Exploratory biomarker findings from cohort 2 of MODUL: An adaptable, phase 2, signal-seeking trial of fluoropyrimidine + bevacizumab ± atezolizumab maintenance therapy for BRAFwt metastatic colorectal cancer

3570

Background: MODUL is an adaptable, phase 2, signal-seeking trial testing novel agents as first-line therapy for predefined subgroups of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Previously reported findings demonstrated that adding atezolizumab to fluoropyrimidine (FP)/bevacizumab as first-line maintenance treatment after induction with FOLFOX + bevacizumab did not improve efficacy outcomes in BRAFwt mCRC. Given these efficacy results, exploratory assessments on tumour samples were conducted to provide insights into factors that might affect efficacy of maintenance treatment and provide guidance on appropriate therapeutic strategies for BRAFwt mCRC. Methods: In patients with BRAFwt tumours (Cohort 2), experimental treatment was FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab. Primary efficacy endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Archival tissue samples from 104 patients were analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) at HistoGeneX (PD-L1; CD8/GrB/FoxP3). SP142 antibody was used for PD-L1 IHC analysis, which evaluated PD-L1low (IC 0–1) vs PD-L1high (IC > 1) in correlation with PFS and OS in the control and experimental arms. CD8/GrB/FoxP3 triplex staining was also performed to evaluate potential correlations with efficacy. Results: 445 patients with BRAFwt mCRC were randomised (2:1 ratio) to maintenance treatment in Cohort 2. Archival samples from 104 patients were analysed: FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab (n = 82); FP/bevacizumab (n = 22). The biomarker evaluable population (BEP) for PD-L1 was n = 81 for FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab [PD-L1low n = 35 (43%); PD-L1high n = 46 (57%)] and n = 22 for FP/bevacizumab [PD-L1low n = 16 (72%); PD-L1high n = 6 (28%)]. The BEP for CD8/GrB was n = 50 for FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab and n = 16 for FP/bevacizumab. No difference in PFS or OS was observed in the FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab vs FP/bevacizumab arms for PD-L1high [PFS: HR = 1.5 (95% CI 0.45−4.8), p = 0.51; OS: HR = 1.3 (95% CI 0.38−4.1), p = 0.71] or PD-L1low [PFS: HR = 0.92 (95% CI 0.47−1.8), p = 0.81; OS: HR = 0.78 (95% CI 0.4−1.5), p = 0.48]. Similar results were observed with CD8/GrBhigh [PFS: HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.27−2.0), p = 0.55; OS: HR = 0.66 (95% CI 0.24−1.8), p = 0.44], CD8/GrBlow [PFS: HR = 1.0 (95% CI 0.42–2.5), p = 0.96; OS: HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.3–1.8), p = 0.5], FoxP3high [PFS: HR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.37−2.5), p = 0.95; OS: HR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.36−2.5), p = 0.91] and FoxP3low [PFS: HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.29−1.9), p = 0.53; OS: HR = 0.5 (95% CI 0.19−1.3), p = 0.18]. Conclusions: These findings suggest that PD-L1, CD8/GrB and FoxP3 might not be predictive biomarkers in BRAFwt mCRC. Further analyses are needed to further evaluate potential predictive and prognostic factors of response in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02291289.

A randomized phase III study of immune checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy in treatment-naive metastatic anal cancer patients: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (EA2176)

TPS3614

Background: Anal cancer is growing in annual incidence globally and human papillomavirus (HPV) remains the predominant risk factor underlying its development. Due to its relative rarity, clinical trials in anal cancer have historically been difficult to conduct and treatment options for metastatic disease remain limited. Carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) was compared to cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (historical standard of care) in a recent randomized phase II clinical trial (InterAACT; EA2133) in treatment-naïve metastatic anal cancer, finding that response rates were equivocal, but that overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the CP arm (20 months vs 12.3 months, p = 0.014). Additionally, reduced grade 3/4 toxicities were seen in the CP arm. NCI9673, a single-arm phase II study, established safety and efficacy of nivolumab in previously-treated metastatic anal cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.0-7.9) and OS was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.1-not estimable). Multiple randomized trials in lung cancer have demonstrated efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy combined with checkpoint inhibitors. Together these studies form the rationale behind combining CP and nivolumab in treatment-naïve metastatic anal cancer. Methods: EA2176 (NCT04444921) is the first NCTN phase III randomized clinical trial in treatment-naïve metastatic anal cancer. Stratification factors include HIV status and history of chemoradiation for curative intent. Patients will be randomized to carboplatin (AUC = 5, Day 1) plus paclitaxel (80mg/m2, Days 1, 8, 15) +/- nivolumab 240mg IV (Cycle 1 = Days 1, 15; Cycle ≥2 = Day 1, 480mg) q 28-days until disease progression or treatment intolerance. CP will be given for up to 6 cycles, while nivolumab will be continued as maintenance for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary objectives include OS, response rate, and toxicity. Goal enrollment is 205 patients and the study continues accrual. This sample size will provide 80% power at a two-sided α of 0.05 to detect a 4.8-month improvement in PFS assuming 8 months in the control arm. Novel correlative studies include sequential quantitative tumor-derived cell-free HPV ctDNA levels (serotypes 16 and 18; Sysmex-Inostics SafeSEQ NGS assay). Correlative funding provided in part by the Farrah Fawcett Foundation and Sysmex Inostics, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT04444921.

Phase I trial of regorafenib, hydroxychloroquine, and entinostat in metastatic colorectal cancer

e15580

Background: The antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib provides a survival benefit in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Antiangiogenic therapy causes hypoxic stress within tumor cells, which activate autophagy as a survival mechanism. Entinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, increases dependence on autophagy through epigenetic mechanisms. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blocks autophagy by blunting lysosomal acidification and is synergistic with antiangiogenic therapies. We hypothesized that HCQ and entinostat would be tolerable with regorafenib and potentiate the antitumor response. Methods: This was a 3+3 phase I trial to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of HCQ and entinostat with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. No prior regorafenib or HDAC inhibitor therapy was permitted. Regorafenib was dosed at 160mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles, with provision to lower the starting dose to 80mg if toxicity was excessive. Entinostat was dosed at 3mg weekly in dose level 1 and at 5mg weekly in dose levels 2 and 3 while HCQ was dosed at 200mg qAM and 400mg qPM in dose levels 1 and 2 and at 600mg BID at dose level 3. Expansion was planned at the RP2D with a primary endpoint of objective response rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were screened, and 20 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 with no dose-limiting toxicity. The starting regorafenib dose was reduced to 80mg after 3 patients discontinued therapy early due to fatigue or rash due to regorafenib. At dose level 2, 7 patients were enrolled to achieve 6 evaluable patients. One DLT (G3 fatigue) was noted and one patient withdrew consent after 14 days due to fever and tumor pain flare possibly related to treatment. Six patients enrolled at dose level 3; no DLTs were seen. One additional patient received HCQ 400mg BID instead of 600mg BID due to a clerical error. Weight loss (60%), fatigue (50%), and anorexia (50%) were the most common toxicities. Thirteen grade 3 toxicities were noted, with rash (15%), fatigue (10%), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (10%) the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Seven patients discontinued therapy early due to toxicity. Nearly all patients experienced rapid weight loss, with a range of 1.5 lbs to 27.1 lbs and a median weight loss of 9.5 lbs at two weeks. No objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 1.8 months, the median OS was 5.2 months, and no patient remained on study longer than 4 months. Expansion was not pursued due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib, HCQ, and entinostat was poorly tolerated without evident activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. The substantial weight loss suggests a potential adverse metabolic interaction between these drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03215264.

A phase II/III study of perioperative nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients (pts) with locoregional esophageal (E) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: Results of a safety run-in—A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (EA2174)

4064

Background: E/GEJ adenocarcinoma has a high mortality rate despite curative intent therapy. The use of immune checkpoint inhibition is beneficial for treatment of this cancer in the metastatic and adjuvant settings but the role of these agents in the perioperative setting remains unclear. Here we report the results of an initial safety run-in of nivolumab when given in combination with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Methods: Pts with a localized T1N1-3M0 or T2-3N0-2M0 E/GEJ adenocarcinoma with an ECOG PS of 0-1 and whom were deemed surgical candidates for an esophagectomy by a qualified surgeon were eligible. In step 1, pts were randomized to neoadjuvant therapy with carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly x 5 along with 41.4-50.4 Gy radiation without (Arm A) or with (Arm B) nivolumab 240 mg IV during weeks 1 and 3 of treatment, followed by esophagectomy. Pts underwent a second randomization (step 2) to adjuvant nivolumab 240 mg IV every 2 weeks x 12 cycles with or without ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks during cycles 1, 4, 7 and 10. For the safety run-in, 30 pts were planned for accrual to allow for 12 evaluable pts per arm. Pts were followed for safety during neoadjuvant therapy through surgery and toxicities monitored per CTCAEv5. Pre-specified early stopping rules were defined to allow halting of the trial if deemed unsafe. Planned study accrual is 278 pts. Neoadjuvant primary endpoint is pathologic complete response rate, adjuvant primary endpoint is disease-free survival. Results: A total of 31 pts were enrolled to the safety run-in element of the study (Arm A, n = 16; Arm B n = 15). Male, 94%; White, 100%; median age, 62; esophageal adenocarcinoma, 52%; GEJ, 48%. Grade (G) 3 events occurring in more than one pt on Arm A—decreased lymphocytes (n = 5). G4 events occurring on Arm A—decreased lymphocytes (n = 1). G3 events occurring in more than one pt on Arm B—decreased lymphocytes (n = 2); anemia (n = 2); leukopenia (n = 4); hypotension (n = 2). G4 events occurring on Arm B—decreased lymphocytes (n = 3); cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion (n = 1). Cardiac events were thought to be secondary to tumor location, not neoadjuvant treatment. On Arm B, notable G3 events seen in one pt each included colonic obstruction, wound infection and esophageal anastomotic leak. Of pts who have reached the time for surgery, 12/14 pts on Arm A and 13/13 pts on Arm B have proceeded to surgery. Of pts who have completed step 1, 7/14 pts on Arm A and 8/11 pts on Arm B have registered to step 2. Conclusions: The addition of nivolumab to carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiation in the neoadjuvant setting appears to be safe with no disproportionate level of toxicity observed between the two treatment arms. Accrual to the remainder of the trial continues with 43/278 patients accrued. Clinical trial information: NCT03604991.

