1
|
Marley G, Annis IE, Ostrach B, Egan K, Delamater PL, Bell R, Dasgupta N, Carpenter DM. Naloxone Accessibility by Standing Order in North Carolina Community Pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2024; 64:102021. [PMID: 38307248 PMCID: PMC11081860 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to a standing order in North Carolina (NC), naloxone can be purchased without a provider prescription. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to examine whether same-day naloxone accessibility and cost vary by pharmacy type and rurality in NC. METHODS A cross-sectional telephone audit of 202 NC community pharmacies stratified by pharmacy type and county of origin was conducted in March and April 2023. Trained "secret shoppers" enacted a standardized script and recorded whether naloxone was available and its cost. We examined the relationship between out-of-pocket naloxone cost, pharmacy type, and rurality. RESULTS Naloxone could be purchased in 53% of the pharmacies contacted; 26% incorrectly noting that naloxone could be filled only with a provider prescription and 21% did not sell naloxone. Naloxone availability by standing order was statistically different by pharmacy type (chain/independent) (χ2 = 20.58, df = 4, P value < 0.001), with a higher frequency of willingness to dispense according to the standing order by chain pharmacies in comparison to independent pharmacies. The average quoted cost for naloxone nasal spray at chain pharmacies was $84.69; the cost was significantly more ($113.54; P < 0.001) at independent pharmacies. Naloxone cost did not significantly differ by pharmacy rurality (F2,136 = 2.38, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION Approximately half of NC community pharmacies audited dispense naloxone according to the statewide standing order, limiting same-day access to this life-saving medication. Costs were higher at independent pharmacies, which could be due to store-level policies. Future studies should further investigate these cost differences, especially as intranasal naloxone transitions from a prescription only to over-the-counter product.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Marley
- Grace T. Marley, PharmD, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy 201 Pharmacy Lane, CB 7355, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7355, USA
| | - Izabela E Annis
- Izabela E Annis, MS, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Bayla Ostrach
- Bayla Ostrach PhD, MA CIP, Medical Anthropology & Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine; Fruit of Labor Action Research & Technical Assistance, LLC, 608 Emmas Grove Rd., Fletcher, NC 28732
| | - Kathleen Egan
- Kathleen L Egan PhD, MS, Department of Implementation Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
| | - Paul L. Delamater
- Paul Delamater PhD, Department of Geography and Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Ronny Bell
- Ronny Bell, PhD, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Nabarun Dasgupta, MPH, PhD, Injury Prevention Research Center, 725 MLK Jr. Blvd, CB 7505, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Delesha M. Carpenter
- Delesha M. Carpenter MSPH, PhD, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy 220 Campus Drive CPO 2125 Asheville, NC 28804
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lei F, Lofwall MR, McAninch J, Adatorwovor R, Slade E, Freeman PR, Moga DC, Dasgupta N, Walsh SL, Vickers-Smith R, Slavova S. Higher First 30-Day Dose of Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Is Associated With Decreased Mortality. J Addict Med 2024:01271255-990000000-00306. [PMID: 38598300 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Buprenorphine is a medication for opioid use disorder that reduces mortality. This study aims to investigate the less well-understood relationship between the dose in the early stages of treatment and the subsequent risk of death. METHODS We used Kentucky prescription monitoring data to identify adult Kentucky residents initiating transmucosal buprenorphine medication for opioid use disorder (January 2017 to November 2019). Average daily buprenorphine dose for days covered in the first 30 days of treatment was categorized as ≤8 mg, >8 to ≤16 mg, and >16 mg. Patients were followed for 365 days after the first 30 days of buprenorphine treatment. Endpoints were opioid-involved overdose death and death from other causes. Causes and dates of death were obtained using Kentucky death certificate records. Associations were evaluated using multivariable Fine and Gray models adjusting for patient baseline characteristics. RESULTS In the cohort of 49,857 patients, there were 227 opioid-involved overdose deaths and 459 deaths from other causes. Compared with ≤8 mg, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (aSHR) of opioid-involved overdose death decreased by 55% (aSHR, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.60) and 64% (aSHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.52) for patients receiving doses of >8 to ≤16 mg and >16 mg, respectively. The incidence of death from other causes was lower in patients receiving >8 to ≤16 mg (aSHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98) and >16 mg (aSHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80) versus ≤8 mg dose. CONCLUSIONS Higher first 30-day buprenorphine doses were associated with reduced opioid-involved overdose death and death from other causes, supporting benefit of higher dosing in reducing mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feitong Lei
- From the Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (FL, RA, ES, SS); Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (FL, PRF, DCM); Departments of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (MRL, SLW); Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (MRL, SLW, RV-S); Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration (JM); Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (ND); Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (RV-S, DCM); and Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (SS, DCM, PRF)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Figgatt MC, Hincapie-Castillo JM, Schranz AJ, Dasgupta N, Edwards JK, Jackson BE, Marshall SW, Golightly YM. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder and Mortality and Hospitalization Among People With Opioid Use-related Infections. Epidemiology 2024; 35:7-15. [PMID: 37820243 PMCID: PMC10841877 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe skin and soft tissue infections related to injection drug use have increased in concordance with a shift to heroin and illicitly manufactured fentanyl. Opioid agonist therapy medications (methadone and buprenorphine) may improve long-term outcomes by reducing injection drug use. We aimed to examine the association of medication use with mortality among people with opioid use-related skin or soft tissue infections. METHODS An observational cohort study of Medicaid enrollees aged 18 years or older following their first documented medical encounters for opioid use-related skin or soft tissue infections during 2007-2018 in North Carolina. The exposure was documented medication use (methadone or buprenorphine claim) in the first 30 days following initial infection compared with no medication claim. Using Kaplan-Meier estimators, we examined the difference in 3-year incidence of mortality by medication use, weighted for year, age, comorbidities, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS In this sample, there were 13,286 people with opioid use-related skin or soft tissue infections. The median age was 37 years, 68% were women, and 78% were white. In Kaplan-Meier curves for the total study population, 12 of every 100 patients died during the first 3 years. In weighted models, for every 100 people who used medications, there were four fewer deaths over 3 years (95% confidence interval = 2, 6). CONCLUSION In this study, people with opioid use-related skin and soft tissue infections had a high risk of mortality following their initial healthcare visit for infections. Methadone or buprenorphine use was associated with reductions in mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C Figgatt
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, 725 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
| | - Juan M Hincapie-Castillo
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, 725 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
| | - Asher J Schranz
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases, Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, 725 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
| | - Jessie K Edwards
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
| | - Bradford E Jackson
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Cancer Center Cancer Information and Population Health Resource, 101 East Weaver St, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
| | - Stephen W Marshall
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, 725 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
| | - Yvonne M Golightly
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 27599
- University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Allied Health Professions, 42 and Emilie St, Omaha, Nebraska, USA, 68198
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zagorski CM, Hosey RA, Moraff C, Ferguson A, Figgatt M, Aronowitz S, Stahl NE, Hill LG, McElligott Z, Dasgupta N. Correction: Reducing the harms of xylazine: clinical approaches, research deficits, and public health context. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:170. [PMID: 38012764 PMCID: PMC10683201 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00903-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Claire M Zagorski
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2409 University Avenue, A1910, PHR 3.208J, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
| | - Rebecca A Hosey
- HIV Prevention Research Division, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Suite 4000, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | | | - Aaron Ferguson
- National Survivors Union, 1116 Grove St, Greensboro, NC, 27403, USA
| | - Mary Figgatt
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Shoshana Aronowitz
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Natalie E Stahl
- Greater Lawrence Family Health Center, 34 Haverhill Street, Lawrence, MA, 01841, USA
| | - Lucas G Hill
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2409 University Avenue, A1910, PHR 3.208J, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Zoe McElligott
- Department of Pharmacology, Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, CB#7178, 104 Manning Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 2759, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- University of North Carolina, 725 MLK Jr. Blvd., CB 7505, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Figgatt MC, Schranz AJ, Jackson BE, Dasgupta N, Hincapie-Castillo JM, Baggett C, Marshall SW, Golightly YM. Mortality associated with bacterial and fungal infections and overdose among people with drug use diagnoses. Ann Epidemiol 2023; 87:S1047-2797(23)00168-0. [PMID: 37690738 PMCID: PMC10843512 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hospital visits for drug use-related bacterial and fungal infections have increased alongside overdose deaths. The incidence of mortality from these infections and the comparison to overdose mortality is not established. METHODS This cohort study examined mortality outcomes among adults with drug use diagnoses who were insured by public and private plans during 2007 through 2018 in North Carolina. We examined bacterial- and fungal infection-related mortality and overdose mortality using cumulative incidence functions. RESULTS Among 131,522 people with drug use diagnoses, the median age was 45 years (interquartile range: 31-57), 58% were women and 65% had an opioid use disorder diagnosis. The 1-year incidence of bacterial and fungal infection-associated mortality was progressively higher as age increased (35-49 years: 9 per 10,000 people, 50-64 years: 23 per 10,000, 65+ years: 50 per 10,000 people). Conversely, the 1-year incidence of overdose mortality was markedly lower among older adults compared to those under the age of 65 (18-34 years: 34 deaths per 10,000 people; 35-49 years: 47 per 10,000; 50-64 years: 41 per 10,000; 65+ years: 9 per 10,000). CONCLUSIONS Bacterial and fungal infections and overdose were notable causes of death among adults with drug use diagnoses, and varied by age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C Figgatt
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
