, Giurgiutiu DV, Totoraitis V, Hammer M, Jankowitz B, Wechsler L, Rocha M, Gulati D, Campbell D, Star M, Baxendell L, Oakley J, Siddiqui A, Hopkins LN, Snyder K, Sawyer R, Hall S, Costalat V, Riquelme C, Machi P, Omer E, Arquizan C, Mourand I, Charif M, Ayrignac X, Menjot de Champfleur N, Leboucq N, Gascou G, Moynier M, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Singer O, Berkefeld J, Foerch C, Lorenz M, Pfeilschifer W, Hattingen E, Wagner M, You SJ, Lescher S, Braun H, Dehkharghani S, Belagaje SR, Anderson A, Lima A, Obideen M, Haussen D, Dharia R, Frankel M, Patel V, Owada K, Saad A, Amerson L, Horn C, Doppelheuer S, Schindler K, Lopes DK, Chen M, Moftakhar R, Anton C, Smreczak M, Carpenter JS, Boo S, Rai A, Roberts T, Tarabishy A, Gutmann L, Brooks C, Brick J, Domico J, Reimann G, Hinrichs K, Becker M, Heiss E, Selle C, Witteler A, Al-Boutros S, Danch MJ, Ranft A, Rohde S, Burg K, Weimar C, Zegarac V, Hartmann C, Schlamann M, Göricke S, Ringlestein A, Wanke I, Mönninghoff C, Dietzold M, Budzik R, Davis T, Eubank G, Hicks WJ, Pema P, Vora N, Mejilla J, Taylor M, Clark W, Rontal A, Fields J, Peterson B, Nesbit G, Lutsep H, Bozorgchami H, Priest R, Ologuntoye O, Barnwell S, Dogan A, Herrick K, Takahasi C, Beadell N, Brown B, Jamieson S, Hussain MS, Russman A, Hui F, Wisco D, Uchino K, Khawaja Z, Katzan I, Toth G, Cheng-Ching E, Bain M, Man S, Farrag A, George P, John S, Shankar L, Drofa A, Dahlgren R, Bauer A, Itreat A, Taqui A, Cerejo R, Richmond A, Ringleb P, Bendszus M, Möhlenbruch M, Reiff T, Amiri H, Purrucker J, Herweh C, Pham M, Menn O, Ludwig I, Acosta I, Villar C, Morgan W, Sombutmai C, Hellinger F, Allen E, Bellew M, Gandhi R, Bonwit E, Aly J, Ecker RD, Seder D, Morris J, Skaletsky M, Belden J, Baker C, Connolly LS, Papanagiotou P, Roth C, Kastrup A, Politi M, Brunner F, Alexandrou M, Merdivan H, Ramsey C, Given II C, Renfrow S, Deshmukh V, Sasadeusz K, Vincent F, Thiesing JT, Putnam J, Bhatt A, Kansara A, Caceves D, Lowenkopf T, Yanase L, Zurasky J, Dancer S, Freeman B, Scheibe-Mirek T, Robison J, Rontal A, Roll J, Clark D, Rodriguez M, Fitzsimmons BFM, Zaidat O, Lynch JR, Lazzaro M, Larson T, Padmore L, Das E, Farrow-Schmidt A, Hassan A, Tekle W, Cate C, Jansen O, Cnyrim C, Wodarg F, Wiese C, Binder A, Riedel C, Rohr A, Lang N, Laufs H, Krieter S, Remonda L, Diepers M, Añon J, Nedeltchev K, Kahles T, Biethahn S, Lindner M, Chang V, Gächter C, Esperon C, Guglielmetti M, Arenillas Lara JF, Martínez Galdámez M, Calleja Sanz AI, Cortijo Garcia E, Garcia Bermejo P, Perez S, Mulero Carrillo P, Crespo Vallejo E, Ruiz Piñero M, Lopez Mesonero L, Reyes Muñoz FJ, Brekenfeld C, Buhk JH, Krützelmann A, Thomalla G, Cheng B, Beck C, Hoppe J, Goebell E, Holst B, Grzyska U, Wortmann G, Starkman S, Duckwiler G, Jahan R, Rao N, Sheth S, Ng K, Noorian A, Szeder V, Nour M, McManus M, Huang J, Tarpley J, Tateshima S, Gonzalez N, Ali L, Liebeskind D, Hinman J, Calderon-Arnulphi M, Liang C, Guzy J, Koch S, DeSousa K, Gordon-Perue G, Haussen D, Elhammady M, Peterson E, Pandey V, Dharmadhikari S, Khandelwal P, Malik A, Pafford R, Gonzalez P, Ramdas K, Andersen G, Damgaard D, Von Weitzel-Mudersbach P, Simonsen C, Ruiz de Morales Ayudarte N, Poulsen M, Sørensen L, Karabegovich S, Hjørringgaard M, Hjort N, Harbo T, Sørensen K, Deshaies E, Padalino D, Swarnkar A, Latorre JG, Elnour E, El-Zammar Z, Villwock M, Farid H, Balgude A, Cross L, Hansen K, Holtmannspötter M, Kondziella D, Hoejgaard J, Taudorf S, Soendergaard H, Wagner A, Cronquist M, Stavngaard T, Cortsen M, Krarup LH, Hyldal T, Haring HP, Guggenberger S, Hamberger M, Trenkler J, Sonnberger M, Nussbaumer K, Dominger C, Bach E, Jagadeesan BD, Taylor R, Kim J, Shea K, Tummala R, Zacharatos H, Sandhu D, Ezzeddine M, Grande A, Hildebrandt D, Miller K, Scherber J, Hendrickson A, Jumaa M, Zaidi S, Hendrickson T, Snyder V, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Mutzenbach J, Weymayr F, Broussalis E, Stadler K, Jedlitschka A, Malek A, Mueller-Kronast N, Beck P, Martin C, Summers D, Day J, Bettinger I, Holloway W, Olds K, Arkin S, Akhtar N, Boutwell C, Crandall S, Schwartzman M, Weinstein C, Brion B, Prothmann S, Kleine J, Kreiser K, Boeckh-Behrens T, Poppert H, Wunderlich S, Koch ML, Biberacher V, Huberle A, Gora-Stahlberg G, Knier B, Meindl T, Utpadel-Fischler D. Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17:895-904. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30242-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 213] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
12
|
Campbell BCV, van Zwam WH, Goyal M, Menon BK, Dippel DWJ, Demchuk AM, Bracard S, White P, Dávalos A, Majoie CBLM, van der Lugt A, Ford GA, de la Ossa NP, Kelly M, Bourcier R, Donnan GA, Roos YBWEM, Bang OY, Nogueira RG, Devlin TG, van den Berg LA, Clarençon F, Burns P, Carpenter J, Berkhemer OA, Yavagal DR, Pereira VM, Ducrocq X, Dixit A, Quesada H, Epstein J, Davis SM, Jansen O, Rubiera M, Urra X, Micard E, Lingsma HF, Naggara O, Brown S, Guillemin F, Muir KW, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Jovin TG, Hill MD, Mitchell PJ, Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJH, van Walderveen MAA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle J, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PL, van Rooij WJJ, van den Berg JS, van Hasselt BA, Aerden LA, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JC, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder TH, Heijboer RJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach Z, Marquering HA, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Beenen LF, van den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YB, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Wakhloo A, Moonis M, Henninger N, Goddeau R, Massari F, Minaeian A, Lozano JD, Ramzan M, Stout C, Patel A, Majoie CB, Tunguturi A, Onteddu S, Carandang R, Howk M, Ribó M, Sanjuan E, Rubiera M, Pagola J, Flores A, Muchada M, Dippel DW, Meler P, Huerga E, Gelabert S, Coscojuela P, Tomasello A, Rodriguez D, Santamarina E, Maisterra O, Boned S, Seró L, Brown MM, Rovira A, Molina CA, Millán M, Muñoz L, Pérez de la Ossa N, Gomis M, Dorado L, López-Cancio E, Palomeras E, Munuera J, Liebig T, García Bermejo P, Remollo S, Castaño C, García-Sort R, Cuadras P, Puyalto P, Hernández-Pérez M, Jiménez M, Martínez-Piñeiro A, Lucente G, Stijnen T, Dávalos A, Chamorro A, Urra X, Obach V, Cervera A, Amaro S, Llull L, Codas J, Balasa M, Navarro J, Andersson T, Ariño H, Aceituno A, Rudilosso S, Renu A, Macho JM, San Roman L, Blasco J, López A, Macías N, Cardona P, Mattle H, Quesada H, Rubio F, Cano L, Lara B, de Miquel MA, Aja L, Serena J, Cobo E, Albers GW, Lees KR, Wahlgren N, Arenillas J, Roberts R, Minhas P, Al-Ajlan F, Salluzzi M, Zimmel L, Patel S, Eesa M, Martí-Fàbregas J, Jankowitz B, van der Heijden E, Serena J, Salvat-Plana M, López-Cancio E, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Anxionnat