A comparison of the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

Expert panel consensus recommendations on the utilization of nebulized budesonide for managing asthma and COPD in both stable and exacerbation stages in Thailand

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the utilization of nebulized budesonide for acute asthma and COPD exacerbations as well as for maintenance therapy in adults.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a search on PubMed for nebulized budesonide treatment.

SELECTED STUDIES

Selecting all English-language papers that utilize Mesh phrases "asthma," "COPD," "budesonide," "nebulized," "adult," "exacerbation," and "maintenance" without temporal restrictions, and narrowing down to clinical research such as RCTs, observational studies, and real-world studies.

RESULTS

Analysis of 25 studies was conducted to assess the effectiveness of nebulized budesonide in asthma (n = 10) and COPD (n = 15). The panel in Thailand recommended incorporating nebulized budesonide as an additional or alternative treatment option to the standard of care and systemic corticosteroids (SCS) based on the findings.

CONCLUSION

Nebulized budesonide is effective and well-tolerated in treating asthma and COPD, with less systemic adverse effects compared to systemic corticosteroids. High-dose nebulized budesonide can enhance clinical outcomes for severe and mild exacerbations with slow systemic corticosteroid response. Nebulized budesonide can substitute systemic corticosteroids in some situations.

Budesonide Attains Its Wide Clinical Profile by Alternative Kinetics

The introduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) changed over a few decades the treatment focus of mild-to-moderate asthma from bronchodilation to reduction in inflammation. This was achieved by inhaling a suitable corticosteroid (CS), giving a high, protracted airway concentration at a low total dose, thereby better combining efficacy and tolerance than oral therapy. Successful trials with the potent, lipophilic "skin" CS beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) paved the way, suggesting that ICSs require a very low water solubility, prolonging their intraluminal dissolution within airways. The subsequent ICS development, with resulting clinical landmarks, is exemplified here with budesonide (BUD), showing that a similar efficacy/safety relationship is achievable by partly alternative mechanisms. BUD is much less lipophilic, giving it a 100-fold higher water solubility than BDP and later developed ICSs, leading to its more rapid intraluminal dissolution and faster airway and systemic uptake rates. In airway tissue, a BUD fraction is reversibly esterified to intracellular fatty acids, a lipophilic conjugate, which prolongs airway efficacy. Another mechanism is that the rapidly absorbed bulk fraction, via short plasma peaks, adds anti-inflammatory activity at the blood and bone marrow levels. Importantly, these plasma peaks are too short to provoke systemic adverse actions. Controlled clinical trials with BUD changed the use of ICS from a last resort to first-line treatment. Starting ICS treatment immediately after diagnosis ("early intervention") became a landmark for BUD. An established dose response made BUD suitable for the treatment of patients with all degrees of asthma severity. With the development of the budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler (BUD/FORM), BUD contributed to the widely used BUD/FORM maintenance and reliever therapy (MART). Recent studies demonstrated the value of BUD/FORM as a generally recommended as-needed therapy for asthma ("anti-inflammatory reliever", AIR). These abovementioned qualities have all influenced international asthma management and treatment guidelines.

May a different kinetic mode explain the high efficacy/safety profile of inhaled budesonide?

The claimed functional basis for ICSs in asthma and COPD is airway selectivity, attained by inhaling a potent, lipophilic compound with long local dissolution/absorption time. The development has been empirically based, resulting in five widely used ICSs. Among them, budesonide (BUD) deviates by being less lipophilic, leading to a more rapid systemic uptake with plasma peaks with some systemic anti-inflammatory activity. By this, BUD fits less well into the current pharmacological dogma of optimal ICS profile. In this review we compared the physicochemical, pharmacological and clinical properties of BUD, fluticasone propionate (FP) and fluticasone furoate (FF), representing different levels of lipophilicity, airway and systemic kinetics, focusing on their long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combinations, in line with current GINA and GOLD recommendations. We are aware of the differences between formoterol (FORM) and the not rapid acting LABAs such as e.g. salmeterol and vilanterol but our comparisons are based on currently available combination products. A beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP)/FORM combination is also commented upon. Based on clinical comparisons in asthma and COPD, we conclude that the BUD/formoterol (BUD/FORM) combination is as effective and safe as the FP and FF combinations, and is in some cases even better as it can be used as "maintenance plus reliever therapy" (MART) in asthma and as maintenance in COPD. This is difficult to explain by current views of required ICS's/LABAs pharmacokinetic profiles. We propose that BUD achieves its efficacy by a combination of airway and systemic activity. The airway activity is dominating. The systemic activity contributes by plasma peaks, which are high enough for supportive anti-inflammatory actions at the blood and bone marrow levels but not sufficiently long to trigger a similar level of systemic adverse effects. This may be due to BUD's capacity to exploit a systemic differentiation mechanism as programmed for cortisol's various actions. This differentiation prospect can be reached only for an ICS with short plasma half-life. Here we present an alternative mode for an ICS to reach combined efficacy and safety, based on a poorly investigated and exploited physiological mechanism. A preference of this mode is broader versatility, due to that its straighter dose-response should allow a better adaptation to disease fluctuations, and that its rapid activity enables use as "anti-inflammatory reliever".

Intranasal Corticosteroids: Topical Potency, Systemic Activity and Therapeutic Index

Intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) therapy is the preferred treatment option for allergic rhinitis (AR). Although all INCSs for the treatment of AR are considered safe and effective, differences in potency, molecular structure features and physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties could result in differences in clinical efficacy and safety. Higher glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding affinity of INCS is associated with higher lipophilicity, nasal tissue retention and topical potency. Higher topical potency is also accompanied by low oral bioavailability and high systemic clearance conferring low systemic exposure, reduced potential for systemic adverse effects and an improved therapeutic index. It has been shown that adverse events related to systemic exposure of INCSs in children are low. Although INCSs mostly produce low systemic effects, use of an INCS with low systemic exposure in patients on multiple corticosteroid (CS) therapies could help reduce the total systemic burden of CS therapy. Despite differences in topical potency, physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties between INCSs, clinical studies of INCSs in the treatment of AR generally show no clinically important differences between these compounds, and poor correlation between INCS topical potency and clinical response. However, the lack of head-to-head comparisons of INCSs in clinical studies conducted in more severe AR patients should be noted. This narrative review provides an assessment of the therapeutic relevance of topical potency and the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of INCSs and describes for the first time the relationship between topical potency and therapeutic index using pharmacological features of INCSs. It concludes that higher GR binding affinity and topical potency can potentially improve the therapeutic index of an INCS. Therefore, both efficacy and systemic exposure profiles should be considered when comparing INCS regimens in terms of therapeutic equivalence, to aid clinical decision-making and avoid the assumption that all INCS formulations are the same when considering treatment options.

