Reduced incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer with flexible-sigmoidoscopy screening: A meta-analysis

AIM: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published population-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS: RCTs evaluating the difference in mortality and incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) between a screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) group and control group (not assigned to screening FS) with a minimum 5 years median follow-up were identified by a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials through August 2013. Random effects model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS: Four RCTs with a total of 165659 patients in the FS group and 249707 patients in the control group were included in meta-analysis. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that there was a 22% risk reduction in total incidence of CRC (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.74-0.83), 31% in distal CRC incidence (RR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.63-0.75), and 9% in proximal CRC incidence (RR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.83-0.99). Those who underwent screening FS were 18% less likely to be diagnosed with advanced CRC (OR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.71-0.94). There was a 28% risk reduction in overall CRC mortality (RR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.65-0.80) and 43% in distal CRC mortality (RR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.45-0.72).

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that screening FS can reduce the incidence of proximal and distal CRC and mortality from distal CRC along with reduction in diagnosis of advanced CRC.

Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

BACKGROUND

The benefits of endoscopic testing for colorectal-cancer screening are uncertain. We evaluated the effect of screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy on colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality.

METHODS

From 1993 through 2001, we randomly assigned 154,900 men and women 55 to 74 years of age either to screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy, with a repeat screening at 3 or 5 years, or to usual care. Cases of colorectal cancer and deaths from the disease were ascertained.

RESULTS

Of the 77,445 participants randomly assigned to screening (intervention group), 83.5% underwent baseline flexible sigmoidoscopy and 54.0% were screened at 3 or 5 years. The incidence of colorectal cancer after a median follow-up of 11.9 years was 11.9 cases per 10,000 person-years in the intervention group (1012 cases), as compared with 15.2 cases per 10,000 person-years in the usual-care group (1287 cases), which represents a 21% reduction (relative risk, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.85; P<0.001). Significant reductions were observed in the incidence of both distal colorectal cancer (479 cases in the intervention group vs. 669 cases in the usual-care group; relative risk, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.80; P<0.001) and proximal colorectal cancer (512 cases vs. 595 cases; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.97; P=0.01). There were 2.9 deaths from colorectal cancer per 10,000 person-years in the intervention group (252 deaths), as compared with 3.9 per 10,000 person-years in the usual-care group (341 deaths), which represents a 26% reduction (relative risk, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.87; P<0.001). Mortality from distal colorectal cancer was reduced by 50% (87 deaths in the intervention group vs. 175 in the usual-care group; relative risk, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64; P<0.001); mortality from proximal colorectal cancer was unaffected (143 and 147 deaths, respectively; relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.22; P=0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy was associated with a significant decrease in colorectal-cancer incidence (in both the distal and proximal colon) and mortality (distal colon only). (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; PLCO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00002540.).

Ergonomics with the use of curved versus straight laparoscopic graspers during rectosigmoid resection: results of a multiprofile comparative study

BACKGROUND

A detailed ergonomic comparison of motions and muscular activity in the left upper extremity using a laparoscopic straight or curved grasper in rectosigmoid resection is presented.

METHODS

The study had two parts: experimental and clinical. In the experiment part, 30 laparoscopic sigmoid resections were performed under animal organ phantom conditions. The operations were divided into three groups according to instrument and trocar position. Group 1 (n = 10) underwent operations performed with a curved grasper in the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the left-hand curved grasper placed in the right flank and the right hand instrument in the right lower quadrant. In group 2 (n = 10), straight forceps were used in the excentral trocar position. Group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparoscopic sigmoid resection performed with a straight grasper in the central position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the instruments placed at both sides of the lower abdomen. To measure ergonomic aspects during rectosigmoid resection, several overview video cameras, surface electromyography (EMG), an ultrasound tracking system (UTS), and a questionnaire were used. In the clinical part of the study, laparoscopic rectosigmoid resections (n = 5) were performed using a curved instrument in the excentral trocar position. The surgeon's left-hand movement and body posture were recorded for further analysis.

RESULTS

The curved grasper required the fewest contractions (group 1) of the measured muscles. A comparison of the UTS analysis in the experimental part of the study and the video analysis in the clinical part showed economy of movements in group 1. According to subjective estimation, both physical activity and mental stress remain at the lowest level when the excentral trocar position is used (groups 1 and 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the curved grasper and the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar) is, according to our examinations, the best ergonomic adjustment for laparoscopic rectosigmoid surgery.

The use of a dedicated rectosigmoidoscope for ultrasound staging of tumours of the upper and middle third of the rectum

OBJECTIVE

Tumours of the upper rectum, and many in the middle third, are not accessible to endorectal ultrasound staging because of the difficulty in reaching all sites of the rectum with a rigid probe. The aim of this prospective study was to assess whether using a dedicated rectosigmoidoscope, endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) can accurately stage any rectal lesion irrespective of its distance from the anal verge.

METHOD

A total of 173 consecutive patients with a primary rectal tumour were included. A rotating, high multifrequency (5.0-10 MHz) endoprobe was introduced through a dedicated rectosigmoidoscope and advanced above the lesion. A computer allowed for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of 2D images. Treatment was selected on the basis of 3D-ERUS findings. ERUS staging was correlated with pathological staging.

RESULTS

The depth of invasion was correctly determined by 3D-ERUS in 78.2% of tumours of the lower rectum, 76.4% of tumours extending between the lower and middle third of the rectum, 80.9% of tumours of the middle third of the rectum, 78.5% of tumours extending between the middle and upper third of the rectum and 78.9% of tumours of the upper rectum. The accuracy for the absence of lymph node metastases was 81.2% for tumours of the lower rectum, 78.5% for tumours extending between the lower and middle third of the rectum, 85.7% for tumours of the middle third of the rectum, 83.3% for tumours extending between the middle and upper third of the rectum and 78.5% for tumours of the upper rectum. Analysis showed that there was no difference between the various tumour sites.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that using a dedicated proctosigmoidoscope, tumours of the upper and middle third of the rectum are equally accessible to ultrasonographic evaluation. The distance of the tumour from the anal verge does not influence the accuracy of examinations considered adequate by the operator.

