An Update on the Epidemiology of Uveitis in an Urban Setting in Northern Madrid, Spain

PURPOSE

To describe the incidence, prevalence and etiologies of uveitis in Madrid, Spain.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in a single hospital. All consecutive cases of uveitis that attended the Hospital during year 2019 were included. Mean incidence and prevalence were calculated.

RESULTS

Three hundred and one cases were included. Of these, 127 were incident. This represents an incidence of 21.24 new cases per 100,000 persons/year, and a prevalence was 50.43 cases per 100,000 persons. Mean age was 56.89 ± 18.78 years, and 159 were women (52.8%). Sixty-two cases were infectious (20.6%). Age (p = .005), initial visual acuity (p = .001) and cystoid macular oedema (CMO; p = .010) were found to be independent predictors of the final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with uveitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Uveitis affects approximately 1 in 1800 persons in northern Madrid. Younger age, better initial visual acuities and the presence of CMO predicted better final BCVA.

VIP/VPAC Axis Expression in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disorders: Associated miRNA Signatures

Few studies have considered immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMID) together, which is necessary to adequately understand them given they share common mechanisms. Our goal was to investigate the expression of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and its receptors VPAC1 and VPAC2 in selected IMID, analyze the effect of biological therapies on them, and identify miRNA signatures associated with their expression. Serum VIP levels and mRNA of VPAC and miRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed from 52 patients with psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, Graves’ disease, or spondyloarthritis and from 38 healthy subjects. IMID patients showed higher levels of VIP and increased expression of VPAC2 compared to controls (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0192, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the levels of VIP or VPAC2 expression were adequate discriminators capable of identifying IMID. Treatment of IMID patients with anti-TNFα and anti-IL12/23 significantly affected serum VIP levels. We identified miRNA signatures associated with levels of serum VIP and VPAC2 expression, which correlated with IMID diagnosis of the patients. The results indicate that the expression of VIP/VPAC2 is able of identify IMIDs and open up a line of research based on the association between the VIP/VPAC axis and miRNA signatures in immune-mediated diseases.

POS1089 HLA-Cw6 ALLELE AND BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS ARE PROTECTIVE FACTORS AGAINST LIVER FIBROSIS IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease can be expressed from an indolent steatosis, evolve to steatohepatitis and eventually evolve to liver fibrosis. This spectrum of non-alcoholic inflammatory liver disease is increased in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). To date, the relationship between non-alcoholic liver fibrosis and genetics in PsA has not been studied.

Objectives

The objective of our study is to evaluate the association between the HLA-Cw6 allele and the FIB-4 (fibrosis-4) index in patients with PsA.

Methods

Retrospective longitudinal study in patients older than 18 years with PsA according to CASPAR criteria with determination of the HLA-Cw6 allele. To estimate liver fibrosis, the FIB-4 index was obtained, calculating it at the onset of PsA and at the last available visit. A descriptive analysis of the variables was carried out using mean and standard deviation (SD) for those with symmetric distribution, and median and interquartile range (IR) for the asymmetric ones. Qualitative variables were described using absolute values ​​and percentages. A bivariate analysis was carried out using parametric and non-parametric hypothesis contrast tests to determine the association between the main variable (current FIB-4) and the secondary variables. Bivariate correlations were analyzed using Pearson’s coefficient. A multivariate model was developed to assess the association between HLA-Cw6 and liver fibrosis adjusted for potential confounding factors, and results were presented as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and level of statistical significance p-value=0.05. The statistical program SPSS version 20 was used. The study was approved by the local committee.

Results

209 patients with PsA were included (56.9% men, mean age 42.72±14.24 years), 84.7% with psoriasis, and median (IR) ESR (mm/h) of 16.9(9-28) and CRP (mg/l) 5.0(2.52-12.25). 74.3% of patients were HLA-Cw6 negative. 79.4% of patients were receiving treatment with MTX, and 59.8% biological therapy. Regarding comorbidities, 29.6% had hypertension, 24% dyslipidemia, 10.1% diabetes, and 4.2% acute myocardial infarction. FIB-4 could be calculated in 154 patients at the onset of PsA, with a mean of 1.53±9.05 points, being 58.9% of patients at FIB-4 F0-1 (non advanced fibrosis, <1, 30 points). At the last available visit, FIB-4 could be calculated in 180 patients, mean of 1.35±0.85 points, 86.4% of the patients at FIB-4 F0-1. Table 1 shows bivariate analysis and Table 2 the multivariate one.

