Association of AKI with mortality and complications in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis

Current and emerging therapies for alcohol-associated hepatitis

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) encompasses a spectrum of diseases caused by excessive alcohol consumption. ALD includes hepatic steatosis, steatohepatitis, variable degrees of fibrosis, cirrhosis, and alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), the latter being the most severe acute form of the disease. Severe AH is associated with high mortality (reaching up to 30%-50%) at 90 days. The cornerstone of ALD, and particularly AH, treatment continues to be abstinence, accompanied by support measures such as nutritional supplementation and management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). In severe AH with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥21, corticosteroids can be used, especially MELD score between 25 and 39, where the highest benefit is achieved. Other key aspects of treatment include the early identification of infections and their associated management and the proper identification of potential candidates for liver transplantation. The development of new therapies based on the pathophysiology and mechanisms of liver injury are underway. This includes the modulation and management of the innate immune response, gut dysbiosis, bacterial translocation, and bacteria-derived products from the intestine. These hold promise for the future of AH treatment.

Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Background Several primary studies have looked at the burden of chronic kidney disease among diabetic patients, but their results have shown significant variance in India. In order to determine the combined prevalence of chronic kidney disease and associated risk factors among patients with diabetes, this study used a combination of methods. Methods Over the course of two years, a cross-sectional observational study was undertaken in the Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital's Department of General Medicine including all chronic kidney disease patients of 18 years of age and above of either gender. People not suffering from the disease were chosen as controls. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-ELISA (NGAL-ELISA) sample analysis by the kit method was done. The study was carried out in accordance with Schedule Y, ICH GCP principles, and the Helsinki Declaration after receiving approval from the institutional ethics committee. Results In our study, the urinary mean KIM-1 was 49.75±4.35 μg/g Cr in the Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown etiology (CKDu) group and 1.43±0.15 μg/g Cr in the controls group. The mean NGAL levels of the CKDu Group and the controls group were 8.94±1.31 μg/g and 0.41±0.05 μg/g, respectively. In CKDu and the controls group, the mean eGFR (ml/min/1.73m²) was 69.83±7.91 and 108±3.7, respectively. The mean serum creatinine (mg/dL) was reported 3.79 in the CKDu group and 1.0 in the controls group. Conclusion Despite the urban centers previously being thought of as a non-endemic location, for the first time in the city, 60 CKDu patients are reported in this study. This is the first study to use the urinary biomarkers KIM-1 and NGAL to find suspected cases of CKDu and early kidney damage in local communities in the urban centers.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Controversies and consensus

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a poorly defined syndrome characterised by rapid clinical deterioration in patients with chronic liver disease. Consequences include high short-term morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource utilisation. ACLF encompasses a dysregulated, systemic inflammatory response, which can precipitate extra hepatic organ failures. Common precipitants include infection, alcoholic hepatitis, and reactivation of viral hepatitis although frequently no cause is identified. Heterogenous definitions, diagnostic criteria, and treatment guidelines, have been proposed by international hepatology societies. This can result in delayed or missed diagnoses of ACLF, significant variability in clinical management, and under-estimation of disease burden. Liver transplantation may be considered but the mainstay of treatment is organ support, often in the intensive care unit. This review will provide clarity around where are the controversies and consensus in ACLF including: Epidemiology and resource utilisation, key clinical and diagnostic features, strategies for management, and research gaps.

Novel biomarkers of acute kidney injury in chronic liver disease: Where do we stand after a decade of research?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequently encountered complication in decompensated chronic liver disease (CLD) with an estimated prevalence of 20%-50% among hospitalized patients. AKI often heralds the onset of a downhill course in the natural history of CLD. Serum creatinine has several limitations as a stand-alone marker of AKI in patients with decompensated CLD. The concept of hepatorenal syndrome, the prototype of AKI in decompensated CLD, has evolved tremendously over recent years. There is emerging evidence of an additional "structural" component in the pathophysiology of hepatorenal syndrome-AKI, which was previously identified as a purely "functional" form of renal impairment. Lacunae in the existent biochemical arsenal for diagnosis and prognosis of AKI have fueled enthusiastic research in the field of novel biomarkers of kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis. The advent of these biomarkers provides a crucial window of opportunity to improve the diagnosis and clinical outcomes of this vulnerable cohort of patients. This review summarizes the dynamic concept of renal dysfunction in CLD and the available literature on the role of novel biomarkers of AKI in assessing renal function, identifying AKI subtypes, and predicting prognosis. There is special emphasis on the renal tubular injury marker, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, the most exhaustively studied biomarker of AKI in the CLD population.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Evaluation and Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cirrhosis: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update is to review the available published evidence and expert advice regarding the clinical management of patients with suspected acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

This article provides practical advice for the management of patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury based on the best available published evidence. This best practice document is not based on a formal systematic review. This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through the standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology. These Best Practice Advice (BPA) statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Since systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Acute kidney injury (AKI) should be diagnosed when the serum creatinine increases by ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or is ≥50% from baseline or when the urine output is reduced below 0.5 mL/kg/h for >6 hours. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Preventive measures against the development of AKI in cirrhosis include (1) avoidance of potentially nephrotoxic medications like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (2) avoidance of excessive or unmonitored diuretics or nonselective beta-blockade, (3) avoidance of large-volume paracentesis without albumin replacement, and (4) counseling patients to avoid alcohol use. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: (A) Investigation is directed to determining the cause of AKI, which can be due to hypovolemic causes (volume responsive, and the most common cause of AKI in patients with cirrhosis); acute tubular necrosis; hepatorenal syndrome with AKI (HRS-AKI) (a functional renal failure that persists despite volume repletion); HRS with acute kidney disease, a type of functional renal failure of <3 months- duration in which criteria for HRS-AKI are not met; or postrenal, which occurs only rarely. (B) The specific type of AKI should be identified through a careful history, physical examination, blood biochemistry, urine microscopic examination, urine chemistry (Na+ and urea) and selected urinary biomarkers, and renal ultrasound. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: A rigorous search for infection is required in all patients with AKI. A diagnostic paracentesis should be carried out to evaluate for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; blood and urine cultures and chest radiograph are also required. There is no role for routine prophylactic antibiotics in patients with AKI, but broad-spectrum antibiotics should be started whenever infection is strongly suspected. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: When AKI is diagnosed, diuretics and nonselective beta-blockers should be held, NSAIDs discontinued, the precipitating cause of AKI treated, and fluid losses replaced, administering albumin 1 g/kg/d for 2 days if the serum creatinine shows doubling from baseline. Urine output, vital signs, and when indicated, echocardiography or CVP (if there is a pre-existing central line) should be used to monitor fluid status. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: When the serum creatinine remains higher than twice the baseline value despite these measures, treatment of HRS-AKI should be initiated with albumin at a dose of 1 g/kg intravenously on day 1 followed by 20-40 g daily along with vasoactive agents (terlipressin; if terlipressin is not available, either a combination of octreotide and midodrine; or norepinephrine, depending on institutional preferences) and continued either until 24 hours following the return of the serum creatinine level to within ≤0.3 mg/dL of baseline for 2 consecutive days or for a total of 14 days of therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Terlipressin should be initiated as a bolus dose of 1 mg every 4-6 hours (total 4-6 mg/d). The dose should be increased to a maximum of 2 mg every 4-6 hours (total 8-12 mg/d) if there is no reduction in serum creatinine at day 3 of therapy by at least 25% compared to the baseline value. Alternatively, clinicians can administer terlipressin by continuous intravenous infusion at a lower starting dose of 2 mg/d, which may reduce ischemic side effects and increase the dose gradually every 24-48 hours up to a maximum dose of 12 mg/d, or reversal of HRS. As per Food and Drug Administration restrictions, terlipressin should not be used in patients with a serum creatinine ≥5 mg/dL, or oxygen saturation of <90%. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Oral midodrine when used should be initiated at doses of 7.5 mg and titrated upward to 12.5 mg 3 times daily with octreotide (starting with 100 μg and titrating upward to 200 μg subcutaneously 3 times daily). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Norepinephrine should be used as a continuous intravenous infusion at a starting dose of 0.5 mg/h and the dose increased every 4 hours by 0.5 mg/h to a maximum of 3 mg/h with the goal of increasing the mean arterial pressure by ≥10 mm Hg and/or the urine output to >50 mL/h for at least 4 hours. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: The risks of ischemic side effects of terlipressin and norepinephrine include angina and ischemia of fingers, skin, and intestine. These side effects may be lowered by starting at the lowest dose and gradually titrating upward. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Fluid status should be closely monitored because of the risk of pulmonary edema with excessive use of albumin. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) may be used in the management of (A) AKI secondary to acute tubular necrosis; (B) HRS-AKI in potential candidates for liver transplantation (that is, RRT should not be used in patients with HRS-AKI who are not candidates for liver transplantation); and (C) AKI of uncertain etiology in which the need for RRT may be considered on an individual basis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts should not be used as a specific treatment of HRS-AKI. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Liver transplantation is the most effective treatment for HRS-AKI. Pharmacotherapy for HRS-AKI before proceeding with liver transplantation may be associated with better post-liver transplantation outcomes. Selected patients with HRS-AKI may require simultaneous liver kidney transplantation based on updated Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network listing criteria.

