The mode of action and clinical pharmacology of gliclazide: a review

Effects of St John's wort and CYP2C9 genotype on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gliclazide

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients commonly take complementary medicines in conjunction with conventional drugs without clear evidence of safety or the risk of herb-drug interactions. The aim of this study was to assess potential pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) interactions between St John's wort and gliclazide in healthy subjects with different cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) genotypes.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

A crossover controlled study was conducted in 21 healthy subjects. Each received gliclazide (80 mg) either alone or during 15 days treatment with St John's wort. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)), apparent clearance (CL/F) and elimination half-life (t 1/2) of gliclazide and incremental changes in glucose and insulin AUC(0-4) were compared. CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 alleles were identified using PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion analysis.

KEY RESULTS

St John's wort significantly altered gliclazide pharmacokinetics in all except for four healthy subjects. The mean ratio and 90% confidence interval (CI) of gliclazide AUC(0-infinity) and CL/F were 0.67 (0.55-0.81) and 1.50 (1.24-1.81), respectively, after St John's wort treatment. St John's wort decreased gliclazide t (1/2), with mean ratio and 90% CI of 0.85 (0.74-0.93). There were no significant changes in glucose or insulin AUC(0-4) after St John's wort treatment and no significant differences according to CYP2C9 genotype.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Treatment with St John's wort significantly increases the apparent clearance of gliclazide which is independent of CYP2C9 genotype. People with diabetes receiving this combination should be closely monitored to evaluate possible signs of reduced efficacy.

Cytochrome P450 2C9 *2 and *3 polymorphisms and the dose and effect of sulfonylurea in type II diabetes mellitus

Sulfonylurea hypoglycemics are mainly metabolized by the cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) enzyme. The CYP2C9*2 and *3 polymorphisms encode proteins with less enzymatic activity and are correlated with elevated serum levels of sulfonylurea, as demonstrated in healthy volunteers. In this study, the effect of these variants is described for patients with diabetes mellitus treated with sulfonylurea. Associations between CYP2C9 polymorphisms, prescribed doses of sulfonylurea, and change in glucose levels after the start of sulfonylurea therapy were assessed in all patients with incident diabetes mellitus starting on sulfonylurea therapy in the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort study of 7,983 elderly people. In CYP2C9*3 allele carriers using tolbutamide, the prescribed dose was lower compared to patients with the wild-type CYP2C9 genotype. No differences in the prescribed dose were found in tolbutamide users with the CYP2C9*1/*2 or CYP2C9*2/*2 genotype compared to wild-type patients or in patients using other sulfonylurea. In CYP2C9*3 allele carriers, the mean decrease in fasting serum glucose levels after the start of tolbutamide therapy was larger than in patients with the wild-type genotype, although not statistically significant. Patients with diabetes mellitus who are carriers of a CYP2C9*3 allele require lower doses of tolbutamide to regulate their serum glucose levels compared to patients with the wild-type genotype.

Application of monolithic column in quantification of gliclazide in human plasma by liquid chromatography

A simple, rapid and sensitive isocratic reversed phase HPLC method with UV detection using a monolithic column has been developed and validated for the determination of gliclazide in human plasma. The assay enables the measurement of gliclazide for therapeutic drug monitoring with a minimum quantification limit of 10ngml(-1). The method involves simple, one-step extraction procedure and analytical recovery was complete. The separation was carried out in reversed-phase conditions using a Chromolith Performance (RP-18e, 100mmx4.6mm) column with an isocratic mobile phase consisting of 0.01M disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer-acetonitrile (52:48, v/v) adjusted to pH 4.0. The wavelength was set at 230nm. The calibration curve was linear over the concentration range 10-5000ngml(-1). The coefficients of variation for inter-day and intra-day assay were found to be less than 6.0%.

Influence of nicorandil on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of gliclazide in rats and rabbits

Chronic diabetes precipitates ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and many other disorders. IHD inturn is shown in the form of angina initially. According to EUROPA study, the incidence of angina is high in type II diabetics. Gliclazide, a second generation sulphonylurea derivative is widely used in the treatment of type-II diabetes and is known to release insulin by K(+) channel inhibition. Nicorandil, a newer antianginal drug widely used now a days acts by opening potassium channels in the cardiac muscle cell and also by releasing nitric oxide. However its action on pancreatic cell K(+) channel is not known. Since there is possibility for drug interaction leading to decreased activity of gliclazide the present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the combination. Studies in normal and alloxan induced diabetic rats were conducted with oral doses of 2 mg/kg bd. wt. of gliclazide, 1.8 mg/kg bd. wt. of nicorandil and their combination with adequate washout periods in between treatments. Studies in normal rabbits were conducted with 5.6 mg/1.5 kg bd. wt. of gliclazide, 1.4 mg/1.5 kg bd. wt. of nicorandil and their combination given orally. Blood samples were collected in rats from retro orbital puncture at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h and by marginal ear vein puncture in rabbits at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h. All the blood samples were analysed for glucose by GOD/POD method. The blood samples of rabbits were analysed by HPLC for gliclazide. Gliclazide produced hypoglycaemic/antidiabetic activity in normal and diabetic rats with peak activity at 1 h and 8 h and hypoglycaemic activity in normal rabbits at 3 h, while nicorandil alone produced significant hyperglycaemia at 4 h and reduced the effect of gliclazide with no significant change in pharmacokinetics when administered in combination. The interaction observed appears to be pharmacodynamic at the receptor level as expected.

