Development of a Practical Guide to Implement and Monitor Diet Therapy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Dietary therapy for short- and long-term management of eosinophilic esophagitis is an effective yet poorly understood and underutilized treatment strategy. Despite several prospective trials demonstrating the efficacy of dietary therapies, successful clinical implementation is hampered by the need for a multidisciplinary approach including dietitian support and provider expertise. The availability of these resources is not readily available to most gastroenterologists. Without standardized guidance on starting or completing the diet for gastrointestinal providers and/or consulting dietitians, provider attitudes toward dietary therapy vary greatly depending on familiarity and knowledge gaps in using diet therapy. This review aims to summarize evidence in support of dietary therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis while providing guidance on initiation and implementation of dietary therapy for providers.

A Clinical Perspective on the Dietary Therapies for Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis: The Gap Between Research and Daily Practice

Pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (ped-EoE) is an immune-mediated pathology affecting 34 per 100.000 children. It is characterized by an esophageal inflammation caused by an immune response towards food antigens that come into contact with the esophageal lining. Depending on the age of the child, symptoms can vary from abdominal pain, vomiting and failure to thrive to dysphagia and food impaction. The diagnosis of this chronic disease is based on the symptoms of esophageal dysfunction combined with an infiltration of more than 15 eosinophils per high-power field and the exclusion of secondary causes. The treatment modalities include the 3Ds: Drugs, allergen avoidance by Diet and/or esophageal Dilation. In this review we focused on the efficacy of dietary approaches in ped-EoE, which currently include the elemental diet (amino acid-based diet), the empiric elimination diet and the allergy test-directed elimination diet. Although several reviews have summarized these dietary approaches, a lack of consistency between and within the elimination diets hampers its clinical use and differences in subsequent reintroduction phases present a barrier for dietary advice in daily clinical practice. We therefore conducted an analysis driven from a clinician's perspective on these dietary therapies in the management of ped-EoE, whereby we examined whether these variations within dietary approaches, yet considered to be similar, could result in significant differences in dietary counseling.

Efficacy of a Short-term Six-food Elimination Diet and Reintroduction Therapy in Pediatric Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

A 13-year-old boy presented to the hospital with a 3-month history of repeated vomiting and abdominal pain. Results of esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a diagnosis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE). We initiated a short-term six-food elimination diet (SFED) and reintroduction therapy over five days. On the third day of SFED, the patient's abdominal symptoms completely disappeared. However, he experienced unbearable abdominal pain six hours after the reintroduction of milk and peanuts. His symptoms remain completely controlled at present after eliminating milk and peanut products. The SFED and reintroduction therapy for EGE may be effective even for short-term treatments over a five-day period.

Eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroenteritis, and colitis in a patient with prior parasite exposure

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID) comprise a spectrum of inflammatory diseases that can affect any segment of the gastrointestinal tract. The pathogenesis of these conditions is complex; differentiating between primary and secondary forms of these disorders can be clinically challenging. We report a case of primary EGID in a patient with remote parasite exposure, whose symptoms were initially attributed to irritable bowel syndrome. Endoscopy revealed the rare finding of EGID involving the entire gastrointestinal tract; symptoms improved with an elimination diet. This case raises the possibility of a link between prior parasite exposure and development of EGID, and underscores the necessity of exploring alternative diagnoses in patients with presumed IBS who present with severe symptoms.

Eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is defined by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction, persistent esophageal eosinophilia, and exclusion of other etiologies that may be contributing to the condition. EoE is different from erosive esophagitis. In children, symptoms vary by age groups, such as feeding disorders in 2 year olds; vomiting in 8 year olds; and abdominal pain, dysphagia, and/or food impaction in adolescents. Most adults present with dysphagia, food impaction, heartburn, or chest pain. Common endoscopic features in adults with EoE include linear furrows (creases that orient longitudinally), mucosal rings (esophageal "trachealization"), small-caliber esophagus, white plaques or exudates (which are microabscesses of eosinophils), and strictures. Children often present with similar endoscopic features, yet one-third of pediatric patients with EoE have a normal result in an endoscopic examination. Histologic features of EoE include increased intramucosal eosinophils in the esophagus (≥15 eosinophils per high power field), without similar findings in the stomach or duodenum. There also may be eosinophilic microabscesses. In addition to evidence of mast cell activation, mucosa from patients with EoE have increased levels of interleukin 5; supporting eosinophilia; and upregulation of gene expression of eotaxin-3, a chemokine important in eosinophil migration. The majority of patients have evidence of either aeroallergen and/or food sensitization. Dietary therapy is considered first-line therapy for patients with EoE because it is inexpensive and effective, without requiring pharmacologic therapy. Removal of food antigens has been shown to improve symptoms in patients with EoE. Topical corticosteroids improve esophageal eosinophilia and symptoms, and have become the criterion standard of pharmacotherapy.

