1
|
Peuker F, Hoepelman RJ, Beeres FJP, Balogh ZJ, Beks RB, Sweet AAR, IJpma FFA, Lansink KWW, van Wageningen B, Tromp TN, Minervini F, van Veelen NM, Hoogendoorn JM, de Jong MB, van Baal MCPM, Leenen LPH, Groenwold RHH, Houwert RM. Nonoperative treatment of multiple rib fractures, the results to beat: International multicenter prospective cohort study among 845 patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024; 96:769-776. [PMID: 37934655 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal treatment (i.e., nonoperative or operative) for patients with multiple rib fractures remains debated. Studies that compare treatments are rationalized by the alleged poor outcomes of nonoperative treatment. METHODS The aim of this prospective international multicenter cohort study (between January 2018 and March 2021) with 1-year follow-up, was to report contemporary outcomes of nonoperatively treated patients with multiple rib fractures. Including 845 patients with three or more rib fractures. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (HLOS), (pulmonary) complications, and quality of life. RESULTS Mean age was 57.7 ± 17.0 years, median Injury Severity Score was 17 (13-22) and the median number of rib fractures was 6 (4-8). In-hospital mortality rate was 1.5% (n = 13), 112 (13.3%) patients had pneumonia and four (0.5%) patients developed a symptomatic nonunion. The median HLOS was 7 days (4-13 days), and median intensive care unit length of stay was 2 days (1-5 days). Mean 5-Level Quality of Life Questionnaire index value was 0.83 ± 0.18 1 year after trauma. Polytrauma patients had a median HLOS of 10 days (6-18 days), a pneumonia rate of 17.6% (n = 77) and mortality rate of 1.7% (n = 7). Elderly patients (≥65 years) had a median HLOS of 9 days (5-15 days), a pneumonia rate of 19.7% (n = 57) and mortality rate of 4.1% (n = 12). CONCLUSION Overall, nonoperative treatment of patients with multiple rib fractures shows low mortality and morbidity rate and good quality of life after 1 year. Future studies evaluating the benefit of operative stabilization should use contemporary outcomes to establish the therapeutic margin of rib fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Peuker
- From the Department of Trauma Surgery (F.P., R.J.H., A.A.R.S., M.B.J., M.B., L.P.H.L., R.M.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery (F.P., F.J.P.B., N.M.V.), Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Traumatology (Z.J.B.), John Hunter Hospital & University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Trauma Surgery (F.F.A.I.), University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Department of Trauma Surgery (K.W.W.L.), Elisabeth TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg; Department of Trauma Surgery (B.W., T.N.T.), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Thoracic Surgery (F.M.), Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Trauma Surgery (J.M.H.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague; Department of Clinical Epidemiology (R.H.H.G.), and Department of Biomedical Data Sciences (R.H.H.G.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Veelen NM, van de Wall BJM, Hoepelman RJ, IJpma FFA, Link BC, Babst R, Groenwold RHH, van der Velde D, Diwersi N, van Heijl M, Houwert RM, Beeres FJP. Let's Agree to Disagree on Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Distal Radius Fractures in Older People: Protocol for a Prospective International Multicenter Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e52917. [PMID: 38349719 PMCID: PMC10900084 DOI: 10.2196/52917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distal radius fractures are the most frequently encountered fractures in Western societies, typically affecting patients aged 50 years and older. Although this is a common injury, the best treatment for these fractures in older patients is still under debate. OBJECTIVE This prospective study aims to compare the outcome of operatively and nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures in the older population. Only patients with distal radius fractures for which equipoise regarding the optimal treatment exists will be included. METHODS This prospective international multicenter observational cohort study will be designed as a natural experiment. Natural experiments are observational studies in which treatment allocation is determined by factors outside the control of the investigators but also (largely) independent of patient characteristics. Patients aged 65 years and older with an acute distal radius fracture will be considered for inclusion. Treatment allocation (operative vs nonoperative) will be based on the local preferences of the treating hospital either in Switzerland or the Netherlands. Hence, the process governing treatment allocation resembles that of randomization. Patients will be identified after treatment has been initiated. Based on the radiographs and baseline information of the patient, an expert panel of 6 certified trauma surgeons from 2 regions will provide their treatment recommendation. Only patients for whom the experts disagree on treatment recommendations will ultimately be included in the study (ie, for whom there is a clinical equipoise). For these patients, both operative and nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures are viable, and treatment choice is predominantly determined by personal or local preference. The primary outcome will be the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include the Physical Activity Score for the Elderly, the EQ questionnaire, pain, the living situation, range of motion, complications, and radiological outcomes. By including outcomes such as living situation and the Physical Activity Score for the Elderly, which are not relevant for younger cohorts, valuable information to tailor treatment to the needs of the older population can be gained. According to the sample size collection, which was based on the minimal important clinical difference of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, 92 patients will have to be included, with at least 46 patients in each treatment group. RESULTS Enrollment began in July 2023 and is expected to continue until summer 2024. The final follow-up will be 2 years after the last patient is included. CONCLUSIONS Although many trials on this topic have previously been published, there remains an ongoing debate regarding the optimal treatment for distal radius fractures in older patients. This observational study, which will use a fairly new methodological study design, will provide further information on treatment outcomes for older patients with distal radius fractures for which to date equipoise exists regarding the optimal treatment. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/52917.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Maria van Veelen
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Bryan J M van de Wall
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Ruben J Hoepelman
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Frank F A IJpma
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Björn-Christian Link
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Reto Babst
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Nadine Diwersi
- Department of General and Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Obwalden, Sarnen, Switzerland
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Frank J P Beeres
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stadhouder A, van Rossenberg LX, Kik C, Muijs SPJ, Öner FC, Houwert RM. Natural Experiments as a Study Method in Spinal Trauma Surgery: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231220889. [PMID: 38073538 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231220889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVES To determine if the natural experiment design is a useful research methodology concept in spinal trauma care, and to determine if this methodology can be a viable alternative when randomized controlled trials are either infeasible or unethical. METHODS A Medline, Embase and Cochrane database search was performed between 2004 and 2023 for studies comparing different treatment modalities of spinal trauma. All observational studies with a natural experiment design comparing different treatment modalities of spinal trauma were included. Data extraction and quality assessment with the MINORS criteria was performed. RESULTS Four studies with a natural experiment design regarding patients with traumatic spinal fractures were included. All studies were retrospective, one study collected follow-up data prospectively. Three studies compared different operative treatment modalities, whereas one study compared different antibiotic treatment strategies. Two studies compared preferred treatment modalities between expertise centers, one study between departments (neuro- and orthopedic surgery) and one amongst surgeons. For the included retrospective studies, MINORS scores (maximum score 18) were high ranging from 12-17 and with a mean (SD) of 14.6 (1.63). CONCLUSIONS Since 2004 only four studies using a natural experiment design have been conducted in spinal trauma. In the included studies, comparability of patient groups was high emphasizing the potential of natural experiments in spinal trauma research. Natural experiments design should be considered more frequently in future research in spinal trauma as they may help to address difficult clinical problems when RCT's are infeasible or unethical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnita Stadhouder
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Luke Xander van Rossenberg
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Kik
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - S P J Muijs
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - F C Öner
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Wessem KJP, Leenen LPH, Houwert RM, Benders KEM, Simmermacher RKJ, van Baal MCPM, de Bruin IGJM, de Jong MB, Nijs SJB, Hietbrink F. Outcome of severely injured patients in a unique trauma system with 24/7 double trauma surgeon on-call service. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2023; 31:60. [PMID: 37880795 PMCID: PMC10598943 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-023-01122-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of in-house attending trauma surgeons has improved efficiency of processes in the treatment of polytrauma patients. However, literature remains equivocal regarding the influence of the presence of in-house attendings on mortality. In our hospital there is a double trauma surgeon on-call system. In this system an in-house trauma surgeon is 24/7 backed up by a second trauma surgeon to assist with urgent surgery or multiple casualties. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome in severely injured patients in this unique trauma system. METHODS From 2014 to 2021, a prospective population-based cohort consisting of consecutive polytrauma patients aged ≥ 15 years requiring both urgent surgery (≤ 24h) and admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) was investigated. Demographics, treatment, outcome parameters and pre- and in-hospital transfer times were analyzed. RESULTS Three hundred thirteen patients with a median age of 44 years (71% male), and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 33 were included. Mortality rate was 19% (68% due to traumatic brain injury). All patients stayed ≤ 32 min in ED before transport to either CT or OR. Fifty-one percent of patients who needed damage control surgery (DCS) had a more deranged physiology, needed more blood products, were more quickly in OR with shorter time in OR, than patients with early definitive care (EDC). There was no difference in mortality rate between DCS and EDC patients. Fifty-six percent of patients had surgery during off-hours. There was no difference in outcome between patients who had surgery during daytime and during off-hours. Death could possibly have been prevented in 1 exsanguinating patient (1.7%). CONCLUSION In this cohort of severely injured patients in need of urgent surgery and ICU support it was demonstrated that surgical decision making was swift and accurate with low preventable death rates. 24/7 Physical presence of a dedicated trauma team has likely contributed to these good outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlijn J P van Wessem
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim E M Benders
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roger K J Simmermacher
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark C P M van Baal
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ivar G J M de Bruin
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam B de Jong
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefaan J B Nijs
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoepelman RJ, Driessen MLS, de Jongh MAC, Houwert RM, Marzi I, Lecky F, Lefering R, van de Wall BJM, Beeres FJP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Groenwold RHH, Leenen LPH. Concepts, utilization, and perspectives on the Dutch Nationwide Trauma registry: a position paper. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49:1619-1626. [PMID: 36624221 PMCID: PMC10449938 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02206-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Over the last decades, the Dutch trauma care have seen major improvements. To assess the performance of the Dutch trauma system, in 2007, the Dutch Nationwide Trauma Registry (DNTR) was established, which developed into rich source of information for quality assessment, quality improvement of the trauma system, and for research purposes. The DNTR is one of the most comprehensive trauma registries in the world as it includes 100% of all trauma patients admitted to the hospital through the emergency department. This inclusive trauma registry has shown its benefit over less inclusive systems; however, it comes with a high workload for high-quality data collection and thus more expenses. The comprehensive prospectively collected data in the DNTR allows multiple types of studies to be performed. Recent changes in legislation allow the DNTR to include the citizen service numbers, which enables new possibilities and eases patient follow-up. However, in order to maximally exploit the possibilities of the DNTR, further development is required, for example, regarding data quality improvement and routine incorporation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. This would improve the quality assessment and scientific output from the DNTR. Finally, the DNTR and all other (European) trauma registries should strive to ensure that the trauma registries are eligible for comparisons between countries and healthcare systems, with the goal to improve trauma patient care worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Hoepelman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - M L S Driessen
- Dutch Network for Emergency Care (LNAZ), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M A C de Jongh
- Brabant Trauma Registry, Network Emergency Care Brabant, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Marzi
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - F Lecky
- The Trauma Audit and Research Network, The University of Manchester, Salford Royal-Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
- Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research, Health Services Research Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - R Lefering
- Faculty of Health, IFOM-Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - B J M van de Wall
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - F J P Beeres