Endoscopic placement of flatus tube using "lasso" technique with snare wire

A 55-year old man presented with acute sigmoid volvulus. The distal level of obstruction was above the level which could be reached by the rigid sigmoidoscope to allow decompression, and so a flatus tube was "lassoed" onto the side of a flexible endoscope which allowed accurate placement under direct vision. This technique allows accurate placement of catheters, feeding tubes and other devices endoscopically, which cannot be placed through the instrument channel of the endoscope.

Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in colorectal cancer prevention

OBJECTIVES

To study an individual's experience of either flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) or colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer prevention programme.

METHODS

Consecutive individuals in a Bowel Cancer Prevention Programme, who had either an unsedated FS or a colonoscopy with sedation, participated in a prospective cross-sectional questionnaire-based study.

RESULTS

A total of 447 responses were obtained for 256 colonoscopies and 191 FSs (200 men [45%] and 247 women [55%]). The overall experience of colonoscopy was more comfortable than FS (75% versus 18%; P<0.001). Embarrassment was low for both procedures (8%). There was no pain associated with colonoscopy and most individuals had a pain score of less than 3 (11-point scale) for FS: 72% of men, 55% of women (P<0.001). Most individuals did not have a gender preference for the endoscopist. For colonoscopy, the worst part of the procedure was the preparation (78%) and for FS the preparation and the procedure ranked equally worst (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that colonoscopy with sedation is a very comfortable procedure. FS is more uncomfortable than colonoscopy; however, for the majority it is a tolerable experience. Women found FS only slightly more painful than men. The worst part of either procedure was the preparation. Embarrassment with either procedure was minimal. Both procedures are well tolerated and suitable for colorectal cancer screening.

Selecting patients for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Determinants of incomplete depth of insertion

BACKGROUND

Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is an effective method to prevent and reduce mortality from colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Incomplete depth of insertion (IDI) during FS may result in missed polyps and carcinomas. To determine whether it is possible to predict IDI, the authors analyzed factors that affected the depth of insertion in FS.

METHODS

For the current study, FS results were recorded prospectively over a 5-year period. A questionnaire was administered to the patient by the investigator prior to FS to collect data, including age, gender, weight, comorbid illnesses, history of prior abdominal and pelvic surgeries, family history of colon carcinoma or polyps, and prior FS or colonoscopies. The depth of insertion of the flexible sigmoidoscope from the anal verge, which was defined as the reading on the outside of the instrument at its maximal insertion, was measured in centimeters. IDI was defined as a depth of insertion < 50 cm. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to develop a model that included variables predictive of IDI.

RESULTS

The best classification tree included gender, age < 69 years (in women), and a history of hysterectomy. Men had a < 5% risk of an IDI and women age < 69 years without a hysterectomy fared as well (6.6%). Older women and younger women who underwent hysterectomy had higher rates of IDI (29.2% and 22.3%, respectively.)

CONCLUSIONS

The authors developed a model based on age, gender, and hysterectomy status that, after further validation, may be useful for predicting which patients likely will have an incomplete examination. In those patients who have a high probability of IDI, the choice can be made to offer colonoscopy or perform FS under sedation, with analgesia, or with the help of distraction techniques.

Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening test for colorectal cancer

Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is one of the screening modalities for colorectal cancer. The rationale for screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy is that it provides direct visualisation of the colon, and suspicious lesions can be biopsied. The most obvious disadvantage is that it examines only the lower third of the colon. The technical aspects of FS are sufficiently clear to enable us to define what FS can and cannot do. From the point of view of screening, FS clearly cannot completely exclude the presence of colon cancer in all asymptomatic people. A distinction must be made between screening the general population and testing the individual seeking screening. For the former, obtaining the greatest mortality benefit safely and at an acceptable cost to the nation is the crux of the matter. Recently published data indicate that FS is a cost-effective screening strategy, although colonoscopy and annual fecal occult blood test avert a greater number of cancer deaths. The results of randomised controlled trials of screening FS and colonoscopy, currently being conducted, will allow us to make a more accurate comparison with the established data regarding fecal occult blood test. In conclusion, flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years with or without FOBT is one of the screening methods recommended by major professional organizations. It identifies 50 to 70% of the advanced neoplasms, if any discovery of a distal neoplasia is followed up with a total examination of the colon by colonoscopy.

Comparison of rigid vs flexible sigmoidoscopy in detection of significant anorectal lesions

OBJECTIVE

Sigmoidoscopy is an essential tool in colorectal clinics in the detection of anorectal lesions including rectosigmoid adenomas and carcinomas. However, rigid sigmoidoscope (RS) is still more widely used than flexible sigmoidoscope (FS) as the primary investigation, despite the fact that the latter is more comfortable to the patient and has greater diagnostic yield. Hence we wanted to compare the two modalities in terms of diagnostic use for picking up significant anorectal lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients referred to the colorectal clinic who had undergone both rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy for investigation of colorectal symptoms in 2001 was done. Findings recorded during rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy including depth of insertion, site of lesion and complications were analysed.

RESULTS

152 patients underwent both rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy as part of investigation of colorectal symptoms. Of the 115 (75.6%) declared normal by RS, 39 (33.9%) had significant lesions including 7 polyps and 4 malignant lesions within 20 cm of the anal verge during FS. Of the 31 patients (20.4%) in whom RS was not helpful due to faecal loading, 15 (48.4%) had significant lesions including 4 malignancies and 1 polyp --all within 20 cm of the anal verge during FS. Only 2 polyps and 1 malignant lesion were picked up by both flexible and rigid sigmoidoscopy. There were no complications in both procedures.