Triple Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease, Celiac Disease, and Eosinophilic Esophagitis in a Child With Siderius-Hamel Syndrome

Siderius-Hamel syndrome is a rare condition characterized by intellectual disability and distinct facial features. Crohn's disease-related eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been reported; however, an association between celiac disease and EoE remains controversial. We present a case of a child with Siderius-Hamel syndrome who had characteristic findings of all these conditions-Crohn's disease, celiac disease, and EoE-an occurrence that to our knowledge has not been reported previously. The purpose of this report is to make physicians aware of this rare occurrence, so that it can be kept in mind while evaluating a patient with Siderius-Hamel syndrome presenting with gastrointestinal complaints.

Pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis effectively treated with a short-term 6-food-group elimination diet and reintroduction therapy: A case report

RATIONALE

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an inflammatory disease diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and pathological findings. EoE is treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), topical steroids, and elimination diet-reintroduction therapy. After remission is achieved with the elimination diet, foods can be reintroduced sequentially to identify specific food triggers; however, this reintroduction method was not previously standardized.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 12-year-old girl presented to our hospital with a 3-year history of epigastric pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed linear furrows, esophageal rings, white exudates, and pallor throughout the esophagus. Histopathological findings revealed eosinophilic infiltration >15 eos/hpf on esophageal biopsy. There were no obvious abnormal findings in the stomach and duodenum.

DIAGNOSES

EoE INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES:: Because PPI was ineffective, we proposed a 6-food-group elimination diet (SFGED) and reintroduction therapy for EoE, which was initially planned out over a 6-week interval. However, a 5-day interval of SFGED and reintroduction therapy was performed instead. The treatment was effective and causative food antigens (egg and nuts) were identified. Since her symptoms recovered following short-term treatment, the nutritional impact was minimized, as was the duration of her hospitalization. Consequently, the patient's quality of life was well-preserved.

LESSONS

SFGED and reintroduction therapy for EoE may be effective even for short-term treatments involving 5-day intervals.

The role of maintenance therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis: who, why, and how?

In patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) who do not respond to proton pump inhibitors, initial anti-inflammatory/anti-eosinophilic treatment is with either topical corticosteroids or dietary elimination. A large body of literature supports the efficacy of these approaches, with histologic response rates in the 50-90% range for steroids and 70% range for the six-food elimination diet. However, these studies are almost all short-term and data evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of either treatment are limited. Nevertheless, because EoE is chronic, symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic disease activity recurs when successful treatments are stopped. An emerging body of data also suggest that left untreated, persistent eosinophilic esophageal inflammation may progress to fibrostenosis over time. Therefore, maintenance therapy in EoE is intuitively attractive. This paper reviews the rationale for maintenance treatment in EoE, the available long-term pharmacologic and dietary response data for EoE, and discusses who may benefit the most from ongoing treatment. While all patients with EoE can be offered maintenance treatment, this option should be strongly recommended in patients with severe disease phenotypes or complications, including malnutrition or failure to thrive, esophageal fibrostenosis, strictures requiring dilation, recurrent food bolus impaction, history of perforation, and symptoms that recur quickly after treatment discontinuation. In all EoE patients, regular follow-up is also advised.

Food elimination diets are effective for long-term treatment of adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Limited data describe the long-term efficacy of dietary elimination in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).

