1
|
Šavrova A, Jaal J, Nõmm O, Innos K. Factors associated with advanced-stage diagnosis of cervical cancer in Estonia: a population-based study. Public Health 2023; 225:369-375. [PMID: 37989009 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cervical cancer (CC) remains a crucial public health issue in Estonia, with high incidence and late diagnosis. The aim of this study was to examine time trends of stage-specific CC incidence in Estonia and factors associated with advanced-stage diagnosis of CC. STUDY DESIGN This was a nationwide population-based retrospective study. METHODS Data on CC cases diagnosed in Estonia in 2007-2018 were obtained from the Estonian Cancer Registry, including tumour, nodes, metastases stage at diagnosis. Sociodemographic data were obtained from the Population Registry. To estimate the risk of advanced-stage diagnosis (stages II-IV vs stage I) associated with sociodemographic factors, Poisson regression with robust variance was used to calculate univariate and multivariate prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Time trends of stage-specific CC incidence for 2005-2019 were examined with joinpoint analysis. RESULTS Incidence of stage I CC showed a significant decline of 4.9% per year since 2007, whereas no change was seen for other stages. Of the 2046 women diagnosed in 2007-2018, 1137 (55.6%) were diagnosed at an advanced stage; this proportion increased from 51% in 2007-2009 to 58% in 2015-2018 (P = 0.004). Multivariate regression analysis showed that advanced-stage diagnosis was associated with age (PR 2.16, 95% CI 1.87-2.49 for women aged ≥75 years compared with those aged 30-44 years), educational level (PR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15-1.51 for women with basic/primary education compared to university education) and marital status (PR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29 for single women compared to married/cohabiting women). No associations were observed by region of residence or nationality. CONCLUSIONS To reduce CC mortality, it is crucial to improve prevention and early diagnosis of CC in Estonia through human papillomavirus vaccination and effective and quality-assured screening particularly targeting high-risk groups as well as encouraging symptom awareness and regular check-ups among older women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Šavrova
- North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Womens Clinic, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419, Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - J Jaal
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L, Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia
| | - O Nõmm
- National Institute for Health Development, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hiiu 42, 11619, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - K Innos
- National Institute for Health Development, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hiiu 42, 11619, Tallinn, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Girardi F, Matz M, Stiller C, You H, Marcos Gragera R, Valkov MY, Bulliard JL, De P, Morrison D, Wanner M, O'Brian DK, Saint-Jacques N, Coleman MP, Allemani C, Hamdi-Chérif M, Kara L, Meguenni K, Regagba D, Bayo S, Cheick Bougadari T, Manraj SS, Bendahhou K, Ladipo A, Ogunbiyi OJ, Somdyala NIM, Chaplin MA, Moreno F, Calabrano GH, Espinola SB, Carballo Quintero B, Fita R, Laspada WD, Ibañez SG, Lima CA, Da Costa AM, De Souza PCF, Chaves J, Laporte CA, Curado MP, de Oliveira JC, Veneziano CLA, Veneziano DB, Almeida ABM, Latorre MRDO, Rebelo MS, Santos MO, Azevedo e Silva G, Galaz JC, Aparicio Aravena M, Sanhueza Monsalve J, Herrmann DA, Vargas S, Herrera VM, Uribe CJ, Bravo LE, Garcia LS, Arias-Ortiz NE, Morantes D, Jurado DM, Yépez Chamorro MC, Delgado S, Ramirez M, Galán Alvarez YH, Torres P, Martínez-Reyes F, Jaramillo L, Quinto R, Castillo J, Mendoza M, Cueva P, Yépez JG, Bhakkan B, Deloumeaux J, Joachim C, Macni J, Carrillo R, Shalkow Klincovstein J, Rivera Gomez R, Perez P, Poquioma E, Tortolero-Luna G, Zavala D, Alonso R, Barrios E, Eckstrand A, Nikiforuk C, Woods RR, Noonan G, Turner D, Kumar E, Zhang B, Dowden JJ, Doyle GP, Saint-Jacques N, Walsh G, Anam A, De P, McClure CA, Vriends KA, Bertrand C, Ramanakumar AV, Davis L, Kozie S, Freeman T, George JT, Avila RM, O’Brien DK, Holt A, Almon L, Kwong S, Morris C, Rycroft R, Mueller L, Phillips CE, Brown H, Cromartie B, Ruterbusch J, Schwartz AG, Levin GM, Wohler B, Bayakly R, Ward KC, Gomez SL, McKinley M, Cress R, Davis J, Hernandez B, Johnson CJ, Morawski BM, Ruppert