CONCLUSION

Since flexible sigmoidoscopy is superior to rigid sigmoidoscopy in terms of patient comfort, diagnostic value and ease of doing procedures like biopsy and polypectomy; it can be used as a front line investigation to exclude colorectal pathology in out patient clinics. The utility of rigid sigmoidoscope is in question and in view of obvious shortcomings, may be replaced by flexible sigmoidoscopy, though obvious resource constraints need to be considered.

Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among Chinese-Americans

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with receipt of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among urban senior Chinese-Americans.

METHODS

Two hundred three men and women from three senior centers completed a questionnaire that included sections on demographics, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy use, and potential barriers to screening.

RESULTS

Receipt of a FOBT within the prior 12 months (37.9% of sample) was associated with fewer years of US residency, lower level of worries or fears of test results, and higher level of perceived susceptibility to CRC. Receipt of a flexible sigmoidoscopy within the past 5 years (22.2% of sample) was associated with higher levels of education, lower levels of worries or fears of test results, and higher level of perceived susceptibility of CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention programs may target these areas to facilitate CRC screening in Chinese-Americans so that national goals can be met for all Americans.

Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy using an upper endoscope is better tolerated by women

BACKGROUND

Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is a commonly used method for colorectal cancer screening. Women are more likely than men to have a FS with a limited depth of insertion, in part due to differences of anatomy and perception of pain.

AIM

The objective of this prospective single-blinded randomized clinical study is to assess satisfaction in women undergoing screening FS using an upper endoscope (E, diameter 9.8 mm) versus a standard sigmoidoscope (S, diameter 13.3 mm) as measured by pain and discomfort and overall satisfaction using a validated survey instrument. Secondary endpoints of FS efficacy included the depth of insertion of the instrument, frequency of polyp detection, and complication rate.

RESULTS

A total of 160 asymptomatic women undergoing screening FS were entered over a 4-month period (July through November 2002). All procedures were performed by two experienced physician assistants. The two groups were of similar age (E = 57.5, S = 58.2, p= 0.579) and had a similar rate of previous abdominal surgery (E = 51.2%, S = 45.0%, p= 0.428) or hysterectomy (E = 34.2%, S = 26.3%, p= 0.274). Depth of insertion of the scope was 54.5 cm (+/-9.2 cm) with the E and 51.6 cm (+/- 10.3 cm) with the S (p= 0.058). Polyps were found more frequently in the study group (18.3%) compared with the control group (p= 10.2%) though this did not reach statistical significance (p= 0.131). Overall satisfaction with FS was similar in both groups (p= 0.694) but pain and discomfort were less in the patients undergoing FS using the E (p= 0.006). Controlling for age and previous surgery the differences in pain scores remained significant (p= 0.035). Endoscopist assessment of procedure difficulty (p= 0.726) and complication rates (p= 0.614) was equivalent. Controlling for the presence of polyps, the total duration for the procedure was 7.2 min in the E group and 5.7 min in the S group (p= 0.008). There were no significant differences between women with and without hysterectomy on either overall satisfaction or pain and discomfort.

CONCLUSION

Screening FS in women using an upper endoscope is a feasible approach to colorectal cancer screening. Patients screened with an upper endoscope reported less pain and discomfort compared to standard sigmoidoscope while overall satisfaction did not differ. The trend toward increased polyp detection in patients undergoing FS with an upper endoscope may be related to a more thorough examination due to less patient discomfort and/or an increased depth of insertion of the upper endoscope. Thinner, more flexible endoscopes should be considered when performing screening FS in women.

Evaluation of flexible sigmoidoscopy as an investigation for "left sided" colorectal symptoms

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy is the best way of imaging the colon with concurrent biopsy and treatment. However it is expensive, requires full bowel preparation, and carries a risk of complications. Flexible sigmoidoscopy is an alternative way to investigate symptoms that raise the suspicion of a lesion of the rectum or left colon.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate flexible sigmoidoscopy as the main investigation for "left sided" colorectal symptoms.

METHODS

The clinical records of 317 patients who were assessed at a colorectal specialist clinic and were thought to have a suspicion of a lesion of the rectum or left colon were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had flexible sigmoidoscopy as the primary investigation. Primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of flexible sigmoidoscopy and secondary outcomes were any additional colonic investigations required, failure rates, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixteen patients who had flexible sigmoidoscopy with the above criteria were retrospectively analysed. Twenty four procedures (7.6%) had to be abandoned because of poor bowel preparation. The examination was considered complete when it reached the splenic flexure, which was the case in 205 cases (65%). In 137 flexible sigmoidoscopies (43.3%) there were no abnormal findings. Of the remaining 179 a carcinoma of the rectum or colon was found in 28 cases (8.8%) and one or more polyps was found in 57 (18%) cases. On the basis of the findings it was calculated that 31% of the patients would require an additional investigation for further imaging of the right colon.

DISCUSSION

Although flexible sigmoidoscopy has a high yield of pathologies when carried out by a specialist colorectal clinic, the presence of those pathologies makes the full imaging of the whole colon with an additional investigation necessary. Therefore the cost efficiency of flexible sigmoidoscopy is questionable. Although flexible sigmoidoscopy is indicated for certain patients, it cannot replace colonoscopy as the main investigation used by a specialist colorectal clinic.