Direct and indirect bronchoprovocation tests in dose-response studies of inhaled corticosteroids: Past, present, and future directions

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are a mainstay of treatment in eosinophilic asthma. Many studies have explored the dose-response effect of different formulations of ICS through direct or indirect bronchoprovocation testing. Such studies are important for investigating efficacy and identifying the relative potency between formulations. However, lack of consistency in methods and designs has hindered the comparability of study findings. This review discusses current knowledge of the dose-response, or lack thereof, of different formulations of ICS through direct and indirect bronchoprovocation testing. The strengths and weaknesses of past studies inform recommendations for future methodological considerations in this field, such as utilizing a randomized double-blind crossover design, enrolling participants likely to respond to ICS therapy, and carefully selecting treatment durations and washout periods to assess incremental improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness while reducing the likelihood of a carryover effect.

Fluticasone/formoterol compared with other ICS/LABAs in asthma: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

An inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA) combination has become the standard of care in asthma. Various ICS-LABAs are commercially available providing the clinician with many choices. A thorough understanding of the clinical efficacy and safety of various formulations will immensely benefit the prescribing doctor to decide the choice of agent. The present systematic review was undertaken to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of formoterol fluticasone (FF) to other ICS/LABA combinations in asthmatics.

METHODS

The review adhered to the general principles mentioned in the CRD guidance and the PRISMA statement. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases on the efficacy of FF in treating asthma compared with other ICS-LABAs. A total of 138 trials identified initially. Only trials comparing the efficacy and safety of FF in comparision with Salmeterol/fluticasone (SF) or Budesonide/Formoterol (BF) were selected. The outcomes compared were onset of bronchodilator action, improvement in lung function, asthma control, asthma-related quality of life and risk of pneumonia.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in the final analysis. FF therapy provided faster onset of bronchodilatation than SF. A better improvement in lung function was seen with FF inhaler use as compared with comparators in two studies. Patients using the FF inhaler had a non-inferior asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. Pneumonia risk was least with FF usage.

CONCLUSION

FF provides faster onset of action, numerically superior improvement in lung function and comparable asthma control than other ICS-LABA formulations. FF has better safety evidenced by lower occurrence of pneumonia.

Inhaled Formoterol-Fluticasone Single Inhaler Therapy in Asthma: Real-World Efficacy, Budget Impact, and Potential to Improve Adherence

Asthma is the commonest chronic disease affecting airways in humans and has an increasing global disease burden. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the first-line therapeutic option for asthma, and addition of a long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA) has been shown to improve asthma control. A combination of the two agents in a single inhaler is beneficial with regard to ease of administration and patient compliance. Various ICS-LABA formulations are available across various countries in the world, one among them being formoterol-fluticasone. Both formoterol and fluticasone have pharmacologic peculiarities which places the combination in a uniquely advantageous position when it comes to asthma therapy. The present review focuses on some of the, hitherto, less explored aspects of this combination inhaler such as real-world efficacy, impact on budget allocation, results of switch-over therapy, and potential to improve adherence to asthma treatment. It also provides practical recommendations on positioning it in real-world asthma management.

Asthma maintenance and reliever therapy: Should this be the standard of care?

OBJECTIVE

The goal of asthma management is to achieve optimal asthma control, defined by the absence of daytime symptoms, nighttime waking, reliever use, functional limitation, and lung function stability, and to also reduce the future risks of asthma exacerbations, deterioration in lung function, and the medication's adverse effects. The most widely used maintenance therapy is inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). This review considered the evidence in which the combination of the ICS budesonide and the rapid-onset long-acting β-agonist (LABA) formoterol can be used as a standard of care for maintenance and reliever therapy in moderate to severe asthma.

DATA SOURCES

The archival literature of peer-reviewed studies on the efficacy and safety of budesonide-formoterol as maintenance and reliever therapy in moderate to severe asthma.

RESULTS

The ICS-LABA combination containing budesonide-formoterol reduces future risk of severe asthma exacerbations and provides similar levels of day-to-day asthma control when compared with using high-dose ICS alone, or combination ICS-LABA therapy and short-acting β₂-agonist as a reliever.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide-formoterol as a single combination maintenance and reliever inhaler is effective in reducing asthma exacerbation risk, requires a lower maintenance dose of ICS, and results in a simplified approach to asthma management.

Benefit:Risk Profile of Budesonide in Obstructive Airways Disease

Airway inflammation is a major contributing factor in both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and represents an important target for treatment. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as monotherapy or in combination therapy with long-acting β2-agonists or long-acting muscarinic antagonists are used extensively in the treatment of asthma and COPD. The development of ICS for their anti-inflammatory properties progressed through efforts to increase topical potency and minimise systemic potency and through advances in inhaled delivery technology. Budesonide is a potent, non-halogenated ICS that was developed in the early 1970s and is now one of the most widely used lung medicines worldwide. Inhaled budesonide's physiochemical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties allow it to reach a rapid and high airway efficacy due to its more balanced relationship between water solubility and lipophilicity. When absorbed from the airways and lung tissue, its moderate lipophilicity shortens systemic exposure, and its unique property of intracellular esterification acts like a sustained release mechanism within airway tissues, contributing to its airway selectivity and a low risk of adverse events. There is a large volume of clinical evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of budesonide, both alone and in combination with the fast- and long-acting β2-agonist formoterol, as maintenance therapy in patients with asthma and with COPD. The combination of budesonide/formoterol can also be used as an as-needed reliever with anti-inflammatory properties, with or without regular maintenance for asthma, a novel approach that is already approved by some country-specific regulatory authorities and currently recommended in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Budesonide remains one of the most well-established and versatile of the inhaled anti-inflammatory drugs. This narrative review provides a clinical reappraisal of the benefit:risk profile of budesonide in the management of asthma and COPD.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled corticosteroids for asthma treatment

