1
|
Goossen K, Bieler D, Weise A, Nothacker M, Flohé S, Pieper D. Application of the PANELVIEW instrument to evaluate the guideline development process of the German polytrauma guideline. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024:10.1007/s00068-024-02470-6. [PMID: 38381190 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02470-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND PANELVIEW is an instrument for evaluating the appropriateness of the process, methods, and outcome of guideline development and the satisfaction of the guideline group with these steps. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the guideline development process of the German guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries ('German polytrauma guideline') from the perspective of the guideline group, and to identify areas where this process may be improved in the future. METHODS We administered PANELVIEW to the participants of the 2022 update of the German polytrauma guideline. All guideline group members, including delegates of participating medical societies, steering group members, authors of guideline chapters, the chair, and methodological lead, were invited to participate. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Comments received were categorised by domains/items of the tool. RESULTS After the first, second, and last consensus conference, the guideline group was invited via email to participate in a web-based survey. Response rates were 36% (n/N = 13/36), 40% (12/30), and 37% (20/54), respectively. The mean scores for items ranged between 5.1 and 6.9 on a scale from 1 (fully disagree) to 7 (fully agree). Items with mean scores below 6.0 were related to (1) administration, (2) consideration of patients' views, perspectives, values, and preferences, and (3) the discussion of research gaps and needs for future research. CONCLUSION The PANELVIEW tool showed that the guideline group was satisfied with most aspects of the guideline development process. Areas for improvement of the process were identified. Strategies to improve response rates should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Käthe Goossen
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Dan Bieler
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), c/o Philipps Universität Marburg/AWMF Berlin, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Flohé
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen, Solingen, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doni K, Bühn S, Weise A, Mann NK, Hess S, Sönnichsen A, Salem S, Pieper D, Thürmann P, Mathes T. Safety outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants in older adults with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of (subgroup analyses from) randomized controlled trials. GeroScience 2024; 46:923-944. [PMID: 37261677 PMCID: PMC10828375 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-023-00825-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Balancing stroke prevention and risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are by now considered standard of care for treating patients with AF in international guidelines. Our objective was to assess the safety of long-term intake of DOACs in older adults with AF. We included RCTs in elderly (≥ 65 years) patients with AF. A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed on 19 April 2022. For determination of risk of bias, the RoB 2 tool was applied. We pooled outcomes using random-effects meta-analyses. The quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Eleven RCTs with a total of 63,374 patients were identified. Two RCTs compared apixaban with either warfarin or aspirin, four edoxaban with either placebo, aspirin, or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), two dabigatran with warfarin and three rivaroxaban with warfarin. DOACs probably reduce mortality in elderly patients with AF (HR 0.89 95%CI 0.77 to 1.02). Low-dose DOACs likely reduce bleeding compared to VKAs (HR ranged from 0.47 to 1.01). For high-dose DOACS the risk of bleeding varied widely (HR ranged from 0.80 to 1.40). We found that low-dose DOACs probably decrease mortality in AF patients. Moreover, apixaban and probably edoxaban are associated with fewer major or clinically relevant bleeding (MCRB) events compared to VKAs. For dabigatran and rivaroxaban, the risk of MCRB varies depending on dose. Moreover, subgroup analyses indicate that in the very old (≥ 85) the risk for MCRB events might be increased when using DOACs.Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42020187876.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Doni
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Witten, Germany
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology of the University of Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Bühn
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Witten, Germany
| | - Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Witten, Germany
| | - Nina-Kristin Mann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Simone Hess
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Witten, Germany
| | | | - Susanna Salem
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Witten, Germany
| | - Petra Thürmann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Philipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Tim Mathes
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Witten, Germany.
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bühn S, Huppertz E, Weise A, Lühnen J, Steckelberg A, Büchter RB, Hess S, Choi KEA, Mathes T. The effects of modifying elements of written informed consent forms for elective surgical or invasive procedures: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 107:107576. [PMID: 36455317 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.107576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the effect of modifying content and design elements within written informed-consent-forms (ICF) for patients undergoing elective surgical or invasive procedures. METHODS We included (quasi-)randomized trials in which a modified written ICF (e.g. visual aids) was compared to a standard written ICF. We searched PubMed, Web-of-Science and PsycINFO until 08/2021. Risk of Bias was assessed. The complexity of intervention was assessed using the Intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews. RESULTS Eleven trials with 1091 participants were eligible. Effect sizes and levels of evidence varied from trivial to moderate andthere were contradictory findings for some outcomes. Providing patients with more informationin general or specific information on risks and complications mostly increased anxiety. The use of verbal risk presentation decreased anxiety and increased satisfaction.A lower readability level decreased anxiety and improved comprehension and knowledge. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that providing more information and addressing certain types of risks have differential effects. While more information improved knowledge, it also increased anxiety. We did not find any or only insufficient evidence for many other possible ICF modifications. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS When developing ICFs the differential impact of different elements on patient important outcomes should be carefully considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Bühn
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
| | - Elena Huppertz
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Julia Lühnen
- Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg; Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences; Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg; Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences; Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Roland Brian Büchter
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Simone Hess
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Kyung-Eun Anna Choi
- Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany; Health Services Research, Research Center MIAAI, Faculty of Medicine/Dentistry, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstrasse 124, 3500 Krems-Stein, Austria
| | - Tim Mathes
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamid O, Lewis K, Weise A, McKean M, Papadopoulos K, Crown J, Thomas S, Kaczmar J, Lakhani N, Kim T, Kim K, Rabinowits G, Spira A, Mani J, Chen S, Gullo G. 150P Phase I study of fianlimab: A human lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) monoclonal antibody, in combination with cemiplimab in advanced melanoma (mel) - Subgroup analysis. Immuno-Oncology and Technology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
5
|
Hamid O, Weise A, Kim T, Mckean M, Lakhani N, Crown J, Kaczmar J, Papadopoulos K, Chen S, Mani J, Jankovic V, Kroog G, Sims T, Lowy I, Gullo G. 400P Phase I study of fianlimab, a human lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) monoclonal antibody, in combination with cemiplimab in advanced melanoma (mel). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
|
6
|
Hamid O, Weise A, Kim T, Mckean M, Lakhani N, Kaczmar J, Papadopoulos K, Chen S, Mani J, Jankovic V, Kroog G, Sims T, Lowy I, Gullo G. 790MO Phase I study of fianlimab, a human lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) monoclonal antibody, in combination with cemiplimab in advanced melanoma (mel). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
7
|
Weise A, Büchter RB, Pieper D, Mathes T. Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations – a review of methodological guidance. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:52. [PMID: 35184733 PMCID: PMC8858549 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01536-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective For assessing cost-effectiveness, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) organisations may use primary economic evaluations (P-HEs) or Systematic Reviews of Health Economic evaluations (SR-HEs). A prerequisite for meaningful results of SR-HEs is that the results from existing P-HEs are transferable to the decision context (e.g, HTA jurisdiction). A particularly pertinent issue is the high variability of costs and resource needs across jurisdictions. Our objective was to review the methods documents of HTA organisations and compare their recommendations on considering transferability in SR-HE. Methods We systematically hand searched the webpages of 158 HTA organisations for relevant methods documents from 8th January to 31st March 2019. Two independent reviewers performed searches and selected documents according to pre-defined criteria. One reviewer extracted data in standardised and piloted tables and a second reviewer checked them for accuracy. We synthesised data using tabulations and in a narrative way. Results We identified 155 potentially relevant documents from 63 HTA organisations. Of these, 7 were included in the synthesis. The included organisations have different aims when preparing a SR-HE (e.g. to determine the need for conducting their own P-HE). The recommendations vary regarding the underlying terminology (e.g. transferability/generalisability), the assessment approaches (e.g. structure), the assessment criteria and the integration in the review process. Conclusion Only few HTA organisations address the assessment of transferability in their methodological recommendations for SR-HEs. Transferability considerations are related to different purposes. The assessment concepts and criteria are heterogeneous. Developing standards to consider transferability in SR-HEs is desirable. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01536-6.
