1
|
Fonseca AL, Ahmad R, Amin K, Tripathi M, Vobbilisetty V, Richman JS, Hearld L, Bhatia S, Heslin MJ. Time Kills: Impact of Socioeconomic Deprivation on Timely Access to Guideline-Concordant Treatment in Foregut Cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:720-730. [PMID: 38205919 PMCID: PMC11089897 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Receipt of guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) is associated with improved prognosis in foregut cancers. Studies show that patients living in areas of high neighborhood deprivation have worse healthcare outcomes; however, its effect on GCT in foregut cancers has not been evaluated. We studied the impact of the area deprivation index (ADI) as a barrier to GCT. STUDY DESIGN A single-institution retrospective review of 498 foregut cancer patients (gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary adenocarcinoma) from 2018 to 2022 was performed. GCT was defined based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. ADI, a validated measure of neighborhood disadvantage was divided into terciles (low, medium, and high) with high ADI indicating the most disadvantage. RESULTS Of 498 patients, 328 (66%) received GCT: 66%, 72%, and 59% in pancreatic, gastric, and hepatobiliary cancers, respectively. Median (interquartile range) time from symptoms to workup was 6 (3 to 13) weeks, from diagnosis to oncology appointment was 4 (1 to 10) weeks, and from oncology appointment to treatment was 4 (2 to 10) weeks. Forty-six percent were diagnosed in the emergency department. On multivariable analyses, age 75 years or older (odds ratio [OR] 0.39 [95% CI 0.18 to 0.87]), Black race (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.31 to 0.86]), high ADI (OR 0.25 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.48]), 6 weeks or more from symptoms to workup (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.73]), 4 weeks or more from diagnosis to oncology appointment (OR 0.76 [95% CI 0.46 to 0.93]), and 4 weeks or more from oncology appointment to treatment (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.98]) were independently associated with nonreceipt of GCT. CONCLUSIONS Residence in an area of high deprivation predicts nonreceipt of GCT. This is due to multiple individual- and system-level barriers. Identifying these barriers and developing effective interventions, including community outreach and collaboration, leveraging telehealth, and increasing oncologic expertise in underserved areas, may improve access to GCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle L. Fonseca
- Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL
| | - Rida Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL
| | - Krisha Amin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL
| | - Manish Tripathi
- Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Joshua S. Richman
- Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL
| | - Larry Hearld
- Department of Health Services Administration, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL
| | - Martin J. Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fonseca AL, Heslin MJ. SSO 2022-International Conference on Surgical Cancer Care and Advanced Care Therapies Highlights. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:168-170. [PMID: 35984562 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00853-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fonseca AL, Heslin MJ. Navigating post- hepatectomy care: Risk-stratified pathways and patient-centric medicine. Am J Surg 2024:S0002-9610(24)00001-1. [PMID: 38199872 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle L Fonseca
- Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Irfan A, Gleason F, Reddy S, Heslin MJ, Rose JB. Resection Versus Observation for Small (≤2 cm) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Am Surg 2023; 89:4675-4680. [PMID: 36134675 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221129501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized that those patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) ≤2 cm managed nonoperatively would have comparable disease progression to individuals undergoing an operation. METHODS Patients diagnosed with nonfunctional pNETs ≤ 2 cm who were evaluated at a single comprehensive cancer center from 2010 to 2017 were selected from a cancer registry database. Clinicopathologic variables were obtained via retrospective chart review. Primary outcomes were overall and disease specific survival. Variables were compared between the 2 groups using chi-square and independent t-test. RESULTS Fifty-two individuals had tumors ≤2 cm, of whom 75% had an operation, while 25% were observed. Each treatment arm had similar distributions of gender, race, and tumor location. The most common operation was distal pancreatectomy (n = 29) followed by pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 6). Nine patients had grade III postoperative complications and 4 had grade IV under Clavien-Dindo classification. The observation group was noted to have a mean disease progression interval of 80.9 months, while those who underwent an operation had a mean disease progression interval of 94.6 months (P = .246). CONCLUSIONS Overall disease progression in patients with pNETs ≤ 2 cm without evidence of metastasis at the time of presentation is not different between those who underwent operation compared to those observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmer Irfan
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Frank Gleason
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sushanth Reddy
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Bart Rose
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amin K, Khan H, Hearld LR, Chu DI, Prete V, Mehari KR, Heslin MJ, Fonseca AL. Association between Rural Residence and Processes of Care in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2155-2165. [PMID: 37553515 PMCID: PMC10731615 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05764-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy associated with poor outcomes. Surgical resection and receipt of multimodal therapy have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with potentially resectable PDAC; however treatment and outcome disparities persist on many fronts. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between rural residence and receipt of quality cancer care in patients diagnosed with non-metastatic PDAC. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database, patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer were identified from 2006-2016. Patients were classified as living in metropolitan, urban, or rural areas. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of cancer treatment and survival. RESULTS A total of 41,786 patients were identified: 81.6% metropolitan, 16.2% urban, and 2.2% rural. Rural residing patients were less likely to receive curative-intent surgery (p = 0.037) and multimodal therapy (p < 0.001) compared to their metropolitan and urban counterparts. On logistic regression analysis, rural residence was independently associated with decreased surgical resection [OR 0.82; CI 95% 0.69-0.99; p = 0.039] and multimodal therapy [OR 0.70; CI 95% 0.38-0.97; p = 0.047]. Rural residence independently predicted decreased overall survival [OR 1.64; CI 95% 1.45-1.93; p < 0.001] for all patients that were analyzed. In the cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection, rural residence did not independently predict overall survival [OR 0.97; CI 95% 0.85-1.11; p = 0.652]. CONCLUSIONS Rural residence impacts receipt of optimal cancer care in patients with non-metastatic PDAC but does not predict overall survival in patients who receive curative-intent treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krisha Amin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, 2451 USA Medical Center Drive, Mastin, 705, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA
| | - Hamza Khan
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Larry R Hearld
- Department of Health Services Administration, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Daniel I Chu
- Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Victoria Prete
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, 2451 USA Medical Center Drive, Mastin, 705, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA
| | - Krista R Mehari
- Department of Psychology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, 2451 USA Medical Center Drive, Mastin, 705, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA
| | - Annabelle L Fonseca
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, 2451 USA Medical Center Drive, Mastin, 705, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fonseca AL, Heslin MJ. Pancreatic operative experience for residents: How much is enough? Am J Surg 2023:S0002-9610(23)00180-0. [PMID: 37142516 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tian Y, Hassani I, Anbiah B, Ahmed B, Van Der Pol W, Lefkowitz EJ, Kuhlers PC, Habbit NL, Heslin MJ, Lipke EA, Greene MW. Abstract 4567: Transcriptomic analysis of a 3D engineered cancer model recapitulating stage-dependent heterogeneity in colorectal PDX tumors. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-4567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. To advance the understanding of CRC tumor progression, models which mimic the tumor microenvironment (TME) and have translatable study outcomes are urgently needed. CRC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are promising tools for their ability to recapitulate tumor heterogeneity and key patient tumor characteristics, such as molecular characteristics. However, as in vivo models, CRC PDXs are costly and low-throughput, which leads to a need for equivalent in vitro models. To address this need, we previously established an in vitro model using a tissue engineering toolset with CRC PDX cells. However, it is unclear whether tissue engineering has the capacity to maintain patient- and/or cancer stage-specific tumor heterogeneity. To address this gap, we employed three PDX tumor lines, originated from stage II, III-B, and IV CRC tumors, in the formation of 3D engineered CRC PDX (3D-eCRC-PDX) tissues and performed an in-depth comparison between the 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues and the original CRC-PDX tumors. To form the tissues, CRC-PDX tumors were expanded in vivo and dissociated. The isolated cells were encapsulated within poly(ethylene glycol)-fibrinogen hydrogels and remained viable and proliferative post encapsulation over the course of 29 days in culture. To gain molecular insight into the maintenance of PDX line stage heterogeneity, we performed a transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq to determine the extent to which there were similarities and differences between the CRC-PDX tumors and the 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues. We observed the greatest correspondence in overlapping differentially expressed human genes, gene ontology, and Hallmark gene set enrichment between the 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues and CRC-PDX tumors in the stage II PDX line, while the least correspondence was observed in the stage IV PDX line. The Hallmark gene set enrichment from murine mapped RNA seq transcripts was PDX line-specific which suggested that the stromal component of the 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues was maintained in a PDX line-dependent manner. Consistent with our transcriptomic analysis, we observed that tumor cell subpopulations, including human proliferative (B2M+Ki67+) and CK20+ cells, remained constant for up to 15 days in culture even though the number of cells in the 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues from all three CRC stages increased over time. Yet, tumor cell subpopulation differences in the stage IV 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues were observed starting at 22 days in culture. Overall, our results demonstrate a strong correlation between our in vitro 3D-eCRC-PDX models and the originating in vivo CRC-PDX tumors, providing evidence that these engineered tissues may be capable of mimicking patient- and/or cancer stage-specific heterogeneity.
