Molnupiravir versus favipiravir in at-risk outpatients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial in Thailand

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of molnupiravir and favipiravir in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and at risk of severe COVID-19.

METHODS

In an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter trial in Thailand, participants with moderate COVID-19 and at least one factor associated with severe COVID-19 were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral molnupiravir or oral favipiravir (standard of care). Phone calls for remote symptom assessment were made on Days 6, 15, and 29. Participants with worsening symptoms were instructed to return to the hospital. The primary endpoint was pulmonary involvement by Day 29, as evidenced by ≥2 of the following: dyspnea, oxygen saturation <92% or imaging.

RESULTS

Nine hundred seventy-seven participants (487 molnupiravir, 490 favipiravir) were enrolled from 8 July 2022 to 19 January 2023. 98% had received ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 83% ≥3 doses. By Day 29, pulmonary involvement occurred in 0% (0/483) in molnupiravir arm versus 1% (5/482) in favipiravir arm (-1.0%; Newcombe 95.2% CI: -2.4% to -0.0%; P = 0.021); all-cause death in 0% (0/483) and <1% (1/482); COVID-19 related hospitalization in <1% (1/483) and 1% (3/482); treatment-related adverse event in 1% (5/483) and 1% (4/486); and serious adverse event in 1% (4/483) and 1% (4/486).

CONCLUSIONS

Favipiravir and molnupiravir had a similar efficacy and safety profile. Whether either of the two reduced the risk of complications during the omicron era in this population with a low risk of pulmonary involvement and a high vaccine coverage remains unclear. There were no differences in any of the safety endpoints.

THAI CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY ID

TCTR20230111009.

Molnupiravir for Oral Treatment of Covid-19 in Nonhospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND

New treatments are needed to reduce the risk of progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Molnupiravir is an oral, small-molecule antiviral prodrug that is active against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with molnupiravir started within 5 days after the onset of signs or symptoms in nonhospitalized, unvaccinated adults with mild-to-moderate, laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and at least one risk factor for severe Covid-19 illness. Participants in the trial were randomly assigned to receive 800 mg of molnupiravir or placebo twice daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy end point was the incidence hospitalization or death at day 29; the incidence of adverse events was the primary safety end point. A planned interim analysis was performed when 50% of 1550 participants (target enrollment) had been followed through day 29.

RESULTS

A total of 1433 participants underwent randomization; 716 were assigned to receive molnupiravir and 717 to receive placebo. With the exception of an imbalance in sex, baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. The superiority of molnupiravir was demonstrated at the interim analysis; the risk of hospitalization for any cause or death through day 29 was lower with molnupiravir (28 of 385 participants [7.3%]) than with placebo (53 of 377 [14.1%]) (difference, -6.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11.3 to -2.4; P = 0.001). In the analysis of all participants who had undergone randomization, the percentage of participants who were hospitalized or died through day 29 was lower in the molnupiravir group than in the placebo group (6.8% [48 of 709] vs. 9.7% [68 of 699]; difference, -3.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.9 to -0.1). Results of subgroup analyses were largely consistent with these overall results; in some subgroups, such as patients with evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, those with low baseline viral load, and those with diabetes, the point estimate for the difference favored placebo. One death was reported in the molnupiravir group and 9 were reported in the placebo group through day 29. Adverse events were reported in 216 of 710 participants (30.4%) in the molnupiravir group and 231 of 701 (33.0%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early treatment with molnupiravir reduced the risk of hospitalization or death in at-risk, unvaccinated adults with Covid-19. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme; MOVe-OUT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04575597.).

An updated practical guideline on use of molnupiravir and comparison with agents having emergency use authorization for treatment of COVID-19

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Molnupiravir is a newer oral antiviral drug that has recently received emergency use authorization (EUA) in USA, UK and India. We aim to conduct an update on our previous systematic review to provide practical clinical guideline for using molnupiravir in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

We systematically searched the electronic database of PubMed, MedRxiv and Google Scholar until January 5, 2022, using key MeSH keywords.

RESULTS

Final result of phase 3 study in 1433 non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients showed a significant reduction in composite risk of hospital admission or death (absolute risk difference, -3.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -5.9 to -0.1%]; 1-sided P = 0.02) although with a non-significant 31% relative risk reduction (RRR). RRR for death alone was 89% (95% CI, 14 to 99; P-value not reported). Number needed to treat to prevent 1 death or 1 hospitalization or death composite appears to be closely competitive to other agents having EUA in people with COVID-19. However, cost-wise molnupiravir is comparatively cheaper compared to all other agents.

