1
|
Staal FHE, Janssen J, Oprea-Lager DE, Engelen AM, van Limbergen EJ, Smeenk RJ, de Jong MAA, Budiharto TCG, Jacobs I, Haverkort DMAD, Brouwer CL, Ng Wei Siang K, Langendijk JA, Verzijlbergen JF, de Jong IJ, Noordzij W, Aluwini S. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Target Volume Delineation Guideline for Postprostatectomy Salvage Radiation Therapy: The PERYTON Guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:688-696. [PMID: 37729971 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) scan is the standard imaging procedure for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer postprostatectomy because of its high detection rate at low serum prostate-specific antigen levels. However, existing guidelines for clinical target volume (CTV) in prostate bed salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) are primarily based on experience-based clinical consensus and have been validated using conventional imaging modalities. Therefore, this study aimed to optimize CTV definition in sEBRT by using PSMA PET/CT-detected local recurrences (LRs). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with suspected LR on PSMA PET/CT postprostatectomy were retrospectively enrolled in 9 Dutch centers. Anonymized scans were centrally reviewed by an expert nuclear medicine physician. Each boundary of the CTV guideline from the Groupe Francophone de Radiothérapie en Urologie (GFRU) was evaluated and adapted to improve the accuracy and coverage of the area at risk of LR (CTV) on PSMA PET/CT. The proposed CTV adaptation was discussed with the radiation oncologists of the participating centers, and final consensus was reached. To assess reproducibility, the participating centers were asked to delineate 3 new cases according to the new PERYTON-CTV, and the submitted contours were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS After central review, 93 LRs were identified on 83 PSMA PET/CTs. The proposed CTV definition improved the coverage of PSMA PET/CT-detected LRs from 67% to 96% compared with the GFRU-CTV, while reducing the GFRU-CTV by 25%. The new CTV was highly reproducible, with a mean DSC of 0.82 (range, 0.81-0.83). CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the optimization of CTV definition in postprostatectomy sEBRT by using the pattern of LR detected on PSMA PET/CT. The PERYTON-CTV is highly reproducible across the participating centers and ensures coverage of 96% LRs while reducing the GFRU-CTV by 25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor H E Staal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jorinde Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Evert J van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tom C G Budiharto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Jacobs
- Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Instituut, Vlissingen/Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | | | - Charlotte L Brouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kelvin Ng Wei Siang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Fred Verzijlbergen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Staal FH, Siang KNW, Brouwer CL, Janssen J, Budiharto TC, Haverkort DM, Hollmann B, Jacobs I, De Jong MA, van de Sande MA, Vanneste BG, De Jong IJ, Verzijlbergen JF, Langendijk JA, Smeenk RJ, Aluwini S. Pretrial Quality Assurance for Hypofractionated Salvage Radiation Therapy After Prostatectomy in the Multi-Institutional PERYTON-trial. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101379. [PMID: 38405312 PMCID: PMC10885595 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The PERYTON trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that will investigate whether the treatment outcome of salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) will be improved with hypofractionated radiation therapy. A pretrial quality assurance (QA) program was undertaken to ensure protocol compliance within the PERYTON trial and to assess variation in sEBRT treatment protocols between the participating centers. Methods and Materials Completion of the QA program was mandatory for each participating center (N = 8) to start patient inclusion. The pretrial QA program included (1) a questionnaire on the center-specific sEBRT protocol, (2) a delineation exercise of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk, and (3) a treatment planning exercise. All contours were analyzed using the pairwise dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 50th and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD50 and HD95, respectively). The submitted treatment plans were reviewed for protocol compliance. Results The results of the questionnaire showed that high-quality, state-of-the-art radiation therapy techniques were used in the participating centers and identified variations of the sEBRT protocols used concerning the position verification and preparation techniques. The submitted CTVs showed significant variation, with a range in volume of 29 cm3 to 167 cm3, a mean pairwise DSC of 0.52, and a mean HD50 and HD95 of 2.3 mm and 24.4 mm, respectively. Only in 1 center the treatment plan required adaptation before meeting all constraints of the PERYTON protocol. Conclusions The pretrial QA of the PERYTON trial demonstrated that high-quality, but variable, radiation techniques were used in the 8 participating centers. The treatment planning exercise confirmed that the dose constraints of the PERYTON protocol were feasible for all participating centers. The observed variation in CTV delineation led to agreement on a new (image-based) delineation guideline to be used by all participating centers within the PERYTON trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor H.E. Staal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kelvin Ng Wei Siang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L. Brouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jorinde Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C.G. Budiharto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Birgit Hollmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HAGA Ziekenhuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Jacobs
- Zuidwest Radiotherapy Institute Vlissingen/Roosendaal, Vlissingen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Igle Jan De Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J. Fred Verzijlbergen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A. Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Janssen J, Brouwer CL, Staal FH, van Herpt HE, Both S, Langendijk JA, Aluwini S. Simple immobilization for stereotactic radiotherapy aimed at pelvic metastases. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100460. [PMID: 37435559 PMCID: PMC10331836 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for pelvic oligometastases of prostate cancer, and currently no simple immobilization method is available for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided treatment. We assessed patient set-up and intrafraction motion using simple immobilization during CBCT-guided pelvic SBRT. Forty patients were immobilized with basic arm- head- and knee support and either a thermoplastic cushion or a foam cushion. Analysis of 454 CBCTs showed mean intrafraction translation <3.0 mm in 94% of fractions and mean intrafraction rotation <1.5° in 95% of fractions. Therefore, simple immobilization ensured stable patient positioning during CBCT-guided pelvic SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorinde Janssen
- Corresponding author at: University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feng SQ, Brouwer CL, Korevaar EW, Vapiwala N, Kang-Hsin Wang K, Deville C, Langendijk JA, Both S, Aluwini S. Dose evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction prostate motion in extremely hypofractionated intensity-modulated proton therapy for prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100474. [PMID: 37560512 PMCID: PMC10407426 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Inter- and intra-fractional prostate motion can deteriorate the dose distribution in extremely hypofractionated intensity-modulated proton therapy. We used verification CTs and prostate motion data calculated from 1024 intra-fractional prostate motion records to develop a voxel-wise based 4-dimensional method, which had a time resolution of 1 s, to assess the dose impact of prostate motion. An example of 100 fractional simulations revealed that motion had minimal impact on planning dose, the accumulated dose in 95 % of the scenarios fulfilled the clinical goals for target coverage (D95 > 37.5 Gy). This method can serve as a complementary measure in clinical setting to guarantee plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sen-Quan Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L. Brouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik W. Korevaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ken Kang-Hsin Wang
