Low-dose, titratable interferon alfa in decompensated liver disease caused by chronic infection with hepatitis B virus

Hepatitis B and end-stage liver disease

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the most common cause of chronic hepatitis and end-stage liver disease worldwide. Untreated, chronic hepatitis B acquired early in life results in cirrhosis, liver failure, or hepatocellular carcinoma in up to 40% of individuals. Until recently, the options for a patient who had end-stage hepatitis B cirrhosis were severely limited, but during the past 15 years great strides have been made in prevention and treatment of hepatitis B cirrhosis. This article reviews recent advances in the understanding of the natural history, prevention, and medical management of HBV-related end-stage liver disease.

Peginterferon alpha-2b is safe and effective in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with advanced fibrosis

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with advanced fibrosis are often not considered for treatment with peginterferon (PEG-IFN) because IFN therapy may precipitate immunological flares, potentially inducing hepatic decompensation. We investigated the efficacy and safety of treating hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB patients with 52 weeks of PEG-IFN-alpha-2b (100 microg weekly) alone or in combination with lamivudine (100 mg daily). Seventy patients with advanced fibrosis (Ishak fibrosis score 4-6) and 169 patients without advanced fibrosis, all with compensated liver disease, participated in the study. Virologic response, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA < 10,000 copies/ml at week 78, occurred significantly more often in patients with advanced fibrosis than in those without (25% versus 12%, respectively; P = 0.02). Also patients with cirrhosis (n = 24) exhibited a virologic response more frequently than did patients without cirrhosis (30% versus 14%, respectively; P = 0.02). Improvement in liver fibrosis occurred more frequently in patients with advanced fibrosis (66% versus 26%, P < 0.001). HBV genotype A was more prevalent among patients with advanced fibrosis than among those without (57% versus 24%, P < 0.001). Most adverse events, including serious adverse events, were observed equally as frequently in patients with advanced fibrosis and those without. Fatigue, anorexia, and thrombocytopenia occurred more often in patients with advanced fibrosis than in those without (P < 0.01). Necessary dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy was comparable for both patient groups (P = 0.92 and P = 0.47, respectively).

CONCLUSION

PEG-IFN is effective and safe for HBeAg-positive patients with advanced fibrosis. Because PEG-IFN therapy results in a high rate of sustained off-therapy response, patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis but compensated liver disease should not be excluded from PEG-IFN treatment.

Future prospectives for the management of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection affects about 400 million people around the globe and causes approximately one million deaths a year. Since the discovery of interferon-α as a therapeutic option the treatment of hepatitis B has evolved fast and management has become increasingly complicated. The amount of viral replication reflected in the viral load (HBV-DNA) plays an important role in the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The current treatment modalities for chronic hepatitis B are immunomodulatory (interferons) and antiviral suppressants (nucleoside and nucleotide analogues) all with their own advantages and limitations. An overview of the treatment efficacy for both immunomodulatory as antiviral compounds is provided in order to provide the clinician insight into the factors influencing treatment outcome. With nucleoside or nucleotide analogues suppression of viral replication by 5-7 log₁₀ is feasible, but not all patients respond to therapy. Known factors influencing treatment outcome are viral load, ALT levels and compliance. Many other factors which might influence treatment are scarcely investigated. Identifying the factors associated with response might result in stopping rules, so treatment could be adapted in an early stage to provide adequate treatment and avoid the development of resistance. The efficacy of compounds for the treatment of mutant virus and the cross-resistance is largely unknown. However, genotypic and phenotypic testing as well as small clinical trials provided some data on efficacy in this population. Discontinuation of nucleoside or nucleotide analogues frequently results in viral relapse; however, some patients have a sustained response. Data on the risk factors for relapse are necessary in order to determine when treatment can be discontinued safely. In conclusion: chronic hepatitis B has become a treatable disease; however, much research is needed to tailor therapy to an individual patient, to predict the sustainability of response and determine the best treatment for those failing treatment.

Lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B and cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis B is a common disease and approximately 20% of infected patients with compensated cirrhosis will decompensate over 5 years. If untreated, the survival of decompensated cirrhosis is poor (15% at 5 years). The extent of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, as assessed by serum HBV-DNA level, is a strong predictor of the risk of disease progression and hepatocellular carcinoma. This provides a rationale for antiviral therapy to arrest progression of liver disease. Lamivudine is a pyrimidine analogue that inhibits HBV-DNA reverse transcriptase. It decreases HBV replication, normalises alanine aminotransferase levels and reduces hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. This article will focus on the use of lamivudine in patients with HBV-cirrhosis. In patients with compensated HBV-cirrhosis, a randomised, placebo-controlled trial has shown that lamivudine significantly reduced the rate of disease progression and hepatocellular carcinoma development over a 3-year period. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, treatment with lamivudine can produce spectacular improvements of liver function, but the improvement is slow and a clinical benefit is usually not observed until after at least 3-6 months of treatment. A major drawback of lamivudine treatment is the development of resistance, observed in 15-20% of patients after 1 year and up to 70% after 5 years of continued treatment. Thus, patients with HBV-cirrhosis treated with lamivudine should have regular monitoring of serum HBV-DNA levels and prompt institution of additional antiviral therapy if viral breakthrough is observed. Adefovir, tenofovir and entecavir have demonstrated efficacy in patients with lamivudine resistance. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, in whom the development of resistance can be fatal, combination therapy (such as lamivudine plus adefovir) may prove more effective than monotherapy and this issue needs further study.

