Effects of Exenatide and Humalog Mix25 on Fat Distribution, Insulin Sensitivity, and β-Cell Function in Normal BMI Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Visceral Adiposity

In China, most normal BMI (body mass index of ≥18.5 to <25 kg/m²) adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) exhibit visceral adiposity. This study compared the effects of exenatide and humalog Mix25 on normal BMI patients with T2DM and visceral adiposity. A total of 95 patients were randomized to receive either exenatide or humalog Mix25 treatment for 24 weeks. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were quantified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and liver fat content (LFC) by liver proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H MRS). Each patient's weight, waist circumference, BMI, blood glucose, insulin sensitivity, pancreatic β-cell function, and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) levels were measured. Data from 81 patients who completed the study (40 and 41 in the exenatide and humalog Mix25 groups, respectively) were analysed. The change in 2 h plasma blood glucose was greater in the exenatide group (P = 0.039). HOMA-IR and MBCI improved significantly after exenatide therapy (P < 0.01, P = 0.045). VAT and LFC decreased in both groups (P < 0.01 for all) but to a greater extent in the exenatide group, while SAT only decreased with exenatide therapy (P < 0.01). FGF-21 levels declined more in the exenatide group (P < 0.01), but were positively correlated with VAT in the entire cohort before (r = 0.244, P = 0.043) and after (r = 0.290, P = 0.016) the intervention. The effects of exenatide on glycaemic metabolism, insulin resistance, pancreatic β-cell function, and fat deposition support its administration to normal BMI patients with T2DM and visceral adiposity.

Comparison of analog insulin mix 50:50 with human insulin mix 30:70 in persons with type 2 diabetes during Ramadan

AIM OF THE STUDY

To test if changing the Iftar insulin to a 50:50 mixed analog insulin from a 30:70 human insulin at the same total dose leads to improvement in the postprandial blood glucose (taken as after the main meal). Since the intermediate acting insulin dose is effectively lowered, the pre-Suhur blood glucose is also tested to see if this rises.

METHODS

The Iftar human 30:70 mixed insulin is substituted for a 50:50 one using insulin lispro protamine suspension and 50% insulin lispro (Humalog^® Mix50/50™), whilst maintaining the same total dose. The participants were also changed to 75% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 25% insulin lispro (Humalog^® Mix75/25™) at the same pre-Ramadan dose for their Suhur injection (Experimental group). A similar number of controls continued their 30:70 mixed human insulin at the same dose during Ramadan (Control group). Pre-Ramadan and during Ramadan fasting and postprandial (3 hours) and pre-Suhur blood glucose (BG) are tested in 20 subjects and 20 controls by the patients using home glucose meters. Hypoglycaemia, defined as a BG of ≤ 70 mg%, was tested for by the patients and noted if they experience symptoms of it. Severe hypoglycaemia occurred if the patient needed assistance for recovery. No insulin dose adjustments are made in either group and any other anti-diabetic treatment was continued. Pre- and post-Ramadan HbA₁ c and body weight are measured. The number of days fasted and baseline characteristics are age, gender, and duration of diabetes are also noted. Differences between groups in parameters were assessed using ANCOVA to adjust for pre-Ramadan values of age, gender, and duration of diabetes.

RESULTS

All the participants fasted for at least 29 days. The 2 groups were not significantly different at baseline. During Ramadan, mean postprandial BG in the Experimental group was lower by 21.1 mg% (1.2 mmol/l) (95% CI 12.6, 29.7; P < 0.001). Similarly, after Ramadan mean HbA₁ c in the Experimental group was lower by 0.4% (95% CI 0.1%, 0.8%; P = 0.01). No significant differences between the groups were detected in mean bodyweight after Ramadan (P = 0.86) or mean fasting BG during Ramadan (P = 0.07). There was no difference in incidence of hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from human insulin mix 30:70 to analog insulin mix 50:50 results in better post main meal control in Ramadan, without affecting HbA1c, or increasing the incidence of hypoglycaemia.

Weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving once-weekly dulaglutide plus insulin lispro or insulin glargine plus insulin lispro: A post-hoc analysis of the AWARD-4 study across baseline body mass index subgroups

AIMS

Insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are challenged in achieving body weight stability or reduction, in addition to glycaemic control. Post-hoc analyses of body weight and insulin dose data from the AWARD-4 trial involved comparison of treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg (N = 295) or 0.75 mg (N = 293) and treatment with daily insulin glargine (N = 296), each with prandial insulin lispro (± metformin).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Changes in weight and in the proportion of patients without weight gain or with weight loss of at least 3%, 5% or 10% or composites of HbA1c less than 7% without weight gain and weight loss of at least 3% after 52 weeks were compared between the dulaglutide (either dose) groups and the insulin glargine group, overall and by baseline BMI (<30, 30-<35, ≥35 kg/m² ), using analysis of covariance and logistic regression, including interaction terms.

