Global survival trends for brain tumors, by histology: analysis of individual records for 556,237 adults diagnosed in 59 countries during 2000-2014 (CONCORD-3)

BACKGROUND

Survival is a key metric of the effectiveness of a health system in managing cancer. We set out to provide a comprehensive examination of worldwide variation and trends in survival from brain tumors in adults, by histology.

METHODS

We analyzed individual data for adults (15-99 years) diagnosed with a brain tumor (ICD-O-3 topography code C71) during 2000-2014, regardless of tumor behavior. Data underwent a 3-phase quality control as part of CONCORD-3. We estimated net survival for 11 histology groups, using the unbiased nonparametric Pohar Perme estimator.

RESULTS

The study included 556,237 adults. In 2010-2014, the global range in age-standardized 5-year net survival for the most common sub-types was broad: in the range 20%-38% for diffuse and anaplastic astrocytoma, from 4% to 17% for glioblastoma, and between 32% and 69% for oligodendroglioma. For patients with glioblastoma, the largest gains in survival occurred between 2000-2004 and 2005-2009. These improvements were more noticeable among adults diagnosed aged 40-70 years than among younger adults.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the largest account to date of global trends in population-based survival for brain tumors by histology in adults. We have highlighted remarkable gains in 5-year survival from glioblastoma since 2005, providing large-scale empirical evidence on the uptake of chemoradiation at population level. Worldwide, survival improvements have been extensive, but some countries still lag behind. Our findings may help clinicians involved in national and international tumor pathway boards to promote initiatives aimed at more extensive implementation of clinical guidelines.

Five-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing bursectomy and omentectomy alone for resectable gastric cancer (JCOG1001)

BACKGROUND

Bursectomy, the total resection of the bursa omentalis, is a standard procedure in gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer. A phase III trial (JCOG1001) comparing bursectomy and omentectomy alone was terminated early at the interim analysis. The final results of the updated analysis after a minimum follow-up of 5 years are reported here.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach (cT3-T4a) were randomized (1 : 1) during surgery to bursectomy or omentectomy-alone groups and then underwent D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

A total of 1204 patients (602 bursectomy and 602 omentectomy alone) were enrolled between June 2010 and March 2015. The bursectomy group had a significantly higher incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV intra-abdominal abscess than the omentectomy-alone group (5.5 versus 2.5 per cent respectively; P = 0.008). The updated 5-year overall survival rates were 74.9 (95 per cent c.i. 71.2 to 78.2) per cent in the bursectomy group and 76.5 (72.8 to 79.7) per cent in the omentectomy-alone group; the adjusted HR for death in the bursectomy group was 1.03 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.27) (1-sided P = 0.598). Bursectomy did not decrease peritoneal recurrence (12.1 versus 12.3 per cent respectively; P = 1.000). In a multivariable analysis, old age (above 65 years), tumour located in the lower third or posterior wall of the stomach, macroscopic type 3/5, total gastrectomy, and cT4a were independent predictors of poor overall survival, but omentectomy alone was not.

CONCLUSION

In D2 gastrectomy, bursectomy is not recommended as a standard procedure for cT3-T4a gastric cancer. Registration number: UMIN000003688 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).

Impact of tumor-related factors and inter-institutional heterogeneity on preoperative T staging for gastric cancer

Background: To improve the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative T staging in gastric cancer, the authors evaluated tumor-related factors that might affect the diagnosis. Materials & methods: The authors analyzed the data of cT2-4b gastric cancer patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter JCOG1302A study. They used contrast-enhanced computed tomography to analyze the association between tumor-related factors and the diagnostic accuracy of T3-4b staging for gastric cancer. Results: Among 876 cT3-4b tumors, the diagnostic accuracy was relatively low in the lower third of the stomach compared with those in the upper or middle. A multivariable analysis revealed that accuracy was higher in the lesser curvature or entire circumference region than in other areas (p < 0.001), in macroscopic types 3/5 than in types 0/1/2 (p = 0.003) and in the undifferentiated histological type than in the differentiated type (p = 0.011). Conclusion: The authors found tumor-related factors affecting preoperative T staging by enhanced computed tomography.

