1
|
Vermersch P, Kwiatkowski A, de Sèze J, Créange A, Texier N, Fantoni-Quinton S, Gros M, Ruiz M, Lebrun-Frenay C. Impact of Natalizumab on Productivity and Ability to Work in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in France: The TITAN Study. Neurol Ther 2025:10.1007/s40120-025-00725-x. [PMID: 40208417 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-025-00725-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2025] [Indexed: 04/11/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The TITAN study examined changes in productivity, ability to work, and quality of life (QoL) before and after treatment with the high-efficacy therapy natalizumab (TYSABRI®) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in France. METHODS Patients, aged ≥ 18 and < 65 years with relapsing-remitting MS, either naïve to natalizumab or with ≤ 1 prior natalizumab infusion, with paid employment, were evaluated for productivity (number of working hours) in the 12 months prior to and after natalizumab initiation. Changes in annualized relapse rate and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score were assessed. Changes in work status, working ability, physical and psychologic functioning, and QoL were also evaluated. RESULTS Of 185 enrolled patients, the primary analysis population comprised 162 patients with a mean (SD) age of 36.8 (9.6) years and a baseline mean (SD) EDSS score of 1.9 (1.4). Annual mean (SD) productivity (n = 160) decreased from 1284.4 (503.3) h before natalizumab to 1208.0 (575.3) h (p = 0.05) in the year after natalizumab initiation. Significant improvement was seen in overall activity impairment at 6, 12, and 18 months of natalizumab treatment (p < 0.001). Decreases in annualized relapse rate (p < 0.0001) and EDSS score (p < 0.05) were observed during this period. In addition, treatment-related improvements were observed in presenteeism (reduced work efficiency), overall work impairment, and absenteeism (p < 0.05); significant improvements in psychological and physical impact (p ≤ 0.01) of MS were reported. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that early treatment with natalizumab may improve the work function of patients with MS, thereby decreasing the economic burden of the disease and improving patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Vermersch
- Université de Lille, Inserm UMR1172 Lilncog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, 59037, Lille Cedex, France.
| | - Arnaud Kwiatkowski
- Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Univ. Catholique de Lille, Lille, France
| | | | | | | | - Sophie Fantoni-Quinton
- Université Lille, CRDP-EA4487, UF pathologies professionnelles et maintien dans l'emploi, CHR Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Marta Ruiz
- Médical, Biogen France SAS, Paris, France
| | - Christine Lebrun-Frenay
- CRC SEP CHU de Nice, UMR2CA-URRIS, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur 2, 30 Voie Romaine, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adibi A, Adibi I, Javidan M. Effect of Different Treatments on Retinal Thickness Changes in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Review. CNS Neurosci Ther 2025; 31:e70225. [PMID: 39853938 PMCID: PMC11759887 DOI: 10.1111/cns.70225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Revised: 01/02/2025] [Accepted: 01/08/2025] [Indexed: 01/26/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder affecting the central nervous system, with varying clinical manifestations such as optic neuritis, sensory disturbances, and brainstem syndromes. Disease progression is monitored through methods like MRI scans, disability scales, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), which can detect retinal thinning, even in the absence of optic neuritis. MS progression involves neurodegeneration, particularly trans-synaptic degeneration, which extends beyond the initial injury site. This review focuses on the impact of different MS treatments on retinal thickness as assessed by OCT. RESULTS Injectable drugs, such as interferon beta and glatiramer acetate (GA), have a relatively modest impact on retinal atrophy. Oral medications like Fingolimod, Teriflunomide, and Dimethyl fumarate also have different impacts on retinal thickness. Fingolimod has been shown to protect against retinal thinning but may lead to macular edema. DMF-treated patients had less ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thinning than GA-treated patients but more thinning compared to natalizumab-treated patients and healthy controls. Teriflunomide's impact on retinal layers remains unexplored in human studies. Monoclonal antibodies, including Alemtuzumab, Rituximab, Ocrelizumab, and Natalizumab, had protective effects on retinal layer atrophy. Alemtuzumab-treated patients showed significantly less atrophy compared to interferon- and GA-treated patients. Rituximab initially increased atrophy rates in the first months but subsequently demonstrated potential neuroprotective effects. Ocrelizumab slowed the rate of inner nuclear layer thinning in progressive forms of the disease. Natalizumab is considered the most effective in reducing retinal layer atrophy, particularly the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer. CONCLUSIONS It's important to note that the effectiveness of these treatments may vary depending on MS subtype and individual factors. Future research should explore the long-term effects of these treatments on retinal layers and their correlations with overall disease progression and disability in MS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Adibi
- Department of NeurologyIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
- Neuroscience Research CenterIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
| | - Iman Adibi
- Department of NeurologyIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
- Neuroscience Research CenterIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
| | - Milad Javidan
- Department of NeurologyIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
- Neuroscience Research CenterIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zakharova MN, Simaniv TO, Sapozhnikov KV, Tolkacheva DG, Sokolova VD, Sableva NA, Mironenko ON, Lazarev AA, Khimich TV. [Comparing the efficacy of divozilimab and second-line treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the Russian Federation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2025; 125:58-68. [PMID: 40047834 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202512502158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare efficacy of the new drug divozilimab with other second-line treatment options for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) that have been already included or submitted application to be included into the «14 high-cost nosologies» program in the Russian Federation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted systematic literature review (PROSPERO ID CRD42022310082) and frequentist network meta-analysis of 2-years efficacy of divozilimab and other second-line therapies to treat RRMS. RESULTS Annualized relapse rate ratio in divozilimab vs fingolimod was 0.4 (95% CI 0.3-0.7), divozilimab vs cladribin 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9), divozilimab vs alemtuzumab 0.7 (95% CI 0.3-1.7), divozilimab vs ocrelizumab 0.7 (95% CI 0.3-1.6), divozilimab vs ofatumumab 0.7 (95% CI 0.4-1.1), divozilimab vs natalizumab 0.4 (95% CI 0.4-1.1) respectively. Divozilimab had the highest SUCRA rank (0.9) while fingolimod had the lowest (0.4). CONCLUSION Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis revealed statistically significant superiority of divozilimab over cladribine and fingolimod and absence of statistically significant differences with alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and natalizumab in the annual relapse rate during 2 years of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - T O Simaniv
- Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - D G Tolkacheva
- The North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - V D Sokolova
- Health Economics Group School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N A Sableva
- The North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - O N Mironenko
- The North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - A A Lazarev
- Bonch-Bruevich Saint Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - T V Khimich
- The North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, St. Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foley JF, Defer G, Ryerson LZ, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter GR, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Wiendl H, Li K, Dsilva L, Toukam M, Ferber K, Sohn J, Engelman H, Lasky T. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Natalizumab 6-Week Dosing vs Continued 4-Week Dosing for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2024; 11:e200321. [PMID: 39393045 PMCID: PMC11488827 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000200321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Exposure to natalizumab, an efficacious treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Compared with every-4-week (Q4W) dosing, extended-interval dosing of natalizumab is associated with decreased risk of PML. Clinical efficacy was maintained in the majority of patients switched to every-6-week (Q6W) dosing in the phase 3b NOVA clinical trial. In this article, we report pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Q6W vs Q4W dosing in NOVA. METHODS In NOVA study Part 1, participants with RRMS (aged 18-60 years) and Expanded Disability Status Scale score <5.5, who were stable on IV natalizumab Q4W dosing for ≥12 months, were randomized to continue IV Q4W dosing or switched to IV Q6W dosing of natalizumab and followed for 72 weeks. Exploratory outcomes were measurements of trough serum natalizumab concentration, α4-integrin saturation, and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) concentration. A mixed model of repeated measures was used to estimate mean treatment differences between groups. Patient-level PK and PD data were examined in those with relapse or radiologic disease activity. RESULTS In NOVA, 486 (Q6W, n = 245; Q4W, n = 241) and 487 (Q6W, n = 246; Q4W, n = 241) participants were included in the PK and PD populations, respectively. Mean trough natalizumab concentrations ranged from 10 to 21 μg/mL (Q6W) and 33-38 μg/mL (Q4W), and mean α4-integrin saturation remained above 65.5% (Q6W) and above 77.9% (Q4W). In the Q6W group, mean sVCAM-1 levels increased 23.6% by week 24 and remained elevated throughout the study, while mean sVCAM-1 levels remained generally stable in the Q4W group. Most participants with T2 lesion activity or relapse activity, in either treatment arm, maintained trough natalizumab levels >10 μg/mL and trough α4-integrin saturation >50%. DISCUSSION Compared with Q4W dosing, Q6W dosing was associated with a 60%-70% decrease in mean trough natalizumab levels and a 9%-16% decrease in mean α4-integrin saturation. At the patient level, neither natalizumab concentration nor α4-integrin saturation was consistently predictive of lesion or relapse activity, suggesting that trough natalizumab and α4-integrin saturation measurements should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03689972; EudraCT, 2018-002145-11. Submitted 2018-09-27. First patient enrolled: 2018-12-26. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03689972.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Foley
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Gilles Defer
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Lana Zhovtis Ryerson
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Jeffrey A Cohen
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Douglas L Arnold
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Gary R Cutter
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Gavin Giovannoni
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Joep Killestein
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Kexuan Li
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Liesel Dsilva
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Marie Toukam
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Kyle Ferber
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Jihee Sohn
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Holly Engelman
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| | - Tyler Lasky
- From the Rocky Mountain MS Clinic (J.F.F.), Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France; Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology (L.Z.R.), Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ; Mellen MS Center (J.A.C.), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Montréal Neurological Institute (D.L.A.), McGill University; NeuroRx Research (D.L.A.), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.R.C.), School of Public Health; Blizard Institute (G.G.), Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (J.K.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Biogen (K.L., L.D., M.T., K.F., J.S., T.L.), Cambridge, MA; and Ashfield MedComms (H.E.), Middletown, CT
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shimizu F, Nakamori M. Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Neuroimmunological Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:10625. [PMID: 39408955 PMCID: PMC11476930 DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) acts as a structural and functional barrier for brain homeostasis. This review highlights the pathological contribution of BBB dysfunction to neuroimmunological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), autoimmune encephalitis (AE), and paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS). The transmigration of massive lymphocytes across the BBB caused by the activation of cell adhesion molecules is involved in the early phase of MS, and dysfunction of the cortical BBB is associated with the atrophy of gray matter in the late phase of MS. At the onset of NMOSD, increased permeability of the BBB causes the entry of circulating AQP4 autoantibodies into the central nervous system (CNS). Recent reports have shown the importance of glucose-regulated protein (GRP) autoantibodies as BBB-reactive autoantibodies in NMOSD, which induce antibody-mediated BBB dysfunction. BBB breakdown has also been observed in MOGAD, NPSLE, and AE with anti-NMDAR antibodies. Our recent report demonstrated the presence of GRP78 autoantibodies in patients with MOGAD and the molecular mechanism responsible for GRP78 autoantibody-mediated BBB impairment. Disruption of the BBB may explain the symptoms in the brain and cerebellum in the development of PNS, as it induces the entry of pathogenic autoantibodies or lymphocytes into the CNS through autoimmunity against tumors in the periphery. GRP78 autoantibodies were detected in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, and they were associated with cerebellar ataxia with anti-P/Q type voltage-gated calcium channel antibodies. This review reports that therapies affecting the BBB that are currently available for disease-modifying therapies for neuroimmunological diseases have the potential to prevent BBB damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumitaka Shimizu
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube 755-8505, Japan;
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Belder CRS, Boche D, Nicoll JAR, Jaunmuktane Z, Zetterberg H, Schott JM, Barkhof F, Fox NC. Brain volume change following anti-amyloid β immunotherapy for Alzheimer's disease: amyloid-removal-related pseudo-atrophy. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:1025-1034. [PMID: 39304242 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00335-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
Progressive cerebral volume loss on MRI is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease and has been widely used as an outcome measure in clinical trials, with the prediction that disease-modifying treatments would slow loss. However, in trials of anti-amyloid immunotherapy, the participants who received treatment had excess volume loss. Explanations for this observation range from reduction of amyloid β plaque burden and related inflammatory changes through to treatment-induced toxicity. The excess volume changes are characteristic of only those immunotherapies that achieve amyloid β lowering; are compatible with plaque removal; and evidence to date does not suggest an association with harmful effects. Based on the current evidence, we suggest that these changes can be described as amyloid-removal-related pseudo-atrophy. Better understanding of the causes and consequences of these changes is important to enable informed decisions about treatments. Patient-level analyses of data from the trials are urgently needed, along with longitudinal follow-up and neuroimaging data, to determine the long-term trajectory of these volume changes and their clinical correlates. Post-mortem examination of cerebral tissue from treated patients and evaluation of potential correlation with antemortem neuroimaging findings are key priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R S Belder
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, University College London, London, UK; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Delphine Boche
- Clinical Neurosciences, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - James A R Nicoll
- Clinical Neurosciences, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Zane Jaunmuktane