Citation Format: Yuan Tian, Iman Hassani, Benjamin Anbiah, Bulbul Ahmed, William Van Der Pol, Elliot J. Lefkowitz, Peyton C. Kuhlers, Nicole L. Habbit, Martin J. Heslin, Elizabeth A. Lipke, Michael W. Greene. Transcriptomic analysis of a 3D engineered cancer model recapitulating stage-dependent heterogeneity in colorectal PDX tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4567.
Collapse
|
8
|
Khan H, Cherla D, Mehari K, Tripathi M, Butler TW, Crook ED, Heslin MJ, Johnston FM, Fonseca AL. Palliative Therapies in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Does Medicaid Expansion Make a Difference? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:179-188. [PMID: 36169753 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12563-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of medicaid expansion (ME) on receipt of palliative therapies in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A difference-in-differences (DID) approach was used to analyze patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer identified from the National Cancer Database diagnosed during two time periods: pre-expansion (2010-2012) and post-expansion (2014-2016). Patients diagnosed while residing in ME states were compared with those in non-ME states. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of receipt of palliative therapies. RESULTS Of 87,738 patients overall, 7483(18.1%) received palliative therapies in the pre-expansion, while 10,211(21.5%) received palliative therapies in the post-expansion period. In the pre-expansion period, treatment at a high-volume facility (HVF) (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.18) and non-west geographic location were predictive of increased palliative therapies. In the post-expansion period, treatment at an HVF (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16), geographic location, and living in an ME state at the time of diagnosis (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.22) were predictive of increased palliative therapies. Older age, highest quartile median income (zip-code based), and treatment at a nonacademic facility were independently associated with decreased palliative therapies in both periods. DID analysis demonstrated that patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer living in ME states had increased receipt of palliative therapies relative to those in non-ME states (DID = 2.68, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The overall utilization of palliative therapies in metastatic pancreatic cancer is low. Multiple sociodemographic disparities exist in the receipt of palliative therapies. ME is associated with increased receipt of palliative therapies in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Khan
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Deepa Cherla
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Krista Mehari
- Department of Psychology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Manish Tripathi
- Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas W Butler
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Errol D Crook
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khan H, Crook ED, Heslin MJ, Johnston FM, Fonseca AL. ASO Author Reflections: Disparities in Receipt of Palliative Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer: Did Medicaid Expansion Help? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:189-190. [PMID: 36245052 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12638-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Khan
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Errol D Crook
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Khan H, Cherla D, Mehari K, Tripathi M, Butler TW, Crook ED, Heslin MJ, Johnston FM, Fonseca AL. ASO Visual Abstract: Palliative Therapies in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer-Does Medicaid Expansion Make a Difference? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:191-192. [PMID: 36207483 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12612-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Khan
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Deepa Cherla
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Krista Mehari
- Department of Psychology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Manish Tripathi
- Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas W Butler
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Errol D Crook
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vikramdeo KS, Anand S, Khan MA, Khushman M, Heslin MJ, Singh S, Singh AP, Dasgupta S. Detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in circulating mitochondria-originated extracellular vesicles for potential diagnostic applications in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18455. [PMID: 36323735 PMCID: PMC9630429 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22006-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a complete lack of highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) diagnosis, limiting multi-modal therapeutic options. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is an excellent resource for biomarker discovery because of its high copy number and increased mutational frequency in cancer cells. We examined if mtDNA mutations can be detected in circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) of PDAC patients and used for discerning between cancer and non-cancer subjects. A greater yield of circulating EVs (~ 1.4 fold; p = 0.002) was obtained in PDAC patients (n = 20) than non-cancer (NC) individuals (n = 10). PDAC-EVs contained a higher quantity of total DNA (~ 5.5 folds; p = 0.0001) than NC-EVs and had greater enrichment of mtDNA (~ 14.02-fold; p = 0.0001). PDAC-EVs also had higher levels of cardiolipin (a mitochondrial inner-membrane phospholipid), suggestive of their mitochondrial origin. All mtDNA mutations in PDAC-EVs were unique and frequency was remarkably higher. Most mtDNA mutations (41.5%) in PDAC-EVs were in the respiratory complex-I (RCI) (ND1-ND6), followed by the RCIII gene (CYTB; 11.2%). Among the non-coding genes, D-Loop and RNR2 exhibited the most mutations (15.2% each). Altogether, our study establishes, for the first time, that mtDNA mutations can be detected in circulating EVs and potentially serve as a tool for reliable PDAC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunwar Somesh Vikramdeo
- Cancer Biology Program, Department of Pathology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA
| | - Shashi Anand
- Cancer Biology Program, Department of Pathology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA
| | - Mohammad Aslam Khan
- Cancer Biology Program, Department of Pathology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA
| | - Moh'd Khushman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Cancer Biology Program, Department of Pathology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA
| | - Seema Singh
- Cancer Biology Program, Department of Pathology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA
| | - Ajay Pratap Singh
- Cancer Biology Program, Department of Pathology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA.
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
| | - Santanu Dasgupta
- Cancer Biology Program, Department of Pathology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA.
