[Does patient communication influence kinesiophobia? A systematic review]

The aim of the present systematic review was to determine the effect of communication in the health care setting on kinesiophobia. To this end, a literature search was conducted in seven databases between November 2022 and February 2023. The review was carried out following the PRISMA statement and for the analysis of methodological quality we used: PEDro Scale, Van Tulder criteria and risk of bias analysis of the Cochrane Collaboration. A total of 13 articles were included with a mean methodological quality of 7.1 out of 10. Significant results were obtained for at least one variable (kinesiophobia, disability or level of physical activity) in 12 articles. There is strong evidence that communication can influence a subject's kinesiophobia. This influence is most likely to be in a negative or disabling sense, but it can also act in a positive sense by decreasing it.

Non adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and strategies to improve adherence

Lipid lowering therapies is well-established to prevent cardiovascular events in adults with dyslipidemia and multiple risk factors. However, global clinical usage of LLT,particularly statins remains suboptimal, with adherence low rates for primary prevention and secondary prevention. Low adherence is influenced by concerns about side effects, misconceptions about benefits. Patients often discontinue statins due to perceived side effects, despite clinical trials showing no increase in symptoms compared to placebo. Poor understanding of statin benefits, doubts about their necessity, and suspicions of over prescription contribute to nonadherence, which is often amplified by negative portrayal of LLT specialy statins on social media. Strategies to improve adherence include addressing patient concerns, enhancing physician-patient communication, and increasing patient education. Optimizing statin usage and reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease necessitates addressing patient perceptions and improving communication between healthcare providers and patients.

Patient-reported muscle symptoms and their characterization in a hypertensive population eligible for statin therapy: An exploratory study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are claimed to be frequent in clinical practice. We evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of patient-reported muscle symptoms (PRMS) attributed to drugs/nutraceuticals in hypertensive patients, focusing the attention on statin treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Observational study on 390 consecutive outpatients. All patients were asked the following question: "Have you ever taken a drug/nutraceutical that you think gave you muscle symptoms?". Patients who answered "yes" were evaluated with a modified version of the SAMS-clinical index (SAMS-CI). Mean age: 60.5 ± 13.5 years (males 53.8%.). Patients who have ever taken a statin: 250. Patients who have never taken a statin: 140. Prevalence of PRMS (48.5% of the entire study population) did not differ between groups (p = 0.217). Only age, followed by number of drugs taken, was significantly associated with PRMS at multivariate analysis. A high prevalence of low scores to all the questions of "modified" SAMS-CI was found in both groups. Localization and pattern of PRMS did not differ between groups (p = 0.170). Timing of PRMS onset after starting the drug (p = 0.036) and timing of improvement after withdrawal (p = 0.002) were associated with statin therapy.

CONCLUSION

PRMS are highly prevalent among the hypertensive population and are believed to be drug-related, especially with aging and regardless of whether the drug taken is a statin or not. These findings are in line with the growing evidence that subjective muscle symptoms are often misattributed to statins, while they may more likely be related to the nocebo/drucebo effect or to other common undiagnosed conditions.

The relationship between expectancy, anxiety, and the nocebo effect: a systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for future research

Despite the theoretical prominence of expectancy and anxiety as potential mechanisms of the nocebo effect, not all studies measure expectancy and/or anxiety, and there are inconsistent findings among those that do. The present study sought to systematically review and meta-analyse available data to evaluate the relationship between expectancy, anxiety and the nocebo effect. The two key questions were: (1) whether nocebo manipulations influence expectancy and anxiety; and (2) whether expectancy and anxiety are associated with the subsequent nocebo effect. Fifty-nine independent studies (n = 3129) were identified via database searches to 1st August 2021. Nocebo manipulations reliably increased negative expectancy with a large effect (g = .837) and state anxiety with a small effect (g = .312). Changes in expectancy and state anxiety due to the nocebo manipulation were associated with larger nocebo effects (r = .376 and .234, respectively). However, there was no significant association between dispositional anxiety and the nocebo effect. These findings support theories that rely on situationally-induced expectancy and anxiety, but not dispositional anxiety, to explain nocebo effects. Importantly, being malleable, these findings suggest that interventions that target maladaptive negative expectancies and state anxiety could be beneficial for reducing the harm nocebo effects cause across health settings. Recommendations for future research are discussed.

Nocebo Hypothesis Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (NH-CBT) for non-epileptic seizures: a consecutive case series

BACKGROUND

Research has demonstrated that implementation of Nocebo Hypothesis Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (NH-CBT) achieved full symptom remission in 93% of people with Functional Neurological Symptoms Disorder (FNSD), most of them exhibiting motor symptoms. The basis for NH-CBT is consistent with a predictive coding aetiological model of FNSD. This idea is transparently shared with people with FNSD in the form of telling them that their symptoms are caused by a nocebo effect, usually followed by some physical activity that aims to change the person's belief about their body.

AIMS

To demonstrate that a version of NH-CBT can also be effective in eliminating or reducing non-epileptic seizures (assumed to be a sub-type of FNSD).

METHOD

A consecutive case series design was employed. Participants were treated with NH-CBT over a 12-week period. The primary outcome measure was seizure frequency. Numerous secondary measures were employed, as well as a brief qualitative interview to explore participants' subjective experience of treatment.

RESULTS

Seven out of the 10 participants became seizure free at least 2 weeks before their post-treatment assessment, and all stayed seizure-free for at least 5 months. Six of those seven remained seizure free at 6-month follow-up. There were large positive effect sizes for the majority of secondary measures assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series provides evidence of feasibility and likely utility of NH-CBT in reducing the frequency of non-epileptic seizures.

Nocebo Hyperalgesia in Patients With Fibromyalgia and Healthy Controls: An Experimental Investigation of Conditioning and Extinction Processes at Baseline and 1-Month Follow-up

Nocebo effects are adverse treatment outcomes that are not ascribed to active treatment components. Potentially, their magnitude might be higher in patients with chronic pain compared to healthy controls since patients likely experience treatment failure more frequently. The current study investigated group differences in the induction and extinction of nocebo effects on pressure pain at baseline (N = 69) and 1-month follow-up (N = 56) in female patients with fibromyalgia and matched healthy controls. Nocebo effects were first experimentally induced via classical conditioning combined with instructions on the pain-increasing function of a sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device, then decreased via extinction. One month later, the same procedures were repeated to explore their stability. Results suggest that nocebo effects were induced in the healthy control group during baseline and follow-up. In the patient group, nocebo effects were only induced during follow-up, without clear group differences. Extinction was only observed during baseline in the healthy control group. Further comparisons of nocebo effects and extinction indicated no significant changes across sessions, possibly suggesting their overall magnitudes were stable over time and across groups. In conclusion, contrary to our expectations, patients with fibromyalgia did not have stronger nocebo hyperalgesia; instead, they might be less responsive to nocebo manipulations than healthy controls. PERSPECTIVE: The current study is the first to investigate group differences in experimentally manipulated nocebo hyperalgesia between chronic pain and healthy populations at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Since nocebo effects are common in clinical settings, their investigation in different populations is essential to explain and minimize their adverse effects during treatment.

Disentangling pharmacological and expectation effects in antidepressant discontinuation among patients with fully remitted major depressive disorder: study protocol of a randomized, open-hidden discontinuation trial

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants are established as an evidence-based, guideline-recommended treatment for Major Depressive Disorder. Prescriptions have markedly increased in past decades, with a specific surge in maintenance prescribing. Patients often remain on antidepressants longer than clinically necessary. When attempting to stop, many patients experience adverse discontinuation symptoms. Discontinuation symptoms can be debilitating and hinder successful discontinuation. While discontinuation symptoms can result from pharmacological effects, evidence on nocebo-induced side effects of antidepressant use suggests that patients' expectations may also influence occurrence.