| | - Asher J Schranz
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | - Bradford E Jackson
- Lineberger Cancer Center Cancer Information and Population Health Resource, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Juan M Hincapie-Castillo
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Christopher Baggett
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Lineberger Cancer Center Cancer Information and Population Health Resource, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Stephen W Marshall
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Yvonne M Golightly
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wagner KD, Fiuty P, Page K, Tracy EC, Nocera M, Miller CW, Tarhuni LJ, Dasgupta N. Prevalence of fentanyl in methamphetamine and cocaine samples collected by community-based drug checking services. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 252:110985. [PMID: 37826988 PMCID: PMC10688611 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overdose deaths involving stimulants and opioids simultaneously have raised the specter of widespread contamination of the stimulant supply with fentanyl. METHODS We quantified prevalence of fentanyl in street methamphetamine and cocaine, stratified by crystalline texture, analyzing samples sent voluntarily to a public mail-in drug checking service (May 2021-June 2023). Samples from 77 harm reduction programs and clinics originated in 25 US states. Sample donors reported expected drug and physical descriptions. Substances were identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Negative binomial models were used to calculate fentanyl prevalence, adjusting for potential confounders related to sample selection. We also examined if xylazine changed donors' accuracy of detecting fentanyl. RESULTS We analyzed 718 lab-confirmed samples of methamphetamine (64%) and cocaine (36%). The adjusted prevalence of fentanyl was 12.5% (95% CI: 2.2%, 22.9%) in powder methamphetamine and 14.8% (2.3%, 27.2%) in powder cocaine, with notable geographic variation. Crystalline forms of both methamphetamine (Chisq=57, p<0.001) and cocaine (Chisq=18, p<0.001) were less likely to contain fentanyl: less than 1% of crystal methamphetamine (2/276) and no crack cocaine (0/53). Heroin was present in 6.6% of powder cocaine samples. Xylazine reduced donors' ability to detect fentanyl, with correct classification dropping from 92% to 42%. CONCLUSIONS Fentanyl was detected primarily in powder forms of methamphetamine and cocaine. Recommended interventions include expanding community-based drug checking, naloxone and fentanyl test strip distribution for people who use stimulants , and supervised drug consumption sites. New strategies to dampen variability in street drug composition are needed to reduce inadvertent fentanyl exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla D Wagner
- Department of Health Behavior, Policy, and Administration Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
| | | | - Kimberly Page
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
| | - Erin C Tracy
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Maryalice Nocera
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Colin W Miller
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Lina J Tarhuni
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zagorski CM, Hosey RA, Moraff C, Ferguson A, Figgatt M, Aronowitz S, Stahl NE, Hill LG, McElligott Z, Dasgupta N. Reducing the harms of xylazine: clinical approaches, research deficits, and public health context. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:141. [PMID: 37777769 PMCID: PMC10544173 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00879-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Xylazine has emerged as a consistent part of the unregulated drug supply in recent months. We discuss major domains of xylazine's harm, current knowledge deficits, clinical and harm reduction strategies for minimizing harm, and xylazine's public health and policy context. As an interdisciplinary team from across the USA, we have pooled our knowledge to provide an overview of xylazine's current and emerging contexts. METHODS To inform this essay, the pertinent literature was reviewed, clinical knowledge and protocols were shared by multiple clinicians with direct expertise, and policy and public health context were added by expert authors. RESULTS We describe xylazine's major harm domains-acute poisoning, extended sedation, and wounds, along with anemia and hyperglycemia, which have been reported anecdotally but lack as clear of a connection to xylazine. Current successful practices for xylazine wound care are detailed. Understanding xylazine's epidemiology will also require greater investment in drug checking and surveillance. Finally, approaches to community-based wound care are discussed, along with an orientation to the larger policy and public health context. CONCLUSIONS Addressing the harms of xylazine requires interdisciplinary participation, investment in community-based harm reduction strategies, and improved drug supply surveillance. The relatively unique context of xylazine demands buy-in from public health professionals, harm reduction professionals, clinicians, basic science researchers, policymakers and more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire M Zagorski
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2409 University Avenue, A1910, PHR 3.208J, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
| | - Rebecca A Hosey
- HIV Prevention Research Division, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Suite 4000, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | | | - Aaron Ferguson
- National Survivors Union, 1116 Grove St, Greensboro, NC, 27403, USA
| | - Mary Figgatt
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Shoshana Aronowitz
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Natalie E Stahl
- Greater Lawrence Family Health Center, 34 Haverhill Street, Lawrence, MA, 01841, USA
| | - Lucas G Hill
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2409 University Avenue, A1910, PHR 3.208J, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Zoe McElligott
- Department of Pharmacology, Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, CB#7178, 104 Manning Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 2759, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- University of North Carolina, 725 MLK Jr. Blvd., CB 7505, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Freeman PR, McAninch J, Dasgupta N, Oyler DR, Slavov K, Collins C, Hargrove S, Freeman E, Miracle D, Slavova S. Drugs involved in Kentucky drug poisoning deaths and relation with antecedent controlled substance prescription dispensing. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:53. [PMID: 37658455 PMCID: PMC10474700 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00561-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The shift from prescription to illicit drugs involved in drug poisoning deaths raises questions about the current utility of prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) data to inform drug poisoning (overdose) prevention efforts. In this study, we describe relations between specific drugs involved in Kentucky drug poisoning deaths and antecedent controlled substance (CS) dispensing. METHODS The study used linked death certificates and PDMP data for 2,248 Kentucky resident drug poisoning deaths in 2021. Death certificate literal text analysis identified drugs mentioned with involvement (DMI) in drug poisoning deaths. We characterized the concordance between each DMI and the CS dispensing history for this drug at varying timepoints since 2008. RESULTS Overall, 25.5% of all decedents had dispensed CS in the month before fatal drug poisoning. Over 80% of decedents were dispensed opioid(s) since 2008; the percentage was similar regardless of opioid involvement in the poisoning death. One-third of decedents had dispensed buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder since 2008, but only 6.1% had dispensed buprenorphine in the month preceding death. Fentanyl/fentanyl analogs were DMI in 1,568 (69.8%) deaths, yet only 3% had received a fentanyl prescription since 2008. The highest concordance in the month preceding death was observed for clonazepam (43.6%). CONCLUSION Overall, concordance between CS dispensing history and the drugs involved in poisoning deaths was low, suggesting a need to reevaluate the complex relationships between prescription medication exposure and overdose death and to expand harm reduction interventions both within and outside the healthcare system to reduce drug poisoning mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia R Freeman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
| | - Jana McAninch
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Douglas R Oyler
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Krassimir Slavov
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Candice Collins
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sarah Hargrove
- Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Edward Freeman
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Dustin Miracle
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Svetla Slavova
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dasgupta N, Ajazi EM, Schwartz TA, Marshall SW. Misclassification of overdose events in the X:BOT study. Lancet 2023; 402:526-527. [PMID: 37480936 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00113-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Elizabeth M Ajazi
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Todd A Schwartz
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Stephen W Marshall
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ali F, Kaura A, Russell C, Bonn M, Bruneau J, Dasgupta N, Imtiaz S, Martel-Laferrière V, Rehm J, Shahin R, Elton-Marshall T. Identifying barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination uptake among People Who Use Drugs in Canada: a National Qualitative Study. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:99. [PMID: 37516836 PMCID: PMC10387201 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00826-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People Who Use Drugs (PWUD) have lower vaccination uptake than the general population, and disproportionately experience the burden of harms from vaccine-preventable diseases. We conducted a national qualitative study to: (1) identify the barriers and facilitators to receiving COVID-19 vaccinations among PWUD; and (2) identify interventions to support PWUD in their decision-making. METHODS Between March and October 2022, semi-structured interviews with PWUD across Canada were conducted. Fully vaccinated (2 or more doses) and partially or unvaccinated (1 dose or less) participants were recruited from a convenience sample to participate in telephone interviews to discuss facilitators, barriers, and concerns about receiving COVID-19 vaccines and subsequent boosters, and ways to address concerns. A total of 78 PWUD participated in the study, with 50 participants being fully vaccinated and 28 participants partially or unvaccinated. Using thematic analysis, interviews were coded based on the capability, opportunity, and motivation-behavior (COM-B) framework. RESULTS Many partially or unvaccinated participants reported lacking knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine, particularly in terms of its usefulness and benefits. Some participants reported lacking knowledge around potential long-term side effects of the vaccine, and the differences of the various vaccine brands. Distrust toward government and healthcare agencies, the unprecedented rapidity of vaccine development and skepticism of vaccine effectiveness were also noted as barriers. Facilitators for vaccination included a desire to protect oneself or others and compliance with government mandates which required individuals to get vaccinated in order to access services, attend work or travel. To improve vaccination uptake, the most trusted and appropriate avenues for vaccination information sharing were identified by participants to be people with lived and living experience with drug use (PWLLE), harm reduction workers, or healthcare providers working within settings commonly visited by PWUD. CONCLUSION PWLLE should be supported to design tailored information to reduce barriers and address mistrust. Resources addressing knowledge gaps should be disseminated in areas and through organizations where PWUD frequently access, such as harm reduction services and social media platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farihah Ali
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, Canada.