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - M G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Methodology, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - L P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Network for Emergency Care (LNAZ), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huizing F, Sier VQ, Tresfon JAS, van der Vorst JR, Liem RSL, Schmitz RF, Schepers A, Houwert RM, Vriens MR, Snijders HS, Blok JJ. Future surgeon: bridging the intergenerational gap. Br J Surg 2023:7161652. [PMID: 37178181 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Floortje Huizing
- Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent Q Sier
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jaco A S Tresfon
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Abbey Schepers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Heleen S Snijders
- Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - Joris J Blok
- Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baden DN, Visser MFL, Roetman MH, Smeeing DPJ, Houwert RM, Groenwold RHH, van der Meijden OAJ. Effects of reduction technique for acute anterior shoulder dislocation without sedation or intra-articular pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49:1383-1392. [PMID: 36856781 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02242-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly seen in the emergency department for which several closed reduction techniques exist. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the most successful principle of closed reduction techniques for an acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department without the use of sedation or intra-articular lidocaine injection. METHODS A literature search was conducted up to 15-08-2022 in the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL for randomized and observational studies comparing two or more closed reduction techniques for anterior shoulder dislocations. Included techniques were grouped based on their main operating mechanism resulting in a traction-countertraction (TCT), leverage and biomechanical reduction technique (BRT) group. The primary outcome was success rate and secondary outcomes were reduction time and endured pain scores. Meta-analyses were conducted between reduction groups and for the primary outcome a network meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS A total of 3118 articles were screened on title and abstract, of which 9 were included, with a total of 987 patients. Success rates were 0.80 (95% CI 0.74; 0.85), 0.81 (95% CI 0.63; 0.92) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.56; 0.93) for BRT, leverage and TCT, respectively. No differences in success rates were observed between the three separate reduction groups. In the network meta-analysis, similar yet more precise effect estimates were found. However, in a post hoc analysis the BRT group was more successful than the combined leverage and TCT group with a relative risk of 1.33 (95% CI 1.19, 1.48). CONCLUSION All included techniques showed good results with regard to success of reduction. The BRT might be the preferred technique for the reduction of an anterior shoulder dislocation, as patients experience the least pain and it results in the fastest reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D N Baden
- Emergency Physician, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - M F L Visser
- Medical Student, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M H Roetman
- Nurse Practitioner, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - D P J Smeeing
- Trauma Surgeon in Training, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- Trauma Surgeon, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Natural experiments are observational studies of medical treatments in which treatment allocation is determined by factors outside the control of the investigators, arguably resembling experimental randomisation. Natural experiments in the field of orthopaedic trauma research are scarce. However, they have great potential due to the process governing treatment allocation and the existence of opposing treatment strategies between hospitals or between regions as a result of local education, conviction, or cultural and socio-economic factors. Here, the possibilities and opportunities of natural experiments in the orthopaedic trauma field are discussed. Potential solutions are presented to improve the validity of natural experiments and how to assess the credibility of such studies. Above all, it is meant to spark a discussion about its role within the field of orthopaedic trauma research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan J M van de Wall
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| | - Agnita Stadhouder
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F Cumhur Oner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J P Beeres
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
van der Vet P, Wilson S, Houwert RM, Verleisdonk EJ, Heng M. Quality and reporting of patient-reported outcomes in elderly patients with hip fracture: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058197. [PMID: 36521890 PMCID: PMC9756149 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess how patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reported and to assess the quality of reporting PROs for elderly patients with a hip fracture in both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase and CENTRAL were searched on 1 March 2013 to 25 May 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA RCTs and observational studies on geriatric (≥65 years of age) patients, with one or more PRO as outcome were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Primary outcome was type of PRO; secondary outcome and quality assessment was measured by adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension for patient-reported outcomes (CONSORT-PRO). Because of heterogeneity in study population and outcomes, data pooling was not possible. RESULTS 3659 studies were found in the initial search. Of those, 67 were included in the final analysis. 83.6% of studies did not adequately mention missing data, 52.3% did not correctly report how PROs were collected and 61.2% did not report adequate effect size. PRO limitations were adequately reported in 20.9% of studies and interpretation of PROs was adequately reported in 19.4% of studies. Most Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes were measured by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Levels, and pain as well as patient satisfaction by Visual Analogue Scale. CONCLUSION This study found that a high variety of PRO measures are used to evaluate geriatric hip fracture care. In addition, 47.8% of studies examining PROs in elderly patients with hip fracture do not satisfy at least 50% of the CONSORT-PRO criteria. This enables poorly conducted research to be published and used in evidence-based medicine and, consequently, shared decision-making. More efforts should be undertaken to improve adequate reporting. We believe extending the CONSORT-PRO extension to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for observational studies would be a valuable addition to current guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puck van der Vet
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sandra Wilson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Luijken K, van de Wall BJM, Hooft L, Leenen LPH, Houwert RM, Groenwold RHH. How to assess applicability and methodological quality of comparative studies of operative interventions in orthopedic trauma surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48:4943-4953. [PMID: 35809102 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02031-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is challenging to generate and subsequently implement high-quality evidence in surgical practice. A first step would be to grade the strengths and weaknesses of surgical evidence and appraise risk of bias and applicability. Here, we described items that are common to different risk-of-bias tools. We explained how these could be used to assess comparative operative intervention studies in orthopedic trauma surgery, and how these relate to applicability of results. METHODS We extracted information from the Cochrane risk-of-bias-2 (RoB-2) tool, Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions tool (ROBINS-I), and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria and derived a concisely formulated set of items with signaling questions tailored to operative interventions in orthopedic trauma surgery. RESULTS The established set contained nine items: population, intervention, comparator, outcome, confounding, missing data and selection bias, intervention status, outcome assessment, and pre-specification of analysis. Each item can be assessed using signaling questions and was explained using good practice examples of operative intervention studies in orthopedic trauma surgery. CONCLUSION The set of items will be useful to form a first judgment on studies, for example when including them in a systematic review. Existing risk of bias tools can be used for further evaluation of methodological quality. Additionally, the proposed set of items and signaling questions might be a helpful starting point for peer reviewers and clinical readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Luijken
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Bryan J M van de Wall
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Lotty Hooft
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sam ASY, Nawijn F, Benders KEM, Houwert RM, Leenen LPH, Hietbrink F. Outcomes of the resuscitative and emergency thoracotomy at a Dutch level-one trauma center: are there predictive factors for survival? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48:4877-4887. [PMID: 35713680 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02021-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the 30-day survival rate of resuscitative and emergency thoracotomies in trauma patients. Moreover, factors that positively influence 30-day survival rates were investigated. METHODS A retrospective study of patients (> 16 years), between 2008 and 2020, who underwent a resuscitative or emergency thoracotomy at a level-one trauma center in the Netherlands was conducted. RESULTS Fifty-six patients underwent a resuscitative (n = 45, 80%) or emergency (n = 11, 20%) thoracotomy. The overall 30-day survival rate was 32% (n = 18), which was 23% after blunt trauma and 72% after penetrating trauma, and which was 18% for the resuscitative thoracotomy and 91% for the emergency thoracotomy. The patients who survived had full neurologic recovery. Factors associated with survival were penetrating trauma (p < 0.001), (any) sign of life (SOL) upon presentation to the hospital (p = 0.005), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15 (p < 0.001) and a thoracotomy in the operating room (OR) (p = 0.018). Every resuscitative thoracotomy after blunt trauma and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole in the pre-hospital phase was futile (0 survivors out of 11 patients), of those patients seven (64%) had concomitant severe neuro-trauma. CONCLUSION This study found a 30-day survival rate of 32% for resuscitative and emergency thoracotomies, all with good neurological recovery. Factors associated with survival were related to the trauma mechanism, the thoracotomy indication and response to resuscitation prior to thoracotomy (for instance, if resuscitation enables enough time for safe transport to the operating room, survival chances increase). Resuscitative thoracotomies after blunt trauma in combination with loss of SOL before arrival at the emergency room were in all cases futile, interestingly in nearly all cases due to concomitant neuro-trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Y Sam
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F Nawijn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - K E M Benders
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - L P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F Hietbrink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Meyer MA, Tarabochia MA, Goh BC, Hietbrink F, Houwert RM, Dyer GSM. The Impact of Resident Involvement on Outcomes and Costs in Elective Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2022:S0363-5023(22)00121-6. [PMID: 35461739 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of resident involvement on periprocedural outcomes and costs after common procedures performed at an academic hand surgical practice. METHODS A retrospective review was performed in all patients undergoing 7 common elective upper extremity procedures between January 2008 and December 2018: carpal tunnel release, distal radius open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), trigger finger release, thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty, phalanx closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, cubital tunnel release, and olecranon ORIF. The medical record was reviewed to determine the impact of surgical assistants (resident, fellow, or physician assistant) on periprocedural outcomes, periprocedural costs, and 1-year postoperative outcomes. The involvement of surgical trainees operating under direct supervision was compared with the entire operation performed by the attending surgeon with a physician assistant present. RESULTS A total of 396 procedures met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of the whole study sample revealed low rates of intraoperative complications, wound complications, medical complications, readmissions, and mortality. Subgroup analysis of carpal tunnel releases revealed significantly greater tourniquet times for residents compared with physician assistants (7 ± 2 min, 6 ± 1 min), as well as longer overall operating room times for residents compared to fellows or physician assistants (17 ± 5 min, 13 ± 3 min, 12 ± 3 min). Operating room times for distal radius ORIF were significantly greater among residents compared to fellows or physician assistants (68 ± 19 min, 57 ± 17 min, 56 ± 14 min). There were no differences in any other perioperative metrics or periprocedural costs for the trigger finger release or cubital tunnel release cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Resident involvement in select upper extremity procedures can lengthen operative times but does not have an impact on blood loss or operating room costs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Surgeons should be aware that having a resident assistant slightly increases operative times in elective hand surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian A Meyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Brian C Goh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - George S M Dyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Houwert RM, Vriens MR. Invited Commentary: Nationwide Study on Stress Perception Among Surgical Residents. World J Surg 2022; 46:1623-1624. [PMID: 35430644 PMCID: PMC9013270 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06560-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ochen Y, Guss D, Houwert RM, Smith JT, DiGiovanni CW, Groenwold RHH, Heng M. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function for Evaluating Outcome After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211022686. [PMID: 34692874 PMCID: PMC8527582 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211022686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There is increased demand for valid, reliable, and responsive
patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate treatment for Achilles
tendon rupture, but not all PROMs currently in use are reliable and
responsive for this condition. Purpose: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes
Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF) compared with
other PROMs used after treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up questionnaire was performed.
