[Kidney and bone update : the 5-year history and future of CKD-MBD. Bisphosphonates treatment for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder]

Recently, much of the attention given to bone-mineral disorder as the prognostic factor for mortality has focused on their links to chronic-kidney disease. High-frequency severe atherosclerosis/calcinosis is observed in chronic dialysis, which leads to cardiovascular events. Recent progress in basic research has revealed certain similarities between processes of bone calcification and calcifications of vascular tissues which contribute to several cardiovascular diseases. However, the effective treatment for suppressing the progression of vascular calcification has not been established. Here we review the mechanism of vascular calcification and present our findings that a bisphosphonate is useful in prevention of vascular calcification in chronic renal failure.

Heel ultrasound can assess maintenance of bone mass in women with breast cancer

Postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer are at increased risk for bone loss and fractures. Bisphosphonates can prevent bone loss, but little data are available on changes in bone mass assessed by heel quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Our objectives were to determine if (1) heel QUS would provide a reliable and accessible method for evaluation of changes in bone mass in women with breast cancer when compared with the current standard of bone mass measurement, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and (2) oral risedronate could affect these changes. Eighty-six newly postmenopausal (up to 8 yr) women with nonmetastatic breast cancer were randomized to risedronate, 35 mg once weekly or placebo. Outcomes were changes in heel QUS bone mass measurements and conventional DXA-derived bone mineral density (BMD). Over 2 yr, bone mass assessed by heel QUS remained stable in women on risedronate, whereas women on placebo had a 5.2% decrease (p ≤ 0.05) in heel QUS bone mass. Both total hip BMD and femoral neck BMD assessed by DXA decreased by 1.6% (p ≤ 0.05) in the placebo group and remained stable with risedronate. Spine BMD remained stable in both groups. Heel QUS was moderately associated with BMD measured by DXA at the total hip (r=0.50), femoral neck (r=0.40), and spine (r=0.46) at baseline (all p ≤ 0.001). In conclusion, risedronate helps to maintain skeletal integrity as assessed by heel QUS for women with early stage breast cancer. Heel QUS is associated with DXA-derived BMD at other major axial sites and may be used to follow skeletal health and bone mass changes in these women.

Preventive effect of risedronate on bone loss and frailty fractures in elderly women treated with anastrozole for early breast cancer

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of adjuvant anastrozole, alone or associated with risedronate, on BMD and bone fracture risk in women more than 70 years old with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer (EBC). In a group of 51 elderly women (aged 76.4 ± 5.0 years) considered for adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for EBC, 24 patients with T-scores ≥ -2 and no prevalent fractures received anastrozole 1 mg/day (group A), and 27 patients with T-scores < -2, or with T-scores ≥ -2 and prevalent fractures (group B), received anastrozole (1 mg/day) plus risedronate (35 mg/week). Both groups received supplementation with 1 g calcium carbonate and 800 IU vitamin D per day. Differences in BMD and frailty fractures were evaluated after 1 and 2 years. In group A, significant decreases in BMD were observed in the lumbar spine (Δ BMD, -0.030 ± 0.04 g/cm², P < 0.05), femoral neck (Δ BMD, -0.029 ± 0.05 g/cm², P < 0.05), and trochanter (Δ BMD, -0.026 ± 0.03 g/cm², P < 0.01) after 2 years. The greatest percent reduction in height (Hpr) emerged in the thoracic spine (3.6 ± 2.4%, P < 0.01), although only one incident vertebral fracture was observed. In group B, BMD increased in the lumbar spine (Δ BMD, 0.038 ± 0.04, P < 0.001), although no significant changes were seen in the hip regions. The decline in Hpr was negligible (about 1%). No incident fractures were observed at follow-up. In conclusion, anastrozole treatment for EBC in elderly women seems to have only mild negative effects on the femoral bone. Risedronate makes the use of anastrozole safer, even for osteopenic or osteoporotic elderly patients.

Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are specific inhibitors of osteoclastic activity and used in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). While bisphosphonates are shown to be effective in reducing vertebral fractures and pain, their role in improving overall survival (OS) remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the evidence related to benefits and harms associated with use of various types of bisphosphonates (aminobisphosphonates versus nonamino bisphosphonates) in the management of patients with MM. Our primary objective was to determine whether adding bisphosphonates to standard therapy in MM improves OS and progression-free survival (PFS), and decreases skeletal-related morbidity. Our secondary objectives were to determine the effects of bisphosphonates on pain, quality of life, incidence of hypercalcemia, incidence of bisphosphonate-related gastrointestinal toxicities, osteonecrosis of jaw and hypocalcemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE (December 2009 to October 2011) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (all years, latest Issue September 2011) to identify all randomized trials in MM up to October 2011 using a combination of text and MeSH terms. We also handsearched relevant meeting proceedings (December 2009 to October 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the role of bisphosphonates and observational studies or case reports examining bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with MM were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted the data. Data were pooled and reported as hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) under a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was explored using metaregression.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we included 2 studies (2464 patients) that were not part of our last Cochrane review published in 2010. In this review we included 16 RCTs comparing bisphosphonates with either placebo or no treatment and 4 RCTs with a different bisphosphonate as a comparator. The 20 included RCTs enrolled 6692 patients. Overall methodological quality of reporting was moderate. Thirty per cent (6/20) of trials reported the method of generating the randomization sequence. Forty per cent (8/20) of trials had adequate allocation concealment. Withdrawals and dropouts were described in 60% (12/20) of trials. Pooled results showed no direct effect of bisphosphonates on OS compared with placebo or no treatment (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.13; P = 0.64). However, there was a statistically significant heterogeneity among the included RCTs (I(2) = 55%, P = 0.01) for OS. To explain this heterogeneity we performed a metaregression assessing the relationship between bisphosphonate potency and improvement in OS, which found indicating an OS benefit with zoledronate (P = 0.058). This provided a further rationale for performing network meta-analyses of the various types of bisphosphonates that were not compared head to head in RCTs. Results from network meta-analyses showed superior OS with zoledronate compared with etidronate (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.86) and placebo (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.98). However, there was no difference between zoledronate and other bisphosphonates. Pooled analysis did not demonstrate a beneficial effect of bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no treatment in improving PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.19; P = 0.18) There was no heterogeneity among trials reporting PFS estimates (I(2) = 35%, P = 0.20).Pooled analysis demonstrated a beneficial effect of bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no treatment on prevention of pathological vertebral fractures (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.89; I(2) = 7%), skeletal-related events (SRE) (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.89; I(2) = 2%) and amelioration of pain (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95; I(2) = 63%). The network meta-analysis did not show any difference in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (5 RCTs, 3198 patients) between bisphosphonates. Rates of osteonecrosis of the jaw in observational studies (9 studies, 1400 patients) ranged from 0% to 51%. The pooled results (6 RCTs, 1689 patients) showed no statistically significant increase in frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms with the use of bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.60; P = 0.11).The pooled results (3 RCTs, 1002 patients) showed no statistically significant increase in frequency of hypocalcemia with the use of bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 2.19, 95% CI 0.49 to 9.74). The network meta-analysis did not show any differences in the incidence of hypocalcemia, renal dysfunction and gastrointestinal toxicity between the bisphosphonates used.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Use of bisphosphonates in patients with MM reduces pathological vertebral fractures, SREs and pain. Assuming a baseline risk of 20% to 50% for vertebral fracture without treatment, between 8 and 20 MM patients should be treated to prevent vertebral fracture(s) in one patient. Assuming a baseline risk of 31% to 76% for pain amelioration without treatment, between 5 and 13 MM patients should be treated to reduce pain in one patient. With a baseline risk of 35% to 86% for SREs without treatment, between 6 and 15 MM patients should be treated to prevent SRE(s) in one patient. Overall, there were no significant adverse effects associated with the administration of bisphosphonates identified in the included RCTs. We found no evidence of superiority of any specific aminobisphosphonate (zoledronate, pamidronate or ibandronate) or nonaminobisphosphonate (etidronate or clodronate) for any outcome. However, zoledronate appears to be superior to placebo and etidronate in improving OS.

Long-term outcomes of children and adolescents who had cerebral palsy with secondary osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term efficacy and index of treatment with vitamin D alone or with a bisphosphonate in children and adolescents who have cerebral palsy (CP) with secondary osteoporosis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty patients diagnosed with CP and secondary osteoporosis were analyzed for 5 years, and the efficacy of treatment was compared. Treatment was divided into three groups: The monotherapy group, consisting of patients taking only alfacalcidol (0.03 µg/kg/day); the polytherapy group, consisting of those taking alfacalcidol and risedronate (0.05 mg/kg/day); and the control group, consisting of patients who discontinued taking their medications for reasons unrelated to these therapies. Bone mineral density (BMD), bone-specific alkaline phosphate (BAP), and N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX/Cr) were measured on each patient just before and at discontinuation of treatment, after 6 months, and again at 1 and 3 years, respectively. The changes in BMD (ΔBMD), BAP (ΔBAP), and NTX/Cr (ΔNTX/Cr) were evaluated at these intervals, because the normal value of each parameter varies over time during childhood.

RESULTS

ΔBMD significantly increased in the polytherapy group at ≥1 year (p = 0.006), and the difference in BMD between the polytherapy and the control groups at ≥1 year was also significant (p = 0.005). ΔBAP was increased in the monotherapy and polytherapy groups at ≥1 year (p = 0.021 and p = 0.033). ΔNTX/Cr decreased in the polytherapy group at ≥1 year, which was consistent with the polytherapy group of the period from 1 month to 1 year (p = 0.033). The relation between ΔBMD to ΔBAP was a positive correlation in the second period in the monotherapy group (r = 0.46). And the relations between ΔBMD to ΔNTX/Cr were not recognized negative correlations in the monotherapy and polytherapy groups. Thus, ΔBMD reflected ossification of secondary osteoporosis in patients with CP, and ΔBAP and ΔNTX/Cr was significantly related to the increase and decrease of ΔBMD. There were no effects of other factors except sexual maturity. Limitations of this study include that each index of examination was the evaluation according to rate of change. Therefore, the results of this study were limited to longitudinal evaluations.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation according to ΔBMD and both methods of monotherapy and polytherapy were useful for CP patient taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and regardless of sex. Especially, polytherapy for longer than 1 year led to improvement in BMD in children who had CP with secondary osteoporosis. BAP and NTX/Cr were useful for the index of the progression osteoporosis with or without these therapies.