Management of hepatitis B: summary of a clinical research workshop

Chronic hepatitis B is caused by persistent infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV), a unique DNA virus that replicates through an RNA intermediate produced from a stable covalently closed circular DNA molecule. Viral persistence appears to be due to inadequate innate and adaptive immune responses. Chronic infection has a variable course after several decades resulting in cirrhosis in up to one-third of patients and liver cancer in a proportion of those with cirrhosis. Sensitive assays for HBV DNA levels in serum have been developed that provide important insights into pathogenesis and natural history. Therapy of hepatitis B is evolving. Peginterferon induces long-term remissions in disease in one-third of patients with typical hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B, but a lesser proportion of those without HBeAg. Several oral nucleoside analogues with activity against HBV have been shown to be effective in suppressing viral levels and improving biochemical and histological features of disease in a high proportion of patients with and without HBeAg, at least in the short term. What is uncertain is which agent or combination of agents is most effective, how long therapy should last, and which criteria should be used to start, continue, switch or stop therapy. Long-term therapy with nucleoside analogues may be the most appropriate approach to treatment, but the expense and lack of data on long-term safety and efficacy make recommendations difficult. Clearly, many basic and clinical research challenges remain in defining optimal means of management of chronic hepatitis B.

Expression, purification and characterization of the Hepatitis B virus entire envelope large protein in Pichia pastoris

The current HBsAg vaccine has performed a vital role in preventing the transmission of HBV during the past 20 years. However, a number of individuals still show no response or a low response to the vaccine. In the present study, the HBV envelope large protein gene was cloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pPIC9k and was subsequently expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris. The HBV large protein (L protein) was produced and secreted into the medium, where some of the L protein formed particles. The soluble L protein and particles were purified by column chromatography and sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the particle was composed of both HBV L and S protein. To compare the antigenicity of the L protein and HBsAg, rabbits were immunized with the soluble L protein and the commercially available HBV vaccine and the increasing level of antibodies was determined by ELISA. The results showed that the anti-HBsAg antibody, from rabbits injected with the L protein at a dose of 2 and 10microg, was detected on day 14, whereas rabbits vaccinated with 10 and 2microg HBsAg did not develop antibodies until day 21 and 28, respectively. The antibody level in groups inoculated with the L protein was approximately 50% higher than in the group injected with HBsAg using the same dose. Furthermore, 2microg L protein induced a significant and rapid anti-HBsAg antibody response than 10microg HBsAg. Therefore, we suggest that the L protein is an ideal candidate for a new generation HB vaccine to protect people from HBV infection.

The effectiveness of lamivudine treatment in cirrhotic patients with HBV precore mutations: a prospective, open-label study

In this study, the effect of lamivudine therapy on viral suppression, Child-Pugh score, and survival was assessed in patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to precore mutant hepatitis B virus and the results were compared with those for nonreplicative cirrhotic patients. Twenty-three replicative patients who received lamivudine and 15 nonreplicative patients were included and followed up for an average of 23.7+/-13.4 months. At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups with regard to clinical and biochemical parameters or Child-Pugh scores, except for serum alanine aminotransferase levels (P<0.05) and quantitative hepatitis B virus DNA measurements (P<0.001). Compared to baseline, there was no significant difference in Child-Pugh score in the lamivudine group at the last visit (P=0.202), whereas a marked increase was observed in nonreplicative patients (P=0.002). Mortality rates in the lamivudine and nonreplicative groups were 17.43% and 13.3%, respectively (P=0.556), and there was no difference in survival analysis (P=0.809). Lamivudine therapy stabilizing clinical situation in decompensated cirrhotics with precore mutation makes the natural history of the disease equal with nonreplicative decompensated cirrhotics or even provides some advantages over them.

Optimizing management strategies in special patient populations

Chronic hepatitis B infection presents a number of challenges to clinicians. There are additional considerations when defining management strategies for individuals with advanced liver disease, or coinfection, or those at high risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment of decompensated cirrhosis is particularly important. Evidence suggests that suppression of viral replication through nucleos(t)ide analog therapy leads to longer time to transplantation, improved liver function, and improved survival times. The use of interferon in patients with decompensated hepatitis B is associated with serious complications and is currently contraindicated for these patients by the AASLD Practice Guidelines. Hepatitis B coinfection is often associated with more extensive disease. In patients with HBV/HCV coinfection, one disease is usually dominant and consequently should be the focus of therapy. HIV/HBV coinfection increases the risk of progressive liver disease. Therapeutic agents active against both viruses should be utilized at the correct dose to limit the development of resistance. Agents specific for HBV, e.g., entecavir, enable hepatitis to be treated while avoiding the risk of HIV resistance developing. Dual infection with HBV and HDV is particularly challenging. Nucleos(t)ide analogs are ineffective in treating HDV infection, and there is limited data concerning the efficacy of interferon in this setting. The association between chronic hepatitis B infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is well established. In patients at high risk of HCC, screening regimes may be effective. Furthermore, there is an increasing body of evidence indicating that effective suppression of viral replication may be associated with a reduced risk of HCC.