Comparing the clinical impact of pancreatic cyst surveillance programs: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (EA2185)

TPS10608

Background: The optimal surveillance strategy for pancreatic cysts, which occur in up to 20% of the adult population, is ill defined. Although risk of malignant degeneration of these cysts is low, pancreatic cancer mortality remains high. Two cyst surveillance guidelines, one proposed by an international consensus group (Fukuoka) and the other by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), are accepted standards. Both rely on radiographic and endoscopic ultrasonographic imaging. They differ in indications for, and intervals between, imaging tests, with the Fukuoka guideline advocating more intensive imaging. Clinical guidelines that provide discordant recommendations may undercut the quality and/or value of care, and have implications for societal health care costs. The primary objective of this prospective trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness and associated resource utilization of the Fukuoka and AGA guidelines for pancreatic cyst surveillance. Secondary objectives include a comparison of resource utilization and patient reported outcomes. We are also collecting and banking radiomics data and biospecimens to identify novel methods that might improve cancer risk stratification. Methods: 4606 asymptomatic patients with newly identified pancreatic cysts ≥1cm in diameter are being randomized 1:1 to high intensity (Fukuoka) or low intensity (AGA) surveillance. The primary endpoint is a composite of any pancreatic cancer without surgery, unresectable pancreatic cancer or cancer > T1a, N0 at surgery, and benign disease at surgery. This sample size will provide 90% power to identify a 30% relative difference in the primary outcome at 5 years between the two study arms. Study duration is 8 years in total, allowing for 2 years of cohort enrollment, 5 years of prospective follow-up, and six months reserved for study initiation and close out. Study participants must be ≥ 50 years and ≤ 75 years with an ECOG Performance Status 0-1 at baseline. Participants must have received a CT or MRI within 6 months of registration that identifies a new ≥1 cm pancreatic cyst. Patients with a prior diagnosis of a pancreatic cyst, pancreatic malignancy or a history of pancreatic resection are not eligible. Additional exclusion criteria include a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis, a family history of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 1 or more first degree relatives, imaging findings or clinical signs that would prompt immediate surgical consideration (enhancing mural nodule, solid component in cyst, pancreatic duct > 10mm, cyst causing obstructive jaundice), a comorbid illness that precludes pancreatic cyst resection, pregnancy or current participation in an established surveillance program. As of February 4, 2021, thirty three (33) participants have been enrolled from two hundred (200) potential sites. Clinical trial information: NCT04239573 .

The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design

Background

The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with refractory malignancies to treatment targeted to potential tumor molecular drivers regardless of cancer histology.

Methods

Trial development required assumptions about molecular target prevalence, accrual rates, treatment eligibility, and enrollment rates as well as consideration of logistical requirements. Central tumor profiling was performed with an investigational next-generation DNA–targeted sequencing assay of alterations in 143 genes, and protein expression of protein expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, mutL homolog 1, mutS homolog 2, and RB transcriptional corepressor 1. Treatments were allocated with a validated computational platform (MATCHBOX). A preplanned interim analysis evaluated assumptions and feasibility in this novel trial.

Results

At interim analysis, accrual was robust, tumor biopsies were safe (<1% severe events), and profiling success was 87.3%. Actionable molecular alteration frequency met expectations, but assignment and enrollment lagged due to histology exclusions and mismatch of resources to demand. To address this lag, we revised estimates of mutation frequencies, increased screening sample size, added treatments, and improved assay throughput and efficiency (93.9% completion and 14-day turnaround).

Conclusions

The experiences in the design and implementation of the NCI-MATCH trial suggest that profiling from fresh tumor biopsies and assigning treatment can be performed efficiently in a large national network trial. The success of such trials necessitates a broad screening approach and many treatment options easily accessible to patients.

Comparative Effectiveness of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The use of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer has been increasing in recent years, but the long-term overall survival characteristics of this approach is currently unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer within the National Cancer Database. Patients who received TNT (defined as chemotherapy, followed by CRT, followed by surgery) were propensity score matched to patients who received adjuvant therapy (defined as CRT, followed by surgery, followed by chemotherapy). We compared overall survival (OS) and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) between the 2 arms.

RESULTS

Of the 4300 patients in our cohort, 3502 (81%) received adjuvant therapy and 798 (19%) received TNT. At baseline, patients who received TNT were more likely to have higher clinical T and N stages (P< .001). The 5-year OS was 77% for both TNT and adjuvant therapy patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.28, P = .57). After propensity score matching and adjusting for potential confounders, there were no significant differences in OS (HR_adj 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.40, P = .99). After propensity score matching, there were higher pCR rates among TNT patients (16.1%) compared to adjuvant therapy patients (12.0%) (P = .037).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, we found TNT was not associated with a lower OS compared to standard adjuvant chemotherapy. This finding potentially reassures clinicians choosing TNT as an alternative to adjuvant chemotherapy. However, future prospective data are needed to confirm these findings.

Comparative Effectiveness of Proton vs Photon Therapy as Part of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cancer

Importance

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard-of-care curative treatment for many cancers but is associated with substantial morbidity. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy administered with proton therapy might reduce toxicity and achieve comparable cancer control outcomes compared with conventional photon radiotherapy by reducing the radiation dose to normal tissues.

Objective

To assess whether proton therapy in the setting of concurrent chemoradiotherapy is associated with fewer 90-day unplanned hospitalizations (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4 [CTCAEv4], grade ≥3) or other adverse events and similar disease-free and overall survival compared with concurrent photon therapy and chemoradiotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, nonrandomized comparative effectiveness study included 1483 adult patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with curative intent from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2016, at a large academic health system. Three hundred ninety-one patients received proton therapy and 1092, photon therapy. Data were analyzed from October 15, 2018, through February 1, 2019.

Interventions

Proton vs photon chemoradiotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was 90-day adverse events associated with unplanned hospitalizations (CTCAEv4 grade ≥3). Secondary end points included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status decline during treatment, 90-day adverse events of at least CTCAEv4 grade 2 that limit instrumental activities of daily living, and disease-free and overall survival. Data on adverse events and survival were gathered prospectively. Modified Poisson regression models with inverse propensity score weighting were used to model adverse event outcomes, and Cox proportional hazards regression models with weighting were used for survival outcomes. Propensity scores were estimated using an ensemble machine-learning approach.

Results

Among the 1483 patients included in the analysis (935 men [63.0%]; median age, 62 [range, 18-93] years), those receiving proton therapy were significantly older (median age, 66 [range, 18-93] vs 61 [range, 19-91] years; P < .01), had less favorable Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores (median, 3.0 vs 2.0; P < .01), and had lower integral radiation dose to tissues outside the target (mean [SD] volume, 14.1 [6.4] vs 19.1 [10.6] cGy/cc × 107; P < .01). Baseline grade ≥2 toxicity (22% vs 24%; P = .37) and ECOG performance status (mean [SD], 0.62 [0.74] vs 0.68 [0.80]; P = .16) were similar between the 2 cohorts. In propensity score weighted-analyses, proton chemoradiotherapy was associated with a significantly lower relative risk of 90-day adverse events of at least grade 3 (0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.66; P = .002), 90-day adverse events of at least grade 2 (0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P = .006), and decline in performance status during treatment (0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.71; P < .001). There was no difference in disease-free or overall survival.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this analysis, proton chemoradiotherapy was associated with significantly reduced acute adverse events that caused unplanned hospitalizations, with similar disease-free and overall survival. Prospective trials are warranted to validate these results.

Molecular Landscape and Actionable Alterations in a Genomically Guided Cancer Clinical Trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH)

Therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across cancer types. The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial was designed to evaluate targeted therapy antitumor activity in underexplored cancer types. Tumor biopsy specimens were analyzed centrally with next-generation sequencing (NGS) in a master screening protocol. Patients with a tumor molecular alteration addressed by a targeted treatment lacking established efficacy in that tumor type were assigned to 1 of 30 treatments in parallel, single-arm, phase II subprotocols.

What happened to the US cancer cooperative groups? A status update ten years after the Institute of Medicine report

The US cancer cooperative groups (cooperative groups) were founded in the 1950s to establish a standing infrastructure to conduct multi-institutional cancer clinical trials. Initially funded almost entirely by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI), over the years, the research conducted by the Cooperative Groups has evolved to meet the demands of cancer clinical research, with a scope now encompassing trials to advance cancer treatment, cancer control, biomarker development and validation, and health services research, with a corresponding broadening of their funding sources. The cooperative groups are also a critical mechanism for educating the next generation of cancer clinical trialists from many different disciplines. This review outlines the overall mission, structure, and funding of the cooperative groups, beginning in 1955 when they were first established by the NCI, and describes the considerable progress against cancer achieved over the past decade.

Comparing the clinical impact of pancreatic cyst surveillance programs: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (EA2185)

BACKGROUND

The optimal surveillance strategy for pancreatic cysts, which occur in up to 20% of the adult population, is ill defined. The risk of malignant degeneration of these cysts is low, however the morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic cancer are high. Two clinical surveillance guidelines are in regular use. Both the Fukuoka and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines rely on radiographic and endoscopic imaging. They differ primarily in their recommended frequencies of interval surveillance imaging. While evidence driven clinical guidelines should promote higher quality care, competing guidelines on the same topic may provide discordant recommendations and potential reduction in the quality and/or value of care.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the two surveillance guidelines to identify patients most likely to benefit from pancreatic resection. Secondary objectives include comparison of resource utilization, patient reported outcomes, incidental findings are other clinical outcomes.

METHODS

4606 asymptomatic patients with newly identified pancreatic cysts ≥1 cm in diameter will be randomized 1:1 to high intensity (Fukuoka) or low intensity (AGA) surveillance. All participants will be followed prospectively for 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Differing guidelines confuse providers, patients and policymakers. This large, prospective, randomized trial will compare the clinical effectiveness and resource allocation requirements of two guidelines addressing a common clinical entity. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04239573.

Radiology teaching improves Anatomy scores for medical students

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate if small group teaching in Radiology impacted Anatomy scores in the summative end of year examination.

Methods:

Small group teaching in Radiology was incorporated into Anatomy of year one medical students during the academic years 2016/17 and 2017/18. Examination outcome for 2 years before and 1 year after the study period were compared.

Question papers for end of year summative examinations were retrieved; questions relating to Anatomy were identified and anonymised scores for students were obtained.

Results:

Student numbers ranged 238 to 290/year. Mean Anatomy scores ranged 62–74%, this compared with mean total exam score of 62–65%. No significant difference in Anatomy and Total examination scores for 2015, 2016 and 2019. Mean (SD) Anatomy scores were significantly higher than the Total examination scores for the study period of 2017 and 2018 [68.97 (17.32) vs 63.12 (11.51) and 73.77 (17.85) vs 64.99 (10.31) (p < 0.001)]. Combined Anatomy scores 2017 and 2018 were significantly higher than 2015 and 2016, difference of 5.50 (95% C.I. 3.31–7.70; p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

This is the first study to objectively demonstrate Radiology small group teaching significantly improved Anatomy scores for medical students in the summative end of year examination.

Advances in knowledge:

No evidence in the literature that Radiology teaching improves examination outcomes for medical students.

This is the first study to directly link Radiology teaching with improved Anatomy examination result.

Small group teaching in Radiology is a feasible way to teach Anatomy.

