Predictive value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for coronary artery disease detection in liver transplant candidates

Evaluation of recipients with significant comorbidity - Patients with cardiovascular disease

Liver transplant(ation) (LT) is the most effective treatment for patients with decompensated liver disease. The increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes and the growing number of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease being evaluated for LT, have resulted in a greater proportion of LT candidates presenting with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. As cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after LT, a thorough cardiovascular evaluation pre-LT is crucial. In this review, we discuss the latest evidence on the cardiovascular evaluation of LT candidates and we focus on the most prevalent conditions, namely ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathies. LT candidates undergo an electrocardiogram, a resting transthoracic echocardiography and an assessment of their cardiopulmonary functional ability as part of their standardised pre-LT work-up. Further diagnostic work-up is undertaken based on the results of the baseline evaluation and may include a coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. The evaluation of potential LT candidates for cardiovascular disease requires a multidisciplinary approach, with input from anaesthetists, cardiologists, hepatologists and transplant surgeons.

Assessment of Postsystolic Shortening and Global Longitudinal Strain Improves the Sensitivity of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in End-Stage Liver Disease

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) remains a widely used method for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) despite low sensitivity. Speckle-tracking assessment of strain may enhance the sensitivity of DSE in the general population, but the value of strain analysis in ESLD is unknown.

METHODS

Dobutamine stress echocardiography with two-dimensional speckle-tracking and quantitative coronary angiography were performed in 146 patients with ESLD. Thirty-six patients (25%) had CAD (≥50% diameter stenosis of a major vessel). Global longitudinal strain at rest (GLSr) and at peak stress (GLSp) and an index of postsystolic (PSSi) shortening ([maximal extent of shortening - extent of shortening in systole]/[extent of shortening in systole]) were determined. A PSSi of ≥ 0.25 was considered evidence for CAD. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal thresholds of GLSr and GLSp for CAD and to assess the diagnostic performance of visual assessment of wall motion (WMA) and strain parameters. The sensitivity and specificity of WMA, GLSr, GLSp, and PSSi were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (25%) had significant CAD. The areas under the curve for WMA, GLSr, GLSp, and PSSi were 0.60, 0.72, 0.68, and 0.78, respectively. Visual assessment of wall motion had a sensitivity of 28%. The sensitivity of each of the strain parameters, GLSr (53%, P = .016), GLSp (69%, P = .004), and PSSi (78%, P < .001), exceeded the sensitivity for WMA. Visual assessment of wall motion specificity was 92%, which exceeded the specificity for each of the strain parameters (GLSr = 82%, P = .037; GLSp = 63%, P < .001; and PSSi =78%, P = .009). Of the strain parameters, PSSi had the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (both 78%).

CONCLUSION

Assessment of GLS and PSSi with DSE yields better sensitivity than WMA in ELSD patients. Index of postsystolic shortening had the best diagnostic performance of all parameters in this population with a low prevalence of CAD.

Cardiology Assessment of Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a viable treatment option for end-stage liver disease. Significant perioperative stress is placed on the cardiovascular system because of hemodynamic changes and the length of the operation. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease before OLT are imperative to ensure favorable outcomes. Considerable variability exists among practitioners caring for these patients. Institutions tailor their protocols on the basis of local and historical practices, the preferences of the cardiologists, and the OLT team, and algorithms are not often revised or updated on the basis of the available evidence. In collaboration with cardiology and hepatology experts from leading OLT centers, we sought to examine the diagnostic cardiovascular workup of OLT candidates, including a review of the available literature on the diagnostic modalities used to screen cardiovascular disease before OLT. We advocate an emphasis on noninvasive methods to assess cardiovascular risk with reserved use of invasive risk stratification in select patients.

Emerging Evidence on Coronary Heart Disease Screening in Kidney and Liver Transplantation Candidates: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation

Coronary heart disease is an important source of mortality and morbidity among kidney transplantation and liver transplantation candidates and recipients and is driven by traditional and nontraditional risk factors related to end-stage organ disease. In this scientific statement, we review evidence from the past decade related to coronary heart disease screening and management for kidney and liver transplantation candidates. Coronary heart disease screening in asymptomatic kidney and liver transplantation candidates has not been demonstrated to improve outcomes but is common in practice. Risk stratification algorithms based on the presence or absence of clinical risk factors and physical performance have been proposed, but a high proportion of candidates still meet criteria for screening tests. We suggest new approaches to pretransplantation evaluation grounded on the presence or absence of known coronary heart disease and cardiac symptoms and emphasize multidisciplinary engagement, including involvement of a dedicated cardiologist. Noninvasive functional screening methods such as stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy have limited accuracy, and newer noninvasive modalities, especially cardiac computed tomography-based tests, are promising alternatives. Emerging evidence such as results of the 2020 International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease trial emphasizes the vital importance of guideline-directed medical therapy in managing diagnosed coronary heart disease and further questions the value of revascularization among asymptomatic kidney transplantation candidates. Optimizing strategies to disseminate and implement best practices for medical management in the broader end-stage organ disease population should be prioritized to improve cardiovascular outcomes in these populations.

Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Patients with Preexisting Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Advances in surgical and medical technology over the years has made liver transplantation possible for older and higher risk patients. Despite rigorous preoperative cardiac testing, cardiovascular events remain a major cause of death after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, there are little data on the outcomes of OLT in patients with preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to compare all-cause and cardiovascular mortality of patients with and without history of CAD undergoing OLT.

METHODS

Six hundred ninety-three adult patients with cirrhosis underwent liver transplantation between July 2013 and December 2018 (female n = 243, male n = 450; median age 59).

RESULTS

During the study period of 5 y (median follow-up, 24.1 mo), 92 of 693 patients (13.3%) died. All-cause mortality in the CAD group was significantly higher than in the non-CAD group (26.7% versus 9.6%; P <0.01). Cardiovascular events accounted for 52.5% of deaths (n = 21) in patients with CAD compared with 36.5% (n = 19) in non-CAD patients. At 6 mo, patients with combined nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)/CAD had significantly worse survival than those with CAD or NASH alone ( P <0.01). After 6 mo, patients with CAD alone had similar survival to those with combined NASH/CAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with preexisting CAD before liver transplantation are at higher risk of death from any cause, specifically cardiovascular-related death. This risk increases with coexisting NASH. The presence of NASH and CAD at the time of liver transplant should prompt the initiation of aggressive risk factor modification for patients with CAD.