Natural history, spectrum and outcome of stage 3 AKI in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is limited data on natural course and interventions in stage-3 acute kidney injury (AKI-3) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). We studied the factors of AKI-3 reversal and outcomes of dialysis in ACLF patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with ACLF were prospectively enrolled (n = 1022) and variables determining AKI and its outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

At 1 month, 337 (33%) patients had AKI-3, of which, 131 had AKI-3 at enrolment and 206 developed AKI-3 during hospital stay. Of patients with AKI-3 at enrolment, 18% showed terlipressin response, 21% had AKI resolution and 59% required dialysis. High MELD (≥35) (model 1), serum bilirubin (≥23 mg/dL) (model 2) and AARC score (≥11) (model 3) were independent risk factors for dialysis. Dialysis was associated with worse survival in all AKI patients but improved outcomes in patients with AKI-3 (p = .022, HR 0.69 [0.50-0.95]). Post-mortem kidney biopsies (n = 61) revealed cholemic nephropathy (CN) in 54%, acute tubular necrosis (ATN) in 31%, and a combination (CN and ATN) in 15%. Serum bilirubin was significantly higher in patients with CN, CN and ATN compared with ATN respectively ([30.8 ± 12.2] vs. [26.7 ± 12.0] vs. [18.5 ± 9.8]; p = .002).

CONCLUSION

AKI-3 rapidly increases from 13% to 33% within 30 days in ACLF patients. Histopathological data suggested cholemic nephropathy as the predominant cause which correlated with high bilirubin levels. AKI-3 resolves in only one in five patients. Patients with AARC grade 3 and MELD >35 demand need for early dialysis in AKI-3 for improved outcomes.

Automated Machine Learning in Predicting 30-Day Mortality in Patients with Non-Cholestatic Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of automated machine learning (AutoML) in predicting 30-day mortality in non-cholestatic cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 932 cirrhotic patients were included from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between 2014 and 2020. Participants were divided into training and validation datasets at a ratio of 8.5:1.5. Models were developed on the H₂O AutoML platform in the training dataset, and then were evaluated in the validation dataset by area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). The best AutoML model was interpreted by SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) Plot, Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), and Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanation (LIME).

RESULTS

The model, based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, performed better (AUC 0.888) than the other AutoML models (logistic regression 0.673, gradient boost machine 0.886, random forest 0.866, deep learning 0.830, stacking 0.850), as well as the existing scorings (the model of end-stage liver disease [MELD] score 0.778, MELD-Na score 0.782, and albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] score 0.662). The most key variable in the XGBoost model was high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, followed by creatinine, white blood cell count, international normalized ratio, etc. Conclusion: The AutoML model based on the XGBoost algorithm presented better performance than the existing scoring systems for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with non-cholestatic cirrhosis. It shows the promise of AutoML in its future medical application.

Timely Albumin Improves Survival in Patients With Cirrhosis on Diuretic Therapy Who Develop Acute Kidney Injury: Real-World Evidence in the United States

Background and Aims

Patients admitted with decompensated cirrhosis who develop acute kidney injury (AKI) tend to experience poor outcomes, even if provided with increased organ support such as renal replacement therapies. We assessed the association of albumin administered ≤24 hours of admission with hospital length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

The Cerner Health Facts Database was queried for hospitalized patients with cirrhosis who had >0.3 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine within 48 hours and received diuretics following admission between January 2009 and April 2018. This study received institutional review board exemption through federal regulation 45CFR46. Albumin infusion was "timely" if administered ≤24 hours after admission and "nontimely" if administered >24 hours after admission or not at all. Two subgroups were assessed: the AKILOS subgroup (patients who survived to discharge) and the AKIMORTALITY RISK subgroup (patients with the highest risk of mortality, ie, AKI stage 3).

Results

A total of 4135 hospitalizations with cirrhosis and AKI were grouped into AKILOS (n = 3321) and AKIMORTALITY RISK (n = 609) subgroups. Albumin administration occurred in 59.7% of the AKILOS subgroup and 77.8% of the AKIMORTALITY RISK subgroup, but timely treatment only occurred in 25.9% and 35.8% of encounters within these subgroups, respectively. Risk-adjusted analysis showed timely albumin administration to be associated with a 15.5% reduction (P < .01) in LOS in the AKILOS subgroup and a 49% reduction in the odds of death (adjusted odds ratio: 0.51; P < .01) in the AKIMORTALITY RISK subgroup, when compared to the nontimely group.

Conclusion

Among patients with cirrhosis and AKI, treatment with albumin ≤24 hours after admission was associated with a shorter LOS and lower risk of death in patients with stage 3 AKI.

Patterns of kidney dysfunction in acute-on-chronic liver failure: Relationship with kidney and patients' outcome

Impairment of kidney function is common in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Patterns of kidney dysfunction and their impact on kidney and patient outcomes are ill-defined. Aims of the current study were to investigate patterns of kidney dysfunction and their impact on kidney and patient outcomes in patients with acute decompensation (AD) of cirrhosis, with or without ACLF. This prospective study includes 639 admissions for AD (232 with ACLF; 407 without) in 518 patients. Data were collected at admission and during hospitalization, and patients were followed up for 3 months. Urine samples were analyzed for kidney biomarkers. Most patients with ACLF (92%) had associated acute kidney injury (AKI), in most cases without previous chronic kidney disease (CKD), whereas some had AKI-on-CKD (70% and 22%, respectively). Prevalence of AKI in patients without ACLF was 35% (p < 0.001 vs. ACLF). Frequency of CKD alone was low and similar in both groups (4% and 3%, respectively); only a few patients with ACLF (4%) had no kidney dysfunction. AKI in ACLF was associated with poor kidney and patient outcomes compared with no ACLF (AKI resolution: 54% vs. 89%; 3-month survival: 51% vs. 86%, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). Independent predictive factors of 3-month survival were Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score, ACLF status, and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). AKI is almost universal in patients with ACLF, sometimes associated with CKD, whereas CKD alone is uncommon. Prognosis of AKI depends on ACLF status. AKI without ACLF has good prognosis. Best predictors of 3-month survival are MELD-Na, ACLF status, and urine NGAL.

Acute kidney disease is common and associated with poor outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acute kidney disease (AKD) is the persistence of acute kidney injury (AKI) for up to 3 months, which is proposed to be the time-window where critical interventions can be initiated to alter downstream outcomes of AKI. In cirrhosis, AKD and its impact on outcomes have been scantly investigated. We aimed to define the incidence and outcomes associated with AKD in a nationwide US cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI in the Cerner-Health-Facts database from 1/2009-09/2017 (n = 6,250) were assessed for AKD and were followed-up for 180 days. AKI and AKD were defined based on KDIGO and ADQI AKD and renal recovery consensus criteria, respectively. The primary outcome measure was mortality, and the secondary outcome measure was de novo chronic kidney disease (CKD). Competing-risk multivariable models were used to determine the independent association of AKD with primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

AKD developed in 32% of our cohort. On multivariable competing-risk analysis adjusting for significant confounders, patients with AKD had higher risk of mortality at 90 (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.37; 95% CI 1.14-1.66; p = 0.001) and 180 (sHR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14-1.64; p = 0.001) days. The incidence of de novo CKD was 37.5%: patients with AKD had higher rates of de novo CKD (64.0%) compared to patients without AKD (30.7%; p <0.001). After adjusting for confounders, AKD was independently associated with de novo CKD (sHR 2.52; 95% CI 2.01-3.15; p <0.001) on multivariable competing-risk analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

AKD develops in 1 in 3 hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI and it is associated with worse survival and de novo CKD. Interventions that target AKD may improve outcomes of patients with cirrhosis and AKI.

