Incidence and risk of remnant gastric cancer after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study from the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) constitutes a major global health problem, of which remnant gastric cancer (RGC) occurs less frequently. The rate of RGCs after gastrectomy for GC is increasing recently due to improved survival and screening, however, their incidence and risk have not been reported in the U.S.

POPULATION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and elevated risk of RGC after GC gastrectomy in this population, and to identify the risk factors.

METHODS

Patients underwent gastrectomy for first primary GC in 2000-2015 and those who developed RGC were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Fine-Gray regression was used to estimate the cumulative incidence and to identify risk factors. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by Poisson regression to compare the risk with the general population.

RESULTS

Among 21,566 patients included in the cohort, 227 developed RGC. The 20-year cumulative incidence of RGC was 1.88%. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, invasion depth, male sex, marital status, and lower income are independent risk factors for RGC development. SIR was 7.70 overall and > 4.5 in each stratum.

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative incidence and risk for RGCs increased continuously in patients underwent GC gastrectomy. Close and lifelong endoscopy surveillance should be recommended for patients who received GC gastrectomy, especially those with high-risk factors.

Risks of second non-breast primaries following breast cancer in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Second primary cancer incidence is rising among breast cancer survivors. We examined the risks of non-breast second primaries, in combination and at specific cancer sites, through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, seeking studies published by March 2022. We included studies that reported standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), with associated standard errors, assessing the combined risk of second non-breast primaries following breast cancer. We performed meta-analyses of combined second primary risks, stratifying by age, follow-up duration, and geographic region. We also assessed second primary risks at several specific sites, stratifying by age. The inverse variance method with DerSimonian-Laird estimators was used in all meta-analyses, assuming a random-effects model. Associated biases and study quality were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

One prospective and twenty-seven retrospective cohort studies were identified. SIRs for second non-breast primaries combined ranged from 0.84 to 1.84. The summary SIR estimate was 1.24 (95% CI 1.14-1.36, I2: 99%). This varied by age: the estimate was 1.59 (95% CI 1.36-1.85) when breast cancer was diagnosed before age 50, which was significantly higher than in women first diagnosed at 50 or over (SIR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.36, p for difference: < 0.001). SPC risks were also significantly higher when based on Asian, rather than European, registries (Asia-SIR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.29-1.67. Europe-SIR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.28). There were significantly increased risks of second thyroid (SIR: 1.89, 95% CI 1.49-2.38), corpus uteri (SIR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.53-2.23), ovary (SIR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.35-1.73), kidney (SIR: 1.43, 95% CI 1.17-1.73), oesophagus (SIR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.26-1.55), skin (melanoma) (SIR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.52), blood (leukaemia) (SIR: 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.45), lung (SIR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.51), stomach (SIR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.12-1.36) and bladder (SIR: 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26) primaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer survivors are at significantly increased risk of second primaries at many sites. Risks are higher for those diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 and in Asian breast cancer survivors compared to European breast cancer survivors. This study is limited by a lack of data on potentially confounding variables. The conclusions may inform clinical management decisions following breast cancer, although specific clinical recommendations lie outside the scope of this review.

Epidemiology of Second Non-breast Primary Cancers among Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Korean Population-based Study by the SMARTSHIP group

Purpose

To evaluate the incidence and prognosis of second non-breast primary cancer (SNBPC) among Korean survivors of breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service were searched to identify women who received curative surgery for initial breast cancer (IBC) between 2003 and 2008 (n=64,340). Among them, patients with the following characteristics were excluded: other cancer diagnosis before IBC (n=10,866), radiotherapy before IBC (n=349), absence of data on sex or age (n=371), or male (n=248). Accordingly, data of 52,506 women until December, 2017 were analyzed. SNBPC was defined as a newly diagnosed SNBPC that occurred five years or more after IBC diagnosis.

Results

The median follow-up time of all patients was 12.13 years. SNBPC was developed in 3,084 (5.87%) women after a median 7.61 years following IBC diagnosis. The 10-year incidence of SNBPC was 5.78% (95% CI, 5.56-6.00). Higher SNBPC incidence was found in survivors with the following factors: old age at IBC diagnosis, low household income, and receiving combined chemotherapy with endocrine therapy, whereas receiving radiotherapy was related to a lower incidence of SNBPC (hazard ratio = 0.89, p<0.01). Among the patients with SNBPC, the 5-year survival rate was 62.28% (95% CI, 65.53-69.02).

Conclusion

Approximately 5% of breast cancer survivors developed SNBPC within 10 years after IBC diagnosis. The risk of SNBPC was associated with patient's age at IBC diagnosis, income level, and a receipt of systemic treatments.

The genomic and transcriptome characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma patients with previous breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer and lung cancer are the top two malignancies in the female population and the number of patients with breast cancer and subsequent primary lung cancer has increased significantly in recent years. However, the unique molecular characteristics of this group of patients remains unclear.

Purpose

To identify the genomic and transcriptome characteristics of primary lung adenocarcinoma patients with previous breast cancer by comparison with single primary lung adenocarcinoma (SPLA) patients.

Methods

The tumor and normal pulmonary tissue specimens of ten primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients with previous breast cancer (multiple primary cancer, MPC) and ten SPLA patients were prospectively collected. The whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) were performed to analyze the gene mutation and expression differences between MPC and SPC patients.

Results

The results of WES indicated that the mutations of TRIM73, DLX6 and CNGB1 only existed in MPC patients. The results of RNA-seq manifested the occurrence of second primary lung adenocarcinoma in breast cancer patients was closely associated with cytokine-cytokine receptor action, autophagy, PI3L-Akt, cAMP and calcium ion signaling pathways. Besides, the expression levels of FGF10 and VEGFA genes were significantly increased in MPC patients.