Evaluation of liver transplant candidates with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is anticipated to become the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States in the near future. LT is indicated in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis who have medically refractory hepatic decompensation, synthetic dysfunction, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) meeting certain criteria. The objective of LT evaluation is to determine which patient will derive the most benefit from LT with the least risk, thus maximizing the societal benefits of a limited resource. LT evaluation is a multidisciplinary undertaking involving several specialists, assessment tools, and diagnostic testing. Although the steps involved in LT evaluation are relatively similar across different liver diseases, patients with NASH-related cirrhosis have unique demographic and clinical features that affect transplant outcomes and influence their LT evaluation. LT candidates with NASH should be assessed for metabolic syndrome and obesity, malnutrition and sarcopenia, frailty, and cardiovascular disease. Interventions that treat cardiometabolic co-morbidities and improve patients' nutrition and functionality should be considered in order to improve patient outcomes in the waitlist and after LT.

Cardiac risk stratification of the liver transplant candidate: A comprehensive review

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) form a principal consideration in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) undergoing evaluation for liver transplant (LT) with prognostic implications in the peri- and post-transplant periods. As the predominant etiology of ESLD continues to evolve, addressing CVD in these patients has become increasingly relevant. Likewise, as the number of LTs increase by the year, the proportion of older adults on the waiting list with competing comorbidities increase, and the demographics of LT candidates evolve with parallel increases in their CVD risk profiles. The primary goal of cardiac risk assessment is to preemptively reduce the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality that may arise from hemodynamic stress in the peri- and post-transplant periods. The complex hemodynamics shared by ESLD patients in the pre-transplant period with adverse cardiovascular events occurring in only some of these recipients continue to challenge currently available guidelines and their uniform applicability. This review focusses on cardiac assessment of LT candidates in a stepwise manner with special emphasis on preoperative patient optimization. We hope that this will reinforce the importance of cardiovascular optimization prior to LT, prevent futile LT in those with advanced CVD beyond the stage of optimization, and thereby use the finite resources prudently.

Ischemic Heart Disease and Liver Cirrhosis: Adding Insult to Injury

The link between heart and liver cirrhosis was recognized decades ago, although much data regarding atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease are still missing. Ischemic heart disease or coronary artery disease (CAD) and liver cirrhosis could be associated with characteristic epidemiological and pathophysiological features. This connection determines increased rates of morbidity and all-cause mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. In the era of a metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease pandemic, primary prevention and early diagnosis of coronary artery disease could improve the prognosis of liver cirrhosis patients. This review outlines a summary of the literature regarding prevalence, risk assessment and medical and interventional treatment options in this particular population. A collaborative heart–liver team-based approach is imperative for critical management decisions for patients with CAD and liver cirrhosis.

Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for liver transplantation

Cardiac risk assessment prior to liver transplantation has become widely accepted. With the emergence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among the leading causes of end-stage liver disease and the steady rise of the age of liver transplant recipients, the burden of cardiovascular diseases has markedly increased in this population. Selecting appropriate liver transplant candidates is crucial due to the increasing demand for scarce donor organs. The use of noninvasive cardiac imaging for pre-operative assessment of the cardiovascular status of liver transplant recipients has been on the rise, yet the optimal assessment strategy remains an area of active debate. In this review, we examine the relevant literature pertaining to the diagnostic and prognostic applications of noninvasive cardiac imaging in this population. We also propose a simple literature-based evaluation algorithm for CAD surveillance in liver transplant candidates.

Diagnostic Yield of Coronary Angiography in Asymptomatic Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Candidates

BACKGROUND

The ideal cardiac risk stratification strategy for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is unknown. Our institution performed coronary angiography for asymptomatic OLT candidates at high risk for CAD: ≥65 years of age, diabetic and ≥55 years of age or diagnosed ≥5 years, abnormal stress test, or at the discretion of the OLT committee.

METHODS

The analysis included 301 consecutive, asymptomatic OLT candidates who underwent coronary angiography. The primary outcome was the prevalence of obstructive CAD.

RESULTS

At 2-year follow-up, OLT was performed in 44.9%, and 42.2% died. The prevalence of obstructive CAD, involvement of the proximal or mid LAD, and 3-vessel CAD were 10.3%, 6.6%, and 0.7%, respectively. Percutaneous and surgical revascularization were performed in 7.0% and 1.3%, respectively. Stress test was performed in 54.8%. The sensitivity and specificity of stress testing were 0% and 87.1%, respectively. The negative and positive predictive values of stress testing were 91.4% and 0%, respectively. Chest computed tomography (CT) was performed in 83.1%. Moderate or severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) was present in 47.8%. The sensitivity and specificity of moderate or severe CAC were 88.9% and 57.3%, respectively. The negative and positive predictive values of moderate or severe CAC were 97.7% and 20.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CAC was an independent predictor of obstructive CAD (HR 10.7; 95% CI 3.2-37.9; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of obstructive CAD in asymptomatic OLT candidates at high risk was uncommon. Alternative diagnostic strategies may be preferred to coronary angiography.

Use of Computed Tomography Coronary Calcium Score for Coronary Artery Disease Risk Stratification During Liver Transplant Evaluation

Background

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is not considered a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, lifestyle characteristics commonly associated with increased ASCVD risk are highly prevalent in ESLD. Emerging literature shows a high burden of asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with ESLD and a high ASCVD risk in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Coronary artery calcium score (CAC) is a noninvasive test providing reliable CAD risk stratification. We implemented an LT evaluation protocol with CAC playing a central role in triaging and determining the need for further CAD assessment. Here, we inform our results from this early experience.

Methods

Patients with ESLD referred for LT evaluation were prospectively studied. We compared accuracy of CAC against that of CAD risk factors/scores, troponin I, dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to detect coronary stenosis ≥70 (CAD ≥ 70) per left heart catheterization (LHC). Thirty-day post-LT cardiac outcomes were also analyzed.