Cisplatin Plus Capecitabine After Adjuvant S-1 in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Phase II T-CORE1102 Trial

BACKGROUND/AIM

This phase II study assessed the efficacy of capecitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to adjuvant S-1.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study was conducted by Tohoku Clinical Oncology Research and Education Society (T-CORE) in Japan. Patients aged ≥20 years with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer that was refractory to S-1 were enrolled. Patients received 80 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1 intravenously and 1,000 mg/m² capecitabine twice daily from day 1 to day 14, in 3-week cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The threshold overall response rate (ORR) was estimated to be 15%. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, ORR, and toxicities.

RESULTS

In total, 21 patients were enrolled from seven hospitals. The median patient age was 63 years. Nineteen patients received the protocol treatment. Median PFS was 3.7 months [90% confidence interval (CI)=2.7-5.6 months], which did not reach the predefined threshold of 4.0 months. ORR was 5.9% (95%CI=0.0-17.1%). Median OS was 11.9 months (95% CI 6.3-19.4 months). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 5.3% of patients. The most frequently observed grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were nausea (15.8%) and hyponatremia (15.8%).

CONCLUSION

The addition of a fluoropyrimidine to a platinum agent after adjuvant therapy is not suitable for gastric cancer.

Randomized phase II study of CPT-11 versus PTX versus each combination chemotherapy with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer that is refractory to S-1 or S-1 plus CDDP: OGSG0701

BACKGROUND

To compare irinotecan-alone, paclitaxel-alone, and each combination chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that is refractory to S-1 or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP).

METHODS

Patients with AGC after first-line chemotherapy with S-1 or SP, or patients during adjuvant chemotherapy or within 26 weeks after adjuvant chemotherapy completion with S-1 with confirmed disease progression were eligible. Patients were randomly divided into four groups based on treatment: irinotecan-alone (irinotecan; 150 mg/m², day 1, q14 days), paclitaxel-alone (paclitaxel; 80 mg/m², days 1, 8, 15, q28 days), S-1 plus irinotecan (irinotecan; 80 mg/m², days 1, 15, S-1; 80 mg/m², days 1-21, q35 days), and S-1 plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel; 50 mg/m², day1, 8, S-1; 80 mg/m², days 1-14, q21 days). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and safety.

RESULTS

From July 2008 to March 2012, 127 patients were enrolled. No difference in median OS was observed in the irinotecan vs. paclitaxel groups or in the monotherapy groups vs. the S-1 combination therapy groups. Median PFS was longer in the paclitaxel group compared with the irinotecan group (4.1 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.035), although no difference was observed when comparing monotherapy vs. S-1 combination. The most common grade 3 to 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia with no difference in incidence rate across the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in OS between irinotecan and paclitaxel no in OS prolongation of S-1 combination therapy in second-line chemotherapy.

Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study

BACKGROUND

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has become an increasingly preferred procedure for early cancer in the upper third of the stomach, owing to reportedly superior quality of life (QOL) after PG when compared with total gastrectomy. However, various methods of reconstruction have currently been proposed. We compared the postoperative QOL among the three different reconstruction methods after PG using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45) questionnaire.

METHODS

Post Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Study (PGSAS), a nationwide multi-institutional survey, was conducted to evaluate QOL using the PGSAS-45 among various types of gastrectomy. Of the 2,368 eligible data from the PGSAS survey, data from 193 patients who underwent PG were retrieved and used in the current study. The PGSAS-45 consists of 45 items including 22 original gastrectomy specific items in addition to the SF-8 and GSRS. These were consolidated into 19 main outcome measures pertaining postgastrectomy symptoms, amount of food ingested, quality of ingestion, work, and level of satisfaction for daily work, and the three reconstruction methods (n = 193; 115 esophago-gastrostomy [PGEG], 34 jejunal interposition [PGJI], and 44 jejunal pouch interposition [PGJPI]) were compared using PGSAS-45.

RESULTS

Size of the remnant stomach was significantly larger in PGEG, and significantly smaller in PGJI and PGJPI (P < 0.05). There was no difference in other patient background factors among the groups. EGJPI tended to be superior to PGEG in several of the 19 main outcome with marginal significance (P = 0.047-0.076).

CONCLUSION

PGJPI appears to be the most favorable of the three reconstruction methods after PG especially when the size of remnant stomach is rather small.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN-CTR #000002116 entitled as "A study to observe correlation between resection and reconstruction procedures employed for gastric neoplasms and development of postgastrectomy syndrome".