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Iman H, Benjamin A, Peyton K, Habbit NL, Ahmed B, Heslin MJ, Mobley JA, Greene MW, Lipke EA. Engineered colorectal cancer tissue recapitulates key attributes of a patient-derived xenograft tumor line. Biofabrication 2022; 14:10.1088/1758-5090/ac73b6. [PMID: 35617932 PMCID: PMC9822569 DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac73b6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The development of physiologically relevantin vitrocolorectal cancer (CRC) models is vital for advancing understanding of tumor biology. Although CRC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) recapitulate key patient tumor characteristics and demonstrate high concordance with clinical outcomes, the use of thisin vivomodel is costly and low-throughput. Here we report the establishment and in-depth characterization of anin vitrotissue-engineered CRC model using PDX cells. To form the 3D engineered CRC-PDX (3D-eCRC-PDX) tissues, CRC PDX tumors were expandedin vivo, dissociated, and the isolated cells encapsulated within PEG-fibrinogen hydrogels. Following PEG-fibrinogen encapsulation, cells remain viable and proliferate within 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues. Tumor cell subpopulations, including human cancer and mouse stromal cells, are maintained in long-term culture (29 days); cellular subpopulations increase ratiometrically over time. The 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues mimic the mechanical stiffness of originating tumors. Extracellular matrix protein production by cells in the 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues resulted in approximately 57% of proteins observed in the CRC-PDX tumors also being present in the 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues on day 22. Furthermore, we show congruence in enriched gene ontology molecular functions and Hallmark gene sets in 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues and CRC-PDX tumors compared to normal colon tissue, while prognostic Kaplan-Meier plots for overall and relapse free survival did not reveal significant differences between CRC-PDX tumors and 3D-eCRC-PDX tissues. Our results demonstrate high batch-to-batch consistency and strong correlation between ourin vitrotissue-engineered PDX-CRC model and the originatingin vivoPDX tumors, providing a foundation for future studies of disease progression and tumorigenic mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassani Iman
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Anbiah Benjamin
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Kuhlers Peyton
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Hospitality Management, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Nicole L. Habbit
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Bulbul Ahmed
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Hospitality Management, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | - Martin J. Heslin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - James A. Mobley
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35205-3703, USA,Division of Molecular and Translational Biomedicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35205-3703, USA
| | - Michael W. Greene
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Hospitality Management, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA,Co-corresponding authors Elizabeth A. Lipke, , Michael W. Greene,
| | - Elizabeth A. Lipke
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA,Co-corresponding authors Elizabeth A. Lipke, , Michael W. Greene,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carroll KL, Frugé AD, Heslin MJ, Lipke EA, Greene MW. Diet as a Risk Factor for Early-Onset Colorectal Adenoma and Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Front Nutr 2022; 9:896330. [PMID: 35757246 PMCID: PMC9218641 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.896330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer in adults 50 years old and younger is increasing in incidence worldwide. Diet may be a modifiable risk factor. The objective of this study was to examine evidence regarding the association between diet and the risk of developing early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) and early-onset colorectal adenomas in young adults. Methods PUBMED, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched for studies examining dietary intake as a risk factor for EOCRC and early-onset colorectal adenomas. Results were synthesized narratively due to the heterogeneity of the studies. Results Of the 415 studies identified, ten met the inclusion criteria. Of these ten studies, four provided data on dietary risk factors for early-onset colorectal adenomas and six provided data on dietary risk factors for EOCRC. The four studies that measured colorectal adenoma occurrence reported an increased incidence with high sugar sweetened beverage intake, a higher pro-inflammatory diet, a higher Western diet score and higher sulfur microbial diet score. A protective effect against early-onset colorectal adenomas was observed in those who had a higher Prudent diet score or higher adherence to other health dietary approaches (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010, or the alternative Mediterranean diet). Those who consumed large amounts of deep-fried foods, refined foods, followed a high fat diet, consumed large amounts of sugary drinks and desserts, and had low folate and fiber consumption had a significantly higher occurrence of EOCRC. A protective effect against EOCRC was observed for those who consumed more fruits and vegetables, high amounts of micronutrients and those who adhered to a vegetarian diet. Conclusions The results of this study reveal various dietary habits may be risk factors or protective against early-onset colorectal cancer and adenomas. Future research should focus on large prospective cohort studies with long-term follow-up to confirm published results and further examine whether differences in diet quality are associated with EOCRC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin L Carroll
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Hospitality Management, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Andrew D Frugé
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Hospitality Management, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States
| | - Elizabeth A Lipke
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Michael W Greene
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Hospitality Management, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fonseca AL, Khan H, Mehari KR, Cherla D, Heslin MJ, Johnston FM. Disparities in Access to Oncologic Care in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3232-3250. [PMID: 35067789 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11258-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer care is complex, and multiple disparities in receipt of therapies have been documented. The authors aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to critically assess and summarize disparities in access to oncologic therapies for pancreatic cancer. METHODS A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were performed for studies reporting disparities in access to oncologic care for pancreatic cancer. Primary research articles published in the United States from 2000 to 2020 were included. Data were independently extracted, and risk of bias was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS The inclusion criteria were met by 47 studies. All the studies used retrospective data, with 70 % involving national database studies, 41 assessing the impact of race/ethnicity, 22 assessing the impact of socioeconomic status, 18 assessing the impact of insurance status, 23 assessing the impact of gender, 26 assessing the impact of age, and 3 assessing the impact of location on the delivery of cancer-directed therapies. Race, socioeconomic status, insurance status, gender, and age- based disparities in receipt of surgical resection, treatment at high-volume facilities and multimodal therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer, receipt of systemic chemotherapy for metastatic cancer, and receipt of expected standard-of-care treatment are reported. CONCLUSION Significant sociodemographic disparities in access to equitable oncologic care exist along the continuum of pancreatic cancer care. Multiple patient, provider, and systemic factors contribute to these disparities. The ongoing study of these disparities is important to elucidate processes that may be targeted to improve access to equitable oncologic care for patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hamza Khan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Krista R Mehari
- Department of Psychology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Deepa Cherla
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fonseca AL, Khan H, Mehari KR, Cherla D, Heslin MJ, Johnston FM. ASO Visual Abstract: Disparities in Access to Oncologic Care in Pancreatic Cancer-A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [PMID: 35171404 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11309-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hamza Khan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Krista R Mehari
- Department of Psychology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Deepa Cherla
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fonseca AL, Heslin MJ, Johnston FM, Tran-Cao HS. ASO Visual Abstract: Association of Medicaid Expansion with Pancreatic Cancer Treatment and Outcomes-Evidence from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol 2021. [PMID: 34613535 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10754-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle L Fonseca
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hop S Tran-Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fonseca AL, Cherla D, Kothari AN, Tzeng CWD, Heslin MJ, Mehari KR, Johnston FM, Tran-Cao HS. Association of Medicaid Expansion with Pancreatic Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: Evidence from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:342-351. [PMID: 34453259 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10709-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socioeconomic- and demographic-based disparities exist in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Medicaid expansion (ME) may have an impact on these disparities. Analyses of patients with PDAC from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were performed to examine the impact of ME on access to treatment and outcomes. METHODS Patients with non-metastatic PDAC diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were identified. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with curative-intent surgical resection, multimodal therapy, treatment at a high-volume facility (HVF), and survival. RESULTS The study identified 41,876 patients who met the criteria. Medicaid expansion was independently associated with curative-intent resection (odds ratio [OR] 1.54; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.43-1.67; p < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, ME was independently associated with multimodal therapy (OR 1.60; 95 % CI 1.44-1.76; p < 0.001) and treatment at an HVF (OR 1.57; 95 % CI 1.42-1.74; p < 0.001). Medicaid expansion was independently associated with improved 30-day mortality (OR 0.49; 95 % CI 0.34-0.79) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.48 95 % CI 0.35-0.59). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that after adjustment for other variables, ME status was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95 % CI 0.73-0.90; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Medicaid expansion is associated with increased use of care processes that improve outcomes in PDAC, operative outcomes, and overall survival. The study data suggest that ME has helped to improve disparities in PDAC in ME states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deepa Cherla
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Anai N Kothari
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Krista R Mehari
- Department of Psychology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hop S Tran-Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shah MH, Goldner WS, Benson AB, Bergsland E, Blaszkowsky LS, Brock P, Chan J, Das S, Dickson PV, Fanta P, Giordano T, Halfdanarson TR, Halperin D, He J, Heaney A, Heslin MJ, Kandeel F, Kardan A, Khan SA, Kuvshinoff BW, Lieu C, Miller K, Pillarisetty VG, Reidy D, Salgado SA, Shaheen S, Soares HP, Soulen MC, Strosberg JR, Sussman CR, Trikalinos NA, Uboha NA, Vijayvergia N, Wong T, Lynn B, Hochstetler C. Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:839-868. [PMID: 34340212 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 219] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Gland Tumors focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. NETs are generally subclassified by site of origin, stage, and histologic characteristics. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of NETs often involves collaboration between specialists in multiple disciplines, using specific biochemical, radiologic, and surgical methods. Specialists include pathologists, endocrinologists, radiologists (including nuclear medicine specialists), and medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists. These guidelines discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. This article is focused on the 2021 NCCN Guidelines principles of genetic risk assessment and counseling and recommendations for well-differentiated grade 3 NETs, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha H Shah
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | - Al B Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | - Pamela Brock
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Paxton V Dickson
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Jin He
