Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients

Optimal treatment and current situation in reperfusion after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction is the leading cause of death in the industrialized world and the paramount goal is establishing early, complete, and sustained reperfusion at the myocardial tissue level. For hospitals without the capacity to perform emergent percutaneous coronary intervention, fibrinolytic therapy plays a critical role although it is limited by a 67% success rate. Despite promising pilot studies, reduced-dose fibrinolytic therapy with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa therapy (GUSTO-V) and full-dose fibrinolytic therapy with enoxaparin (ASSENT-3) or bivalirudin (HERO-2) provide only marginally improved clinical outcomes. Adjunctive in-hospital and secondary preventive measures should include an aspirin, a beta-blocker, an ACE inhibitor, and a statin, based on the Heart Protection Study, unless contraindicated. Patients should be risk stratified, participate in a cardiac rehabilitation program, cease smoking tobacco, and have an intracardiac defibrillator (ICD) implanted if their LV systolic function is < or = 30% at one month based on the MADIT-2 trial.

Current medical therapies for patients with peripheral arterial disease: a critical review

There is a paucity of trials that specifically evaluate the benefits of cardiovascular risk reduction therapies in patients with peripheral arterial disease. We therefore sought to describe the data supporting the use of therapies for lowering cardiovascular risk, preventing ischemic events, as well as managing intermittent claudication, in these patients. A search for randomized, placebo-controlled trials in peripheral arterial disease was conducted using Medline and reference lists of relevant articles. These trials served as the primary sources of data and treatment recommendations, while observational studies and case series were included as sources of commonly accepted treatment recommendations that were not fully supported by the randomized trial. Data from the primary sources support the use of antiplatelet therapy and, potentially, of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, for preventing ischemic events. In contrast, the evidence demonstrates a nonsignificant trend for treating dyslipidemia to prevent mortality and does not specifically support intensive glycemic control in persons with diabetes or estrogen use in these patients. However, observational data and data derived from trials in persons with other manifestations of cardiovascular disease may be generalized to support the importance of treating key risk factors, such as smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Data supporting the use of estrogen to reduce cardiovascular risk are less clear. Studies do demonstrate improvement in walking ability resulting from exercise rehabilitation programs, as well as from use of cilostazol and, to a more modest degree, pentoxifylline. The consensus is to treat risk factors of peripheral arterial disease patients similarly to patients with other manifestations of atherosclerosis and to use exercise rehabilitation or cilostazol to treat the subset of patients with claudication.

Blood-pressure reduction and cardiovascular risk in HOPE study

In the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, use of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor ramipril was associated with a 22% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, despite only a modest reduction in blood pressure (23.3 mm Hg systolic). To test the hypothesis that the benefits seen were not due to reduced blood pressure alone, we calculated blood-pressure-related risk estimates from the placebo group of the HOPE trial, and from earlier studies. We found that the benefits seen in HOPE were around three times greater than predicted from these calculations. In this well treated and largely normotensive population with coronary disease, but good left-ventricular function, the benefits from ramipril were additive to other proven therapies in normotensive patients and in those with higher baseline blood pressure.

Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: Part II: variations in cardiovascular disease by specific ethnic groups and geographic regions and prevention strategies

This two-part article provides an overview of the global burden of atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease. Part I initially discusses the epidemiological transition which has resulted in a decrease in deaths in childhood due to infections, with a concomitant increase in cardiovascular and other chronic diseases; and then provides estimates of the burden of cardiovascular (CV) diseases with specific focus on the developing countries. Next, we summarize key information on risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and indicate that their importance may have been underestimated. Then, we describe overarching factors influencing variations in CVD by ethnicity and region and the influence of urbanization. Part II of this article describes the burden of CV disease by specific region or ethnic group, the risk factors of importance, and possible strategies for prevention.

Vascular effects of newer cardiovascular drugs: focus on nebivolol and ACE-inhibitors

Alterations in the function and structure of the blood vessel wall account for most clinical events in the coronary and cerebrovascular circulation such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Cardiovascular drugs may exert beneficial effects on the vascular wall both at the level of the endothelium and vascular smooth muscle cells. Therefore, endothelial mediators, in particular nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin (ET), are of special interest. Drugs can modulate the expression and actions of NO, a vasodilator with antiproliferative and antithrombotic properties, and of ET, a potent vasoconstrictor and proliferative mitogenic agent. The most successful drugs in this context are statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors. While statins increase the expression of NO synthase. ACE-inhibitors increase the release of NO via bradykinin-mediated mechanisms. Antioxidant properties of drugs are also important, as oxidative stress is crucial in atherosclerotic vascular disease. These properties may explain part of the effects of calcium antagonists and ACE-inhibitors. Indeed, angiotensin II stimulates NAD(P)H oxidases responsible for the formation of superoxide, which inactivates NO. ACE-Inhibitors thus increase the bioavailability of NO. Newer cardiovascular drugs such as nebivolol are able to directly stimulate NO release from the endothelium both in isolated arteries and in the human forearm circulation. ET receptor antagonists may exert beneficial effects in the vessel wall by preventing the effects of ET at its receptors and by reducing ET production. In summary, cardiovascular drugs have important effects on the vessel wall, which may be clinically relevant for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Comparative effects of ramipril on ambulatory and office blood pressures: a HOPE Substudy