LP, Bentler S, Charlton ME, Huang B, Tucker TC, Deapen D, Liu L, Hsieh MC, Wu XC, Schwenn M, Stern K, Gershman ST, Knowlton RC, Alverson G, Weaver T, Desai J, Rogers DB, Jackson-Thompson J, Lemons D, Zimmerman HJ, Hood M, Roberts-Johnson J, Hammond W, Rees JR, Pawlish KS, Stroup A, Key C, Wiggins C, Kahn AR, Schymura MJ, Radhakrishnan S, Rao C, Giljahn LK, Slocumb RM, Dabbs C, Espinoza RE, Aird KG, Beran T, Rubertone JJ, Slack SJ, Oh J, Janes TA, Schwartz SM, Chiodini SC, Hurley DM, Whiteside MA, Rai S, Williams MA, Herget K, Sweeney C, Kachajian J, Keitheri Cheteri MB, Migliore Santiago P, Blankenship SE, Conaway JL, Borchers R, Malicki R, Espinoza J, Grandpre J, Weir HK, Wilson R, Edwards BK, Mariotto A, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Wang N, Yang L, Chen JS, Zhou Y, He YT, Song GH, Gu XP, Mei D, Mu HJ, Ge HM, Wu TH, Li YY, Zhao DL, Jin F, Zhang JH, Zhu FD, Junhua Q, Yang YL, Jiang CX, Biao W, Wang J, Li QL, Yi H, Zhou X, Dong J, Li W, Fu FX, Liu SZ, Chen JG, Zhu J, Li YH, Lu YQ, Fan M, Huang SQ, Guo GP, Zhaolai H, Wei K, Chen WQ, Wei W, Zeng H, Demetriou AV, Mang WK, Ngan KC, Kataki AC, Krishnatreya M, Jayalekshmi PA, Sebastian P, George PS, Mathew A, Nandakumar A, Malekzadeh R, Roshandel G, Keinan-Boker L, Silverman BG, Ito H, Koyanagi Y, Sato M, Tobori F, Nakata I, Teramoto N, Hattori M, Kaizaki Y, Moki F, Sugiyama H, Utada M, Nishimura M, Yoshida K, Kurosawa K, Nemoto Y, Narimatsu H, Sakaguchi M, Kanemura S, Naito M, Narisawa R, Miyashiro I, Nakata K, Mori D, Yoshitake M, Oki I, Fukushima N, Shibata A, Iwasa K, Ono C, Matsuda T, Nimri O, Jung KW, Won YJ, Alawadhi E, Elbasmi A, Ab Manan A, Adam F, Nansalmaa E, Tudev U, Ochir C, Al Khater AM, El Mistiri MM, Lim GH, Teo YY, Chiang CJ, Lee WC, Buasom R, Sangrajrang S, Suwanrungruang K, Vatanasapt P, Daoprasert K, Pongnikorn D, Leklob A, Sangkitipaiboon S, Geater SL, Sriplung H, Ceylan O, Kög I, Dirican O, Köse T, Gurbuz T, Karaşahin FE, Turhan D, Aktaş U, Halat Y, Eser S, Yakut CI, Altinisik M, Cavusoglu Y, Türkköylü A, Üçüncü N, Hackl M, Zborovskaya AA, Aleinikova OV, Henau K, Van Eycken L, Atanasov TY, Valerianova Z, Šekerija M, Dušek L, Zvolský M, Steinrud Mørch L, Storm H, Wessel Skovlund C, Innos K, Mägi M, Malila N, Seppä K, Jégu J, Velten M, Cornet E, Troussard X, Bouvier AM, Guizard AV, Bouvier V, Launoy G, Dabakuyo Yonli S, Poillot ML, Maynadié M, Mounier M, Vaconnet L, Woronoff AS, Daoulas M, Robaszkiewicz M, Clavel J, Poulalhon C, Desandes E, Lacour B, Baldi I, Amadeo B, Coureau G, Monnereau A, Orazio S, Audoin M, D’Almeida TC, Boyer S, Hammas K, Trétarre B, Colonna M, Delafosse P, Plouvier S, Cowppli-Bony A, Molinié F, Bara S, Ganry O, Lapôtre-Ledoux B, Daubisse-Marliac L, Bossard N, Uhry Z, Estève J, Stabenow R, Wilsdorf-Köhler H, Eberle A, Luttmann S, Löhden I, Nennecke AL, Kieschke J, Sirri E, Justenhoven C, Reinwald F, Holleczek B, Eisemann N, Katalinic A, Asquez RA, Kumar V, Petridou E, Ólafsdóttir EJ, Tryggvadóttir L, Murray DE, Walsh PM, Sundseth H, Harney M, Mazzoleni G, Vittadello F, Coviello E, Cuccaro F, Galasso R, Sampietro G, Giacomin A, Magoni M, Ardizzone A, D’Argenzio A, Di Prima AA, Ippolito A, Lavecchia AM, Sutera Sardo A, Gola G, Ballotari P, Giacomazzi E, Ferretti S, Dal Maso L, Serraino D, Celesia MV, Filiberti RA, Pannozzo F, Melcarne A, Quarta F, Andreano A, Russo AG, Carrozzi G, Cirilli C, Cavalieri d’Oro L, Rognoni M, Fusco M, Vitale MF, Usala M, Cusimano R, Mazzucco W, Michiara M, Sgargi P, Boschetti L, Marguati S, Chiaranda G, Seghini P, Maule MM, Merletti F, Spata E, Tumino R, Mancuso P, Cassetti T, Sassatelli R, Falcini F, Giorgetti S, Caiazzo AL, Cavallo R, Piras D, Bella F, Madeddu A, Fanetti AC, Maspero S, Carone S, Mincuzzi A, Candela G, Scuderi T, Gentilini MA, Rizzello R, Rosso S, Caldarella A, Intrieri T, Bianconi F, Contiero P, Tagliabue G, Rugge M, Zorzi M, Beggiato S, Brustolin A, Gatta G, De Angelis R, Vicentini M, Zanetti R, Stracci F, Maurina A, Oniščuka M, Mousavi M, Steponaviciene L, Vincerževskienė I, Azzopardi MJ, Calleja N, Siesling S, Visser O, Johannesen TB, Larønningen S, Trojanowski M, Macek P, Mierzwa T, Rachtan J, Rosińska A, Kępska K, Kościańska B, Barna K, Sulkowska U, Gebauer T, Łapińska JB, Wójcik-Tomaszewska J, Motnyk M, Patro A, Gos A, Sikorska K, Bielska-Lasota M, Didkowska JA, Wojciechowska U, Forjaz de Lacerda G, Rego RA, Carrito B, Pais A, Bento MJ, Rodrigues J, Lourenço A, Mayer-da-Silva A, Coza D, Todescu AI, Valkov MY, Gusenkova L, Lazarevich O, Prudnikova O, Vjushkov DM, Egorova A, Orlov A, Pikalova LV, Zhuikova LD, Adamcik J, Safaei Diba C, Zadnik V, Žagar T, De-La-Cruz M, Lopez-de-Munain