Heterogeneous lipoprotein (a) size isoforms differ by their interaction with the low density lipoprotein receptor and the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor

Functional interrogation of cellular Lp(a) uptake by genome-scale CRISPR screening

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

An elevated level of lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), in the bloodstream has been causally linked to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Steady state levels of circulating lipoproteins are modulated by their rate of clearance, but the identity of the Lp(a) uptake receptor(s) has been controversial.

METHODS

We performed a genome-scale CRISPR screen to functionally interrogate all potential Lp(a) uptake regulators in HuH7 cells. Screen validation was performed by single gene disruption and overexpression. Direct binding between purified lipoproteins and recombinant protein was tested using biolayer interferometry. An association between human genetic variants and circulating Lp(a) levels was analyzed in the UK Biobank cohort.

RESULTS

The top positive and negative regulators of Lp(a) uptake in our screen were LDLR and MYLIP, encoding the LDL receptor and its ubiquitin ligase IDOL, respectively. We also found a significant correlation for other genes with established roles in LDLR regulation. No other gene products, including those previously proposed as Lp(a) receptors, exhibited a significant effect on Lp(a) uptake in our screen. We validated the functional influence of LDLR expression on HuH7 Lp(a) uptake, confirmed in vitro binding between the LDLR extracellular domain and purified Lp(a), and detected an association between loss-of-function LDLR variants and increased circulating Lp(a) levels in the UK Biobank cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support a central role for the LDL receptor in mediating Lp(a) uptake by hepatocytes.

Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease

Elevated plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are a prevalent, independent, and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve disease. Lp(a) consists of a lipoprotein particle resembling low density lipoprotein and the covalently-attached glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). Novel therapeutics that specifically and potently lower Lp(a) levels are currently in advanced stages of clinical development, including in large, phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes trials. However, fundamental unanswered questions remain concerning some key aspects of Lp(a) biosynthesis and catabolism as well as the true pathogenic mechanisms of the particle. In this review, we describe the salient biochemical features of Lp(a) and apo(a) and how they underlie the disease-causing potential of Lp(a), the factors that determine plasma Lp(a) concentrations, and the mechanism of action of Lp(a)-lowering drugs.

Functional interrogation of cellular Lp(a) uptake by genome-scale CRISPR screening

An elevated level of lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), in the bloodstream has been causally linked to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Steady state levels of circulating lipoproteins are modulated by their rate of clearance, but the identity of the Lp(a) uptake receptor(s) has been controversial. In this study, we performed a genome-scale CRISPR screen to functionally interrogate all potential Lp(a) uptake regulators in HuH7 cells. Strikingly, the top positive and negative regulators of Lp(a) uptake in our screen were LDLR and MYLIP, encoding the LDL receptor and its ubiquitin ligase IDOL, respectively. We also found a significant correlation for other genes with established roles in LDLR regulation. No other gene products, including those previously proposed as Lp(a) receptors, exhibited a significant effect on Lp(a) uptake in our screen. We validated the functional influence of LDLR expression on HuH7 Lp(a) uptake, confirmed in vitro binding between the LDLR extracellular domain and purified Lp(a), and detected an association between loss-of-function LDLR variants and increased circulating Lp(a) levels in the UK Biobank cohort. Together, our findings support a central role for the LDL receptor in mediating Lp(a) uptake by hepatocytes.

Low Molecular Weight Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotype Rather Than Lipoprotein(a) Is Associated With Coronary Atherosclerosis and Myocardial Infarction

Background and Aims

Current evidence suggests that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level above 50 mg/dL is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Our study aim was to determine the relationship of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes and Lp(a) concentration below and above 50 mg/dL with coronary atherosclerosis severity and myocardial infarction (MI).

Material and Methods

The study population consisted of 540 patients (mean age 54.0 ± 8.8 years, 82% men) who passed through coronary angiography. The number of diseased major coronary arteries assessed atherosclerosis severity. Lipids, glucose, Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes were determined in all patients. All patients were divided into four groups: with Lp(a) <50 mg/dL [ “normal” Lp(a)] or ≥50 mg/dL [hyperLp(a)], and with low-molecular (LMW) or high-molecular weight (HMW) apo(a) phenotypes.

Results

Baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics were similar between the groups. In groups with LMW apo(a) phenotypes, the odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval) of multivessel disease was higher [10.1; 3.1–33.5, p < 0.005 for hyperLp(a) and 2.2; 1.0–4.9, p = 0.056 for normal Lp(a)], but not in the group with HMW apo(a) and hyperLp(a) [1.1; 0.3–3.3, p = 0.92] compared with the reference group with HMW apo(a) and normal Lp(a). Similarly, MI was observed more often in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotype and hyperLp(a) and normal Lp(a) than in groups with HMW apo(a) phenotype.

Conclusion

The LMW apo(a) phenotype is associated with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis and MI even when Lp(a) level is below 50 mg/dL. The combination of Lp(a) level above 50 mg/dL and LMW apo(a) phenotype increases the risk of severe coronary atherosclerosis, regardless of other risk factors.

Lipoprotein(a) the Insurgent: A New Insight into the Structure, Function, Metabolism, Pathogenicity, and Medications Affecting Lipoprotein(a) Molecule

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], aka "Lp little a", was discovered in the 1960s in the lab of the Norwegian physician Kåre Berg. Since then, we have greatly improved our knowledge of lipids and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) is an enigmatic class of lipoprotein that is exclusively formed in the liver and comprises two main components, a single copy of apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 (apo-B100) tethered to a single copy of a protein denoted as apolipoprotein(a) apo(a). Plasma levels of Lp(a) increase soon after birth to a steady concentration within a few months of life. In adults, Lp(a) levels range widely from <2 to 2500 mg/L. Evidence that elevated Lp(a) levels >300 mg/L contribute to CVD is significant. The improvement of isoform-independent assays, together with the insight from epidemiologic studies, meta-analyses, genome-wide association studies, and Mendelian randomization studies, has established Lp(a) as the single most common independent genetically inherited causal risk factor for CVD. This breakthrough elevated Lp(a) from a biomarker of atherosclerotic risk to a target of therapy. With the emergence of promising second-generation antisense therapy, we hope that we can answer the question of whether Lp(a) is ready for prime-time clinic use. In this review, we present an update on the metabolism, pathophysiology, and current/future medical interventions for high levels of Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a) Particle Production as a Determinant of Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Concentration Across Varying Apolipoprotein(a) Isoform Sizes and Background Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy

Background Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), a low-density lipoprotein-like particle bound to the polymorphic apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), may be causal for cardiovascular disease. However, the metabolism of Lp(a) in humans is poorly understood. Methods and Results We investigated the kinetics of Lp(a)-apo(a) and low-density lipoprotein-apoB-100 in 63 normolipidemic men. The fractional catabolic rate ( FCR ) and production rate PR ) were studied. Plasma apo(a) concentration was significantly and inversely associated with apo(a) isoform size ( r=-0.536, P<0.001) and apo(a) FCR ( r=-0.363, P<0.01), and positively with apo(a) PR ( r=0.877, P<0.001). There were no significant associations between the FCR s of apo(a) and low-density lipoprotein-apoB-100. Subjects with smaller apo(a) isoform sizes (≤22 kringle IV repeats) had significantly higher apo(a) PR ( P<0.05) and lower apo(a) FCR ( P<0.01) than those with larger sizes. Plasma apo(a) concentration was significantly associated with apo(a) PR ( r=0.930, P<0.001), but not with FCR ( r=-0.012, P>0.05) in subjects with smaller apo(a) isoform size. In contrast, both apo(a) PR and FCR were significantly associated with plasma apo(a) concentrations ( r=0.744 and -0.389, respectively, P<0.05) in subjects with larger isoforms. In multiple regression analysis, apo(a) PR and apo(a) isoform size were significant predictors of plasma apo(a) concentration independent of low-density lipoprotein-apoB-100 FCR and background therapy with atorvastatin and evolocumab. Conclusions In normolipidemic men, the plasma Lp(a) concentration is predominantly determined by the rate of production of Lp(a) particles, irrespective of apo(a) isoform size and background therapy with a statin and a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitor. Our findings underscore the importance of therapeutic targeting of the hepatic synthesis and secretion of Lp(a) particles. Lp(a) particle catabolism may only play a modest role in determining Lp(a) concentration in subjects with larger apo(a) isoform size. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02189837.