R, Baillot PA, Barbier C, Derelle AL, Lacour JC, Ghannouti N, Richard S, Samson Y, Sourour N, Baronnet-Chauvet F, Clarencon F, Crozier S, Deltour S, Di Maria F, Le Bouc R, Leger A, Fleitour N, Mutlu G, Rosso C, Szatmary Z, Yger M, Zavanone C, Bakchine S, Pierot L, Caucheteux N, Estrade L, Kadziolka K, Hooijenga I, Leautaud A, Renkes C, Serre I, Desal H, Guillon B, Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Daumas-Duport B, De Gaalon S, Derkinderen P, Evain S, Puppels C, Herisson F, Laplaud DA, Lebouvier T, Lintia-Gaultier A, Pouclet-Courtemanche H, Rouaud T, Rouaud Jaffrenou V, Schunck A, Sevin-Allouet M, Toulgoat F, Pellikaan W, Wiertlewski S, Gauvrit JY, Ronziere T, Cahagne V, Ferre JC, Pinel JF, Raoult H, Mas JL, Meder JF, Al Najjar-Carpentier AA, Geerling A, Birchenall J, Bodiguel E, Calvet D, Domigo V, Godon-Hardy S, Guiraud V, Lamy C, Majhadi L, Morin L, Naggara O, Lindl-Velema A, Trystram D, Turc G, Berge J, Sibon I, Menegon P, Barreau X, Rouanet F, Debruxelles S, Kazadi A, Renou P, van Vemde G, Fleury O, Pasco-Papon A, Dubas F, Caroff J, Godard Ducceschi S, Hamon MA, Lecluse A, Marc G, Giroud M, Ricolfi F, de Ridder A, Bejot Y, Chavent A, Gentil A, Kazemi A, Osseby GV, Voguet C, Mahagne MH, Sedat J, Chau Y, Suissa L, Greebe P, Lachaud S, Houdart E, Stapf C, Buffon Porcher F, Chabriat H, Guedin P, Herve D, Jouvent E, Mawet J, Saint-Maurice JP, de Bont-Stikkelbroeck J, Schneble HM, Turjman F, Nighoghossian N, Berhoune NN, Bouhour F, Cho TH, Derex L, Felix S, Gervais-Bernard H, Gory B, de Meris J, Manera L, Mechtouff L, Ritzenthaler T, Riva R, Salaris Silvio F, Tilikete C, Blanc R, Obadia M, Bartolini MB, Gueguen A, Janssen K, Piotin M, Pistocchi S, Redjem H, Drouineau J, Neau JP, Godeneche G, Lamy M, Marsac E, Velasco S, Clavelou P, Struijk W, Chabert E, Bourgois N, Cornut-Chauvinc C, Ferrier A, Gabrillargues J, Jean B, Marques AR, Vitello N, Detante O, Barbieux M, Licher S, Boubagra K, Favre Wiki I, Garambois K, Tahon F, Ashok V, Voguet C, Coskun O, Guedin P, Rodesch G, Lapergue B, Boodt N, Bourdain F, Evrard S, Graveleau P, Decroix JP, Wang A, Sellal F, Ahle G, Carelli G, Dugay MH, Gaultier C, Ros A, Lebedinsky AP, Lita L, Musacchio RM, Renglewicz-Destuynder C, Tournade A, Vuillemet F, Montoro FM, Mounayer C, Faugeras F, Gimenez L, Venema E, Labach C, Lautrette G, Denier C, Saliou G, Chassin O, Dussaule C, Melki E, Ozanne A, Puccinelli F, Sachet M, Slokkers I, Sarov M, Bonneville JF, Moulin T, Biondi A, De Bustos Medeiros E, Vuillier F, Courtheoux P, Viader F, Apoil-Brissard M, Bataille M, Ganpat RJ, Bonnet AL, Cogez J, Kazemi A, Touze E, Leclerc X, Leys D, Aggour M, Aguettaz P, Bodenant M, Cordonnier C, Mulder M, Deplanque D, Girot M, Henon H, Kalsoum E, Lucas C, Pruvo JP, Zuniga P, Bonafé A, Arquizan C, Costalat V, Saiedie N, Machi P, Mourand I, Riquelme C, Bounolleau P, Arteaga C, Faivre A, Bintner M, Tournebize P, Charlin C, Darcel F, Heshmatollah A, Gauthier-Lasalarie P, Jeremenko M, Mouton S, Zerlauth JB, Lamy C, Hervé D, Hassan H, Gaston A, Barral FG, Garnier P, Schipperen S, Beaujeux R, Wolff V, Herbreteau D, Debiais S, Murray A, Ford G, Muir KW, White P, Brown MM, Clifton A, Vinken S, Freeman J, Ford I, Markus H, Wardlaw J, Lees KR, Molyneux A, Robinson T, Lewis S, Norrie J, Robertson F, van Boxtel T, Perry R, Dixit A, Cloud G, Clifton A, Madigan J, Roffe C, Nayak S, Lobotesis K, Smith C, Herwadkar A, Koets J, Kandasamy N, Goddard T, Bamford J, Subramanian G, Lenthall R, Littleton E, Lamin S, Storey K, Ghatala R, Banaras A, Boers M, Aeron-Thomas J, Hazel B, Maguire H, Veraque E, Harrison L, Keshvara R, Cunningham J, Santos E, Borst J, Jansen I, Kappelhof M, Lucas M, Geuskens R, Barros RS, Dobbe R, Csizmadia M, Hill MD, Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Wright MR, Kamal NR, Andersen L, Randhawa PA, Stewart T, Patil S, Minhas P, Almekhlafi M, Mishra S, Clement F, Sajobi T, Shuaib A, Montanera WJ, Roy D, Silver FL, Jovin TG, Frei DF, Sapkota B, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Williams D, Tampieri D, Poppe AY, Dowlatshahi D, Wong JH, Mitha AP, Subramaniam S, Hull G, Lowerison MW, Sajobi T, Salluzzi M, Wright MR, Maxwell M, Lacusta S, Drupals E, Armitage K, Barber PA, Smith EE, Morrish WF, Coutts SB, Derdeyn C, Demaerschalk B, Yavagal D, Martin R, Brant R, Yu Y, Willinsky RA, Montanera WJ, Weill A, Kenney C, Aram H, Stewart T, Stys PK, Watson TW, Klein G, Pearson D, Couillard P, Trivedi A, Singh D, Klourfeld E, Imoukhuede O, Nikneshan D, Blayney S, Reddy R, Choi P, Horton M, Musuka T, Dubuc V, Field TS, Desai J, Adatia S, Alseraya A, Nambiar V, van Dijk R, Wong JH, Mitha AP, Morrish WF, Eesa M, Newcommon NJ, Shuaib A, Schwindt B, Butcher KS, Jeerakathil T, Buck B, Khan K, Naik SS, Emery DJ, Owen RJ, Kotylak TB, Ashforth RA, Yeo TA, McNally D, Siddiqui M, Saqqur M, Hussain D, Kalashyan H, Manosalva A, Kate M, Gioia L, Hasan S, Mohammad A, Muratoglu M, Williams D, Thornton J, Cullen A, Brennan P, O'Hare A, Looby S, Hyland D, Duff S, McCusker M, Hallinan B, Lee S, McCormack J, Moore A, O'Connor M, Donegan C, Brewer L, Martin A, Murphy S, O'Rourke K, Smyth S, Kelly P, Lynch T, Daly T, O'Brien P, O'Driscoll A, Martin M, Daly T, Collins R, Coughlan T, McCabe D, Murphy S, O'Neill D, Mulroy M, Lynch O, Walsh T, O'Donnell M, Galvin T, Harbison J, McElwaine P, Mulpeter K, McLoughlin C, Reardon M, Harkin E, Dolan E, Watts M, Cunningham N, Fallon C, Gallagher S, Cotter P, Crowe M, Doyle R, Noone I, Lapierre M, Coté VA, Lanthier S, Odier C, Durocher A, Raymond J, Weill A, Daneault N, Deschaintre Y, Jankowitz B, Baxendell L, Massaro L, Jackson-Graves C, Decesare S, Porter P, Armbruster K, Adams A, Billigan J, Oakley J, Ducruet A, Jadhav A, Giurgiutiu DV, Aghaebrahim A, Reddy V, Hammer M, Starr M, Totoraitis V, Wechsler L, Streib S, Rangaraju S, Campbell D, Rocha M, Gulati D, Silver FL, Krings T, Kalman L, Cayley A, Williams J, Stewart T, Wiegner R, Casaubon LK, Jaigobin C, del Campo JM, Elamin E, Schaafsma JD, Willinsky RA, Agid R, Farb R, ter Brugge K, Sapkoda BL, Baxter BW, Barton K, Knox A, Porter A, Sirelkhatim A, Devlin T, Dellinger C, Pitiyanuvath N, Patterson J, Nichols J, Quarfordt S, Calvert J, Hawk H, Fanale C, Frei DF, Bitner A, Novak A, Huddle D, Bellon R, Loy D, Wagner J, Chang I, Lampe E, Spencer B, Pratt R, Bartt R, Shine S, Dooley G, Nguyen T, Whaley M, McCarthy K, Teitelbaum J, Tampieri D, Poon W, Campbell N, Cortes M, Dowlatshahi D, Lum C, Shamloul R, Robert S, Stotts G, Shamy M, Steffenhagen N, Blacquiere D, Hogan M, AlHazzaa M, Basir G, Lesiuk H, Iancu D, Santos M, Choe H, Weisman DC, Jonczak K, Blue-Schaller A, Shah Q, MacKenzie L, Klein B, Kulandaivel K, Kozak O, Gzesh DJ, Harris LJ, Khoury JS, Mandzia J, Pelz D, Crann S, Fleming L, Hesser K, Beauchamp B, Amato-Marzialli B, Boulton M, Lopez- Ojeda P, Sharma M, Lownie S, Chan R, Swartz R, Howard P, Golob D, Gladstone D, Boyle K, Boulos M, Hopyan