Underrepresentation of elderly people in randomised controlled trials. The example of trials of 4 widely prescribed drugs

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the representation of elderly people in published reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We focused on trials of 4 medications--pioglitazone, rosuvastatin, risedronate, and valsartan-frequently used by elderly patients with chronic medical conditions.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We selected all reports of RCTs indexed in PubMed from 1966 to April 2008 evaluating one of the 4 medications of interest. Estimates of the community-based "on-treatment" population were from a national health insurance database (SNIIR-AM) covering approximately 86% of the population in France. From this database, we evaluated data claims from January 2006 to December 2007 for 1,958,716 patients who received one of the medications of interest for more than 6 months. Of the 155 RCT reports selected, only 3 studies were exclusively of elderly patients (2 assessing valsartan; 1 risedronate). In only 4 of 37 reports (10.8%) for pioglitazone, 4 of 22 (18.2%) for risedronate, 3 of 29 (10.3%) for rosuvastatine and 9 of 67 (13.4%) for valsartan, the proportion of patients aged 65 or older was within or above that treated in clinical practice. In 62.2% of the reports for pioglitazone, 40.9% for risedronate, 37.9% for rosuvastatine, and 70.2% for valsartan, the proportion of patients aged 65 or older was lower than half that in the treated population. The representation of elderly people did not differ by publication date or sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients are poorly represented in RCTs of drugs they are likely to receive.

Post hoc analysis of a single IV infusion of zoledronic acid versus daily oral risedronate on lumbar spine bone mineral density in different subgroups with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

This study summarizes the treatment effect of zoledronic acid infusion on lumbar spine bone mineral density in different subgroups with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Zoledronic acid is significantly more effective than risedronate in increasing lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) in both prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Introduction In patients on glucocorticoids, a single zoledronic acid infusion significantly increased BMD versus daily oral risedronate. We assessed treatment effect on LS BMD in different patient subgroups at month 12 that contributed to the risk of osteoporosis in addition to glucocorticoids. Methods Patients randomized to a single IV infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg or risedronate (5 mg/day) and stratified based on glucocorticoids duration [treatment (>3 months) and prevention (≤ 3 months) subpopulations]were subgrouped by age; gender; menopausal status in women; dose and duration of prednisone during the trial; and baseline serum 25-OH vitamin D, LS BMD T-score, creatinine clearance, and concomitant medication use. Results At month 12, zoledronic acid significantly increased LS BMD versus risedronate in patients ≤ 74 years (P<0.05) in the treatment and 65-74 years (P = 0.0008) in the prevention subpopulation. At month 12, zoledronic acid significantly increased LS BMD versus risedronate in both subpopulations irrespective of gender (all P<0.05), cumulative prednisone dose (all P<0.01), and postmenopausal status (all P<0.05). In premenopausal women, in both subpopulations, zoledronic acid significantly increased total hip BMD (all P<0.05) versus risedronate at month 12 but not LS BMD. Osteoporotic patients in the prevention (P=0.0189) and osteopenic patients in the treatment subpopulation (P=0.0305) showed significant LS BMD increases with zoledronic acid versus risedronate at month 12. Conclusions This post hoc analysis suggests that zoledronic acid is significantly more effective than risedronate in increasing LS BMD in prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis across a wide range of patients.

Adherence to osteoporosis medications amongst Singaporean patients

Compliance and persistence to bisphosphonates amongst Singaporean patients with osteoporosis were estimated. Mean medication possession ratio (MPR) ± standard deviation (SD) was 78.9 ± 27.5%, and 69.0% was persistent at 1 year. In contrast to US and Europe where poor adherence is noted, our study suggests higher adherence rates to bisphosphonate therapy amongst patients.

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy during treatment of osteoporosis has been reported to be poor. We aimed to estimate the compliance and persistence to prescribed bisphosphonate therapy amongst patients at the largest public restructured hospital in Singapore.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of records of patients who were prescribed the two most commonly used oral bisphosphonates-alendronate and risedronate. The study was conducted between January 2007 and December 2008. Prescription and pharmacy refill records of all patients were extracted and matched. Compliance was calculated using the MPR, while persistence, a dichotomous variable, was defined as continuous refill of bisphosphonates for at least 12 months with a permissible gap of 30 days.