A, Aleman A, Rojas D, Chillarón RJ, Navarro AIM, Marcos-Gragera R, Puigdemont M, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Sánchez Perez MJ, Franch Sureda P, Ramos Montserrat M, Chirlaque López MD, Sánchez Gil A, Ardanaz E, Guevara M, Cañete-Nieto A, Peris-Bonet R, Carulla M, Galceran J, Almela F, Sabater C, Khan S, Pettersson D, Dickman P, Staehelin K, Struchen B, Egger Hayoz C, Rapiti E, Schaffar R, Went P, Mousavi SM, Bulliard JL, Maspoli-Conconi M, Kuehni CE, Redmond SM, Bordoni A, Ortelli L, Chiolero A, Konzelmann I, Rohrmann S, Wanner M, Broggio J, Rashbass J, Stiller C, Fitzpatrick D, Gavin A, Morrison DS, Thomson CS, Greene G, Huws DW, Grayson M, Rawcliffe H, Allemani C, Coleman MP, Di Carlo V, Girardi F, Matz M, Minicozzi P, Sanz N, Ssenyonga N, James D, Stephens R, Chalker E, Smith M, Gugusheff J, You H, Qin Li S, Dugdale S, Moore J, Philpot S, Pfeiffer R, Thomas H, Silva Ragaini B, Venn AJ, Evans SM, Te Marvelde L, Savietto V, Trevithick R, Aitken J, Currow D, Fowler C, Lewis C. Global survival trends for brain tumors, by histology: analysis of individual records for 556,237 adults diagnosed in 59 countries during 2000-2014 (CONCORD-3). Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:580-592. [PMID: 36355361 PMCID: PMC10013649 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival is a key metric of the effectiveness of a health system in managing cancer. We set out to provide a comprehensive examination of worldwide variation and trends in survival from brain tumors in adults, by histology. METHODS We analyzed individual data for adults (15-99 years) diagnosed with a brain tumor (ICD-O-3 topography code C71) during 2000-2014, regardless of tumor behavior. Data underwent a 3-phase quality control as part of CONCORD-3. We estimated net survival for 11 histology groups, using the unbiased nonparametric Pohar Perme estimator. RESULTS The study included 556,237 adults. In 2010-2014, the global range in age-standardized 5-year net survival for the most common sub-types was broad: in the range 20%-38% for diffuse and anaplastic astrocytoma, from 4% to 17% for glioblastoma, and between 32% and 69% for oligodendroglioma. For patients with glioblastoma, the largest gains in survival occurred between 2000-2004 and 2005-2009. These improvements were more noticeable among adults diagnosed aged 40-70 years than among younger adults. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the largest account to date of global trends in population-based survival for brain tumors by histology in adults. We have highlighted remarkable gains in 5-year survival from glioblastoma since 2005, providing large-scale empirical evidence on the uptake of chemoradiation at population level. Worldwide, survival improvements have been extensive, but some countries still lag behind. Our findings may help clinicians involved in national and international tumor pathway boards to promote initiatives aimed at more extensive implementation of clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Girardi
- Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Division of Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Melissa Matz
- Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Charles Stiller
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Hui You
- Cancer Information Analysis Unit, Cancer Institute NSW, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rafael Marcos Gragera
- Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
| | - Mikhail Y Valkov
- Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russia
| | - Jean-Luc Bulliard
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Neuchâtel and Jura Tumour Registry, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Prithwish De
- Surveillance and Cancer Registry, and Research Office, Clinical Institutes and Quality Programs, Ontario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Morrison
- Scottish Cancer Registry, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Miriam Wanner
- Cancer Registry Zürich, Zug, Schaffhausen and Schwyz, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - David K O'Brian
- Alaska Cancer Registry, Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| | - Nathalie Saint-Jacques
- Department of Medicine and Community Health and Epidemiology, Centre for Clinical Research, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Michel P Coleman
- Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Claudia Allemani
- Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hallik R, Innos K, Jänes J, Veerus P. HPV self-sampling as an additional option in cervical cancer screening: a pilot study in Estonia. Eur J Public Health 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates remain high in Estonia and participation in organized cervical cancer screening program is low. The aim of this pilot study was to estimate the impact of offering an HPV self-sampling option on screening uptake.
Methods
A randomized intervention study was conducted within Estonian organized cervical cancer screening program in 2021. Among target group women who had not participated in screening by August 2021, 26,000 women were randomly selected and allocated to two equally sized intervention arms offering a choice between attending a clinic or taking a self-sample. The opt-out group received a Qvintip sampler by regular mail to home address, the opt-in group received by e-mail a link to order the sampler from a web-site. A control group of 32,000 women received the usual reminder to attend screening at a clinic. Participation rates were calculated and data on user experience were collected with a questionnaire.
Results
Significant difference in participation rates was observed between opt-out (41%) (among them 20% chose self-sampling, 21% chose clinic attendance), opt-in (34%) (8% self-sampling, 26% clinic) and control group (28%). Intervention arms showed higher screening uptake in all age-groups and regions, but the largest effect was seen at ages 60 and 65 years and in regions showing the lowest screening participation rates. Among self-sampling users, 99% agreed that self-sampling was easy and only 3% prefer testing at a clinic.
Conclusions
Offering women a choice between HPV self-sampling or attending a clinic significantly increased cervical cancer screening uptake. Sending an HPV self-sampling kit to home address was the most effective approach. Majority of women who chose HPV self-sampling want to use this option in the future. HPV self-sampling should be integrated in the cervical cancer screening program in Estonia.
Key messages
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hallik
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The National Institute for Health Development , Tallinn, Estonia
| | - K Innos
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The National Institute for Health Development , Tallinn, Estonia
| | - J Jänes
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The National Institute for Health Development , Tallinn, Estonia
| | - P Veerus
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The National Institute for Health Development , Tallinn, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hallik R, Innos K, Jänes J, Veerus P. HPV self-sampling among cervical cancer screening nonattenders: a feasibility study in Estonia. Eur J Public Health 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab164.362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Organized cervical cancer screening in Estonia was started in 2006, but it has not been effective, partly due to low coverage. In 2021, primary HPV screening was implemented. HPV self-sampling has been shown to be effective in increasing screening uptake. This is the first study in Estonia addressing the feasibility of HPV self-sampling and the acceptance of this method among long-term screening nonattenders.
Methods
A randomized intervention study was conducted in 2020. Women born between 1958-1983 without a Pap-smear in 2013-2019 were included in the study population. Altogether 12 000 women were randomly allocated to three equally sized study groups. Opt-out group received a Qvintip sampling device by regular mail. Two opt-in groups received an e-mail invitation to order a self-sampler from a website, one received Qvintip and the other Evalyn Brush. Data on user experience was collected with a questionnaire. Participantś background characteristics were obtained from the Population Register. The effect of covariates on participation rate was estimated with multivariate Poisson regression with a robust error variance and risk ratios (RR) were calculated.
Results
Overall participation rate was 17%, but significant differences were observed between opt-out (27%) and opt-in groups (11%). Compared to opt-out group, adjusted RRs for Qvintip and Evalyn Brush opt-in groups were 0.39 (95% CI 0.35-0.42) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.38-0.47), respectively. Participation was significantly associated with region, citizenship, and education. Self-sampling was well accepted: 98% agreed that it was easy and convenient; 88% prefer it as a screening method in future.