In the HOPE-trial, the ACE inhibitor ramipril significantly reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. The benefit could only partly be attributed to the modest mean reduction of office blood pressure (OBP) during the study period (3/2 mm Hg). However, because according to the HOPE protocol ramipril was given once daily at bedtime and blood pressure was measured during the day, the 24-hour reduction of blood pressure may be underestimated based on OBP. Thirty-eight patients with peripheral arterial disease enrolled in the HOPE study underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measurement before randomization and after 1 year. OBP was measured in the sitting position immediately before fitting the ABP measuring equipment to the patients. Ramipril did not significantly reduce OBP (8/2 mm Hg, P=NS) or day ABP (6/2 mm Hg, P=NS) after 1 year. Twenty-four-hour ABP was significantly reduced (10/4 mm Hg, P=0.03), mainly because of a more pronounced blood pressure lowering effect during nighttime (17/8 mm Hg, P<0.001). The night/day ratio was also significantly lowered in the ramipril group. ABP shows greater falls, especially at night, than OBP during treatment with ramipril given once daily at bedtime. Although, OBP is the correct comparator when comparing with previous large intervention trials and epidemiological studies, the effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality seen with ramipril in the HOPE study may, to a larger extent than previously ascribed, relate to effects on blood pressure patterns over the 24-hour period.

Interactions between sodium and angiotensin

1. Increased sodium intake causes decreased formation of angiotensin (Ang) II and increased AngII causes increased Na+ retention. 2. Increased sodium intake and increased AngII causes cardiac hypertrophy, but decreased sodium intake regresses cardiac hypertrophy despite high AngII levels. Likewise, decreased Na+ and blockers of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in neonatal rats have similar effects on subsequent blood pressure development. 3. Cardiac hypertrophy due to renal hypertension does not regress when the RAS is blocked and rats are on a high salt intake. Likewise, sodium restriction alone does not cause regression; combination of reduced NaCl intake and RAS blockade is required. 4. High doses of perindopril and losartan in combination cause a syndrome in rats on 0.2% NaCl that leads to profound hypotension, polyuria, renal impairment and involution of the heart and death. This is reversed or prevented by a high (4%) NaCl intake, which also prevents the plasma angiotensinogen depletion that occurs with combined blockade on 0.2% NaCl intake. 5. Intake of NaCl and AngII interact at many levels. It is postulated that there is an important interaction at the cellular level that can explain the above events.

Step care therapy for hypertension in diabetic patients

For diabetic patients, a goal blood pressure lower than 130/80-85 mm Hg is strongly supported by clinical trial results. We review the agents, sequence, and dosing used in clinical trials and propose a treatment algorithm. Multiagent antihypertensive therapy is required to attain goal blood pressure in most patients. Step sequences to obtain this goal are suggested. In general, we favor initial therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, followed by the addition of a diuretic. The presence of comorbid conditions may dictate variation from this scheme. The effect of antihypertensive agents on established cardiovascular diseases, proteinuria, renal function, and metabolic factors is discussed. Tailored recommendations for specific clinical scenarios are described.

Treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients with nephropathy

In type 1 diabetes, hypertension is closely linked to the development of nephropathy. An association of hypertension and the impact of hypertension on the clinical course of type 2 diabetes, including the development of vascular complications, has been well established. However, the association with nephropathy in type 2 diabetes is less clear. Despite that, antihypertensive treatment has a crucial impact on the course of nephropathy in both types of diabetes. In this article, we discuss recent evidence focusing on the nephroprotective potential of various classes of antihypertensive agents and confront it with current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients with nephropathy. Unlike type 1 diabetes, where the nephroprotection could be a good sole measure for assessing the efficiency of a particular agent or their combination, defining of the optimal antihypertensive agent or agents in type 2 diabetes requires consideration of both cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and nephroprotective potentials of such a treatment. In both types of diabetes, recent data support the use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system with or without diuretics as the initial therapy. In type 1 diabetes, additional beneficial effect can be expected from calcium channel blockers (CCBs). In type 2 diabetic patients, combining more agents may be necessary early in the course of nephropathy to affect both micro- and macrovascular targets. beta blockers should be applied early to enhance cardioprotectivity, followed by CCBs to achieve goal blood pressure. Although not supported by all recent data, aggressive blood pressure control (< 130/75 mm Hg) is warranted. Furthermore, multifactorial intervention targeting metabolic derangements and lifestyle, is a necessary complimentary measure that must accompany antihypertensive treatment.

Lisinopril therapy for hemodialysis hypertension: hemodynamic and endocrine responses

To evaluate the antihypertensive effects of lisinopril, a renally excreted angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, we assessed supervised administration of the drug after hemodialysis (HD) three times weekly. Blood pressure (BP) was assessed by interdialytic 44-hour ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring, and endocrine responses were assessed by plasma renin activity (PRA) before and after dialysis. Lisinopril dose was titrated at biweekly intervals. If this was not effective after full titration (lisinopril to 40 mg three times weekly), ultrafiltration was added to reduce dry weight. The primary outcome variable was change in BP from the end of the run-in period to the end of the study. No change in mean ABP was noted during run-in. However, mean 44-hour ABP decreased from 149 +/- 14 (SD)/84 +/- 9 to 127 +/- 16/73 +/- 9 mm Hg, a decrease of 22/11 mm Hg (P < 0.001) at final evaluation. Of 11 patients who completed the trial, only 2 patients had systolic hypertension (>/=135 mm Hg) and 1 patient had diastolic hypertension (>/=85 mm Hg) at the final visit. Four patients were administered 10 mg of lisinopril; 5 patients, 20 mg; and 2 patients, 40 mg; only 1 of these patients required ultrafiltration therapy. There was a persistent antihypertensive effect over 44 hours. BP reduction was achieved without an increase in intradialytic symptomatic or asymptomatic hypotensive episodes. PRA increased in response to dialysis, as well as lisinopril. In conclusion, supervised lisinopril therapy is effective in controlling hypertension in chronic HD patients. This may be related to blockade of angiotensin II generation by kidneys despite the loss of excretory function.