All adult patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture between June 2016
and June 2018 with a minimum 12-month follow-up were eligible for inclusion.
Functional outcome was assessed using the PROMIS PF computerized adaptive
test (CAT), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living
(ADL), FAAM–Sports, and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS). Pearson
correlation (r) was used to assess the correlations between
PROMs. Absolute and relative floor and ceiling effects were calculated. Results: In total, 103 patients were included (mean age, 44.7 years; 74% male); 82
patients (79.6%) underwent operative repair, while 21 patients (20.4%)
underwent nonoperative management. The mean time between treatment and
collection of PROMs was 25.3 months (range, 15-36 months). The mean scores
were 55.4 ± 9.2 (PROMIS PF), 92.9 ± 12.2 (FAAM-ADL), 77.7 ± 22.9
(FAAM–Sports), and 83.0 ± 19.4 (ATRS). The ATRS was correlated with FAAM-ADL
(r = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.86; P <
.001) and FAAM–Sports (r = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90;
P < .001). The PROMIS PF was correlated with the
FAAM-ADL (r = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75; P
< .001), FAAM–Sports (r = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75;
P < .001), and ATRS (r = 0.69; 95%
CI, 0.58-0.78; P < .001). The PROMIS PF did not show
absolute floor or ceiling effects (0%). The FAAM-ADL (35.9%), FAAM–Sports
(15.8%), and ATRS (20.4%) had substantial absolute ceiling effects. Conclusion: The PROMIS PF, FAAM-ADL, and FAAM–Sports all showed a moderate to high mutual
correlation with the ATRS. Only the PROMIS PF avoided substantial floor and
ceiling effects. The results suggest that the PROMIS PF CAT is a valid,
reliable, and perhaps the most responsive tool to evaluate patient outcomes
after treatment for an Achilles tendon rupture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassine Ochen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel Guss
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Foot and Ankle Service, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Foot and Ankle Service, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeremy T Smith
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher W DiGiovanni
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Foot and Ankle Service, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Foot and Ankle Service, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jochems D, van Rein E, Niemeijer M, van Heijl M, van Es MA, Nijboer T, Leenen LPH, Houwert RM, van Wessem KJP. Incidence, causes and consequences of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury as determined by Abbreviated Injury Score in the Netherlands. Sci Rep 2021; 11:19985. [PMID: 34620973 PMCID: PMC8497630 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99484-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. Epidemiology seems to be changing. TBIs are increasingly caused by falls amongst elderly, whilst we see less polytrauma due to road traffic accidents (RTA). Data on epidemiology is essential to target prevention strategies. A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted. The Dutch National Trauma Database was used to identify all patients over 17 years old who were admitted to a hospital with moderate and severe TBI (AIS ≥ 3) in the Netherlands from January 2015 until December 2017. Subgroup analyses were done for the elderly and polytrauma patients. 12,295 patients were included in this study. The incidence of moderate and severe TBI was 30/100.000 person-years, 13% of whom died. Median age was 65 years and falls were the most common trauma mechanism, followed by RTAs. Amongst elderly, RTAs consisted mostly of bicycle accidents. Mortality rates were higher for elderly (18%) and polytrauma patients (24%). In this national database more elderly patients who most often sustained the injury due to a fall or an RTA were seen. Bicycle accidents were very frequent, suggesting prevention could be an important aspect in order to decrease morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Jochems
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Eveline van Rein
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Menco Niemeijer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael A van Es
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht and de Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja Nijboer
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn J P van Wessem
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
de la Mar ACJ, Lokerman RD, Waalwijk JF, Ochen Y, van der Vliet QMJ, Hietbrink F, Houwert RM, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. In-house versus on-call trauma surgeon coverage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 91:435-444. [PMID: 33852558 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A rapid trauma response is essential to provide optimal care for severely injured patients. However, it is currently unclear if the presence of an in-house trauma surgeon affects this response during call and influences outcomes. This study compares in-hospital mortality and process-related outcomes of trauma patients treated by a 24/7 in-house versus an on-call trauma surgeon. METHODS PubMed/Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched on the first of November 2020. All studies comparing patients treated by a 24/7 in-house versus an on-call trauma surgeon were considered eligible for inclusion. A meta-analysis of mortality rates including all severely injured patients (i.e., Injury Severity Score of ≥16) was performed. Random-effect models were used to pool mortality rates, reported as risk ratios. The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Process-related outcomes were chosen as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS In total, 16 observational studies, combining 64,337 trauma patients, were included. The meta-analysis included 8 studies, comprising 7,490 severely injured patients. A significant reduction in mortality rate was found in patients treated in the 24/7 in-house trauma surgeon group compared with patients treated in the on-call trauma surgeon group (risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.95; p = 0.002; I2 = 0%). In 10 of 16 studies, at least 1 process-related outcome improved after the in-house trauma surgeon policy was implemented. CONCLUSION A 24/7 in-house trauma surgeon policy is associated with reduced mortality rates for severely injured patients treated at level I trauma centers. In addition, presence of an in-house trauma surgeon during call may improve process-related outcomes. This review recommends implementation of a 24/7 in-house attending trauma surgeon at level I trauma centers. However, the final decision on attendance policy might depend on center and region-specific conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic review/meta-analysis, level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C J de la Mar
- From the Department of Surgery (A.C.J.d.l.M., R.D.L., J.F.W., Y.O., Q.M.J.v.d.V., F.H., R.M.H., M.v.H., L.P.H.L.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Department of Clinical Epidemiology (Y.O.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; and Department of Surgery (M.v.H.), Diakonessenhuis, Zeist, Doorn, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Groenwold RHH, Brenkman HFJ, Houwert RM. [Trials, observational research and the real world]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2021; 165:D5514. [PMID: 34346607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The treatment effect found in a randomized trial does not always correspond to the effect of the treatment in daily practice. To estimate the applicability of the results of a trial, a comparison can be made with the results of observational research. In this commentary we discuss such a comparison between the results of the TIME trial and the analysis of the observational DUCA database. Both compared open and minimally invasive oesophageal resection, yet results were strikingly different. We discuss nine possible explanations for the differences found in the effects of the two treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R H H Groenwold
- LUMC, afd. Klinische Epidemiologie, Leiden(tevens: afd. Biomedical Data Sciences)
- Contact: R.H.H. Groenwold
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Niemeyer MJS, Lokerman RD, Sadiqi S, van Heijl M, Houwert RM, van Wessem KJP, Post MWM, van Koppenhagen CF. Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in the Netherlands: Emergency Medical Service, Hospital, and Functional Outcomes. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2021; 26:243-252. [PMID: 33536729 DOI: 10.46292/sci20-00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Evaluating treatment of traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCIs) from the prehospital phase until postrehabilitation is crucial to improve outcomes of future TSCI patients. Objective To describe the flow of patients with TSCI through the prehospital, hospital, and rehabilitation settings and to relate treatment outcomes to emergency medical services (EMS) transport locations and surgery timing. Method Consecutive TSCI admissions to a level I trauma center (L1TC) in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Corresponding EMS, hospital, and rehabilitation records were assessed. Results A total of 151 patients were included. Their median age was 58 (IQR 37-72) years, with the majority being male (68%) and suffering from cervical spine injuries (75%). In total, 66.2% of the patients with TSCI symptoms were transported directly to an L1TC, and 30.5% were secondarily transferred in from a lower level trauma center. Most injuries were due to falls (63.0%) and traffic accidents (31.1%), mainly bicycle-related. Most patients showed stable vital signs in the ambulance and the emergency department. After hospital discharge, 71 (47.0%) patients were admitted to a rehabilitation hospital, and 34 (22.5%) patients went home. The 30-day mortality rate was 13%. Patients receiving acute surgery (<12 hours) compared to subacute surgery (>12h, <2 weeks) showed no significance in functional independence scores after rehabilitation treatment. Conclusion A surge in age and bicycle-injuries in TSCI patients was observed. A substantial number of patients with TSCI were undertriaged. Acute surgery (<12 hours) showed comparable outcomes results in subacute surgery (>12h, <2 weeks) patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menco J S Niemeyer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Trauma Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R D Lokerman
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Trauma Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S Sadiqi
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Orthopedics, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M van Heijl
- Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Trauma Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - K J P van Wessem
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Trauma Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M W M Post
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Rehabilitation, Groningen, the Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMCU Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C F van Koppenhagen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMCU Brain Center and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van de Wall BJM, Baumgärtner R, Houwert RM, Link BC, Heng M, Knobe M, Groenwold RHH, Babst R, Beeres FJP. MIPO versus nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised clinical trials and observational studies. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 48:47-59. [PMID: 33452548 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01585-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no consensus on the optimal operative technique for humeral shaft fractures. This meta-analysis aims to compare minimal-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures regarding healing, complications and functional results. METHODS PubMed/Medline/Embase/CENTRAL/CINAHL were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing MIPO with nailing for humeral shaft fractures. Effect estimates were pooled across studies using random effects models and presented as weighted odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD), mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Analyses were repeated stratified by study design (RCTs and observational studies). RESULTS A total of 2 RCTs (87 patients) and 5 observational studies (595 patients) were included. The effects estimated in observational studies and RCTs were similar in direction and magnitude for all outcomes except operation duration. MIPO has a lower risk for non-union (RD 7%; OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5) and re-intervention (RD 13%; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8). Functional shoulder (SMD 1.0, 95% CI 0.2-1.8) and elbow scores (SMD 0.4, 95% CI 0-0.8) were better among patients treated with MIPO. The risk for radial nerve palsy following surgery was equal (RD 2%; OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.2) and nerve function recovered spontaneously in all patients in both groups. No difference was detected with regard to infection, time to union and operation duration. CONCLUSION MIPO has a considerable lower risk for non-union and re-intervention, leads to better shoulder function and, to a lesser extent, better elbow function compared to nailing. Although nailing appears to be a viable option, the evidence suggests that MIPO should be the preferred treatment of choice. The learning curve of minimal-invasive plating should, however, be taken into account when interpreting these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan J M van de Wall
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000, Luzern, Switzerland.