Influence of selenium (antioxidant) on gliclazide induced hypoglycaemia/anti hyperglycaemia in normal/alloxan-induced diabetic rats

Oxidative stress is involved in diabetes mellitus and its complications. Since diabetes is a stress-related disorder, supplementation with antioxidants may improve the condition. The purpose of this study is to know the effect of oral administration of selenium on blood glucose and its influence on gliclazide induced hypoglycaemia/antihyperglycaemia in normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Albino rats of either sex were divided into three groups of six each. Group-I/II/III were treated with selenium 1/2 TD (0.9 microg/200 g rat)/TD (1.8 microg/200 g rat)/2TD (3.6 microg/200 g rat), respectively. Later group II was treated with gliclazide TD (1.44 mg/200 g rat)/selenium TD + gliclazide TD with a washout period of 1 week between the treatments. Diabetes was induced by alloxan monohydrate 100 mg/kg body weight i.p. A group of six rats showing fasting blood glucose levels ranging from 175-250 mg/dl were selected for the study. Rats were treated with selenium TD, gliclazide TD and selenium TD + gliclazide TD with a washout period of 1 week between the treatments. Selenium 1/2 TD and TD produced hypoglycaemia while 2TD produced hyperglycaemia. The combination of selenium TD with gliclazide TD, significantly enhanced the glucose lowering effect of gliclazide in normal and diabetic rats.

Double-blind, randomized, multicentre study of the efficacy and safety of gliclazide-modified release in the treatment of Chinese type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gliclazide-modified release (gliclazide MR) is a new formulation of the sulfonylurea gliclazide designed for once-daily administration. The hydrophilic matrix of hypromellose-based polymer in the new formulation induces a progressive drug release, which parallels the 24-h glycaemic profile in type 2 diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of gliclazide MR (once-daily administration) versus gliclazide (twice-daily administration) in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three type 2 diabetic Chinese patients who had been on diet control alone or on treatment with metformin or on low dose of sulfonylurea were randomized to either gliclazide MR taken once daily or gliclazide taken twice daily. Dosage of metformin was maintained throughout the study, and the sulfonylurea was stopped. The dose of gliclazide MR was increased at 1-month intervals from 30 mg to 120 mg, while that of gliclazide from 80 mg to 320 mg until metabolic control was achieved [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < or = 7.7 mmol/l] or the maximum dose reached. Efficacy was mainly evaluated by levels of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and FPG.

RESULTS

The mean baseline characteristics of the full analysis set 1 (FAS1) (HbA1c, n = 58) and the FAS2 (FPG, n = 61) were comparable in both groups. The levels of HbA1c decreased similarly in both groups over the treatment period: -1.6 +/- 1.6% (p < 0.001) on gliclazide MR (n = 31) and -1.6 +/- 1.4% (p < 0.001) on gliclazide (n = 27). Decrease in HbA1c was observed irrespective of pre-existing therapy for diabetes: -2.3 +/- 1.5% for patients on diet alone; -0.6 +/- 1.3% for patients switched from sulfonylurea to study drug and -1.4 +/- 0.8% for patients on metformin in combination with study drug. FPG decreased significantly from 177.5 +/- 63.5 to 136.7 +/- 42.2 (p < 0.001, n = 32) on gliclazide MR and not significant from 188.2 +/- 62.6 to 163.7 +/- 67.9 (p = 0.059, n = 29) on gliclazide. Both treatments were very well tolerated with no major hypoglycaemic episodes requiring external assistance; only three patients experienced mild hypoglycaemic episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily gliclazide MR showed a better trend in improving blood glucose control in comparison with gliclazide in type 2 diabetic Chinese patients irrespective of the pre-existing anti-diabetic treatment. The safety profiles of gliclazide MR and gliclazide were similar with a small number of patients having reported hypoglycaemic episodes. Once-daily dosing with gliclazide MR should improve patient compliance, an important factor in long-term glycaemic control.