- Ontario CRISM Node Team (OCRINT), IMHPR, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Room 2035, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Ashima Kaura
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cayley Russell
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, Canada
- Ontario CRISM Node Team (OCRINT), IMHPR, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Room 2035, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, Canada
| | - Matthew Bonn
- Canadian Association of People Who Use Drugs, Dartmouth, NS, Canada
| | - Julie Bruneau
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 900 Saint-Denis Street, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boul, Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sameer Imtiaz
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - Valérie Martel-Laferrière
- Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jürgen Rehm
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, Canada
- Ontario CRISM Node Team (OCRINT), IMHPR, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Room 2035, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, & Institute of Medical Science (IMS), Toronto, Canada
- 1 King's College Circle, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 1001 Queen St. West, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H4, Canada
- Institut Für Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, 01187, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Tara Elton-Marshall
- Ontario CRISM Node Team (OCRINT), IMHPR, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Room 2035, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lazard AJ, Nicolla S, Vereen RN, Pendleton S, Charlot M, Tan HJ, DiFranzo D, Pulido M, Dasgupta N. Exposure and Reactions to Cancer Treatment Misinformation and Advice: Survey Study. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e43749. [PMID: 37505790 PMCID: PMC10422174 DOI: 10.2196/43749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer treatment misinformation, or false claims about alternative cures, often spreads faster and farther than true information on social media. Cancer treatment misinformation can harm the psychosocial and physical health of individuals with cancer and their cancer care networks by causing distress and encouraging people to abandon support, potentially leading to deviations from evidence-based care. There is a pressing need to understand how cancer treatment misinformation is shared and uncover ways to reduce misinformation. OBJECTIVE We aimed to better understand exposure and reactions to cancer treatment misinformation, including the willingness of study participants to prosocially intervene and their intentions to share Instagram posts with cancer treatment misinformation. METHODS We conducted a survey on cancer treatment misinformation among US adults in December 2021. Participants reported their exposure and reactions to cancer treatment misinformation generally (saw or heard, source, type of advice, and curiosity) and specifically on social media (platform, believability). Participants were then randomly assigned to view 1 of 3 cancer treatment misinformation posts or an information post and asked to report their willingness to prosocially intervene and their intentions to share. RESULTS Among US adult participants (N=603; mean age 46, SD 18.83 years), including those with cancer and cancer caregivers, almost 1 in 4 (142/603, 23.5%) received advice about alternative ways to treat or cure cancer. Advice was primarily shared through family (39.4%) and friends (37.3%) for digestive (30.3%) and natural (14.1%) alternative cancer treatments, which generated curiosity among most recipients (106/142, 74.6%). More than half of participants (337/603, 55.9%) saw any cancer treatment misinformation on social media, with significantly higher exposure for those with cancer (53/109, 70.6%) than for those without cancer (89/494, 52.6%; P<.001). Participants saw cancer misinformation on Facebook (39.8%), YouTube (27%), Instagram (22.1%), and TikTok (14.1%), among other platforms. Participants (429/603, 71.1%) thought cancer treatment misinformation was true, at least sometimes, on social media. More than half (357/603, 59.2%) were likely to share any cancer misinformation posts shown. Many participants (412/603, 68.3%) were willing to prosocially intervene for any cancer misinformation posts, including flagging the cancer treatment misinformation posts as false (49.7%-51.4%) or reporting them to the platform (48.1%-51.4%). Among the participants, individuals with cancer and those who identified as Black or Hispanic reported greater willingness to intervene to reduce cancer misinformation but also higher intentions to share misinformation. CONCLUSIONS Cancer treatment misinformation reaches US adults through social media, including on widely used platforms for support. Many believe that social media posts about alternative cancer treatment are true at least some of the time. The willingness of US adults, including those with cancer and members of susceptible populations, to prosocially intervene could initiate the necessary community action to reduce cancer treatment misinformation if coupled with strategies to help individuals discern false claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison J Lazard
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Sydney Nicolla
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hll, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Rhyan N Vereen
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hll, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Shanetta Pendleton
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hll, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Marjory Charlot
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Hung-Jui Tan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Dominic DiFranzo
- P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, United States
| | - Marlyn Pulido
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Bedard ML, Nowlan AC, Martin Del Campo Z, Miller C, Dasgupta N, McElligott ZA. All Hands on Deck: We Need Multiple Approaches To Uncover the Neuroscience behind the Opioid Overdose Crisis. ACS Chem Neurosci 2023; 14:1921-1929. [PMID: 37159430 PMCID: PMC10591273 DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) affects millions of people throughout the United States, yet there are only three Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacological treatments. Though these treatments have been shown to be effective, the number of overdose deaths continues to rise. The increase of fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, and adulterants in the illicit drug supply has further complicated treatment strategies. Preclinical researchers strive to model OUD to better understand this complicated disorder, and this research is a critical enabler for the development of novel treatments. As a result, there are many different preclinical models of OUD. Often, researchers form strong opinions on what they believe to be the "best" model to mimic the human condition. Here, we argue that researchers should be supportive of multiple models to promote new perspectives and discoveries and always consider the trends in human opioid use when designing preclinical studies. We describe the benefits of contingent and noncontingent models as well as models of opioid withdrawal and how each of these can help illuminate different components of OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madigan L Bedard
- Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
- Department of Pharmacology, The University North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
| | - Alexandra C Nowlan
- Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
| | - Zoe Martin Del Campo
- Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
- Injury Prevention Research Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
| | - Colin Miller
- Injury Prevention Research Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
| | - Zoe A McElligott
- Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
- Department of Pharmacology, The University North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Figgatt MC, Schranz AJ, Hincapie-Castillo JM, Golightly YM, Marshall SW, Dasgupta N. Complications in Using Real-World Data to Study the Health of People Who Use Drugs. Epidemiology 2023; 34:259-264. [PMID: 36722808 PMCID: PMC10583269 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C. Figgatt
- University of North Carolina Department of Epidemiology
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center
| | - Asher J. Schranz
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases
| | | | - Yvonne M. Golightly
- University of North Carolina Department of Epidemiology
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases
- University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Allied Health Professions
| | - Stephen W. Marshall
- University of North Carolina Department of Epidemiology
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center
- University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maierhofer CN, Ranapurwala SI, DiPrete BL, Fulcher N, Ringwalt CL, Chelminski PR, Ives TJ, Dasgupta N, Go VF, Pence BW. Intended and unintended consequences: Changes in opioid prescribing practices for postsurgical, acute, and chronic pain indications following two policies in North Carolina, 2012-2018 - Controlled and single-series interrupted time series analyses. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 242:109727. [PMID: 36516549 PMCID: PMC9801483 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential misapplication of current opioid prescribing policies remains understudied and may have substantial adverse implications for patient safety. METHODS We used autoregressive integrated moving average models to assess level and trend changes in monthly 1) prescribing rates, 2) days' supply, and 3) daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) of incident opioid prescriptions relative to 1) a state medical board initiative to reduce high-dose and -volume opioid prescribing and 2) legislation to limit initial opioid prescriptions for acute and postsurgical pain. We examined outcomes by pain indication overall and by cancer history, using prescribing patterns for benzodiazepines to control for temporal trends. We used large private health insurance claims data to include North Carolina residents, aged 18-64, insured at any point between January 2012 and August 2018. RESULTS After the medical board initiative, prescribing patterns for chronic pain patients did not change; conversely, acute and postsurgical pain patients experienced immediate declines in daily MME. Post-legislation prescription rates did not decline for those with acute, postsurgical, and non-cancer pain, but instead declined among cancer patients with chronic pain. Chronic pain patients experienced the largest days' supply declines post-legislation, instead of acute and postsurgical pain patients. CONCLUSIONS We found mixed evidence on the potential impact of two opioid prescribing policies, with some observed declines in a group not intended to be impacted by the policy. This study provides evidence of the need for clearer opioid prescribing policies to ensure impacts on intended populations and avoid unintended consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney N Maierhofer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Shabbar I Ranapurwala
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, 521S Greensboro St, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA.