Results

One hundred twenty-four of 148 (84%) patients underwent CAC, 106 (72%) DSE/SPECT, and 50 (34%) LHC. CAC ≥ 400 was found in 35 (28%), 100 to 399 in 17 (14%), and <100 in 72 (58%). LHC identified CAD ≥ 70% in 8 of 29 (28%), 2 of 9 (22%), and 0 of 4, respectively. Two acute coronary syndromes occurred after LT in a patient with CAC 811 (CAD < 70%), and one with CAC 347 (CAD ≥ 70%). No patients with CAC < 100 presented with acute coronary syndrome after LT. When using CAD ≥ 70% as primary endpoint of LT evaluation, CAC ≥ 346 was the only test showing predictive usefulness (negative predictive value 100%).

Conclusions

CAC is a promising tool to guide CAD risk stratification and need for LHC during LT evaluation. Patients with a CAC < 100 can safely undergo LT without the need for LHC or cardiac stress testing, whereas a CAC < 346 accurately rules out significant CAD stenosis (≥70%) on LHC, outperforming other CAD risk-stratification strategies.

What's New in Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy?-Review Article

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a relatively new medical term. The constant development of novel diagnostic and clinical tools continuously delivers new data and findings about this broad disorder. The purpose of this review is to summarize current facts about CCM, identify gaps of knowledge, and indicate the direction in which to prepare an updated definition of CCM. We performed a review of the literature using scientific data sources with an emphasis on the latest findings. CCM is a clinical manifestation of disorders in the circulatory system in the course of portal hypertension. It is characterized by impaired left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and electrophysiological abnormalities, especially QT interval prolongation. However, signs and symptoms reported by patients are non-specific and include reduced exercise tolerance, fatigue, peripheral oedema, and ascites. The disease usually remains asymptomatic with almost normal heart function, unless patients are exposed to stress or exertion. Unfortunately, due to the subclinical course, CCM is rarely recognized. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) seems to improve circulatory function although there is no consensus about its positive effect, with reported cases of heart failure onset after transplantation. Researchers indicate a careful pre-, peri-, and post-transplant cardiac assessment as a crucial point in detecting CCM and improving patients’ prognosis. There is also an urgent need to update the CCM definition and establish a diagnostic algorithm for early diagnosis of CCM as well as a specific treatment of this condition.

Prognostic value of coronary risk factors, exercise capacity and single photon emission computed tomography in liver transplantation candidates: A 5-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Although consensus-based guidelines support noninvasive stress testing prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), the optimal screening strategy for assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is unclear. This study sought to determine the relative predictive value of coronary risk factors, functional capacity, and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in liver transplantation candidates.

METHODS

Prior to listing for transplantation, 404 consecutive ESLD patients were referred to a University hospital for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification. All subjects met at least one of the following criteria: inability to perform > 4 METs by history (62%), insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (53%), serum creatinine > 1.72 mg/dL (8%), history of MI, PCI or CABG (5%), stable angina (3%), cerebrovascular disease (1%), peripheral vascular disease (1%). Subjects underwent Technetium-99m SPECT with multislice coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) using exercise treadmill or standard adenosine stress in those unable to achieve 85% maximal heart rate (Siemens Symbia T16). Abnormal perfusion was defined as a summed stress score (SSS) ≥ 4.

RESULTS

Of the 404 patients, 158 (age 59 ± 9 years; male 68%) subsequently underwent transplantation and were included in the primary analysis. Of those, 50 (32%) died after a mean duration follow-up of 5.4 years (maximal 10.9 years). Most deaths (78%) were attributed to noncardiovascular causes (malignancy, sepsis, renal failure). Of the 32 subjects with abnormal perfusion (20%), nine (6%) had a high-risk perfusion abnormality defined as a total perfusion defect size (PDS) ≥ 15% and/or an ischemic PDS ≥ 10%. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated abnormal perfusion was associated with increased CV mortality (generalized Wilcoxon, P = 0.014) but not all-cause death. Subjects with both abnormal perfusion and an inability to exercise > 4 METs had the lowest survival from all-cause death (P = 0.038). Abnormal perfusion was a strong independent predictor of CV death (adjusted HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4 to 12.3; P = 0.019) and MACE (adjusted HR 7.7; 95% CI 1.4 to 42.4; P = 0.018) in a multivariate Cox regression model that included age, sex, diabetes, smoking and the ability to exercise > 4 METs. There was no association between CACS and the extent of perfusion abnormality, nor with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most deaths following OLT are noncardiovascular. Nonetheless, abnormal perfusion is prevalent in this high-risk population and a stronger predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than functional status. A combined assessment of functional status and myocardial perfusion identifies those at highest risk of all-cause death. (Exercise Capacity and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Liver Transplantation Candidates [ExSPECT]; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03864497).

Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy and Cardiac Failure after Liver Transplantation: A Case Series

Preoperative cardiac functional assessment has been a long-debated topic in liver transplantation. Debate continues to exist regarding the use of invasive cardiac studies, and the utility of each prior to transplant. Despite the debate, a 7% mortality can be attributed to significant cardiac events. We present a case series of 3 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation and developed significant cardiac dysfunction postoperatively. All preoperative cardiac assessments in each patient were normal with no hemodynamically significant abnormalities. Interestingly enough, each patient developed cardiac failure due to completely different diagnoses.

