Conventional vs. conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of dosimetry and acute toxicity

Rectal wall sparing by dosimetric effect of rectal balloon used during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer

The use of an air-filled rectal balloon has been shown to decrease prostate motion during prostate radiotherapy. However, the perturbation of radiation dose near the air-tissue interfaces has raised clinical concerns of underdosing the prostate gland. The aim of this study was to investigate the dosimetric effects of an air-filled rectal balloon on the rectal wall/mucosa and prostate gland. Clinical rectal toxicity and dose-volume histogram (DVH) were also assessed to evaluate for any correlation. A film phantom was constructed to simulate the 4-cm diameter air cavity created by a rectal balloon. Kodak XV2 films were utilized to measure and compare dose distribution with and without air cavity. To study the effect in a typical clinical situation, the phantom was computed tomography (CT) scanned on a Siemens DR CT scanner for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning. A target object was drawn on the phantom CT images to simulate the treatment of prostate cancer. Because patients were treated in prone position, the air cavity was situated superiorly to the target. The treatment used a serial tomotherapy technique with the Multivane Intensity Modulating Collimator (MIMiC) in arc treatment mode. Rectal toxicity was assessed in 116 patients treated with IMRT to a mean dose of 76 Gy over 35 fractions (2.17-Gy fraction size). They were treated in the prone position, immobilized using a Vac-Loktrade mark bag and carrier-box system. Rectal balloon inflated with 100 cc of air was used for prostate gland immobilization during daily treatment. Rectal toxicity was assessed using modifications of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and late effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT) scales systems. DVH of the rectum was also evaluated. From film dosimetry, there was a dose reduction at the distal air-tissue interface as much as 60% compared with the same geometry without the air cavity for 15-MV photon beam and 2x2-cm field size. The dose beyond the interface recovered quickly and the dose reductions due to air cavity were 50%, 28%, 11%, and 1% at 2, 5, 10, and 15 mm, respectively, from the distal air-tissue interface. Evaluating the dose profiles of the more clinically relevant situation revealed the dose at air-tissue interface was approximately 15% lower in comparison to that without an air cavity. The dose built up rapidly so that at 1 and 2 mm, there was only an 8% and 5% differential, respectively. The dosimetric coverage at the depth of the posterior prostate wall was essentially equal with or without the air cavity. The median follow-up was 31.3 months. Rectal toxicity profile was very favorable: 81% (94/116) patients had no rectal complaint while 10.3% (12/116), 6.9% (8/116), and 1.7% (2/116) had grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicity, respectively. There was no grade 4 rectal toxicity. DVH analysis revealed that none of the patients had more than 25% of the rectum receiving 70 Gy or greater. Rectal balloon has rendered anterior rectal wall sparing by its dosimetric effects. In addition, it has reduced rectal volume, especially posterior and lateral rectal wall receiving high-dose radiation by rectal wall distension. Both factors may have contributed to decreased rectal toxicity achieved by IMRT despite dose escalation and higher than conventional fraction size. The findings have clinical significance for future very high-dose escalation trials whereby radiation proctitis is a major limiting factor.

Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI)

PURPOSE

To quantify prostate motion during a radiation therapy treatment using cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) for time frames comparable to that expected in an image-guided radiation therapy treatment session (20-30 min).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six patients undergoing radiation therapy for prostate cancer were imaged on 3 days, over the course of therapy (Weeks 1, 3, and 5). Four hundred images were acquired during the 1-h MRI session in 3 sagittal planes through the prostate at 6-s intervals. Eleven anatomic points of interest (POIs) have been used to characterize prostate/bony pelvis/abdominal wall displacement. Motion traces and standard deviation for each of the 11 POIs have been determined. The probability of displacement over time has also been calculated.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into 2 groups according to rectal filling status: full vs. empty rectum. The displacement of POIs (standard deviation) ranged from 0.98 to 1.72 mm for the full-rectum group and from 0.68 to 1.04 mm for the empty-rectum group. The low standard deviations in position (2 mm or less) would suggest that these excursions have a low frequency of occurrence. The most sensitive prostate POI to rectal wall motion was the mid-posterior with a standard deviation of 1.72 mm in the full-rectum group vs. 0.79 mm in the empty-rectum group (p = 0.0001). This POI has a 10% probability of moving more than 3 mm in a time frame of approximately 1 min if the rectum is full vs. approximately 20 min if the rectum is empty.