The differences in the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) critically influence the profile of each of them, but also the significant differences in glucocorticoid receptor selectivity, potency, and physicochemical properties are critical in defining the pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of an ICS. The PK and PD properties of ICSs used in asthma and the importance of their interrelationship have been reviewed. The differences among the ICSs in PK and PD must be considered when an ICS should be prescribed to an asthmatic patient because a better understanding of the PK/PD interrelationship of ICSs could be important to better fit with the between-patient variability and within-patient repeatability in the response to ICSs that often complicate the therapeutic approach to the asthmatic patient. The role of the device in influencing the PK profile of an ICS must be always considered because it is crucial. Also patient-related factors and disease severity affect pulmonary deposition of ICS.

Computational and Biological Comparisons of Plant Steroids as Modulators of Inflammation through Interacting with Glucocorticoid Receptor

Despite the usefulness of glucocorticoids, they may cause hazardous side effects that limit their use. Searching for compounds that are as equally efficient as glucocorticoids, but with less side effects, the current study compared plant steroids, namely, glycyrrhetinic acid, guggulsterone, boswellic acid, withaferin A, and diosgenin with the classical glucocorticoid, fluticasone. This was approached both in silico using molecular docking against glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and in vivo in two different animal models. All tested compounds interacted with GR, but only boswellic acid and withaferin A showed docking results comparable to fluticasone, as well as similar in vivo anti-inflammatory effects, by significantly decreasing serum levels of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in cotton pellet-induced granuloma in rats. In addition, both compounds significantly decreased the percent of change in ear weight in croton oil-induced ear edema in mice and the granuloma weight in cotton pellet-induced granuloma in rats, to levels comparable to that of fluticasone. Both boswellic acid and withaferin A had no effect on adrenal index, but only withaferin A significantly increased the thymus index. In conclusion, boswellic acid may have comparable anti-inflammatory effects to fluticasone with fewer side effects.

Treating Pediatric Asthma According Guidelines

Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory disorder of the lower respiratory airways in childhood. The management of asthma exacerbations and the disease control are major concerns for clinical practice. The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, published by GINA, updated in 2017, the British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network, revised in 2016, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence asthma guideline consultation, available in 2017, are widely accepted documents, frequently implemented, with conflicting advices, and different conclusion on asthma definition and treatment. An International Consensus on Pediatric Asthma was carried out in 2012 by a Committee with expertise in the field, to critically review differences on current guidelines. In addition, the specific issue of treating severe and difficult asthma has been recently highlighted throughout the International European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guidelines on severe asthma. The aim of this paper is to describe conventional treatments and some new therapeutic approaches to pediatric asthma according to guidelines, highlighting key aspects, and differences on proposed clinical recommendations for asthma management. Age specific therapy are proposed in steps, according to clinical severity and the level of disease control. If control is not achieved within 3 months, stepping-up should be considered; otherwise, if control is achieved after 3 months, stepping down may be considered. The most used drug classes of asthma medications are beta-2 adrenergic agonists, corticosteroids, and leukotriene modifiers. Intramuscolar triamcinolone has been used for severe asthma treatment. Chromones and xanthines have been extensively used in the past, but they have shown limits related to their efficacy and safety profile. Omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody against IgE, is an immunomodulatory biological agent, used as new drug in patients with confirmed IgE-mediated allergic asthma, only for patient's specific range of total IgE level. There are low evidences in the efficacy of metotrexate, as well as macrolide antibiotics in children with asthma. Antifungal agents are also not recommended in asthmatic patients. Non-pharmacological measures that may improve patient's quality of life should also be attempted. We conclude that treatment decisions on childhood asthma management should be critically made, pondering the differences suggested by agreed international consensus documents.

Inhalation Therapy in Horses

This article discusses the benefits and limitations of inhalation therapy in horses. Inhalation drug therapy delivers the drug directly to the airways, thereby achieving maximal drug concentrations at the target site. Inhalation therapy has the additional advantage of decreasing systemic side effects. Inhalation therapy in horses is delivered by the use of nebulizers or pressured metered dose inhalers. It also requires the use of a muzzle or nasal mask in horses. Drugs most commonly delivered through inhalation drug therapy in horses include bronchodilators, antiinflammatories, and antimicrobials.

Randomized Trial of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate in Children with Inadequately Controlled Asthma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the dose-response, efficacy, and safety of fluticasone furoate (FF; 25 µg, 50 µg, and 100 µg), administered once daily in the evening during a 12-week treatment period to children with inadequately controlled asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a Phase IIb, multicenter, stratified, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled study in children aged 5-11 years with inadequately controlled asthma. The study comprised a 4-week run-in period, 12-week treatment period, and 1-week follow-up period. Children were randomized to receive either placebo once daily, fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 µg twice daily, FF 25 µg, FF 50 µg, or FF 100 µg each once daily in the evening. Primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in daily morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) averaged over weeks 1-12. Adverse events (AEs) also were investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 593 children were included in the intent-to-treat population. The difference vs placebo in change from baseline daily morning PEF averaged over weeks 1-12 was statistically significant for the FF 25, FF 50, FF 100, and FP 100 groups (18.6 L/min, 19.5 L/min, 12.5 L/min, and 14.0 L/min, respectively; P < .001 for all). The incidence of AEs was greater in the FF groups (32%-36%) than in the placebo group (29%); the most frequent AE was cough.

CONCLUSION

FF and FP resulted in significant improvements in morning PEF compared with placebo, suggesting that they are effective treatments for children with inadequately controlled asthma. All treatments were well tolerated; no new safety concerns were identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01563029.

Inhaled Corticosteroids in Young Asthmatic Children: Association with Hypercalciuria

Introduction:

The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) via infant aerochamber in young, asthmatic children is increasing. However, concern has been raised about its long-term impact. Hypercalciuria is a known adverse effect of systemic corticosteroids.