LAY SUMMARY

In a nationwide US cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury, acute kidney disease developed in 1 in 3 patients and was associated with worse survival and chronic kidney disease. Interventions that target acute kidney disease may improve outcomes of patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury.

Prognosis of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney disease

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of acute kidney disease (AKD), defined as a glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or a rise in serum creatinine (sCr) of <50% for <3 months, is not clearly known.

AIM

To study the prevalence, predictive factors and clinical outcomes in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with AKD.

METHODS

The North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease prospectively enrolled hospitalized decompensated cirrhotic patients. Patients were separated into those with normal renal function (controls or C), AKD or stage 1 AKI as their worst renal dysfunction per International Club of Ascites definition and compared. Parameters assessed included demographics, laboratory data, haemodynamics, renal and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

1244 patients with cirrhosis and ascites (C: 704 or 57%; AKD: 176 or 14%; stage 1 AKI: 364 or 29%) with similar demographics were enrolled. AKD patients had similar baseline sCr but higher hospital admission in the previous 6 months, and higher peak sCr, compared to controls, with their peak sCr being lower than that in stage 1 AKI patients (all P < .0001). The in-hospital and 30-day survival for AKD patients were intermediary between that for controls and stage 1 AKI patients (96% vs 91% vs 86%, P < .0001). The strongest predictors for AKD development while in hospital were the presence of a second infection (OR: 2.44) and diabetes (OR: 1.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AKD had intermediate outcomes between stage 1 AKI and controls. AKD patients, especially those with diabetes and a second infection, need careful monitoring and prompt treatment for AKD to prevent negative outcomes.

Value of Acute Kidney Injury in Predicting Mortality in Vietnamese Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis

Background: Acute kidney injury remains a common complication with a poor prognosis, and is a significant predictor of mortality in cirrhosis patients. We aimed to determine the percentage of acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhosis patients and evaluate the treatment results of acute kidney injury as well as several factors related to the mortality of decompensated cirrhosis patients. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on decompensated cirrhosis patients in Can Tho City, Vietnam, from 2019 to 2020. Decompensated cirrhosis patients were found to have acute kidney injury on admission by a blood creatinine test. They were treated according to ICA 2015 standards, after which they were monitored and evaluated for treatment outcomes during hospitalization. Results: Of 250 decompensated cirrhosis patients, 64 (25.6%) had acute kidney injury and 37.5% died. Several factors were associated with mortality in decompensated cirrhosis patients, such as Child–Pugh C (p = 0.02; OR = 3, 95% CI 1.5–6.3), acute kidney injury (p < 0.0001; OR = 9.5, 95% CI 4.3–21.1), hyponatremia (p = 0.01; OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.1), elevated total bilirubin > 51 µmol/L (p = 0.03; OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1–4.6), and prothrombin < 70% (p = 0.03; OR = 6.8, 95% CI 1–51.6). Hypoalbuminemia was unrelated to mortality in these patients (p = 0.8; OR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.5–2.7), but gastrointestinal bleeding significantly increased mortality in these patients up to 2.3 times (p = 0.03; OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.9). Three independent factors regarding mortality in decompensated cirrhosis patients included acute kidney injury, hepatic encephalopathy, and gastrointestinal bleeding. The rate of acute kidney injury in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was 25.6%; the mortality rate was 37.5%. Conclusions: Acute kidney injury was a valuable predictor of mortality in Vietnamese patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Role of Novel Kidney Biomarkers in Patients With Cirrhosis and After Liver Transplantation

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are important drivers of morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation (LT). In this review, we examine the role of novel kidney biomarkers for early recognition of kidney injury. Studies are limited by lack of reference standards, heterogeneous definitions of outcomes and biomarker cutoffs, and inconsistent diagnostic performance. Overall, a change in biomarker is more relevant than an absolute cutoff. Cystatin C and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) are the most studied candidate biomarkers and identify AKI or progression of AKI earlier than serum creatinine (sCr). Kidney injury molecule 1 and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) also show potential. NGAL and interleukin 18 may play a role in differentiating acute tubular necrosis from other forms of AKI. Combining novel biomarkers with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score may assist prognosis. Persistent elevations in select markers (eg, NGAL) can portend irreversible injury. Several pretransplantation markers (including sCr) predict posttransplantation kidney dysfunction. Pretransplantation assessment of clinical factors (eg, age, diabetes) and novel markers (osteopontin and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 [TIMP-1]) may predict renal kidney recovery after LT. Intraoperative changes in biomarkers predict early post-LT AKI. Prediction of CKD remains difficult, although a combination of biomarkers (eg, beta-2 microglobulin, CD40) is promising. Novel biomarkers have yet to replace sCr in guideline-based evaluation and management of kidney dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. We propose a theoretical framework for practical incorporation of these biomarkers that considers patient characteristics (risk for irreversible injury), markers of functional and structural change, and assessment of the AKI-CKD continuum to identify patients at the highest risk for progressive kidney disease before and after LT.

Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: Prevalence, Predictors, and In-Hospital Mortality at a District Hospital in Ghana

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most severe complications of cirrhosis and portends an ominous prognosis with an estimated mortality of about 50% in a month and 65% within a year. Infection and hypovolemia have been found to be the main precipitating factors of AKI in liver cirrhosis. Early detection and treatment of AKI may improve outcomes. AKI in patients with liver cirrhosis in Ghana and their impact on inpatient mortality are largely unknown. This study was aimed at determining the prevalence, precipitating factors, predictors, and in-hospital mortality of AKI in patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to a district hospital in Ghana.

Methods

Consecutive hospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis from 1 January 2018 to 30 April 2020 were recruited. Patient's demographic data and clinical features were collected using a standardized questionnaire. Biochemical and haematological tests as well as abdominal ultrasound scans were done for all patients. All patients were then followed up until discharge or death.

Results

There were 117 (65.4%) males out of the 179 patients with a mean age of 49.94 and 45.84 years for those with and without AKI, respectively. The prevalence of AKI was 27.9% (50/179). Out of 50 participants with AKI, 64.0% (32/50) died, contributing 41.0% of all in-patient mortality amongst participants. There was a significant association between AKI and death (p ≤ 0.001). The major precipitating factors of AKI were infections (60.0%), hypovolemia (20.0%) due to gastrointestinal bleeding and gastroenteritis, and refractory ascites (16.0%). Alkaline phosphatase, INR, model for end-stage liver disease sodium, sodium, and blood urea nitrogen were independent predictors of AKI.

Conclusion

AKI was common among patients with liver cirrhosis with high in-patient mortality. Identification of these precipitants and independent predictors of AKI may lead to prompt and targeted treatment with reduction in patient mortality.

CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS WITH ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY (AKI) HAVE HIGHER MORTALITY AFTER ABDOMINAL HERNIA SURGERY

BACKGROUND

The incidence of abdominal hernia in cirrhotic patients is as higher as 20%; in cases of major ascites the incidence may increase up to 40%. One of the main and most serious complications in cirrhotic postoperative period (PO) is acute kidney injury (AKI).

AIM

To analyze the renal function of cirrhotic patients undergoing to hernia surgery and evaluate the factors related to AKI.

METHODS

Follow-up of 174 cirrhotic patients who underwent hernia surgery. Laboratory tests including the renal function were collected in the PO.AKI was defined based on the consensus of the ascite´s club. They were divided into two groups: with (AKI PO) and without AKI .

RESULTS

All 174 patients were enrolled and AKI occurred in 58 (34.9%). In the AKI PO group, 74.1% had emergency surgery, whereas in the group without AKI PO it was only 34.6%.In the group with AKI PO, 90.4% presented complications, whereas in the group without AKI PO they occurred only in 29.9%. Variables age, baseline MELD, baseline creatinine, creatinine in immediate postoperative (POI), AKI and the presence of ascites were statistically significant for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

There is association between AKI PO and emergency surgery and, also, between AKI PO and complications after surgery. The factors related to higher occurrence were initial MELD, basal Cr, Cr POI. The patients with postoperative AKI had a higher rate of complications and higher mortality.

Fractional Excretion of Sodium and Urea in Differentiating Acute Kidney Injury Phenotypes in Decompensated Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Prerenal acute kidney injury (prerenal AKI), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI), and acute tubular necrosis (ATN-AKI) are the various phenotypes of acute kidney injury, which are described in decompensated cirrhosis. It has therapeutic and prognostic implications. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of fractional excretion of sodium and urea (FENa and FEUrea) for differentiating AKI phenotypes.