| | - Bethany L DiPrete
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, 521S Greensboro St, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA.
| | - Naoko Fulcher
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, 521S Greensboro St, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA.
| | - Christopher L Ringwalt
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, 521S Greensboro St, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Paul R Chelminski
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 321S. Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Timothy J Ives
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 321S. Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, 521S Greensboro St, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA.
| | - Vivian F Go
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Brian W Pence
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Miracle DK, Slavova S, Brown JR, Dasgupta N, Harris S, Freeman PR. Accuracy and validity of reported opioid prescription days' supply. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2022; 31:1253-1261. [PMID: 36053913 PMCID: PMC9729389 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary objective of this study was to estimate the percentage of opioid analgesic (OA) prescriptions dispensed by Kentucky independent pharmacies with correctly entered days' supply in the state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) system in 2019. METHODS Using a two-stage cluster design, pharmacies were sampled with probabilities proportional to the volume of dispensed OAs; 100 random OA prescriptions were sampled from PDMP records submitted by each pharmacy. Following recruitment, demographic information and hard-copy prescription data for sampled records were abstracted on-site. Days' supply was independently calculated by two pharmacists using a standard formula with disagreements adjudicated blindly by a third pharmacist. Adjudicated days' supply was compared with that submitted to the PDMP and classified as accurate/inaccurate. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the relationship between accuracy and prescription/practice-related factors. RESULTS A total of 1281 OA prescriptions were reviewed at 13 participating pharmacies. Accuracy of reported OA days' supply was 89.85%, (95% CI: 86.90, 92.80). Factors associated with accuracy were presence of special instructions from the prescriber (OR 3.13 [95% CI: 1.43, 6.82]), presence of 'as-needed' directions (OR 0.29 [95% CI: 0.18, 0.47]), and billing to a third-party payer (OR 1.43 [95% CI: 1.01, 2.02]). CONCLUSIONS Accuracy of OA days' supply reported to the state PDMP was found to be moderately high. Certain prescription-related factors influence accuracy and should be accounted for in future studies. Patterns, including opioid 'split-billing' were identified and may impact validity of PDMP and administrative claims studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin K. Miracle
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
| | - Svetla Slavova
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
- Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
| | - John R. Brown
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Sarah Harris
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
| | - Patricia R. Freeman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gertner AK, Dasgupta N, Vincent L. The North American opioid crisis: draw on the expertise of people who use drugs. Lancet 2022; 400:1401-1402. [PMID: 36273474 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01590-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alex K Gertner
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moitra MN, Dasgupta N, Chourasiya M, Banerjee S. Assessing response of microarthropod populations to four edaphic factors in a humid subtropical forest in the sub-Himalayan alluvial plains. Trop Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s42965-022-00242-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
19
|
Dasgupta N. History and Future of Harm Reduction in North Carolina: Pragmatism and Innovation. N C Med J 2022; 83:257-260. [PMID: 35817454 DOI: 10.18043/ncm.83.4.257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Harm reduction is a practice-oriented approach to reducing harms from drug use, including overdose and injection-related infections. North Carolina has a legacy of harm reduction innovation, yet our history includes sustained racist and harmful drug policies. People with lived experience are central to the creation of next-generation strategies for prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center and Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dasgupta N, Morabia A. Experimental Forum 2: Two Years After the 2020 Food and Drug Administration Guidance on E-Cigarette Flavors. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:995-998. [PMID: 35728030 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.306921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is an AJPH associate editor. Alfredo Morabia is the AJPH editor in chief and is with the Barry Commoner Center for Health and the Environment, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, and the Department of Epidemiology, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY
| | - Alfredo Morabia
- Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is an AJPH associate editor. Alfredo Morabia is the AJPH editor in chief and is with the Barry Commoner Center for Health and the Environment, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, and the Department of Epidemiology, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Nabarun Dasgupta is an AJPH associate editor and is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Farzana Kapadia is deputy editor of AJPH and is associate professor of epidemiology at the School of Public Health, New York University, New York, NY
| | - Farzana Kapadia
- Nabarun Dasgupta is an AJPH associate editor and is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Farzana Kapadia is deputy editor of AJPH and is associate professor of epidemiology at the School of Public Health, New York University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Young JC, Dasgupta N, Stürmer T, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Considerations for Observational Study Design: Comparing the Evidence of Opioid Use between Electronic Health Records and Insurance Claims. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2022; 31:913-920. [PMID: 35560685 PMCID: PMC9271595 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pharmacoepidemiology studies often use insurance claims and/or electronic health records (EHR) to capture information about medication exposure. The choice between these data sources has important implications. METHODS We linked EHR from a large academic health system (2015-2017) to Medicare insurance claims for patients undergoing surgery. Drug utilization was characterized based on medication order dates in the EHR, and prescription fill dates in Medicare claims. We compared opioid use measured in EHR orders to prescription claims in 4 time periods: 1) Baseline (182-d before surgery); 2) Perioperative period; 3) Discharge date; 4) Follow-up (90-d after surgery). RESULTS We identified 11,128 patients undergoing surgery. During baseline, 34.4% (EHR) vs 44.1% (claims) had evidence of opioid use, and 56.9% of all baseline use was reflected only in one data source. During the perioperative period, 78.8% (EHR) vs 47.6% (claims) had evidence of use. On the day of discharge, 59.6% (EHR) vs 45.5% (claims) had evidence of use, and 51.8% of all discharge use was reflected only in one data source. During follow-up, 4.3% (EHR) vs 10.4% (claims) were identified with prolonged opioid use following surgery with 81.4% of all prolonged use reflected only in one data source. CONCLUSIONS When characterizing opioid exposure, we found substantial discrepancies between EHR medication orders and prescription claims data. In all time periods assessed, most patients' use was reflected only in the EHR, or only in the claims, not both. The potential for misclassification of drug utilization must be evaluated carefully, and choice of data source may have large impacts on key study design elements. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica C Young
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Til Stürmer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A
| | - Virginia Pate
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A
| | - Michele Jonsson Funk
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Netherland J, Kral AH, Ompad DC, Davis CS, Bluthenthal RN, Dasgupta N, Gilbert M, Morgan R, Wheelock H. Principles and Metrics for Evaluating Oregon's Innovative Drug Decriminalization Measure. J Urban Health 2022; 99:328-331. [PMID: 35107693 PMCID: PMC8809225 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-022-00606-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jules Netherland
- Department of Research and Academic Engagement, Drug Policy Alliance, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Danielle C Ompad
- Department of Epidemiology, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
- Center for Drug Use and HIV|HCV Research, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Corey S Davis
- Network for Public Health Law, Harm Reduction Legal Project, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ricky N Bluthenthal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
DiPrete BL, Ranapurwala SI, Maierhofer CN, Fulcher N, Chelminski PR, Ringwalt CL, Ives TJ, Dasgupta N, Go VF, Pence BW. Association of Opioid Dose Reduction With Opioid Overdose and Opioid Use Disorder Among Patients Receiving High-Dose, Long-term Opioid Therapy in North Carolina. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e229191. [PMID: 35476064 PMCID: PMC9047650 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Rapid reduction or discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy may increase risk of opioid overdose or opioid use disorder (OUD). Current guidelines for chronic pain management caution against rapid dose reduction but are based on limited evidence. OBJECTIVE To characterize the association between rapid reduction or abrupt discontinuation of opioid therapy (vs maintained or gradual reduction) and incidence of opioid overdose and OUD among patients prescribed high-dose, long-term opioid therapy (HDLTOT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients aged 18 to 64 years who were prescribed HDLTOT (≥90 daily morphine milligram equivalents for ≥90% of 90 days) from January 2006 to September 2018, with follow-up up to 4 years after cohort entry. Claims data were drawn from a large private health insurer in North Carolina and analyzed from March 1, 2006, to September 30, 2018. EXPOSURES Time-varying exposure of rapid dose reduction or discontinuation (>10% dose reduction/week) vs maintenance, increase, or gradual reduction or discontinuation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was incident opioid overdose (fatal or nonfatal) or diagnosed OUD. Inverse probability-weighted cumulative incidence of outcomes were estimated using the cumulative incidence function and hazard ratios (HRs) using marginal structural Fine-Gray models as a function of rapid dose tapering or discontinuation (vs gradual reduction or discontinuation or maintained or increased), accounting for competing risks. RESULTS A total of 19 443 patients (median [IQR] age, 49 [41-55] years; 10 073 [51.8%] men) who received HDLTOT were identified. Rapid reduction or discontinuation was associated with higher risk of fatal and nonfatal overdoses compared with gradual reduction after the first year (year 1: HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.94-2.18; years 2-4: HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.31-2.90). There was no association between rapid reduction or discontinuation and diagnosed OUD through 2 years of follow-up; however, the hazard of incident OUD among patients exposed to rapid tapering or discontinuation was greater 25 to 48 months after the start of follow-up (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.01-1.63). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, rapid dose reduction or discontinuation was associated with increased risk of opioid overdose and OUD during long-term follow-up. These findings reinforce prior concerns about safety of rapid dose reductions for patients receiving HDLTOT and highlight the need for caution when reducing opioid doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany L. DiPrete
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Shabbar I. Ranapurwala