Small early tubular adenomas and mixed colonic polyps found on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy do not predict proximal neoplasia in males

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Distal colonic adenomas found on flexible sigmoidoscopy are associated with proximal neoplasias, thus requiring a complete colonoscopic examination, but data regarding the association of distal mixed polyps with proximal neoplasia are lacking. We conducted this study to elucidate the significance of distal mixed colonic polyps in predicting proximal neoplasia.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent a flexible sigmoidoscopic examination for colorectal cancer screening and a follow-up colonoscopic examination because of distal colonic polyps. Distal index polyps were classified by a pathologist as early tubular adenoma (ETA), serrated, or true mixed categories. Index polyps also were immunostained with a monoclonal antibody, Adnab-9, a marker for the colorectal adenoma carcinoma sequence.

RESULTS

In 636 patients with distal index polyps, 6% were malignant, 55% were adenomas, 13% were ETAs, 6% were serrated, 4% were true mixed, and 17% were hyperplastic. Compared with distal hyperplastic index polyps, distal malignant polyps (P = 0.0006) and adenomas (P = 0.001) were associated with a significantly increased number of synchronous proximal neoplasia, but the small distal mixed, serrated, or ETA did not predict the increased incidence of proximal neoplasia. Large distal polyps of each category were significantly associated with an increased number of synchronous proximal neoplasias. In support of these findings, immunostaining of distal polyps with Adnab-9 showed predictability for proximal neoplasia only in the adenoma category (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Small ETAs, serrated, or mixed polyps found on flexible sigmoidoscopic examination do not increase the probability of synchronous proximal neoplasia.

A novel shape-locking guide for prevention of sigmoid looping during colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Looping of the endoscope in the sigmoid colon and other colonic segments often represents a significant challenge to the performance of comfortable, complete, and swift colonoscopy. This report describes the design and operation of a new device that addresses this problem, together with preliminary preclinical experience with this use of this shape-locking guide (SG-1).

METHODS

The shape-locking guide is an overtube that can be converted from a flexible to a rigid configuration on demand. When in the rigid configuration, the shape-locking guide is designed to protect the colon wall from lateral forces exerted by the colonoscope. The shape-locking guide was evaluated in vitro by using an artificial colon model to learn how to operate it, and to assess feasibility for prevention of colon looping. In addition, safety was assessed in vivo in a pig model.

RESULTS

In vitro, the shape-locking guide prevented colonic looping and, thereby, aided completion of "colonoscopy" in the artificial colon model. Subsequent in vivo studies demonstrated that use of the shape-locking guide is safe and feasible; it performed well with respect to ease of insertion and avoidance of sigmoid looping. There was no evidence of significant injury to the colon or adjacent abdominal viscera.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study shows that use of the shape-locking guide is safe and that it has performance characteristics that may assist the performance of colonoscopy. Human trials are being undertaken.

Dual endoscopic-assisted endoluminal colostomy reversal: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Emergent colostomies are associated with increased morbidity related to second closure operations. The purpose of this canine pilot study was to create a minimally invasive procedure that would reduce the time interval and morbidity involved with colostomy reversals after left colon end colostomies.

METHODS

Six mongrel dogs underwent modified laparoscopic Hartmann's procedures in which the stapled end of the rectal stump was approximated to the left colon proximal to the stoma. After 1 week, they underwent an endoluminal colostomy reversal with a computer-mediated, circular stapling device and varying anvil insertion methods. Variables recorded included anvil insertion technique and feasibility, OR time, complications, and number of days to first meal and bowel movement. A contrast enema performed 1 week post colostomy reversal ruled out anastomosis leaks and stenosis. The dogs were euthanized and subjected to necropsy.

RESULTS

Of four anvil insertion techniques tested, the most feasible employed a large-bore needle to perforate through the stapled end of the Hartmann pouch into the lumen of the left colon. Simultaneous endoluminal views of the rectal stump with a sigmoidoscope and the left colon lumen with an endoscope permitted a controlled and safe needle puncture. Through the needle, a guide wire was inserted to withdraw the anvil via the colostomy into place. A transanally inserted stapler was then married to the anvil under fluoroscopic guidance, thus completing the anastomosis. The colostomy was then taken down and transected at the level of the colocolostomy. Average operating time was 126 min (range 90-180), diet was tolerated within 1.5 days, and average number of days to first bowel movement was 2.5. The absence of stenosis, leaks, and inadvertent visceral injuries confirmed feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

In this canine model, a dual endoscopic-assisted colostomy reversal with a computer-mediated, circular stapling device is feasible. Using this technique, colostomy reversals can possibly be performed 1 week post-colostomy without entering the peritoneal cavity, thus reducing the number of invasive operations and subsequent morbidity required to manage emergent colon perforations.

Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer

This study was conducted in the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program of Northern California to identify patient characteristics that explain interest in flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening. A mailed screening invitation to 6837 age-eligible patients elicited responses from 49%. Efforts to reach and interview both eligible respondents and non-respondents resulted in 2728 computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI), with 60% indicating interest in FS screening. Five components of the Integrated Behavioral Model were measured with respect to FS screening: attitude, affect, social influence, facilitators/barriers, and perceived risk of colorectal cancer. All five model components were significantly and independently associated with interest in FS, with patient attitude being the strongest predictor. Of the 32 items comprising the model components, nine items having the highest correlations with FS interest were identified as potentially important issues to address by efforts to increase interest in screening. Six of these were attitudinal beliefs. The findings from this theory-driven study provide specific targets for the design of interventions to increase FS interest and screening rates.