Pre-Operative Cardiovascular Testing before Liver Transplantation

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is increasingly prevalent and shares many risk factors with coronary artery disease (CAD). No specific guidelines exist for pre-liver transplant evaluation of CAD, and pretransplant cardiovascular testing varies widely. The aim of this study is to characterize pre-transplant cardiac testing practices with post-transplant clinical outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing initial liver transplantation at our transplant center between January 2015 and March 2019. Patients with previous liver transplantation or multi-organ transplantation were excluded. Electronic medical records were reviewed for relevant demographic and clinical data. We included 285 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.4 years. Of 274 patients (96.1%) with pre-transplant transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), 18 (6.6%) were abnormal. Non-invasive ischemic testing was performed in 193 (68%) patients: 165 (58%) underwent stress TTE, 24 (8%) underwent myocardial perfusion imaging, 3 underwent coronary computed tomography, and 1 underwent exercise electrocardiogram. Sixteen patients (6%) had left heart catheterization of which 10 (63%) were abnormal and 5 proceeded to revascularization before transplant. There were 4 (1.4%) deaths within 30 days of transplant and 23 deaths (8.1%) in total. ST-elevation myocardial infarction was seen in 1 patient within 30 days and 1 patient after 30 days (0.7% total). No cardiovascular deaths were observed. Among patients undergoing liver transplantation, pre-transplantation cardiovascular testing is exceedingly common and post-transplant cardiovascular complications are rare. Additional research is needed to determine the optimal testing and surveillance in this patient population.

Echocardiography in the Liver Transplant Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study is to review current echocardiographic modalities utilized in the assessment of the preoperative liver transplant candidate with an emphasis on newer techniques. We sought to assess if newer methods imparted additional diagnostic or prognostic accuracy compared to prior methods based on existing studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Standard dobutamine stress echocardiography offers important information regarding operative risk and post-operative survival in liver transplant candidates; however, technologies such as speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and evaluation of diastolic function have emerged as useful tools as well. 2D-STE and diastolic echocardiography offer additional parameters such as global longitudinal strain and measures of diastolic dysfunction that can better predict peri-operative and post-operative complications in liver transplant candidates. If able, practitioners should utilize these methods routinely in their assessment of liver transplant candidates.

CAD-LT score effectively predicts risk of significant coronary artery disease in liver transplant candidates

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis and significant coronary artery disease (CAD) are at risk of peri-liver transplantation (LT) cardiac events. The coronary artery disease in liver transplantation (CAD-LT) score and algorithm aim to predict the risk of significant CAD in LT candidates and guide pre-LT cardiac evaluation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pre-LT evaluation at Indiana University (2010-2019) were studied retrospectively. Stress echocardiography (SE) and cardiac catheterization (CATH) reports were reviewed. CATH was performed for predefined CAD risk factors, irrespective of normal SE. Significant CAD was defined as CAD requiring percutaneous or surgical intervention. A multivariate regression model was constructed to assess risk factors. Receiver-operating curve analysis was used to compute a point-based risk score and a stratified testing algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 1,771 pre-LT patients underwent cardiac evaluation, including results from 1,634 SE and 1,266 CATH assessments. Risk-adjusted predictors of significant CAD at CATH were older age (adjusted odds ratio 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.08), male sex (1.69; 1.16-2.50), diabetes (1.57; 1.12-2.22), hypertension (1.61; 1.14-2.28), tobacco use (pack years) (1.01; 1.00-1.02), family history of CAD (1.63; 1.16-2.28), and personal history of CAD (6.55; 4.33-9.90). The CAD-LT score stratified significant CAD risk as low (≤2%), intermediate (3% to 9%), and high (≥10%). Among patients who underwent CATH, a risk-based testing algorithm (low: no testing; intermediate: non-invasive testing vs. CATH; high: CATH) would have identified 97% of all significant CAD and potentially avoided unnecessary testing (669 SE [57%] and 561 CATH [44%]).

CONCLUSIONS

The CAD-LT score and algorithm (available at www.cad-lt.com) effectively stratify pre-LT risk for significant CAD. This may guide more targeted testing of candidates with fewer tests and faster time to waitlist.

LAY SUMMARY

The coronary artery disease in liver transplantation (CAD-LT) score and algorithm effectively stratify patients based on their risk of significant coronary artery disease. The CAD-LT algorithm can be used to guide a more targeted cardiac evaluation prior to liver transplantation.

Cardiac Risk Assessment in Liver Transplant Candidates: Current Controversies and Future Directions

In the changing landscape of liver transplantation (LT), we are now evaluating older and sicker patients with more cardiovascular comorbidities, and the spectrum of cardiovascular disease is uniquely physiologically impacted by end-stage liver disease. Cardiac complications are now the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in LT recipients, and the pretransplant risk is exacerbated immediately during the transplant operation and continues long term under the umbrella of immunosuppression. Accurate risk estimation of cardiac complications before LT is paramount to guide allocation of limited health care resources and to improve both short-term and long-term clinical outcomes for patients. Current screening and diagnostic testing are limited in their capacity to accurately identify early coronary disease and myocardial dysfunction in persons with end-stage liver disease physiology. Furthermore, a number of testing modalities have not been evaluated in patients with end-stage liver disease. As a result, there is wide variation in cardiac risk assessment practices across transplant centers. In this review, we propose a definition for defining cardiac events in LT, evaluate the current evidence for surgery-related, short-term and long-term cardiac risk assessment in LT candidates, propose an evidence-based testing algorithm, and highlight specific gaps in knowledge and current controversies, identifying areas for future research.

Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in Liver transplant (LT) patients is much higher than prior estimates and the morbidity and mortality are significant in this group of patients. Coronary angiography is the gold standard for detection of CAD, a non-invasive test that allows appropriate risk stratification would be preferred. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to assess the pooled diagnostic accuracy of various noninvasive cardiac imaging tests in detecting CAD in patients listed for LT.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive tests to that of coronary angiography in diagnosing coronary artery disease in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Results

Five studies (616 participants) evaluated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI); five studies (1243 participants) dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE); and three (87 participants), other tests. MPI had a pooled sensitivity of 0.62 (95% CI 0.37, 0.83), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI 0.39, 0.79), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 2.5 (95% CI 1.7, 5.64) and Area under the curve (AUC) 0.649. DSE had a pooled sensitivity of 0.25 (95%CI 0.09, 0.51), specificity of 0.68 (95% CI 0.44, 0.84) and DOR of 0.7 (95% CI 0.12, 3.84).

Conclusions

Our results show that both MPI and DSE are not effective screening tools for detecting CAD in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) and coronary artery calcium score (CAC) with coronary CT angiography in patients with ESLD.

PRO: Cardiac Catheterization Is the Optimal Strategy for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in This Patient

Watch a video presentation of this article Watch an interview with the author.