Conclusion

The occurrence of second primary lung adenocarcinoma may be related to the cytokine-cytokine receptor action, autophagy, PI3L-Akt, cAMP and calcium ion signaling pathways. Furthermore, the mutations of TRIM73, DLX6 and CNGB1 and high expression of FGF10 and VEGFA might play an important role in the development of lung adenocarcinoma in breast cancer patients. However, more in-depth investigations are needed to verify above findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09727-6.

[The 41,000 long-term survivor cohort of the German Childhood Cancer Registry]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

One-third of childhood cancer long-term survivors suffer from severe late effects (e.g., secondary cancer and cardiovascular diseases). The German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) holds approximately 70,000 registered cancer cases, of which more than 41,000 are long-term survivors, with recent follow-up and contact information that can be used for scientific studies on late effects. The characteristics of this cohort are presented, previous late effects studies with the support of the GCCR are described, and the respective participation rates are reported.

METHODS

For all patients who developed cancer between 1980 and 2019 and were in long-term observation at the GCCR, the distribution of diagnoses, current age, observation time, and number of secondary cancers as of 16 July 2021 was determined. The rates of patients who responded to history queries were computed. The influence of determinants on the participation rate were calculated using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

The cohort comprises 41,466 long-term survivors. Of these, 10% are older than 40 years and 40% had their cancer diagnosis more than 20 years ago. The participation rates range between 30 and 60% and depend on age at diagnosis, the complexity of the study, and the number of previously conducted surveys. A time interval of at least four years between two consecutive contacts seems optimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Our unique cohort enables population-based research on late effects after childhood cancer. To define a sensible time interval for contacting survivors is essential. In order to ensure that survivors are not contacted too frequently, the number of survivors included in research projects should be as small as possible.

Successful Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Could Prevent Metachronous Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Helicobacter pylori is the leading cause of gastric cancer, but it is still uncertain whether eradicating H. pylori in early gastric cancer (EGC) patients who underwent endoscopic resection can prevent metachronous gastric cancer (MGC). This study aimed to investigate the effect of H. pylori eradication to prevent MGC after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

In this propensity-matched retrospective observational study, 770 patients with EGC who received ESD were enrolled. The outcome was the incidence of MGC; this was compared between the persistent and eradicated groups.

RESULTS

MGC was detected in 27 patients (7.8%) during a median period of 39.0 months (range 26.0-64.0). After propensity matching, 126 pairs of patients in each group were analyzed. The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of MGC were 13.2 and 3.9% in the persistent and eradicated groups, respectively (p= 0.021, log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, H. pylori eradication prevented MGC significantly (hazard ratio [HR] 0.32; p = 0.029). The results remained robust after inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (HR 0.30; p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Successful H. pylori eradication could prevent MGC after ESD for EGC.

Second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma after radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Methods

The clinicopathological characteristics of 48 second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma patients with a history of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer were retrospectively analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model, including gender, age, alcohol consumption, smoking, clinical stage, margin status, regional lymph node status, tumor differentiation and treatment mode.

Results

The second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma mostly occurred on the tongue [18/48], buccal [12/48] and gingiva [10/48], and the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 60.3% and 39.4%, respectively. Margin status and extranodal extension were significantly associated with OS, while only margin status was found to be an independent prognostic factor of OS in the Cox proportional hazards model (P=0.003, HR =3.976, 95% CI: 1.596–9.904).

Conclusions

Oral squamous cell carcinoma patients underwent radiotherapy for head and neck cancer show poor survival outcomes. Margin status is an independent prognostic factor of second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma.

What is the most appropriate period to define synchronous cancers?

BACKGROUND

Studies about second primary cancers (SPC) incidence exclude a period following the first cancer diagnosis given the high probability of diagnosing another primary cancer during this phase (synchronous cancers). However, definition of synchronicity period varies widely, from one to six months, without clear epidemiological justification. The objective of this study was to determine the most appropriate synchronicity period.

METHODS

Data from 13 French population-based cancer registries were used to establish a cohort of all patients diagnosed with a first cancer between 1989 and 2010. The incidence rate of subsequent cancer was computed by day within 1 year of follow-up after the first diagnosis. Incidence was modelized by joinpoint regression models with an initial quadratic trend and a second constant part (plateau). The joinpoint was the point from which the plateau began and defining the synchronicity period.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 696,775 patients with a first cancer, of which 12,623 presented a SPC. The median joinpoint for all sites combined was estimated at 120.5 days [112.0-129.0]. Analysis by gender reported a higher difference in 32 days for males (127.8 vs 96.1 days). Noteworthy differences were found depending on patient age and the site of first cancer, with joinpoint ranging from 84.7 (oesophagus cancer) to 250.1 days (bladder cancer).

CONCLUSION

Although some heterogeneity was observed based on the characteristic of the patients, the appropriate synchronicity period appears to be 4 months after the diagnosis of first cancer.

Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Metachronous Second Primary Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with metachronous malignancies before carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract were analyzed regarding clinical parameters, oncological outcome, and prognosis.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 1583 patients with gastroesophageal cancer who underwent oncological resections between 2002 and 2018. Of 1583 patients, 172 had a malignant tumor before the upper gastrointestinal cancer (second primary carcinomas) and 1411 without preceding malignancies served as the control group. The analyses were performed between both groups and within the subgroup of second primary carcinomas.