RESULTS

Seven hundred ninety-eight patients were included in the study. Mean MPR ± SD was 78.9 ± 27.5%, and 69.0% of the patients were persistent with bisphosphonate therapy at 1 year. The proportion of patients with MPR ≥ 80% at 6, 12 and 18 months was 90%, 72% and 62%, respectively. Age <69 years was associated with better compliance (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.99-1.82; P = 0.043), and history of fractures was associated with better compliance (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.02-1.87; P = 0.038) and persistence (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.97-1.82; P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

In contrast to studies conducted in the US and Europe that show poor adherence, our study suggests higher adherence rates to bisphosphonate therapy amongst Singaporean patients.

Long-term treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a review from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF)

INTRODUCTION

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a chronic disease requiring treatment that balances long-term fracture efficacy against risk.

METHODS

We reviewed the efficacy and safety of calcium and vitamin D, the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), the bisphosphonates, denosumab, and strontium ranelate in studies of 3 years or longer.

RESULTS

Six trials lasted for 5 years, and seven went beyond that. The evidence beyond 5 years is generally weak, mainly due to methodological issues (open-label design, small samples, or absence of placebo control). Although calcium and vitamin D appear to be beneficial, the data are insufficient to evaluate benefits and risk beyond 3 years. The fracture efficacy of SERMs beyond 5 years is not known, though increases in bone mineral density (BMD) appear to be maintained. The SERMs have good long-term safety, including protective effects against breast cancer. The bisphosphonates have established fracture efficacy to 3 years, and 4 or 5 years with alendronate and risedronate. The evidence beyond 5 years indicates sustained increases in BMD. The safety of the bisphosphonates does not appear to be modified with time, with the possible exceptions of atypical subtrochanteric fracture and other events of unknown frequency. Denosumab has been tested up to 5 years, with continued increased in BMD and no reported safety issues. There is evidence for fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate, and sustained increases in BMD over 10 years. Strontium ranelate has good long-term safety.

CONCLUSION

Robust long-term studies are relatively rare for the osteoporosis treatments, and generally show maintenance of BMD and, for some agents, an additional reduction in fracture incidence.

Serum sclerostin levels positively correlate with lumbar spinal bone mineral density in postmenopausal women--the six-month effect of risedronate and teriparatide

Sclerostin is expressed by osteocytes and inhibits bone formation by osteoblasts. In this study, serum sclerostin was positively correlated with either lumbar spinal bone mineral density or T-score. Furthermore, serum sclerostin was increased after 6 months treatment with risedronate, whereas remained unchanged after 6 months teriparatide treatment.

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this study was the evaluation of serum sclerostin levels in postmenopausal women and their association with bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. The secondary aim was the evaluation of treatment with either teriparatide (TPTD) or risedronate (RIS) on serum sclerostin levels in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, assigned to receive either TPTD (TPTD group, n = 13) or RIS (RIS group, n = 36) for 6 months, and non-osteoporotic early postmenopausal women (NOEP group, n = 13) were recruited. Main outcome measure was serum sclerostin levels.

RESULTS

Serum sclerostin was higher in the NOEP group at baseline compared with either TPTD group (p = 0.007) or RIS group (p = 0.049). Sclerostin was positively correlated with both lumbar spinal (LS) BMD (r = 0.353; p = 0.005) and T-score (r = 0.501; p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with intact parathyroid hormone (r = -0.343; p = 0.024) at baseline. Multiple regression analysis showed that either LS BMD (Beta = 0.653; p = 0.018) or T-score (Beta = 0.711; p = 0.005) were independent predictors of serum sclerostin levels. No significant correlation was observed between serum sclerostin and bone turnover markers or estradiol at baseline. Sclerostin was significantly increased 6 months post-treatment in RIS group (p = 0.002), whereas remained statistically unaffected in the TPTD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum sclerostin is decreased in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis compared with non-osteoporotic early postmenopausal women and is positively correlated to either LS BMD or LS T-score. Furthermore, serum sclerostin was increased after 6 months treatment with RIS, whereas remained essentially unchanged after 6 months TPTD treatment.

Paget disease of bone - an update

BACKGROUND

Paget disease of bone is the most common metabolic bone disease after osteoporosis, affecting 2-4% of adults over 55 years of age. Its aetiology is only partly understood, but includes both genetic and environmental factors.

OBJECTIVE

This article outlines the clinical features, diagnosis and management options for Paget disease of bone.

DISCUSSION

The disease may be asymptomatic, found incidentally on radiography or biochemistry, or present with bone pain, deformity, fracture or other complications. Bisphosphonate therapy is indicated for patients with symptomatic disease and should also be considered in patients whose sites of disease suggest a risk of complications, such as long bones, vertebrae or base of the skull. The treatment of choice is a single infusion of zoledronic acid; courses of oral alendronate (3-6 months) or risedronate (2 months) are also effective.