Randomized phase III trial to evaluate omentum preserving gastrectomy for patients with resectable advanced gastric cancer: JCOG1711 (ROAD-GC)

TPS4646

Background: Standard surgery for resectable advanced gastric cancer is D2 (standardized extended lymph node dissection) gastrectomy with omentectomy. The reason why omentectomy has been performed is as follows; (1) principal surgery for gastrointestinal cancers is en-block resection of mesothelium including regional lymph nodes. Omentum is a part of the mesothelium of the stomach. (2) Cancer cells implanted into the peritoneal cavity aggregated in the milky-spot of the omentum and formed peritoneal dissemination in an animal model. (3) By special staining, micrometastasis detected in the omentum. There is some arguments for this theory. (1) no prospective study showed survival benefit of omentectomy as compared with omentum preservation. (2) anatomically, milky-spot is found not only in the omentum but also in other mesothelium or Douglas pouch. (3) JCOG1001 phase III study showed no survival benefit of bursectomy against non-bursectomy although bursa is a part of mesothelium of the stomach. (4) Anti-immunity is accelerated by antigen presentation by macrophage in the milky-spot of the omentum. Preservation of the omentum may have several benefits; (1) decrease in blood loss and operation time, (2) preservation of physical function by omentum such as reaction to peritonitis and prevention of adhesion, and (3) overcoming difficulties in laparoscopic omentectomy and avoidance of organ injury during surgery. Methods: The study is multicenter randomized phase III trial designed to confirm non-inferiority of omentum preservation to omentectomy for resectable advanced gastric cancer. Patients aged 20-79 years, histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma, clinical subserosal/serosal invasion, and expected R0 (curative) resection are randomly assigned (1:1) during surgery to either omentum preservation or omentectomy. Total or distal gastrectomy with D2 dissection is performed in both arms. Laparoscopic gastrectomy is not allowed. Intraoperative photographs of the dissected field are centrally reviewed for all patients for quality control. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, blood loss, operation time, and adverse events. Sample size was set at 1050 considering expected 3-year RFS of 77% in both arms with non-inferiority margin of 5%, one-sided alpha of 5%, and power of 80%. Planned accrual and follow up period are 6.5 years and 3 years respectively. The trial was activated in March 2019, and 177 patients are enrolled as of January 2020. Clinical trial information: UMIN000036253 .

An integrated analysis of two phase II trials (JCOG0001 and JCOG0405) of preoperative chemotherapy followed by D3 gastrectomy for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis is commonly regarded as unresectable, while preoperative chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy has been tested since 2000 in JCOG (JCOG0001 and JCOG0405). The survivals were quite different between the trials despite the similar eligibility criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate if survival is still better in JCOG0405 after adjusting baseline factors and if there is any subset of patients who benefit more from either treatment.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria for both trials included histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma; bulky nodal involvement around the celiac artery and its major branches (bulky N) and/or para-aortic lymph node (PAN); cM0 (except PAN); negative lavage cytology; not linitis plastica type; PS of 0 or 1. Patients received two or three cycles of preoperative chemotherapy of irinotecan plus cisplatin in JCOG0001, or S-1 plus cisplatin in JCOG0405, followed by D3 gastrectomy. Multivariable analysis for overall survival adjusting baseline and treatment factors was performed with the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

After adjusting baseline factors, S-1 plus cisplatin was superior to irinotecan plus cisplatin for overall survival (HR = 0.39: 95% CI 0.22-0.67). The 5-year overall survival was poor for patients with bulky N+/PAN+ (19.2%) compared with bulky N+/PAN- (50.7%) or bulky N-/PAN+ (43.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus cisplatin was shown to be a favorable preoperative treatment for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis by multivariable analysis, while poor prognosis in patients having both bulky N+ and PAN+ may necessitate further treatment improvement.

Recurrence risk evaluation in T1N1M0/T2N0M0/T3N0M0 gastric cancer with TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is not indicated for T1N1M0/T2N0M0/T3N0M0 gastric cancer. However, approximately 10% to 30% of these patients experience recurrence and metastasis.

METHODS

Among 658 patients with gastric cancer who received gastrectomy with curative intent, 130 T1N1M0/T2N0M0 and 73 T3N0M0 patients were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were analyzed based on TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms Arg/Arg, Arg/Pro, and Pro/Pro. The hazard ratio (HR) for each subgroup was compared by TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms.