Cardiac evaluation of the kidney or liver transplant candidate

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the field of transplant has advanced, cardiac events have become the leading cause of morbidity and mortality after liver and kidney transplantation ahead of graft failure and infection. This trend has been bolstered by the transplantation of older and sicker patients who have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors, accentuating the need to determine which patients should undergo more extensive cardiac evaluation prior to transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Computed tomography coronary angiography with or without coronary artery calcium scoring is now preferred over stress imaging in most transplant candidates for assessment of coronary artery disease. Assessment of cardiac structure and function using transthoracic echocardiography with tissue doppler imaging and strain imaging is recommended, particularly in liver transplant candidates who are at high risk of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, for which new diagnostic criteria were recently published in 2019.

SUMMARY

Cardiac evaluation of liver and kidney transplant candidates requires a global assessment for both short and long-term risk for cardiac events. Imaging of cardiac structure and function using transthoracic echocardiography with tissue doppler imaging and strain imaging is recommended. Risk stratification should consider both the anatomic and functional consequences of coronary artery disease in transplant candidates.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/MOT/A27.

Cardiac and Pulmonary Vascular Risk Stratification in Liver Transplantation

Cardiovascular disease complications are the leading cause of early (short-term) mortality among liver transplant recipients. The increasingly older candidate pool has multiple comorbidities necessitating cardiac and pulmonary vascular disease risk stratification of patients for optimal allocation of scarce donor livers. Arrhythmias, heart failure, stroke, and coronary artery disease are common pretransplant cardiovascular comorbidities and contribute to cardiovascular complications after liver transplant. Valvular heart disease and portopulmonary hypertension present intraoperative challenges during liver transplant surgery. The Cardiovascular Risk in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation score estimates the risk of cardiovascular complications in liver transplant candidates within the first year after transplant.

Preoperative Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in Liver Transplant Candidates: Many Unanswered Questions in Clinical Practice

Cardiovascular (CV) complications represent the first non-graft-related cause of death and the third overall cause of death among patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). History of coronary artery disease is related to increased CV mortality following LT. Although it is of paramount importance to stratify CV risk in pre-LT patients, there is no consensus regarding the choice of the optimal non-invasive cardiac imaging test. Algorithms proposed by scientific associations include non-traditional risk factors, which are associated with increased cardiac risk profiles. Thus, an individualized pre-LT evaluation protocol should be followed. As the average age of patients undergoing LT and the number of candidates continue to rise, the “3 W” questions still remain unanswered, Who, Which and When? Who should be screened for coronary artery disease (CAD), which screening modality should be used and when should the asymptomatic waitlisted patients repeat cardiac evaluation? Prospective studies with large sample sizes are warranted to define an algorithm that can provide better risk stratification and more reliable survival prediction.

Acute heart failure after liver transplantation: A narrative review

Acute heart failure (AHF) is an under recognized yet potentially lethal complication after liver transplantation (LT) surgery. The increase in incidence of liver transplantation amongst high-risk patients and the leniency in the criteria for transplantation, predisposes these patients to postoperative AHF and the antecedent morbidity and mortality. The inability of conventional preoperative cardiovascular testing to accurately identify patients at risk for post-LT AHF poses a considerable challenge to clinicians caring for these patients. Even if high-risk patients are identified, there is considerable ambiguity in the candidacy for transplantation as well as optimization strategies that could potentially prevent the development of AHF in the postoperative period. The intraoperative and postoperative management of patients who develop AHF is also challenging and requires a well-coordinated multidisciplinary approach. The use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with refractory heart failure has the potential to improve outcomes but its use in this complex patient population can be associated with significant complications and requires a stringent risk-benefit analysis on a case-by-case basis.

A Comprehensive Review of Outcome Predictors in Low MELD Patients

Risk scoring for patients with cirrhosis has evolved greatly over the past several decades. However, patients with low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium scores still suffer from liver-related morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, it is not clear which of these low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score patients would benefit from earlier consideration of liver transplantation. This article reviews the literature of risk prediction in patients with cirrhosis, identifies which patients may benefit from earlier interventions, such as transplantation, and proposes directions for future research.

Pre-Liver Transplant Cardiac Catheterization Is Associated With Low Rate of Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Mortality

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A study at Indiana University demonstrated a reduction in myocardial infarction (MI) incidence with increased frequency of cardiac catheterization (CATH) in liver transplant (LT) candidates. A strict protocol for performing CATH based upon predefined risk factors, rather than noninvasive testing alone, was applied to a subgroup (2009-2010) from that study. CATH was followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in cases of significant coronary artery disease (CAD; ≥50% stenosis). The current study applies this screening protocol to a larger cohort (2010-2016) to assess post-LT clinical outcomes.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Among 811 LT patients, 766 underwent stress testing (94%) and 559 underwent CATH (69%), of whom 10% had CAD requiring PCI. The sensitivity of stress echocardiography in detecting significant CAD was 37%. Predictors of PCI included increasing age, male gender, and personal history of CAD (P < 0.05 for all). Compared to patients who had no CATH, patients who underwent CATH had higher mortality (P = 0.07), and the hazard rates (HR) for mortality increased with CAD severity (normal CATH, HR, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-2.33; P = 0.298; nonobstructive CAD, HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.84-2.77; P = 0.161; and significant CAD, HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.93-4.15; P = 0.080). Post-LT outcomes were compared to the 2009-2010 subgroup from the previous study and showed similar 1-year overall mortality (8% and 6%, P = 0.48), 1-year MI incidence (<1% and <1%, P = 0.8), and MI deaths as a portion of all deaths (3% and 9%, P = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Stress echocardiography alone is not reliable in screening LT patients for CAD. Aggressive CAD screening with CATH is associated with low rate of MI and cardiac mortality and validates the previously published protocol when extrapolated over a larger sample and longer follow-up period.