AIM

To assess the long-term outcomes of food elimination diets for treatment of adults with EoE.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at our centre analysing all EoE patients receiving a food elimination diet without concomitant steroids. Baseline data were abstracted using standardised collection forms. Follow-up data from a mean 24.9-month period were collected for patients with a histological response to a food elimination diet during and after food reintroduction. The main outcomes were symptomatic, endoscopic and histological responses.

RESULTS

Of 52 patients, 18 received a 6-food food elimination diet, 32 received targeted diet, and two received a 6-food food elimination diet with targeted elimination. There were 21 (40%) patients with an initial histological response. Responders reported less dysphagia after treatment (95% baseline vs 11%; P = .001) and at the end of follow-up (95% baseline vs 33%; P = .008). Significant and durable endoscopic improvements were recorded at the same time points: Endoscopic reference score: 3.2 vs 0.7; P = .001; and 3.2 vs 1.7; P = .06. Histological findings improved after the most restrictive diet in responders (49.8 vs 4.1 eosinophils per high-power field; P = .001) and remained suppressed in the 10 initial responders maintaining compliance at the end of follow-up (5.2 eosinophils per high-power field).

CONCLUSIONS

Among EoE patients responding to a food elimination diet and remaining adherent, maintenance dietary therapy produced durable long-term symptomatic, endoscopic and histological disease control. These long-term data confirm that a food elimination diet is an effective maintenance treatment option in select adults with EoE.

Medical therapy versus dietary avoidance in eosinophilic esophagitis: Which approach is better?

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated esophageal disease characterized by esophageal symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia. It is induced by food triggers and by environmental allergens in some patients. No U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved therapies exist for patients with EoE. Common therapies include topical corticosteroids (TCS) and dietary restriction.

METHODS

This article reviewed the pros and cons of a medical versus dietary approach in treating EoE in children and adults. Available data on short- and long-term efficacy, ease of implementation, cost, adverse effects, and quality of life (QoL) were summarized.

RESULTS

Although no comparative studies of TCS versus dietary restrictions exist, they seemed to be equivalent from an efficacy standpoint. However, each therapy offers different advantages and disadvantages. TCS allow ingestion of multiple food triggers and improve QoL of patients with EoE. However, TCS have the potential for topical and/or systemic adverse effects and can be costly in the long run. Dietary restriction therapies allow identification of food triggers and are less costly in the long run. However, they are more challenging to implement because they require a team approach with a dietitian and an allergist. In addition, they decrease the QoL of some children with EoE, often require extensive allergy testing and multiple endoscopies, and are not effective when environmental allergens trigger EoE. Therefore, the choice of medical versus dietary therapy needs to be individualized based on a thorough medical evaluation and discussion with patients with EoE and their families.

CONCLUSION

Research is needed to establish the lowest most effective and safe dose of TCS and the extent of adherence needed when eliminating foods for EoE, and to find less-invasive ways to monitor histologic disease activity. Potential results from this research may allow more tailored therapies or specific combination therapies that would take advantage of each treatment modality to maximize benefits to the patient while maintaining disease remission.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis From an Allergy Perspective: How to Optimally Pursue Allergy Testing & Dietary Modification in the Adult Population

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic condition characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. In adults, the three most common treatment options are swallowed steroids, elimination diets, and periodic esophageal dilations. Many different elimination diets have been studied in adults, including elemental diets, allergy testing-directed diets, and empiric elimination diets. This article will review the existing data on these dietary therapies and will propose an approach to dietary management in adult EoE.

Should wheat, barley, rye, and/or gluten be avoided in a 6-food elimination diet?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a food antigen-mediated disease, is effectively treated with the dietary elimination of 6 foods commonly associated with food allergies (milk, wheat, egg, soy, tree nuts/peanuts, and fish/shellfish). Because wheat shares homologous proteins (including gluten) with barley and rye and can also be processed with these grains, some clinicians have suggested that barley and rye might also trigger EoE as a result of cross-reaction and/or cross-contamination with wheat. In this article, we discuss the theoretical risks of cross-reactivity and cross-contamination among wheat, barley, and rye proteins (including gluten); assess common practices at EoE treatment centers; and provide recommendations for dietary treatment and future studies of EoE.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Once considered a rare condition, eosinophilic esophagitis is now one of the most common conditions diagnosed during the assessment of feeding problems in children and during the evaluation of dysphagia and food impaction in adults. The entity exists worldwide but has been most extensively studied in Western countries, where its prevalence has been estimated to be 0.4% among all children and adults. Whether eosinophilic esophagitis is truly a new disease or simply a recently recognized one is uncertain. In this review, we consider the diagnostic criteria, pathophysiological and clinical features, and treatment of this increasingly prevalent disease.