RESULTS

Of the 189 patients for whom polymorphism analysis results were available, the 5- and 10-year OS was 84.9% and 65.1%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year RFS was 81.8% and 65.4%, respectively. When the study cohort was divided into two groups according to polymorphism status (ie, "Arg/Arg and Arg/Pro" vs Pro/Pro), both the OS (HR, 2.799; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.071-7.315; P = .036) and RFS (HR, 2.639; 95% CI, 1.025-6.794; P = .044) of the Pro/Pro group were significantly lower than those for the Arg/Arg and Arg/Pro groups across the entire observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

The TP53 codon 72 Pro/Pro polymorphism may isolate a relatively high-risk patient group in T1N1M0/T2N0M0/T3N0M0 gastric cancer.

P1671Subclinical persistent hemolysis may affect late renal function deterioration after HeartMateII implantation

Background

Late renal function dysfunction is an increasingly recognized complication in continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) patients. Although hemolysis is prevalent in CF-LVAD patients and hemolysis may deteriorate renal function, the influence of persistent hemolysis on renal function in CF-LVAD patients remains to be investigated.

Purpose

To investigate the influence of persistent hemolysis on renal function in CF-LVAD patients, using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a sensitive marker of hemolysis.

Methods

Excluding patients who died or underwent pump exchange for pump thrombosis, we retrospectively reviewed 65 consecutive adults who underwent HeartMateII implantation in our center from May 2011 to October 2017. Patient characteristics, chronotropic change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and LDH values weekly for 4 weeks and every 4 weeks between 4 and 48 weeks after implantation were collected. Then, calculating mean LDH during 48 weeks after implantation, study population was divided into low and high mean LDH groups at the median value of mean LDH.

Results

The median value of mean LDH was 304 U/l. Compared with low LDH patients, though high LDH patients were more likely female and had smaller body surface area, there were no significant difference in pre-operative eGFR between the groups (66.0±23.7 vs. 70.2±25.7 ml/min/1.73m2, p=0.495). After 40 weeks after implantation, high LDH patients had significantly lower eGFR than low LDH patients (71.0±23.7 vs. 87.1±31.4 ml/min/1.73m2, p=0.024). In multivariate linear regression analysis, mean LDH [parameter estimate: −0.10 (95% CI: −0.17 to −0.04), p=0.003] and post-operative pulse pressure [parameter estimate: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.05 to 1.37), p=0.036] were significantly associated with eGFR change during 48 weeks after HeartMateII implantation.

Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis for eGFR change Univariate parameter estimate 95% CI p value Multivariate parameter estimate 95% CI p value Bilirubin, mg/dl 9.97 3.82 to 16.13 0.002 6.55 −0.43 to 13.53 0.065 BNP, pg/ml 0.01 0.00 to 0.02 0.044 0.00 −0.01 to 0.01 0.528 Mean LDH during 4 to 48 weeks, U/l −0.11 −0.18 to −0.05 <0.001 −0.10 −0.17 to −0.04 0.003 Pre-operative right atrial pressure, mmHg 1.43 0.35 to 2.51 0.010 −0.06 −1.52 to 1.40 0.935 Post-operative pulse pressure, mmHg 0.77 0.03 to 1.52 0.042 0.71 0.05 to 1.37 0.036

Conclusions

High mean LDH and low pulse pressure were associated with a significant decrease in eGFR late after HeartMateII implantation. Subclinical persistent hemolysis may be associated with late renal function deterioration in CF-LVAD patients.

The impact of postoperative complications on survival outcomes in patients with cT3/4a gastric cancer

4067

Background: Recently, the negative impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival outcomes has been reported in patients with gastric cancer. However, most are single center, retrospective studies with different definitions of postoperative complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcomes using the data of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (JCOG1001). Methods: This study included 1191 out of all 1204 patients enrolled in JCOG1001 which was aimed to confirm the superiority of bursectomy for patients with cT3/4a locally advanced gastric cancer. Complications were graded by Clavien-Dindo classification. The relationships between the grade (≥grade II or ≥grade III) or type (all or intraabdominal infectious (pancreatic fistula, anastomotic leakage, and intra-abdominal abscess.)) of complications and survival outcomes were evaluated. Results: The incidences of ≥grade II and ≥grade III all complications were 23.0% and 9.7%, and those of ≥grade II and ≥grade III intraabdominal infectious complications were 13.4% and 6.9%, respectively. The hazard ratios for overall survival (OS) of patients with ≥grade II and ≥grade III all complications and those of patients with ≥grade II and ≥grade III intraabdominal infectious complications were shown in Table. With whichever definition we adopted, postoperative complications were significantly associated with OS in both univariable and multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Postoperative complication was identified as an independent prognostic factor in patients with cT3/4a gastric cancer. Hazard ratios for overall survival by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003688. [Table: see text]

