ALK-positive adenocarcinoma of the lung expressing neuroendocrine markers and presenting as a "pituitary adenoma"

We report an ALK-rearranged adenocarcinoma of the lung presenting as a pituitary metastasis, clinically simulating a pituitary adenoma. The patient, a 50 year-old, former-smoking woman was admitted with a Parinaud's syndrome characterized by progressive oculomotor impairment of visual verticality, bitemporal hemianopsia and nystagmus. Imaging studies showed a sellar tumor and the biopsy revealed a TTF-1 and napsin positive lung adenocarcinoma strongly expressing synaptophysin and CD56, also harboring ALK rearrangement. A subsequent CT scan disclosed the primary lung mass of the left upper lobe. The patient progressed after 4 cycles of cisplatin/pemetrexed as first line treatment, but showed a partial response and a significant clinical benefit from the combination of ceritinib and nivolumab in a phase Ib trial. Despite its central nervous system tropism, ALK-rearranged adenocarcinoma manifesting with pituitary gland involvement was never reported. Second generation ALK inhibitors seem the best therapeutic strategy.

Efficacy and safety of Everolimus and Exemestane in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) human-epidermal-growth-factor negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer patients: New insights beyond clinical trials. The EVA study

BACKGROUND

The BOLERO-2 trial reported efficacy and safety of Everolimus (EVE) and Exemestane (EXE) combination in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. The BALLET trial further evaluated the safety of EVE-EXE in HR+ ABC patients, without reporting efficacy data. Aim of the EVA real-life study was to collect data of efficacy and safety of EVE-EXE combination in the clinical setting, as well as exploring efficacy according to EVE Dose-Intensity (DI) and to previous treatment with Fulvestrant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study aimed to describe the outcome of ABC pts treated with EVE-EXE combination in terms of median duration of EVE treatment and ORR in a real-life setting.

RESULTS

From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled 404 pts. Median age was 61 years (33-83). Main metastatic sites were: bone (69.1%), soft tissue (34.7%) and viscera (33.2%). Median number of previous treatments was 2 (1-7). 43.3% of the pts had received Fulvestrant. Median exposure to EVE was 31.0 weeks (15.4-58.3) in the whole population. No difference was observed in terms of EVE exposure duration according to DI (p for trend = 0.27) or type of previous treatments (p = 0.33). ORR and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were observed in 31.6% and 60.7% of the patients, respectively, with the lowest ORRs confined in CHT pre-treated patients or in those who received the lowest DI of EVE. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37.9% of the patients. Main AEs were: stomatitis (11.2%), non-infectious pneumonitis - NIP (3.8%), anaemia (3.8%) and fatigue (3.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The EVA study provided new insights in the use of EVE-EVE combination in HR+ ABC pts many years after the publication of the pivotal trial. The combination is safe and the best response could be obtained in patients receiving the full dose of EVE and/or after hormone-therapy as Fulvestrant in ABC.

Quality of Life and Anxious-depressive Symptoms in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mindfulness-based Interventions: Feasibility and Preliminary Outcomes on Prospective Single-centre Case-control Study (MIND4ME St.)

Background

Mindfulness based interventions (MBIs) have shown efficacy in improving psychological symptoms including depression and anxiety in cancer patients (pts). The study aimed to explore feasibility and reproducibility of MBIs in an Italian Cancer Centre measuring biochemical and psychological parameters.

Methods

In this pilot prospective case-control study, we recruited newly diagnosed pts receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). A MBIs program was designed consisting of 2.5 hours weekly for 8 weeks and, including meditation, yoga and body scan. Material for 45 minutes (mn) home daily practice was provided. Primary endpoint was to evaluate feasibility. Secondary endpoints were assessment of quality of life (QoL), psychological and biochemical outcomes of stress, tested at baseline (W0), W4, W8, W24, W48. PSS (Perceived Stress Reduction), POMS (profile of mood states scores), EuroQoL (EQ-5D-3L) were administered.