Therapy of hepatitis B -- viral suppression or eradication?

The practicing clinician is currently faced with a number of treatment options for chronic hepatitis B. Beginning in 1998 with the licensing of lamivudine and subsequently adefovir, the treatment paradigm shifted from 4 to 6 months of conventional alfa interferon to a year of nucleoside analog therapy. However, prolonged treatment with nucleoside analogs is often needed to optimize virological response. Recently, a 48-week regimen of pegylated interferon for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B has been shown to be effective, and long-term nucleoside analog therapy has been demonstrated to maintain viral suppression. These findings have added to the complexity of decision-making and have raised questions about whether a finite course of pegylated interferon or nucleoside analog therapy, with possible long-term maintenance, is better as first-line therapy. Each of these fundamentally different approaches has advantages and limitations, and both have a place in the therapeutic armamentarium against chronic hepatitis B. Long-term therapy with nucleoside analogs, however, raises a number of practical concerns that have not been fully addressed as of yet. I will present evidence in support of the recommendation that antiviral therapy should ideally be directed toward achieving the highest rate of viral clearance with the shortest interval of treatment.

Advancing patient care: integrating new data

Physicians involved in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection are frequently faced with complex clinical issues concerning the diagnosis, investigation, and treatment of patients. Guidelines exist within the literature that help with decision making; however, in practice individual nuances are often encountered necessitating decisions that go beyond the current guidelines. Following presentation of the available data, a panel of expert hepatologists and gastroenterologists sought to identify and solve challenges that are faced by clinicians in the daily management of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection. The following summary provides an overview of the outcome of these discussions. Because of the complexities of clinical management, the recommendations reflect the opinion of the majority; however, many recommendations were not unanimous. Furthermore, the recommendations that follow are limited to adult patients; the treatment of children was not discussed. A number of issues were identified, and statements concerning possible management strategies that could be applied were developed.

Hepatotoxicity of Chemotherapy

The selection of an antineoplastic regimen for an oncology patient is based first on the availability of effective drugs and then on a balancing of potential treatment-related toxicities with the patient's clinical condition and associated comorbidities. Liver function abnormalities are commonly observed in this patient population and identifying their etiology is often difficult. Immunosuppression, paraneoplastic phenomena, infectious diseases, metastases, and poly-pharmacy may cloud the picture. While criteria for standardizing liver injury have been established, dose modifications often rely on empiric clinical judgment. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of hepatotoxic manifestations for the most common chemotherapeutic agents is essential. We herein review the hepatotoxicity of commonly used antineoplastic agents and regimens.

Management of HIV Infection in Persons Co-infected With Hepatitis

Co-infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) is becoming a rampant disparity in HIV-infected patients. The advent of antiretroviral therapy has led to agents that are effective for suppression of both HIV and HBV; however, this can not be extrapolated to patients who are coinfected with HCV. Treatment of HCV disease is often strenuous and can lead to untoward adverse effects. Co-infection with HIV often leads to higher rates of cirrhosis and liver failure in patients with HBV or HCV, compromising antiretroviral treatment in this patient population due to the hepatotoxicity of these agents. The purpose of this review is to familiarize health care providers to the management of HIV infection in patients who are also co-infected with HBV or HCV.

Determinants of early mortality and benefits of lamivudine therapy in patients with hepatitis B virus-related decompensated liver cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis B infection (HBV) is a major health problem worldwide. The prognosis is grave for patients with HBV-related decompensated liver cirrhosis (LC). We evaluated the effectiveness and the determinants of early mortality of lamivudine treatment in patients with HBV-related decompensated LC. Thirty patients with HBV-related decompensated LC and active viral replication were treated with lamivudine 100 mg daily for a median duration of 9 months. Among these patients, five patients died within 3 months. Two patients were lost to follow-up at week 8 and 9. One patient was treated for <6 months. Twenty-two patients were treated over 6 months. Univariate analysis revealed that the total bilirubin (P = 0.008), prothrombin time (P = 0.004), Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (P = 0.005), the model of efd-stage liver disease score (P = 0.004) and stage III hepatic encephalopathy (P = 0.001) were predictive factors of early mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed that the independent factor associated with early mortality was stage III encephalopathy. Among 22 patients, liver function improved markedly after lamivudine therapy. Of the nine hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, three had HBeAg seroconversion. Two patients had YMDD mutant and virological breakthrough at 41 and 46 weeks. One of the two had hepatocellular carcinoma and died of hepatic failure at week 125; the other received adefovir and is doing well. Lamivudine appeared to have benefits in viral suppression and significant improvement in liver function in patients with HBV-related decompensated LC. As noted in prior studies, poor baseline liver function is associated with a poor prognosis in Asian patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis treated with lamivudine.