Role of the renin-angiotensin system in vascular diseases: expanding the field

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has emerged as one of the essential links in the pathophysiology of vascular disease. Angiotensin (Ang) II, the main peptide of the RAS, was considered as a vasoactive hormone, but in the past years, this view has been modified to a growth factor that regulates cell proliferation/apoptosis and fibrosis. Recently, this view has been enlarged with a novel concept: Ang II participates in the inflammatory response, acting as a proinflammatory mediator. In resident vascular cells, Ang II produces chemokines, cytokines, and adhesion molecules, which contribute to the migration of inflammatory cells into the tissue injury. Ang II is also a chemotactic and mitogenic factor for mononuclear cells. The molecular mechanisms of Ang II-induced vascular damage are mediated by the activation of transcription factors, redox signaling systems, and production of endogenous growth factors. In addition, other components of the RAS could also be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. The Ang II degradation product Ang III shares some of its properties with Ang II, including chemotaxis and production of growth factors and chemokines. All these data clearly demonstrate that Ang II is a true cytokine, show the complexity of the RAS in pathological processes, and provide some mechanistic responses of the beneficial effects of the treatment with RAS blockers in cardiovascular diseases.

Blood pressure lowering in diabetes: a brief review of the current evidence and description of a new trial

1. Diabetes is a major global public health problem. The prevalence of this disease is predicted to increase sharply in the coming decades, particularly in less-developed regions of the world. 2. Most premature morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes relates to markedly increased risks of major cardiovascular diseases, such as myocardial infarction and stroke (macrovascular events), as well as microvascular complications, such as nephropathy and retinopathy. 3. Hypertension is a prevalent and important risk factor for vascular events in these patients. However, observational data demonstrate a continuous relationship between blood pressure and risk of vascular events, suggesting that even those individuals considered normotensive may benefit from blood pressure lowering. 4. Trials of blood pressure lowering among mostly hypertensive individuals with diabetes have demonstrated benefit of intervention on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes. Recent data may suggest additional effects of angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors independent of blood pressure lowering. 5. Issues where data are lacking with respect to blood pressure lowering in diabetes include the effects of blood pressure lowering among non-hypertensive individuals and the effects of blood pressure lowering regimens based on different classes of drug. 6. Data expected to address some of these issues are being collected. These include a prospective meta-analysis of blood pressure-lowering trials with large numbers of patients with diabetes. A new large-scale randomised trial, ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease), is also described.

Coronary artery disease in uremia: Etiology, diagnosis, and therapy

Cardiovascular disease is a major challenge to nephrologists, whether we deal with patients with pre-end-stage renal failure, on dialysis or after successful renal transplantation. It is the most common cause for death in patients with a functional allograft, and prevents many dialysis patients from being engrafted. Coronary artery disease is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, as it differs in some respects from that seen in non-uremic cohorts, and lacks much of the evidence-base on which therapeutic intervention rests. This review examines the experimental and clinical literature on cardiovascular disease in uremia, focusing on coronary artery disease. We focus on the incidence, presenting syndromes, screening tools, and interventions in the context of acute and chronic coronary syndromes. Recent evidence comparing coronary angioplasty, coronary artery stenting, and bypass surgery in subjects with renal failure is also reviewed. Coronary artery disease is more prevalent in uremia, more difficult to diagnose and less rewarding to treat compared to non-uremic subjects. Many more randomized trials are needed. In the absence of information from such trials, we advocate aggressive control of conventional and novel cardiovascular risk factors, and early intervention for symptomatic coronary disease.

A critical evaluation of the NICE guidelines for post-myocardial infarction prophylaxis. National Institute for Clinical Excellence

The UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has recently published guidelines on prophylaxis for patients who have experienced a myocardial infarction (MI). Based on a previously commissioned extensive review of the literature, the recommendations are antiplatelet therapy, beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) for all patients; statins for those with hypercholesterolaemia; spironolactone for those with moderate-to-severe heart failure (HF); and insulin for those with diabetes. While there may be concerns about some of the details (eg., the possible adverse interaction between aspirin and ACEIs), comments on the use of statins for those with HF, the lack of advice on the choice of lipid-lowering therapy for those intolerent of statins, the dangers of spironolactone therapy and the practicality of intensive insulin treatment, the guidelines are firmly based on sound evidence of efficacy and cost effectiveness. The NICE guidelines should therefore stimulate the provision of resources to address the gap between current practice and these recommendations.