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, University College London, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nick C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Noteboom S, Strijbis EMM, Coerver EME, Colato E, van Kempen ZLE, Jasperse B, Vrenken H, Killestein J, Schoonheim MM, Steenwijk MD. Long-term neuroprotective effects of natalizumab and fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: Evidence from real-world clinical data. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2024; 87:105670. [PMID: 38772150 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term effect of high efficacy disease modifying therapy (DMT) on neurodegeneration in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of natalizumab (NTZ) or fingolimod (FTY) therapy on the evolution of brain atrophy compared to moderate efficacy DMT in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS A total of 438 pwMS with 2,439 MRI exams during treatment were analyzed: 252 pwMS treated with moderate efficacy DMT, 130 with NTZ and 56 with FTY. Evolution of brain atrophy was analyzed over an average follow-up of 6.6 years after treatment initiation. Brain segmentation was performed on clinical 3D-FLAIRs using SynthSeg and regional brain volume changes over time were compared between the treatment groups. RESULTS Total brain, white matter and deep gray matter atrophy rates did not differ between moderate efficacy DMTs, NTZ and FTY. Annualized ventricle growth rates were lower in pwMS treated with NTZ (1.1 %/year) compared with moderate efficacy DMT (2.4 %/year, p < 0.001) and similar to FTY (2.0 %/year, p = 0.051). Cortical atrophy rates were lower in NTZ (-0.08 %/year) compared with moderate efficacy DMT (-0.16 %/year, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION In a real-world clinical setting, pwMS treated with NTZ had slower ventricular expansion and cortical atrophy compared to those treated with moderate efficacy DMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Noteboom
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - E M M Strijbis
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E M E Coerver
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Colato
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University college London, UK
| | - Z L E van Kempen
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B Jasperse
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Vrenken
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Killestein
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M M Schoonheim
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M D Steenwijk
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nakamura K, Sun Z, Hara-Cleaver C, Bodhinathan K, Avila RL. Natalizumab reduces loss of gray matter and thalamic volume in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A post hoc analysis from the randomized, placebo-controlled AFFIRM trial. Mult Scler 2024; 30:687-695. [PMID: 38469809 DOI: 10.1177/13524585241235055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loss of brain gray matter fractional volume predicts multiple sclerosis (MS) progression and is associated with worsening physical and cognitive symptoms. Within deep gray matter, thalamic damage is evident in early stages of MS and correlates with physical and cognitive impairment. Natalizumab is a highly effective treatment that reduces disease progression and the number of inflammatory lesions in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of natalizumab on gray matter and thalamic atrophy. METHODS A combination of deep learning-based image segmentation and data augmentation was applied to MRI data from the AFFIRM trial. RESULTS This post hoc analysis identified a reduction of 64.3% (p = 0.0044) and 64.3% (p = 0.0030) in mean percentage gray matter volume loss from baseline at treatment years 1 and 2, respectively, in patients treated with natalizumab versus placebo. The reduction in thalamic fraction volume loss from baseline with natalizumab versus placebo was 57.0% at year 2 (p < 0.0001) and 41.2% at year 1 (p = 0.0147). Similar findings resulted from analyses of absolute gray matter and thalamic fraction volume loss. CONCLUSION These analyses represent the first placebo-controlled evidence supporting a role for natalizumab treatment in mitigating gray matter and thalamic fraction atrophy among patients with RRMS. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT00027300URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00027300.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunio Nakamura
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gold R, Schmidt S, Deisenhammer F, Motte J, Richter N, Taipale K, Salmen HC, Bohland C, Schirduan K. Real-world evidence and patient preference for subcutaneous versus intravenous natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - initial results from the observational SISTER study. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2024; 17:17562864241241382. [PMID: 38616781 PMCID: PMC11015759 DOI: 10.1177/17562864241241382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The consideration of patient preference for a certain drug route of administration (RoA) plays an important role in promoting patient adherence in chronic diseases. Natalizumab is an established treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and can be administered as intravenous (IV) infusion or subcutaneous (SC) injection developed to enable a shorter and easier administration versus IV RoA. Study objectives Primary objective is to compare patients' preference for RoA and satisfaction with SC versus IV natalizumab at baseline and subsequent visits up to 12 months. Secondary objectives include drug utilization, clinical outcomes, safety, and treatment satisfaction in a usual care setting. Design and methods SISTER (Subcutaneous: Non-Interventional Study for Tysabri Patient Preference - Experience from Real World) is an ongoing, prospective, observational study where natalizumab is utilized according to local label. RRMS patients are included in three natalizumab cohorts: Patients switching from current IV to SC administration (switcher) and patients newly starting natalizumab on either SC or IV route (starter SC/IV). This interim analysis includes 262 patients (184 switchers, 39 SC starters, and 39 IV starters), median observation period was 9 months. Results 80.8% IV starters and 93.9% SC starters reported at baseline that they prefer the assigned RoA. Although initial satisfaction with chosen RoA was maintained over time from baseline through Month 12 in all three cohorts, the wish for change of the current RoA after 6 and 12 months was more frequently expressed among IV starters than in either SC cohort. Consistently, six patients (23.1%) starting with IV changed their RoA from IV to SC route.Mean global treatment satisfaction according to TSQM-II score at baseline remained high in the switcher group and increased through Month 12 in both IV and SC starter cohorts. Conclusion Based on current data, there is a trend toward patients' preference for the natalizumab SC route over the IV route, which provides valuable insights into patients' preference for natalizumab RoA in routine care and complements available data from clinical studies with real-world data on SC natalizumab. Trial registration This observational (non-interventional) study was registered in the local German PEI register for non-interventional studies (NIS-No. 611) and in the international CTgov register (NCT05304520).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Gold
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, Bochum 44791, Germany
| | | | | | - Jeremias Motte
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nils Richter
- Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shayestehfar M, Salari M, Karimi S, Vosough M, Memari A, Nabavi SM. Sex hormone therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 2024; 16:11795735231223411. [PMID: 38188227 PMCID: PMC10768623 DOI: 10.1177/11795735231223411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In spite of the observed immunomodulatory properties of different sex hormones on Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in different investigations, to date, there has been no study to systematically review the documents to add more powerful data to the field. Objectives Therefore, in this paper we aim to systematically review clinical and randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing the effect of sex hormone therapies on individuals with MS. Design A comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus was conducted. Clinical trials and RCTs that assessed the impact of sex hormones on individuals with MS were selected and included in the systematic review. Data sources and methods In the final phase of the search strategy, 9 papers reached the criteria for entering in the systematic review. Two independent reviewers extracted the relevant data from each article according to the standardized data extraction form. Two reviewers also assessed the quality of each study independently using PEDro scale. Results We categorized three different classifications of outcomes including clinical, MRI, and immune system findings and put each measured outcome in the category which matched best. Conclusion In conclusion, the existed investigations on the effect of sex hormones on inflammatory and neurodegenerative components of MS are promising particularly in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monir Shayestehfar
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehri Salari
- Neuro Functional Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahedeh Karimi
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Massoud Vosough
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Memari
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Massood Nabavi
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bellanca CM, Augello E, Mariottini A, Bonaventura G, La Cognata V, Di Benedetto G, Cantone AF, Attaguile G, Di Mauro R, Cantarella G, Massacesi L, Bernardini R. Disease Modifying Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: New Rays of Hope to Combat Disability? Curr Neuropharmacol 2024; 22:1286-1326. [PMID: 38275058 PMCID: PMC11092922 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x22666240124114126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most prevalent chronic autoimmune inflammatory- demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS). It usually begins in young adulthood, mainly between the second and fourth decades of life. Usually, the clinical course is characterized by the involvement of multiple CNS functional systems and by different, often overlapping phenotypes. In the last decades, remarkable results have been achieved in the treatment of MS, particularly in the relapsing- remitting (RRMS) form, thus improving the long-term outcome for many patients. As deeper knowledge of MS pathogenesis and respective molecular targets keeps growing, nowadays, several lines of disease-modifying treatments (DMT) are available, an impressive change compared to the relative poverty of options available in the past. Current MS management by DMTs is aimed at reducing relapse frequency, ameliorating symptoms, and preventing clinical disability and progression. Notwithstanding the relevant increase in pharmacological options for the management of RRMS, research is now increasingly pointing to identify new molecules with high efficacy, particularly in progressive forms. Hence, future efforts should be concentrated on achieving a more extensive, if not exhaustive, understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this phase of the disease in order to characterize novel molecules for therapeutic intervention. The purpose of this review is to provide a compact overview of the numerous currently approved treatments and future innovative approaches, including neuroprotective treatments as anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody and cell therapies, for effective and safe management of MS, potentially leading to a cure for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Maria Bellanca
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Clinical Toxicology Unit, University Hospital, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Egle Augello
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Clinical Toxicology Unit, University Hospital, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Alice Mariottini
- Department of Neurosciences Drugs and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Bonaventura
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), Italian National Research Council, 95126 Catania, Italy
| | - Valentina La Cognata
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), Italian National Research Council, 95126 Catania, Italy
| | - Giulia Di Benedetto
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Clinical Toxicology Unit, University Hospital, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Anna Flavia Cantone
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Attaguile
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Rosaria Di Mauro
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Cantarella
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Luca Massacesi
- Department of Neurosciences Drugs and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Renato Bernardini
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Pharmacology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Clinical Toxicology Unit, University Hospital, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nakamura K, Elliott C, Lee H, Narayanan S, Arnold DL. Brain volume increase after discontinuing natalizumab therapy: Evidence for reversible pseudoatrophy. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2024; 81:105123. [PMID: 37976981 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phenomenon of pseudoatropy after initiation of anti-inflammatory therapy is believed to be reversible, but a rebound in brain volume following cessation of highly-effective therapy has not been reported. OBJECTIVES To evaluate brain volume change in a treatment interruption study (RESTORE) in which relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients were randomized to switch from natalizumab to placebo, from natalizumab to once-monthly intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), or to remain on natalizumab. METHODS T2 lesion volume (T2LV), baseline normalized brain volumes, and follow-up percent brain volume changes (PBVC) were calculated. Approximate T2 relaxation-time (pT2) was calculated within the brain mask and the T2 lesions to estimate changes in water content. Linear mixed effects models were used to detect differences in T2LV, pT2 in whole brain, pT2 in T2-weighted lesions, and PBVC among the placebo, natalizumab, and IVMP groups. We also estimated contributions of T2LV and pT2 (in whole brain and T2 lesions) to PBVC. RESULTS T2LV increased in the placebo group (by 0.66 ml/year, p<0.0001) and IVMP (+1.98 ml/year, p = 0.05) groups relative to the natalizumab group. The rates of PBVC were significantly different: -0.239%/year with continued natalizumab and +0.126 %/year after switch to placebo (p = 0.03), while the IVMP group showed brain volume loss (-0.74 %/ year, p = 0.08). pT2 was not statistically different between the groups (p ≥ 0.29) and did not have significant effects on PBVC (p ≥ 0.25). CONCLUSION The increase in the brain volume in patients witching from natalizumab to placebo is consistent with reversal of so-called pseudoatrophy after starting natalizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunio Nakamura
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute Hospital, and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, ND20, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
| | - Colm Elliott
- Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, 3480 Rue University, Montréal, QC H3A 2A7, Canada. NeuroRx Research, 3575 Park Avenue, Suite #5322, Montreal, Quebec H2 × 4B3, Canada; NeuroRx Research, 3575 Park Avenue, Suite #5322, Montreal, Quebec H2 × 4B3, Canada
| | - Hyunwoo Lee
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute Hospital, and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia S154-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T2B5, Canada
| | - Sridar Narayanan
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute Hospital, and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; NeuroRx Research, 3575 Park Avenue, Suite #5322, Montreal, Quebec H2 × 4B3, Canada
| | - Douglas L Arnold
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute Hospital, and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; NeuroRx Research, 3575 Park Avenue, Suite #5322, Montreal, Quebec H2 × 4B3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alonso-Moreno M, Ladrón-Guevara M, Ciudad-Gutiérrez P. Systematic review of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurologia 2023; 38:695-706. [PMID: 37996214 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This article analyses the presence of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a systematic review of controlled clinical trials of 4 monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis (natalizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab). We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published in English before March 2020. The study was conducted in accordance with the relevant international recommendations. RESULTS The search identified 89 articles, 55 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of all patients included in these trials, 64.6% were women. The lead authors of 10 of the studies were women. Fifteen of the 55 studies included a sex-based analysis of the primary endpoint. Only 8 articles discussed the results separately for men and for women. CONCLUSIONS The clinical trials of these 4 monoclonal antibodies present a significant gender bias. In most cases, the primary and secondary endpoints are not analyzed according to patient sex, despite the fact that international recommendations include this as a minimum requirement for ensuring scientific validity and obtaining appropriate results for extrapolation to the wider population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Alonso-Moreno
- Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avenue Manuel Siurot, 41013 Seville, Spain.