- Biomedical Imaging and Radiation Technology Laboratory (BIRTLab), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Johannes A. Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Janssen J, Noordzij W, Velleman T, de Jong IJ, Langendijk JA, Verzijlbergen JF, Stormezand GN, Aluwini S. Skeletal 18F-PSMA-1007 uptake in prostate cancer patients. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231179311. [PMID: 37441326 PMCID: PMC10333984 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231179311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/objectives Accurate and uniform interpretation and reporting of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) lesions on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are indispensable. 18F-PSMA-1007 is increasingly used because of its favorable imaging characteristics. However, increased non-specific skeletal uptake may be an important pitfall of this radioligand. Therefore, we aimed to assess the interobserver variation in reporting skeletal 18F-PSMA-1007 uptake on PET/CT. Design/methods In total, 33 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans of 21 patients with primary PCa and 12 patients with biochemical recurrence were included, and a total of 85 skeletal lesions were evaluated by three independent observers. The primary endpoint was the interobserver variability of the likelihood of malignancy of the skeletal lesions on both patient and lesion level (kappa analysis). Results Observers qualified most lesions as not malignant (81-91%) and the overall mean interobserver agreement was moderate on both patient (κ: 0.54) and lesion level (κ: 0.55). In 52 lesions without corresponding CT substrate, the rating resulted in not malignant in 95-100%. Availability of additional imaging (60% of lesions) did not improve interobserver agreement (κ: 0.39 on lesion level) and resulted in unchanged rating for all observers in 78%. Conclusion This interobserver analysis of skeletal 18F-PSMA-1007 uptake resulted in moderate agreement, in line with rates reported in literature. Importantly, the presence of non-specific skeletal uptake without CT substrate, as a potential shortcoming of 18F-PSMA-1007, did not impair interobserver agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine,
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
| | - Ton Velleman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine,
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
| | - Igle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University of Groningen,
University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A. Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of
Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
| | - J. Fred Verzijlbergen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine,
Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gilles N. Stormezand
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine,
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of
Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mehra N, Kloots I, Vlaming M, Aluwini S, Dewulf E, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel H, Stoevelaar H, Yakar D, Bangma CH, Bekers E, van den Bergh R, Bergman AM, van den Berkmortel F, Boudewijns S, Dinjens WN, Fütterer J, van der Hulle T, Jenster G, Kroeze LI, van Kruchten M, van Leenders G, van Leeuwen PJ, de Leng WW, van Moorselaar RJA, Noordzij W, Oldenburg RA, van Oort IM, Oving I, Schalken JA, Schoots IG, Schuuring E, Smeenk RJ, Vanneste BG, Vegt E, Vis AN, de Vries K, Willemse PPM, Wondergem M, Ausems M. Genetic Aspects and Molecular Testing in Prostate Cancer: A Report from a Dutch Multidisciplinary Consensus Meeting. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:23-31. [PMID: 36874601 PMCID: PMC9975012 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming more broadly accepted, but testing indications and clinical consequences for carriers in each disease stage are not yet well defined. Objective To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the indication and application of germline and tumour genetic testing in PCa. Design setting and participants The panel consisted of 39 specialists involved in PCa management. We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a virtual consensus meeting. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Consensus was reached if ≥75% of the panellists chose the same option. Appropriateness was assessed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Results and limitations Of the multiple-choice questions, 44% reached consensus. For men without PCa having a relevant family history (familial PCa/BRCA-related hereditary cancer), follow-up by prostate-specific antigen was considered appropriate. For patients with low-risk localised PCa and a family history of PCa, active surveillance was considered appropriate, except in case of the patient being a BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant carrier. Germline and tumour genetic testing should not be done for nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive PCa in the absence of a relevant family history of cancer. Tumour genetic testing was deemed most appropriate for the identification of actionable variants, with uncertainty for germline testing. For tumour genetic testing in metastatic castration-resistant PCa, consensus was not reached for the timing and panel composition. The principal limitations are as follows: (1) a number of topics discussed lack scientific evidence, and therefore the recommendations are partly opinion based, and (2) there was a small number of experts per discipline. Conclusions The outcomes of this Dutch consensus meeting may provide further guidance on genetic counselling and molecular testing related to PCa. Patient summary A group of Dutch specialists discussed the use of germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, indication of these tests (which patients and when), and impact of these tests on the management and treatment of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author. Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 243610354; Fax: +31 243615025.
| | - Iris Kloots
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Vlaming
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Els Dewulf
- Centre for Decision Analysis & Support, Ismar Healthcare NV, Lier, Belgium
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Stoevelaar
- Centre for Decision Analysis & Support, Ismar Healthcare NV, Lier, Belgium
| | - Derya Yakar
- Department of Radiology, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H. Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise Bekers
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Andries M. Bergman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Oncogenomics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Steve Boudewijns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jurgen Fütterer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van der Hulle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Guido Jenster
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michel van Kruchten
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Irma Oving
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ivo G. Schoots
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J. Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim de Vries
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maurits Wondergem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Barros HA, van Beurden I, Droghetti M, Wilthagen EA, Özman O, Bergman AM, Aluwini S, van Moorselaar RJA, Donswijk ML, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG. Role of Local and/or Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Hormone-sensitive M1a Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:16-27. [PMID: 36372736 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT It remains unclear whether men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa) metastasized to nonregional lymph nodes (M1a) benefit from prostate-directed therapy (PDT) and/or metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). OBJECTIVE To systematically summarize the literature regarding oncological outcomes of de novo and recurrent M1a PCa patients treated with PDT and/or MDT. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase, and Scopus according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines for reports on oncological outcomes of de novo or recurrent hormone-sensitive M1a PCa patients treated with PDT (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) and/or MDT (nodal radiotherapy or salvage lymph node dissection) with or without androgen deprivation therapy. A descriptive data synthesis and a methodological quality assessment were performed to evaluate the impact of PDT and/or MDT on survival in M1a PCa patients. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 6136 articles were screened and 24 studies were included in this systematic review. In de novo M1a PCa patients, PDT was associated with improved oncological outcomes compared with no PDT. In recurrent M1a PCa, MDT could delay the need for systemic treatment in a selection of patients, but high-level evidence from prospective phase III randomized controlled trials is still awaited. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review summarized the limited literature data on the management of M1a PCa. Subgroup analyses suggest a role for PDT plus systemic therapy in de novo M1a PCa. MDT to distant nodal metastases delayed the need for systemic therapy in recurrent disease, but robust data are lacking. The predominantly retrospective nature of the included studies and significant heterogeneity in study designs limit the strength of evidence. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the treatment of patients with prostate cancer that has spread to lymph nodes outside the pelvis without metastases in other organ systems. There is evidence that treatment of the primary prostate tumor improves outcomes in well-selected patients and that treatment targeting distant lymph node metastases can delay the start of systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda A de Barros
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Isabeau van Beurden
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Erica A Wilthagen
- Scientific Information Service, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oktay Özman
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Jeroen A van Moorselaar