METHODS

A prospective analysis was performed in 200 patients with decompensated cirrhosis with AKI to derive receiver operating curve, optimal cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity. These findings were validated in an independent cohort (n = 50) to differentiate ATN-AKI, HRS-AKI, and prerenal AKI.

RESULTS

The incidence of prerenal AKI, HRS-AKI, and ATN-AKI were 37.5%, 34%, and 28.5% in the derivation cohort and 28%, 38%, and 34% in the validation cohort respectively. The median FENa was significantly different in various phenotypes of AKI in the derivation and validation cohort (P 0.001); FEUrea was significantly different in the derivation cohort (P 0.0001), not in the validation cohort (P 0.106). The AUC for FENa (cut-off, sensitivity/specificity) was 86.6% (0.567, 89/71) and for FEUrea was 60.3% (34.73, 70/58) for ATN-AKI vs. non-ATN-AKI. The area under the curve for FENa to differentiate between HRS-AKI vs. non-HRS-AKI was 74.5%. FEUrea could not differentiate HRS-AKI vs. non-HRS-AKI (AUC 60.4%) satisfactorily. FENa and FEUrea were unable to differentiate between prerenal AKI and HRS-AKI (AUC <70%).

CONCLUSION

Among cirrhotics FENa at admission is a simple, commonly available clinical tool that can be used to differentiate structural AKI from prerenal AKI and HRS-AKI. The newly derived lowered cut-off value of FENa makes the diagnosis of ATN-AKI easier, faster and thus obviates the need for extensive workup in a significant proportion of patients. FENa appears better than FEUrea in decompensated cirrhosis with AKI.

Practice patterns and outcomes associated with intravenous albumin in patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Guidelines recommend albumin as the plasma-expander of choice for acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis. However, the impact of these recommendations on patient outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to determine the practice-patterns and outcomes associated with albumin use in a large, nationwide-US cohort of hospitalized cirrhotics with AKI.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in hospitalized cirrhotics with AKI using Cerner-Health-Facts database from January 2009 to March 2018. 6786 were included for analysis on albumin-practice-patterns, and 4126 had available outcomes data. Propensity-score-adjusted model was used to determine the association between albumin use, AKI-recovery and in-hospital survival.

RESULTS

Median age was 61-years (60% male, 70% white), median serum-creatinine was 1.8 mg/dL and median Model for End-stage Liver Disease Sodium (MELD-Na) score was 24. Albumin was given to 35% of patients, of which 50% received albumin within 48-hours of AKI-onset, and 17% received appropriate weight-based dosing. Albumin was used more frequently in patients with advanced complications of cirrhosis, higher MELD-Na scores and patients admitted to urban-teaching hospitals. After propensity-matching and multivariable adjustment, albumin use was not associated with AKI-recovery (odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 95% confidence-interval [CI]: 0.59-1.07, P = .130) or in-hospital survival (OR 0.76 [95% CI: 0.46-1.25], P = .280), compared with crystalloids. Findings were unchanged in subgroup analyses of patients with varying cirrhosis complications and disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

USA hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI frequently do not receive intravenous albumin, and albumin use was not associated with improved clinical outcomes. Prospective randomised trials are direly needed to evaluate the impact of albumin in cirrhotics with AKI.

An Integrated Review of the Hepatorenal Syndrome

Among the complications of cirrhosis, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is characterized by having the worst survival rate. HRS is a disorder that involves the deterioration of kidney function caused primarily by a systemic circulatory dysfunction, but in recent years, systemic inflammation and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy have been discovered to also play an important role. The diagnosis of HRS requires to meet the new International Club of Ascites-Acute Kidney Injury (ICA-AKI) and Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury (HRS-AKI) criteria after ruling out other causes of kidney injury. At the time of diagnosis, it is important to start the medical treatment as soon as possible where three types of vasoconstrictors have been recognized: vasopressin analogs (ornipressin and terlipressin), alpha-adrenergic agonists (norepinephrine and midodrine) and somatostatin analogues (octreotide); all should be combined with albumin infusion. Among them, terlipressin and albumin are the first lines of treatment in most cases, although terlipressin should be monitor closely due to its adverse events. The best treatment of choice is a liver transplant, because it is the only definitive treatment for this disease.

Hepatorenal syndrome in acute-on-chronic liver failure with acute kidney injury: more questions requiring discussion

In cirrhosis with ascites, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a specific prerenal dysfunction unresponsive to fluid volume expansion. Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) comprises a group of clinical syndromes with multiple organ failure and early high mortality. There are differences in the characterization of ACLF between the Eastern and Western medical communities. Patients with ACLF and acute kidney injury (AKI) have more structural injuries, contributing to confusion in diagnosing HRS-AKI. In this review, we discuss progress in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of HRS-AKI, especially in patients with ACLF. Controversy regarding HRS-AKI in ACLF and acute liver failure, hepatic carcinoma, shock, sepsis, and chronic kidney disease is also discussed. Research on the treatment of HRS-AKI with ACLF needs to be more actively pursued to improve disease prognosis.

The prognostic impact of different stages of acute kidney injury in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: a prospective cohort study

AIM

To assess the impact of the different stages of acute kidney injury (AKI) on the prognosis of patients hospitalized with decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted in two tertiary hospitals in southern Brazil. Participants were considered eligible if they were admitted for acute decompensation of cirrhosis. The main exposure factor was the onset of AKI. AKI stages were defined according the European recommendations. The outcomes evaluated were survival time and death rates at 28 and 90 days from hospital admission. A χ2 test was used to compare mortality between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were undertaken assessing time to event as days from AKI diagnosis to death or liver transplant.

RESULTS

Two hundred and five patients were included in the study, and 121 met the criteria for AKI. Patients with AKI 1b, AKI 2 and AKI 3 had higher 90-day mortality than patients without AKI (P = 0.008, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, there was no difference in 90-day mortality when patients with AKI 1a were compared with those without AKI (P = 0.742). The mean survival of patients without AKI was higher than that of patients with AKI 1b (591.4 and 305.4 days, respectively, P = 0.015), while there was no significant difference between the mean survival of patients without AKI and that of patients with AKI 1a (591.4 and 373.6 days, respectively, P = 0.198).

CONCLUSION

Only AKI ≥1b seems to substantially impact mortality of patients hospitalized for acute decompensation of cirrhosis.

Predictors of Development of Hepatorenal Syndrome in Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a type of acute kidney injury (AKI), occurring in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis and is associated with high mortality. We aim to describe the predictors associated with the development of HRS in cirrhotic patients with AKI. We retrospectively analyzed 529 cirrhotic patient encounters with AKI across all Northwell Health institutions between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. We performed multivariate analyses to determine independent predictors of development of HRS. Alcoholic cirrhosis was the most common identified etiology of cirrhosis. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scorewas18 (±7). Ascites was the most commonly identified clinical feature of portal hypertension. Infection was identified in 38.4% of patients with urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis being the most common. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis occurred in 5.9% of patients. The most common cause of AKI was pre-renal. Hepatorenal syndrome was identified in 9.8% of patient encounters. Predictors of HRS were history of ascites, serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL, albumin <3 g/dL, bilirubin >2 mg/dL and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. We demonstrate strong predictors for the development of HRS which can aid clinicians to attain an early diagnosis of HRS, leading to prompt and targeted management and improving outcomes.

Management of Decompensated Cirrhosis and Associated Syndromes

Patients with cirrhosis account for 3% of intensive care unit admissions with hospital mortality exceeding 50%; however, improvements in survival among patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis and organ failure have been described when treated in specialized liver transplant centers. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct clinical syndrome characterized by decompensated cirrhosis associated with one or more organ failures resulting in a significantly higher short-term mortality. In this review, we will discuss the management of common life-threatening complications in the patient with cirrhosis that require intensive care management including neurologic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and renal complications.