Phase II Trial of Palbociclib in Patients with Advanced Esophageal or Gastric Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

Palbociclib monotherapy demonstrated minimal clinical activity in patients with previously treated gastroesophageal cancers. Further clinical evaluation of palbociclib monotherapy is not warranted in gastroesophageal cancers, but improved understanding of resistance mechanisms may permit rational combination approaches.

BACKGROUND

Dysregulation of the cell cycle is a hallmark of cancer. Progression through the G1/S transition requires phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (RB) by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6, which are regulated by cyclins D and E. Amplifications of cyclin D loci and activating mutations in CDKs are frequent molecular aberrations in gastroesophageal malignancies. We conducted a phase II trial of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib as an initial test of efficacy.

METHODS

Patients with previously treated metastatic gastroesophageal cancers with intact RB nuclear expression by immunohistochemistry were treated with 125 mg daily of palbociclib for days 1-21 of 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate.

RESULTS

We screened 29 patients and enrolled 21 patients: 5 with gastric adenocarcinoma, 3 with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 8 with esophageal adenocarcinoma, and 5 with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. All 29 tumors screened had intact nuclear RB expression, and four treated patients tested positive for CCND1 overexpression. No objective responses were seen. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months, and median overall survival was 3.0 months. All recurrent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hematologic, with neutropenia in eight patients (38%), anemia in four patients (19%), and thrombocytopenia in two patients (10%).

CONCLUSION

Palbociclib has limited single-agent activity in gastroesophageal tumors.

Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients With Tumors With BRAFV600E Mutations: Results of the NCI-MATCH Trial Subprotocol H

PURPOSE

BRAF^V600 mutations are commonly found in melanoma and thyroid cancers and to a lesser degree in other tumor types. Subprotocol H (EAY131-H) of the NCI-MATCH platform trial sought to investigate the selective BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK1/2 inhibitor trametinib in patients with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma whose tumors harbored a BRAF^V600 mutation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

EAY131-H is an open-label, single-arm study. Patients with melanoma, thyroid, or colorectal cancer were excluded; patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were later excluded in an amendment. Patients received dabrafenib 150 mg twice per day and trametinib 2 mg per day continuously until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 29 were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the protocol. Median age was 59 years, and 45% of the patients had received ≥ 3 lines of therapy. The confirmed ORR was 38% (90% CI, 22.9% to 54.9%) with P < .0001 against a null rate of 5%, and PFS was 11.4 months (90% CI, 8.4 to 16.3 months); responses were seen in 7 distinct tumor types. Seven patients had a duration of response of > 12 months, including 4 patients with a duration of response of > 24 months. An additional 8 patients had a PFS > 6 months. The median overall survival was 28.6 months. Reported adverse events were comparable to those noted in previously reported profiles of dabrafenib and trametinib.

CONCLUSION

This study met its primary end point, with an ORR of 38% (P < .0001) in this mixed histology, pretreated cohort. This promising activity warrants additional investigations in BRAF^V600-mutated tumors outside of currently approved indications.

Early treatment-related neutropenia predicts response to palbociclib

BACKGROUND

Palbociclib is highly active in oestrogen-receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer, but neutropenia is dose limiting. The goal of this study was to determine whether early neutropenia is associated with disease response to single-agent palbociclib.

METHODS

Blood count and disease-response data were analysed from two Phase 2 clinical trials at different institutions using single-agent palbociclib: advanced solid tumours positive for retinoblastoma protein and advanced liposarcoma. The primary endpoint was PFS. The primary exposure variable was the nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) during the first two cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-six patients (61 breast, 135 non-breast) were evaluated between the two trials. Development of any grade neutropenia was significantly associated with longer median PFS in both the breast cancer (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.74, p = 0.010) and non-breast cancer (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006) cohorts. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly associated with prolonged PFS in the non-breast cohort (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006) but not in the breast cohort (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51-1.47, p = 0.596). Multivariate analysis yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-related neutropenia in the first two cycles was significantly and independently associated with prolonged PFS, suggesting that neutropenia may be a useful pharmacodynamic marker to guide individualised palbociclib dosing.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Basket Trial: NCT01037790; Sarcoma Trial: NCT01209598.

Open-label, Phase I Study of Nivolumab Combined with nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Assess safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer in a two-part, open-label, phase I trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty chemotherapy-naive patients received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m² plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² (days 1, 8, and 15) and nivolumab 3 mg/kg (days 1 and 15) in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; part 1) and grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs (parts 1/2). Secondary efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response. Assessment of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was an exploratory endpoint; additional biomarkers were assessed post hoc.

RESULTS

One DLT (hepatitis) was reported in part 1 among six DLT-evaluable patients; 48 of 50 patients experienced grade 3/4 TEAEs and 18 discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. One grade 5 TEAE (respiratory failure) was reported. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] PFS/OS was 5.5 (3.25-7.20 months)/9.9 (6.74-12.16 months) months, respectively [median follow-up for OS, 13.6 months (95% CI, 12.06-23.49 months)]. Overall response rate (95% CI) was 18% (8.6%-31.4%). Median PFS/OS was 5.5/9.7 months (PD-L1 <5%) and 6.8/11.6 months (PD-L1 ≥5%), respectively. Proportion of peripheral Ki67⁺ CD8⁺/CD4⁺ cells increased significantly from baseline to cycle 3; median peak on-treatment Ki67⁺ CD8⁺ T-cell values were higher in responders than in nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of nivolumab plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine at standard doses in advanced pancreatic cancer was manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. Overall, the clinical results of this study do not support further investigation.

BRAF-Mutant Transcriptional Subtypes Predict Outcome of Combined BRAF, MEK, and EGFR Blockade with Dabrafenib, Trametinib, and Panitumumab in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The influence of the transcriptional and immunologic context of mutations on therapeutic outcomes with targeted therapy in cancer has not been well defined. BRAF V600E-mutant (BM) colorectal cancer comprises two main transcriptional subtypes, BM1 and BM2. We sought to determine the impact of BM subtype, as well as distinct biological features of those subtypes, on response to BRAF/MEK/EGFR inhibition in patients with colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Paired fresh tumor biopsies were acquired at baseline and on day 15 of treatment from all consenting patients with BM colorectal cancer enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab. For each sample, BM subtype, cell cycle, and immune gene signature expression were determined using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), and a Cox proportional hazards model was applied to determine association with progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Confirmed response rates, median PFS, and median overall survival (OS) were higher in BM1 subtype patients compared with BM2 subtype patients. Evaluation of immune contexture identified greater immune reactivity in BM1, whereas cell-cycle signatures were more highly expressed in BM2. A multivariate model of PFS incorporating BM subtype plus immune and cell-cycle signatures revealed that BM subtype encompasses the majority of the effect.

CONCLUSIONS

BM subtype is significantly associated with the outcome of combination dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab therapy and may serve as a standalone predictive biomarker beyond mutational status. Our findings support a more nuanced approach to targeted therapeutic decisions that incorporates assessment of transcriptional context.

Phase II Study of AZD4547 in Patients With Tumors Harboring Aberrations in the FGFR Pathway: Results From the NCI-MATCH Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol W

PURPOSE

NCI-MATCH is a nationwide, histology-agnostic, signal-finding, molecular profile-driven trial for patients with refractory cancers, lymphomas, or myelomas. Patients with tumors harboring actionable aberration(s) in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 were treated with AZD4547, an oral FGFR1-3 inhibitor.

METHODS

Patients' tumors were screened by next-generation sequencing for predefined FGFR amplification, activating mutations, or fusions. Patients were treated with AZD4547, 80 mg orally twice daily until progression of disease or drug intolerance. A response rate of 16% was considered promising.

RESULTS

Between July 2016 and June 2017, 70 patients were assigned and 48 received protocol therapy and are eligible for analysis. Patients' tumors harbored FGFR1 or FGFR2 amplification (n = 20), FGFR2 or FGFR3 single-nucleotide variants (n = 19), or FGFR1 or FGFR3 fusions (n = 9). The most common primary tumors were breast (33.3%), urothelial (12.5%), and cervical cancer (10.4%).Grade 3 adverse events were consistent with those described in previous clinical trials. Confirmed partial responses were seen in 8% (90% CI, 3% to 18%) and were observed only in patients whose tumors harbored FGFR1-3 point mutations or fusions. Stable disease was observed in 37.5% (90% CI, 25.8% to 50.4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months, and the 6-month PFS rate was 15% (90% CI, 8% to 31%). For patients with tumors harboring FGFR fusions, the response rate was 22% (90% CI, 4.1% to 55%), and 6-month PFS rate was 56% (90% CI, 31% to 100%).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary signals of activity appeared to be limited to cancers harboring FGFR activating mutations and fusions, although AZD4547 did not meet the primary end point. Different FGFR somatic alterations may confer different levels of signaling potency and/or oncogene dependence.

BET inhibitor molibresib for the treatment of advanced solid tumors: Final results from an open-label phase I/II study

3618

Background: Molibresib is an orally available, small molecule bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) protein inhibitor under investigation for treatment of advanced solid tumors. Methods: This was an open-label, single- and repeat-dose, 2-part, Phase 1/2 study including patients (aged ≥16 years) with advanced solid tumors. Part 1: patients received different oral doses of molibresib (2–100mg QD; amorphous free-base formulation) to determine recommended Phase 2 dose. Part 2 (expansion cohort): patients with various tumor types received the bioequivalent besylate formulation (75mg) to explore clinical activity at recommended dose. Safety and efficacy (response rate [RR] based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) were evaluated for the total cohort (patients from Part 1 and 2). Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy per tumor type were evaluated in Part 2. Results: Part 1 only data have previously been reported. Overall, 196 patients were included in the total cohort (1 patient in Part 1 was counted twice). In the all treated population, 195 patients (median age 58 years; 46% male) received ≥1 dose of molibresib (Part 1: n = 93; Part 2: n = 102). Adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 193/196 (98%) patients; 180/196 (92%) had a treatment-related AE (TRAE). AEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 38/196 (19%) patients. Of different tumor types in Part 2, NUT carcinoma (NC) had the lowest frequency of TRAEs (10/12 [83%]) and AEs leading to permanent treatment discontinuation (1/12 [8%]). In total cohort, 3/31 NC patients and 1/35 with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) achieved a confirmed partial response. A further 67/196 (34%) achieved stable disease (SD). In Part 2, RR in 12 NC patients was 8% (CI: 0.2–38.5); 50% had SD and median PFS was 4.8 months with median OS of 5.0 months. In CRPC patients, RR was 4% (CI: 0.1–21.9); 22% had SD; median PFS was 8.0 months with median OS of 9.1 months. Plasma concentrations for molibresib and active metabolites were similar between different tumor types. Gene expression analysis from pre- and post-dose biopsy samples collected from 10 mCRPC patients showed transcriptional downregulation of Myc target genes upon treatment with molibresib. Conclusions: Molibresib demonstrated a manageable safety and tolerability profile with single agent activity observed in selected patients with NC and CRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT01587703 .