Long-term outcome of preoperative docetaxel with cisplatin plus S-1 therapy for advanced gastric cancer with extensive nodal metastasis (JCOG1002)

141

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with cisplatin plus S-1 (CS) followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus para-aortic lymph node (PAN) dissection is regarded as a standard treatment in Japan for advanced gastric cancer with bulky lymph node (BN) and/or PAN metastasis based on the results of JCOG0405. In JCOG1002, we added docetaxel to CS (DCS) to further improve the long-term outcome. However the primary endpoint, clinical response rate (RR), did not meet the expected level (Ito S, Gastric Cancer. 2017). Herein we report the long-term survival. Methods: Patients with BN and/or PAN metastasis received two or three cycles of DCS therapy (docetaxel at 40 mg/m2 and cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 at 40 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks, were administered every four weeks) followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection and postoperative S-1 for 1 year. Results: Between July 2011 and May 2013, 53 patients were enrolled. Clinically, 17.0% of patients had both PAN and BN metastasis, and remaining patients had either PAN (26.4%) or BN (56.6%) metastasis. The clinical response rate (RR) was 57.7 % as assessed by RECIST v1.0, and the R0 resection rate was 84.6%, which did not exceed those in JCOG0405 (64.7% and 82.3%, respectively). The pathological RR defined as residual tumor corresponding to less than one-third the size of the original tumor was 34.6% in 52 eligible patients, which was slightly higher than in JCOG0405 (28.6%). Among all eligible patients, 5-year overall survival was 54.9% (95% confidence interval 40.3–67.3%) at the date cut-off of May 2018. Among 44 eligible patients with R0 resection, 5-year progression-free survival was 47.7% (95% confidence interval 32.5–61.5%). These were similar to the results of JCOG0405 (52.8% and 50.0%). Twenty patients developed cancer recurrence. The most frequent site of recurrence was lymph nodes (50.0% of all recurrences). Conclusions: Adding docetaxel to CS in NAC for extensive lymph node metastasis did not improve not only short-term outcomes but also long-term survival. NAC with CS followed by D2 + PAN dissection and postoperative S-1 remains standard for patients with extensive nodal metastasis. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006069.

Peritoneal metastasis as a predictive factor for nab-paclitaxel in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer: an exploratory analysis of the phase III ABSOLUTE trial

BACKGROUND

In the ABSOLUTE trial, weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (w-nab-PTX) showed non-inferiority to weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (w-sb-PTX) for overall survival (OS). Thus, w-nab-PTX might be an option for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, predictive factors for efficacies of these agents have not been evaluated.

METHODS

Patients previously enrolled in the ABSOLUTE trial were divided into apparent peritoneal metastasis group (PM group) and no apparent peritoneal metastasis group (no PM group) based on baseline imaging evaluated by RECIST ver. 1.1 criteria and amount of ascites. OS, progression-free survival, and overall response rate were compared between two arms in each group.

RESULTS

This study included 240 and 243 patients in the w-nab-PTX and w-sb-PTX arms, respectively. In the PM group, the w-nab-PTX arm (n = 88) had longer OS than the w-sb-PTX arm (n = 103), and median survival time (MST) of 9.9 and 8.7 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.88; P = 0.0060], respectively. In the no PM group, the w-nab-PTX arm (n = 140) had shorter OS than the w-sb-PTX arm (n = 152), and MST of 11.6 and 15.7 months (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.06-1.86; P = 0.0180), respectively. After adjusting for prognostic factors, the HR for OS in the w-nab-PTX arm versus the w-sb-PTX arm was 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83; P = 0.0023; PM group) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.01-1.78; P = 0.0414; no PM group), with significant interaction between treatment efficacy and presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of apparent peritoneal metastasis might be a predictive factor for selecting w-nab-PTX for pretreated AGC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

JapicCTI-132059.