| | - Ralf Baumgärtner
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Björn C Link
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopaedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Boston, USA
| | - Matthias Knobe
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Reto Babst
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Frank J P Beeres
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000, Luzern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van de Wall BJM, Ochen Y, Beeres FJP, Babst R, Link BC, Heng M, van der Velde D, Knobe M, Groenwold RHH, Houwert RM. Response to Yin et al regarding: "Conservative vs. operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies". J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:e32-e33. [PMID: 32956777 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan J M van de Wall
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Luzern, Switzerland; Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Yassine Ochen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J P Beeres
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Reto Babst
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Björn C Link
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Matthias Knobe
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Peek J, Beks RB, Hietbrink F, Heng M, De Jong MB, Beeres FJ, Leenen LP, Groenwold RH, Houwert RM. Complications and outcome after rib fracture fixation: A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 89:411-418. [DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
22
|
Peek J, Ochen Y, Saillant N, Groenwold RHH, Leenen LPH, Uribe-Leitz T, Houwert RM, Heng M. Traumatic rib fractures: a marker of severe injury. A nationwide study using the National Trauma Data Bank. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2020; 5:e000441. [PMID: 32550267 PMCID: PMC7292040 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the treatment of patients with rib fractures. However, the current literature on the epidemiology and outcomes of rib fractures is outdated and inconsistent. Furthermore, although it has been suggested that there is a large heterogeneity among patients with traumatic rib fractures, there is insufficient literature reporting on the outcomes of different subgroups. Methods A retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Data Bank was performed. All adult patients with one or more traumatic rib fractures or flail chest who were admitted to a hospital between January 2010 and December 2016 were identified by the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision diagnostic codes. Results Of the 564 798 included patients with one or more rib fractures, 44.9% (n=2 53 564) were patients with polytrauma. Two per cent had open rib fractures (n=11 433, 2.0%) and flail chest was found in 4% (n=23 388, 4.1%) of all cases. Motor vehicle accidents (n=237 995, 51.6%) were the most common cause of rib fractures in patients with polytrauma and flail chest. Blunt chest injury accounted for 95.5% (n=5 39 422) of rib fractures. Rib fractures in elderly patients were predominantly caused by high and low energy falls (n=67 675, 51.9%). Ultimately, 49.5% (n=2 79 615) of all patients were admitted to an intensive care unit, of whom a quarter (n=146 191, 25.9%) required invasive mechanical ventilatory support. The overall mortality rate was 5.6% (n=31 524). Discussion Traumatic rib fractures are a marker of severe injury as approximately half of patients were patients with polytrauma. Furthermore, patients with rib fractures are a very heterogeneous group with a considerable difference in epidemiology, injury characteristics and in-hospital outcomes. Worse outcomes were predominantly observed among patients with polytrauma and flail chest. Future studies should recognize these differences and treatment should be evaluated accordingly. Level of evidence II/III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Peek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yassine Ochen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Noelle Saillant
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Loek P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ochen Y, Peek J, van der Velde D, Beeres FJP, van Heijl M, Groenwold RHH, Houwert RM, Heng M. Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e203497. [PMID: 32324239 PMCID: PMC7180423 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE No consensus has been reached to date regarding the optimal treatment for distal radius fractures. The international rate of operative treatment has been increasing, despite higher costs and limited functional outcome evidence to support this shift. OBJECTIVES To compare functional, clinical, and radiologic outcomes after operative vs nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures in adults. DATA SOURCES The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases were searched from inception to June 15, 2019, for studies comparing operative vs nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting on the following: acute distal radius fracture with operative treatment (internal or external fixation) vs nonoperative treatment (cast immobilization, splinting, or bracing); patients 18 years or older; and functional outcome. Studies in a language other than English or reporting treatment for refracture were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction was performed independently by 2 reviewers. Effect estimates were pooled using random-effects models and presented as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Data were analyzed in September 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measures included medium-term functional outcome measured with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) and the overall complication rate after operative and nonoperative treatment. RESULTS A total of 23 unique studies were included, consisting of 8 RCTs and 15 observational studies, that described 2254 unique patients. Among the studies that presented sex data, 1769 patients were women [80.6%]. Overall weighted mean age was 67 [range, 22-90] years). The RCTs included 656 patients (29.1%); observational studies, 1598 patients (70.9%). The overall pooled effect estimates the showed a significant improvement in medium-term (≤1 year) DASH score after operative treatment compared with nonoperative treatment (MD, -5.22 [95% CI, -8.87 to -1.57]; P = .005; I2 = 84%). No difference in complication rate was observed (RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.69-1.55]; P = .87; I2 = 62%). A significant improvement in grip strength was noted after operative treatment, measured in kilograms (MD, 2.73 [95% CI, 0.15-5.32]; P = .04; I2 = 79%) and as a percentage of the unaffected side (MD, 8.21 [95% CI, 2.26-14.15]; P = .007; I2 = 76%). No improvement in medium-term DASH score was found in the subgroup of studies that only included patients 60 years or older (MD, -0.98 [95% CI, -3.52 to 1.57]; P = .45; I2 = 34%]), compared with a larger improvement in medium-term DASH score after operative treatment in the other studies that included patients 18 years or older (MD, -7.50 [95% CI, -12.40 to -2.60]; P = .003; I2 = 77%); the difference between these subgroups was statically significant (test for subgroup differences, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This meta-analysis suggests that operative treatment of distal radius fractures improves the medium-term DASH score and grip strength compared with nonoperative treatment in adults, with no difference in overall complication rate. The findings suggest that operative treatment might be more effective and have a greater effect on the health and well-being of younger, nonelderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassine Ochen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jesse Peek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rolf H. H. Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R. Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ochen Y, Peek J, McTague MF, Weaver MJ, van der Velde D, Houwert RM, Heng M. Long-term outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Injury 2020; 51:1097-1102. [PMID: 32147141 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To establish normative data, long-term patient-reported functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) after operative treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Secondly, to identify risk factors associated with functional outcome and HrQoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study at two Level I trauma centers. All adult patients with AO/OTA 41-C or Schatzker V/ VI tibial plateau fractures treated between 2001 and 2016 (n = 450) by open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The survey was completed by 214 patients (48%). Primary outcome was patient-reported functional outcome assessed with the PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS PF). Secondary outcomes were HrQoL measured with the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3 L), infection rate, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rate. RESULTS Infection occurred in 26 cases (12%) and TKA was performed in 6 patients (3%). The median PROMIS PF scores was 49.8 (IQR;42-54). The median EQ-5D-3 L was 0.83 (IQR;0.78-1.0).%). The multivariable regression model revealed female gender, diabetes, and worse HrQoL were correlated with worse functional outcome. The multivariable regression model revealed smoking, diabetes, and the subsequent need for TKA to be correlated with worse HrQoL. CONCLUSION The PROMIS PF and EQ-5D-3L did not reach a minimum clinically important difference. The PROMIS PF items revealed patients had no difficulty in walking more than a mile or climbing a flight of stairs. However, patients were limited in doing vigorous activities and patients should be counseled about the expected long-term outcomes. This study emphasizes the correlation between injury specific functional outcome measures and general health measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassine Ochen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jesse Peek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michael F McTague
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Michael J Weaver
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Rein EAJ, van der Sluijs R, Voskens FJ, Lansink KWW, Houwert RM, Lichtveld RA, de Jongh MA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Champion HR, Beeres FJP, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Prehospital Triage of Trauma Patients. JAMA Surg 2020; 154:421-429. [PMID: 30725101 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Importance Prehospital trauma triage protocols are used worldwide to get the right patient to the right hospital and thereby improve the chance of survival and avert lifelong disabilities. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma set target levels for undertriage rates of less than 5%. None of the existing triage protocols has been able to achieve this target in isolation. Objective To develop and validate a new prehospital trauma triage protocol to improve current triage rates. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter cohort study, all patients with trauma who were 16 years and older and transported to a trauma center in 2 different regions of the Netherlands were included in the analysis. Data were collected from January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2014, in the Central Netherlands region for the design data cohort and from January 1 through December 31, 2015, in the Brabant region for the validation cohort. Data were analyzed from May 3, 2017, through July 19, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures A new prediction model was developed in the Central Netherlands region based on prehospital predictors associated with severe injury. Severe injury was defined as an Injury Severity Score greater than 15. A full-model strategy with penalized maximum likelihood estimation was used to construct a model with 8 predictors that were chosen based on clinical reasoning. Accuracy of the developed prediction model was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. The model was externally validated in the Brabant region. Results Using data from 4950 patients with trauma from the Central Netherlands region for the design data set (58.3% male; mean [SD] age, 47 [21] years) and 6859 patients for the validation Brabant region (52.2% male; mean [SD] age, 51 [22] years), the following 8 significant predictors were selected for the prediction model: age; systolic blood pressure; Glasgow Coma Scale score; mechanism criteria; penetrating injury to the head, thorax, or abdomen; signs and/or symptoms of head or neck injury; expected injury in the Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax region; and expected injury in 2 or more Abbreviated Injury Scale regions. The prediction model showed a C statistic of 0.823 (95% CI, 0.813-0.832) and good calibration. The cutoff point with a minimum specificity of 50.0% (95% CI, 49.3%-50.7%) led to a sensitivity of 88.8% (95% CI, 87.5%-90.0%). External validation showed a C statistic of 0.831 (95% CI, 0.814-0.848) and adequate calibration. Conclusions and Relevance The new prehospital trauma triage prediction model may lower undertriage rates to approximately 10% with an overtriage rate of 50%. The next step should be to implement this prediction model with the use of a mobile app for emergency medical services professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline A J van Rein
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier van der Sluijs
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J Voskens
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Koen W W Lansink
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob A Lichtveld
- Regional Ambulance Facility Utrecht, Utrecht Regional Ambulance Service, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mariska A de Jongh