J, Yang V, Da Costa L, Holmstedt CA, Turk AS, Navarro R, Jauch E, Ozark S, Turner R, Phillips S, Shankar J, Jarrett J, Gubitz G, Maloney W, Vandorpe R, Schmidt M, Heidenreich J, Hunter G, Kelly M, Whelan R, Peeling L, Burns PA, Hunter A, Wiggam I, Kerr E, Watt M, Fulton A, Gordon P, Rennie I, Flynn P, Smyth G, O'Leary S, Gentile N, Linares G, McNelis P, Erkmen K, Katz P, Azizi A, Weaver M, Jungreis C, Faro S, Shah P, Reimer H, Kalugdan V, Saposnik G, Bharatha A, Li Y, Kostyrko P, Santos M, Marotta T, Montanera W, Sarma D, Selchen D, Spears J, Heo JH, Jeong K, Kim DJ, Kim BM, Kim YD, Song D, Lee KJ, Yoo J, Bang OY, Rho S, Lee J, Jeon P, Kim KH, Cha J, Kim SJ, Ryoo S, Lee MJ, Sohn SI, Kim CH, Ryu HG, Hong JH, Chang HW, Lee CY, Rha J, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, Yan B, Dowling R, Yassi N, Oxley TJ, Wu TY, Silver G, McDonald A, McCoy R, Kleinig TJ, Scroop R, Dewey HM, Simpson M, Brooks M, Coulton B, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Steinfort B, Faulder K, Priglinger M, Day S, Phan T, Chong W, Holt M, Chandra RV, Ma H, Young D, Wong K, Wijeratne T, Tu H, Mackay E, Celestino S, Bladin CF, Loh PS, Gilligan A, Ross Z, Coote S, Frost T, Parsons MW, Miteff F, Levi CR, Ang T, Spratt N, Kaauwai L, Badve M, Rice H, de Villiers L, Barber PA, McGuinness B, Hope A, Moriarty M, Bennett P, Wong A, Coulthard A, Lee A, Jannes J, Field D, Sharma G, Salinas S, Cowley E, Snow B, Kolbe J, Stark R, King J, Macdonnell R, Attia J, D'Este C, Saver JL, Goyal M, Diener HC, Levy EI, Bonafé A, Mendes Pereira V, Jahan R, Albers GW, Cognard C, Cohen DJ, Hacke W, Jansen O, Jovin TG, Mattle HP, Nogueira RG, Siddiqui AH, Yavagal DR, von Kummer R, Smith W, Turjman F, Hamilton S, Chiacchierini R, Amar A, Sanossian N, Loh Y, Devlin T, Baxter B, Hawk H, Sapkota B, Quarfordt S, Sirelkhatim A, Dellinger C, Barton K, Reddy VK, Ducruet A, Jadhav A, Horev A, Giurgiutiu DV, Totoraitis V, Hammer M, Jankowitz B, Wechsler L, Rocha M, Gulati D, Campbell D, Star M, Baxendell L, Oakley J, Siddiqui A, Hopkins LN, Snyder K, Sawyer R, Hall S, Costalat V, Riquelme C, Machi P, Omer E, Arquizan C, Mourand I, Charif M, Ayrignac X, Menjot de Champfleur N, Leboucq N, Gascou G, Moynier M, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Singer O, Berkefeld J, Foerch C, Lorenz M, Pfeilschifer W, Hattingen E, Wagner M, You SJ, Lescher S, Braun H, Dehkharghani S, Belagaje SR, Anderson A, Lima A, Obideen M, Haussen D, Dharia R, Frankel M, Patel V, Owada K, Saad A, Amerson L, Horn C, Doppelheuer S, Schindler K, Lopes DK, Chen M, Moftakhar R, Anton C, Smreczak M, Carpenter JS, Boo S, Rai A, Roberts T, Tarabishy A, Gutmann L, Brooks C, Brick J, Domico J, Reimann G, Hinrichs K, Becker M, Heiss E, Selle C, Witteler A, Al-Boutros S, Danch MJ, Ranft A, Rohde S, Burg K, Weimar C, Zegarac V, Hartmann C, Schlamann M, Göricke S, Ringlestein A, Wanke I, Mönninghoff C, Dietzold M, Budzik R, Davis T, Eubank G, Hicks WJ, Pema P, Vora N, Mejilla J, Taylor M, Clark W, Rontal A, Fields J, Peterson B, Nesbit G, Lutsep H, Bozorgchami H, Priest R, Ologuntoye O, Barnwell S, Dogan A, Herrick K, Takahasi C, Beadell N, Brown B, Jamieson S, Hussain MS, Russman A, Hui F, Wisco D, Uchino K, Khawaja Z, Katzan I, Toth G, Cheng-Ching E, Bain M, Man S, Farrag A, George P, John S, Shankar L, Drofa A, Dahlgren R, Bauer A, Itreat A, Taqui A, Cerejo R, Richmond A, Ringleb P, Bendszus M, Möhlenbruch M, Reiff T, Amiri H, Purrucker J, Herweh C, Pham M, Menn O, Ludwig I, Acosta I, Villar C, Morgan W, Sombutmai C, Hellinger F, Allen E, Bellew M, Gandhi R, Bonwit E, Aly J, Ecker RD, Seder D, Morris J, Skaletsky M, Belden J, Baker C, Connolly LS, Papanagiotou P, Roth C, Kastrup A, Politi M, Brunner F, Alexandrou M, Merdivan H, Ramsey C, Given II C, Renfrow S, Deshmukh V, Sasadeusz K, Vincent F, Thiesing JT, Putnam J, Bhatt A, Kansara A, Caceves D, Lowenkopf T, Yanase L, Zurasky J, Dancer S, Freeman B, Scheibe-Mirek T, Robison J, Rontal A, Roll J, Clark D, Rodriguez M, Fitzsimmons BFM, Zaidat O, Lynch JR, Lazzaro M, Larson T, Padmore L, Das E, Farrow-Schmidt A, Hassan A, Tekle W, Cate C, Jansen O, Cnyrim C, Wodarg F, Wiese C, Binder A, Riedel C, Rohr A, Lang N, Laufs H, Krieter S, Remonda L, Diepers M, Añon J, Nedeltchev K, Kahles T, Biethahn S, Lindner M, Chang V, Gächter C, Esperon C, Guglielmetti M, Arenillas Lara JF, Martínez Galdámez M, Calleja Sanz AI, Cortijo Garcia E, Garcia Bermejo P, Perez S, Mulero Carrillo P, Crespo Vallejo E, Ruiz Piñero M, Lopez Mesonero L, Reyes Muñoz FJ, Brekenfeld C, Buhk JH, Krützelmann A, Thomalla G, Cheng B, Beck C, Hoppe J, Goebell E, Holst B, Grzyska U, Wortmann G, Starkman S, Duckwiler G, Jahan R, Rao N, Sheth S, Ng K, Noorian A, Szeder V, Nour M, McManus M, Huang J, Tarpley J, Tateshima S, Gonzalez N, Ali L, Liebeskind D, Hinman J, Calderon-Arnulphi M, Liang C, Guzy J, Koch S, DeSousa K, Gordon-Perue G, Haussen D, Elhammady M, Peterson E, Pandey V, Dharmadhikari S, Khandelwal P, Malik A, Pafford R, Gonzalez P, Ramdas K, Andersen G, Damgaard D, Von Weitzel-Mudersbach P, Simonsen C, Ruiz de Morales Ayudarte N, Poulsen M, Sørensen L, Karabegovich S, Hjørringgaard M, Hjort N, Harbo T, Sørensen K, Deshaies E, Padalino D, Swarnkar A, Latorre JG, Elnour E, El-Zammar Z, Villwock M, Farid H, Balgude A, Cross L, Hansen K, Holtmannspötter M, Kondziella D, Hoejgaard J, Taudorf S, Soendergaard H, Wagner A, Cronquist M, Stavngaard T, Cortsen M, Krarup LH, Hyldal T, Haring HP, Guggenberger S, Hamberger M, Trenkler J, Sonnberger M, Nussbaumer K, Dominger C, Bach E, Jagadeesan BD, Taylor R, Kim J, Shea K, Tummala R, Zacharatos H, Sandhu D, Ezzeddine M, Grande A, Hildebrandt D, Miller K, Scherber J, Hendrickson A, Jumaa M, Zaidi S, Hendrickson T, Snyder V, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Mutzenbach J, Weymayr F, Broussalis E, Stadler K, Jedlitschka A, Malek A, Mueller-Kronast N, Beck P, Martin C, Summers D, Day J, Bettinger I, Holloway W, Olds K, Arkin S, Akhtar N, Boutwell C, Crandall S, Schwartzman M, Weinstein C, Brion B, Prothmann S, Kleine J, Kreiser K, Boeckh-Behrens T, Poppert H, Wunderlich S, Koch ML, Biberacher V, Huberle A, Gora-Stahlberg G, Knier B, Meindl T, Utpadel-Fischler D, Zech M, Kowarik M, Seifert C, Schwaiger B, Puri A, Hou S. Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17:47-53. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30407-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
13
|