Collapse
|
8
|
Doni K, Bühn S, Weise A, Mann NK, Hess S, Sönnichsen A, Pieper D, Thürmann P, Mathes T. Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2022; 13:20420986211072383. [PMID: 35111291 PMCID: PMC8785305 DOI: 10.1177/20420986211072383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42020210645 Introduction: We aimed to assess the safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in older patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in older (⩾65 years) patients with type 2 diabetes. The intervention group was randomized to treatment with any DPP-4 inhibitors. A systematic search in MEDLINE and Embase was performed in December 2020. For assessing the risk of bias, RoB 2 tool was applied. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We pooled outcomes using random effects meta-analyses. Results: We identified 16 RCTs that included 19,317 patients with a mean age of greater than 70 years. The mean HbA1c level ranged between 7.1 and 10.0 g/dl. Adding DPP-4 inhibitors to standard care alone may increase mortality slightly [risk ratio (RR) 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.21]. Adding DPP-4 inhibitors to standard care increases the risk for hypoglycaemia (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01–1.16), but difference in overall adverse events is negligible. DPP-4 inhibitors added to standard care may reduce mortality compared with sulfonylureas (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75–1.04). DPP-4 inhibitors probably reduce the risk for hypoglycaemia compared with sulfonylureas (magnitude of effect not quantifiable because of heterogeneity) but difference in overall adverse events is negligible. There is insufficient evidence on hospitalizations, falls, fractures, renal impairment and pancreatitis. Conclusion: There is no evidence that DPP-4 inhibitors in addition to standard care decrease mortality but DPP-4 inhibitors increase hypoglycaemia risk. Second-line therapy in older patients should be considered cautiously even in drugs with a good safety profile such as DPP-4 inhibitors. In case second-line treatment is necessary, DPP-4 inhibitors appear to be preferable to sulfonylureas. Plain language summary Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in older adults with type 2 diabetes Introduction: We performed the review to assess the safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in older type 2 diabetes patients with blood sugar outside the normal level. Methods: To answer the question, we searched various electronic databases. We included studies in older (⩾65 years) patients with type 2 diabetes that assessed the safety of DPP-4 inhibitors. The data from the different studies were quantitatively summarized using statistical methods. We assessed the quality of the data to judge the certainty of the findings. Results: We identified 16 studies that included 19,317 patients with a mean age greater than 70 years. The average blood sugar level of patients in the included studies was slightly or moderately increased. Adding DPP-4 inhibitors to standard care alone may increase mortality slightly. Adding DPP-4 inhibitors to standard care increases the risk for hypoglycaemia, but difference in overall adverse events is negligible. DPP-4 inhibitors added to standard care may reduce mortality compared with sulfonylureas. DPP-4s probably reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia compared with sulfonylureas (magnitude of effect not quantifiable because of heterogeneity) but difference in overall adverse events is negligible. There is insufficient evidence on hospitalizations, falls, fractures, renal impairment and pancreatitis. Conclusion: There is no evidence that DPP-4 inhibitors in addition to standard care decrease mortality but DPP-4 inhibitors increase the risk that blood sugar falls below normal. Adding DPP-4 inhibitorss to standard care in older patients should be considered cautiously even in drugs with a good safety profile such as DPP-4 inhibitors. In case additional treatment is necessary, DPP-4 inhibitors appear to be preferable to sulfonylureas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Doni
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Bühn
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Nina-Kristin Mann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Simone Hess
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Andreas Sönnichsen
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Petra Thürmann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Philipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Tim Mathes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstraße 40, 42283 Wuppertal Germany
- Institute for Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Büchter RB, Weise A, Pieper D. Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:240. [PMID: 34742231 PMCID: PMC8571672 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01438-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous research on data extraction methods in systematic reviews has focused on single aspects of the process. We aimed to provide a deeper insight into these methods by analysing a current sample of reviews. METHODS We included systematic reviews of health interventions in humans published in English. We analysed 75 Cochrane reviews from May and June 2020 and a random sample of non-Cochrane reviews published in the same period and retrieved from Medline. We linked reviews with protocols and study registrations. We collected information on preparing, piloting, and performing data extraction and on use of software to assist review conduct (automation tools). Data were extracted by one author, with 20% extracted in duplicate. Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS Of the 152 included reviews, 77 reported use of a standardized extraction form (51%); 42 provided information on the type of form used (28%); 24 on piloting (16%); 58 on what data was collected (38%); 133 on the extraction method (88%); 107 on resolving disagreements (70%); 103 on methods to obtain additional data or information (68%); 52 on procedures to avoid data errors (34%); and 47 on methods to deal with multiple study reports (31%). Items were more frequently reported in Cochrane than non-Cochrane reviews. The data extraction form used was published in 10 reviews (7%). Use of software was rarely reported except for statistical analysis software and use of RevMan and GRADEpro GDT in Cochrane reviews. Covidence was the most frequent automation tool used: 18 reviews used it for study selection (12%) and 9 for data extraction (6%). CONCLUSIONS Reporting of data extraction methods in systematic reviews is limited, especially in non-Cochrane reviews. This includes core items of data extraction such as methods used to manage disagreements. Few reviews currently use software to assist data extraction and review conduct. Our results can serve as a baseline to assess the uptake of such tools in future analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Brian Büchter
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weise A, Lühnen J, Bühn S, Steffen F, Zacher S, Lauberger J, Ates DM, Böhmer A, Rosenau H, Steckelberg A, Mathes T. Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:107. [PMID: 33985574 PMCID: PMC8116642 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00843-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent for surgery often focuses on risk centered information due to high liability risks for treatment errors. This may affect patients' anxiety of adverse events and the nocebo effect. This study focuses on the optimization of pre-surgical information on risks and complications, and at the same time reconciles these information with legal requirements. METHODS The development, piloting, and evaluation of evidence-based informed consent forms for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and related anesthesia procedures will follow the UK MRC Framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Conducting different sub-studies, we will (I) qualitatively explore the information acquisition and decision-making processes, (II) develop and pilot test evidence-based informed consent forms on the example of TKA and related anesthesia procedures, (III) conduct a monocentric interrupted time series (ITS) pilot study to evaluate the effects of evidence-based informed consent forms in comparison with standard consent forms, and (IV) perform a process evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention and to analyze mechanisms of impact. DISCUSSION The evidence-based and understandable presentation of risks in informed consent forms aims at avoiding distorted risk depiction and strengthening the patients' competencies to correctly assess the risks of undergoing surgery. This might reduce negative expectations and anxiety of adverse events, which in turn might reduce the nocebo effect. At the same time, the practitioners' acceptance of evidence-based informed consent forms meeting legal requirements could be increased. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04669483 . Registered 15 December 2020. German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS00022571 . Registered 15 December 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health–School of Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, Building 38, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Lühnen
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Stefanie Bühn