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | - Arash Kardan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nikolaos A Trikalinos
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | - Beth Lynn
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
von Mehren M, Kane JM, Bui MM, Choy E, Connelly M, Dry S, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Homsi J, Keedy V, Kelly CM, Kim E, Liebner D, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Meyer C, Pappo AS, Parkes AM, Paz IB, Petersen IA, Poppe M, Riedel RF, Rubin B, Schuetze S, Shabason J, Sicklick JK, Spraker MB, Zimel M, Bergman MA, George GV. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1604-1612. [PMID: 33285515 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with soft tissue sarcomas. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines, including the development of a separate and distinct guideline for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); reconception of the management of desmoid tumors; inclusion of further recommendations for the diagnosis and management of extremity/body wall, head/neck sarcomas, and retroperitoneal sarcomas; modification and addition of systemic therapy regimens for sarcoma subtypes; and revision of the principles of radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Edwin Choy
- 4Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | - Mary Connelly
- 5The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Sarah Dry
- 6UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Jade Homsi
- 10UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Edward Kim
- 13Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | - David Liebner
- 5The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Christian Meyer
- 16The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Alberto S Pappo
- 17St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | - Matthew Poppe
- 21Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | - Brian Rubin
- 23Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Jacob Shabason
- 25Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Matthew B Spraker
- 27Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Melissa Zimel
- 28UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Agarwal S, Behring M, Kim H, Chandrashekar DS, Chakravarthi BVSK, Gupta N, Bajpai P, Elkholy A, Al Diffalha S, Datta PK, Heslin MJ, Varambally S, Manne U. TRIP13 promotes metastasis of colorectal cancer regardless of p53 and microsatellite instability status. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:3007-3029. [PMID: 33037736 PMCID: PMC7718953 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Overexpression of TRIP13, a member of the AAA-ATPase family, is linked with various cancers, but its role in metastasis is unknown in colorectal cancer (CRC). In the current study, we investigated the role TRIP13 in experimental metastasis and its involvement in regulation of WNT/β-catenin and EGFR signaling pathways. Evaluation of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and frozen tissues of adenomas and CRCs, along with their corresponding normal samples, showed that TRIP13 was gradually increased in its phenotypic expression from adenoma to carcinoma and that its overexpression in CRCs was independent of patient's gender, age, race/ethnicity, pathologic stage, and p53 and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Moreover, liver metastases of CRCs showed TRIP13 overexpression as compared to matched adjacent liver tissues, indicating the biological relevance of TRIP13 in CRC progression and metastasis. TRIP13 knockdown impeded colony formation, invasion, motility, and spheroid-forming capacity of CRC cells irrespective of their p53 and MSI status. Furthermore, xenograft studies demonstrated high expression of TRIP13 contributed to tumor growth and metastasis. Depletion of TRIP13 in CRC cells decreased metastasis and it was independent of the p53 and MSI status. Furthermore, TRIP13 interacted with a tyrosine kinase, FGFR4; this interaction could be essential for activation of the EGFR-AKT pathway. In addition, we demonstrated the involvement of TRIP13 in the Wnt signaling pathway and in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cell-based assays revealed that miR-192 and PNPT1 regulate TRIP13 expression in CRC. Additionally, RNA sequencing of CRC cells with TRIP13 knockdown identified COL6A3, TREM2, SHC3, and KLK7 as downstream targets that may have functional relevance in TRIP13-mediated tumor growth and metastasis. In summary, our results demonstrated that TRIP13 promotes tumor growth and metastasis regardless of p53 and MSI status, and indicated that it is a target for therapy of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit Agarwal
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | - Michael Behring
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | - Hyung‐Gyoon Kim
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | | | | | - Nirzari Gupta
- Department of ChemistryUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | - Prachi Bajpai
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | - Amr Elkholy
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | | | - Pran K. Datta
- Division of Hematology and OncologyDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | - Martin J. Heslin
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | - Sooryanarayana Varambally
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| | - Upender Manne
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamALUSA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Okoroh JS, Weaver L, Heslin MJ, Vickers SM, Wang TN, Rose JB, Reddy S. Does health insurance protect against risk of financial catastrophe for pancreatic tumor care? A cost-based review of patients undergoing pancreatic resection at an academic institution. Am J Surg 2020; 222:139-144. [PMID: 33279170 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of financial insolvency and cancer related deaths in the United States. The risk of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) was calculated for patients undergoing pancreatic resection at an academic institution. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 2013 and 2017 were identified through an institutional cancer registry. A CHE was an out-of-pocket payment (OOP) > 10% of the estimated median household income. RESULTS 319 patients met inclusion criteria. Hospital median charge was $76,700. 99% of patients had insurance and hospital bill adjustments. As a result, 61% (n = 193) made no OOP. Only 3 patients risked CHE. For all tumors combined there were no differences in survival outcomes by OOP. CONCLUSION This is the first study to use institutional financial data to calculate CHE risk for pancreatic resection patients. Insurance adjustments to hospital charges that accompany health insurance and voluntary hospital adjustments for the uninsured protect patients against CHE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet S Okoroh
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Lauren Weaver
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Selwyn M Vickers
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Thomas N Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Bart Rose
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sushanth Reddy
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Box EW, Deng L, Morgan DE, Xie R, Kirklin JK, Wang TN, Heslin MJ, Reddy S, Vickers S, Dudeia V, Rose JB. Preoperative anthropomorphic radiographic measurements can predict postoperative pancreatic fistula formation following pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2020; 222:133-138. [PMID: 33390246 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistulae (POPF) are a major contributing factor to pancreatoduodenectomy-associated morbidity. Established risk calculators mostly rely on subjective or intraoperative assessments. We hypothesized that various objective preoperatively determined computed tomography (CT) measurements could predict POPF as well as validated models and allow for more informed operative consent in high-risk patients. METHODS Patients undergoing elective pancreatoduodenectomies between January 2013 and April 2018 were identified in a prospective database. Comparative statistical analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were generated to predict POPF development. Model performance was tested with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Pancreatic neck attenuation (Hounsfield units) was measured in triplicate by pancreatic protocol CT (venous phase, coronal plane) anterior to the portal vein. A pancreatic density index (PDI) was created to adjust for differences in contrast timing by dividing the mean of these measurements by the portal vein attenuation. Total areas of subcutaneous fat and skeletal muscle were calculated at the L3 vertebral level on axial CT. Pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was determined by CT. RESULTS In the study period 220 patients had elective pancreatoduodenectomies with 35 (16%) developing a POPF of any grade. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that demographics (age, sex, and race) were not associated with POPF, yet patients resected for pancreatic adenocarcinoma or chronic pancreatitis were less likely to develop a POPF (10 vs. 24%; p = 0.004). ROC curves were created using various combinations of gland texture, body mass index, skeletal muscle index, sarcopenia, PDI, PD diameter, and subcutaneous fat area indexed for height (SFI). A model replacing gland texture with SFI and PDI (AUC 0.844) had similar predictive performance as the established model (p = 0.169). CONCLUSION A combination of preoperative objective CT measurements can adequately predict POPF and is comparable to established models relying on subjective intraoperative variables. Validation in a larger dataset would allow for better preoperative stratification of high-risk patients and improve informed consent among this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E W Box
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - L Deng
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - D E Morgan
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 500 22nd Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - R Xie
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - J K Kirklin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - T N Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - M J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - S Reddy
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - S Vickers
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - V Dudeia
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - J B Rose
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Boshell Diabetes Building #618, 1808 7th Ave. S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Memon RA, Granada CNP, Patel C, Manne U, Heslin MJ, Gbolahan OB, Harada S, Diffalha SA. Gastric Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma Harboring a Rare FUS- CREM Fusion. Int J Surg Pathol 2020; 29:565-570. [PMID: 32964769 DOI: 10.1177/1066896920961174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF) is a rare, aggressive soft-tissue tumor, commonly occurring in upper and lower extremities, the limb girdle, and the head and neck, which shows morphologic and molecular overlap with low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. For SEF in soft tissues, 100 case reports have been published. To our knowledge, the present case is the first to be reported in English literature for a primary SEF of the stomach with a rare FUS-CREM fusion. We report a case of gastric SEF in a 35-year-old female who presented with nonspecific symptoms, including night sweat, cough, and iron deficiency anemia for the past few months. Further workup showed, on computed tomography, a large, heterogeneously enhancing and centrally necrotic left upper quadrant mass, which measured approximately 8.4 cm. A laparoscopic partial gastrectomy with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy was performed. Histological examination and immunohistochemical staining suggested the diagnosis of primary gastric SEF, which was later confirmed by sarcoma fusion panel showing FUS-CREM fusion. In this article, we report this first case of SEF in the stomach with a rare FUS-CREM fusion, which has been previously reported only once in SEFs of soft tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raima A Memon
- Depatment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
| | | | - Chirag Patel
- Depatment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
| | - Upender Manne
- Depatment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Olumide B Gbolahan
- Department of Medicine/Hematology & Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Shuko Harada
- Depatment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
| | - Sameer Al Diffalha
- Depatment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zeh HJ, Wong SL, Heslin MJ. Warm and Welcoming: Is It What We Say or How We Say It? Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:3581-3582. [PMID: 32699929 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08908-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Siddiqui M, Dominiczak AF, Touyz RM, Carey RM, Basile J, Heslin MJ, Winokur T, Calhoun DA, Oparil S, Dudenbostel T. Case of Episodic and Positional Hypertension: Diagnosis and Treatment. Hypertension 2020; 76:614-621. [PMID: 32683905 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Siddiqui
- From the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine (M.S., D.A.C., S.O., T.D.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Anna F Dominiczak
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences (A.F.D.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Rhian M Touyz
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre (R.M.T.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Robert M Carey
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (R.M.C.)
| | - Jan Basile
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston (J.B.)