Management of patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus and HIV

The management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection poses specific problems in the presence of HIV co-infection, since therapeutic approaches have to consider both HBV and HIV infections. There are currently four drugs approved for the treatment of chronic HBV infection (interferon alpha, lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir); the dual antiviral activity of tenofovir and emtricitabine broadens the armamentarium against HBV in HBV/HIV co-infected patients. Nucleotide analogues--eg, adefovir and tenofovir--have the advantage of a higher genetic barrier to the development of resistance compared with nucleoside analogues--eg, lamivudine and emtricitabine. Fortunately, the two families do not share resistance mutations, allowing salvage therapy and the possibility of combination therapy for drug-naive individuals. Although response to interferon alpha is poorer in HBV/HIV co-infected patients compared with HIV-negative individuals, especially in hepatitis B e antigen-negative HBV infection, the more potent pegylated forms of interferon alpha have brought new hope.

Effect of lamivudine treatment in patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to anti-HBe positive/HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

Lamivudine has been shown to improve liver function and reduce the need for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with decompensated HBeAg-positive cirrhosis. Nevertheless, there is only limited experience with lamivudine in patients with anti-HBe-positive/HBeAg-negative cirrhosis. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether lamivudine treatment improves liver function and subsequently pre-LT survival or delays or obviates the need for LT in patients with anti-HBe-positive/HBeAg-negative cirrhosis. Between July 1998 and June 2003, 20 consecutive patients awaiting LT were enrolled in the study. All patients showed active viral replication and were treated with lamivudine 100 mg daily. Significant clinical improvement, defined as a decrease in the Child-Pugh-Turcotte score by >or=2 points, was observed in 11 (55%) patients. The median change in the Child-Pugh-Turcotte score was -2 (range -5 to +2). The median time required to achieve a 2-point or greater reduction in Child-Pugh-Turcotte score was 6 months (range 3-12 months). In nine patients (45%), the Child-Pugh-Turcotte score decreased to Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
• Female
• Hepatitis B e Antigens/immunology
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/immunology
• Humans
• Lamivudine/therapeutic use
• Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy
• Liver Cirrhosis/immunology
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Treatment Outcome

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Nikolaos Nikolaidis Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokatrion General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Themistoklis Vassiliadis
Olga Giouleme
Konstantinos Tziomalos
Nikolaos Grammatikos
Kalliopi Patsiaoura
Eleni Orfanou-Koumerkeridou
Aikaterini Balaska
Nikolaos Eugenidis

Collapse

Is Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis Needed for Liver Transplantation in the Era of New Antivirals?

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most common causes of cirrhosis of the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide, frequently requiring liver transplantation. Other nonliver organ transplants get infected de novo or through reactivation from previous active or inactive infections. With significant improvements in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens over the last 20 years, organ transplantation has become the most effective and lifesaving therapy for patients with chronic renal failure, cirrhosis, hepatocarcinoma, and heart failure. Until recently chronic HBV infection was considered a formal contraindication for liver transplantation, since recurrence of infection without prophylaxis occurs in 75% to 90% of the patients, with significant morbidity and mortality and few therapeutic alternatives. However, the introduction of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) a decade ago to reduce the risk of reinfection of liver grafts, and more recently the availability of nucleoside analogues with few side effects and easy administration, have led to a dramatic improvement in patient outcomes with a risk of long-term HBV reinfection of less than 10% with combined HBIG and lamivudine prophylaxis. Chronic HBV infection in kidney, heart, and other organs has become a serious long-term problem and one of the most frequent and important comorbidities affecting graft and patient survival. Fortunately the introduction of nucleoside analogues allows significant control of viral replication and prevents progression of liver disease and other organ damage. In the present article we discuss the current indications for HBV prophylaxis and treatment prior to and after organ transplantation, as well as the most cost-effective way to apply different regimens to reduce side effects and improve survival and quality of life after transplantation.

Antiviral therapy in advanced chronic liver disease due to hepatitis C virus infection: pilot study

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy has not been adequately evaluated in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related advanced liver disease due to apprehensions of adverse events and intolerance. The titrable dose of interferon (IFN)-alpha and ribavirin was evaluated in a flexible regimen in a pilot study.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with HCV-related advanced chronic liver disease received IFN-alpha 1-3 MIU daily with ribavirin 200-600 mg daily for 9 months-3 years. Careful assessment of safety, tolerability and efficacy was made.

RESULTS

Improvement in Child-Pugh score (8.4 +/- 1.2 to 7.4 +/- 2.0; P = 0.010) and serum albumin (3.0 +/- 0.5 g/dL to 3.6 +/- 0.5 g/dL; P = 0.007) occurred at follow up after antiviral therapy (median dose and duration: IFN-alpha 1.5 MIU/day for 12 months and ribavirin 400 mg/day for 7.5 months) as compared to baseline. Ascites regressed in 53% of patients (11/21). Thirteen patients (52%) lost HCV-RNA on therapy and eight (32%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). Death occurred in three patients (12%) while on therapy, in two due to infection. No patient died in the responder group compared to five deaths (29%) in the non-responder group. However, there was no difference in the cumulative probability of survival in the sustained virological responder versus non-responder (P = 0.09). Adverse events were common (92%), but permanent withdrawal was required in only five patients (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Low and titrable dose IFN-alpha and ribavirin therapy in patients with HCV-related advanced chronic liver disease achieves improvement in hepatic synthetic function, Child-Pugh score and ascites. However, close monitoring for serious adverse events is warranted.