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zilli T, Achard V, Dal Pra A, Schmidt-Hegemann N, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Lancia A, Ingrosso G, Alongi F, Aluwini S, Arcangeli S, Blanchard P, Conde Moreno A, Couñago F, Créhange G, Dirix P, Gomez Iturriaga A, Guckenberger M, Pasquier D, Sargos P, Scorsetti M, Supiot S, Tree AC, Zapatero A, Le Guevelou J, Ost P, Belka C. Recommendations for radiation therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: An ESTRO-ACROP Delphi consensus. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:199-207. [PMID: 36228761 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Oligometastatic prostate cancer is a new and emerging treatment field with only few prospective randomized studies published so far. Despite the lack of strong level I evidence, metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) are widely used in clinical practice, mainly based on retrospective and small phase 2 studies and with a large difference across centers. Pending results of ongoing prospective randomized trials, there is a clear need for more consistent treatment indications and radiotherapy practices. MATERIAL AND METHODS A European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Guidelines Committee consisting of radiation oncologists' experts in prostate cancer was asked to answer a dedicated questionnaire, including 41 questions on the main controversial issues with regard to oligometastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS The panel achieved consensus on patient selection and routine use of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging as preferred staging and restaging imaging. MDT strategies are recommended in the de novo oligometastatic, oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease setting for nodal, bone and visceral metastases. Radiation therapy doses, volumes and techniques were discussed and commented. CONCLUSION These recommendations have the purpose of providing standardization and consensus to optimize the radiotherapy treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer until mature results of randomized trials are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Antonio Conde Moreno
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Castellón, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain; Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alfonso Gomez Iturriaga
- Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Basque Country University (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Research Institute, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jennifer Le Guevelou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA ziekenhuizen, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
De Barros H, Van Beurden I, Droghetti M, Wilthagen E, Özman O, Bergman A, Aluwini S, Van Moorselaar R, Donswijk M, Van Leeuwen P, Van Der Poel H. Role of local and/or metastasis-directed therapy in patients with hormone-sensitive M1a prostate cancer – a systematic review. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(22)02527-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
10
|
Janssen J, Staal FHE, Brouwer CL, Langendijk JA, de Jong IJ, van Moorselaar RJA, Schuit E, Verzijlbergen JF, Smeenk RJ, Aluwini S. Androgen Deprivation therapy for Oligo-recurrent Prostate cancer in addition to radioTherapy (ADOPT): study protocol for a randomised phase III trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:482. [PMID: 35501744 PMCID: PMC9063099 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09523-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background More than 60% of oligo-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) develop biochemical recurrence within 2 years. This recurrence rate emphasises the need for improved treatment and patient selection. In line with the treatment of primary PCa, the efficacy of MDRT may be enhanced when combined with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Furthermore, the availability of PSMA PET/CT offers an excellent tool for optimal patient selection for MDRT. This phase III randomised controlled trial will investigate the role of the addition of ADT to MDRT in oligo-recurrent PCa patients selected with PSMA PET/CT to enhance oncological outcome. Methods Two hundred and eighty patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the standard treatment arm (MDRT alone) or the experimental arm (MDRT + 6 months ADT). Patients with biochemical recurrence after primary treatment of PCa presenting with ≤ 4 metastases will be included. The primary endpoint is the 2.5-year metastases progression-free survival (MPFS). Secondary endpoints are acute and late toxicity, quality of life, biochemical progression-free survival, overall survival, and the sensitivity of the PSMA PET/CT for detecting oligometastases at low PSA-levels. So far, between March 2020 and December 2021, one hundred patients have been included. Discussion This phase III randomised controlled trial will assess the possible benefit of the addition of 6 months ADT to MDRT on metastases progression-free survival, toxicity, QoL and survival in PCa patients with 1–4 recurrent oligometastatic lesions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04302454. Registered 10 March 2020. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09523-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - F H E Staal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - C L Brouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - I J de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R J A van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Schuit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J F Verzijlbergen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - S Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Janssen J, Brouwer C, Staal F, Both S, Langendijk J, Aluwini S. PO-1688 Intra-fraction motion of pelvic lymph node metastases during SBRT. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03652-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
12
|
Feng S, Brouwer C, Korevaar E, Vapiwala N, Wang K, Deville C, Langendijk J, Both S, Aluwini S. PO-1500 Robustness evaluation of ultra hypo-fractionated IMPT for PCa on target and OAR dose-constraints. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03464-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
13
|
Brouwer C, Strbac B, Langendijk H, Both S, Yakar D, Aluwini S. PO-1722 Investigation of principal modes of intra-fraction anatomical shape variations in the prostate. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03686-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
14
|
Aluwini S, Staal F, langendijk H. SP-0958 Hypofractionation for the management of postoperative PCa. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)04068-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
15
|
Staal FHE, Janssen J, Brouwer CL, Langendijk JA, Ng Wei Siang K, Schuit E, de Jong IJ, Verzijlbergen JF, Smeenk RJ, Aluwini S. Phase III randomised controlled trial on PSMA PET/CT guided hypofractionated salvage prostate bed radiotherapy of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PERYTON-trial): study protocol. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:416. [PMID: 35428210 PMCID: PMC9013125 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09493-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Salvage external beam radiotherapy (sEBRT) for patients with a biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy provides a 5-year biochemical progression-free survival up to 60%. Multiple studies have shown that dose escalation to the primary prostate tumour improves treatment outcome. However, data is lacking on the role of dose escalation in the recurrent salvage setting. The main objective of the PERYTON-trial is to investigate whether treatment outcome of sEBRT for patients with a BCR after prostatectomy can be improved by increasing the biological effective radiation dose using hypofractionation. Moreover, patients will be staged using the PSMA PET/CT scan, which is superior to conventional imaging modalities in detecting oligometastases. Methods The PERYTON-study is a prospective multicentre open phase III randomised controlled trial. We aim to include 538 participants (269 participants per treatment arm) with a BCR after prostatectomy, a PSA-value of < 1.0 ng/mL and a recent negative PSMA PET/CT scan. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio between the conventional fractionated treatment arm (35 × 2 Gy) and the experimental hypofractionated treatment arm (20 × 3 Gy). The primary endpoint is the 5-year progression-free survival after treatment. The secondary endpoints include toxicity, quality of life and disease specific survival. Discussion Firstly, the high rate of BCR after sEBRT may be due to the presence of oligometastases, for which local sEBRT is inappropriate. With the use of the PSMA PET/CT before sEBRT, patients with oligometastases will be excluded from intensive local treatment to avoid unnecessary toxicity. Secondly, the currently applied radiation dose for sEBRT may be too low to achieve adequate local control, which may offer opportunity to enhance treatment outcome of sEBRT by increasing the biologically effective radiotherapy dose to the prostate bed. Trial registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04642027). Registered on 24 November 2020 – Retrospectively registered. The study protocol was approved by the accredited Medical Ethical Committee (METc) of all participating hospitals (date METc review: 23-06-2020, METc registration number: 202000239). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. • This is the first PSMA PET/CT based study addressing the role of hypofractionation in salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT); • Participants will be randomised 1:1 to conventional fractionated sEBRT (35 × 2 Gy) or hypofractionated sEBRT (20 × 3 Gy); • The PSMA PET/CT-scan will be used for staging of all participants at baseline; • The primary endpoint is 5-year progression-free survival after treatment; • All participants will receive early sEBRT (PSA < 1.0 ng/mL) without the use of androgen deprivation therapy; • A quality assurance program was undertaken, to ensure protocol compliance within the PERYTON-trial; • An interim analysis will be performed after the inclusion of 25% (n = 135) of the total number of required participants, to identify any early signs of excessive (unexpected) acute toxicity.