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health–School of Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, Building 38, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Felicia Steffen
- Department for Criminal Law, Law of Criminal Procedure and Medical Law, Faculty of Law, Economics and Business, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsplatz 6, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Sandro Zacher
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Julia Lauberger
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Deha Murat Ates
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Böhmer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Witten-Herdecke, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Henning Rosenau
- Department for Criminal Law, Law of Criminal Procedure and Medical Law, Faculty of Law, Economics and Business, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsplatz 6, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Tim Mathes
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health–School of Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, Building 38, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Büchter RB, Weise A, Pieper D. Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:259. [PMID: 33076832 PMCID: PMC7574308 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01143-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Data extraction forms link systematic reviews with primary research and provide the foundation for appraising, analysing, summarising and interpreting a body of evidence. This makes their development, pilot testing and use a crucial part of the systematic reviews process. Several studies have shown that data extraction errors are frequent in systematic reviews, especially regarding outcome data. Methods We reviewed guidance on the development and pilot testing of data extraction forms and the data extraction process. We reviewed four types of sources: 1) methodological handbooks of systematic review organisations (SRO); 2) textbooks on conducting systematic reviews; 3) method documents from health technology assessment (HTA) agencies and 4) journal articles. HTA documents were retrieved in February 2019 and database searches conducted in December 2019. One author extracted the recommendations and a second author checked them for accuracy. Results are presented descriptively. Results Our analysis includes recommendations from 25 documents: 4 SRO handbooks, 11 textbooks, 5 HTA method documents and 5 journal articles. Across these sources the most common recommendations on form development are to use customized or adapted standardised extraction forms (14/25); provide detailed instructions on their use (10/25); ensure clear and consistent coding and response options (9/25); plan in advance which data are needed (9/25); obtain additional data if required (8/25); and link multiple reports of the same study (8/25). The most frequent recommendations on piloting extractions forms are that forms should be piloted on a sample of studies (18/25); and that data extractors should be trained in the use of the forms (7/25). The most frequent recommendations on data extraction are that extraction should be conducted by at least two people (17/25); that independent parallel extraction should be used (11/25); and that procedures to resolve disagreements between data extractors should be in place (14/25). Conclusions Overall, our results suggest a lack of comprehensiveness of recommendations. This may be particularly problematic for less experienced reviewers. Limitations of our method are the scoping nature of the review and that we did not analyse internal documents of health technology agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Brian Büchter
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health - School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health - School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health - School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weise A, Büchter R, Pieper D, Mathes T. Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare-An integrative review of methodological guidance. Res Synth Methods 2020; 11:760-779. [PMID: 32920989 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence syntheses provide the basis for evidence-based decision making in healthcare. To judge the certainty of findings for the specific decision context evidence syntheses should consider context suitability (ie, generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability). Our objective was to determine the status quo and to provide a comprehensive overview of existing methodological recommendations of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Systematic Review (SR) producing organizations in assessing context suitability of evidence on effectiveness of health care interventions. Additionally, we analyzed similarities and differences between the recommendations. METHODS In this Integrative Review we performed a structured search for methods documents from evidence synthesis producing organizations that include recommendations on appraising context suitability in effectiveness assessments. Two reviewers independently selected documents according to predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted in standardized and piloted tables by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. We performed a thematic analysis to identify and summarize the main themes and categories regarding recommended context suitability assessments. RESULTS We included 14 methods documents of 12 organizations in our synthesis. Assessment approaches are very heterogeneous both regarding the general concepts (eg, integration in the evidence synthesis preparation process) and the content of assessments (eg, assessment criteria). CONCLUSION Some heterogeneity seems to be justified because of the need to tailor the assessment to different settings and medical areas. However, most differences were inexplicable. More harmonization is desirable and appears possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health-School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roland Büchter
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health-School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health-School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tim Mathes
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health-School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hamilton E, Vidula N, Ma C, LoRusso P, Bagley R, Yu Z, Annett M, Weitzman A, Conlan M, Weise A. Phase I dose escalation study of a selective androgen receptor modulator RAD140 in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz242.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
14
|
Rischin D, Gil-Martin M, González-Martin A, Brana I, Hou J, Cho D, Falchook G, Formenti S, Jabbour S, Moore K, Naing A, Papadopoulos K, Baranda J, Weise A, Fury M, Feng M, Li J, Lowy I, Mathias M. Cemiplimab, a human PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Interim data from phase I cohorts. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy487.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
15
|
Specht J, Pusztai L, Forero-Torres A, Mita M, Weise A, Krop I, Grosse-Wilde A, Wang Z, Li M, Hengel S, Garfin P, Means G, Onsum M, Modi S. Post-treatment biopsies show evidence of cell cycle arrest and immune cell infiltration into tumors of ladiratuzumab vedotin-treated advanced breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy272.278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
16
|
Rischin D, Gil-Martin M, González-Martín A, Brana I, Hou J, Cho D, Falchook G, Formenti S, Jabbour S, Moore K, Naing A, Papadopoulos K, Baranda J, Weise A, Fury M, Feng M, Li J, Lowy I, Mathias M. Cemiplimab, a human PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Interim data from phase I cohorts. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy285.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
17
|
Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, Mita M, Miller KD, Weise A, Krop I, Burris H, Kalinsky K, Tsai M, Liu MC, Hurvitz SA, Wilks S, Ademuyiwa F, Diab S, Han HS, Kato G, Nanda R, O'Shaughnessy J, Kostic A, Li M, Specht J. Abstract PD3-14: Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd3-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
LIV-1, a transmembrane protein and downstream target of STAT3, is highly expressed in breast cancer cells. It is associated with lymph node involvement and metastatic progression. SGN-LIV1A is an anti-LIV-1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Upon binding to cell-surface LIV-1, SGN-LIV1A is internalized and releases MMAE, which disrupts microtubulin and induces apoptosis.
Methods
This ongoing, phase 1 study evaluates safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-LIV1A (q3wks IV) in women with LIV-1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) (NCT01969643). Patients (pts) with measurable disease and ≥2 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC are eligible. Pts with ≥ Grade 2 neuropathy are excluded. Response is assessed per RECIST v1.1; pts with stable disease (SD) or better can continue treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. At completion of dose escalation in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) and triple-negative (TN) pts, expansion cohorts were opened to further evaluate safety and antitumor activity of monotherapy in TN pts. Tumor biopsies are evaluated for LIV-1 expression.