- Network Emergency Care Brabant, Brabant Trauma Registry, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Howard R Champion
- SimQuest Solutions Inc, Annapolis, Maryland.,Section of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Frank J P Beeres
- Department of Traumatology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hellebrekers P, Rentenaar RJ, McNally MA, Hietbrink F, Houwert RM, Leenen LPH, Govaert GAM. Getting it right first time: The importance of a structured tissue sampling protocol for diagnosing fracture-related infections. Injury 2019; 50:1649-1655. [PMID: 31208777 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fracture-related infection (FRI) is an important complication following surgical fracture management. Key to successful treatment is an accurate diagnosis. To this end, microbiological identification remains the gold standard. Although a structured approach towards sampling specimens for microbiology seems logical, there is no consensus on a culture protocol for FRI. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a structured microbiology sampling protocol for fracture-related infections compared to ad-hoc culture sampling. METHODS We conducted a pre-/post-implementation cohort study that compared the effects of implementation of a structured FRI sampling protocol. The protocol included strict criteria for sampling and interpretation of tissue cultures for microbiology. All intraoperative samples from suspected or confirmed FRI were compared for culture results. Adherence to the protocol was described for the post-implementation cohort. RESULTS In total 101 patients were included, 49 pre-implementation and 52 post-implementation. From these patients 175 intraoperative culture sets were obtained, 96 and 79 pre- and post-implementation respectively. Cultures from the pre-implementation cohort showed significantly more antibiotic use during culture sampling (P = 0.002). The post-implementation cohort showed a tendency more positive culture sets (69% vs. 63%), with a significant difference in open wounds (86% vs. 67%, P = 0.034). In all post-implementation culture sets causative pathogens were cultured more than once per set, in contrast to pre-implementation. Despite stricter tissue sampling and culture interpretation criteria, the number of polymicrobial infections was similar in both cohorts, approximately 29% of all culture sets and 44% of all positive culture sets. Significantly more polymicrobial cultures were found in early infections in the post-implementation cohort (P = 0.048). This indicates a better yield in the new protocol. CONCLUSION A standardised protocol for intraoperative sampling for bacterial identification in FRI is superior than an ad-hoc approach. It has a positive effect on both surgeon and microbiologist by increasing awareness about the problem at hand. This resulted in more microbiologically confirmed infections and more certainty when identifying causative pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hellebrekers
- Department of Traumasurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R J Rentenaar
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M A McNally
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, United Kingdom
| | - F Hietbrink
- Department of Traumasurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- Department of Traumasurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - L P H Leenen
- Department of Traumasurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G A M Govaert
- Department of Traumasurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
van der Vliet QMJ, Sweet AAR, Bhashyam AR, Ferree S, van Heijl M, Houwert RM, Leenen LPH, Hietbrink F. Polytrauma and High-energy Injury Mechanisms are Associated with Worse Patient-reported Outcomes After Distal Radius Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:2267-2275. [PMID: 30985610 PMCID: PMC6999931 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly relevant when evaluating the treatment of orthopaedic injuries. Little is known about how PROs may vary in the setting of polytrauma or secondary to high-energy injury mechanisms, even for common injuries such as distal radius fractures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Are polytrauma and high-energy injury mechanisms associated with poorer long-term PROs (EuroQol Five Dimension Three Levels [EQ-5D-3L] and QuickDASH scores) after distal radius fractures? (2) What are the median EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS [EuroQol VAS], and QuickDASH scores for distal radius fractures in patients with polytrauma, high-energy monotrauma and low-energy monotrauma METHODS: This was a retrospective study with followup by questionnaire. Patients treated both surgically and conservatively for distal radius fractures at a single Level 1 trauma center between 2008 and 2015 were approached to complete questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-VAS) and wrist function (the QuickDASH). Patients were grouped according to those with polytrauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥ 16), high-energy trauma (ISS < 16), and low-energy trauma based on the ISS score and injury mechanism. Initially, 409 patients were identified, of whom 345 met the inclusion criteria for followup. Two hundred sixty-five patients responded (response rate, 77% for all patients; 75% for polytrauma patients; 76% for high-energy monotrauma; 78% for low-energy monotrauma (p = 0.799 for difference between the groups). There were no major differences in baseline characteristics between respondents and nonrespondents. The association between polytrauma and high-energy injury mechanisms and PROs was assessed using forward stepwise regression modeling after performing simple bivariate linear regression analyses to identify associations between individual factors and PROs. Median outcome scores were calculated and presented. RESULTS Polytrauma (intraarticular: β -0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.21 to -0.02]; p = 0.015) was associated with lower HRQoL and poorer wrist function (extraarticular: β 11.9; 95% CI, 0.4-23.4; p = 0.043; intraarticular: β 8.2; 95% CI, 2.1-14.3; p = 0.009). High-energy was associated with worse QuickDASH scores as well (extraarticular: β 9.5; 95% CI, 0.8-18.3; p = 0.033; intraarticular: β 11.8; 95% CI, 5.7-17.8; p < 0.001). For polytrauma, high-energy trauma, and low-energy trauma, the respective median EQ-5D-3L outcome scores were 0.84 (range, -0.33 to 1.00), 0.85 (range, 0.17-1.00), and 1.00 (range, 0.174-1.00). The VAS scores were 79 (range, 30-100), 80 (range, 50-100), and 80 (range, 40-100), and the QuickDASH scores were 7 (range, 0- 82), 11 (range, 0-73), and 5 (range, 0-66), respectively. CONCLUSIONS High-energy injury mechanisms and worse HRQoL scores were independently associated with slightly inferior wrist function after wrist fractures. Along with relatively well-known demographic and injury characteristics (gender and articular involvement), factors related to injury context (polytrauma, high-energy trauma) may account for differences in patient-reported wrist function after distal radius fractures. This information may be used to counsel patients who suffer a wrist fracture from polytrauma or high-energy trauma and to put their outcomes in context. Future research should prospectively explore whether our findings can be used to help providers to set better expectations on expected recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q M J van der Vliet
- Q. M. J. van der Vliet, A. A. R. Sweet, A. R. Bhashyam, R. M. Houwert, L. P. H. Leenen, F. Hietbrink, University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Traumatology, Utrecht, The Netherlands S. Ferree, M. van Heijl, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lokerman RD, Smeeing DPJ, Hietbrink F, van Heijl M, Houwert RM. Treatment of a Scientifically Neglected Ankle Injury: The Isolated Medial Malleolar Fracture. A Systematic Review. J Foot Ankle Surg 2019; 58:959-968. [PMID: 31178394 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Isolated medial malleolar fractures are frequently encountered injuries. Literature regarding their treatment, though, is scarce and contradicting. The aim of this systematic review is to compare surgical and conservative treatment of isolated medial malleolar fractures considering complication rates and functional outcomes. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for this review. Articles from 1980 or later, written in English, French, German, or Dutch, reporting any outcome of 10 or more isolated medial malleolar fractures in skeletally mature patients were included. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non Randomized Studies (MINORS) instrument. Eighteen studies were included involving 2566 isolated medial malleolar fractures, which showed a mean (± SD) MINORS score of 8 ± 2. Mean nonunion rate was 1.7% after surgical treatment and 3.5% after conservative treatment. Overall, comparable functional outcomes were found after both treatment methods. Only 2 of the included studies reported the exact amount of fracture displacement. One study-comparing surgical and conservative treatment-showed similar functional outcomes for 1- and 2-mm displaced isolated medial malleolar fractures, and the other, a nonunion rate of 3.5% and a good mean functional outcome in 57 conservatively treated isolated medial malleolar fractures with a mean displacement of 3.8 mm. The available evidence is scarce and of low quality but suggests that conservative treatment of isolated medial malleolar fractures displaced ≤2 mm is safe. No study exists that compares surgical and conservative treatment in isolated medial malleolar fractures displaced >2 mm. Therefore, further research is needed. Until then, the eventual choice of treatment for isolated medial malleolar fractures displaced >2 mm, might be mainly dependent on the patients' characteristics and demands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin D Lokerman
- PhD Student, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Diederik P J Smeeing
- Surgical Resident, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Trauma Surgeon, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Trauma Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Trauma Surgeon, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hundersmarck D, van Koperen PJ, Leenen LPH, de Borst GJ, Houwert RM, Hietbrink F. [Not Available]. NEDERLANDS TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR GENEESKUNDE 2019; 163:D2879. [PMID: 31424702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) as a result of stabbing or deliberate self-harm are complex and potentially life-threatening. Nowadays, selective non-operative management of PNI has become common practice. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms originating from high-volume trauma centres in South-Africa and North-America are used in Dutch clinical practice. Three patients that sustained a PNI are discussed. Two patients, aged 61 and 37, only had mild signs on physical examination that justified additional diagnostic investigations. In the first patient, a penetrating oesophageal injury was found and repaired. The latter had a partial Horner syndrome as a result of PNI, no underlying injuries were found. One patient, aged 57, was haemodynamically unstable and therefore received immediate surgical exploration of the neck. A penetrating injury of the jugular vein was discovered and repaired. A summary of literature and guidelines is presented for the benefit of Dutch physicians that may be confronted with these complex injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Hundersmarck
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, afd. Heelkunde, Utrecht
- Contact: D. Hundersmarck
| | | | - Loek P H Leenen
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, afd. Heelkunde, Utrecht
| | - Gert J de Borst
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, afd. Heelkunde, Utrecht
| | | | - Falco Hietbrink
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, afd. Heelkunde, Utrecht
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hundersmarck D, van Koperen PJ, Leenen LPH, de Borst GJ, Houwert RM, Hietbrink F. [Penetrating neck injury caused by stabbing: a rare but complex problem in the Netherlands]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2019; 163:D2879. [PMID: 31433138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) as a result of stabbing or deliberate self-harm are complex and potentially life-threatening. Nowadays, selective non-operative management of PNI has become common practice. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms originating from high-volume trauma centres in South-Africa and North-America are used in Dutch clinical practice. Three patients that sustained a PNI are discussed. Two patients, aged 61 and 37, only had mild signs on physical examination that justified additional diagnostic investigations. In the first patient, a penetrating oesophageal injury was found and repaired. The latter had a partial Horner syndrome as a result of PNI, no underlying injuries were found. One patient, aged 57, was haemodynamically unstable and therefore received immediate surgical exploration of the neck. A penetrating injury of the jugular vein was discovered and repaired. A summary of literature and guidelines is presented for the benefit of Dutch physicians that may be confronted with these complex injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Hundersmarck
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, afd. Heelkunde, Utrecht
- Contact: D. Hundersmarck
| | | | - Loek P H Leenen
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, afd. Heelkunde, Utrecht
| | - Gert J de Borst
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, afd. Heelkunde, Utrecht
| | | | - Falco Hietbrink
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, afd. Heelkunde, Utrecht