Litière S, Isaac G, De Vries E, Bogaerts J, Chen AP, Dancey J, Ford R, Gwyther SJ, Hoekstra OS, Huang E, Lin NU, Liu Y, Mandrekar SJ, Schwartz LHOWARD, Shankar L, Therasse P, Seymour L. Validation of RECIST 1.1 for use with cytotoxic agents and targeted cancer agents (TCA): Results of a RECIST Working Group analysis of a 50 clinical trials pooled individual patient database. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.2534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2534 Background: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 were derived from an international collaborative effort supported by data from clinical trials (16 studies, 9147 patients) on cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT), providing a standard tool for response assessment. RECIST’s role has been questioned for TCA. Using a pooled individual patient database (IPD) from clinical trials performed by industry and cooperative groups, we assessed whether modifications to RECIST are required to evaluate antitumor activity of TCA. Methods: Data were collected from phase 2 and 3 clinical trials testing TCA in solid tumors. To study the occurrence of mixed responses, the variability of response of lesions within patients was studied. Furthermore, response was correlated with survival through landmark analyses and time dependent Cox models. Results: Clinical data were obtained from 23,259 patients, mainly with lung (36%), colorectal (28%) or breast cancer (11%). 15,620 patients (67%) received a TCA, mainly transduction or angiogenesis inhibitors, either as single agent (37%) or combined with other TCAs (7%) or CT (56%); 28% received CT only and 5% best supportive care or placebo. Within-patient variability reduced as the number of lesions used for response assessment increased, and did so similarly for TCAs (+/- CT) and CT. Mixed responses seemed to occur similarly across these treatment categories as well. Landmark analyses showed improving overall survival by % tumor shrinkage and a clear distinction between the effect of tumor shrinkage and progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST 1.1. This was confirmed by time dependent analysis. In addition target lesion growth showed no marked improvement in overall survival prediction over and above the other components of RECIST 1.1 PD (new lesions, non-target PD), regardless of treatment (TCA, CT or both) received. Similar results were seen focusing on major tumor types and classes of TCA. Conclusions: Using a large IPD dataset we demonstrated that RECIST 1.1 performs equally well for response assessment of TCA as for CT. No modifications are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Litière
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Elisabeth De Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan Bogaerts
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alice P. Chen
- Early Clinical Trials Development Program, DCTD, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Robert Ford
- Clinical Trials Imaging Consulting, LLC, New Jersey, NJ
| | | | - Otto S. Hoekstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Erich Huang
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Lalitha Shankar
- Diagnostic Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tummers WS, Warram JM, Tipirneni KE, Fengler J, Jacobs P, Shankar L, Henderson L, Ballard B, Pfefer TJ, Pogue BW, Weichert JP, Bouvet M, Sorger J, Contag CH, Frangioni JV, Tweedle MF, Basilion JP, Gambhir SS, Rosenthal EL. Regulatory Aspects of Optical Methods and Exogenous Targets for Cancer Detection. Cancer Res 2017; 77:2197-2206. [PMID: 28428283 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-3217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Revised: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Considerable advances in cancer-specific optical imaging have improved the precision of tumor resection. In comparison to traditional imaging modalities, this technology is unique in its ability to provide real-time feedback to the operating surgeon. Given the significant clinical implications of optical imaging, there is an urgent need to standardize surgical navigation tools and contrast agents to facilitate swift regulatory approval. Because fluorescence-enhanced surgery requires a combination of both device and drug, each may be developed in conjunction, or separately, which are important considerations in the approval process. This report is the result of a one-day meeting held on May 4, 2016 with officials from the National Cancer Institute, the FDA, members of the American Society of Image-Guided Surgery, and members of the World Molecular Imaging Society, which discussed consensus methods for FDA-directed human testing and approval of investigational optical imaging devices as well as contrast agents for surgical applications. The goal of this workshop was to discuss FDA approval requirements and the expectations for approval of these novel drugs and devices, packaged separately or in combination, within the context of optical surgical navigation. In addition, the workshop acted to provide clarity to the research community on data collection and trial design. Reported here are the specific discussion items and recommendations from this critical and timely meeting. Cancer Res; 77(9); 2197-206. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemieke S Tummers
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jason M Warram
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kiranya E Tipirneni
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | | | | | - Betsy Ballard
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | - Brian W Pogue
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Jamey P Weichert
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Michael Bouvet
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Christopher H Contag
- Departments of Pediatrics, Radiology, Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | | | - James P Basilion
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sanjiv S Gambhir
- Departments of Radiology, Bioengineering, and Materials Science & Engineering, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Eben L Rosenthal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rosen M, Kinahan PE, Gimpel JF, Opanowski A, Siegel BA, Hill G, Weiss L, Shankar L. Performance Observations of Scanner Qualification of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the Centers of Quantitative Imaging Excellence (CQIE) Program. Acad Radiol 2017; 24:232-245. [PMID: 28395794 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/30/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
We present an overview of the Centers for Quantitative Imaging Excellence (CQIE) program, which was initiated in 2010 to establish a resource of clinical trial-ready sites within the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Cancer Centers (NCI-CCs) network. The intent was to enable imaging centers in the NCI-CCs network capable of conducting treatment trials with advanced quantitative imaging end points. We describe the motivations for establishing the CQIE, the process used to initiate the network, the methods of site qualification for positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, and the results of the evaluations over the subsequent 3 years.
