Clinical characteristics of patients with diabetic foot using WIfI classification-A pilot study in Vietnam

BACKGROUND

Due to its effect on patient health and healthcare resources, the study of diabetic foot is essential. Despite the existence of classification and grading systems, further evidence is required. Current systems are prone to a lack of validation in specific populations, inadequate consideration of regional variations, and an incomplete evaluation of risk factors and outcomes. The prevalence and complications of diabetes, such as diabetic foot, are on the rise worldwide, necessitating regionally specific research. To fill these gaps, this study focuses on a Southeast Asian subpopulation.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics of diabetic foot patients using the WIfI classification system, and to develop a risk calculator for patients to predict and evaluate potential outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of patients with diabetic foot who visited a tertiary hospital in Vietnam between December 2021 and July 2022. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were collected and classified according to the WIfI (Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection) classification system. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and a multivariable logistic regression model was employed to develop a risk calculator.

RESULTS

The study included 60 patients with diabetic foot. Gender distribution was similar (56.7% male), with a mean age of 44 years. Most patients had ulcers of varying degrees, while ischemia contributed to higher grades, placing 43.3% at moderate-to-high risk of amputation (stages 3 and 4). HbA1c positively correlated with amputation risk (p<0.05), while ABI, TBI, and TP showed inverse correlations (p<0.001). The amputation risk equation based on the WIfI scale was: risk=3.701-0.788ABI-1.260TP. A risk calculator was developed using these predictors to estimate adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In diabetic foot patients, early identification and management of risk factors are crucial. The findings of this study highlight the importance of ischemia and its association with amputation risk. Incorporating HbA1c, ABI, and TP, the risk calculator enables personalized assessments of amputation risk, thereby assisting healthcare professionals in treatment planning. Further validation and refinement of the risk calculator is required for broader clinical application.

Evaluating the effects of sedentary behaviour on plantar skin health in people with diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers (DRFUs) are a common and devastating consequence of Diabetes Mellitus and are associated with high morbidity, mortality, social and economic costs. Whilst peak plantar pressures during gait are implicated cited as a major contributory factor, DRFU occurrence has also been associated with increased periods of sedentary behaviour. The present study was designed aimed to assess the effects of sitting postures on plantar tissue health.

METHODS

After a period of acclimatisation, transcutaneous oxygen tensions (T_CPO₂) and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α and IL-1RA) were measured at the dorsal and plantar aspects of the forefoot before, during and after a 20-min period of seated-weight-bearing in participants with diabetes (n = 11) and no diabetes (n = 10). Corresponding interface pressures at the plantar site were also measured.

RESULTS

During weight-bearing, participants with diabetes showed increases in tissue ischaemia which were linearly correlated proportional to plantar pressures (Pearson's r = 0.81; p < 0.05). Within the healthy group, no such correlation was evident (p > 0.05). There were also significant increases in post seated weight-bearing values for ratio for IL-1α and IL-1RA, normalised to total protein, post seated weight-bearing in participants with diabetes compared to healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that prolonged sitting may be detrimental to plantar skin health. It highlights the need to further examine the effects of prolonged sitting in individuals, who may have a reduced tolerance to loading in the plantar skin and soft tissues.

Inter-rater reliability of four validated diabetic foot ulcer classification systems

BACKGROUND

The need to classify, score and describe diabetic foot ulcerations is needed for accurate clinical documentation. An agreed wound classification can improve communication between health care professionals, and improve ease of discussion regarding potential outcomes. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability between four validated wound classification systems.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD

A prospective non-experimental comparative study was conducted. Forty patients with diabetes presenting with a new or long-standing ulceration were recruited. Each ulcer was graded/scored by three clinicians using four widely used classification systems; namely the University of Texas, SINBAD, Meggitt-Wagner and the PEDIS scoring systems.

RESULTS

All classifications had a satisfactory inter-rater agreement when evaluated by three raters of various clinical experience, however, the strength of the agreement varied between classifications. The Meggitt-Wagner system had an almost perfect agreement, the SINBAD and UT systems had a strong inter-rater agreement whilst the PEDIS had a moderate inter-rater agreement.

CONCLUSION

Results of study serve as assurance and provides the evidence that these systems may be reliably used by different clinicians, even those with varied experience in wound care.

Deep Learning Classification for Diabetic Foot Thermograms

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent diseases in the world. It is also associated with a high mortality index. Diabetic foot is one of its main complications, and it comprises the development of plantar ulcers that could result in an amputation. Several works report that thermography is useful to detect changes in the plantar temperature, which could give rise to a higher risk of ulceration. However, the plantar temperature distribution does not follow a particular pattern in diabetic patients, thereby making it difficult to measure the changes. Thus, there is an interest in improving the success of the analysis and classification methods that help to detect abnormal changes in the plantar temperature. All this leads to the use of computer-aided systems, such as those involved in artificial intelligence (AI), which operate with highly complex data structures. This paper compares machine learning-based techniques with Deep Learning (DL) structures. We tested common structures in the mode of transfer learning, including AlexNet and GoogleNet. Moreover, we designed a new DL-structure, which is trained from scratch and is able to reach higher values in terms of accuracy and other quality measures. The main goal of this work is to analyze the use of AI and DL for the classification of diabetic foot thermograms, highlighting their advantages and limitations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first proposal of DL networks applied to the classification of diabetic foot thermograms. The experiments are conducted over thermograms of DM and control groups. After that, a multi-level classification is performed based on a previously reported thermal change index. The high accuracy obtained shows the usefulness of AI and DL as auxiliary tools to aid during the medical diagnosis.