| | - M Ladrón-Guevara
- Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avenue Manuel Siurot, 41013 Seville, Spain
| | - P Ciudad-Gutiérrez
- Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avenue Manuel Siurot, 41013 Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bazzurri V, Fiore A, Curti E, Tsantes E, Franceschini A, Granella F. Prevalence of 2-year "No evidence of disease activity" (NEDA-3 and NEDA-4) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. A real-world study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 79:105015. [PMID: 37769430 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) is becoming a gold standard in the evaluation of disease modifying therapies (DMT) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). NEDA-3 status is the absence of relapses, new activity on brain MRI, and disability progression. NEDA-4 meets all NEDA-3 criteria plus lack of brain atrophy. OBJECTIVE Aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of two-year NEDA-3, NEDA-4, six-month delayed NEDA-3 (6mdNEDA-3), and six-month delayed NEDA-4 (6mdNEDA-4) in a cohort of patients with RRMS. Six-month delayed measures were introduced to consider latency of action of drugs. METHODS Observational retrospective monocentric study. All the patients with RRMS starting DMT between 2015 and 2018, and with 2-year of follow-up, were included. Annualized brain volume loss (a-BVL) was calculated by SIENA software. RESULTS We included 108 patients, the majority treated with first line DMT. At 2-year follow-up, 35 % of patients were NEDA-3 (50 % 6mdNEDA-3), and 17 % NEDA-4 (28 % 6mdNEDA-4). Loss of NEDA-3 status was mainly driven by MRI activity (70 %), followed by relapses (56 %), and only minimally by disability progression (7 %). CONCLUSION In our cohort 2-year NEDA status, especially including lack of brain atrophy, was hard to achieve. Further studies are needed to establish the prognostic value of NEDA-3 and NEDA4 in the long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Bazzurri
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.
| | - A Fiore
- Department of Biomedical Metabolic and Neurosciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - E Curti
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Neurology Unit, Department of General Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - E Tsantes
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Neurology Unit, Department of General Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - A Franceschini
- Unit of Neurosciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - F Granella
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Neurology Unit, Department of General Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy; Unit of Neurosciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gklinos P, Dobson R. Monoclonal Antibodies in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Review and an Updated Clinical Guide. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:ph16050770. [PMID: 37242553 DOI: 10.3390/ph16050770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) early in the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes and is becoming an increasingly popular treatment strategy. As a result, monoclonal antibodies, including natalizumab, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab, are frequently used for the treatment of MS in women of childbearing age. To date, only limited evidence is available on the use of these DMTs in pregnancy. We aim to provide an updated overview of the mechanisms of action, risks of exposure and treatment withdrawal, and pre-conception counseling and management during pregnancy and post-partum of monoclonal antibodies in women with MS. Discussing treatment options and family planning with women of childbearing age is essential before commencing a DMT in order to make the most suitable choice for each individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Gklinos
- Department of Neurology, Aeginition University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Ruth Dobson
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, QMUL, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bolzenius J, Sacdalan C, Ndhlovu LC, Sailasuta N, Trautmann L, Tipsuk S, Crowell TA, Suttichom D, Colby DJ, Phanuphak N, Chan P, Premeaux T, Kroon E, Vasan S, Hsu DC, Valcour V, Ananworanich J, Robb ML, Ake JA, Pohl KM, Sriplienchan S, Spudich S, Paul R. Brain volumetrics differ by Fiebig stage in acute HIV infection. AIDS 2023; 37:861-869. [PMID: 36723491 PMCID: PMC10079583 DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000003496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE People with chronic HIV exhibit lower regional brain volumes compared to people without HIV (PWOH). Whether imaging alterations observed in chronic infection occur in acute HIV infection (AHI) remains unknown. DESIGN Cross-sectional study of Thai participants with AHI. METHODS One hundred and twelve Thai males with AHI (age 20-46) and 18 male Thai PWOH (age 18-40) were included. Individuals with AHI were stratified into early (Fiebig I-II; n = 32) and late (Fiebig III-V; n = 80) stages of acute infection using validated assays. T1-weighted scans were acquired using a 3 T MRI performed within five days of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Volumes for the amygdala, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, pallidum, putamen, and thalamus were compared across groups. RESULTS Participants in late Fiebig stages exhibited larger volumes in the nucleus accumbens (8% larger; P = 0.049) and putamen (19%; P < 0.001) when compared to participants in the early Fiebig. Compared to PWOH, participants in late Fiebig exhibited larger volumes of the amygdala (9% larger; P = 0.002), caudate nucleus (11%; P = 0.005), nucleus accumbens (15%; P = 0.004), pallidum (19%; P = 0.001), and putamen (31%; P < 0.001). Brain volumes in the nucleus accumbens, pallidum, and putamen correlated modestly with stimulant use over the past four months among late Fiebig individuals ( P s < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate that brain volume alterations occur in acute infection, with the most prominent differences evident in the later stages of AHI. Additional studies are needed to evaluate mechanisms for possible brain disruption following ART, including viral factors and markers of neuroinflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlo Sacdalan
- SEARCH, Institute of HIV Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Lishomwa C Ndhlovu
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Napapon Sailasuta
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Medical Microbiology & Pharmacology, University of Hawaii, Hawaii
| | - Lydie Trautmann
- Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon
| | - Somporn Tipsuk
- SEARCH, Institute of HIV Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Trevor A Crowell
- U.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Donn J Colby
- U.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Phillip Chan
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Thomas Premeaux
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Eugène Kroon
- SEARCH, Institute of HIV Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sandhya Vasan
- U.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Denise C Hsu
- U.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Victor Valcour
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jintanat Ananworanich
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merlin L Robb
- U.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Julie A Ake
- Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon
| | - Kilian M Pohl
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Serena Spudich
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Robert Paul
- University of Missouri, St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Panafieu A, Lecler A, Goujon A, Krystal S, Gueguen A, Sadik JC, Savatovsky J, Duron L. Contrast-Enhanced 3D Spin Echo T1-Weighted Sequence Outperforms 3D Gradient Echo T1-Weighted Sequence for the Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 3.0 T Brain MRI. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:314-319. [PMID: 36729811 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using reliable contrast-enhanced T1 sequences is crucial to detect enhancing brain lesions for multiple sclerosis (MS) at the time of diagnosis and over follow-up. Contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) T1-weighted imaging (WI) and 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) T1-WI are both available for clinical practice and have never been compared within the context of this diagnosis. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced 3D GRE T1-WI and 3D TSE T1-WI for the detection of enhancing lesions in the brains of MS patients. METHODS This single-center prospective study enrolled patients with MS who underwent a 3.0 T brain MRI from August 2017 to April 2021 for follow-up. Contrast-enhanced 3D GRE T1-WI and 3D TSE T1-WI were acquired in randomized order. Two independent radiologists blinded to all data reported all contrast-enhanced lesions in each sequence. Their readings were compared with a reference standard established by a third expert neuroradiologist. Interobserver agreement, contrast ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated for both sequences. RESULTS A total of 158 MS patients were included (mean age, 40 ± 11 years; 95 women). Significantly more patients had at least 1 contrast-enhanced lesion on 3D TSE T1-WI than on 3D GRE T1-WI for both readers (61/158 [38.6%] vs 48/158 [30.4%] and 60/158 [38.6%] vs 47/158 [29.7%], P < 0.001). Significantly more contrast-enhanced lesions per patient were detected on 3D TSE T1-WI (mean 2.47 vs 1.56 and 2.56 vs 1.39, respectively, P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was excellent for both sequences, κ = 0.96 (confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.00) for 3D TSE T1-WI and 0.92 (CI, 0.86-0.99) for 3D GRE T1-WI. Contrast ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly higher on 3D TSE T1-WI (0.84 vs 0.53, P < 0.001, and 87.9 vs 57.8, P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS At 3.0 T, contrast-enhanced 3D TSE-T1-WI supports the detection of significantly more enhancing lesions than 3D GRE T1-WI and should therefore be used for MS patients requiring contrast-enhanced examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Augustin Lecler
- From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
| | - Adrien Goujon
- From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
| | - Sidney Krystal
- From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
| | - Antoine Gueguen
- From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
| | - Jean-Claude Sadik
- From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
| | - Julien Savatovsky
- From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
| | - Loïc Duron
- From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Morgan A, Tallantyre E, Ontaneda D. The benefits and risks of escalation versus early highly effective treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother 2023; 23:433-444. [PMID: 37129299 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2208347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, demyelinating, inflammatory, and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system that affects over 2 million people worldwide. Considerable advances have been made in the availability of disease modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis since their introduction in the 1990s. This has led to debate regarding the optimal first-line treatment approach: a strategy of escalation versus early highly effective treatment. AREAS COVERED This review defines the strategies of escalation and early highly effective treatment, outlines the pros and cons of each, and provides an analysis of both the current literature and expected future directions of the field. EXPERT OPINION There is growing support for using early highly effective treatment as the initial therapeutic approach in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However, much of this support stems from observational real-world studies that use historic data and lack safety outcomes or randomized control trials that compare individual high versus low-moderate efficacy therapies, instead of the approaches themselves. Randomized control trials (DELIVER-MS, TREAT-MS) are needed to systemically and prospectively compare contemporary escalation versus early highly effective treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Morgan
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Emma Tallantyre
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Daniel Ontaneda
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ryerson LZ, Foley JF, Defer G, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter G, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Wiendl H, Sinks S, Kuhelj R, Bodhinathan K, Lasky T. Exploratory clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcomes from NOVA: A randomized controlled study of intravenous natalizumab 6-week dosing versus continued 4-week dosing for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 72:104561. [PMID: 36931078 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Natalizumab (TYSABRI®) 300 mg administered intravenously every-4-weeks (Q4W) is approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis but is associated with increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Extended natalizumab dosing intervals of approximately every-6-weeks (Q6W) are associated with a lower risk of PML. Primary and secondary clinical outcomes from the NOVA randomized clinical trial (NCT03689972) suggest that effective disease control is maintained in patients who were stable during treatment with natalizumab Q4W for ≥12 months and who then switched to Q6W dosing. We compared additional exploratory clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from NOVA to assess the efficacy of Q6W dosing. METHODS Prespecified exploratory clinical efficacy endpoints in NOVA included change from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), dominant- and nondominant-hand 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Exploratory patient-reported outcome (PRO) efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Neuro-QoL fatigue questionnaire, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5 L) index score, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement (patient- and clinician-assessed) and CGI-Severity (clinician-assessed) rating scales. Estimated proportions of patients with confirmed EDSS improvement were based on Kaplan-Meier methods. Estimates of mean treatment differences for Q6W versus Q4W in other outcomes were assessed by least squares mean (LSM) and analyzed using a linear mixed model of repeated measures or ordinal logistic regression (CGI-scale). RESULTS Exploratory clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of randomly assigned study treatment and had ≥1 postbaseline efficacy assessment (Q6W group, n = 247, and Q4W group, n = 242). Estimated proportions of patients with EDSS improvement at week 72 were similar for Q6W and Q4W groups (11.7% [19/163] vs 10.8% [17/158]; HR 1.02 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.98]; P = 0.9501). At week 72, there were no significant differences between Q6W and Q4W groups in LSM change from baseline for T25FW (0.00, P = 0.975), 9HPT (dominant [0.22, P = 0.533] or nondominant [0.09, P = 0.862] hand), or SDMT (-1.03, P = 0.194). Similarly, there were no significant differences between Q6W and Q4W groups in LSM change from baseline for any PRO (TSQM, -1.00, P = 0.410; Neuro-QoL fatigue, 0.52, P = 0.292; MSIS-29 Psychological, 0.67, P = 0.572; MSIS-29 Physical, 0.74, P = 0.429; EQ-5D-5 L, 0.00, P = 0.978). For the EQ-5D-5 L, a higher proportion of Q6W patients than Q4W patients demonstrated worsening (≥0.5 standard deviation increase in the EQ-5D-5 L index score; P = 0.0475). From baseline to week 72 for Q6W versus Q4W, odds ratio (ORs) of LSM change in CGI scores did not show meaningful differences between groups (CGI-Improvement [patient]: OR [95% CI] 1.2 [0.80-1.73]; CGI-Improvement [physician]: 0.8 [0.47-1.36]; CGI-Severity [physician]: 1.0 [0.71-1.54]). CONCLUSIONS No significant differences were observed in change from baseline to week 72 between natalizumab Q6W and Q4W groups for all exploratory clinical or PRO-related endpoints assessed. For the EQ-5D-5 L, a higher proportion of Q6W than Q4W patients demonstrated worsening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Zhovtis Ryerson
- Hackensack Meridian Medical Group - Neurology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ, United States of America.