Collapse
|
16
|
Schwartz LH, Litière S, de Vries E, Ford R, Gwyther S, Mandrekar S, Shankar L, Bogaerts J, Chen A, Dancey J, Hayes W, Hodi FS, Hoekstra OS, Huang EP, Lin N, Liu Y, Therasse P, Wolchok JD, Seymour L. RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer 2016; 62:132-7. [PMID: 27189322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1026] [Impact Index Per Article: 128.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2016] [Accepted: 03/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) were developed and published in 2000, based on the original World Health Organisation guidelines first published in 1981. In 2009, revisions were made (RECIST 1.1) incorporating major changes, including a reduction in the number of lesions to be assessed, a new measurement method to classify lymph nodes as pathologic or normal, the clarification of the requirement to confirm a complete response or partial response and new methodologies for more appropriate measurement of disease progression. The purpose of this paper was to summarise the questions posed and the clarifications provided as an update to the 2009 publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Elisabeth de Vries
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stephen Gwyther
- Department of Medical Imaging, East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, Surrey, UK
| | - Sumithra Mandrekar
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Clinical Trials Branch, Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Alice Chen
- Early Clinical Trials Development Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Janet Dancey
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Wendy Hayes
- Exploratory Clinical & Translational Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Otto S Hoekstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erich P Huang
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Nancy Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Jedd D Wolchok
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical and Graduate Colleges, New York, NY, USA; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lesley Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ellingson BM, Bendszus M, Boxerman J, Barboriak D, Erickson BJ, Smits M, Nelson SJ, Gerstner E, Alexander B, Goldmacher G, Wick W, Vogelbaum M, Weller M, Galanis E, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Shankar L, Jacobs P, Pope WB, Yang D, Chung C, Knopp MV, Cha S, van den Bent MJ, Chang S, Yung WKA, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Gilbert MR. Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. Neuro Oncol 2015; 17:1188-98. [PMID: 26250565 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 254] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 05/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A recent joint meeting was held on January 30, 2014, with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Cancer Institute (NCI), clinical scientists, imaging experts, pharmaceutical and biotech companies, clinical trials cooperative groups, and patient advocate groups to discuss imaging endpoints for clinical trials in glioblastoma. This workshop developed a set of priorities and action items including the creation of a standardized MRI protocol for multicenter studies. The current document outlines consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol (BTIP), along with the scientific and practical justifications for these recommendations, resulting from a series of discussions between various experts involved in aspects of neuro-oncology neuroimaging for clinical trials. The minimum recommended sequences include: (i) parameter-matched precontrast and postcontrast inversion recovery-prepared, isotropic 3D T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo; (ii) axial 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo acquired after contrast injection and before postcontrast 3D T1-weighted images to control timing of images after contrast administration; (iii) precontrast, axial 2D T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; and (iv) precontrast, axial 2D, 3-directional diffusion-weighted images. Recommended ranges of sequence parameters are provided for both 1.5 T and 3 T MR systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Martin Bendszus
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Jerrold Boxerman
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Daniel Barboriak
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Bradley J Erickson
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Marion Smits
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Sarah J Nelson
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Elizabeth Gerstner
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Brian Alexander
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Gregory Goldmacher
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Michael Vogelbaum
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Michael Weller
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Paula Jacobs
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Whitney B Pope
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Dewen Yang
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Caroline Chung
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Michael V Knopp
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Soonme Cha
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Susan Chang
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - W K Al Yung
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., W.B.P.); Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (M.B.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warrne Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (J.B.); Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (D.B.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.J.E.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.S.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.N., S.C.); Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.A., P.Y.W.); Medical and Scientific Affairs, ICON Medical Imaging, Warrington, Pennsylvania (G.G., D.Y.); Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (W.W.); Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.V.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (M.W.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.G.); Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.K.-C.); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland (L.S., P.J.); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Litière S, De Vries EGE, Seymour L, Sargent D, Shankar L, Bogaerts J. Reply to Verlingue, Koscielny and Ferté. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:2889-91. [PMID: 25219450 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Litière
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E G E De Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - L Seymour
- NCIC Clinical trials group, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - D Sargent
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - L Shankar
- NCI Cancer Imaging Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA, United States
| | - J Bogaerts
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Litière S, de Vries EGE, Seymour L, Sargent D, Shankar L, Bogaerts J. The components of progression as explanatory variables for overall survival in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 database. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:1847-1853. [PMID: 24726734 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2014] [Accepted: 03/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Progressive disease (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 is defined as growth of measurable target lesions, presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target disease. In this manuscript we explored whether a more refined categorisation of tumour response and/or these components of progression, varying over time, can improve prediction of overall survival (OS) in the RECIST database. METHODS Data were randomly selected from 13 randomised clinical trials (3758 patients with breast, lung or colorectal cancer). A maximum of five target lesions contributed to the sum of longest diameters. At each measurement time we determined: best target response as best % improvement from baseline; tumour growth of target lesions as worst % change and worst rate of increase (mm/week) from nadir; presence of new lesions and occurrence of non-target PD. OS was analysed by tumour type using Cox regression, adjusting for baseline sum and including these parameters as time-dependent covariates. RESULTS 36% of patients had new lesions, 28% non-target PD and 49% experienced target lesion growth (median strongest growth 1.5mm/week). Regardless of tumour type, presence of new lesions (hazard ratio (HR) ranging 1.5-2.3) and non-target PD (HR 1.5-2.0) were strongly associated with worse OS. The explanatory value of tumour growth for OS was low compared to the other components. CONCLUSION Modelling target lesion tumour growth did not show a marked improvement in OS prediction over and above the other components. These analyses enable a better understanding of the role of each component in PD evaluation. Work is ongoing to incorporate this information into an updated version of RECIST with enhanced prediction of subsequent survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Litière
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lesley Seymour
- NCIC Clinical trials group, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Dan Sargent
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- NCI Cancer Imaging Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA, United States
| | - Jan Bogaerts
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu Y, Litière S, de Vries EG, Sargent D, Shankar L, Bogaerts J, Seymour L. The role of response evaluation criteria in solid tumour in anticancer treatment evaluation: results of a survey in the oncology community. Eur J Cancer 2013; 50:260-6. [PMID: 24239447 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2013] [Accepted: 10/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With the increasing use of novel targeted agents and the development of high imaging techniques, response evaluation criteria in solid tumour (RECIST) 1.1 developed primarily for cytotoxic agents and anatomic imaging, has demonstrated limitations. A survey was conducted of RECIST users to identify concerns and their suggestions for future RECIST criteria. METHODS 140 key partners of the RECIST collaboration were asked to complete a questionnaire. The 49 questions concerned (a) satisfaction and concerns with RECIST 1.1; (b) use of modified RECIST criteria and (c) suggestions for the next RECIST Version. RESULTS Sixty-five replies were received. 52.3% responders were satisfied with RECIST 1.1, while 10.8% indicated dissatisfaction. Areas of potential weakness included: (a) lack of incorporation of potential early indicators of response such as functional imaging, (b) lack of validation in rarer tumour types and (c) lack of validation for novel (targeted) agents. Suggestions were multiple, with highest numbers on two points: developing sub-criteria for certain disease types and including advanced imaging techniques for the evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Constructive suggestions were received for optimising the next version. Ongoing data collection will make it possible to investigate the possible utilisation of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in tumour assessment, to verify whether RECIST is/can still be applicable in novel targeted therapy and to consider the need for criteria for specific disease types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Liu
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Saskia Litière
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elisabeth Ge de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Sargent
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Jan Bogaerts
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lesley Seymour
- National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical trials group, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Litière S, De Vries E, Seymour L, Sargent DJ, Shankar L, Bogaerts J. The components of progression as explanatory variables for overall survival in the RECIST database. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.10602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10602 Background: Progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST 1.1 (Eisenhauer et al, 2009) is defined as one or more of (1) PD of measurable target lesions, (2) the presence of a new lesion (NL) or (3) the unequivocal PD of non-target disease (NT-PD). We explored the impact of these components, varying over time, on predicting overall survival (OS) in the RECIST database residing at EORTC (Bogaerts et al, 2009). Methods: Data was selected from 12 randomized clinical trials (3530 patients with breast, lung or colorectal cancer). A maximum of 5 target lesions was used to determine the sum of diameters. The following were calculated or assigned at each measurement time t: best response (BR) was best % improvement from baseline up to t (0% if no improvement - 100% if complete response (CR)); tumor growth (TG) was the weekly rate of increase from nadir to t (0 if no increase; irrespective of prior shrinkage), presence of NL (yes/no), and occurrence of NT-PD (yes/no); categories were not mutually exclusive. OS was analyzed by tumor type using a Cox regression model, adjusting for baseline sum, and including BR, TG, presence of NL and NT-PD as time dependent covariates. Results: Thirty-six percent of patients had NL, 26% had NT-PD, 11% achieved CR and 14% did not have shrinkage of target lesions, while 46% experienced TG (median strongest growth per patient of 0.5 mm/week). Regardless of tumor type, the presence of NL (Hazard Ratio (HR) ranging 1.4-2.5), NT-PD (HR 1.2-2.5) and TG (per 1mm/week increase; HR 1.1-1.4) were associated with worse OS, while achieving CR was associated with a longer OS (HR 0.2-0.8). Further analyses exploring the functional shape of the association between BR and TG, and OS are ongoing. This includes putting TG in contrast with the more usual % cutoff defining target PD. Conclusions: All three components of PD according to RECIST are independently strongly associated with OS. Quantification such as this will enable a better understanding of the role of each component (e.g. clinical aspect of NT-PD assessment) in PD evaluation. Work is ongoing to incorporate this information into an updated RECIST with enhanced prediction of subsequent survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Litière
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elisabeth De Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jan Bogaerts
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
DeSouza N, Hoekstra OS, Nestle U, Stroobants S, Boellaard R, Schaefer-Prokop C, Shankar L, Pylkkanen L, Hristova I, Bean J. EORTC Imaging Group. EJC Suppl 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(12)70015-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
23
|
Jolles PJ, Kostakoglu L, Bear HD, Idowu MO, Kurdziel K, Shankar L, Mankoff DA, Duan F, L'Heureux DZ. OT2-05-03: ACRIN 6688 Phase II Study of Fluorine-18 3′-Deoxy-3′ Fluorothymidine (FLT) in Invasive Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-ot2-05-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to surgery provides enhanced options for locoregional management and has become an integral component of primary breast cancer management. Initial tumor response in patients receiving NAC is generally determined at therapy completion. This evaluation is determined by either the presence/absence of palpable tumor as a clinical response and/or presence/absence of invasive tumor cells in the breast and nodes as a pathological response. The ability to evaluate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy early during treatment would be of significant importance. FDG PET imaging has been shown to be predictive of subsequent tumor response, but the tendency of FDG to accumulate in inflammatory tissues can complicate image interpretation. MRI changes have also been touted as predictors of response. Preliminary data suggest that early FLT PET is better able to predict response to therapy, as FLT uptake has been shown to correlate with cellular proliferation, and does not significantly accumulate in inflammatory tissue (Kenny et al, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007:1339–1347). The analysis of these data may provide a better understanding of early treatment response and improve the clinical management of breast cancer in the future.