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery (M.J.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Thomas Winokur
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Pathology (T.W.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - David A Calhoun
- From the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine (M.S., D.A.C., S.O., T.D.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Suzanne Oparil
- From the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine (M.S., D.A.C., S.O., T.D.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Tanja Dudenbostel
- From the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine (M.S., D.A.C., S.O., T.D.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fazendin JM, Corey BL, Heslin MJ, Chen H. Analysis of Open Payments Receipts Among Surgical Faculty at a Large Academic Institution. J Surg Res 2019; 244:599-603. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
27
|
von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Kane JM, Keedy V, Kim E, Koon H, Mayerson J, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Meyer C, Morris ZS, O'Donnell RJ, Pappo AS, Paz IB, Petersen IA, Pfeifer JD, Riedel RF, Ruo B, Schuetze S, Tap WD, Wayne JD, Bergman MA, Scavone JL. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 16:536-563. [PMID: 29752328 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 400] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare solid tumors of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Guidelines for STS provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as intra-abdominal/retroperitoneal STS, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of STS of the extremities, superficial trunk, or head and neck; outlines treatment recommendations by disease stage; and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.
Collapse
|
28
|
Shah MH, Goldner WS, Halfdanarson TR, Bergsland E, Berlin JD, Halperin D, Chan J, Kulke MH, Benson AB, Blaszkowsky LS, Eads J, Engstrom PF, Fanta P, Giordano T, He J, Heslin MJ, Kalemkerian GP, Kandeel F, Khan SA, Kidwai WZ, Kunz PL, Kuvshinoff BW, Lieu C, Pillarisetty VG, Saltz L, Sosa JA, Strosberg JR, Sussman CA, Trikalinos NA, Uboha NA, Whisenant J, Wong T, Yao JC, Burns JL, Ogba N, Zuccarino-Catania G. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 16:693-702. [PMID: 29891520 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors provide recommendations for the management of adult patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), adrenal gland tumors, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas. Management of NETs relies heavily on the site of the primary NET. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the management options and the 2018 updates to the guidelines for locoregional advanced disease, and/or distant metastasis originating from gastrointestinal tract, bronchopulmonary, and thymus primary NETs.
Collapse
|
29
|
Clemente-Gutiérrez U, Medina-Franco H, Santes O, Morales-Maza J, Alfaro-Goldaracena A, Heslin MJ. Open surgical treatment for esophageal cancer: transhiatal vs. transthoracic, does it really matter? J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:783-788. [PMID: 31392059 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.03.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Uriel Clemente-Gutiérrez
- Department of Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, México
| | - Heriberto Medina-Franco
- Department of Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, México
| | - Oscar Santes
- Department of Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, México
| | - Jesús Morales-Maza
- Department of Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, México
| | - Alejandro Alfaro-Goldaracena
- Department of Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, México
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Moaven O, Richman JS, Reddy S, Wang T, Heslin MJ, Contreras CM. Healthcare disparities in outcomes of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 2018; 217:725-731. [PMID: 30583797 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate health disparities in the outcomes of patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 280,935 patients from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), from 1998 to 2012 to compare the differences in patient characteristics, refusal of offered surgical treatment and overall survival after pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection between white vs. black patients. RESULTS Black patients did not undergo and refused offered surgical treatment more frequently. Race and insurance were the most important factors independently associated with not receiving the offered resection. Having private insurance, Hispanic ethnic background, geographic location, higher income, residing in urban/metropolitan area and systemic treatment were independently associated with improved survival. Race was associated with overall worse survival in an unadjusted model but not in multivariable analysis. The association between race and survival was removed when adjusting for facility location, income, education, tumor size, tumor stage or systemic treatment. CONCLUSION Disparities exist at various levels in resectable pancreatic cancers. These findings help developing targeted interventions and quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omeed Moaven
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Joshua S Richman
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Sushanth Reddy
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Thomas Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Carlo M Contreras
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bateman LA, Nguyen TB, Roberts AM, Miyamoto DK, Ku WM, Huffman TR, Petri Y, Heslin MJ, Contreras CM, Skibola CF, Olzmann JA, Nomura DK. Chemoproteomics-enabled covalent ligand screen reveals a cysteine hotspot in reticulon 4 that impairs ER morphology and cancer pathogenicity. Chem Commun (Camb) 2018; 53:7234-7237. [PMID: 28352901 DOI: 10.1039/c7cc01480e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Chemical genetics has arisen as a powerful approach for identifying novel anti-cancer agents. However, a major bottleneck of this approach is identifying the targets of lead compounds that arise from screens. Here, we coupled the synthesis and screening of fragment-based cysteine-reactive covalent ligands with activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) chemoproteomic approaches to identify compounds that impair colorectal cancer pathogenicity and map the druggable hotspots targeted by these hits. Through this coupled approach, we discovered a cysteine-reactive acrylamide DKM 3-30 that significantly impaired colorectal cancer cell pathogenicity through targeting C1101 on reticulon 4 (RTN4). While little is known about the role of RTN4 in colorectal cancer, this protein has been established as a critical mediator of endoplasmic reticulum tubular network formation. We show here that covalent modification of C1101 on RTN4 by DKM 3-30 or genetic knockdown of RTN4 impairs endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope morphology as well as colorectal cancer pathogenicity. We thus put forth RTN4 as a potential novel colorectal cancer therapeutic target and reveal a unique druggable hotspot within RTN4 that can be targeted by covalent ligands to impair colorectal cancer pathogenicity. Our results underscore the utility of coupling the screening of fragment-based covalent ligands with isoTOP-ABPP platforms for mining the proteome for novel druggable nodes that can be targeted for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Bateman
- Departments of Chemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lam A, Heslin MJ, Tzeng CWD, Chen H. The effects of tenure and promotion on surgeon productivity. J Surg Res 2018; 227:67-71. [PMID: 29804864 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies investigating the impact of promotion and tenure on surgeon productivity are lacking. The aim of this study is to elucidate the relationship of promotion and tenure to surgeon productivity. METHODS We reviewed data for the Department of Surgery at our institution. Relative value units (RVUs) billed per year, publications per year, and grant funding per year were used to assess productivity from 2010 to 2016. We analyzed tenure-track (TT) and non-tenure-track (NT) surgeons and compared the productivity within these groups by rank: assistant professor (ASST), associate professor (ASSOC), and full professor (FULL). Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess significance and relationships between the groups. RESULTS A TT faculty was promoted if they produced more research, with the highest publication rates in TT FULL. TT faculty publishing rates increased from ASST to ASSOC (1 versus 2, P = 0.006) and from ASSOC to FULL (2 versus 4, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the low publication rates among NT ranks. Grant funding was also highest at the TT FULL level. The clinical production (RVUs) was highest between TT ASSOC and NT FULL. TT faculty increased productivity between ASST and ASSOC (7023 versus 8384, P = 0.001) and decreased between ASSOC and FULL (8384 versus 6877, P < 0.001). Among NT faculty, RVUs were stagnant between ASST and ASSOC levels (4877 versus 6313, P = 0.312) and increased between ASSOC and FULL levels (6313 versus 8975, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Tenure and nontenure pathways appear to appropriately incentivize surgical faculty over the course of their advancement. TT FULL has the highest research production and grant funding, whereas NT FULL has the highest clinical production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lam
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Martin J Heslin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Herbert Chen
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Conrad EU, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Kane JM, Koon H, Mayerson J, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Meyer C, O'Donnell RJ, Pappo AS, Paz IB, Petersen IA, Pfeifer JD, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Schupak KD, Schwartz HS, Tap WD, Wayne JD, Bergman MA, Scavone J. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 14:758-86. [PMID: 27283169 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare solid tumors of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Soft Tissue Sarcoma (available at NCCN.org) provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as intra-abdominal/retroperitoneal STS, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the diagnosis and staging of STS and evidence for treatment modalities that include surgery, radiation, chemoradiation, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy.