Table 1.

Bivariate analysis of the main variable (current FIB-4) categorized into normal (result F0-1, non advanced fibrosis, <1.30 points) and altered (result F2-3-4, intermediate zone and significant fibrosis, >1.3 points).1Median (IR) 2Mean±SD. * p-value < 0.05. AMI acute myocardial infarction.

Normal current FIB-4 (N = 106)Altered current FIB-4 (N = 74)p valueHLA-Cw6 (%)18.546.740.024 *ESR (mm/h)116 (9-32)10 (6-19)0.362CRP (mg/l)15.31 (2.41-12.97)3.30 (2.11-9.00)0.348PsA age onset (years)237.33±11.7151.53±12.330.630Male sex (%)60.439.60.627Biologic (%)64.335.70.059Methotrexate (%)56.843.30.211Leflunomide (%)60400.915Psoriasis (%)58.941.10.648Hypertension (%)42.257.80.002 *Diabetes (%)40600.079AMI (%)16.783.30.023 *Dyslipidemia (%)45.954.10.030 *Table 2.

Multivariate analysis. * p-value < 0.05.

VariableOR (IC 95%)p valueHLA-Cw60.210 (0.062-0.707)0.012 *Male sex1.553 (0.624-3.864)0.344Hypertension2.973 (1.125-7.858)0.028 *Diabetes1.478 (0.395-5.530)0.561Dyslipidemia1.429 (0.541-3.773)0.471Methotrexate1.113 (0.357-3.466)0.854ESR at onset (mm/h)0.993 (0.967-1.019)0.605AMI6.302 (0.495-80.246)0.156Biologic0.397 (0.166-0.949)0.038 *

Conclusion

In our study, having the HLA-Cw6 allele and receiving biological treatment behaved as a protective factor for liver fibrosis in PsA, while arterial hypertension was an independent risk factor. The presence of psoriasis was not related to hepatic fibrosis measured by FIB-4.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0804 TOCILIZUMAB IN LARGE-VESSEL GIANT CELL ARTERITIS AND TAKAYASU ARTERITIS: MULTICENTRIC OBSERVATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be effective for large vessel vasculitis including giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (1-5). However, LVV-GCA and TAK show different demographic and clinical features that may influence on TCZ therapeutic response.

Objectives

To compare the effectiveness of TCZ in patients with LVV-GCA and patients with TAK.

Methods

Observational multicenter study of patients with LVV-GCA and TAK who received TCZ. Outcome variables were: a) proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical improvement along with normalization of laboratory markers (CRP ≤0.5mg/dL and/or ESR ≤ 20 mm/1st hour) at 12 months b) complete improvement in imaging techniques. A comparative study between patients with LVV-GCA and TAK was performed.

Results

We evaluated 70 LVV-GCA and 57 TAK patients who received TCZ. Main clinical and demographic characteristic are described in Table 1. Patients with TAK were younger, had longer disease duration, had received more commonly previous biologic therapy and were receiving higher doses of prednisone at baseline. TCZ intravenous administration was more common in TAK patients (80.7% vs 48.6%; p<0.01). Follow-up time after TCZ onset was similar in both groups. At 12 months, about 75% of patients achieved complete clinical improvement and ESR/CRP normalization in both groups. A follow-up imaging technique was performed in 37 LVV-GCA patients after a mean time of 12.9±6.0 months and 38 TAK patients after 9.5±5.0 months. Complete improvement in imaging techniques was only observed in 18.9% and 21.1% of patients with LVV-GCA and TAK, respectively (Figure 1).