Objective:

To determine whether ICS-induced hypercalciuria occurs in young, asthmatic children.

Setting:

Two outpatient clinics.

Methods:

Urinary calcium/creatinine ratio (UCa/Cr) was determined in 32 asthmatic children (age 6–36 mo) who were receiving inhaled budesonide or beclomethasone 200–600 μg/d for two to three months. A control group of asthmatic children within the same age range (n = 23) who did not receive ICS was included. None of the children were receiving oral corticosteroids, diuretics, antibiotics, or theophylline.

Statistics:

Student's t-test and χ2 analysis.

Results:

The treated and control groups were similar with regard to age and male/female ratio. Mean ± SD UCa/Cr was significantly higher in the asthmatic children receiving ICS (0.23 ± 0.19 vs. 0.09 ± 0.07, respectively; p = 0.002). Fourteen (43.75%) of the treated patients had hypercalciuria (UCa/Cr >0.2) compared with only one (4.35%) in the control group (p = 0.002). Renal ultrasonography failed to demonstrate nephrocalcinosis in eight of the treated hypercalciuric patients.

Conclusions:

Treatment of young, asthmatic children with ICS may be associated with hypercalciuria. More studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of this finding.

Different approaches in the treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases

Advances in drug formulation, inhalation device design and disease management are generating new opportunities for patients suffering from obstructive pulmonary diseases. This article provides a comprehensive review of the different promising pulmonary drug delivery technologies in the treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases, particularly with regard to the treatment of asthma and chronic pulmonary diseases (COPD), which are increasing day by day due to increasing environmental pollution and its harmful and toxic contaminants. In the recent years, a better knowledge has been gained regarding the mechanism of action of glucocorticoids and how they suppress the chronic inflammation. New etiology has been brought into light regarding the inactivity of glucocorticoids in some patients having asthma and COPDs even though the inflammatory genes are triggered by similar molecules in both the diseases. This new knowledge has given a new platform to improve glucocorticoids and their resistance also how other combination therapy can be used for these diseases. It has also led to the quest for improving and developing other alternatives such as anti-leukotriene agents, muscarinic inhibitors, combination therapy, as well as biologic immune-modulators in the treatment of the different pulmonary diseases. Several new combinations of glucocorticoids are available in the global market for the use in pulmonary diseases especially asthma although their availability fluctuates between continents. There has been several studies done regarding the variation of effectiveness of the different inhaled glucocorticoids and hence it is important to take into consideration the different delivery systems and the methods which are used to treat the patients.

Quantification of Aerosol Hydrofluoroalkane HFA-134a Elimination in the Exhaled Human Breath Following Inhaled Corticosteroids Administration

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and β2-agonists are the primary pharmacotherapies of asthma management. However, suboptimal medication compliance is common in asthmatics and is associated with increased morbidity. We hypothesized that exhaled breath measurements of the aerosol used in the inhaled medications might prove useful as surrogate marker for asthma medication compliance. To explore this, 10 healthy controls were recruited and randomly assigned to ICS (Flovent HFA) or short acting bronchodilators (Proventil HFA). Both inhalers contain HFA-134a as aerosol propellant. Exhaled breath sampling and pulmonary function tests were performed prior to the inhaler medication dispersion, immediately after inhalation, then at 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours postadministration. At baseline, mean (SD) levels of HFA-134a in the breath were 252 (156) pptv. Immediately after inhalation, HFA-134a breath levels increased to 300 × 10(6) pptv and were still well above ambient levels 24 hours postadministration. The calculated ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second over forced vital capacity did not change over time following inhaler administration. This study demonstrates, for the first time, that breath HFA-134a levels can be used to assess inhaler medication compliance. It may also be used to evaluate how effectively the medicine is delivered.

Vascular Anomalies in Children Misdiagnosed with Asthma: Case series

In most asthmatic children, inhaled steroids can relieve and control the symptoms of asthma. Persistent wheezing and respiratory symptoms in young children despite appropriate treatment may indicate other diagnostic considerations. Delays in this diagnosis can result in unnecessary investigations, inappropriate treatment and further complications. We report three patients who presented to Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, in the period between September 2010 and May 2012 with persistent wheezing due to compression of the trachea caused by vascular anomalies. All patients had double aortic arches putting pressure on the trachea, leading to respiratory manifestations and feeding problems. Following surgery, all cases showed improvement and no longer required medication. Without clinical suspicion and appropriate imaging, congenital vascular anomalies may remain undetected for years. Infants and children with chronic wheezing should be evaluated for vascular anomalies as soon as possible. General practitioners should refer all such patients to a tertiary-level hospital for further investigations and management.

The effects of inhaled corticosteroids on growth in children

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended as the first-line therapy for children with persistent asthma. These agents are particularly effective in reducing underlying airway inflammation, improving lung function, decreasing airway hyper-reactivity, and reducing intensity of symptoms in asthmatics. Chronic diseases, such as asthma, have growth-suppressing effects independent of the treatment, which inevitably complicates growth studies. One year studies showed a small, dose-dependent effect of most ICS on childhood growth, with some differences across various ICS molecules, and across individual children. Some ICS at the doses studied did not affect childhood growth when rigorous study designs were used. Most studies did not conform completely with the FDA guidance. The data on effects of childhood ICS use on final adult height are conflicting, but one recent well-designed study showed such an effect, clearly warranting additional studies. In spite of these measurable effects of ICS on childhood growth, it is important to understand that the safety profile of all ICS preparations, with focal anti-inflammatory effects on the lung, is significantly better than oral glucocorticoids.

Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on glycemic status

Although the dysglycemic effects of systemic glucocorticoid therapy are well known, the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on carbohydrate metabolism is still a subject of debate. The systemic bioavailability of ICS is claimed to be minimal and the side effects negligible. However, some large retrospective cohort studies showed a definite association between ICS use and incident diabetes or worsening glycemic control in pre-existing diabetes. There are no professional-body recommended guidelines on the diagnosis and management of steroid-induced diabetes for the general population. This review aims to evaluate the systemic dysglycemic effect of ICS treatment and to propose a management algorithm.