Rigid rectosigmoidoscopy: still a well-tolerated diagnostic tool

BACKGROUND

Although rigid rectosigmoidoscopy has been gradually replaced by the use of flexible rectosigmoidoscopy in recent years, it remains an effective, economic and widely available diagnostic tool. The aim of this study was to determine the type and magnitude of symptoms during rigid rectosigmodoscopy.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of patients who underwent diagnostic rigid rectosigmoidoscopy. The main complaints were recorded, and their magnitude quantified using a visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients (mean age = 48 years) were examined. The prone jackknife position was used in 54% of them and left lateral decubitus in 46%. A complete (full length) examination was achieved in 68%. There were no complications. Sixty percent of patients referred complaints: pain (33%), discomfort by rectal preparation (13%), uncomfortable defecation desire (8%), and discomfort by the position (4%). Median values determined by visual analogue scale for pain, discomfort by rectal preparation, uncomfortable positioning and overall discomfort were graded as 3.3, 3.3, 2.1 and 2, respectively. There was an association between higher magnitude of pain and overall discomfort with female gender, left lateral decubitus position, and full-length exploration (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A high percentage of patients have symptoms during rigid rectosigmoidoscopy but the study is usually well tolerated due the low magnitude of pain and discomfort and remains a very cost-effective study.

The PreOp flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer. Validation and early evaluation of a virtual reality based system

AIM

To demonstrate face and construct validity of a computer based flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer.

METHODS

The PreOp (Immersion Medical, USA) system is a virtual reality based flexible sigmoidoscopy simulator. The system records several performance parameters, such as percentage of colonic mucosa visualized, time taken, and pathlength of endoscope travel. Forty-five subjects were divided into three groups: novice (never performed a lower GI endoscopy), intermediate (5-50 examinations), and trained (greater than 200 examinations). After initial familiarization subjects were assessed three times on a case module. Results showed a nonparametric distribution.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between all three groups with respect to percentage of mucosa visualized (novice 71.0 +/- 3.7%, intermediate 77.3 +/- 5.6%, expert 84.8 +/- 4.6%, Kruskal-Wallis p <0.001) and efficiency ratio (%mucosa/time, novice 0.163 +/- 0.055, intermediate 0.259 +/- 0.07, expert 0.306 +/- 0.058, p <0.001). The novice group was also slower and had a lower pathlength of instrument travel compared to the others.

CONCLUSION

PreOp virtual reality simulator is a valid discriminator of flexible sigmoidoscopic experience. Its effect on training needs to be explored.

Use of a disposable sheath system for flexible sigmoidoscopy in decentralized colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

To prevent transmission of infectious agents and to reduce instrument reprocessing time, the use of disposable sheath systems instead of conventionally reprocessed endoscopes has been promoted for flexible sigmoidoscopy. This trial primarily investigated the feasibility of a disposable sheath system for flexible sigmoidoscopy in decentralized colorectal cancer screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In an ongoing colorectal cancer screening trial, 226 consecutive participants were randomly allocated to have their flexible sigmoidoscopy performed with either a fiberoptic sigmoidoscope covered with a disposable sheath ("EndoSheath group") or a conventional video colonoscope ("standard colonoscope group"). All examinations were performed at a temporary screening center. The patients' experience was documented using a questionnaire. The feasibility of running temporary screening units was evaluated.

RESULTS

Examinations beyond the 60-cm level were excluded. Thus, 113 patients (examined with the disposable instrument) and 87 (standard instrument) were eligible for analysis. When the sheathed system was used, all the devices needed could be satisfactorily transported. A screening center could be set up within a few hours. No differences were observed in patient discomfort. Fewer patients with polyps were observed in the EndoSheath group (48 [42%]), compared with 55 (63%) in the standard colonoscope group; P = 0.005). No significant differences were observed for polyps larger than 5 mm (14 [12%] in the EndoSheath group, 13 [15%] in the standard colonoscope group; P = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the disposable system, decentralized colorectal cancer screening was easily established. However, fewer polyps were found, possibly due to the fiberoptic nature of the instrument. Sheathed video instruments are desirable and may increase the diagnostic yield.

Achieving quality in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Sigmoidoscopy screening, which can dramatically reduce colorectal cancer mortality, is supported increasingly by physicians and payers, and is likely to be performed more frequently in the future. As more physicians and nonphysician medical personnel learn how to perform this procedure, and with attention to quality standards, the overall impact of sigmoidoscopy screening may improve. This review describes elements that characterize high-quality examinations and identifies resources for in-depth information on performing flexible sigmoidoscopy.

METHODS

The domains of quality were identified from textbooks, articles, and the professional opinions of gastroenterologists and primary care physicians. Information was obtained from MEDLINE, bibliographies in recent articles, medical professional organizations, equipment manufacturers' representatives, and focus groups of primary care physicians.

RESULTS

Nine domains of quality are identified and discussed: training, logistical start-up, patient interaction, bowel preparation, examination technique, lesion recognition, complications, reporting, and processing (equipment cleaning and disinfection).

CONCLUSIONS

Persons learning how to perform and to implement flexible sigmoidoscopy may use this information to help ensure the quality of screening examinations.

Rectal retroflexion: an essential part of lower gastrointestinal endoscopic examination

PURPOSE

Retroflexion of the endoscope during rectal examination may increase diagnostic yield but is not routinely performed because of concerns about safety and a lack of appreciation of its importance. The purpose of this study was to examine the yield, safety, and tolerance of endoscopic rectal retroflexion.

METHODS

Prospective cohorts of subjects undergoing unsedated screening flexible sigmoidoscopy were examined with and without routine retroflexion. Pain scores were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 526 subjects (mean age 60 (range, 55-66) years) underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy in the first period when the endoscope was not routinely retroflexed. Of these, 480 (mean age 60 (range, 55-66) years) were subsequently examined with routine retroflexion. Retroflexion was impossible in 17 subjects (3.5 percent) because of discomfort. In the second group, 12 subjects (2.5 percent) had polyps in the lower rectum seen only on retroflexion. Of these, eight had metaplastic and four had adenomatous polyps (3 tubular <5 mm, 1 tubulovillous 15 mm). There was no difference in mean pain scores between the groups (no retroflexion = 2.13, retroflexion = 2.18).