Table 1.LVV-GCA (n=70)TAK (n=57)pGeneral featuresAge (years), mean ± SD67.2 ± 10.540.5 ± 16.3< 0.01Sex (female), n (%)51 (72.9)49 (86)0.07Disease evolution before TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]5 [2-15]12 [3-37]<0.01Baseline laboratory parametersESR (mm/1st hour), median [IQR]32 [12.5-54.7]31 [10-52]0.82CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.4 [0.5-2.4]1.4 [0.5-3.5]0.41Baseline prednisone dose (mg/day), median [IQR]15 [10-20]30 [15-50]< 0.01Previous therapyConventional DMARDs, n(%)45 (64.3)44(77.2)0.51Biologic therapy, n (%)0(0)12 (21.1)<0.01TCZ therapyIntravenous, n (%)34 (48.6)46 (80.7)< 0.01Combined with MTX, n(%)24 (34.3)24 (42.1)0.37Follow-up time after TCZ onset, median [IQR]20 [10-36]18 [7-41]0.73Complete clinical improvement and ESR/CRP normalization at 12 months, n/N (%)35/47 (74.4)30/39 (76.9)0.79Complete improvement in imaging techniques, n/N(%)7/37 (18.9)8/38 (21.1)0.85

CRP: C-reactive protein; DMARDs: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; LVV: large vessel; MTX: methotrexate; n: Number of patients; N: total number of patients: TCZ: tocilizumab; TAK:takayasu

Figure 1.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of TCZ was similar in patients with LVV-GCA and TAK, despite a more refractory disease in TAK patients. A discordance between clinical and imaging activity improvement was observed in both LVV-GCA and TAK, as reported in previous studies (3).

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003

[2]Prieto-Peña D et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;13:175. PMID: 34211589.

[3]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39 Suppl 129:69-75. PMID: 33253103.

[4]González-Gay MA, et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019;19:65-72. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1556256.

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;48(4):720-727. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.05.007

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OP0064 TOCILIZUMAB IN CRANIAL AND EXTRACRANIAL REFRACTORY GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: A MULTICENTER STUDY OF 312 CASES

Background:

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) may be divided into cranial, and extracranial GCA. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy and safety in GCA and other large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) (1-5).

Objectives:

To compare the efficacy of TCZ in cranial and extracranial GCA.

Methods:

Multicenter observational study of 312 patients with GCA treated with TCZ. They were divided into 3 groups a) only cranial (cGCA), b) only extracranial (ecGCA), c) mixed affection (mixGCA). GCA was diagnosed by a) ACR criteria, and/or b) positive temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) LVV by imaging. Remission and sustained remission was defined according to EULAR definitions (1). In ecGCA and mixGCA we also studied the improvement (complete or partial) by imaging techniques.

Results:

We studied 312 patients (218 females; mean age, 73.4±9.6 years). TABLE shows the main features of the 3 groups. Remission at month 6 was higher in cGCA, as well as the sustained remission at month12 (FIGURE). At 18 and 24months, were similar in the 3 groups. Improvement by imaging techniques was partial/complete at 6,12,18 and 24 months, in 50%/0%,71%/0%, 61%/15% and 67%/17% respectively, in ecGCA, and in 75%/0%,53%/18%, 64%/12% and 50%/28% in mixGCA.

Table 1.

Main features of 312 patients at TCZ onset.