Guidelines on the classification of diabetic foot ulcers (IWGDF 2019)

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has been publishing evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This publication represents a new guideline addressing the use of classifications of diabetic foot ulcers in routine clinical practice and reviews those which have been published. We only consider systems of classification used for active diabetic foot ulcers and do not include those that might be used to define risk of future ulceration. The guidelines are based on a review of the available literature and on expert opinion leading to the identification of eight key factors judged to contribute most to clinical outcomes. Classifications are graded on the number of key factors included as well as on internal and external validation and the use for which a classification is intended. Key factors judged to contribute to the scoring of classifications are of three types: patient related (end-stage renal failure), limb-related (peripheral artery disease and loss of protective sensation), and ulcer-related (area, depth, site, single, or multiple and infection). Particular systems considered for each of the following five clinical situations: (a) communication among health professionals, (b) predicting the outcome of an individual ulcer, (c) as an aid to clinical decision-making for an individual case, (d) assessment of a wound, with/without infection, and peripheral artery disease (assessment of perfusion and potential benefit from revascularisation), and (d) audit of outcome in local, regional, or national populations. We recommend: (a) for communication among health professionals the use of the SINBAD system (that includes Site, Ischaemia, Neuropathy, Bacterial Infection and Depth); (b) no existing classification for predicting outcome of an individual ulcer; (c) the Infectious Diseases Society of America/IWGDF (IDSA/IWGDF) classification for assessment of infection; (d) the WIfI (Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection) system for the assessment of perfusion and the likely benefit of revascularisation; and (e) the SINBAD classification for the audit of outcome of populations.

Diabetic foot ulcer classifications: A critical review

Classification and scoring systems can help both clinical management and audit outcomes of routine care. The aim of this study was to assess published systems of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) to determine which should be recommended for a given clinical purpose. Published classifications had to have been validated in populations of > 75% people with diabetes and a foot ulcer. Each study was assessed for internal and external validity and reliability. Eight key factors associated with failure to heal were identified from large clinical series and each classification was scored on the number of these key factors included. Classifications were then arranged according to their proposed purpose into one or more of four groups: (a) aid communication between health professionals, (b) predict clinical outcome of individual ulcers, (c) aid clinical management decision making for an individual case, and (d) audit to compare outcome in different populations. Thirty-seven classification systems were identified of which 18 were excluded for not being validated in a population of >75% DFUs. The included 19 classifications had different purposes and were derived from different populations. Only six were developed in multicentre studies, just 13 were externally validated, and very few had evaluated reliability.Classifications varied in the number (4 - 30), and definition of individual items and the diagnostic tools required. Clinical outcomes were not standardized but included ulcer-free survival, ulcer healing, hospitalization, limb amputation, mortality, and cost. Despite the limitations, there was sufficient evidence to make recommendations on the use of particular classifications for the indications listed above.

Updates on Diabetic Foot and Charcot Osteopathic Arthropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetes mellitus affects approximately 30.8 million people currently living in the USA. Chronic diabetes complications, including diabetic foot complications, remain prevalent and challenging to treat. We review clinical diagnosis and challenges providers may encounter when managing diabetic foot ulcers and Charcot neuroarthropathy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mechanisms controlling these diseases are being elucidated and not fully understood. Offloading is paramount to heal and manage diabetic foot ulcers and Charcot neuroarthropathy. Diabetic foot ulcers recur and the importance of routine surveillance and multidisciplinary approach is essential. Several predictors of failure in Charcot foot include a related diabetic foot ulcer, midfoot or rearfoot location of the Charcot event, and progressive bony changes on interval radiographs. Patients with diabetic foot ulcer and/or Charcot neuroarthropathy are in need of consistent and regular special multidisciplinary care. If not diagnosed early and managed effectively, morbidity and mortality significantly increase.

Diabetic foot ulcer development risk classifications' validation: A multicentre prospective cohort study

AIMS

To prospectively validate the existing classifications to stratify subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) by their risk of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), in high and low risk settings.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted, including 446 subjects with DM without active DFU followed in the hospital or primary care setting. Demographic, clinical characterization variables, and those included in the classifications were collected at baseline. Subjects were followed for 1year, until DFU or death.

RESULTS

In our sample, with a mean age of 65years, 52% were male; 32 developed a DFU, 7 required an amputation and 18 died. Differences were found between participants' characteristics and classifications' accuracy according to the setting. The great majority of the variables were associated with higher DFU risk. Globally, classifications were highly and equally valid, positive predictive values (PV) were inferior to 40%, negative PV superior to 90% and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve superior to 0.75.

DISCUSSION

All the existing classifications are valid to be applied in high risk clinical context and have a very high capacity to categorize as low risk those subjects that will not develop a DFU. Further research is needed in the primary care setting.

Cost and mortality data of a regional limb salvage and hyperbaric medicine program for Wagner Grade 3 or 4 diabetic foot ulcers

We obtained costs and mortality data in two retrospective cohorts totaling 159 patients who have diabetes mellitus and onset of a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Data were collected from 2005 to 2013, with a follow-up period through September 30, 2014. A total of 106 patients entered an evidence-based limb salvage protocol (LSP) for Wagner Grade 3 or 4 (WG3/4) DFU and intention-to-treat adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen (HBO₂) therapy. A second cohort of 53 patients had a primary lower extremity amputation (LEA), either below the knee (BKA) or above the knee (AKA) and were not part of the LSP. Ninety-six of 106 patients completed the LSP/HBO₂with an average cost of USD $33,100. Eighty-eight of 96 patients (91.7%) who completed the LSP/HBO₂had intact lower extremities at one year. Thirty-four of the 96 patients (35.4%) died during the follow-up period. Costs for a historical cohort of 53 patients having a primary major LEA range from USD $66,300 to USD $73,000. Twenty-five of the 53 patients (47.2%) died. The difference in cost of care and mortality between an LSP with adjunctive HBO₂therapy vs. primary LEA is staggering. We conclude that an aggressive limb salvage program that includes HBO₂ therapy is cost-effective.

[Has been changed numbers and characteristics of patients with major amputations indicated for the diabetic foot in our department during last decade?]

INTRODUCTION

One of the most serious complications of the diabetic foot (DF) is a major amputation, which is associated with poor patient prognosis. The occurrence of major amputations may be influenced by a variety of factors including deep infection caused by resistant pathogens.The aims of our study were to compare the incidence of major amputations in podiatric center, characteristics of amputated patients with the DF and other factors contributing to major amputations in last decade.

METHODS

We included into our study all patients hospitalized for the DF in our center whose underwent major amputations from 9/2004 to 9/2006 (group 1) and from 9/2013 to 9/2015 (group 2). Risk factors such as severity of DF ulcers based on Texas classification, duration of previous anti-biotic therapy, the presence and severity of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) according to Graziani classification, the number of revascularizations, renal failure/hemodialysis, osteomyelitis, infectious agents found before amputations and their resistance were compared between the study groups.