Trial design and eligibility: In this phase II multi-institutional study, breast cancer patients with locally advanced disease with a tumor size ≥2cm (measured on imaging or estimated by physical exam) are eligible. Participants will receive standard of care NAC at their respective institutions. Participants will have 3 FLT imaging sessions to evaluate therapy response: at baseline, early-treatment (5-10 days after initiating treatment), and post-treatment prior to surgery.
Specific aims: The primary objective is to correlate the percentage change in the standardized uptake value between baseline and early therapy FLT in the primary tumor with pathologic response. Correlatively, FLT PET parameters will be compared with proliferative indices from the initial biopsy and residual tumor surgical samples using Ki-67 staining, mitotic index, and residual cancer burden. Potential safety issues and the physiologic effects associated with FLT administration will also be evaluated.
Statistical methods: To evaluate the relationship between an uptake parameter and pathologic complete response, a ROC curve will be estimated and the area under the curve, along with its 95% confidence interval, will be determined.
Accrual: Currently, 45/67 patients have accrued to the study.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-05-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PJ Jolles
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - L Kostakoglu
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - HD Bear
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - MO Idowu
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - K Kurdziel
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - L Shankar
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - DA Mankoff
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - F Duan
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - DZ L'Heureux
- 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Brown University, Providence, RI; American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shankar L. SP 125 Functional activity versus clinical predictivity. Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)72609-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
25
|
Mankoff DA, Linden HM, Link J, Kurland BF, Schubert EK, Peterson L, Gadi VK, Specht JM, Shankar L, Eary JF. NCI-sponsored phase II study of [18f]fluoroestradiol (FES) as a marker of hormone sensitivity of metastatic breast cancer: Initial results. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e11104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
26
|
Jolles PR, Kostakoglu L, Bear HD, Idowu MO, Kurdziel KA, Shankar L, Mankoff DA, Duan F, L'Heureux D. ACRIN 6688 phase II study of fluorine-18 3′-deoxy-3′ fluorothymidine (FLT) in invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.tps125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
27
|
|
28
|
Trimble EL, Abrams JS, Meyer RM, Calvo F, Cazap E, Deye J, Eisenhauer E, Fitzgerald TJ, Lacombe D, Parmar M, Seibel N, Shankar L, Swart AM, Therasse P, Vikram B, von Frenckell R, Friedlander M, Fujiwara K, Kaplan RS, Meunier F. Improving cancer outcomes through international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5109-14. [PMID: 19720905 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.22.5771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The need for international collaboration in cancer clinical trials has grown stronger as we have made progress both in cancer treatment and screening. We sought to identify those efforts already underway which facilitate such collaboration, as well as barriers to greater collaboration. METHODS We reviewed the collective experiences of many cooperative groups, governmental organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and academic investigators in their work to build international collaboration in cancer clinical trials across multiple disease sites. RESULTS More than a decade of work has led to effective global harmonization for many of the elements critical to cancer clinical trials. Many barriers remain, but effective international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials should become the norm, rather than the exception. CONCLUSION Our ability to strengthen international collaborations will result in maximization of our resources and patients, permitting us to change practice by establishing more effective therapeutic strategies. Regulatory, logistical, and financial hurdles, however, often hamper the conduct of joint trials. We must work together as a global community to overcome these barriers so that we may continue to improve cancer treatment for patients around the world.
Collapse
|
29
|
Bhal K, Bhal N, Mulik V, Shankar L. The uterine compression suture - a valuable approach to control major haemorrhage at lower segment caesarean section. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2009; 25:10-4. [PMID: 16147684 DOI: 10.1080/01443610400022553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to review the efficacy of a modified uterine compression suture in controlling major haemorrhage at lower segment caesarean section. This is a descriptive study of patients who had major obstetric haemorrhage where a compression suture was used to control bleeding at the two obstetrics unit in Cardiff between January 1998 and December 2003 (n = 11).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ford R, Schwartz L, Dancey J, Dodd LE, Eisenhauer EA, Gwyther S, Rubinstein L, Sargent D, Shankar L, Therasse P, Verweij J. Lessons learned from independent central review. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:268-74. [PMID: 19101138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2008] [Accepted: 10/29/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Independent central review (ICR) is advocated by regulatory authorities as a means of independent verification of clinical trial end-points dependent on medical imaging, when the data from the trials may be submitted for licensing applications [Food and Drug Administration. United States food and drug administration guidance for industry: clinical trial endpoints for the approval of cancer drugs and biologics. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) guideline on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man. London, UK: European Medicines Agency; 2006; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for application number NDA 21-492 (oxaliplatin). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for application number NDA 21-923 (sorafenib tosylate). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2005; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for application number NDA 22-065 (ixabepilone). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for application number NDA 22-059 (lapatinib ditosylate). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Approval package for BLA numbers 97-0260 and BLA Number 97-0244 (rituximab). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1997; United States Food and Drug Administration. FDA clinical review of BLA 98-0369 (Herceptin((R)) trastuzumab (rhuMAb HER2)). FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 1998; United States Food and Drug Administration. FDA Briefing Document Oncology Drugs Advisory Committee meeting NDA 21801 (satraplatin). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; Thomas ES, Gomez HL, Li RK, et al. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment. JCO 2007(November):5210-7]. In addition, clinical trial sponsors have used ICR in Phase I-II studies to assist in critical pathway decisions including in-licensing of compounds [Cannistra SA, Matulonis UA, Penson RT, et al. Phase II study of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or peritoneal serous cancer. JCO 2007(November):5180-6; Perez EA, Lerzo G, Pivot X, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in a phase II study of patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine. JCO 2007(August):3407-14; Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. JCO 2007(June):2171-7; Ghassan KA, Schwartz L, Ricci S, et al. Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. JCO 2006(September):4293-300; Boué F, Gabarre J, GaBarre J, et al. Phase II trial of CHOP plus rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. JCO 2006(September):4123-8; Chen HX, Mooney M, Boron M, et al. Phase II multicenter trial of bevacizumab plus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced refractory colorectal cancer: an NCI Treatment Referral Center Trial TRC-0301. JCO 2006(July):3354-60; Ratain MJ, Eisen T, Stadler WM, et al. Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JCO 2006(June):2502-12; Jaffer AA, Lee FC, Singh DA, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. JCO 2006(February):663-7; Bouché O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain F, et al. Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive Group Study-FFCD 9803. JCO 2004(November):4319-28]. This article will focus on the definition and purpose of ICR and the issues and lessons learned in the ICR setting primarily in Phase II and III oncology studies. This will include a discussion on discordance between local and central interpretations, consequences of ICR, reader discordance during the ICR, operational considerations and the need for specific imaging requirements as part of the study protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ford
- RadPharm, 100 Overlook Center, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009. [PMID: 19097774 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. FUTURE WORK A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Eisenhauer
- National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group, 10 Stuart Street, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schwartz LH, Bogaerts J, Ford R, Shankar L, Therasse P, Gwyther S, Eisenhauer EA. Evaluation of lymph nodes with RECIST 1.1. Eur J Cancer 2008; 45:261-7. [PMID: 19091550 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2008] [Accepted: 10/29/2008] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Lymph nodes are common sites of metastatic disease in many solid tumours. Unlike most metastases, lymph nodes are normal anatomic structures and as such, normal lymph nodes will have a measurable size. Additionally, the imaging literature recommends that lymph nodes be measured in the short axis, since the short axis measurement is a more reproducible measurement and predictive of malignancy. Therefore, the RECIST committee recommends that lymph nodes be measured in their short axis and proposes measurement values and rules for categorising lymph nodes as normal or pathologic; either target or non-target lesions. Data for the RECIST warehouse are presented to demonstrate the potential change in response assessment following these rules. These standardised lymph node guidelines are designed to be easy to implement, focus target lesion measurements on lesions that are likely to be metastatic and prevent false progressions due to minimal change in size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue (C-276D), New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubenstein L, Shankar L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. 32 INVITED New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline version 1.1. EJC Suppl 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(08)71964-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