Use of inhaled versus oral steroids for acute dysphonia

Acute dysphonia is a frequent condition in clinical practice. Its treatment, especially in adults, is not well established in the literature. Steroids are the most recommended drug treatment. However, the existing studies are not enough to establish superiority among the different steroids and the best route of administration.

Objective

This prospective clinical study aimed at comparing the effect of inhaling steroids as a dry powder with the effect of oral steroids to treat acute dysphonia.

Method

We assessed 32 adult patients, broken down into two groups of 16 patients in each one of the treatments, before and seven days after the use of the medication. The patients were submitted to videolaryngoscopy and perceptive and acoustic voice assessment.

Result

Oral and inhalation treatment significantly reduced hyperemia and edema, and improved the muco-ondulatory movement; nonetheless, edema reduction was statistically more significant (p = 0.012) in the patients treated with the inhalation form of the drug. However, comparing the values of the auditory perceptive analysis and the acoustic measures after treatment between the groups was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

There was a significant improvement in the acute laryngitis concerning the assessments carried out in all the patients assessed, concerning the two treatments. The inhalation steroid treatment was significantly more effective in reducing the edema.

Once-daily fluticasone furoate is efficacious in patients with symptomatic asthma on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone furoate (FF) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with 24-hour activity in development as a once-daily treatment for the long-term management of asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of 4 doses of once-daily FF administered using a dry powder inhaler in patients (≥12 years) with moderate asthma, uncontrolled on low-dose ICS (fluticasone propionate [FP] 200 μg/day or equivalent).

METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study randomized 622 patients to 1 of 6 treatments: FF (100, 200, 300, or 400 μg) once daily in the evening, FP 250 μg twice daily (active control), or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in predose evening forced expiratory colume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 8.

RESULTS

At week 8, relative to placebo, all doses of FF once daily and FP twice daily demonstrated significantly (P < .001) greater increases from baseline and greater than 200-mL increases in predose FEV1. There was no evidence of a dose-response relationship between FF doses. Improvement with once-daily FF was similar to or greater than that for twice-daily FP. Secondary efficacy endpoint findings generally supported the efficacy of FF 100 to 400 μg once daily, although statistically significant improvements versus placebo in symptom-free 24-hour periods were only reported for FF 400 μg. There were few withdrawals due to lack of efficacy. Oral candidiasis was reported in 0 to 4% of patients; 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion ratios were similar across active treatment groups and not significantly different from placebo.

CONCLUSION

FF 100 to 400 μg once daily in the evening is effective and well tolerated in patients with asthma uncontrolled on low-dose ICS, with 100 μg and 200 μg, considered the most applicable doses in this asthma population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00603278.

Short-term safety and tolerability of double-dose salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in adult asthmatic patients

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of asthma exacerbations in patients receiving salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretidetrade mark or Advair((R))) is low. However, when asthma control deteriorates, clinicians may instruct patients to double the dose of their inhaled corticosteroid medication for a short period. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that doubling the dose of Seretidetrade mark for a period of 2 weeks in subjects with persistent asthma is safe and well tolerated.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in primary-care centres. Adults with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of >/=70% predicted were stratified to receive a single dose of Seretidetrade mark 50mug/100mug, 50mug/250mug or 50mug/500mug twice daily from a Diskustrade mark inhaler for a 4-week run-in period, dependent on the dose of inhaled corticosteroid on entry. Subjects were then randomised to receive either an extra inhalation of the same dose of Seretidetrade mark received during the run-in (double dose) or an inhalation of matching placebo (single dose) for 14 days in a 2 : 1 ratio. Subjects were asked to record any adverse events, morning and evening heart rate (HR), peak flow and relief medication use in daily record cards. The primary endpoint was tremor as perceived by the subject. Clinic evaluations included HR, 12-lead ECG, and potassium and glucose levels.

RESULTS

110 and 208 subjects received single- and double-dose Seretidetrade mark, respectively. Only one subject experienced tremor. This was classified as mild and occurred in a subject receiving double-dose Seretidetrade mark (50mug/100mug). There was no difference between the treatment groups in the incidence of tremor (difference <1%; 95% CI -6, 8). Other salmeterol-related adverse events (palpitations, muscle cramps and headache) and fluticasone propionate-related events (oral candidiasis and hoarseness) occurred in a similar percentage of subjects in each treatment group. The treatment differences for morning and evening HR measurements showed small differences between the two groups (<2 beats/min). The adjusted mean treatment difference (double dose - single dose) in morning HR was 1.1 beats/min (95% CI 0.2, 2.0) and evening HR was 0.9 beats/min (95% CI 0.1, 1.7). Seven percent of subjects receiving single-dose Seretidetrade mark and 8% receiving double-dose Seretidetrade mark had a QTc change from baseline in the interval 30-59 msec. No increases above 59 msec were seen in either group. There were no clinically significant changes from baseline for potassium levels. Two percent of subjects in the single dose and <1% in the double-dose group had a change from a non-clinically significant baseline blood glucose assessment to a clinically significant abnormality at the end of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In circumstances in which a physician may be considering doubling the dose of Seretidetrade mark for a short period of time in adult asthmatics, this study demonstrates that doubling the dose for a period of 2 weeks is safe and well tolerated.

Iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome with inhaled steroid plus antidepressant drugs

Current guidelines recommend the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for suppression of airway inflammation in patients with asthma. Although it is well known that ICS cause dose-related adrenocortical suppression, it is less known that they can lead to iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome (CS). Fluticasone propionate (FP) is an ICS more potent than beclomethasone and budesonide. FP is metabolized as mediated by cytochrome P450 3A4 in the liver and the gut. Systemic bioactivity of FP can increase with the use of drugs that affect the cytochrome P450. Herein, we report the rapid development of iatrogenic CS in a patient receiving paroxetine and mirtazepine for 12 weeks in addition to inhaled FP.

Dose effect of once-daily fluticasone furoate in persistent asthma: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled once-daily fluticasone furoate (FF) administered in the evening in patients with persistent asthma not controlled by short-acting beta(2) agonists, and to determine the dose(s) suitable for further development.

METHODS

Of 1459 patients screened, 598 received one of six treatments: placebo, FF (25 μg, 50 μg, 100 μg or 200 μg) once daily each evening, or fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 μg twice daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in pre-dose evening forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)).