RESULTS

Patients with second primary carcinomas were older (P < 0.0001), had more comorbidities (P < 0.0001), and underwent longer surgical resections (P = 0.0024). They had lower (y)pT-categories (P = 0.0427) and had longer stays in intensive care unit (P = 0.0002) and hospital (P = 0.0018). R0-resection was more frequent (P = 0.0275) while having more surgical complications (P = 0.0378). The median survival was 39.5 mo (primary carcinoma) versus 32.9 mo for (second primary carcinoma) and was not significantly different (P = 0.5359).In the subgroup analysis of second primaries, there were no significant survival differences depending on primary tumor entity (P = 0.4989). pT status (P = 0.0062), pN status (P < 0.0001), pM status (P < 0.0001), and R-status (P < 0.0001) were significant prognostic factors. A time period >9 y after the primary cancer could be identified as a novel and beneficial survival factor (P = 0.0496). Most patients with primary colorectal, prostate, hematogenous, or breast cancer had adenocarcinoma, whereas patients with initial otolaryngologic cancers mainly had squamous cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Second primary carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract show distinct clinical and oncological characteristics. Common prognostic factors are applicable, and oncologic resection is recommended.

Argon plasma coagulation for superficial squamous cell carcinoma in the residual esophagus after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Patients after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) occasionally develop metachronous SCC in the residual esophagus. Although most of these second primary lesions are detected as superficial cancer at follow-up endoscopy, it is often difficult to perform endoscopic resection for these lesions near the site of anastomosis.

METHODS

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of argon plasma coagulation (APC) for superficial SCC in the residual esophagus after esophagectomy. Twelve patients (involving 15 s primary lesions) received APC for superficial SCC in the residual esophagus after esophagectomy. These lesions were difficult to perform endoscopic resection and they were treated using APC.

RESULTS

There was no treatment-related complication. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 13 (86.6%) of the 15 lesions: CR was achieved in 11 lesions (73.3%) after the first APC course, and in another 2 lesions (13.3%) after two or more APC courses. Of the 2 patients with persisting residual tumor, 1 patient received 12 times repeated-APC courses over 6 years, and eventually achieved local control without metastasis, the other patient received radiotherapy and cervical esophagectomy after treatment failure with APC. All patients survived except for one patient who died of old age and another patient who died of tongue cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

APC was a safe treatment that was easy to perform. APC was concluded to be an effective treatment for superficial SCC in the residual esophagus after esophagectomy when endoscopic resection was difficult.

Lung cancer screening in patients with previous malignancy: Is this cohort at increased risk for malignancy?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of second primary lung cancer (SPLC) and describe the clinical characteristics and radiological findings in individuals with a prior history of cancer presenting to a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening program at a tertiary cancer center.

METHODS

Patients with a previous history of malignancy, a life expectancy ≥ 5 years referred for CT lung cancer screening between May 2, 2011, and November 28, 2018, were included. Demographics regarding risk factors including smoking history and prior history of thoracic radiation were collected. CT scan features assessed nodule size, morphologic features, and number. The Lung-CT Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) scoring system was retrospectively applied to studies performed before October 2014 and prospectively applied to remainder of studies. Data was collected in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant manner.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients were studied (mean age of 66 years). All had a previous history of cancer, most commonly breast cancer 205 (38%), head and neck cancer 105 (19%), and lung cancer 87 (16%). Of screening CTs performed, 17.5% were positive screening study results as per Lung-RADS scoring system. SPLC was diagnosed in 35 patients (6.4%) with 21 prevalence cancers detected and 14 interval cancers detected in subsequent screening rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of screen-detected SPLC in patients with prior malignancy is higher than reported rates seen in historical prospective screening studies. Our study suggests the need for prospective research to evaluate any mortality benefit that screening may have in this population.

KEY POINTS

• The rate of screen-detected second primary lung cancer in patients with prior malignancy is higher than reported rates seen in historical prospective randomized lung cancer screening studies in a general screened population. • Patients with a prior malignancy undergoing lung cancer screening have higher rates of positive screening studies and higher rates of invasive diagnostic procedures than those reported in a general screening population. • Prospective research is required to evaluate if screening offers a mortality benefit in this population.

Evaluating the Age-Based Recommendations for Long-Term Follow-Up in Breast Cancer

Background

After 5 years of annual follow‐up following breast cancer, Dutch guidelines are age based: annual follow‐up for women <60 years, 60–75 years biennial, and none for >75 years. We determined how the risk of recurrence corresponds to these consensus‐based recommendations and to the risk of primary breast cancer in the general screening population.

Subjects, Materials, and Methods

Women with early‐stage breast cancer in 2003/2005 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 18,568). Cumulative incidence functions were estimated for follow‐up years 5–10 for locoregional recurrences (LRRs) and second primary tumors (SPs). Risks were compared with the screening population without history of breast cancer. Alternative cutoffs for age were determined by log‐rank tests.

Results

The cumulative risk for LRR/SP was lower in women <60 years (5.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3–6.6) who are under annual follow‐up than for women 60–75 (6.3%, 95% CI 5.6–7.1) receiving biennial visits. All risks were higher than the 5‐year risk of a primary tumor in the screening population (ranging from 1.4% to 1.9%). Age cutoffs <50, 50–69, and > 69 revealed better risk differentiation and would provide more risk‐based schedules. Still, other factors, including systemic treatments, had an even greater impact on recurrence risks.

Conclusion

The current consensus‐based recommendations use suboptimal age cutoffs. The proposed alternative cutoffs will lead to a more balanced risk‐based follow‐up and thereby more efficient allocation of resources. However, more factors should be taken into account for truly individualizing follow‐up based on risk for recurrence.