RESULTS

During the 1st study period (9/2004-9/2006) 373 patients were hospitalized for the DF, of whom 3.2 % underwent major amputation (12/373 - group 1), during the 2nd study period (9/2013-9/2015) 376 patients, of whom 5.1 % absolved major amputation (19/376 - group 2). As the numbers of major amputations as their indications were similar in both study groups. The study groups did not differ significantly in the age, BMI, duration and type of diabetes, duration of DF and severity of DF ulcers, the presence of renal failure/hemodialysis, osteomyelitis and PAD. Group 2 had milder forms of PAD by Graziani classification (4.4 ±1.4 vs 5.7 ± 0.9; p = 0.012) and a higher number of revascularizations before major amputations (2.5 ± 1.5 vs 1 ± 1; p = 0.003) compared to the group 1. These patients were significantly longer treated by antibiotics (5.4 ± 2.4 vs 2.5 ± 2 months; p = 0.002) and underwent more resections and minor amputations (3.1 ± 2.1 vs 0.9 ± 0.5; p = 0.0004) before major amputations in contrast to the group 1. There was a trend to higher incidence of Gram-negatives (65.1 % vs 61.5 %; NS) with a predominance of Enterobacteriacae species (60.7 % vs 56 %; NS) and a trend to the increase of Pseudomonas (25 % vs 18.8 %; NS) and Enterococci sp. (46.7 % vs 20 %; NS) in the group 2 compared to the group 1. The incidences as of MRSA, multidrug resistant Pseudomonas sp. of other resistant microbes were similar in both study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of major amputations in patients hospitalized for the DF remains unchanged during the last decade. The therapy of factors leading to amputations has evidently intensified. This is in accordance with the latest international recommendations for the therapy of DF. In the future, it is appropriate to focus on the improvement of detection and treatment of infection and ischemia in such risk group of patients.Key words: diabetic foot - major amputation.

[The problem of classification and organization of medical care for diabetic patients with different forms of ulcerative-necrotic lesions of lower extremities]

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at risk of development of both diabetic foot syndrome and ulcers on the lower legs due to chronic venous insufficiency and other factors. The main group in this study was comprised of diabetic patients with ulcers of different etiology (venous, post-traumatic, mixed) treated at the Diabetic Foot Cabinet during 5 years (n=101). The group of comparison included simultaneously treated patients with diabetic foot syndrome (n=721). Patients of the main group was dominated by women (71%) and patients with type 2 DM. Ulcer healing due to the treatment, persistent non-healing ulcers, and high-level amputations occurred equally often in the two groups: 60 and 58%, 18 and 15%, 4 and 5% respectively (р>0,05). Lower leg ulcers in DM are very persistent and constitute a serious medico-social problem to be addresses based at Diabetic Foot cabinets. The frequency of such ulcers and related amputations must be taken into consideration in epidemiological surveys.

Increased healing in diabetic toe ulcers in a multidisciplinary foot clinic-An observational cohort study

AIM

To study toe ulcer healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers attending a multidisciplinary foot clinic over a 10 years period.

METHODS

The study was retrospective, consecutive and observational during 2001 through 2011. The patients were treated according to the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. During the period the chiropodist staffing in the foot clinic was doubled; new offloading material and orthopedic foot corrections for recalcitrant ulcers were introduced. Healing was investigated in toe ulcers in Cox regression models.

RESULTS

2634 patients developed foot ulcers, of which 1461 developed toe ulcers; in 790 patients these were neuropathic, in 551 they were neuro-ischemic and in 120 they were critically ischemic. One-year healing rates increased in the period 2001-2011 from 75% to 91% for neuropathic toe ulcers and from 72% to 80% for neuro-ischemic toe ulcers, while no changes was observed for ischemic toe ulcers. Adjusted for changes in the patient population, the overall rate of healing for neuropathic and neuro-ischemic toe ulcers almost doubled (HR=1.95 [95% CI: 1.36-2.80]).

CONCLUSION

The results show that the healing of toe ulcers improved. This outcome could not be explained by changes in the patient characteristics, but coincided with a number of improvements in organization and therapy.

Lower-limb amputation following foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: classification systems, external validation and comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to validate and compare the existing systems developed to stratify subjects with diabetic foot ulcers by risk of consequent lower extremity amputation.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study on a consecutive series of patients (mean age of 68 years; 64% male) with active ulcer who were attending our Hospital Diabetic Foot Clinic (n = 293) from January 2010 to March 2013. At baseline, we collected information on the participants' characteristics and the relevant variables. Afterwards, we assessed the predictive value of each variable and each system's prognostic accuracy for amputation occurrence.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 91 days (interquartile range of 98), ulcers healed in 62% of the subjects. Major amputation occurred in 7% and minor occurred in 17%. Previous ulcer or amputation, ulcer area, and gangrene were associated with amputation occurrence. Nephropathy, pulses number, ulcer aetiology, depth, and number were associated with risk of amputation. Systems typically presented sensitivity values ≥80% and negative likelihood ratios ≤0.5 for the highest risk group; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.56 to 0.83 and positive likelihood ratios from 1.0 to 5.9. If one chose only major amputation as an outcome, positive predictive values were lower, and negative predictive values tended to be higher.

CONCLUSIONS

System stages, grades, scores, and/or prognostics were generally associated with amputation, presenting overall substantial accuracy values. Nevertheless, great improvement is possible. A multicentre study validating and refining the existing systems is needed to improve clinical decision-making in this area.

A clinical practice guideline for the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

BACKGROUND

The role of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) has been examined in the medical literature for decades. There are more systematic reviews of the HBO2/DFU literature than there have been randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but none of these reviews has resulted in a clinical practice guideline (CPG) that clinicians, patients and policy-makers can use to guide decision-making in everyday practice.