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Renal and Liver Transplant Candidates: A Multidisciplinary Institutional Standardized Approach

In the modern era, renal and liver transplant candidates present with a greater medical complexity driven in part by a higher prevalence of cardiovascular conditions, including coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathies. In fact, cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death after kidney transplantation worldwide. Similarly, an increase in the number of patients being listed with end-stage liver disease from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and a rising model for end-stage liver disease scores at the time of liver transplant in the United States parallel an increasing cardiovascular disease risk profile for liver transplant candidates. A large degree of variation exists among clinical practice guidelines and transplant center practice patterns regarding patient selection for routine cardiac testing and the choice of testing modalities. Here, we review the clinical practice guidelines established at our center by a multidisciplinary group, including transplant nephrology, hepatology, and surgery, as well as general and interventional cardiology, with the goal of improving patient selection and reducing adverse cardiac events posttransplant.

MELD-XI Score and Coronary Artery Disease Prevalence and Extent Among In-Hospital Patients With End-Stage Liver Failure Awaiting Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Liver transplant is a life-saving procedure for a variety of end-stage liver diseases. Cardiovascular disorders are among the leading cause of death among patients with end-stage liver disease and those undergoing liver transplant procedures. MELD-XI score is a newly developed score for mortality prediction in patients with end-stage liver failure. In this study, we investigated the relationships among MELD-XI score, total in-hospital mortality, and coronary artery disease severity and extent among patients with end-stage liver failure who were awaiting transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 121 patients with end-stage liver failure on transplant wait list. Study patients had undergone coronary angiography as part of pretransplant cardiac evaluation. We determined prevalence of coronary artery disease and Gensini score (which indicates extent of coronary artery disease) using coronary angiography and reviewed MELD-XI score and in-hospital mortality rates. We compared MELD-XI score and Gensini score in deceased and surviving patients and correlated both scores with mortality and with each other.

RESULTS

Of 121 patients, 79 (65.3%) were men; mean age of the study population was 59.6 ± 10.2 years. Twenty-eight patients (23.1%) had coronary artery disease, and 13 (10.7%) had severe coronary artery disease on coronary angiography. Twenty-three patients (19%) died while on the transplant wait list. Gensini score and MELD-XI scores were significantly higher in those who died (P < .05). MELD-XI score, but not Gensini score, was a significant independent predictor of death among patients awaiting liver transplant (hazard ratio = 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.78; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

MELD-XI score independently predicted in-hospital death among patients scheduled to undergo liver transplant. These patients also had increased prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease.

Peri-transplant management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in liver transplant candidates

The incidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rapidly growing, affecting 25% of the world population. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most severe form of NAFLD and affects 1.5% to 6.5% of the world population. Its rising incidence will make end-stage liver disease (ESLD) due to NASH the number one indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the next 10 to 20 years, overtaking Hepatitis C. Patients with NASH also have a high prevalence of associated comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which must be adequately managed during the peritransplant period for optimal post-transplant outcomes. The focus of this review article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the unique challenges these patients present in the peritransplant period, which comprises the pre-transplant, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative periods.

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Consequences of Liver Transplantation: A Review

Liver transplantation (LT) is considered the curative treatment option for selected patients who suffer from end-stage or acute liver disease or hepatic malignancy (primary). After LT, patients should be carefully monitored for complications that may appear, partially due to immunosuppressive therapy, but not entirely. Cardiovascular diseases are frequently encountered in patients with LT, being responsible for high morbidity and mortality. Patients with underlying cardiovascular and metabolic pathologies are prone to complications after the transplant, but these complications can also appear de novo, mostly associated with immunosuppressants. Metabolic syndrome, defined by obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia, is diagnosed among LT recipients and is aggravated after LT, influencing the long-term survival. In this review, our purpose was to summarize the current knowledge regarding cardiovascular (CV) diseases and the metabolic syndrome associated with LT and to assess their impact on short and long-term morbidity and mortality.

Risk stratification of myocardial injury after liver transplantation in patients with computed tomographic coronary angiography-diagnosed coronary artery disease

We aimed to determine if the severity of computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA)-diagnosed coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with postliver transplantation (LT) myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days and early mortality. We retrospectively evaluated 2118 consecutive patients who underwent CAD screening using CTCA. Post-LT type-2 MI, elicited by oxygen supply-and-demand mismatch within a month after LT, was assessed according to the severity of CTCA-diagnosed CAD. Obstructive CAD (>50% narrowing, 9.2% prevalence) was identified in 21.7% of patients with 3 or more known CAD risk factors of the American Heart Association. Post-LT MI occurred in 60 (2.8%) of total patients in whom 90-day mortality rate was 16.7%. Rates of post-LT MI were 2.1%, 3.1%, 3.4%, 4.3%, and 21.4% for normal, nonobstructive CAD, and 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel obstructive CAD, respectively. Two-vessel or 3-vessel obstructive CAD showed a 4.9-fold higher post-LT MI risk compared to normal coronary vessels. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of obstructive CAD in detecting post-LT MI were, respectively, 20% and 97.5%. In conclusion, negative CTCA finding in suspected patients can successfully exclude post-LT MI, whereas proceeding with invasive angiography is needed to further risk-stratify in patients with significant CTCA-diagnosed CAD. Prognostic role of CTCA in predicting post-LT MI needs further research.

International Liver Transplantation Consensus Statement on End-stage Liver Disease Due to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Liver Transplantation

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related cirrhosis has become one of the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT), particularly in candidates older than 65 years. Typically, NASH candidates have concurrent obesity, metabolic, and cardiovascular risks, which directly impact patient evaluation and selection, waitlist morbidity and mortality, and eventually posttransplant outcomes. The purpose of these guidelines is to highlight specific features commonly observed in NASH candidates and strategies to optimize pretransplant evaluation and waitlist survival. More specifically, the working group addressed the following clinically relevant questions providing recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system supported by rigorous systematic reviews and consensus: (1) Is the outcome after LT similar to that of other etiologies of liver disease? (2) Is the natural history of NASH-related cirrhosis different from other etiologies of end-stage liver disease? (3) How should cardiovascular risk be assessed in the candidate for LT? Should the assessment differ from that done in other etiologies? (4) How should comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, renal dysfunction, etc.) be treated in the candidate for LT? Should treatment and monitoring of these comorbidities differ from that applied in other etiologies? (5) What are the therapeutic strategies recommended to improve the cardiovascular and nutritional status of a NASH patient in the waiting list for LT? (6) Is there any circumstance where obesity should contraindicate LT? (7) What is the optimal time for bariatric surgery: before, during, or after LT? (8) How relevant is donor steatosis for LT in NASH patients?