Phase II study of copanlisib in patients with tumors with PIK3CA mutations (PTEN loss allowed): NCI MATCH EAY131-Z1F

3506

Background: The NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a platform trial that enrolls patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on matching genomic alterations of interest (NCT02465060). Arm Z1F evaluated copanlisib, a highly selective, pan-Class 1 PI3K inhibitor with predominant activity against both the δ and α isoforms in pts with PIK3CA mutations. Methods: Pts received copanlisib (60 mg IV) on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles until progression/toxicity. Tumor assessment was every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were PFS, 6-month PFS, and predictive biomarkers. Pts with KRAS mutations, HER2+ve breast cancers, lymphomas were excluded. Results: 35 pts were enrolled (from 8/2/18 to 12/27/18), of which, 28 pts were available for analysis (7 patients, not eligible or did not start therapy). Multiple histologies were enrolled with gynecologic (n = 7), gastrointestinal (n = 6), and genitourinary (n = 5) the most common tumors. Median age 61 (range 42-78). 75% of pts had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. 54% of PIK3CA mutations were located in the helical domain, 32% in kinase domain and 14% in other domains. Twenty-six pts had co-occurring gene alterations (median 3; range 1-9), with 9 patients having 4 or more gene alterations. The ORR was 11% (3/28, 90% CI: 3%-25%). Partial responses were seen in uterine cancer, clear cell carcinoma of anterior abdominal wall, and liposarcoma. 6 pts had > 6 months of stable disease and clinical benefit rate was 32% (9/28). Two pts are still on treatment. The most common reason for protocol discontinuation was disease progression (n = 18, 69%). Thirty pts were included for toxicity analysis. Ten pts (33%) had grade 1 or 2 toxicities, 16 pts (53%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0). Most common toxicities include hyperglycemia (n = 19), fatigue (n = 11), hypertension (n = 10), diarrhea (n = 10), and nausea (n = 9). Total of 5 deaths were reported, none related to treatment. Conclusions: Copanlisib showed meaningful clinical activity across various tumors with PIK3CA mutation in the late-line refractory setting. Further study either alone or in combinations in select tumors is warranted. G3/4 toxicities observed were consistent with reported toxicities for PI3K pathway inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060 .

Comparative effectiveness of proton versus photon chemoradiotherapy for patients with private insurance

7049

Background: Proton therapy may increase the tolerability/efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) but is controversial & generally not covered by private insurers. There is little data on the comparative effectiveness (CE) of proton vs photon CRT among private insurance pts to guide payers on proton coverage policies. Methods: We conducted a CE study of adult non-metastatic cancer pts with private insurance treated with curative-intent proton vs photon CRT from 2011-2016 at Penn. The choice of radiation modality was heavily influenced by the insurer’s proton coverage policy. Data on adverse events (AEs) & survival were gathered prospectively using standardized templates. Primary endpoint was 90-day AEs associated with unplanned hospitalizations (CTCAEv4 grade ≥3 AEs). Secondary endpoints included 90-day grade ≥2 AEs, decline in ECOG performance status (PS) during treatment, disease-free survival (DFS) & overall survival (OS). Modified Poisson regression models with inverse propensity score weighting were used for adverse event outcomes. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival outcomes. Propensity scores were estimated using an ensemble machine-learning approach. P<0.01 was significant. Results: 920 pts were included (178 proton/742 photon), with H&N(25 proton/296 photon); CNS(44/128); lung(41/120); upper GI(34/78) & lower GI/GYN(34/120). Median age was 57. Race, comorbidity score, BMI, baseline AEs & baseline PS were similar (p>0.05 for all). 11.2% of proton pts had grade ≥3 AE’s vs 26.8% of photon pts. On propensity score weighted-analyses, proton CRT was associated with significantly lower relative risk (RR) of 90-day grade ≥3 AEs (RR 0.51, 95%CI 0.32-0.81, p<0.01). 90-day grade ≥2 AE’s (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.83-0.99, p=0.03); decline in PS (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.70-1.04, p=0.11); DFS (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.27-1.52, p=0.31) & OS (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.18-1.52, p=0.24) favored protons. Sensitivity analysis showed that a substantial imbalance in an unmeasured confounder would be needed to alter the significance of the primary outcome. Proton accepting insurance status was not associated with a difference in 90-day grade ≥3 AE’s (RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.10, p=0.54) for pts treated with photon CRT (608 with non-proton accepting insurance & 134 with proton-accepting insurance). Conclusions: In adults with private insurance, proton CRT was associated with significantly reduced acute grade ≥3 AE’s with similar DFS & OS. Proton-accepting insurance status was not associated with better health outcomes when adjusting for RT modality.

A phase II/III study of perioperative nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients (pts) with locoregional esophageal (E) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (EA2174)

TPS4651

Background: E/GEJ adenocarcinoma has a high mortality rate despite curative intent treatment. A pathologic complete response (pCR) is associated with better overall survival (OS) but occurs in less than 30% of pts. Immunotherapy is effective in the metastatic setting. Here we aim to evaluate the contribution of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings in pts with locoregional E/GEJ cancer. Methods: This is a multi-center, randomized phase II/III trial. Surgical candidates with locoregional E/GEJ adenocarcinoma receive carboplatin AUC 2 IV and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 IV, both weekly x 5 during concurrent radiation (50.4 Gy) either with or without nivolumab 240 mg IV during weeks 1 and 3, followed by surgery. Pts with no post-operative disease receive nivolumab 240 mg IV every 2 weeks for 12 cycles either with or without ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks for 4 cycles. Eligibility criteria include pts with T1-N1-3M0 or T2-3N0-2M0 disease whom are candidates for surgery, no prior chemotherapy or radiation for this disease, no prior immunotherapy, no significant autoimmune disease. Pts must be disease free for adjuvant treatment. Primary neoadjuvant endpoint is pCR rate; primary adjuvant endpoint is disease free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints include toxicity, DFS and OS. Pre- and mid-treatment diffusion weighted imaging MRI will be conducted during the neoadjuvant portion of the study. A neoadjuvant safety run in of 30 pts is underway. Overall, 278 pts will be needed to detect an absolute improvement of 15% in pCR rate in pts receiving and not receiving neoadjuvant nivolumab and 236 pts will be needed to detect a HR of 0.65 in favor of adjuvant ipilimumab/nivolumab over nivolumab (90% power, one sided alpha of 0.10). Accrual is expected over 34 months at a rate of 8 patients per month. If favorable at interim analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT03604991 .

Trametinib Activity in Patients with Solid Tumors and Lymphomas Harboring BRAF Non-V600 Mutations or Fusions: Results from NCI-MATCH (EAY131)

PURPOSE

Substantial preclinical evidence and case reports suggest that MEK inhibition is an active approach in tumors with BRAF mutations outside the V600 locus, and in BRAF fusions. Thus, Subprotocol R of the NCI-MATCH study tested the MEK inhibitor trametinib in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The NCI-MATCH study performed genomic profiling on tumor samples from patients with solid tumors and lymphomas progressing on standard therapies or with no standard treatments. Patients with prespecified fusions and non-V600 mutations in BRAF were assigned to Subprotocol R using the NCI-MATCHBOX algorithm. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Among 50 patients assigned, 32 were eligible and received therapy with trametinib. Of these, 1 had a BRAF fusion and 31 had BRAF mutations (13 and 19 with class 2 and 3 mutations, respectively). There were no complete responses; 1 patient (3%) had a confirmed partial response (patient with breast ductal adenocarcinoma with BRAF G469E mutation) and 10 patients had stable disease as best response (clinical benefit rate 34%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months, and median overall survival was 5.7 months. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed that patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 8) had particularly poor PFS. No new toxicity signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Trametinib did not show promising clinical activity in patients with tumors harboring non-V600 BRAF mutations, and the subprotocol did not meet its primary endpoint.

A Phase I Study of GGTI-2418 (Geranylgeranyl Transferase I Inhibitor) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

Geranylgeranyltransferase I (GGTase I) catalyzes geranylgeranylation, a modification required for the function of many oncogenic RAS-related proteins. GGTI-2418 is a peptidomimetic small molecule inhibitor of GGTase I.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of GGTI-2418 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study conducted in two US centers (University of Pennsylvania and Indiana University) in adults with treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors. An accelerated dose-escalation schema was used across eight dose levels, from 120 to 2060 mg/m², administered on days 1-5 of each 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and 2060 mg/m² was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose. The only potential drug-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities were elevated bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase in a single patient with concurrent malignant biliary obstruction. No objective responses were observed. Four of thirteen evaluable patients had stable disease for up to 6.7 months. The study was terminated prior to dose expansion based on a sponsor decision. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated a mean terminal half-life of 1.1 h.

CONCLUSIONS

GGTI2418 was safe and tolerable at all tested dose levels with some evidence of disease stability. Due to rapid elimination, dosing of GGTI2418 in this study may have been inadequate to achieve optimal inhibition of its target, GGTase I.

Effect of Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel With or Without Hydroxychloroquine on Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Autophagy is a mechanism of treatment resistance to chemotherapy that has a role in the maintenance of pancreatic cancer. Hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ) is an inhibitor of autophagy that inhibits the fusion of the autophagosome to the lysosome.

Objective

To determine whether HCQ improves overall survival at 1 year in combination with gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel (GA) among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial conducted between March 18, 2013, and November 16, 2017, at the University of Pennsylvania, HonorHealth, and The Johns Hopkins University among 112 patients with previously untreated metastatic or advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate marrow and organ function. All efficacy analyses were performed for the intention-to-treat population.

Interventions

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive GA with or without HCQ. All patients received standard doses of GA, and those randomized to receive HCQ were treated continuously with 600 mg orally twice daily.

Main Outcome and Measure

Overall survival at 1 year.

Results

A total of 112 patients (45 women and 67 men; median age, 65 years; range, 43-86 years) were enrolled; 55 were randomized to receive GA plus HCQ, and 57 to receive GA. Overall survival at 12 months was 41% (95% CI, 27%-53%) in the HCQ group and 49% (95% CI, 35%-61%) in the non-HCQ group. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-9.3 months) in the HCQ group and 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.5-7.6 months) in the non-HCQ group. Median overall survival was 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.0-14.2 months) in the HCQ group and 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.3-15.5 months) in the non-HCQ group. Overall response rate was 38.2% (n = 21) in the HCQ group and 21.1% (n = 12) in the non-HCQ group (P = .047). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events that differed between the HCQ and non-HCQ groups were neutropenia (23 of 54 [42.6%] vs 12 of 53 [22.6%]), anemia (2 of 54 [3.7%] vs 9 of 53 [17.0%]), fatigue (4 of 54 [7.4%] vs 0), nausea (5 of 54 [9.3%] vs 0), peripheral neuropathy (7 of 54 [13.0%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), visual changes (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs 0), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs 0).

Conclusions and Relevance

The addition of HCQ to block autophagy did not improve the primary end point of overall survival at 12 months. These data do not support the routine use of GA plus HCQ for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the absence of a biomarker. However, improvement seen in the overall response rate with HCQ may indicate a role for HCQ in the locally advanced setting, where tumor response may permit resection.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01506973.