METHODS

The Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS), following the methodology of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group, undertook this systematic review of the HBO2 literature in order to rate the quality of evidence and generate practice recommendations for the treatment of DFUs. We selected four clinical questions for review regarding the role of HBO2 in the treatment of DFUs and analyzed the literature using patient populations based on Wagner wound classification and age of the wound (i.e., acute post-operative wound vs. non-healing wound of 30 or more days). Major amputation and incomplete healing were selected as critical outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

This analysis showed that HBO2 is beneficial in preventing amputation and promoting complete healing in patients with Wagner Grade 3 or greater DFUs who have just undergone surgical debridement of the foot as well as in patients with Wagner Grade 3 or greater DFUs that have shown no significant improvement after 30 or more days of treatment. In patients with Wagner Grade 2 or lower DFUs, there was inadequate evidence to justify the use of HBO2 as an adjunctive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians, patients, and policy-makers should engage in shared decision-making and consider HBO2 as an adjunctive treatment of DFUs that fit the criteria outlined in this guideline. The current body of evidence provides a moderate level of evidence supporting the use of HBO2 for DFUs. Future research should be directed at improving methods for patient selection, testing various treatment protocols and improving our confidence in the existing estimates.

[Issues of infection related to diabetic foot syndrome]

Foot wounds are common problem in people with diabetes and now constitute the most frequent diabetes-related cause of hospitalization. Diabetic foot infections cause substantial morbidity and at least one in five results in a lower extremity amputation. They are are now the predominant proximate trigger for lower extremity amputations worldwide. One in five diabetic wounds present clinical signs of infection at primomanifestation. About 80 % of limb non-threating wounds can be succesfully healed using appropriate and comprehensive approach, including antimicrobial therapy, revascularisation and off-loading.

[Prolonged blockade of nervus ischiadicus in a system of complex treatment of patients, suffering complicated diabetic foot syndrome]

General principles of treatment in patients, suffering diabetic foot syndrome, are adduced. There was proved, that reconvalescence of the patients depends not only on quality of complex treatment, but from optimal choice of anesthesia method, its impact on postoperative period course. Application of prolonged blockade of n. ischiadicus gives possibility to perform operative intervention on the lower extremity in full volume, guarantees sufficient motor and sensory block, permits patients to reject from application of narcotic analgetics, to reduce the dose of strong nonnarcotic analgetics, the terms of transition of the wound process phase I into phase II, promotes early activization of patients postoperatively, constitutes alternative for other methods of anesthesiological support.

Classification systems for lower extremity amputation prediction in subjects with active diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

We systematically review the available systems used to classify diabetic foot ulcers in order to synthesize their methodological qualitative issues and accuracy to predict lower extremity amputation, as this may represent a critical point in these patients' care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two investigators searched, in EBSCO, ISI, PubMed and SCOPUS databases, and independently selected studies published until May 2013 and reporting prognostic accuracy and/or reliability of specific systems for patients with diabetic foot ulcer in order to predict lower extremity amputation.

RESULTS

We included 25 studies reporting a prevalence of lower extremity amputation between 6% and 78%. Eight different diabetic foot ulcer descriptions and seven prognostic stratification classification systems were addressed with a variable (1-9) number of factors included, specially peripheral arterial disease (n = 12) or infection at the ulcer site (n = 10) or ulcer depth (n = 10). The Meggitt-Wagner, S(AD)SAD and Texas University Classification systems were the most extensively validated, whereas ten classifications were derived or validated only once. Reliability was reported in a single study, and accuracy measures were reported in five studies with another eight allowing their calculation. Pooled accuracy ranged from 0.65 (for gangrene) to 0.74 (for infection).

CONCLUSION

There are numerous classification systems for diabetic foot ulcer outcome prediction, but only few studies evaluated their reliability or external validity. Studies rarely validated several systems simultaneously and only a few reported accuracy measures. Further studies assessing reliability and accuracy of the available systems and their composing variables are needed.

Diabetic foot ulcers: Part I. Pathophysiology and prevention

Diabetes mellitus is a serious, life-long condition that is the sixth leading cause of death in North America. Dermatologists frequently encounter patients with diabetes mellitus. Up to 25% of patients with diabetes mellitus will develop diabetic foot ulcers. Foot ulcer patients have an increased risk of amputation and increased mortality rate. The high-risk diabetic foot can be identified with a simplified screening, and subsequent foot ulcers can be prevented. Early recognition of the high-risk foot and timely treatment will save legs and improve patients' quality of life. Peripheral arterial disease, neuropathy, deformity, previous amputation, and infection are the main factors contributing to the development of diabetic foot ulcers. Early recognition of the high-risk foot is imperative to decrease the rates of mortality and morbidity. An interprofessional approach (ie, physicians, nurses, and foot care specialists) is often needed to support patients' needs.

Statistical analysis of spectral data: a methodology for designing an intelligent monitoring system for the diabetic foot

Early detection of (pre-)signs of ulceration on a diabetic foot is valuable for clinical practice. Hyperspectral imaging is a promising technique for detection and classification of such (pre-)signs. However, the number of the spectral bands should be limited to avoid overfitting, which is critical for pixel classification with hyperspectral image data. The goal was to design a detector/classifier based on spectral imaging (SI) with a small number of optical bandpass filters. The performance and stability of the design were also investigated. The selection of the bandpass filters boils down to a feature selection problem. A dataset was built, containing reflectance spectra of 227 skin spots from 64 patients, measured with a spectrometer. Each skin spot was annotated manually by clinicians as "healthy" or a specific (pre-)sign of ulceration. Statistical analysis on the data set showed the number of required filters is between 3 and 7, depending on additional constraints on the filter set. The stability analysis revealed that shot noise was the most critical factor affecting the classification performance. It indicated that this impact could be avoided in future SI systems with a camera sensor whose saturation level is higher than 106, or by postimage processing.

Guidelines for treatment of patients with diabetes and infected ulcers

Diabetic foot ulcers and their consequences do not only represent a major tragedy for the patient and his/her family, but also place a significant burden on the healthcare systems and society in general. Diabetic patients may develop foot ulcers due to neuropathy (autonomic, sensory, and motor deficits), angiopathy or both. As a result of the additional immunopathy associated with diabetes, the probability of these wounds to become infected is extremely high. Diabetic foot infections can be classified in mild, moderate and severe according to local and systemic signs. Their identification should lead to a prompt and systematic evaluation and treatment, ideally performed by a multidisciplinary team. Decisions concerning empirical initial antibiotic agent(s), desirable route of administration, duration and need of hospitalization should be based on the more likely involved pathogen(s), the severity of the infection, the ulcer chronicity and the presence of significant ischemia. Wound cultures, ideally from ulcer tissue, are strongly advisable and can help guiding and narrowing the antibiotic spectrum. Appropriate wound care and off-loading should not be neglected. When revascularization is required, the correct timing can be crucial for limb salvage. Since the recurrence of ulcer and infection is high, the implementation of appropriate preventive measures can be critical. Ultimately, the definitive goal in the treatment of diabetic foot infections is to prevent the amputation catastrophe.

Prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus patients

Foot ulcer is one of the most common and dreadest complication of diabetes mellitus.This is also a frequent cause of hospitalisation and disability. Most of the patients with diabetic foot ulcers living in developing countries present to healthcare facilities fairly late with advanced foot ulcers because of poor economic status, inadequate knowledge of self-care, sociocultural reasons and poor and inadequate diabetes healthcare. To determine the prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers amongst the newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus patients (n = 1674) a cross-sectional study was carried out during the period January 2010 to January 2011 in the department of medicine, NRS Medical College, Kolkata. Diabetic foot ulcers were found in 4.54% newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus patients. Neuropathic type of foot ulcer was present in 46.06% of patients (52.5% in male and 38.88% in female). Ischaemic type of foot ulcer was present in 19.74% of patients (22.5% in male and in 16.66% females). Neuroischaemic type of foot ulcer was present in 34.2% of patients (25% in males and 44.44% in females). Neuropathy occurred most frequently either singly or with peripheral vascular disease. General awareness about the disease, early diagnosis and proper management will prevent this dreaded complication.

Risk factors for lower extremity amputation in diabetic foot disease categorized by Wagner classification

AIMS

To elucidate the risk factors for lower extremity amputation (LEA) in patients of diabetic foot disease with different Wagner gradings.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a multidisciplinary diabetic foot care center. Demographic characteristics, laboratory data, disease history, ankle brachial pressure index (ABI) and Wagner classification were considered as independent variables to predict the therapeutic outcome (major LEA, minor LEA, and non-amputation). Risk factors for LEA in different Wagner grades were further analyzed. Multivariate stepwise ordinal logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

Of 789 study subjects, 19.9% received major LEA and 22.9% received minor LEA. Higher Wagner grade, lower ABI, serum albumin and hemoglobin, and elevated white blood cell (WBC) count were significantly associated with an increased risk of LEA. When stratified by Wagner classification, most of the above predictors and estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) were detected only in grade 3. While in grades 2 and 4, WBC count was identified as primary predictor positively associated with an increased risk of LEA.

CONCLUSIONS

Wagner classification remarkably influenced the potential risk factors for LEA, showing different predictors in different grades. The traditionally recognized predictors for diabetic foot amputation such as lower ABI, albumin or eGFR were almost exclusively found in patients with Wagner grade 3.

Diabetic foot lesions as seen in Nigerian teaching hospital: pattern and a simple classification

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot syndrome is a complication of diabetes mellitus that has serious socioeconomic implications for the individual, family and the society as a whole. When there are ulcers, the condition becomes limb threatening. Early detection of the risk factors and appropriate management of the ulcers reduces the incidence of amputations, morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To find the pattern of diabetic foot laesions (DFL) as seen at the orthopaedic clinic of Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria over a five-year period and to present a classification of DFL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2006 to June 2011 diabetics who had complaints arising from their feet were referred to the orthopaedic clinic at Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria. At presentation each patient was examined and investigated. Each foot was examined thoroughly and all the laesions were documented and graded according to Wagner's classification. Out come of management of the cases of DFL was also recorded. All the data collected was analysed.

RESULTS

Two groups (A and B) of patients were identified. In group (A) were patients in whom there was good renal function, no septicaemia, mean value of fasting blood glucose most often was < or = 14 mmol/l. In this group only the feet were threatened. There was a second group (B) in whom there was septicaemia, mean value of fasting blood glucose most often was < or = 15 mmol/l, and impaired renal function (ketone bodies were identified in urine, high serum levels of urea and creatine). Most of these patients had gangrene of the whole foot. In some of the patients infections extended into the gastrosnemius muscle. In diabetic foot laesions grades 0-3, no part of the foot was amputated. In diabetic foot laesions grade 4, infections were controlled and part of the foot had to be amputated. In diabetic foot laesions grade 5, infections were controlled with difficulty and there were systemic symptoms. Amputation of the whole foot was always indicated in this group of patients. The level of amputation most often was far above the ankle joint, either below or above knee.

CONCLUSION

Outcome of treatment revealed three groups of feet. There were salvageable, difficult to salvage and unsalvageable feet. These three outcomes of treatment of diabetic foot lesions formed the basis of a new grading system: gradel (salvageable), grade 2 (difficult to salvage) and grade 3 (unsalvageable). The condition of the patient determines the urgency, extent of intervention and length of stay in the hospital.

[System of classification of diabetic foot and its appraisal]

The classification system of diabetic foot not only helps to assess the wound, but it also can be used to predict the outcome of diabetic foot ulcer in the early stage, dynamically monitor the changes in the wound, and rationally direct the therapeutic schedule. At present, there are diverse systems for classifying the diabetic foot, but none has been internationally recognized. The classification systems can be categorized by time sequence, research objective, or structure type. When one of the classification systems is chosen, it is still very important to take the population, facility, and research type into consideration.

[Diabetic foot: definitions]

Diabetes is a metabolic disorder characterized by chronic hyperglycemia associated with impaired glucose, lipid and protein metabolism. The purpose of our work is to provide a clear and precise definition of the disease and of his frequent complications: diabetic foot and diabetic foot infection.

Consensus document on treatment of infections in diabetic foot

Diabetic foot infection, particularly if it is associated to ischaemia,is the most common cause of lower limb amputation, in the general population, of hospital admissions, and a decrease in the quality of life in diabetics. Of all diabetics, 15% of them are going to suffer from a foot infection during their life, with an annual incidence of 1-4%, preceded by a foot ulcer in more than 80% of cases. They are complex infections and the prognosis is influenced by many factors, depending on the ulcer (location, extension, whether chronic or not, previous amputation, ischaemia grade), and the patient (age, renal impairment, time of onset of diabetes, associated comorbidity). All these must be taken into account when establishing its treatment. The infections must be classified according to their severity (mild, moderate-mild, moderatesevere, and severe). Their treatment is complex and must be multidisciplinary and must include debridement, discharge, adequate antibiotic therapy, revascularisation, and treatment of the ulcer. In this consensus document, produced in collaboration with the Spanish Angiology and Vascular Surgery Society (SEACV), the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), the Spanish Chemotherapy Society (SEQ), the Spanish Surgeons Association (AEC), the Spanish Society of Urgent Medicine and Emergencies (INFURG-SEMES) and the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Medicine and Coronary Care (SEMICYUC), the guidelines are developed based on the best available evidence on diabetic foot infections, aimed at achieving greater clinical efficacy.