METHODS

To disentangle pharmacological and expectation effects in antidepressant discontinuation, patients with fully remitted Major Depressive Disorder who fulfill German guideline recommendations to discontinue will either remain on or discontinue their antidepressant. Participants' expectations will be manipulated by varying verbal instructions using an open-hidden paradigm. Within the open trial arms, participants will receive full information about treatment, i.e., high expectation. Within the hidden trial arms, participants will be informed about a 50% chance of discontinuing versus remaining on their antidepressant, i.e., moderate expectation. A total of N = 196 participants will be randomly assigned to either of the four experimental groups: open discontinuation (OD; n = 49), hidden discontinuation (HD; n = 49), open continuation (OC; n = 49), or hidden continuation (HC; n = 49). Discontinuation symptom load during the 13-week experimental phase will be our primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures include discontinuation symptom load during the subsequent 39-week clinical observation phase, recurrence during the 13-week experimental period, recurrence over the course of the complete 52-week trial evaluated in a time-to-event analysis, and stress, anxiety, and participants' attentional and emotional processing at 13 weeks post-baseline. Blood and saliva samples will be taken as objective markers of antidepressant blood serum level and stress. Optional rsfMRI measurements will be scheduled.

DISCUSSION

Until today, no study has explored the interplay of pharmacological effects and patients' expectations during antidepressant discontinuation. Disentangling their effects has important implications for understanding mechanisms underlying adverse discontinuation symptoms. Results can inform strategies to manage discontinuation symptoms and optimize expectations in order to help patients and physicians discontinue antidepressants more safely and effectively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05191277), January 13, 2022.

[Statin intolerance-Statin tolerance]

BACKGROUND

Statins are the first-line treatment for reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, because the evidence regarding safety, tolerability, and reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is very good. For combination treatment several options are available. Nevertheless, LDL cholesterol values are often not sufficiently lowered. One reason is intolerance of the lipid-lowering medications.

OBJECTIVE

In addition to the study situation regarding statin tolerability, possible approaches to overcome intolerability are also shown.

RESULTS

In randomized trials adverse effects due to statin treatment are as rare as in the placebo groups. In clinical practice patients more frequently report complaints, particularly muscular symptoms. One important reason for intolerability is the nocebo effect. Complaints during treatment can lead to the fact that statins are not taken or are taken in insufficient doses. As a result, the LDL cholesterol level is insufficiently lowered with unfavorable effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events. Therefore, it is important to establish a tolerable treatment together with the patient on an individual basis. Information about the facts is one important aspect. In addition, a positively guided communication with the patient helps to reduce the nocebo effect.

CONCLUSION

Most adverse effects that patients attribute to statins are not caused by statins. This shows that other reasons are frequent and should be the focus of medical care. In this article international recommendations and personal experiences of a specialized lipid outpatient clinic are described.

Negative language use of the physiotherapist in low back pain education impacts anxiety and illness beliefs: A randomised controlled trial in healthy respondents

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effect of physiotherapists' negative language use on nocebo effects of state anxiety and illness beliefs.

METHODS

A web-based randomised controlled trial included adults without recent musculoskeletal pain. The intervention was a short educational video about low back pain using negative language (nocebo condition: n = 87) versus a video using neutral or positive language (control condition: n = 82). State anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Illness beliefs were assessed using the Illness Perception Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Nocebo and control groups differed in outcome measures (MANOVA Pillai's trace = 0.22, F = 4.98; df = (9,159), p < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses showed a medium to large effect for the nocebo condition on anxiety (d = 0.71, 95% CI 0.4 -1.0). The nocebo group also had higher scores in three illness beliefs: beliefs on timeline (d = 0.45, 95% CI 0.14 - 0.75), treatment control (d = 0.43, 95% CI 0.12 - 0.74) and concern (d = 0.47, 95% CI 0.16 - 0.78).

CONCLUSION

Physiotherapists' use of negative language contributes directly to a higher state anxiety and illness beliefs that can trigger the nocebo effects in the recipient PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Negative language use should be avoided.

The Interplay Between Expected Psychological Responses to Exercise and Physical Activity in Analogue Generalized Anxiety Disorder: a Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Expectations for psychological responses to exercise are not well characterized, particularly in people at risk for anxiety-related illnesses. Given the substantial evidence for salutary effects of exercise on anxiety symptoms and emerging recognition for expectations as a critical mechanism of placebo/nocebo effects, this study explored the interplay between expectations and physical activity in young adults with and without analogue generalized anxiety disorder.

METHODS

Participants (N=470, 23.2±4.8 years, 63% female) completed a physical activity and mood survey, including a 7-day physical activity recall questionnaire, and a 20-item questionnaire designed to measure positive and negative expectations for psychological and perceptual responses to exercise, particularly expectations for symptoms in the generalized anxiety disorder symptom profile. Analogue generalized anxiety disorder status was determined using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder subscale of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire.

RESULTS

For select outcomes, expected exercise-induced changes significantly differed according to analogue generalized anxiety disorder (whole-body pain, sleep quality, psychological well-being, stress, relaxation) and active versus inactive (anxious mood, depressed mood, concentration, physical function, psychological well-being, relaxation) status. However, these findings did not survive corrections for multiple comparisons and the magnitude of these differences was small, approximating 0.25 standard deviations. Expectations for anxious (Spearman's ρ=-0.14, p≤0.002) and depressed mood (ρ=-0.15, p≤0.002), and psychological well-being (ρ=0.15, p≤0.001) were significantly associated with higher physical activity levels. Exercise expectations for anxious mood explained a significant, but small (+1.5%, p≤0.03), amount of variance in physical activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Expectations for exercise-induced improvements did not significantly differ between young adults based on analogue generalized anxiety disorder or physical activity status.

The influence of video-based social modelling on the nocebo effect

OBJECTIVE

Seeing someone else experience side effects (i.e., social modelling) can increase negative expectations and subsequent nocebo effects. In face-to-face contexts, this effect appears stronger in female participants. Less is known about the influence of gender on negative expectations and nocebo effects generated via video-based social modelling.

METHODS

One hundred and seven undergraduate participants recruited from a participant pool at an Australian university took part in a study ostensibly investigating the influence of beta-blocker medications (actually a sham treatment) on physiological and psychological aspects of anxiety. Participants were randomly assigned to either a no-treatment control group, a standard treatment group, or a video modelling group, in which participants viewed video-recorded confederates (one male, one female) report experiencing four side effects (two each) after taking the study treatment. Symptoms were assessed 15-min following pill ingestion, and at follow-up 24 h later.

RESULTS

Video modelling of side effects, compared to standard treatment, interacted with gender and was associated with increased reporting of modelled symptoms in female compared to male participants, p = .01, η_p²=0.06. Video modelling also increased negative expectations in female compared to male participants, p = .03, η_p²=0.07, and expectations mediated the influence of modelling on modelled symptoms in female participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Social modelling of side effects via video increased negative expectations, and nocebo symptoms, to a greater extent in female participants. These findings suggest that males and females are differentially impacted by video-based side effect modelling. Results have implications for social modelling of side effects via social media and patient-support websites.

Side effects of statins: from pathophysiology and epidemiology to diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Treatment with statins, inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, has proven beneficial preventive effects on cardiovascular events. However, discontinuation due to intolerance and non-adherence remain two of the major gaps in both primary and secondary prevention. This leads many patients with high-risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) to be inadequately treated or not to achieve target lipid level goals, and as consequence they undergo an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The aim of this review is thus to give an overview of the reasons for discontinuation and on the possible mechanisms behind them. Although statins, as a class, are generally safe, they are associated with an increased risk of diabetes mellitus and hepatic transaminase elevations. Incidence of cataracts or cognitive dysfunction and others presented in the literature (e.g. proteinuria and haematuria) have been never confirmed to have a causal link. Conversely, debated remains the effect on myalgia. Muscle side effects are the most commonly reported, although myalgia is still believed by some to be the result of a nocebo/drucebo effect. Concerning mechanisms behind muscular side effects, no clear conclusions have been reached. Thus, if on one side it is important to identify individuals either at higher risk to develop a side effect, or with confirmed risk factors and conditions of statin intolerance, on the other side alternative strategies should be identified to avoid an increased ASCVD risk.

Impact of media coverage on side effect reports from the COVID-19 vaccine

OBJECTIVE

Past research shows that media coverage of medicine side effects can produce a nocebo response. New Zealand news media discussed myocarditis following the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. This study examined whether side effects mentioned in the media increased compared to control symptoms not mentioned.

