Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-analysis

Necroptosis in alveolar epithelial cells drives lung inflammation and injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, results in irreversible or fatal lung injury. We assumed that necroptosis of virus-infected alveolar epithelial cells (AEC) could promote local inflammation and further lung injury in COVID-19. Since CD8+ lymphocytes induced AEC cell death via cytotoxic molecules such as FAS ligands, we examined the involvement of FAS-mediated cell death in COVID-19 patients and murine COVID-19 model. We identified the occurrence of necroptosis and subsequent release of HMGB1 in the admitted patients with COVID-19. In the mouse model of COVID-19, lung inflammation and injury were attenuated in Fas-deficient mice compared to Fas-intact mice. The infection enhanced Type I interferon-inducible genes in both groups, while inflammasome-associated genes were specifically upregulated in Fas-intact mice. The treatment with necroptosis inhibitor, Nec1s, improved survival rate, lung injury, and systemic inflammation. SARS-CoV-2 induced necroptosis causes cytokine induction and lung damage, and its inhibition could be a novel therapeutic strategy for COVID-19.

Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes among hospitalised COVID-19 patients in tertiary hospitals in Tanzania, 2021-2022: a retrospective cohort study

Background

There have been differential mortality rates from COVID-19 in different parts of the world. It is not clear whether the clinical presentation does also differ, thus the need for this study in a sub-Saharan African setting. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in selected tertiary hospitals in Tanzania.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of hospitalised adults confirmed SAR-COV-2 infection in five tertiary-level hospitals in Tanzania. Data collected and analysed included sociodemographic, radiological and clinical characteristics of the patients as well as the outcome of the admission (discharge vs death).

Results

Out of 1387 COVID-19 patients, 52% were males. The median age was 60 years ((IQR)=(19-102)). The most common symptoms were dyspnoea (943,68%), cough (889, 64%), fever (597,43%) and fatigue (570, 41%). In-hospital mortality was (476, 34%). Mortality significantly increased with increasing age, being the most in age >90 years (aHR (95% CI)=4.4 (2.52 to 28.82), p=0.02). Other predictors of mortality were not possessing a health insurance, (aHR (95% CI)=3.7 (1.09 to 14.25), p=0.04); chest pain, (aHR (95% CI)=2.27 (1.36 to 4.13), p=0.03); HIV positivity, (aHR (95% CI)=3.9 (1.46 to 8.15), p=0.03); neutrophilia, (aHR (95% CI)=1.12 (1.01 to 2.65), p=0.03); no use of ivermectin, (aHR (95% CI)=1.21 (1.04 to 1.57), p=0.04) and non-use of steroids, (aHR (95% CI)=1.36 (1.18 to 2.78), p=0.04). The retrospective nature of this study which based on documented patients' records, with a large number of patients left out of the analysis due to missed data, this might in a way affect the results of the present study.

Conclusion

In-hospital mortality was 34%. The independent predictors of mortality were advanced age, HIV infection, no possession of a health insurance, chest pain, neutrophilia and no use of steroids or ivermectin.

Efficacy of COVID-19 Treatments in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objectives: Examining the cumulative evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evaluating the use of pharmacological agents for the treatment of COVID-19 infections in patients with critical illness. Data Sources: Databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were RCTs that enrolled patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection who are critically ill. Only RCTs that examined therapeutic agents against one another or no intervention, placebo, or standard of care, were included. Data Extraction: Pairs of reviewers extracted data independently. Outcomes of interest included the overall reported mortality defined as either the ICU mortality, hospital mortality, mortality within 28 days or mortality within 90 days. Data Synthesis: A total of 40 studies (11,613 patients) evaluated 50 therapeutic intervention arms divided into five main therapy categories; steroids, antiviral medications, immunomodulators, plasma therapies [intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), convalescent plasma and/or, therapeutic plasma exchange], and therapeutic anticoagulation. Immunomodulators was the only group with possible mortality benefit, risk ratio (RR) 0.83 (95% CI 0.73; 0.95), with nonsignificant heterogeneity (I 2 = 8%, p=0.36). In contrast, the other therapy groups showed no significant impact on mortality, as indicated by their respective pooled RRs: steroids [RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.82; 1.01), I 2 = 31%], antiviral medications [RR 1.11 (95% CI 0.82; 1.49), I 2 = 57%], plasma therapies [RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.58; 1.01), I 2 = 36%], and anticoagulation [RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.95; 1.18), I 2 = 0%]. Conclusions: This meta-analysis highlights both the heterogeneity and a lack of benefit from therapies evaluated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of the RCTs were developed based on limited observational data. Future RCTs investigating pharmaceutical interventions in critically ill patients during pandemics need to be designed based on better evidence.

Pharmacotherapy from Pre-COVID to Post-COVID: Longitudinal Trends and Predictive Indicators for Long COVID Symptoms

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

A significant number of COVID-19 cases experience persistent symptoms after the acute infection phase, a condition known as long COVID or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Approved prevention and treatment options for long COVID are currently lacking. Given the heterogeneous nature of long COVID, a personalized medicine approach is essential for effective disease management. This study aimed to describe trends in pharmacotherapy from pre-COVID to post-COVID phases to gain insights into COVID-19 treatment strategies and assess whether pre-COVID pharmacotherapy can predict long COVID symptoms as a health status indicator.

METHODS

In the Precision Medicine for more Oxygen (P4O2) COVID-19 study, 95 long COVID patients were comprehensively evaluated through post-COVID outpatient clinics and study visits. This study focused on descriptive analysis of the pharmacotherapy patterns across different phases: pre-COVID-19, acute COVID, and post-COVID. Furthermore, associations between pre-COVID medication and long COVID outcomes were analyzed with regression analyses.

RESULTS

We observed peaks in the use of certain medications during the acute infection phase, including corticosteroids and antithrombotic agents, with a decrease in the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Consistently high use of alimentary tract medications was found across all phases. Pre-COVID respiratory medications were associated with fatigue symptoms, while antiinfectives and cardiovascular drugs were linked to fewer persisting long COVID symptom categories.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide longitudinal, descriptive pharmacotherapy insights and suggest that medication history can be a valuable health status indicator in characterizing patients for personalized disease management strategies, considering the heterogeneous nature of long COVID.

The impact of dexamethasone on short- and long-term mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Dexamethasone has been widely used in treating severe COVID-19 patients due to its anti-inflammatory properties. However, its long-term impact on mortality remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of dexamethasone on short-term (28-day) and long-term (1-year) mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and to explore its efficacy across different respiratory support.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the MIMIC-IV (v3.0) database. A total of 576 confirmed COVID-19 patients were included, with 288 patients receiving dexamethasone and 288 not receiving it, matched by propensity scores. Survival analyses assessed the impact of dexamethasone on mortality, and subgroup analyses were performed based on the type of respiratory support received.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, dexamethasone treatment was associated with reduced mortality at both 28 days (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99, P = 0.045) and 1 year (adjusted HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.92, P = 0.014). Subgroup analysis revealed differential treatment effects by respiratory support type (P for interaction = 0.001 at 28 days and 0.004 at 1 year). The survival benefit was most pronounced in patients receiving NIV (28-day adjusted HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.42, P < 0.001) and significant in those receiving IMV (28-day adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99, P = 0.045), while no significant benefit was observed in patients receiving oxygen therapy alone.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study suggests that dexamethasone treatment was associated with reduced mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, particularly in those receiving NIV or IMV. These findings add to the evidence supporting dexamethasone use in severe COVID-19 patients requiring respiratory support.

Protopanaxadiol derivative: A plant origin of novel selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator with anti-inflammatory effect

Constant efforts have been made to move towards maintaining the positive anti-inflammatory functions of glucocorticoids (GCs) while minimizing side effects. The anti-inflammatory effect of GCs is mainly attributed to the inhibition of major inflammatory pathways such as NF-κB through GR transrepression, while its side effects are mainly mediated by transactivation. Here, we investigated the selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator (SGRM)-like properties of a plant-derived compound. In this study, glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated alleviation of inflammation by SP-8 was investigated by a combination of in vitro, in silico, and in vivo approaches. Molecular docking and cellular thermal shift assay suggested that SP-8 bound stably to the active site of GR via hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. SP-8 activated GR, induced GR nuclear translocation, and inhibited NF-κB pathway activation. Furthermore, SP-8 did not up-regulate the gene and protein expression of PEPCK and TAT in HepG2 cells, and it did not induce fat deposition like GC and has little effect on bone metabolism. Interestingly, SP-8 upregulated GR protein expression and did not cause GR phosphorylation at Ser211 in RAW264.7 cells. This work proved that SP-8 dissociated characteristics of transrepression and transactivation can be separated. In addition, the in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory effects of SP-8 were confirmed in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells and in a mouse model of DSS-induced ulcerative colitis, respectively. In conclusion, SP-8 might serve as a potential SGRM and might hold great potential for therapeutic use in inflammatory diseases.