RESULTS

The following parameters were statistically significant (P < 0.01) in favour of the dulaglutide-treated groups, at lower mean total daily insulin doses, vs the insulin glargine group. The achieved targets were more pronounced with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than with insulin glargine: LSM weight change difference, -3.23 kg; proportion of patients without weight gain, 49.0% vs 19.0%; proportion of patients with weight loss ≥3%, 21.7% vs 5.7% or with weight loss ≥5%, 10.5% vs 2.4%; proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% without weight gain, 26.2% vs 7.9%; proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% and weight loss ≥3%, 11.9% vs 1.4%, respectively. Treatment effect for these parameters was not significantly different across BMI categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger proportions of patients in late-stage T2D needing treatment intensification achieved glycemic control without weight gain or with weight loss at lower insulin doses with once-weekly dulaglutide plus daily prandial insulin than with a basal-bolus insulin regimen, overall and across all three BMI subgroups.

Effects of Insulin Treatment with Glargine or Premixed Insulin Lispro Programs in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intensive insulin therapy (premixed insulin lispro vs. insulin glargine) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and www.clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of patients with T2DM treated with either premixed insulin lispro or insulin glargine for a duration of 24 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 13 RCTs and 5401 patients were included in this study. In parallel trials and crossover trials, premixed insulin lispro was found to be superior to insulin glargine at reducing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (parallel trials: weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.18%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.31 to -0.06; P = 0.004; crossover trials: WMD 0.37%; 95% CI -0.51 to -0.23; P < 0.00001). Premixed insulin lispro resulted in more weight gain than insulin glargine (parallel trials: WMD +0.64 kg; 95% CI +0.14 to +1.15; P = 0.01; crossover trials: WMD +0.74 kg; 95% CI +0.19 to +1.29; P = 0.009), and premixed insulin lispro was associated with a higher risk of hypoglycemia than insulin glargine (parallel trials: odds ratio [OR] 1.20; 95% CI 1.06-1.36; P = 0.005; crossover trials: OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.45-3.46; P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Premixed insulin lispro provides a larger reduction in HbA1c and is associated with a significantly higher risk of hypoglycemia and greater weight gain in patients with T2DM. These findings may be helpful in selecting therapy for individual subjects.

Optimal prandial timing of bolus insulin in diabetes management: a review

The inability to achieve optimal diabetes glucose control in people with diabetes is multifactorial, but one contributor may be inadequate control of postprandial glucose. In patients treated with multiple daily injections of insulin, both the dose and timing of meal-related rapid-acting insulin are key factors in this. There are conflicting opinions and evidence on the optimal time to administer mealtime insulin. We performed a comprehensive literature search to review the published data, focusing on the use of rapid-acting insulin analogues in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of rapid-acting insulin analogues, together with postprandial glucose excursion data, suggest that administering these 15-20 min before food would provide optimal postprandial glucose control. Data from clinical studies involving people with Type 1 diabetes receiving structured meals and rapid-acting insulin analogues support this, showing a reduction in post-meal glucose levels of ~30% and less hypoglycaemia when meal insulin was taken 15-20 min before a meal compared with immediately before the meal. Importantly, there was also a greater risk of postprandial hypoglycaemia when patients took rapid-acting analogues after eating compared with before eating.

Baseline factors associated with better response to insulin lispro low mixture or insulin glargine: A post hoc analysis of the DURABLE study

AIMS

To identify baseline characteristics associated with better efficacy and safety responses to twice-daily insulin lispro low mixture (LM) or once-daily insulin glargine (IG) in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of the DURABLE study used the gradient-boosting method to generate hypothetical outcomes with the alternative treatment to assigned study drug to evaluate the potential additional benefit of one insulin over the other in association with influential baseline covariates in the same patient. The magnitude of additional benefit was further quantified by the generalized linear model and recursive partitioning regression tree method.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics with the highest relative influence on 24-week outcomes in the overall population (LM, n = 1045; IG, n = 1046) were: for HbA1c change: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (29.31%), age (28.57%); for reaching target HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol): weight (22.41%); for weight change: weight (18.54%); for FPG: FPG (43.66%), age (20.8%); for 30-day hypoglycemia: FPG (57.09%), weight (10.1%). LM showed superiority over IG for HbA1c reduction and reaching HbA1c <7% overall, with clinically significant differences in HbA1c reduction (>0.4%) in some subpopulations. IG was superior over LM in most patients for less weight gain and hypoglycemia and lower FPG.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in magnitude of response to twice-daily LM and once-daily IG in association with baseline characteristics of insulin-naïve patients with T2D were found. Future real-world studies using these statistical methods could help identify patients who respond better to certain insulin regimens to help guide clinicians in treatment decisions.