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bhashyam AR, van der Vliet QMJ, Houwert RM, Simmermacher RKJ, Brink P, de Boer P, Leenen LPH. Redesigning an International Orthopaedic CME Course: The Effects on Participant Engagement over 5 Years. J Eur CME 2019; 8:1633193. [PMID: 31263631 PMCID: PMC6598514 DOI: 10.1080/21614083.2019.1633193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The time required to observe changes in participant evaluation of continuing medical education (CME) courses in surgical fields is unclear. We investigated the time required to observe changes in participant evaluation of an orthopaedic course after educational redesign using aggregate course-level data obtained from 1359 participants who attended one of 23 AO Davos Courses over a 5-year period between 2007 and 2011. Participants evaluated courses using two previously validated, 5-point Likert scales based on content and faculty performance, and we compared results between groups that underwent educational redesign incorporating serial needs assessment, problem-based learning, and faculty training initiatives (Masters Course), and those that did not (Non-Masters Course). Average scores for the usefulness and relevancy of a course and faculty performance were significantly higher for redesigned courses (p < 0.0001) and evaluations were significantly improved for both groups after faculty training was formalised in 2009 (p < 0.001). In summary, educational redesign incorporating serial needs assessment, problem-based learning, and faculty training initiatives were associated with improvement in participant evaluation, but these changes required 4–5 years to become evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhiram R Bhashyam
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Brink
- Department of Traumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Briet JP, Hietbrink F, Smeeing DP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Verleisdonk EJ, Houwert RM. Ankle Fracture Classification: An Innovative System for Describing Ankle Fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg 2019; 58:492-496. [PMID: 30795890 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
A good classification system is important for clinical handoffs, research, and clinical treatment guidelines. A reliable classification system shows good interobserver and intraobserver agreement. This study analyzed the interobserver and intraobserver agreement of a descriptive system for ankle fractures and the Lauge-Hansen classification. Three groups of observers (experts, semiexperts, and novices) scored a total of 20 ankle radiographs. All ankle radiographs were classified according to the Lauge-Hansen and Danis-Weber classifications. The ankle fractures were subsequently reviewed in a descriptive manner for the following features: number of affected malleoli, type of fracture of the lateral and medial malleolus, and congruence of the ankle joint. After 2 weeks, the same set of radiographs were reviewed. For interobserver and intraobserver variability, the separate groups were used for analysis, and the Fleiss (multirater) κ values were calculated. The interobserver agreement for the Lauge-Hansen classification was moderate for the experts, fair for semiexperts, and slight for novices (κ = 0.45, κ = 0.37, and κ = 0.16). All factors of the descriptive system had better interobserver agreement than the Lauge-Hansen classification, except for the agreement on the type of fracture of the lateral malleolus. The intraobserver agreement of the Lauge-Hansen classification was substantial for the experts, moderate for the semiexperts, and fair for the novice observers (κ = 0.70, κ = 0.49, and κ = 0.26). The intraobserver agreement was better for all factors of the descriptive system compared with the Lauge-Hansen classification. The descriptive system presented in this study shows less variability between observers than the Lauge-Hansen classification. This system has clinical implications and is easy to use for clinicians with mixed levels of experience. It has the potential to improve clinical and research handoffs and overcome the limitations of current classification systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Paul Briet
- Surgical Resident, Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Trauma Surgeon, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Statistician, Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Egbert Jan Verleisdonk
- Trauma Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Trauma Surgeon, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Trauma Surgeon, Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lemans JVC, Wijdicks SPJ, Boot W, Govaert GAM, Houwert RM, Öner FC, Kruyt MC. Intrawound Treatment for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Instrumented Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Comparative Effectiveness Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J 2019; 9:219-230. [PMID: 30984503 PMCID: PMC6448203 DOI: 10.1177/2192568218786252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy of intrawound treatments in reducing deep surgical site infections (SSIs) in instrumented spinal surgery. METHODS The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were systematically searched for intrawound treatments for the prevention of SSIs in clean instrumented spine surgery. Both randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies were included. The results of included studies were pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS After full text- and reference screening, 20 articles were included. There were 2 randomized controlled trials and 18 observational studies. Sixteen studies investigated the use of intrawound antibiotics, and 4 studies investigated the use of intrawound antiseptics. The relative risk of deep SSI for any treatment was 0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.44, P < .0001), a significant reduction compared with controls receiving no treatment. For patients treated with local antibiotics the relative risk was 0.29 (95% CI 0.17-0.51, P < .0001), and patients treated with local antiseptics had a relative risk of 0.14 (95% CI 0.05-0.44, P = .0006). CONCLUSIONS Both the use of antibiotic and antiseptic intrawound prophylactics was associated with a significant 3 to 7 times reduction of deep SSIs in instrumented spine surgery. No adverse events were reported in the included studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin V. C. Lemans
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht,
Netherlands
| | | | - Willemijn Boot
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht,
Netherlands
| | | | - R. Marijn Houwert
- Utrecht Traumacenter, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht,
Netherlands
| | - F. Cumhur Öner
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht,
Netherlands
| | - Moyo C. Kruyt
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht,
Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bosman WMPF, Emmink BL, Bhashyam AR, Houwert RM, Keizer J. Intramedullary screw fixation for simple displaced olecranon fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019; 46:83-89. [PMID: 30879100 PMCID: PMC7026218 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01114-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Olecranon fractures are common and typically require surgical fixation due to displacement generated by the pull of the triceps muscle. The most common techniques for repairing olecranon fractures are tension-band wiring or plate fixation, but these methods are associated with high rates of implant-related soft-tissue irritation. Another treatment option is fixation with an intramedullary screw, but less is known about surgical results using this strategy. Thus, the purpose of this study was to report the clinical and functional outcomes of olecranon fractures treated with an intramedullary cannulated screw. Methods We identified 15 patients (average age at index procedure 44 years, range 16–83) with a Mayo type I or IIA olecranon fracture who were treated with an intramedullary cannulated screw at a single level 2 trauma center between 2012 and 2017. The medical record was reviewed to assess radiographic union, postoperative range of motion and complications (including hardware removal). Patient-reported outcome was evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Average follow-up was 22 months (range 8–36 months). Results By the 6th month post-operative visit, 14 patients had complete union of their fracture and 1 patient had an asymptomatic non-union that did not require further intervention. Average flexion was 145° (range 135–160) and the average extension lag was 11° (range 0–30). Implants were removed in 5 patients due to soft-tissue irritation. Average DASH score (± standard deviation) by final follow-up was 16 ± 10. Conclusions Fixation of simple olecranon fractures with an intramedullary screw is a safe and easy fixation method in young patients, leading to good functional and radiological results. Compared to available data, less hardware removal is necessary than with tension-band wiring or plate fixation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem-Maarten P F Bosman
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Benjamin L Emmink
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Abhiram R Bhashyam
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jort Keizer
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ochen Y, Frima H, Houwert RM, Heng M, van Heijl M, Verleisdonk EJMM, van der Velde D. Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019; 29:989-997. [PMID: 30847678 PMCID: PMC6570672 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02411-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Different fixation methods are used for treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures (LCF). Definitive consensus and guidelines for the surgical fixation of LCF have not been established. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the clavicle hook plate (CHP) and the superior clavicle plate with lateral extension (SCPLE). Methods A dual-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients operatively treated for unstable Neer type II and type V LCF between 2011 and 2016, with the CHP (n = 23) or SCPLE (n = 53), were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcomes were the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, complications, and implant removal. Results A total of 67 patients (88%) were available for the final follow-up. There was a significant difference in bicortical lateral fragment size, 15 mm (± 4, range 6–21) in the CPH group compared to 20 mm (± 8, range 8–43) in the SCPLE group (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score (CHP; 0.00 [IQR 0.0–0.0], SCPLE; 0.00 [IQR 0.0–4.5]; p = 0.073) or other functional outcome scores (NRS at rest; p = 0.373, NRS during activity; p = 0.559). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score or other functional outcome scores between Neer type II and type V fractures. There was no significant difference in complication rate, CHP 11% and SCPLE 8% (relative risk 1.26; [95% CI 0.25–6.33; p = 0.777]). The implant removal rate was 100% in the CHP group compared to 42% in the SCPLE group (relative risk 2.40; [95% CI 1.72–3.35; p ≤ 0.001]). Conclusion Both the CHP and SCPLE are effective fixation methods for the treatment of unstable LCF, resulting in excellent patient-reported functional outcome and similar complication rates. SCPLE fixation is an effective fixation method for the treatment of both Neer type II and type V LCF. The SCPLE has a lower implant removal rate. Therefore, if technically feasible, we recommend SCPLE fixation for the treatment of unstable LCF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassine Ochen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. .,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
| | - Herman Frima
- Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Frima H, Michelitsch C, Beks RB, Houwert RM, Acklin YP, Sommer C. Long-term follow-up after MIPO Philos plating for proximal humerus fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139:203-209. [PMID: 30421113 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-3063-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been described as a suitable technique for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures, but long-term functional results have never been reported. The aim of this study was to describe the long-term functional outcome and implant-related irritation after MIPO for proximal humerus fractures. METHODS A long-term prospective cohort analysis was performed on all patients treated for a proximal humerus fracture using MIPO with a Philos plate (Synthes, Switzerland) between December 2007 and October 2010. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcome measures were the subjective shoulder value (SSV), implant related irritation and implant removal. RESULTS Seventy-nine out of 97 patients (81%) with a mean age of 59 years were available for follow-up. The mean follow-up was 8.3 years (SD 0.8). The mean QuickDASH score was 5.6 (SD 14). The mean SSV was 92 (SD 11). Forty out of 79 patients (50.6%) had implant removal, and of those, 27/40 (67.5%) were due to implant-related irritation. On average, the implant was removed after 1.2 years (SD 0.5). In bivariate analysis, there was an association between the AO classification and the QuickDASH (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using MIPO with Philos through a deltoid split approach showed promising results. A good function can be assumed due to the excellent scores of patient oriented questionnaires. However, about one-third of the patients will have a second operation for implant removal due to implant-related irritation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Frima
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland.