34
|
Abstract
Maxillary sinus hypoplasia has been observed in up to 10% of radiological studies of the face or head. Although this may be a coincidental finding, it has been associated with chronic sinusitis and facial pain. Associated abnormalities of the lateral nasal wall, orbit, and ostiomeatal complex are common. The importance of this condition is, first, in the differential diagnosis of an "opaque" maxillary sinus and, second, as a potential hazard to the orbit of such patients, should they undergo functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Wake
- Department of Otolaryngology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kelloff GJ, Hoffman JM, Johnson B, Scher HI, Siegel BA, Cheng EY, Cheson BD, O'shaughnessy J, Guyton KZ, Mankoff DA, Shankar L, Larson SM, Sigman CC, Schilsky RL, Sullivan DC. Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:2785-808. [PMID: 15837727 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-2626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 446] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
2-[(18)F]Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) assesses a fundamental property of neoplasia, the Warburg effect. This molecular imaging technique offers a complementary approach to anatomic imaging that is more sensitive and specific in certain cancers. FDG-PET has been widely applied in oncology primarily as a staging and restaging tool that can guide patient care. However, because it accurately detects recurrent or residual disease, FDG-PET also has significant potential for assessing therapy response. In this regard, it can improve patient management by identifying responders early, before tumor size is reduced; nonresponders could discontinue futile therapy. Moreover, a reduction in the FDG-PET signal within days or weeks of initiating therapy (e.g., in lymphoma, non-small cell lung, and esophageal cancer) significantly correlates with prolonged survival and other clinical end points now used in drug approvals. These findings suggest that FDG-PET could facilitate drug development as an early surrogate of clinical benefit. This article reviews the scientific basis of FDG-PET and its development and application as a valuable oncology imaging tool. Its potential to facilitate drug development in seven oncologic settings (lung, lymphoma, breast, prostate, sarcoma, colorectal, and ovary) is addressed. Recommendations include initial validation against approved therapies, retrospective analyses to define the magnitude of change indicative of response, further prospective validation as a surrogate of clinical benefit, and application as a phase II/III trial end point to accelerate evaluation and approval of novel regimens and therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary J Kelloff
- Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jayaraman S, Song Y, Vetrivel L, Shankar L, Verkman AS. Noninvasive in vivo fluorescence measurement of airway-surface liquid depth, salt concentration, and pH. J Clin Invest 2001; 107:317-24. [PMID: 11160155 PMCID: PMC199195 DOI: 10.1172/jci11154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2000] [Accepted: 12/19/2000] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The concentration of salt in the thin layer of fluid at the surface of large airways, the airway-surface liquid (ASL), is believed to be of central importance in airway physiology and in the pathophysiology of cystic fibrosis. Invasive sampling methods have yielded a wide range of ASL [NaCl] from 40 to 180 mM. We have developed novel fluorescent probes and microscopy methods to measure ASL thickness, salt concentration, and pH quantitatively in cell-culture models and in the trachea in vivo. By rapid z-scanning confocal microscopy, ASL thickness was 21 +/- 4 microm in well-differentiated cultures of bovine tracheal epithelial cells grown on porous supports at an air-liquid interface. By ratio imaging fluorescence microscopy using sodium, chloride, and pH-sensitive fluorescent indicators, ASL [Na+] was 97 +/- 5 mM, [Cl-] was 118 +/- 3 mM, and pH was 6.94 +/- 0.03. In anesthetized mice in which a transparent window was created in the trachea, ASL thickness was 45 +/- 5 microm, [Na+] was 115 +/- 4 mM, [Cl-] was 140 +/- 5 mM, and pH was 6.95 +/- 0.05. Similar ASL tonicity and pH were found in cystic fibrosis (CFTR-null) mice. In freshly harvested human bronchi, ASL thickness was 55 +/- 5 microm, [Na+] was 103 +/- 3 mM, [Cl-] was 92 +/- 4 mM, and pH was 6.78 +/- 0.2. These results establish by a noninvasive approach the key properties of the ASL and provide direct evidence that the ASL is approximately isotonic and not saltier in cystic fibrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Jayaraman
- Departments of Medicine and Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0521, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Shankar SK, Gourie-Devi M, Shankar L, Yasha TC, Santosh V, Das S. Pathology of Madras type of motor neuron disease (MMND)--a histological and immunohistochemical study. Acta Neuropathol 2000; 99:428-34. [PMID: 10787043 DOI: 10.1007/s004010051146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
A neuropathological report of Madras type of motor neuron disease (MMND) is presented and the differences from other forms of MND are discussed. An 18-year-old girl presented with nerve deafness and slowly progressive bulbo-spinal muscular atrophy, characteristic of MMND. Post-mortem examination of the spinal cord showed a severe loss of anterior horn cells, prominent dilatation of vessels, diffuse, but sparse sprinkling of microglial cells and lymphocytes, and demyelination and sclerosis of the ventrolateral columns. Neuronal depletion and marked gliosis was noted in the cochlear nucleus on both sides, while other bulbar motor nuclei were also involved. The cochlear nerve showed demyelination and axonal loss. Trigeminal and vestibular ganglia revealed features of ganglionitis. The possibility of an inflammatory aetiology for MMND needs to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Shankar
- Department of Neuropathology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kulagina NV, Shankar L, Michael AC. Monitoring glutamate and ascorbate in the extracellular space of brain tissue with electrochemical microsensors. Anal Chem 1999; 71:5093-100. [PMID: 10575963 DOI: 10.1021/ac990636c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This paper describes electrochemical microsensors for the in vivo measurement of glutamate and ascorbate in the extracellular space of brain tissue. To prepare glutamate microsensors, carbon fiber microelectrodes (10 microns in diameter and 300-400 microns long) were modified with a cross-linked redox polymer film containing enzymes. The microsensors were coated with a thin Nafion film before use. The glutamate microsensors were both selective and sensitive toward glutamate, with detection limits in the low micromolar range. Physiologically relevant concentrations of several electroactive compounds found in brain tissue produced no response at the glutamate microsensors and also did not affect their glutamate response, the only exception being glutamine, for which a small response was observed in the absence, but not in the presence, of glutamate. The ascorbate microsensors were used in conjunction with cyclic voltammetry. They were sensitive and selective toward ascorbate, but did exhibit a small sensitivity toward the dopamine metabolite, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. The in vivo measurements performed establish the ability of the glutamate microsensors to monitor the component of the basal extracellular glutamate level that is derived from the neuronal activity of brain tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N V Kulagina
- Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
We report an unusual case of malocclusion following a history of apparently blunt trauma. No maxillary or mandibular fractures were identified. The malocclusion persisted for several days. Finally computed tomography was performed, which revealed a foreign body in the infratemporal fossa. A 4-cm pencil was extracted from the patient's right temporomandibular joint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Tang
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- P Satishchandra
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yasha TC, Shankar L, Santosh V, Das S, Shankar SK. Histopathological & immunohistochemical evaluation of ageing changes in normal human brain. Indian J Med Res 1997; 105:141-50. [PMID: 9119421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
As age related changes in the brain have not been systematically studied in the Indian population though there is an impression that they are less frequent, we studied 52 brains collected at autopsy from individuals above the age of 60 yr. The incidence of senile plaques (SPs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) together were found to increase with age from 21 per cent in the seventh decade to 33 per cent in the eighth decade and 54 per cent in the ninth decade, the increasing incidence of NFTs being statistically significant. The SPs were found both in the hippocampus and frontal cortex while NFTs were seen only in the hippocampus in non-demented aged individuals. In contrast, in the three cases of Alzheimer's disease (symbol: see text) AD studied, the NFTs and SPs were found in high density in both hippocampus and frontal cortex. By immunohistochemistry, various morphological forms of SPs were found to have beta amyloid protein consistently, while ubiquitin and phosphorylated neurofilament occurred variably. More number of SPs could be labelled by amyloid immunostaining than by conventional silver stains. The NFTs contained ubiquitin and phosphorylated neurofilament protein as the antigenic components, both in AD and normal ageing. The incidence of age related changes and their antigenic character in the limited sample studied from south India appears to be comparable to findings from the West. Multicentric studies on a large sample derived from different ethnic groups in India are needed to further evaluate these features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T C Yasha