METHODS

The study analysed 64,086 vaccine adverse reaction reports, retrieved from the medicine safety authority. Generalised linear regressions compared the side effect rate during three discrete periods of media reporting (August 2021, December 2021, April 2022) with the pre-media baseline rate. The outcomes were weekly reports of chest discomfort, monthly reports of chest, heart and breathing symptoms, and myocarditis, pericarditis, and anxiety. Control symptoms were fever, numbness, and musculoskeletal pain. Logistic regressions investigated factors associated with side effect reporting.

RESULTS

The reporting rate of chest discomfort was 190% greater in the five weeks after the first media item (p < .001). The monthly reporting rates of the symptoms mentioned in the media were significantly greater after the news coverage (ps ≤ 0.001). There was no effect of media on the control side effect fever (p = .06). There was an effect of media on myocarditis, pericarditis and anxiety (ps < 0.001). Anxiety, male gender, and younger age were significantly associated with side effects.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that a media-induced nocebo response occurred. This is most likely due to increased expectations and awareness of COVID-19 vaccine side effects, elevated symptom experience from anxiety, and consequently greater reporting of the symptoms in line with the media coverage.

Developing principles for sharing information about potential trial intervention benefits and harms with patients: report of a modified Delphi survey

BACKGROUND

The way information about potential harms of trial intervention is shared within participant information leaflets (PILs) varies widely and can cause subjective 'nocebo' harms. This study aimed to develop principles to improve the composition of information about potential trial intervention benefits and harms within PILs so that variability and avoidable harms are reduced.

METHODS

We conducted a two-round modified online Delphi survey, followed by a consensus meeting. For the first round of the survey, 27 statements were developed based on previous research and relevant guidance from the UK, the USA and the World Health Organization. Participants included members from each of the following stakeholder groups: patient and public representatives, research ethics committee members, industry representatives, medico-legal experts, psychologists and trial managers. Each participant was asked to rate their degree of agreement or disagreement with each statement on a 9-point Likert scale. In the second round, participants were invited to reappraise their ratings after reviewing the results of the first round. Finally, two members from each stakeholder group participated in a meeting to confirm those statements for which there was agreement.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty participants completed round 1, and 201 participants completed round 2. In round 1, consensus was reached for 16 statements. In round 2, consensus was reached for an additional three statements. The consensus meeting confirmed the survey results and consolidated the statements. This process resulted in seven principles: (1) all potential harms of a given intervention should be listed, (2) all potential harms should be separated into serious and less serious, (3) it must be made explicit that not all potential harms are known, (4) all potential benefits should be listed, (5) all potential benefits and harms need to be compared with what would happen if the participant did not take part in the trial, (6) suitable visual representations should be added where appropriate and (7) information regarding potential benefits and harms should not be presented apart by one or more pages.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified Delphi process successfully generated seven principles that can and should be used to guide how information is conveyed to patients in information leaflets regarding potential trial benefits and harms.

Meta-analysis of the Placebo and Nocebo Effects Associated with Placebo Treatment in Randomized Trials of Lipid Lowering Therapy

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in which the control groups received placebo without background LLT offer unique insights into the placebo and nocebo effects of lipid-lowering RCTs.

METHODS

Embase and Medline were searched for hyperlipidemia RCTs with placebo-controlled arms. Placebo arms with background LLT were excluded. A single arm meta-analysis of proportions was used to estimate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and adverse events (AE). A meta-analysis of means was used to estimate the pooled mean differences of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and triglycerides.

RESULTS

A total of 40 RCTs and 37 668 placebo-treated participants were included. The pooled mean changes for TC, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides were -0.019 mmol/L, -0.028 mmol/L, 0.013 mmol/L and 0.062 mmol/L respectively among placebo-treated participants, indicating a modest placebo effect. The pooled average nocebo effect among placebo-treated participants was 42.62% for all AEs and 3.38% for musculoskeletal-related AEs, 11.36% for gastrointestinal-related AEs and 6.62% for headaches. Placebo-treated participants in secondary prevention RCTs had a far higher incidence of these nocebo effects than primary prevention RCTs: any AEs (OR 6.76, 95%CI: 5.56-8.24, P < 0.001), and gastrointestinal-related AE (OR 1.23, 95%CI: 1.00-1.51, P = 0.049). No differences in nocebo effects were found between the placebo arms of statin and non-statin trials.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis of placebo-treated participants in RCTs with no background LLT indicate a modest placebo effect but prominent nocebo effect of musculoskeletal, headache and gastrointestinal symptoms that was greatest among secondary prevention RCTs. These findings may inform the design of future LLT RCTs.

The reward for placebos: mechanisms underpinning placebo-induced effects on motor performance

Different from the most popular thinking, the placebo effect is not a purely psychological phenomenon. A body of knowledge from multidisciplinary fields has shown that the expectation of a potential benefit when receiving a treatment induces a cascade of neurochemical-electrophysiological alterations in brain reward areas, including motor-related ones. Alterations in the dopamine, opioid, and glutamate metabolism are the neural representation converting reward-derived declarative forms into an attractive and wanted behavior, thereby changing the activation in reward subcortical and cortical structures involved in motor planning, motor execution, and emotional-cognitive attributes of decision-making. We propose that the expectation of receiving a treatment that is beneficial to motor performance triggers a cascade of activations in brain reward areas that travels from motor planning and motor command areas, passing through corticospinal pathways until driving the skeletal muscles, therefore facilitating the motor performance. Although alternative explanations cannot be totally ruled out, this mechanistic route is robust in explaining the results of placebo-induced effects on motor performance and could lead to novel insights and applications in the exercise sciences. Factors such as sex differences in reward-related mechanisms and aversion-induced nocebo effects should also be addressed.

A Review of Statin Intolerance: a Focus on Statin-Attributed Muscle Symptoms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a systematic approach to management of the patient with statin-attributed muscle symptoms.

RECENT FINDINGS

We examined the prevalence of statin intolerance, the role of the nocebo effect, key findings in the patient's history and laboratory studies, the potential value of coronary calcium scoring, and the importance of shared decision-making in considering statin re-initiation. Most patients with statin-attributed muscle symptoms can be successfully treated with statins or a combination of statins and non-statins to achieve successful ASCVD risk reduction.

Placebo: a brief updated review

Our aims were to provide updated information on placebo/nocebo effect and the potential use of placebo in clinical practice. This article can only provide a rough overview on the placebo and nocebo effect and is intended to serve as a starting point for the reader to go deeper into the corresponding literature. The placebo effect has been observed in multiple medical conditions, after oral administration, with manual therapies as well as with surgery and invasive procedures. The use of placebo in clinical trials is fundamental, although the ethics of its use is under discussion. The placebo may behave like a drug from the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic point of view and can also be associated with adverse events (nocebo effect). Placebo can modify treatment by increasing or decreasing the effects of drugs. The factors associated with the occurrence of placebo effect are multiple, but in addition to those that depend on the placebo itself, the doctor-patient relationship would be the most important. As a result of findings that were published in the last two decades, the psycho-neurobiological basis of placebo is becoming better understood, although further studies are needed. In conclusion, the placebo effect in the clinic exhibits weak to moderate intensity. Placebo, in addition to its use in the clinical trial, should be considered another therapeutic remedy either as stand alone or in association with treatment, and could be useful in certain circumstances. The use of placebo should be regulated by the European health authorities through a guide in clinical practice that will improve patient care.

The effect of a methadone reformulation on opioid agonist treatment outcomes: A population-based study in British Columbia, Canada, 2013-14

INTRODUCTION

The province of British Columbia, Canada, changed the existing oral anhydrous methadone solution to a 10-times more concentrated pre-mixed solution, Methadose®, on February 1, 2014. We aimed to assess the immediate effects of the methadone reformulation on missed doses, days off methadone, changes in medication dosing and dispensations of opioids for pain, and hospitalizations and mortality among all people receiving treatment at or near the time of the change.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study including all individuals receiving at least one methadone dispensation in the 12 months prior to the study period. We executed a difference-in-differences analysis by estimating a multivariate regression model to compare outcomes in the three months before and after the reformulation (November 1, 2013 to April 30, 2014) versus a time-lagged control cohort with similar characteristics observed during an equivalent nonoverlapping interval. We used daily individual-level linked health administrative data capturing missed doses, days off methadone, changes in methadone dosing, concurrent dispensations of opioids for pain, hospitalizations, and mortality. We stratified the cohorts into three subgroups: (i) those receiving OAT for ≥12 months; (ii) those receiving OAT for <12 months; and (iii) those not receiving OAT at the start of the study period. We conducted sensitivity analyses and placebo tests to assess the robustness of our results.