Diagnostic Performance of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in End-Stage Liver Disease

OBJECTIVES

This study determined the test performance of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in end-stage liver disease (ESLD).

BACKGROUND

The reported sensitivity of DSE in ESLD has been variable.

METHODS

Data from 633 ESLD patients who had coronary angiography within 6 months after DSE was analyzed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of coronary arterial disease (CAD) (≥70% stenosis by quantitative angiography) was 12% (74 of 633 patients). DSE sensitivity was 24% (17 of 72 patients), and specificity was 90% (503 of 559 patients). The positive and negative predictive values were 23% (17 of 73 patients) and 90% (503 of 558 patients), respectively. Stratifying the cohort into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk CAD groups yielded sensitivities of 0%, 21%, and 32%, respectively. Independent predictors of an accurate ischemic DSE result included left ventricular internal dimension at end-diastole (LVIDd) >4.8 cm and assigning ischemia based on tardokinesis or lack of low-to-peak dose hyperkinesis (p < 0.05 for all). DSE sensitivity was 38% in LVIDd >4.8 cm versus 13% with LVIDd ≤4.8 cm (p = 0.013). The sensitivity was 67% when tardokinesis or lack of hyperkinesis was considered abnormal versus 15% (p < 0.001) for readings that did not consider tardokinesis or lack of hyperkinesis abnormal. There was a higher frequency of cardiac events in patients with significant CAD who had abnormal (45%) versus normal (18%) DSE (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of DSE in ESLD was low. DSE sensitivity was higher for those with larger cavity dimension and when tardokinesis or lack of hyperkinesis was considered abnormal. An abnormal DSE in those with significant CAD was associated with worse outcome.

Screening of Cardiovascular Disease in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Whom and How?

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide. Patients with NAFLD are at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). In fact, CVD-related mortality is more common in patients with NAFLD in comparison to liver-related mortality. This association is related to the common metabolic risk factors such as obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension shared by both NAFLD and CVD, and also there is independent association of NAFLD with CVD because of risk factors such as insulin resistance, systemic inflammation, and atherogenic dyslipidemia. While there is abundant literature on association of NAFLD with CVD, there is sparse literature regarding the screening for CVD in patients with NAFLD. In the current review article, we discuss as to which patients with NAFLD to screen and how to screen for CVD.

Cardiac stress testing and coronary artery disease in liver transplantation candidates: Meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) in cirrhotic patients listed for liver transplantation (LT), using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as gold-standard.

METHODS

Retrieval of studies was based on Medical Subject Headings and Health Sciences Descriptors, which were combined using Boolean operators. Searches were run on the electronic databases Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), BIREME (Biblioteca Regional de Medicina), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), Cochrane Library for Systematic Reviews and Opengray.eu. There was no language or date of publication restrictions. The reference lists of the studies retrieved were searched manually.

RESULTS

The search strategy retrieved 322 references for DSE and 90 for MPS. In the final analysis, 10 references for DSE and 10 for MPS were included. Pooled sensitivity was 28% and 61% for DSE and MPS and specificity was 82% and 74%, for diagnosis of CAD using ICA as gold-standard, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DSE and MPS do not have adequate sensitivity for determination of whether CAD is present, despite having significant specificity.

Preoperative dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with increased mortality in patients who undergo orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Chronic vasodilatory state and poor exercise tolerance in patients with end-stage liver disease make dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) preferred for preoperative evaluation of CAD prior to OLT. We studied the incidence of positive DSE results and the association between DSE results and perioperative and longer-term events.

HYPOTHESIS

DSE results pre-OLT will predict short and long term outcomes.

METHODS

We studied 460 patients who underwent DSE within 1 year prior to OLT between 2004 and 2011. Primary events included death and MI at 30 days post-OLT. We also recorded longer-term deaths.

RESULTS

Four patients (0.9%) had an ischemic response to DSE, 360 (78%) were normal, and 96 (21%) were nondiagnostic. Fourteen patients (3%) had a primary event at 30 days following OLT (13 deaths and 1 NSTEMI), and there were 108 (24%) deaths at 4.6±2 years of follow-up. No patient with ischemia on DSE had a 30-day event. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DSE that was not normal (ie, ischemic or nondiagnostic response) to predict 30-day post-OLT events were 76%, 14%, 78%, 2%, and 97%, respectively. On Cox survival analysis, only baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96, P < 0.001) was associated with longer-term deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing pre-OLT DSE have very low incidence of an ischemic response on DSE, and it has no association with 30-day events.

Cardiovascular dysfunction and liver transplantation

Cardiovascular complications have emerged as the leading cause of death after liver transplantation, particularly among those with advanced liver cirrhosis. Therefore, a thorough and accurate cardiovascular evaluation with clear comprehension of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is recommended for optimal anesthetic management. However, cirrhotic patients manifest cardiac dysfunction concomitant with pronounced systemic hemodynamic changes, characterized by hyperdynamic circulation such as increased cardiac output, high heart rate, and decreased systemic vascular resistance. These unique features mask significant manifestations of cardiac dysfunction at rest, which makes it difficult to accurately evaluate cardiovascular status. In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge of heart and liver interactions, focusing on the usefulness and limitations of cardiac evaluation tools for identifying high-risk patients.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, invasive coronary angiography, and post-liver transplantation events: Systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of coronary artery disease on the clinical course of patients enrolled for liver transplantation (LT) has changed over the years as these patients become older and sicker. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in predicting cardiac events post-LT in cirrhotic patients. A literature search was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), BIREME (regional medical library of the Pan American Health Organization), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), Cochrane Library for Systematic Reviews, and OpenGrey Repository (www.opengrey.eu) electronic databases. A total of 322 records were retrieved for DSE, 90 for MPS, and 149 for ICA. In the final analysis, 11 records for DSE, 7 for MPS, and 8 for ICA were included. The relative risk and confidence interval for major adverse cardiac events were 30.2 (2.8-325.4) for DSE, 2.6 (1.09-6.1) for MPS, and 2.1 (1.0-2.3) for ICA, while the relative risk and confidence interval for all-cause mortality was 4.7 for DSE (1.8-12.0), 2.7 (1.25-5.9) for MPS, and 1.5 (0.89-3.2) for ICA. In conclusion, this meta-analysis found that DSE, MPS, and ICA do not satisfactorily predict increased risk of perioperative MACE or all-cause mortality among cirrhotic patients listed for LT, among small and heterogenous studies.