New Frontiers in Lp(a)-Targeted Therapies

Interest in lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has exploded over the past decade with the emergence of genetic and epidemiological studies pinpointing elevated levels of this unique lipoprotein as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). This review summarizes the most recent discoveries regarding therapeutic approaches to lower Lp(a) and presents these findings in the context of an emerging, although far from complete, understanding of the biosynthesis and catabolism of Lp(a). Application of Lp(a)-specific lowering agents to outcome trials will be the key to opening this new frontier in the battle against CVD.

Lipoprotein(a) catabolism: a case of multiple receptors

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing plasma lipoprotein similar in structure to low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Lp(a) is more complex than LDL due to the presence of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], a large glycoprotein sharing extensive homology with plasminogen, which confers some unique properties onto Lp(a) particles. ApoB and apo(a) are essential for the assembly and catabolism of Lp(a); however, other proteins associated with the particle may modify its metabolism. Lp(a) specifically carries a cargo of oxidised phospholipids (OxPL) bound to apo(a) which stimulates many proinflammatory pathways in cells of the arterial wall, a key property underlying its pathogenicity and association with cardiovascular disease (CVD). While the liver and kidney are the major tissues implicated in Lp(a) clearance, the pathways for Lp(a) uptake appear to be complex and are still under investigation. Biochemical studies have revealed an exceptional array of receptors that associate with Lp(a) either via its apoB, apo(a), or OxPL components. These receptors fall into five main categories, namely 'classical' lipoprotein receptors, toll-like and scavenger receptors, lectins, and plasminogen receptors. The roles of these receptors have largely been dissected by genetic manipulation in cells or mice, although their relative physiological importance for removal of Lp(a) from the circulation remains unclear. The LPA gene encoding apo(a) has an overwhelming effect on Lp(a) levels which precludes any clear associations between potential Lp(a) receptor genes and Lp(a) levels in population studies. Targeted approaches and the selection of unique Lp(a) phenotypes within populations has nevertheless allowed for some associations to be made. Few of the proposed Lp(a) receptors can specifically be manipulated with current drugs and, as such, it is not currently clear whether any of these receptors could provide relevant targets for therapeutic manipulation of Lp(a) levels. This review summarises the current status of knowledge about receptor-mediated pathways for Lp(a) catabolism.

Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: New perspectives from basic and translational science

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Genetic, epidemiological and in vitro data provide strong evidence for a pathogenic role for Lp(a) in the progression of atherothrombotic disease. Despite these advancements and a race to develop new Lp(a) lowering therapies, there are still many unanswered and emerging questions about the metabolism and pathophysiology of Lp(a). New studies have drawn attention to Lp(a) as a contributor to novel pathogenic processes, yet the mechanisms underlying the contribution of Lp(a) to CVD remain enigmatic. New therapeutics show promise in lowering plasma Lp(a) levels, although the complete mechanisms of Lp(a) lowering are not fully understood. Specific agents targeted to apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), namely antisense oligonucleotide therapy, demonstrate potential to decrease Lp(a) to levels below the 30-50 mg/dL (75-150 nmol/L) CVD risk threshold. This therapeutic approach should aid in assessing the benefit of lowering Lp(a) in a clinical setting.

Emerging Therapeutic Options for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a): Implications for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are an independent and causal risk factor for cardiovascular diseases including coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, and calcific aortic valve stenosis. This review summarizes the rationale for Lp(a) lowering and surveys relevant clinical trial data using a variety of agents capable of lowering Lp(a).

RECENT FINDINGS

Contemporary guidelines and recommendations outline populations of patients who should be screened for elevated Lp(a) and who might benefit from Lp(a) lowering. Therapies including drugs and apheresis have been described that lower Lp(a) levels modestly (∼20 %) to dramatically (∼80 %). Existing therapies that lower Lp(a) also have beneficial effects on other aspects of the lipid profile, with the exception of Lp(a)-specific apheresis and an antisense oligonucleotide that targets the mRNA encoding apolipoprotein(a). No clinical trials conducted to date have managed to answer the key question of whether Lp(a) lowering confers a benefit in terms of ameliorating cardiovascular risk, although additional outcome trials of therapies that lower Lp(a) are ongoing. It is more likely, however, that Lp(a)-specific agents will provide the most appropriate approach for addressing this question.

Roles of the low density lipoprotein receptor and related receptors in inhibition of lipoprotein(a) internalization by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The mechanisms underlying Lp(a) clearance from plasma remain unclear, which is an obvious barrier to the development of therapies to specifically lower levels of this lipoprotein. Recently, it has been documented that monoclonal antibody inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) can lower plasma Lp(a) levels by 30%. Since PCSK9 acts primarily through the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), this result is in conflict with the prevailing view that the LDLR does not participate in Lp(a) clearance. To support our recent findings in HepG2 cells that the LDLR can act as a bona fide receptor for Lp(a) whose effects are sensitive to PCSK9, we undertook a series of Lp(a) internalization experiments using different hepatic cells, with different variants of PCSK9, and with different members of the LDLR family. We found that PCSK9 decreased Lp(a) and/or apo(a) internalization by Huh7 human hepatoma cells and by primary mouse and human hepatocytes. Overexpression of human LDLR appeared to enhance apo(a)/Lp(a) internalization in both types of primary cells. Importantly, internalization of Lp(a) by LDLR-deficient mouse hepatocytes was not affected by PCSK9, but the effect of PCSK9 was restored upon overexpression of human LDLR. In HepG2 cells, Lp(a) internalization was decreased by gain-of-function mutants of PCSK9 more than by wild-type PCSK9, and a loss-of function variant had a reduced ability to influence Lp(a) internalization. Apo(a) internalization by HepG2 cells was not affected by apo(a) isoform size. Finally, we showed that very low density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR), LDR-related protein (LRP)-8, and LRP-1 do not play a role in Lp(a) internalization or the effect of PCSK9 on Lp(a) internalization. Our findings are consistent with the idea that PCSK9 inhibits Lp(a) clearance through the LDLR, but do not exclude other effects of PCSK9 such as on Lp(a) biosynthesis.

LDL-Cholesterol: Standards of Treatment 2016: A German Perspective

Decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is one of the few established and proven principles for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis. The higher the individual cardiovascular risk, the higher the benefit of lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy. Therefore, treatment options are chosen based on a patient's total cardiovascular risk. The latter depends not only on the levels of LDL-C but also on the presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and on the number and severity of other risk factors. Current guidelines recommend the lowering of LDL-C to 115 mg/dl (3 mmol/l) in patients with low and moderate risk. The LDL-C treatment target is <100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l) for patients at high risk and <70 mg/dl (1.8 mmol/l) for patients at very high risk. Although lifestyle measures remain a fundamental part of treatment, many patients require drug therapy to achieve their LDL-C targets. Statins are the drugs of choice, with other options including ezetimibe and the newly available monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9). In some cases, bile acid-binding sequestrants and fibrates can also be considered. Nicotinic acid is no longer available in Germany. PCSK9 antibodies decrease LDL-C about 50-60 % and are well tolerated. Their effects on clinical endpoints are being investigated in large randomized trials. The aim of the present review is to summarize the current guidelines and treatment options for hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, we provide an appraisal of PCSK9 antibodies and propose their use in selected patient populations, particularly in those at very high cardiovascular risk whose LDL-C levels under maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy are significantly over their treatment target.