Factors associated with response to lamivudine: Retrospective study in a tertiary care clinic serving patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an important cause of end stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Controlled clinical trials indicate treatment with lamivudine results in positive clinical responses. The study goal was to determine if the response to lamivudine treatment (HBeAg loss, HBV DNA loss and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] reduction) differs according to pretherapy (pre-tx) ALT levels.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of medical record data. All CHB patients at all stages of disease (including cirrhotic) with more than two visits to the clinic were included in the study (n = 719). Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards were estimated.

RESULTS

Of the total 719 HBsAg (+) patients, 317 were treated with lamivudine 150 mg or 100 mg daily. Among HBeAg positive patients, at 3 years, Kaplan-Meier estimates of the loss of HBeAg were 40%, 57% and 61% for pre-tx ALT < upper limit of normal (ULN), 1-2 x ULN and >2 x ULN, respectively. Similar results of HBV-DNA loss were seen in HBeAg negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this setting, we observed that pre-tx ALT levels were not associated with response to lamivudine, but that lower platelet count and female sex in HBeAg (+) patients were important predictive factors of a favorable response to lamivudine therapy.

Current therapies for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Patients who are chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus are at an increased risk of developing cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Therapeutic intervention offers the only means of interrupting this progression. Currently there are three licensed agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. These are interferon-alpha, an immunomodulator, and two synthetic nucleos(t)ide analogs, namely lamivudine (Epivir, GlaxoSmithKline) and adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera, Gilead Sciences). This review aims to summarize current experience with these drugs in the treatment and management of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, their efficacy, and current problems of drug resistance. An outline of future treatment perspectives is also included.

Clinical outcome of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B in relation to virological response to lamivudine

The effect of lamivudine treatment on the outcome of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis is unclear. In a retrospective multicenter study, we have analyzed the virological events observed during lamivudine therapy in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis and evaluated the correlation between virological response and clinical outcomes. Among 656 patients (mean age 49.1 years) included in the database, 54% had chronic hepatitis, 30% had Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) A cirrhosis, and 16% had CTP B/C cirrhosis. On therapy (median 22 months, range 1-66), a virological response was obtained in 616 patients (93.9%). The rate of maintained virological response was 39% after 4 years. During follow-up, 47 (7.2%) patients underwent liver transplantation, liver disease worsened in 31 (4.7%), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed in 31 (4.7%), and 24 patients (3.6%) died of liver-related causes. Patients who had cirrhosis and who maintained virological response were less likely than those with viral breakthrough to develop HCC (P <.001) and disease worsening (P <.001). Survival was better in CTP A patients with cirrhosis and maintained virological response (P =.01 by rank test). Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of cirrhosis and viral breakthrough were independently related to mortality and development of HCC. In conclusion, lamivudine is highly effective in reducing viral load in HBeAg-negative patients. After 4 years of therapy, 39% of patients maintain a virological and biochemical response. Loss of virological response may lead to clinical deterioration in patients with cirrhosis.

Clinical outcome of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B in relation to virological response to lamivudine

The effect of lamivudine treatment on the outcome of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis is unclear. In a retrospective multicenter study, we have analyzed the virological events observed during lamivudine therapy in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis and evaluated the correlation between virological response and clinical outcomes. Among 656 patients (mean age 49.1 years) included in the database, 54% had chronic hepatitis, 30% had Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) A cirrhosis, and 16% had CTP B/C cirrhosis. On therapy (median 22 months, range 1-66), a virological response was obtained in 616 patients (93.9%). The rate of maintained virological response was 39% after 4 years. During follow-up, 47 (7.2%) patients underwent liver transplantation, liver disease worsened in 31 (4.7%), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed in 31 (4.7%), and 24 patients (3.6%) died of liver-related causes. Patients who had cirrhosis and who maintained virological response were less likely than those with viral breakthrough to develop HCC (P <.001) and disease worsening (P <.001). Survival was better in CTP A patients with cirrhosis and maintained virological response (P =.01 by rank test). Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of cirrhosis and viral breakthrough were independently related to mortality and development of HCC. In conclusion, lamivudine is highly effective in reducing viral load in HBeAg-negative patients. After 4 years of therapy, 39% of patients maintain a virological and biochemical response. Loss of virological response may lead to clinical deterioration in patients with cirrhosis.

Antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B and cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection (HBV) may result in significant morbidity, including cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The management of chronic HBV cirrhosis is advancing rapidly. Current treatment options for patients with HBV-related cirrhosis include interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil. IFN-a is used less commonly today because of its toxicity, difficulty with administration, and the availability of safer drugs. Lamivudine, an oral nucleoside analog, has proven to be at least as effective, and is safer, than IFN-a in the treatment of HBV-related cirrhosis. It is plagued by the development of resistant viral mutants, however. The newest oral nucleotide analog, adefovir dipivoxil, has shown excellent efficacy in treatment-naïve and lamivudine-resistant HBV patients and has lower rates of resistance in the short-term.