CONCLUSION

With an adenoma pick-up rate of 8 to 12 percent for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy, retroflexion increases adenoma detection by approximately 1 percent without adverse effects and should be an integral part of flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Open-access versus hospital-initiated flexible sigmoidoscopy: a comparative audit of efficacy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is a continuing demand for the provision of open-access endoscopy services. While open-access gastroscopy is now a well-established practice in most hospitals, open-access flexible sigmoidoscopy (OAS) is not yet available to the same extent. We present our early experience with OAS, a new service provided by our unit.

PATIENTS, METHODS AND RESULTS

Over a 12-month period, 255 flexible sigmoidoscopies were carried out (139 OAS and 116 hospital-initiated sigmoidoscopies, HIS). Referral criteria for sigmoidoscopy were similar in both groups, with rectal bleeding and change in bowel habit being the most frequent.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable with regards to age and gender, but patients referred for OAS had symptoms for shorter duration than those referred for HIS (30 +/- 5.6 months v. 101 +/- 28 months, P < 0.00001). The diagnostic yield for OAS was 44% and for HIS 29% (P= 0.01). Significant pathology (colorectal cancer, polyps and newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease, colonic strictures) was detected in 31 patients (22%) in the OAS group and 12 patients (10%) in the HIS group (P = 0.02). Six cancers were diagnosed (5 OAS, 1 HIS), all staged Duke A. The waiting times for OAS and HIS were 3.1 +/- 0.3 weeks and 11.4 +/- 1.2 weeks, respectively (P = 0.0001). The diagnostic yield of fibre-optic endoscopy was independent of duration of symptoms, although patients referred for OAS with rectal bleeding and/or diarrhoea had a higher diagnostic yield (55/125, 44%).

CONCLUSION

OAS is feasible and effective, with a high diagnostic yield. Such service can usually be provided with minimal added resources.

The use of the 130-cm colonoscope for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

The 130-cm colonoscope was utilized to determine whether a deeper insertion could be accomplished after the usual enema preparation for routine flexible sigmoidoscopy and, if so, to what extent that would enhance the yield of neoplastic findings. Sixty-four patients were examined, and intubation was accomplished to the level of 69 cm compared with 48.1 cm for a matched control group that had flexible sigmoidoscopy with the 60-cm endoscope. Another 24 patients who had a barium enema prep had a significantly greater depth of insertion (81.4 cm). Only two polyps were found proximal to 60 cm. The 130-cm colonoscope does not offer any substantial advantage over the standard 60-cm sigmoidoscope unless a bowel preparation more thorough than enemas is given and then it would probably only be worthwhile using the colonoscope in patients who are above average risk for colorectal neoplasia.

Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of two preparations for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

BACKGROUND

The best and most cost-effective bowel cleansing regimen for patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy is not known. The aim of this study was to compare patient tolerance, quality of preparation, and cost of 2 bowel cleansing regimens for flexible sigmoidoscopy.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty consecutive patients referred for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy were randomized to receive an oral preparation (45 mL oral sodium phosphate and 10 mg bisacodyl) or an enema preparation (2 Fleet enemas and 10 mg bisacodyl). Tolerance of the preparation was graded as easy, tolerable, slightly difficult, extremely difficult, or intolerable. The endoscopist was blinded to which preparation the patient received and graded the quality of the preparation as poor, fair, good, or excellent. Cost was calculated by adding the cost of the medications and the cost for the nursing time required to prepare the patient for endoscopy.

RESULTS

Patients in the oral preparation group were more likely to grade the preparation as easy or tolerable when compared with the enema group (96.8% vs. 56.4%, p < 0.001). The endoscopist graded the quality of the preparation as good or excellent in 86.5% of the patients in the oral preparation group compared with 57.3% in the enema group (p < 0.001). In the oral preparation group, the mean nursing time (34.6 vs. 65.3 minutes, p < 0.001) and cost ($16.39 vs. $31.13, p < 0.001) were significantly less than in the enema group.

CONCLUSIONS

An oral sodium phosphate preparation results in a superior quality endoscopic examination that is better tolerated and more cost-effective than enemas in patients undergoing screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

The utilization of flexible sigmoidoscopy by family practitioners after residency training

BACKGROUND

Flexible sigmoidoscopy is routinely performed by family practice physicians, most of whom receive training in postgraduate education programs. The aim of this study was to assess the utilization of flexible sigmoidoscopy by family practitioners who received training during residency.

METHODS

Family practitioners who underwent training in flexible sigmoidoscopy during their residency were contacted by phone or mail and polled regarding their current use of flexible sigmoidoscopy and assessment of their previous training.

RESULTS

Forty-two graduates were contacted; 76% were certified (according to our predefined criteria) during training and 74% were currently performing flexible sigmoidoscopy. Of those who were certified, 87% were currently using flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with 45% of those who did not receive certification (p = 0.02). Training during the last year of residency was more likely to be associated with current use of flexible sigmoidoscopy than earlier training (69% vs. 30%, p = 0.03). Certification was associated with more procedures during training (24.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 16.6 +/- 3.1, p < 0.05). Current users performed a mean of 4.3 +/- 0.75 procedures/month; most reached 40 cm in depth of insertion and completed the procedure in 17.2 +/- 1.2 minutes. Of patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy, 13% were ultimately referred for colonoscopy. Most practitioners considered their training useful and only 9.6% had obtained additional training outside residency.

CONCLUSIONS

Most family practitioners certified in flexible sigmoidoscopy during residency performed the procedure in their practices. Depth of insertion and time for completion of the procedure seem to be adequate.