Lipoprotein(a) catabolism is regulated by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 through the low density lipoprotein receptor

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) have been identified as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. Plasma Lp(a) levels are reduced by monoclonal antibodies targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). However, the mechanism of Lp(a) catabolism in vivo and the role of PCSK9 in this process are unknown. We report that Lp(a) internalization by hepatic HepG2 cells and primary human fibroblasts was effectively reduced by PCSK9. Overexpression of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) in HepG2 cells dramatically increased the internalization of Lp(a). Internalization of Lp(a) was markedly reduced following treatment of HepG2 cells with a function-blocking monoclonal antibody against the LDLR or the use of primary human fibroblasts from an individual with familial hypercholesterolemia; in both cases, Lp(a) internalization was not affected by PCSK9. Optimal Lp(a) internalization in both hepatic and primary human fibroblasts was dependent on the LDL rather than the apolipoprotein(a) component of Lp(a). Lp(a) internalization was also dependent on clathrin-coated pits, and Lp(a) was targeted for lysosomal and not proteasomal degradation. Our data provide strong evidence that the LDLR plays a role in Lp(a) catabolism and that this process can be modulated by PCSK9. These results provide a direct mechanism underlying the therapeutic potential of PCSK9 in effectively lowering Lp(a) levels.

apoB-independent enzyme immunoassay for lipoprotein(a) by capture on immobilized lectin (jacalin)

Enzyme immunoassay for lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] using antibodies to both apoB and apo(a) subunits (a-B assay) is shown to be affected by differential masking of apoB by apo(a) and the presence of LDL-Lp(a) adducts. An apoB-independent immunoassay by capturing Lp(a) through its O-glycans on microplate-coated lectin jacalin and quantitation using peroxidase-labeled anti-apo(a) (J-a assay) is described. J-a assay response is linear, more than twice as sensitive as a-B assay, and is suppressed only 18 ± 5% by non-Lp(a) O-glycan-containing proteins of serum. Wide variations in IgA did not significantly affect Lp(a) binding to jacalin (CV = 6.4%).

A novel peptide derived from human apolipoprotein E is an inhibitor of tumor growth and ocular angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is a hallmark of tumor development and metastasis and now a validated target for cancer treatment. We previously reported that a novel dimer peptide (apoEdp) derived from the receptor binding region of human apolipoprotein E (apoE) inhibits virus-induced angiogenesis. However, its role in tumor anti-angiogenesis is unknown. This study demonstrates that apoEdp has anti-angiogenic property in vivo through reduction of tumor growth in a mouse model and ocular angiogenesis in a rabbit eye model. Our in vitro studies show that apoEdp inhibits human umbilical vein endothelial cell proliferation, migration, invasion and capillary tube formation. We document that apoEdp inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-induced Flk-1 activation as well as downstream signaling pathways that involve c-Src, Akt, eNOS, FAK, and ERK1/2. These in vitro data suggest potential sites of the apoE dipeptide inhibition that could occur in vivo.

This is the first evidence that a synthetic dimer peptide mimicking human apoE has anti-angiogenesis functions and could be an anti-tumor drug candidate.

Effects of simvastatin and carnitine versus simvastatin on lipoprotein(a) and apoprotein(a) in type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of simvastatin and L-carnitine coadministration versus simvastatin monotherapy on lipid profile, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and apoprotein(a) (Apo(a)) levels in type II diabetic patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 75 patients were assigned to one of two treatment groups for 4 months. Group A received simvastatin monotherapy; group B received L-carnitine and simvastatin. The following variables were assessed at baseline, after washout and at 1, 2, 3 and 4 months of treatment: body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, Apolipoprotein A1, Apo B, lipoprotein(a) and apoprotein(a).

RESULTS

At the end of treatment in the carnitine and simvastatin combined group compared with the simvastatin alone group, we observed a significant decrease in glycemia (p < 0.001), triglycerides (p < 0.001), Apo B (p < 0.05), Lp(a) (p < 0.05), apo(a) (p < 0.05), while HDL significantly increased (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The coadministration of carnitine and simvastatin resulted in a significant reduction in Lp(a) and apo(a) and may represent a new therapeutic option in reducing plasma Lp(a) levels, LDL cholesterol and Apo B100.

Malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis syndrome in Chronic Kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease is becoming a major health problem globally and in India an alarming number of about 8 million people are suffering from this disease. Patients undergoing hemodialysis have a high prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition and inflammation. As these two conditions often occur concomitantly in hemodialysis patients, they have been referred together as 'malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis syndrome' to emphasize the important association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The three factors related to the pathophysiology in these patients are dialysis related nutrient loss, increased protein catabolism and hypoalbuminemia. Inflammation in Chronic Kidney disease is the most important factor in the genesis of several complications in renal disease. Pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1 and TNF-alpha play a major role in the onset of metabolic alterations in Chronic Kidney disease patients. Atherosclerosis is a very frequent complication in uremia due to the coexistence of hypertension, hyperhomocysteinemia, inflammation, malnutrition and increased oxidative stress, generation of advanced glycation end products, advanced oxidation protein products, hyperlipidemia and altered structural and functional ability of HDL. LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein (A), apolipoprotein (B), and Lp(a) are also associated with atherosclerosis. Studies have now provided enormous data to enable the evaluation of the severity of malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis syndrome as well as effective monitoring of these patients.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism is associated with both carotid and coronary atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) polymorphism plays a significant role in the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the association between apoE polymorphism and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and severity and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

B-mode ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were used to assess carotid, and coronary artery atherosclerosis in 91 patients with clinically suspected CAD referred for cardiac catheterization. Two apoE phenotype groups were defined: apoE3 (E3/E3) and apoE4 (including E4/E3, E4/E4 phenotypes). Maximum IMT was higher in the apoE4 group than in the apoE3 group (p=0.022). The global atheroma burden index was similarly higher in the apoE4 group than in the apoE3 group (p=0.033). ApoE4 subjects had higher levels of apolipoprotein B (apoB) (p=0.008), triglycerides (p=0.006), remnant lipoprotein-cholesterol (RLP-C) (p=0.023), and lipoprotein(a) [(Lp(a)] (p=0.041) than apoE3 subjects. The mean LDL particle size was smaller in the apoE4 group than in the apoE3 group (p=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

ApoE polymorphism was associated with both carotid and coronary atherosclerosis. Patients with the apoE4 isoform had an increased carotid IMT and a more severe and extensive CAD than patients with the apoE3 isoform.