Progress in reducing the burden of stroke

1. The burden of stroke worldwide is growing rapidly, driven by an ageing population and by the rapid rate of urbanization and industrialization in the developing world. There are approximately 5 million fatal and 15 million non-fatal strokes each year and over 50 million survivors of stroke alive, worldwide, today. 2. The most important determinant of stroke risk is blood pressure, with a strong, continuous relationship between the level of the systolic and diastolic pressures and the risk of initial and recurrent stroke, in both Western and Asian populations. 3. Randomized clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that blood pressure lowering reduces the risk of initial stroke by 35-40% in hypertensive patients; but, until recently, there was no conclusive evidence that blood pressure lowering was effective in the secondary prevention of stroke. 4. The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) has provided definitive evidence that blood pressure lowering in patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) reduces the incidence of secondary stroke by 28%, of major vascular events by 26% and of major coronary events by 26%. These reductions were all magnified by approximately 50% in a subgroup of patients in whom the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril was routinely combined with the diuretic indapamide. 5. Successful global implementation of a treatment with perindopril and indapamide in patients with a history of stroke or TIA would markedly reduce the burden of stroke and could avert between 0.5 and one million strokes each year, worldwide.

Cardiomyopathy and heart failure in diabetes

Patients with insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes have a particularly high risk for heart failure and a poor prognosis once they develop heart failure. The choice of drugs for the management of heart failure in these patients should be directed at changing the natural history of the disease. The various drugs available for the treatment of heart failure, including ACE inhibitors and beta-adrenergic blockers, are known to be beneficial and should be given as first-line agents. Aggressive risk-factor modification and tight blood pressure and glycemic control are crucial. Much work is needed to establish the safety and efficacy of various oral antidiabetic agents, especially the TZDs, for which the theoretic benefits are substantial and overall morbidity and mortality impact remain ill-defined.

Nutraceuticals: vitamins and other nutrients in coronary heart disease

Nutraceuticals and specifically vitamins, oils and herbs are increasingly being taken by patients. Some supplements may improve cardiovascular outcome, most are unproved, and some could potentially cause harm. Marine lipid supplementation needs to be considered in all patients who have manifest coronary heart disease. For most supplements more data are needed before confident recommendations can be made.

Reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive diabetic patients on first-line therapy with an ACE inhibitor compared with a diuretic/beta-blocker-based treatment regimen: a subanalysis of the Captopril Prevention Project

OBJECTIVE

The Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) evaluated the effects of an ACE inhibitor-based therapeutic regimen on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in hypertension. One planned subanalysis of the CAPPP was to evaluate the outcome in the diabetic patient group.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In the CAPPP, 572 (4.9% of 10,985 hypertensive patients) had diabetes at baseline and were studied according to a prospective, randomized, open, blinded, end point trial design. Patients aged 25-66 years with diastolic blood pressure > or =100 mmHg were included and randomized to receive either captopril or conventional antihypertensive treatment (diuretics and/or beta-blockers).

RESULTS

The primary end point, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke as well as other cardiovascular deaths, was markedly lower in the captopril than in the conventional therapy group (relative risk [RR] = 0.59; P = 0.018). Specifically, cardiovascular mortality, defined as fatal stroke and myocardial infarction, sudden death, and other cardiovascular death, tended to be lower in the captopril group (RR = 0.48; P = 0.084), and no difference was observed between the study groups for stroke (RR = 1.02; P = 0.96). Myocardial infarctions were less frequent in the captopril group than in the conventional therapy group (RR = 0.34; P = 0.002). Furthermore, total mortality was lower in the captopril as compared with the conventional therapy group (RR = 0.54; P = 0.034). Patients with impaired metabolic control seemed to benefit the most from ACE inhibitor-based therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Captopril is superior to a diuretic/beta-blocker antihypertensive treatment regimen in preventing cardiovascular events in hypertensive diabetic patients, especially in those with metabolic decompensation.

Angiotensin AT(1) receptor stimulates heat shock protein 27 phosphorylation in vitro and in vivo

The angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT(1)) exerts a variety of its signaling and cellular actions through its effects on protein phosphorylation. Phosphoproteomic analysis of angiotensin (Ang) II-stimulated aortic smooth muscle cells revealed that heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) represents a major protein phosphorylation target of the AT(1) signaling pathway. Stimulation of cells with Ang II resulted in 1.7-fold (P<0.05) and 5.5-fold (P<0.001) increases in HSP27 phosphoisoforms at pI 5.7 and pI 5.4, respectively. This was accompanied by a 54% (P<0.01) decrease in the nonphosphorylated HSP27 isoform, located at pI 6.4. Treatment of samples with alkaline phosphatase reversed this redistribution of HSP27 phosphoisoforms. Ang II-stimulated HSP27 phosphorylation was completely blocked by pretreatment of cells with the AT(1) antagonist CV11974. Phosphoamino acid analysis demonstrated that Ang II-induced phosphorylation of both HSP27 phosphoisoforms occurred exclusively on serine. Protein kinase C inhibition completely blocked phorbol ester-induced HSP27 phosphorylation but did not impair Ang II-stimulated phosphorylation of HSP27, suggesting that AT(1) increased HSP27 phosphorylation by a protein kinase C-independent pathway. Intrajugular infusion of Ang II in rats increased HSP27 in aorta by 1.7-fold (P<0.02), and this response was inhibited by CV11974. These results suggest that Ang II-induced HSP27 phosphorylation is a physiologically relevant AT(1) signaling event. Because serine phosphorylation of HSP27 blocks its ability to cap F-actin, Ang II/AT(1)-induced HSP27 phosphorylation may play a key role in actin filament remodeling required for smooth muscle cell migration and contraction.

Diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease

Diabetes mellitus, especially type 2 diabetes, is a growing concern in America. Longitudinal trends show that obesity is more prevalent than in the past, and the incidence of type 2 diabetes is also increasing. Type 2 diabetes typically doubles the CHD risk in men and triples the risk in women. Intervening to control lipid levels and blood pressure has been shown to be especially helpful in preventing CHD, but the impact of better glycemic control on CHD risk is less convincing, especially in clinical trials. Revascularization studies in diabetics show that coronary bypass surgery is related to better outcomes than angioplasty procedures.

Angiotensin receptors: signaling, vascular pathophysiology, and interactions with ceramide

Angiotensin II (ANG II) is a pleiotropic vasoactive peptide that binds to two distinct receptors: the ANG II type 1 (AT(1)) and type 2 (AT(2)) receptors. Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) results in vascular hypertrophy, vasoconstriction, salt and water retention, and hypertension. These effects are mediated predominantly by AT(1) receptors. Paradoxically, other ANG II-mediated effects, including cell death, vasodilation, and natriuresis, are mediated by AT(2) receptor activation. Our understanding of ANG II signaling mechanisms remains incomplete. AT(1) receptor activation triggers a variety of intracellular systems, including tyrosine kinase-induced protein phosphorylation, production of arachidonic acid metabolites, alteration of reactive oxidant species activities, and fluxes in intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations. AT(2) receptor activation leads to stimulation of bradykinin, nitric oxide production, and prostaglandin metabolism, which are, in large part, opposite to the effects of the AT(1) receptor. The signaling pathways of ANG II receptor activation are a focus of intense investigative effort. We critically appraise the literature on the signaling mechanisms whereby AT(1) and AT(2) receptors elicit their respective actions. We also consider the recently reported interaction between ANG II and ceramide, a lipid second messenger that mediates cytokine receptor activation. Finally, we discuss the potential physiological cross talk that may be operative between the angiotensin receptor subtypes in relation to health and cardiovascular disease. This may be clinically relevant, inasmuch as inhibitors of the RAS are increasingly used in treatment of hypertension and coronary heart disease, where activation of the RAS is recognized.

Achieving maximal renal protection in nondiabetic chronic renal disease

A rapid global increase in the number of patients requiring renal replacement therapy necessitates that effective strategies for renal protection are developed and applied widely. We review the experimental and clinical evidence in support of individual renoprotective interventions, including angiotensin-converting enzyme therapy, control of systemic hypertension, dietary protein restriction, reduction of proteinuria, treatment of hyperlipidemia, and smoking cessation. We also consider potential future renoprotective therapies. To achieve maximal renal protection, a comprehensive strategy employing all of these elements is required. This strategy should be directed at normalizing clinical markers of renal disease to induce a state of remission.

Endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Endothelial function is impaired in coronary artery disease and may contribute to its clinical manifestations. Increased oxidative stress has been linked to impaired endothelial function in atherosclerosis and may play a role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular events. This study was designed to determine whether endothelial dysfunction and vascular oxidative stress have prognostic impact on cardiovascular event rates in patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation was determined in 281 patients with documented coronary artery disease by measuring forearm blood flow responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside using venous occlusion plethysmography. The effect of the coadministration of vitamin C (24 mg/min) was assessed in a subgroup of 179 patients. Cardiovascular events, including death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, coronary angioplasty, and coronary or peripheral bypass operation, were studied during a mean follow-up period of 4.5 years. Patients experiencing cardiovascular events (n=91) had lower vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (P<0.001) and sodium nitroprusside (P<0.05), but greater benefit from vitamin C (P<0.01). The Cox proportional regression analysis for conventional risk factors demonstrated that blunted acetylcholine-induced vasodilation (P=0.001), the effect of vitamin C (P=0.001), and age (P=0.016) remained independent predictors of cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Endothelial dysfunction and increased vascular oxidative stress predict the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. These data support the concept that oxidative stress may contribute not only to endothelial dysfunction but also to coronary artery disease activity.

Effect of lipid-lowering agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and calcium antagonists on coronary disease risk

Dyslipidemia is a causative, yet modifiable risk factors for the development of adverse outcomes secondary to coronary artery disease. Recent trials have focused on the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) necessary to achieve maximum reduction in clinical events. Data also exist demonstrating that intensive lowering of LDL-C in patients with unstable angina reduces the incidence of adverse clinical events. The statins appear to be fundamental therapy in patients with established coronary disease as well as a mainstay for those with early evidence of atherosclerosis. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have demonstrated a reduction in ischemic events in patients with heart failure. Recent trials of ACE inhibitors in patients with vascular disease who do not have the traditional indications for ACE inhibition have shown a reversal of endothelial dysfunction and a reduction in adverse clinical endpoints. A role for the use of calcium antagonists in patients with atherosclerosis is less well established, despite the evidence of excellent results in patients with symptomatic coronary disease. A recent clinical trial, using a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with novel mechanisms, found promising results with regard to its effects on atherosclerosis

Irbesartan, an angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibitor, regulates the vascular oxidative state in patients with coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists on pro-oxidant species observed in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Parameters such as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) susceptibility, monocyte binding capacity, superoxide generation and lipid peroxidation were examined in the presence of the AT(1) receptor antagonist irbesartan.

BACKGROUND

Low-density lipoprotein oxidation is a key component in the process of atherogenesis. This modification may involve various mechanisms, including changes in nitric oxide levels and superoxide levels. Additionally, compounds that suppress these mechanisms may retard or inhibit the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with documented coronary artery disease were treated with irbesartan for a 12-week period. Patients were randomized to receive irbesartan or placebo. Lipid peroxidation, superoxide levels, monocyte binding and LDL oxidation were measured at 0, 4 and 12 weeks. Findings were statistically evaluated by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with p < 0.05 being significant.