Collapse
|
34
|
Nandagopal L, Heslin MJ, Porterfield JR, Jacob R, Li P, Posey J, Paluri R. Abstract 3283: Adjuvant therapy associated with improved survival in gall bladder cancer: A single institution retrospective study. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-3283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The survival outcome of resected gallbladder carcinoma remains poor. We conducted a retrospective study to examine factors affecting patient outcomes in resectable gallbladder carcinoma.
Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients treated at our institution between January 2005 and June 2015 from the electronic medical record using a standardized data collection tool. The univariate Cox proportional hazard model was used for evaluating predictors of overall survival. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare time-to-events among subgroups and the p values were calculated by the log-rank method. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between surgery and death, or censored at the last follow-up date. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time to recurrence or death.
Results: Of 67 evaluable patients, 65.7% were female. While clinical staging determined 51% to be stage 2 or less, interval portal lymphadenectomy and hepatic resection upstaged 20% to stage 3 or 4. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) was given to 18% and adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) to 15%. About 46% did not receive any post-operative treatment and data was not available in 21%. On multivariate analysis, albumin < 3.5g/dl, LN involvement and pathological (p)Stage >2 were independent predictors of OS and PFS. Median 5 yrs OS and PFS of pstage < 2 was 54% and 54% respectively. Median 5 yr OS and PFS of stage ≥3 was 10.9% and 5.8% respectively. Adjuvant therapy was administered commonly for stage 3 and 4 (20 patients) compared to stage 1 and 2 (2 patients). In stage ≥3, adjuvant therapy improved OS (17.5% vs 8.9% for surgery alone) and PFS (12% vs 0%). Adjuvant chemoradiation for stage 3/4 had better median OS advantage compared to chemotherapy alone (54 m vs 15m, p=0.0008).
Conclusion: The use of adjuvant treatment may improve long-term disease control in patients with node positive tumors. A significant difference between CRT and CT was demonstrated in our series and needs further validation in a larger cohort.
Overall survial (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among various subgroupsGroup (n)Median OS (months)5 year OSMedian PFS (months)5 year PFSstage 1&2 (21)NA54%NA54%stage 3&4 (46)13.410.9%9.45.8%Surgery + Adjuvant treatment (22)25.115.9%16.910.9%Surgery alone (31)26.134.4%21.331.8%Surgery + CRT (10)54.235%45.724%Surgery + CT (12)14.90%13.40%Stage 3 and 4- Surgery + Adjuvant treatment (20)27.317.5%22.512%Stage 3 and 4- Surgery alone (15)2.78.9%2.10%
Citation Format: Lakshminarayanan Nandagopal, Martin J. Heslin, John R. Porterfield, Rojymon Jacob, Peng Li, James Posey, Ravikumar Paluri. Adjuvant therapy associated with improved survival in gall bladder cancer: A single institution retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3283. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3283
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rojymon Jacob
- 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Peng Li
- 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - James Posey
- 2Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Roberts AM, Miyamoto DK, Huffman TR, Bateman LA, Ives AN, Akopian D, Heslin MJ, Contreras CM, Rape M, Skibola CF, Nomura DK. Chemoproteomic Screening of Covalent Ligands Reveals UBA5 As a Novel Pancreatic Cancer Target. ACS Chem Biol 2017; 12:899-904. [PMID: 28186401 DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Chemical genetic screening of small-molecule libraries has been a promising strategy for discovering unique and novel therapeutic compounds. However, identifying the targets of lead molecules that arise from these screens has remained a major bottleneck in understanding the mechanism of action of these compounds. Here, we have coupled the screening of a cysteine-reactive fragment-based covalent ligand library with an isotopic tandem orthogonal proteolysis-enabled activity-based protein profiling (isoTOP-ABPP) chemoproteomic platform to rapidly couple the discovery of lead small molecules that impair pancreatic cancer pathogenicity with the identification of druggable hotspots for potential cancer therapy. Through this coupled approach, we have discovered a covalent ligand DKM 2-93 that impairs pancreatic cancer cell survival and in vivo tumor growth through covalently modifying the catalytic cysteine of the ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 5 (UBA5), thereby inhibiting its activity as a protein that activates the ubiquitin-like protein UFM1 to UFMylate proteins. We show that UBA5 is a novel pancreatic cancer therapeutic target and show DKM 2-93 as a relatively selective lead inhibitor of UBA5. Our results underscore the utility of coupling the screening of covalent ligand libraries with isoTOP-ABPP platforms for mining the proteome for druggable hotspots for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M. Roberts
- Departments of Chemistry,
Molecular and Cell Biology, and Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, 127 Morgan Hall, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - David K. Miyamoto
- Departments of Chemistry,
Molecular and Cell Biology, and Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, 127 Morgan Hall, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - Tucker R. Huffman
- Departments of Chemistry,
Molecular and Cell Biology, and Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, 127 Morgan Hall, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - Leslie A. Bateman
- Departments of Chemistry,
Molecular and Cell Biology, and Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, 127 Morgan Hall, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - Ashley N. Ives
- Departments of Chemistry,
Molecular and Cell Biology, and Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, 127 Morgan Hall, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - David Akopian
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - Martin J. Heslin
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
| | - Carlo M. Contreras
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
| | - Michael Rape
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | - Christine F. Skibola
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
| | - Daniel K. Nomura
- Departments of Chemistry,
Molecular and Cell Biology, and Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, 127 Morgan Hall, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bateman LA, Ku WM, Heslin MJ, Contreras CM, Skibola CF, Nomura DK. Argininosuccinate Synthase 1 is a Metabolic Regulator of Colorectal Cancer Pathogenicity. ACS Chem Biol 2017; 12:905-911. [PMID: 28229591 DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b01158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Like many cancer types, colorectal cancers have dysregulated metabolism that promotes their pathogenic features. In this study, we used the activity-based protein profiling chemoproteomic platform to profile cysteine-reactive metabolic enzymes that are upregulated in primary human colorectal tumors. We identified argininosuccinate synthase 1 (ASS1) as an upregulated target in primary human colorectal tumors and show that pharmacological inhibition or genetic ablation of ASS1 impairs colorectal cancer pathogenicity. Using metabolomic profiling, we show that ASS1 inhibition leads to reductions in the levels of oncogenic metabolite fumarate, leading to impairments in glycolytic metabolism that supports colorectal cancer cell pathogenicity. We show here that ASS1 inhibitors may represent a novel therapeutic approach for attenuating colorectal cancer through compromising critical metabolic and metabolite signaling pathways and demonstrate the utility of coupling chemoproteomic and metabolomic strategies to map novel metabolic regulators of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie A. Bateman
- Departments of Chemistry,
Molecular and Cell Biology, and Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| | | | - Martin J. Heslin
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
| | - Carlo M. Contreras
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
| | - Christine F. Skibola
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
| | - Daniel K. Nomura
- Departments of Chemistry,
Molecular and Cell Biology, and Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Reddy S, Swords JA, Waldrop MG, Contreras CM, Heslin MJ, Wei B, Cerfolio RJ, Wang TN. Effect of nodal status compared to tumor response after neoadjuvant radiation on outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