Lipoprotein metabolism in chronic renal insufficiency

Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) is associated with a characteristic dyslipidemia. Findings in children with CRI largely parallel those in adults. Moderate hypertriglyceridemia, increased triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) and reduced high-density lipoproteins (HDL) are the most usual findings, whereas total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remain normal or modestly increased. Qualitative abnormalities in lipoproteins are common, including small dense LDL, oxidized LDL, and cholesterol-enriched TRL. Measures of lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase activity are reduced, and concentrations of apolipoprotein C-III are markedly elevated. Still an active area of research, major pathophysiological mechanisms leading to the dyslipidemia of CRI include insulin resistance and nonnephrotic proteinuria. Sources of variability in the severity of this dyslipidemia include the degree of renal impairment and the modality of dialysis. The benefits of maintaining normal body weight and physical activity extend to those with CRI. In addition to multiple hypolipidemic pharmaceuticals, fish oils are also effective as a triglyceride-lowering agent, and the phosphorous binding agent sevelamer also lowers LDL-C. Emerging classes of hypolipidemic agents and drugs affecting sensitivity to insulin may impact future treatment. Unfortunately, cardiovascular benefit has not been convincingly demonstrated by any trial designed to study adults or children with renal disease. Therefore, it is not possible at this time to endorse general recommendations for the use of any agent to treat dyslipidemia in children with chronic kidney disease.

Lipoprotein(a) in the cerebrospinal fluid of neurological patients with blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a recognized pathogenic particle in human plasma, but its presence in the cerebrospinal fluid and its possible role in the central nervous system have not been documented. We tested the hypothesis that apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], free or as a component of the Lp(a) particle, can cross the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier and be found in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients affected by neurologic pathologies.

METHODS

We studied paired cerebrospinal fluid/serum samples from 77 patients with inflammatory (n=20) or noninflammatory (n=34) blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier dysfunction and without blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier dysfunction (n=23). We used ELISA to measure Lp(a) concentrations and Western blot and immunodetection to analyze apo(a) isoforms in native and reducing conditions.

RESULTS

Entire Lp(a) with either small or large apo(a) isoforms was present in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier dysfunction, regardless of its pathogenesis. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that both serum Lp(a) concentration (P=0.003) and cerebrospinal fluid/serum albumin ratio (P<0.001) were predictors of the Lp(a) concentration in cerebrospinal fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that Lp(a) can cross a dysfunctional blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. The unusual presence of Lp(a) in the cerebrospinal fluid could extend some of its known pathogenic effects to the central nervous system.

Lipoprotein(a), lipids and proinflammatory cytokines in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery

Background

The aims were to investigate whether surgical stress can induce a positive or negative lipoprotein(a) acute response, to determine any association with apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes, and to establish whether any such response is dependent on changes in lipids and proinflammatory cytokines. In addition, the impact of interleukin (IL) 6 genetic variability on the cytokine response to surgery was examined.

Methods

This prospective, observational study included 41 patients with cancer referred for abdominal surgery. Preoperative (T0) plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a), IL-6, tumour necrosis factor α, and serum concentrations of transforming growth factor β1 and lipids, were compared with values obtained 5 h (T1), 24 h (T2) and 5 days (T3) after surgery. Apolipoprotein(a) Kringle IV (KIV)-VNTR (variable-number tandem repeat) and IL-6 − 174 G/C polymorphisms were analysed.

Results

Lipoprotein(a) was found to act as a negative acute-phase reactant (30·0 per cent reduction at T2) (P = 0·009). Surgery had a more profound impact on subjects with low KIV-VNTR. After surgery, lipoprotein(a) correlated significantly with corrected low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (r = 0·408 at T2). IL-6 inversely correlated with lipoprotein(a) (r = −0·321 at T1) and LDL-cholesterol (r = −0·418 at T1). The IL-6 response could be predicted from a combination of the surgical severity and −174 G/C genotype.

Conclusion

Although temporal associations did not indicate causality, these data provide a hypothesis to explain the inverse relationship between lipoprotein(a) and IL-6.

Lipoprotein [a] is cleared from the plasma primarily by the liver in a process mediated by apolipoprotein [a]

The cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for lipoprotein [a] (Lp[a]) catabolism are unknown. We examined the plasma clearance of Lp[a] and LDL in mice using lipoproteins isolated from human plasma coupled to radiolabeled tyramine cellobiose. Lipoproteins were injected into wild-type, LDL receptor-deficient (Ldlr-/-), and apolipoprotein E-deficient (Apoe-/-) mice. The fractional catabolic rate of LDL was greatly slowed in Ldlr-/- mice and greatly accelerated in Apoe-/- mice compared with wild-type mice. In contrast, the plasma clearance of Lp[a] in Ldlr-/- mice was similar to that in wild-type mice and was only slightly accelerated in Apoe-/- mice. Hepatic uptake of Lp[a] in wild-type mice was 34.6% of the injected dose over a 24 h period. The kidney accounted for only a small fraction of tissue uptake (1.3%). To test whether apolipoprotein [a] (apo[a]) mediates the clearance of Lp[a] from plasma, we coinjected excess apo[a] with labeled Lp[a]. Apo[a] acted as a potent inhibitor of Lp[a] plasma clearance. Asialofetuin, a ligand of the asialoglycoprotein receptor, did not inhibit Lp[a] clearance. In summary, the liver is the major organ accounting for the clearance of Lp[a] in mice, with the LDL receptor and apolipoprotein E having no major roles. Our studies indicate that apo[a] is the primary ligand that mediates Lp[a] uptake and plasma clearance.

Apo(a) promotes thrombosis in a vascular injury model by a mechanism independent of plasminogen

OBJECTIVE

Structural similarity between apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], the unique apoprotein of lipoprotein(a), and plasminogen (Plg), the zymogen for plasmin, results in inhibition of functions of Plg by apo(a) in vitro. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction of Plg and apo(a) in vivo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Vascular injury was induced in the carotid artery with a perivascular cuff in: (i) wild-type (WT); (ii) Plg deficient (Plg-/-); (iii) apo(a) (6 KIV construct) transgenic [apo(a)tg]; and (iv) apo(a) transgenic and Plg deficient [apo(a):Plg-/-] mice. At 10 days after cuff placement, the media and adventitia area were increased in the injured carotids compared with the uninjured carotids, and collagen deposition was greater in apo(a)tg, Plg-/- and apo(a):Plg-/- mice compared with WT mice. The incidence of a thrombus was greater (P < 0.05) in apo(a):Plg-/- mice (83%) than WT (20%), Plg-/- (12%), and apo(a)tg mice (9%). In the thrombi from apo(a)tg and apo(a):Plg-/- mice, P-selectin and von Willebrand factor immunostaining, indicating a platelet-rich thrombi, was greater than in WT and Plg-/- mice. The presence of fibrin(ogen) in the thrombi was greater in Plg-/- and apo(a):Plg-/- mice than apo(a)tg and WT mice. Of the four genotypes, only the apo(a):Plg-/- mice had both increased platelet and increased fibrin(ogen) deposition.

CONCLUSIONS

The major finding of this study is the high incidence of thrombosis after vascular injury in apo(a)transgenic mice in a Plg deficient background, providing strong evidence for a prothrombotic role of apo(a) independent of Plg in vivo.

An Apolipoprotein(a) Peptide Delays Chylomicron Remnant Clearance and Increases Plasma Remnant Lipoproteins and Atherosclerosis In Vivo

Objective— Humans with high expression of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] and high plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are at increased risk for atherosclerosis, but the mechanism is not known. We have previously shown that the KIV 5–8 domain of apo(a) has unique cell-surface binding properties, and naturally occurring fragments of apo(a) encompassing this domain are thought to be atherogenic in humans. To investigate the effect of KIV 5–8 on lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis in vivo, we created several independent lines of liver-targeted KIV 5–8 transgenic mice.