| | - C Michelitsch
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland
| | - R B Beks
- Utrecht Traumacenter, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- Utrecht Traumacenter, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Y P Acklin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland
| | - C Sommer
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van Bussel EM, Houwert RM, Kootstra TJM, van Heijl M, Van der Velde D, Wittich P, Keizer J. Antegrade intramedullary Kirschner-wire fixation of displaced metacarpal shaft fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019; 45:65-71. [PMID: 28913569 PMCID: PMC6394543 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0836-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to analyze complications and patient-related functional outcome after antegrade intramedullary Kirschner-wire fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. METHODS All consecutive patients treated from January 2010 until December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed using patient logs and radiographic images. Indications for operative fixation were angulation > 40°, shortening > 2 mm, or rotational deficit. Complications were registered from the patient logs. Functional outcome was assessed with the Patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH) questionnaire both ranging from 1 to 100 after a minimum follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS During the study period, 34 fractures of 27 patients could be included. Mean outpatient follow-up was 11 weeks (range 4-24 weeks). The mean interval for functional assessment was 30 months (range 8-62 months) and 19 patients (70%) responded to the questionnaires. During outpatient follow-up, all fractures proceeded to union with no signs of secondary fracture dislocation or implant migration. One re-fracture after a new adequate trauma was seen and one patient underwent tenolysis due to persistent pain and impaired function. In 26 cases (81%), the K-wires were removed of which 23 (68%) were planned removals. Functional outcome was excellent with mean PRWHE and DASH scores of 7 and 5 points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS If surgical treatment for metacarpal shaft fractures is considered, we recommend antegrade intramedullary K-wire fixation. This technique results in low complication rates and excellent functional outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M van Bussel
- Department of Traumatology, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - R M Houwert
- Department of Traumatology, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - T J M Kootstra
- Department of Traumatology, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - M van Heijl
- Department of Traumatology, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - D Van der Velde
- Department of Traumatology, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Ph Wittich
- Department of Traumatology, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - J Keizer
- Department of Traumatology, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ochen Y, Beks RB, van Heijl M, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, van der Velde D, Heng M, van der Meijden O, Groenwold RHH, Houwert RM. Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 364:k5120. [PMID: 30617123 PMCID: PMC6322065 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k5120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare re-rupture rate, complication rate, and functional outcome after operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; to compare re-rupture rate after early and late full weight bearing; to evaluate re-rupture rate after functional rehabilitation with early range of motion; and to compare effect estimates from randomised controlled trials and observational studies. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES PubMed/Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were last searched on 25 April 2018 for studies comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials and observational studies reporting on comparison of operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. DATA EXTRACTION Data extraction was performed independently in pairs, by four reviewers, with the use of a predefined data extraction file. Outcomes were pooled using random effects models and presented as risk difference, risk ratio, or mean difference, with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS 29 studies were included-10 randomised controlled trials and 19 observational studies. The 10 trials included 944 (6%) patients, and the 19 observational studies included 14 918 (94%) patients. A significant reduction in re-ruptures was seen after operative treatment (2.3%) compared with nonoperative treatment (3.9%) (risk difference 1.6%; risk ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.60; P<0.001; I2=22%). Operative treatment resulted in a significantly higher complication rate than nonoperative treatment (4.9% v 1.6%; risk difference 3.3%; risk ratio 2.76, 1.84 to 4.13; P<0.001; I2=45%). The main difference in complication rate was attributable to the incidence of infection (2.8%) in the operative group. A similar reduction in re-rupture rate in favour of operative treatment was seen after both early and late full weight bearing. No significant difference in re-rupture rate was seen between operative and nonoperative treatment in studies that used accelerated functional rehabilitation with early range of motion (risk ratio 0.60, 0.26 to 1.37; P=0.23; I2=0%). No difference in effect estimates was seen between randomised controlled trials and observational studies. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis shows that operative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures reduces the risk of re-rupture compared with nonoperative treatment. However, re-rupture rates are low and differences between treatment groups are small (risk difference 1.6%). Operative treatment results in a higher risk of other complications (risk difference 3.3%). The final decision on the management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures should be based on patient specific factors and shared decision making. This review emphasises the potential benefits of adding high quality observational studies in meta-analyses for the evaluation of objective outcome measures after surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassine Ochen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Reinier B Beks
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Marilyn Heng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Frima H, Houwert RM, Beks RB, van Heijl M, van der Velde D, Beeres FJP. [Proximal humerus fractures; conservative or surgical treatment?]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2019; 163:D3096. [PMID: 30638000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
There is an increasing incidence of proximal humerus fractures. Patients with proximal humerus fractures have traditionally been treated conservatively. During the past decades, however, various new osteosynthetic and prosthetic implants have been developed for the shoulder and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures has increased. However, recent literature in which conservative and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures is compared has shown no difference in functional outcome. The trend towards more frequent surgical treatment is thus not based on scientific evidence. In this article, we present the current state of affairs and attempt to give a nuanced picture of who will not, but also who might profit from surgical treatment of a proximal humerus fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herman Frima
- Kantonsspital Graubünden, afd. Traumachirurgie, Chur, Zwitserland
- Contact: H. Frima
| | | | | | | | | | - Frank J P Beeres
- Luzerner Kantonsspital, afd. Traumachirurgie, Luzern, Zwitserland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Plate JDJ, Peelen LM, Leenen LPH, Houwert RM, Hietbrink F. Joint management format at the mixed-surgical intermediate care unit: an interrupted time series analysis. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2018; 3:e000177. [PMID: 30402555 PMCID: PMC6203139 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The management format of the mixed-surgical intermediate care unit (IMCU) affects its performance. A format of combined supervision of surgeons with additional critical care certifications and admitting specialists, named the “joint format”, may herein be a promising new model of specialized critical care. This study aims to assess the performance of the joint management format. Methods This observational cohort study compared three IMCU management formats at the stand-alone, mixed-surgical IMCU of a tertiary referral hospital using interrupted time series analyses. All admissions from 2001 until 2015 were included. Predetermined criteria for performance (utilization, efficiency, and safety) were applied to three different management format periods: open (2001–2006), closed (2006–2011), and joint (2011–2015) formats. Results A total of 8894 admissions were analyzed. In terms of case load (utilization), there was an overall increase in the number of surgical patients (0.25%/year) (p<0.001), age (0.38/year) (p<0.001), and readmissions from the ward (0.16%/year) (p<0.001) and from the intensive care unit (ICU) (0.17%/year) (p=0.014). In terms of efficiency, the admission duration decreased (1.58 hours/year) (p<0.001). Transfer to the ICU within 24 hours, readmission within 24 hours from the ward, and unplanned mortality (eg, safety) did not change over time. Discussion At a time of increasingly complex case load, the joint format at the mixed-surgical IMCU is an efficient and safe management format in which the admitting specialist continues to provide specialized care. Specialty-specific supervision at IMCUs is a safe option which should be considered in healthcare policy decisions. Level of evidence Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost D J Plate
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda M Peelen
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Plate JDJ, Peelen LM, Leenen LPH, Houwert RM, Hietbrink F. Assessment of the intermediate care unit triage system. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2018; 3:e000178. [PMID: 30234163 PMCID: PMC6135419 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An important critique with respect to the utilization of intermediate care units (IMCU) is that they potentially admit patients who would otherwise be cared for on the regular ward. This would lead to an undesired waste of critical care resources. This article aims to (1) describe the caseload at the IMCU and (2) to assess the triage system at the IMCU to determine potentially unnecessary admissions. METHODS This cohort study included all admissions at the mixed-surgical IMCU from 2001 to 2015. The Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) was prospectively collected for all admissions to describe the caseload at the IMCU and to identify medical criteria for admission. These were combined with logistical criteria to assess the IMCU triage system. RESULTS A total of 8816 admissions were included in the study. The average TISS-28 was 20.19 (95% CI 18.05 to 22.33), corresponding with 3.57 (95% CI 3.19 to 3.94) hours of direct patient-related work per patient per nursing shift. Over time, this increased by an average of 0.27 points/year (p<0.001). Of all admissions, 6539 (74.2%) were medically considered to be justly admitted, and 7093 (80.4%) were logistically considered to be justly admitted. With these criteria combined, a total of 8324 (94.4%) were correctly admitted. DISCUSSION Most admissions to the IMCU are medically and/or logistically necessary, as the majority of admitted patients demand a higher level of nursing care than available on the general ward. Continuous triage is thereby essential. These findings support further utilization of the IMCU in our current healthcare system and has important implications for IMCU-related management decisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level VI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost D J Plate
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda M Peelen
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jochems D, Leenen LPH, Hietbrink F, Houwert RM, van Wessem KJP. Increased reduction in exsanguination rates leaves brain injury as the only major cause of death in blunt trauma. Injury 2018; 49:1661-1667. [PMID: 29903577 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Central nervous system (CNS) related injuries and exsanguination have been the most common causes of death in trauma for decades. Despite improvements in haemorrhage control in recent years exsanguination is still a major cause of death. We conducted a prospective database study to investigate the current incidence of haemorrhage related mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective database study of all trauma patients admitted to an urban major trauma centre between January 2007 and December 2016 was conducted. All in-hospital trauma deaths were included. Cause of death was reviewed by a panel of trauma surgeons. Patients who were dead on arrival were excluded. Trends in demographics and outcome were analysed per year. Further, 2 time periods (2007-2012 and 2013-2016) were selected representing periods before and after implementation of haemostatic resuscitation and damage control procedures in our hospital to analyse cause of death into detail. RESULTS 11,553 trauma patients were admitted, 596 patients (5.2%) died. Mean age of deceased patients was 61 years and 61% were male. Mechanism of injury (MOI) was blunt in 98% of cases. Mean ISS was 28 with head injury the most predominant injury (mean AIS head 3.4). There was no statistically significant difference in sex and MOI over time. Even though deceased patients were older in 2016 compared to 2007 (67 vs. 46 years, p < 0.001), mortality was lower in later years (p = 0.02). CNS related injury was the main cause of death in the whole decade; 58% of patients died of CNS in 2007-2012 compared to 76% of patients in 2013-2016 (p = 0.001). In 2007-2012 9% died of exsanguination compared to 3% in 2013-2016 (p = 0.001). DISCUSSION In this cohort in a major trauma centre death by exsanguination has decreased to 3% of trauma deaths. The proportion of traumatic brain injury has increased over time and has become the most common cause of death in blunt trauma. Besides on-going prevention of brain injury future studies should focus on treatment strategies preventing secondary damage of the brain once the injury has occurred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Jochems
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L P H Leenen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Hietbrink
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K J P van Wessem