Clinical and biologic profiles of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or emphysema; a cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by diffuse lung injury. The impact of pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or emphysema on ARDS pathogenesis is not well characterized.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of ARDS patients enrolled in the Acute Lung Injury Registry and Biospecimen Repository at the University of Pittsburgh between June 2012 and September 2021. Patients were categorized into two mutually exclusive groups by the prevalence of COPD or emphysema at the time of ARDS diagnosis. The COPD/emphysema group comprised ARDS patients with radiological evidence of emphysema, chart diagnosis of COPD, or both. Demographics, lung mechanics, and clinical outcomes were obtained from the electronic medical record. Host-response biomarkers known to have validated associations with ARDS were previously measured in plasma and lower respiratory tract samples using a customized Luminex assay. Continuous and categorical variables were compared between groups with and without COPD/emphysema.

RESULTS

217 patients with ARDS were included in the study, 57 (27%) had COPD/emphysema. Patients with COPD/emphysema were older (median 62 [interquartile range 55-69] versus 53 [41-64] years, p < 0.01), more likely to be male (62% vs. 44%, p = 0.02) and had a higher prevalence of congestive heart failure (25% vs. 4%, p < 0.01) compared to patients without COPD/emphysema. Baseline demographics, laboratory parameters, and mechanical ventilatory characteristics were otherwise similar between the two groups. No difference in 90-day mortality was observed between groups; however, patients with COPD/emphysema had shorter duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (median 10 [7-18] versus 16 [9-28] days, p = 0.04) and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (median 7 [4-16] vs. 12 [6-20] days, p = 0.01). Host response biomarkers in serum and lower respiratory tract samples did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

ARDS patients with COPD or emphysema had similar respiratory mechanics, host response biomarker profiles, and mortality compared to those without COPD or emphysema but with a shorter median duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay. Future studies should address differences in clinical and biological responses by disease severity, and should investigate the impact of severity of COPD and emphysema on mechanical ventilation and targeted therapeutic strategies in ARDS.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Epidemiology, clinical and biological characteristics, and prognosis of critically ill COVID 19 patients: a single-center experience through 4 successive waves

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2, comparing them according to successive waves, and to identify prognostic factors for morbidity and mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective observational descriptive study was conducted from March 10, 2020, to October 17, 2021. All adult patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia presenting acute respiratory failure were included. COVID 19 diagnosis was confirmed by RT-PCR testing of respiratory specimens. The primary endpoint was ICU mortality. Secondary endpoints were the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 437 patients were included of whom 282 (65%) patients were ventilated for 9 [5;20] days. Among the studied population, 38% were treated for one or more episodes of VAP, and 22 (5%) for bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. ICU mortality was 26% in the first wave, then fell and stabilized at around 10% in subsequent waves (p = 0.02). Increased age, Charlson index, SOFA score and lactatemia on admission were predictive of mortality. Survival at 90 days was 85% (95% CI 82-88) and was unaffected by the presence of VAP. However, the occurrence of bronchopulmonary aspergillosis increased mortality to 36%.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed mortality in the lower range of those previously reported. Risk factors for mortality mainly included age and previous comorbidities. The prognosis of these critically ill Covid 19 patients improved over the four waves, underlining the likely beneficial effect of vaccination and dexamethasone.

National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel: Perspectives and Lessons Learned

DESCRIPTION

In March 2020, the White House Coronavirus Task Force determined that clinicians in the United States needed expert treatment guidelines to optimally manage patients with COVID-19, a potentially life-threatening disease caused by a new pathogen for which no specific treatments were known to be effective.

METHODS

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services requested that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) take the lead in expeditiously convening a panel of experts to create "living" guidelines that would be widely accessible and capable of frequent updating as important new information became available.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The purpose of this article is to expand on the experiences of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) over the past 4 years, summarize the Panel's final recommendations for COVID-19, highlight some challenges and unanswered questions about COVID-19 management, and inform future responses to public health emergencies. The Panel was formed in March 2020, and the first iteration of the guidelines was released in April 2020. Now that the public health emergency has ended, the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines have sunsetted. This role will now fall to professional societies and organizations, such as the American College of Physicians, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the World Health Organization, all of which have been active in this area.

Circulating Proteins Associated with Anti-IL6 Receptor Therapeutic Resistance in the Sera of Patients with Severe COVID-19

Circulating proteomes provide a snapshot of the physiological state of a human organism responding to pathogenic challenges and drug interventions. The outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome triggered by the SARS-CoV2 virus remain uncertain. Tocilizumab is an anti-interleukin-6 treatment that exerts encouraging clinical activity by controlling the cytokine storm and improving respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19. We investigate the biological determinants of therapeutic outcomes after tocilizumab treatment. Overall, 28 patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 who were treated with tocilizumab intravenously were included in this study. Sera were collected before and after tocilizumab, and the patient's outcome was evaluated until day 30 post-tocilizumab infusion for favorable therapeutic response to tocilizumab and mortality. Hyperreaction monitoring measurements by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis with data-independent acquisition quantified 510 proteins and 7019 peptides in the serum of patients. Alterations in the serum proteome reflect COVID-19 outcomes in patients treated with tocilizumab. Our results suggested that circulating proteins associated with the most significant prognostic impact belonged to the complement system, platelet degranulation, acute-phase proteins, and the Fc-epsilon receptor signaling pathway. Among these, upregulation of the complement system by activation of the classical pathway was associated with poor response to tocilizumab, and upregulation of Fc-epsilon receptor signaling was associated with lower mortality.

Clinical phenotyping uncovers heterogeneous associations between corticosteroid treatment and survival in critically ill COVID-19 patients

PURPOSE

Disease heterogeneity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may render the current one-size-fits-all treatment approach suboptimal. We aimed to identify and immunologically characterize clinical phenotypes among critically ill COVID-19 patients, and to assess heterogeneity of corticosteroid treatment effect.

METHODS

We applied consensus k-means clustering on 21 clinical parameters obtained within 24 h after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) from 13,279 COVID-19 patients admitted to 82 Dutch ICUs from February 2020 to February 2022. Derived phenotypes were reproduced in 6225 COVID-19 ICU patients from Spain (February 2020 to December 2021). Longitudinal immunological characterization was performed in three COVID-19 ICU cohorts from the Netherlands and Germany, and associations between corticosteroid treatment and survival were assessed across phenotypes.

RESULTS

We derived three phenotypes: COVIDICU1 (43% of patients) consisted of younger patients with the lowest Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scores, highest body mass index (BMI), lowest PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and a 90-day in-hospital mortality rate of 18%. COVIDICU2 patients (37%) had the lowest BMI, were older and had higher APACHE scores and mortality rate (24%) than COVIDICU1. Patients with COVIDICU3 (20%) were the eldest with the most comorbidities, the highest APACHE scores, acute kidney injury and metabolic dysregulations, and the highest mortality rate (47%). These patients also displayed the most pronounced inflammatory response. Corticosteroid therapy started at day 5 [2-9] after ICU admission and administered for 5 [3-7] days was associated with an increased risk for 90-day mortality in patients with the COVIDICU1 and COVIDICU2 phenotypes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59 [1.09-2.31], p = 0.015 and HR 1.79 [1.42-2.26], p < 0.001, respectively), but not in patients with the COVIDICU3 phenotype (HR 1.08 [0.76-1.54], p = 0.654).

CONCLUSION

Our multinational study identified three distinct clinical COVID-19 phenotypes, each exhibiting marked differences in demographic, clinical, and immunological features, and in the response to late and short-term corticosteroid treatment.

How international guidelines recommend treating children who have severe COVID-19 or risk disease progression

AIM

This study reviewed the current knowledge and guidelines on managing COVID-19 in children and proposed a practical approach to drug treatment.

METHODS

We analysed international guidelines from four prominent scientific bodies on treating COVID-19 in children. These were the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the American National Institutes of Health, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce COVID-19.

RESULTS

Most paediatric patients with COVID-19 only require symptomatic treatment. There was limited evidence on treatment recommendations for children with severe COVID-19 or at risk of disease progression. However, several drugs are available for children and we have summarised the guidelines, in order to provide a concise, practical format for clinicians. All the guidelines agree that nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir or remdesivir can be used as prophylaxis for severe COVID-19 in high-risk patients. Remdesivir can also be used for severe COVID-19 cases. Glucocorticosteroids are recommended, particularly in patients requiring oxygen therapy. Tocilizumab or baricitinib should be reserved for patients with progressive disease and/or signs of systemic inflammation.