Methods and Results— The transgenic mice have plasma apo(a) peptide concentrations that are similar to Lp(a) concentrations in humans at risk for coronary artery disease. Remarkably, the transgenic mice had a 2- to 4-fold increase in cholesterol-rich remnant lipoproteins (RLPs) when fed a cholesterol-rich diet, and a 5- to 20-fold increase in atherosclerosis lesion area in the aortic root. Using an in vivo clearance study, we found only slight differences in the triglyceride and apolipoprotein B secretion rates between the 2 groups of mice, suggesting an RLP clearance defect. Using an isolated perfused mouse liver system, we showed that transgenic livers had a slower rate of RLP removal, which was retarded further when KIV 5–8 , full-length apo(a), or Lp(a) were added to the perfusate. An apo(a) peptide that does not interact with cells, K(IV 2 ) 3 , did not retard RLP removal, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had a much smaller effect than Lp(a).

Conclusions— We propose that high levels of apo(a)/Lp(a), perhaps acting via a specific cell-surface binding domain, inhibit hepatic clearance of remnants, leading to high plasma levels of RLPs and markedly enhanced atherosclerosis. We speculate that the KIV 5–8 region of apo(a) competes with one or more receptors for remnant clearance in the liver and that this process may represent one mechanism accounting for increased atherosclerosis in humans with high secretion levels of apo(a).

Relation of apolipoprotein(a) size to alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level is a newly established vascular risk factor which has been suggested to play a role in dementia. However, the majority of Lp(a) cell-to-cell interactions are mediated by its specific apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] moiety. This suggests that the size polymorphism of apo(a) may be of importance in conveying the Lp(a)-related risk. Specifically, we postulated that variation in apo(a) isoform size may lead to increased risk of vascular dementia (VaD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), stroke, or all three of them. Under a case-control design we compared Lp(a) plasma levels and the distribution of apo(a) phenotypes in groups of subjects consisting of 50 VaD patients, 162 sporadic AD patients, 95 non-demented stroke patients (NDS), and 105 normal controls. The prevalence of small-sized apo(a) isoforms in the VaD group was significantly higher than that in the stroke and normal control groups, with an odds ratio of 5.29 (95% CI 2.24-12.49, p = 0.0001) for the development of VaD for individuals with at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight (LMW). Furthermore, the possession of at least one small-sized apo(a) isoform significantly increased the risk of AD to 1.92 (95% CI 1.02-3.61, p = 0.0434). Our results demonstrate that possession of at least one LMW apo(a) isoform is significantly associated with dementia and specifically offer new evidence of a strong association between the lipoprotein system and post-stroke dementia.

Apolipoprotein(a) null phenotype is related to a delayed age at onset of Alzheimer's disease

Apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] is a highly polymorphic glycoprotein which has been suggested to play a role in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and the differential expression of apo(a) isoforms were analyzed in 73 sporadic AD patients compared with 73 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. The distribution of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) concentrations were similar in the two groups. However, we observed that AD patients with no apo(a) isoform from immunoblots (subjects with the 'null phenotype') had a mean age at onset of 76.8+/-8.8 versus 66.9+/-9.6 years of those who expressed at least one apo(a) band (P = 0.010). Multivariate analysis showed that this effect was independent of apolipoproteinE epsilon4 allele. We conclude that the expression of at least one apo(a) isoform may interact with other pathogenic mechanisms involved in controlling the age at onset of AD.

Galactose-specific asialoglycoprotein receptor is involved in lipoprotein (a) catabolism

Lp(a) [lipoprotein (a)] is a highly atherogenic plasma lipoprotein assembled from low-density lipoprotein and the glycoprotein apolipoprotein (a). The rate of Lp(a) biosynthesis correlates significantly with plasma Lp(a) concentrations, whereas the fractional catabolic rate does not have much influence. So far, little is known about Lp(a) catabolism. To study the site and mode of Lp(a) catabolism, native or sialidase-treated Lp(a) was injected into hedgehogs or ASGPR (asialoglycoprotein receptor)-knockout (ASGPR-) mice or wild-type (ASGPR+) mice, and the decay of the plasma Lp(a) concentration was followed. COS-7 cells were transfected with high- (HL-1) and low-molecular-mass ASGPR subunits (HL-2), and binding and degradation of intact or desialylated Lp(a) were measured. In hedgehogs, one of the few species that synthesize Lp(a), most of the Lp(a) was taken up by the liver, followed by kidney and spleen. Lp(a) and asialo-Lp(a) were catabolized with apparent half-lives of 13.8 and 0.55 h respectively. Asialo-orosomucoide increased both half-lives significantly. In mice, the apparent half-life of Lp(a) was 4-6 h. Catabolism of native Lp(a) by wild-type mice was significantly faster compared with ASGPR- mice and there was a significantly greater accumulation of Lp(a) in the liver of ASGPR+ mice compared with ASGPR- mice. The catabolism of asialo-Lp(a) in ASGPR- mice was 8-fold faster when compared with native Lp(a) in wild-type mice. Transfected COS-7 cells expressing functional ASGPR showed approx. 5-fold greater binding and 2-fold faster degradation of native Lp(a) compared with control cells. Our results for the first time demonstrate a physiological function of ASGPR in the catabolism of Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a): an emerging cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) is a cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein, consisting of a covalent linkage joining the unique and highly polymorphic apolipoprotein(a) to apolipoprotein B100, the main protein moiety of low-density lipoproteins. Although the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in humans is mostly genetically determined, acquired disorders might influence synthesis and catabolism of the particle. Raised concentration of lipoprotein(a) has been acknowledged as a leading inherited risk factor for both premature and advanced atherosclerosis at different vascular sites. The strong structural homologies with plasminogen and low-density lipoproteins suggest that lipoprotein(a) might represent the ideal bridge between the fields of atherosclerosis and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of vascular occlusive disorders. Unfortunately, the exact mechanisms by which lipoprotein(a) promotes, accelerates, and complicates atherosclerosis are only partially understood. In some clinical settings, such as in patients at exceptionally low risk for cardiovascular disease, the potential regenerative and antineoplastic properties of lipoprotein(a) might paradoxically counterbalance its athero-thrombogenicity, as attested by the compatibility between raised plasma lipoprotein(a) levels and longevity.

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and alcohol consumption in hypertension: possible relevance for cardiovascular damage

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationships between alcohol intake and serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a powerful predictor of organ damage, in patients with essential hypertension with a wide range of alcohol intake, and to investigate whether the association between alcohol intake and serum Lp(a) concentrations occurs over the entire spectrum of apo(a) phenotypes.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of a case series.

SETTING

University medical centre.

PATIENTS

Four hundred and two patients with untreated essential hypertension recruited at a hypertension clinic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serum Lp(a) concentrations, apo(a) isoforms, alcohol consumption, smoking habits and cardiovascular status.

RESULTS

No difference in Lp(a) concentrations was observed between teetotalers and occasional drinkers. Light drinkers (1-20 g/day ethanol), moderate drinkers (21-50 g/day), and heavy drinkers (> 50 g/day) had, respectively, 21, 26 and 57% lower median Lp(a) concentrations than teetotalers and occasional drinkers. Similar findings were obtained when male and female patients were analysed separately. Log Lp(a) concentrations were inversely and independently correlated with alcohol consumption in both men and women with hypertension. The frequency distributions of apo(a) isoforms and liver function parameters were comparable across the different alcohol intake groups. Patients with evidence of cardiovascular damage had greater concentrations of serum Lp(a) and higher frequency of low-molecular weight apo(a) isoforms as compared with patients without such evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum Lp(a) is inversely and dose-dependently related with alcohol intake in patients with hypertension, and this relationship is independent of the size distribution of apo(a) isoforms. Reduction of Lp(a) concentrations by regular consumption of alcohol might favourably affect the atherosclerotic risk profile of patients with hypertension and thereby decrease cardiovascular morbidity.