Terminal Ileac Ulcers Mimicked Post-transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder in a Heart Recipient Treated With Everolimus: A Case Report

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-recognized and potentially fatal complication of cardiac transplantation that commonly involves the gastrointestinal tract. Herein, we report a case of life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding from recurrent terminal ileac ulcers mimicking PTLD in a heart recipient treated with everolimus (EVL). A 40-year-old man underwent heart transplantation for dilated cardiomyopathy 3 years prior to the current admission and was treated with tacrolimus and EVL. He was admitted to a local hospital because of fever, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. His symptoms persisted and, 3 weeks later, hematochezia occurred; thus, he was transferred to our hospital. As computed tomography and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography showed bowel-wall thickening of the terminal ileum, gastrointestinal PTLD was initially suspected. However, although colonoscopy- performed after switching EVL to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-showed terminal ileac ulcers, the histologic examination revealed no findings corresponding to PTLD. As EVL may delay ulcer healing, MMF was maintained for 3 months. After repeated colonoscopy showed ulcer healing, MMF was switched back to EVL for cardiac allograft vasculopathy prevention. Three weeks later, he was emergently admitted to a local hospital for life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding from a recurrent terminal ileal ulcer, which required hemostatic forceps hemostasis. As EVL is suspected to be associated with recurrent ileal ulcers, EVL was again switched back to MMF. The ileal ulcers resolved, without recurrence in 3 months of clinical follow-up. This case demonstrates that cases of life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding from recurrent terminal ileac ulcers can mimic PTLD in a heart recipient treated with EVL.

[A Case of Sarcoidosis Associated with Esophageal Cancer]

A 67-year-old man was diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Computed tomography(CT)revealed multiple sites of bilateral mediastinal lymph node swelling. Serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor(sIL-2R)were elevated; however, serum levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme(ACE)were normal. Thus, we could not confirm a diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Esophagectomy with neck lymph node dissection was performed. The resected specimen, comprising the mediastinal lymph nodes, showed noncaseating epithelioid cell granuloma; this supported the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Cases of sarcoidosis associated with esophageal cancer are rare. It is difficult to distinguish between metastasis and sarcoid-like reactions from swollen lymph nodes using preoperative CT or positron emission tomography(PET). It is possible to differentiate lymph node metastasis from its sarcoid reaction it the patient received.

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome After Heart Transplantation: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a transient cerebrovascular disorder putatively caused by some immunosuppressive agents.

CASE REPORT

We recently encountered a 47-year-old female patient diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy who developed RCVS after heart transplantation. A triple-drug regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and a corticosteroid was started after surgery. On postoperative day (POD) 11, the patient developed a severe headache, although computed tomography of the head demonstrated no signs of hemorrhage or infarction. At first, both a painkiller and migraine drugs were regularly administered to the patient. On POD 21, however, she developed an unbearable headache with a visual field defect and mild hemiparesis of the right hand. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed a cerebral infarction in the left occipital lobe with diffuse vasoconstriction of both the middle and posterior cerebral arteries. A diagnosis of RCVS was made and tacrolimus, a drug suspected to cause RCVS, was discontinued. In its place, two doses of basiliximab followed by everolimus, both of which are alternatives for tacrolimus, were given. The corticosteroid dose was also increased. Furthermore, to release vasoconstriction, both verapamil and diltiazem were administered. On POD 27, cerebrovascular constrictions were shown to be relieved on brain MRI and the patient's neurological symptoms subsequently almost completely diminished.

CONCLUSION

RCVS should always be considered as a cause of headache in heart transplant recipients because tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent, may trigger RCVS. This will allow rapid intervention that is essential for avoiding irreversible neurological deficits.

Paradoxical Reaction of Tuberculosis in a Heart Transplant Recipient During Antituberculosis Therapy: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculous paradoxical reactions (PRs) are excessive immune reactions occurring after antituberculosis (TB) treatment and are commonly observed in immunocompromised hosts such as patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

CASE REPORT

We recently encountered a 63-year-old male heart transplant recipient who developed tuberculous PR after treatment for miliary TB. The patient had been receiving immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for over 15 years. The diagnosis of miliary TB was made based on the presence of intermittent fever and fatigue; thus, anti-TB treatments (isoniazid, levofloxacin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide) were started, which led to rapid defervescence and regression of the granular shadow and pleural effusion. However, a new persistent fever and confused state developed 1 month after the anti-TB therapy was started. After excluding possible etiologies of the patient's symptom, a PR was suspected, and anti-TB drugs were continued; corticosteroids were added as anti-inflammatory agents. After that, he has shown a favorable course with long-term anti-TB chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