Plasma Cystatin C Level is a Prognostic Marker of Morbidity and Mortality in Hospitalized Decompensated Cirrhotic Patients

Introduction : Cystatin C (CysC) is biomarker for early detection of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, there is limited evidence in decompensated cirrhotic patients without AKI at admission. This study aimed to assess CysC as a predictor of 90-day mortality. Methods : Decompensated cirrhotic patients without AKI were prospectively enrolled. CysC and creatinine were measured within 24 hours of admission and compared between patients with in-hospital complications (AKI, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF)) vs. those without, and survivors vs. non-survivors. The AUROC and cut-off point of CysC in predicting 90-day mortality were determined. Results : Of 137 decompensated cirrhotic patients, 46 without AKI at admission were included (58.7% male, age 60.8 ± 11.2years, MELD 13.1 ± 5.1, ChildA / B / C 43.5% / 39.1% / 17.4%). The mean CysC level tended to be higher in patients with ACLF (1.52 ± 0.60 vs. 1.11 ± 0.28, p = 0.05), and significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors (1.61 ± 0.53 vs. 1.08 ± 0.28, p = 0.013). The 90-day mortality rate was 21.7%. After adjusting with age and bacterial infection on admission, CysC level  ≥ 1.25 mg / L was significantly associated with 90-day mortality. The CysC cut-off level  ≥ 1.25 mg / L provided 80% sensitivity and 75% specificity for predicting 90-day mortality. Conclusion : Plasma CysC within 24 hours could be used as a predictor for 90-day mortality and development of ACLF in decompensated cirrhotic patients. J. Med. Invest. 68 : 302-308, August, 2021.

Post-Liver Transplant Acute Kidney Injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common condition following liver transplantation (LT). It negatively impacts patient outcomes by increasing the chances of developing chronic kidney disease and reducing graft and patient survival rates. Multiple definitions of AKI have been proposed and used throughout the years, with the International Club of Ascites definition being the most widely now used for patients with cirrhosis. Multiple factors are associated with the development of post-LT AKI and can be categorized into pre-LT comorbidities, donor and recipient characteristics, operative factors, and post-LT factors. Many of these factors can be optimized in an attempt to minimize the risk of AKI occurring and to improve renal function if AKI is already present. A special consideration during the post-LT phase is needed for immunosuppression as certain immunosuppressive medications can be nephrotoxic. The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus (TAC) is the mainstay of immunosuppression but can result in AKI. Several strategies including use of the monoclonoal antibody basilixamab to allow for delayed initiation of tacrolimus therapy and minimization through combination and minimization or elimination of TAC through combination with mycophenolate mofetil or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have been implemented to reverse and avoid AKI in the post-LT setting. Renal replacement therapy may ultimately be required to support patients until recovery of AKI after LT. Overall, by improving renal function in post-LT patients with AKI, outcomes can be improved.

Admission Urinary and Serum Metabolites Predict Renal Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute kidney injury (AKI) has a poor prognosis in cirrhosis. Given the variability of creatinine, the prediction of AKI and dialysis by other markers is needed. The aim of this study is to determine the role of serum and urine metabolomics in the prediction of AKI and dialysis in an inpatient cirrhosis cohort.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Inpatients with cirrhosis from 11 North American Consortium of End-stage Liver Disease centers who provided admission serum/urine when they were AKI and dialysis-free were included. Analysis of covariance adjusted for demographics, infection, and cirrhosis severity was performed to identify metabolites that differed among patients (1) who developed AKI or not; (2) required dialysis or not; and/pr (3) within AKI subgroups who needed dialysis or not. We performed random forest and AUC analyses to identify specific metabolite(s) associated with outcomes. Logistic regression with clinical variables with/without metabolites was performed. A total of 602 patients gave serum (218 developed AKI, 80 needed dialysis) and 435 gave urine (164 developed AKI, 61 needed dialysis). For AKI prediction, clinical factor-adjusted AUC was 0.91 for serum and 0.88 for urine. Major metabolites such as uremic toxins (2,3-dihydroxy-5-methylthio-4-pentenoic acid [DMTPA], N2N2dimethylguanosine, uridine/pseudouridine) and tryptophan/tyrosine metabolites (kynunerate, 8-methoxykyunerate, quinolinate) were higher in patients who developed AKI. For dialysis prediction, clinical factor-adjusted AUC was 0.93 for serum and 0.91 for urine. Similar metabolites as AKI were altered here. For dialysis prediction in those with AKI, the AUC was 0.81 and 0.79 for serum/urine. Lower branched-chain amino-acid (BCAA) metabolites but higher cysteine, tryptophan, glutamate, and DMTPA were seen in patients with AKI needing dialysis. Serum/urine metabolites were additive to clinical variables for all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific admission urinary and serum metabolites were significantly additive to clinical variables to predict AKI development and dialysis initiation in inpatients with cirrhosis. These observations can potentially facilitate earlier initiation of renoprotective measures.

The Role of Urinary N-Acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase in Cirrhotic Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study

Background and Aims: Currently, it is difficult to predict the reversibility of renal function and to discriminate renal parenchymal injury in cirrhotic patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether urine N-acetyl-β-d-Glucosaminidase (NAG) can predict the survival and response to terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with AKI. Methods: Two hundred sixty-two cirrhotic consecutive patients who developed AKI were prospectively enrolled from 11 tertiary medical centers in Korea between 2016 to 2019. AKI was defined as an increase in serum Cr (SCr) of 0.3 mg/dL or a 50% increase in baseline SCr. Patients diagnosed with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) were treated with terlipressin plus albumin. Results: The patients were 58.8 ± 12.9 years old on average and were predominantly male (72.5%). The mean MELD score was 25.3 ± 9.1. When classified according to the AKI phenotype, there were 119 pre-renal, 52 acute tubular necrosis, 18 miscellaneous, and 73 HRS-AKI patients. However, the urine NAG was not effective at discriminating AKI phenotypes, except for HRS-AKI. The baseline urine NAG increased as the baseline AKI stage increased (p < 0.001). In addition, within the same AKI stage, the urine NAG values were significantly lower in the AKI-resolved group than in the unresolved group. The urine NAG level was significantly lower in living patients compared with those who died or who underwent a liver transplant within 3 months (p = 0.005). In the multivariate analysis, the increased urine NAG was a significant risk factor for the 3-month transplant-free survival (TFS) rate, especially in patients with Child–Pugh class ≤ B or MELD < 24. The urine NAG did not predict the response to terlipressin treatment in patients with HRS. Conclusions: Urine NAG is strongly associated with the severity of AKI in patients with liver cirrhosis and is useful for predicting the 3-month TFS.

Current knowledge about biomarkers of acute kidney injury in liver cirrhosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in advanced cirrhosis. Prerenal azotemia, hepatorenal syndrome, and acute tubular necrosis are the main causes of AKI in patients with cirrhosis. Evaluation of renal function and differentiation between functional and structural kidney injury are important issues in the management of cirrhosis. However, AKI in cirrhosis exists as a complex clinical spectrum rather than concrete clinical entity. Based on current evidence, changes in serum creatinine (Cr) levels remain the most appropriate standard for defining AKI in cirrhosis. However, serum Cr has a limited role in assessing renal function in this population. This review examines previous studies that investigated the ability of recent biomarkers for AKI in cirrhosis from the perspective of earlier and accurate diagnosis, classification of AKI phenotype, and prediction of clinical outcomes. Serum cystatin C and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin have been extensively studied in cirrhosis, and have facilitated improved diagnosis and prognosis prediction in patients with AKI. In addition, urine N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, interleukin 18, and kidney injury molecule 1 are other promising biomarkers for advanced cirrhosis. However, the clinical significance of these markers remains unclear because there are no cut-off values defining the normal range and differentiating phenotypes of AKI. In addition, AKI has been defined in terms of serum Cr, and renal biopsy-the gold standard-has not been carried out in most studies. Further discovery of innovate biomarkers and incorporation of various markers could improve the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of AKI, and will translate into meaningful improvements in patient outcomes.

Progression of Stage 2 and 3 Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis and Ascites

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Progression of stages 2 and 3 acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis has not been characterized adequately. Patients with higher stages of AKI are believed to have worse outcomes. We assessed outcomes and factors associated with stages 2 and 3 AKI in patients with cirrhosis in the North American Consortium for the Study of End-stage Liver Disease cohort.

METHODS

We collected data from 2297 hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites from December 2011 through February 2017. Our final analysis included 760 patients who developed AKI per the International Ascites Club 2015 definition (419 with maximum stage 1 and 341 with maximum stage 2 or 3; 63% male; mean age, 58 y). We compared demographic features, laboratory values, AKI treatment response, and survival between patients with maximum stage 1 vs patients with stage 2 or 3 AKI.