Results

Ten pts underwent MBIs program arm. We present preliminary results, while data of control arm are being collected. All pts were female, two pts (20%) dropped out. Median age was 56 years. All received adjuvant CT, 5/8 received radiotherapy and hormone therapy. Mean of sessions attending was 6.8 (76%). Median daily practice was 30 mn. EQ-5D item for depression and anxiety showed decreasing trend in mean score from moderate to light (P = 0.15) and significant improvement of auto-perceived QoL was observed comparing W0 and W8 (P = 0.02)

Conclusions

In a sensitive setting such as start CT, we found high pts compliance to MBIs. Improvement in self-perceived QoL after starting program was found and comparing anxious-depressive symptoms outcomes with control arm is still needed.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Abstract P4-22-12: Ribociclib + fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– advanced breast cancer (ABC)

Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the treatment backbone for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) ABC, but efficacy is limited by ET resistance. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6–cyclin D (CCND1)–retinoblastoma (Rb) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways have been implicated in ET resistance. CDK4/6 and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors act synergistically with ET in preclinical and clinical studies of HR+ breast cancer. Ribociclib (LEE011; CDK4/6 inhibitor) + fulvestrant ± alpelisib (BYL719) or buparlisib (BKM120) in HR+, HER2– ABC is being investigated in a Phase Ib/II study (NCT02088684). Here, we present results from the ribociclib + fulvestrant combination, with intermittent and continuous ribociclib dosing.

Methods: Postmenopausal patients (pts) with HR+, HER2– ABC refractory to aromatase inhibitors received ribociclib intermittently (600 mg/day, 3-weeks-on/1-week-off; Arm A) or continuously (400 mg/day; Arm B; following Arm A safety evaluation) + fulvestrant (500 mg; Cycle 1 Day 1 and 15; subsequent cycles Day 1). Primary objective: dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) to confirm the recommended Phase II dose of ribociclib + fulvestrant. Secondary objectives: safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity (RECIST v1.1); biomarkers that may correlate with response were also assessed.

Results: As of March 10, 2016, 24 pts received ribociclib + fulvestrant (Arm A, n=13; Arm B, n=11); 4 pts in Arm B were ongoing; median duration of exposure was 7.4 (Arm A) and 4.5 (Arm B) months. Median number of prior regimens: 4 (Arm A) and 3 (Arm B). Treatment discontinuation (n; Arm A, Arm B) was due to disease progression (11, 4), physician decision (1, 2), and adverse events (AEs; 1, 1). DLTs in Cycle 1 (n; Arm A, Arm B) were Grade [G] 3 pulmonary embolism (1, 0) and G3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation (0, 1). The most common G3/4 drug-related AE (Arm A, Arm B) was neutropenia (62%, 36%); 5 pts had QTcF prolongation >60 ms (n; 4, 1).

Common all-Grade drug-related AEs (>35% pts) n (%)Arm A (n=13)Arm B (n=11)Neutropenia10 (77)7 (64)Fatigue9 (69)3 (27)Nausea6 (46)5 (46)Anemia6 (46)0 (0)Reduced appetite5 (39)1 (9)

Best overall responses (BORs; n; Arm A, Arm B): partial response (PR; 3, 1), stable disease (SD; 9, 6), and neither complete response nor progressive disease (NCRNPD; non-measurable disease; 1, 4). Overall response rate: 23% (Arm A) and 9% (Arm B); disease control rate (BOR of complete response, PR, SD, or NCRNPD): 100% in both arms. Next-generation sequencing data (n; Arm A, Arm B) were available for 16 pts (7, 9): 5 pts had CCND1 alterations (PR [1, 0], SD [2, 1], and NCRNPD [0, 1]); 11 pts had PIK3CA alterations (PR [1, 0], SD [3, 4], and NCRNPD [1, 2]); 2 of these pts had both CCND1 and PIK3CA alterations (SD [1, 0] and NCRNPD [0, 1]).

Conclusions: Ribociclib + fulvestrant has a manageable safety profile and shows preliminary clinical activity in pretreated pts with HR+, HER2– ABC. Both ribociclib intermittent and continuous dosing schedules were well tolerated. Clinical responses were observed in tumors with and without CDK4/6–cyclin D–Rb and PI3K/mTOR pathway alterations.

Citation Format: Tolaney SM, Forero-Torres A, Boni V, Bachelot T, Lu Y-S, Maur M, Fasolo A, Motta M, Pan C, Dobson J, Hewes B, Chin Lee S. Ribociclib + fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-12.