Antiviral therapy for treatment-naïve hepatitis B virus patients

Hepatitis B virus infection is a major public health problem worldwide,responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality from chronic liver disease. It is estimated that there are 350 million hepatitis B virus carriers globally. The prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection varies greatly in different regions of the world. In the United States, approximately 1.5 million people are infected and 50,000 to 100,000 new cases are reported annually despite the availability of effective vaccines. This article reviews various antiviral therapies for treatment naïve hepatitis B virus patients.

Current antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B

During the past decade, major breakthroughs have been achieved in treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Currently, three therapeutic agents are approved for chronic hepatitis B: interferon-alpha, lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil. In patients with HBeAgpositive chronic hepatitis B, all of these drugs achieve HBeAg loss (24-33%) and anti-HBe seroconversion (12-30%) rates that are superior to those observed in untreated controls. Interferon-alpha has several drawbacks, such as the parenteral administration and the development of frequent and potentially serious side effects. Lamivudine is a safe drug with rare and generally mild side effects. Lamivudine induces an initial virological remission in 70-90% of patients, but only 30-40% of patients remain in remission after the third year due to progressively increasing viral resistance. The main advantage of adefovir dipivoxil is the rare emergence of resistance, which has been identified in less than 2% of patients at 2 yr of treatment. Adefovir is also effective against lamivudine-resistant strains. This review will focus on the natural history and recently gained knowledge on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic hepatitis B is an important public health problem worldwide and in the United States. A treatment algorithm for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was developed by a panel of US hepatologists based on new developments in the understanding of the virology of HBV, availability of more sensitive molecular diagnostic testing, and advantages and disadvantages of currently approved therapies.

METHODS

This algorithm is based on available evidence, but where data are lacking, the panel relied on clinical experience and consensus expert opinion.

RESULTS

Serum HBV DNA can be detected at levels as low as 100-1000 copies/mL by using molecular assays and should be determined to establish a baseline level before treatment, monitor response to antiviral therapy, and survey for the development of drug resistance. The primary aim of antiviral therapy is durable suppression of serum HBV DNA to the lowest level possible. The threshold level of HBV DNA for determination of candidacy for therapy is >/=10(5) copies/mL for patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B. A lower serum HBV DNA threshold is appropriate for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B and those with decompensated cirrhosis, and the panel recommends thresholds of 10(4) copies/mL and 10(3) copies/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon alfa-2b, lamivudine, and adefovir dipivoxil are all approved as initial therapy for chronic hepatitis B and have certain advantages and disadvantages. Issues for consideration include efficacy, safety, incidence of resistance, method of administration, and cost. Studies are under way to explore the safety and efficacy of combination therapy, which may prove to be more effective than monotherapy in suppressing viral replication and may decrease or delay the incidence of drug resistance.

A United States compassionate use study of lamivudine treatment in nontransplantation candidates with decompensated hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis

Patients with hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhosis have limited treatment options. This prospective, multicenter study assessed lamivudine in 75 patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the majority of whom (93%) were not candidates for liver transplantation. At baseline, all 75 patients tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg (+)] and 62% tested positive for hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg (+)]. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were detectable in 64% of patients by the branched chain DNA (bDNA) assay. Patients received lamivudine 100 mg once daily (median duration, 12.7 months; range, 0.5 to 33 months). In patients with detectable HBV DNA pretreatment, the virus became undetectable by the bDNA assay in 69% of patients with > or = 6 months treatment and in 64% overall. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level improved in 90% and normalized in 55% of patients with > or = 6 months treatment and in 48% overall. Improvements in bilirubin and albumin levels occurred throughout treatment. The median Child-Pugh score improved from a baseline of 10 to 8 at last visit, with 31% (23/75) having an improved score of > or = 2 points, 57% (43/75) unchanged (< 2 points), and 12% (9/75) worsened (> or = 2 points). A virologic breakthrough developed in eight of 41 patients (18%) after a median of 13.1 months of treatment. Tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) variant HBV was detected in three of four patients tested. Nevertheless, at last visit, ALT, albumin, and bilirubin levels were similar for patients with and without breakthrough. Lamivudine treatment can lead to significant improvements in liver disease severity in nontransplantation candidates with advanced disease. Additional studies of lamivudine in combination with other antivirals are indicated for the large population of patients worldwide with advanced HBV-related cirrhosis and inadequate access to liver transplantation.

Therapy of chronic hepatitis B: current challenges and opportunities

Better understanding of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, natural history and the immunopathogenesis of chronic hepatitis B, together with the introduction of effective agents with different mechanisms of action are the basis for better therapeutic strategies against chronic hepatitis B. Among currently available drugs, interferon-alpha and thymosin-alpha1 have only modest efficacy (approximately 40% vs 9-20% in controls). In the past decade, lamivudine has dominated in the treatment of chronic HBV infection because it is easy to use, safe, and is effective in terms of hepatitis B e antigen and/or HBV-DNA loss, ALT normalization, and improvement in histology. The response rate increases with increasing pretherapy alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, suggesting that patients with stronger endogenous immune response against HBV have a better response to direct antiviral agents. Lamivudine is also beneficial in decompensated cirrhotics with HBV replication. Hepatitic flares may occur after stopping lamivudine therapy in nonresponders and also in responders. Therefore, prolonged therapy is usually required. However, tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutations conferring resistance to lamivudine start to emerge after 6-9 months of therapy, and hepatitis flare, even decompensation, may develop after viral breakthrough. Thus the benefits of long-term lamivudine therapy must be balanced against the concern about YMDD mutations and the durability of treatment response. Adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, emtricitabine, clevudine and other nucleoside/ nucleotide analogues have shown encouraging results and some agents appear effective in patients with YMDD mutants. Further development of new drugs and new strategies may help to improve treatment in the new century.

Hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy

The selection of a chemotherapeutic regimen for the oncology patient is based on a thorough assessment of potential hazards relating to the patient's clinical condition and the toxicities of chemotherapy. Liver function abnormalities are commonly seen in this patient population and deducing their aetiology may be difficult. Immunosuppression, paraneoplastic phenomena, infectious disease, metastases and polypharmacy may all confound the clinical picture. While criteria for standardising liver injury have been established, dose modifications often rely on empirical clinical judgement. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of hepatotoxic manifestations for the most common chemotherapeutic agents is essential. This article reviews the hepatotoxicity of commonly utilised antineoplastic agents.

Efficacy of lamivudine therapy for advanced liver disease in patients with precore mutant hepatitis B virus infection awaiting liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease resulting from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is associated with a high rate of recurrence and reduced survival. Lamivudine is effective in inhibiting HBV replication in patients with chronic hepatitis. This study evaluated the impact of lamivudine on viral suppression, liver function, and disease severity in patients awaiting OLT with HBV e-minus strain infection.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients received lamivudine (100 mg per day) from the day of listing for OLT. All patients were positive for serum HBV-DNA by polymerase chain reaction and all had a Child-Pugh score of 7 or higher.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for 12+/-9 months (mean +/- SD). Eleven underwent OLT within 13 months of treatment initiation, one died after 10 months, and one dropped out after 3 months. After 3, 6, and 9 months, HBV-DNA by polymerase chain reaction was undetectable in 14 of 25, 14 of 20, and 13 of 15 patients, respectively. Two patients developed lamivudine resistance after 9 and 18 months of treatment, respectively, without liver decompensation. Comparing baseline to last visit data, a significant improvement in prothrombin activity (43+/-15% vs. 52+/-19%; P=0.0014), serum bilirubin (3.4+/-1.9 vs. 2.5+/-2.2 mg/dL; P=0.0007), serum albumin (3.3+/-0.3 vs. 3.6+/-0.5 g/dL; P=0.0278), presence of ascites (15/25 vs. 7/25; P=0.0047), and Child-Pugh score (9 vs. 8; P=0.0003) was observed. Because of liver function improvement, four patients were placed on low priority status for OLT (United Network of Organ Sharing 3) and 9 on inactive status (United Network of Organ Sharing 7). The overall probability of survival at 6 and 12 months was 100% and 90.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine has an important role in patients with end-stage liver disease caused by HBV precore mutant strain. Not only does HBV-DNA suppression allow patients to be eligible for OLT, but the improvement of the patients' clinical status may delay the need for OLT in an era of organ shortage.

Determinants of early mortality in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B treated with antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chronic hepatitis B is a leading cause of death worldwide. To identify patients who might require urgent liver transplantation despite antiviral therapy, we investigated the determinants of early mortality in a large cohort of patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B treated with lamivudine.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-four North American patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B received lamivudine for a median of 16 months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression modeling was used to develop a model of 6-month mortality.

RESULTS

A biphasic survival pattern was observed, with most deaths occurring within the first 6 months of treatment (25 of 32, 78%) because of complications of liver failure. The estimated actuarial 3-year survival of patients who survived at least 6 months was 88% on continued treatment. In multivariate modeling, elevated pretreatment serum bilirubin and creatinine levels as well as the presence of detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (by the bDNA assay) pretreatment were significantly associated with 6-month mortality. An equation approximating the probability of early mortality was developed from these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate a distinct alteration in the slope of the survival curve after 6 months of lamivudine treatment for decompensated chronic hepatitis B. An equation consisting of 3 widely available pretreatment laboratory parameters was developed that can be used to predict the likelihood of early death in patients receiving lamivudine for decompensated chronic hepatitis B. These observations may help identify patients who can be stabilized with suppressive antiviral therapy vs. those who require urgent liver transplantation.