Beneficial effect of risedronate for preventing recurrent hip fracture in the elderly Japanese women

SUMMARY

A 36-month observational study compared the incidence of unaffected side hip fracture in Japanese female osteoporosis patients with a history of hip fracture between 173 patients receiving risedronate and 356 risedronate-untreated controls. New hip fractures were significantly less frequent in the risedronate group, suggesting a preventive effect in high-risk patients.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to investigate the preventive effect of risedronate on second hip fracture immediately following a first hip fracture in Japanese female osteoporosis patients with unilateral hip fracture.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective matched cohort study in 184 patients treated with risedronate and 445 patients not receiving risedronate after discharge from hospital. Both groups were followed-up for 36 months, and the incidence of unaffected side hip fracture and the frequency of adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Efficacy could be investigated in 173 patients from the risedronate group and 356 patients from the control group. Hip fracture was detected in 5 and 32 patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 36-month fracture incidence were 4.3% in the risedronate group and 13.1% in the control group (P = 0.010, log-rank test). The hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) obtained by univariate and multivariate analysis were 0.310 (0.121-0.796) and 0.218 (0.074-0.639), respectively, indicating a significantly lower incidence of unaffected side hip fracture in the risedronate group. Adverse events occurred in 38 patients (48 events) from the risedronate group and 94 patients (108 events) from the control group, with serious adverse events in 21 patients (26 events) and 78 patients (88 events), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups. The incidence of unaffected side hip fracture was significantly lower in the risedronate group. Accordingly, risedronate may have a preventive effect on hip fracture in high-risk Japanese female osteoporosis patients for fracture with a history of unilateral hip fracture.

Topically administered Risedronate shows powerful anti-osteoporosis effect in ovariectomized mouse model

We investigated the therapeutic effect of topical Risedronate (RIS) on a mouse model of estrogen-deficient osteoporosis. Fourteen-week-old female mice were ovariectomized and assigned to 4 groups: SHAM-operated (SHAM), OVX mice treated with vehicle (OVX-V), OVX mice treated with 0.2% RIS (OVX-0.2% RIS), and OVX-mice treated with 0.02% RIS (OVX-0.02% RIS). Topical samples containing RIS were prepared in 10% (w/w) polyethylene glycol (PEG, MW 400) and 80 μg of sample was spread on the mice's mid-backs every 3 days for 5 weeks. Micro-CT analysis of femora demonstrated that OVX-0.2% RIS exhibited a 29% greater bone mineral density and 24% greater bone volume fraction than that of OVX-V group. Investigation of the trabecular bone in OVX-0.2% RIS revealed a 24% higher bone volume (BV/TV), 51% higher trabecular number (Tb.N), and 40% lower trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) compared to OVX-V mice. Additionally, bone phenotypes of tibiae were further confirmed by histological analysis. OVX-0.2% RIS group exhibited a 494% greater BV/TV, 464% less Tb.Sp, 81% greater active osteoclast surface (Oc.S/BS) and 26% less osteoclast number (N.Oc/BS) than that of OVX-V group. Collectively, these results indicated that topical delivery of RIS has powerful pharmaceutical effects on the prevention of osteoporosis and bone turnover.

Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid osteoporosis in men: results of a randomized controlled trial comparing zoledronic acid with risedronate

BACKGROUND

We studied 265 men (mean age 56.4 years; range 18-83 years), among patients enrolled in two arms of a double-blind, 1-year study comparing the effects of zoledronic acid (ZOL) with risedronate (RIS) in patients either commencing (prednisolone 7.5 mg/day or equivalent) (prevention arm, n=88) or continuing glucocorticoid therapy (treatment arm, n=177).

METHODS

Patients received either a single ZOL 5 mg infusion or RIS 5 mg oral daily at randomization, along with calcium (1000 mg) and vitamin D (400-1200 IU). Primary endpoint: difference in percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints: percentage changes in BMD at total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN), relative changes in bone turnover markers (β-CTx and P1NP), and overall safety.

FINDINGS

In the treatment subpopulation, ZOL increased LS BMD by 4.7% vs. 3.3% for RIS and at TH the percentage changes were 1.8% vs. 0.2%, respectively. In the prevention subpopulation, bone loss was prevented by both treatments. At LS the percentage changes were 2.5% vs. -0.2% for ZOL vs. RIS and at TH the percentage changes were 1.1% vs. -0.4%, respectively. ZOL significantly increased lumbar spine BMD more than RIS at Month 12 in both the prevention population (p=0.0024) and the treatment subpopulation (p=0.0232) in men. In the treatment subpopulation, ZOL demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in serum β-CTx and P1NP relative to RIS at all time-points. In the prevention subpopulation, ZOL significantly reduced β-CTx at all time-points, and P1NP at Month 3 (p=0.0297) only. Both treatments were well tolerated in men, albeit with a higher incidence of influenza-like illness and pyrexia events post-infusion with ZOL.

INTERPRETATION

Once-yearly ZOL preserves or increases BMD within 1 year to a greater extent than daily RIS in men receiving glucocorticoid therapy.

Evidence to inform decision makers in Thailand: a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment strategies for postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess value for money of providing systematic screening for osteoporosis among postmenopausal women and medical treatments for those diagnosed with osteoporosis as evidence-based decision making for the revision of the National List of Essential Medicines.