RESULTS

Treatment with irbesartan significantly decreased the pro-oxidative environment seen in our study population. Lag time for LDL oxidation increased 32% at 12 weeks, suggesting an increased resistance of LDL modification in the serum. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances activity indicated that lipid peroxidation decreased by 36% in comparison to placebo. In addition, superoxide levels and monocyte-binding capacity were also significantly reduced in coronary artery disease patients receiving irbesartan.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that irbesartan may suppress the atherosclerotic process by inhibiting the intravascular oxidative state and the production of reactive oxygen species, compounds that may cause damage to the vasculature.

The relevance of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme: manifestations in mechanistic and endpoint data

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is primarily localized (>90%) in various tissues and organs, most notably on the endothelium but also within parenchyma and inflammatory cells. Tissue ACE is now recognized as a key factor in cardiovascular and renal diseases. Endothelial dysfunction, in response to a number of risk factors or injury such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesteremia, and cigarette smoking, disrupts the balance of vasodilation and vasoconstriction, vascular smooth muscle cell growth, the inflammatory and oxidative state of the vessel wall, and is associated with activation of tissue ACE. Pathologic activation of local ACE can have deleterious effects on the heart, vasculature, and the kidneys. The imbalance resulting from increased local formation of angiotensin II and increased bradykinin degradation favors cardiovascular disease. Indeed, ACE inhibitors effectively reduce high blood pressure and exert cardio- and renoprotective actions. Recent evidence suggests that a principal target of ACE inhibitor action is at the tissue sites. Pharmacokinetic properties of various ACE inhibitors indicate that there are differences in their binding characteristics for tissue ACE. Clinical studies comparing the effects of antihypertensives (especially ACE inhibitors) on endothelial function suggest differences. More comparative experimental and clinical studies should address the significance of these drug differences and their impact on clinical events.

Vasopeptidase inhibitors

Vasopeptidase inhibitors are a new class of cardiovascular drug that simultaneously inhibit both neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). They increase the availability of peptides that have vasodilatory and other vascular effects; they also inhibit production of angiotensin II. In animal models vasopeptidase inhibitors decrease blood pressure in low, medium, and high renin forms of hypertension, and they also appear to confer benefits in models of heart failure and ischaemic heart disease. Studies in human hypertension show that these agents are effective in decreasing blood pressure regardless of race or age. Experience with omapatrilat, the most clinically advanced of these drugs, has shown it to be more effective than currently available ACE inhibitors or other widely used antihypertensive agents. Studies with omapatrilat in congestive heart failure have shown beneficial effects on haemodynamics and symptoms. The vasopeptidase inhibitors appear to have safety profiles similar to ACE inhibitors, though the frequency of side-effects such as angio-oedema and cough remains to be established. Large trials with clinical endpoints, some already in progress, are needed to establish the place of this class of drug beside that of established therapies in conditions such as hypertension, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, and nephropathy.

Pharmacotherapy of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus

The co-existence of hypertension and diabetes dramatically and synergistically increases the risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Overwhelming evidence supports aggressive treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients. However, only a small percentage of diabetic hypertensive patients reach their treatment goal of blood pressure (BP) < 130/80 mmHg. Tight BP control is not only cost-effective but also more rewarding than glycaemic control. The optimal goal of BP control in diabetics should be 130/80 mmHg. In subjects with diabetes and renal insufficiency, the BP should be lowered to 125/75 mmHg to delay the progression of renal failure. The choice of an antihypertensive agent should be based on proven effects on morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate parameters such as lipid or glucose. Limited data suggests that an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) is the agent of choice, especially in those with proteinuria or renal insufficiency. beta-blockers (betaBs) can be the first-line agent in diabetics with coronary heart disease, while thiazide diuretics (TD) and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) are the second-line drugs. Angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) may be proven to be as effective as ACEIs in diabetics with hypertension. alpha-adrenergic antagonists (AAAs) should be avoided. Most hypertensive patients require more than one agent to control their BP. There is no evidence to support one combination regimen over others; nevertheless, a combination of an ACEI with a TD or a betaB may be the most cost-effective regimens compared to other combinations.

Cardiovascular monitoring and therapy for HIV-infected patients

Cardiovascular complications are important contributors to morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. These complications can usually be detected at subclinical levels with monitoring, which can help guide targeted interventions. This article reviews available data on types and frequency of cardiovascular manifestations in HIV+ patients and proposes monitoring strategies aimed at early subclinical detection. In particular, we recommend routine echocardiography for HIV+ patients, even those with no evidence of cardiovascular disease. We also review preventive and therapeutic cardiovascular interventions. For procedures that have not been studied in HIV+ patients, we extrapolate from evidence-based guidelines for the general population.