A PR should always be considered when the patients' symptoms of tuberculosis re-exacerbate after an appropriate anti-TB therapy. A PR commonly occurs in patients with various immunologic conditions including heart transplant recipients.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Single-center Experience From Japan

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is the "gold standard" alternative therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. However, LVAD therapy is still uncommon in the Asia-Pacific region. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the clinical outcomes of patients from Japan supported with the HeartMate II (HM-II) LVAD at our institution.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients (mean 44.3 ± 12.1 years, 68 men, average body mass index 1.65 ± 0.28 m²; 81 with nonischemic cardiomyopathy) who underwent HM-II implantation for bridge to transplantation (n = 91) or for destination therapy in a clinical study (n = 1) at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center between April 2013 and October 2017 were enrolled in this analysis. Preoperatively, most patients (n = 73, 79%) had an INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) profile of between level 2 and 4. Postoperatively, the average pump speed was 8602 ± 258 rpm and the hemodynamics were well compensated.

RESULTS

Adverse events consisted of 38 (41.3%) hemolysis, 30 (32.6%) major infection, 27 (29.3%) major bleeding (6 [6.5%] with gastrointestinal bleeding), and 18 (19.6%) neurologic dysfunction events. Eighteen patients underwent heart transplantation (HTx) after an average of 32.9 ± 8.9 months of VAD support, and overall survival at both 6 months and 3 years was 96.3%.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcome among patients with HM-II at our institution is satisfactory for both survival and adverse events. The HM-II can provide effective hemodynamic support during the extremely long waiting period for HTx in Japan.

[Aortoesophageal Fistula with Infected Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Rupture;Report of a Case]

A 67-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of fever and discomfort of the throat. Gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed hematoma at the middle thoracic esophagus. Computed tomography revealed posterior mediastinal hematoma extending the descending aorta. Bacillus was detected in the blood culture. Aortoesophageal fistula with an infected thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture was diagnosed. First, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed. Resection of the thoracic esophagus and omentopexy was conducted 15 days after TEVAR. Esophageal reconstruction using a gastric tube was performed 43 days after esophagectomy. He has been doing well since then.

A prospective multicenter trial of S-1 with lafutidine vs S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Japan: AEOLUS

91

Background: From the result of ACTS-GC study, adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for one year is standard therapy of gastric cancer in Japan. In this study, completion rate of pre-planned S-1 treatment was 65.8% and there is still room for improvement on this rate. Lafutidine is a H2 blocker and enhances submucosal blood flow via capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons. Alleviating effect of lafutidine on toxicity of 5FU leading to discontinuation of adjuvant treatment could be expected. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed stage II (excluding T1 cases), IIIA, or IIIB (Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma 13th) who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 with lafutidine(L) or S-1 (S). All patients were given S-1 (40mg/m2) for 4 weeks with 2 weeks rest, repeated for 1 year after surgery. Patients of L group received lafutidine (20mg/day) every day for 1 year with S-1. The primary end point was treatment completion rate (TCR) of S-1. Definition of treatment completion was S-1 continuation for 1 year with over 70% planned dose. The secondary end points were toxicity (CTCAE v3.0) and relative total administration dose (RD) of S-1. Results: We randomly assigned 101 patients to the L group and 101 patients to the S group between February 2010 and December 2012 from 17 centers in Japan. After randomization, two patients were found to be ineligible in L group (the absence of cytologic examination of the peritoneal fluid, stageIB) and 1 in S group (allocation violation). TCR was 68.3% in the L group and 60.4% in the S group (p = 0.072, Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel test at a pre-specified one-sided significance level of 0.1). Adverse events of grade 3/4 excluding ineligible example was 30.0% in the L group, and 36.0% in the S group. Patients who require a dose reduction and/or delay of S-1 was 41.6% in the L group, and 51.5% in the S group. RD was 83.9% (range: 1.6-103.7) in the L group, and 84.0% (range: 1.7-103.8) in the S group. No any toxicity of lafutidine was observed. Conclusions: Lafutidine may increase a completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 within a 30% dose reduction for gastric cancer. This result need to be confirmed in double-blind placebo control study. Clinical trial information: UMIN000002703.

Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with favorable outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Limited information exists regarding beneficial effects of Helicobacter pylori. To examine the effect in advanced gastric cancer, we compared survival for patients treated with surgery-only or adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of H. pylori infection status.