[Clinical classification of diabetic foot syndrome]

Basing on analysis of the treatment results in 521 patients, suffering diabetic foot syndrome (DFS), the clinical classification was proposed, taking into account regulations of the International agreement on diabetic foot. It contains pathogenetic mechanisms of DFS occurrence, severity of the nerves and vessels affection, degree of ischemia, character of purulent-necrotic complications. Classification permits to determine the methods of treatment in homogenous groups of patients, suffering DFS.

[The attempt of clinical classification of the complicated diabetic foot syndrome]

The experience of surgical treatment of 1532 patients with the complicated forms of diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) was analyzed. The original clinical classification of the complicated DFS was suggested. The classification considered the clinical form (symbol "C"), anatomic localization (symbol "Z") and etiology (symbol "E"). The classification allows to define surgical tactics depending on concrete complications of the DFS, frames conditions for the unification and uniform registration of the form and severity of the disease and volume of the surgical treatment.

[Original clinical classification of a complicated diabetic foot syndrome]

Original clinical classification of a complicated diabetic foot syndrome (DFS), based on summarizing of experience, concerning surgical treatment of 1532 patients, suffering complicated DFS, was proposed, necessitating determination of clinical form (symbol C), anatomic localization (symbol Z) and etiological factor (symbol E) of the lower extremity tissues affection. The classification applied permits to choose a surgical tactics depending on presence of specific complication of DFS, and this creates conditions for unification and universal registration of form and severity of a complicated DFS, as well as the volume of a surgical aid

Topical wound oxygen therapy in the treatment of severe diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective controlled study

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are common, difficult-to-treat, and prone to complications. A prospective, controlled study was conducted to: 1) examine the clinical efficacy of a pressurized topical oxygen therapy (TWO(2)) device in outpatients (N = 28) with severe DFU referred for care to a community wound care clinic and 2) assess ulcer reoccurrence rates after 24 months. Seventeen (17) patients received TWO(2) five times per week (60-minute treatment, pressure cycles between 5 and 50 mb) and 11 selected a silver-containing dressing changed at least twice per week (control). Patient demographics did not differ between treatment groups but wounds in the treatment group were more severe, perhaps as a result of selection bias. Ulcer duration was longer in the treatment (mean 6.1 months, SD 5.8) than in the control group (mean 3.2 months, SD 0.4) and mean baseline wound area was 4.1 cm2 (SD 4.3) in the treatment and 1.4 cm2 (SD 0.6) in the control group (P = 0.02). Fourteen (14) of 17 ulcers (82.4%) in the treatment group and five of 11 ulcers (45.5%) in the control group healed after a median of 56 and 93 days, respectively (P = 0.04). No adverse events were observed and there was no reoccurrence at the ulcer site after 24 months' follow-up in either group. Although the absence of randomization and blinding may have under- or overestimated the treatment effect of either group, the significant differences in treatment outcomes confirm the potential benefits of TWO(2) in the management of difficult-to-heal DFUs. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness studies as well as studies to elucidate the mechanisms of action of TWO(2) are warranted.

Foot screening for diabetics

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to evaluate the results of foot screening performed in a study population of 2137 diabetics (3926 feet) screened from 2006 to 2008 by the National University Hospital (NUH) multi-disciplinary team for diabetic foot problems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A standardised protocol was designed. Foot screening consisted of detailed history taking and clinical examination including assessment for sensory neuropathy by Semmes Weinstein monofilament (SWMF) and neurothesiometer and assessment of vasculopathy by ankle-brachial index (ABI) and total body irradiation (TBI). The foot screening was performed by a trained staff nurse. All patients were classified according to King's College Classification.

RESULTS

Majority of the patients were in the fifth (27.9%) and sixth (30.0%) decades of life. Two thousand sixty-four had type II diabetes, and only 73 had type I diabetes. Neuropathy was found in 1307 (33.3%) feet based on 5.07 SWMF. Vasculopathy was recorded in 510 (13.0%) and 546 (13.9%) feet based on ABI <0.8 and TBI <0.7. According to King's Classification, 1069 (50.0%) were Stage 1: Normal and 615 (28.8%) were Stage 2: At-Risk.

CONCLUSION

Foot screening should be performed as early as possible to detect "At-Risk" feet and prevent the development of diabetic foot complications, thereby further reducing the risk of major amputations.

A systematic review of scoring systems for diabetic foot ulcers

AIMS

Foot ulcers are a common and important complication of diabetes. Variation in the clinical presentation of this disease has resulted in a paucity of evidence from comparable studies to guide optimal clinical management. A validated scoring system might help clinicians and researchers in everyday assessment and management of patients or the development and assessment of new therapies. The aim of the present review was to critically appraise the published literature of wound scoring systems for diabetic foot ulcers.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed using the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from 1966 until 2009 for scoring systems for diabetic foot ulcers. The literature review conformed to PRISMA statement standards.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 197 articles, of which 180 were excluded. Eleven scoring systems and six validation or comparative studies are described.

CONCLUSIONS

Many scoring systems exist for classification of the diabetic foot, few of which have been validated. Detailed scoring systems offer a valuable method for the comparison of data from different diabetic foot centres. Simplistic scoring systems may be used in clinical practice and the choice of scoring system should be determined by the population under study.

Effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers

INTRODUCTION

This is the fi rst prospective study done locally to determine the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic vacuum pump was used to apply controlled negative pressure evenly across the wound surface. Changes in wound dimension, presence of wound granulation and infection status of diabetic foot ulcers in 11 consecutive patients with diabetes were followed over the course of VAC therapy.