The effect of gliclazide and glibenclamide on preconditioning of the human myocardium

The cardioprotection of ischaemic preconditioning may be abolished in diabetic patients especially when some oral hypoglycaemics are used. The dose-response effect of gliclazide and glibenclamide on ischaemic preconditioning and the action of glibenclamide on signal transduction in human myocardium were investigated using right atrial appendages from cardiac surgery patients. Glibenclamide (0.1, 1, 3 and 10 microM) and gliclazide (1, 10, 30 and 100 microM) were added for 10 min prior to ischaemic preconditioning. The cardioprotection was abolished by glibenclamide at all concentrations and by gliclazide at supratherapeutic concentrations of 30 and 100 microM. Glibenclamide abolished the protective effect of mitoK(ATP) channel opening but not that of protein kinase C (PKC) or p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) activation. In conclusion, glibenclamide and gliclazide differential effects may be a result of differential sensitivities. Glibenclamide does not block protection conferred by either PKC or p38MAPK activation. These findings may have clinical implications in ischaemic heart disease.

Disease System Analysis: Basic Disease Progression Models in Degenerative Disease

PURPOSE

To describe the disease status of degenerative diseases (i.e., type 2 diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's disease) as function of disease process and treatment effects, a family of disease progression models is introduced.

METHODS

Disease progression is described using a progression rate (Rdp) acting on the synthesis or elimination parameters of the indirect response model. Symptomatic effects act as disease-dependent or -independent effects on the synthesis or elimination parameters. Protective drug effects act as disease dependent or -independent effects on Rdp.

RESULTS

Simulations with the ten disease models show distinctly different signature profiles of treatment effects on disease status. Symptomatic effects result in improvement of disease status with a subsequent deterioration. Treatment cessation results in a disease status equal to the situation where treatment had not been applied. Protective effects result in a lasting reduction, or even reversal, of the disease progression rate and the resulting disease status during the treatment period. After cessation of treatment the natural disease course will continue from the disease status at that point.

CONCLUSION

Disease system analysis constitutes a scientific basis for the distinction between symptomatic versus protective drug effects in relation to specific disease processes as well as the identification of the exposure-response relationship during the time-course of disease.

A long-term comparison of pioglitazone and gliclazide in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison trial

AIMS

This study compared the effects of pioglitazone and gliclazide on metabolic control in drug-naive patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A total of 1270 patients with Type 2 diabetes were randomized in a parallel-group, double-dummy, double-blind study. Patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7.5-11%), despite dietary advice, received either pioglitazone up to 45 mg once daily or gliclazide up to 160 mg two times daily. Primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of the study. Secondary efficacy endpoints included change in fasting plasma glucose, fasting plasma insulin and plasma lipids. At selected centres, oral glucose tolerance tests were performed and C-peptide and pro-insulin levels were measured.

RESULTS

Mean HbA1c values decreased by the same amount in the two treatment groups from baseline to week 52 [pioglitazone: -1.4%; gliclazide: -1.4%; (90% CI: -0.18 to 0.02)]. A significantly greater mean reduction in fasting plasma glucose was observed in the pioglitazone group (2.4 mmol/l) than in the gliclazide group [2.0 mmol/l; treatment difference -0.4 mmol/l in favour of pioglitazone; P = 0.002; (95% CI: -0.7 to -0.1)]. Improvements in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and total cholesterol/HDL-C were greater with pioglitazone than with gliclazide (P < 0.001). The frequencies of adverse events were comparable between the two treatment groups, but more hypoglycaemic events were reported for gliclazide, whereas twice as many patients reported oedema with pioglitazone than with gliclazide.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone monotherapy was equivalent to gliclazide in reducing HbA1c, with specific differences between treatments in terms of mechanism of action, plasma lipids and adverse events.

Pioglitazone elicits long-term improvements in insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes: comparisons with gliclazide-based regimens

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Recent studies have demonstrated that pioglitazone (PIO) has beneficial effects on insulin sensitivity compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. The effects of PIO and gliclazide (GLIC)-based therapy on insulin sensitivity have not previously been directly compared. This analysis aimed to compare the effects of 52 weeks of treatment with PIO (30-45 mg/day) and GLIC (80-320 mg/day), both titrated to maximum tolerable doses, as monotherapy or in combination with metformin (MET), on insulin sensitivity and lipid parameters known to be related to insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We performed an analysis of 1,880 patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7.5-11.0%) who were participants in two parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, multicentre, clinical trials. Measures of insulin sensitivity and lipids were assessed.

RESULTS

The PIO- and GLIC-based regimens produced similar levels of glycaemic control (HbA1c). In both trials, insulin sensitivity as assessed using the homeostasis model assessment was improved in patients receiving PIO, but decreased in those receiving GLIC (mean change, baseline to endpoint: PIO 15.5, GLIC -15.6; p<0.001 and PIO+MET 18.9, GLIC+MET -5.3; p<0.001). Improvements in the atherogenic index of plasma (mean change: PIO -0.17, GLIC -0.08; p<0.001 and PIO+MET -0.17, GLIC+MET -0.02; p<0.001), triglycerides (mean change, mmol/l: PIO+MET -0.62, GLIC+MET -0.22; p<0.001) and NEFA (mean change, mmol/l: PIO+MET -0.12, GLIC+MET-0.05; p<0.001) were greater in PIO-treated patients than in patients receiving GLIC.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

The PIO-based regimens resulted in improved insulin sensitivity and more favourable insulin sensitivity-related lipid profiles compared with the GLIC-based regimens. These benefits may be important in the management of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Rational pharmacotherapy in the diabetic hypertension: analysis-prescribing patterns in a general hospital in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

To examine prescribing at a 2800-bed hospital, also providing ambulatory services for 9000 visits per day, with a view to assessing the extent to which it followed international guidelines for treating diabetic hypertension.