Results
To date, 69 pts (18 HR+/HER2–, 51 TN) have received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–12) of SGN-LIV1A at doses of 0.5–2.8 mg/kg. Median age was 56 yrs. Pts had a median of 3 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC; 58 had visceral disease and 37 had bone metastases. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 19 DLT-evaluable pts; maximum tolerated dose was not exceeded at 2.8 mg/kg. Expansion cohorts of TN pts were opened at 2.0 and 2.5 mg/kg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥25% of pts were fatigue (59%), nausea (51%), peripheral neuropathy (44%), alopecia (36%), decreased appetite (33%), constipation (30%), abdominal pain, diarrhea, and neutropenia (25% each). Most AEs were Grade 1/2; AEs ≥ Grade 3 included neutropenia (25%) and anemia (15%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 pts whose total dose exceeded 200 mg per cycle, including 1 treatment-related death due to sepsis. No other treatment-related deaths occurred on-study. Seven pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. In dose escalation, activity was observed in 17 efficacy evaluable (EE) HR+/HER2- pts, with a disease control rate (DCR= CR+PR+SD) of 59% (10 SD), including 1 pt with SD ≥24 wks. Among the 44 EE TN pts (dose escalation plus expansion cohorts), the objective response rate (ORR) was 32% (14 PR) with a confirmed PR rate of 21%, DCR was 64% (14 PR, 14 SD), and clinical benefit rate (CBR=CR+PR+SD ≥24 wks) was 36% (16 pts). For TN pts, median PFS was 11.3 wks (95% CI: 6.1, 17.1); 10 pts remain on treatment.
Of 631 MBC tumor samples of all clinical subtypes evaluated for LIV-1, 91% were positive; 75% had moderate-to-high expression (H-score ≥100).
Conclusions
LIV-1 is expressed in almost all MBC tumors. SGN-LIV1A monotherapy was generally well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated TN MBC, with a PR rate of 32%, confirmed PR rate of 21%, and CBR (≥24 wks) of 36%. Response duration data continue to evolve. Enrollment continues in the TN monotherapy expansion cohort.
Citation Format: Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, Mita M, Miller KD, Weise A, Krop I, Burris III H, Kalinsky K, Tsai M, Liu MC, Hurvitz SA, Wilks S, Ademuyiwa F, Diab S, Han HS, Kato G, Nanda R, O'Shaughnessy J, Kostic A, Li M, Specht J. Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - L Pusztai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Forero
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Mita
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - KD Miller
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Weise
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - I Krop
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - H Burris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - K Kalinsky
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Tsai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - MC Liu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - SA Hurvitz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - S Wilks
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - F Ademuyiwa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - S Diab
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - HS Han
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - G Kato
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - R Nanda
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Kostic
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - J Specht
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tsimberidou A, Verschraegen C, Weise A, Sarantopoulos J, Lopes G, Nemunaitis J, Victor A, Shaw J, Kaleta R, Kurzrock R. Phase I dose escalation study of M2698, a p70S6K/AKT inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx367.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
19
|
Donat M, Louis A, Kreskowski K, Ziegler M, Weise A, Schreyer I, Liehr T. X-autosome and X-Y Translocations in Female Carriers: X-chromosome Inactivation Easily Detectable by 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU). Balkan J Med Genet 2017; 20:87-90. [PMID: 28924545 PMCID: PMC5596826 DOI: 10.1515/bjmg-2017-0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Here we report one new case each of an X-autosome translocation (maternally derived), and an X-Y-chromosome translocation. Besides characterizing the involved breakpoints and/or imbalances in detail by molecular cyto-genetics, also skewed X-chromosome inactivation was determined on single cell level using 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU). Thus, we confirmed that the recently suggested EdU approach can be simply adapted for routine diagnostic use. The latter is important, as only by knowing the real pattern of the skewed X-chromosome inactivation, correct interpretation of obtained results and subsequent reliable genetic counseling, can be done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Donat
- Universtätsklinikum Jena, Institut für Humangenetik, Jena, Germany
| | - A Louis
- Labor für Humangenetische Diagnostik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Kreskowski
- Universtätsklinikum Jena, Institut für Humangenetik, Jena, Germany
| | - M Ziegler
- Universtätsklinikum Jena, Institut für Humangenetik, Jena, Germany
| | - A Weise
- Universtätsklinikum Jena, Institut für Humangenetik, Jena, Germany
| | - I Schreyer
- Universtätsklinikum Jena, Institut für Humangenetik, Jena, Germany.,Jena University Hospital, Center for Ambulant Medicine, Jena, Germany
| | - T Liehr
- Universtätsklinikum Jena, Institut für Humangenetik, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Forero-Torres A, Modi S, Specht J, Miller K, Weise A, Burris H, Liu M, Krop I, Pusztai L, Kostic A, Li M, Mita M. Abstract P6-12-04: Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p6-12-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
LIV-1, a transmembrane protein and downstream target of STAT3, is highly expressed in breast cancer cells. It is associated with lymph node involvement and metastatic progression. SGN-LIV1A is an anti-LIV-1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Upon binding to cell-surface LIV-1, SGN-LIV1A is internalized and releases MMAE, which binds to tubulin and induces G2/M arrest and apoptosis.
Methods
This is an ongoing, phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-LIV1A (q3 wks IV) in women with LIV-1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) (NCT01969643). Patients (pts) with measurable disease and ≥2 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC were eligible. Pts with ≥Grade 2 neuropathy were excluded. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1; pts with stable disease (SD) or better could continue treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. At completion of dose escalation in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) and triple-negative (TN) pts, expansion cohorts were opened to further evaluate safety and antitumor activity of monotherapy in TN pts and combination therapy with trastuzumab (Tz) in HER2-positive (HER2+) pts. Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were done to evaluate LIV-1 expression and other correlative endpoints.
Results
To date, 39 pts (18 HR+/HER2–, 21 TN) have received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–10) of SGN-LIV1A monotherapy at doses of 0.5–2.8 mg/kg. Median age was 57 yrs (range, 33–79). At baseline, pts had a median of 4 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC (range, 2–8); 36 had visceral disease and 25 had bone involvement. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred in 19 DLT-evaluable pts; maximum tolerated dose was not exceeded at 2.8 mg/kg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥30% of pts were: fatigue (64%), nausea (54%), alopecia (46%), decreased appetite (41%), constipation (39%), neutropenia (33%), and vomiting (31%). Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 9 pts (23%). Most AEs were Grade 1/2, except neutropenia (all ≥Grade 3). Four pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (acute respiratory distress syndrome, nausea, pneumonia, tachycardia). In dose escalation, modest activity was observed in 17 efficacy evaluable (EE) HR+/HER2- pts, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 59% (10 SD), including 1 pt with SD≥24 wks. Among the 17 EE TN pts (dose escalation plus cohort expansion), the overall response rate (ORR) was 41% (7 PR), DCR was 82% (7 PR, 7 SD) and clinical benefit rate (CBR=OR+SD≥24 wks) was 53% (9 pts). For TN pts, median PFS was 17.1 wks (95% CI: 6.0, 18.4); 6 pts remain on treatment.
Of 281 MBC tumor samples evaluated for LIV-1, 93% were positive; 81% had moderate-to-high expression (H-score ≥100).
Conclusions
LIV-1 is expressed in almost all MBC tumors. SGN-LIV1A monotherapy has been generally well tolerated and shown encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated TN MBC, with a PR rate of 41% and a CBR at ≥24 wks of 53%. Response duration data continue to evolve. Enrollment continues in the TN monotherapy expansion cohort and the HER2+ combination cohort with Tz.