METHODS

A cohort of 491 patients who underwent R0 resection for locally advanced gastric cancer between 2000 and 2009 at 12 institutions in northern Japan was included. H. pylori infection status, was assessed from paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed samples. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in surgery-only (Surgery) and adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1) groups were analyzed. A propensity score matching was employed to correct for confounding factors by indication.

RESULTS

H. pylori infection was positive in 175 patients and negative in 316 patients. H. pylori-positive patients showed significantly better survival than H. pylori-negative patients in both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.593, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.417-0.843; P = 0.003]) and DFS (HR 0.679, 95%CI 0.492-0.937; P = 0.018). Propensity score matching further confirmed that S-1 was virtually only effective when tumors were H. pylori-positive.

CONCLUSIONS

The favorable outcome of H. pylori-positive patients implies that the host immune system is modulated by H. pylori enhancing the chemotherapeutic efficacy.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Heart Transplant Recipients With Transplant Coronary Arterial Vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Transplant coronary arterial vasculopathy (TCAV) is a major cause of death after heart transplantation (HTx). Palliative coronary revascularization has been attempted in patients with severe TCAV; however, the outcome has not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients who were treated after HTx at our institute between 1999 and 2015 were screened for TCAV. TCAV was defined as >70% stenosis on coronary angiography (CAG) or a maximal intimal thickness of >0.5 mm in the right or left coronary arteries on intracoronary ultrasonography (IVUS). In the present study, the outcomes of patients with severe TCAV who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were investigated.

RESULTS

TCAV containing donor-transmitted atherosclerosis was cumulatively found in 69 patients (71.9% of the total; mean age, 34.6 ± 13.1 years; 52 men; mean follow-up duration, 83.0 ± 60.4 months). Five (7.2%) and 64 (92.8%) of the 69 patients were diagnosed as having TCAV by use of CAG and IVUS, respectively. All 5 patients diagnosed by with the use of CAG underwent coronary revascularization between 1 and 236 months after HTx. Three patients underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents, with a primary success rate of 100%. No angiographic restenosis occurred in 2 patients at 31 and 36 months after PCI, respectively. Meanwhile, 2 patients underwent CABG. No peri-operative complications occurred, and all grafts were patent as assessed by use of CAG at 34 and 5 months after CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary revascularization was feasible and effective for severe TCAV with middle-term follow-up.

Primary results of a phase III trial to evaluate bursectomy for patients with subserosal/serosal gastric cancer (JCOG1001)

5

Background: The role of bursectomy dissecting the peritoneal lining covering the pancreas and the anterior plane of the transverse mesocolon for preventing peritoneal metastasis had long been controversial. We conducted a phase III trial evaluating the role of bursectomy in patients with subserosal (SS) / serosal (SE) gastric cancer. Patient accrual had been completed on Mar. 2015. Methods: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach; cT3(SS) or cT4a(SE). Patients were intraoperatively randomized to non-bursectomy arm or bursectomy arm. Primary endpoint was overall survival. A total of 1,200 patients were required to detect a hazard ratio of 0.77 with a one-sided alpha of 5% and 80% power. Results: Between Jun 2010 and Mar 2015, 1,204 patients were accrued from 57 institutions (non-bursectomy 602, bursectomy 602). Patients’ background and operative procedures were well balanced between the arms. After completion of patient enrollment, the second interim analysis was performed on Sep 2016, with 54% (196/363) of the expected events observed. The 3y-survival were 86.0% (95%CI, 82.7 to 88.7) in non-bursectomy arm and 83.3% (95%CI, 79.6 to 86.3) in bursectomy arm. Hazard ratio for bursectomy was 1.075 (98.5%CI: 0.760 to 1.520) with predictive probability in favor of bursectomy at the final analysis of 12.7%. These results led to early study termination based on the recommendation of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee. Operation time was longer (median 222 min vs 254 min) and blood loss was larger (230 ml vs 330 ml) in bursectomy arm; however, the incidence of patients received blood transfusion was not different between the arms (4.8% vs 4.5%). Although the incidence of pancreatic fistula was a bit higher in bursectomy arm (2.5% vs 4.8%), the incidence of Grade 3 or higher complications was not different between the arms (11.6% vs 13.3%). Five patients in non-bursectomy arm and one patient in bursectomy showed in-hospital death. Conclusions: Although bursectomy can be safely performed without increasing morbidity and mortality, bursectomy was not recommended as a standard treatment for cT3 or cT4 gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003688.