Cranial GCA(n=152)Extracranial GCA(n=49)Mixed GCA(n=111)Cranial vs Extracranial GCApAge at TCZ onset, years, mean± SD76.0±8.265.4±12.273.5±8.10.000*Sex, female/male, n (% female)105/47 (69)33/16 (67)80/31 (72)0.960Time from diagnosis to TCZ onset (months, median [IQR]6 [2-21]7 [2-20]9 [3-25]0.765Biopsy-proven GCA, n (%)87/128 (68)0 (0)50/87 (57)0.000*Systemic manifestations at TCZ onset109 (72)32 (65)84 (76)0.501Fever, n (%)18 (12)1 (2)8 (7)0.048*Constitutional syndrome, n (%)52 (34)16 (33)47 (42)0.933PmR, n (%)88 (58)29 (59)71 (64)0.999Ischemic manifestations at TCZ onset117 (77)0 (0)70 (63)0.000*Visual involvement, n (%)31 (20)0 (0)16 (14)0.000*Headache, n (%)103 (85)0 (0)63 (57)0.000*Jaw claudication, n (%)39 (26)0 (0)21 (19)0.000*Acute phase reactantsESR, mm/1st hour, median [IQR]28 [9-53]24 [10-43]28 [15-48]0.462CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.2 [0.3-3.4]0.7 [0.4-1.8]1.6 [0.4-3.8]0.153Prednisone dose at TCZ onset, mean ± SD26.2±17.615.4±14.220.1±14.90.000*TCZmono/TCZcombo, n (% TCZ mono)116/36 (76)26/23 (53)69/42 (62)0.003*Follow-up (months), mean ± SD27.3±21.132.7±23.327.9±22.00.143Figure 1.

Remission and sustained remission of cGCA, ecGCA and mixGCA according to EULAR (1). In the first 3 months we only could assess cGCA because in ecGCA and mixGCA a control imaging was not performed

Conclusion:

TCZ seems to be effective in all phenotypes but it is faster in cGCA in reaching remission. However, improvement by imaging techniques was partial and very rarely complete in ecGCA and mixGCA.

References:

[1]Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30.

[2]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 317-28.

[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003.

[4]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33253103.

[5]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34:S44-53. PMID: 27050507

Disclosure of Interests:

Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Juan Pablo Valdivieso-Achá: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Juan Ramón De Dios: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto González: None declared, Eva Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Valvanera Pinillos: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Ruth López-González: None declared, Cristina Campos Fernández: None declared, Antonio Juan-Mas: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, María Dolors Boquet: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, Adela Gallego: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

Risk of Severe COVID-19 Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

OBJECTIVE

To describe the cohort of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Ramón y Cajal Hospital, and to determine the increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with no IRD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center observational study of patients with IRD actively monitored in the Department of Rheumatology who were hospitalized due to COVID-19.

RESULTS

Forty-one (1.8%) out of 2315 patients admitted due to severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia suffered from an IRD. The admission OR for patients with IRD was 1.91 against the general population, and it was considerably higher in patients with Sjögren syndrome, vasculitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Twenty-seven patients were receiving treatment for IRD with corticosteroids, 23 with conventional DMARDs, 12 with biologics (7 rituximab [RTX], 4 anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF], and 1 abatacept), and 1 with Janus kinase inhibitors. Ten deaths were registered among patients with IRD. A higher hospitalization rate and a higher number of deaths were observed in patients treated with RTX (OR 12.9) but not in patients treated with anti-TNF (OR 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Patients with IRD, especially autoimmune diseases and patients treated with RTX, may be at higher risk of severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 compared to the general population. More studies are needed to analyze this association further in order to help manage these patients during the pandemic.

Anti-IL-6 Receptor Tocilizumab in Refractory Graves' Orbitopathy: National Multicenter Observational Study of 48 Patients

Graves' orbitopathy (GO) is the most common extrathyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease (GD). Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in GO refractory to conventional therapy. This was an open-label multicenter study of glucocorticoid-resistant GO treated with TCZ. The main outcomes were the best-corrected visual acuity (BVCA), Clinical Activity Score (CAS) and intraocular pressure (IOP). These outcome variables were assessed at baseline, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month after TCZ therapy onset. The severity of GO was assessed according to the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO). We studied 48 (38 women and 10 men) patients (95 eyes); mean age ± standard deviation 51 ± 11.8 years. Before TCZ and besides oral glucocorticoids, they had received IV methylprednisolone (n = 43), or selenium (n = 11). GO disease was moderate (n =29) or severe (n = 19) and dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) (n = 7). TCZ was used in monotherapy (n = 45) or combined (n = 3) at a dose of 8 mg/kg IV every four weeks (n = 43) or 162 mg/s.c. every week (n = 5). TCZ yielded a significant improvement in all of the main outcomes at the 1st month that was maintained at one year. Comparing the baseline with data at 1 year all of the variables improved; BCVA (0.78 ± 0.25 vs. 0.9 ± 0.16; p = 0.0001), CAS (4.64 ± 1.5 vs. 1.05 ± 1.27; p = 0.0001) and intraocular pressure (IOP) (19.05 ± 4.1 vs. 16.73 ± 3.4 mmHg; p = 0.007). After a mean follow-up of 16.1 ± 2.1 months, low disease activity (CAS ≤ 3), was achieved in 88 eyes (92.6%) and TCZ was withdrawn in 29 cases due to low disease activity (n = 25) or inefficacy (n = 4). No serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, TCZ is a useful and safe therapeutic option in refractory GO treatment.