Lipid changes during basal insulin peglispro, insulin glargine, or NPH treatment in six IMAGINE trials

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel basal insulin with hepato-preferential action resulting from reduced peripheral effects. This report provides an integrated summary of lipid changes at 26 weeks with BIL and comparator insulins (glargine, NPH) from phase III studies in type 1 diabetes (T1D), insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), patients with T2D on basal insulin only and patients with T2D on basal-bolus therapy. BIL treatment had little effect on HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in all patients. The effect of both BIL and glargine treatment on triglycerides (TG) depended on whether patients had been previously treated with insulin. When BIL replaced conventional insulin glargine or NPH treatments, increases in TG levels were observed. When BIL or comparator insulins were given for 26 weeks to insulin-naïve patients with T2D, TG levels were unchanged from baseline with BIL but decreased with either glargine or NPH. The decreased peripheral action of BIL may reduce suppression of lipolysis in peripheral adipose tissue resulting in increased free fatty acid delivery to the liver and, hence, increased hepatic TG synthesis and secretion.

Basal insulin peglispro: Overview of a novel long-acting insulin with reduced peripheral effect resulting in a hepato-preferential action

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel basal insulin with a flat, prolonged activity profile. BIL has been demonstrated in a dog model, in healthy men and in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to have significant hepato-preferential action resulting from reduced peripheral activity. In the IMAGINE-Phase 3 clinical trial program, more than 6000 patients were included, of whom ~3900 received BIL. Of the 7 pivotal IMAGINE trials, 3 studies were double-blinded and 3 were in T1D patients. BIL consistently demonstrated a greater HbA1c reduction, less glycaemic variability and a clinically relevant reduction in the rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia across comparator [glargine and isophane insulin (NPH)] studies. Trials using basal/bolus regimens had higher rates of total hypoglycaemia with BIL due to higher rates of daytime hypoglycaemia. Severe hypoglycaemia rates were similar to comparator among both patients with T1D or type 2 diabetes (T2D). T1D patients lost weight compared with glargine (GL). Patients with T2D tended to gain less weight with BIL than with glargine. Compared to glargine, BIL was associated with higher liver fat, triglycerides and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, including a higher frequency of elevation of ALT ≥3 times the upper limit of normal, but without severe, acute drug-induced liver injury. Injection site reactions, primarily lipohypertrophy, were more frequent with BIL. In conclusion, BIL demonstrated better glycaemic control with reduced glucose variability and nocturnal hypoglycaemia but higher triglycerides, ALT and liver fat relative to conventional comparator insulin. The hepato-preferential action of BIL with reduced peripheral activity may account for these findings.

Reduced peripheral activity leading to hepato-preferential action of basal insulin peglispro compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL), a novel PEGylated basal insulin with a large hydrodynamic size, has a delayed absorption and reduced clearance that prolongs the duration of action. The current study compared the effects of BIL and insulin glargine (GL) on endogenous glucose production (EGP), glucose disposal rate (GDR) and lipolysis in patients with type 1 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a randomized, open-label, four-period, crossover study. Patients received intravenous infusions of BIL and GL, each at two dose levels selected for partial and maximal suppression of EGP, during an 8 to 10 h euglycemic clamp procedure with d-[3-³ H] glucose.

RESULTS

Following correction for equivalent human insulin concentrations (EHIC), low-dose GL infusion resulted in similar EGP at the end of the clamp compared to low-dose BIL infusion (GL/BIL ratio of 1.03) but a higher GDR (GL/BIL ratio of 2.42), indicating similar hepatic activity but attenuated peripheral activity of BIL. Consistent with this, the EHIC-corrected GDR/EGP at the end of the clamp was 1.72-fold greater for GL than BIL following low-dose administration. At the lower dose of BIL and GL (concentrations in the therapeutic range), BIL produced less suppression of lipolysis compared with GL as indicated by free fatty acid and glycerol levels at the end of the clamp.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with GL, BIL restored the hepato-peripheral insulin action gradient seen in normal physiology via its peripherally restricted action on target tissues related to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.