Implications for Practice

The current age‐based recommendations for breast cancer follow‐up after 5 years are suboptimal and do not reflect the actual risk of recurrent disease. This results in situations in which women with higher risks actually receive less follow‐up than those with a lower risk of recurrence. Alternative cutoffs could be a start toward risk‐based follow‐up and thereby more efficient allocation of resources. However, age, or any single risk factor, is not able to capture the risk differences and therefore is not sufficient for determining follow‐up. More risk factors should be taken into account for truly individualizing follow‐up based on the risk for recurrence.

Actual survival benefits related to the intensive follow‐up recommendations of current guidelines for patients with breast cancer are unclear. This article analyses long‐term breast cancer recurrence patterns to determine how the current age‐based recommendations on follow‐up schedules after 5 years correspond to the actual risk of locoregional recurrence and second primary breast cancer. Alternative guidelines are proposed.

Second malignancies in multiple myeloma; emerging patterns and future directions

The changing landscape of treatment options for multiple myeloma has led to a higher proportion of patients achieving deep, long-lasting responses to therapy. With the associated improvement in overall survival, the development of subsequent second malignancies has become of increased significance. The risk of second malignancy after multiple myeloma is affected by a combination of patient-, disease- and therapy-related risk factors. This review discusses recent data refining our knowledge of these contributing factors, including current treatment modalities which increase risk (i.e. high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant and lenalidomide maintenance therapy). We highlight emerging data towards individualized risk- and response-adapted treatment strategies and discuss key areas requiring future research.

Maintenance therapy and need for cessation studies in multiple myeloma: Focus on the future

With ten years of follow-up since the advent of the modern paradigm of combination induction therapy, consolidative autologous stem-cell transplant, and lenalidomide maintenance, median survival for multiple myeloma has increased to almost 50% at 10 years. Given this outlook, the overarching goal of maintenance therapy is to spare patients from the toxicities of aggressive or otherwise intrusive therapies while ideally extending survival or, at the least, extending progression-free survival or time until next treatment. This review will focus on the current landscape of maintenance therapies for multiple myeloma. The historical context and evidence for choice of agent, duration of treatment, and current strategies and ongoing trials will be discussed - as well as a focus on unmet needs. The case for studies investigating cessation of therapy and risk and response-adapted approaches will be underscored given that the current paradigm likely results in overtreatment for some patients.

Synchronous resection of esophageal cancer and other organ malignancies: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neoplasms arising in the esophagus may coexist with other solid organ or gastrointestinal tract neoplasms in 6% to 15% of patients. Resection of both tumors synchronously or in a staged procedure provides the best chances for long-term survival. Synchronous resection of both esophageal and second primary malignancy may be feasible in a subset of patients; however, literature on this topic remains rather scarce.

AIM

To analyze the operative techniques employed in esophageal resections combined with gastric, pancreatic, lung, colorectal, kidney and liver resections and define postoperative outcomes in each case.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched the Medline database for cases of patients with esophageal tumors coexisting with a second primary tumor located in another organ that underwent synchronous resection of both neoplasms. All English language articles deemed eligible for inclusion were accessed in full text. Exclusion criteria included: (1) Hematological malignancies; (2) Head/neck/pharyngeal neoplasms; (3) Second primary neoplasms in the esophagus or the gastroesophageal junction; (4) Second primary neoplasms not surgically excised; and (5) Preclinical studies. Data regarding the operative strategy employed, perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search yielded 23 eligible studies incorporating a total of 117 patients. Of these patients, 71% had a second primary neoplasm in the stomach. Those who underwent total gastrectomy had a reconstruction using either a colonic (n = 23) or a jejunal (n = 3) conduit while for those who underwent gastric preserving resections (i.e., non-anatomic/wedge/distal gastrectomies) a conventional gastric pull-up was employed. Likewise, in cases of patients who underwent esophagectomy combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy (15% of the cohort), the decision to preserve part of the stomach or not dictated the reconstruction method (whether by a gastric pull-up or a colonic/jejunal limb). For the remaining patients with coexisting lung/colorectal/kidney/liver neoplasms (14% of the entire patient population) the types of resections and operative techniques employed were identical to those used when treating each malignancy separately.

CONCLUSION

Despite the poor quality of available evidence and the great interstudy heterogeneity, combined procedures may be feasible with acceptable safety and satisfactory oncologic outcomes on individual basis.

Hypopharyngeal Skin Cancer Following Total Laryngectomy and Pectoralis Flap Reconstruction: Case Report and Literature Review

Although early complications of microvascular free flaps and regional pedicled flaps of the head and neck are well described in the literature, there is relatively limited knowledge regarding their long-term complications. We describe the case of a 62-year-old gentleman who underwent primary resection and adjuvant radiation therapy for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma who subsequently underwent salvage total laryngectomy with pectoralis major muscle flap reconstruction. During a later esophageal dilation for complaints of dysphagia, a new exophytic lesion of the hypopharynx was biopsied on endoscopy. The lesion was excised via transoral robotic surgery with final pathology revealing squamous cell carcinoma completely confined to the skin paddle of the pectoralis flap and arising from the epidermis of the skin flap. No further therapy was undertaken and there has been no evidence of recurrence 2 years after resection. Synchronous cutaneous malignancy is a rare complication of free and pedicled flap reconstruction, however its diagnosis is increasing. Given the concern for recurrent mucosal tumors arising in the upper aerodigestive tract which may require extensive resection with or without adjuvant therapy, it is important to determine the etiology of the underlying malignancy to guide appropriate treatment.