147 Background: The CROSS trial established the role of neoadjuvant radiation in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). While response to radiation is an important factor in predicting long-term outcomes, the vast majority of patients succumb to systemic disease. The purpose of this study is to assess predictors of survival in patients with EAC following radiation therapy. Methods: All patients who underwent resection after radiation therapy for EAC at a single institution were retrospectively identified from January 2004 to December 2014. Patients who died within 30 days of surgery were excluded. Cox-proportional hazard analyses were performed to identify clinico-pathological factors associated with survival after surgery. Results: In the time period, 334 patients underwent esophagectomy for EAC. Univariable/multivariable analyses are shown in the table. The presence of a pathologic complete response (pCR) did not correlate to survival. The most important factors in predicting outcome were pre-operative albumin and initial lymph node stage by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Pre-treatment N0 patients had better survival than N1 patients (median survival 37.2 vs. 16.3 months, P < 0.0001). Patients who remained N0 after radiation had much better outcomes than those that either developed N1 disease after radiation or were initially staged as N1 (stayed N0, N = 126, median survival 52.0 months; N1→N0, N = 85, median survival 22.9 months; N0→N1, N = 30, median survival 15.3 months; persistent N1, N = 44, median survival 11.4 months; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Pathologic response to radiation does not predict outcomes for patients with EAC. Patients with node positive EAC have poor outcomes even after neoadjuvant radiation therapy. These patients are at an increased risk of distant disease and should be offered additional systemic therapies prior to surgical resection. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin Wei
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kirby MK, Ramaker RC, Gertz J, Davis NS, Johnston BE, Oliver PG, Sexton KC, Greeno EW, Christein JD, Heslin MJ, Posey JA, Grizzle WE, Vickers SM, Buchsbaum DJ, Cooper SJ, Myers RM. RNA sequencing of pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors yields novel expression patterns associated with long-term survival and reveals a role for ANGPTL4. Mol Oncol 2016; 10:1169-82. [PMID: 27282075 PMCID: PMC5423196 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Revised: 04/25/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients have low survival rates due to late-stage diagnosis and high rates of cancer recurrence even after surgical resection. It is important to understand the molecular characteristics associated with survival differences in pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors that may inform patient care. RESULTS RNA sequencing was performed for 51 patient tumor tissues extracted from patients undergoing surgical resection, and expression was associated with overall survival time from diagnosis. Our analysis uncovered 323 transcripts whose expression correlates with survival time in our pancreatic patient cohort. This genomic signature was validated in an independent RNA-seq dataset of 68 additional patients from the International Cancer Genome Consortium. We demonstrate that this transcriptional profile is largely independent of markers of cellular division and present a 19-transcript predictive model built from a subset of the 323 transcripts that can distinguish patients with differing survival times across both the training and validation patient cohorts. We present evidence that a subset of the survival-associated transcripts is associated with resistance to gemcitabine treatment in vitro, and reveal that reduced expression of one of the survival-associated transcripts, Angiopoietin-like 4, impairs growth of a gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cell line. CONCLUSIONS Gene expression patterns in pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors can distinguish patients with differing survival outcomes after undergoing surgical resection, and the survival difference could be associated with the intrinsic gemcitabine sensitivity of primary patient tumors. Thus, these transcriptional differences may impact patient care by distinguishing patients who would benefit from a non-gemcitabine based therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie K Kirby
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Ryne C Ramaker
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jason Gertz
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Patsy G Oliver
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - James A Posey
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sara J Cooper
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Richard M Myers
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hollis RH, Cannon JA, Singletary BA, Korb ML, Hawn MT, Heslin MJ. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26:850-856. [PMID: 27398733 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRO Although the use of laparoscopy has significantly increased in colorectal procedures, robotic surgery may enable additional cases to be performed using a minimally invasive approach. We separately evaluated the value of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal procedures compared to the open approach. METHODS Patients undergoing nonemergent colorectal operations from 2010 to 2013 with National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data were identified. Robotic and laparoscopic procedures were separately matched (1:1) to open cases. Outcomes included 30-day composite morbidity, length of stay, operative time, and inpatient costs. Frequently used intraoperative disposable items were categorized, and significant cost contributors were identified by surgical approach. Statistical differences were determined with Chi-square and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS Both laparoscopic (n = 67) and robotic (n = 45) approaches were associated with decreased composite morbidity compared to matched open cases (lap vs. open: 22.4% vs. 49.2%, P < .01; robotic vs. open: 6.7% vs. 33.3%, P < .01). Median length of stay was significantly shorter for both laparoscopic and robotic compared to open surgery (lap vs. open: 5 vs. 7 days, P < .01; robotic vs. open: 5 vs. 7 days, P < .01). Median hospital costs were similar between laparoscopic and open surgery ($13,319 vs. $14,039; P = .80) and robotic and open surgery ($13,778 vs. $13,629; P = .48). CONCLUSION These findings illustrate the value for both laparoscopic and robotic approaches to colorectal surgery compared to the open approach in terms of short-term outcomes and inpatient costs. Advanced intraoperative disposable items such as cutting staplers and energy devices are important targets for additional cost containment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Hollis
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jamie A Cannon
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Brandon A Singletary
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Melissa L Korb
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mary T Hawn
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham, Alabama.,2 Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California
| | - Martin J Heslin
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kim H, Arnoletti PJ, Christein J, Heslin MJ, Posey JA, Pednekar A, Mark Beasley T, Morgan DE. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a pilot study of quantitative perfusion and diffusion-weighted breath-hold magnetic resonance imaging. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 39:744-52. [PMID: 24549880 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0107-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To confirm the feasibility of breath-hold DCE-MRI and DWI at 3T to obtain the intra-abdominal quantitative physiologic parameters, K(trans), k ep, and ADC, in patients with untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. METHODS Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (DW-SS-EPI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI were used for 16 patients with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. K(trans), k ep, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of pancreatic tumors, non-tumor adjacent pancreatic parenchyma (NAP), liver metastases, and normal liver tissues were quantitated and statistically compared. RESULTS Fourteen patients were able to adequately hold their breath for DCE-MRI, and 15 patients for DW-SS-EPI. Four patients had liver metastases within the 6 cm of Z axis coverage centered on the pancreatic primary tumors. K(trans) values (10(-3) min(-1)) of primary pancreatic tumors, NAP, liver metastases, and normal liver tissues were 7.3 ± 4.2 (mean ± SD), 25.8 ± 14.9, 8.1 ± 5.9, and 45.1 ± 15.6, respectively, k ep values (10(-2) min(-1)) were 3.0 ± 0.9, 7.4 ± 3.1, 5.2 ± 2.0, and 12.1 ± 2.8, respectively, and ADC values (10(-3) mm(2)/s) were 1.3 ± 0.2, 1.6 ± 0.3, 1.1 ± 0.1, and 1.3 ± 0.1, respectively. K(trans), k ep, and ADC values of primary pancreatic tumors were significantly lower than those of NAP (p < 0.05), while K(trans) and k ep values of liver metastases were significantly lower than those of normal liver tissues (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS 3T breath-hold quantitative physiologic MRI is a feasible technique that can be applied to a majority of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunki Kim
- Departments of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0019, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hollis RH, Graham L, Lazenby JP, Brown DM, Taylor BB, Heslin MJ, Rue LW, Hawn MT. Harnessing the Electronic Medical Record to Identify Patients at Risk for In-Hospital Complications. J Am Coll Surg 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
42
|
Kulke MH, Shah MH, Benson AB, Bergsland E, Berlin JD, Blaszkowsky LS, Emerson L, Engstrom PF, Fanta P, Giordano T, Goldner WS, Halfdanarson TR, Heslin MJ, Kandeel F, Kunz PL, Kuvshinoff BW, Lieu C, Moley JF, Munene G, Pillarisetty VG, Saltz L, Sosa JA, Strosberg JR, Vauthey JN, Wolfgang C, Yao JC, Burns J, Freedman-Cass D. Neuroendocrine tumors, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 13:78-108. [PMID: 25583772 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise a broad family of tumors that may or may not be associated with symptoms attributable to hormonal hypersecretion. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Neuroendocrine Tumors discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary NETs. This selection from the guidelines focuses on sporadic NETs of the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, lung, and thymus.