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Courtney N. Maierhofer
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Naoko Fulcher
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Paul R. Chelminski
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Christopher L. Ringwalt
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Timothy J. Ives
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Vivian F. Go
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - Brian W. Pence
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dasgupta N, Figgatt MC. Invited Commentary: Drug Checking for Novel Insights Into the Unregulated Drug Supply. Am J Epidemiol 2022; 191:248-252. [PMID: 34528056 PMCID: PMC8824693 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Tobias et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191 (2):241–247) present a novel analysis of time trends in fentanyl concentrations in the unregulated drug supply in British Columbia, Canada. The preexisting knowledge about unregulated drugs had come from law-enforcement seizures and postmortem toxicology. As both of these data sources are subject to selection bias, large-scale drug-checking programs are poised to be a crucial component of the public health response to the unrelenting increase in overdose in North America. As programs expand, we offer 2 guiding principles. First, the primary purpose of these programs is to deliver timely results to people who use drugs to mitigate health risks. Second, innovation is needed to go beyond criminal justice paradigms in laboratory analysis for a more nuanced understanding of health concerns. We provide examples of the role adulterants play in our understanding of drug harms. We also describe the applications and limitations of common laboratory assays, with implications for epidemiologic surveillance. While the research and direct service teams in British Columbia have taken groundbreaking steps, there is still a need to establish best practices for communicating results to sample donors in an approachable yet nonalarmist tone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Correspondence to Dr. Nabarun Dasgupta, University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (e-mail: )
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Young JC, Dasgupta N, Chidgey BA, Stürmer T, Pate V, Hudgens M, Funk MJ. Impacts of Initial Prescription Length and Prescribing Limits on Risk of Prolonged Postsurgical Opioid Use. Med Care 2022; 60:75-82. [PMID: 34812786 PMCID: PMC8900903 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to concerns about opioid addiction following surgery, many states have implemented laws capping the days supplied for initial postoperative prescriptions. However, few studies have examined changes in the risk of prolonged opioid use associated with the initial amount prescribed. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of prolonged opioid use associated with the length of initial opioid prescribed and the potential impact of prescribing limits. RESEARCH DESIGN Using Medicare insurance claims (2007-2017), we identified opioid-naive adults undergoing surgery. Using G-computation methods with logistic regression models, we estimated the risk of prolonged opioid use (≥1 opioid prescription dispensed in 3 consecutive 30-d windows following surgery) associated with the varying initial number of days supplied. We then estimate the potential reduction in cases of prolonged opioid use associated with varying prescribing limits. RESULTS We identified 1,060,596 opioid-naive surgical patients. Among the 70.0% who received an opioid for postoperative pain, 1.9% had prolonged opioid use. The risk of prolonged use increased from 0.7% (1 d supply) to 4.4% (15+ d). We estimated that a prescribing limit of 4 days would be associated with a risk reduction of 4.84 (3.59, 6.09)/1000 patients and would be associated with 2255 cases of prolonged use potentially avoided. The commonly used day supply limit of 7 would be associated with a smaller reduction in risk [absolute risk difference=2.04 (-0.17, 4.25)/1000]. CONCLUSIONS The risk of prolonged opioid use following surgery increased monotonically with increasing prescription duration. Common prescribing maximums based on days supplied may impact many patients but are associated with relatively low numbers of reduced cases of prolonged use. Any prescribing limits need to be weighed against the need for adequate pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica C. Young
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Brooke A. Chidgey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Til Stürmer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
| | - Virginia Pate
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
| | - Michael Hudgens
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
| | - Michele Jonsson Funk
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
It has been well-documented that concerns about side effects prevent many from soliciting immunization. And family medicine providers play a key role in addressing concerns about COVID vaccines. However, there are few documented examples of the decision-making process regarding second shots after the emergence of a concerning and previously unknown side effect. Therefore, we present a case where a primary care provider and patient worked together to analyze real-time adverse event data on post-vaccination shingles to decide whether to receive the second dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Maierhofer CN, Ranapurwala SI, DiPrete BL, Fulcher N, Ringwalt CL, Chelminski PR, Ives TJ, Dasgupta N, Go VF, Pence BW. Association Between Statewide Opioid Prescribing Interventions and Opioid Prescribing Patterns in North Carolina, 2006-2018. Pain Med 2021; 22:2931-2940. [PMID: 34175958 PMCID: PMC8665995 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of three sequential statewide policy and legislative interventions on opioid prescribing practices among privately insured individuals in North Carolina. METHODS An interrupted time series approach was used to examine level and trajectory changes of new and prevalent opioid prescription rates, days' supply, and daily morphine milligram equivalents before and after implementation of a 1) prescription drug monitoring program, 2) state medical board initiative, and 3) legislative action. Analyses were conducted using individual-level claims data from a large private health insurance provider serving North Carolina residents, ages 18-64 years, from January 2006 to August 2018. RESULTS Rates of new and prevalent prescription opioid patients were relatively unaffected by the prescription monitoring program but sharply declined in the months immediately following both medical board (-3.7 new and -19.3 prevalent patients per 10,000 person months) and legislative (-14.1 new and -26.7 prevalent patients) actions. Among all opioid prescriptions, days' supply steadily increased on average over the study period but declined after legislative action (-1.5 days' supply per year). CONCLUSIONS The voluntary prescription drug monitoring program launched in 2010 only marginally affected opioid prescribing patterns on its own, but its redeployment as an investigative and clinical tool in multifaceted public policy approaches by the state medical board and legislature later in the decade plausibly contributed to notable declines in prescription rates and days' supply. This study lends new emphasis to the importance of enforcement mechanisms for state and national policies seeking to reverse this critical public health crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney N Maierhofer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shabbar I Ranapurwala
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bethany L DiPrete
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Naoko Fulcher
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher L Ringwalt
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paul R Chelminski
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Timothy J Ives
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Vivian F Go
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian W Pence
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dasgupta N, Brown JR, Nocera M, Lazard A, Slavova S, Freeman PR. Abuse-Deterrent Opioids: A Survey of Physician Beliefs, Behaviors, and Psychology. Pain Ther 2021; 11:133-151. [PMID: 34870790 PMCID: PMC8861217 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00343-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Evaluate beliefs and behaviors pertaining to abuse-deterrent opioids (ADFs). Design Survey in 2019 by invitation to all licensed physicians. Setting Commonwealth of Kentucky. Participants 374 physicians. Methods Descriptive statistics, and hypothesis test that early adopter prescribers would have greater endorsement of opioid risk management. Results Of all prescribers, 55% believed all opioid analgesics should have ADF requirements (15% were unsure); 74% supported mandating insurance coverage. Only one-third considered whether an opioid was ADF when prescribing, motivated by patient family diversion (94%) and societal supply reduction (88%). About half believed ADFs were equally effective in preventing abuse by intact swallowing, injection, chewing, snorting, smoking routes. Only 4% of OxyContin prescribers chose it primarily because of ADF properties. Instead, the most common reason (33%) was being started by another prescriber. A quarter of physicians chose not to prescribe ADFs because of heroin switching potential. Early adopters strongly believed ADFs were effective in reducing abuse (PR 3.2; 95% CI 1.5, 6.6) compared to mainstream physicians. Early-adopter risk-management practices more often included tools increasing agency and measurement: urine drug screens (PR 2.0; 1.3, 3.1), risk screening (PR 1.3; 0.94, 1.9). While nearly all respondents (96%) felt that opioid abuse was a problem in the community, only 57% believed it was a problem among patients in their practice. Attribution theory revealed an externalization of opioid abuse problems that deflected blame from patients on to family members. Conclusions The primary motivator for prescribing ADFs was preventing diversion by family members, not patient-level abuse concerns. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00343-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- UNC CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - John R Brown
- UNC CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Maryalice Nocera
- UNC CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Allison Lazard
- UNC CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Svetla Slavova
- UNC CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Patricia R Freeman
- UNC CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lau DT, Sosa P, Dasgupta N, He H. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Public Health Surveillance and Survey Data Collections in the United States. Am J Public Health 2021; 111:2118-2121. [PMID: 34878884 PMCID: PMC8667853 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2021.306551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Denys T Lau
- Denys T. Lau is an AJPH Associate Editor and was with the National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC. Paulina Sosa is a doctoral candidate with the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Nabarun Dasgupta is an AJPH Associate Editor and is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Hua He is the AJPH Deputy Statistical Editor and is with the School of Public Health and Tropic Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Paulina Sosa
- Denys T. Lau is an AJPH Associate Editor and was with the National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC. Paulina Sosa is a doctoral candidate with the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Nabarun Dasgupta is an AJPH Associate Editor and is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Hua He is the AJPH Deputy Statistical Editor and is with the School of Public Health and Tropic Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Denys T. Lau is an AJPH Associate Editor and was with the National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC. Paulina Sosa is a doctoral candidate with the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Nabarun Dasgupta is an AJPH Associate Editor and is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Hua He is the AJPH Deputy Statistical Editor and is with the School of Public Health and Tropic Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Hua He