A competing risk nomogram to predict severe late toxicity after modern re-irradiation for squamous carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Severe late toxicity is common after re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary (RSP) squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. However, many patients experience complications from tumor progression before manifesting late effects. We constructed a nomogram to examine this relationship between late toxicity and competing risks.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with RSP squamous carcinoma originating in a field previously irradiated to ≥40 Gy and treated with IMRT-based re-irradiation to ≥40 Gy were collected. Grade ≥3 late toxicity developing ≥90 days after re-irradiation was collected. A multivariable competing-risk model was fit to the actuarial risk of late toxicity with progression or death as the competing risk. The final bootstrap optimized model was converted into a nomogram.

RESULTS

From 9 institutions, 505 patients were included. The 2-year incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity was 16.7% (95% CI 13.2-20.2%) whereas progression or death was 64.2% (95% CI 59.7-68.8%). The median freedom from late toxicity, progression or death was 10.7, 5.5 and 3.2 months for RPA class I-III patients respectively, whereas the median OS was 44.9, 15.9 and 7.9 months, respectively. The final model included six clinical factors. Notably, dose, volume and fractionation did not significantly impact toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

After re-irradiation, the risk of progression or death is approximately four times the risk of radiation-related severe late toxicity. The risk of late toxicity may be more dependent on patient and disease factors than modifiable treatment factors. This model is useful for patient selection, pre-treatment consent and post-treatment survivorship following re-irradiation.

Cancer screening in the pediatric cancer patient: a focus on genitourinary malignancies, and why does a urologist need to know about this?

INTRODUCTION

The long-term survival of a patient with childhood cancer now exceeds 80%. Unfortunately, as survivorship improves, the long-term consequences of the treatments used have become manifest. Specifically, the finding that development of a subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN) is the leading cause of late mortality is concerning. In cancer survivors who are at high risk for developing an SMN, cancer screening protocols have well-documented survivorship benefits. Regrettably, 50% of these high-risk patients are non-compliant with these protocols, with studies revealing that inadequate patient compliance is in part because of insufficient knowledge of the physician regarding its need.

DISCUSSION

Urologists are in a unique position to correct this deficiency. Characteristically, survivors of childhood cancer present to urologists as an adult with complaints of infertility, erectile dysfunction, androgen deprivation, lower urinary tract symptoms or for follow-up of a urinary diversion. The urologist because of their specialty should be able to treat the patients presenting complaint, identify the high-risk patient, and re-establish them on their surveillance protocol.

SCREENING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HIGH-RISK PATIENTS

The risk for developing an SMN is unequally expressed and is temporally biphasic. A minimal 10-year follow-up time span is recommended for patients who received alkylating agents or topoisomerase inhibitors. These agents can induce hematologic malignancies classically within the first 3-5 years after chemotherapy completion, with minimal risk existing after 10 years. Lifelong follow-up for SMN development is recommended under five distinct circumstances; if a genetic predisposition to tumor formation exists, a persistent post-treatment non-malignant mass is present if chemotherapy was received before 2 years of age, if the initial type of tumor predisposes to SMN, or if the patient received radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

The urologists ability to identify the patient at high risk for developing an SMN and return them to a surveillance protocol is crucial for appropriate patient management.

Chemotherapy and molecular therapy in cervical cancer

In recent years, the treatment of locally-advanced and metastatic cervical cancer has improved greatly due to the introduction of targeted therapies, new chemotherapy combinations, and emerging treatments. Candidates for potentially curative treatment are those patients with good functional status without associated comorbidities. Numerous trials have demonstrated that chemotherapy prolongs survival versus supportive care alone. In addition, polychemotherapy schemes are superior to single agent regimens. Targeted molecular agents have proven beneficial in the treatment of cervical cancer. Second-line treatment should be considered standard practice in patients with good functional status. Finally, given the poor survival outcomes in patients with metastatic disease, participation in clinical studies should always be considered the best option.

Risk of secondary rectal cancer and colon cancer after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate whether radiotherapy for prostate cancer increases the risk of therapy-related rectal cancer and colon cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out using the Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies examining the association between radiotherapy for prostate cancer and secondary colorectal cancer (rectal cancer and colon cancer) published before March 19, 2018. The risk of second colorectal cancer after radiotherapy was summarized using unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to detect potential bias and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

After study selection, 16 reports were retrieved for analysis. When patients received radiotherapy compared with those unexposed to radiation, there was an increased risk of the rectal cancer (OR 1.37, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.85), but not colon cancer. According to adjusted HR, there was an increased risk of the rectal cancer (HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.39 to 1.94), and colon cancer (HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.76). The OR for rectal cancer showed an increased risk with longer latent period (5 years lag time versus 10 years lag time, OR: 1.56 versus 2.22). Brachytherapy had no association with second cancer across all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy was associated with an increased risk of subsequent rectal cancer compared with patients unexposed to radiation. Colon may be free from the damage of radiation. Brachytherapy had no association with second rectal cancer or colon cancer.

Second primary cancer after primary peritoneal, epithelial ovarian, and fallopian tubal cancer: a retrospective study

Background

In this retrospective study, data from patients listed in the Korea Central Cancer Registry during 1993–2014 were analysed, to investigate the incidence and survival of second primary cancers (SPCs) after a diagnosis of primary peritoneal, epithelial ovarian, and fallopian tubal (POFT) cancer.

Methods

The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) and survival outcomes of patients with SPCs among POFT cancer survivors were analysed.