Platinum response characteristics of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a germline BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutation

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies suggest a survival benefit when platinum-based chemotherapy is administered to patients with pancreatic cancer harbouring a germline mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 (mut-positive PDAC). However, the objective response rate (ORR) and real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) achieved with such treatment remain ill-defined.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with advanced-stage mut-positive PDAC who had been treated with platinum-based therapy were matched by age, race and sex to 52 platinum-treated control PDAC patients. Responses to therapy were determined by RECIST v1.1, performed by blinded radiology review. Measured outcomes included ORR and rwPFS.

RESULTS

The ORR in mut-positive patients was 58% compared to 21% in the control group (p = 0.0022). There was no significant difference in ORR between platinum regimens in mut-positive patients (p = 0.814), whereas in control patients, the only observed responses were to FOLFIRINOX. rwPFS was 10.1 mo. for mut-positive patients and 6.9 mo. for controls (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.25-0.74; 0.0068).

CONCLUSION

Mut-positive PDAC has a high ORR and prolonged rwPFS to platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings may have implications particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, and for future clinical trial design, and highlight the importance of early germline testing in patients with PDAC.

A phase Ib/II study of the anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab with cetuximab in solid tumor and colorectal cancer patients

114

Background: Magrolimab (M, Hu5F9-G4) is an antibody targeting CD47, a macrophage “don’t eat me” signal that demonstrates preclinical synergy with cetuximab (C) in refractory KRAS wild type (KRASwt) and KRAS mutant (KRASm) colorectal (CRC) tumors. Methods: Phase (Ph) 1 doses of M+C were escalated in solid tumor patients (pts) and Ph 2 efficacy was explored in previously treated KRASwt and KRASm CRC patients. Day 1 priming with 1 mg/kg of M was used to mitigate on-target anemia followed by maintenance doses ranging from 10 to 45 mg/kg in combination with C. Ph 2 pts were treated with 30 or 45 mg/kg of M and 400/250 mg/m2 of C. Results: In 78 treated pts (32 Ph 1 and 46 Ph 2), the median age was 59 years (range 19-82), and median prior therapies was 5 (range 1-14). No maximum tolerated dose was reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any Grade (G) included dermatitis acneiform 36%, dry skin 33%, fatigue 32%, infusion reactions 31%, headache 30%, diarrhea 23%, nausea 23%, chills 23%, and anemia 22%. There were no fatal TRAEs and 3/78 (4%) discontinued M treatment due to any adverse events. In the combined Ph 1+2 study, 2 of 30 evaluable KRASwt CRC pts had confirmed PRs for 7.0 and 12.5 months (mo), for a 6.7% objective response rate (ORR). Both had prior C treatment. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 3.6 mo (95%CI 1.8-5.4) and 10.1 mo (95%CI: 6.9-14.4), respectively. In 40 evaluable KRASm pts, there were no responses but 45% had stable disease (SD) and the mPFS and mOS were 1.9 mo (95%CI: 1.8-3.5) and 10.4 mo (95%CI: 5.7-16.4), respectively. In 28 KRASm pts who were TAS102/regorafenib naïve, preliminary mOS was 12.4 mo (95%CI: 5.9-not reached) which is longer than that reported for historical controls. Tumor biopsies showed treatment-related increases in macrophage immune cell infiltrates in SD pts, and baseline T cell infiltration was associated with longer OS. Pharmacokinetic profiles will be presented. Conclusions: M+C is a novel, well-tolerated combination immunotherapeutic treatment regimen. Responses were observed in two previously treated CRC pts and survival is encouraging in KRASm pts. Funded by Forty Seven and California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Clinical trial information: NCT02953782.

Phase 2 study of vismodegib, a hedgehog inhibitor, combined with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The Hedgehog (Hh) signalling pathway is overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Preclinical studies have shown that Hh inhibitors reduce pancreatic cancer stem cells (pCSC), stroma and Hh signalling.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic PDA were treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Vismodegib was added starting on the second cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as compared with historical controls. Tumour biopsies to assess pCSC, stroma and Hh signalling were obtained before treatment and after cycle 1 (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) or after cycle 2 (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel plus vismodegib).

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 5.42 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.37-6.97) and 9.79 months (95% CI: 7.85-10.97), respectively. Of the 67 patients evaluable for response, 27 (40%) had a response: 26 (38.8%) partial responses and 1 complete response. In the tumour samples, there were no significant changes in ALDH + pCSC following treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding vismodegib to chemotherapy did not improve efficacy as compared with historical rates observed with chemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study does not support the further evaluation of Hh inhibitors in this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01088815.

Nivolumab Is Effective in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Noncolorectal Cancers: Results From Arm Z1D-A Subprotocol of the NCI-MATCH (EAY131) Study

PURPOSE

The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial, the largest national precision oncology study to date (> 1,100 sites) of patients with relapsed or refractory malignancies, assigned patients to targeted therapy in parallel phase II studies based on tumor molecular alterations. The anti-programmed death receptor 1 inhibitor nivolumab previously showed activity in mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient colon cancer. We hypothesized that nivolumab would have activity in patients with MMR-deficient, noncolorectal tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with relapsed or refractory tumors, good end-organ function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 1 underwent tumor biopsy for centralized screening of molecular alterations. MMR deficiency was defined by complete loss of nuclear expression of MLH1 or MSH2 MMR gene products by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients with MMR-deficient colorectal cancer were excluded. Nivolumab, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (28-day cycles) and 480 mg every 4 weeks after cycle 4, was administered intravenously. Disease reassessment was performed every 2 cycles. The primary end point was RECIST 1.1 objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Two percent of 4,902 screened patients had an MMR-deficient cancer by IHC. Forty-two evaluable patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years and a median of 3 prior therapies. The most common histologies were endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (n = 13), prostate adenocarcinoma (n = 5), and uterine carcinosarcoma (n = 4). ORR was 36% (15 of 42 patients). An additional 21% of patients had stable disease. The estimated 6-, 12-, and 18-month progression-free survival rates were 51.3% (90% CI, 38.2% to 64.5%), 46.2% (90% CI, 33.1% to 59.3%), and 31.4% (90% CI, 18.7% to 44.2%), respectively. Median overall survival was 17.3 months. Toxicity was predominantly low grade.

CONCLUSION

A variety of refractory cancers (2.0% of those screened) had MMR deficiency as defined in NCI-MATCH. Nivolumab has promising activity in MMR-deficient noncolorectal cancers of a wide variety of histopathologic types.

Intergroup Randomized Phase III Study of Postoperative Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Bevacizumab for Patients with Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Receiving Preoperative Chemoradiation: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (E5204)

BACKGROUND

The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colon cancer. E5204 was designed to test whether the addition of bevacizumab to mFOLFOX6, following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and definitive surgery, could improve overall survival (OS) in patients with stage II/III adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS

Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer who had completed neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation and had undergone complete resection were enrolled. Patients were randomized to mFOLFOX6 (Arm A) or mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab (Arm B) administered every 2 weeks for 12 cycles.

RESULTS

E5204 registered only 355 patients (17% of planned accrual goal) as it was terminated prematurely owing to poor accrual. At a median follow-up of 72 months, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (88.3% vs. 83.7%) or 5-year disease-free survival (71.2% vs. 76.5%) between the two arms. The rate of treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) was 68.8% on Arm A and 70.7% on Arm B. Arm B had a higher proportion of patients who discontinued therapy early as a result of AEs and patient withdrawal than did Arm A (32.4% vs. 21.5%, p = .029).The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia, leukopenia, neuropathy, diarrhea (without prior colostomy), and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

At 17% of its planned accrual, E5204 did not meet its primary endpoint. The addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOX6 in the adjuvant setting did not significantly improve OS in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

At 17% of its planned accrual, E5204 was terminated early owing to poor accrual. At a median follow-up of 72 months, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (88.3% vs. 83.7%) or in 5-year disease-free survival (71.2% vs. 76.5%) between the two arms. Despite significant advances in the treatment of rectal cancer, especially in improving local control rates, the risk of distant metastases and the need to further improve quality of life remain a challenge. Strategies combining novel agents with chemoradiation to improve both distant and local control are needed.

Abstract A089: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cohort of the NCI MATCH clinical trial (EAY131)

Background: Over the last 30 years, adolescent and young adult (AYA, 15-39 years of age) patients (pts) with cancer have experienced smaller improvements in 5-year survival compared to younger and older pts. One reason is their historically lower rate of participation in clinical trials (~3% AYA vs. 10% in pts &gt; 40 years of age in adult cancer centers). A histology-agnostic trial provides greater opportunity for the AYA population and may improve accrual. The National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH; NCT0246506), a phase II precision medicine trial evaluating targeted therapy in adult pts (3 18 years old) based on molecular abnormalities in a tumor-agnostic fashion, has been open since 2015. Jointly developed and coordinated by NCI and ECOG-ACRIN and open through the NCI National Clinical Trials Network and the NCI Community Oncology Research Program at more than 1100 academic and community sites, this trial screened 6801 pts for 39 independently-accruing targeted treatment subprotocols. We reviewed the AYA data from the NCI-MATCH trial, which, due to eligibility criteria, does not include pts age 15-17. Materials and Methods: AYA pts age 18-39 with treatment-refractory malignancies (solid tumor, lymphoma, or myeloma) who were (a) eligible for a screening biopsy on the NCI-MATCH trial (screening cohort [SC]) or (b) had an actionable mutation previously identified through clinically indicated sequencing at a CLIA-approved and NCI-MATCH–accepted laboratory (outside assay cohort [OAC]) were eligible for MATCH AYA analysis. Results: Of the 6801 pts screened for NCI-MATCH, 373 were AYA pts age 18-39 (5.5%). Within the SC, 93.5% (300/321) of AYA pts were successfully biopsied, vs. 92.9% of those age 40+ (5240/5640); 35.7% of the SC AYA vs. 39.6% of the 40+ pts had a study-eligible actionable mutation, and 17% (51/300) of AYA pts vs. 17.8% (934/5240) of those 40+ were subsequently assigned to treatment. Of the 401 pts in the OAC, 30 (7.1%) were AYA; 24/30 (80.0%) of AYA OAC pts were assigned to treatment vs. 87.6% (332/379) of OAC pts age 40+. Screening enrollment data show that at Lead Academic Participating Sites (LAPS), a higher percentage of AYA pts were enrolled compared to pts age 40+ (32.8% [113/344] vs. 24.3% [1472/6047], respectively). In contrast, at NCORP sites, a higher percentage of 40+ pts was enrolled relative to AYA pts (43.8% [2647/6047] vs. 35.8% [123/344], respectively). Among the top histologies enrolled (aside from colon, breast, ovarian) were soft tissue sarcoma other than rhabdomyosarcoma, primary CNS tumors, and liver and hepatobiliary, cervical, and neuroendocrine cancers. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences between AYA and older (40+) pts in the number who underwent successful biopsies, the prevalence of tumor actionable mutations, or the number of pts assigned to or who received study treatment. AYA pts were more likely to have been enrolled at a LAPS than a NCORP site, consistent with the AYA population being referred to LAPS upon progression from first-line treatment. Enrollment of the AYA in adult cancer centers in the NCI-MATCH trial was higher than the historical 3%: 5.5% in the SC and 7.1% in the OAC. As more tissue-agnostic studies become available in nationwide trials, AYA participation in clinical trials may increase.