Collapse
|
16
|
Staal F, Ng Wei Siang K, Brouwer C, Vanneste B, de Jong M, Budiharto T, Haverkort D, van de Sande M, Langendijk H, Smeenk R, Aluwini S. PO-1745 A pre-trial quality assurance for salvage radiotherapy of the multi-institutional PERYTON-trial. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08196-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
17
|
Sharfo AWM, Rossi L, Dirkx MLP, Breedveld S, Aluwini S, Heijmen BJM. Complementing Prostate SBRT VMAT With a Two-Beam Non-Coplanar IMRT Class Solution to Enhance Rectum and Bladder Sparing With Minimum Increase in Treatment Time. Front Oncol 2021; 11:620978. [PMID: 33816253 PMCID: PMC8018286 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Enhance rectum and bladder sparing in prostate SBRT with minimum increase in treatment time by complementing dual-arc coplanar VMAT with a two-beam non-coplanar IMRT class solution (CS). Methods For twenty patients, an optimizer for automated multi-criterial planning with integrated beam angle optimization (BAO) was used to generate dual-arc VMAT plans, supplemented with five non-coplanar IMRT beams with individually optimized orientations (VMAT+5). In all plan generations, reduction of high rectum dose had the highest priority after obtaining adequate PTV coverage. A CS with two most preferred directions in VMAT+5 and largest rectum dose reductions compared to dual-arc VMAT was then selected to define VMAT+CS. VMAT+CS was compared with automatically generated i) dual-arc coplanar VMAT plans (VMAT), ii) VMAT+5 plans, and iii) IMRT plans with 30 patient-specific non-coplanar beam orientations (30-NCP). Plans were generated for a 4 x 9.5 Gy fractionation scheme. Differences in PTV doses, healthy tissue sparing, and computation and treatment delivery times were quantified. Results For equal PTV coverage, VMAT+CS, consisting of dual-arc VMAT supplemented with two fixed, non-coplanar IMRT beams with fixed Gantry/Couch angles of 65°/30° and 295°/-30°, significantly reduced OAR doses and the dose bath, compared to dual-arc VMAT. Mean relative differences in rectum Dmean, D1cc, V40GyEq and V60GyEq were 19.4 ± 10.6%, 4.2 ± 2.7%, 34.9 ± 20.3%, and 39.7 ± 23.2%, respectively (all p<0.001). There was no difference in bladder D1cc, while bladder Dmean reduced by 17.9 ± 11.0% (p<0.001). Also, the clinically evaluated urethra D5%, D10%, and D50% showed small, but statistically significant improvements. All patient VX with X = 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 Gy were reduced with VMAT+CS, with a maximum relative reduction for V10Gy of 19.0 ± 7.3% (p<0.001). Total delivery times with VMAT+CS only increased by 1.9 ± 0.7 min compared to VMAT (9.1 ± 0.7 min). The dosimetric quality of VMAT+CS plans was equivalent to VMAT+5, while optimization times were reduced by a factor of 25 due to avoidance of individualized BAO. Compared to VMAT+CS, the 30-NCP plans were only favorable in terms of dose bath, at the cost of much enhanced optimization and delivery times. Conclusions The proposed two-beam non-coplanar class solution to complement coplanar dual-arc VMAT resulted in substantial plan quality improvements for OARs (especially rectum) and reduced irradiated patient volumes with minor increases in treatment delivery times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Wahab M Sharfo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Linda Rossi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten L P Dirkx
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Ben J M Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Aluwini S, Oprea‐Lager DE, Barros H, Mehra N, Stoevelaar H, Yakar D, Poel H. M1a prostate cancer: Results of a Dutch multidisciplinary consensus meeting. BJUI Compass 2021; 2:159-168. [PMID: 35475128 PMCID: PMC8988794 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of de novo and recurrent metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) limited to non‐regional lymph nodes (M1a) in daily clinical practice. Materials and methods The panel consisted of 37 Dutch specialists from disciplines involved in the management of M1a PCa (urology, medical and radiation oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine). We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a consensus meeting (video conference). Consensus (good agreement) was defined as the situation in which ≥ 75% of the panelists chose the same option. Results Consensus existed for 57% of the items. The panel agreed that prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA‐PET/CT) is the most appropriate standard imaging modality to identify de novo (100%) and recurrent (97%) M1a PCa. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiotherapy to the prostate ± the M1a lesion(s) was most frequently considered an option for de novo M1a PCa. For M1a as recurrent disease, ADT alone, deferring treatment, or local radiotherapy to the M1a lesion(s) were judged to be the most important treatment options. However, no specific indications for treatment choice in relation to disease characteristics could be formulated. Conclusions The Dutch consensus panel preferred PSMA‐PET/CT as the standard diagnostic modality to detect M1a PCa. Although potential treatment options were identified, explicit recommendations could not be formulated. This might (partly) be explained by the absence of high‐level clinical evidence in this subset of patients. Further research is, therefore, strongly encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology UMCG Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E. Oprea‐Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam University Medical CentersVU University Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Hilda Barros
- Department of Urology Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology Radboudumc Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Herman Stoevelaar
- Centre for Decision Analysis & Support Ismar Healthcare NV Lier Belgium
| | - Derya Yakar
- Department of Radiology UMCG Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Henk Poel
- Department of Urology Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gort EM, Beukema JC, Matysiak W, Sijtsema NM, Aluwini S, Langendijk JA, Both S, Brouwer CL. Inter-fraction motion robustness and organ sparing potential of proton therapy for cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:194-200. [PMID: 32956707 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Large-field photon radiotherapy is current standard in the treatment of cervical cancer patients. However, with the increasing availability of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy (PBS-PT) and robust treatment planning techniques, protons may have significant advantages for cervical cancer patients in the reduction of toxicity. In this study, PBS-PT and photon Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) were compared, examining target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) dose, taking inter- and intra-fraction motion into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve cervical cancer patients were included in this in-silico planning study. In all cases, a planning CT scan, five weekly repeat CT scans (reCTs) and an additional reCT 10 min after the first reCT were available. Two-arc VMAT and robustly optimised two- and four-field (2F and 4F) PBS-PT plans were robustly evaluated on planCTs and reCTs using set-up and range uncertainty. Nominal OAR doses and voxel-wise minimum target coverage robustness were compared. RESULTS Average voxel-wise minimum accumulated doses for pelvic target structures over all patients were adequate for both photon and proton treatment techniques (D98 > 95%, [91.7-99.3%]). Average accumulated dose of the para-aortic region was lower than the required 95%, D98 > 94.4% [91.1-98.2%]. With PBS-PT 4F, dose to all OARs was significantly lower than with VMAT. Major differences were observed for mean bowel bag V15Gy: 60% [39-70%] for VMAT vs 30% [10-52%] and 32% [9-54%] for PBS-PT 2F and 4F and for mean bone marrow V10Gy: 88% [82-97%] for VMAT vs 66% [60-73%] and 67% [60-75%] for PBS-PT 2F and 4F. CONCLUSION Robustly optimised PBS-PT for cervical cancer patients shows equivalent target robustness against inter- and intra-fraction variability compared to VMAT, and offers significantly better OAR sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elske M Gort
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Jannet C Beukema
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Witold Matysiak
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Nanna M Sijtsema
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Brouwer
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Breedveld S, Bennan ABA, Aluwini S, Schaart DR, Kolkman-Deurloo IKK, Heijmen BJM. Fast automated multi-criteria planning for HDR brachytherapy explored for prostate cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:205002. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab44ff] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