Lispro insulin in people with non-alcoholic liver cirrhosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To compare metabolic control under lispro and recombinant regular human insulin (RHI) in people with diet-unresponsive type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and compensated non-alcoholic liver disease (CLD).

METHODS

108 people with T2DM and CLD were randomly allocated to RHI or lispro according to a 12+12 week cross-over protocol. A 1-week continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) session was performed at the end of each treatment period followed by a standard meal test with a 12IU lispro or RHI shot ahead.

RESULTS

CGM showed higher glycemic excursions under RHI than under lispro (p<0.01) with lower glucose levels in the late post-absorption phase (p<0.05) and even more during the night (p<0.01). Post-challenge incremental areas under the curve (ΔAUC) were undistinguishable for insulin but lower for glucose, while insulin peaked higher and earlier and glycemic excursions were lower with lispro than with RHI (0.05<p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lispro granted lower early postprandial glucose levels and late postprandial hypoglycemic rates and therefore might represent the treatment of choice for people with T2DM and compensated CLD. This might depend on its faster/shorter-living effects, as well as, on the lower liver glucose output expected from its earlier hepatic distribution.

Insulin analogues display atypical differentiative activities in skin keratinocytes

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown that both insulin and IGF1 lead to increased proliferation of keratinocytes. However, whereas insulin supports keratinocytes differentiation, IGF1 inhibits this process. The aim of the present study was to examine the proliferative and differentiative effects of insulin analogues (glargine, detemir, lispro and aspart) in primary keratinocytes in comparison with insulin and IGF1.

METHODS

Primary keratinocytes cultures were produced from newborn BALB/c mice skin. Proliferation rates were assessed by [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation and XTT assays and differentiation was evaluated by Western blots analysis. Insulin receptor and IGF1 receptor phosphorylation was assessed by immunoprecipitation assays.

RESULTS

Treatment with glargine or detemir resulted in an insulin-like effect on the differentiation process whereas lispro and aspart treatment led to an IGF1-like effect. In addition, treatment of keratinocytes with aspart led to a rapid phosphorylation of the IGF1 receptor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides evidence that insulin analogues elicit atypical actions in the skin.

PEGylated insulin Lispro, (LY2605541)--a new basal insulin analogue

There is a clinical rationale for a basal insulin with a predictable action and low inter- and intra-individual variability coupled with an improved side effect and metabolic profile. Since insulin therapy is anabolic and its initiation is commonly associated with weight gain, an insulin preparation associated with a beneficial weight profile would represent a particularly valuable therapeutic entity. LY2605541, or PEGylated insulin Lispro, has a large hydrodynamic size while still exerting the metabolic effects of insulin. This may reduce absorption and clearance of the compound following subcutaneous administration. A number of preclinical and clinical studies have been constructed to evaluate the utility of this novel insulin. The currently available data from preclinical, phase I and phase II studies suggests LY2605541 has a non-inferior glucose-lowering efficacy compared to insulin glargine in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and may afford a weight-loss advantage. Pre-clinical studies indicate that LY2605541 has low mitogenic potency, exerting a preferential hepatic effect on glucose homeostasis. LY2605541 appears to cause elevated transaminases and derangement of lipid profiles. On the basis of these initial observations, LY2605541 requires further extensive clinical evaluation to fully assess its risk/benefit profile in the management in people with diabetes.

Novel PEGylated basal insulin LY2605541 has a preferential hepatic effect on glucose metabolism