| | - John F Foley
- Rocky Mountain MS Clinic, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Gilles Defer
- Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Jeffrey A Cohen
- Mellen MS Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Douglas L Arnold
- Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; NeuroRx Research, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gary Cutter
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Gavin Giovannoni
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK; Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Joep Killestein
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Susie Sinks
- Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | | | | | - Tyler Lasky
- Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Foley J, Xiong K, Hoyt T, Singh CM, Riddle E, de Moor C, Plavina T, Campbell N. Serum neurofilament light levels in natalizumab-treated patients with multiple sclerosis who switch to extended interval dosing from every-4-week dosing in real-world clinical practice. Mult Scler 2023; 29:196-205. [PMID: 36377744 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221130949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum levels of neurofilament light chain (sNfL) are a potentially useful biomarker for assessing the efficacy of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments. OBJECTIVE To compare levels of sNfL in patients with MS who switched from natalizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) to extended interval dosing (EID) and patients who remained on Q4W dosing in real-world clinical practice. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of samples from patients treated with natalizumab from 2010 to 2015 at a single center in the United States. Levels of sNfL were compared in patients who stayed on Q4W dosing or who switched to EID (parallel-arm analyses) and during Q4W and EID periods in patients who switched to EID (pre- and post-switch analyses). RESULTS The analysis included 139 patients (Q4W: n = 79; EID: n = 60). After adjustment, levels of sNfL did not significantly differ between patients who remained on Q4W dosing and those who switched to EID in parallel-arm analyses (adjusted Q4W-EID difference = 0.51 pg/mL; p = 0.60) or pre- and post-switch analyses (adjusted difference = 0.96 pg/mL; p = 0.10). CONCLUSION These sNfL biomarker results suggest that the effectiveness of natalizumab is maintained in patients who switch from Q4W dosing to EID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Foley
- Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Tammy Hoyt
- Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mey GM, Mahajan KR, DeSilva TM. Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. WIREs Mech Dis 2023; 15:e1583. [PMID: 35948371 PMCID: PMC9839517 DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a key component of disease progression and permanent neurologic disability. MS is a heterogeneous demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with varying presentation, disease courses, and prognosis. Immunomodulatory therapies reduce the frequency and severity of inflammatory demyelinating events that are a hallmark of MS, but there is minimal therapy to treat progressive disease and there is no cure. Data from patients with MS, post-mortem histological analysis, and animal models of demyelinating disease have elucidated patterns of MS pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms of neurodegeneration. MRI and molecular biomarkers have been proposed to identify predictors of neurodegeneration and risk factors for disease progression. Early signs of axonal dysfunction have come to light including impaired mitochondrial trafficking, structural axonal changes, and synaptic alterations. With sustained inflammation as well as impaired remyelination, axons succumb to degeneration contributing to CNS atrophy and worsening of disease. These studies highlight the role of chronic demyelination in the CNS in perpetuating axonal loss, and the difficulty in promoting remyelination and repair amidst persistent inflammatory insult. Regenerative and neuroprotective strategies are essential to overcome this barrier, with early intervention being critical to rescue axonal integrity and function. The clinical and basic research studies discussed in this review have set the stage for identifying key propagators of neurodegeneration in MS, leading the way for neuroprotective therapeutic development. This article is categorized under: Immune System Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology Neurological Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle M. Mey
- Department of NeurosciencesLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Kedar R. Mahajan
- Department of NeurosciencesLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
- Mellen Center for MS Treatment and ResearchNeurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Tara M. DeSilva
- Department of NeurosciencesLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Freeman L, Longbrake EE, Coyle PK, Hendin B, Vollmer T. High-Efficacy Therapies for Treatment-Naïve Individuals with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2022; 36:1285-1299. [PMID: 36350491 PMCID: PMC9645316 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00965-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
There are > 18 distinct disease-modifying therapy (DMT) options covering 10 mechanisms of action currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Given the multitude of available treatment options, and recent international consensus guidelines offering differing recommendations, there is broad heterogeneity in how the DMTs are used in clinical practice. Choosing a DMT for newly diagnosed patients with MS is currently a topic of significant debate in MS care. Historically, an escalation approach to DMT was used for newly diagnosed patients with RRMS. However, the evidence for clinical benefits of early treatment with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) in this population is emerging. In this review, we provide an overview of the DMT options and MS treatment strategies, and discuss the clinical benefits of HETs (including ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and cladribine) in the early stages of MS, along with safety concerns associated with these DMTs. By minimizing the accumulation of neurological damage early in the disease course, early treatment with HETs may enhance long-term clinical outcomes over the lifetime of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léorah Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1601 Trinity St, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
| | | | - Patricia K Coyle
- Department of Neurology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Barry Hendin
- Banner, University Medicine Neurosciences Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Timothy Vollmer
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Niiranen M, Koikkalainen J, Lötjönen J, Selander T, Cajanus A, Hartikainen P, Simula S, Vanninen R, Remes AM. Grey matter atrophy in patients with benign multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav 2022; 12:e2679. [PMID: 35765699 PMCID: PMC9304852 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain atrophy appears during the progression of multiple sclerosis (MS) and is associated with the disability caused by the disease. METHODS We investigated global and regional grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes, WM lesion load, and corpus callosum index (CCI), in benign relapsing-remitting MS (BRRMS, n = 35) with and without any treatment and compared those to aggressive relapsing-remitting MS (ARRMS, n = 46). Structures were analyzed by using an automated MRI quantification tool (cNeuro®). RESULTS The total brain and cerebral WM volumes were larger in BRRMS than in ARRMS (p = .014, p = .017 respectively). In BRRMS, total brain volumes, regional GM volumes, and CCI were found similar whether or not disease-modifying treatment (DMT) was used. The total (p = .033), as well as subcortical (p = .046) and deep WM (p = .041) lesion load volumes were larger in BRRMS patients without DMT. Cortical GM volumes did not differ between BRRMS and ARRMS, but the volumes of total brain tissue (p = .014) and thalami (p = .003) were larger in patients with BRRMS compared to ARRMS. A positive correlation was found between CCI and whole-brain volume in both BRRMS (r = .73, p < .001) and ARRMS (r = .80, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Thalamic volume is the most prominent measure to differentiate BRRMS and ARRMS. Validation of automated quantification of CCI provides an additional applicable MRI biomarker to detect brain atrophy in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marja Niiranen
- Neuro Center, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | | | - Tuomas Selander
- Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Antti Cajanus
- Institute of Clinical Medicine - Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Päivi Hartikainen
- Neuro Center, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sakari Simula
- Department of Neurology, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine - Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Radiology, Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
de Stefano N, Barkhof F, Montalban X, Achiron A, Derfuss T, Chan A, Hodgkinson S, Prat A, Leocani L, Schmierer K, Sellebjerg F, Vermersch P, Wiendl H, Keller B, Roy S. Early Reduction of MRI Activity During 6 Months of Treatment With Cladribine Tablets for Highly Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: MAGNIFY-MS. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2022; 9:9/4/e1187. [PMID: 35701185 PMCID: PMC9197134 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000001187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives The onset of action for high-efficacy immunotherapies in multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important parameter. This study (MAGNIFY-MS) evaluates the onset of action of cladribine tablets by observing changes in combined unique active (CUA) MRI lesion counts during the first 6 months of treatment in patients with highly active relapsing MS. Methods MRI was performed at screening, baseline, and at months 1, 2, 3, and 6 after initiating treatment with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg. CUA lesion counts, defined as the sum of T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions and new or enlarging active T2 lesions (without T1 Gd+), were compared between postbaseline and the baseline period and standardized to the period length and the number of MRIs performed. Results Included in this analysis were 270 patients who received ≥1 dose of cladribine tablets. After treatment initiation, significant reductions in mean CUA lesion counts were observed from month 1 onward compared with the baseline period (−1.193 between month 1 and month 6, −1.500 between month 2 and month 6, and −1.692 between month 3 and month 6; all p < 0.0001). Mean T1 Gd+ lesion counts were decreased from month 2 onward compared with baseline (−0.857 at month 2, −1.355 at month 3, and −1.449 at month 6; all p < 0.0001), whereas the proportion of patients without any CUA lesions increased from 52.0% between month 1 and month 6 to 80.5% between month 3 and month 6. Discussion Findings suggest an early onset of action for cladribine tablets, with an increasing reduction in active MRI lesions over time. Trial Registration Information NCT03364036; Date registered: December 06, 2017. Classification of Evidence Using frequent MRI assessments of the brain over the first 6 months of the MAGNIFY-MS study (NCT03364036), we aimed to determine the onset of action of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in adult patients with highly active relapsing MS. This study provides Class IV evidence that, in such patients, treatment with cladribine tablets is associated with an early onset of action with reductions in active MRI lesion counts from month 2 (day 60) onward, with an increasing reduction in such lesions over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de Stefano
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Xavier Montalban
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Anat Achiron
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Tobias Derfuss
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Andrew Chan
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Suzanne Hodgkinson
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Alexandre Prat
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Letizia Leocani
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Klaus Schmierer
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Finn Sellebjerg
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Patrick Vermersch
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Birgit Keller
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | - Sanjeev Roy