METHOD

Patients receiving antidiabetic and antihypertensive drugs concomitantly during the 4-week study period were included.

RESULT

Of the 5015 eligible patients, most received combination antidiabetic therapy. Oral antidiabetic agents used alone or in combination included (in descending order) metformin, glibenclamide, gliclazide, glipizide, glimepiride and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Gliclazide accounted for most of the oral antidiabetic drug expenditure. Sulfonylurea plus metformin was the most popular regimen. Prescriptions for long-acting sulfonylureas did not differ between elderly and younger patients. For blood pressure control, calcium-channel blockers were most commonly used alone and overall, although current guidelines suggest that they should be second-line treatments. Inappropriate use of immediate-release nifedipine was noted. The combination, atenolol >100 mg/day and hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg/day (or an equivalent) were extensively used. Among 54.7% patients treated with combination antihypertensives, calcium-channel blockers and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor were most commonly used.

CONCLUSION

Most diabetic hypertensive patients were treated with combination therapy for glucose and blood pressure control. Prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs often differed from current guidelines, especially in the choice of agents and their combinations.

Quantification of gliclazide by semi-micro high-performance liquid chromatography: application to a bioequivalence study of two formulations in healthy subjects

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two formulations of gliclazide in healthy human volunteers. Bioequivalence of the two formulations was determined in 20 healthy subjects with a single-dose, two-period, crossover study. A new high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the pharmacokinetic analysis of gliclazide was developed, using a semi-micro column to quantify gliclazide in plasma samples. Chromatographic separation was achieved with a semi-micro C18 column and 40 mM KH2PO4 (pH 4.6)-acetonitrile-isopropyl alcohol (5:4:1, v/v/v) as the mobile phase, and with UV detection at 229 nm. The method displayed good precision (coefficients of variation (CV < 8.0%)), was fast (total analysis time 8 min), and required only a small amount of mobile phase (0.22 ml/min), with a reasonable limit of quantification (0.1 microg/ml). The calibration curve was linear in the concentration range 0.1-10 microg/ml. When the pharmacokinetic parameters of gliclazide in the two formulations were calculated and compared statistically using crossover analysis of variance, they were similar, with no statistically significant difference. Ninety percent confidence intervals for AUC0-last, AUC0-infinity, and Cmax, used to evaluate bioequivalence, were in the stipulated range of 0.80-1.25. This result suggests that two formulations are bioequivalent when administered orally at a dose of 80 mg gliclazide.

Population PKPD modelling of the long-term hypoglycaemic effect of gliclazide given as a once-a-day modified release (MR) formulation

AIMS

To study the relationship between the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gliclazide and its long-term pharmacodynamic (PD) effect in a large population of Type 2 diabetic patients and to identify factors predicting intersubject variability.

METHODS

A PKPD database of 634 Type 2 diabetic patients with a total of 5,258 fasting plasma glucose (FPG) samples was built up from the data collected during the clinical development of a modified release formulation of gliclazide (gliclazide MR). The PKPD analysis used a nonlinear mixed effect modelling approach. A mixture model was used to identify patients with a FPG response to treatment. In patients identified as responders, the decrease in FPG was related to gliclazide exposure (AUC) by an Emax relationship. An effect compartment was used to describe the link between PK and PD. A linear disease-progression model was used to assess the glycaemic deterioration observable over several months of treatment. Simulations were performed to evaluate the predictive performance of the PKPD model and to illustrate the time course of the antidiabetic effect of gliclazide MR.

RESULTS

Disease state was found to be the main explanatory factor for intersubject variability in response to gliclazide. The percentage of responders to gliclazide, used as monotherapy, increased inversely to the number of classes of antidiabetic agents received prior to entry in the studies. In responders, the initial dose (30 mg) of the gliclazide MR dosing regimen induced half of the maximum hypoglycaemic effect. The equilibration half-life between the PK and PD steady states was 3 weeks (intersubject variability of 84%). The rate of disease progression was 0.84 mmol l(-1) year(-1) (intersubject variability 143%). The PKPD model adequately predicted the FPG profiles of 234 patients who received the current formulation of gliclazide. Simulation of a 1-year parallel dose ranging clinical trial illustrated the influence of dose, time and type of previous antidiabetic treatment on the percentage of patients with clinically significant improvement of blood glucose control.

