Developmental expression patterns of bone morphogenetic proteins, receptors, and binding proteins in the chick retina

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), a large subfamily of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of growth factors, have been implicated in patterning of the central nervous system, but their role in the retina is much less well known. As an initial step in addressing this issue, we have investigated by in situ hybridization the expression patterns of BMP-2, -4, -5, -6, and -7, BMP receptor kinases (BRKs) -1, -2, and -3, and BMP binding proteins noggin and chordin, in the chick embryonic eye at embryonic day 3 (E3), and in isolated retinas at E6, E8, and E18. Strikingly, all mRNAs examined had spatially restricted patterns of expression in the early eye, with the receptors found primarily in the ventral portion of the retina and in the optic stalk, and the ligands and binding proteins localized to other regions of the retina and/or retinal pigment epithelium. Dorso-ventrally restricted patterns of expression persisted at E8, but were no longer apparent at E18, whereas layer-specific patterns of expression were detectable at both E8 and E18. This distribution of BMP family members, receptors, and binding proteins within the retina appears consistent with a possible role in patterning and/or differentiation of this tissue.

Identification of two rds/peripherin homologs in the chick retina

PURPOSE

To identify possible homologs of mammalian rds/peripherin in chick photoreceptors.

METHODS

An embryonic day-15 chick retinal library was screened by polymerase chain reaction with degenerate oligonucleotide primers derived from conserved segments of the mammalian retinal degeneration slow (rds) mRNA. The resultant amplification products were used to isolate cDNAs, containing complete coding regions. These clones were studied by nucleotide sequence, Northern blot, and in situ hybridization analyses.

RESULTS

Two new homologs of rds/peripherin were discovered: crds1 and crds2. The predicted crds1 protein is 78%, and the predicted crds2 protein is 54%, identical to mammalian rds/peripherin. The crds1 mRNA is an abundant 4.4-kb species present in photoreceptors. The crds2 mRNA is of similar size but is much rarer. No homologs of rom1 were identified in our screen. Developmentally, the crds1 mRNAs were first detectable at embryonic day 18.

CONCLUSIONS

Crds1 likely represents the chick ortholog of mammalian rds/peripherin, whereas crds2 is a more distant homolog. Both share an elongated C-terminal domain, an unusual feature compared with other members of the rds family.

Pax-6, Prox 1, and Chx10 homeobox gene expression correlates with phenotypic fate of retinal precursor cells

PURPOSE

To study the expression patterns of the homeobox genes Pax-6, Prox 1, and Chx10 during chick retinal development in vivo and in vitro.

METHODS

Sections of paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded eyes were obtained at a range of developmental stages. In situ hybridization was carried out on tissue sections using digoxigenin-labeled sense and antisense RNA probes that recognize chicken Pax-6 and Prox 1 (whose sequences were already available), and chicken Chx10 (which was cloned and sequenced as part of this study). Selected developmental stages were also studied by immunocytochemistry with antibodies against Pax-6 and Prox 1, and by Northern blot analysis using 32P-labeled probes.

RESULTS

Until embryonic day (ED) 5, in situ hybridization shows widespread, diffuse distribution of all three genes. Between ED 6 and ED 8, however, they acquire distinct, topographically specific patterns of expression. The Prox 1 signal is predominantly expressed in the prospective horizontal cell layer of the neuroepithelium, decreases vitreally, and is absent from ganglion cells and the prospective photoreceptor layer. Pax-6 is strongly expressed only in the prospective ganglion-cell and amacrine-cell regions at the same stages, and is not detected in prospective photoreceptors. Chx10 expression becomes concentrated in the future bipolar-cell region of the inner nuclear layer. Similar patterns are maintained by ED 15 through ED 18, after cell differentiation has taken place. Pax-6 and Prox 1 immunoreactive materials showed nuclear localization and a pattern of laminar distribution equivalent to that seen by in situ hybridization.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the differentiated fate of retinal precursor cells may be influenced by Pax-6, Prox 1, or Chx10, this hypothesis is now being tested using dissociated chick embryo retinal cell cultures.

Correlations between terminal mitosis and differentiated fate of retinal precursor cells in vivo and in vitro: analysis with the "window-labeling" technique

We have investigated with high resolution the timing of retinal precursor cell commitment to specific differentiated fates, using an in ovo modification of the in vitro "window-labeling" technique (A. M. Repka and R. Adler, J. Histochem. Cytochem. 40, 947-953, 1992a). The method involves an initial injection of tritiated thymidine into chick embryos, followed a specific number of hours later by an injection of bromodeoxyuridine (BrDU); cells born during this period are identified by being labeled with thymidine but not with BrDU. We used this method to determine, in a narrow region adjacent to the choroid fissure, the fate of cells born during defined 5-hr intervals between Embryonic Days (ED) 4-8. All the cohorts gave rise to heterogenous differentiated populations, indicating that time of cell birth is not a major cell fate determinant. A progressive restriction in the developmental potential of precursor cells, however, was suggested by the observed decrease in the number of different populations generated during each 5-hr period from ED 4 to 8, and supported also by dissociated cell culture experiments investigating the fate of cells born at different developmental stages. Microenvironmental influences were tested in vitro using cells windowed-labeled in ovo for 5 hr on ED 5. After spending at least 72 hr within the retina before their isolation for culture, these cells mimicked their in vivo fate, giving rise predominantly to nonphotoreceptor neurons; a completely different behavior was observed when the cells were isolated after shorter exposures to the retinal microenvironment, when they gave rise predominantly to photoreceptors. Together with data demonstrating that differential cell death cannot account for these results, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that cell fate determination occurs after the time of terminal mitosis.

Intragenic sequences are required for cell type-specific and injury-induced expression of the rat peripherin gene

Peripherin is a 57 kDa type III intermediate-filament protein that is thought to play a role in axonogenesis both during development and following nerve injury (Oblinger et al., 1989; Escurat et al., 1990; Gorham et al., 1990; Troy et al., 1990b). We have used transgenic mouse technology to define peripherin gene sequences that are necessary for cell type-specific expression and for the increase in peripherin that occurs in response to axonal injury. Correct temporal and nervous system-specific expression resulted when 5.8 kilobases of peripherin 5' flanking sequence were linked to a reporter gene, but precise cell type-specific expression was achieved only when intragenic sequences were included. When intragenic sequences were present, peripherin transgenes were expressed in dorsal root ganglion neurons and spinal cord motor neurons and were upregulated in these cells following nerve injury.