- Denys T. Lau is an AJPH Associate Editor and was with the National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC. Paulina Sosa is a doctoral candidate with the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Nabarun Dasgupta is an AJPH Associate Editor and is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Hua He is the AJPH Deputy Statistical Editor and is with the School of Public Health and Tropic Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- Denys T Lau
- AJPH Associate Editor
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- AJPH Associate Editor
- AJPH Statistical Deputy Editor
| | - Paulina Sosa
- AJPH Associate Editor
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- AJPH Associate Editor
- AJPH Statistical Deputy Editor
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- AJPH Associate Editor
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- AJPH Associate Editor
- AJPH Statistical Deputy Editor
| | - Hua He
- AJPH Associate Editor
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- AJPH Associate Editor
- AJPH Statistical Deputy Editor
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Blackburn NA, Joniak-Grant E, Nocera M, Dorris SW, Dasgupta N, Chelminski PR, Carey TS, Wu LT, Edwards DA, Marshall SW, Ranapurwala SI. Implementation of mandatory opioid prescribing limits in North Carolina: healthcare administrator and prescriber perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1191. [PMID: 34732177 PMCID: PMC8565171 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07230-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent increases in state laws to reduce opioid prescribing have demonstrated a need to understand how they are interpreted and implemented in healthcare systems. The purpose of this study was to explore the systems, strategies, and resources that hospital administrators and prescribers used to implement the 2017 North Carolina Strengthen Opioid Prevention (STOP) Act opioid prescribing limits, which limited initial prescriptions to a five (for acute) or seven (for post-surgical) days' supply. METHODS We interviewed 14 hospital administrators and 38 prescribers with degrees in medicine, nursing, pharmacy, business administration and public health working across North Carolina. Interview guides, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, explored barriers and facilitators to implementation. Interview topics included communication, resources, and hospital system support. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, then analyzed using flexible coding, integrating inductive and deductive coding, to inform analytic code development and identify themes. RESULTS We identified three main themes around implementation of STOP act mandated prescribing limits: organizational communication, prescriber education, and changes in the electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Administrators reflected on implementation in the context of raising awareness and providing reminders to facilitate changes in prescriber behavior, operationalized through email and in-person communications as well as dedicated resources to EMR changes. Prescribers noted administrative communications about prescribing limits often focused on legality, suggesting a directive of the organization's policy rather than a passive reminder. Prescribers expressed a desire for more spaces to have their questions answered and resources for patient communications. While hospital administrators viewed compliance with the law as a priority, prescribers reflected on concerns for adequately managing their patients' pain and limited time for clinical care. CONCLUSIONS Hospital administrators and prescribers approached implementation of the STOP act prescribing limits with different mindsets. While administrators were focused on policy compliance, prescribers were focused on their patients' needs. Strategies to implement the mandate then had to balance patient needs with policy compliance. As states continue to legislate to prevent opioid overdose deaths, understanding how laws are implemented by healthcare systems and prescribers will improve their effectiveness through tailoring and maximizing available resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie A Blackburn
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Joniak-Grant
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Maryalice Nocera
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Samantha Wooten Dorris
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
- Office of Research, Innovations, and Global Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Paul R Chelminski
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Timothy S Carey
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Cecil G. Sheps Health Center for Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Li-Tzy Wu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David A Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephen W Marshall
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shabbar I Ranapurwala
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Young JC, Dasgupta N, Chidgey BA, Stürmer T, Pate V, Hudgens M, Funk MJ. Day-of-Surgery Gabapentinoids and Prolonged Opioid Use: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Medicare Patients Using Electronic Health Records. Anesth Analg 2021; 133:1119-1128. [PMID: 34260433 PMCID: PMC8542643 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While preoperative gabapentinoids are commonly used in surgical multimodal analgesia protocols, little is known regarding the effects this therapy has on prolonged postsurgical opioid use. In this observational study, we used data from a large integrated health care system to estimate the association between preoperative day-of-surgery gabapentinoids and the risk of prolonged postsurgical opioid use. METHODS We identified adults age ≥65 years undergoing major therapeutic surgical procedures from a large integrated health care system from 2016 to 2019. Exposure to preoperative gabapentinoids on the day of surgery was measured using inpatient medication administration records, and the outcome of prolonged opioid use was measured using outpatient medication orders. We used stabilized inverse probability of treatment-weighted log-binomial regression to estimate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of prolonged opioid use, comparing patients who received preoperative gabapentinoids to those who did not and adjusting for relevant clinical factors. The main analysis was conducted in the overall surgical population, and a secondary analysis was conducted among procedures where at least 30% of all patients received a preoperative gabapentinoid. RESULTS Overall, 13,958 surgical patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 21.0% received preoperative gabapentinoids. The observed 90-day risk of prolonged opioid use following surgery was 0.91% (95% CI, 0.77-1.08). Preoperative gabapentinoid administration was not associated with a reduced risk of prolonged opioid use in the main analysis conducted in a broad surgical population (adjusted risk ratio [adjRR], 1.19 [95% CI, 0.67-2.12]) or in the secondary analysis conducted in patients undergoing colorectal resection, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, or hysterectomy (adjRR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.30-3.33]). CONCLUSIONS In a large integrated health system, we did not find evidence that preoperative gabapentinoids were associated with reduced risk of prolonged opioid use in patients undergoing a broad range of surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica C. Young
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Brooke A. Chidgey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Til Stürmer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
| | - Virginia Pate
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
| | - Michael Hudgens
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
| | - Michele Jonsson Funk
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Salazar ZR, Vincent L, Figgatt MC, Gilbert MK, Dasgupta N. Research led by people who use drugs: centering the expertise of lived experience. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2021; 16:70. [PMID: 34544478 PMCID: PMC8454046 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-021-00406-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research collaborations between people who use drugs (PWUD) and researchers are largely underutilized, despite the long history of successful, community-led harm reduction interventions and growing health disparities experienced by PWUD. PWUD play a critical role in identifying emerging issues in the drug market, as well as associated health behaviors and outcomes. As such, PWUD are well positioned to meaningfully participate in all aspects of the research process, including population of research questions, conceptualization of study design, and contextualization of findings. MAIN BODY We argue PWUD embody unparalleled and current insight to drug use behaviors, including understanding of novel synthetic drug bodies and the dynamics at play in the drug market; they also hold intimate and trusting relationships with other PWUD. This perfectly situates PWUD to collaborate with researchers in investigation of drug use behaviors and development of harm reduction interventions. While PWUD have a history of mistrust with the medical community, community-led harm reduction organizations have earned their trust and are uniquely poised to facilitate research projects. We offer the North Carolina Survivors Union as one such example, having successfully conducted a number of projects with reputable research institutions. We also detail the fallacy of meaningful engagement posed by traditional mechanisms of capturing community voice. As a counter, we detail the framework developed and implemented by the union in hopes it may serve as guidance for other community-led organizations. We also situate research as a mechanism to diversify the job opportunities available to PWUD and offer a real-time example of the integration of these principles into public policy and direct service provision. CONCLUSION In order to effectively mitigate the risks posed by the fluid and volatile drug market, research collaborations must empower PWUD to play meaningful roles in the entirety of the research process. Historically, the most effective harm reduction interventions have been born of the innovation and heart possessed by PWUD; during the current overdose crisis, there is no reason to believe they will not continue to be.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach R Salazar
- North Carolina Survivors Union, 1116 Grove Street, Greensboro, NC, 27403, USA.
| | - Louise Vincent
- North Carolina Survivors Union, 1116 Grove Street, Greensboro, NC, 27403, USA
| | - Mary C Figgatt
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dasgupta N. Commentary on Paljarvi et al: Can harder-to-crush oxycodone prevent overdose? Addiction 2021; 116:2416-2417. [PMID: 34263500 DOI: 10.1111/add.15617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 725 MLK Jr. Blvd., CB 7505, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Shiue KY, Dasgupta N, Naumann RB, Nelson AE, Golightly YM. Sociodemographic and Clinical Predictors of Prescription Opioid Use in a Longitudinal Community-Based Cohort Study of Middle-Aged and Older Adults. J Aging Health 2021; 34:213-220. [PMID: 34404244 PMCID: PMC8854450 DOI: 10.1177/08982643211039338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Identifying factors associated with opioid use in middle-aged and older
adults is a fundamental step in the mitigation of potentially unnecessary
opioid consumption and opioid-related harms. Methods Using longitudinal data on a community-based cohort of adults aged
50–90 years residing in Johnston County, North Carolina, we examined
sociodemographic and clinical factors in non-opioid users
(n = 786) at baseline (2006–2010) as predictors of
opioid use at follow-up (2013–2015). Variables included age, sex, race,
obesity, educational attainment, employment status, household poverty rate,
marital status, depressive symptoms, social support, pain catastrophizing,
pain sensitivity, insurance status, polypharmacy, and smoking status. Results At follow-up, 13% of participants were using prescription opioids. In the
multivariable model, high pain catastrophizing (adjusted odds ratio; 95%
confidence interval = 2.14; 1.33–3.46), polypharmacy (2.08; 1.23–3.53), and
history of depressive symptoms (2.00; 1.19–3.38) were independent markers of
opioid use. Discussion Findings support the assessment of these modifiable factors during clinical
encounters in patients ≥ 50 years old with chronic pain.