The impact of the novel basal insulin LY2605541 (LY) on hepatic and nonhepatic glucose uptake (non-HGU) was evaluated. Conscious dogs underwent euglycemic clamps with tracer and hepatic balance measurements. Clamp period infusions were peripheral venous regular insulin (0.1 nmol ⋅ kg(-1) ⋅ h(-1) [control], n = 6) or LY (bolus [nmol/kg], continuous [nmol ⋅ kg(-1) ⋅ h(-1)]: 0.5, 0.5 [n = 6]; 0.375, 0.375 [n = 5]; 0.25, 0.25 [n = 4]), somatostatin, and glucose, as well as intraportal glucagon (basal). During the clamp, the dogs switched from net hepatic glucose output to uptake (rates reached 2.1 ± 1.2, 0.9 ± 2.1, 8.6 ± 2.3, and 6.0 ± 1.1 µmol ⋅ kg(-1) ⋅ min(-1) within 5 h in control, LY0.25, LY0.375, and LY0.5, respectively). Non-HGU in LY increased less than in control; the ratio of change from basal in non-HGU to change in net hepatic glucose balance, calculated when glucose infusion rates (GIRs) were ~20 µmol ⋅ kg(-1) ⋅ min(-1) in all groups, was higher in control (1.17 ± 0.38) versus LY0.25 (0.39 ± 0.33), LY0.375 (-0.01 ± 0.13), and LY0.5 (-0.09 ± 0.07). Likewise, the change from baseline in glucose Rd-to-Ra ratio was greatest in control (1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.4, 0.5 ± 0.2, and 0.6 ± 0.2 in LY0.25, LY0.375, and LY0.5, respectively). In contrast to exogenously administered human insulin, LY demonstrated preferential hepatic effects, similar to endogenously secreted insulin. Therefore, the analog might reduce complications associated with current insulin therapy.

Enhanced insulin action following subcutaneous co-administration of insulin and C-peptide in rats

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to examine if C-peptide (C) may interact with hexameric insulin and facilitate its disaggregation into the physiologically active monomeric form.

METHODS

Regular insulin (I) or an insulin analogue (IA) were injected s.c. in rats together with C or its C-terminal pentapeptide (PP). I or IA and C or PP were administered either as a physical mixture or into two separate s.c. depots. Whole body glucose utilization was evaluated using the euglycemic clamp technique. Phosphorylation of Akt/PKB and GSK in liver and skeletal muscles and ⁸⁶Rb⁺ uptake by L6 cells were measured.

RESULTS

S.c. injection of a mixture of I and C or I and PP resulted in a 30-55% greater (P < 0.01-0.001) and 15-27% (P < 0.05-0.001) longer stimulation of whole body glucose utilization than after separate injections. Insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of Akt/PKB in liver increased 35% more after injection of I and C in mixture compared with after separate injections. Phosphorylation of GSK3 was augmented by 50% (P < 0.05) following the injection of I and C in mixture compared with separate injections. Stimulation of myotubes with premixed I and C (1 nM) elicited 20% additional increase in ouabain-sensitive ⁸⁶Rb⁺ uptake (P < 0.05) in comparison with the effect when I and C were added separately.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous co-administration of insulin and C results in augmented insulin bioactivity at the level of tissue glucose uptake, intracellular signalling, and enzyme activation. These effects may be attributed to augmented C mediated disaggregation of hexameric insulin into its physiologically active monomeric form.

Integrating advances in insulin into clinical practice: Advances In insulin formulations

The central role of insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) remains, nearly a century after its first use in humans. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the role of insulin has evolved as other therapies have been introduced, with insulin now used across the spectrum of the disease. This article discusses the use of insulin in patients with T1DM or T2DM, including combined use with other agents in T2DM, with an emphasis on incretin-based therapies. In addition, new insulin products and concentrations are discussed along with their varied routes of administration.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues and their clinical consequences

Postprandial glucose excursions can inhibit achievement of good glycaemic control, and possibly have a specific effect on the risk of vascular comorbidities. Rapid-acting analogues control these excursions better than human insulin because their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile is closer to that of meal-time endogenous insulin secretion. Review of the findings of PK/PD studies and clinical trials suggests that the three marketed rapid-acting analogues--insulin lispro, insulin aspart and insulin glulisine--are equally efficacious and safe. In comparison with human insulin when using the same basal insulin, they provide comparable glycaemic control with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, although the combination of rapid-acting and basal analogues reduces glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) more than human meal-time insulin combined with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Some studies have suggested that insulin glulisine has a slightly faster onset of action compared with insulin lispro or insulin aspart, but this has not been translated into demonstrable clinical benefit. Treatment satisfaction in patients with diabetes has been higher when therapy with a rapid-acting analogue is used instead of human insulin, perhaps due to differences in advised timing of injection. The largest benefits in efficacy, hypoglycaemia incidence, treatment satisfaction and quality of life have occurred when patients receive an all-analogue meal-time plus basal regimen as compared with an all-human insulin regimen. No new safety issues have been identified with the marketed rapid-acting analogues, and their insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor affinity and mitogenic activity are comparable to human insulin.

Evaluation of insulin lispro and biosynthetic human insulin in pulmonary absorption: in vivo and in vitro studies

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pulmonary absorption characteristics of two insulin solutions-humalog (insulin lispro) and Novolin R (Biosynthetic Human insulin) with in vivo and in vitro methods.