RESULTS

Patients with stage 2 or 3 AKI had higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (25.9 ± 7.3) than patients with stage 1 AKI (21.9 ± 7.5) (P < .0001). More patients fulfilled systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria on admission, and more developed a second nosocomial infection (P < .05 for both comparisons). More patients with stage 2 or 3 AKI also had progression of AKI and required dialysis and admission into intensive care units when compared to stage 1 AKI patients (P < .0001 for both). A lower proportion of patients with stage 2 or 3 AKI survived their hospital stay (80% vs 99% with stage 1 AKI; P < .0001), or survived for 30 days without a liver transplant (56% vs 81%; P < .0001). The development of stage 2 or 3 AKI was associated with a higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at the time of admission (P < .0001), presence of systemic inflammatory response on admission (P = .039), and second infection (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on an analysis of data from the North American Consortium for the Study of End-stage Liver Disease cohort, we found that patients with cirrhosis and more advanced liver disease, as well as a second infection, are more likely to develop stages 2 or 3 AKI, with a progressive course associated with decreased 30-day transplant-free survival. Prevention of AKI progression in patients with cirrhosis and stage 2 or 3 AKI might improve their outcomes.

Acute kidney injury and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis, including hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), is a common and serious complication in cirrhotic patients, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. AKI is separated into two categories, non-HRS AKI and HRS-AKI. The most recent definition and diagnostic criteria of AKI in cirrhosis and HRS have helped diagnose and prognosticate the disease. The pathophysiology behind non-HRS-AKI and HRS is more complicated than once theorized and involves more processes than just splanchnic vasodilation. The common biomarkers clinicians use to assess kidney injury have significant limitations in cirrhosis patients; novel biomarkers being studied have shown promise but require further studies in clinical settings and animal models. The overall management of non-HRS AKI and HRS-AKI requires a systematic approach. Although pharmacological treatments have shown mortality benefit, the ideal HRS treatment option is liver transplantation with or without simultaneous kidney transplantation. Further research is required to optimize pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches to treatment. This article reviews the current guidelines and recommendations of AKI in cirrhosis.

Impact of acute kidney injury on mortality in patients with acute variceal bleeding

Background

The effect of acute kidney injury (AKI) on patients with acute variceal bleeding (AVB) using the recently proposed International Club of Ascites (ICA) criteria is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of AKI using the ICA criteria and factors associated with the outcomes in cirrhotic patients with AVB.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included data of cirrhotic patients with AVB from two centers in Korea. The association of the ICA criteria for AKI with 6-week mortality was analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

In total, there were 546 episodes of AVB in 390 patients, of which 425 and 121 episodes were due to esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding, respectively. Moreover, 153 patients fulfilled the ICA criteria for AKI, and 64, 30, 39, and 20 patients were diagnosed with stages 1a, 1b, 2, and 3, respectively. Conversely, 97 patients developed AKI within 42 days as per the conventional criteria. The 6-week mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with ICA-AKI than in patients without ICA-AKI; the occurrence of ICA-AKI was an independent factor for predicting the 6-week mortality.

Conclusion

The ICA criteria could help diagnose renal dysfunction earlier, and presence of AKI is a predictor of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and AVB.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01862-x.

New clinical and pathophysiological perspectives defining the trajectory of cirrhosis

Traditionally, the complications of cirrhosis, namely variceal bleeding, ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, were thought to result predominantly from circulatory dysfunction and altered organ perfusion arising as a result of portal hypertension. Over the past 20 years, large, international prospective studies have indicated the importance of systemic inflammation and organ immunopathology as additional determinants of organ dysfunction in cirrhosis, which not only manifests in the liver, brain, circulation and the kidneys, but also the immune system, gut, muscles, adrenal glands, reproductive organs, heart and lungs. This review provides an overview of the traditional and emerging concepts around the initiation and maintenance of organ dysfunction in cirrhosis and proposes a new paradigm based upon a better understanding of acute decompensation of cirrhosis. The interaction between the traditional concepts and the emerging perspectives remains a matter of great interest and the basis for future research.

A Review of Hepatorenal Syndrome

The development of acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent complications in patients with cirrhosis. AKI due to volume depletion is the most common etiology and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the second most common cause of AKI in these patients. HRS is the extreme form of kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis, which is caused due to a reduction in renal blood flow unresponsive to volume expansion. The literature involving HRS is rapidly evolving and newer tests and updated definitions have been proposed which allows timely identification and treatment. Here, we will discuss the definition, pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of HRS.

The Effect of Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) on Postoperative Delirium in Patients with Liver Transplantation: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Objectives Postoperative opioid use and pain are related to postoperative delirium. This study aims to compare the incidence of delirium in patients with and without patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) among liver transplant recipients. Methods The medical records of 253 patients who received liver transplantation (LT) from January 2010 to July 2017 in a single university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: the patients who had used PCIA (P group, n = 71) and those who did not use PCIA (C group, n = 182) after LT in intensive care unit (ICU). The patient data were collected, which included demographic data, and details about perioperative management and postoperative complications. Results There was no difference in the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score between the two groups. Postoperative delirium occurred in 10 / 71 (14.08 %) in the P group and 26 / 182 (14.29 %) in the C group after LT, respectively (P = 0.97). After propensity score matching, no differences were observed in the incidence of delirium (P = 0.359) and the time from surgery to discharge (P = 0.26) between the two groups. Conclusions Patients with PCIA after LT exhibited no relationship with postoperative delirium. Therefore, it is necessary to actively control postoperative pain using PCIA.

Recent advances in the understanding and management of hepatorenal syndrome

Renal dysfunction occurs frequently in hospitalized patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD)/cirrhosis and has profound prognostic implications. In ACLD patients with ascites, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) may result from circulatory dysfunction that leads to reduced kidney perfusion and glomerular filtration rate (in the absence of structural kidney damage). The traditional subclassification of HRS has recently been replaced by acute kidney injury (AKI) type of HRS (HRS-AKI) and non-AKI type of HRS (HRS-NAKI), replacing the terms “HRS type 1” and “HRS type 2”, respectively. Importantly, the concept of absolute serum creatinine (sCr) cutoffs for diagnosing HRS was partly abandoned and short term sCr dynamics now may suffice for AKI diagnosis, which facilitates early treatment initiation that may prevent the progression to HRS-AKI or increase the chances of AKI/HRS-AKI reversal. Recent randomized controlled trials have established (a) the efficacy of (long-term) albumin in the prevention of complications of ascites (including HRS-AKI), (b) the benefits of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement in patients with recurrent ascites, and (c) the superiority of terlipressin over noradrenaline for the treatment of HRS-AKI in the context of acute-on-chronic liver failure. This review article aims to summarize recent advances in the understanding and management of HRS.

Position paper on liver and kidney diseases from the Italian Association for the Study of Liver (AISF), in collaboration with the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN)

Liver and kidney are strictly connected in a reciprocal manner, in both the physiological and pathological condition. The Italian Association for the Study of Liver, in collaboration with the Italian Society of Nephrology, with this position paper aims to provide an up-to-date overview on the principal relationships between these two important organs. A panel of well-recognized international expert hepatologists and nephrologists identified five relevant topics: 1) The diagnosis of kidney damage in patients with chronic liver disease; 2) Acute kidney injury in liver cirrhosis; 3) Association between chronic liver disease and chronic kidney disease; 4) Kidney damage according to different etiology of liver disease; 5) Polycystic kidney and liver disease. The discussion process started with a review of the literature relating to each of the five major topics and clinical questions and related statements were subsequently formulated. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were graded according to the GRADE system. The statements presented here highlight the importance of strong collaboration between hepatologists and nephrologists for the management of critically ill patients, such as those with combined liver and kidney impairment.

The impact of acute kidney injury on mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis in the USA

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic liver disease. Although the impact of AKI on patients with liver disease has been established, its impact on alcoholic cirrhosis has not been studied.

METHODS

Our study utilized data from the National Inpatient Sample for the year 2016 for all patients with a diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis and AKI. Primary outcomes were mortality, length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization cost were compared. Secondary outcomes were complications of cirrhosis and its impact on mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity-score matching were used to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 29 906 patients were included and 6733 (22.5%) had AKI. Propensity-matched multivariate analysis demonstrates that AKI was associated with a significant increase risk of mortality [odds ratio (OR): 8.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6.68-9.79; P < 0.0001]. AKI prolonged the hospital stay by 3.68 days (95% CI, 3.42-3.93; P < 0.0001) and increased total hospital charges by $50 284 (95% CI, 45 829-54 739; P < 0.0001). AKI increased the risk of complications of cirrhosis, including hepatorenal syndrome (OR: 19.15; 95% CI, 16.1-22.76), ascites (OR: 2.27; 95% CI, 2.11-2.44), hepatic encephalopathy (OR: 2.54; 95% CI, 1.87-3.47) and portal hypertension (OR: 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16).