Management of viral hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health concern and is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The natural history and clinical outcomes of chronic HBV infection are determined by the viral replication cycle and the host immune responses. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B is directed at interrupting the natural history by suppressing HBV replication before development of any significant irreversible liver cell damage. Effective antiviral therapies should be followed by sustained suppression of HBV-DNA, normalization of transaminases levels and a stable stage of HBeAg seroconversion with persistence of circulating anti-HBeAg antibodies. Two major classes of antiviral therapeutic agents that have been approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are immunomodulating agents (i.e. interferon) and the nucleoside analogs (i.e. lamivudine). A 4-6 month course of interferon-alpha has resulted in improvement of survival in 20%-30% of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had elevated serum ALT levels without hepatic decompensation. Interferon-alpha therapy is associated with HBeAg seroconversion; normalization of ALT levels, reduced hepatic inflammation, and possibly reduced disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon can also be used with caution in patients with early compensated cirrhosis. A 12-month course of lamivudine has been shown to be well tolerated and effective. Lamivudine can be used in decompensated cirrhosis and immunosuppressed patients and for prevention of recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. The response rates after 3 years of lamivudine therapy account for 40-65%. A major problem of antiviral treatment is the emergence of drug resistance conferred by mutations in the YMDD motif of HBV reverse transcriptase. The prevalence of YMDD mutations increases with longer durations of antiviral therapies and this has been detected in 20% of immunocompetent patients receiving lamivudine per year. Contentious issues remain when to stop the treatment if HBeAg seroconversion does not occur. Many new immunomodulatory therapies and antiviral agents are in various stages of clinical development and have shown some promise. Among newer HBV antivirals, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, emtricitabine, DAPD and clevudine appear to be at least as potent as lamivudine in suppressing HBV replication. In vitro studies have shown that YMDD mutations confer cross-resistance between lamivudine and emtricitabine. However, adefovir, dipivoxil, lobucavir, DAPD and possibly clevudine suppress replications of both YMDD mutants and wild types of HBV. Immunomodulatory approaches for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are conceptually attractive, but newer agents used to date (thymosin-alpha, interleukin-12, therapeutic vaccines) have not demonstrated sufficient efficacy for widespread use. Combinations of an immunomodulatory agent and nucleoside analog may improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the emergence of drug resistance. Nevertheless, combinations of interferon and lamivudine therapies do not confer such additional benefits. The next challenge for HBV treatment is to use antivirals in combination and/or in cyclical therapy to minimize the emergence of drug resistance and increase efficacy, particularly to achieve sustainable post-treatment suppression of HBV. Randomized prospective control trials of combined antiviral therapies given simultaneously or sequentially are needed to establish safe and effective combined regimens that can be recommended for future treatment strategies.

How will we use the new antiviral agents for hepatitis B?

There are two licensed drugs for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), interferon alfa and lamivudine, with similar efficacy rates. Lamivudine is less expensive and better tolerated than interferon alfa and is the drug of choice for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. The major problem with lamivudine monotherapy has been the emergence of drug-resistant HBV polymerase (YMDD) mutants. Thus, long-term use of lamivudine in other settings remains somewhat controversial. Alternative nucleoside analogues that are active against both wild-type and YMDD-mutant HBV are currently being tested. It is hoped that a combination of one or more of these agents with lamivudine will not only prove more effective than lamivudine alone but also decrease the rate of lamivudine resistance. Preliminary studies suggest that the combination of interferon and lamivudine is associated with an enhanced rate of virologic response when compared with either agent alone. From a theoretical perspective, the combination of interferon with one or more nucleoside analogues may be the most effective way to treat HBV infection in many clinical situations.

Current management strategies for hepatitis B in the elderly

Despite the availability of an efficient vaccine, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major public health problem worldwide. The World Health Organization estimates that there are still 350 million chronic carriers of the virus who are at risk of developing chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Antiviral therapy consists of the administration of either interferon-alpha (IFN alpha) or lamivudine. In the elderly, specific issues should be addressed. Because of the long duration of viral infection, screening for HCC is warranted in these patients, as new therapeutic options are being developed. Antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B is indicated in patients with elevated transaminases, the presence of HBV replication, and inflammatory activity on liver histology analysis, providing the patient has no other serious health problem impacting on life expectancy. Since IFN alpha therapy may cause many general adverse effects, lamivudine may be the best current treatment option in this patient population. The pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in the elderly are slightly different from those in younger adults but this does not require dose adjustment, except in the presence of renal function impairment. However, the beneficial effects of lamivudine therapy must be weighed against the selection of drug-resistant mutants. New therapeutic strategies are now under evaluation and may be available in the future for the elderly population. Besides mass HBV vaccination programmes, people sharing a house with patients infected with HBV should be vaccinated to prevent viral transmission.

Therapeutic management of hepatitis B-related cirrhosis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has a world-wide distribution, and may lead to cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Therapeutic strategies for HBV cirrhosis are changing rapidly. Treatment with interferon (IFN)-alpha may be hazardous and often can only be administered at low doses. The availability of lamivudine has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and opened up new options for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis or recurrent hepatitis B post-liver transplantation. However, lamivudine therapy should be weighed against the risk of selection of resistant mutants and randomized control trials are needed. Hopefully, in the near future, new antiviral drugs such as adefovir dipivoxil which is active on lamivudine-resistant mutants will become available. IFN-alpha is still the only molecule which may prevent HBV-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in humans. Whether other antivirals will also prove useful warrants further follow-up studies.

Therapeutic advances in the management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C

Until recently, interferon monotherapy has been the only available therapeutic option for patients with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Lamivudine has emerged as another effective first-line therapy for chronic hepatitis B as well as a beneficial treatment option for patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis. Viral resistance with long-term lamivudine therapy remains a major concern but new data continue to show benefits despite the development of YMDD mutations. Combination therapy with ribavirin and pegylated interferon-alpha has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The rate of sustained virological response can now be expected to be as high as nearly 50% for genotype 1 and 80% for non-1 genotypes of hepatitis C.