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Beks RB, Ochen Y, Frima H, Smeeing DPJ, van der Meijden O, Timmers TK, van der Velde D, van Heijl M, Leenen LPH, Groenwold RHH, Houwert RM. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27:1526-1534. [PMID: 29735376 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus on the choice of treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in older patients (aged > 65 years). The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were (1) to compare operative with nonoperative management of displaced proximal humeral fractures and (2) to compare effect estimates obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. METHODS The databases of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched on September 5, 2017, for studies comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures; both RCTs and observational studies were included. The criteria of the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies, a validated instrument for methodologic quality assessment, were used to assess study quality. The primary outcome measure was physical function as measured by the absolute Constant-Murley score after operative or nonoperative treatment. Secondary outcome measures were major reinterventions, nonunion, and avascular necrosis. RESULTS We included 22 studies, comprising 7 RCTs and 15 observational studies, resulting in 1743 patients in total: 910 treated operatively and 833 nonoperatively. The average age was 68.3 years, and 75% of patients were women. There was no difference in functional outcome between operative and nonoperative treatment, with a mean difference of -0.87 (95% confidence interval, -5.13 to 3.38; P = .69; I2 = 69%). Major reinterventions occurred more often in the operative group. Pooled effects of RCTs were similar to pooled effects of observational studies for all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS We recommend nonoperative treatment for the average elderly patient (aged > 65 years) with a displaced proximal humeral fracture. Pooled effects of observational studies were similar to those of RCTs, and including observational studies led to more generalizable conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier B Beks
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Yassine Ochen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Frima
- Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Tim K Timmers
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Julius Center for Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bosch P, van den Kieboom J, Plate JDJ, IJpma FFA, Houwert RM, Huisman A, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, Govaert GAM. Limited Predictive Value of Serum Inflammatory Markers for Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infections: results of a large retrospective multicenter cohort study. J Bone Jt Infect 2018; 3:130-137. [PMID: 30013894 PMCID: PMC6043470 DOI: 10.7150/jbji.26492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infections (FRI) based on clinical symptoms alone can be challenging and additional diagnostic tools such as serum inflammatory markers are often utilized. The aims of this study were 1) to determine the individual diagnostic performance of three commonly used serum inflammatory markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Leukocyte Count (LC) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and 2) to determine the diagnostic performance of a combination of these markers, and the additional value of including clinical parameters predictive of FRI. Methods: This cohort study included patients who presented with a suspected FRI at two participating level I academic trauma centers between February 1st 2009 and December 31st 2017. The parameters CRP, LC and ESR, determined at diagnostic work-up of the suspected FRI, were retrieved from hospital records. The gold standard for diagnosing or ruling out FRI was defined as: positive microbiology results of surgically obtained tissue samples, or absence of FRI at a clinical follow-up of at least six months. The diagnostic accuracy of the individual serum inflammatory markers was assessed. Analyses were done with both dichotomized values using hospital thresholds as well as with continuous values. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain the discriminative performance (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic, AUROC) of (1) the combined inflammatory markers, and (2) the added value of these markers to clinical parameters. Results: A total of 168 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. CRP had a 38% sensitivity, 34% specificity, 42% positive predictive value (PPV) and 78% negative predictive value (NPV). For LC this was 39%, 74%, 46% and 67% and for ESR 62%, 64%, 45% and 76% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 52%, 61% and 80% respectively. The AUROC was 0.64 for CRP, 0.60 for LC and 0.58 for ESR. The AUROC of the combined inflammatory markers was 0.63. Serum inflammatory markers combined with clinical parameters resulted in AUROC of 0.66 as opposed to 0.62 for clinical parameters alone. Conclusion: The added value of CRP, LC and ESR for diagnosing FRI is limited. Clinicians should be cautious when interpreting the results of these tests in patients with suspected FRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Bosch
- Department of General Surgery, Subdivision of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Janna van den Kieboom
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost D J Plate
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank F A IJpma
- Department of General Surgery, Subdivision of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Huisman
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geertje A M Govaert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
van Rein EA, van der Sluijs R, Houwert RM, Gunning AC, Lichtveld RA, Leenen LP, van Heijl M. Effectiveness of prehospital trauma triage systems in selecting severely injured patients: Is comparative analysis possible? Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36:1060-1069. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
46
|
Würdemann FS, Smeeing DPJ, Ferree S, Nawijn F, Verleisdonk EJMM, Leenen LPH, Houwert RM, Hietbrink F. Differentiation in an inclusive trauma system: allocation of lower extremity fractures. World J Emerg Surg 2018; 13:18. [PMID: 29682003 PMCID: PMC5899363 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0178-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation of an inclusive trauma system leads to reduced mortality rates, specifically in polytrauma patients. Field triage is essential in this mortality reduction. Triage systems are developed to identify patients with life-threatening injuries, and trauma mechanisms are important for triaging. Although complex extremity fractures are mostly non-lethal, these injuries are frequently the result of a high-energy trauma mechanism. The aim of this study is to compare injury and patient characteristics, as well as resource demands, of lower extremity fractures between a level (L)1 and level (L)2 trauma centre in a mature inclusive trauma system. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with below-the-knee joint fractures diagnosed in a L1 or L2 trauma centre between July 2013 and June 2015 were included. Main outcome parameters were patient demographics, trauma mechanism, fracture pattern, and resource demands. Results One thousand two hundred sixty-seven patients with 1517 lower extremity fractures were included. Most patients were treated in the L2 centre (L1 = 417; L2 = 859). Complex fractures were more frequently triaged to the L1 centre. Patients in the L1 centre had more concomitant injuries to other body regions and ipsi- or contralateral lower extremity. Patients in the L1 centre were more resource demanding: more surgeries (> 1 surgery; 24.9% L1 vs 1.4% L2), higher immediate admission rates (70.1% L1 vs 37.6% L2), and longer length of stay (mean 13.4 days L1 vs 3.1 days L2). Conclusion The majority of patients were treated in the L2 trauma centre, whereas complex lower extremity injuries were mostly treated in the L1 centre, which placed higher demand on resources and labour per patient. This change in allocation is the next step in centralization of low-volume high complex care and high-volume low complex care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F S Würdemann
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,3Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D P J Smeeing
- 2Traumacenter, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,3Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Ferree
- 3Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Nawijn
- 3Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - L P H Leenen
- 3Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- 2Traumacenter, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,3Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Hietbrink
- 3Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hulsmans MHJ, van Heijl M, Frima H, van der Meijden OAJ, van den Berg HR, van der Veen AH, Gunning AC, Houwert RM, Verleisdonk EJMM. Predicting suitability of intramedullary fixation for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017; 44:581-587. [PMID: 28993839 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0848-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Implant-related irritation is a technique-specific complication seen in a substantial number of patients treated with intramedullary nailing for clavicle fractures. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors for developing implant-related irritation in patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing. METHODS A retrospective analysis of the surgical database in two level 2 trauma centers was performed. Patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures between 2005 and 2012 in the first hospital were included. Age, gender, fracture comminution and fracture location were assessed as possible predictors for developing irritation using multivariate logistic regression analysis. These predictors were externally validated using data of patients treated in another hospital. RESULTS Eighty-one patients were included in initial analysis. In the multivariate analysis, comminuted fractures in comparison to non-comminuted fractures (72 vs. 38%, p = 0.027) and fracture location (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the development of implant-related irritation. In particular, lateral diaphyseal fractures caused irritation compared to fractures on the medial side of the cut-off point (88 vs. 26%). External validation of these predictors in 48 additional patients treated in another hospital showed a similar predictive value of the model and a good fit. CONCLUSION Comminuted and lateral diaphyseal fractures were found to be statistically significant and independent predictors for developing implant-related irritation. We, therefore, believe that intramedullary nailing might not be suitable for these types of fractures. Future studies are needed to determine whether alternative surgical techniques or implants would be more suitable for these specific types of fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M van Heijl
- Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H Frima
- Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - A C Gunning
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
van Rein EAJ, Houwert RM, Gunning AC, Lichtveld RA, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. Accuracy of prehospital triage protocols in selecting severely injured patients: A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017; 83:328-339. [PMID: 28452898 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000001516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehospital trauma triage ensures proper transport of patients at risk of severe injury to hospitals with an appropriate corresponding level of trauma care. Incorrect triage results in undertriage and overtriage. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommends an undertriage rate below 5% and an overtriage rate below 50% for prehospital trauma triage protocols. To find the most accurate prehospital trauma triage protocol, a clear overview of all currently available protocols and corresponding outcomes is necessary. OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on all available prehospital trauma triage protocols and determine accuracy of protocol-based triage quality in terms of sensitivity and specificity. METHODS A search of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify all studies describing prehospital trauma triage protocols before November 2016. The search terms included "trauma," "trauma center," or "trauma system" combined with "triage," "undertriage," or "overtriage." All studies describing protocol-based triage quality were reviewed. To assess the quality of these type of studies, a new critical appraisal tool was developed. RESULTS In this review, 21 articles were included with numbers of patients ranging from 130 to over 1 million. Significant predictors for severe injury were: vital signs, suspicion of certain anatomic injuries, mechanism of injury, and age. Sensitivity ranged from 10% to 100%; specificity from 9% to 100%. Nearly all protocols had a low sensitivity, thereby failing to identify severely injured patients. Additionally, the critical appraisal showed poor quality of the majority of included studies. CONCLUSION This systematic review shows that nearly all protocols are incapable of identifying severely injured patients. Future studies of high methodological quality should be performed to improve prehospital trauma triage protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic review, level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline A J van Rein
- From the Department of Traumatology (E.A.J.V.R., A.C.G., L.P.H.L., M.V.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Trauma Center (R.M.H.), Utrecht, The Netherlands; and Regional Ambulance Facilities Utrecht (R.L.), RAVU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
van der Vet P, Kussen J, van Dijk M, Houwert RM, Verleisdonk EJMM, van der Velde D. [Hip fracture in elderly patients; additional value of a multidisciplinary approach and concentration of care]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2017; 161:D1563. [PMID: 28488559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Management of elderly patients with a proximal femoral fracture is an increasing challenge for the Dutch healthcare system. Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly have high morbidity and mortality rates. Furthermore, healthcare costs for this group of patients are rising. Referral, operation and postoperative care demand efficient collaboration between healthcare professionals. Every step in this chain of events is crucial for optimal treatment results. Multidisciplinary orthogeriatric trauma care shows promising results. In addition, high volume care results in better outcome of geriatric trauma patients.
Collapse
|
50
|
Beks RB, Houwert RM, Groenwold RHH. [Added value of observational studies in surgery: the hierarchical structure of study designs requires a more refined approach]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2017; 161:D1493. [PMID: 28488557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The randomised placebo-controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard for the evaluation of medical interventions. Observational studies, on the other hand, usually do not get much credit. For studies investigating surgical interventions this does not always seem entirely justified. A more refined approach might be needed for the often-used hierarchical structure of research designs. Instead of a strict separation of results from RCTs and other designs, results of the different designs should rather be regarded as complementary to each other when evaluating surgical interventions in traumatology.
Collapse
|