METHODS

Decision analytic models were constructed, using a societal perspective, to assess the cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from systematic screening using the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry alone compared with no screening. Alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, and nasal calcitonin were economically evaluated to determine a treatment of choice for the prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures. Most input parameters were obtained from literature reviews, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses, if available. The service costs and related household expenses were based on the Thai setting. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were used to incorporate the impact of parameter uncertainty.

RESULTS

The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool and sequential dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry provided better value for money for osteoporosis screening among young age groups (<60 years old). Although there was no significant difference in cost per QALY for older age groups, alendronate provided the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio while nasal calcitonin presented the highest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. It was shown that providing medication for a secondary prevention yielded a much higher cost per QALY gained compared with providing medication for a primary prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the benchmark set at 100,000 Thai baht per QALY gained, providing systematic screening and treatment for osteoporosis was cost-ineffective in the Thai setting.

Marked improvement of calcinosis in adult dermatomyositis with etidronate therapy

We report a 26-year-old woman with severe calcinosis associated with dermatomyositis. Although calcinosis of the skin or muscles is unusual in adults with dermatomyositis, this patient developed subcutaneous calcinosis with tenderness on the arms, axillary areas, shoulder areas, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and limbs. The calcinosis steadily increased and spread until joint motions were severely limited. Radiographic examination showed extensive soft-tissue calcification with a reticular pattern and severe osteoporosis. The patient was treated with oral etidronate (800 mg/day for 3 months every 6 months) to prevent calcification of the lesions. Three months later, the patient showed a dramatic improvement in symptoms with softening of the calcinosis, reduced pain, and marked increase in joint mobility. Radiographic examination showed marked decreases in the size of the calcified lesions compared to pre-treatment findings, and this effect persisted with a constant progressive efficacy for 3 years. The 3-year course of etidronate therapy also resulted in marked improvement of the severe osteoporosis and the patient was able to return to work and enjoy a normal life. We propose etidronate as a beneficial and effective therapy for calcinosis with osteoporosis.

Risedronate in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta type I: increased bone mineral density and decreased bone turnover, but high fracture rate persists

Bisphosphonates can increase bone mineral density (BMD) in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). In this study of adults with OI type I, risedronate increased BMD at lumbar spine (but not total hip) and decreased bone turnover. However, the fracture rate in these patients remained high.

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous bisphosphonates given to children with OI can increase BMD and reduce fracture incidence. Oral and/or intravenous bisphosphonates may have similar effects in adults with OI. We completed an observational study of the effect of risedronate in adults with OI type I.

METHODS

Thirty-two adults (mean age, 39 years) with OI type I were treated with risedronate (total dose, 35 mg weekly) for 24 months. Primary outcome measures were BMD changes at lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH). Secondary outcome measures were fracture incidence, bone pain, and change in bone turnover markers (serum procollagen type I aminopropeptide (P1NP) and bone ALP). A meta-analysis of published studies of oral bisphosphonates in adults and children with OI was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven participants (ten males and seventeen females) completed the study. BMD increased at LS by 3.9% (0.815 vs. 0.846 g/cm(2), p = 0.007; mean Z-score, -1.93 vs. -1.58, p = 0.002), with no significant change at TH. P1NP fell by 37% (p = 0.00041), with no significant change in bone ALP (p = 0.15). Bone pain did not change significantly (p = 0.6). Fracture incidence remained high, with 25 clinical fractures and 10 major fractures in fourteen participants (0.18 major fractures per person per year), with historical data of 0.12 fractures per person per year. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in fracture incidence in patients with OI treated with oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate in adults with OI type I results in modest but significant increases in BMD at LS, and decreased bone turnover. However, this may be insufficient to make a clinically significant difference to fracture incidence.

Vertebral fracture efficacy during risedronate therapy in patients using proton pump inhibitors

Recent evidence suggests that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use may affect fracture risk, an important issue for patients being concurrently treated for osteoporosis. The results of our post hoc analysis showed that, regardless of PPI concomitant use, risedronate significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures compared with placebo.

INTRODUCTION

Recent evidence suggests that PPI use may affect fracture risk, an important issue for patients being concurrently treated for osteoporosis. Moreover, data suggest that concomitant use of PPIs may wane the anti-fracture effect of bisphosphonates. We explored the relationship between concomitant use of PPIs and incident vertebral fractures among patients treated with risedronate or placebo. Bone mineral density (BMD) and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.

METHODS

This study is a post hoc analysis of a subset of patients participating in three prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, with durations of up to 3 years, which evaluated the efficacy of risedronate in reducing fracture risk: Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Trial-MultiNational (VERT-MN); Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Trial-North America (VERT-NA); and the risedronate Hip Intervention Program (HIP).

RESULTS

Total enrollment included 2,729 risedronate and 2,725 placebo patients. Concomitant acid-suppressing drugs were used by 8.8% of the total population (n = 482). Regardless of PPI concomitant use, risedronate significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures compared with placebo (risk reduction: PPI users 57%, p = 0.009; PPI non-users 38%, p < 0.001). BMD increased with risedronate, independent of PPI use. PPI users were at a 2.5-fold greater risk of experiencing at least one UGI AE compared with non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures compared with placebo, regardless of PPI concomitant use.