- From the Department of Medicine (N.S.), Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Radiology (F.B.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; UCL Institute of Neurology (F.B.), London, UK; Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology (X.M.), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Center (A.A.), Sheba Academic Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology (T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (A.C.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (S.H.), University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (A.P.), Université de Montréal, QC, Canada; Experimental Neurophysiology Unit (L.L.), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; The Blizard Institute (K.S.), Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK and; Clinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience) (K.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; Danish MS Center (F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Univ. Lille (P.V.), Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, France; Department of Neurology (H.W.), Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Germany; the healthcare business of Merck KGaA (B.K.), Darmstadt, Germany; and Ares Trading S.A. (S.R.), Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Foley JF, Defer G, Ryerson LZ, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter G, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Wiendl H, Smirnakis K, Xiao S, Kong G, Kuhelj R, Campbell N, Dwyer C, Buzzard K, Spies J, Parratt J, van Pesch V, Willekens B, Perrotta G, Bartholomé E, Grand'Maison F, Jacques F, Giacomini P, Vosoughi R, Girard JM, de Seze J, Lebrun Frenay C, Ruet A, Laplaud DA, Reifschneider G, Wagner B, Rauer S, Pul R, Seipelt M, Berthele A, Klotz L, Kallmann BA, Paul F, Achiron A, Lus G, Centonze D, Patti F, Grimaldi L, Hupperts R, Frequin S, Fermont J, Madueno SE, Alonso Torres AM, Costa-Frossard França L, Meca-Lallana JE, Ruiz LB, Pearson O, Rog D, Evangelou N, Ismail A, Lathi E, Fox E, Leist T, Sloane J, Wu G, Khatri B, Steingo B, Thrower B, Gudesblatt M, Calkwood J, Bandari D, Scagnelli J, Laganke C, Robertson D, Kipp L, Belkin M, Cohan S, Goldstick L, Courtney A, Vargas W, Sylvester A, Srinivasan J, Kannan M, Picone M, English J, Napoli S, Balabanov R, Zaydan I, Nicholas J, Kaplan J, Lublin F, Riser E, Miller T, Alvarez E, Wray S, Gross J, Pawate S, Hersh C, McCarthy L, Crayton H, Graves J. Comparison of switching to 6-week dosing of natalizumab versus continuing with 4-week dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (NOVA): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:608-619. [PMID: 35483387 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00143-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment with natalizumab once every 4 weeks is approved for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Switching to extended-interval dosing is associated with lower progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk, but the efficacy of this approach is unclear. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of natalizumab once every 6 weeks compared with once every 4 weeks in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS We did a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b trial (NOVA) at 89 multiple sclerosis centres across 11 countries in the Americas, Europe, and Western Pacific. Included participants were aged 18-60 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and had been treated with intravenous natalizumab 300 mg once every 4 weeks with no relapses for at least 12 months before randomisation, with no missed doses in the previous 3 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a randomisation sequence generated by the study funder and contract personnel with interactive response technology, to switch to natalizumab once every 6 weeks or continue with once every 4 weeks. The centralised MRI reader, independent neurology evaluation committee, site examining neurologists, site backup examining neurologists, and site examining technicians were masked to study group assignments. The primary endpoint was the number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at week 72, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of assigned treatment and had at least one postbaseline MRI, relapse, or neurological examination or efficacy assessment. Missing primary endpoint data were handled under prespecified primary and secondary estimands: the primary estimand included all data, regardless of whether participants remained on the assigned treatment; the secondary estimand classed all data obtained after treatment discontinuation or study withdrawal as missing. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Study enrolment is closed and an open-label extension study is ongoing. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2018-002145-11, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03689972. FINDINGS Between Dec 26, 2018, and Aug 30, 2019, 605 patients were assessed for eligibility and 499 were enrolled and assigned to receive natalizumab once every 6 weeks (n=251) or once every 4 weeks (n=248). After prespecified adjustments for missing data, mean numbers of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at week 72 were 0·20 (95% CI 0·07-0·63) in the once every 6 weeks group and 0·05 (0·01-0·22) in the once every 4 weeks group (mean lesion ratio 4·24 [95% CI 0·86-20·85]; p=0·076) under the primary estimand, and 0·31 (95% CI 0·12-0·82) and 0·06 (0·01-0·31; mean lesion ratio 4·93 [95% CI 1·05-23·20]; p=0·044) under the secondary estimand. Two participants in the once every 6 weeks group with extreme new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion numbers (≥25) contributed most of the excess lesions. Adverse events occurred in 194 (78%) of 250 participants in the once every 6 weeks group and 190 (77%) of 247 in the once every 4 weeks group, and serious adverse events occurred in 17 (7%) and 17 (7%), respectively. No deaths were reported. There was one case of asymptomatic progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (without clinical signs) in the once every 6 weeks group, and no cases in the once every 4 weeks group; 6 months after diagnosis, the participant was without increased disability and remained classified as asymptomatic. INTERPRETATION We found a numerical difference in the mean number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at week 72 between the once every 6 weeks and once every 4 weeks groups, which reached significance under the secondary estimand, but interpretation of statistical differences (or absence thereof) is limited because disease activity in the once every 4 weeks group was lower than expected. The safety profiles of natalizumab once every 6 weeks and once every 4 weeks were similar. Although this trial was not powered to assess differences in risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, the occurrence of the (asymptomatic) case underscores the importance of monitoring and risk factor consideration in all patients receiving natalizumab. FUNDING Biogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Foley
- Rocky Mountain MS Clinic, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Gilles Defer
- Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | | | - Jeffrey A Cohen
- Mellen MS Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Douglas L Arnold
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; NeuroRx Research, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gary Cutter
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Gavin Giovannoni
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK; Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Joep Killestein
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kumar P, Lim A, Hazirah SN, Chua CJH, Ngoh A, Poh SL, Yeo TH, Lim J, Ling S, Sutamam NB, Petretto E, Low DCY, Zeng L, Tan EK, Arkachaisri T, Yeo JG, Ginhoux F, Chan D, Albani S. Single-cell transcriptomics and surface epitope detection in human brain epileptic lesions identifies pro-inflammatory signaling. Nat Neurosci 2022; 25:956-966. [PMID: 35739273 PMCID: PMC9276529 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01095-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Epileptogenic triggers are multifactorial and not well understood. Here we aimed to address the hypothesis that inappropriate pro-inflammatory mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of refractory epilepsy (non-responsiveness to antiepileptic drugs) in human patients. We used single-cell cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq) to reveal the immunotranscriptome of surgically resected epileptic lesion tissues. Our approach uncovered a pro-inflammatory microenvironment, including extensive activation of microglia and infiltration of other pro-inflammatory immune cells. These findings were supported by ligand–receptor (LR) interactome analysis, which demonstrated potential mechanisms of infiltration and evidence of direct physical interactions between microglia and T cells. Together, these data provide insight into the immune microenvironment in epileptic tissue, which may aid the development of new therapeutics. Single-cell analysis of immune cells from surgically resected human epileptic brain tissues showed heterogeneity and pro-inflammatory signaling in microglia and evidence for direct interaction of microglia with T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavanish Kumar
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore. .,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Amanda Lim
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sharifah Nur Hazirah
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Camillus Jian Hui Chua
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Adeline Ngoh
- Duke-NUS Medical School and Paediatric Neurology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Su Li Poh
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tong Hong Yeo
- Duke-NUS Medical School and Paediatric Neurology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jocelyn Lim
- Duke-NUS Medical School and Paediatric Neurology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Simon Ling
- Duke-NUS Medical School and Paediatric Neurology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nursyuhadah Binte Sutamam
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Enrico Petretto
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders (CVMD) and Centre for Computational Biology (CCB), Singapore, Singapore
| | - David Chyi Yeu Low
- Duke-NUS Medical School and Neurosurgical Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Research Department, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Zeng
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Neuroscience & Behavioral Disorders Program, DUKE-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eng-King Tan
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Neuroscience & Behavioral Disorders Program, DUKE-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Thaschawee Arkachaisri
- Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School and Rheumatology and Immunology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joo Guan Yeo
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School and Rheumatology and Immunology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Florent Ginhoux
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Singapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Derrick Chan
- Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School and Paediatric Neurology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Salvatore Albani
- Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School and Rheumatology and Immunology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Krajnc N, Bsteh G, Berger T, Mares J, Hartung HP. Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:753-773. [PMID: 35378683 PMCID: PMC8978776 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01224-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Krajnc
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Bsteh
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Berger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan Mares
- Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
- Brain and Mind Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nakamura K, Mokliatchouk O, Arnold DL, Yousry TA, Kappos L, Richert N, Ayling-Rouse K, Miller C, Fisher E. Effects of Dimethyl Fumarate on Brain Atrophy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Pooled Analysis Phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM Studies. Front Neurol 2022; 13:809273. [PMID: 35370887 PMCID: PMC8973916 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.809273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective In the pivotal DEFINE and CONFIRM trials for dimethyl fumarate (DMF), patterns of brain volume changes were different, potentially due to low sample sizes and because MRIs were analyzed at two different reading centers. We evaluated effects of DMF on brain volume change in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) through reanalysis of pooled images from DEFINE/CONFIRM trials in one reading center. Methods MRIs from DEFINE/CONFIRM at weeks 0, 24, 48, and 96 from patients randomized to twice-daily DMF or placebo (PBO) were reanalyzed at the Cleveland Clinic to measure brain parenchymal fraction (BPF). To account for pseudoatrophy, brain volume estimates were re-baselined to calculate changes for weeks 48–96. Results Across studies, 301 and 314 patients receiving DMF and PBO, respectively, had analyzable MRIs. In weeks 0–48, mean ± SE percentage change in BPF was −0.44 ± 0.04 vs. −0.34 ± 0.04% in DMF vs. PBO, respectively, whereas in weeks 48–96, mean ± SE percentage change in BPF was −0.27 ± 0.03 vs. −0.41 ± 0.04% in DMF vs. PBO, respectively. The mixed-effect model for repeated measures showed similar results: in weeks 48–96, estimated change (95% confidence interval) in BPF was −0.0021 (−0.0027, −0.0016) for DMF vs. −0.0033 (−0.0039, −0.0028) for PBO (35.9% reduction; p = 0.0025). Conclusions The lower rate of whole brain volume loss with DMF in this pooled BPF analysis in the second year vs. PBO is consistent with its effects on relapses, disability, and MRI lesions. Brain volume changes in the first year may be explained by pseudoatrophy effects also described in other MS clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunio Nakamura
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | - Douglas L. Arnold
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tarek A. Yousry
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Elizabeth Fisher
- Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States
- *Correspondence: Elizabeth Fisher
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rollot F, Couturier J, Casey R, Wiertlewski S, Debouverie M, Pelletier J, De Sèze J, Labauge P, Ruet A, Thouvenot E, Ciron J, Berger E, Gout O, Clavelou P, Stankoff B, Casez O, Bourre B, Zephir H, Moreau T, Lebrun-Frenay C, Maillart E, Edan G, Neau JP, Montcuquet A, Cabre P, Camdessanché JP, Defer G, Nasr HB, Maurousset A, Hankiewicz K, Pottier C, Leray E, Vukusic S, Laplaud DA. Comparative Effectiveness of Natalizumab Versus Anti-CD20 in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis After Fingolimod Withdrawal. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:476-490. [PMID: 35217934 PMCID: PMC9226262 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01202-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In France, two therapeutic strategies can be offered after fingolimod (FNG) withdrawal to highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients: natalizumab (NTZ) or anti-CD20. We compared the effectiveness of these two strategies as a switch for FNG within the OFSEP database. The primary endpoint was the time to first relapse. Other outcomes were the relapse rates over 3-month periods, time to worsening the EDSS score, proportion of patients with worsened 24-month MRI, time to treatment discontinuation, and incidence rates of serious adverse events. The dynamics of event rates over time were modeled using multidimensional penalized splines, allowing the possibility to model the effects of covariates in a flexible way, considering non-linearity and interactions. A total of 740 patients were included (337 under anti-CD20 and 403 under NTZ). There was no difference between the two treatments regarding the dynamic of the first occurrence of relapse, with a monthly probability of 5.0% at initiation and 1.0% after 6 months. The rate of EDSS worsening increased in both groups until 6 months and then decreased. No difference in the proportion of patients with new T2 lesions at 24 months was observed. After 18 months of follow-up, a greater risk of NTZ discontinuation was found compared to anti-CD20. This study showed no difference between NTZ and anti-CD20 after the FNG switch regarding the clinical and radiological activity. The effect of these treatments was optimal after 6 months and there was more frequent discontinuation of NTZ after 18 months, probably mainly related to JC virus seroconversions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Rollot
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, Bron, France.
- Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Observatoire Français de La Sclérose en Plaques, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Lyon, France.
- EUGENE DEVIC EDMUS Foundation Against Multiple Sclerosis, State-Approved Foundation, Bron, France.