Beyond the usual strategies for blood pressure reduction: therapeutic considerations and combination therapies

Rapidly accumulating clinical data have repeatedly demonstrated not only the critical importance of even small increases in blood pressure as a pathophysiologic factor in the development of cardiovascular disease, particularly in individuals with diabetes mellitus, but also the therapeutic necessity of more aggressive blood pressure reduction and the achievement of progressively lower blood pressure targets in reducing cardiovascular event rates. JNC VI has defined optimal blood pressure as <or=120/80 mm Hg, and Stage 1 hypertension as >or=140/80 mm Hg. Target blood pressures are now <or=130/80 mm Hg in patients with diabetes and <125/75 mm Hg for patients with hypertensive renal disease with proteinuria of >1 gm/24 hours. Achieving such target pressures is increasingly difficult, particularly in diabetic patients with chronic renal disease, who require complex multidrug antihypertensive regimens. This review attempts to provide some suggestions for constructing such antihypertensive regimens, and provides considerations for the appropriate use of diuretics and the most effective drug combinations. Factors potentially contributing to drug resistant hypertension include such problems as failure to maximize drug dosing, suboptimal diuretic use, noncompliance, and possible confounding effects of such concomitant medications as nonsteroidal and anti-inflammatory drugs or decongestants. The issues underlying drug-resistant hypertension are listed, together with strategies for overcoming this problem.

Physiological and pathophysiological functions of the AT(2) subtype receptor of angiotensin II: from large arteries to the microcirculation

Angiotensin II exerts a potent role in the control of hemodynamic and renal homeostasis. Angiotensin II is also a local and biologically active mediator involved in both endothelial and smooth muscle cell function acting on 2 receptor subtypes: type 1 (AT(1)R) and type 2 (AT(2)R). Whereas the key role of AT(2)R in the development of the embryo has been extensively studied, the role of AT(2)R in the adult remains more questionable, especially in humans. In vitro studies in cultured cells and in isolated segments of aorta have shown that AT(2)R stimulation could lead to the production of vasoactive substances, among which NO is certainly the most cited, suggesting that acute AT(2)R stimulation will produce vasodilation. However, in different organs or in small arteries isolated from different type of tissues, other vasoactive substances may also mediate AT(2)R-dependent dilation. Sometimes, such as in large renal arteries, AT(2)R stimulation may lead to vasoconstriction, although it is not always seen. In isolated arteries submitted to physiological conditions of pressure and flow, AT(2)R stimulation may also have a role in shear stress-induced dilation through a endothelial production of NO. Thus, when acutely stimulated, the most probable response expected from AT(2)R stimulation will be a vasodilation. Therefore, in the perspective of a chronic AT(1)R blockade in patients, overstimulation of AT(2)R might be beneficial, given their potential vasodilator effect. Concerning the possible role of AT(2)R in cardiovascular remodeling, the situation is more controversial. In vitro AT(2)R stimulation clearly inhibits cardiac and vascular smooth muscle growth and proliferation, stimulates apoptosis, and promotes extra cellular matrix synthesis. In vivo, the situation might be less beneficial if not deleterious; indeed, if chronic AT(2)R overstimulation would lead to cardiovascular hypertrophy and fibrosis, then the long-term consequences of chronic AT(1)R blockade, and thus AT(2)R overstimulation, require more in-depth analysis.

Aging-associated changes in vascular activity: a potential link to geriatric cardiovascular disease

Ischemic cardiovascular disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States population over the age of 65. Prior clinical studies have demonstrated that the severity of cardiovascular pathophysiology is increased in older individuals. Both in vitro and in vivo experimental studies have shown that age-associated clinical events parallel changes in vascular function. Aging is associated with systemic as well as cardiac alterations in three basic vascular regulatory functions: vascular tone, hemostasis, and vascular repair/angiogenesis. This article reviews the molecular and cellular events that may contribute to senescent cardiac pathology. Indeed, a better understanding of the biology of aging-associated vascular dysfunction is fundamental for the development of therapeutics targeted for the treatment of cardiovascular disease in older individuals.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in combination: theory and practice

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are commonly used to treat hypertension and/or a range of progressive end-organ diseases. The success of each of these drug classes in disease-state management is without dispute, and has led to speculation that given together the observed response would improve upon that observed with a member of each drug class individually given. Few studies are available, however, which carefully address the effect(s) of the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker. Review of available studies would seem not to strongly support combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker as preferred therapy in the broad base of general hypertensive patients with or without end-organ disease. Additional clarifying studies are needed to determine if specific patient subsets exist that might benefit from such combination therapy.

Lercanidipine: a novel dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker

Calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) have been used for the treatment of hypertension for more than 20 years, and recent clinical trials support the efficacy and safety of long-acting dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs for a wide spectrum of hypertensive patients, including diabetic hypertensive patients. DHP CCBs are effective agents overall and are particularly effective when used in combination with other agents. Lercanidipine is a novel DHP CCB effective for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. Compared with other DHP CCBs, lercanidipine has a molecular design that imparts greater solubility within the arterial cellular membrane bilayer, membrane-controlled kinetics, and a high cholesterol tolerance factor. These favorable membrane-controlled kinetics impart a gradual onset of vasodilation and a long duration of action. Further, the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of lercanidipine appear to contribute to its efficacy and favorable safety profile. In clinical trials in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension, lercanidipine was administered at a starting dose of 10 mg once daily, and increased to 20 mg once daily for nonresponders. Studies have shown that lercanidipine has a 24-hour antihypertensive effect and causes no significant increase in heart rate. Lercanidipine has been shown to be effective in a wide range of hypertensive patients, including mild-to-moderate hypertension, severe hypertension, the elderly, and those with isolated systolic hypertension. It is associated with a low rate of adverse events. Because of its efficacy and favorable safety profile, lercanidipine has the potential to improve blood pressure control in a wide range of patients, including those who have not responded to, or who have been unable to tolerate, other antihypertensive agents.