THU0297 SERIOUS INFECTIONS IN 134 PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS WITH TOCILIZUMAB IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. FREQUENCY, TYPE AND CLINICAL ASSOCIATIONS

Background:

Infections are the most common adverse event of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). In GiACTA study(1),serious infections were observed in 7% (9.6/100 patient-years) of patients who received TCZ weekly. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are conducted under highly standardized design excluding some real-world patients. Therefore, adverse events may be underestimated in RCTs. In our series of real-life, serious infections occurred in 11.9% (10.6/100 patient-years)(2).

Objectives:

In a wide series of GCA of clinical practice treated with TCZ, we assess the frequency, type and predisposing factors of serious infections.

Methods:

Multicenter study of 134 patients diagnosed with GCA, all of them refractory to conventional therapy, treated with TCZ. Serious infection was considered when a life-threatening infection, fatal, or requiring hospitalization occurred, intravenous antibiotics were required, or the infectious process led to persistent or significant disability.

Results:

16 of 134 (11.9%, 10.6/100 patient-years) patients developed serious infections during follow-up. The most frequent infections were pneumonia (n=4), urinary tract infection (n=4), and facial herpes zoster (n=2). At TCZ onset, serious infections were more frequent in older patients (74.3±9.6 vs 72.9±8.7 years), with a longer GCA evolution (20 [4.3-45.6] vs 13 [5-29.3] months), with visual manifestations (43.75% vs 17.8%) and a higher dose of prednisone at TCZ onset (30.4±15.5 vs 21.1±16.1 mg/day) (TABLE). Presence of comorbidities were similar in both groups. 13 of the 16 patients who had infections received a dose of prednisone greater than 15 mg/day (16.3/100 patient-years) compared to 3 patients under treatment with less than 15 mg/day of prednisone (4.2/100 patient-years).

Conclusion:

The age, GCA duration, ocular involvement and the dose of glucocorticoids, at TCZ onset, seem to be predisposing factors related to an increased risk of developing serious infections in GCA patients.

References:

[1]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:317-28.

[2]Calderón-Goercke M et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019 Aug;49(1): 126-135.

TABLESERIOUS INFECTIONS(n=16)WITHOUT SERIOUS INFECTIONS(n=118)pBASAL FEATURES AT TCZ ONSETGENERAL FEATURES Age, years, mean± SD74.3±9.672.9±8.70.552 Sex, female/male n(%)13/388/300.760 Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]20[4.3-45.6]13[5-29.3]0.604COMORBIDITIES Hypertension, n(%)9(56)86(73)0.551 Diabetes, n(%)3(19)39(33)0.677 Chronic kidney disease, n(%)3(19)27(23)0.512CLINICAL FEATURES OF GCA PMR, n(%)9(56.25)64(54.2)0.879 Aortitis, n(%)5(31.25)53(45)0.301 Visual manifestations, n(%)7(43.75)21(17.8)0.017CORTICOSTEROIDS AT TCZ ONSET Prednisone dose mg/d, mean (SD)30.4±15.521.1±16.10.031

Disclosure of Interests:

Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Elena Becerra-Fernández: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, E. Galindez: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro Speakers bureau: Roche, Abbvie, MSD, UCB, Pfizer, Menarini, Grunenthal, Gebro, Novartis, Janssen, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Catalina Gomez-Arango: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Alejandro Olive: None declared, María Álvarez del Buergo: None declared, Luisa Marena Rojas: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Francisco Navarro: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Arantxa Conesa: None declared, Carlos Vázquez: None declared, Jose Andrés Román-Ivorra: None declared, Pau Lluch: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Carmen Torres-Martín: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi, Carmen Ordas-Calvo: None declared, Cristina Luna-Gomez: None declared, Francisco J. Toyos Sáenz de Miera: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, Carmen González-Vela: None declared, Javier García-Fernández: None declared, Patricia Vicente-Gómez: None declared, Ángel García-Manzanares: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, Montserrat Corteguera: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

OP0033 OPTIMIZATION OF TOCILIZUMAB THERAPY IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. A MULTICENTER REAL-LIFE STUDY OF 134 PATIENTS

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only biological agent approved in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). There is general agreement on the initial and the standard maintenance dose of TCZ. However, information on duration and optimization of TCZ in GCA is scarce.

Objectives:

Our aim was to assess efficacy and safety of TCZ therapy optimization in an unselected wide series of GCA in clinical practice.

Methods:

Multicenter study, 134 patients with GCA who received TCZ due to inefficacy/adverse events of previous therapy. Once complete remission was reached and based on a shared decision between patient and physician TCZ was optimized in some cases. Optimization was done by decreasing the dose and/or prolonging the TCZ dosing interval progressively.

Results:

134 GCA patients treated with TCZ (101w/33m); mean age 73.0±8.8 years. TCZ was administered IV to 106 (79.1%) patients and SC to 28 (20.9%). TCZ was optimized in 43 (32.1%) patients. No demographic, clinical manifestations or laboratory data differences had been found at TCZ onset (TABLE). After a follow up of 12 [6-15.5] months, and a complete remission for 6 [3-12] months; the first TCZ optimization was performed. Median prednisone dose at first TCZ optimization was 2.5 [0-5] mg/day. TCZ IV was optimized from 8 to 4 mg/kg/4weeks in 12 of 106 (11.3%) and from 162 mg/SC/week to 162 mg/SC/2weeks in 9 of 28 (32.1%) cases. Five (11.6%) of the 43 optimized cases relapsed. In 4 cases, the relapses were treated increasing TCZ up to the pre-optimization dose, in 1 case the route of administration was change (4 mg/kg/4week to 162 mg/SC/week). In 8 of 43 optimized patients (18.6%), it was possible to withdraw TCZ after complete remission for 30 [16.25-45.75] months. Regarding adverse events and severe infections were similar in both groups. The mean TCZ treatment costs were lower in the optimized group.

Conclusion:

Once remission is reached in GCA patients under TCZ treatment, optimization of TCZ may be performed. Based on our experience it could be performed by reducing the dose with IV TCZ or by prolonging dosing interval with SC TCZ.

References:

[1]Calderón-Goercke M et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019 Aug;49(1): 126-135.

TABLE.OPTIMIZED-TCZ GROUP (n=43)NON-OPTIMIZED TCZ GROUP (n=91)pBASAL FEATURES AT TCZ ONSETGENERAL FEATURESAge, years, mean± SD68.9±8.771.4±8.50.125Sex, female/male n(%)32/1068/240.779Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]19.5[7.75-45]10.5[4 – 25]0.047SYSTEMIC MANIFESTATIONSFever, n(%)1(2.4)8(8.7)0.176Constitutional syndrome, n(%)11(26.2)19(20.7)0.476PMR, n(%)18(42.9)56(60.9)0.052ISCHEMIC MANIFESTATIONSVisual involvement, n(%)5(11.9)23(25)0.084Headache, n(%)26(61.9)42(45.7)0.081Jaw claudication, n(%)1(2.4)11(12)0.072CORTICOSTEROIDS AT TCZ ONSETPrednisone dose, mg/d mean (SD)15.1±11.125±17.40.001FOLLOW-UP ON TCZ THERAPY (MONTHS), MEDIAN [IQR]24[18-27]6 [3-18]0.000Relapses, n(%)5(11.6)5(5.5)0.207End follow-up remission, n(%)40(93)84(92)0.99Severe side efects, n(%)14(32.6)22(24.2)0.307Seriuos infections, n(%)6(14)10(11)0.878Cost, (mean) euros per yearIVSC7 538.47 329.011 726.411 726.4--