Citation Format: Alice P Chen, Shuli Li, Brent Coffey, James V Tricoli, Stanley R Hamilton, Mickey P Williams, Edith P Mitchell, David Patton, Robert J Gray, Lisa M McShane, Lawrence V Rubinstein, Carlos L Arteaga, Peter J O'Dwyer, Lyndsay N Harris, Barbara A Conley, Keith T Flaherty. Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cohort of the NCI MATCH clinical trial (EAY131) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A089. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A089

Abstract A079: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH): A successful precision medicine signal-seeking trial in patients (pts) with rare variants and refractory malignancies

Introduction: NCI-MATCH, developed by ECOG-ACRIN & NCI, is the largest precision medicine study for pts with refractory malignancy. Over 1100 clinical sites in the National Clinical Trials Network enrolled pts. The purpose of the study is to identify potentially beneficial targeted treatments across tumor types with similar molecular abnormalities. Methods: The NCI Central IRB approved NCI-MATCH. Pts with refractory/no treatment available solid tumors, lymphomas or myelomas had a fresh biopsy profiled by next generation sequencing (143 genes, &gt; 4000 single nucleotide variants, indels, amplifications & targeted fusions). Pts are assigned by a defined algorithm to treatments with evidence of activity against tumors with the relevant molecular alteration. Pts are excluded if a treatment is FDA approved or known to be ineffective for their malignancy. After successfully sequencing fresh biopsies from 5540 pts, subprotocols with extremely rare variants lacked sufficient accrual. To address actionable variants with a prevalence of &lt; 1.5%, we decided to accept clinical sequencing results from 30 commercial and academic laboratories vetted by NCI-MATCH to address relevant variants. These labs notify clinicians participating in NCI-MATCH if their pt’s tumor contains an actionable variant. Treatment continues until tumors became refractory, pt intolerance or withdrawal of consent. An objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) of &gt; 16% among 31 eligible patients is considered a positive signal. Results: After screening 5540 pts, 37.6% had an actionable variant. After histology and treatment-specific exclusions, 17.8% were assigned and 69.5% enrolled on the assigned subprotocol. 11 of the initial 30 subprotocols reached completion with adequate follow-up. Of the first 11 evaluable subprotocols, 3 addressing rare variants had a positive signal: Nivolumab in pts with loss of expression of MLH1 or MSH2 (ORR 36%), capivasertib in pts with AKT mutations (ORR 23%), and dabrafenib + trametinib in pts with BRAF V600 mutations (ORR 33%). These molecular variants were found in 2%, 1.2% and 1.9% respectively, of screened pts. Two other subprotcocols (afatinib in ERBB2 mutations and AZD4547 in FGFR abnormalities) showed responses in rare tumors or specific variant subsets, respectively. As of July 15, 2019, an additional 378 of 432 (88%) pts have been assigned to a treatment with a clinical sequencing assay; 83% of these pts enrolled to 1 of 24 subprotocols, allowing completion of an additional 9 of the original 30 subprotocols and complete accrual to 2 of 5 recently added subprotocols. Four of 35 subprotocols closed for lack of accrual, 10 continue accruing and 4 are planned. Conclusions: Platform precision medicine trials can identify potentially useful targeted treatments for diverse malignancies in pts with uncommon tumors & rare actionable variants, an unmet need. In a population of pts with refractory cancers, lymphomas and myelomas, 30-40% will have an actionable variant for targeted treatment (investigational or standard). Of the first 11 subprotocols with adequate follow-up, 3 (27%) showed a positive signal and an additional 2 showed responses in rare tumors or in a molecular subset, suggesting that the NCI-MATCH trial approach identifies useful targets for further exploration.

Citation Format: Lyndsay N Harris, Robert J Gray, Barbara A Conley, Alice P Chen, Keith T Flaherty, Stanley R Hamilton, Paul M Williams, Chris Karlovich, David Patton, Shuli Li, Lisa M McShane, Larry V Rubinstein, Edith P Mitchell, James V Tricoli, Richard F Little, Carlos L Arteaga, Peter J O'Dwyer, NCI-MATCH team. National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH): A successful precision medicine signal-seeking trial in patients (pts) with rare variants and refractory malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A079. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A079

Safety and Efficacy Results of a Phase I, Open-Label Study of Concurrent and Delayed Nivolumab in Combination With nab-Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Multicenter, phase I study of concurrent and delayed nivolumab plus nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC (ineligible for potentially curative radiation or surgery) received nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m² (days 1, 8, 15) and carboplatin area under the curve 6 (day 1) intravenously every 21 days (first 4 cycles); nivolumab 5 mg/kg was administered intravenously (day 15) beginning in cycle 1 (concurrent) or cycle 3 (delayed) in separate cohorts and continued beyond the 4 chemotherapy cycles. The primary objective was to assess safety. Secondary objectives were to assess tolerability and explore antitumor activity.

Results: All 32 patients received chemotherapy; 20 of 22 and 6 of 10 patients also received concurrent or delayed nivolumab, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the concurrent cohort; 1 dose-limiting toxicity was reported in the delayed cohort. In the concurrent cohort, 20 patients (91%) had ≥1 grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), and 7 (32%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. In the delayed cohort, all patients had ≥1 grade 3/4 TEAE, and 2 (20%) discontinued due to TEAEs. The median progression-free and overall survival, respectively, were 10.5 and 29.3 months in the concurrent cohort and 4.1 and 8.2 months in the delayed cohort.

Conclusions: The safety profile of the combination was consistent with that of individual agents and generally similar in the 2 cohorts. Efficacy outcomes in the concurrent cohort, but not in the delayed cohort, were encouraging and support the rationale for concurrent administration of nivolumab with nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02309177

Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-amplified tumors excluding breast and gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas: results from the NCI-MATCH trial (EAY131) subprotocol Q

BACKGROUND

The National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) is a national precision medicine study incorporating centralized genomic testing to direct refractory cancer patients to molecularly targeted treatment subprotocols. This treatment subprotocol was designed to screen for potential signals of efficacy of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-amplified histologies other than breast and gastroesophageal tumors.

METHODS

Eligible patients had HER2 amplification at a copy number (CN) >7 based on targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a custom Oncomine AmpliSeq™ (ThermoFisher Scientific) panel. Patients with prior trastuzumab, pertuzumab or T-DM1 treatment were excluded. Patients received T-DM1 at 3.6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks until toxicity or disease progression. Tumor assessments occurred every three cycles. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). Exploratory end points included correlating response with HER2 CN by NGS. The impact of co-occurring genomic alterations and PTEN loss by immunohistochemistry were also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and 36 included in efficacy analysis. Median prior therapies in the metastatic setting was 3 (range 0-9; unknown in one patient). Median HER2 CN was 17 (range 7-139). Partial responses were observed in two (5.6%) patients: one mucoepidermoid carcinoma of parotid gland and one parotid gland squamous cell cancer. Seventeen patients (47%) had stable disease including 8/10 (80%) with ovarian and uterine carcinomas, with median duration of 4.6 months. The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 23.6% [90% confidence interval 14.2% to 39.2%]. Common toxicities included fatigue, anemia, fever and thrombocytopenia with no new safety signals. There was a trend for tumor shrinkage with higher levels of gene CN as determined by the NGS assay.

CONCLUSION

T-DM1 was well tolerated. While this subprotocol did not meet the primary end point for ORR in this heavily pre-treated diverse patient population, clinical activity was seen in salivary gland tumors warranting further study in this tumor type in dedicated trials.

Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine as First-line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Importance

Gemcitabine with platinum has limited efficacy for treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma, necessitating an evaluation of alternative drug combinations. Recent evidence suggests that paclitaxel may potentiate gemcitabine activity.

Objective

To evaluate whether gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel is safe and effective for treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-arm, 2-stage, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at 23 community and academic centers across the United States and Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older enrolled between September 2014 and March 2016 had confirmed advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma without prior systemic therapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0 to 1 and a Child-Pugh score less than 8. Previous surgery, radiation, or liver-directed therapies were permitted.

Interventions

Patients received intravenous nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m2, followed by gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was improvement in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (null and alternative hypotheses of 55% and 70%, respectively) in the evaluable population. Secondary outcomes included median overall survival (OS), PFS, time to progression, best overall response rate, disease control rate, safety and toxicity, and association of change in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 with survival.

Results

Seventy-four patients with a median age of 62 (range, 36-87) years, including 44 women (60%), were enrolled. Patients received a median of 6 (range, 1-18) treatment cycles, and the median follow-up was 10.2 (range, 0.6-27.3) months. The observed 6-month PFS rate of 61% (95% CI, 48%-73%) did not favor the alternative hypothesis. Median PFS was 7.7 (95% CI, 5.4-13.1) months, median OS was 12.4 (95% CI, 9.2-15.9) months, and median time to progression was 7.7 (95% CI, 6.1-13.1) months. The confirmed best overall response rate and disease control rate were 30% and 66%, respectively. Hazard ratios for an association between a change in serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and median PFS as well as median OS were 2.02 (95% CI, 0.86-4.75) (P = .10) and 1.54 (95% CI, 0.64-3.71) (P = .34), respectively. The most common treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic adverse events at grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (43%) and fatigue (14%), respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although the trial did not meet its primary efficacy end point, the results indicate that a nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine regimen was well tolerated and may be an alternative option to current therapeutic approaches for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02181634.

Phase II randomised discontinuation trial of brivanib in patients with advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Brivanib is a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling. We performed a phase II randomised discontinuation trial of brivanib in 7 tumour types (soft-tissue sarcomas [STS], ovarian cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC], gastric/esophageal cancer and transitional cell carcinoma [TCC]).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During a 12-week open-label lead-in period, patients received brivanib 800 mg daily and were evaluated for FGF2 status by immunohistochemistry. Patients with stable disease at week 12 were randomised to brivanib or placebo. A study steering committee evaluated week 12 response to determine if enrolment in a tumour type would continue. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) for brivanib versus placebo in patients with FGF2-positive tumours.