CONCLUSIONS

This population PKPD analysis has characterized the relationship between the exposure to gliclazide and its long-term hypoglycaemic effect, and has established that the intersubject variability in response is mostly related to disease state. These results underline the clinical interest of quickly increasing the dose of gliclazide MR according to the response to treatment in order to achieve effective blood glucose control.

Remodelling of zero-stress state of small intestine in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Effect of gliclazide

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical properties in terms of residual strains in diabetic small intestine have not been studied. Furthermore, no data have been reported on affect of gliclazide on gastrointestinal complications of diabetes.

AIMS

To determine remodelling of zero-stress state of small intestine in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats and effect of gliclazide treatment.

MATERIALS

Morphological properties and residual strains were studied in duodenum, jejunum and ileum obtained from diabetic rats, gliclazide-treated diabetic rats and normal rats (n = 8 each group).

METHODS

Diabetes was induced by single intraperitoneal injection of 65 mg/kg streptozotocin. Gliclazide (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) was injected directly into stomach lumen by intragastric gavage twice daily. Experimental period was 35 days. To approach no-load state; intestinal segments were surgically excised and cut transversely into short ring-shaped segments. Each ring was cut radially to obtain geometry of zero-stress state. Circumferential length, the wall thickness and opening angle were measured from digital images of each specimen and residual strains were computed.

RESULTS

Blood glucose level of diabetic group (approximately 20 mmol/l) was consistently higher than that in normal group (approximately 4 mmol/l) after induction of diabetes (p < 0.001). Gliclazide lowered average blood glucose level to between 10 and 15 mmol/l (p < 0.001). Plasma insulin levels of both diabetic groups (average between 10 and 15 pmol/l) were significantly lower than those in normal group (average approximately 18 pmol/l, p < 0.05). Wet weight per unit length and wall thickness of duodenum, jejunum and ileum were significantly higher in Diabetes group than those in Normal group (p < 0.05). Opening angle and absolute value of residual strain were significantly smaller in duodenum and larger in jejunum and ileum in Diabetes group than in Normal group (p < 0.001). Gliclazide treatment partly restored these changes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes induced morphometric and biomechanical remodelling in intestine. Gliclazide partly restored these changes.

Gliclazide modified release

Gliclazide modified release (MR) is a new formulation of the drug gliclazide and is given once daily. The hydrophilic matrix of hypromellose-based polymer in the new formulation effects a progressive release of the drug which parallels the 24-hour glycaemic profile in untreated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The formulation shows high bioavailability and its absorption profile is unaffected by coadministration with food. Mean plasma glucose levels are significantly reduced over a 24-hour period in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with gliclazide MR once daily, in both fasting and postprandial states. No cardiovascular ATP-sensitive potassium channel interaction has been observed at therapeutic concentrations of gliclazide MR. Gliclazide MR has also demonstrated antioxidant properties that are independent of glycaemic control. In a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study, gliclazide MR 30 to 120 mg once daily showed similar efficacy to gliclazide immediate release (IR) 80 to 320 mg/day (in divided doses for doses >80 mg) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over a 10-month period, reducing glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to a similar extent. The drug appeared most efficacious in patients who had previously been treated by diet alone, where significant reductions in HbA(1c) from baseline of 0.9% and 0.95% were seen at 10 and 24 months. Similarly, a sustained effect of gliclazide MR was observed in a subgroup of elderly patients defined a priori; HbA(1c) was decreased to a similar degree to that observed in the general study population. Gliclazide MR showed similar tolerability to gliclazide IR after 10 months' treatment in the randomised trial. The most commonly observed adverse events were arthralgia, arthritis, back pain and bronchitis (each <5%). Bodyweight remained stable. In this study no episodes of nocturnal hypoglycaemia or hypoglycaemia requiring third party assistance were observed during treatment with gliclazide MR. Episodes of symptomatic hypoglycaemia were infrequent, occurring in approximately 5% of patients.

Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of gliclazide 80 mg tablets (Glyzide & Diamicron)--in healthy human volunteers

A randomized, two-way, crossover, bioequivalence study in 24 fasting, healthy, male volunteers was conducted to compare two brands of gliclazide 80 mg tablets, Glyzide (Julphar, UAE) as test and Diamicron (Servier Industries, France) as reference product. The study was performed at the International Pharmaceutical Research Centre (IPRC), in joint venture with Speciality Hospital, Amman, Jordan. The drug was administered with 240 ml of 20% glucose solution after a 10 h overnight fasting. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 h. Plasma harvested from blood was analyzed for gliclazide by validated HPLC method. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0-t), AUC(0- proportional, variant), C(max), T(max), T(1/2), and elimination rate constant were determined from plasma concentrations of both formulations. Statistical modules (ANOVA and 90% confidence intervals) were applied to AUC(0-t), AUC(0- proportional, variant), and C(max) for bioequivalence evaluation of the two brands which revealed no significant difference between them, and 90% CI fell within US FDA accepted bioequivalence range of 80-125%. Based on these statistical inferences, Glyzide was judged bioequivalent to Diamicron.