Disclosure of Interests:

Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Elena Becerra-Fernández: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, E. Galindez: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro Speakers bureau: Roche, Abbvie, MSD, UCB, Pfizer, Menarini, Grunenthal, Gebro, Novartis, Janssen, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Catalina Gomez-Arango: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, María Álvarez del Buergo: None declared, Luisa Marena Rojas: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Francisco Navarro: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Arantxa Conesa: None declared, Carlos Vázquez: None declared, Jose Andrés Román-Ivorra: None declared, Pau Lluch: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Carmen Torres-Martín: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi, Carmen Ordas-Calvo: None declared, Cristina Luna-Gomez: None declared, Francisco J. Toyos Sáenz de Miera: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis: differences between the GiACTA trial and a multicentre series of patients from the clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

A potential point of concern among clinicians is whether results derived from the clinical trials can be reasonably applied or generalised to a definable group of patients seen in real world. It can be the case of the GiACTA study that is a phase III randomised controlled trial of tocilizumab (TCZ) in giant cell arteritis (GCA). To address this question, we compared the clinical features and the responses to TCZ from the GiACTA trial patients with those from a series of GCA seen in the daily clinical practice.

METHODS

Comparative study of clinical features between patients from the GiACTA trial (overall n=251) and those from a multicentre series of real-world GCA patients undergoing TCZ therapy (n=134). The diagnosis of GCA in the GiACTA trial was established by the ACR modified criteria whereas in the series of real-world patients it was made by using the ACR criteria, a positive biopsy of temporal artery or the presence of imaging techniques consistent with large-vessel vasculitis in individuals who presented cranial symptoms of GCA. GiACTA trial patients received subcutaneous TCZ (162 mg every 1 or 2 weeks) whereas those from the clinical practice series were treated using standard IV dose (8 mg/kg/month) or subcutaneous (162 mg/week).

RESULTS

Real-life patients undergoing TCZ were older with longer disease duration and higher values of ESR and had received conventional immunosuppressive therapy (mainly methotrexate) more commonly than those included in the GiACTA trial. Despite clinical differences, TCZ was equally effective in both GiACTA trial and clinical practice patients. However, serious infections were more commonly observed in GCA patients recruited from the clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite clinical differences with patients recruited in clinical trials, data from real-life patients confirm the efficacy of TCZ in GCA.

Ellipsoid layer restoration after Ozurdex® treatment in a patient with acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy

An atypical case of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy with a clear reappearance of the ellipsoid layer of the retina after Ozurdex^® intravitreal implantation is presented. A 51-year-old woman reported a 3-week history of left eye photopsia. On slit-lamp examination, yellowish placoid lesions were found on her left eye fundus. Ancillary tests were performed. The patient was diagnosed as a left eye acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy, and observational approach was decided. Later, the condition started to progress in an ampiginous manner and a decrease of visual acuity caused by an increase in number and size of the lesions was observed. As the disease was progressing with the conservative, observational approach, and the macula was menaced, an intravitreal dexamethasone implant was injected in the left eye with a consequent improvement of the visual acuity and lesion stabilization. The ellipsoid layer, unidentifiable inside the placoid lesions in previous optical coherence tomography tests, reappeared after the treatment. Intravitreal dexamethasone implants can be used to stabilize acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy lesions and help resolve the condition. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography can also be useful for monitoring these lesions, as the ellipsoid layer may reappear upon resolution.

Do Season and Environment Have a Role in the Incidence of Anterior Uveitis Attacks?

PURPOSE

To investigate the seasonal influence on the incidence of uveitis attacks.