RESULTS

A total of 595 patients were treated, and stable disease was observed at the week 12 randomisation point in all tumour types. Closure decisions were made for breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, NSCLC, gastric cancer and TCC. Criteria for expansion were met for STS and ovarian cancer. In 53 randomised patients with STS and FGF2-positive tumours, the median PFS was 2.8 months for brivanib and 1.4 months for placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58, p = 0.08). For all randomised patients with sarcomas, the median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-4.0) for those treated with brivanib compared with 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3-1.6) for placebo (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.38-1.07; p = 0.09). In the 36 randomised patients with ovarian cancer and FGF2-positive tumours, the median PFS was 4.0 (95% CI: 2.6-4.2) months for brivanib and 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.2-2.7) for placebo (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.26-1.22). For all randomised patients with ovarian cancer, the median PFS in those randomised to brivanib was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.6-4.2) and was 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.2-2.7) in those randomised to placebo (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.25-1.17; p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Brivanib demonstrated activity in STS and ovarian cancer with an acceptable safety profile. FGF2 expression, as defined in the protocol, is not a predictive biomarker of the efficacy of brivanib.

Abstract CT234: A Phase II, single arm study of maintenance rucaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive advanced pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2

Background: PARP inhibitors have activity in multiple BRCA-related malignancies and have recently demonstrated dramatic efficacy as a maintenance strategy for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Between 5-8% of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) have a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2. Therefore, we initiated a single arm phase II clinical trial of maintenance monotherapy rucaparib in patients with advanced PC and a pathogenic germline or somatic BRCA or PALB2 mutation, whose cancer had not progressed following at least four months of platinum-based chemotherapy (NCT 03140670).

Methods: Patients were enrolled and treated with rucaparib 600mg PO BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Patients have previously received &gt;4 months of platinum-based chemotherapy without evidence of disease progression. However, patients with a medical contraindication to receiving the full four months of platinum have been permitted to enroll at the discretion of the primary investigator. Responses were determined using RECIST v1.1.

Results: As of December 31st, 2018, we have enrolled 24 of the planned 42 patients, of which 19 are evaluable for PFS at the time of this interim analysis. For these patients, the mutational distribution includes: 13 germline BRCA2, 3 germline BRCA1, 2 germline PALB2, 1 somatic BRCA2. Patients were predominantly female (84.2%) with a median age of 61 years (range: 35-81). Patients had received a median of four months (range 0.5-32 months) of prior platinum therapy for advanced disease. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Overall, treatment with rucaparib was well tolerated without dose limiting toxicities. The most common adverse events that were at least possibly related to treatment included nausea (grade 1, 41.6%; grade 2, 4.2%), dysgeusia (grade 1, 33.3%) and fatigue (grade 1, 25%). One patient required dose reduction for nausea. The median PFS was 9.1 months from the start of rucaparib therapy with an ORR of 36.8% (six PRs; one CR). Disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) was 89.5% for at least eight weeks. Two patients (10.5%) had progressive disease at first follow-up scan two months after beginning treatment. Eight patients have been on rucaparib for &gt;6 months and two patients remain on treatment for &gt;1 year (13 months and 15 months). The seven responding patients include those with germline BRCA2 mutations (4 patients), germline PALB2 mutations (2 patients) and somatic BRCA2 mutation (1 patient).

Conclusions: Based on these early data, maintenance rucaparib following induction with platinum-based chemotherapy shows encouraging disease control with minimal toxicity in patients with platinum-sensitive advanced PC and a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2.

Citation Format: Kim A. Reiss Binder, Rosemarie Mick, Mark O'Hara, Ursina Teitelbaum, Thomas Karasic, Charles Schneider, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Erica Carpenter, Austin Pantel, Mehran Makvandi, David Mankoff, Katherine Nathanson, Kara Maxwell, Stacy Cowden, Mary Jane Fuhrer, Janae Romeo, Gregory L. Beatty, Susan Domchek. A Phase II, single arm study of maintenance rucaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive advanced pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT234.

Dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with tumors with BRAF V600E/K mutations: Results from the molecular analysis for therapy choice (MATCH) Arm H

3002

Background: The NCI-MATCH precision medicine trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma with progression on prior treatment to a targeted therapy based on genetic alterations identified in pre-treatment biopsies. Arm H (EAY131-H) evaluated the combination of the BRAF inhibitor (inh) dabrafenib (DAB), and the MEK inh, trametinib (TRM), in pts with BRAF V600E/K mutations. Methods: Pts with melanoma, thyroid, or colorectal cancer were excluded. Pts with NSCLC were excluded after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved DAB/TRM for this indication. Pts received DAB 150 mg po BID and TRM 2 mg PO daily on 28 day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity; restaging was performed every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 35 pts were enrolled from 1/2016-2/2018; 2 were ineligible (CrCl below criteria; labs out of window). Over 17 distinct tumor histologies were represented. 58% of pts were female, median age was 63 (range 21-85), 94% were Caucasian, and 48% of pts had received at least 3 prior therapies (range 1- 8). The confirmed ORR was 33.3% (90% CI 19.9%, 49.1%), with a median duration of response (DoR) of 12 months (mon). Varied histologies had a DoR of > 12 mon: histiocytic sarcoma, cholangiocarcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary, among others. Median PFS was 9.4 mon; the 6 mon PFS rate was 70.6% (90% CI 58.2%-85.5%), and an additional 10 pts had a PFS > 5.5 mon. Median OS has not been reached. At the time of data cutoff (12/2018) 11 pts continue on treatment. Adverse events (AE) were comparable to previously reported profiles of DAB/TRM; no new AEs were identified. The most frequent grade 3 AEs were fatigue, neutropenia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, and urinary tract infection; there was 1 grade 4 sepsis; no grade 5 AEs. Conclusions: In this pre-treated, mixed histology cohort, DAB and TRM showed promising activity outside of currently approved FDA indications warranting further investigations. Correlative analyses are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060.

Comparative effectiveness of proton therapy versus photon therapy as part of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cancer

6521

Background: Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is standard-of-care curative treatment for many cancers, but is associated with substantial morbidity. Proton therapy may increase the tolerability or effectiveness of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy by reducing radiation to normal tissues. Methods: We conducted a comparative effectiveness study of adult non-metastatic cancer patients treated with curative intent with proton chemo-radiotherapy vs. photon chemo-radiotherapy from 2011-2016 at the University of Pennsylvania. Re-irradiation and disease sites treated with photon-only therapy were excluded. Data on adverse events and survival was gathered prospectively. Primary endpoint was 90-day adverse events associated with unplanned hospitalizations (CTCAEv4 grade ≥3 adverse events). Secondary endpoints included decline in ECOG performance status during treatment, 90-day grade ≥2 adverse events, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Modified Poisson regression models with inverse propensity score weighting were fit for both outcomes. Propensity scores were estimated using an ensemble machine-learning approach. Results: 1,483 patients were included (391 proton/1,092 photon). Proton patients were significantly older (median 66 vs. 61), had less favorable Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores (median 3.0 vs. 2.0), and had lower integral radiation dose to tissues outside the target (p < 0.05 for all). Baseline toxicity and performance status were similar (p > 0.05). In propensity score weighted-analyses, proton chemo-radiotherapy was associated with significantly lower relative risk (RR) of 90-day grade ≥3 adverse events [11.5%(95%CI 8.3-14.7%) for protons; 27.6%(95%CI 24.9-30.2%) for photons; RR 0.31, 95%CI 0.15-0.66, p < 0.01]; 90-day grade ≥2 adverse events (RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.65-0.93, p < 0.01); and decline in performance status during treatment (RR 0.51, 95%CI 0.37-0.71, p < 0.01). There was no difference in DFS or OS. Conclusions: In adults with locally advanced cancer, proton chemo-radiotherapy was associated with significantly reduced acute adverse events causing unplanned hospitalizations with similar disease-free and overall survival.

Design and development of the molecular analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Designated Laboratory Network

3016

Background: NCI-MATCH is a precision medicine trial that assigns treatment to refractory cancer patients by tumor mutation profile rather than by histology. After screening fresh tumor biopsies from nearly 6000 patients many treatment arms did not meet accrual due to the low prevalence of the eligible variants. NCI MATCH developed an approach to identify patients for the remaining arms utilizing a network of academic and commercial CLIA-certified labs that perform NGS assays as routine care at MATCH participating sites. Methods: Candidate labs were recruited through a notice in the Federal Register and posted on the NCI and ECOG ACRIN web sites. Twenty-seven labs (17 academic/10 commercial) submitted applications. After acceptance each lab analyzed a common set of 10 DNAs extracted from 8 cell lines and 2 clinical samples for concordance with the central NCI-MATCH NGS assay. Results: For the 17 labs with concordance results, a median of 8 (range 2 – 58) copy number variants (CNVs) were evaluated by the NGS assay of each DL, with the number evaluated depending on each lab’s clinical assay panel content. CNV concordance between central and DL assays, as measured by positive percent agreement (PPA), averaged 98.7% (range 87.5% - 100%) with the central assay as referent and 94.1% (range 77.8% – 100%) with the DL assay as referent. For single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and Insertion/deletions (Indels) combined, a median of 19 variants (range 11 – 26) were evaluated by each DL for concordance. PPA between central and DL assays averaged 98.0% (range 87.5% – 100%) and 98.6% (range 90.0% – 100%) with central and DL assay as referents, respectively. Strong correlations were observed between central and DL assays for both CNVs (median r = 0.93; 0.33 – 1.00) and SNV/Indels (median r = 0.98; 0.67 – 0.99). Conclusions: Our results suggest that different NGS assay platforms using diverse strategies for target enrichment and data analysis may still achieve high concordance if pre-analytical variables are minimized and the common genomic regions interrogated by each assay are well-understood. The designated lab network allows for a wider search for rare variants in tumors and provides a model for conducting future clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060.

A randomized phase II trial of niraparib plus either nivolumab or ipilimumab in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose cancer has not progressed on platinum-based therapy

TPS4161

Background: The treatment paradigm for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) typically involves ongoing chemotherapy until either disease progression or clinical deterioration. A subset of patients with advanced PDAC have exceptional responses to platinum-based chemotherapy. We hypothesized that durable platinum sensitivity in patients with advanced PDAC might be indicative of a DNA repair deficiency, and that these patients may respond to a combination of niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, plus immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: We have enrolled 25 of 84 planned patients on study NCT 03404960. Eligibility criteria include inoperable PDAC and stability on platinum-based chemotherapy for ≥16 weeks without evidence of progressive disease. Patients who have progressed on platinum-based treatment or who have received prior therapy with PARP inhibitors are excluded. Patients are randomized to receive oral niraparib 200mg PO daily plus nivolumab 240mg IV every two weeks in continuous 28 day cycles or oral niraparib 200mg PO daily plus ipilimumab 3mg/kg IV every three weeks for four doses in continuous 21 day cycles. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include response rate, duration of response and overall survival. Paired biopsies are obtained, as well as serial blood collections for circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Correlative assays will include germline whole exome sequencing and analyses of serially collected PBMCs, CTCs and ctDNA to identify genomic and immunologic innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms. Clinical trial information: NCT 03404960.