Conclusions
The study showed the feasibility and high acceptance of HPV self-sampling among long-term screening nonattenders in Estonia. As a next step, self-sampling will be piloted in organized screening program to identify optimal dissemination strategy.
Key messages
HPV self-sampling in Estonia is feasible, well accepted and has the potential for improving screening uptake among hard-to-reach women. Self-sampling strategy will be further tested within cervical cancer screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hallik
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - K Innos
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - J Jänes
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - P Veerus
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nõmm O, Veerus P, Innos K. Pap-smear and cervical cancer in Estonia: a population-based case-control study. Eur J Public Health 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Backround
Studies have shown the ineffectiveness of Estonian cervical cancer (CC) screening programme. To examine the reasons for high CC incidence in Estonia, a study was conducted, linking individual Pap-smear history to CC incidence.
Methods
In this population-based case-control study, cases were women aged ≥25 years with an in situ/invasive CC diagnosed in Estonia in 2011-2017, derived from cancer registry. Three controls per case were randomly selected from population registry using a density sampling scheme. Exposure was defined as no Pap-smears during seven years prior to diagnosis or index date compared to at least one smear. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Age, place of residence, citizenship, education, marital status and interruption in health insurance were also analysed. The analysis was done separately in screening age group (35-60 years).
Results
Among 1439 cases and 4317 controls, the proportion of women with no Pap-smears was 53% and 35%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, women with no Pap-smears were at a higher risk for CC (OR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.97-2.97). In screening age group, the impact of no Pap-smears was stronger (OR = 2.62; 95% CI: 2.12-3.24). CC risk decreased with age, was two to three times higher in other regions compared to Northern Estonia; was higher for lower-educated women; and for divorced/widowed women compared to married women. Interruption in health insurance caused a 25% increase in risk. However in screening age group, women with no Pap-smears and an interruption in health insurance experienced a four-fold increase in CC risk.
Conclusions
The study confirmed the importance of screening in preventing CC, also revealing the independent effect of several social factors on CC risk. To reduce CC incidence in Estonia, immediate efforts are necessary to increase the effectiveness of screening, particularly among high-risk and hard-to-reach women.
Key messages
This case-control study of cervical cancer in Estonia identified high-risk groups: women with no Pap-smears, interruptions in health insurance, low education, and living outside the capital city area. Reduction in cervical cancer incidence in Estonia can be achieved through more effective screening and communication, tailored to the needs of different population groups, mainly high-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Nõmm
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - P Veerus
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - K Innos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matz M, Coleman MP, Sant M, Chirlaque MD, Visser O, Gore M, Allemani C, Bouzbid S, Hamdi-Chérif M, Zaidi Z, Bah E, Swaminathan R, Nortje S, El Mistiri M, Bayo S, Malle B, Manraj S, Sewpaul-Sungkur R, Fabowale A, Ogunbiyi O, Bradshaw D, Somdyala N, Stefan D, Abdel-Rahman M, Jaidane L, Mokni M, Kumcher I, Moreno F, González M, Laura E, Espinola S, Calabrano G, Carballo Quintero B, Fita R, Garcilazo D, Giacciani P, Diumenjo M, Laspada W, Green M, Lanza M, Ibañez S, Lima C, Lobo de Oliveira E, Daniel C, Scandiuzzi C, De Souza P, Melo C, Del Pino K, Laporte C, Curado M, de Oliveira J, Veneziano C, Veneziano D, Latorre M, Tanaka L, Azevedo e Silva G, Galaz J, Moya J, Herrmann D, Vargas S, Herrera V, Uribe C, Bravo L, Arias-Ortiz N, Jurado D, Yépez M, Galán Y, Torres P, Martínez-Reyes F, Pérez-Meza M, Jaramillo L, Quinto R, Cueva P, Yépez J, Torres-Cintrón C, Tortolero-Luna G, Alonso R, Barrios E, Nikiforuk C, Shack L, Coldman A, Woods R, Noonan G, Turner D, Kumar E, Zhang B, McCrate F, Ryan S, Hannah H, Dewar R, MacIntyre M, Lalany A, Ruta M, Marrett L, Nishri D, McClure C, Vriends K, Bertrand C, Louchini R, Robb K, Stuart-Panko H, Demers S, Wright S, George J, Shen X, Brockhouse J, O'Brien D, Ward K, Almon L, Bates J, Rycroft R, Mueller L, Phillips C, Brown H, Cromartie B, Schwartz A, Vigneau F, MacKinnon J, Wohler B, Bayakly A, Clarke C, Glaser S, West D, Green M, Hernandez B, Johnson C, Jozwik D, Charlton M, Lynch C, Huang B, Tucker T, Deapen D, Liu L, Hsieh M, Wu X, Stern K, Gershman S, Knowlton R, Alverson J, Copeland G, Rogers D, Lemons D, Williamson L, Hood M, Hosain G, Rees