METHODS

An ecological study was designed including 731 uveitis attacks in 594 patients diagnosed at the eye emergency of a hospital in Madrid between 2014 and 2017. The incidence of uveitis attacks, B27+, and presumed herpetic attacks were calculated, and their correlations with seasonal and environmental variables in the same timeframe were analyzed. The analyzed variables were precipitation, barometric pressure, temperature, humidity, wind speed, global solar radiation, ultraviolet radiation, air pollution components (particulate matter and polluting gases), and the incidence of influenza.

RESULTS

The incidence of attacks was significantly higher in the winter than in the autumn (p = .025). It showed a significant correlation to the number of rainy days per month (r = 0.612;p = .04), and the average wind speed (r = 0.469;p = .02) after Bonferroni correction.

CONCLUSION

Uveitis episodes happened more frequently under rainy and windy conditions. Most factors were not significantly correlated to attacks.

Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis. Observational, open-label multicenter study of 134 patients in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in clinical trials on giant cell arteritis (GCA). Real-world data are scarce. Our objective was to assess efficacy and safety of TCZ in unselected patients with GCA in clinical practice Methods: Observational, open-label multicenter study from 40 national referral centers of GCA patients treated with TCZ due to inefficacy or adverse events of previous therapy. Outcomes variables were improvement of clinical features, acute phase reactants, glucocorticoid-sparing effect, prolonged remission and relapses. A comparative study was performed: (a) TCZ route (SC vs. IV); (b) GCA duration (≤6 vs. >6 months); (c) serious infections (with or without); (d) ≤15 vs. >15 mg/day at TCZ onset.

RESULTS

134 patients; mean age, 73.0 ± 8.8 years. TCZ was started after a median [IQR] time from GCA diagnosis of 13.5 [5.0-33.5] months. Ninety-eight (73.1%) patients had received immunosuppressive agents. After 1 month of TCZ 93.9% experienced clinical improvement. Reduction of CRP from 1.7 [0.4-3.2] to 0.11 [0.05-0.5] mg/dL (p < 0.0001), ESR from 33 [14.5-61] to 6 [2-12] mm/1st hour (p < 0.0001) and decrease in patients with anemia from 16.4% to 3.8% (p < 0.0001) were observed. Regardless of administration route or disease duration, clinical improvement leading to remission at 6, 12, 18, 24 months was observed in 55.5%, 70.4%, 69.2% and 90% of patients. Most relevant adverse side-effect was serious infections (10.6/100 patients-year), associated with higher doses of prednisone during the first three months of therapy.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, TCZ yields a rapid and maintained improvement of refractory GCA. Serious infections appear to be higher than in clinical trials.

A health system program to reduce work disability related to musculoskeletal disorders

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a frequent cause of work disability, accounting for productivity losses in industrialized societies equivalent to 1.3% of the U.S. gross national product.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a population-based clinical program offered to patients with recent-onset work disability caused by MSDs is cost-effective.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled intervention study. The inclusion and follow-up periods each lasted 12 months.

SETTING

Three health districts in Madrid, Spain.

PATIENTS

All patients with MSD-related temporary work disability in 1998 and 1999.

INTERVENTION

The control group received standard primary care management, with referral to specialized care if needed. The intervention group received a specific program, administered by rheumatologists, in which care was delivered during regular visits and included 3 main elements: education, protocol-based clinical management, and administrative duties.

MEASUREMENTS

Efficacy variables were 1) days of temporary work disability and 2) number of patients with permanent work disability. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

1,077 patients were included in the study, 7805 in the control group and 5272 in the intervention group, generating 16,297 episodes of MSD-related temporary work disability. These episodes were shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (mean, 26 days compared with 41 days; P < 0.001), and the groups had similar numbers of episodes per patient. Fewer patients received long-term disability compensation in the intervention group (n = 38 [0.7%]) than in the control group (n = 99 [1.3%]) (P < 0.005). Direct and indirect costs were lower in the intervention group than in the control group. To save 1 day of temporary work disability, 6.00 dollars had to be invested in the program. Each dollar invested generated a benefit of 11.00 dollars. The program's net benefit was in excess of 5 million dollars.

LIMITATIONS

The study was unblinded.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the program, offered to the general population, improves short- and long-term work disability outcomes and is cost-effective.