RESULTS

Among the 16,339 individuals receiving methadone during the study period, the reformulation was associated with more instances of methadone dose increases (34.5% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 27.4%, 41.5%]). For those retained in treatment ≥12 months prior to the study period (n = 7449), the reformulation was associated with more instances of methadone dose increases (50.2% [39.5%, 60.8%]) and dispensations of opioids for pain (62.2% [40.8%, 83.5%]), as well as an increase in missed doses (41.9% [29.1%, 54.7%]) and days off methadone (62.6% [39.7%, 85.4%]). We found no statistically significant change in risk of hospitalization or mortality. Sensitivity analyses supported our results.

CONCLUSION

Our results reinforce the need expressed by people receiving methadone for greater client involvement in the planning and implementation of regulatory changes that may impact client care, especially those patients with a relatively long treatment history.

SAMSON and the Nocebo Effect: Management of Statin Intolerance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Statins are essential medications in the treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; however, remain widely underutilized in large part due to concerns regarding adverse side effects. We describe the role of the nocebo effect in the perception of statin intolerance and provide management recommendations utilizing both statin and non-statin lipid-lowering therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent Self-Assessment Method for Statin side-effects Or Nocebo (SAMSON) trial demonstrated that 90% of adverse symptoms related to statins were also elicited by placebo, a powerful demonstration of the nocebo effect. Importantly, 50% of the study patients were able to successfully reinitiate statin therapy. Statin intolerance is common and can often be managed with expectation setting and adjustment of doses and/or dosing regimens. In those who remain unable to tolerate statins, numerous alternative lipid-lowering therapies exist with strong safety and efficacy profiles.

Step-by-step diagnosis and management of the nocebo/drucebo effect in statin-associated muscle symptoms patients: a position paper from the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP)

Statin intolerance is a clinical syndrome whereby adverse effects (AEs) associated with statin therapy [most commonly statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS)] result in the discontinuation of therapy and consequently increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, complete statin intolerance occurs in only a small minority of treated patients (estimated prevalence of only 3-5%). Many perceived AEs are misattributed (e.g. physical musculoskeletal injury and inflammatory myopathies), and subjective symptoms occur as a result of the fact that patients expect them to do so when taking medicines (the nocebo/drucebo effect)-what might be truth even for over 50% of all patients with muscle weakness/pain. Clear guidance is necessary to enable the optimal management of plasma in real-world clinical practice in patients who experience subjective AEs. In this Position Paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP), we present a step-by-step patient-centred approach to the identification and management of SAMS with a particular focus on strategies to prevent and manage the nocebo/drucebo effect and to improve long-term compliance with lipid-lowering therapy.

Moving forward: Implementing health psychology research to improve patient acceptance of biosimilars

As more biosimilars enter the pharmaceutical market, patient acceptance remains a significant barrier to their uptake. Psychological factors, such as negative expectations, are important causes of patient hesitancy. As a result, patients can develop nocebo responses following a transition, discontinue biosimilar treatment early, or have poor adherence. These negative outcomes may offset some of the cost-saving potential of biosimilars. Key healthcare professionals such as pharmacists, physicians, and nurses already play a noteworthy role in educating and transitioning patients. However, given the psychological aspect of biosimilar acceptance, it is logical for healthcare professionals and researchers to draw on research and theory from health psychology. This commentary outlines how a multidisciplinary approach can add to the understanding of the mechanisms behind patient resistance to biosimilars and help engage patients in the transitioning process. It also explores how health psychology strategies that have been successful in similar areas can be translated to help conduct more effective transitions. Future directions in research are discussed.

Patients' perceptions on non-specific effects of acupuncture: Qualitative comparison between responders and non-responders

BACKGROUND

Non-specific effect of acupuncture constitutes part of the overall effect generated via clinical encounter beyond needle insertion and stimulation. It is unclear how responders and non-responders of acupuncture experience non-specific effects differently. We aimed to compare their experiences in a nested qualitative study embedded in an acupuncture randomized trial on functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

Purposive sampling was used to capture experience of responders (n=15) and non-responders (n=15) to acupuncture via individual in-depth interviews. Design and analysis followed a framework analysis approach, with reference to an existing model on acupuncture non-specific effects. Themes emerging outside of this model were purposefully explored.

RESULTS

Responders had a more trusting relationship with acupuncturist in response to their expression of empathy. In turn they were more actively engaged in lifestyle modifications and dietary advice offered by acupuncturists. Non-responders were not satisfied with the level of reassurance regarding acupuncture safety. They were also expecting more peer support from fellow participants, regarded that as an empowerment process for initiating and sustaining lifestyle changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlighted key differences in acupuncture non-specific effect components experienced by responders and non-responders. Positive non-specific effects contributing to overall benefits could be enhanced by emphasizing on empathy expression from acupuncturists, trust-building, offering appropriate explanations on safety, and organizing patient support groups. Further research on the relative importance of each component is warranted.

What is the nocebo effect and does it apply to dentistry? A narrative review

Background

Evidence for the nocebo effect, a phenomenon characterised by suboptimal treatment efficacy, worsening of symptoms, or the occurrence of adverse events caused by an individual’s negative treatment expectations, is growing across a multitude of medical fields. However, little attention has been paid to patients’ negative expectations and the nocebo effect within dentistry.

Aim

This review summarises essential evidence of the nocebo phenomenon especially in relation to pain and drug administration. Subsequently, an overview of the current evidence of the nocebo phenomenon in the dental field is presented.

Methods

A PubMed search was performed using keywords related to “nocebo,” “placebo,” “expectations,” and “dentistry.” In addition to the articles selected from the search, placebo/nocebo researchers and dental researchers added important references from their respective fields.

Results

Although research on the nocebo effect in dentistry is limited, available current evidence suggests that the factors, which is related to the nocebo effect are likely to play a role in dental practice.

Conclusion

Preliminary evidence from the review warrants further investigation into the nocebo effect in dentistry. Finally, based on the general knowledge of the nocebo effect, the review indicates fruitful arrays of research into the nocebo effect in dentistry.

[From gut feeling to visceral pain : Effects of negative expectations in the context of the gut-brain axis]

Disturbances of the gut-brain axis are characterized by complex dysfunctions on peripheral and central nervous system levels, which can contribute to visceral hypervigilance and hyperalgesia and imprint visceral pain. Numerous cognitive, emotional and psychoneurobiological factors are involved in visceral pain modulation, which in the psychosocial treatment concept can have a positive as well as a negative impact on the experience of visceral pain. Nocebo effects induced by negative expectations are of high clinical relevance in acute and especially in chronic visceral pain but the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. Verbal instructions, previous experiences and learning processes as well as emotional factors, such as fear and stress contribute to the development and maintenance of negative expectation effects. Targeted communication strategies, a sensitive use of information in the clarification and positive environmental context conditions can contribute to establishing an adequate expectation management and minimize negative expectation effects in the clinical practice. At the same time, translational research approaches are required to gain further insights into the mediators and moderators of negative expectation effects and to transfer these into clinical practice. In this way the treatment of patients with disorders of the gut-brain communication can be improved.

Side-effect expectations from COVID-19 vaccination: Findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS - wave 2)

OBJECTIVES

Concern about side effects is one of the most common reasons for refusing vaccination. Side-effect expectations are known to predict perception of side effects. We aimed to investigate the percentage of people who thought side effects from COVID-19 vaccination were likely and investigate factors associated with side-effect expectation.

METHODS

Online cross-sectional survey of 1470 UK adults who had not been vaccinated for COVID-19 (conducted 13 to 15 January 2021). We asked participants how likely they thought side effects from COVID-19 vaccination were. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate associations with side-effect expectations.