Collapse
|
43
|
Garcia PL, Miller AL, Kreitzburg KM, Council LN, Gamblin TL, Christein JD, Heslin MJ, Arnoletti JP, Richardson JH, Chen D, Hanna CA, Cramer SL, Yang ES, Qi J, Bradner JE, Yoon KJ. The BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 suppresses growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patient-derived xenograft models. Oncogene 2015; 35:833-45. [PMID: 25961927 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2015.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Revised: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patient-derived xenograft (tumorgraft) models. A secondary aim of the study was to evaluate whether JQ1 decreases expression of the oncogene c-Myc in PDAC tumors, as has been reported for other tumor types. We used five PDAC tumorgraft models that retain specific characteristics of tumors of origin to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of JQ1. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with JQ1 (50 mg/kg daily for 21 or 28 days). Expression analyses were performed with tumors harvested from host mice after treatment with JQ1 or vehicle control. An nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel (NanoString Technologies) of 230 cancer-related genes was used to identify gene products affected by JQ1. Quantitative RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry and immunoblots were carried out to confirm that changes in RNA expression reflected changes in protein expression. JQ1 inhibited the growth of all five tumorgraft models (P<0.05), each of which harbors a KRAS mutation; but induced no consistent change in expression of c-Myc protein. Expression profiling identified CDC25B, a regulator of cell cycle progression, as one of the three RNA species (TIMP3, LMO2 and CDC25B) downregulated by JQ1 (P<0.05). Inhibition of tumor progression was more closely related to decreased expression of nuclear CDC25B than to changes in c-Myc expression. JQ1 and other agents that inhibit the function of proteins with bromodomains merit further investigation for treating PDAC tumors. Work is ongoing in our laboratory to identify effective drug combinations that include JQ1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P L Garcia
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - A L Miller
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - K M Kreitzburg
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - L N Council
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - T L Gamblin
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J D Christein
- Division of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery or Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - M J Heslin
- Division of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery or Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J P Arnoletti
- Division of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery or Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J H Richardson
- Division of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery or Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - D Chen
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - C A Hanna
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - S L Cramer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - E S Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Qi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J E Bradner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K J Yoon
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
McDonald AM, Dulaney CR, López-Araujo J, Posey JA, Keene KS, Christein JD, Heslin MJ, Wood TE, Jacob R. Patterns of Failure for Lymph Node-Positive Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After Adjuvant Radiotherapy or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy Alone. J Gastrointest Cancer 2015; 46:149-55. [DOI: 10.1007/s12029-015-9702-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
45
|
von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Casper ES, Conrad EU, DeLaney TF, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Kane JM, Mayerson J, McGarry SV, Meyer C, O'Donnell RJ, Pappo AS, Paz IB, Pfeifer JD, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Schupak KD, Schwartz HS, Van Tine BA, Wayne JD, Bergman MA, Sundar H. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 12:853-62. [PMID: 24925196 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract, resulting most commonly from KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα)-activating mutations. These NCCN Guideline Insights highlight the important updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Soft Tissue Sarcoma specific to the management of patients with GIST experiencing disease progression while on imatinib and/or sunitinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret von Mehren
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - R Lor Randall
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Robert S Benjamin
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Sarah Boles
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Ephraim S Casper
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Ernest U Conrad
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Thomas F DeLaney
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Kristen N Ganjoo
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Suzanne George
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Ricardo J Gonzalez
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Martin J Heslin
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - John M Kane
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Joel Mayerson
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Sean V McGarry
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Christian Meyer
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Richard J O'Donnell
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Alberto S Pappo
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - I Benjamin Paz
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - John D Pfeifer
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Richard F Riedel
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Scott Schuetze
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Karen D Schupak
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Herbert S Schwartz
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Brian A Van Tine
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Jeffrey D Wayne
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Mary Anne Bergman
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| | - Hema Sundar
- From Fox Chase Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Stanford Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center at The Nebraska Medical Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Garcia PL, Gamblin T, Council LN, Christein JD, Arnoletti JP, Heslin MJ, Richardson JH, Qi J, Bradner JE, Yoon KJ. Abstract 4612: JQ1 suppresses tumor growth in tumorgraft models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2014. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-4612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common form of pancreatic cancer, is one of the most deadly of malignancies. Patients often present late in the course of disease limiting treatment options, with the majority of patients receiving chemotherapy. However, currently available chemotherapy has not impacted overall patient survival, and new therapies are urgently needed.
Recently, our lab has documented that tumorgrafts derived specifically from primary PDAC tumors retain characteristics of the tumors of origin. In terms of drug evaluation, tumorgraft models have been shown to be predictive of clinical utility because these models retain tumor heterogeneity, recapitulate tumor architecture, and contain human stroma. To date, most efforts to use tumorgraft models to identify effective agents for the treatment of PDAC have taken an “all comers approach”; but this approach has thus far identified no effective therapies.
We proposed that JQ1, a compound that targets the oncogene c-Myc, would be efficacious for the treatment of PDAC, based on molecular characteristics of these tumors. The oncogene c-Myc is amplified or overexpressed in a 30-45% of primary or metastatic PDAC tumors. Also, overexpression of this oncogene is sufficient to induce tumor formation in a genetically engineered mouse model of PDAC, suggesting a critical role in the tumorigenesis of this tumor type. JQ1 is a novel compound in that it is a relatively specific bromodomain inhibitor. Bromodomain containing proteins recognize acetylated lysine residues on histones and direct the assembly of macromolecular molecules to the chromatin for transcription. A specific subfamily of these proteins, known as BETs (bromodomain and extra-terminal), recruit c-Myc to specific sites for transcription. Exposure of PDAC cells to JQ1 decreases the expression and therefore the activity of c-Myc.
To test the effectiveness of JQ1 in vivo, we administered 50 mg/kg of JQ1 i.p. once a day for 28 days and monitored tumor growth in a panel of 5 PDAC tumorgraft models. This dose and schedule of JQ1 administration was well tolerated in mice with no significant toxicity. Our data indicate that JQ1 suppressed tumor growth in all 5 models, compared to vehicle control treated mice. The data also showed a modest, JQ1-induced down regulation of c-Myc and NFkB. We conclude that JQ1 and other bromodomain inhibitors warrant further investigation as potentially effective agents for the treatment of PDAC.
This work was supported by UAB/UMN SPORE in pancreatic cancer (P50 CA101955).
Citation Format: Patrick L. Garcia, Tracy Gamblin, Leona N. Council, John D. Christein, J. Pablo Arnoletti, Martin J. Heslin, Joseph H. Richardson, Jun Qi, Jay E. Bradner, Karina J. Yoon. JQ1 suppresses tumor growth in tumorgraft models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4612. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4612
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tracy Gamblin
- 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jun Qi
- 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Korb ML, Cannon JA, Hawn MT, Morris MS, Singletary BA, Hunter JD, O'Brien DM, Heslin MJ. Minimally Invasive Surgery Is Associated with Decreased Overall Hospital Costs in Elective Colorectal Procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
48
|
Korb ML, Hawn MT, Singletary BA, Cannon JA, Heslin MJ, O'Brien DM, Morris MS. Adoption of Preoperative Oral Antibiotics Decreases Surgical Site Infection for Elective Colorectal Surgery. Am Surg 2014. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481408000906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa L. Korb
- Department of Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mary T. Hawn
- Department of Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Jamie A. Cannon
- Department of Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Martin J. Heslin
- Department of Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Davis M. O'Brien
- Department of Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Melanie S. Morris
- Department of Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Korb ML, Hawn MT, Singletary BA, Cannon JA, Heslin MJ, O'Brien DM, Morris MS. Adoption of preoperative oral antibiotics decreases surgical site infection for elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg 2014; 80:e270-e273. [PMID: 25197859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa L Korb
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Casper ES, Conrad EU, DeLaney TF, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Kane JM, Mayerson J, McGarry SV, Meyer C, O’Donnell RJ, Pappo AS, Paz IB, Pfeifer JD, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Schupak KD, Schwartz HS, Van Tine BA, Wayne JD, Bergman MA, Sundar H. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014; 12:473-83. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|