21
|
Sharfo A, Rossi L, Dirkx M, Aluwini S, Breedveld S, Heijmen B. OC-0524 A two-beam non-coplanar class solution to supplement VMAT in prostate SBRT. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30944-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
22
|
Rossi L, Sharfo AW, Aluwini S, Dirkx M, Breedveld S, Heijmen B. First fully automated planning solution for robotic radiosurgery - comparison with automatically planned volumetric arc therapy for prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1490-1498. [PMID: 29966472 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1479068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For conventional radiotherapy treatment units, automated planning can significantly improve plan quality. For robotic radiosurgery, systems for automatic generation of clinically deliverable plans do not yet exist. For prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), few studies have systematically compared VMAT with robotic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS The multi-criteria autoplanning optimizer, developed at our institute, was coupled to the commercial treatment planning system of our robotic treatment unit, for fully automated generation of clinically deliverable plans (autoROBOT). The system was then validated by comparing autoROBOT plans with manually generated plans. Next, the autoROBOT system was used for systematic comparisons between autoROBOT plans and VMAT plans, that were also automatically generated (autoVMAT). CTV-PTV margins of 3 mm were used for autoROBOT (clinical routine) and autoVMAT plan generation. For autoVMAT, an extra plan was generated with 5 mm margin (often applied for VMAT). Plans were generated for a 4 × 9.5 Gy fractionation scheme. RESULTS Compared to manual planning, autoROBOT improved rectum D[Formula: see text] (16%), V[Formula: see text] (75%) and D[Formula: see text] (41%), and bladder D[Formula: see text] (37%) (all p [Formula: see text] .002), with equal PTV coverage. In the autoROBOT and autoVMAT comparison, both with 3 mm margin, rectum doses were lower for autoROBOT by 5% for rectum D[Formula: see text] (p=.002), 33% for V[Formula: see text] (p=.001) and 4% for D[Formula: see text] (p=.05), with comparable PTV coverage and other OAR sparing. With 5 mm margin for VMAT, 18/20 plans had a PTV coverage lower than requested (<95%) and all plans had higher rectum doses than autoROBOT (mean percentage differences of 13% for D[Formula: see text], 69% for V[Formula: see text] and 32% for D[Formula: see text] (all p<.001)). CONCLUSIONS The first system for fully automated generation of clinically deliverable robotic plans was built. Autoplanning did largely enhance robotic plan quality, compared to manual planning. Using autoplanning for both the robotic system and VMAT, superiority of non-coplanar robotic treatment compared to coplanar VMAT for prostate SBRT was demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Abdul Wahab Sharfo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Dirkx
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rossi L, Bijman R, Schillemans W, Aluwini S, Cavedon C, Witte M, Incrocci L, Heijmen B. Texture analysis of 3D dose distributions for predictive modelling of toxicity rates in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:548-553. [PMID: 30177372 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To explore the use of texture analysis (TA) features of patients' 3D dose distributions to improve prediction modelling of treatment complication rates in prostate cancer radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Late toxicity scores, dose distributions, and non-treatment related (NTR) predictors for late toxicity, such as age and baseline symptoms, of 351 patients of the hypofractionation arm of the HYPRO randomized trial were used in this study. Apart from DVH parameters, also TA features of rectum and bladder 3D dose distributions were used for predictive modelling of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities. Logistic Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) models were derived, using only NTR parameters, NTR + DVH, NTR + TA, and NTR + DVH + TA. RESULTS For rectal bleeding, the area under the curve (AUC) for using only NTR parameters was 0.58, which increased to 0.68, and 0.73, when adding DVH or TA parameters respectively. For faecal incontinence, the AUC went up from 0.63 (NTR only), to 0.68 (+DVH) and 0.73 (+TA). For nocturia, adding TA features resulted in an AUC increase from 0.64 to 0.66, while no improvement was seen when including DVH parameters in the modelling. For urinary incontinence, the AUC improved from 0.68 to 0.71 (+DVH) and 0.73 (+TA). For GI, model improvements resulting from adding TA parameters to NTR instead of DVH were statistically significant (p < 0.04). CONCLUSION Inclusion of 3D dosimetric texture analysis features in predictive modelling of GI and GU toxicity rates in prostate cancer radiotherapy improved prediction performance, which was statistically significant for GI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rik Bijman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilco Schillemans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlo Cavedon
- Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | - Marnix Witte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sharfo AWM, Dirkx MLP, Bijman RG, Schillemans W, Breedveld S, Aluwini S, Pos F, Incrocci L, Heijmen BJM. Late toxicity in the randomized multicenter HYPRO trial for prostate cancer analyzed with automated treatment planning. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:349-356. [PMID: 29885745 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Revised: 05/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE Assess to what extent the use of automated treatment planning would have reduced organ-at-risk dose delivery observed in the randomized HYPRO trial for prostate cancer, and estimate related toxicity reductions. Investigate to what extent improved plan quality for hypofractionation scheme as achieved with automated planning can potentially reduce observed enhanced toxicity for the investigated hypofractionation scheme to levels observed for conventional fractionation scheme. MATERIAL/METHODS For 725 trial patients, VMAT plans were generated with an algorithm for automated multi-criterial plan generation (autoVMAT). All clinically delivered plans (CLINICAL), generated with commonly applied interactive trial-and-error planning were also available for the investigations. Analyses were based on dose-volume histograms (DVH) and predicted normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. RESULTS Compared to CLINICAL, autoVMAT plans had similar or higher PTV coverage, while large and statistically significant OAR sparing was achieved. Mean doses in the rectum, anus and bladder were reduced by 7.8 ± 4.7 Gy, 7.9 ± 6.0 Gy and 4.2 ± 2.9 Gy, respectively (p < 0.001). NTCPs for late grade ≥2 GI toxicity, rectal bleeding and stool incontinence were reduced from 23.3 ± 9.1% to 19.7 ± 8.9%, from 9.7 ± 2.8% to 8.2 ± 2.8%, and from 16.8 ± 8.5% to 13.1 ± 7.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Reductions in rectal bleeding NTCP were observed for all published Equivalent Uniform Dose volume parameters, n. AutoVMAT allowed hypofractionation with predicted toxicity similar to conventional fractionation with CLINICAL plans. CONCLUSION Compared to CLINICAL, autoVMAT had superior plan quality, with meaningful NTCP reductions for both conventional fractionation and hypofractionation schemes. AutoVMAT plans might reduce toxicity for hypofractionation to levels that were clinically observed (and accepted) for conventional fractionation. This may be relevant when considering clinical use of the investigated hypofractionation schedule with relatively high fraction dose (3.4 Gy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Wahab M Sharfo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maarten L P Dirkx
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik G Bijman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilco Schillemans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J M Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Dessel LF, Reuvers SHM, Bangma CH, Aluwini S. Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: Long-term results of urinary incontinence, toxicity and treatment outcomes. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 11:26-32. [PMID: 30014044 PMCID: PMC6019864 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Revised: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
We report on long-term toxicity of salvage radiotherapy with a focus on incontinence. Salvage radiotherapy results in good long-term biochemical control. Toxicity and urinary incontinence rates are high after salvage radiotherapy.