Citation Format: Forero-Torres A, Modi S, Specht J, Miller K, Weise A, Burris III H, Liu M, Krop I, Pusztai L, Kostic A, Li M, Mita M. Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Forero-Torres
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - S Modi
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - J Specht
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - K Miller
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Weise
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - H Burris
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Liu
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - I Krop
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - L Pusztai
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Kostic
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Li
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Mita
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Naing A, Goel S, Curti B, Weise A, Eder J, Marshall S, Morehouse C, Li X, Karakunnel J, Infante J. A Phase 1 first-in-human study of MEDI0680, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in adult patients (pts) with advanced tumors. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw378.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
22
|
Sachdev J, Hu-Lieskovan S, Patnaik A, Eisenberg P, Weise A, Hutchinson M, West B, Gause C, Tong S, Ribas A. Phase 1/2a study of double immune suppression blockade by combining a CSF1R inhibitor (pexidartinib/PLX3397) with an anti–PD-1 antibody (pembrolizumab) to treat advanced melanoma and other solid tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
23
|
Schubert S, Opgen-Rhein B, Haverkämper G, zu Knyphausen E, Weise A, Jacob A, Rompel O, Schranz D, Müller G, Schmidt F, Kästner M, Udink ten Cate F, Wagner R, Ruf B, Pickardt T, Messroghli D. Myocarditis in Paediatric Patients: Age and Gender Are Influencing Incidence, Severity, and Clinical Course: Initial Data Analysis from the German Multi-Centre Registry (“MYKKE”). Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
24
|
Hu-Lieskovan S, Patnaik A, Eisenberg P, Sachdev J, Weise A, Kaufman D, Aromin I, West B, Tong S, Ribas A. Phase 1/2a study of double immune suppression blockade by combining a CSF1R inhibitor (pexidartinib/PLX3397) with an anti PD-1 antibody (pembrolizumab) to treat advanced melanoma and other solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv514.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
25
|
Winkler S, Hempel M, Brückner S, Mallek F, Weise A, Liehr T, Tautenhahn HM, Bartels M, Christ B. Mouse white adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells gain pericentral and periportal hepatocyte features after differentiation in vitro, which are preserved in vivo after hepatic transplantation. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2015; 215:89-104. [PMID: 26235702 DOI: 10.1111/apha.12560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Revised: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Mesenchymal stem cells may differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, they are considered a novel cell resource for the treatment of various liver diseases. Here, the aim was to demonstrate that mesenchymal stem cells may adopt both perivenous and periportal hepatocyte-specific functions in vitro and in vivo. METHODS Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells were isolated from immunodeficient C57BL/6 (B6.129S6-Rag2(tm1Fwa) Prf1(tm1Clrk) ) mice and differentiated into the hepatocytic phenotype by applying a simple protocol. Their physiological and metabolic functions were analysed in vitro and after hepatic transplantation in vivo. RESULTS Mesenchymal stem cells changed their morphology from a fibroblastoid into shapes of osteocytes, chondrocytes, adipocytes and hepatocytes. Typical for mesenchymal stem cells, hematopoietic marker genes were not expressed. CD90, which is not expressed on mature hepatocytes, decreased significantly after hepatocytic differentiation. Markers indicative for liver development like hepatic nuclear factor 4 alpha, or for perivenous hepatocyte specification like cytochrome P450 subtype 3a11, and CD26 were significantly elevated. Periportal hepatocyte-specific markers like carbamoylphosphate synthetase 1, the entry enzyme of the urea cycle, were up-regulated. Consequently, cytochrome P450 enzyme activity and urea synthesis increased significantly to values comparable to cultured primary hepatocytes. Both perivenous and periportal qualities were preserved after hepatic transplantation and integration into the host parenchyma. CONCLUSIONS Adult mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue differentiated into hepatocyte-like cells featuring both periportal and perivenous functions. Hence, they are promising candidates for the treatment of region-specific liver cell damage and may support organ regeneration in acute and chronic liver diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Winkler
- Applied Molecular Hepatology Laboratory; Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| | - M. Hempel
- Applied Molecular Hepatology Laboratory; Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| | - S. Brückner
- Applied Molecular Hepatology Laboratory; Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| | - F. Mallek
- Jena University Hospital; Institute of Human Genetics; Friedrich Schiller University; Jena Germany
| | - A. Weise
- Jena University Hospital; Institute of Human Genetics; Friedrich Schiller University; Jena Germany
| | - T. Liehr
- Jena University Hospital; Institute of Human Genetics; Friedrich Schiller University; Jena Germany
| | - H.-M. Tautenhahn
- Applied Molecular Hepatology Laboratory; Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
- Translational Centre for Regenerative Medicine (TRM); University of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| | - M. Bartels
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| | - B. Christ
- Applied Molecular Hepatology Laboratory; Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; University Hospital of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
- Translational Centre for Regenerative Medicine (TRM); University of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tsimberidou A, Verschraegen C, Heestand G, Kaleta R, Scheuenpflug J, Huck B, Weise A, Kurzrock R. A first in human, dose escalation trial of MSC2363318A – a dual p70S6K/Akt inhibitor, for patients with advanced malignancies. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv094.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
27
|
Scholten M, Vilser C, Weise A, Baniahmad A. Atypical polycystic ovary syndrome--a genetic analysis. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2014; 123:55-60. [PMID: 25148265 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1387735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Although polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrinopathy the pathogenesis is not entirely understood. Typically, high androgen levels are associated with increased virilization. We report 2 rare groups of patients with either unexpectedly high testosterone levels despite low virilization as well as patients with low testosterone levels despite high grade of virilization. One possibility for the atypical PCOS may be based on an altered androgen receptor (AR) signaling. METHODS 6 patients and when available the parents were included in this study. Alterations of the metaphase chromosomes by GTG staining, the length of both the trinucleotide CAG- and GGC-repeats of the androgen receptor (AR) gene was determined by PCR, further the entire AR gene was sequenced and analyzed. RESULTS The GTG banding revealed no chromosomal alterations and the range of CAG- and GGC-repeat lengths are within the normal range. Interestingly, by sequencing of the entire AR gene few genetic mutations were identified. CONCLUSION The detected mutations do not alter the AR protein sequence but they change the codon usage towards less frequent codons that potentially may alter AR protein levels and androgen signaling. In addition to this, we postulate also other causes for manifestation of atypical PCOS, which may include AR-coregulators or epigenetic alterations. To our knowledge this is the first report of combining chromosomal analysis of PCOS patients with full sequencing of the human AR gene and linking codon usage to PCOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Scholten
- Department of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - C Vilser
- Department of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - A Weise
- Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - A Baniahmad
- Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bhatt SS, Manvelyan M, Moradkhani K, Hunstig F, Mrasek K, Puechberty J, Lefort G, Sarda P, Weise A, Liehr T, Pellestor F. Inverted segment size and the presence of recombination hot spot clusters matter in sperm segregation analysis. Cytogenet Genome Res 2013; 142:145-9. [PMID: 24217531 DOI: 10.1159/000356142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S S Bhatt
- Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Münzer AM, Heimgreiter M, Melzer K, Weise A, Fabel B, Abdellah A, Lugli P, Scarpa G. Back-gated spray-deposited carbon nanotube thin film transistors operated in electrolytic solutions: an assessment towards future biosensing applications. J Mater Chem B 2013; 1:3797-3802. [PMID: 32261132 DOI: 10.1039/c3tb20170h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