Resident participation in flexible sigmoidoscopy does not affect patient satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the effect of resident involvement in flexible sigmoidoscopy on patient satisfaction and comfort.

METHODS

Adults undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy completed a previsit questionnaire on indication for procedure, GI-related history, and functional status. Immediately after the procedure, satisfaction and procedure comfort were assessed. Additional information collected included procedure duration, depth of sigmoidoscope penetration, and visualization of diverticuli or polyps.

RESULTS

Among 408 endoscopies, patient characteristics and procedure indications were similar between sigmoidoscopies done by residents (n = 111) or staff. There were no differences in patient satisfaction, procedure comfort, or willingness to undergo the procedure again in the future. Sigmoidoscopies involving residents averaged 5.6 min longer, even after adjusting for preparation quality, depth of insertion, specific endoscopist, and the presence of polyps or diverticuli.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction and comfort with flexible sigmoidoscopy was not reduced by resident involvement, though the procedure duration was slightly longer.

Sigmoid stiffener for decompression tube placement in colonic pseudo-obstruction

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Decompression tube placement improves outcome in colonic pseudo-obstruction (CP) which is refractory to conservative measures, especially if the decompression tube is placed proximal to the hepatic flexure. We evaluate the ability of a sigmoid stiffener to facilitate more proximal colonoscopy and decompression tube placement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A sigmoid stiffener is used in the standard fashion during colonoscopic decompression for pseudo-obstruction. After cecal wire placement, the colonoscope is withdrawn, leaving the stiffener and wire in place. By passing through the stiffener, an over-wire decompression tube can avoid sigmoid looping. We compared proximal extent of colonoscopy, tube position, endoscopy time, and patient outcomes using a sigmoid stiffener, with a control group of patients treated previously. Patients with colonic ischemia were excluded.

RESULTS

Using this technique, nine consecutive colonoscopies and decompression tube placements reached the right colon. Significantly, only three of seven control colonoscopies and two control decompression tubes did so. However, improvements in procedural time and patient outcome did not reach statistical significance. No complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

The use of a sigmoid stiffener during colonic decompression allows more proximal colonoscopy and decompression tube placement, with possible clinical benefit. We do not use this technique in the setting of left colon ischemia.

Argon plasma coagulation therapy for hemorrhagic radiation proctosigmoiditis

BACKGROUND

Radiation-induced proctosigmoiditis is a serious complication of pelvic radiation therapy. Rectal bleeding occurs among 6% to 8% of these patients and is extremely difficult to manage. Pharmacotherapy is generally ineffective, whereas surgical treatment is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Argon plasma coagulation is a new method of noncontact electrocoagulation well suited for hemostasis of large bleeding areas.

METHODS

From December 1996 through March 1998, we used argon plasma coagulation to treat 28 patients with hemorrhagic radiation-induced proctosigmoiditis. Indications for treatment were anemia (n = 18) and persistent bleeding despite pharmacotherapy (n = 10). Argon flow and electrical power were set at 1.5 L/min and 50 W. The severity of rectal bleeding was graded from 0 to 4 (highest), and hemoglobin levels were recorded before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Eighty-two therapeutic sessions were performed (median 2.9 sessions per patient). The severity score for rectal bleeding dropped at least 1 point for all but 2 patients, and the mean value decreased from 2.96 to 0.68. Average hemoglobin level increased 1.2 gm/dL (1.9 gm/dL among anemic patients). No serious complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Argon plasma coagulation appears to be a simple, safe, and effective technique in the management of hemorrhagic radiation-induced proctosigmoiditis.

Rigid videosigmoidoscopy vs conventional sigmoidoscopy. A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Not only is rigid sigmoidoscopy uncomfortable for patients, but visualisation of the rectosigmoid junction and sigmoid colon is successful in only 40-70% of examinations. A novel fine-bore rigid videosigmoidoscope is described and then compared with a rigid conventional sigmoidoscope for patient discomfort and length of insertion.

METHOD

A total of 58 patients were examined with both sigmoidoscopes in a random order. Discomfort was scored on a visual analogue scale; length of insertion was scored by the surgeon. Patients were blinded to which sigmoidoscope was being used. The images from the video examination were transmitted in real time for a second opinion in a different hospital.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) insertion distance of the videosigmoidoscope was 23.2 (5.9) cm, which was significantly further than with the conventional sigmoidosocpe 16.5 (3.8) cm (p < 0.01). The discomfort on a visual analogue score for the videosigmoidoscope was 3.0 (1.8), which was significantly less than for the conventional sigmoidoscope 5.5 (2.7) (p < 0.01). The five users of the equipment (four surgeons and one colorectal nurse practitioner) preferred the videosigmoidoscope for image quality and ease of examination.

CONCLUSIONS

A thinner, longer, rigid videosigmoidoscope is a more effective means of looking at the proximal sigmoid colon. Despite being inserted further, it caused less discomfort than the conventional sigmoidoscope. High-quality video images can be recorded or transmitted for real-time teleconsultation.

[The treatment of rectorrhagia secondary to postradiation proctitis with 4% formalin]

Radiation proctitis is a common complication of radiotherapy for pelvic malignancies. In the chronic form it might lead to intractable or massive hemorrhage unresponsive to conventional therapy. In these cases surgery is associated with a high morbidity. Seven female patients previously treated with external beam radiation for carcinoma of the uterus and cervix were included. They had required multiple blood transfusions (median 2), and still had low hemoglobin rates and active hemorrhagic radiation proctitis, were treated. Therapy was accomplished by direct application of gauzes soaked in 4% formalin through the rigid sigmoidoscope or the Pratt anoscope, with the patients under peridural anesthesia. Gauzes were laid in contact with the hemorrhagic surface during 4 minutes and repeated until the bleeding ceased (median total exposure time was 26 minutes). Bleeding ceased immediately in 6 patients, one continued with minor bleeding after formalin treatment, two patients had fever during the first 24 hours which was controlled with physical measures, three patients required repeat formalin application (in external bases), after that six patients had no further bleeding nor was any blood transfusion needed, one patient presented unsuspected sigmoid bleeding stenosis. The formalin therapy is an effective, safe, simple and inexpensive treatment for rectal bleeding caused by radiation proctitis.