Purpose For patients with local recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy (35–54%) salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is the treatment of choice. In the post prostatectomy setting, SRT may impose risk at increased toxicity. As data on long-term toxicity, especially on urinary incontinence, are scarce, we report on the long-term treatment outcomes, toxicity and urinary incontinence rates after SRT. Materials and methods Patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, who were treated with SRT (3D-CRT) at our institution between 1998 and 2012, were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Primary endpoint was urinary incontinence rate. Secondary endpoints were acute and late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity rates, biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Results 244 patients were included. Median follow-up after SRT was 50 months (range: 4–187 months). Before start of SRT 69.7% of patients were continent for urine. After SRT de novo urinary incontinence complaints (grade ≥ 1) occurred in the respective acute and late phase in 6.1% and 17.6% of patients. Respective acute grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity was 19.2% and 17.6%. Late grade ≥2 toxicity for GU was 29.9% and for GI was 21.3%, respectively. The respective 5-year bPFS, OS, DSS and DMFS rates were 47.6%, 91.8%, 98.8% and 80.5%. Conclusions Experience at our institution with SRT demonstrates that this results in good long-term biochemical control. However, toxicity and urinary incontinence rates were high.
Collapse
Key Words
- AMS, American medical systems
- CTCAE, common terminology criteria for adverse events
- DMFS, distant metastasis–free survival
- DSS, disease specific survival
- GI, gastrointestinal
- GU, genitourinary
- Gy, gray
- IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique
- OS, overall survival
- PSA, prostate specific antigen
- Prostatic neoplasms
- RTOG, radiation therapy oncology group
- Radiotherapy
- SRT, salvage radiotherapy
- Salvage therapy
- Toxicity
- Urinary incontinence
- bPFS, biochemical progression-free survival
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne F van Dessel
- Department of Experimental Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah H M Reuvers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Luthart L, Kolkman-Deurloo I, Busser W, Aluwini S, Christianen M. EP-2264: Single fraction HDR brachytherapy in low-risk prostate cancer: a search for the best dose level. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)32573-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
27
|
Van Vreeswijk N, Hammer C, Van den Bergh A, Vanhauten H, Bijmolt S, Langendijk J, Aluwini S. PV-0626: Long term toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: NTCP models for rectal toxicity. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30936-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
28
|
Rossi L, Bijman R, Schillemans W, Aluwini S, Witte M, Pos F, Incrocci L, Heijmen B. PV-0565: Texture Analysis of 3D dose distributions for predictive modelling of toxicity rates in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30875-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
29
|
Heemsbergen W, Wortel R, Pos F, Smeenk R, Krol S, Aluwini S, Witte M, Heijmen B, Incrocci L. OC-0128: Patient-reported outcome in the prostate HYPRO trial: gastrointestinal toxicity. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)30571-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
30
|
Sharfo A, Dirkx M, Bijman R, Schillemans W, Breedveld S, Aluwini S, Pos F, Incrocci L, Heijmen B. OC-0251: Late toxicity in HYPRO randomized trial analyzed by automated planning and intrinsic NTCP modelling. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)30694-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
31
|
Aluwini S, Busser W, Kroon M, Heijmen B. PO-0735: HDR-brachytherapy or SBRT for extreme hypofractionation in prostate cancer - long-term results. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)31172-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
32
|
Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG, Aluwini S, Schimmel E, Krol S, van der Toorn PP, Jager HD, Heemsbergen W, Heijmen B, Pos F. Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:1061-1069. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30070-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 313] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
33
|
Aluwini S, Busser WMH, Baartman LEA, Bhawanie A, Alemayehu WG, Boormans JL, Kolkman-Deurloo IKK. Fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in prostate cancer: Does implant displacement and its correction influence acute and late toxicity? Brachytherapy 2016; 15:707-713. [PMID: 27364871 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Revised: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer (PCa) with one implant for several fractions, dose delivery relies on reproducibility of catheter positions. However, caudal displacement of implanted catheters does occur between fractions and needs to be corrected. Our protocol prescribes correction of displacements > 3 mm. We investigated whether displacement and its corrections influence acute and late toxicity incidences. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed 162 PCa patients treated with HDR-BT monotherapy between 2007 and 2013. The implant remained in situ between the 4 fractions. Catheter displacement was assessed before each fraction using lateral X-ray images and corrected if needed. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) acute and late toxicities were assessed using clinical record forms and patient self-assessment questionnaires. RESULTS Implant displacement corrections (DC) were needed in 71 patients (43.8%) whereas no DCs were needed in 91 patients (56.2%). No statistically significant differences were seen in acute and late grade ≥ 2 GU and GI toxicity incidences between DC and no DC groups. The maximum displacement nor the number of corrections had any influence on toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The occurrence and subsequent correction of implant displacements exceeding 3 mm during fractionated HDR-BT monotherapy for PCa did not lead to increased incidences of acute or late GU and GI toxicity. This indicates that our clinical protocol to correct displacements > 3 mm results in safe treatment regarding organ at risk toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wendy M H Busser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lizette E A Baartman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anand Bhawanie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Faasse-de Hoog M, Hoogeman M, Nuyttens J, Aluwini S. OC-0555: Organ at risk dose parameters increased by daily anatomic changes in prostate cancer SBRT. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31805-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
35
|
Pos F, Incrocci L, Wortel R, Van der Heide U, Lebesque J, Aluwini S, Witte M, Heemsbergen W. OC-0341: Anal dose reduction for radiotherapy of prostate cancer does not lead to less rectal incontinence. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31590-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
36
|
Witte M, Heemsbergen W, Pos F, Vens C, Aluwini S, Incrocci L. OC-0258: Linear-quadratic modeling of acute rectum toxicity in a prostate hypo-fractionation trial. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31507-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
37
|
Heemsbergen W, Incrocci L, Vens C, Witte M, Aluwini S, Pos F. OC-0339: More acute proctitis symptoms with hypofractionation (3.4 Gy) than 2 Gy fractions. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31588-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
38
|
Dirkx M, Sharfo A, Voet P, Della Gala G, Rossi L, Fransen D, Penninkhof J, Hoogeman M, Petit S, Mendez-Romero A, Mens J, Incrocci L, Hoekstra N, Van de Pol M, Aluwini S, Breedveld S, Heijmen B. Fully automated treatment plan generation using ErasmusiCycle - the Rotterdam experience. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31562-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
39
|
Aluwini S, Hoogeman M, Lebesque J, Bangma C, Incrocci L, Heemsbergen W. OC-0062: High-dose-rate HDR boost for localized prostate cancer decreases long term rectum toxicity. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31311-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
40
|
Roos M, De Pan C, Kolkman-Deurloo I, Aluwini S. OC-0557: Feasibility of single fraction HDR brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a planning study. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31807-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
41
|
Wortel R, Incrocci L, Aluwini S, Schimmel E, Krol S, van der Toorn PP, de Jager H, Dirkx M, Ghidey W, Heijmen B, Pos F. MP14-01 HYPOFRACTIONATED VERSUS CONVENTIONALLY FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: 5-YEAR ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES OF THE DUTCH RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 HYPRO TRIAL. J Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
42
|