RESULTS

Most participants were uncertain whether they would experience side effects from a COVID-19 vaccine; only a minority reported that side effects were very likely (9.4%, 95% CI 7.9% to 10.9%, n = 138/1470). Personal and clinical characteristics, general, and COVID-19 vaccination beliefs and attitudes explained 29.7% of the variance in side-effect expectation, with COVID-19 vaccination beliefs alone accounting for 17.2%. Side-effect expectations were associated with: older age, being clinically extremely vulnerable to COVID-19, being afraid of needles, lower perceived social norms for COVID-19 vaccination, lower perceived necessity and safety of COVID-19 vaccination, and perceived lack of information about COVID-19 and vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Side-effect expectation was associated with believing that COVID-19 vaccination was unsafe, ineffective and that others would be less likely to approve of you having a COVID-19 vaccination. Communications should emphasise the safety, effectiveness, and widespread uptake of vaccination, while promoting accurate perceptions of the incidence of vaccination side effects.

Increasing and dampening the nocebo response following medicine-taking: A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The nocebo effect is the adverse effects of treatment that cannot be attributed to a medicine. We investigated if we could increase or decrease nocebo responding following medicine taking. A nocebo explanation to reduce side effects was compared with a negative medication news item designed to increase side effects and a control condition.

METHODS

108 healthy participants enrolled in a between-subjects study purportedly testing the effect of lamotrigine (actually placebo) on mood and cognition. Participants were randomised to watch either a video explaining the nocebo effect; a negative media item on lamotrigine, or control video prior to receiving the tablet. Side effects were assessed at 45-min and 48-h.

RESULTS

The negative media group reported significantly more side effects (M = 0.78, SD = 1.53) than the control group (M = 0.46, SD = 1.80, p = .035) at the end of session and a greater proportion of the negative media group (33%) reported at least one side effect compared to the nocebo explanation (11%) and control group (11%, p = .020). The nocebo explanation group reported significantly fewer side effects (M = 0.38, SD = 1.16) than the control group (M = 1.37, SD = 2.98, p = .038) at the 48-h follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Explaining the nocebo effect may be a beneficial addition to standard medicine information for reducing side effect reporting. Negative media coverage about a drug is likely to generate increased side effects. Future research should examine the benefit of nocebo explanation in patients starting new medicines.

[The effect of treatment expectations on pruritus and skin pain]

Hintergrund

Patientenerwartungen in Bezug auf den Nutzen einer medizinischen Behandlung stellen eine wichtige Determinante für die Placeboantwort dar. Sie können Entwicklung und Verlauf von Erkrankungen sowie Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von Therapien maßgeblich beeinflussen. Die Mechanismen, die diese Placebo- und Noceboeffekte vermitteln, wurden bislang am besten auf dem Gebiet der Placeboanalgesie beschrieben. Aber auch in der Dermatologie findet sich eine zunehmende Evidenz dafür, dass verschiedene Symptome wie Schmerzen an der Haut und Pruritus (Jucken) sowie verschiedene dermatologische Erkrankungen durch die Behandlungserwartungen von Patienten moduliert werden können.

Ziel der Arbeit

Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist die Darstellung der aktuellen Datenlage in Bezug auf den Einfluss von Erwartungseffekten auf dermatologische Symptome wie Pruritus und Hautschmerzen sowie auf verschiedene dermatologische Erkrankungen. Schließlich soll die Bedeutung dieses Themas für Ärzte, die Patienten mit Hautsymptomen behandeln, vermittelt werden.

Material und Methoden

Es handelt sich um eine narrative Übersichtsarbeit.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Eine zunehmende Anzahl von Studien an gesunden Probanden und dermatologischen Patienten zeigt, dass Hautsymptome wie Pruritus und Schmerzen durch die Induktion positiver Erwartungen verringert und durch die Induktion negativer Erwartungen verstärkt werden können. Vorherige Behandlungserfahrungen der Patienten sowie die Qualität und Quantität der Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation spielen für die Induktion der Behandlungserwartung eine zentrale Rolle.

Schlussfolgerung

Techniken, die darauf abzielen, positive Erwartungseffekte von Patienten mit Hautsymptomen zu maximieren und negative zu minimieren, sollten in die klinische Routine implementiert werden.

Coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with statin associated muscle symptoms: Prescribing statins for those most likely to benefit

For primary prevention, statin therapy reduces the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events in adults with intermediate or high estimated 10-year risk using traditional population-based risk calculators. While a variety of reported symptoms may limit statin adherence, muscle complaints, whether typical or atypical of that associated with statin therapy, are the most common reported by patients. Because additional testing, alteration in the patient's medical regimen and subsequent medical visits are often required, an informed clinician-patient discussion and shared decision making are necessary to achieve the best outcomes. The authors provide support for the perspective that coronary calcium scoring, by individualizing estimated risk and helping to identify those most likely to benefit, plays a vital role in preventive therapy decision-making for the primary prevention patient with troublesome muscle complaints attributed to statin therapy.

[Treatment expectations for postoperative pain]

Hintergrund

Präoperative Behandlungserwartungen haben einen deutlichen Einfluss auf die postoperativen Schmerzen und Behandlungsergebnisse. Positive Erwartungen sind ein wichtiger Mechanismus von Placeboeffekten und negative Erwartungen ein wichtiger Mechanismus von Noceboeffekten.

Fragestellung

Welchen Einfluss haben Behandlungserwartungen, wie werden diese im klinischen Setting erhoben und wie können diese Erkenntnisse in der klinischen Praxis umgesetzt werden?

Material und Methoden

Es wurde eine Literatursuche für klinische Studien mit den Schlagwörtern „expectation“ AND („postoperative“ OR „surgery“) durchgeführt. Ausgewählt wurden alle aktuellen englischen und deutschen Artikel. Zusätzlich wurden die Literaturverzeichnisse der gefundenen Artikel untersucht und mit aufgenommen.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt 158 Artikel wurden gefunden, von denen 49 Artikel Erwartungen erheben und ein postoperatives Behandlungsergebnis einbeziehen. Die meisten Artikel untersuchen Erwartungen in der Baseline-Erhebung, um nachzuweisen, dass sich Gruppen in Gruppenvergleichen präoperativ nicht voneinander unterscheiden. Die Studien, die den Einfluss von Erwartungen prospektiv untersuchen, verwenden sehr unterschiedliche Messverfahren, um das Konstrukt „Erwartung“ zu erheben. Somit ist ein Vergleich zwischen den Studien schwer möglich. Es gibt wenige Studien, die untersuchen, ob und wie die Erwartungen perioperativ beeinflusst werden können, und die praxisrelevante Interventionen zu deren Veränderung entwickelt haben.

Schlussfolgerung

Für eine fundierte Untersuchung der Behandlungserwartung sollten in klinischen Studien valide und reliable Messverfahren verwendet werden. Weitere Studien sollten sich mit Interventionsmöglichkeiten auseinandersetzen, damit Behandlungserwartungen auch in die klinische Standardbehandlung einbezogen werden können.

Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Practitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent for surgery often focuses on risk centered information due to high liability risks for treatment errors. This may affect patients' anxiety of adverse events and the nocebo effect. This study focuses on the optimization of pre-surgical information on risks and complications, and at the same time reconciles these information with legal requirements.

METHODS

The development, piloting, and evaluation of evidence-based informed consent forms for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and related anesthesia procedures will follow the UK MRC Framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Conducting different sub-studies, we will (I) qualitatively explore the information acquisition and decision-making processes, (II) develop and pilot test evidence-based informed consent forms on the example of TKA and related anesthesia procedures, (III) conduct a monocentric interrupted time series (ITS) pilot study to evaluate the effects of evidence-based informed consent forms in comparison with standard consent forms, and (IV) perform a process evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention and to analyze mechanisms of impact.

DISCUSSION

The evidence-based and understandable presentation of risks in informed consent forms aims at avoiding distorted risk depiction and strengthening the patients' competencies to correctly assess the risks of undergoing surgery. This might reduce negative expectations and anxiety of adverse events, which in turn might reduce the nocebo effect. At the same time, the practitioners' acceptance of evidence-based informed consent forms meeting legal requirements could be increased.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04669483 . Registered 15 December 2020. German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS00022571 . Registered 15 December 2020.