CONCLUSION

AKI in alcoholic cirrhosis significantly increases the risk of mortality, hospitalizations costs and LOS. Further studies are needed on addressing renal failure and treatment options for patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.

End-stage liver disease: Management of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a serious complication of cirrhosis with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, the definition of HRS type 1 has been updated and is now called HRS-AKI. This new definition reduces the risk of delaying HRS treatment and eliminates the need to establish a minimum creatinine cut-off for the diagnosis of HRS-AKI. From a pathophysiological point of view, newly identified mechanisms involved in the development of HRS are related to the inflammatory response, conditioning the development of extrahepatic organ dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. One of the main challenges for the diagnosis of HRS is the validation of new biomarkers to obtain an early and differential diagnosis of kidney injury (eg HRS vs. ATN). Treatment of HRS is based on the use of vasoconstrictive agents in combination with albumin and terlipressin is the most widely used vasoconstrictor drug, with a high response rate. The effects of a continuous infusion of terlipressin at a dose of 2-12 mg/day was similar to bolus administration, but with lower rates of adverse events. Finally, MELD/MELD-Na which includes creatinine as one of its main determinants gives AKI-HRS patients priority on the waiting list (WL) for liver transplant (LT). However, the MELD and MELD-Na scores are reduced in responding patients, resulting a longer waiting time in these patients than in non-responders. Thus, the initial MELD/MELD-Na score (pre-treatment value) should be used to prioritize patients on the WL for LT in these cases.

Hillien SA, Kalim S, Nigwekar SU, Flood JG, Nixon A, Simonetto DA, Juncos LA, Karakala N, Wadei HM, Regner KR, Belcher JM, Nadim MK, Garcia-Tsao G, Velez JCQ, Parikh SM, Chung RT. Urinary NGAL as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker for Acute Kidney Injury in Cirrhosis: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has shown promise in differentiating acute tubular necrosis (ATN) from other types of acute kidney injuries (AKIs) in cirrhosis, particularly hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). However, NGAL is not currently available in clinical practice in North America.

METHODS

Urinary NGAL was measured in a prospective cohort of 213 US hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis (161 with AKI and 52 reference patients without AKI). NGAL was assessed for its ability to discriminate ATN from non-ATN AKI and to predict 90-day outcomes.

RESULTS

Among patients with AKI, 57 (35%) had prerenal AKI, 55 (34%) had HRS, and 49 (30%) had ATN, with a median serum creatinine of 2.0 (interquartile range 1.5, 3.0) mg/dL at enrollment. At an optimal cutpoint of 244 μg/g creatinine, NGAL distinguished ATN (344 [132, 1,429] μg/g creatinine) from prerenal AKI (45 [0, 154] μg/g) or HRS (110 [50, 393] μg/g; P < 0.001), with a C statistic of 0.762 (95% confidence interval 0.682, 0.842). By 90 days, 71 of 213 patients (33%) died. Higher median NGAL was associated with death (159 [50, 865] vs 58 [0, 191] μg/g; P < 0.001). In adjusted and unadjusted analysis, NGAL significantly predicted 90-day transplant-free survival (P < 0.05 for all Cox models) and outperformed Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score by C statistic (0.697 vs 0.686; P = 0.04), net reclassification index (37%; P = 0.008), and integrated discrimination increment (2.7%; P = 0.02).

DISCUSSION

NGAL differentiates the type of AKI in cirrhosis and may improve prediction of mortality; therefore, it holds potential to affect management of AKI in cirrhosis.

INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease

Renal dysfunction is very common among patients with chronic liver disease, and concomitant liver disease can occur among patients with chronic kidney disease. The spectrum of clinical presentation and underlying etiology is wide when concomitant kidney and liver disease occur in the same patient. Management of these patients with dual onslaught is challenging and requires a team approach of hepatologists and nephrologists. No recent guidelines exist on algorithmic approach toward diagnosis and management of these challenging patients. The Indian National Association for Study of Liver (INASL) in association with Indian Society of Nephrology (ISN) endeavored to develop joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of patients who have simultaneous liver and kidney disease. For generating these guidelines, an INASL-ISN Taskforce was constituted, which had members from both the societies. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of simultaneous liver and kidney diseases, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A round-table meeting of the Taskforce was held on 20-21 October 2018 at New Delhi to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong and weak) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (I, II, III). We present here the INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease.

Monitoring Renal Function and Therapy of Hepatorenal Syndrome Patients with Cirrhosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in patients with cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis can develop AKI due to different causes. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a unique cause of AKI occurring in patients with advanced cirrhosis and is associated with high short-term mortality. The differential diagnosis between different causes of AKI may be challenging. In this regard, new urine biomarkers may be helpful. Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment of patients with HRS-AKI. Vasoconstrictors and albumin represent the first-line pharmacologic treatment of HRS-AKI. This review summarizes current knowledge for the diagnosis and management of HRS in cirrhosis.

Royal Free Hospital-estimated glomerular filtration rate for prognostic stratification of first acute kidney injury in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Renal function is a major determinant of prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. Current guidelines only contemplate serum creatinine (sCr) to assess kidney injury. However, there are formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) which better measure renal function in patients listed for liver transplantation. There is no data available on whether these formulas predict prognosis in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

In 143 patients presenting with a first episode of AKI, we compared the prognostic value of renal function estimated using sCr or eGFR assessed with Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-6), chronic kidney disease epidemiology (CKD-EPI) and Royal Free Hospital (RFH) for renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 30 days of AKI, and 30- and 90-day transplant-free survival.

RESULTS

eGFR was calculated on values obtained before and at admission, at presentation of AKI (D0) and 48 hours after AKI (D2).15% of patients (more commonly in alcohol + metabolic etiology; P = .049 vs other) required RRT. Transplant-free survival at 30-and 90-day were 77% and 63%. Among sCr, MDRD-6, CKD-EPI and RFH-eGFR, the latter predicted best RRT (HR 0.937 95% CI 0.893-0.982, P = .007), 30-d (HR 0.936 95% CI 0.901-0.972, P = .001) and 90-d (HR 0.934 95% CI 0.908-0.972, P < .001) mortality/OLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal function estimated using the RFH-eGFR calculated at D2 after AKI diagnosis is a strong predictor of RRT and of 30-d and 90-d transplant-free survival. Results suggest that in cirrhosis, RFH-eGFR may be a better indicator of prognosis in AKI than sCr.

Impact of acute kidney injury on survival in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is expected to occur commonly in patients with chronic hepatitis C. In addition, AKI may affect the survival of patients with chronic hepatitis C. However, few studies are available on this topic. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of AKI in patients with chronic hepatitis C and investigate the factors related to overall mortality.

Methods

Between January 2005 and December 2018, 1252 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, defined as persistent HCV RNA for at least 6 months, were retrospectively enrolled at two centers. Of them, 1008, 123, and 121 patients had chronic hepatitis (CH), compensated cirrhosis (Com-LC), and decompensated cirrhosis (Decom-LC) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at entry, respectively. Factors associated with AKI and overall mortality were evaluated using the Cox proportional regression model. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the development of AKI and overall mortality were generated.

Results

Over a mean follow-up period of 5.2 years, 285 patients developed AKI, with an incidence rate of 4.35 per 100 person-years. The incidence of AKI increased gradually with progression of chronic hepatitis C: CH (3.32 per 100 person-years), Com-LC (5.86 per 100 person-years), and Decom-LC or HCC (17.28 per 100 person-years). The patients without AKI showed better survival rates at 14 years than the patients with AKI (94.2% vs. 26.3%, P < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, AKI (hazard ratio, 6.66; 95% confidence interval, 4.26–10.41) remained an independent risk factor for overall mortality.

Conclusion

AKI is common in patients with chronic HCV infection and is associated with significant overall mortality. Therefore, clinicians should carefully monitor the occurrence of AKI, which is an important predictor of mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-05991-2.