J, Pawlish K, Stroup A, Key C, Wiggins C, Kahn A, Schymura M, Leung G, Rao C, Giljahn L, Warther B, Pate A, Patil M, Schubert S, Rubertone J, Slack S, Fulton J, Rousseau D, Janes T, Schwartz S, Bolick S, Hurley D, Richards J, Whiteside M, Nogueira L, Herget K, Sweeney C, Martin J, Wang S, Harrelson D, Keitheri Cheteri M, Farley S, Hudson A, Borchers R, Stephenson L, Espinoza J, Weir H, Edwards B, Wang N, Yang L, Chen J, Song G, Gu X, Zhang P, Ge H, Zhao D, Zhang J, Zhu F, Tang J, Shen Y, Wang J, Li Q, Yang X, Dong J, Li W, Cheng L, Chen J, Huang Q, Huang S, Guo G, Wei K, Chen W, Zeng H, Demetriou A, Pavlou P, Mang W, Ngan K, Swaminathan R, Kataki A, Krishnatreya M, Jayalekshmi P, Sebastian P, Sapkota S, Verma Y, Nandakumar A, Suzanna E, Keinan-Boker L, Silverman B, Ito H, Nakagawa H, Hattori M, Kaizaki Y, Sugiyama H, Utada M, Katayama K, Narimatsu H, Kanemura S, Koike T, Miyashiro I, Yoshii M, Oki I, Shibata A, Matsuda T, Nimri O, Ab Manan A, Bhoo-Pathy N, Tuvshingerel S, Chimedsuren O, Al Khater A, El Mistiri M, Al-Eid H, Jung K, Won Y, Chiang C, Lai M, Suwanrungruang K, Wiangnon S, Daoprasert K, Pongnikorn D, Geater S, Sriplung H, Eser S, Yakut C, Hackl M, Mühlböck H, Oberaigner W, Zborovskaya A, Aleinikova O, Henau K, Van Eycken L, Dimitrova N, Valerianova Z, Šekerija M, Zvolský M, Engholm G, Storm H, Innos K, Mägi M, Malila N, Seppä K, Jégu J, Velten M, Cornet E, Troussard X, Bouvier A, Faivre J, Guizard A, Bouvier V, Launoy G, Arveux P, Maynadié M, Mounier M, Fournier E, Woronoff A, Daoulas M, Clavel J, Le Guyader-Peyrou S, Monnereau A, Trétarre B, Colonna M, Cowppli-Bony A, Molinié F, Bara S, Degré D, Ganry O, Lapôtre-Ledoux B, Grosclaude P, Estève J, Bray F, Piñeros M, Sassi F, Stabenow R, Eberle A, Erb C, Nennecke A, Kieschke J, Sirri E, Kajueter H, Emrich K, Zeissig S, Holleczek B, Eisemann N, Katalinic A, Brenner H, Asquez R, Kumar V, Ólafsdóttir E, Tryggvadóttir L, Comber H, Walsh P, Sundseth H, Devigili E, Mazzoleni G, Giacomin A, Bella F, Castaing M, Sutera A, Gola G, Ferretti S, Serraino D, Zucchetto A, Lillini R, Vercelli M, Busco S, Pannozzo F, Vitarelli S, Ricci P, Pascucci C, Autelitano M, Cirilli C, Federico M, Fusco M, Vitale M, Usala M, Cusimano R, Mazzucco W, Michiara M, Sgargi P, Maule M, Sacerdote C, Tumino R, Di Felice E, Vicentini M, Falcini F, Cremone L, Budroni M, Cesaraccio R, Contrino M, Tisano F, Fanetti A, Maspero S, Candela G, Scuderi T, Gentilini M, Piffer S, Rosso S, Sacchetto L, Caldarella A, La Rosa F, Stracci F, Contiero P, Tagliabue G, Dei Tos A, Zorzi M, Zanetti R, Baili P, Berrino F, Gatta G, Sant M, Capocaccia R, De Angelis R, Liepina E, Maurina A, Smailyte G, Agius D, Calleja N, Siesling S, Visser O, Larønningen S, Møller B, Dyzmann-Sroka A, Trojanowski M, Góźdż S, Mężyk R, Grądalska-Lampart M, Radziszewska A, Didkowska J, Wojciechowska U, Błaszczyk J, Kępska K, Bielska-Lasota M, Kwiatkowska K, Forjaz G, Rego R, Bastos J, Silva M, Antunes L, Bento M, Mayer-da-Silva A, Miranda A, Coza D, Todescu A, Valkov M, Adamcik J, Safaei Diba C, Primic-Žakelj M, Žagar T, Stare J, Almar E, Mateos A, Quirós J, Bidaurrazaga J, Larrañaga N, Díaz García J, Marcos A, Marcos-Gragera R, Vilardell Gil M, Molina E, Sánchez M, Franch Sureda P, Ramos Montserrat M, Chirlaque M, Navarro C, Ardanaz E, Moreno-Iribas C, Fernández-Delgado R, Peris-Bonet R, Galceran J, Khan S, Lambe M, Camey B, Bouchardy C, Usel M, Ess S, Herrmann C, Bulliard J, Maspoli-Conconi M, Frick H, Kuehni C, Schindler M, Bordoni A, Spitale A, Chiolero A, Konzelmann I, Dehler S, Matthes K, Rashbass J, Stiller C, Fitzpatrick D, Gavin A, Bannon F, Black R, Brewster D, Huws D, White C, Finan P, Allemani C, Bonaventure A, Carreira H, Coleman M, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Liu K, Matz M, Montel L, Nikšić M, Rachet B, Sanz N, Spika D, Stephens R, Peake M, Chalker E, Newman L, Baker D, Soeberg M, Aitken J, Scott C, Stokes B, Venn A, Farrugia H, Giles G, Threlfall T, Currow D, You H, Hendrix J, Lewis C. Erratum to “The histology of ovarian cancer: Worldwide distribution and implications for international survival comparisons (CONCORD-2)” [Gynecol. Oncol. 144 (2017) 405–413]. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147:726. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
7
|
Paapsi K, Innos K. Age, sex and place of residence predicted the diagnosis of late stage colorectal cancer in Estonia. Eur J Public Health 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx189.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- K Paapsi
- National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - K Innos