Results

Among 20,738 POFT cancer survivors, 798 (3.84%) developed SPCs, at an average interval of 5.50 years. SPC risk in POFT survivors (SIR, 1.29) was higher compared to the general population. The most high-risk type of SPC was leukaemia (3.07) followed by the lung and bronchus (1.80), colon (1.58), rectum and rectosigmoid junction (1.42), thyroid (1.34), and breast (1.26). In women aged < 60 years, cancer of the breast (1.30), ascending colon (2.26), and transverse colon (4.07) as SPCs increased. Up to 10 years after POFT cancer treatment, leukaemia risk increased, especially in those < 60 years, with serous histology, and with distant stage, which required aggressive chemotherapy. The median overall survival time was 12.8 years and 14.3 years in women with POFT cancer and SPCs, respectively. Thyroid and breast cancers were favourable prognostic markers among SPCs.

Conclusions

The overall SPC risk increases in POFT cancer survivors, especially in those < 60 years. The cancer risk of breast and the proximal colon increase based on hereditary predisposition, while leukaemia likely develops from aggressive treatment. The median overall survival is favourable in POFT cancer survivors with SPCs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4700-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Development of second primary cancer in Korean breast cancer survivors

Purpose

Breast cancer survivors have slightly increased the risk of second primary cancers. Breast, colon, uterine, and ovarian cancers are common secondary cancers in breast cancer survivors. In this study, we assessed the development of second primary cancers of breast cancer survivors in Korea.

Methods

Medical records of patients with breast cancer in 3 tertiary medical institutions were reviewed retrospectively. We evaluated secondary malignancy diagnosed at least 2 months after the breast cancer diagnosis. Based on the International Classification of Disease-9 codes of malignancies, secondary primary breast cancer records were evaluated with person-year adjustment. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was assessed using national cancer incidence.

Results

A total of 3,444 treatment records were included from 3 medical centers. The cumulative incidence of overall second primary cancers was 2.8% (n = 93). The SIR was significantly higher in all sites (1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–1.91), endometrial cancer (5.65; 95% CI, 2.06–12.31), biliary tract cancer (3.96; 95% CI, 1.19–8.60), and thyroid cancer (2.29; 95% CI, 1.67–3.08).

Conclusion

The incidence of cancer was higher in breast cancer survivors compared to general population. Surveillance of secondary cancer in this group should be recommended individually considering the benefit related to the prognosis of primary breast cancer.

Risk of Second Lung Cancer in Patients with Previously Treated Lung Cancer: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Data

INTRODUCTION

The risk for development of a second primary lung cancer (SPLC) after treatment of an initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) is around 1% to 2% per patient per year. The present screening and surveillance guidelines do not adequately address this particular patient population.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1992 to 2007 to assess the frequency of occurrence of SPLC with regard to multiple patient demographics and calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs).

RESULTS

The SIRs for SPLCs were high for both men and women at any age but highest if the IPLC occurred at a younger age. Women had the highest SIR values irrespective of age and race, with the highest SIR reported for the youngest age group (20-49 years) (SIR = 15.26, 95% confidence interval: 12.81-18.04). The rate of SPLC development was 1.10% per patient per year, with median time intervals between the IPLC and SPLC diagnoses of 59 and 62 months, respectively, for men and women. The cumulative risk for development of SPLC increased over time and did not plateau.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that there is a continued risk for development of SPLC. Surveillance strategies for this population must be addressed.

Risk factors for metachronous gastric carcinoma development after endoscopic resection of gastric dysplasia: Retrospective, single-center study

AIM

To determine the gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) occurrence rate and related factors, we evaluated the follow-up results of patients confirmed to have gastric dysplasia after endoscopic resection (ER).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records, endoscopic examination records, endoscopic procedure records, and histological records of 667 cases from 641 patients who were followed-up for at least 12 mo, from among 1273 patients who were conformed to have gastric dysplasia after Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric mucosal lesions between January 2007 and August 2013 at the Chungnam National University Hospital.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 33.8 mo, and the median follow-up period was 29 mo (range: 12-87). During the follow-up period, the occurrence of metachronous GAC was 4.0% (27/667). The mean and median interval periods between the occurrence of metachronous GAC and endoscopic treatment of gastric dysplasia were 36.3 and 34 mo, respectively (range: 16-71). The factors related to metachronous GAC occurrence after ER for gastric dysplasia were male sex (5.3% vs 1.0%), open-type atrophic gastritis (9.5% vs 3.4%), intestinal metaplasia (6.8% vs 2.4%), and high-grade dysplasia (HGD; 8.4% vs 3.2%). Among them, male sex [OR: 5.05 (1.18-21.68), P = 0.029], intestinal metaplasia [OR: 2.78 (1.24-6.23), P = 0.013], and HGD [OR: 2.70 (1.16-6.26), P = 0.021] were independent related factors in multivariate analysis. Furthermore, 24 of 27 GAC cases (88.9%) occurred at sites other than the previous resection sites, and 3 (11.1%) occurred at the same site as the previous resection site.

CONCLUSION

Male sex, intestinal metaplasia, and HGD were significantly related to the occurrence of metachronous GAC after ER of gastric dysplasia, and most GACs occurred at sites other than the previous resection sites.