CONCLUSION

The guidelines provide useful advice and a degree of consensus on specific drug treatment for children with severe COVID-19 or at risk of progression.

Targeting Sepsis: Disease Tolerance, Immune Resilience, and Compartmentalized Immunity

Introduction: Sepsis remains a major contributor to critical care mortality and morbidity worldwide. Despite advances in understanding its complex immunopathology, the compartmentalized nature of immune responses across different organs has yet to be fully translated into targeted therapies. This review explores the burden of sepsis on organ-specific immune dysregulation, immune resilience, and epigenetic reprogramming, emphasizing translational challenges and opportunities. Methods: We implemented a systematic literature search strategy, incorporating data from studies published between 2010 and 2024, to evaluate the role of molecular profiling techniques, including transcriptomics and epigenetic markers, in assessing the feasibility of targeted therapies. Results: Sepsis-induced immune dysregulation manifests differently in various organs, with lung, heart, liver, and kidney responses driven by unique local immune environments. Organ-specific biomarkers, such as the Spns2/S1P axis in lung macrophages, mitochondrial dysfunction in the heart, proenkephalin for early acute kidney injury (AKI), and adrenomedullin for predicting multi-organ failure, offer promising avenues for timely intervention. Furthermore, immune resilience, particularly through regulatory T-cell modulation and cytokine targeting (e.g., IL-18), is crucial for long-term recovery. Epigenetic mechanisms, including histone modification and trained immunity, present opportunities for reprogramming immune responses but require more precision to avoid unintended inflammatory sequelae. Conclusions: A deeper understanding of compartmentalized immune responses and the dynamic immune landscape in sepsis is critical for developing precision therapies. Real-time immune monitoring and organ-targeted interventions could revolutionize sepsis management, although significant barriers remain in clinical translation. Further research is required to establish biomarkers and treatment timing that optimize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic risks.

Immunity and Coagulation in COVID-19

Discovered in late 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has caused the largest pandemic of the 21st century, claiming more than seven million lives. In most cases, the COVID-19 disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus is relatively mild and affects only the upper respiratory tract; it most often manifests itself with fever, chills, cough, and sore throat, but also has less-common mild symptoms. In most cases, patients do not require hospitalization, and fully recover. However, in some cases, infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus leads to the development of a severe form of COVID-19, which is characterized by the development of life-threatening complications affecting not only the lungs, but also other organs and systems. In particular, various forms of thrombotic complications are common among patients with a severe form of COVID-19. The mechanisms for the development of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 remain unclear. Accumulated data indicate that the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 is based on disruptions in the functioning of various innate immune systems. The key role in the primary response to a viral infection is assigned to two systems. These are the pattern recognition receptors, primarily members of the toll-like receptor (TLR) family, and the complement system. Both systems are the first to engage in the fight against the virus and launch a whole range of mechanisms aimed at its rapid elimination. Normally, their joint activity leads to the destruction of the pathogen and recovery. However, disruptions in the functioning of these innate immune systems in COVID-19 can cause the development of an excessive inflammatory response that is dangerous for the body. In turn, excessive inflammation entails activation of and damage to the vascular endothelium, as well as the development of the hypercoagulable state observed in patients seriously ill with COVID-19. Activation of the endothelium and hypercoagulation lead to the development of thrombosis and, as a result, damage to organs and tissues. Immune-mediated thrombotic complications are termed "immunothrombosis". In this review, we discuss in detail the features of immunothrombosis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and its potential underlying mechanisms.

Corticosteroids for hospitalized patients with severe/critical COVID-19: a retrospective study in Chongqing, China

Corticosteroids have always been recommended for severe cases of COVID-19. However, the efficacy of treatment with corticosteroids for COVID-19 during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron outbreak in China has not been reported. Clinical data from 406 patients hospitalized for severe/critical COVID-19 from December 2022 to January 2023 at six hospitals in Chongqing were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 28 days in the groups with and without corticosteroids treatment after propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary outcomes were to compare in-hospital mortality and length of survival time with corticosteroids and those without corticosteroids. This study included 406 patients with severe or critical COVID-19, divided into the corticosteroids group (231, 56.9%) and non-corticosteroids group (175, 43.1%). After PSM, the use of corticosteroids did not reduce all-cause mortality at 28 days (42.5% vs. 39.1%). Univariate analysis showed that corticosteroids were not associated with improved all-cause mortality at 28 days [hazard ratio (HR), 1.019; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.639-1.623; p = 0.938]. Multivariate analysis showed similar results (HR, 1.047; 95% CI, 0.633-1.732; p = 0.858). Among non-survivors, the survival time was significantly larger in those who received corticosteroids compared with the non-corticosteroid users [median 13 (IQR 6.5-15.5) vs. 6 (4-11.25), p = 0.007]. The use of systemic corticosteroids in severe/critical COVID-19 may provide certain potential survival benefits but does not improve prognosis.

Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Review

Importance

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) results in approximately 1.4 million emergency department visits, 740 000 hospitalizations, and 41 000 deaths in the US annually.

Observations

Community-acquired pneumonia can be diagnosed in a patient with 2 or more signs (eg, temperature >38 °C or ≤36 °C; leukocyte count <4000/μL or >10 000/μL) or symptoms (eg, new or increased cough or dyspnea) of pneumonia in conjunction with consistent radiographic findings (eg, air space density) without an alternative explanation. Up to 10% of patients with CAP are hospitalized; of those, up to 1 in 5 require intensive care. Older adults (≥65 years) and those with underlying lung disease, smoking, or immune suppression are at highest risk for CAP and complications of CAP, including sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and death. Only 38% of patients hospitalized with CAP have a pathogen identified. Of those patients, up to 40% have viruses identified as the likely cause of CAP, with Streptococcus pneumoniae identified in approximately 15% of patients with an identified etiology of the pneumonia. All patients with CAP should be tested for COVID-19 and influenza when these viruses are common in the community because their diagnosis may affect treatment (eg, antiviral therapy) and infection prevention strategies. If test results for influenza and COVID-19 are negative or when the pathogens are not likely etiologies, patients can be treated empirically to cover the most likely bacterial pathogens. When selecting empirical antibacterial therapy, clinicians should consider disease severity and evaluate the likelihood of a bacterial infection-or resistant infection-and risk of harm from overuse of antibacterial drugs. Hospitalized patients without risk factors for resistant bacteria can be treated with β-lactam/macrolide combination therapy, such as ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin, for a minimum of 3 days. Systemic corticosteroid administration within 24 hours of development of severe CAP may reduce 28-day mortality.

Conclusions

Community-acquired pneumonia is common and may result in sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or death. First-line therapy varies by disease severity and etiology. Hospitalized patients with suspected bacterial CAP and without risk factors for resistant bacteria can be treated with β-lactam/macrolide combination therapy, such as ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin, for a minimum of 3 days.

The Efficacy of Oral/Intravenous Corticosteroid Use in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review

The COVID-19 pandemic is prompting extensive investigation into potential treatments, including the use of corticosteroids to manage inflammation and mitigate severe disease outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral/intravenous corticosteroids in the management of COVID-19. A comprehensive search was conducted across major scientific databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane for relevant studies published from 2019-2024. The inclusion criteria included studies investigating the use of oral/intravenous corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients >18 years with a randomized placebo-controlled trial method. Non-placebo-controlled studies, studies using combined treatments with other drugs, as well as protocol articles, conference proceedings, review articles, and non-English studies were excluded. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted given the significant methodological diversity. The results showed that a total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria covering the use of three drugs, including dexamethasone (three), hydrocortisone (two), and methylprednisolone (seven). The outcome parameters used for each study were different. Among the total 12 studies, five showed insignificant results for hydrocortisone (two) and methylprednisolone (three), while others reported significant results. This systematic review suggested that oral/intravenous corticosteroids might confer clinical benefits in the management of COVID-19, particularly in reducing mortality and severe disease outcomes. However, further investigation was needed to establish standardized protocols regarding dosage, duration, and safety considerations to optimize efficacy and minimize potential adverse effects.

The first five years of SARS-CoV-2: inpatient treatment updates and future directions

INTRODUCTION

In December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in adults with pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

AREAS COVERED

It is now believed that several billion humans have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and more than ten million have died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2.

EXPERT OPINION

The first five years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have been marked by unfathomable suffering as well as remarkable scientific progress. This manuscript examines what has been learned about the treatment of inpatients with COVID-19 and explores how the therapeutic approach may evolve in the years ahead.

COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19 related nosocomial pneumonias: any differences in etiology, prevalence, and mortality?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the similarities and differences between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related and non-COVID-related nosocomial pneumonia, particularly hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It critically assesses the etiology, prevalence, and mortality among hospitalized patients, emphasizing the burden of these infections during the period before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies highlight an increase in nosocomial infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a significant rise in cases involving severe bacterial and fungal superinfections among mechanically ventilated patients. These infections include a higher incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), complicating treatment and recovery. Notably, COVID-19 patients have shown a higher prevalence of VAP than those with influenza or other respiratory viruses, influenced by extended mechanical ventilation and immunosuppressive treatments like corticosteroids.

SUMMARY

The findings suggest that COVID-19 has exacerbated the frequency and severity of nosocomial infections, particularly VAP. These complications not only extend hospital stays and increase healthcare costs but also lead to higher morbidity and mortality rates. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies to manage and mitigate nosocomial infections during regular or pandemic care.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a prospective meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been proposed as a potential treatment for adults hospitalised with COVID-19, due to their potential anti-inflammatory and endothelial protective effects. Published evidence from randomised control trials (RCTs) does not provide evidence of benefit. We aimed to estimate the effect of oral administration of SGLT2 inhibitors compared with usual care or placebo in adults hospitalised with COVID-19.

METHODS

Eligible RCTs that estimated the effect of oral administration of SGLT2 inhibitors compared with usual care or placebo on 28-day all-cause mortality (primary outcome) were included in this prospective meta-analysis. The primary safety outcome was ketoacidosis by 28 days. Trials were identified through systematic searches of ClinicalTrials.gov, EudraCT, and the WHO ISRCTN registry between Nov 1, 2022 and Jan 31, 2023. The search terms were "random*" AND "COVID" AND each SGLT2i, not restricted by trial status or language. Individual searches were then combined. Prespecified summary outcome data, overall and within subgroups of interest, were provided by each trial. The primary analyses were inverse variance weighted meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023406442.

FINDINGS

Three eligible trials randomly assigned 6096 participants (3025 to the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 3071 to the usual care or placebo group). 2381 (39%) patients were women and 1547 (25%) had type 2 diabetes at randomisation. By 28 days, there were 351 deaths in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 382 deaths in the usual care or placebo group (summary OR 0·93 [95% CI 0·79-1·08]; p=0·33, I2 for inconsistency across trials 0%). The risk of bias was assessed as being low. Ketoacidosis was observed in seven participants in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and two patients in the usual care or placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

Although administration of SGLT2 inhibitor was safe, we found no clear evidence that adding SGLT2 inhibitor therapy improved outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 compared with usual care or placebo. These data do not support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors as standard treatment in adults hospitalised for COVID-19.

FUNDING

None.

Impact of corticosteroid doses on prognosis of severe and critical COVID-19 patients with Omicron variant infection: a propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

There is lack of research on corticosteroid use for severe and critical COVID-19 patients with Omicron variant infection.

METHODS

This multi-center retrospective cohort study involved 1167 patients from 59 ICUs across the mainland of China diagnosed with severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection between November 1, 2022, and February 11, 2023. Patients were segregated into two groups based on their corticosteroid treatment-usual dose (equivalent prednisone dose 30-50 mg/day) and higher dose (equivalent prednisone dose > 50 mg/day). The primary outcome was 28-day ICU mortality. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between cohorts.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 520 patients in the usual dose corticosteroid group and 260 patients in the higher dose corticosteroid group were included in the analysis, respectively. The mortality was significantly higher in the higher dose corticosteroid group (67.3%, 175/260) compared to the usual dose group (56.0%, 291/520). Logistic regression showed that higher doses of corticosteroids were significantly associated with increased mortality at 28-day (OR = 1.62,95% CI 1.19-2.21, p = 0.002) and mortality in ICU stay (OR = 1.66,95% CI 1.21-2.28, p = 0.002). Different types of corticosteroids did not affect the effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that higher-dose corticosteroids may lead to a poorer prognosis for severe and critical COVID-19 patients with Omicron variant infection in the ICU. Further research is needed to determine the appropriate corticosteroid dosage for these patients.

Opportunity for severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia treatment with corticosteroids: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been the most significant infectious disease outbreak worldwide in the past 3 years, with the potential to progress to severe pneumonia and trigger systemic inflammatory response, posing a threat to human health and life. This study aims to explore the use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 and provide recommendations on the timing and dosage of the treatment.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study, enrolling 100 with COVID-19 pneumonia between December 2022 and January 2023. The diagnosis of severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia patients was according to China's Ninth Edition of the Diagnosis and Treatment Plan for COVID-19 Pneumonia. T test and univariate proportional hazard analysis were employed to investigate the opportunity of corticosteroids therapy in relation to patients' prognosis.

Results

Compared to COVID-19 pneumonia patients treated with corticosteroids in the early phase, those who received late-phase corticosteroid therapy had a higher proportion of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (P=0.01), longer hospital stay (P=0.006), lower in-hospital survival rate (P=0.03), and slower recovery (P<0.001). A significant difference was also observed in logistic univariate proportional hazard analysis.

Conclusions

The early administration of corticosteroid therapy has been shown to significantly improve the prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia patients, promoting recovery with significant clinical significance. Our recommendation for the administration of corticosteroid therapy is to be applied on the 6th-9th day of persisting unrelieved symptoms of COVID-19 pneumonia.

COVID-19 and Cancer Care: A Review and Practical Guide to Caring for Cancer Patients in the Era of COVID-19

COVID-19, a novel infectious disease caused by the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in 2020, has had a profound impact on healthcare, both at the individual and population level. The impact at the population level was felt most acutely during the emergency phase of the pandemic, with hospital capacity issues leading to widespread disruptions and delays in the delivery of healthcare services such as screening programs and elective surgeries. While hospitals are no longer being acutely overwhelmed by COVID-19 patients, the impact of the virus on vulnerable patient populations such as cancer patients continues to be of ongoing consequence. Cancer patients remain at high risk of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death due to COVID-19, even in the era of vaccination. Infection prevention and risk mitigation strategies such air quality control, masking, testing, vaccination, and treatment should therefore be integrated into the usual care and counseling of cancer patients moving forward to avoid preventable morbidity and mortality from this infection and ensure the safety of this vulnerable cohort as they navigate their cancer diagnosis and treatment in the era of COVID-19.

The usage of immunosuppressant agents and secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study

Although COVID-19 infection is an immunosuppressant disease, many immunosuppressant agents, such as pulse methylprednisolone (PMP), dexamethasone (DXM), and tocilizumab (TCZ), were used during the pandemic. Secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 have been reported recently. This study investigated these agents' effects on secondary infections and outcomes in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICUs). This study was designed retrospectively, and all data were collected from the tertiary intensive care units of six hospitals between March 2020 and October 2021. All patients were divided into three groups: Group I [GI, PMP (-), DXM (-) and TCZ (-)], Group II [GII, PMP (+), DXM (+)], and Group III [GIII, PMP (+), DXM (+), TCZ (+)]. Demographic data, PaO/FiO2 ratio, laboratory parameters, culture results, and outcomes were recorded. To compare GI-GII and GI-GIII, propensity score matching (PSM) was used by matching 14 parameters. Four hundred twelve patients with COVID-19 in the ICU were included in the study. The number of patients with microorganisms ≥ 2 was 279 (67.7%). After PSM, in GII and GIII, the number of (+) tracheal cultures and (+) bloodstream cultures detected different microorganisms ≥ 2 during the ICU period, neuropathy, tracheotomized patients, duration of IMV, and length of ICU stay were significantly higher than GI. The mortality rate was similar in GI and GII, whereas it was significantly higher in GIII than in GI. The use of immunosuppressant agents in COVID-19 patients may lead to an increase in secondary infections. In addition, increased secondary infections may lead to prolonged ICU stay, prolonged IMV duration, and increased mortality.

A High-Dose Corticosteroid Treatment Increases Coronavirus Disease of 2019 Mortality in Intensive Care Units

Objectives

The study is aimed to investigate the association between different corticosteroid treatment regimens and clinical status, complications, mechanical ventilation requirement, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in individuals diagnosed with Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19).

Materials and Methods

This is a descriptive retrospective study. Patients admitted to the ICU for COVID-19 and treated with low- or medium-dose corticosteroid therapy (methylprednisolone at a dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg for 7-10 days) were compared with patients treated with high-dose pulse corticosteroid therapy (methylprednisolone at varying doses of 250 mg, 500 mg or 1000 mg for 3-7 days) in addition to standard therapy because of increased pulmonary infiltrate and elevated inflammatory markers during clinical monitoring. All demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, clinical course, laboratory findings, discharge status, 28-day mortality, intubation status, acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sequential organ failure assessment score, were recorded.