Complete bioavailability and lack of food-effect on pharmacokinetics of gliclazide 30 mg modified release in healthy volunteers

A new modified release (MR) formulation containing 30 mg of gliclazide was developed to obtain a better predictable release of the active principle and to allow once-daily dosing regimen. An absolute bioavailability study was carried out to characterise the performance of the new formulation and the food-effect was also investigated in a separate study. Both studies were single dose, randomised, open label, two way cross over studies with a wash out period between doses. For the bioavailability study, each volunteer received 30 mg of gliclazide given either as a 1 h intravenous infusion or as a 30 mg MR tablet. For the food-effect study, the treatment was given either fasted or 10 min after the start of a standardised Melander breakfast. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h after administrations and plasma samples assayed for gliclazide concentrations using a reverse-phase HPLC method with UV detection. Mean absolute bioavailability of gliclazide was 97% and ranged between 79 and 110% showing complete absorption. A similar moderate to low variability was observed after IV and oral administration showing the MR formulation did not add to the overall variability which is solely due to the disposition parameters, in particular metabolism of gliclazide. No significant difference was observed in t(max), t(1/2z), C(max) and AUC of gliclazide after administration of the 30 mg MR tablet under fasted and fed conditions. In conclusion, after single oral administration of a 30 mg MR tablet, gliclazide was completely absorbed both under fasted and fed conditions. A consistent and optimal release of gliclazide from this formulation leads to a low to moderate overall variability of its pharmacokinetic parameters. Diamicron 30 mg MR can be given without regards to meals i.e. before, during or after breakfast.

Characteristics of pancreatic beta-cell secretion in Type 2 diabetic patients treated with gliclazide and glibenclamide

The aim of the present cross-over study was to compare the beta-cell response to gliclazide and glibenclamide administered orally during and following a hyperglycaemic clamp in sulphonylurea treated Type 2 diabetes. Nine patients (6 males), aged 61.4 (S.D. 6.9) years with a body mass index of 27.5 (3.1) kg m(-2) and HbA(1c) at baseline of 7.2 (0.9)% were included. Eight healthy control subjects underwent the same tests. Patients received 80-240 mg gliclazide or 5-15 mg glibenclamide for 6 weeks. Thirty minutes after administration of 160 mg of gliclazide or 10 mg of glibenclamide a 1-h hyperglycaemic clamp (11.0 mmol l(-1)) was begun, and followed by a 3.5-h observation period. Nadir blood glucose levels were 4.2 (1.0), 4.3 (1.2) and 3.4 (1.0) mmol l(-1) for glibenclamide gliclazide and controls, respectively (both P=0.07 vs. controls). Glucose levels decreased slowly and linearly in people with diabetes and reached nadirs after 204 (8) and 198 (18) min, respectively, after cessation of glucose infusion, while in controls, glucose levels declined steeply to a nadir at 98 (47) min (P<0.003 vs. both drugs). No first phase insulin secretion peak was observed in people with diabetes. Insulin levels remained elevated during the 3-h observation period in SU treated patients but, in control subjects decreased to baseline values within 2 h of the clamp. The proinsulin to C-peptide ratio increased during the observation period. In conclusion, the effects of glibenclamide and gliclazide on insulin secretion are very similar in patients with Type 2 diabetes who are in moderate glycaemic control, with a slow rise to lower amplitude, poor responsiveness to falling glucose levels, and raised proinsulin to C-peptide ratio.

Diamicron MR once daily is effective and well tolerated in type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, multinational study

In a double-blind, multicenter, multinational study, the long-term efficacy and safety of Diamicron(R)MR, a new gliclazide formulation taken once daily at lower dose (30-120 mg/day) was compared with Diamicron(R) (80-320 mg/day) taken twice daily in type 2 diabetic outpatients. After a 2-week run-in period, 800 patients with poor blood glucose control were randomized to Diamicron(R)MR (n=401) or Diamicron(R) (n=399). After a 4-month titration period, the efficacy and safety of Diamicron(R)MR was compared with Diamicron(R) over a 6-month fixed-dose treatment period. The ability to switch from Diamicron(R) to Diamicron(R)MR was then assessed during an additional 2-month follow-up period. Equivalence between treatment with Diamicron(R)MR and Diamicron(R) was compared by a non-inferiority test; the limit of equivalence was set at 0.5% for HbA(1c) and 1 mmol/l for fasting plasma glucose (FPG). The treatment groups were comparable at baseline. After 10 months of treatment, Diamicron(R)MR was as efficient as Diamicron(R) in controlling blood glucose, with a mean end point difference in HbA(1c) of -0.08 (0. 08)%, significantly lower than the equivalence limit (p<0.001). Similar results were obtained for FPG.The safety of Diamicron(R)MR and Diamicron(R) was equally high. The incidence of hypoglycemia was particularly low (0.2 hypoglycemia/100 patient months) in the elderly population, which represented almost 40% of the included patients. This study demonstrates that 30 to 120 mg of Diamicron(R)MR taken once daily is at least as efficient as 80 to 320 mg of Diamicron(R) taken in divided doses with respect to HbA(1c) and FPG levels, with a similar safety profile.