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Aids in Distinguishing Metastatic Recurrence from Second Primary Cancers

BACKGROUND

Metastatic recurrence after treatment for locoregional cancer is a major cause of morbidity and cancer-specific mortality. Distinguishing metastatic recurrence from the development of a second primary cancer has important prognostic and therapeutic value and represents a difficult clinical scenario. Advances beyond histopathological comparison are needed. We sought to interrogate the ability of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to aid in distinguishing between these clinical scenarios.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified three prospective cases of recurrent tumors in patients previously treated for localized cancers in which histologic analyses suggested subsequent development of a distinct second primary. Paired samples from the original primary and recurrent tumor were subjected to hybrid capture next-generation sequencing-based CGP to identify base pair substitutions, insertions, deletions, copy number alterations (CNA), and chromosomal rearrangements. Genomic profiles between paired samples were compared using previously established statistical clonality assessment software to gauge relatedness beyond global CGP similarities.

RESULTS

A high degree of similarity was observed among genomic profiles from morphologically distinct primary and recurrent tumors. Genomic information suggested reclassification as recurrent metastatic disease, and patients received therapy for metastatic disease based on the molecular determination.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases demonstrate an important adjunct role for CGP technologies in separating metastatic recurrence from development of a second primary cancer. Larger series are needed to confirm our observations, but comparative CGP may be considered in patients for whom distinguishing metastatic recurrence from a second primary would alter the therapeutic approach. The Oncologist 2017;22:152-157Implications for Practice: Distinguishing a metastatic recurrence from a second primary cancer can represent a difficult clinicopathologic problem but has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Approaches to aid histologic analysis may improve clinician and pathologist confidence in this increasingly common clinical scenario. Our series provides early support for incorporating paired comprehensive genomic profiling in clinical situations in which determination of metastatic recurrence versus a distinct second primary cancer would influence patient management.

Re-irradiation for recurrent and second primary cancers of the head and neck

PURPOSE

To evaluate a single-institutional experience with the use of re-irradiation for recurrent and new primary cancers of the head and neck.

METHODS

The medical charts of 80 consecutive patients who underwent re-irradiation for local-regionally recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer between November 1998 and December 2015 were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression to determine predictors of clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-six of the 80 patients were evaluable. The median age was 57.5 (range 26.6-84.9); Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was used in 71 (93.4%) patients with a median dose of 60Gy. Thirty-one patients (40.8%) underwent salvage surgery before re-irradiation and 47 (61.8%) received concurrent systemic therapy. The median time interval between radiation courses was 25.3months (range 2-322months). The 2-year estimates of overall survival, progression free survival, locoregional control, and distant control were 51.0%, 31.3%, 36.8% and 68.3%, respectively. Patients who underwent salvage surgery prior to re-irradiation had significantly improved locoregional control, progression free survival, and overall survival (p<0.05, for all). On multivariate analysis, gross tumor volume (GTV) at re-irradiation and interval between radiation courses were associated with improved overall survival. Severe (grade⩾3) late complications were observed in 25 patients (32.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer is feasible and effective in select patients with head and neck cancer. The high observed rate of treatment-related morbidity highlights the continue challenges that accompany this approach.

Increased Incidence of Second Primary Pancreatic Cancer in Patients with Prior Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based US Study

BACKGROUND

Identifying high-risk groups for pancreatic cancer (PC) may lead to earlier detection. We determined the risk of subsequent PC among survivors of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We evaluated data from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry to identify individuals with primary CRC between the years 1973-2006. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated to compare the risk of subsequent primary PC in the study cohort to that of the standard population. Analysis was stratified by age at diagnosis of CRC and sex. CRC characteristics were compared among CRC survivors with and without PC. Multivariate sub-hazard ratios were calculated to identify factors associated with subsequent primary PC, using death from non-PC causes as a competing event.

RESULTS

Of the 273,144 patients with first primary CRC, 657 (0.24 %) developed subsequent PC. CRC survivors were more likely to develop PC (SIR 1.22; 95 % CI 1.09-1.35). Mean latency period (time between CRC and PC diagnosis) was 1, 3, and 5 years from index age of CRC 20-49, 50-64, and >65 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed CRC survivors >50 years had 3.5-fold, those with right-sided CRC had 1.2-fold, and those with localized and regional CRCs had sixfold and fivefold increased risk of PC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that CRC survivors have an increased risk of developing subsequent PC within 1-5 years. CRC survivors age >50 with localized/regional stage, and right-sided CRC have higher predisposition to PC.

Second primary pancreatic ductal carcinoma in the remnant pancreas after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal carcinoma: High cumulative incidence rates at 5 years after pancreatectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence rate and clinical features of second primary pancreatic ductal carcinoma (SPPDC) in the remnant pancreas after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDC).

METHODS

Data of patients undergoing R0 resection for PDC at a single high-volume center were reviewed. SPPDC was defined as a tumor in the remnant pancreas after R0 resection for PDC, and SPPDC met at least one of the following conditions: 1) the time interval between initial pancreatectomy and development of a new tumor was 3 years or more; 2) the new tumor was not located in contact with the pancreatic stump. We investigated the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with SPPDC.

RESULTS

This study included 130 patients who underwent surgical resection for PDC between 2005 and 2014. Six (4.6%) patients developed SPPDC. The cumulative 3- and 5-year incidence rates were 3.1% and 17.7%, respectively. Four patients underwent remnant pancreatectomy for SPPDC. They were diagnosed with the disease in stage IIA or higher and developed recurrence within 6 months after remnant pancreatectomy. One patient received carbon ion radiotherapy and survived 45 months. One patient refused treatment and died 19 months after the diagnosis of SPPDC.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of SPPDC is not negligible, and the cumulative 5-year incidence rate of SPPDC is markedly high. Post-operative surveillance of the remnant pancreas is critical for the early detection of SPPDC, even in long-term survivors after PDC resection.