Results

Corticosteroid treatment was administered to 689 (88.3%) of 780 COVID-19 ICU patients between April 2020 and October 2021. The overall mortality rate was 45.1% (n= 352). When the mortality rates of patients were compared according to the corticosteroid dose, the mortality rate in the low-to-medium-dose group (40%) was significantly lower than that in the high-dose group (76%). In addition, significant deterioration in laboratory and clinical parameters was observed in the high-dose corticosteroid group.

Conclusion

High mortality, adverse effects, and complications were significantly increased when high-dose corticosteroids were administered. Corticosteroid therapy should be used cautiously according to the patient's clinical condition, disease stage, comorbidities, and systemic or organ reserves.

Bleeding and thrombotic events and intensity of heparin therapy in the two first waves of COVID-19

A systemic inflammatory response occurs during SARS-CoV2 infection and is associated with hypercoagulability and thrombotic events. From March 2020 in our hospital different dosages of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) were introduced according to the level of patient care intensity. Because bleeding episodes occurred in hospitalized COVID-19 patients on heparin, the dosage of LMWH at the end of first wave was tailored on the severity of COVID-19. The aim of this study is to describe bleeding and thrombotic events in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV2 infection on LMWH therapy in the two waves of COVID-19 and analyze the factors associated with these events. Among 1143 patients enrolled in the COVID-19 Network registry, 912 were included in the analysis, 537 of them admitted during the first wave and 375 during the second. Bleeding events were 30 (3.3%): 22 (2.4%) major and 8 (0.9%) non-major. Arterial and venous thrombotic events were 6 (0.7%) and 24 (2.6%). The incidence of venous thrombotic events was higher in the first than in the second wave (0.29% [95% CI 0.20-0.45] events/day vs. 0.05% [95% CI 0.02-0.16]), with a 71% risk reduction (95% CI 22%-94%). The incidence of bleeding was 0.33% (95% CI 0.22-0.50) vs 0.14% events/day (95% CI 0.07-0.28), with no statistical between-wave difference (HR 0.41 95% CI 0.16-1.08). After adjusting for the competing risks of death and comorbidities, patients in the second wave had lower odds to have thrombotic events than in the first wave (0.24 HR [95% C.I. 0.07-0.89]). In this retrospective study on COVID-19 we found a low rate of hemorrhagic and thrombotic events, that may be explained by the absence in the case material of patients admitted to intensive care unit.

COVID-19: from immune response to clinical intervention

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has highlighted the pivotal role of the immune response in determining the progression and severity of viral infections. In this paper, we review the most recent studies on the complicated dynamics between SARS-CoV-2 and the host immune system, highlight the importance of understanding these dynamics in developing effective treatments and formulate potent management strategies for COVID-19. We describe the activation of the host's innate immunity and the subsequent adaptive immune response following infection with SARS-CoV-2. In addition, the review emphasizes the immune evasion strategies of the SARS-CoV-2, including inhibition of interferon production and induction of cytokine storms, along with the resulting clinical outcomes. Finally, we assess the efficacy of current treatment strategies, including antiviral drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and anti-inflammatory treatments, and discuss their role in providing immunity and preventing severe disease.

Investigating the effects of dexamethasone on pulmonary surfactant lipids based on lipidomics studies

Dexamethasone, a glucocorticoid commonly used in pediatric patients, has potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties. However, it is associated with side effects such as reduced lung function and decreased immunity. Pulmonary surfactant lipids are closely linked to lung disease and play a role in reducing surface tension, immune response and antiviral activity. The dysregulation of lipid metabolism is closely associated with lung disease. Hence, untargeted lipidomics may be instrumental in elucidating the effects of dexamethasone on pulmonary surfactant lipids. We obtained surfactant lipid samples from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of young mice injected subcutaneously with dexamethasone and conducted a comprehensive lipidomic analysis, comparing them with a control group. We observed a decrease in lipids, such as phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylethanolamine, and an increase in ceramide, fatty acid, diacylglycerol and monoglyceride, which may impact lung health. This study revealed the influence of dexamethasone on pulmonary surfactant lipids, offering new insights into adverse reactions in clinical settings.

Evaluating the Risk-Benefit Profile of Corticosteroid Therapy for COVID-19 Patients: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak was declared a global pandemic in March 2020. It quickly spread across all continents, causing significant social, environmental, health, and economic impacts. During the pandemic, there has been consideration of repurposing and repositioning of medications, such as corticosteroids, for the treatment of hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and summarise corticosteroid regimens used for hospitalised COVID-19 patients, focusing on dosage, route of administration, and clinical outcome from clinical trials.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases and the grey literature were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of corticosteroids in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 between January 2020 and January 2023. This scoping review was conducted in line with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.

KEY FINDINGS

A total of 24 RCTs were eligible for inclusion. There was variation in the steroid regimens used for treatment across COVID-19 trials. Despite the heterogeneity of included RCTs, the overall results have shown the benefits of improving lung function and a lower all-cause mortality rate in hospitalised COVID-19 patients treated with systematic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids have proven to be an effective treatment for COVID-19 patients in critical condition. However, comparative effectiveness studies should be conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of optimal corticosteroid treatment at the population level. Moreover, the global burden of long COVID is significant, affecting millions with persistent symptoms and long-term health complications. Thus, it is also necessary to evaluate the optimal steroid regimen for long COVID treatment.

Outcomes of different steroid dosing regimens in critical Covid-19 pneumonia at a Kenyan hospital: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Among therapeutic options for severe and critical COVID- 19 infection, dexamethasone six milligrams once daily for ten days has demonstrated mortality benefit and is guideline recommended at this dose. In practice, variable doses of steroids have been used, especially in critical care settings. Our study aimed to determine the pattern of steroid dosing and outcomes in terms of critical care mortality, occurrence of dysglycaemias, and occurrence of superadded infections in patients with critical COVID-19.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out on all eligible patients admitted to the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, with critical COVID-19 between 1st March 2020 and 31st December 2021. The intervention of interest was corticosteroids quantified as the average daily dose in milligrams of dexamethasone. A steroid dose of six milligrams once a day was compared to high dose steroid dosing, which was defined as any dose greater than this. The primary outcome measure was ICU mortality and secondary outcomes included occurrence of dysglycaemias, superadded infections and duration of critical care admission.

RESULTS

The study included 288 patients. The median age was 61.2 years (IQR: 49.7, 72.5), with 71.2% of patients being male. The most common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (60.7%), hypertension (58%), and heart disease (12.2%). The average oxygen saturation and C-reactive protein at admission were 82% [IQR: 70.0-89.0]and 113.0 [IQR: 54.0-186.0], respectively. Fifty-eight percent of patients received a standard dose (6mg) of steroids. The mortality rate was higher in the high-dose group compared to the standard-dose group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (47.9% vs 43.7% p = 0.549). The two most common steroid associated adverse effects were uncomplicated hyperglycemia (62.2%) and superimposed bacterial pneumonia (20.1%). The high-dose group had a higher incidence of uncomplicated hyperglycemia compared to the standard-dose group (63.6% vs 61.1%). However, the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis was lower in the high dose group (0.6% vs 6.6%). Oxygen saturation at admission was associated with survival where it was lower among non-survivor patients with critical COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

The study found that high-dose steroids in the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia did not confer any mortality benefit and were associated with an increased risk of dysglycemia and superimposed infections.

Outcomes for people admitted to Australian and New Zealand intensive care units with primary, exacerbating, or incidental SARS-CoV-2 infections, 2022-23: a retrospective analysis of ANZICS data

OBJECTIVES

To compare in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay for people admitted to Australian and New Zealand ICUs during 2022-23 with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis, incidental or exacerbating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, or without SAR-CoV-2 infections.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study; analysis of Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Database data.

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

Adults (16 years or older) admitted to participating ICUs in Australia or New Zealand, 1 January 2022 - 30 June 2023.

MAJOR OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, the secondary outcome ICU length of stay, each by SARS-CoV-2 infection attribution classification: primary COVID-19; exacerbating SARS-CoV-2 infection (SARS-CoV-2 infection was a contributing factor to the primary cause of ICU admission); incidental SARS-CoV-2 infections (SARS-CoV-2 infection detected during ICU admission but did not contribute to admission diagnosis); no SARS-CoV-2 infection.