| | | | - Romain Casey
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, Bron, France
- Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Observatoire Français de La Sclérose en Plaques, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Lyon, France
- EUGENE DEVIC EDMUS Foundation Against Multiple Sclerosis, State-Approved Foundation, Bron, France
| | - Sandrine Wiertlewski
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
- INSERM, CIC 0004, CRTI-INSERM UMR U1064, Nantes, France
| | - Marc Debouverie
- Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Et Universitaire de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, 4360 APEMAC, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, EA, France
| | - Jean Pelletier
- Aix Marseille University, APHM, Hôpital de La Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, CEMEREM, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Jérôme De Sèze
- Service de Neurologie Et Centre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU de Strasbourg, INSERM 1434, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pierre Labauge
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Aurélie Ruet
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, Neurocentre Magendie, U1215, Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric Thouvenot
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France
- Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Jonathan Ciron
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Toulouse, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CRC-SEP, Toulouse, France
- Institut Toulousain Des Maladies Infectieuses Et Inflammatoires (Infinity), INSERM UMR 1291, CNRS UMR 5051, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - Eric Berger
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Olivier Gout
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Fondation A de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Clavelou
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Olivier Casez
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Hélène Zephir
- Pôle Des Neurosciences Et de L'appareil Locomoteur, CRC-SEP, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Université de Lille, Inserm U1172, Lille, France
| | | | - Christine Lebrun-Frenay
- Service de Neurologie, Neurologie Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice, Université Nice Cote d'Azur UR2CA-URRIS, Nice, France
| | - Elisabeth Maillart
- Département de Neurologie, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Edan
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Philippe Cabre
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Fort de France, Fort de France, France
| | | | - Gilles Defer
- Service de Neurologie, Centre Expert SEP, CHU de Caen, Université Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Haifa Ben Nasr
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Sud Francilien, Corbeil Essonnes, France
| | | | | | | | - Emmanuelle Leray
- Université de Rennes/EHESP, REPERES - EA, 7449, Rennes, France
- CHU Rennes, CIC-P 1414, Rennes, France
| | - Sandra Vukusic
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, Bron, France
- Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Observatoire Français de La Sclérose en Plaques, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Lyon, France
- EUGENE DEVIC EDMUS Foundation Against Multiple Sclerosis, State-Approved Foundation, Bron, France
| | - David-Axel Laplaud
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
- INSERM, CIC 0004, CRTI-INSERM UMR U1064, Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tur C, Dubessy AL, Otero-Romero S, Amato MP, Derfuss T, Di Pauli F, Iacobaeus E, Mycko M, Abboud H, Achiron A, Bellinvia A, Boyko A, Casanova JL, Clifford D, Dobson R, Farez MF, Filippi M, Fitzgerald KC, Fonderico M, Gouider R, Hacohen Y, Hellwig K, Hemmer B, Kappos L, Ladeira F, Lebrun-Frénay C, Louapre C, Magyari M, Mehling M, Oreja-Guevara C, Pandit L, Papeix C, Piehl F, Portaccio E, Ruiz-Camps I, Selmaj K, Simpson-Yap S, Siva A, Sorensen PS, Sormani MP, Trojano M, Vaknin-Dembinsky A, Vukusic S, Weinshenker B, Wiendl H, Winkelmann A, Zuluaga Rodas MI, Tintoré M, Stankoff B. The risk of infections for multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder disease-modifying treatments: Eighth European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis Focused Workshop Review. April 2021. Mult Scler 2022; 28:1424-1456. [PMID: 35196927 DOI: 10.1177/13524585211069068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Over the recent years, the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has evolved very rapidly and a large number of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are now available. However, most DMTs are associated with adverse events, the most frequent of which being infections. Consideration of all DMT-associated risks facilitates development of risk mitigation strategies. An international focused workshop with expert-led discussions was sponsored by the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and was held in April 2021 to review our current knowledge about the risk of infections associated with the use of DMTs for people with MS and NMOSD and corresponding risk mitigation strategies. The workshop addressed DMT-associated infections in specific populations, such as children and pregnant women with MS, or people with MS who have other comorbidities or live in regions with an exceptionally high infection burden. Finally, we reviewed the topic of DMT-associated infectious risks in the context of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Herein, we summarize available evidence and identify gaps in knowledge which justify further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Tur
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anne-Laure Dubessy
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR7225, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Paris, France/ Department of Neurology, Saint Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Susana Otero-Romero
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Pia Amato
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy/IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy
| | - Tobias Derfuss
- Neurology Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedicine and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Di Pauli
- Clinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ellen Iacobaeus
- Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marcin Mycko
- Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Hesham Abboud
- Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology Program, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anat Achiron
- Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Angelo Bellinvia
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alexey Boyko
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia/Institute of Clinical Neurology and Department of Neuroimmunology, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jean-Laurent Casanova
- St. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Rockefeller Branch, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Clifford
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ruth Dobson
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK/Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mauricio F Farez
- Center for Research on Neuroimmunological Diseases, FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology Unit, Neurorehabilitation Unit and Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy/Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Kathryn C Fitzgerald
- Department of Neurology and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mattia Fonderico
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riadh Gouider
- Department of Neurology, Razi Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Yael Hacohen
- Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine, and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Filipa Ladeira
- Neurology Department, Hospital Santo António dos Capuchos, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Christine Lebrun-Frénay
- CRCSEP Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice Pasteur 2, UR2CA-URRIS, Université Nice Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Céline Louapre
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR7225, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Paris, France/Sorbonne University, Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Inserm, CNRS, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, CIC Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - Melinda Magyari
- Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Matthias Mehling
- Neurology Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedicine and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Celia Oreja-Guevara
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Idissc, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lekha Pandit
- Center for Advanced Neurological Research, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, India
| | - Caroline Papeix
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR7225, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Paris, France/Sorbonne University, Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Inserm, CNRS, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, CIC Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - Fredrik Piehl
- Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emilio Portaccio
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isabel Ruiz-Camps
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Krzysztof Selmaj
- Collegium Medicum, Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland/Center of Neurology, Lodz, Poland
| | - Steve Simpson-Yap
- Clinical Outcomes Research Unit, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Aksel Siva
- Department of Neurology, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Per Soelberg Sorensen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Pia Sormani
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro," Bari, Italy
| | - Adi Vaknin-Dembinsky
- Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, The Agnes-Ginges Center for Neurogenetics Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sandra Vukusic
- Service de neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France/Centre des Neurosciences de Lyon, Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | | | - Heinz Wiendl
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | - Mar Tintoré
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bruno Stankoff
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR7225, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Paris, France/ Department of Neurology, Saint Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Davidescu EI, Odajiu I, Sandu CD, Ghergu A, Luca D, Mureșanu DF, Popescu BO. Real-World Data Regarding Long-Term Administration of Natalizumab Derived from a Neurology Department along with Literature Review. CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS DRUG TARGETS 2022; 21:326-334. [PMID: 34455973 DOI: 10.2174/1871527320666210827113733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Natalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody with high efficacy and an acceptable safety profile used in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE Our aim was to report data regarding long-term administration of Natalizumab in patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) from our clinic. METHODS A retrospective observational study was performed including RRMS patients who underwent treatment with ≥ 24 Natalizumab infusions. We analyzed EDSS values, the relapse rate and the rate and type of adverse events related to Natalizumab administration. RESULTS 51 subjects were included with a predominance of women (62.74%), with an average age of 40.43±1.49 years, a mean disease duration of 9.86±0.7 years and mean number of Natalizumab infusions of 45.58±2.74. An increased number of patients (80.39%) were relapse-free and a mild reduction of the mean EDSS value following Natalizumab initiation in patients who had not been treated with other disease modifying therapies anteriorly was observed. Among the encountered adverse events such as increased liver transaminases (13.72%), local infections (7.84%) and dysmenorrhea in one patient were registered in this study. The rate of severe adverse events was 3.92 and no cases of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) were registered. CONCLUSION Natalizumab proves to be effective, has an adequate safety profile and can be administered with good tolerability for a rather extended period of time, provided that the patients are closely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Irene Davidescu
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Odajiu
- Neurology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Amalia Ghergu
- Neurology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dimela Luca
- Neurology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dafin Fior Mureșanu
- Department of Neurosciences, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Age-related changes in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Semin Immunol 2022; 59:101631. [PMID: 35752572 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2022.101631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
A better understanding of the pathological mechanisms that drive neurodegeneration in people living with multiple sclerosis (MS) is needed to design effective therapies to treat and/or prevent disease progression. We propose that CNS-intrinsic inflammation and re-modelling of the sub-arachnoid space of the leptomeninges sets the stage for neurodegeneration from the earliest stages of MS. While neurodegenerative processes are clinically silent early in disease, ageing results in neurodegenerative changes that become clinically manifest as progressive disability. Here we review pathological correlates of MS disease progression, highlight emerging mouse models that mimic key progressive changes in MS, and provide new perspectives on therapeutic approaches to protect against MS-associated neurodegeneration.
Collapse
|
33
|
Calabresi PA, Kappos L, Giovannoni G, Plavina T, Koulinska I, Edwards MR, Kieseier B, de Moor C, Sotirchos ES, Fisher E, Rudick RA, Sandrock A. Measuring treatment response to advance precision medicine for multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2021; 8:2166-2173. [PMID: 34704393 PMCID: PMC8607451 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the independent contributions of clinical measures (relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] scores, and neuroperformance measures) and nonclinical measures (new brain magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] activity and serum neurofilament light chain [sNfL] levels) for distinguishing natalizumab‐treated from placebo‐treated patients. Methods We conducted post hoc analyses using data from the AFFIRM trial of natalizumab for multiple sclerosis. We used multivariable regression analyses with predictors (EDSS progression, no relapse, new or enlarging MRI activity, brain atrophy, sNfL levels, and neuroperformance worsening) to identify measures that independently discriminated between treatment groups. Results The multivariable model that best distinguished natalizumab from placebo was no new or enlarging T2 or gadolinium‐enhancing activity on MRI (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval: 7.2; 4.7–10.9), year 2 sNfL levels <97.5th percentile (4.1; 2.6–6.2), and no relapses in years 0–2 (2.1; 1.5–3.0). The next best‐fitting model was a two‐component model that included no MRI activity and sNfL levels <97.5th percentile at year 2. There was little difference between the three‐ and two‐component models. Interpretation Nonclinical measures (new MRI activity and sNfL levels) discriminate between treatment and placebo groups similarly to or better than clinical outcomes composites and have implications for patient monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Calabresi
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gavin Giovannoni
- Blizzard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Bernd Kieseier
- Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine Universitat, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Elias S Sotirchos
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Grahl S, Bussas M, Wiestler B, Eichinger P, Gaser C, Kirschke J, Zimmer C, Berthele A, Hemmer B, Mühlau M. Differential Effects of Fingolimod and Natalizumab on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics 2021; 18:2589-2597. [PMID: 34561843 PMCID: PMC8804113 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01118-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Fingolimod and natalizumab are approved disease-modifying drugs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The two drugs have different modes of action and may therefore influence different aspects of MS-related tissue damage. In this retrospective cohort study, we longitudinally compared patients treated with fingolimod and patients treated with natalizumab by measures based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We included patients with RRMS given that two standardized MRI scans under the same drug were available with an interval of at least 6 months both from therapy start to baseline scan and from baseline scan to follow-up scan. After matching for age, baseline and follow-up scans from 93 patients (fingolimod, 48; natalizumab, 45) were investigated. Mean follow-up time was 1.9 years. We determined the number of new white matter lesions as well as thalamic, cortical, and whole-brain atrophy. After scaling for time of the interscan interval, measures were analyzed by group comparisons and, to account for demographic and clinical characteristics, by multiple regression models and a binary logistic regression model. Compared to natalizumab, fingolimod treatment went along with more new white matter lesions (median [interquartile range, IQR] 0.0 [0.0; 0.7] vs. 0.0 [0.0; 0.0] /year; p < 0.01) whereas whole-brain atrophy was lower (median [IQR] 0.2 [0.0; 0.5] vs. 0.5 [0.2; 1.0] %/year; p = 0.01). These significant differences were confirmed by multiple regression models and the binary logistic regression model. In conclusion, our observation is compatible with stronger neuroprotective properties of fingolimod compared to natalizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Grahl
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- TUM Neuroimaging, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - M Bussas
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- TUM Neuroimaging, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - B Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - P Eichinger
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - C Gaser
- Department of Psychiatry and Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - J Kirschke
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - C Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - A Berthele
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - B Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Feodor-Lynen-Str. 17, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - M Mühlau
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
- TUM Neuroimaging, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alvarez E, Nair KV, Hoyt BD, Seale RA, Sillau S, Miravalle A, Engebretson E, Schurr B, Corboy JR, Vollmer TL, Honce JM. Brain atrophy rates in patients with multiple sclerosis on long term natalizumab resembles healthy controls. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 55:103170. [PMID: 34364034 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinically stable multiple sclerosis (MS) patients often have negligible inflammatory MRI changes. Brain atrophy may provide insight into subclinical disease progression. The objective was to compare brain atrophy rates in stable patients on long term natalizumab treatment vs. age and gender matched healthy non-MS controls (HC) prospectively over two-years examining brain volume, cognition, and patient reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS MS patients treated with natalizumab for a minimum of 2 years, age 18-60 were recruited and compared with age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC). Both groups were followed prospectively to obtain two years of consecutive magnetic resonance imaging, clinical and PRO data. Baseline normalized brain volume (NBV), yearly T2 lesion volume (T2LV), and percent brain volume change (PBVC) were measured using SIENAX, JIM 6.0, and SIENA respectively. Neuropsychological tests from the MACFIMS battery were selected to optimize assessments for impairments in the domains of information processing speed and memory. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) for domains of physical, mental and social quality of life were evaluated using the NeuroQol short forms. RESULTS Forty-eight natalizumab and 62 HC completed all study visits. At baseline, unadjusted mean NBV (natalizumab=1508.80cm (Popescu et al., 2013) vs. HC=1539.23cm (Popescu et al., 2013); p=0.033) and median baseline T2LV (natalizumab=1724.62mm (Popescu et al., 2013) vs. HC=44.20mm (Popescu et al., 2013); p=<0.0001) were different. The mean PBVC at year 2, adjusted for gender and baseline age was -0.57% (CI: 0.7620, -0.3716) for natalizumab and -0.50% (-0.7208, -0.2831) for HC, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (0.073%; p=0.62). Over the 2-year period, HC demonstrated mild improvements in some cognitive tests vs. natalizumab subjects. However, PROs were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION Stable MS patients on natalizumab have similar brain volume loss as people who do not have MS, suggesting normalization of brain atrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Alvarez
- Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Kavita V Nair
- Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045 USA; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado, 12850 East Montview Boulevard, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Brian D Hoyt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Rebecca A Seale
- Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Stefan Sillau
- Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Augusto Miravalle
- Advanced Neurology, 2121 E Harmony Rd Ste #180, Fort Collins, CO 80528 USA
| | - Eric Engebretson
- Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Brittany Schurr
- Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - John R Corboy
- Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Timothy L Vollmer
- Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado, 1635 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Justin M Honce
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Hospital, 12401 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Alonso-Moreno M, Ladrón-Guevara M, Ciudad-Gutiérrez P. Systematic review of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurologia 2021; 38:S0213-4853(21)00008-6. [PMID: 33775476 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This article analyses the presence of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a systematic review of controlled clinical trials of 4 monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis (natalizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab). We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published in English before March 2020. The study was conducted in accordance with the relevant international recommendations. RESULTS The search identified 89 articles, 55 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of all patients included in these trials, 64.6% were women. The lead authors of 10 of the studies were women. Fifteen of the 55 studies included a sex-based analysis of the primary endpoint. Only 8 articles discussed the results separately for men and for women. CONCLUSIONS The clinical trials of these 4 monoclonal antibodies present a significant gender bias. In most cases, the primary and secondary endpoints are not analyzed according to patient sex, despite the fact that international recommendations include this as a minimum requirement for ensuring scientific validity and obtaining appropriate results for extrapolation to the wider population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Alonso-Moreno
- Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avenue Manuel Siurot, 41013 Seville, Spain.