No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

This study examined attention as a mechanism of nocebo hyperalgesia. No association was observed between attentional bias towards pain-related words and nocebo hyperalgesia.

Introduction:

Placebo and nocebo effects in pain are well documented. One leading explanation is that instructions indicating that pain will either increase or decrease after receipt of a treatment give rise to expectations for increased or decreased pain. However, the psychological mechanisms through which expectations affect pain perception are not well understood. One possibility is that the expectation of increased pain leads to anticipatory anxiety, which in turn increases attention towards painful sensations.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that attention mediates nocebo hyperalgesia. This was done by measuring attentional bias towards pain using a dot-probe task both before and after a nocebo manipulation.

Methods:

Ninety-six healthy volunteers were randomized to receive one of the following: (1) an inert nasal spray with placebo instructions, (2) an inert nasal spray with nocebo instructions, or (3) no treatment. Participants completed measures of expectations, anxiety, and attention bias (dot-probe paradigm) both before and after randomization.

Results:

Results showed that the nocebo instructions induced expectations for increased pain and resulted in nocebo hyperalgesia. Conversely, the placebo instruction failed to induce expectations for decreases in pain and did not demonstrate any placebo analgesia. Furthermore, despite the significant expectancies for pain and subsequent nocebo hyperalgesia, there were no differences between the nocebo group and either the placebo or no-treatment group for anxiety or attentional bias.

Conclusion:

The results are consistent with the expectancy model of placebo and nocebo effects. That is, changes in expectations seemed to be necessary to induce a placebo or nocebo effect. However, there was no evidence that anxiety or attention bias towards pain-related stimuli was necessary to achieve nocebo hyperalgesia.

Predicting Expectations of Side-Effects for Those Which Are Warned Versus Not Warned About in Patient Information Leaflets

BACKGROUND

Research investigating predictors of side-effect expectations is disparate and largely based on hypothetical vignettes.

PURPOSE

To carry out a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial and investigate the predictors of side-effect expectations for side-effects that were, or were not, warned about.

METHODS

Two hundred and three healthy adults completed measures concerning demographics, psychological factors, baseline symptoms, and medication-related beliefs before reading one of two types of patient information leaflet (PIL) (standard or positively framed PIL) for a sham medication and asking them about their side-effect expectations. Associations between these measures and side-effect expectations whilst controlling for the PIL received were assessed using regression analyses.

RESULTS

82.8% of participants expected side-effects that were warned about in the PIL, and 29.1% expected side-effects that were not warned about. Participants who were younger, from White backgrounds, less optimistic, experienced increased anxiety and received the standard PIL were more likely to expect side-effects that were warned about. Those with higher beliefs about medicine overuse and lower trust in medicine development were more likely to expect side-effects that were not warned about. Higher somatization, baseline symptoms, modern health worries scores, and lower trust in pharmaceutical companies were associated with increased expectations for all side-effects. The results suggest we can not only rely on altering side-effect risk communication to reduce side-effect expectations and therefore nocebo effects. We must also consider patients' beliefs about trust in medicines. More work is needed to investigate this in a patientsample in which the medication is known to them.

The catastrophization effects of an MRI report on the patient and surgeon and the benefits of 'clinical reporting': results from an RCT and blinded trials

PURPOSE

Inappropriate use of MRI leads to increasing interventions and surgeries for low back pain (LBP). We probed the potential effects of a routine MRI report on the patient's perception of his spine and functional outcome of treatment. An alternate 'clinical reporting' was developed and tested for benefits on LBP perception.

METHODS

In Phase-I, 44 LBP patients were randomized to Group A who had a factual explanation of their MRI report or Group B, who were reassured that the MRI findings showed normal changes. The outcome was compared at 6 weeks by VAS, PSEQ-2, and SF-12. In Phase-II, clinical reporting was developed, avoiding potential catastrophizing terminologies. In Phase-III, 20 MRIs were reported by both routine and clinical methods. The effects of the two methods were tested on four categories of health care professionals (HCP) who read them blinded on their assessment of severity of disease, possible treatment required, and the probability of surgery.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable initial by demographics and pain. After 6 weeks of treatment, Group A had a more negative perception of their spinal condition, increased catastrophization, decreased pain improvement, and poorer functional status(p = significant for all). The alternate method of clinical reporting had significant benefits in assessment of lesser severity of the disease, shift to lesser severity of intervention and surgery in three groups of HCPs.

CONCLUSION

Routine MRI reports produce a negative perception and poor functional outcomes in LBP. Focussed clinical reporting had significant benefits, which calls for the need for 'clinical reporting' rather than 'Image reporting'.

The placebo phenomenon and the underlying mechanisms

The clinical role of the placebo effect is a topic of increasing interest for the scientific community. Focus is shifting from the inert role of placebos in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to potential effects in clinical applications, since the phenomenon is thought to be inherent in routine clinical practice, affecting therapy success rates. Mediation of the mind-brain-body relationship involves both psychosocial and neurobiological factors, the interaction of which comprises the placebo mechanisms. Psychosocial factors include environmentally induced expectations, reward expectations, and even conditioned responses to certain stimuli. Expectations also depend on previous experience of the patient with a similar procedure and can affect future responses. Moreover, the supportive bedside behavior of the clinician and the positive framing of information provided to the patient have proven to be of great importance, setting the foundations for reconsideration of standardized practices. Neurobiological mechanisms mediate these effects through neurotransmitter and neuromodulator pathways. The best understood mechanisms are those regulating non-opioid- and opioid-mediated analgesic responses that implicate specific brain regions of pain control and activation of endogenous opioids. Other responses concern, among others, hormonal control, motor performance, and antidepressant responses. Although mechanisms underlying placebo responses are not as yet completely elucidated, there is substantial evidence suggesting that placebo effects are indicative of healthy functioning of intact brain structures and occur through actual functional changes, and are not simply subjective symptom reports. These effects can be utilized in treatment optimization while maintaining an ethical and respectful manner toward the patient and the standardized disclosure procedures.

When symptoms become side effects: Development of the side effect attribution scale (SEAS)

OBJECTIVES

Symptom misattribution is a central process in the nocebo effect but it is not accurately assessed in current side effect measures. We have developed a new measure, the Side Effect Attribution Scale (SEAS), which examines the degree to which people believe their symptoms are treatment side effects.

METHODS

The SEAS was tested in three New Zealand studies: a vaccination sample (n = 225), patients with gout or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 102), and patients switching to a generic medicine (n = 69). The internal reliability of the scale was examined using Cronbach's alpha. To assess validity, the Side Effect Attribution Total Score and Side Effect Attribution Binary Score were related to a number of psychological measures associated with side effect reporting.

RESULTS

The scale showed good internal reliability across the three studies, with Cronbach alphas ranging from 0.840 to 0.943. Analysis of the effect sizes showed that the Attribution Total Score was generally more strongly associated with nocebo responding than Attribution Binary Score. Participants had greater Side Effect Attribution Total Scores if they had higher expectations for vaccination side effects (r = 0.18, p = .028), more worry about future vaccine effects (r = 0.16, p = .046), a higher perceived sensitivity to medicines (r = 0.50, p < .001), greater anxiety (r = 0.25, p = .016), greater intentional non-adherence (r = 0.30, p = .003), greater medicine information seeking (r = 0.26, p = .010), lower trust in pharmaceutical agencies (r = -0.29, p = .026), and lower medicine efficacy beliefs (r = -0.46, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SEAS provides a more nuanced assessment of symptom attribution beliefs. It appears to be more sensitive measure than just a side effect total, as it is associated with a greater number of relevant psychological variables. Future research should examine the scale in other populations and settings.

The subthalamic nucleus and the placebo effect in Parkinson's disease

The study of the placebo effect, or response, is related to the investigation of the psychologic component of different therapeutic rituals. The high rate of placebo responses in Parkinson's disease clinical trials provided the impetus for investigating the underlying mechanisms. Ruling out spontaneous remission and regression to the mean through the appropriate experimental designs, genuine psychologic placebo effects have been identified, in which both patients' expectations of therapeutic benefit and learning processes are involved. Specifically, placebo effects are associated with dopamine release in the striatum and changes in neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra pars reticulata, and motor thalamus in Parkinson's disease, as assessed through positron emission tomography and single-neuron recording during deep brain stimulation, respectively. Conversely, verbal suggestions of clinical worsening or drug dose reduction induce nocebo responses in Parkinson's disease, which have been detected at both behavioral and electrophysiologic level. Important implications and applications emerge from this new knowledge. These include better clinical trial designs, whereby patients' expectations should always be assessed, as well as better drug dosage in order to reduce drug intake.