The impact of dietary therapy on clinical and biologic parameters of pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic disease that presents with a massive infiltration of the esophagus by eosinophils triggered by food antigen(s).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of dietary therapy on nutritional parameters in patients who present with EoE.

METHODS

A convenience retrospective study analyzed patients with EoE after a 2-month dietary therapy (6-food elimination diet, avoidance of the 6 most common allergenic foods, plus avoidance of those eliciting positive skin testing, plus amino-acid formula as replacement for dairy products). Pre- and postdiet allergic and nutritional status were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 111 eligible patients, 59 patients, with a median age of 77.7 months (range, 9-189 months) were enrolled. Dietary therapy significantly increased the return to normal endoscopic appearance (47.4%, P < .0009) and led to complete remission (<5 eosinophils/esophageal HPF and disappearance of symptoms) in 59.3%. All symptoms improved, digestive (98.3%), cutaneous (80%), and respiratory (92.8%). The prediet median weight-for-height (WFH) z score was -0.75 (-3.00 to 5.69), and the postdiet WFH did not significantly differ, -0.51 (-3.09 to 5.00). The prediet WFH z score was less than -2 (moderate malnutrition) in 10.1%. Postdiet blood eosinophils counts decreased in absolute numbers and in counts ≥ 500 × 10(6)/L (P < .0001). Evaluation after 1 year of progressive reintroduction of eliminated foods was available in 33 children: the median WFH z score did not significantly improve, from -0.89 (range, -3.00 to 0.67) at enrollment to -0.59 (range, -3.66 to 2.24).

CONCLUSION

The nutritional status of children with EoE was mildly affected and not worsened by the 2-month dietary therapy.

[Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults: current approaches to diet therapy]

The review describes the basic strategy of eosinophilic esophagitis diet therapy in adult patients: elemental diet, allergy testing-directed food elimination diet and empirical elimination diet. The review includes information about the effects of different methods of diet therapy on the severity of eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa and symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis.

[FEATURES OF TREATMENT OF EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS IN SCHOOLCHILDREN]

The inclusion of probiotic L. reuteri into the complex therapy of eosinophilic esophagitis significantly affect the outcomes of children--there was significant decrease in the number of eosinophils in the esophageal mucosa of children.

Advances in clinical management of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune/antigen-mediated clinicopathologic condition that has become an increasingly important cause of upper gastrointestinal morbidity in adults and children over the past 2 decades. It is diagnosed based on symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, the presence of at least 15 eosinophils/high-power field in esophageal biopsy specimens, and exclusion of competing causes of esophageal eosinophilia, including proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. We review what we have recently learned about the clinical aspects of EoE, discussing the clinical, endoscopic, and histological features of EoE in adults and children. We explain the current diagnostic criteria and challenges to diagnosis, including the role of gastroesophageal reflux disease and proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. It is also important to consider the epidemiology of EoE (with a current incidence of 1 new case per 10,000 per year and prevalence of 0.5 to 1 case per 1000 per year) and disease progression. We review the main treatment approaches and new treatment options; EoE can be treated with topical corticosteroids, such as fluticasone and budesonide, or dietary strategies, such as amino acid-based formulas, allergy test-directed elimination diets, and nondirected empiric elimination diets. Endoscopic dilation has also become an important tool for treatment of fibrostenotic complications of EoE. There are a number of unresolved issues in EoE, including phenotypes, optimal treatment end points, the role of maintenance therapy, and treatment of refractory EoE. The care of patients with EoE and the study of the disease span many disciplines; EoE is ideally managed by a multidisciplinary team of gastroenterologists, allergists, pathologists, and dieticians.