METHODS

Investigate the pharmacodynamics in Sprague Dawley (SD) rat model (in vivo studies) and permeability across Rana catesbeiana pulmonary membrane (in vitro studies) of Biosynthetic Human insulin (BHI) and insulin lispro (LI) at different doses.

RESULTS

Both of the insulins could reduce blood glucose levels promptly after pulmonary administration. But LI showed a better tendency on hypoglycemic effect than BHI in the in vivo studies. In the in vitro studies, the apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) for BHI and LI were almost constant with increasing concentrations, which implied that insulin maybe passively diffuse through the Rana catesbeiana pulmonary membrane barrier. Interestingly, the Papp of LI was obviously higher than that of BHI, indicating that the permeability of LI across Rana catesbeiana pulmonary membrane was more effective than that of BHI.

CONCLUSION

These in vitro and in vivo results suggested that LI was easier to be absorbed in the lung than BHI and Rana catesbeiana pulmonary membrane had a potential ability, as a transport model, to predict in vivo pulmonary absorption of insulin.

Differential effects of α-glucosidase inhibitors on postprandial plasma glucose and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes under control with insulin lispro mix 50/50

BACKGROUND

The additive effect of α-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GIs) was investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) under control with rapid-acting insulin analog.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six poorly controlled T2D patients were recruited, and plasma glucose (PG) was controlled by three times daily injection of insulin lispro mix 50/50 (Mix50) to maintain fasting PG <130 mg/dL and 2-h postprandial PG (PPG) <180 mg/dL. Another group of 20 patients was randomly assigned to either 0.3 mg of voglibose or 50 mg of miglitol, which was administered at breakfast every other day. Another group of 16 patients was assigned to a crossover study, in which each α-GI was switched every day during the 6-day study. PPG, C-peptide, and lipid profile were analyzed.

RESULTS

The addition of voglibose had no effect on PPG, but miglitol blunted the PPG rise and significantly decreased 1-h and 2-h postprandial C-peptide levels compared with Mix50 alone. In addition, miglitol significantly decreased the 1-h postprandial triglyceride rise and the remnant-like particle-cholesterol rise, while it increased the 1-h postprandial high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels in the crossover study.

CONCLUSIONS

Miglitol appears to have rapid action, which appears earlier than that of lispro. The combination of miglitol and Mix50 seems effective for the control of PPG and lipid profile in T2D.

U-100, pH-Neutral formulation of VIAject(®) : faster onset of action than insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

VIAject® is a formulation of human insulin with a very fast onset of action. Previous studies used VIAject in a concentration of 25 U/ml and a pH of 4 [VIAject 25 (VJ25)]. Objective of this double blind, three-way crossover study was to compare the pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties of a novel formulation of VIAject with a concentration of 100 U/ml and a neutral pH [VIAject 7 (VJ7)] with VJ25 and insulin lispro (LIS).

METHODS

Forty-three patients with type 1 diabetes [aged 43 (21-65) years, BMI 24.1 (20-28) kg/m(2) and HbA1c 7.5 (5.7-9.5) %] participated in this study. They received subcutaneous injections of 12 U of each insulin formulation under euglycaemic glucose clamp conditions.

RESULTS

VJ7 was bioequivalent to VJ25 [90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratios for total insulin AUCs and maximum insulin concentration (C(INS max) ) was within 0.80-1.25]. VJ7 showed a faster absorption compared to LIS [time to C(INS max) 23 vs. 60 min; difference (CI) -30 (-35 to -23)] and faster onset of action [time to early half-maximal glucose infusion rate (GIR) 25 vs. 44 min; -18 (-26 to -10)], and a higher AUC of glucose infusion rate (AUC(GIR) ) in the first 60 min after injection [176 vs. 107 mg/kg; ratio 1.65 (1.27 to 2.14)], contributing to a slightly higher value for AUC(GIR 0-480) [1263 vs. 1095 mg/kg; 1.15 (1.06 to 1.26)]. Maximum GIR was similar between VJ7 and LIS [6.1 vs.6.6 mg/kg/min; ratio 0.93 (0.86 to 1.01)], whereas the duration of action (t(GIR50%-late) ) was longer with VJ7 [274 vs. 228 min; 50 (25 to 73)].

CONCLUSIONS

This formulation of VIAject is bioequivalent to the previously used formulation and has a faster absorption/onset of action than LIS.