RESULTS

A total of 207 684 adults were admitted to 195 Australian and New Zealand ICUs during 2022-23; 2674 people (1.3%) had incidental SARS-CoV-2 infections, 4923 (2.4%) exacerbating infections, and 3620 (1.7%) primary COVID-19. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality for people with incidental SARS-CoV-2 infections (288 deaths, 10.8%) was lower than for those with exacerbating infections (928 deaths, 18.8%) or primary COVID-19 (830 deaths, 22.9%), but higher than for patients without SARS-CoV-2 infections (15 486 deaths, 7.9%). After adjusting for illness severity, frailty, geographic region, and type of hospital, mortality was higher for patients with incidental SARS-CoV-2 infections (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.50), exacerbating infections (aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.48), or primary COVID-19 (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.30-2.81) than for patients without SARS-CoV-2 infections. After adjusting for diagnosis and illness severity, ICU stays were longer for people with incidental (mean difference, 3.3 hours; 95% CI, 2.4-4.2 hours) or exacerbating infections (0.8 hours; 95% CI, 0.2-1.5 hours) than for those without SARS-CoV-2 infections.

CONCLUSION

Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality and ICU length of stay are higher for people admitted to intensive care who have concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infections than for people who do not.

Revisiting the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mortality and Predictors of Death in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

COVID-19 has generated a global impact due to its contagiousness and high lethality rates, with a large number of deaths occurring in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to verify the occurrence of and understand the factors related to mortality in adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU in a tertiary hospital. This is a retrospective cohort study, which included COVID-19 patients admitted between March 2020 and December 2021. A total of 588 patients were included, of whom the majority (55.27%) did not survive. Invasive mechanical ventilation was the strongest predictor of the risk of death in the ICU with OR = 97.85 (95% CI = 39.10-244.86; p < 0.001), along with age and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS3). The length of the ICU stay was protective. Evaluating patients on invasive mechanical ventilation in isolation, using an adjusted model, we found the following risk factors: use of vasopressin, renal replacement therapy, red cell distribution width > 15, use of hydrocortisone, and age in years. Protective factors included the days of mechanical ventilation use, being admitted from another service, and being of female sex. Identifying early predictors of mortality in patients with COVID-19 who require hospitalization is essential in the search for actions to prevent and manage complications, which can increase the survival of these patients and reduce the impact on health services.

The life-saving benefit of dexamethasone in severe COVID-19 is linked to a reversal of monocyte dysregulation

Dexamethasone is a life-saving treatment for severe COVID-19, yet its mechanism of action is unknown, and many patients deteriorate or die despite timely treatment initiation. Here, we identify dexamethasone treatment-induced cellular and molecular changes associated with improved survival in COVID-19 patients. We observed a reversal of transcriptional hallmark signatures in monocytes associated with severe COVID-19 and the induction of a monocyte substate characterized by the expression of glucocorticoid-response genes. These molecular responses to dexamethasone were detected in circulating and pulmonary monocytes, and they were directly linked to survival. Monocyte single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq)-derived signatures were enriched in whole blood transcriptomes of patients with fatal outcome in two independent cohorts, highlighting the potential for identifying non-responders refractory to dexamethasone. Our findings link the effects of dexamethasone to specific immunomodulation and reversal of monocyte dysregulation, and they highlight the potential of single-cell omics for monitoring in vivo target engagement of immunomodulatory drugs and for patient stratification for precision medicine approaches.

High Prevalence of Diabetes Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Minority Patients: Data from a Single Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in the minority population and is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that COVID-19 patients with pre-existing diabetes mellitus are prone to fatal outcomes compared to non-diabetic patients. We aimed to illustrate the characteristics and outcomes and identify the risk factors for in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients with DM.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, electronic medical records of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis at Howard University Hospital (HUH) from March 2020 to Dec 2021 were analyzed. Clinical, demographic, and serological information, as well as outcomes, were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 463 COVID-19 patients, 66.3% (n = 307) were African Americans (AA) and 35.9% (n = 166) had diabetes, with a mean age of 64 years. The majority of the diabetic patients were AA (n = 123, 74.1%) and had a higher mortality rate (n = 26, 74.3%) compared to others. Length of stay in the hospital is significantly more for the diabetic than for the non-diabetic patients (11.3 vs. 8.3 days, p = 0.03). A higher proportion of ICU admission (32.3% vs. 17.9%, p =  < 0.001), intubation (17% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.04), and increased mortality (21.1% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.01) were identified in COVID-19 patients with DM than in those with no DM. Among DM patients, non-survivors were older (69.9 vs. 62.9 years). DM patients were more likely to have underlying hypertension (72.3% vs. 43.3%, p =  < 0.001), obesity (44.8% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.007), chronic kidney disease (23.6 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.001), and cardiovascular disease (29.5% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.001) than the non-DM patients. HbA1C above 9%, indicating poorly controlled hyperglycemia, was associated with poor outcome among the DM subjects. AST (23.5% vs. 31.3%) and creatinine (61.4% vs. 37.9%) were significantly more elevated in DM COVID-19 patients (all p-values < 0.05). The levels of serum troponin (42.5% vs. 30.9%, p = 0.03), interleukin-6 (67.2 vs. 50%, p = 0.04), ferritin (65.6% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.03), procalcitonin (58.1% vs. 46.1, p = 0.03), and D-dimers (92.8% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.04) were significantly higher in DM patients as compared to those in non-DM COVID-19 patients, indicating more susceptibility of diabetic COVID-19 patients to coagulation dysfunction and inflammatory storm.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of DM is high among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in our cohort. While DM patients have a higher mortality rate and ICU admission than non-DM patients, other factors such as underlying comorbidities, old age, elevated creatinine, AST, serum inflammatory markers, and D-dimer are more significant predictors of fatal outcomes. DM patients had higher metabolic derangements, hypercoagulability, and severe inflammatory response. No significant difference of outcome was noted between DM patients of different races in our cohort. In the diabetic group, it appears that race may not significantly contribute to the observed mortality disparity. This could be attributed to the significant influence of diabetes, which acts as a major effector, potentially overshadowing the significance of race in this context.

Inhaled corticosteroids on mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on mortality in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of COVID-19 with ICS were reviewed. Studies were pooled to risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven RCTs (enrolling 5832 participants) met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in COVID-19-related death (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.38-2.04), all-cause death (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.49-2.23), and invasive ventilation (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.60-2.62) between the two groups. ICS was not associated with reduced mortality and invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19.

Is lupus anticoagulant testing with dilute Russell's viper venom clotting times reliable in the presence of inflammation?

Background

Testing for lupus anticoagulant (LA) is not recommended in case of inflammation as C-reactive protein (CRP) can interfere in vitro with the phospholipids present in the activated partial thromboplastin time test used to detect an LA. However, the potential interference of an acute phase protein (ie, CRP) in LA testing using the dilute Russell's viper venom (DRVV) test is poorly studied.

Objectives

To study the effect of inflammation, as evidenced by increased CRP levels, on DRVV tests.

Methods

First, a retrospective analysis (2013-2023) was performed: data on all LA workups were retrieved, and the association between CRP levels and DRVV screen, mix, and confirm clotting times was studied. Second, data on DRVV panels and CRP levels were extracted from 2 prospective studies involving intensive care unit patients to study the association between both variables. Third, CRP was added to normal pooled plasma at 6 relevant concentrations (up to 416 mg/L) to study the association between CRP itself and DRVV coagulation times.

Results

In the retrospective analysis, DRVV screen and confirm clotting times significantly increased as CRP increased (increase of 0.11 seconds and 0.03 seconds per 1 mg/L increase of CRP level, respectively). In the prospective analysis, only DRVV screen was prolonged with high CRP levels (increase of 0.06 seconds for a 1 mg/L increase in CRP level); DRVV screen/confirm ratio was also increased with high CRP levels. In vitro, the addition of CRP did not significantly increase any DRVV clotting times.

Conclusion

LA testing should be performed with much caution in the presence of inflammation as it may be associated with prolongation of both activated partial thromboplastin time and DRVV clotting times.

Competing Benefits and Competing Hazards: The Benefit to Harm Balance in Individual Patients in Rational Therapeutics

For any therapeutic intervention in an individual, there is a balance between the potential benefits and the possible harms. The extent to which the benefits are desirable in a given condition depends on the efficacy of the intervention, the chance of obtaining it and the seriousness and intensity of the condition. The extent to which the harms are undesirable depends on the nature of the hazard that can lead to harm, the chance that the harm will occur and its seriousness and intensity. Rational therapeutic decisions require clinicians to consider competing courses of action, with potential benefits of different desirability and potential harms of different undesirability. They also have a duty to explain to the patient, for the contemplated interventions, both the possible benefits and the potential harms that the patient may consider significant. In an individual patient, it is necessary to consider (a) the probabilities of benefit from both intervention and non-intervention and (b) the probabilities of harm from both intervention and non-intervention. However, there are several potential problems. Here, we consider how failure to distinguish maximum benefits from probable benefits, or hazards (potential harms) from probable harms, and failure to consider all the competing probabilities may lead to imperfect therapeutic decisions. We also briefly discuss methods to assess the benefit to harm balance.