RESULTS

A dose-response effect was observed for once-daily FF 25-200 μg including (p < 0.001) and excluding placebo (p = 0.03). FF 50-200 μg once daily significantly increased FEV(1) from baseline (p < 0.05 vs placebo), by >200 mL for FF 100 μg and 200 μg. Significant improvements were also achieved for peak expiratory flow, and percentage symptom-free and rescue-free 24 h periods. The magnitude of effect was at least as good as twice-daily FP. Overall, once-daily FF was well tolerated with no systemic corticosteroid effects.

CONCLUSION

FF 50-200 μg/day once daily in the evening demonstrated dose-related efficacy in asthma with 100-200 μg appearing to be the optimal doses for further evaluation. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00603382.

Serum Fructosamine, Total Cholesterol, and High-Density Lipoprotein in Children with Asthma during Glucocorticoid Treatment

Background/Aims. Glucocorticoids may have adverse effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. The present study was conducted to investigate possible effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism of inhaled and oral glucocorticoids in children with asthma. Methods. Two randomised controlled trials with blinded crossover designs were performed. Active treatment was 400  μ g inhaled budesonide or 5 mg prednisolone orally daily during one week. The budesonide trial included 17 and the prednisolone trial 20 school children. Serum fructosamine, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein were assessed. Results. Serum fructosamine was increased during active treatment (prednisolone 252.3  μ M versus placebo 247.3  μ M; P = 0.03 and budesonide 228.1  μ M versus no treatment 223.1  μ M; P = 0.02). Total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein were not statistically significantly increased. Conclusion. Short-term treatment with oral prednisolone and inhaled budesonide may adversely affect mean blood glucose concentration. Possible long-term consequences require further investigations.

Inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma: the story continues

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of persistent asthma in children. Treatment with ICS decreases asthma mortality and morbidity, reduces symptoms, improves lung function, reduces bronchial hyperresponsiveness and reduces the number of exacerbations. The efficacy of ICS in preschool wheezing is controversial. A recent task force from the European Respiratory Society on preschool wheeze defined two different phenotypes: episodic viral wheeze, wheeze that occurs only during respiratory viral infections, and multiple-trigger wheeze, where wheeze also occurs in between viral episodes. Treatment with ICS appears to be more efficacious in the latter phenotype. Small particle ICS may offer a potential benefit in preschool children because of the favourable spray characteristics. However, the efficacy of small particle ICS in preschool children has not yet been evaluated in prospective clinical trials. The use of ICS in school children with asthma is safe with regard to systemic side effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, growth and bone metabolism, when used in low to medium doses. Although safety data in wheezing preschoolers is limited, the data are reassuring. Also for this age group, adverse events tend to be minimal when the ICS is used in appropriate doses.

[Inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: which have the best tolerance?]

Asthmatic syndrome, better definition of asthma, is an inflammatory chronic disease, probably the most frequent in pediatrics. An important characteristic of asthma is the bronchial inflammation with a complex network of cells and inflammatory mediators of pivotal importance in the pathogenesis. The long term control and treatment of this disease are cardinal points of the management of asthmatic syndrome. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the first-line treatment for persistent asthma in children of any age. The adverse events of the inhaled steroids on growth, bone mineralization, and hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis function are the main concerns for the pediatricians. The long-term effects on growth and bone mineralization are actually reassuring. Good tolerance is achieved on hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis function with low to moderate doses in children. Scientific and clinical researches are pointed to find out molecules able to improve clinical efficacy of ICS with better tolerance and higher reduction of adverse events.

Does the current stepwise approach to asthma pharmacotherapy encourage over-treatment?

For the past 20 years, asthma pharmacotherapy has been described in clinical practice guidelines in terms of a stepwise approach, with medications and/or doses increased if asthma is not well-controlled, and reduced once good control is achieved and maintained. Although many patients with asthma are untreated, there are also significant problems with over-treatment once regular controller therapy is commenced. This increases the cost of treatment and exposes patients to unnecessary risks of side-effects. The present pro-con debate addresses the question of whether the stepwise approach itself leads to over-treatment. Two asthma experts discuss factors for and against this proposition, identify issues on which more research is needed, and suggest areas in which guidelines can be changed in order to facilitate more appropriate prescribing of asthma medications. These strategies include better validation of the concepts underlying asthma treatment recommendations, stronger recommendations that every treatment change should be followed up with a scheduled review using evidence-based assessment tools and incorporation of phenotype-specific considerations into treatment recommendations. In addition, the process for development and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines should ensure that recommendations are easily understood, feasible to implement, and relevant to everyday asthma care and the needs and concerns of patients and clinicians.

Intranasal Mometasone Furoate for Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic nasal disease that affects the upper respiratory tract. This disorder is characterized by inflammation of the mucous membranes and it manifests with several nasal symptoms accompanied sometimes by non-nasal symptoms. Best therapy aims to prevent and improve the AR-clinical picture. Steroids have an important role in the treatment of AR. The development of steroids administrated directly on nasal mucosa has much reduced the systemic adverse affects associated with oral steroids therapy. Mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray is a synthetic steroid assessed for intranasal use in the therapy of adults and children affected by AR. Such topical nasal steroid is an effective molecule improving clinical picture of AR and it is also approved as prophylactic therapy. In this article, apart from a careful description of its successful clinical use the authors review pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of such steroid molecule.

[Therapy of asthma: anti-inflammatory effects of antileukotrienes]

The antileukotrienes (anti-LT), consisting of synthesis inhibitors and leukotriene receptor antagonists, represent a new direction in targeted drug therapy for asthma. In the present article, the anti-inflammatory properties of anti-LT are briefly summarized. Orally administered anti-LT inhibit the allergen-induced early and late asthmatic reactions and may attenuate the allergen-associated hyperresponsiveness. They also have a remarkable inhaled steroid-sparing effect. In chronic asthma, anti-LT may exert significant therapeutic benefit. In addition to their properties as relievers, anti-LT may have properties as controllers of asthma.