The presence of liver cirrhosis is a strong negative predictor of survival for patients admitted to the intensive care unit - Cirrhosis in intensive care patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

 Liver cirrhosis is a systemic disease that substantially impacts the body's physiology, especially in advanced stages. Accordingly, the outcome of patients with cirrhosis requiring intensive care treatment is poor. We aimed to analyze the impact of cirrhosis on mortality of intensive care unit (ICU) patients compared to other frequent chronic diseases and conditions.

METHODS

 In this retrospective study, patients admitted over three years to the ICU of the Department of Medicine of the University Hospital Frankfurt were included. Patients were matched for age, gender, pre-existing conditions, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II), and therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS).

RESULTS

 A total of 567 patients admitted to the ICU were included in the study; 99 (17.5 %) patients had liver cirrhosis. A total of 129 patients were included in the matched cohort for the sensitivity analysis. In-hospital mortality was higher in cirrhotic patients than non-cirrhotic patients (p < 0.0001) in the entire and matched cohort. Liver cirrhosis remained one of the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital mortality (entire cohort p = 0.001; matched cohort p = 0.03) along with dialysis and need for transfusion in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, in the cirrhotic group, the need for kidney replacement therapy (p < 0.001) and blood transfusion (p < 0.001) was significantly higher than in the non-cirrhotic group.  CONCLUSIONS:  In the presented study, liver cirrhosis was one of the strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients needing intensive care treatment along with dialysis and the need for ventilation. Therefore, concerted efforts are needed to improve cirrhotic patients' outcomes, prevent disease progression, and avoid complications with the need for ICU treatment in the early stages of the disease.

[Chronic kidney injury in patients with liver diseases - Reappraising pathophysiology and treatment options]

Acute and chronic kidney disease concurs commonly with liver disease and is associated with a wide array of complications including dialysis dependency and increased mortality. Patients with liver disease or liver cirrhosis show a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease. This is attributed to concomitant comorbidities, such as metabolic syndrome, chronic inflammation, hypercoagulability, hyperfibrinolysis, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemias. But chronic progressive kidney disease is not always due to hepatorenal syndrome. Beyond that, other diseases or disease entities should be considered. Among them are diabetic nephropathy, secondary IgA nephropathy, hepatitis C -associated membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis (MPGN) and hepatitis B-associated membranous nephropathy.Coexisting diseases, similar underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, or simultaneously concurring pathophysiological processes and overlapping clinical manifestations, impede the etiologic diagnosis and corresponding treatment of chronic kidney disease in the setting of chronic liver disease. In this review, we focus on common and rare pathologies, which can lead to chronic kidney disease in this particular patient group and try to summarize the most recent therapeutic modalities.

Natural history of acute kidney disease in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In 2012, the KDIGO group proposed new definitions for acute kidney injury (AKI), acute kidney disease (AKD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). According to the definition adapted by the International Club of Ascites, AKI has been extensively investigated in patients with cirrhosis. On the contrary, there are currently no data on the epidemiology and clinical outcomes associated with AKD. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence and the impact of AKD on the clinical course and survival of patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 272 consecutive patients with cirrhosis attending our outpatient clinic were included in the study. Clinical and laboratory data were collected at inclusion. Patients were followed-up until death, liver transplant or the end of follow-up.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 80 patients developed AKD (29.4%). Forty-two (52.5%) recovered from the first episode of AKD and 26 maintained a normal renal function up to the end of follow-up. Sixteen patients developed a second episode of AKD. Globally, 36 patients (45.0%) died with AKD. Finally, AKD progressed to CKD in 11 patients (13.8%). The 5-year survival rate was significantly lower in patients who developed AKD than in those who did not (34.8% vs. 88.8%, p <0.001). The 5-year rates of complications of cirrhosis and of hospitalizations were also higher in patients with AKD than in those without AKD.

CONCLUSIONS

AKD is frequent in patients with cirrhosis. It can be reversible, but it may recur and progress to CKD. AKD has a very negative impact on morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

LAY SUMMARY

Renal impairment has a very negative impact on patients with cirrhosis. Renal impairment seems to be characterized by a very dynamic course, which is defined according to renal function and length of the impairment as acute kidney injury, acute kidney disease and chronic kidney disease. The role of acute kidney disease is currently unknown. Our study shows for the first time that acute kidney disease is frequent in patients with cirrhosis and has a very negative impact on survival.

Acute kidney injury in hospitalized cirrhotic patients: Risk factors, type of kidney injury, and survival

Background and Aim

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of chronic liver disease (CLD). We performed a prospective study to evaluate the risk factors and spectrum of AKI among decompensated cirrhosis (DC) patients and the impact of AKI on survival.

Methods

This study was conducted in consecutive DC patients hospitalized in SCB Medical College between December 2016 and October 2018. AKI was defined as per ICA criteria. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters and outcomes were compared between patients with and without AKI.

Results

A total of 576 DC subjects were enrolled, 315 (54.69%) of whom had AKI; 34% (n = 106) had stage 1A, 28% (n = 90) stage 1B, 21% (n = 65) stage 2, and 17% (n = 54) stage 3 AKI. Alcohol was the predominant cause of CLD (66.7%). In 207 (65.7%) patients, diuretic/lactulose/nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs use was noted, and infection was present in 190 (60.3%) patients. Compared to those without AKI, patients with AKI had higher leucocyte count, higher serum urea and creatinine, higher Child‐Turcotte‐Pugh, higher Model of End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (P < 0.001), longer hospital stay, and lower survival at 28 days and 90 days (P < 0.001). Besides, in patients with stages 1A to 3 AKI, there were differences in overall survival at 28 days (P < 0.001) and 90 days (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Over half of DC patients had AKI, and alcohol was the most common cause of cirrhosis in them. Use of AKI‐precipitating medications was the most common cause of AKI, followed by bacterial infection. AKI patients had increased prevalence of acute‐on‐chronic liver failure and had prolonged hospitalization and lower survival both at 28 days and 90 days.

Reduction in acute kidney injury stage predicts survival in patients with type-1 hepatorenal syndrome

Background

Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1), a form of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis, has a median survival of days to weeks if untreated. The impact of reduction in AKI stage on overall survival in cirrhosis, independent of HRS reversal, is unclear.

Methods

The Randomized, placEbo-controlled, double-blind study to confirm the reVERSal of HRS-1 with terlipressin study assessed terlipressin versus placebo, both with albumin, as treatment for HRS-1 for ≤14 days. Renal dysfunction severity was categorized by AKI stage at enrollment. Baseline patient characteristics were evaluated as predictors of AKI improvement using a multivariate model; the association between AKI stage reduction and 90-day survival was assessed using linear regression.

Results

A total of 184 patients (terlipressin: n = 91; placebo: n = 93) with similar numbers in AKI Stages 1–3 (terlipressin/placebo, Stage 1: n = 25/26; Stage 2: n = 35/33; Stage 3: n = 31/34) were included. Predictors of AKI improvement were absence of alcoholic hepatitis, baseline serum creatinine and male gender. Overall survival was not significantly different across AKI stages (range 53–65%). In patients with no AKI worsening, 90-day survival was consistently better when AKI improved independent of HRS reversal, regardless of the initial AKI stage, with patients with Stage 1 at initial diagnosis achieving the greatest clinical benefit. A significant association was observed between AKI reduction and overall 90-day survival (P = 0.0022).

Conclusions

A reduction in AKI stage, independent of HRS reversal, was sufficient to improve overall survival in patients with HRS-1. The goal for HRS-1 treatment should be less stringent than absolute HRS reversal.

Renohepatic crosstalk: a review of the effects of acute kidney injury on the liver

Several theories regarding acute kidney injury (AKI)-related mortality have been entertained, although mounting evidence supports the paradigm that impaired kidney function directly and adversely affects the function of several remote organs. The kidneys and liver are fundamental to human metabolism and detoxification, and it is therefore hardly surprising that critical illness complicated by hepatorenal dysfunction portends a poor prognosis. Several diseases can simultaneously impact the proper functioning of the liver and kidneys, although this review will address the impact of AKI on liver function. While evidence for this relationship in humans remains sparse, we present supportive studies and then discuss the most likely mechanisms by which AKI can cause liver dysfunction. These include 'traditional' complications of AKI (uremia, volume overload and acute metabolic acidosis, among others) as well as systemic inflammation, hepatic leukocyte infiltration, cytokine-mediated liver injury and hepatic oxidative stress. We conclude by addressing the therapeutic implications of these findings to clinical medicine.