Potential Impact of Subphenotyping in Pharmacologic Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an acute inflammatory process in the lungs associated with high morbidity and mortality. Previous research has studied both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions aimed at targeting this inflammatory process and improving ventilation. Hypothesis: To date, only nonpharmacologic interventions including lung protective ventilation, prone positioning, and high positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation strategies have resulted in significant improvements in patient outcomes. Given the high mortality associated with ARDS despite these advancements, interest in subphenotyping has grown, aiming to improve diagnosis and develop personalized treatment approaches. Data Collection: Previous trials evaluating pharmacologic therapies in heterogeneous populations have primarily demonstrated no positive effect, but hope to show benefit when targeting specific subphenotypes, thus increasing their efficacy, while simultaneously decreasing adverse effects. Results: Although most studies evaluating pharmacologic therapies for ARDS have not demonstrated a mortality benefit, there is limited data evaluating pharmacologic therapies in ARDS subphenotypes, which have found promising results. Neuromuscular blocking agents, corticosteroids, and simvastatin have resulted in a mortality benefit when used in patients with the hyper-inflammatory ARDS subphenotype. Therapeutic Opinion: The use of subphenotyping could revolutionize the way ARDS therapies are applied and therefore improve outcomes while also limiting the adverse effects associated with their ineffective use. Future studies should evaluate ARDS subphenotypes and their response to pharmacologic intervention to advance this area of precision medicine.

Al Maslamani MA, Mahmoud A. Hashim S, Ittaman AV, Wadi Al Ramahi J, Gergely Szabo B, Konopnicki D, Baskol Elik D, Lakatos B, Sipahi OR, Khedr R, Jalal S, Pshenichnaya N, Magdalena DI, El-Kholy A, Khan EA, Alkan S, Hakamifard A, Sincan G, Esmaoglu A, Makek MJ, Gurbuz E, Liskova A, Albayrak A, Stebel R, Unver Ulusoy T, Ripon RK, Moroti R, Dascalu C, Rashid N, Cortegiani A, Bahadir Z, Erdem H. Factors affecting mortality in COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: An international ID-IRI study

Background

This study aimed to identify factors that influence the mortality rate of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA).

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, data from 23 centers across 15 countries, spanning the period of March 2020 to December 2021, were retrospectively collected. The study population comprised patients who developed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis while being treated for COVID-19 in the intensive care unit. Cox regression and decision tree analyses were used to identify factors associated with mortality in patients with CAPA.

Results

A total of 162 patients (males, 65.4 %; median age: 64 [25th-75th: 54.0-73.8] years) were included in the study, of whom 113 died during the 90-day follow-up period. The median duration from CAPA diagnosis to death was 12 (25th-75th: 7-19) days. In the multivariable Cox regression model, an age of ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.05, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-3.07), requiring vasopressor therapy at the time of CAPA diagnosis (HR: 1.80, 95 % CI: 1.17-2.76), and receiving renal replacement therapy at the time of CAPA diagnosis (HR: 2.27, 95 % CI: 1.35-3.82) were identified as predictors of mortality. Decision tree analysis revealed that patients with CAPA aged ≥65 years who received corticosteroid treatment for COVID-19 displayed higher mortality rates (estimated rate: 1.6, observed in 46 % of patients).

Conclusion

This study concluded that elderly patients with CAPA who receive corticosteroids are at a significantly higher risk of mortality, particularly if they experience multiorgan failure.

Low-Dose Corticosteroids for Critically Ill Adults With Severe Pulmonary Infections: A Review

Importance

Severe pulmonary infections, including COVID-19, community-acquired pneumonia, influenza, and Pneumocystis pneumonia, are a leading cause of death among adults worldwide. Pulmonary infections in critically ill patients may cause septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or both, which are associated with mortality rates ranging between 30% and 50%.

Observations

Corticosteroids mitigate the immune response to infection and improve outcomes for patients with several types of severe pulmonary infections. Low-dose corticosteroids, defined as less than or equal to 400 mg hydrocortisone equivalent daily, can reduce mortality of patients with severe COVID-19, community-acquired pneumonia, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. A randomized clinical trial of 6425 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who required supplemental oxygen or noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation reported that dexamethasone 6 mg daily for 10 days decreased 28-day mortality (23% vs 26%). A meta-analysis that included 7 randomized clinical trials of 1689 patients treated in the intensive care unit for severe bacterial community-acquired pneumonia reported that hydrocortisone equivalent less than or equal to 400 mg daily for 8 days or fewer was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared with placebo (10% vs 16%). In a meta-analysis of 6 randomized clinical trials, low-dose corticosteroids were associated with lower mortality rates compared with placebo for patients with HIV and moderate to severe Pneumocystis pneumonia (13% vs 25%). In a predefined subgroup analysis of a trial of low-dose steroid treatment for septic shock, patients with community-acquired pneumonia randomized to 7 days of intravenous hydrocortisone 50 mg every 6 hours and fludrocortisone 50 μg daily had decreased mortality compared with the placebo group (39% vs 51%). For patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by various conditions, low-dose corticosteroids were associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (34% vs 45%) according to a meta-analysis of 8 studies that included 1091 patients. Adverse effects of low-dose corticosteroids may include hyperglycemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, neuropsychiatric disorders, muscle weakness, hypernatremia, and secondary infections.

Conclusions and Relevance

Treatment with low-dose corticosteroids is associated with decreased mortality for patients with severe COVID-19 infection, severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and moderate to severe Pneumocystis pneumonia (for patients with HIV). Low-dose corticosteroids may also benefit critically ill patients with respiratory infections who have septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or both.

A Review of Current Evidence for the Use of Steroids in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

Systemic steroids are frequently used in critically ill patients for their anti-inflammatory properties. Potential benefits of these agents should be balanced against their known side effects. In this paper, we review trials assessing the use of systemic steroids in common conditions requiring admission to the intensive care unit. These include septic shock, the acute respiratory distress syndrome, severe pneumonia, COVID-19, and hypercapnic respiratory failure due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We will mainly focus on well-conducted randomized controlled trials to determine whether steroids should be administered to critically ill patients presenting with these conditions.

Impact of diabetes on COVID-19 and glucocorticoids on patients with COVID-19 and diabetes during the Omicron variant epidemic: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in South China

BACKGROUND

To explore the impact of diabetes on the clinical features and prognosis of COVID-19 and assess the influence of glucocorticoid use on the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 and diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients admitted between December 2022 and January 2023. The patients were grouped according to diabetes and glucocorticoid use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among 400 patients with glucocorticoid data, 109 (27.3%) had diabetes. The inflammatory cytokines were higher in patients with diabetes, manifested by higher IL-6 (25.33 vs. 11.29 ng/L, p = 0.011), CRP (26.55 vs. 8.62 mg/L, p = 0.003), and PCT (0.07 vs. 0.04 ng/ml, p = 0.010), while CD4+ (319 vs. 506 /mL, p = 0.004) and CD8+ (141 vs. 261 /mL, p < 0.001) T lymphocytes were lower. The overall mortality rate of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with diabetes was 13.46%. The diabetic patients who received glucocorticoids vs. those who did not receive glucocorticoids had a similar mortality (15.00% vs. 11.39%, p = 0.591).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with COVID-19 and diabetes are more likely to experience hyperinflammatory response and T cell reduction, especially those with severe/critical disease. Glucocorticoid use was not associated with the prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with diabetes. Still, glucocorticoids should be used cautiously in diabetic patients with severe/critical COVID-19.

Effect of early administration of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and risk of development of acute respiratory distress syndrome: EARLY-DEX COVID-19 trial

Introduction and objectives

Corticosteroids are among the drugs demonstrating a mortality benefit for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The RECOVERY trial highlighted that dexamethasone reduced 28-day mortality for hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring either supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation. It is noted that approximately 30% of COVID-19 patients, initially presenting with mild symptoms, will advance to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially those with detectable laboratory markers of inflammation indicative of disease progression. Our research aimed to explore the efficacy of dexamethasone in preventing the progression to ARDS in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia who do not yet require additional oxygen but are at high risk of developing ARDS, potentially leading to a reduction in morbimortality.

Methods

In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we evaluated the impact of dexamethasone on adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia who did not need supplementary oxygen at admission but were identified as having risk factors for ARDS. The risk of ARDS was determined based on specific criteria: elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels over 245 U/L, C-reactive protein levels exceeding 100 mg/L, and a lymphocyte count below 0.80 × 109/L. Participants were randomly allocated to either receive dexamethasone or the standard care. The primary endpoints included the incidence of moderate or severe ARDS and all-cause mortality within 30 days post-enrollment.