We report on back-gated carbon nanotube (CNT) thin-film transistors (CNTFETs) and their performance in electrolytic solutions to assess their suitability for future application as biosensors. Spray-deposited CNT networks were used as the sensitive active layer which offers the opportunity for integration on flexible sensing platforms at low-cost. We characterized the transistors' behavior in electrolytes by analyzing the response to different KCl solutions and buffers over a wide pH range. We observed a linear response of the drain current upon changing the pH in low molarity buffers and obtained an exponential dependence on the salt concentration of the electrolyte. These responses can be attributed to electrostatic gating effects that go along with shifts in the threshold voltage. Even though a lot of effort has been put into understanding the biosensing mechanism a detailed theory is still missing. Back-gated CNTFETs operated in electrolytic solutions can be a further tool to investigate and clarify the existing unsolved phenomena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Münzer
- Technische Universität München, Institute for Nanoelectronics, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liehr T, Klein E, Mrasek K, Kosyakova N, Guilherme R, Aust N, Venner C, Weise A, Hamid A. Clinical Impact of Somatic Mosaicism in Cases with Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2013; 139:158-63. [DOI: 10.1159/000346026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
31
|
Klein E, Rocchi M, Ovens-Raeder A, Kosyakova N, Weise A, Ziegler M, Meins M, Morlot S, Fischer W, Volleth M, Polityko A, Ogilvie CM, Kraus C, Liehr T. Five novel locations of Neocentromeres in human: 18q22.1, Xq27.1∼27.2, Acro p13, Acro p12, and heterochromatin of unknown origin. Cytogenet Genome Res 2012; 136:163-6. [PMID: 22377933 DOI: 10.1159/000336648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/13/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the first report in 1993, an ectopic centromere, i.e. neocentromere formation, has been reported in more than 100 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC), in 7 instances of centromere repositioning, and in about a dozen cases with more complex chromosomal rearrangements. Here we report 2 new cases with centromere repositioning and 3 neocentric sSMC consisting exclusively of heterochromatic material. Yet, no centromere formation was reported for the regions 18q22.1 and Xq27.1∼27.2 as it was observed in the 2 cases with centromere repositioning here; in both cases, cytogenetically an inversion was suggested. Two of the 3 neocentric sSMC were derived from a short arm of an acrocentric chromosome. The remainder neocentric sSMC case was previously reported and was stainable only by material derived from itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Klein
- Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fitzgerald JS, Weber M, San Martin S, San Roman MP, Weise A, Markert U. The placenta as a chimeric organ? Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1293258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
33
|
Fitzgerald JS, Weber M, Weise A, Markert UR, Schleußner E. Die Plazenta: eine fetomaternale Chimäre? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2011. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1286486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
34
|
Weise A, Weber M, Liehr T, Markert U, Fitzgerald J. Fusion between HTR/8SVneo and HUVEC. J Reprod Immunol 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.06.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
35
|
Chiorean EG, Sausville EA, Heath EI, Weise A, Gomez-Navarro J, Venkatakrishnan K, Sankoh S, Wu J, Corvez M, LoRusso P. Phase I study of TAK-285, an investigational HER2/EGFR inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced cancer: Updated results and assessment of human CSF distribution. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.2538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
36
|
Zeh A, Weise A, Vasarhelyi A, Bach AG, Wohlrab D. [Medium-term results of the Mayo™ short-stem hip prosthesis after avascular necrosis of the femoral head]. Z Orthop Unfall 2011; 149:200-5. [PMID: 21425048 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1270710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM Short-stemmed prostheses are increasingly regarded as implants of first choice in coxarthrosis, especially in young patients. Despite promising short-term results, long-term follow-up studies are still lacking. Short-stemmed femoral implants are characterised by a metaphyseal osseointegration and strain distribution. Therefore a reduced stress shielding of the proximal femur is hypothesized and in some studies already proven. There is histological evidence that osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head may involve not only the intracapital region but also the femoral neck and metaphyseal area. This could lead to a higher rate of aseptic loosening of short-stemmed implants. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the midterm results of the Mayo™ short-stem prosthesis after ON with particular attention on osseointegration. METHOD From 2002-2004, in 21 patients (2 females, 19 males; mean age 45 years; mean BMI = 27) with secondary coxarthrosis after ON implantation of 26 Mayo™ Conservative Hips was performed. Postoperatively, all patients were mobilised with full weight-bearing. Using the specially developed Wristing® software, longitudinal stem migration and varus-valgus femoral stem alignment were examined digitally in anteroposterior X-rays taken immediately after surgery and in standing AP radiographs after 8.2 months and on average after 7.9 years (16 patients). The incidence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines was captured in the anteroposterior X-rays and assigned to the Gruen zones and a DEXA scan was performed. The X-rays of a matched control group with implantation of a Mayo™ short-stem prosthesis in primary coxarthrosis were analyzed by the same method. In all patients the Harris hip score (HHS) was obtained pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS There was no significant migration or valgus tilt of the Mayo™ prosthesis in the study and control groups during postoperative follow-up (paired t-test, p = 0.13 and 0.69, respectively). In six of 26 Mayo™-Stems 12 radiolucent lines (RL) of the Mayo™ prosthesis were observed. The control group showed at ten of 30 Mayo™ stems 17 radiolucent lines. The difference between the groups was not statistically different (chi-square test for the total number of RL: χ² = 0.001, p = 1.0 and χ² = 0.06, p = 0.79 for the number of Mayo™ stems with RL). The DEXA scan showed a slightly higher bone mineral density (BMD) in Gruen zones 3 and 5 compared with a control group: study group. In the study group the postoperative HHS was 93.5 (SD 5.6) compared to 94.2 (SD 6.9) in the control group (t-test, p = 0.63). CONCLUSION In the mid-term course no increased migration or tilt could be proven for Mayo™ short-stem THA in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Due to the absence of differences in the occurrence of radiolucent lines and the same results in the DEXA scan an unimpaired osseointegration of the Mayo™ stem is assumed. Therefore it is concluded that the Mayo™ Conservative Hip can be regarded as an alternative for operative treatment of ON of the femoral head.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Zeh
- Klinik für Orthopädie und Physikalische Medizin, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Liehr T, Bartels I, Zoll B, Ewers E, Mrasek K, Kosyakova N, Merkas M, Hamid A, von Eggeling F, Posorski N, Weise A. Is There a Yet Unreported Unbalanced Chromosomal Abnormality without Phenotypic Consequences in Proximal 4p? Cytogenet Genome Res 2011; 132:121-3. [DOI: 10.1159/000316393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
38
|
LoRusso P, Chiorean EG, Heath E, Weise A, Foley M, Olivo YS, Chi X, Corvez M, Venkatakrishnan K, Sausville E. Abstract P3-14-20: Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of the Investigational HER2/EGFR Inhibitor TAK-285 in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p3-14-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and Objectives: TAK-285 is a novel, orally active, dual HER2/EGFR inhibitor. Nonclinical data show that TAK-285 has high selectivity and specificity for binding to HER family kinases, and has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in a BT-474 mouse xenograft model of breast cancer. Nonclinical data also indicate that TAK-285 is not a substrate for the efflux transporters P-gp and BCRP and penetrates an intact blood-brain barrier in rats. This phase 1 dose-escalation study in patients with advanced cancer aimed to determine the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile.
Methods: Adults had advanced histologically confirmed non-hematologic malignancies, life expectancy >12 weeks, adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function, ECOG PS 0-2, and were refractory to other treatments. Oral TAK-285 was escalated from 50 to 500 mg QD or BID for 21 or 28 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed.