Clinical features and prognostic factors in patients with head and neck cancer: Results from a multicentric study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether demographics, lifestyle habits, clinical data and alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphisms rs1229984 and rs1573496 associated with first primary head and neck (HNC) are associated with overall survival, recurrence, and second primary cancer (SPC).

METHODS

We conducted a follow-up study in five centres including 801 cases. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for overall survival, recurrence and SPC.

RESULTS

Five-years overall survival was 62% for HNC cases, 55% for oral cavity, 53% for oropharynx, 41% for hypopharynx, and 71% for larynx. Predictors of survival were older ages (HR=1.18 for 5 years increase; CI: 1.07-1.30), higher tumour stage (HR=4.16; CI: 2.49-6.96), and high alcohol consumption (HR=3.93; CI: 1.79-8.63). A combined therapy (HR=3.29; CI: 1.18-9.13) was associated with a worst prognosis for oral cavity cancer. The only predictor was higher tumour stage (HR=2.25; CI: 1.26-4.03) for recurrence, and duration of smoking (HR=1.91; CI: 1.00-3.68) for SPC. ADH1B rs1229984 polymorphism HRs for HNC and oesophageal cancer death and for alcohol related cancer death were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.42-1.08), and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.40-1.03), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival expectation differs among HNC sites. Increasing age and stage, and high alcohol consumption were unfavourable predictors of HNC survival overall. Duration of tobacco consumption before the first primary tumour was a risk factor for SPC.

Risk of second cancers cancer after a first primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the scientific evidence and the risk of second primary cancers in women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer.

METHODS

The literature was searched in Pubmed and Embase and included studies published up to June 2013, using population-based data and IARC/AICR codification rules for multiple primary cancers. A qualitative synthesis was carried out and the methodological quality of the studies evaluated. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) on second cancer risk, weighted by the standard error of each study, were pooled using fixed and random effects models. SIRs were also pooled by age at diagnosis (<50 and ≥ 50 years), and time since diagnosis of the first breast cancer (<10 and ≥ 10 years).

RESULTS

15 out of 710 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All of them were retrospective cohort studies either population-based (13 studies) or hospital-based studies (2 studies). The studies varied with respect to number of cases, selection criteria, definition of multiple primary cancers, and the second cancer sites included. SIRs reported in these studies for all cancers combined varied from 1.0 to 1.4. The pooled SIR estimate for second cancer risk was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.10-1.25). By age groups, SIR estimates were 1.51 (95% CI: 1.35-1.70) for women younger than 50 years and 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02-1.21) for those who were older. Women with breast cancer are at risk of second cancers within the first 10 years after the first breast cancer diagnosis (SIR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06-1.33), and thereafter (SIR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.05-1.52).

CONCLUSION

This higher risk of second cancers in women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer with respect to the general population emphasises the importance of prevention and control policies aimed at reducing incidence of second cancers.

The role of re-irradiation of secondary and recurrent head and neck carcinomas. Is it a potentially curative treatment? A practical approach

Despite aggressive efforts to cure head and neck cancer patients, including altered fractionation and the addition of chemotherapy to radiation, locoregional recurrence remains a serious issue to face in clinical practice. Indeed, recurrent and second primary tumors occurring in previously irradiated area are common clinical challenge. Whenever possible, patients are advised to undergo salvage surgery. Nevertheless, few patients are suitable candidates for curative resection. In such cases, chemotherapy alone has traditionally been considered, with a poor response rate. It has been questioned whether re-irradiation toxicity outweighs the potential benefits, considering that the median survival of re-irradiated patients marginally exceeds the benefits observed with chemotherapy alone. However, full-dose re-irradiation is a viable treatment option, offering long-term survival for selected patients. Moreover, several prognostic factors should be considered for patients undergoing re-irradiation, such as basic patient characteristics, performance status, the location and extension of recurrent disease, patient co-morbidities, current speech and swallowing function, the interval from the initial radiation therapy to recurrence, previously received doses by critical structures and prior treatment toxicity. Nevertheless, several questions remain unanswered. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the major issues in the field of re-irradiation regarding the current evidence. Therefore, the major selection criteria and new treatment strategies are discussed to define the ideal candidates to undergo re-irradiation and describe a practical approach to these patients. Given the limited evidence in this field, the optimal treatment of recurrent and second primary cancers remains to be defined. Future prospective study of this approach is warranted.

Results of Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Maxillary Sinus: A 26-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Five-year survival in squamous cell carcinoma of maxillary antrum is low. This article examines the results of various approaches to treatment as given in our hospital in past 26 years.

METHODS

From 1979 to 2005, 379 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of maxillary antrum managed with curative intent were studied. Twenty-eight patients had T2, 237 patients had T3, and 114 had T4 tumors. The N classification was N0 in 316 patients, N1 in 21 patients, N2a in 28 patients and N2b in 14 patients. Treatment to the primary site comprised of surgery (Sx) and radiation therapy (RT) in 284 patients, RT alone in 57 patients and chemotherapy (CTx) with radiotherapy in 38 patients.

RESULTS

There was a difference in survival between patients who underwent Sx with RT compared with patients who received RT alone or CTx with RT. The most common pattern of recurrence was in the primary site, 187 (49.3%) patients. Local control at 3 and 5 years was 71% and 63.8% respectively in Sx with RT, 31.6% and 28% respectively in RT, and 28.9% and 26% in CTx with RT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of treatment to the primary site is an important determinant of survival and local control. Surgery with radiation is a better treatment option.