[Nocebo, informed consent and doctor-patient communication]

Negative previous experiences (conditioning), observational learning and expectations can trigger nocebo effects. They are responsible for a substantial proportion of the side effects of medical treatment, and are induced primarily by risk information for informed consent. This has been demonstrated in studies on patient groups with or without modified medical information. Drug trials in the field of neurology and psychiatry have regularly revealed side effects and drop-out also in placebo groups. The underlying neurobiological mechanisms were experimentally investigated especially for nocebo-induced hyperalgesia, whereby the specifically involved regions of the brain could be identified by functional imaging as well as changes in the dopamine, endorphin and cholecystokinin systems. Nocebo effects are specific, i.e. they are closely related to patient information and can induce or aggravate exactly the symptoms addressed. Nevertheless, informed consent is an essential part of doctor-patient communication; however, information on risks can be markedly less damaging when unnecessary repetitions are avoided, misunderstandings are recognized or resolved and several different options are given. In addition, risks should always be named together with positive aspects, such as the advantages of the appropriate treatment, the prophylactic measures applied or the early detection and treatment of developing side effects. The best protection against harm caused by information on risks is a trustful doctor-patient relationship. Poor knowledge of nocebo effects or lack of countermeasures constitute a serious threat to patients and according to the current state of knowledge could be rated as medical malpractice.

Prospective study of nocebo effects related to symptoms of idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF)

The exact causes of Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI-EMF, i.e., experience of somatic symptoms attributed to low-level electromagnetic fields) are still unknown. Psychological causation such as nocebo effects seem plausible. This study aimed to experimentally induce a nocebo effect for somatic symptom perception and examined whether it was reproducible after one week. We also examined whether these effects were associated with increased sympathetic activity and whether interoceptive accuracy (IAcc) moderated these relationships. Participants were recruited from the general population and instructed that electromagnetic exposure can enhance somatosensory perception. They participated twice in a cued exposure experiment with tactile stimulation and sham WiFi exposure in 50% of trials. The two sessions were scheduled one week apart (session 1: N = 65, session 2: N = 63). Before session 1, participants watched either a 6-min film on adverse health effects of EMF or a neutral film on trade of mobile phones. IAcc was assessed with the heartbeat detection paradigm. Electrodermal activity served as a measure of sympathetic activation. Evidence for a nocebo effect (i.e., increased self-reported intensity and aversiveness and electrodermal activity) during sham WiFi exposure was observed in both sessions. IAcc moderated the nocebo effect, depending on stimulus intensity. Contrary to previous findings, no difference emerged between the health-related EMF and the neutral films. Based on negative instructions, somatic perception and physiological responding can be altered. This is consistent with the assumption that IEI-EMF could be due to nocebo effects, suggesting an important role for psychological interventions.

European Headache Federation recommendations for placebo and nocebo terminology

Background and aim

Despite recent publications, practitioners remain unfamiliar with the current terminology related to the placebo and nocebo phenomena observed in clinical trials and practice, nor with the factors that modulate them. To cover the gap, the European Headache Federation appointed a panel of experts to clarify the terms associated with the use of placebo in clinical trials.

Methods

The working group identified relevant questions and agreed upon recommendations. Because no data were required to answer the questions, the GRADE approach was not applicable, and thus only expert opinion was provided according to an amended Delphi method. The initial 12 topics for discussion were revised in the opinion of the majority of the panelists, and after a total of 6 rounds of negotiations, the final agreement is presented.

Results/recommendations

Two primary and mechanism-based recommendations are provided for the results of clinical trials: [1] to distinguish the placebo or nocebo response from the placebo or nocebo effect; and [2] for any favorable outcome observed after placebo administration, the term “placebo response” should be used, and for any unfavorable outcome recorded after placebo administration, the term “nocebo response” should be used (12 out of 17 panelists agreed, 70.6% agreement). The placebo or nocebo responses are attributed to a set of factors including those that are related to the medical condition (e.g. natural history, random comorbidities, etc.), along with idiosyncratic ones, in which the placebo or nocebo effects are attributed to idiosyncratic, or nonspecific mechanisms, exclusively (e.g. expectation, conditioning, observational learning etc.). To help investigators and practitioners, the panel summarized a list of environmental factors and idiosyncratic dynamics modulating placebo and nocebo effects. Some of them are modifiable, and investigators or physicians need to know about them in order to modify these factors appropriately to improve treatment. One secondary recommendation addresses the use of the terms “placebo” and “nocebo” (“placebos” and “nocebos” in plural), which refer to the triggers of the placebo/nocebo effects or responses, respectively, and which are inert agents or interventions that should not be confused with the placebo/nocebo responses or effects themselves (all panelists agreed, 100% agreement).

Conclusion

The working group recommends distinguishing the term response from effect to describe health changes from before to after placebo application and to distinguish the terms placebo(s) or nocebo(s) from the health consequences that they cause (placebo/nocebo responses or effects).

Context matters: the psychoneurobiological determinants of placebo, nocebo and context-related effects in physiotherapy

Background

Placebo and nocebo effects embody psychoneurobiological phenomena where behavioural, neurophysiological, perceptive and cognitive changes occur during the therapeutic encounter in the healthcare context. Placebo effects are produced by a positive healthcare context; while nocebo effects are consequences of negative healthcare context. Historically, placebo, nocebo and context-related effects were considered as confounding elements for clinicians and researchers. In the last two decades this attitude started to change, and the understanding of the value of these effects has increased. Despite the growing interest, the knowledge and the awareness of using the healthcare context to trigger placebo and nocebo effects is currently limited and heterogeneous among physiotherapists, reducing their translational value in the physiotherapy field.

Objectives

To introduce the placebo, nocebo and context-related effects by: (1) presenting their psychological models; (2) describing their neurophysiological mechanisms; (3) underlining their impact for the physiotherapy profession; and (4) tracing lines for future researches.

Conclusion

Several psychological mechanisms are involved in placebo, nocebo and context-related effects; including expectation, learning processes (classical conditioning and observational learning), reinforced expectations, mindset and personality traits. The neurophysiological mechanisms mainly include the endogenous opioid, the endocannabinoid and the dopaminergic systems. Neuroimaging studies have identified different brain regions involved such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the rostral anterior cingulate cortex, the periaqueductal gray and the dorsal horn of spine. From a clinical perspective, the manipulation of the healthcare context with the best evidence-based therapy represents an opportunity to trigger placebo effects and to avoid nocebo effects respecting the ethical code of conduct. From a managerial perspective, stakeholders, organizations and governments should encourage the assessment of the healthcare context aimed to improve the quality of physiotherapy services. From an educational perspective, placebo and nocebo effects are professional topics that should be integrated in the university program of health and medical professions. From a research perspective, the control of placebo, nocebo and context-related effects offers to the scientific community the chance to better measure the impact of physiotherapy on different outcomes and in different conditions through primary studies.

Better than nothing: A historical account of placebos and placebo effects from modern to contemporary medicine

Throughout the history of medicine, multiple conceptions of "placebo" and "placebo effect" have often co-existed across different domains, and today the meaning of these concepts is still disputed. Against this background, this chapter provides a succinct account of the key events in the history of the concepts of "placebo," "placebo control," and "placebo effect." The first section reconstructs the etymology of the term "placebo" and its first introduction in medicine. The next sections provide an account of how placebos have been employed in both medical practice and scientific research in modern medicine. Later sections trace the emergence of the concepts of "placebo control" and "placebo effect" in the first half of the 20th century, from the first empirical studies investigating the effects of placebos up to the publication of Beecher's landmark article "The Powerful Placebo." Finally, the last two sections review the varieties of randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in the second half of the 20th century, and the subsequent wave of empirical studies that, starting from the 1970s, have investigated the psychological, pharmacological and neurobiological mechanisms of placebo effects.