Collapse
|
37
|
Dasgupta N, Wang Y, Bae J, Kinlaw AC, Chidgey BA, Cooper T, Delcher C. Inches, Centimeters, and Yards: Overlooked Definition Choices Inhibit Interpretation of Morphine Equivalence. Clin J Pain 2021; 37:565-574. [PMID: 34116543 PMCID: PMC8270512 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Morphine-standardized doses are used in clinical practice and research to account for molecular potency. Ninety milligrams of morphine equivalents (MME) per day are considered a "high dose" risk threshold in guidelines, laws, and by payers. Although ubiquitously cited, the "CDC definition" of daily MME lacks a clearly defined denominator. Our objective was to assess denominator-dependency on "high dose" classification across competing definitions. METHODS To identify definitional variants, we reviewed literature and electronic prescribing tools, yielding 4 unique definitions. Using Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs data (July to September 2018), we conducted a population-based cohort study of 3,916,461 patients receiving outpatient opioid analgesics in California (CA) and Florida (FL). The binary outcome was whether patients were deemed "high dose" (>90 MME/d) compared across 4 definitions. We calculated I2 for heterogeneity attributable to the definition. RESULTS Among 9,436,640 prescriptions, 42% overlapped, which led denominator definitions to impact daily MME values. Across definitions, average daily MME varied 3-fold (range: 17 to 52 [CA] and 23 to 65 mg [FL]). Across definitions, prevalence of "high dose" individuals ranged 5.9% to 14.2% (FL) and 3.5% to 10.3% (CA). Definitional variation alone would impact a hypothetical surveillance study trying to establish how much more "high dose" prescribing was present in FL than CA: from 39% to 84% more. Meta-analyses revealed strong heterogeneity (I2 range: 86% to 99%). In sensitivity analysis, including unit interval 90.0 to 90.9 increased "high dose" population fraction by 15%. DISCUSSION While 90 MME may have cautionary mnemonic benefits, without harmonization of calculation, its utility is limited. Comparison between studies using daily MME requires explicit attention to definitional variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yanning Wang
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Jungjun Bae
- Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY
| | - Alan C. Kinlaw
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy
| | - Brooke A. Chidgey
- UNC Hospitals Pain Management Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Chris Delcher
- Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Figgatt MC, Salazar ZR, Vincent L, Carden-Glenn D, Link K, Kestner L, Yates T, Schranz A, Joniak-Grant E, Dasgupta N. Treatment experiences for skin and soft tissue infections among participants of syringe service programs in North Carolina. Harm Reduct J 2021; 18:80. [PMID: 34330297 PMCID: PMC8324443 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00528-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bacterial and fungal infections, such as skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and infective endocarditis (IE), are increasing among people who use drugs in the United States. Traditional healthcare settings can be inaccessible and unwelcoming to people who use drugs, leading to delays in getting necessary care. The objective of this study was to examine SSTI treatment experiences among people utilizing services from syringe services programs. This study was initiated by people with lived experience of drug use to improve quality of care. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey among participants of five syringe services programs in North Carolina from July through September 2020. Surveys collected information on each participant's history of SSTIs and IE, drug use and healthcare access characteristics, and SSTI treatment experiences. We examined participant characteristics using counts and percentages. We also examined associations between participant characteristics and SSTI history using binomial linear regression models. RESULTS Overall, 46% of participants reported an SSTI in the previous 12 months and 10% reported having IE in the previous 12 months. Those with a doctor they trusted with drug use-related concerns had 27 fewer (95% confidence interval = - 51.8, - 2.1) SSTIs per every 100 participants compared to those without a trusted doctor. Most participants with a SSTI history reported delaying (98%) or not seeking treatment (72%) for their infections. Concerns surrounding judgment or mistreatment by medical staff and self-treating the infection were common reasons for delaying or not seeking care. 13% of participants used antibiotics obtained from sources other than a medical provider to treat their most recent SSTI. Many participants suggested increased access to free antibiotics and on-site clinical care based at syringe service programs to improve treatment for SSTIs. CONCLUSIONS Many participants had delayed or not received care for SSTIs due to poor healthcare experiences. However, having a trusted doctor was associated with fewer people with SSTIs. Improved access to non-judgmental healthcare for people who use drugs with SSTIs is needed. Expansion of syringe services program-based SSTI prevention and treatment programs is likely a necessary approach to improve outcomes among those with SSTI and IE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C Figgatt
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, CB #7505, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, 170 Rosenau Hall, CB #740, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Zach R Salazar
- North Carolina Survivors Union, 1116 Grove Street, Greensboro, NC, 27403, USA
| | - Louise Vincent
- North Carolina Survivors Union, 1116 Grove Street, Greensboro, NC, 27403, USA
| | | | - Kelly Link
- Community Hope Alliance, 2012 N Fayetteville St, Asheboro, NC, 27203, USA
| | - Lauren Kestner
- Center for Prevention Services, 1117 E Morehead St #200, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Tyler Yates
- Guilford County Solution To the Opioid Problem, 1601 Walker Ave, Greensboro, NC, 27403, USA
| | - Asher Schranz
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth Joniak-Grant
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, CB #7505, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, 170 Rosenau Hall, CB #740, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Young JC, Pack C, Gibson TB, Yoon F, Irwin DE, Shiv S, Cooper T, Dasgupta N. Machine Learning Can Unlock Insights Into Mortality. Am J Public Health 2021; 111:S65-S68. [PMID: 34314195 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2021.306418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica C Young
- Jessica C. Young is with the Cecil. G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Cory Pack, Teresa B. Gibson, Frank Yoon, Debra E. Irwin, and Shalu Shiv are with IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD. Toska Cooper and Nabarun Dasgupta are with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Cory Pack
- Jessica C. Young is with the Cecil. G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Cory Pack, Teresa B. Gibson, Frank Yoon, Debra E. Irwin, and Shalu Shiv are with IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD. Toska Cooper and Nabarun Dasgupta are with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Teresa B Gibson
- Jessica C. Young is with the Cecil. G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Cory Pack, Teresa B. Gibson, Frank Yoon, Debra E. Irwin, and Shalu Shiv are with IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD. Toska Cooper and Nabarun Dasgupta are with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Frank Yoon
- Jessica C. Young is with the Cecil. G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Cory Pack, Teresa B. Gibson, Frank Yoon, Debra E. Irwin, and Shalu Shiv are with IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD. Toska Cooper and Nabarun Dasgupta are with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Debra E Irwin
- Jessica C. Young is with the Cecil. G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Cory Pack, Teresa B. Gibson, Frank Yoon, Debra E. Irwin, and Shalu Shiv are with IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD. Toska Cooper and Nabarun Dasgupta are with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Shalu Shiv
- Jessica C. Young is with the Cecil. G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Cory Pack, Teresa B. Gibson, Frank Yoon, Debra E. Irwin, and Shalu Shiv are with IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD. Toska Cooper and Nabarun Dasgupta are with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Toska Cooper
- Jessica C. Young is with the Cecil. G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Cory Pack, Teresa B. Gibson, Frank Yoon, Debra E. Irwin, and Shalu Shiv are with IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD. Toska Cooper and Nabarun Dasgupta are with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Jessica C. Young is with the Cecil. G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Cory Pack, Teresa B. Gibson, Frank Yoon, Debra E. Irwin, and Shalu Shiv are with IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD. Toska Cooper and Nabarun Dasgupta are with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bartels SM, Gora Combs K, Lazard AJ, Shelus V, Davis CH, Rothschild A, Drewry M, Carpenter K, Newman E, Goldblatt A, Dasgupta N, Hill LM, Ribisl KM. Development and Application of an Interdisciplinary Rapid Message Testing Model for COVID-19 in North Carolina. Public Health Rep 2021; 136:413-420. [PMID: 34011204 PMCID: PMC8202212 DOI: 10.1177/00333549211018676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION From the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, public health officials have sought to develop evidence-based messages to reduce COVID-19 transmission by communicating key information to media outlets and the public. We describe the development of an interdisciplinary rapid message testing model to quickly create, test, and share messages with public health officials for use in health campaigns and policy briefings. METHODS An interdisciplinary research team from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill assembled in March 2020 to assist the state health department in developing evidence-based messages to influence social distancing behaviors in the state. We developed and iteratively executed a rapid message testing model; the components of the 4-step model were message creation, survey development, survey administration, and analysis and presentation to health department officials. The model was executed 4 times, each during a 7-day period in April and May, and each subsequent survey included new phrasing and/or messaging informed by the previous week's survey. A total of 917 adults from North Carolina participated in the 4 surveys. RESULTS Survey participants rated messages focused on protecting oneself and others higher than messages focused on norms and fear-based approaches. Pairing behaviors with motivations increased participants' desire to social distance across all themes and subgroups. For example, adding "Protect your grandmother, your neighbor with cancer, and your best friend with asthma," to messaging received a 0.9-point higher score than the base message, "Stay 6 feet apart from others when out in public." PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Our model to promote social distancing in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic can be used for rapid, iterative message testing during public health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia M. Bartels