Dietary treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis

Emerging evidence supports impaired epithelial barrier function as the key initial event in the development of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and other allergic diseases. Symptom resolution, histologic remission, and prevention of both disease and treatment-related complications are the goals of treatment. Successful dietary treatments include elemental, empirical elimination and allergy test directed diets. Dietary therapy with exclusive elemental diet offers the best response. Cow's milk, wheat, egg, soy, peanut/tree nut, and fish/shellfish are the 6 food antigens most likely to induce esophageal inflammation.

PedsQL eosinophilic esophagitis module: feasibility, reliability, and validity

OBJECTIVE

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic esophageal inflammatory condition with a paucity of information on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The objective of the study was to report on the measurement properties of the PedsQL EoE Module.

METHODS

The PedsQL EoE Module was completed in a multisite study by 196 pediatric patients with EoE and 262 parents of patients with EoE.

RESULTS

The PedsQL EoE Module scales evidenced excellent feasibility (0.6%-3.1% missing), excellent group comparison reliability across total scale scores (patient α 0.93; parent proxy α 0.94), good reliability for the 7 individual scales (patient α 0.75-0.87; parent proxy α 0.81-0.92), excellent test-retest reliability (patient intraclass correlation coefficient 0.88; parent intraclass correlation coefficient 0.82), demonstrated no floor effects and low ceiling effects, and demonstrated a high percentage of scaling success for most scales. Intercorrelations with the PedsQL Generic Core Scales were in the medium (0.30) to large (0.50) range. PedsQL EoE Module scores were worse among patients with active histologic disease (≥ 5 eos/hpf) compared with those in remission (patient self-report: 63.3 vs 69.9 [P < 0.05]; parent proxy report: 65.1 vs 72.3 [P < 0.01]), and those treated with dietary restrictions compared with those with no restrictions (patient self-report: 61.6 vs 74.3 [P < 0.01]; parent proxy report: 65.5 vs 74.7 [P < 0.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate excellent measurement properties of the PedsQL EoE Module. Patients with active histologic disease and those treated with dietary restrictions demonstrated worse PedsQL scores. The PedsQL EoE Module may be used in the evaluation of pediatric EoE disease-specific HRQOL in clinical research and practice.

Eosinophilic esophagitis, celiac disease, and immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy in a 2-year-old child

Celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and urticaria are 3 manifestations of food allergy with different pathogenic mechanisms. We report the case of a 2-year-old child with digestive symptoms, slow growth, and severe asthma. The results of skin prick tests were positive to several foods. Endoscopy revealed eosinophilic esophagitis and celiac disease. Treatment consisted of a gluten-free diet and a 1-month course of oral corticosteroids. Endoscopy and biopsy findings were normal at 5 years of age. A gluten-free diet is the basis of treatment of celiac disease, but the role of an elimination diet in eosinophilic esophagitis is not well established. Our patient also developed urticaria when exposed to milk and egg.We present, to our knowledge, the first report of a patient with celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and immediate-type immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy.

Allergy assessment in children with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is of growing interest for pediatricians and allergists. There is no general agreement about diagnostic and clinical management procedures. The objective of this prospective, observational study was to evaluate the efficacy of a protocol for the etiologic diagnosis and accurate treatment of EoE in the pediatric population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Starting in 2001, patients aged 0 to 14 years with a diagnosis of EoE were consecutively included in a protocol which included an allergy study. Depending on the results, an avoidance or elemental diet was established. Topical corticosteroids were prescribed to patients who rejected the diet. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological evaluation was performed to assess response. In the case of disease remission, challenge tests were performed to identify the offending food.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included. Most of them were male (14/17) and a high percentage (88%) had a history of allergy as well as a history of atopy in parents. Fifteen patients were sensitized to 1 or more foods. With this protocol and the subsequent treatment, 9 out of 17 patients were cured (1 out of 4 with swallowed corticosteroids, 3 out of 3 with an elemental diet, and 5 out of 12 with an avoidance diet). The offending food was identified in 8117 patients. Milk and eggs were the most common foods implicated.

CONCLUSIONS

The allergy study was a useful diagnostic tool but it was not sufficient to identify the offending food.An elemental diet should be attempted before food is excluded as the cause of the disease.