[Asthma therapy: combination of topical glucocorticosteroids and theophylline]

In addition to its bronchodilatory effects, theophylline has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Since theophylline and corticosteroids act via different molecular mechanisms, they may be used in combination. Two recently completed trials have demonstrated that with respect to asthma control the combination of inhaled steroid (400 - 800 microg/d) plus theophylline is at least as effective as doubling the dose of inhaled steroid in patients who remain symptomatic on a dosage of 400 - 800 microg daily.

Fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (January 2008), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and risk of bias.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, recruiting 16,160 participants. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.1 to 0.43 litres); morning PEF (between 23 and 46 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.44 and 0.7); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1 and 1.4 puffs/day). High dose FP increased the number of patients who could withdraw from prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/day Peto Odds Ratio 14.07 (95% CI 7.17 to 27.57). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Doses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/day are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.

Ciclesonide uptake and metabolism in human alveolar type II epithelial cells (A549)

Background

Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of airway inflammation. In this study we investigated uptake and in vitro metabolism of ciclesonide in human alveolar type II epithelial cells (A549). Ciclesonide uptake was compared with fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid that is not metabolized in lung tissue. A549 cells were incubated with 2 × 10^-8 M ciclesonide or fluticasone propionate for 3 to 30 min to determine uptake; or with 2 × 10^-8 M ciclesonide for 1 h, followed by incubation with drug-free buffer for 3, 6, and 24 h to analyze in vitro metabolism. High performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure the concentrations of both corticosteroids and metabolites.

Results

At all time points the mean intracellular concentration was higher for ciclesonide when compared with fluticasone propionate. Activation of ciclesonide to desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC) was confirmed and conjugates of des-CIC with fatty acids were detected. The intracellular concentration of ciclesonide decreased over time, whereas the concentration of des-CIC remained relatively stable: 2.27 to 3.19 pmol/dish between 3 and 24 h. The concentration of des-CIC fatty acid conjugates increased over time, with des-CIC-oleate being the main metabolite.

Conclusion

Uptake of ciclesonide into A549 cells was more efficient than that of the less lipophilic fluticasone propionate. Intracellular concentrations of the pharmacologically active metabolite des-CIC were maintained for up to 24 h. The local anti-inflammatory activity of ciclesonide in the lung may be prolonged by the slow release of active drug from the depot of fatty acid esters.

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression in asthmatic children on inhaled corticosteroids (Part 2)--the risk as determined by gold standard adrenal function tests: a systematic review

The evidence for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) suppression by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) was found to be conflicting. Reviewers have not distinguished between gold standard and basal adrenal function tests. The utility of the latter is limited by physiological and pathological variability as well as by methodological concerns. The risk of HPA suppression in asthmatic children and adolescents treated with ICS, as determined by gold standard adrenal function tests, needs to be established. A systematic review of the literature from January 1973 to July 2005 was performed. The Medline and Cochrane databases were searched, the reference lists of retrieved articles were inspected and pharmaceutical companies were approached. Randomized-controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies designed to detect HPA suppression caused by ICS, diagnosed by the insulin tolerance test (ITT) or the metyrapone test, performed on asthmatics of all ages not on oral steroids, were included and assessed for methodological quality. Of the 22 identified studies only four met the criteria for inclusion. All of these were published before 1988 and only one was methodologically sound. The cohort study showed that the baseline risk for HPA suppression is 0% while the absolute risk is 100% in asthmatic children treated with a beclomethasone dipropionate metered dose inhaler at a dose of 250-600 mug/m(2)/day for 6-42 months. As suggested by other observations these results could be generalized to other ICS. They may be of clinical significance especially if children are subjected to stress. Further research is needed to establish the cumulative dose for all ICS at which HPA suppression will be precipitated. Guidelines for future trials are suggested.

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression in asthmatic children on inhaled corticosteroids: part 1. Which test should be used?

The effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) has been regarded as a 'benign physiological response'. A recent survey suggests that adrenal crisis might be more common in asthmatic children on ICS than previously thought. The clinical features of adrenal insufficiency are non-specific and can easily be missed. Accurate biochemical assessment of the axis is therefore mandatory. A review of the literature determined that all basal adrenal function tests, including plasma cortisol profiles, cannot identify which children can respond to stress. There is no evidence to suggests that the degree of the physiological adjustment of the HPA to ICS predicts clinically significant HPA suppression. Only gold standard adrenal function tests can assess the integrity of the whole axis. Of the two available tests, the correctly performed overnight metyrapone test (with ACTH levels) is safe and better by far. The use of cortisol profiles should only be used to demonstrate differences in systemic activity of various ICS and delivery devices. Regulatory bodies should insist on trials that evaluate the HPA with a gold standard adrenal function test before it is declared safe and allowed to be marketed. A re-analysis of studies that have utilized gold standard adrenal function tests only might identify the lowest safe dose and duration of ICS.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of urinary cortisol suppression after inhalation of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate

AIM

Fluticasone propionate (FP) and mometasone furoate (MF) are inhaled corticosteroids that possess a high ratio of topical to systemic activity. The systemic bioavailability of MF has been claimed to be minimal (1%). FP has been shown to exhibit the same degree of systemic effects, but its systemic availability is between 13 and 17%. We hypothesize that FP and MF have comparable systemic availabilities that can explain their potential to cause systemic effects.

METHODS

Steady-state FP and MF trough plasma samples were determined from a clinical study by Fardon et al. in patients with persistent asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 91%). The percent plasma protein binding of FP and MF was measured using ultracentrifugation. Free FP plasma concentrations were normalized for their differences in receptor binding affinity compared with MF and linked to overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine with an inhibitory E(max).

RESULTS

A plot of steady-state FP and MF total trough plasma concentrations vs. dose showed that both drugs exhibit dose linearity. MF has comparable bioavailability to FP based on the steady-state concentrations observed for the different doses. The free plasma concentration producing 50% of urinary cortisol suppression (IC(50)) for MF was not statistically different from the free, normalized IC(50) for FP.

CONCLUSION

FP and MF have similar pulmonary deposition and the same potential to cause systemic side-effects due to their similar IC(50) values. The observed urinary cortisol suppression of FP and MF is in agreement with their systemic availability, their differences in plasma protein binding and receptor binding affinity.