Results: At the data cut-off of 04/23/10, the dose-escalation portion was complete, and the RP2D expansion cohort is ongoing. Preliminary data from the dose-escalation cohorts are reported. 43 patients (median age 60 years [43-76]) were enrolled: 30% ≥65 years, 51% female, and 86% white. Dose levels were 50 mg QD (N=4), 50 mg BID (N=7), and 75 mg BID (N=6) on d 1-21; and 150 mg (N=6), 225 mg (N=4), 325 mg (N=3), 400 mg (N=6), and 500 mg (N=7) BID on d 1-28. Median duration of exposure across all cohorts was 52 days (3-267). Four patients experienced a DLT in Cycle 1: 1 patient (50 mg BID) had Grade 3 pancreatitis; 1 patient (150 mg BID) had Grade 3 chest pain and Grade 3 hypoxia; 1 patient (500 mg BID) had Grade 3 increased ALT; and 1 patient (500 mg BID) had Grade 3 diarrhoea and Grade 3 hypokalaemia. The MTD was 400 mg BID d 1-28. 30 patients (70%) discontinued TAK-285, primarily due to disease progression (n=19, 44%) or an AE (n=9, 21%). Most frequent AEs were fatigue (37%), diarrhoea (35%), nausea (26%), anorexia (21%), vomiting (16%), and elevated AST (16%). 58% of patients had a drug-related AE; the most frequent were diarrhoea (21%), fatigue (19%), and rash (includes rash, rash maculo-papular and rash macular; 12%). 35% of patients had a grade 3/4 AE; the most common were hypokalaemia (7%), ileus, abdominal pain, and hypoxia (5% each). Grade 3/4 AEs related to TAK-285 were the DLTs in Cycle 1 and Grade 4 rhabdomyolysis in 1 patient (400 mg BID, d 1-28) in Cycle 3. 42% of patients experienced a serious AE (SAE); the only SAE seen in >1 patient was ileus (n=2). 4 (9%) patients had fatal AEs; none were considered related to TAK-285. Absorption was fast: plasma concentrations peaked 2-3 hours post-dose. Steady-state plasma exposures increased with dose in a greater than dose-proportional manner, with PK steady-state achieved by Day 8. Accumulation was noted with BID dosing (mean accumulation ratio, 2.4 at MTD); there was moderate fluctuation in plasma concentrations over the steady-state dosing interval (mean Cmax:Cmin ratio, 2.4 at MTD).
Conclusions: The MTD for TAK-285 was 400 mg BID d 1-28. The RP2D cohort is ongoing and includes CSF collection to assess the CNS distribution of TAK-285. Updated safety as well as efficacy data for the dose escalation cohorts will be presented.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-14-20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P LoRusso
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - EG Chiorean
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - E Heath
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - A Weise
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - M Foley
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - YS Olivo
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - X Chi
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - M Corvez
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - K Venkatakrishnan
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - E. Sausville
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA; University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tolcher A, Papadopolous K, Patniak A, Heath E, Weise A, Prokop T, Morrone S, Zanghi J, Keer H, LoRusso P. 381 Preliminary results of a dose escalation study of the Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) “trap” FP-1039 (FGFR1:Fc) in patients with advanced malignancies. EJC Suppl 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(10)72088-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
40
|
Manolakos E, Kefalas K, Neroutsou R, Lagou M, Kosyakova N, Ewers E, Ziegler M, Weise A, Tsoplou P, Rapti SM, Papoulidis I, Anastasakis E, Garas A, Sotiriou S, Eleftheriades M, Peitsidis P, Malathrakis D, Thomaidis L, Kitsos G, Orru S, Liehr T, Petersen MB, Kitsiou-Tzeli S. Characterization of 23 small supernumerary marker chromosomes detected at pre-natal diagnosis: The value of fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mol Med Rep 2010; 3:1015-22. [PMID: 21472348 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2010.358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2010] [Accepted: 08/11/2010] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) cannot be identified or characterized unambiguously by conventional cytogenetic banding techniques. Until recently, the large variety of marker chromosomes, as well as the limitations in their identification, have presented a diagnostic problem. In order to determine the origin of sSMCs, we used a variety of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods, including centromere-specific multicolor FISH, acrocentric specific multicolor FISH, subcentromere-specific multicolor FISH and multicolor FISH with whole chromosome paint probes. Moreover, uniparental disomy testing was in all cases attempted. From a total of 28,000 pre-natal samples from four diagnostic genetics laboratories in Greece, 23 (0.082%) supernumerary marker chromosomes were detected. The mean maternal age was 36.2 years (range 27-43) and the mean gestational age at which amniocentesis was performed was 18.5 weeks (range 16-23). Eighteen markers were de novo and 5 markers were inherited. Molecular cytogenetic methods were applied to determine the chromosomal origin and composition of the sSMC. In total, 17 markers were derived from acrocentric chromosomes (14, 15, 21 and 22) and 6 markers were non-acrocentric, derived from chromosomes 9, 16, 18, 20 and Y. Uniparental disomy was not detected in any of the cases studied. With regard to pregnancy outcome, 13 pregnancies resulted in normal healthy neonates, while 10 pregnancies were terminated due to ultrasound abnormalities. A total of 23 marker chromosomes from 28,000 pre-natal samples (0.082%) were identified. Molecular cytogenetic techniques provided valuable information on the chromosomal origin and composition of all the sSMCs. Especially in cases with normal ultrasound, the FISH results rendered genetic counseling possible in a category of cases previously considered a diagnostic problem. Abnormal outcome was observed in 10 cases (43,5%), 7 of which showed abnormal ultrasound findings. New technologies, such as array-comparative genomic hybridization, should be used in future genotype-phenotype correlation studies, although the high mosaicism rate poses a problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Manolakos
- Laboratory of Genetics, Bioiatriki S.A., Kifissias Ave. 132 and Papada, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
|
42
|
Kaiser P, Weise A, Maxeiner S, Nolden F, Borck A, Forst T, Pfützner A. Laboruntersuchung zur Effizienz der Mischung von NPH-Insulin in Kartuschen mit unterschiedlicher Anzahl von Mischkugeln. DIABETOL STOFFWECHS 2010. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
43
|
Flacke F, Musholt PB, Weise A, Schipper C, Krasner A, Forst T, Steiner SS, Pfützner A. Das ultraschnell-wirkende Insulin VIAject eignet sich zum Einsatz bei in der Insulinpumpentherapie. DIABETOL STOFFWECHS 2010. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
44
|
Li Z, Zhang Q, Mao JH, Weise A, Mrasek K, Fan X, Zhang X, Liehr T, Lu KH, Balmain A, Cai WW. An HDAC1-binding domain within FATS bridges p21 turnover to radiation-induced tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2010; 29:2659-71. [DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
45
|
Karaer K, Ergun MA, Weise A, Ewers E, Liehr T, Kosyakova N, Mkrtchyan H. The case of an infertile male with an uncommon reciprocal X-autosomal translocation: how does this affect male fertility? Genet Couns 2010; 21:397-404. [PMID: 21290969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Infertility is defined as the inability to conceive after one year of regular unprotected intercourse. Constitutional numerical and/or structural chromosomal aberrations like sex-chromosome aberrations are one of the possible factors involved in fertility problems. Reciprocal translocations between an X-chromosome and an autosome are rarely seen in men. Male carriers of an X-autosome translocation are invariably sterile, regardless of the position of the breakpoint in the X-chromosome. Breakpoints in autosomal chromosomes could also be involved in male infertility. In this paper, we describe a 31-year-old male with azoospermia. GTG banding with high resolution multicolor-banding (MCB) techniques revealed a karyotype 46,Y,t(X;1)(p22.3;q25), and we discuss how the breakpoint of this translocation could affect male infertility. As a conclusion, cytogenetic evaluation of infertile subjects with azoospermia should be considered in the first place before in vitro fertilisation procedures are planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Karaer