Barriers to office-based screening sigmoidoscopy: does reimbursement cover costs?

Screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy may reduce mortality rates from colorectal cancer. Primary care physicians are able to provide this screening procedure, but many have been reluctant to do so, partly because of the impression that reimbursement rates are inadequate to cover physician costs. This study examines the cost of performing flexible sigmoidoscopy in a primary care practice and compares this cost with the new Medicare reimbursement rate for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Fixed and variable costs associated with the performance of office-based flexible sigmoidoscopy were derived from the published literature. The principal assumption in the analyses is that the time required to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy represents an opportunity cost because the physician could use that time to see additional patients during routine office hours. Sensitivity analyses were done across a range of estimates for the cost variables. When Medicare reimbursement rates were used, the physician's total cost for flexible sigmoidoscopy without biopsy was $86.86, which is similar to the Medicare reimbursement rate for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (code 45330, $87.84). The calculations were most sensitive to estimates of equipment cost, procedure time, number of procedures performed per year, additional malpractice coverage, and revenue generated per hour of outpatient care. The estimated cost per procedure in a screening program that includes the ability to perform biopsy is $152.93, which exceeds Medicare reimbursement rates across the range of all variables included in the sensitivity analyses. Thus, low reimbursement may limit the adoption of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy with or without biopsy in primary care practices.

Flexible sigmoidoscopy: screening for colorectal cancer

Flexible sigmoidoscopy is an important screening procedure because of its ability to detect early changes in the distal colon. The 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscope provides excellent visualization with minimal discomfort to patients. Successful sigmoidoscopy requires adequate patient preparation, proper equipment and an experienced examiner who can recognize both normal and abnormal findings. Complications arising from sigmoidoscopy are rare, but patients may experience some cramping, gas or watery stools. Screening and primary preventive measures, including regular exercise and increased dietary fiber intake, can lower the morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal cancer.

Depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for colorectal cancer screening and instrument design

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy is variable, depending upon bowel preparation, patient tolerance and distal colonic anatomy. Many endoscopists routinely aim to insert the 60 cm flexible sigmoidoscope to the splenic flexure; however internal endoscopic markers are unreliable, making the true anatomical extent of the examination difficult to assess. The aim of this study was to assess the depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two separate studies were done. In the first (study 1), magnetic endoscopic imaging was used to determine the final depth of insertion at non-sedated, screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. In the second (study 2), "real-time" imaging was utilized to determine sigmoid looping and the anatomical location of the endoscope tip after 60 cm of instrument had been inserted during total or limited colonoscopy. A total of 117 consecutive average-risk patients, aged 55-65 years participated in study 1, and 136 patients underwent either limited, (33) or attempted total colonoscopy (103) in study 2.

RESULTS

In study 1 the median insertion distance was 52 cm, range 20-58. In 61 % of patients the imaging system showed that the descending colon had not been visualized by the end of the procedure. Failure to reach the sigmoid/descending junction occurred in 29 (24%) patients. Reasons for failure included poor tolerance of the procedure due to pain (23 patients) inadequate preparation (3 patients) and, excessive looping (3 patients). In study 2, after 60 cm of instrument had been inserted, the splenic flexure or beyond was reached in 29% and the descending colon in 9%, whilst in 62 % the endoscope tip had not passed beyond the sigmoid/descending colon junction. A sigmoid loop formed in 70% of patients, and unusual loops such as the alpha, reverse alpha and reverse sigmoid spiral loop occurred more frequently in women compared to men (P = 0.0249). In those 104 patients where the splenic flexure was reached the mean maximum length of instrument inserted prior to reaching the flexure was 75.4 cm, (SD = 21.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Examination of the entire sigmoid was not achieved in approximately one-quarter of patients undergoing screening flexible sigmoidoscopy, mainly because of discomfort. The descending colon is intubated in a minority of cases (using standard instruments), even after 60 cm has been inserted. Alternative instruments with different shaft characteristics (floppy, narrow calibre, 80-100 cm in length) may be necessary to ensure deeper routine intubation in nonsedated patients.

[Dorso-posterior extraperitoneal pelviscopy (DEP). From experiment to initial clinical application]

BACKGROUND

Dorsoposterior and/or perineal access to pelvic connective tissue spaces has lost its importance due to improved transabdominal techniques. Because of the development of minimally invasive surgery towards "soft-tissue endoscopy" we were interested in whether the video-assisted technique could give new impetus to the perineal approach. Successful experiments on corpses were followed by the first clinical application.

METHODS

After the dilation of the retrorectal, rectovaginal and rectoprostatical spaces with a dissecting balloon, pneumoextraperitoneum was established and all extraperitoneal structures of the pelvis could be dissected.

RESULTS

In the experimental and in the clinical situation the spaces could be perfectly surveyed. EXPERIMENTALLY: Complete, circular preparation of the rectum was achieved. Parts of the bladder, vagina and prostate were visualized ventrally. Laterally both ureters and the paraproctal and iliacal vessels could be dissected. In the clinical application the retrorectal space could be dilated without problems and it could be rinsed and drained. Postoperatively no complications were recorded. The patient could be discharged on the 17th postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

The described method is suitable for clinical use. Besides the described indication, further surgical applications exists.