| | - M Ladrón-Guevara
- Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avenue Manuel Siurot, 41013 Seville, Spain
| | - P Ciudad-Gutiérrez
- Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avenue Manuel Siurot, 41013 Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hersh CM, Harris H, Conway D, Hua LH. Effect of switching from natalizumab to moderate- vs high-efficacy DMT in clinical practice. Neurol Clin Pract 2021; 10:e53-e65. [PMID: 33510948 PMCID: PMC7837445 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the real-world comparative effectiveness of switching from natalizumab (NTZ) to a moderate-efficacy (Mod) disease-modifying therapy (DMT) vs high-efficacy therapy (HET) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods Patients discontinuing NTZ at two MS centers (n = 556) who switched to Mod DMT (n = 270) vs HET (n = 130) were assessed using propensity score (PS) weighting. PS model covariates included demographics and baseline clinical and MRI characteristics. All outcomes were reported as Mod DMT vs HET. Results Of the patients included in the study, 48.6% switched to Mod DMT (dimethyl fumarate, n = 130; fingolimod, n = 140) vs 23.4% who switched to HET (ocrelizumab, n = 106; rituximab, n = 17; alemtuzumab, n = 7). Within the first 6 months post-NTZ, switchers to Mod DMT experienced comparable relapses (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.72-1.66], p = 0.724), although they had increased MRI activity on treatment (OR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.09-3.57], p = 0.037). By 24 months post-NTZ, there was no difference in the annualized relapse rate (OR = 1.44, 95% CI [0.69-1.59], p = 0.334) or time to first clinical relapse (HR = 2.12, 95% CI [0.87-5.17], p = 0.090), although switchers to Mod DMT had higher gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions (OR = 3.62, 95% CI [1.56-5.21], p = 0.005), earlier time to first GdE lesion (HR = 6.67, 95% CI [2.06-9.16], p = 0.002), lower proportion with the absence of disease activity (OR = 0.41, 95% CI [0.21-0.71], p = 0.004), and higher risk of disability progression on T25FW (OR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.06-3.02], p = 0.043) and 9-HPT (OR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.05-3.56], p = 0.044). Conclusion Patients switching from NTZ to Mod DMT vs HET were at relatively increased risk of disease activity within the first 6 months of NTZ withdrawal that was sustained at 24 months, yielding greater disability progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie M Hersh
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (CMH, HH, LHH), Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV; and Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (DC), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Haleigh Harris
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (CMH, HH, LHH), Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV; and Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (DC), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Devon Conway
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (CMH, HH, LHH), Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV; and Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (DC), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Le H Hua
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (CMH, HH, LHH), Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV; and Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (DC), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gklinos P, Papadopoulou M, Stanulovic V, Mitsikostas DD, Papadopoulos D. Monoclonal Antibodies as Neurological Therapeutics. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14020092. [PMID: 33530460 PMCID: PMC7912592 DOI: 10.3390/ph14020092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last 30 years the role of monoclonal antibodies in therapeutics has increased enormously, revolutionizing treatment in most medical specialties, including neurology. Monoclonal antibodies are key therapeutic agents for several neurological conditions with diverse pathophysiological mechanisms, including multiple sclerosis, migraines and neuromuscular disease. In addition, a great number of monoclonal antibodies against several targets are being investigated for many more neurological diseases, which reflects our advances in understanding the pathogenesis of these diseases. Untangling the molecular mechanisms of disease allows monoclonal antibodies to block disease pathways accurately and efficiently with exceptional target specificity, minimizing non-specific effects. On the other hand, accumulating experience shows that monoclonal antibodies may carry class-specific and target-associated risks. This article provides an overview of different types of monoclonal antibodies and their characteristics and reviews monoclonal antibodies currently in use or under development for neurological disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Gklinos
- Department of Neurology, KAT General Hospital of Attica, 14561 Athens, Greece;
| | - Miranta Papadopoulou
- Center for Clinical, Experimental Surgery & Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens (BRFAA), 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Vid Stanulovic
- Global Pharmacovigilance, R&D Sanofi, 91385 Chilly-Mazarin, France;
| | - Dimos D. Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11521 Athens, Greece;
| | - Dimitrios Papadopoulos
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, 129 Vasilissis Sophias Avenue, 11521 Athens, Greece
- Salpetriere Neuropsychiatric Clinic, 149 Papandreou Street, Metamorphosi, 14452 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Naismith RT, Bermel RA, Coffey CS, Goodman AD, Fedler J, Kearney M, Klawiter EC, Nakamura K, Narayanan S, Goebel C, Yankey J, Klingner E, Fox RJ. Effects of Ibudilast on MRI Measures in the Phase 2 SPRINT-MS Study. Neurology 2021; 96:e491-e500. [PMID: 33268562 PMCID: PMC7905793 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether ibudilast has an effect on brain volume and new lesions in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS A randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study evaluated ibudilast at a dose of up to 100 mg over 96 weeks in primary and secondary progressive MS. In this secondary analysis of a previously reported trial, secondary and tertiary endpoints included gray matter atrophy, new or enlarging T2 lesions as measured every 24 weeks, and new T1 hypointensities at 96 weeks. Whole brain atrophy measured by structural image evaluation, using normalization, of atrophy (SIENA) was a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS A total of 129 participants were assigned to ibudilast and 126 to placebo. New or enlarging T2 lesions were observed in 37.2% on ibudilast and 29.0% on placebo (p = 0.82). New T1 hypointense lesions at 96 weeks were observed in 33.3% on ibudilast and 23.5% on placebo (p = 0.11). Gray matter atrophy was reduced by 35% for those on ibudilast vs placebo (p = 0.038). Progression of whole brain atrophy by SIENA was slowed by 20% in the ibudilast group compared with placebo (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION Ibudilast treatment was associated with a reduction in gray matter atrophy. Ibudilast treatment was not associated with a reduction in new or enlarging T2 lesions or new T1 lesions. An effect on brain volume contributes to prior data that ibudilast appears to affect markers associated with neurodegenerative processes, but not inflammatory processes. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that for people with MS, ibudilast does not significantly reduce new or enlarging T2 lesions or new T1 lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert T Naismith
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada.
| | - Robert A Bermel
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Christopher S Coffey
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Andrew D Goodman
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Janel Fedler
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Marianne Kearney
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Eric C Klawiter
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Kunio Nakamura
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Sridar Narayanan
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Christopher Goebel
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Jon Yankey
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Klingner
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| | - Robert J Fox
- From Washington University (R.T.N.), St. Louis, MO; Cleveland Clinic Foundation (R.A.B., K.N., C.G., R.J.F.), OH; University of Iowa (C.S.C., J.F., J.Y., E.K.), Iowa City; University of Rochester (A.D.G.), NY; Massachusetts General Hospital (M.K., E.C.K.), Harvard Medical School, Boston; McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.N.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University; and NeuroRx Research (S.N.), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kitzbichler MG, Aruldass AR, Barker GJ, Wood TC, Dowell NG, Hurley SA, McLean J, Correia M, Clarke C, Pointon L, Cavanagh J, Cowen P, Pariante C, Cercignani M, Bullmore ET, Harrison NA. Peripheral inflammation is associated with micro-structural and functional connectivity changes in depression-related brain networks. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:7346-7354. [PMID: 34535766 PMCID: PMC8872995 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01272-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Inflammation is associated with depressive symptoms and innate immune mechanisms are likely causal in some cases of major depression. Systemic inflammation also perturbs brain function and microstructure, though how these are related remains unclear. We recruited N = 46 healthy controls, and N = 83 depressed cases stratified by CRP (> 3 mg/L: N = 33; < 3 mg/L: N = 50). All completed clinical assessment, venous blood sampling for C-reactive protein (CRP) assay, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Micro-structural MRI parameters including proton density (PD), a measure of tissue water content, were measured at 360 cortical and 16 subcortical regions. Resting-state fMRI time series were correlated to estimate functional connectivity between individual regions, as well as the sum of connectivity (weighted degree) of each region. Multiple tests for regional analysis were controlled by the false discovery rate (FDR = 5%). We found that CRP was significantly associated with PD in precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex (pC/pCC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC); and with functional connectivity between pC/pCC, mPFC and hippocampus. Depression was associated with reduced weighted degree of pC/pCC, mPFC, and other nodes of the default mode network (DMN). Thus CRP-related increases in proton density-a plausible marker of extracellular oedema-and changes in functional connectivity were anatomically co-localised with DMN nodes that also demonstrated significantly reduced hubness in depression. We suggest that effects of peripheral inflammation on DMN node micro-structure and connectivity may mediate inflammatory effects on depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manfred G. Kitzbichler
- grid.5335.00000000121885934University of Cambridge, Brain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Downing Site, Cambridge, UK
| | - Athina R. Aruldass
- grid.5335.00000000121885934University of Cambridge, Brain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Downing Site, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gareth J. Barker
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Tobias C. Wood
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas G. Dowell
- grid.414601.60000 0000 8853 076XUniversity of Sussex, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton, UK
| | - Samuel A. Hurley
- grid.416938.10000 0004 0641 5119University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK ,grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675University of Wisconsin, Department of Radiology, Madison, WI USA
| | - John McLean
- grid.8756.c0000 0001 2193 314XCollege of MVLS, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Marta Correia
- grid.415036.50000 0001 2177 2032MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charlotte Clarke
- grid.414601.60000 0000 8853 076XUniversity of Sussex, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton, UK
| | - Linda Pointon
- grid.5335.00000000121885934University of Cambridge, Brain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Downing Site, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Cavanagh
- grid.511123.50000 0004 5988 7216Centre for Immunobiology, University of Glasgow and Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Phil Cowen
- grid.416938.10000 0004 0641 5119University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Carmine Pariante
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Mara Cercignani
- grid.414601.60000 0000 8853 076XUniversity of Sussex, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Edward T. Bullmore
- grid.5335.00000000121885934University of Cambridge, Brain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Downing Site, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neil A. Harrison
- grid.414601.60000 0000 8853 076XUniversity of Sussex, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton, UK ,grid.5600.30000 0001 0807 5670Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Millward JM, Ramos Delgado P, Smorodchenko A, Boehmert L, Periquito J, Reimann HM, Prinz C, Els A, Scheel M, Bellmann-Strobl J, Waiczies H, Wuerfel J, Infante-Duarte C, Chien C, Kuchling J, Pohlmann A, Zipp F, Paul F, Niendorf T, Waiczies S. Transient enlargement of brain ventricles during relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. JCI Insight 2020; 5:140040. [PMID: 33148886 PMCID: PMC7710287 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.140040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The brain ventricles are part of the fluid compartments bridging the CNS with the periphery. Using MRI, we previously observed a pronounced increase in ventricle volume (VV) in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we examined VV changes in EAE and MS patients in longitudinal studies with frequent serial MRI scans. EAE mice underwent serial MRI for up to 2 months, with gadolinium contrast as a proxy of inflammation, confirmed by histopathology. We performed a time-series analysis of clinical and MRI data from a prior clinical trial in which RRMS patients underwent monthly MRI scans over 1 year. VV increased dramatically during preonset EAE, resolving upon clinical remission. VV changes coincided with blood-brain barrier disruption and inflammation. VV was normal at the termination of the experiment, when mice were still symptomatic. The majority of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients showed dynamic VV fluctuations. Patients with contracting VV had lower disease severity and a shorter duration. These changes demonstrate that VV does not necessarily expand irreversibly in MS but, over short time scales, can expand and contract. Frequent monitoring of VV in patients will be essential to disentangle the disease-related processes driving short-term VV oscillations from persistent expansion resulting from atrophy. Brain ventricle volumes expand and contract during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, suggesting that short-term inflammatory processes are interlaced with gradual brain atrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Millward
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula Ramos Delgado
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Smorodchenko
- Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura Boehmert
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joao Periquito
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henning M Reimann
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Prinz
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antje Els
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Scheel
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Judith Bellmann-Strobl
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jens Wuerfel
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Infante-Duarte
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Chien
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joseph Kuchling
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Pohlmann
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frauke Zipp
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonia Waiczies