Correction of glycosylated oxyhemoglobin-induced impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilatation by gliclazide

We have investigated whether gliclazide, a second-generation sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agent, interferes with the impairment of endothelium-dependent nitric-oxide-mediated relaxation produced by 14%-glycosylated human oxyhemoglobin (GHHb). For comparative purposes, other agents, like glibenclamide, aminoguanidine, ascorbic acid or superoxide dismutase (SOD), were also tested. GHHb (10 nM) caused a reduction in endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by acetylcholine (1 nM to 10 microM) in both isolated aortic segments and mesenteric microvessels from normoglycemic nondiabetic rats. Preincubation of the vessels with gliclazide (100 nM to 10 microM) prevented the impairment of endothelial relaxation, the threshold concentration of gliclazide being 300 nM. In addition, 10 microM gliclazide also prevented the reduction by 10 nM GHHb of the relaxation induced by exogenous nitric oxide (NO, 10 nM to 100 microM). Determination of superoxide anion release measured by the reduction in ferricytochrome c indicated that GHHb produced significant amounts of these free radicals that were concentration-dependently inhibited by gliclazide. The impairment of endothelium-mediated responses was also prevented by 100 U/ml SOD or 10 microM ascorbic acid, but not by 10 microM glibenclamide or 100 microM aminoguanidine. We conclude that gliclazide can reduce the impairment of nitric-oxide-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation produced by GHHb. This reduction is likely related to the antioxidant properties of the drug, a mechanism suggested by these studies which demonstrate the inactivation of superoxide anions produced by the glycosylated protein by gliclazide.

Prevention of endothelial dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats by gliclazide treatment

The aim of the present work was to analyze whether the oral hypoglycemic drug gliclazide affects diabetic endothelial dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Gliclazide was compared with glibenclamide, ascorbic acid, and aminoguanidine. An insulin-dependent model of diabetes was selected to exclude insulin-releasing effects of the drugs. Both in isolated aortic segments and mesenteric microvessels, endothelium-dependent relaxation evoked by acetylcholine (ACh, 1 nM to 10 microM) was significantly reduced in vessels from diabetic animals. This impairment was reversed when the segments were previously incubated with 100 U/ml superoxide dismutase. When streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were orally treated from the time of diabetes induction with gliclazide (10 mg/kg) or ascorbic acid (250 mg/kg), ACh-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation was well preserved both in aortic segments and mesenteric microvessels. In addition, the impaired vasodilatation to exogenous nitric oxide (NO) in aortic segments was also improved in gliclazide-treated diabetic rats. On the other hand, oral treatment with glibenclamide (1 and 10 mg/kg) or aminoguanidine (250 mg/kg) did not produce significant improvements in diabetic endothelial dysfunction. We conclude that gliclazide reverses the endothelial dysfunction associated with diabetes. This effect appears to be due not to the metabolic actions of the drug but rather to its antioxidant properties, as it can be mimicked by other antioxidants. We propose that the mechanism involved is the inactivation of reactive oxygen species, which are increased in diabetes probably as a result of increased early protein glycosylation products, such as glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)). These effects of gliclazide are not shared by other oral hypoglycemic agent such as glibenclamide, or by blockade of advanced glycosylation end product (AGE) generation with aminoguanidine.

Accelerated oral absorption of gliclazide in human subjects from a soft gelatin capsule containing a PEG 400 suspension of gliclazide

Whether a rapid elevation of serum gliclazide concentration in human subjects can be achieved through an acceleration of dissolution of gliclazide from a formulation was examined. A soft gelatin capsule containing PEG 400, PEG 4000, Tween 20 and glycerin was prepared as a formulation that may accelerate dissolution of gliclazide. The in vitro dissolution of gliclazide at pH 7.2 was identical for the soft capsule and conventional tablets, Diamicron and Diberin. However, at pH 1, 2 and 4.0 the dissolution from the soft capsule was more rapid compared to the tablets. When bioavailability parameters were compared following oral administration of the soft capsule and Diamicron to 16 healthy Korean male subjects, the parameters representing the amount of adsorption (i.e. the area under the serum gliclazide concentration vs. time curve up to 24 h, AUC24, and the peak serum concentration Cmax) were not statistically different for both formulations. However, the time required to reach the peak (Tmax) was significantly shorter for the soft capsule than for the Diamicron. Our results, therefore, indicate that a rapid elevation of serum gliclazide concentration following oral administration of a formulation can be achieved by accelerating the in vitro dissolution of gliclazide from the formulation into the acidic buffers. Thus, the rate of gastrointestinal absorption of gliclazide appears to be dependent on its in vivo dissolution rate in gastric fluid. A soft capsule containing a PEG 400 suspension of gliclazide appears to be an appropriate formulation for accelerating the dissolution.