Growth deceleration of children on inhaled corticosteroids is compensated for after the first 12 months of treatment

Timing and duration of linear growth suppression in children on long-term inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are not entirely clear; we undertook a "pragmatic" study to determine growth of asthmatic children on long-term ICS managed by a flexible dosing step-down approach. Standard deviation scores of height (HSDS), height velocity (HVSDS), and body mass index (BMISDS) of pre-pubertal asthmatic children on maintenance therapy with either budesonide (BUD) or fluticasone propionate (FP) were calculated in a prospective open-label non-randomized study. Outcomes were recorded at initiation of ICS, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, as applicable, and 6 months after ICS treatment discontinuation. Three hundred twenty-two children on BUD and 319 on FP were enrolled after the completion of 6-month treatment. The median (range) daily dose at initiation was 400 mcg (400-1,200) and 200 mcg (200-500), the final maintenance 200 mcg (200-400) and 100 mcg (100-200), respectively. In the first 6-12 months, a decrease in HSDS of approximately 18% below baseline values was noted (P < 0.01) that was restored to almost baseline average levels by 24 months, and slightly increased to above baseline during the third year. HVSDS showed a linear increase in both treatment arms (P < 0.01). No differences were found between the two treatment arms regarding HSDS, HVSDS, and BMISDS at any time point over the course of the study. In conclusion, growth deceleration of asthmatic children on maintenance ICS is compensated for after the first 12 months of treatment. This effect does not differ between BUD and FP treatment, despite some variation in the pattern of linear growth.

A randomized study comparing ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of once-daily ciclesonide and twice-daily fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

Patients aged 12-75 years with moderate bronchial asthma entered a 1-4 week run-in period. For inclusion into the 12-week, randomized, open-label treatment period, patients had to have a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) of either 60-80% of predicted or 80% of predicted and a defined use of rescue medication and asthma symptoms, depending on previous treatment. Patients received ciclesonide 320 microg once daily (ex-actuator) or fluticasone propionate 200 microg twice daily. Primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in FEV1.

RESULTS

In total, 474 patients were randomized. FEV1 increased significantly from baseline with ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses (all p < 0.0001). Treatment difference was -31 mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: -121, 59) in the PP analysis, demonstrating non-inferiority of ciclesonide. Similar findings were seen for other measures of lung function. In the ITT population, asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use decreased with both treatments (all p < 0.0001). Improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from baseline was significantly greater with ciclesonide than fluticasone (p = 0.005; one-sided). There were no cases of oral candidiasis in patients receiving ciclesonide and nine cases (3.8%) in those receiving fluticasone propionate (p = 0.002; one-sided).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with once-daily ciclesonide and twice-daily fluticasone propionate resulted in similar improvements in lung function in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Ciclesonide showed significant improvements in oral candidiasis and HRQoL over fluticasone.

Airway selectivity: an update of pharmacokinetic factors affecting local and systemic disposition of inhaled steroids

Topical corticosteroids remain the most efficacious single treatment for asthma and rhinitis, despite the emergence of newer drugs in recent years. The antiinflammatory properties of these products, combined with the targeting of formulations and optimization of the intrinsic pharmacokinetic features of the newer corticosteroid molecules has resulted in substantially improved airway selectivity. This review sets out to summarize the pharmacokinetic properties of inhaled corticosteroids that are important for the achievement of high levels of airway selectivity, with additional focus on the use of prodrugs/softdrugs relative to those of conventional corticosteroid molecules, mechanisms (such as esterification) by which retention at the target site is achieved while minimizing systemic exposure, and the role of plasma protein binding.

Prescribed doses of inhaled steroids in Dutch children: too little or too much, for too short a time

AIMS

To investigate the dosage and duration of inhaled steroids prescribed to children and to compare the prescribed doses with recommended doses for the treatment of asthma in children.

METHODS

For 2514 Dutch children aged 0-12 years who had used inhaled steroids in 2002, pharmacy dispensing data were obtained from the InterAction database, type of steroid (beclomethason, budesonide, fluticasone) and type of user (first time or existing) and the average prescribed doses according to age were determined and compared with the doses as recommended in the national Dutch Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap (NHG) guideline. Furthermore, for all first-time users the duration of therapy with inhaled steroids was determined using a Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The major findings were that: (i) overall 43% of children starting inhaled steroids were prescribed doses that are half the recommended dose or less; (ii) overall 8% of the children starting inhaled steroids were prescribed doses that were twice the recommended dose or more, up to 50% in the 12-year-olds fluticasone group; and (iii) only 8% of the children who started with inhaled steroids used them continuously for a full year.

CONCLUSIONS

Doses of inhaled steroids for many children deviate from those recommended, with lower doses more frequently occurring than higher doses. Less than 10% of the children receive prescriptions for a prolonged period of time.

Adrenal axis suppression unrelated to the dynamics of dosing with beclomethasone monopropionate

AIMS

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the cornerstone of asthma treatment. At high doses they can give rise to systemic side-effects such as hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression. This effect may depend on the delivery system, which in turn alters drug deposition and adsorption. We hypothesized that adrenal suppression depends on the rate of steroid absorption rather than the total steroid dose received.

METHODS

Eight healthy adult males were recruited for a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. Adrenocortical suppression ability was demonstrated by a 30% suppression of early morning cortisol following 1 mg dexamethasone. Subjects then attended in the evening on two occasions receiving 500 microg of intravenous beclomethasone monopropionate (17-BMP) for either 15 min or 2 h. Overnight urinary cortisol : creatinine (C : C) ratio was measured before and after the infusion and an 08.00 h serum cortisol was measured following the infusion.

RESULTS

Mean C : C pre and post 15 min infusion was 5.97 and 3.22 (P = 0.005). Mean C : C pre and post 2 h infusion was 6.31 and 4.15 (P = 0.004). Delta C : C and mean 08.00 h cortisol for 15 min and 2 h infusion was 2.74 and 2.16 and 425 nmol l(-1) and 400 nmol l(-1), respectively (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of infusion of 17-BMP seemed to have little effect on the degree of adrenal suppression. Individual C : C ratios were reproducible. Differences in absorption of ICS are unlikely to explain observed differences in HPA axis suppression.