Current strategies and perspectives for correcting endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis

The vascular endothelium synthesizes and releases a spectrum of vasoactive substances such as nitric oxide and endothelin. In atherosclerosis, the delicate balance between endothelium-derived factors is disturbed. Endothelin acts as the natural counterpart to endothelium-derived nitric oxide, which exerts vasodilating, antithrombotic and antiproliferative effects, and inhibits leukocyte adhesion to the vascular wall. Besides its blood pressure increasing effect in man, endothelin also induces vascular and myocardial hypertrophy, which are independent risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The derangement of endothelial function in atherosclerosis is likely to be caused in part by genetic factors, but is also due to cardiovascular risk factors. Endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis is crucial for the development of the disease process in the vasculature and is therefore an important therapeutic target. However, the efficacy of pharmacotherapy aimed at an improvement in endothelial function depends on the individual risk factor profile of the patient.

The looming polypharmacy crisis in the management of patients with heart failure. Potential solutions

Physicians may be on the road to a polypharmacy crisis in the development of new drugs for heart failure. They must somehow learn how to tailor the therapy to individual patients, rather than treating all patients with every potentially beneficial drug. This will not be an easy task, but the current model of rational drug development followed by a large megatrial is costly and not likely to be sustained indefinitely.

Optimizing medical management of patients with pre-end-stage renal disease

Patients with end-stage renal disease have reduced quality of life, high levels of morbidity, and an annual mortality of about 22%. Because the high morbidity and mortality of dialysis patients might be reduced substantially if patients were healthier at the time of initiating renal replacement therapy, this article will present treatment recommendations designed to retard the progression of chronic renal disease, to optimize the medical management of comorbid medical conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and lipid disorders, and to reduce the complications of renal insufficiency, including hypertension, anemia, hyperparathyroidism, and malnutrition. Given the lack of prospective clinical studies in this area, these recommendations are derived from consensus standards for managing dialysis patients or patients with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, and lipid disorders, and from expert opinion derived from laboratory investigations of pathophysiology and relevant experimental disease models.

Vascular complications in diabetes and their prevention

Diabetes mellitus is increasing throughout the world. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for up to 80% of excess mortality in this high-risk population. Patients with diabetes have the same CVD risk factors as those people without diabetes. However, these risk factors are much more powerful in diabetic patients. CVD risk is especially high for diabetic women, and premenopausal diabetic women lose all the protection normally afforded to them by female sex hormones. Controlled clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that rigorous treatment of blood pressure, dyslipidemia and platelet hyperaggrebility strikingly reduces CVD risk in diabetic patients. Strategies directed at interrupting the renin-angiotensin system (both tissue and systemic systems) and the use of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have proven to be especially beneficial for this high-risk population.

Treatment of heart failure: state of the art and prospectives

Heart failure is unique among the major cardiovascular disorders in that it alone is increasing in prevalence while there has been a striking decrease in other conditions. Some of this can be attributed to the aging of the U.S. and European populations. The ability to salvage patients with myocardial damage is also a major factor, as these patients may develop progression of left ventricular dysfunction due to deleterious remodelling of the heart. This process involves structural and conformational changes in the heart characterized by pathological hypertrophy and fibrosis. The net effect is deterioration in cardiac function and the onset of heart failure. Neurohormonal activation is known to be a major factor in promoting cardiac remodelling. Increased neurohormone levels systemically and within the heart lead to increased load on the heart. Many neurohormones involved also directly act as growth factors on cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. Due to its central role in remodelling, neurohormonal activation has emerged as an inviting target for therapeutic interventions. The use of agents to block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems has been shown to inhibit (and sometimes even reverse) cardiac remodelling and to improve the clinical course of patients with cardiac dysfunction. Neurohormonal activation is known to be widespread and there is evidence that additional agents such as endothelin and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) may be involved in the remodelling process. Clinical trials evaluating the effects of blocking these agents are currently under way and should soon provide important information about therapy.

Use of beta-blockers in obesity hypertension: potential role of weight gain

Beta-blockers are the most frequently used drugs for the treatment of hypertension. Apart from concerns regarding potential adverse metabolic effects on lipids or insulin sensitivity, beta-blockers can also cause weight gain in some patients. This fact appears little known to clinical practitioners and trialists. Thus, only a minority of clinical trials with beta-blockers report weight changes during treatment. In trials that do report weight changes, beta-blockers are associated with a weight gain of 1.2 (range -0.4-3.5) kg. This may be attributable to the fact that beta blockade can decrease metabolic rate by 10%. Beta-blockers may also have other negative effects on energy metabolism. Obesity management in overweight hypertensive patients may therefore be more difficult in the presence of beta-blocker treatment. We therefore question the use of beta-blockers as first-line therapy for overweight or obese patients with uncomplicated hypertension.

Implications of recent heart failure trials for patients with hypertension

There are two major reasons why hypertension is an important risk factor for heart failure. The first is that an elevated blood pressure increases the wall stress in the left ventricle. The second is that hypertension, in a complex manner, contributes to the development of atheromatous vascular disease. Among the more common causes of heart failure are the sequelae of coronary heart disease. The treatment of hypertension modifies the progression to heart failure and the occurrence of coronary events. In patients who have heart failure, hypotension rather than hypertension is a predictor of a poor outcome, likely because low blood pressure is a consequence of damage to the myocardium. The clinical message is that hypertension should be treated aggressively. Where heart failure is a likely outcome, or where hypertension occurs in the presence of heart failure, there is a strong case for using drugs that have been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of both hypertension and heart failure.