CONCLUSION

Molnupiravir could be a useful agent in non-pregnant unvaccinated adults with COVID-19 who are at increased risk of severity including hospitalization. However, it is effective only when used within 5-days of onset of symptoms. A 5-days course seems to be safe without any obvious short-term side effects.

Human genetic risk of treatment with antiviral nucleoside analog drugs that induce lethal mutagenesis: The special case of molnupiravir

This review considers antiviral nucleoside analog drugs, including ribavirin, favipiravir, and molnupiravir, which induce genome error catastrophe in SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 via lethal mutagenesis as a mode of action. In vitro data indicate that molnupiravir may be 100 times more potent as an antiviral agent than ribavirin or favipiravir. Molnupiravir has recently demonstrated efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial. Because of its anticipated global use, its relative potency, and the reported in vitro "host" cell mutagenicity of its active principle, β-d-N4-hydroxycytidine, we have reviewed the development of molnupiravir and its genotoxicity safety evaluation, as well as the genotoxicity profiles of three congeners, that is, ribavirin, favipiravir, and 5-(2-chloroethyl)-2'-deoxyuridine. We consider the potential genetic risks of molnupiravir on the basis of all available information and focus on the need for additional human genotoxicity data and follow-up in patients treated with molnupiravir and similar drugs. Such human data are especially relevant for antiviral NAs that have the potential of permanently modifying the genomes of treated patients and/or causing human teratogenicity or embryotoxicity. We conclude that the results of preclinical genotoxicity studies and phase 1 human clinical safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics are critical components of drug safety assessments and sentinels of unanticipated adverse health effects. We provide our rationale for performing more thorough genotoxicity testing prior to and within phase 1 clinical trials, including human PIG-A and error corrected next generation sequencing (duplex sequencing) studies in DNA and mitochondrial DNA of patients treated with antiviral NAs that induce genome error catastrophe via lethal mutagenesis.

A phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous administration of TAS-106 once per week for three consecutive weeks every 28 days in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The nucleoside 3'-c-ethynylcytidine (TAS-106) was designed to inhibit RNA synthesis which occurs throughout the cell cycle except for the M phase. TAS-106 is incorporated into cells, is rapidly phosphorylated to a monophosphate form, and is preferentially distributed into malignant cells. Preclinical studies showed that TAS-106 has a wide antitumor spectrum against human cancer xenografts. This phase I study was conducted in order to determine the recommended phase II dose of TAS-106 administered once per week for three consecutive weeks, every 28 days in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled in cohorts of three, starting at 0.22 mg/m(2)/dose. Patients received at least two doses in order to be evaluable in each dose cohort. Dose escalation was stopped if two or more patients experienced dose limiting toxicity at any dose level.

RESULTS

In 20 evaluable patients, TAS-106 was given at the following dose levels (mg/m(2)/dose): 0.22 (3 pts), 0.33 (3 pts), 0.66 (3 pts), 0.99 (1 pt), 1.32 (3 pts), 2.64 (3 pts) and 3.96 (1 pt). Three additional patients were evaluated at 2.64 mg/m(2)/dose for further characterization of toxicity and safety. A total of 16 patients completed courses 1 and 2. All 21 patients enrolled experienced at least one adverse event. The AE attributed to the study drug was grade 2 peripheral neuropathy characterized by peripheral sensory neuropathy, numbness, tremor, pain, and hyperesthesia involving the fingers, hands, toes, and feet.

CONCLUSION

Due to neurotoxicity the MTD was the 2.64 mg/m(2)/dose for the study schedule. No suggested phase II dose was determined. However, at the 1.32 mg/m(2)/dose level, no patients experienced DLTs during course 1 or 2. This could be further studied to determine its viability as a potential phase II dosage.

The novel DNA methylation inhibitor zebularine is effective against the development of murine T-cell lymphoma

Gene silencing by CpG island promoter hypermethylation has awakened the interest for DNA demethylating agents as chemotherapy drugs. Zebularine (1-[beta-D-ribofuranosil]-1,2-dihydropyrimidin-2-1) has been recently described as a new DNA methylation inhibitor. Here we have studied its effects in a mouse model of radiation-induced lymphomagenesis using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and positron emission tomography (PET). All control animals presented large thymic T lymphomas and died between 4 and 5.5 months. In contrast, 40% (12 of 30) of zebularine-treated animals were still alive after 1 year (Kaplan-Meier P < .001). NMR and PET imaging showed that surviving animals presented a thymus structure/volume similar to normal mice of the same age. Most important, zebularine demonstrated a complete lack of toxicity in nonirradiated control mice. DNA hypomethylation induced by zebularine occurred in association with depletion in extractable DNA methyltransferase 1 protein. Thus, our data support the role of zebularine as a DNA demethylating agent with antitumor activity and little toxicity.