Phase Ib study of weekly mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) with weekly paclitaxel

BACKGROUND

The additive cytotoxicity in vitro prompted a clinical study evaluating the non-prodrug rapamycin analogue ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669; formerly deforolimus) administered i.v. combined with paclitaxel (PTX; Taxol).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with taxane-sensitive solid tumors were eligible. The main dose escalation foresaw 50% ridaforolimus increments from 25 mg with a fixed PTX dose of 80 mg/m(2), both given weekly 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle. Collateral levels with a lower dose of either drug were planned upon achievement of the maximum tolerated dose in the main escalation. Pharmacodynamic studies in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and skin biopsies and pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction studies at cycles 1 and 2 were carried out.

RESULTS

Two recommended doses were determined: 37.5 mg ridaforolimus/60 mg/m(2) PTX and 12.5 mg/80 mg/m(2). Most frequent toxic effects were mouth sores (79%), anemia (79%), fatigue (59%), neutropenia (55%) and dermatitis (48%). Two partial responses were observed in pharyngeal squamous cell and pancreatic carcinoma. Eight patients achieved stable disease > or =4 months. No drug interaction emerged from PK studies. Decrease of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein1 (4E-BP1) phosphorylation was shown in PBMCs. Similar inhibition of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase was present in reparative epidermis and vascular tissues, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Potential antiangiogenic effects and encouraging antitumor activity justify further development of the combination.

Phase 1b study defining the optimal dosing combinations of the mTOR inhibitor AP23573 and Paclitaxel (PTX)

3509

Background: AP23573 is a novel mTOR inhibitor with demonstrated anti-tumor activity in clinical trials. In vitro, AP23573 exhibits at least additive anti-proliferative activity in combination with a variety of agents including taxanes. This trial studied the combination of AP23573 and paclitaxel (PTX) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This was a modified, sequential (3+3) dose finding study with starting doses of 25 mg AP23573 i.v. and 80 mg/m2 PTX i.v. as Dose Level 1 (DL1) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Doses of either drug were adjusted in successive cohorts. Blood samples and skin biopsies were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. Dose limiting toxicity definitions included neutrophils <500/μL; thrombocytopenia = Grade 3 (CTC), any non- hematologic toxicities = Grade 2; missing 2 consecutive doses due to any toxicity. For PK and PD analysis, AP23573 and PTX were administered one day apart at the start of Cycle 1, reversing the sequence at Day 8. Results: Enrollment is complete and 29 patients with a variety of tumors (sarcoma, pancreatic, H&N, melanoma, thymoma) have been treated. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and Grade 2 mouth sores were seen at DL1 as well as missed doses due to moderate (Grade 2) neutropenia. Adverse events include mouth sores and fatigue which were mild and reversible. Available PK data for AP23573 and PTX suggest no interaction. PD analysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells demonstrates no interference by PTX on mTOR inhibition by AP23573. PD data in skin biopsies are forthcoming. Both 12.5 mg AP23573/80mg/m2 PTX and 37.5mg AP23573/60mg/m2 PTX are maximal dose combinations that appear to be well tolerated. Activity has been observed at multiple AP23573 mg/PTX mg/m2 dose levels (25/60, 12.5/80, 25/80). Five patients have been on study for >4 cycles, including 2 patients with partial responses (H&N and pancreatic). Conclusions: Combined therapy with AP23573 and PTX is safe. It is notable that evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed at modest doses of each drug when in combination. Combinations of these agents at both doses cited would be recommended for evaluation in trials examining efficacy in specific tumors.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy (HDSC) with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) support for high-risk breast cancer (BC)