- Department of Medical Genetics, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06500, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Weise A, Prause S, Eidens M, Weber MM, Kann PH, Forst T, Pfützner A. Prevalence of CYP450 gene variations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Lab 2010; 56:311-318. [PMID: 20857895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug degradation in the human organism is driven by detoxification mechanisms that can be affected in their efficiency by genetic mutations. The purpose of this pilot investigation was to investigate whether Type 2 diabetes is associated with mutations in prominent members of the CYP 450 isoenzyme family. METHODS Genomic DNA was isolated from EDTA blood samples of 203 Caucasian subjects (101 patients with Type 2 diabetes and 102 non-diabetic subjects, age (mean +/- STD): 49 +/- 16 years) was analyzed. Genomic DNA was isolated from EDTA blood. Mutation analysis for CYP2C8 (*2/*3/*4), CYP2C9 (*2/*3), CYP2C19 (*2/*3), CYP2D6 (*3/*4/*5/*6) and PPARgamma (P12A) was performed by means of real-time PCR methods (Light-Cycler, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). RESULTS The genotyping revealed the following allele frequency distributions for the two investigated groups: CYP2C8: *2 (type 2 diabetes 3% vs. 1%, n.s.), *3 (16% vs. 3%, n.s.), *4 (15% vs. 2%, p < 0.05), CYP2C9: *2 (20% vs. 24%, n.s.), *3 (22% vs. 21%, n.s.), CYP2C19: *2 (23% s. 33%, n.s.), *3 (0% vs. 0%, n.s.), CYP2D6: *3 (3% vs. 4%, n.s.), *4 (40% vs. 37%, n.s.), *5 (3% vs. 2%, n.s.), *6 (0% vs. 0%, n.s.), PPARgamma P12A (15% vs. 21%, n.s.), i.e. all but one mutation (CYP2C8*4) were found with equal prevalence in the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot investigation, we found an increased prevalence of the CYP2C8*4 mutation in the Type 2 diabetic patient group. This may result in a modification of drug degradation and drug efficacy in these patients and may have an influence, e.g. on the choice of anti-diabetic drugs. However, further trials are necessary in order to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Weise
- IKFE--Institute for Clinical Research and Development, Mainz, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liehr T, Kosyakova N, Weise A, Ziegler M, Raabe-Meyer G. First case of a neocentromere formation in an otherwise normal chromosome 7. Cytogenet Genome Res 2009; 128:189-91. [PMID: 20029167 DOI: 10.1159/000271471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
According to cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic characterization, an otherwise not-altered chromosome 7 formed a neocentromere in band 7q32.1 in a clinically normal female. The alpha satellite sequence D7Z1 remained in its place but was not used for formation of the primary chromosomal incision. Similar observations of centromere repositioning have been made for chromosomes 3 (2x), 4, 8 and Y (2x). Even though data is available for some neocentromeres whose positions are correlated with evolutionary new centromeres for 7q32.1, no correlation could be found for an ancestral inactivated centromere in any of the presently living primates. Overall, we report a new case of centromere repositioning at a position not known to harbor an ancestral inactivated centromere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Liehr
- Jena University Hospital, Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, Jena, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Liehr T, Stumm M, Wegner RD, Bhatt S, Hickmann P, Patsalis PC, Meins M, Morlot S, Klaschka V, Ewers E, Hinreiner S, Mrasek K, Kosyakova N, Cai WW, Cheung SW, Weise A. 10p11.2 to 10q11.2 is a yet unreported region leading to unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities without phenotypic consequences. Cytogenet Genome Res 2009; 124:102-5. [PMID: 19372675 DOI: 10.1159/000200094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Directly transmitted unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities (UBCA) or euchromatic variants (EV) were recently reported for >50 euchromatic regions of almost all human autosomes. UBCA and EV are comprised of a few megabases of DNA, and carriers are in many cases clinically healthy. Here we report on partial trisomies of chromosome 10 within the pericentromeric region which were detected by standard G banding. Those were referred for further delineation of the size of these duplicated regions for molecular cytogenetics and/or array-CGH. Partial trisomies of chromosome 10 in the pericentromeric region were identified prenatally in seven cases. A maximum of three copies of the region from 10p12.1 to 10q11.22 was observed in all cases without apparent clinical abnormalities. The imbalances were either caused by a direct duplication in one familial case or by de novo small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC). Thus, we report a yet unrecognized chromosomal region subject to UBCA detected in seven unrelated cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a UBCA in the pericentromeric region of chromosome 10 that is not correlated with any clinical consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Liehr
- Institut für Humangenetik und Anthropologie, Jena, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Aurich H, Sgodda M, Kaltwasser P, Vetter M, Weise A, Liehr T, Brulport M, Hengstler JG, Dollinger MM, Fleig WE, Christ B. Hepatocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from human adipose tissue in vitro promotes hepatic integration in vivo. Gut 2009; 58:570-81. [PMID: 19022918 DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.154880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 250] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The hepatic integration of human adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (hAT-MSCs) in vivo with or without prior differentiation to hepatocyte-like cells in vitro was investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS Cells, isolated either from peritoneal or subcutaneous adipose tissue, expressed mesenchymal stem cell surface markers and featured multiple lineage differentiation. Under conditions favouring hepatocyte differentiation, hAT-MSCs gained hepatocytic functions in vitro including urea formation, glycogen synthesis, cytochrome P450 enzyme activity, and expression of hepatocyte-specific transcripts of carbamoylphosphate synthetase, albumin and cytochrome P450 type 3A4 (CYP3A4). Transgenic expression of green fluorescent protein emerged upon hepatocyte differentiation when driven by the hepatocyte-specific promoter of the cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene but was constitutive from the ubiquitin gene promoter. Human AT-MSCs were transplanted into livers of immunodeficient Pfp/Rag2-/- mice with or without prior hepatocyte differentiation in vitro. Donor-derived human cells engrafted in the mouse host liver predominantly in the periportal region of the liver lobule. They expressed HepPar1 and albumin, typical features of differentiated human hepatocytes, in the otherwise negative mouse liver background. Engraftment was significantly more efficient using hAT-MSCs pre-differentiated to hepatocyte-like cells in vitro as compared with undifferentiated cells. CONCLUSIONS Pre-differentiation of human MSCs from adipose tissue into hepatocyte-like cells in vitro facilitates long term functional hepatic integration in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Aurich
- First Department of Medicine, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Heinrich-Damerow-Strasse 1, D-06120 Halle/Saale, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pfützner A, Weise A, Pfützner E, Krasner A, Flacke F, Weber MM, Steiner SS, Forst T. Einfluss der Insulinkinetik auf die Postrezeptor-Signaltransduktion bei Patienten mit Typ 2 Diabetes mellitus. DIABETOL STOFFWECHS 2009. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1221997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|