Association of kidney function with serum lipoprotein(a) level: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1991-1994)

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels have been observed in patients on dialysis therapy. However, few studies explored the relationship between kidney function and Lp(a) levels in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

We examined the association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with Lp(a) level in 7,675 participants in the second phase of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

RESULTS

There was no association between Lp(a) level and estimated GFR in the overall sample (geometric mean, 10.4 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.2 to 11.8] in the group with a GFR of 90 to 149 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 9.3 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.9 to 11.0] in the group with a GFR of 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 12.1 mg/dL [95% CI, 9.0 to 15.9] in the group with a GFR of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.77 for linear trend) or non-Hispanic whites (geometric mean, 8.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.8 to 10.2] versus 8.5 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.1 to 10.2] versus 10.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 8.1 to 14.7]; P = 0.54 for linear trend). However, non-Hispanic blacks (geometric mean, 30.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 28.0 to 33.0] versus 35.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 31.4 to 39.4] versus 40.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 27.7 to 58.2]; P = 0.01 for linear trend) and Mexican Americans (geometric mean, 6.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2] versus 7.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5] versus 11.0 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.7 to 20.3]; P = 0.04 for linear trend) showed modestly, but significantly, greater Lp(a) levels with lower GFRs. In a weighed quantile regression model adjusted for age, sex, and race, a lower GFR was associated with greater 95th percentile serum Lp(a) values in the overall sample and non-Hispanic whites and with greater median Lp(a) levels in Mexican Americans.

CONCLUSION

In a cross-section of the US population, a low GFR is associated with only moderately greater Lp(a) levels, and this association may differ by race-ethnicity.

Renal handling of human apolipoprotein(a) and its fragments in the rat

The sites and mechanisms of the catabolism of atherogenic lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are not well understood. Lp(a) is increased in patients with end-stage renal disease, suggesting a renal catabolism of Lp(a). To gain a better insight into renal handling of Lp(a), we established a heterologous rat model to study the renal catabolism of human Lp(a). Pure human Lp(a) was injected into Wistar rats, and animals were sacrificed at different time points (30 minutes to 24 hours). Intact Lp(a) was cleared from the circulation of injected rats with a half-life time of 14.5 hours. Strong intracellular immunostaining for apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) was observed in the cytoplasm of proximal tubular cells after 4, 8, and 24 hours. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) was colocalized with glomerular apo(a) 1 to 8 hours after Lp(a) injection, but renal capillaries and tubules remained negative. No relevant amounts of apo(a) fragments were found in the plasma of rats after injection of Lp(a). During all urine collection periods, apo(a) fragments with molecular weights of 50 to 160 kd were detected in the urine, however. Our results show that human Lp(a) injected into rats accumulates intracellularly in the rat kidney, and apo(a) fragments are excreted in the urine. The kidney apparently plays a major role in fragmentation of Lp(a). Despite the fact that rodents lack endogenous Lp(a), rats injected with human Lp(a) may provide a useful heterologous animal model to study the renal metabolism of Lp(a) further.

Pentanucleotide repeat and size polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein(a) gene are associated with the lipoprotein(a) concentration in chronic hemodialysis patients

The elevation of serum or plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels is regarded as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and many previous reports demonstrated that Lp(a) levels in hemodialysis patients were significantly higher than in controls. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism [(TTTTA)n] in the 5'-flanking region of the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene and of a size polymorphism of apo(a) for elevated Lp(a) concentrations observed in chronic hemodialysis patients. We studied 172 patients on chronic hemodialysis and 199 healthy adults. For analysis of the pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism, polymerase chain reaction products were loaded on polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis. apo(a) size phenotyping was performed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. The median level of Lp(a) in the patients was 14.2 mg/dl which was significantly higher than that in controls (12.0 mg/dl; p < 0.05). In the genotype of (TTTTA)8/8, the median Lp(a) level in the patients (15.9 mg/dl) was significantly higher than that in controls (13.0 mg/dl; p < 0.05). In the genotype of (TTTTA)8/8 with large-sized apo(a) isoforms (A16-A25), the patients had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than the controls (p < 0.05). In conclusion, increased Lp(a) levels in chronic hemodialysis patients were mainly attributed to the combination of eight repeats of the pentanucleotide polymorphism and large-sized isoforms of apo(a).

Association between triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnant receptor polymorphisms and lipid traits

OBJECTIVES

The metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) is, in part, mediated by lipoprotein receptors (such as low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein [LRP] and very low density lipoprotein [VLDL] receptors), which recognize TRL remnants after specific binding with apolipoprotein E. The purpose of this study was to explore the association of the genetic polymorphisms of remnant receptors with lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein levels including remnant-like particle-cholesterol (RLP-C).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Using polymerase chain reaction-amplified DNA, VLDL receptor tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism, LRP trinucleotide repeat polymorphism, and LRP exon 3 polymorphism were analyzed in normal adults (control group: n = 161) and in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD group: n = 102).

RESULTS

The allelic distributions of VLDL receptor triple repeat polymorphism, LRP tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism, and LRP exon 3 polymorphism in Koreans were similar to those of Japanese but were significantly different from those of other ethnic groups. There were no significant differences in the allele frequencies of the polymorphisms between the control and CAD groups. VLDL receptor polymorphism in the control group (p = 0.0403) and LRP exon 3 polymorphism in the CAD group (p = 0.0459) showed significant associations with lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study demonstrated significant interracial distribution of remnant receptor polymorphisms. There was no association between the remnant receptor polymorphisms and the RLP-C levels. However, the polymorphisms showed a significant association with Lp(a), which may suggest that the Lp(a) metabolism is in part mediated by the uptake through the remnant receptors.

Interactions between apolipoprotein E and apolipoprotein(a) in patients with late-onset Alzheimer disease

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], the distinctive, highly polymorphic glycoprotein of lipoprotein(a), shares a series of common features with apolipoprotein E (apoE), which is implicated in the development of Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether apo(a) is associated with Alzheimer disease.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

University hospitals in Europe.

PARTICIPANTS

285 patients with Alzheimer disease and 296 controls.

MEASUREMENTS

Plasma lipoprotein(a) levels, size of the apo(a) isoforms, and apoE and apo(a) genotyping.

RESULTS

Among carriers of the apoE epsilon4 allele, lipoprotein(a) was associated with a progressive, age-dependent increased risk for late-onset Alzheimer disease (odds ratio for patients >80 years of age, 6.0 [95% CI, 1.2 to 30.8]; P<0.01). Among noncarriers older than 80 years of age, lipoprotein(a) was associated with a reduced risk for Alzheimer disease (odds ratio, 0.4 [CI, 0.2 to 0.91; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this convenience sample, lipoprotein(a) was an additional risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer disease in carriers of the apoE epsilon4 allele. However, lipoprotein(a) may protect against late-onset Alzheimer disease in noncarriers.

Lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and proteinuria in patients with moderate renal failure

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic diseases are a major cause of death in patients with renal failure. Increased serum concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been established as a genetically controlled risk factor for these diseases and have been demonstrated in patients with moderate renal failure, suggesting that this lipoprotein contributes to the increased cardiovascular risk seen in these patients. Variable alleles at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus are the main determinants of the serum Lp(a) level in the general population. The purpose of this study was to investigate apo(a) isoforms in patients with moderate renal failure and mild proteinuria (less than 1.0 g/day).

METHODS

In 250 consecutive subjects recruited at a hypertension clinic, we assessed the renal function by 24-hour creatinine clearance, proteinuria, and microalbuminuria, as well as the prevalence of atherosclerotic disease, and we also measured apo(a) isoforms, serum albumin, and Lp(a) concentrations.