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Detects Responses to Stroma-directed Therapy in Mouse Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The dense stroma underlies the drug resistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and has motivated the development of stroma-directed drugs. Our objective is to test the concept that dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI using FDA-approved contrast media, an imaging method sensitive to the tumor microenvironment, can detect early responses to stroma-directed drug.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Imaging studies were performed in three mouse models exhibiting high desmoplastic reactions: the autochthonous PDA in genetically engineered mice (KPC), an orthotopic model in syngeneic mice, and a xenograft model of human PDA in athymic mice. An investigational drug, PEGPH20 (pegvorhyaluronidase alfa), which degrades hyaluronan (HA) in the stroma of PDA, was injected alone or in combination with gemcitabine.

RESULTS

At 24 hours after a single injection of PEGPH20, Ktrans , a DCE-MRI-derived marker that measures how fast a unit volume of contrast media is transferred from capillaries to interstitial space, increased 56% and 50% from baseline in the orthotopic and xenograft tumors, respectively, compared with a 4% and 6% decrease in vehicle groups (both P < 0.05). Similarly, after three combined treatments, Ktrans in KPC mice increased 54%, whereas it decreased 4% in controls treated with gemcitabine alone (P < 0.05). Consistently, after a single injection of PEGPH20, tumor HA content assessed by IHC was reduced substantially in all three models while drug delivery (measured by paclitaxel accumulation in tumor) was increased by 2.6-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrated a DCE-MRI marker, Ktrans , can detect early responses to stroma-directed drug and reveal the sustained effect of combination treatment (PEGPH20+ gemcitabine).

A randomized clinical trial of chemotherapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin/nabpaclitaxel with or without the AXL inhibitor bemcentinib (BGB324) for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

TPS473

Background: The Axl pathway coordinately mediates immune evasion and drug resistance in pancreatic cancer. Systemic Axl inhibition can enhance the efficacy of cancer therapy by blocking tumor cell proliferation, survival and drug resistance associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and targeting innate immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Bemcentinib (BGB324) is a first in class, selective oral inhibitor of Axl. Our group has shown that bemcentinib therapy, in combination with gemcitabine, improved survival in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, phase 1b/2 clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine/cisplatin with or without bemcentinib. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, good performance status and preserved liver, kidney and hematologic function are eligible. The treatment schedule is as follows: Bemcentinib 100 or 200 mg daily, nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 intravenously on D1, 8 every 21 days. 3 -12 patients will be recruited in part 1 following a modified 3+3 dose finding scheme. Part 2 of the study is a 1:1 randomized phase 2 design enrolling 62 patients. The primary objective is to determine complete response rate. Secondary end points are overall response rate, PFS and adverse events. A parallel biomarker study will accompany the trial analyzing blood and tissue samples to determine the effect of chemotherapy and bemcentinib on 1) Axl pathway activity in tumor tissue, 2) changes in immune landscape including upregulation of immune cytokines, and immune cell infiltration into the tumor, 3) apoptosis and decreased proliferation of tumor and 4) to identify predictive biomarkers of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03649321.

Phase I study of nivolumab (Nivo) + nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) + gemcitabine (Gem) in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC)

298

Background: Chemotherapy may work synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors by increasing tumor antigen exposure. This 2-part phase I study assessed safety and efficacy of Nivo + nab-P + Gem in APC. Methods: Treatment-naive patients (pts) with APC (locally advanced or metastatic) received nab-P 125 mg/m2 + Gem 1000 mg/m2 on d 1, 8, and 15 + Nivo 3 mg/kg on d 1 and 15 of each 28-d cycle until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Pts could continue Nivo alone beyond initial PD. Part 1 assessed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determined the recommended Part 2 dose; Part 2 (expansion phase) further assessed safety. The primary endpoints were DLTs (Part 1) and safety and tolerability (Parts 1 and 2). Key secondary endpoints were response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: As of July 13, 2018, 50 pts with APC were treated: 6 in Part 1; 44 in Part 2. The median age was 67.5 years; 56% were male; 62% had an ECOG PS 1. Of 40 pts with available data, 12 (24%) had ≥ 1% and 6 (12%) had ≥ 5% PD-L1 expression at baseline (data missing for 10 pts). The median follow-up was 11.3 mo. In Part 1, 1 DLT (hepatitis, as evidenced by grade 3 elevated liver function tests; suspected to be related to nab-P + Gem) was reported. In Parts 1 and 2, 48 pts (96%) had ≥ 1 grade 3/4 TEAE; 7 (14%) discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. Most common (> 10%) grade 3/4 TEAEs of special interest were anemia (36%), neutropenia (36%), gastrointestinal events (24%), hepatic toxicity (22%), peripheral neuropathy (16%), thrombocytopenia (12%), and colitis (12%). One grade 5 TEAE, respiratory failure (most likely pneumonitis), was reported. The table shows treatment responses. Of 7 pts (14%) who continued Nivo beyond initial PD, 4 achieved disease control. The median PFS was 5.5 mo (6-mo PFS rate, 47%). The median OS was 9.9 mo (6-mo OS rate, 73%). Conclusions: Combining Nivo with nab-P + Gem is feasible in pts with APC: 1 DLT was reported, and no unexpected safety signals were detected. Clinical trial information: NCT02309177. [Table: see text]

FOENIX-101: A phase II trial of TAS-120 in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements

TPS468

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a cancer arising from the intrahepatic bile duct. Standard treatment of unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic iCCA is with cytotoxic chemotherapy. FGFR2 gene fusions have been identified as oncogenic drivers in 10–20% of iCCA tumors, but no targeted agents have been established to date. TAS-120 is an investigational irreversible FGFR1–4 inhibitor in development as a once-daily oral treatment for iCCA. Based on initial studies in multiple tumor types expressing FGFR abnormalities, iCCA was identified as a tumor type with potential susceptibility to FGFR inhibition and high unmet need. A phase I portion of the trial with an iCCA expansion cohort demonstrated tolerability and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy with TAS-120 as a continuous, once-daily oral treatment in patients with iCCA. The most common AEs in the phase I portion of the trial were hyperphosphatemia, a mechanism-based on-target side effect, cutaneous AEs, and gastrointestinal AEs. The phase I portion of the study is continuing to enroll, and final results are anticipated in early 2019. Based on preliminary findings, a phase II portion of the study (FOENIX-101; clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02052778) has been initiated. Methods: The phase II portion of the trial is a global, single-arm study of TAS-120 in patients with iCCA harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements. The study will enroll approximately 100 adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic iCCA that progressed after ≥ 1 systemic therapies and with an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Prior systemic therapy must include gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. Screening for FGFR2 gene rearrangements will be performed at a central laboratory. The primary endpoint is objective response rate based on RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, safety, and health-related quality of life. Clinical trial information: NCT02052778.

Combination Paclitaxel and Palbociclib: Results of a Phase I Trial in Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib rapidly and reversibly inhibits the cell cycle. The goal of this study was to exploit the cell cycle through intermittent, alternating dosing with palbociclib/paclitaxel to enhance efficacy. We determined the combination dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in patients with Rb protein-expressing, advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, phase I trial (NCT01320592) enrolled patients to sequential cohorts of palbociclib orally dosed intermittently between days 1 and 19 of a 28-day cycle alternating with weekly paclitaxel. Dose escalation proceeded in a standard 3 + 3 design. Ten additional patients received the combination at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Those who reached response plateau ≥6 cycles could continue on palbociclib alone on a 3 week on/1 week off schedule at one dose level above their combination dose.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients enrolled. Although there was only 1 DLT (grade 3 alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase at 125 mg), neutropenia (NTP) requiring dose modification in cycle 1 (C1) resulted in an RP2D of 75 mg palbociclib/80 mg/m² paclitaxel. During C1, the most common adverse event was NTP, occurring in 15 patients (55.6%); grade 1 or 2 nausea and peripheral neuropathy were also observed in 8 patients each (29.6%). The clinical benefit rate was 55% at the RP2D; benefit was observed across all receptor subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternating sequential palbociclib/paclitaxel in patients with Rb⁺ advanced breast cancer is feasible and safe, without evidence of additive toxicity. This represents a new application for CDK 4/6 inhibitors in Rb⁺ breast cancer regardless of subtype; efficacy trials are warranted.

Current Activities of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups

The Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups is an organization representing the interests of patients and researchers who conduct research through the National Cancer Institute-supported National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN). The NCTN provides a crucial mechanism for executing practice-changing cancer clinical research to achieve both cancer control and development of new therapeutic agents or modality approaches. Public funding, largely through the National Cancer Institute, ensures that the work of the NCTN achieves important research that would not otherwise be accomplished in the private sector. In fall 2017, the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups convened a Scientific Leadership Council to review the current state of the network with regard to research capabilities and to develop a list of research questions to be prioritized by the network. This report presents the results of this meeting, detailing a roadmap for future work by the NCTN.

Abstract CT085: Randomized phase II trial of hydroxychloroquine in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to inhibit autophagy in pancreatic cancer: A SU2C-funded trial

Autophagy, a regulated metabolic process that enables energy conservation in adverse environmental circumstances, has been shown in animal models to confer resistance to chemotherapy, which can be reversed by hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). After establishing safety in a Phase I run-in, 112 patients were randomized to receive standard gemcitabine (1000mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) weekly x 3 every 4 weeks, with (n=55 evaluable) or without (n=55 evaluable) HCQ 600mg bid. Median age was 65 (range 43-86) of whom 47% were aged &gt; 65, 40% were female, 93% Caucasian, ECOG PS 0/1 51%/49%, and did not differ between the arms. Treatment-related side-effects were consistent with prior studies, and were balanced by arm, except for Grade 3/4 neutropenia (42 vs 23%), nausea (9 vs 0%), and fatigue (7 vs 0%), all higher with HCQ. Partial responses were observed in 21/46 (46%) with HCQ, and 8/48 (17%) without HCQ. The primary endpoint, overall survival at 12 months, was 41% (95% CI 27-53%) in the HCQ arm and 51% (95% CI 36-63%) in the non-HCQ arm. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI 4.0-9.3) in the HCQ arm and 6.4 months in the non-HCQ arm (95% CI 4.5-7.6). Median overall survival was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.0-14.2) in the HCQ arm and 14.4 months (95% CI 9.5-15.6) in the non-HCQ arm. Genomic testing was performed on a subset of the patients (41%), in whom outcomes did not differ by p53 mutational status. We conclude that based on the primary endpoint, the addition of the autophagy reversal agent HCQ did not improve the survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Response rates in patients who received HCQ were higher, and toxicity was tolerable. Autophagy reversal might be explored in the management of locally-advanced disease.

Citation Format: Thomas B. Karasic, Mark H. O'Hara, Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, Kim A. Reiss-Binder, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Erkut Borazanci, Ana M. De Jesus-Acosta, Colleen Redlinger, Jessica A. Burrell, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Daniel A. Laheru, Ravi K. Amaravadi, Jeffrey A. Drebin, Peter J. O'Dwyer. Randomized phase II trial of hydroxychloroquine in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to inhibit autophagy in pancreatic cancer: A SU2C-funded trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT085.