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katherine Gora Combs
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Allison J. Lazard
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Victoria Shelus
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - C. Hunter Davis
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Allison Rothschild
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Maura Drewry
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn Carpenter
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Emily Newman
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Allison Goldblatt
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lauren M. Hill
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kurt M. Ribisl
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dasgupta N. Ghost in the Machine: The Emotional Gravity of Conducting Mortality Research. Am J Public Health 2021; 111:S80-S81. [PMID: 34314218 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2021.306378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Nabarun Dasgupta, MPH, PhD, is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health and the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and is an associate editor of AJPH
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kreps S, Dasgupta N, Brownstein JS, Hswen Y, Kriner DL. Public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination: The role of vaccine attributes, incentives, and misinformation. NPJ Vaccines 2021; 6:73. [PMID: 33990614 PMCID: PMC8121853 DOI: 10.1038/s41541-021-00335-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
While efficacious vaccines have been developed to inoculate against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; also known as COVID-19), public vaccine hesitancy could still undermine efforts to combat the pandemic. Employing a survey of 1096 adult Americans recruited via the Lucid platform, we examined the relationships between vaccine attributes, proposed policy interventions such as financial incentives, and misinformation on public vaccination preferences. Higher degrees of vaccine efficacy significantly increased individuals' willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, while a high incidence of minor side effects, a co-pay, and Emergency Use Authorization to fast-track the vaccine decreased willingness. The vaccine manufacturer had no influence on public willingness to vaccinate. We also found no evidence that belief in misinformation about COVID-19 treatments was positively associated with vaccine hesitancy. The findings have implications for public health strategies intending to increase levels of community vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kreps
- Department of Government, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John S Brownstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Computational Epidemiology Lab, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yulin Hswen
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in risk of long-term opioid therapy after surgery among an opioid-naive population using varying cutoffs based on days supplied (DS), total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) dispensed, and quantity of pills (QTY) dispensed. BACKGROUND In response to the US opioid crisis, opioid prescription (Rx) limits have been implemented on a state-by-state basis beginning in 2016. However, there is limited evidence informing appropriate prescribing limits, and the effect of these policies on long-term opioid therapy. METHODS Using the MarketScan claims databases, we identified all opioid-naive patients undergoing outpatient surgery between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2015. We identified the initial postsurgical opioid prescribed, examining the DS, total MME, and QTY dispensed. We used Poisson to estimate adjusted risk differences and risk ratios of long-term opioid use comparing those receiving larger versus smaller volume of opioids. RESULTS We identified 5,148,485 opioid-naive surgical patients. Overall, 55.5% received an opioid for postoperative pain, with median days supply = 5 and median total MME = 240. The proportion of patients receiving prescriptions above 7 DS increased from 11% in 2006 to 19% in 2015. Among those receiving postoperative opioids, 8% had long-term opioid use, and risk of long-term use was 1.16 times [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-1.25] higher among those receiving >7 days compared with those receiving ≤7 days. Those receiving >400 total MME (15% of patients) were at 1.17 times (95% CI, 1.10-1.25) the risk of long-term use compared with those receiving ≤400 MME. CONCLUSIONS Between 2005 and 2015, the amounts of opioids prescribed for postoperative pain increased dramatically, and receipt of larger volume of opioids was associated with increased risk of long-term opioid therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica C. Young
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Brooke A. Chidgey
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michele Jonsson Funk
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Tarantola
- Daniel Tarantola is with the Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Both authors are AJPH associate editors.,Note. The guidance presented in this editorial does not constitute formal recommendations of AJPH
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Daniel Tarantola is with the Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Both authors are AJPH associate editors.,Note. The guidance presented in this editorial does not constitute formal recommendations of AJPH
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Figgatt MC, Salazar Z, Day E, Vincent L, Dasgupta N. Take-home dosing experiences among persons receiving methadone maintenance treatment during COVID-19. J Subst Abuse Treat 2021; 123:108276. [PMID: 33612201 PMCID: PMC8060693 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Methadone maintenance treatment is a life-saving treatment for people with opioid use disorders (OUD). The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has introduced many concerns surrounding access to opioid treatment. In March 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) issued guidance allowing for the expansion of take-home methadone doses. We sought to describe changes to treatment experiences from the perspective of persons receiving methadone at outpatient treatment facilities for OUD. Methods We conducted an in-person survey among 104 persons receiving methadone from three clinics in central North Carolina in June and July 2020. Surveys collected information on demographic characteristics, methadone treatment history, and experiences with take-home methadone doses in the context of COVID-19 (i.e., before and since March 2020). Results Before COVID-19, the clinic-level percent of participants receiving any amount of days' supply of take-home doses at each clinic ranged from 56% to 82%, while it ranged from 78% to 100% since COVID-19. The clinic-level percent of participants receiving a take-homes days' supply of a week or longer (i.e., ≥6 days) since COVID-19 ranged from 11% to 56%. Among 87 participants who received take-homes since COVID-19, only four reported selling their take-home doses. Conclusions Our study found variation in experiences of take-home dosing by clinic and little diversion of take-home doses. While SAMSHA guidance should allow expanded access to take-home doses, adoption of these guidelines may vary at the clinic level. The adoption of these policies should be explored further, particularly in the context of benefits to patients seeking OUD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C Figgatt
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
| | - Zach Salazar
- North Carolina Survivor's Union, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Day
- North Carolina Survivor's Union, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Louise Vincent
- North Carolina Survivor's Union, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dasgupta N, Paul D. Expansion and persistence of blaCTXM gene within clinical-environmental interface: A study from India. Int J Infect Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Steven C. Fiala is with the Oregon Health Authority Public Health Division and the Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland
| | - Steven C Fiala
- Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Steven C. Fiala is with the Oregon Health Authority Public Health Division and the Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- James C Thomas
- James C. Thomas is with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- James C. Thomas is with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Brown JR, Oh GY, Wang Y, Slavova S, Delcher C, Dasgupta N, Freeman PR. Variation in Abuse-Deterrent Formulation Opioid Prescribing in California, Florida, and Kentucky in 2018. J Rural Health 2020; 37:23-28. [PMID: 32686223 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Abuse-deterrent formulation (ADF) opioid analgesics have been developed as a means to address prescription opioid abuse. ADF opioid use in clinical practice is not well described in the literature. This study characterizes ADF opioid prescribing patterns in 3 diverse states. METHODS This study used data from prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) in California, Florida, and Kentucky. The sample includes all ADF opioid prescriptions for patients ≥18 years old during the study period (CY 2018). Standardized prescribing rates were calculated by age, sex, and county rurality. The ADF opioid prescribing rate was calculated per 1,000 adult recipients of opioid analgesics. FINDINGS The rate of ADF prescribing per 1,000 adult recipients of opioid analgesics was nearly twice as high in Florida (14.57; 95% CI: 14.44-14.69) than in California (8.30; 95% CI: 8.22-8.37) or Kentucky (8.20; 95% CI: 8.01-8.39). ADF prescribing rates were highest among adults ages 55-74 years and among males. ADF opioid prescribing in rural counties represented a greater proportion of total patients using opioid analgesics than in metro counties in California (RR 1.40; CI: 1.28-1.53). Opposite and less pronounced variation was observed in Kentucky (RR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.98), and a significant difference was not observed in Florida (RR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.38-1.19). CONCLUSIONS There were significant differences in the ADF prescribing rates among the 3 states and in rural versus metro counties within 2 states. ADF opioid prescribing by age and sex showed similar trends within states. Further research is needed to elucidate contextual factors which may lead to prescribing variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Brown
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.,Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - GYeon Oh
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky.,Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Yanning Wang
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Svetla Slavova
- Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, Lexington, Kentucky.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Chris Delcher
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.,Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Nabarun Dasgupta
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Carrboro, North Carolina
| | - Patricia R Freeman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.,Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Dasgupta
- Nabarun Dasgupta is with the Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and is an AJPH associate editor
| |
Collapse
|