Results

One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized. Among them, 41 were female (30.8%), with a mean age of 48.8 ± 14.4 years. Ten patients in the dexamethasone group (17.2%) and ten patients in the control group (14.7%) developed moderate ARDS with no significant differences. Mechanical ventilation was required in six patients (4.7%), with four in the treatment group and two in the control group. There were no deaths during hospitalization or during follow-up. An intermediate analysis for futility showed some differences between the control and treatment groups (Z = 0.0284). However, these findings were within the margins close to the region where the null hypothesis would not be rejected.

Conclusion

In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without oxygen needs but at risk of progressing to severe disease, early dexamethasone administration did not lead to a decrease in ARDS development.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04836780.

Simultaneous endobronchial and mediastinal mucormycosis in a patient with Diabetes Mellitus and SARS-CoV-2: A case report and literature review

Background

Mucormycosis can be lethal in people with immunocompromising conditions, especially Diabetes Mellitus. Correction of the underlying disorders, instant initiation of antifungal therapy, and surgical resection are the main components of treatment. Herin, we present the successful medical management of Mucormycosis in a patient with Diabetic Ketoacidosis and positive SARS-CoV-2 test who presented with a less seen condition: the simultaneity of mediastinal mass on one side and an endobronchial mass on the other.

Case presentation

An 18-year-old male with a history of insulin-dependent DM from 4 years ago presented to our hospital with sudden onset dyspnea, chest pain, sore throat, hoarseness, cough, and sputum. Also, we detected unilateral swelling in the neck and multiple lymph nodes in the neck. Lung auscultation revealed bilateral generalized wheezing. Primary laboratory tests detected high blood sugar, metabolic acidosis, positive urine ketone, high ESR, positive CRP, and leukocytosis; his polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 was positive. Chest X-ray showed left upper lobe consolidation. Computed tomography scan (CT-scan) of the chest revealed a large collapse consolidation in the left lung, mild left side pleural effusion, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and distention in the esophagus. With suspicion of malignancy, we performed flexible bronchoscopy and endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) which revealed a creamy tumoral lesion in the right main bronchus. The biopsy was consistent with Mucormycosis. We successfully treated Mucormycosis with Amphotericin-B liposomal.

Conclusion

Mucormycosis can mimic the clinical characteristics of malignancy, and emphasize the importance of considering appropriate differential diagnoses because timely diagnosis and treatment is potentially life-saving in Mucormycosis.

Therapeutically Fine-Tuning Autonomic Nervous System to Treat Sepsis: A New Perspective on the Immunomodulatory Effects of Acupuncture

Recent studies have highlighted the immunomodulatory effects of acupuncture on sepsis and proposed novel non-pharmacological or bioelectronic approaches to managing inflammatory illnesses. Establishing rules for selectively activating sympathetic or vagal nerve-mediated anti-inflammatory pathways using acupuncture has valuable clinical applications. Over the years, studies have revealed the segmental modulatory role of acupuncture in regulating visceral function by targeting the autonomic nervous system (ANS). In this review, we aim to summarize recent findings on acupuncture in treating sepsis, focusing on the underlying ANS mechanism, as well as the rules of acupoint specificity, intensity, frequency, and other parameters utilized in these studies. Mechanistically, the immunomodulatory properties of the sympathetic nervous system have been highlighted. Furthermore, we explore the immunotherapeutic benefits of acupuncture in treating sepsis. A better understanding of the immunoregulatory mechanism of sympathetic nervous system may offer novel approaches for the development of therapeutics to treat or prevent a variety of inflammatory diseases.

Epidemiology of candidemia during COVID-19 pandemic era in a teaching hospital: A non-concurrent cohort study

During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in the incidence of bloodstream infections caused by fungi of the Candida genus, also known as candidemia, was observed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study aimed to assess the incidence of candidemia, the factors related to COVID-19-associated candidemia (CAC), and prognostic factors. A non-concurrent cohort of 87 cases of patients aged over 18 years with candidemia between March 2020 and February 2022 was evaluated. Incidence density (ID) was calculated by the number of patient-days during the period. All causes of mortality within 30 days of observation were considered. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used, respectively, to determine factors associated with CAC and prognostic factors. Values <0.05 were considered significant. The ID of CAC was eight times higher than candidemia in patients without COVID-19 [2.40 per 1000 person-days vs. 0.27 per 1000 person-days; P < .01]. The corticosteroid therapy was as an independent factor associated with CAC [OR = 15.98 (3.64-70.03), P < .01], while abdominal surgery was associated with candidemia in patients without COVID-19 [OR = 0.09 (0.01-0.88), P = .04]. Both patients with and without COVID-19 had a high 30 days-mortality rate (80.8% vs. 73.8%, respectively; P = .59). Liver disease [HR = 3.36 (1.22-9.27); P = .02] and the Charlson score [HR = 1.17 (1.01-1.34); P = .03] were independent factors of death, while the use of antifungals [HR = 0.15 (0.07-0.33); P < .01] and removal of the central venous catheter [HR = 0.26 (0.12-0.56); P < .01] independently reduced the risk of death. These findings highlight the high incidence of candidemia in COVID-19 patients and its elevated mortality.

IL-13 decreases susceptibility to airway epithelial SARS-CoV-2 infection but increases disease severity in vivo

Treatments available to prevent progression of virus-induced lung diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are of limited benefit once respiratory failure occurs. The efficacy of approved and emerging cytokine signaling-modulating antibodies is variable and is affected by disease course and patient-specific inflammation patterns. Therefore, understanding the role of inflammation on the viral infectious cycle is critical for effective use of cytokine-modulating agents. We investigated the role of the type 2 cytokine IL-13 on SARS-CoV-2 binding/entry, replication, and host response in primary HAE cells in vitro and in a model of mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo. IL-13 protected airway epithelial cells from SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro by decreasing the abundance of ACE2-expressing ciliated cells rather than by neutralization in the airway surface liquid or by interferon-mediated antiviral effects. In contrast, IL-13 worsened disease severity in mice; the effects were mediated by eicosanoid signaling and were abolished in mice deficient in the phospholipase A2 enzyme PLA2G2D. We conclude that IL-13-induced inflammation differentially affects multiple steps of COVID-19 pathogenesis. IL-13-induced inflammation may be protective against initial SARS-CoV-2 airway epithelial infection; however, it enhances disease progression in vivo. Blockade of IL-13 and/or eicosanoid signaling may be protective against progression to severe respiratory virus-induced lung disease.

Pre-Existing Atrial Fibrillation in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: Insights from the CARDIO COVID 19-20 Registry

Pre-existing (chronic) atrial fibrillation (AF) has been identified as a risk factor for cardiovascular complications and mortality in patients with COVID-19; however, evidence in Latin America (LATAM) is scarce. This prospective and multicenter study from the CARDIO COVID 19-20 database includes hospitalized adults with COVID-19 from 14 countries in LATAM. A parsimonious logistic regression model was used to identify the main factors associated with mortality in a simulated case-control setting comparing patients with a history of AF to those without. In total, 3260 patients were included, of which 115 had AF. The AF group was older, had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, and had greater use of cardiovascular medications. In the model, AF, chronic kidney disease, and a respiratory rate > 25 at admission were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. The use of corticosteroids did not reach statistical significance; however, an effect was seen through the confidence interval. Thus, pre-existing AF increases mortality risk irrespective of other concomitant factors. Chronic kidney disease and a high respiratory rate at admission are also key factors for in-hospital mortality. These findings highlight the importance of comorbidities and regional characteristics in COVID-19 outcomes, in this instance, enhancing the evidence for patients from LATAM.

COVID-19 drug discovery and treatment options

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused substantial morbidity and mortality, and serious social and economic disruptions worldwide. Unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated older individuals with underlying diseases are especially prone to severe disease. In patients with non-fatal disease, long COVID affecting multiple body systems may persist for months. Unlike SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, which have either been mitigated or remained geographically restricted, SARS-CoV-2 has disseminated globally and is likely to continue circulating in humans with possible emergence of new variants that may render vaccines less effective. Thus, safe, effective and readily available COVID-19 therapeutics are urgently needed. In this Review, we summarize the major drug discovery approaches, preclinical antiviral evaluation models, representative virus-targeting and host-targeting therapeutic options, and key therapeutics currently in clinical use for COVID-19. Preparedness against future coronavirus pandemics relies not only on effective vaccines but also on broad-spectrum antivirals targeting conserved viral components or universal host targets, and new therapeutics that can precisely modulate the immune response during infection.