- Department of Neuropathology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Bangalore
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mehta KP, Ali US, Shankar L, Tirthani D, Ambadekar M. Renal dysfunction detected by beta-2 microglobulinuria in sick neonates. Indian Pediatr 1997; 34:107-11. [PMID: 9255003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess renal involvement in sick neonates referred to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) using standard renal parameters and urinary beta 2 microglobulin (B2M) excretion. DESIGN Descriptive study. SETTING Level II NICU and Nephrology Division of Pediatric Tertiary hospital. SUBJECTS Forty six term sick neonates transferred for neonatal care and forty healthy term neonates who served as normal controls for urinary B2M excretion. METHODS Standard tests including estimation of BUN, serum creatinine, blood pH, serum bicarbonate, serum and urinary electrolytes, urine output, and urinalysis. Urinary B2M levels were estimated from urine collected on day 1 (D1) and day 3 (D3) in all and 18 neonates were tested on day 7 (D7) by radio-immunoassay method. RESULTS Statistically significant elevation of mean values of urinary B2M were noted when sick neonates were compared with normal controls irrespective of primary disease, indicating tubular dysfunction (41/46 = 90%), whilst only 7 of these (17%) had abnormalities indicating renal involvement when judged by standard tests. Very high levels of urinary B2M were noted with birth asphyxia (n = 9), sepsis (n = 8) and renal disease (n = 7). Transient elevation of urinary B2M was noted in meconium aspiration syndrome (n = 4). Ten surgical cases with non renal congenital malformations showed high urinary B2M and 12/18 tested on D7 had persistently high urinary B2M due to multiple factors. CONCLUSIONS Elevated urinary B2M in 90% sick neonates with apparently normal renal parameters in majority (34/41) indicates subclinical proximal tubular dysfunction especially in neonates with asphyxia, sepsis and congenital malformations. Persistent elevation of urinary B2M appear to be a sensitive diagnostic indicator for defining a group of neonates with subtle renal tubular dysfunction, the clinical relevance of which on long term basis is a subject for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K P Mehta
- Nephrology Division, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children Bombay
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shankar L, Ravindranath V, Boyd MR, Vistica DT, Shankar SK. Histological, histochemical and autoradiographic evidence of in vitro neurotoxic effects of the novel antitumor agent, 9-methoxy-N2-methylellipticinium acetate. Neurotoxicology 1997; 18:89-95. [PMID: 9215991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
9-Methoxy-N2-methylellipticinium acetate (MMEA) exhibits selective cytotoxicity towards glial-derived human brain tumor cell lines comprising the U.S. National Cancer Institute preclinical drug screen. Neurotoxic potential of MMEA has been demonstrated in an in vitro model employing sagittal slices of rat brain. Histochemical staining of rat brain slices for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity revealed decreased staining intensity following incubation with increasing concentrations of MMEA (0.1-100 microM). Cytological evaluation of paraffin sections stained with Cresyl Fast Violet revealed neuronal damage delineated by cytoplasmic vacuolation, and distention and fraying of the plasma membrane. No glial or vascular pathology could be discerned. Autoradiography, following exposure to 14C-MMEA, revealed distinct labelling of the large neurons of the brain stem, neurons in the thalamus and pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus, indicating neuronal uptake of the drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Shankar
- Department of Neuropathology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Bangalore, India
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the association between petrous carotid canal (PCC) and internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses in patients with malignant osteopetrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mean and minimum PCC diameters obtained from cranial computed tomographic (CT) scans in 20 patients were compared with similar measurements in 52 control subjects. ICA caliber, evaluated with magnetic resonance (MR) arteriography, was correlated with age and PCC dimensions. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference between patient and control PCC diameters. There was a strong positive correlation between age and PCC diameter in the control subjects, but only a weakly positive correlation in the patients. One or both ICAs were stenotic on all patient MR arteriograms. MR angiographic stenosis grade correlated positively with age but not with PCC diameters. CONCLUSION PCC and ICA stenoses occur frequently in patients with malignant osteopetrosis. Bony overgrowth or a "persistent fetal state" may produce the PPC stenoses. The findings do not support progressive PCC narrowing in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Curé
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425-0720, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Roithmann R, Shankar L, Hawke M, Chapnik J, Kassel E, Noyek A. Diagnostic imaging of fungal sinusitis: eleven new cases and literature review. Rhinology 1995; 33:104-10. [PMID: 7569650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Fungal sinusitis should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic or recurring sinusitis resistant to adequate medical treatment. A high index of suspicion is necessary for the diagnosis, and the clinical examination is rarely conclusive. The definitive diagnosis depends on the pathologist in most cases. We reviewed retrospectively the imaging findings, specifically computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR), in a series of fungal sinusitis patients. Non-enhanced CT scan is more sensitive than conventional X-ray in detecting the classical focal areas of hyper-attenuation and calcification seen in soft-tissue masses of fungal sinusitis. MR findings of hypo-intense signals on T1-weighted sequences which progress to signal-void area on T2-weighted sequences, are characteristic features of fungal sinusitis; however, it is reserved for cases where intracranial invasion is suspected or CT findings are inconclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Roithmann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ali US, Shankar L, Joshi MS, Mehta KP. Nephrocalcinosis in a six-week-old infant. Indian Pediatr 1993; 30:1242-5. [PMID: 8077022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- U S Ali
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children and Research Centre, Bombay
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Roithmann R, Shankar L, Hawke M, Kassel E, Noyek AM. CT imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of sinus disease: a partnership between the radiologist and the otolaryngologist. J Otolaryngol 1993; 22:253-60. [PMID: 8230376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
We consider that the nasal cavity and the paranasal sinuses cannot be declared completely normal without a normal CT scan. While CT scans are clearly useful in the evaluation of patients with recurrent sinusitis, it is important to emphasize that they should not be employed exclusively for diagnosis. Nasal endoscopy and clinical evaluation still form the basis for the diagnosis of chronic and recurring sinusitis. The CT technique described should be used only to supplement the clinical data obtained during history-taking and the rhinoscopic/endoscopic examination and is essential before functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The complexity of the diagnostic process is simplified to patient benefit when the radiologist and the otolaryngologist form a functional interactive partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Roithmann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Stoney P, Probst L, Shankar L, Hawke M. CT scanning for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 200 cases with reporting scheme. J Otolaryngol 1993; 22:72-8. [PMID: 8515520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
An analysis of the computed tomograms of the paranasal sinuses from 200 patients with sinonasal complaints is presented. The results of our study are similar to those of other reported series despite a different patient selection. We have developed a simple systematic reporting scheme which includes all of the relevant abnormalities, and which allows a much more detailed picture of the disease pattern to be generated for both clinical use and for analytical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Stoney
- Department of Otolaryngology, St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Borowy ZJ, Probst L, Deitel M, Shankar L. A family exhibiting carotid body tumours. Can J Surg 1992; 35:546-51. [PMID: 1393873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The authors describe the surgery carried out for 11 carotid body tumours (CBTs) that were found in three generations of a Greek family. Eight patients with CBTs were operated upon at St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, within 1 year. Three patients had bilateral CBTs, which were removed in two stages. Only one of the CBTs occurred in a female. Seven CBTs were excised by meticulous subadventitial dissection. In the eighth, a previous attempt at removal in another hospital had proved unsuccessful, and excision of the tumour required ligation of the external carotid artery and partial excision of the carotid bulb. The authors conclude that most CBTs can be excised directly without ligation, shunts or bypasses. In eight operations carried out on five patients, the only complication was a transient neuropraxia of the hypoglossal nerve that resolved within 2 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z J Borowy
- Department of Surgery St. Joseph's Health Centre, University of Toronto, Ont
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Shankar L, Mehta AL, Hawke M, Rutka J. High-resolution computed tomography of an aberrant internal carotid artery. J Otolaryngol 1992; 21:373-5. [PMID: 1469760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L Shankar
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|