RESULTS

Healing was achieved in all wounds. Nine wounds were closed by split-skin grafting and 2 by secondary closure. The average length of treatment with VAC therapy was 23.3 days. Ten wounds showed reduction in wound size. All wounds were satisfactorily granulated and cleared of bacterial infection at the end of VAC therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

VAC therapy was useful in the treatment of diabetic foot infection and ulcers, which after debridement, may present with exposed tendon, fascia and/or bone. These included ray amputation wounds, wounds post-debridement for necrotising fasciitis, wounds post-drainage for abscess, a heel ulcer and a sole ulcer. It was able to prepare ulcers well for closure via split-skin grafting or secondary closure in good time. This reduced cost of VAC therapy, as therapy was not prolonged to attain greater reduction in wound area. VAC therapy also provides a sterile, more controlled resting environment to large, exudating wound surfaces. Large diabetic foot ulcers were thus made more manageable.

[Complicated course of diabetic foot syndrome. An attempt to create the new classification concerning necrotic-purulent complications severity]

There was analyzed in detail a current state of diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) problem. In spite of that DFS constitutes the discrete nosological entity, it is not included into International Classification of the Diseases (ICD-10). The absence of classification of complicated DFS does not permit to elaborate protocols of the patients treatment standards and to determine real terms of their stationary treatment. Basing on analysis of the work experience of Purulent-septic center, owing hospital beds for the treatment of patients, suffering DFS, concerning diagnosis and treatment of more than 1500 patients with the DFS complications, the original classification of complicated DFS was presented by the authors, which is proposed for discussion in a wide round of specialists.

Diabetic foot care: tips and tools to streamline your approach

Whether you're assessing risk, focusing on prevention, or treating an ulcer, this update--and handy treatment mnemonic--will help you optimize your care.

A study of HVPC as an adjunctive therapy in limb salvage for chronic diabetic wounds of the lower extremity

Complex diabetic ulcers of the lower extremity can be slow to heal and may lead to amputation. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a form of electrical stimulation using high-voltage, pulsed current (HVPC) as an adjunct to a multidisciplinary approach to limb salvage for chronic diabetic wounds of the lower extremity. Data from 30 patients with diabetes (17 men, 13 women, mean age 65.8 +/- 12.6 years, mean HgbA1c level = 8.2 +/- 1.5, with varying comorbidities) and 45 wounds were reviewed. Mean wound duration before referral and treatment was 25.0 weeks (range 4.0 to 60.0) and the mean wound surface area was 7.8 cm2 (range 0.6 cm2 to 62.0 cm2). The majority (62.2%) of wounds were classified 1C, 2C, or 3D (University of Texas diabetic wound classifications). The mean number of treatments, administered two or three times a week, was 23.0 (range 6.0 to 65.0) and 35 wounds (77.8%) healed after a mean of 14.2 weeks (range 3.4 to 59.0). Of those, 31 remained healed at a mean follow-up of 39.8 weeks (range 11.1 to 84.3) and additional HVPC healed two of the four recurrences. These results suggest that HVPC is a useful addition to a multidisciplinary limb salvage management approach for complex lower extremity wounds. Further study is warranted to elucidate its role in this application.

[Debatable questions in diabetic foot syndrome classification]

The experience of treatment of 705 patients with the diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) determined the necessity of reviewing the existing classifications of the disease. Main features of clinics and pathology define three basic forms of the DFS: neuropathic, neuroischemic and ischemic. The new ischemia classification is brought forward. It is based on reliable micro- and macrogemodynamic criteria, which are also important for clinical decision making.

Hyperbaric oxygen, oxidative stress, NO bioavailability and ulcer oxygenation in diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) increases tissue oxygenation, thus serving as an adjunct therapy for diabetic wounds. However, in some patients there is insufficient increase in tissue O2.

AIMS

To investigate the pathophysiology of insufficient HBO2 and the possible role of N-acetylcysteine (NAC).

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, cross-over trial included 50 diabetic patients with non-healing ulcers. Each patient received two treatments with 100% oxygen/2ATA. NAC was administered i.v. at one of the two treatments. Basal and post-treatment peri-wound transcutaneous O2 (TcPO2) pressure, malondialdehyde (MDA), total anti-oxidant status (TAOS) and nitric oxide (NO) were assessed. An ulcer oxygenation increase above 200 mmHg was accepted as sufficient.

RESULTS

During HBO2, 17 patients (34%) demonstrated insufficient increase in TcPO2. Concomitantly, their TAOS and NO decreased, while MDA increased. NAC administration attenuated these parameters, thus improving the HBO2 outcome. In those affected by NAC, the cure rate was 75%. By contrast, in 66% of patients with sufficient increase in TcPO2 TAOS was increased and MDA decreased irrespective of NAC administration. The cure rate in this subgroup was 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient increase of ulcer oxygenation during HBO2 results from exaggerated oxidative stress and decreased NO bioavailability. NAC administration-induced modulation of both parameters and may improve ulcer oxygenation during HBO2.

Comparison of three systems of classification in predicting the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers in a Brazilian population

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare three ulcer classification systems as predictors of the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers: the Wagner, the University of Texas (UT) and the size (area, depth), sepsis, arteriopathy, denervation system (S(AD)SAD) systems in a specialist clinic in Brazil.

METHODS

Ulcer area, depth, appearance, infection and associated ischaemia and neuropathy were recorded in a consecutive series of 94 subjects. A novel score, the S(AD)SAD score, was derived from the sum of individual items of the S(AD)SAD system, and was evaluated. Follow-up was for at least 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of healing.

RESULTS

Mean age was 57.6 years; 57 (60.6%) were male. Forty-eight ulcers (51.1%) healed without surgery; 11 (12.2%) subjects underwent minor amputation. Significant differences in terms of healing were observed for depth (P=0.002), infection (P=0.006) and denervation (P=0.002) using the S(AD)SAD system, for UT grade (P=0.002) and stage (P=0.032) and for Wagner grades (P=0.002). Ulcers with an S(AD)SAD score of <or=9 (total possible 15) were 7.6 times more likely to heal than scores >or=10 (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

All three systems predicted ulcer outcome. The S(AD)SAD score of ulcer severity could represent a useful addition to routine clinical practice. The association between outcome and ulcer depth confirms earlier reports. The association with infection was stronger than that reported from the centres in Europe or North America. The very strong association with neuropathy has only previously been observed in Tanzania. Studies designed to compare the outcome in different countries should adopt systems of classification, which are valid for the populations studied.

