Clinical Trial Simulations and Pharmacometric Analysis in Pediatrics: Application to Inhaled Loxapine in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Loxapine for inhalation is a drug-device combination product approved in adults for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder. The primary objective of this study was to develop a clinical trial protocol to support a phase I pharmacokinetic study in children aged 10 years and older. In addition, this report details the results of the clinical study in relation to the predicted likelihood of achieving the target exposure associated with therapeutic effect in adults.

METHODS

A nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model was developed using adult data and was adjusted for the targeted pediatric age groups by applying allometric scaling to account for body size effects. Based on this pediatric model, age-appropriate regimens to achieve loxapine exposures similar to the ones associated with therapeutic effect in the adult studies were identified via trial simulation. D-optimal design and power analysis were conducted to identify optimal pharmacokinetic sampling times and sample size, respectively.

RESULTS

The developed clinical trial design formed the basis of a phase I study to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of loxapine for inhalation in children aged 10 years and older (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02184767).

CONCLUSION

The results of the study indicated that overall loxapine exposures were consistent with what had been predicted by the trial simulations. The presented approach illustrates how modeling and simulation can assist in the design of informative clinical trials to identify safe and effective doses and dose ranges in children and adolescents.

Inhaled loxapine for the urgent treatment of acute agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Acute agitation is a serious complication of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, which may escalate quickly to aggressive behavior. Rapid treatment is therefore important to calm and stabilize the patient, reducing the potential for harm to the patient and others, and allowing further assessment. Current guidelines suggest that where pharmacologic intervention is indicated, medication should preferably be non-invasive, should have a rapid onset and should control aggressive behavior in the short term without compromising the physician-patient relationship in the long term.

OBJECTIVES

This article presents an overview of a new inhaled formulation of the established antipsychotic loxapine, which aims to provide a more rapidly acting agent for the treatment of acute agitation without the disadvantages of intramuscular or intravenous injection.

DISCUSSION

Inhaled loxapine is rapidly absorbed with intravenous-like pharmacokinetics, with a time to maximum plasma concentration of 2 minutes and a plasma half-life of approximately 6 hours. In phase III studies, loxapine reduced agitation within 10 minutes of inhalation; agitation was decreased at all subsequent assessments during a 24-hour evaluation period. Inhaled loxapine was generally well tolerated with no undue sedation. The most common adverse events were dysgeusia, mild sedation, and dizziness. Inhaled loxapine is contraindicated in patients with asthma, COPD or other pulmonary disease associated with bronchospasm.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled loxapine rapidly reduces acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and is generally well tolerated. The non-invasive route of delivery respects the patient's autonomy, reducing the perception of coercion or forced medication. Inhaled loxapine is therefore an effective and appropriate option for use in the emergency setting in patients with acute agitation.

Loxapine intoxication: case report and literature review

Loxapine is a dibenzoxazepine tricyclic compound used to treat schizophrenia in the United States since 1976. Metabolism includes demethylation to its primary metabolite, amoxapine. There are few documented reports of the disposition of loxapine in deaths due to overdose. This report discusses the overdose suicide of a 69-year-old white female found dead in her home by her husband. A prescription for loxapine (50-mg capsules) was found near the body. An autopsy was performed and heart blood, bile, vitreous humor, and gastric contents were submitted for toxicological analysis. The blood specimen was subjected to comprehensive testing that included volatile analysis by headspace gas chromatography (GC); acidic/neutral and basic drug screening by GC; benzodiazepine screening by high-performance liquid chromatography; opiate screening by modified immunoassay; and acetaminophen, salicylate, and ethchlorvynol screening by colorimetry. Loxapine and amoxapine were detected in the basic drug screen. No other drugs were detected in the case specimens. The respective concentrations of loxapine and amoxapine in each specimen were as follows: heart blood, 9.5 and 0.6 mg/L; bile, 28.8 and 4.7 mg/L; gastric, 278 mg/L and negative; and vitreous, 1.5 mg/L and negative. A review of the literature showed that the heart blood concentration of loxapine measured in this case was the highest reported to date. Based on the autopsy findings, patient history, and toxicology results, the cause of death was determined to be acute intoxication of loxapine and the manner, suicide.

A novel prodrug approach for tertiary amines. 3. In vivo evaluation of two N-phosphonooxymethyl prodrugs in rats and dogs

N-phosphonooxymethyl derivatives of tertiary amine containing drugs have been identified as a novel prodrug approach for improving aqueous solubility. The in vivo reversion of two prodrugs to the corresponding parent compounds following iv and im administration to rats and dogs was investigated. Equimolar doses of parent drugs (loxapine or cinnarizine) and the corresponding prodrugs were each administered via a rapid iv infusion to rats and dogs. Equimolar doses of loxapine and its prodrug were each administered im to rats only. Blood samples were collected over 12 h, and plasma was assayed for both parent drug and intact prodrug by HPLC. Comparison of the plasma AUC for the parent drugs following administration of the parent drugs and prodrugs allowed estimation of the apparent bioavailability of parent drug from prodrug dosing. Plasma levels of the prodrugs fell below the limit of detection 5 min after iv infusion with an approximate half-life of 1 min. The mean AUCs following iv and im dosing of parent drugs were not statistically different from the parent drug AUCs obtained after prodrug dosing. The results are consistent with rapid and quantitative prodrug to parent drug reversion following administration of the phosphonooxymethyl prodrugs to the rats and dogs. This information, together with previous studies on the synthesis and physicochemical evaluation of the prodrugs, suggests that this novel prodrug strategy is a very promising approach for overcoming solubility limitations seen with many tertiary amine containing drugs at physiological pH values.

Pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic considerations in choosing an antipsychotic

Recent advances in our understanding of schizophrenia along with neuroscience insights into antipsychotic medication mechanisms of action have led to a renaissance in new drug development, including an expanded therapeutic spectrum encompassing more of the symptoms encountered in schizophrenia. Atypical antipsychotics, or new generation therapies, also demonstrate greater selectivity for therapeutic actions than for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Our modern armamentarium of drugs spans a wide range of pharmacologies, and it is more accurate to envision shades of gray rather than a black-and-white description for typical versus atypical properties of medications. As our paradigms for antipsychotic efficacy have shifted, a reexploration of the "older" neuroleptics is warranted to determine if they possess pharmacologic attributes that might have been overlooked during the era of high-dose neuroleptic therapy. Loxapine appears to be in the center of this spectrum, somewhere between haloperidol and risperidone. Dosing implications for drugs with a more even serotonin-2A (5-HT2A) receptor and dopamine-2 (D2) receptor blocking effect are discussed. Loxapine might have a window of partial atypicality at doses < or = 50 mg/day. These lower doses might have potential as both monotherapy in responsive patients with persistent psychotic disorders and as an adjunctive treatment in partially responding patients on concurrent atypical antipsychotic treatments. The pharmacologic properties of loxapine within its usable dosage range are quite complex and are the net sum of the parent's plus metabolites' contributions (demethylation and hydroxylation by cytochrome P450 enzymes). These pharmacologic effects include alpha-adrenergic blockade, inhibition of the noradrenergic transporter protein (reuptake inhibition), and antimuscarinic effects. Drug interactions and cigarette smoking might alter the parent-to-metabolite concentration ratios, affecting the relative atypicality of this antipsychotic therapy. Moreover, with the intramuscular formulation, which does not undergo first-pass metabolism, the parent compound of loxapine, i.e., not its metabolites, is predominantly detected in the plasma of patients, reducing the likelihood for EPS during emergency interventions in patients with positive symptoms. Further study is warranted to determine loxapine's place in our treatment of schizophrenia.

PET evidence that loxapine is an equipotent blocker of 5-HT2 and D2 receptors: implications for the therapeutics of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Loxapine, a dibenzoxazepine antipsychotic, is closely related to clozapine and shares clozapine's high affinity for binding to serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D4 receptors. The purpose of this study was to document loxapine's 5-HT2 and D2 receptor occupancy in vivo in patients with psychoses.

METHOD

Ten patients who were taking loxapine (10-100 mg/day) had their D2 and 5-HT2 receptors assessed by means of positron emission tomography with [11C]raclopride and [18F]setoperone, respectively.

RESULTS

The D2 receptor occupancy ranged from 43% to 90%; 5-HT2 occupancy varied from 27% to near saturation. Statistical comparison of the results showed that loxapine was equipotent in blocking 5-HT2 and D2 receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Loxapine differs from typical neuroleptics in demonstrating a high degree of 5-HT2 receptor occupancy. However, it is not "atypical" like clozapine and risperidone, since its 5-HT2 occupancy is not higher than its D2 occupancy. The results demonstrate that a high level of 5-HT2 occupancy is not a sufficient condition for atypicality. If atypical antipsychotic action is predicated on a combination of 5-HT2 and D2 effects, then it requires > 80% 5-HT2 occupancy in conjunction with < 80% D2 occupancy.

The role of metabolites in a bioequivalence study 1: loxapine, 7-hydroxyloxapine and 8-hydroxyloxapine

Loxapine is a drug which is used in the treatment of psychotic disorders. The drug is extensively biotransformed in humans to produce a variety of metabolites, some of which have pharmacological activity. Seven-hydroxyloxapine is 4-5 times more active than the parent drug, although its concentrations in plasma are relatively low. Eight-hydroxyloxapine, on the other hand, is inactive, but is present in higher concentrations in plasma than the parent drug. In the present randomized crossover study to evaluate the bioequivalence of two dosage forms containing loxapine, the parent drug and its 7-hydroxy and 8-hydroxy metabolites were monitored for up to 96 hours after the administration of the test or reference formulations. Estimates of average bioavailability (AUC- infinity, AUC0t and Cmax) were obtained by the difference of the least squares means of log test and log reference. A 90% confidence interval for the log difference was derived from the within-subject error. The test of bioequivalence requires the 90% confidence band so calculated to fall entirely within an imposed regulatory interval of 80-125%. The results showed the two formulations to be bioequivalent in terms of the log mean differences and 90% confidence bands calculated for all three analytes. In fact, the within-subject variabilities of the metabolites were relatively low, so that the 90% confidence intervals for ln AUC0 infinity, ln AUC0t and ln Cmax calculated for the metabolites, were narrower that those for the parent drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)