Strategies to minimize placebo effects in research investigations

Placebo-controlled trials are the research standard to evaluate new interventions for which there is no standard of care. While lessening performance and detection bias, such design provides a direct mode of comparison against the probed intervention. Still, using placebo arms may pose new challenges to the design, conduct and analysis of clinical trials. This is particularly relevant in circumstances of non-additivity between the therapeutic and the placebo effects, if the outcome of interest has floor or ceiling effects, or when the predicted effect size of the intervention is large and leads to small sample sizes. There are several possible strategies to mitigate the confounding effects of the placebo, each relevant to specific clinical trial designs. This chapter puts into context the new challenges created by the placebo effect, discusses possible ways around them, and explores the future of the field.

The nocebo effect and tobacco control-First, do no harm?

Since tobacco remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, emphasis needs to be given to preventive approaches to tobacco consumption. Environmental and policy strategies with fear appeals are important contributors to reductions in smoking prevalence. Fear appeals are persuasive messages-often using graphic and emotionally evocative imagery and language-that attempt to scare their audiences into tobacco cessation. While the intentions of fear appeals are benign, their effects are not necessarily so; here, we argue that some fear appeals carry a significant risk of backfiring by eliciting nocebo effects among its viewers. In this context, it is important to recognize that there is currently no justification for disregarding potential nocebo effects. Therefore, we should improve our understanding of nocebo effects in the field of preventive medicine, as well as the impact of strategies aimed at mitigating their negative health effects.

Antidepressant-placebo differences for specific adverse events in major depressive disorder: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adverse events (AEs) are known to occur while patients are treated with placebos, part of the so-called nocebo effect. Yet evidence is limited regarding the likelihood that specific AEs occurring with antidepressant treatment are or are not due to nocebo effects.

METHODS

This study identified 56 placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressant monotherapy for adults with major depressive disorder that reported AE rates in sufficient detail for comparison. Poisson regression analyses compared rates of AEs according to antidepressant class weighted by study population to determine which separated from placebo. A "nocebo index" was also calculated (with 0 defined as the lowest rate and 1 or higher indicating the same or greater rate of an AE in the placebo group).

RESULTS

Numerous AEs did not differ statistically between antidepressant classes and placebo including worsening psychiatric symptoms, all forms of pain, weight gain and respiratory symptoms. Nevertheless, a number of AEs were significantly more common in antidepressants than placebos across multiple antidepressant classes. These were predominantly neurological, sexual and anticholinergic effects. Several AEs that separated statistically between antidepressants and placebos nevertheless had moderate nocebo indices (≥0.5). For example, dizziness in SSRIs separated significantly from placebo (OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.13-1.99) but had a nocebo index of 0.67.

LIMITATIONS

This study relied on multiple RCTs with subtle design differences.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified several AEs that are likely the physiological result of antidepressants and many that likely represent nocebo effects. These results should inform clinical decision making and discussions with patients.

Viscous placebo and carbohydrate breakfasts similarly decrease appetite and increase resistance exercise performance compared with a control breakfast in trained males

Given the common view that pre-exercise nutrition/breakfast is important for performance, the present study investigated whether breakfast influences resistance exercise performance via a physiological or psychological effect. Twenty-two resistance-trained, breakfast-consuming men completed three experimental trials, consuming water-only (WAT), or semi-solid breakfasts containing 0 g/kg (PLA) or 1·5 g/kg (CHO) maltodextrin. PLA and CHO meals contained xanthan gum and low-energy flavouring (approximately 122 kJ), and subjects were told both 'contained energy'. At 2 h post-meal, subjects completed four sets of back squat and bench press to failure at 90 % ten repetition maximum. Blood samples were taken pre-meal, 45 min and 105 min post-meal to measure serum/plasma glucose, insulin, ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1 and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine concentrations. Subjective hunger/fullness was also measured. Total back squat repetitions were greater in CHO (44 (sd 10) repetitions) and PLA (43 (sd 10) repetitions) than WAT (38 (sd 10) repetitions; P < 0·001). Total bench press repetitions were similar between trials (WAT 37 (sd 7) repetitions; CHO 39 (sd 7) repetitions; PLA 38 (sd 7) repetitions; P = 0·130). Performance was similar between CHO and PLA trials. Hunger was suppressed and fullness increased similarly in PLA and CHO, relative to WAT (P < 0·001). During CHO, plasma glucose was elevated at 45 min (P < 0·05), whilst serum insulin was elevated (P < 0·05) and plasma ghrelin suppressed at 45 and 105 min (P < 0·05). These results suggest that breakfast/pre-exercise nutrition enhances resistance exercise performance via a psychological effect, although a potential mediating role of hunger cannot be discounted.

Multidisciplinary management of the nocebo effect in biosimilar-treated IBD patients: Results of a workshop from the NOCE-BIO consensus group

The high cost of biological drugs for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) considerably impacts on health-care budgets. Since the patent of biological products expired, cheaper biosimilars have entered the market. Available data coming from real-world cohorts and clinical trials indicate that the efficacy and safety of biosimilars is comparable to that of the originator drugs. Treating IBD patients with a biosimilar may be complicated by the risk of the nocebo effect, a negative effect of a pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment, induced by patients's expectations and unrelated to the physiological action of the treatment. The nocebo effect can negatively affect treatment outcomes and hamper the cost-savings of biosimilars. Reducing the nocebo effect requires a multidisciplinary effort of all health-care providers in charge of biosimilar-treated IBD patients. The aim of the review is to reflect the key messages of an international workshop on this topic, including viewpoints from the perspective of physicians, nurses, psychologists, pharmacists and patients.

[Biosimilars and the nocebo effect]

Biosimilars have been approved for use in Germany for many years and in the meantime also in rheumatology but only a few years ago. Biosimilars, which are biotechnologically manufactured products the same as reference biologicals, have actually now achieved a substantial proportion of the market in some regions but there are still doubters among patients and physicians who fear a loss of quality even if there is no evidence for this. A part of this problem can be explained by the nocebo effect but which furthermore also has a substantial medical importance. This effect is described and explained in this article. Psychosocial and context-related factors, such as the relationship between patient and physician, previous experience with treatment and treatment expectations can either improve or impair the efficacy of treatment interventions. These phenomena are commonly known as placebo and nocebo effects. As placebo and nocebo effects can influence the development of symptoms, the frequency of undesired events and the efficacy of treatment, it is decisive to know these effects and to develop strategies for prevention in order to optimize the treatment results. Although in recent years experimental studies have achieved substantial progress in the clarification of the psychosocial and neurobiological mechanisms of placebo effects, detailed mechanisms of nocebo effects are still widely unexplored. An improved understanding of these mechanisms promises the development of user-friendly strategies for the clinical care to improve treatment results and patient satisfaction.

Silodosin Has Nocebo Effect on Sexual Adverse Effects: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

Nocebo effect is known in patients refered to side effects of drugs that cause more side effects than expected. Side effects on sexual function have been reported in about 60% of patients using silodosin. To investigate whether there was nocebo effect of silodosin in the side effects on sexual function.

Materials and Methods

Between May 2014 and March 2017, 129 moderate-to-severe LUTS patients were included in the study. For the patients, PSA (ng/mL), prostate volume (cc), uroflowmetry test IIEF-15 and IPSS questionnaires were filled at the time of before and after treatment. Patients were divided into two groups, referred to as side effects that was mentioned and not mentioned. After 3 months control, all patients were asked whether they had sexual side effects. It was analyzed whether there was significantly differences between two groups.

Results

The groups were compared in terms of the frequency of androgenic side effects, low semen volume was 40.9% in Group 1 and 22.2% in Group 2 (p=0.04). Anejaculation rates were 6% and 4%, respectively (p=0.12); loss of libido and erectile dysfunction were observed in one patient in both groups (p=0.42). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for anejaculation, decreased libido and erectile dysfunction. 9 patients (7%) who left medication due to side effects were excluded from the study.

Conclusion

In patients, mentioned about the sexual side effects, low semen volume was seen more frequantly, but anejaculation, decreased libido and erectile dysfunction were same. Therefore, be informed about the side effects before treatment is a matter of debate.