11026

Background: Recent reports suggest that intensified adjuvant chemotherapy with stem cell support improve disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in subgroups of patients with high risk BC. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy, safety and feasibility of a program of HDSC with PBPC support (according to the Milan protocol, ASCO 2001) in patients with BC at high risk of recurrence Methods: Between February 1995 and January 2001, 201 non-consecutive patients with more than 3 positive axillary nodes at surgery, median age 46 (range 27–62), has been evaluated. Median number of involved nodes was 15 (range 3–48), 38% and 49% pts had ER and PgR negative tumors, respectively. Fourty-sevent percent of pts had tumors with a high proliferative activity. HDSC consisted of sequential administration of cyclosphosphamide 7 g/m2 (day 0) plus filgrastim 5 μg/kg s.c. daily and stem cell collection, methotrexate 8 g/m2 plus vincristine 2 mg/m2 (day +16), and two consecutive courses of epidoxorubicin 120 mg/m2 (days +23 and + 38) plus filgrastim 5 μg/kg s.c. daily. Myeloablative therapy (day +58) consisted of thiotepa 600 mg/m2 and melphalan 160 mg/m2 plus PBPCs and filgrastim 5 μg/kg s.c. daily. Results: Three pts discontinued the program permanently because of toxicity. A median of 9,35x106/kg (range 3.35–35.62) CD34+ cells was infused. Engraftment for neutrophils (> 500/μl) and platelets (> 20.000/μl) was observed a median of 9 days (range 7–17) and 10 days (range 7–18) after PBPC infusion, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were recorded. After a median follow-up of 79 months, 108 (54%) pts are disease- free. Ninety-three patients experienced disease recurrence [9/93 (10%) pts had loco regional disease recurrence and 84/93 (90%) pts distant recurrence], of whom 58/93 (63%) have died. Five-year DFS and OS from the start of treatment are 55% and 71%, respectively. No poor marrow function, myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary tumors were observed. In 2-sided log-rank tests, hormone-receptor status and the number of tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes were significant prognostic factors for DFS. Conclusions: Our results confirm that HDSC is a safe procedure and is associated with favorable outcome in patients with high-risk BC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

An enriched phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the N-cadherin (NCAD) cyclic competitive binder exherin (ADH-1) in patients with solid tumors

3042

Background: N-cad is a cell adhesion molecule expressed by vascular endothelium and tumor cells of invasive tumors. ADH-1, a cyclic pentapeptide, antagonizes N-cad, causing rapid tumor vascular disruption and apoptosis in preclinical models. We report results from a Phase I study of weekly doses of intravenous ADH-1 given to patients with N-cad+ solid tumors, to evaluate safety, PK, antitumor activity, and effect of ADH-1 on tumor vasculature assessed by DCE-MRI. Methods: ADH-1 starting dose was 150 mg/m2 administered weekly for 3 W in 28 D cycles. DCE-MRI was performed to assess changes in tumor perfusion 90 mins after the first dose of ADH-1, and repeated on D 15 if no changes were noted. Following the 3rd dose level (DL 3, 600 mg/m2 ), the schedule was amended to weekly ADH-1 without interruption, in 21 D cycles. Results: 55 pts with refractory solid tumors were screened, 56% were N-cad+ [screened/N-cad+: GYN 16/21 (Ovarian 13/17), GI 5/14, breast 2/6, renal 5/5, head & neck 2/3, others 2/6]. 13 pts (5 males, median age 53 yrs.) received 20 cycles of ADH-1 by bolus injection at 150, 300 and 600 mg/m2/weekly ×3 W Q21–28 D. No DLTs have occurred to date. No pts have experienced > grade 2 study drug related AEs. One pt, with fallopian tube ca. had a mixed response. There was a 30% reduction in retroperitoneal nodal disease at the end of cycle 3, and a 37% reduction at the end of Cy 4. However, new bone lesions were also noted at the end of cycle 4 assessment. Tumor blood flow reduction of ≥40% was noted in this patient, and she also reported pain in the region of the tumor following multiple doses of ADH-1. PK parameters are available for the first 3 DLs (150, 300, and 600 mg/m2): mean Cmax 22.1, 37.0, and 50.8μg/mL, respectively; AUCinf 24.3, 60.6, and 110.3 h·μg/mL; Vss 12.6, 15.1, and 16.3 L/m2; and T1/2 1.8, 2.7, and 2.4hr. Conclusions: ADH-1 has been well tolerated in 4 dose levels tested to date, dose escalation is proceeding. No DLTs have occurred and the MTD has not been reached. Anti-tumor activity has been noted. Updated clinical, PK and PD results will be presented.