- National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saar S, Sokirjanski M, Junkin LK, Laos J, Laar AL, Merioja I, Lepner U, Kukk L, Remmelgas A, Asser T, Innos K, Starkopf J, Talving P. Evolution of severe trauma in Estonia comparing early versus established independence of the state. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2016; 43:791-796. [PMID: 27738725 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-016-0731-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trauma mechanisms and patterns of severe injuries during the Estonian independence have not been evaluated. The aim of the study was to compare the incidence and outcomes of severe injuries between time periods of early independence from the Soviet Union and the present time. METHODS After the ethics review board approval, all adult trauma admissions to major trauma facilities in 1993-1994 and 2013-2014 with Injury Severity Score >15 were identified. Data collection included demographics, injury severity variables, interventions, and in-hospital outcomes. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidence of penetrating trauma, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and in-hospital complications. Primary outcome difference comparing the two time segments was determined using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 1064 patients were included, 593 and 471 from 1993-1994 to 2013-2014, respectively. Incidence of penetrating trauma during 1993-1994 was 11.1 % and in 2013-2014 at 6.4 % (p = 0.007). Gunshot injuries constituted 62.1 and 23.3 % of all penetrating trauma in 1993-1994 and 2013-2014, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall mean HLOS was 15.5 ± 19.8 days and did not differ between the periods. The rate of adjusted complications showed a trend for a decreased incidence (adj. p = 0.064). Adjusted mortality rate was 50.3 and 16.4 % during 1993-1994 and 2013-2014, respectively (adj. OR 7.01; 95 % CI 4.69-10.47; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Effective law enforcement, gun control, evolution of trauma system, and reduction of interpersonal violence have all contributed to a significant decrease in penetrating trauma incidence and all-cause adjusted mortality during the 20 years of Estonian independence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Saar
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Surgery, North Estonia Medical Center, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - M Sokirjanski
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - L K Junkin
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - J Laos
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Surgery, North Estonia Medical Center, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - A L Laar
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - I Merioja
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - U Lepner
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Surgery, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - L Kukk
- Department of Surgery, North Estonia Medical Center, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - A Remmelgas
- Department of Anaesthesiology, North Estonia Medical Center, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - T Asser
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Neurosurgery, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - K Innos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - J Starkopf
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - P Talving
- School of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. .,Department of Surgery, North Estonia Medical Center, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419, Tallinn, Estonia. .,Department of Surgery, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ojamaa K, Veerus P, Tammaru M, Everaus H, Innos K. Ovarian Cancer Survival in Estonia, 1995–2009. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu338.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
10
|
Innos K, Baburin A, Aareleid T. Cancer patient survival in Estonia 1995–2009: Time trends and data quality. Cancer Epidemiol 2014; 38:253-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2013] [Revised: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
11
|
Innos K, Magi M, Tekkel M, Aareleid T. Place of residence predicts breast cancer stage at diagnosis in Estonia. Eur J Public Health 2010; 21:376-80. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
12
|
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the suicide risk among cancer patients in Estonia. This risk was examined in a cohort of 65,419 persons diagnosed with cancer in 1983-1998. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated using the suicide rates of the population of Estonia as a reference. During 192,078 person-years of follow-up between 1983 and 2000, 197 suicides occurred in the cohort. An increased suicide risk was found for men (SMR=1.73; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.45-2.01), but not for women (SMR=0.50; 95% CI 0.37-0.66). Men had the highest risk 90-179 days following their diagnosis (SMR=4.27; 95% CI 2.81-6.21). During this time interval, among men, the risk was more pronounced for cancers of the oesophagus (SMR=35.63; 95% CI 9.71-91.22) and pancreas (SMR=14.53; 95% CI 1.76-52.50). This study provides further evidence that cancer is a risk factor for suicide, at least in men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Innos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hiiu 42, 11619 Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Innos K, Rahu M. Epidemiological data sources in Estonia: a survey of registries and databases. J Epidemiol Biostat 2001; 