RESULTS

Moderate impairment of renal function (creatinine clearance, 30 to 89 ml/min per 1.73 m2 of body surface area) was found in 97 patients. Lp(a) levels were significantly greater in patients with moderate renal failure (21.7+/-23.9 mg/dl) as compared with patients with normal renal function (15.6+/-16.4 mg/dl, P<0.001), and an inverse correlation was observed between log Lp(a) and creatinine clearance (r = -0.181, P <0.01). However, no difference was found in the frequency of low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms between patients with normal (25.5%) and impaired (27.8%) renal function. Only patients with the smallest size apo(a) isoforms exhibited significantly elevated levels of Lp(a), whereas the large-size isoforms had similar concentrations in patients with normal and impaired renal function. No significant relationship was found between serum Lp(a) and proteinuria. Clinical and laboratory evidence of one or more events attributed to atherosclerosis was found in 9.8% of patients with normal renal function and 25.8% of patients with moderate renal failure (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that renal failure per se or other genes beside the apo(a) gene locus are responsible for the elevation of serum Lp(a) levels in patients with moderate impairment of renal function. The elevation of Lp(a) levels occurs independently of the level of proteinuria and may contribute to the risk for atherosclerotic disease in these patients.

Expression of adhesion molecules by lp(a): a potential novel mechanism for its atherogenicity

Lp(a) is a major inherited risk factor for premature atherosclerosis. The mechanism of Lp(a) atherogenicity has not been elucidated, but likely involves both its ability to interfere with plasminogen activation and its atherogenic potential as a lipoprotein particle after receptor-mediated uptake. We demonstrate that Lp(a) stimulates production of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) and E-selectin in cultured human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAEC). This effect resulted from a rise in intracellular free calcium induced by Lp(a) and could be inhibited by the intracellular calcium chelator, BAPTA/AM. The involvement of the LDL and VLDL receptors in Lp(a) activation of HCAEC were ruled out since Lp(a) induction of adhesion molecules was not prevented by an antibody (IgGC7) to the LDL receptor or by receptor-activating protein, an antagonist of ligand binding to the VLDL receptor. Addition of alpha2-macroglobulin as well as treatment with heparinase, chondroitinase ABC, and sodium chlorate did not decrease levels of VCAM-1 and E-selectin stimulated by Lp(a), suggesting that neither the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein nor cell-surface proteoglycans are involved in Lp(a)-induced adhesion molecule production. Neither does the binding site on HCAEC responsible for adhesion molecule production by Lp(a) appear to involve plasminogen receptors, as levels of VCAM-1 and E-selectin were not significantly decreased by the addition of glu-plasminogen, the lysine analog epsilon-aminocaproic acid, or by trans-4-(aminomethyl)-cyclohexanecarboxymethylic acid (tranexamic acid), which acts by binding to the lysine binding sites carried on the kringle structures in plasminogen. In contrast, recombinant apolipoprotein (a) [r-apo(a)] competed with Lp(a) and attenuated the expression of VCAM-1 and E-selectin. In summary, we have identified a calcium-dependent interaction of Lp(a) with HCAEC capable of inducing potent surface expression of VCAM-1 and E-selectin that does not appear to involve any of the known potential Lp(a) binding sites. Because leukocyte recruitment to the vessel wall appears to represent one of the important early events in atherogenesis, this newly described endothelial cell-activating effect of Lp(a) places it at a crucial juncture in the initiation of atherogenic disease and may lead to a better understanding of the role of Lp(a) in the vascular biology of atherosclerosis.

Molecular mechanisms that underlie structural and functional changes at the postsynaptic membrane during synaptic plasticity

The synaptic plasticity that is addressed in this review follows neurodegeneration in the brain and thus has both structural as well as functional components. The model of neurodegeneration that has been selected is the kainic acid lesioned hippocampus. Degeneration of the CA3 pyramidal cells results in a loss of the Schaffer collateral afferents innervating the CA1 pyramidal cells. This is followed by a period of structural plasticity where new synapses are formed. These are associated with changes in the numbers and shapes of spines as well as changes in the morphometry of the dendrites. It is suggested that this synaptogenesis is responsible for an increase in the ratio of NMDA to AMPA receptors mediating excitatory synaptic transmission at these synapses. Changes in the temporal and spatial properties of these synapses resulted in an altered balance between LTP and LTD. These properties together with a reduction in the inhibitory drive increased the excitability of the surviving CA1 pyramidal cells which in turn triggered epileptiform bursting activity. In this review we discuss the insights that may be gained from studies of the underlying molecular machinery. Developments in one of the collections of the cogs in this machinery has been summarized through recent studies characterizing the roles of neural recognition molecules in synaptic plasticity in the adult nervous systems of vertebrates and invertebrates. Such investigations of neural cell adhesion molecules, cadherins and amyloid precursor protein have shown the involvement of these molecules on the morphogenetic level of synaptic changes, on the one hand, and signal transduction effects, on the other. Further complex cogs are found in the forms of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) family of genes and their ligands play pivotal roles in the brain development and in regulating the growth and remodelling of neurones. Evidence is discussed for their role in the maintenance of cognitive function as well as Alzheimer's. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the clustering and maintenance of transmitter receptors at postsynaptic sites are the final cogs in the machinery that we have reviewed. Postsynaptic densities (PSD) from excitatory synapses have yielded many cytoskeletal proteins including actin, spectrin, tubulin, microtubule-associated proteins and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Isolated PSDs have also been shown to be enriched in AMPA, kainate and NMDA receptors. However, recently, a new family of proteins, the MAGUKs (for membrane-associated guanylate kinase) has emerged. The role of these proteins in clustering different NMDA receptor subunits is discussed. The MAGUK proteins are also thought to play a role in synaptic plasticity mediated by nitric oxide (NO). Both NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are highly clustered at excitatory postsynaptic sites in cortical and hippocampal neurones but have revealed differences in their choice of molecular components. Both GABAA and glycine (Gly) receptors mediate synaptic inhibition in the brain and spinal cord. Whilst little is known about how GABAA receptors are localized in the postsynaptic membrane, considerable progress has been made towards the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of Gly receptors. It has been shown that the peripheral membrane protein gephyrin plays a pivotal role in the formation of Gly receptor clusters most likely by anchoring the receptor to the subsynaptic cytoskeleton. Evidence for the distribution as well as function of gephyrin and Gly receptors is discussed. Postsynaptic membrane specializations are complex molecular machinery subserving a multitude of functions in the proper communication between neurones. Despite the fact that only a few key players have been identified it will be a fascinating to watch the story as to how they contribute to structural and functional plasticity unfold.

Increased degradation of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic compared with nonlesioned aortic intima-inner media of rabbits: in vivo evidence that lipoprotein(a) may contribute to foam cell formation

To investigate a potential role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in foam cell formation, we have measured the degradation rates of Lp(a) and LDL in the rabbit aorta in vivo. Lp(a) (or LDL) was labeled with both 113I-TC and 125I and injected into 17 rabbits with extensive aortic atherosclerosis and into 16 rabbits without atherosclerosis. As the protein moiety of the doubly labeled lipoproteins is degraded, 131I-TC is trapped in the cell, whereas 125I diffuses out of the cell. Twenty-four hours after injection, 12 samples of the aorta and biopsies from 9 other tissues were removed. The degradation rate of Lp(a) (percent of plasma pool per gram tissue per day) was less than that of LDL in the adrenals and in the intestine. In contrast, degradation rates of Lp(a) and LDL were similar in liver, spleen, kidney, heart, lung, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue. In nonlesioned aortic intima-inner media, the degradation rate of Lp(a) was 39% of that of LDL (t test: P <.05 in aortic arch and thoracic aorta), whereas the degradation rates of Lp(a) and LDL were similar in atherosclerotic aortic intima-inner media. Lp(a) degradation rates were markedly increased in atherosclerotic compared with nonlesioned aortic intima-inner media: 28.2+/-9.2 x 10(-7)% and 5.0+/-0.6 x 10(-7)% of the plasma pool per gram tissue per day in the intima-inner media of the proximal segment of atherosclerotic and nonlesioned aorta, respectively (t test: P <.01). These results suggest that the metabolism of Lp(a) is different from that of LDL in nonlesioned arterial intima, possibly reflecting that Lp(a) is degraded by LDL receptors in arterial intima less efficiently than LDL. The results also indicate that the degradation rate of Lp(a) is markedly increased in atherosclerotic lesions of rabbits, supporting the idea that Lp(a) contributes to foam cell formation during the development of atherosclerosis.