Multidisciplinary approach to cardiac and pulmonary vascular disease risk assessment in liver transplantation: An evaluation of the evidence and consensus recommendations

Liver transplant (LT) candidates today are older, have greater medical severity of illness, and have more cardiovascular comorbidities than ever before. In addition, there are specific cardiovascular responses in cirrhosis that can be detrimental to the LT candidate. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, a condition characterized by increased cardiac output and a reduced ventricular response to stress, is present in up to 30% of patients with cirrhosis, thus challenging perioperative management. Current noninvasive tests that assess for subclinical coronary and myocardial disease have low sensitivity, and altered hemodynamics during the LT surgery can unmask latent cardiovascular disease either intraoperatively or in the immediate postoperative period. Therefore, this review, assembled by a group of multidisciplinary experts in the field and endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine and Thoracic and Critical Care Communities of Practice, provides a critical assessment of the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary vascular disease and interventions aimed at managing these conditions in LT candidates. Key points and practice-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of cardiac and pulmonary vascular disease in this population are provided to offer guidance for clinicians and identify gaps in knowledge for future investigations.

Liver Transplantation in Patients With Cardiac Disease

Liver transplantation (LT) is a unique surgical procedure that has major hemodynamic and cardiovascular implications. Recently, there has been significant interest focused on cardiovascular issues that affect LT patients in all phases of the perioperative period. The preoperative cardiac evaluation is a major step in the selection of LT candidates. LT candidates are aging in concordance with the general population; cardiovascular disease and their risk factors are highly associated with older age. Underlying cardiovascular disease has the potential to affect outcomes in LT patients and has a major impact on candidate selection. The prolonged hemodynamic and metabolic instability during LT may contribute to adverse outcomes, especially in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular events are not unusual during LT; transplant anesthesiologists must be prepared for these events. Advanced cardiovascular monitoring techniques and treatment modalities are now routinely used during LT. Postoperative cardiovascular complications are common in both the early and late posttransplant periods. The impact of cardiac complications on posttransplant mortality is well recognized. Emerging knowledge regarding cardiovascular disease in LT patients and its impact on posttransplant outcomes will have an important role in guiding the future perioperative management of LT patients.

Outcome of Liver Transplant Recipients With Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparative Analysis With and Without Cardiovascular Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a significant problem during evaluation for liver transplantation (LT). We aim to assess survival in LT recipients based on presence, severity, extent of CAD, and cardiac events within 90 days of LT.

METHODS

Eighty-seven LT recipients with history of pre-LT angiogram (December 2005 to December 2012) were compared with 2 control groups without prior angiogram, 72 LT recipients matched for cardiovascular risk factors (control group I), and 119 consecutive LT recipients without any CV risk factors (control group II). CAD was assessed by (1) vessel score (≥50% reduction in luminal diameter), and (2) Extent score (Reardon scoring system).

RESULTS

Of the 87 LT recipients (study group), 58 (66.7%) had none or less than 50% stenosis, 29 (33.3%) had obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis), 7 (8%) with single-vessel disease, and 22 (25.3%) with multivessel disease. In the study group, irrespective of prerevascularization severity of CAD (P = 0.357), number of segments involved (0, 1-2, > 2 segments, P = 0.304) and extent of CAD based on Reardon score (0, 1-9, >10, P = 0.224), comparable posttransplant survival was noted. Overall, patient survival in the revascularized CAD group was comparable to angiogram group without obstructive CAD, and both control group I and control group II (P = 0.184, Log Rank). Postoperative cardiac events within 90 days of LT predicted poor survival in study group as well as control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity or extent of CAD does not impact post-LT survival, if appropriately revascularized. Early postoperative cardiac events are associated with inferior survival in LT recipients, irrespective of underlying CAD.

Usefulness for Predicting Cardiac Events After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Preoperatively

Patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation have high rates of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Although guidelines recommend noninvasive stress testing as part of the preoperative evaluation, little data have evaluated clinical outcomes following orthotopic liver transplantation. A retrospective study at 2 high-volume liver transplantation centers was performed. All patients undergoing noninvasive stress testing (myocardial perfusion imaging [MPI] or dobutamine stress echocardiography [DSE]) over a 5-year period were included. Descriptive analyses, including clinical outcomes and perioperative and postoperative ischemic events, were performed. Comparisons were made between subsets of patients within each stress modality based on abnormal versus normal results. A total of 506 patients were included, of which 343 underwent DSE and 163 MPI. Few patients had abnormal results, with 19 (5.5%) in the DSE group and 13 (8%) in the MPI group. Perioperative and postoperative cardiac complications were low (n = 20, 5.8% and n = 3, 0.9% in DSE group and n = 15, 9.2% and n = 3, 1.8% in MPI group). Comparisons between abnormal versus normal findings showed a trend toward periprocedural cardiac complications in the abnormal DSE group (n = 3, 15.8% vs n = 17, 5.25%; p = 0.09) with no difference in 6-month postprocedural complications (n = 0 vs n = 3, 0.9%; p = 1.0). In the MPI group, a trend toward periprocedural ischemic complications (n = 3, 23.1% vs n = 12, 8%; p = 0.1) was noted with no difference in 6-month postprocedural complications (n = 0 vs n = 3, 2%; p = 1.0). In conclusion, our study found a significantly lower than reported cardiac event rate. In addition, it demonstrated that ischemic cardiac events are uncommon in patients with normal stress testing.