Phase I clinical trial of continuous infusion cyclopentenyl cytosine

Cyclopentenyl cytosine (CPE-C) is an investigational drug that is active against human solid tumor xenografts. The 5'-triphosphate of CPE-C inhibits CTP synthase, and depletes CTP and dCTP pools. We conducted a phase I clinical trial of CPE-C given as a 24-h continuous i.v. infusion every 3 weeks in 26 adults with solid tumors. The starting dose rate, 1 mg/m2 per h, was selected on the basis of both preclinical studies and pharmacokinetic data from two patients obtained after a test dose of 24 mg/m2 CPE-C as an i.v. bolus. Dose escalation was guided by clinical toxicity. A total of 87 cycles were given, and ten patients received four or more cycles. The mean CPE-C steady-state plasma levels (Cpss) increased linearly from 0.4 microM to 3.1 microM at dose levels ranging from 1 to 5.9 mg/m2 per h (actual body weight); the mean total body clearance was 146 +/- 38 ml/min per m2. CPE-C was eliminated by both renal excretion of intact drug and deamination to cyclopentenyl uracil in an apparent 2:1 ratio. CTP synthase activity in intact bone marrow mononuclear cells was inhibited by 58% to 100% at 22 h compared to matched pretreatment samples at all CPE-C dose levels. When all data were combined, flux through CTP synthase was decreased by 89.6% +/- 3.1% at 22 h (mean +/- SE, n = 16), and remained inhibited by 67.6% +/- 7.7% (n = 10) for at least 24 h post-CPE-C infusion. Granulocyte and platelet toxicities were dose-dependent, and dose-limiting myelosuppression occurred during the initial cycle in two of three patients treated with 5.9 mg/m2 per h. Four of 11 patients (4 of 20 cycles) who received 4.7 mg/m2 per h CPE-C experienced hypotension 24-48 h after completion of the CPE-C infusion during their first (n = 2), third (n = 1) and sixth cycles (n = 1), respectively. Two of these patients died with refractory hypotension despite aggressive hydration and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. One of 12 patients (28 total cycles) treated with 3.5 mg/m2 per h CPE-C experienced orthostatic hypotension during cycle 1, and this patient had a second episode of orthostatic hypotension at a lower dose (3.0 mg/m2 per h). Hypotension was not seen in patients receiving < or = 2.5 mg/m2 per h CPE-C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Study of the P300 and cerebral maps in subjects with multi-infarct dementia treated with cytidine

A study of event-related P300 potential and cerebral EEG maps was performed in 20 patients affected by multi-infarct dementia (MID): 10 subjects were treated with placebo and 10 with cytidine. The trial was divided into three intervals. The patients, after a period of washout, were evaluated throughout the course of the trial by electrophysiological examination performed at baseline, after 90 min from the first IV injection, again after 30 days of IM therapy, and finally after 60 days of continued IM therapy. In the group treated with cytidine, the findings relevant to the study of the P300 showed a significant decrease in latency values compared to baseline (P less than 0.05 ANOVA) and an improvement. though not significant, in the amplitude values. Calculation of the mean relative power of EEG values showed a significant decrease in delta activity and an increase in alpha activity. In the subjects treated with placebo, no statistically significant variation was found in either P300 or EEG map recordings. On the basis of these investigations it has been demonstrated that the variations in the registrations can be correlated to the improved neuronal activity following treatment with cytidine.

Biochemical, pharmacological, and phase I clinical evaluation of pseudoisocytidine

Pseudoisocytidine (psi ICyd) is a C-nucleoside with enhanced stability and resistance to enzymatic deamination when compared to 5-azacytidine and 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine. Elimination kinetics in plasma using [14C]psi ICyd showed a beta-phase for t1/2 for 14C of 2 hr and a beta-phase t1/2 of unchanged psi ICyd of 1.5 hr. Net recovery of radioactivity in urine over 24 hr varied between 40 and 80% of the administered dose; 50 to 90% was unchanged drug and the rest was pseudouridine. Human leukemic cells in vitro deaminated psi ICyd very slowly, formed appreciable quantities of pseudoisocytidine triphosphate, and incorporated small amounts into RNA and DNA. Clinical trials were done using a daily i.v. injection for 5 consecutive days. Hematological or intestine toxicities were not seen, nor was depression of white blood cell count observed in leukemic patients. Hepatic toxicity proved to be dose limiting; this was characterized by an early phase with elevation of prothrombin time and aspartate aminotransferase. A later phase with cirrhosis was observed in two patients. Autopsy showed massive hepatic necrosis in patients dying of acute toxicity and micronodular cirrhosis in one patient dying with the chronic form.