[Table: see text]

Phase Ib pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study to define the optimal dose for combining the mTOR inhibitor AP23573 with capecitabine (CAPE)

3065

Background: AP23573 is a novel mTOR inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in Phase1 and 2 trials. In vitro, AP23573 is at least additive with chemotherapy agents including 5FU. CAPE is activated to 5FU by thymidine phosphorylase which may be highly expressed in tumors and correlates with progression through angiogenic mechanisms controlled by mTOR. Given the potential for a positive interaction, this trial studied the combination of AP23573 and CAPE in adult patients with solid tumors. Methods: Starting doses were: AP23573 25 mg i.v. on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, and CAPE 1650 mg/m2 p.o. daily on Days 1–14. Planned PK and PD studies include analysis of plasma VEGF, PBMC, skin, and tumor samples for effects on pathways associated with mTOR and on the metabolism of CAPE and fluoropyrimidines. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: febrile neutropenia; neutrophils <500x106/L for ≥ 5 days; ≥ Grade 3 (CTC) thrombocytopenia; non-haematological toxicities ≥ Grade 2 (diarrhea, cardiac or renal); or missing two consecutive weekly doses due to any toxicity. Results: 15 patients have been treated. Three dose levels of weekly AP23573 (25, 37.5 and 50 mg) were completed without DLT. Treatment-related toxicity was mostly mild or moderate (≤ grade 2), with mucositis/stomatitis the most frequent. Anti-tumor activity included a partial response in a case of endometrial cancer, and stable disease > 4 months in 3 cases (1 renal, 1 uterine and 1 head & neck cancer). AP23573 did not affect the PK of CAPE or 5FU but a trend toward a decreased exposure to the catabolite 5-FuH2 was apparent in the presence of AP23573. In keeping with this observation, the activity of dihydro-pyridine-dehydrogenase gradually decreased to 60% of that before AP23573. This decrease was not associated with reduced tolerability. Conclusions: The combination of AP23573 with CAPE is safe with initial indications of anti-tumor activity. This is the first description of a feasible combination of an mTOR inhibitor with an anti-metabolite. Additional dose levels of AP23573 (75 mg) and CAPE (1850 mg/m2/day) are ongoing and PK and PD studies are continuing.

[Table: see text]

A randomized phase II trial evaluating standard (50mg/min) versus low (10mg/min) infusion duration of gemcitabine as first-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients who are not eligible for platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine is one of the most active drugs against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical data suggested that gemcitabine efficacy could be improved by increasing the dose or by increasing the infusion duration. This study has been designed in order to explore two different approaches of gemcitabine dose intensification in patients with advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 121 chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not suitable for a platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly allocated to chemotherapy with gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks by standard 30 min intravenous infusion (arm A), or gemcitabine 10 mg/m2/min for 150 min on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks by intravenous infusion at fixed dose rate (arm B).

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen patients were fully analyzed. No difference in response rate (16.1% versus 9.9%, p=0.28), median time to disease progression (4 months versus 4.5 months, p=0.34) median survival (9.8 months in both arms), and 1-year survival (42.6% versus 39.0% p=0.98) was detected in arms A and B, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Main hematological toxicities were grade 3-4 neutropenia observed in 17.9% of patients in group A and in 49.2% of individuals in group B (p=0.0002). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 3.3% in arm A and 0% in arm B (p=0.17). Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was more frequently observed in arm B patients (9.9% versus 1.8%, p=0.057). Non-hematological toxicity was similar in both arms, and consisted in grade 1-2 gastrointestinal toxicity observed in 48.2% of patients in arm A and 41.0% in arm B.

CONCLUSION

Intensification of standard doses or prolonged infusion schedule did not result in efficacy improvement. Gemcitabine infusion duration does not warrant further investigation in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Cardiac toxicity of trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with high-dose chemotherapy: a retrospective study

HER-2 overexpression is associated to a poor prognosis in high-risk and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). HER-2 status is also a predictive factor and when trastuzumab is administered in combination with or sequentially to chemotherapy, a significant disease-free and/or overall survival improvement has been observed in HER-2+ early and MBC. Unfortunately, in both settings, trastuzumab is associated with an increased risk of cardiac dysfunction (CD). We have reviewed the clinical charts of HER-2-overexpressing MBC patients treated with trastuzumab after HDC. Age, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), radiation therapy on cardiac area, exposure to anthracycline, single or multiple transplant, high-dose agents, trastuzumab treatment duration were recorded as potential risk factors. In total, 53 patients have been included in the analysis. Median LVEF at baseline was 60.5%; at the end of trastuzumab (data available for 28 patients only), it was 55% (P = 0.01). Five out of the 28 (17.9%) patients experienced CD. Two out of 53 (3.8%) patients developed a congestive heart failure. Age > or = 50 years and multiple transplant procedure were potential risk factors for CD. The overall incidence of CD observed in this population of HER-2+ MBC patients treated with trastuzumab after HDC is not superior to that reported with concomitant trastuzumab and anthracyclines. However, patients with age > or = 50 years or receiving multiple course of HDC should be considered at risk for CD.

Primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer: clinical data and biological fall-out

Primary systemic chemotherapy (PST) was first used in early 1970s for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer; in this setting primary chemotherapy was administered to allow for radical surgery and the objective response rates were high with a substantial proportion of patients amenable to surgery. On the basis of this activity, PST was subsequently used to treat operable locally advanced or large primary tumors to increase the rate of conservative surgery. First generation clinical trials demonstrated that breast conservation rates were improved, that a proportion of patients experienced a complete pathologic response and that response to PST was a good predictor of long term outcome. Second generation of clinical trials were designed to compare PST to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy: here again the rate of conservative surgery was significantly improved and the pathologic response rate demonstrated its prognostic value, however no progression free or survival improvement was obtained in comparison with postoperative treatments. Another interesting observation from these trials was that some tumor parameters (histology, grade, hormone receptor status) can predict the likelihood of achieving a pathologic complete response. On the basis of these data, PST can now be considered the standard of care for locally advanced disease, an reasonable option in case of large primary breast tumors not eligible for conservative surgery and an acceptable alternative for all the patients who are candidate to adjuvant treatment. It however clear that PST represents an excellent in vivo model to test new regimens, to evaluate biomarkers with predictive value and to evaluate the treatment induced modifications in tumor biology. Availability of new technologies able to measure the expression of thousands of genes and of new molecularly directed drugs will increase further the interest in this treatment strategy.

Phase II study of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

This phase II study evaluated the response rate and tolerability of gemcitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1000 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 8, followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg m⁻² on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles. From February 2002 to May 2004, 60 patients were enrolled into the study in seven Italian institutions. We observed one complete response (1.7%) and 14 partial responses (23.3%), for an overall response rate of 25.0% (95% confidence interval, 14.7–37.9%). The median duration of response was 5.9 months (range 1.5–17.1 months). With a median follow-up of 6.7 months, median time to progressive disease and overall survival were 2.7 (range 1.9–3.4 months) and 7.3 months (range 7.2–8.6 months), respectively. The main grade 3–4 haematological toxicities were transient neutropenia in 11.7% and thrombocytopenia in 8.3% of the patients. Nausea/vomiting was the main grade 3–4 nonhaematological toxicity, occurring in 10.0% of the patients. Two (3.3%) patients developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. Our results show that gemcitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC, deserving further study, especially for patients not eligible to receive cisplatin.

HER2 overexpression as a prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support

We retrospectively evaluated the predictive and prognostic role of HER2 expression in 44 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with high-dose consolidation chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell support after induction chemotherapy (IC) with six courses of epirubicin+paclitaxel (22 patients) or gemcitabine+epirubicin+paclitaxel (22 patients). HER2 expression was evaluated by an immunohistochemical method (Herceptest, Dako). A total of 13 patients (29.5%) showed a HER2 overexpression (score 3+). After IC, nine patients were in complete response (CR), 30 in partial response (PR), and five in stable disease (SD); after HDCT, 20 (45.5%) obtained a CR, and 23 were in PR, for a conversion rate of 48.5%. Conversion rate for HER2-positive patients was 87.5 vs 37% for HER2-negative patients (P=0.018). The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survivals (OS) were 17.6 (95% CI 13.2-22.0) and 44 (95% CI 25.9-62.3) months, respectively. Patients with HER2 overexpression experienced a significantly (P=0.0042) shorter median PFS (15.3 months, 95% CI 11.1-19.5) compared to HER2-negative patients (21.3 months, 95% CI 14.3-28.4). The median OS was 27.6 months (95% CI 4.5-50.7) in HER2-positive patients and 50.3 months (95% CI 38.7-62.0) in HER2-negative patients (P=0.345). These results indicate that HER2 overexpression predicts a worse outcome for patients with MBC treated with HDCT, despite the high CR rate obtained in this subset of patients.