Gliclazide potentiates suppression of hepatic glucose production in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients

The mechanism of the hypoglycemic action of gliclazide was evaluated in 17 diet-treated non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients. In study A, five patients received a 240-minute glucose infusion along with [3-3H]glucose infusion. In study B, seven patients received a 240-minute isoglycemic insulin clamp along with [3-3H]glucose infusion. And in study C, five patients received a somatostatin infusion with basal replacing doses of insulin and glucagon. The three studies (A, B, and C) were repeated twice. Gliclazide (240 mg orally) was administered on one occasion, and placebo was given on the second occasion. Basal hepatic glucose production (HGP) and utilization and plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, and free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations were similar before administration of gliclazide and placebo. In study A, plasma glucose, its incremental area, and HGP were reduced by gliclazide administration (all P < .05), but glucose utilization was not significantly affected. The increase in plasma insulin and C-peptide concentrations was similar with gliclazide and placebo, although the plasma insulin to glucose ratio was increased with gliclazide. HGP decremental area was correlated with the reduction in plasma glucose incremental area (r = -.63, P < .05). In study B, gliclazide administration produced a larger suppression of HGP, but the overall rate of glucose utilization was not different in the two studies. In study C, plasma glucose concentration and HGP progressively decreased in both studies, without a difference between gliclazide and placebo. These results suggest that under conditions of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia gliclazide elicits a larger suppression of HGP.

Antidiabetic plants and their active constituents

Diabetes mellitus is a debilitating and often life-threatening disease with increasing incidence in rural populations throughout the world. A scientific investigation of traditional herbal remedies for diabetes may provide valuable leads for the development of alternative drugs and therapeutic strategies. Alternatives are clearly needed because of the inability of current therapies to control all of the pathological aspects of diabetes, and the high cost and poor availability of current therapies for many rural populations, particularly in developing countries. This review provides information on more than 1200 species of plants reported to have been used to treat diabetes and/or investigated for antidiabetic activity, with a detailed review of representative plants and some of great diversity of plant constituents with hypoglycemic activity, their mechanisms of action, methods for the bioassay of hypoglycemic agents, potential toxicity problems, and promising directions for future research on antidiabetic plants. The objective of this work is to provide a starting point for programs leading to the development of indigenous botanical resources as inexpensive sources for standardized crude or purified antidiabetic drugs, and for the discovery of lead compounds for novel hypoglycemic drug development.

Gliclazide. An update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Gliclazide is a second generation sulphonylurea oral hypoglycaemic agent used in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). It improves defective insulin secretion and may reverse insulin resistance observed in patients with NIDDM. These actions are reflected in a reduction in blood glucose levels which is maintained during both short and long term administration, and is comparable with that achieved by other sulphonylurea agents. Gradually accumulating evidence suggests that gliclazide may be useful in patients with diabetic retinopathy, due to its haemobiological actions, and that addition of gliclazide to insulin therapy enables insulin dosage to be reduced. Thus, gliclazide is an effective agent for the treatment of the metabolic defects associated with NIDDM and may have the added advantage of potentially slowing the progression of diabetic retinopathy. These actions, together with its good general tolerability and low incidence of hypoglycaemia have allowed gliclazide to be well placed within the array of oral hypoglycaemic agents available for the control of NIDDM.

Gliclazide: metabolic and vascular effects--a perspective

Gliclazide is a second-generation sulfonylurea that is widely used in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). It has been recommended for use on the basis of both its metabolic and nonmetabolic effects. It has a clear beneficial effect on metabolic control in NIDDM. Blood glucose and lipid levels are lowered. The glucose-lowering effects are secondary to both enhanced insulin secretion and a decrease in insulin resistance. The former is due to closure of a K+ adenosine triphosphate (ATP) channel in the beta cell. The mechanism whereby insulin action on the liver and muscle are potentiated remains unknown. It does not appear to involve the insulin receptor, and although glycogen synthase activation is enhanced, this is probably not specific. It has proven difficult to separate the metabolic effects of gliclazide from the effects of improved control. The metabolic actions are probably also shared with other sulfonylureas. Gliclazide also has beneficial effects on platelet behavior and function and on the endothelium, in addition to improving free radical status. These effects should be beneficial for the prevention of diabetic microangiopathy and macroangiopathy. Some evidence has appeared for the prevention of deterioration of diabetic retinopathy, but results are variable and more convincing studies are required. Many of the nonmetabolic effects of gliclazide appear to be unique to this agent. Gliclazide thus appears to be a reasonable choice in the treatment of NIDDM with diet failure, both from the metabolic and nonmetabolic standpoint.