Some historical aspects of diabetic foot disease

During the 19th century and for much of the 20th century, disease of the lower limb in diabetic patients was conceptualized not, as it is now, as 'the diabetic foot' or as 'a diabetic foot ulcer' but as 'gangrene in the diabetic foot' or as 'diabetic gangrene'. The prognostically and therapeutically important distinction between gangrene due to vascular insufficiency and gangrene due to infection in a limb with a normal or near normal blood supply was not made until about 1893. The advent of aseptic surgery improved the survival of amputation flaps, but surgery remained a hazardous undertaking until the discovery of insulin. Although insulin therapy reduced the risk of surgical intervention, diabetic foot disease now replaced hyperglycaemic coma as the major cause of diabetic mortality. The increasing workload attributable to diabetic foot disease after the introduction of insulin is reflected in the publications on diabetes in the 1920s. In some hospitals in North America this led to initiatives in prophylactic care and patient education, the importance of which were only more widely appreciated some 60 years later. A continuing emphasis on ischemia and infection as the major causes of diabetic foot disease led to a neglect of the role of neuropathy. In consequence, the management of diabetic neuropathic ulceration entered a prolonged period of therapeutic stagnation at a time when significant advances were being made in the management of lepromatous neuropathic ulceration. Reasons for the revival of progress in the management of diabetic neuropathic ulceration in the 1980s will be discussed.

Amputations and ulceration; pitfalls in assessing incidence

In order to direct scientific research, it is pivotal to know the extent of a clinical problem. Therefore, much effort has been undertaken to tally all diabetic foot problems around the world. Incidence and prevalence figures concerning both foot ulcerations and lower extremity amputations have been reported extensively worldwide. The figures presented are being compared with those from other countries, regions or clinics and those with the lowest numbers are deemed best practices.However, for these comparisons to be valid there are many possible pitfalls that are to be considered. A significant number of epidemiological and clinical considerations are to be dealt with and many of these are extremely important to realize when comparing ulceration or amputation rates. The influence of using a certain definition of nominators and denominators are explained. Also, the clinical setting in which the research has been performed is of importance. Many possible pitfalls are discussed in this presentation. Although there are limitations to this type of research, it may be the only way possible to go. In order to compare health strategies in certain areas of the world or to determine the importance of an intervention, incidence and prevalence figures certainly may prove a beneficial effect and therefore justify an intervention. Therefore, given the limitations epidemiological research concerning the prevalence and incidence of foot-related complications still forms the backbone of clinical research in the area of the diabetic foot.

Diabetic foot surgery: classifying patients to predict complications

The purpose of this article is to describe a classification of diabetic foot surgery performed in the absence of critical limb ischaemia. The basis of this classification is centred on three fundamental variables that are present in the assessment of risk and indication: (1) presence or absence of neuropathy (the loss of protective sensation); (2) presence or absence of an open wound; (3) presence or absence of acute limb-threatening infection. The conceptual framework for this classification is to define distinct classes of surgery in an order of theoretically increasing risk for high-level amputation. These include: Class I: elective diabetic foot surgery (procedures performed to treat a painful deformity in a patient without the loss of protective sensation); Class II: prophylactic (procedure performed to reduce the risk of ulceration or reulceration in a person with the loss of protective sensation but without an open wound); Class III: curative (procedure performed to assist in healing an open wound); and Class IV: emergency (procedure performed to limit the progression of acute infection). The presence of critical ischaemia in any of these classes of surgery should prompt a vascular evaluation to consider (1) the urgency of the procedure being considered and (2) possible revascularization prior to or temporally concomitant with the procedure. It is our hope that this system begins a dialogue amongst physicians and surgeons which can ultimately facilitate communication, enhance perspective, and improve care.

Comparison of four systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers in Tanzania

AIMS

The aim was to compare the use of four different systems of foot ulcer classification in a consecutive population with diabetes presenting to a specialist clinic in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

METHODS

Clinical data were collected prospectively in all patients presenting with foot ulcers between 3 January 2003 and 30 September 2005, and were used retrospectively to classify their ulcers using the Meggitt/Wagner, University of Texas (UT), Size (Area and Depth), Sepsis, Arteriopathy, and Denervation [S(AD)SAD] and Perfusion, Extent/size, Depth/tissue loss, Infection and Sensation (PEDIS) systems. Comparison was made between the strength of the associations between baseline characteristics of each system and outcome determined at 5 December 2005, using linear by linear association.

RESULTS

The strongest statistical associations (P < 0.001) were observed between percent healing and Wagner score (chi(2)= 85.923), depth [S(AD)SAD, PEDIS and UT grade, 70.558], infection [S(AD)SAD, 61.774; PEDIS, 37.924] and UT stage (32.929). Weaker but significant (P < 0.001) associations were observed between percent healing and neuropathy [S(AD)SAD, PEDIS 12.475] and peripheral arterial disease [S(AD)SAD, PEDIS 10.799], as well as cross-sectional area [S(AD)SAD 4.387, P = 0.036].

CONCLUSION

The strength of the statistical association between outcome and both neuropathy and infection contrasts with findings in series previously reported from the USA and UK, and highlights the differences which may be found in different populations. These differences have implications for any system of classification chosen to compare the effectiveness of management in different centres in different countries.

[The follow-up results of patients with necrotic suppurative forms of diabetic foot syndrome]

Follow-up results of 162 patients with necrotic suppurative forms of the diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) are studied in a period of 6 months to 7 years. 51.35% of patients with neuropathic form of DFS (NPDFS) relapsed, whereas among patients with neuroischemic form (NIDFS) relapse was reported in 61.36% of cases. High amputations were performed in 31.58% of patients with NPDFS and in 34.09% in patients with NIDFS. Lethality after five years of follow-up was 25.81% after shank-level amputation and 50% after hip-level amputation in patients with NPDFS, and in the group of NIFDS these numbers amount 57.84% and 72.12%, respectively. Authors conclude that compensation of diabetes and its late complications is crucial for patients with DFS. Surgical treatment should be maximal sparing, with possible foot preservation. Vascular reconstructive surgery should be preferred in NIDFS for critical limb ischemia reduction. The level of high limb amputations in patients of both groups should be limited by shank when possible.