Wortel RC, Incrocci L, Pos FJ, van der Heide UA, Lebesque JV, Aluwini S, Witte MG, Heemsbergen WD. Late Side Effects After Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared to 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results From 2 Prospective Cohorts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:680-9. [PMID: 27055398 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Revised: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Technical developments in the field of external beam radiation therapy (RT) enabled the clinical introduction of image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT), which improved target conformity and allowed reduction of safety margins. Whether this had an impact on late toxicity levels compared to previously applied three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) is currently unknown. We analyzed late side effects after treatment with IG-IMRT or 3D-CRT, evaluating 2 prospective cohorts of men treated for localized prostate cancer to investigate the hypothesized reductions in toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients treated with 3D-CRT (n=189) or IG-IMRT (n=242) to 78 Gy in 39 fractions were recruited from 2 Dutch randomized trials with identical toxicity scoring protocols. Late toxicity (>90 days after treatment) was derived from self-assessment questionnaires and case report forms, according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG-EORTC) scoring criteria. Grade ≥2 endpoints included gastrointestinal (GI) rectal bleeding, increased stool frequency, discomfort, rectal incontinence, proctitis, and genitourinary (GU) obstruction, increased urinary frequency, nocturia, urinary incontinence, and dysuria. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare grade ≥2 toxicities between both techniques, adjusting for other modifying factors. RESULTS The 5-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 GI toxicity was 24.9% for IG-IMRT and 37.6% following 3D-CRT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59, P=.005), with significant reductions in proctitis (HR: 0.37, P=.047) and increased stool frequency (HR: 0.23, P<.001). GU grade ≥2 toxicity levels at 5 years were comparable with 46.2% and 36.4% following IG-IMRT and 3D-CRT, respectively (adjusted HR: 1.19, P=.33). Other strong predictors (P<.01) of grade ≥2 late toxicity were baseline complaints, acute toxicity, and age. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with IG-IMRT reduced the risk of late grade ≥2 complications, whereas GU toxicities remained comparable. This clinically relevant observation demonstrates that IMRT and image-guidance should therefore be the preferred treatment option, provided that margin reduction is implemented with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud C Wortel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joos V Lebesque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G Witte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilma D Heemsbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Aluwini S, Liem E, Boormans J, Antonisse I, Praag J, Kirkels W, Kolkman-Deurloo I. Long-term Treatment Outcome of Local Recurrences After Bladder Preservation With Brachytherapy for Bladder Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.1095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
44
|
Aluwini S, Busser WMH, Alemayehu WG, Boormans JL, Kirkels WJ, Jansen PP, Praag JO, Bangma CH, Kolkman-Deurloo IKK. Toxicity and quality of life after high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015; 117:252-7. [PMID: 26409832 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2015] [Revised: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The use of HDR brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as monotherapy for prostate cancer (PC) is increasing worldwide with good tumour control rates and acceptable toxicity. We report our results on toxicity and quality of life (QoL) after HDR-BT monotherapy for PC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS 166 low- and intermediate-risk localized PC patients were treated with HDR-BT to a total dose of 38Gy in four fractions. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were prospectively assessed using EORTC-RTOG questionnaires and physicians charts. QoL was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaires. RESULTS Three months after treatment, acute GU and GI toxicities were reported in 10.8% and 7.2%. Acute toxicity resolved within two months in the majority of patients (61%). Late grade ⩾ 2 GU and GI toxicity were reported in 19.7% and 3.3% of patients 12 months after HDR-BT. Mean QLQ-PR25 scores showed clinically relevant changes from baseline for urinary symptoms and sexual functioning. With a mean follow-up of 35 months, biochemical failure was observed in 2.4%. Overall survival at 60 months was 93.6% and cancer-specific survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS HDR-BT monotherapy for localized PC showed excellent clinical outcome and acceptable acute and late toxicity. Urinary symptoms and sexual function QoL decreased after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wendy M H Busser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J Kirkels
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P Jansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John O Praag
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ubels RJ, Mokhles S, Andrinopoulou ER, Braat C, van der Voort van Zyp NC, Aluwini S, Aerts JGJV, Nuyttens JJ. Quality of life during 5 years after stereotactic radiotherapy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:98. [PMID: 25896787 PMCID: PMC4465315 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0405-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the long-term impact of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) on the quality of life (QoL) of inoperable patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and materials From January 2006 to February 2008, 39 patients with pathologically confirmed T1-2N0M0 NSCLC were treated with SRT. QoL, overall survival and local tumor control were assessed. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and the lung cancer-specific questionnaire QLQ-LC13 were used to investigate changes in QoL. Assessments were done before treatment, at 3 weeks, every 2–3 months during the first two years, and then every 6 months until 5 years after the treatment or death or progressive disease. The median follow up was 38 months. Results During the 5 years after treatment with SRT for stage I NSCLC, the level of QoL was maintained: There was a slow decline (slope: −0.015) of the global health status over the 5 years (p < 0.0001). The physical functioning and the role functioning improved slowly (slope: 0.006 and 0.004, resp.) over the years and this was also significant (p < 0.0001). The emotional functioning (EF) improved significantly at 1 year compared to the baseline. Two years after the treatment dyspnea slowly increased (slope: 0.005, p = 0.006). The actuarial overall survival was 62% at 2 years and 31% at 5-years. Conclusion QoL was maintained 5 years after SRT for stage I NSCLC and EF improved significantly. Dyspnea slowly increased 2 years after the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rutger J Ubels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Postbus 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, the Netherlands.
| | - Sahar Mokhles
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Cornelia Braat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Postbus 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Postbus 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, the Netherlands.
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost J Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Postbus 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Aluwini S, Bhawanie A, Baartman L, Ghidey Alemayehu W, Busser W, Boormans J, Kolkman-Deurloo I. OC-0036: The effect of catheter displacement on acute and late toxicity in fractionated HDR monotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)40036-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
47
|
Rossi L, Breedveld S, Aluwini S, Heijmen B. Noncoplanar Beam Angle Class Solutions to Replace Time-Consuming Patient-Specific Beam Angle Optimization in Robotic Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:762-70. [PMID: 26104931 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Revised: 03/06/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate development of a recipe for the creation of a beam angle class solution (CS) for noncoplanar prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy to replace time-consuming individualized beam angle selection (iBAS) without significant loss in plan quality, using the in-house "Erasmus-iCycle" optimizer for fully automated beam profile optimization and iBAS. METHODS AND MATERIALS For 30 patients, Erasmus-iCycle was first used to generate 15-, 20-, and 25-beam iBAS plans for a CyberKnife equipped with a multileaf collimator. With these plans, 6 recipes for creation of beam angle CSs were investigated. Plans of 10 patients were used to create CSs based on the recipes, and the other 20 to independently test them. For these tests, Erasmus-iCycle was also used to generate intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for the fixed CS beam setups. RESULTS Of the tested recipes for CS creation, only 1 resulted in 15-, 20-, and 25-beam noncoplanar CSs without plan deterioration compared with iBAS. For the patient group, mean differences in rectum D1cc, V60GyEq, V40GyEq, and Dmean between 25-beam CS plans and 25-beam plans generated with iBAS were 0.2 ± 0.4 Gy, 0.1% ± 0.2%, 0.2% ± 0.3%, and 0.1 ± 0.2 Gy, respectively. Differences between 15- and 20-beam CS and iBAS plans were also negligible. Plan quality for CS plans relative to iBAS plans was also preserved when narrower planning target volume margins were arranged and when planning target volume dose inhomogeneity was decreased. Using a CS instead of iBAS reduced the computation time by a factor of 14 to 25, mainly depending on beam number, without loss in plan quality. CONCLUSIONS A recipe for creation of robust beam angle CSs for robotic prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy has been developed. Compared with iBAS, computation times decreased by a factor 14 to 25. The use of a CS may avoid long planning times without losses in plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Aluwini S, Pos F, Schimmel E, van Lin E, Krol S, van der Toorn PP, de Jager H, Dirkx M, Alemayehu WG, Heijmen B, Incrocci L. Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer (HYPRO): acute toxicity results from a randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:274-83. [PMID: 25656287 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70482-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2007, we began the randomised phase 3 multicentre HYPRO trial to investigate the effect of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with prostate cancer. Here, we examine whether patients experience differences in acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary adverse effects. METHODS In this randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial, done in seven radiotherapy centres in the Netherlands, we enrolled intermediate-risk or high-risk patients aged between 44 and 85 years with histologically confirmed stage T1b-T4 NX-0MX-0 prostate cancer, a PSA concentration of 60 ng/mL or lower, and WHO performance status of 0-2. A web-based application was used to randomly assign (1:1) patients to receive either standard fractionation with 39 fractions of 2 Gy in 8 weeks (five fractions per week) or hypofractionation with 19 fractions of 3·4 Gy in 6·5 weeks (three fractions per week). Randomisation was done with minimisation procedure, stratified by treatment centre and risk group. The primary endpoint is 5-year relapse-free survival. Here we report data for the acute toxicity outcomes: the cumulative incidence of grade 2 or worse acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity. Non-inferiority of hypofractionation was tested separately for genitourinary and gastrointestinal acute toxic effects, with a null hypothesis that cumulative incidences of each type of adverse event were not more than 8% higher in the hypofractionation group than in the standard fractionation group. We scored acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects according to RTOG-EORTC criteria from both case report forms and patients' self-assessment questionnaires, at baseline, twice during radiotherapy, and 3 months after completion of radiotherapy. Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Patient recruitment has been completed. This study is registered with www.controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN85138529. FINDINGS Between March 19, 2007, and Dec 3, 2010, 820 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with standard fractionation (n=410) or hypofractionation (n=410). 3 months after radiotherapy, 73 (22%) patients in the standard fractionation group and 75 (23%) patients in the hypofractionation group reported grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicity; grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal toxicity was noted in 43 (13%) patients in the standard fractionation group and in 42 (13%) in the hypofractionation group. Grade 4 acute genitourinary toxicity was reported for two patients, one (<1%) in each group. No grade 4 acute gastrointestinal toxicities were observed. We noted no significant difference in cumulative incidence by 120 days after radiotherapy of grade 2 or worse acute genitourinary toxicity (57·8% [95% CI 52·9-62·7] in the standard fractionation group vs 60·5% (55·8-65·3) in the hypofractionation group; difference 2·7%, 90% CI -2·99 to 8·48; odds ratio [OR] 1·12, 95% CI 0·84-1·49; p=0·43). The cumulative incidence of grade 2 or worse acute gastrointestinal toxicity by 120 days after radiotherapy was higher in patients given hypofractionation (31·2% [95% CI 26·6-35·8] in the standard fractionation group vs 42·0% [37·2-46·9] in the hypofractionation group; difference 10·8%, 90% CI 5·25-16·43; OR 1·6; p=0·0015; non-inferiority not confirmed). INTERPRETATION Hypofractionated radiotherapy was not non-inferior to standard fractionated radiotherapy in terms of acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity for men with intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer. In fact, the cumulative incidence of grade 2 or worse acute gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly higher in patients given hypofractionation than in those given standard fractionated radiotherapy. Patients remain in follow-up for efficacy endpoints. FUNDING The Dutch Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Erik Schimmel
- Institute for Radiation Oncology Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Emile van Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Stijn Krol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maarten Dirkx
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
van de Water S, Valli L, Aluwini S, Lanconelli N, Heijmen B, Hoogeman M. Intrafraction prostate translations and rotations during hypofractionated robotic radiation surgery: dosimetric impact of correction strategies and margins. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88:1154-60. [PMID: 24661668 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2013] [Revised: 12/22/2013] [Accepted: 12/27/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion and the effect of robot correction strategies for hypofractionated CyberKnife treatments with a simultaneously integrated boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 548 real-time prostate motion tracks from 17 patients were available for dosimetric simulations of CyberKnife treatments, in which various correction strategies were included. Fixed time intervals between imaging/correction (15, 60, 180, and 360 seconds) were simulated, as well as adaptive timing (ie, the time interval reduced from 60 to 15 seconds in case prostate motion exceeded 3 mm or 2° in consecutive images). The simulated extent of robot corrections was also varied: no corrections, translational corrections only, and translational corrections combined with rotational corrections up to 5°, 10°, and perfect rotational correction. The correction strategies were evaluated for treatment plans with a 0-mm or 3-mm margin around the clinical target volume (CTV). We recorded CTV coverage (V100%) and dose-volume parameters of the peripheral zone (boost), rectum, bladder, and urethra. RESULTS Planned dose parameters were increasingly preserved with larger extents of robot corrections. A time interval between corrections of 60 to 180 seconds provided optimal preservation of CTV coverage. To achieve 98% CTV coverage in 98% of the treatments, translational and rotational corrections up to 10° were required for the 0-mm margin plans, whereas translational and rotational corrections up to 5° were required for the 3-mm margin plans. Rectum and bladder were spared considerably better in the 0-mm margin plans. Adaptive timing did not improve delivered dose. CONCLUSIONS Intrafraction prostate motion substantially affected the delivered dose but was compensated for effectively by robot corrections using a time interval of 60 to 180 seconds. A 0-mm margin required larger extents of additional rotational corrections than a 3-mm margin but resulted in lower doses to rectum and bladder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven van de Water
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lorella Valli
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Alma Mater Studiorum, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nico Lanconelli
- Alma Mater Studiorum, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Aluwini S, van Rooij PHE, Kirkels WJ, Boormans JL, Kolkman-Deurloo IKK, Wijnmaalen A. Bladder function preservation with brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and limited surgery in bladder cancer patients: Long-term results [corrected]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88:611-7. [PMID: 24411629 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2013] [Revised: 11/13/2013] [Accepted: 11/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report long-term results of a bladder preservation strategy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) using external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy/interstitial radiation therapy (IRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between May 1989 and October 2011, 192 selected patients with MIBC were treated with a combined regimen of preoperative external beam radiation therapy and subsequent surgical exploration with or without partial cystectomy and insertion of source carrier tubes for afterloading IRT using low dose rate and pulsed dose rate. Data for oncologic and functional outcomes were prospectively collected. The primary endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), bladder function preservation survival, and salvage cystectomy-free survival. The endpoints were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The mean follow-up period was 105.5 months. The LRFS rate was 80% and 73% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Salvage cystectomy-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 93% and 85%. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 65% and 46%, whereas cancer-specific survival at 5 and 10 years was 75% and 67%. The distant metastases-free survival rate was 76% and 69% at 5 and 10 years. Multivariate analysis revealed no independent predictors of LRFS. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥3 late bladder and rectum toxicity were recorded in 11 patients (5.7%) and 2 patients (1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS A multimodality bladder-sparing regimen using IRT offers excellent long-term oncologic outcome in selected patients with MIBC. The late toxicity rate is low, and the majority of patients preserve their functional bladder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institution, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter H E van Rooij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institution, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J Kirkels
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institution, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institution, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arendjan Wijnmaalen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institution, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|