Acute myocardial infarction and atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries in patients treated with drugs against osteoporosis: calcium in the vessels and not the bones?

We studied the association between bisphosphonate use and risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels using a nationwide retrospective cohort from Denmark. All users of bisphosphonates and other drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) comprised the exposed group and three age- and gender-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683), the unexposed group. The main outcomes were occurrence of AMI or atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels. An excess risk of AMI was seen in users of alendronate compared to the unexposed. However, an inverse dose-response relationship was seen, with an increased risk in those with low adherence (≤0.66 DDD, HR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.24-1.82) and a nonsignificantly decreased risk in those who were adherent to the drug (≥1 DDD, HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.09; P for trend <0.01). For etidronate and raloxifene, no excess risk was present and no dose-response relationship was seen. For atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels, a similar trend as for AMI was seen for alendronate but a protective effect was present at high doses (≥1 DDD, HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.70). For etidronate, an increased risk of atherosclerosis was seen at all doses, with no dose-response relationship. For raloxifene, no excess of atherosclerosis was observed. At high doses of alendronate a decreased risk of atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels was seemingly present, whereas at low doses an increased risk was present. The finding may be spurious due to the "healthy user" effect, but a causal relationship cannot be excluded.

Efficacy and safety of a novel delayed-release risedronate 35 mg once-a-week tablet

Dosing regimens of oral bisphosphonates are inconvenient and contribute to poor compliance. The bone mineral density response to a once weekly delayed-release formulation of risedronate given before or following breakfast was non-inferior to traditional immediate-release risedronate given daily before breakfast. Delayed-release risedronate is a convenient regimen for oral bisphosphonate therapy.

INTRODUCTION

We report the results of a randomized, controlled, clinical study assessing the efficacy and safety of a delayed-release (DR) 35 mg weekly oral formulation of risedronate that allows patients to take their weekly risedronate dose before or immediately after breakfast.

METHODS

Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive risedronate 5 mg immediate-release (IR) daily (n = 307) at least 30 min before breakfast, or risedronate 35 mg DR weekly, either at least 30 min before breakfast (BB, n = 308) or immediately following breakfast (FB, n = 307). Bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), fractures, and adverse events were evaluated. The primary efficacy variable was percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at Endpoint.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven subjects (83.7%) in the IR daily group, 252 subjects (82.1%) in the DR FB weekly group, and 258 subjects (83.8%) in the DR BB weekly group completed 1 year. Both DR weekly groups were determined to be non-inferior to the IR daily regimen. Mean percent changes in hip BMD were similar across groups. The magnitude of BTM response was similar across groups; some statistical differences were seen that were small and deemed by investigators to have no major clinical importance. The incidence of adverse events leading to withdrawal and serious adverse events were similar across treatment groups. All three regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate 35 mg DR weekly is similar in efficacy and safety to risedronate 5 mg IR daily, and will allow patients to take their weekly risedronate dose immediately after breakfast.

Cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Canada

OBJECTIVE

Denosumab is a novel biologic agent approved in Canada for treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis (PMO) in women at high risk for fracture or who have failed or are intolerant to other osteoporosis therapies. This study estimated cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs usual care from the perspective of the Ontario public payer.

METHODS

A previously published PMO Markov cohort model was adapted for Canada to estimate cost-effectiveness of denosumab. The primary analysis included women with demographic characteristics similar to those from the pivotal phase III denosumab PMO trial (FREEDOM; age 72 years, femoral neck BMD T-score -2.16 SD, vertebral fracture prevalence 23.6%). Three additional scenario sub-groups were examined including women: (1) at high fracture risk, defined in FREEDOM as having at least two of three risk factors (age 70+; T-score ≤ -3.0 SD at lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck; prevalent vertebral fracture); (2) age 75+; and (3) intolerant or contraindicated to oral bisphosphonates (BPs). Analyses were conducted over a lifetime horizon comparing denosumab to usual care ('no therapy', alendronate, risedronate, or raloxifene [sub-group 3 only]). The analysis considered treatment-specific persistence and post-discontinuation residual efficacy, as well as treatment-specific adverse events. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The multi-therapy comparisons resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for denosumab vs alendronate of $60,266 (2010 CDN$) (primary analysis) and $27,287 per quality-adjusted life year gained for scenario sub-group 1. Denosumab dominated all therapies in the remaining scenarios.

LIMITATIONS

Key limitations include a lack of long-term, real-world, Canadian data on persistence with denosumab as well as an absence of head-to-head clinical data, leaving one to rely on meta-analyses based on trials comparing treatment to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab may be cost-effective compared to oral PMO treatments for women at high risk of fractures and those who are intolerant and/or contraindicated to oral BPs.

Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are widely used for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis often have osteoporosis - either postmenopausal or secondary to the liver disease. No systematic review or meta-analysis has assessed the effects of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, LILACS, clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and full text searches were conducted until November 2011. Manufacturers and authors were contacted for additional studies during the conductance of the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical trials of bisphosphonates in primary biliary cirrhosis compared with placebo or no intervention, or another bisphosphonate, or any other drug.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data. RevMan Analysis was used for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) or risk difference (RD) and of continuous data with mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological components were used to assess risk of systematic errors (bias). Trial sequential analysis was also used to control for random errors (play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials were included. Three trials with 106 participants, of which two trials with high risk of bias, did not demonstrate significant effects of bisphosphonates (etidronate or alendronate) versus placebo or no intervention regarding mortality (RD 0.00; 95% CI -0.12 to 0.12, I² = 0%), fractures (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.29 to 2.66, I² = 0%), or adverse events (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.49 to 2.04). Two trials with 62 participants with high risk of bias compared one bisphosphonate (etidronate or alendronate) versus another (alendronate or ibandronate) and found no significant difference regarding mortality (RD -0.03; 95% CI -0.14 to 0.07, I² = 0%), fractures (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.18 to 5.06, I² = 0%), or adverse events (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.49 to 2.04, I² = 0%). Bisphosphonates had no significant effect on liver-related mortality, liver transplantation, or liver-related morbidity compared with placebo or no intervention, or another bisphosphonate. Bisphosphonates had no significant effect on bone mineral density compared with placebo or no intervention, or another bisphosphonate. Bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no intervention seem to decrease the urinary amino telopeptides of collagen I (NTx) concentration (MD -16.93 nmol bone collagen equivalents/mmol creatinine; 95% CI -23.77 to -10.10; 2 trials with 88 patients; I² = 0%) and serum osteocalcin (SMD -0.81; 95% CI -1.22 to -0.39; 3 trials with 100 patients; I² = 34 %) concentration. The former result was supported by trial sequential analysis, but not the latter. Alendronate compared with another bisphosphonate (ibandronate) had no significant effect on serum osteocalcin concentration (MD -3.61 ng/ml, 95% CI -9.41 to 2.18; 2 trials with 47 patients; I² = 82%) in a random-effects meta-analysis, but it significantly decreased serum osteocalcin (MD -4.40 ng/ml, 95% CI -6.75 to -2.05; 2 trials with 47 patients; I² = 82%), the procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (MD -8.79 ng/ml, 95% CI -15.96 to -1.63; 2 trials with 47 patients; I² = 38%), and NTx concentration (MD -14.07 nmol bone collagen equivalents/mmol creatinine, 95% CI -24.23 to -3.90; 2 trials with 46 patients; I²=0%) in a fixed-effect model. The latter two results were not supported by trial sequential analyses. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients having bisphosphonates withdrawn due to adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (RD -0.04; 95% CI -0.21 to 0.12; 2 trials with 46 patients; I² = 0%), or another bisphosphonate (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.14 to 2.17; 2 trials with 62 patients; I² = 0%). One trial with 32 participants and with high risk of bias compared etidronate versus sodium fluoride without finding significant difference regarding mortality, fractures, adverse events, or bone mineral density. Etidronate compared with sodium fluoride significantly decreased serum osteocalcin, urinary hydroxyproline, and parathyroid hormone concentration.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence to support or refute the use of bisphosphonates for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The data seem to indicate a possible positive intervention effect of bisphosphonates on decreasing urinary amino telopeptides of collagen I concentration compared with placebo or no intervention with no risk of random error. There is need for more randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis on patient-relevant outcomes in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Efficacy and safety of 2-year etidronate treatment in a child with generalized arterial calcification of infancy

Generalized arterial calcification of infancy (GACI, MIM#208000) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by extensive calcifications in the media of large- and medium-sized muscular arteries. Most affected children die in early infancy because of cardiac failure. GACI is linked to mutations in the ENPP1 gene, which encodes for an enzyme that generates inorganic pyrophosphate (PP(i)), a potent inhibitor of hydroxyapatite crystal formation. Treatment with bisphosphonates, which are synthetic PP(i) analogues, has been proposed as a means of reducing arterial calcifications in GACI patients, but no formalized treatment approach exists. We report on the long-term survival of a severe case of GACI linked to a novel homozygous missense mutation c.583T/C in the ENPP1 gene, diagnosed prenatally, and treated with bisphosphonates. Intravenous disodium pamidronate (three infusions at days 8, 15, and 18 of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.50 mg/kg, respectively) was changed to oral disodium etidronate (starting dose of 20 mg/kg daily, 50 mg die) at 3 weeks of age. Although the etidronate dose was maintained at 50 mg daily in our patient (corresponding to a progressive decrease from 20 to 5 mg/kg daily), the progressive resolution of arterial calcifications seen by 3 months of age was maintained until 2 years of age. Throughout the 2-year follow-up, our patient developed mild hypophosphatemia, due to renal phosphate wasting, without clinical, biochemical, or radiological sign of rickets.

CONCLUSION

High-dose bisphosphonate therapy may not be necessary for an extended period of time in children with GACI.