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Moise N, Friedman A. A mathematical model of the multiple sclerosis plaque. J Theor Biol 2020; 512:110532. [PMID: 33152395 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease that affects white matter in the central nervous system. It is one of the primary causes of neurological disability among young people. Its characteristic pathological lesion is called a plaque, a zone of inflammatory activity and tissue destruction that expands radially outward by destroying the myelin and oligodendrocytes of white matter. The present paper develops a mathematical model of the multiple sclerosis plaques. Although these plaques do not provide reliable information of the clinical disability in MS, they are nevertheless useful as a primary outcome measure of Phase II trials. The model consists of a system of partial differential equations in a simplified geometry of the lesion, consisting of three domains: perivascular space, demyelinated plaque, and white matter. The model describes the activity of various pro- and anti-inflammatory cells and cytokines in the plaque, and quantifies their effect on plaque growth. We show that volume growth of plaques are in qualitative agreement with reported clinical studies of several currently used drugs. We then use the model to explore treatments with combinations of such drugs, and with experimental drugs. We finally consider the benefits of early vs. delayed treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolae Moise
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Avner Friedman
- Mathematical Biosciences Institute & Department of Mathematics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Long-term effectiveness of natalizumab on MRI outcomes and no evidence of disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated in a Czech Republic real-world setting: A longitudinal, retrospective study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 46:102543. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
44
|
Butzkueven H, Licata S, Jeffery D, Arnold DL, Filippi M, Geurts JJ, Santra S, Campbell N, Ho PR. Natalizumab versus fingolimod for patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from REVEAL, a prospective, randomised head-to-head study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038861. [PMID: 33082194 PMCID: PMC7577060 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To directly compare the efficacy of natalizumab and fingolimod in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS This phase 4, randomised, rater- and sponsor-blinded, prospective, parallel-group, clinic-based head-to-head study was conducted at 43 sites in nine countries. Patients were randomised (1:1) to intravenous natalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks or oral fingolimod 0.5 mg once daily for ≤52 weeks. Enrolment-related early study termination precluded assessment of the primary endpoint (evolution of new on-treatment gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions to persistent black holes). Unplanned exploratory analyses of secondary endpoints evaluated the effects of treatment on the development of new T1 Gd+ lesions and new/newly enlarging T2 lesions, lesion volumes and relapse outcomes. RESULTS The intent-to-treat population comprised 108 patients (natalizumab, n=54; fingolimod, n=54); 63 completed ≥24 weeks of treatment. Due to the limited numbers of events and patients at risk, MRI and relapse outcomes were reported over up to 24 and 36 weeks, respectively. The mean number of new T1 Gd+ lesions was numerically lower with natalizumab than with fingolimod by 4 weeks; accumulation rates were 0.02 and 0.09 per week, respectively, over 24 weeks (p=0.004). The cumulative probability of developing ≥1 lesion at 24 weeks was 40.7% with natalizumab versus 58.0% with fingolimod (HR=0.60; 95% CI 0.31-1.16; p=0.126); the corresponding probabilities for ≥2 lesions were 11.5% vs 48.5% (HR=0.25; 95% CI 0.09-0.68; p=0.007). No significant between-group differences were observed for the other MRI outcomes at 24 weeks. The cumulative probability of relapse over follow-up was 1.9% with natalizumab versus 22.3% with fingolimod (HR=0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.64; p=0.017). Adverse events were consistent with known safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that natalizumab is more efficacious than fingolimod in reducing multiple sclerosis relapses and T1 Gd+ lesion accumulation in patients with active disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT02342704; EUCTR2013-004622-29-IT; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Alfred Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Douglas L Arnold
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- NeuroRx Research, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeroen Jg Geurts
- Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Section of Clinical Neuroscience, VUmc MS Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sourav Santra
- Biogen (at the time of these analyses), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Pei-Ran Ho
- Biogen (at the time of these analyses), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Deslandes M, Alves P, Alvarenga M, Lessa V, Camargo S, Alvarenga R, Vasconcelos CC. Effectiveness and Adverse Events of Use of Natalizumab in a Brazilian Cohort of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Clin Ther 2020; 42:1292-1301. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Revised: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
46
|
Approved and Emerging Disease Modifying Therapies on Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21124312. [PMID: 32560364 PMCID: PMC7348940 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, chronic, progressive disease leading to a combination of inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration throughout the central nervous system (CNS). The outcome of these processes can be visualized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans as brain atrophy, or brain volume loss (BVL), as well as lesions, “black holes” and spinal cord atrophy. MRI outcomes such as BVL have been used as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and other measures of MS disease progression in clinical research settings. Several FDA-approved medications seek to alleviate disease progression by reducing the impact of such factors as demyelination and neurodegeneration, but there are still many shortcomings that current clinical research aims to mitigate. This review attempts to provide an overview of the FDA-approved medications available for treating multiple sclerosis and their effect on neurodegeneration, measured by BVL.
Collapse
|
47
|
Preziosa P, Rocca MA, Pagani E, Storelli L, Rodegher M, Moiola L, Filippi M. Two-year regional grey and white matter volume changes with natalizumab and fingolimod. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020; 91:493-502. [PMID: 32111638 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of fingolimod and natalizumab in preventing regional grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) over 2 years. METHODS Patients with RRMS starting fingolimod (n=25) or natalizumab (n=30) underwent clinical examination and 3T MRI scans at baseline (month (M) 0), M6, M12 and M24. Seventeen healthy controls were also scanned at M0 and M24. Tensor-based morphometry and SPM12 were used to assess the longitudinal regional GM/WM volume changes. RESULTS At M0, no clinical or GM/WM volume differences were found between treatment groups. At M24, both drugs reduced relapse rate (p<0.001 for both) and stabilised disability. At M6 vs M0, both groups experienced significant atrophy of several areas in the cortex, deep GM nuclei and supratentorial WM. Significant bilateral cerebellar GM and WM atrophy occurred in fingolimod patients only. At M12 vs M6 and M24 vs M12, further supratentorial GM and WM atrophy occurred in both groups. Bilateral GM/WM cerebellar atrophy continued to progress in fingolimod patients only. Compared with natalizumab, fingolimod-treated patients showed a significant cerebellar GM/WM atrophy, mainly at M6 vs M0, but still occurring up to M24. Compared with fingolimod, natalizumab-treated patients had a small number of areas of GM atrophy in temporo-occipital regions at the different time-points. CONCLUSIONS Natalizumab and fingolimod are associated with heterogeneous temporal and regional patterns of GM and WM atrophy progression. Compared with natalizumab, fingolimod-treated patients experience accelerated GM and WM atrophy in the cerebellum, while both drugs show minimal regional volumetric differences in supratentorial regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Preziosa
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Pagani
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Loredana Storelli
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Lucia Moiola
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy .,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurophysiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sotirchos ES, Gonzalez Caldito N, Filippatou A, Fitzgerald KC, Murphy OC, Lambe J, Nguyen J, Button J, Ogbuokiri E, Crainiceanu CM, Prince JL, Calabresi PA, Saidha S. Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Is Associated with Faster and Specific Retinal Layer Atrophy. Ann Neurol 2020; 87:885-896. [PMID: 32285484 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Therapeutic development in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) has been hampered by a lack of reliable biomarkers to monitor neurodegeneration. Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived retinal measures have been proposed as promising biomarkers to fulfill this role. However, it is unclear whether retinal atrophy persists in PMS, exceeds normal aging, or can be distinguished from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS 178 RRMS, 186 PMS, and 66 control participants were followed with serial OCT for a median follow-up of 3.7 years. RESULTS The estimated proportion of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thinning in multiple sclerosis (MS) attributable to normal aging increased from 42.7% and 16.7% respectively at age 25 years, to 83.7% and 81.1% at age 65 years. However, independent of age, PMS was associated with faster pRNFL (-0.34 ± 0.09%/yr, p < 0.001) and GCIPL (-0.27 ± 0.07%/yr, p < 0.001) thinning, as compared to RRMS. In both MS and controls, higher baseline age was associated with faster inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thinning. INL and ONL thinning were independently faster in PMS, as compared to controls (INL:-0.09 ± 0.04%/yr, p = 0.03; ONL:-0.12 ± 0.06%/yr, p = 0.04), and RRMS (INL:-0.10 ± 0.04%/yr, p = 0.01; ONL:-0.13 ± 0.05%/yr, p = 0.01), whereas they were similar in RRMS and controls. Unlike RRMS, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) did not impact rates of retinal layer atrophy in PMS. INTERPRETATION PMS is associated with faster retinal atrophy independent of age. INL and ONL measures may be novel biomarkers of neurodegeneration in PMS that appear to be unaffected by conventional DMTs. The effects of aging on rates of retinal layer atrophy should be considered in clinical trials incorporating OCT outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:885-896.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias S Sotirchos
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Angeliki Filippatou
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kathryn C Fitzgerald
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Olwen C Murphy
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey Lambe
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James Nguyen
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Julia Button
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Esther Ogbuokiri
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jerry L Prince
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter A Calabresi
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shiv Saidha
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sastre-Garriga J, Pareto D, Battaglini M, Rocca MA, Ciccarelli O, Enzinger C, Wuerfel J, Sormani MP, Barkhof F, Yousry TA, De Stefano N, Tintoré M, Filippi M, Gasperini C, Kappos L, Río J, Frederiksen J, Palace J, Vrenken H, Montalban X, Rovira À. MAGNIMS consensus recommendations on the use of brain and spinal cord atrophy measures in clinical practice. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:171-182. [PMID: 32094485 PMCID: PMC7054210 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0314-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Early evaluation of treatment response and prediction of disease evolution are key issues in the management of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). In the past 20 years, MRI has become the most useful paraclinical tool in both situations and is used clinically to assess the inflammatory component of the disease, particularly the presence and evolution of focal lesions - the pathological hallmark of MS. However, diffuse neurodegenerative processes that are at least partly independent of inflammatory mechanisms can develop early in people with MS and are closely related to disability. The effects of these neurodegenerative processes at a macroscopic level can be quantified by estimation of brain and spinal cord atrophy with MRI. MRI measurements of atrophy in MS have also been proposed as a complementary approach to lesion assessment to facilitate the prediction of clinical outcomes and to assess treatment responses. In this Consensus statement, the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS (MAGNIMS) study group critically review the application of brain and spinal cord atrophy in clinical practice in the management of MS, considering the role of atrophy measures in prognosis and treatment monitoring and the barriers to clinical use of these measures. On the basis of this review, the group makes consensus statements and recommendations for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Section of Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Battaglini
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- NMR Research Unit, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Christian Enzinger
- Department of Neurology and Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jens Wuerfel
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maria P Sormani
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tarek A Yousry
- NMR Research Unit, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, University College London Hospitals National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Gasperini
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jordi Río
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jette Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Jackie Palace
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Division of Neurology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pappalardo F, Russo G, Pennisi M, Parasiliti Palumbo GA, Sgroi G, Motta S, Maimone D. The Potential of Computational Modeling to Predict Disease Course and Treatment Response in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Cells 2020; 9:E586. [PMID: 32121606 PMCID: PMC7140535 DOI: 10.3390/cells9030586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
As of today, 20 disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) have been approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and, based on their efficacy, they can be grouped into moderate-efficacy DMDs and high-efficacy DMDs. The choice of the drug mostly relies on the judgment and experience of neurologists and the evaluation of the therapeutic response can only be obtained by monitoring the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) status during follow up. In an era where therapies are focused on personalization, this study aims to develop a modeling infrastructure to predict the evolution of relapsing MS and the response to treatments. We built a computational modeling infrastructure named Universal Immune System Simulator (UISS), which can simulate the main features and dynamics of the immune system activities. We extended UISS to simulate all the underlying MS pathogenesis and its interaction with the host immune system. This simulator is a multi-scale, multi-organ, agent-based simulator with an attached module capable of simulating the dynamics of specific biological pathways at the molecular level. We simulated six MS patients with different relapsing-remitting courses. These patients were characterized based on their age, sex, presence of oligoclonal bands, therapy, and MRI lesion load at the onset. The simulator framework is made freely available and can be used following the links provided in the availability section. Even though the model can be further personalized employing immunological parameters and genetic information, we generated a few simulation scenarios for each patient based on the available data. Among these simulations, it was possible to find the scenarios that realistically matched the real clinical and MRI history. Moreover, for two patients, the simulator anticipated the timing of subsequent relapses, which occurred, suggesting that UISS may have the potential to assist MS specialists in predicting the course of the disease and the response to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Russo
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy;
| | - Marzio Pennisi
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; (M.P.); (G.A.P.P.); (G.S.)
| | | | - Giuseppe Sgroi
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; (M.P.); (G.A.P.P.); (G.S.)
| | - Santo Motta
- National Research Council of Italy, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Davide Maimone
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Neurology Unit, Garibaldi Hospital, 95124 Catania, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|