The atherogenic lipoprotein Lp(a) is internalized and degraded in a process mediated by the VLDL receptor

Lp(a) is a major inherited risk factor associated with premature heart disease and stroke. The mechanism of Lp(a) atherogenicity has not been elucidated, but likely involves both its ability to influence plasminogen activation as well as its atherogenic potential as a lipoprotein particle after receptor-mediated uptake. We demonstrate that fibroblasts expressing the human VLDL receptor can mediate endocytosis of Lp(a), leading to its degradation within lysosomes. In contrast, fibroblasts deficient in this receptor are not effective in catabolizing Lp(a). Lp(a) degradation was prevented by antibodies against the VLDL receptor, and by RAP, an antagonist of ligand binding to the VLDL receptor. Catabolism of Lp(a) was inhibited by apolipoprotein(a), but not by LDL or by monoclonal antibodies against apoB100 that block LDL binding to the LDL receptor, indicating that apolipoprotein(a) mediates Lp(a) binding to this receptor. Removal of Lp(a) antigen from the mouse circulation was delayed in mice deficient in the VLDL receptor when compared with control mice, indicating that the VLDL receptor may play an important role in Lp(a) catabolism in vivo. We also demonstrate the expression of the VLDL receptor in macrophages present in human atherosclerotic lesions. The ability of the VLDL receptor to mediate endocytosis of Lp(a) could lead to cellular accumulation of lipid within macrophages, and may represent a molecular basis for the atherogenic effects of Lp(a).

Association of Lp(a) rather than integrally-bound apo(a) with triglyceride-rich lipoproteins of human subjects

The majority of apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] in plasma is characteristically associated with Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], having a buoyant density (1.05-1.08 g/ml) intermediate between low density lipoproteins (LDL) and high density lipoproteins (HDL). In the fed (postprandial) state or in the presence of fasting (endogenous) hypertriglyceridemia, a small proportion of plasma apo(a) is found in the density < 1.006 g/ml fraction of plasma, associated with larger and less dense triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL). In order to further characterize the presence of apo(a) in ultracentrifugally-separated TRL (UTC-TRL), this lipoprotein fraction was isolated from plasma obtained in the fed state (three hours after an oral fat load) from healthy normolipidemic subjects (Lp(a): 38 +/- 8 mg/dl (mean +/- S.E.), n = 4) and also from plasma obtained after an overnight fast from hypertriglyceridemic patients (plasma TG: 8.16 +/- 2.00 mmol/l, Lp(a): 41 +/- 3 mg/dl, n = 18). Apo(a) in 3 h-postprandial UTC-TRL (5 +/- 2% of total plasma apo(a)) and in hypertriglyceridemic UTC-TRL (8 +/- 2% total apo(a)) was separable by electrophoresis and/or gel chromatography (FPLC) from the majority of UTC-TRL lipid. Apo(a) in UTC-TRL fractions had slow pre-beta electrophoretic mobility and was isolated in a lipoprotein size-range smaller than VLDL and larger than LDL, consistent with it being Lp(a). Recentrifugation of UTC-TRL resulted in the majority of apo(a) being recovered in the density > 1.006 g/ml fraction. Addition of proline to plasma samples before ultracentrifugation (final concentration: 0.1 M) substantially reduced the amount of Lp(a) in UTC-TRL. TRL separated from plasma by FPLC contained less apo(a) (2-5% of total plasma apo(a)), but this apo(a) was also readily dissociable from TRL lipid, had slow pre-beta electrophoretic mobility, and was associated with a lipoprotein with the size of Lp(a). Our data suggest that apo(a) in the TRL fraction of subjects with postprandial triglyceridemia or endogenous hypertriglyceridemia is not an integral component of plasma VLDL or chylomicrons, but represents the presence of non-covalently bound Lp(a).

Defensin Stimulates the Binding of Lipoprotein (a) to Human Vascular Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells

There is evidence to suggest that elevated plasma levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] represent a risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease, but the mechanism by which this lipoprotein localizes to involved vessels is only partially understood. In view of studies suggesting a link between inflammation and atherosclerosis and our previous finding that leukocyte defensin modulates the interaction of plasminogen and tissue-type plasminogen activator with cultured human endothelial cells, we examined the effect of this peptide on the binding of Lp(a) to cultured vascular endothelium and vascular smooth muscle cells. Defensin increased the binding of Lp(a) to endothelial cells approximately fourfold and to smooth muscle cells approximately sixfold. Defensin caused a comparable increase in the amount of Lp(a) internalized by each cell type, but Lp(a) internalized as a consequence of defensin being present was not degraded, resulting in a marked increase in the total amount of cell-associated lipoprotein. Abundant defensin was found in endothelium and in intimal smooth muscle cells of atherosclerotic human cerebral arteries, regions also invested with Lp(a). These studies suggest that defensin released from activated or senescent neutrophils may contribute to the localization and persistence of Lp(a) in human vessels and thereby predispose to the development of atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein lipase-enhanced binding of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to heparan sulfate is improved by apolipoprotein E (apoE) saturation: secretion-capture process of apoE is a possible route for the catabolism of Lp(a)

Recently, it has been recognized that cell-bound heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans (HSPG) are able to bind and subsequently initiate degradation of lipoproteins. Two mediators of lipoprotein catabolism, both with HS binding capacity, lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and apolipoprotein E (apoE), are involved in this process. This mechanism is known as the secretion-capture process of apoE. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] was shown to have a strong binding capacity to cell-associated HSPG. This binding capacity was increased by LPL addition. We investigated the effects of recombinant apoE (r-apoE) enrichment of Lp(a) on the binding to HS. Lp(a), isolated by ultracentrifugation and gel filtration, was incubated with r-apoE and reisolated by ultracentrifugation, resulting in r-apoE-enriched Lp(a). ApoE-enriched Lp(a) and control Lp(a) were coated to microtiter plates. The capacity to bind biotin-conjugated HS (b-HS) in the presence or absence of inactivated bovine LPL was studied. R-apoE-enriched Lp(a) showed increased b-HS binding capacity versus control Lp(a). Addition of LPL resulted in an increased b-HS binding capacity of both control and r-apoE-enriched Lp(a). To investigate whether binding of Lp(a) to endothelial cell HSPG occurred in vivo, 39 volunteers were injected with heparin (50 U/kg) and plasma lipid and Lp(a) levels were determined before and 20 minutes after heparin injection. No significant increase in plasma Lp(a) concentrations was found. The results showed that Lp(a) can be enriched with apoE and that this resulted in increased LPL-enhanced binding to HSPG. From the in vitro studies, it can be concluded that the secretion-capture process of apoE is a possible catabolic route for Lp(a). However, whether this also occurs in vivo remains to be confirmed.