5:293-302. [PMID: 11142605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central and Eastern European countries offer opportunities for studying the health effects of historical and present exposures, as well as the transition to a market economy. A prerequisite for research is the availability of good-quality information. This study was undertaken to describe sources of individual data that are available for epidemiological research in Estonia. Particular attention was paid to the methods of operation of health registries. METHODS Information was collected during site visits, interviews with registry personnel and from published reports. For health registries, information was specifically requested on data collection, scope of recorded data, quality control, electronic linkage capability and use of data in research. RESULTS The authors describe 35 data sources containing individual information on vital status, mortality, morbidity, natality and women's health, health and health care, and occupation. The most important health registries are the cancer registry, with data from 1968, and the medical birth registry, with data from 1992. Computerised cause-of-death information is available from 1983. Electronic linkage can be done with most of the data sources, the main matching variable being the eleven-digit personal identification number. Factors potentially affecting data-quality in health registries are undefined legal basis, scarcity of funding and staff, poor acknowledgement of problems, and rare scientific use of registry DISCUSSION Various data sources are available for epidemiological research in Estonia. Thus far, collected data have largely been an under-used scientific resource. In health registries, more attention should be paid to quality control and continuous involvement of researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Innos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Occupational wood dust exposure is associated with increased risk of sinonasal cancer in men. However, little is known whether it is associated with sinonasal cancer in women or with malignancies of other sites. METHODS In a retrospective cohort study of furniture workers, cancer incidence in 3723 men and 3063 women between 1968 and 1995 was compared to the incidence in the general population of Estonia. Cancer risks were analyzed by employment duration and occupation. RESULTS The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for all cancers did not differ significantly from one. Two men and one woman had sinonasal cancer (expected 1.07 and 0.53, respectively). Significantly increased risk of colon cancer was seen in the cohort (SIR 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.17). Subjects employed for 10 years and over had significant excess of colon cancer (SIR 2.29, 95% CI 1.28-3.77) and rectal cancer (SIR 2.10, 95% CI 1.05-3.76) in the analysis by employment duration using exposure with a latency of 20 years. The nonsignificant excess of pharyngeal cancer in men (SIR 1.82) and lung cancer in women (SIR 1.43) was restricted to short-term workers. CONCLUSIONS This study found an excess of colon and rectal cancer in furniture workers. There was no increase in total cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Innos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Tallinn, Estonia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the methodology and feasibility of follow up for vital status in retrospective cohort studies in Estonia. METHODS A cohort of 7412 workers who had been employed at two factories in Tallinn between 1946 and 1988 was followed up for vital status from the date of first employment until death, emigration, or the end of the study, 31 December 1995, whichever occurred first. The cohort was electronically linked with the National Population Registry of Estonia that was created in 1992 and includes personal identification numbers of Estonian citizens and residents, and the Mortality Database that contains information from death certificates issued in 1983-95. A manual search was carried out on several non-computerised population data sources and archives. RESULTS By 31 December 1995, the vital status of 6780 (91.5%) subjects could be traced (4495 (60.6%) subjects were alive, 1993 (26.9%) had died, and 292 (3.9%) had emigrated). Analysis by calendar period of leaving work showed that the proportion of subjects traced was lowest in the group of workers who had left work between 1946 and 1955 (58.4%), especially those whose age at leaving work was < 30 (53.2%) or > 60 years (42.3%). Among subjects who left work in 1956-65, 1966-75, and 1976-88, the follow up rate was 84.7%, 94.6%, and 98.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The findings, which are especially important for occupational epidemiology, confirm the feasibility of conducting retrospective cohort studies in Estonia. Most of the issues discussed in the paper apply to other former Soviet countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Innos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Tallinn, Estonia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|