CONCLUSION

Motion of the prostate and seminal vesicles during a time frame similar to a standard treatment session is reduced compared to that reported in interfraction studies. The most significant predictor for intrafraction prostate motion is the status of rectal filling. A prostate displacement of <3 mm (90%) can be expected for the 20 min after the moment of initial imaging for patients with an empty rectum. This is not the case for patients presenting with full rectum. The determination of appropriate intrafraction margins in radiation therapy to accommodate the time-dependent uncertainty in positional targeting is a topic of ongoing investigations for the on-line image guidance model.

Volume and hormonal effects for acute side effects of rectum and bladder during conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To identify dosimetric variables predictive of acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity and to determine whether hormonal therapy (HT) is independently associated with acute GI and GU toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with conformal radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This analysis was performed on 336 patients participating in a multicenter (four hospitals) randomized trial comparing 68 Gy and 78 Gy. The clinical target volume consisted of the prostate with or without the seminal vesicles, depending on the risk of seminal vesicle involvement. The margin from the clinical target volume to the planning target volume was 1 cm. For these patients, the treatment plan for a total dose of 68 Gy was used, because nearly all toxicity appeared before the onset of the 10-Gy boost. Acute toxicity (<120 days) was scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The dosimetric parameters were obtained from the relative and absolute dose-volume/surface histograms derived from the rectal wall (rectal wall volume receiving > or =5-65 Gy) and the bladder surface (bladder surface receiving > or =5-65 Gy). Additionally, relative and absolute dose-length histograms of the rectum were created, and the lengths of rectum receiving more than a certain dose over the whole circumference (rectal length receiving > or =5-65 Gy) were computed. The clinical variables taken into account for GI toxicity were neoadjuvant HT, hospital, and dose-volume group; for GU toxicity, the variables pretreatment GU symptoms, neoadjuvant HT, and transurethral resection of the prostate were analyzed. The variable neoadjuvant HT was divided into three categories: no HT, short-term neoadjuvant HT (started < or =3 months before RT), and long-term neoadjuvant HT (started >3 months before RT).

RESULTS

Acute GI toxicity Grade 2 or worse was seen in 46% of the patients. Patients with long-term neoadjuvant HT experienced less Grade 2 or worse toxicity (27%) compared with those receiving short-term neoadjuvant HT (50%) and no HT (50%). The volumes of the prostate and seminal vesicles were significantly smaller in both groups receiving neoadjuvant HT compared with those receiving no HT. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, including the two statistically significant clinical variables neoadjuvant HT and hospital, a volume effect was found for the relative, as well as absolute, rectal wall volumes exposed to intermediate and high doses. Of all the length parameters, the relative rectal length irradiated to doses of > or =5 Gy and > or =30 Gy and absolute lengths receiving > or =5-15 and 30 Gy were significant. Acute GU toxicity Grade 2 or worse was reported in 56% of cases. For patients with pretreatment GU symptoms, the rate was 93%. The use of short-term and long-term neoadjuvant HT resulted in more GU toxicity (73% and 71%) compared with no HT (50%). In multivariate analysis, containing the variables pretreatment symptoms and neoadjuvant HT, only the absolute dose-surface histogram parameters (absolute surface irradiated to > or =40, 45, and 65 Gy) were significantly associated with acute GU toxicity.

CONCLUSION

A volume effect was found for acute GI toxicity for relative, as well as absolute, volumes. With regard to acute GU toxicity, an area effect was found, but only for absolute dose-surface histogram parameters. Neoadjuvant HT appeared to be an independent prognostic factor for acute toxicity, resulting in less acute GI toxicity, but more acute GU toxicity. The presence of pretreatment GU symptoms was the most important prognostic factor for GU symptoms during RT.

The magnetic resonance detected intraprostatic lesion in prostate cancer: planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Local relapse after radiotherapy for prostate cancer mostly originates at the original tumor location. Dose escalation reduces local relapse rates. It may be of benefit to focus the highest dose to the intraprostatic lesion (GTVMRI) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Therefore, the visualization of the GTVMRI and its inclusion into computer optimization is mandatory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma were referred for IMRT. All these patients had a palpable lesion on digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or a PSA >10.0 ng/ml. A T2-weighted MR examination of the prostate was performed in order to detect a GTV(MRI) and correlate the location of the GTV(MRI) with the site of the tumour-containing cylinder (biopsy). Two IMRT plans were compared: a plan without the inclusion of the GTV(MRI) (IMRT-CONV) versus a plan including the GTV(MRI) into the plan optimization (IMRT-GTV(MRI)). For comparison, both physical and biological endpoints of the GTV(MRI), CTV, PTV and rectum were taken into account. After the finalization of the planning study, the IMRT-GTV(MRI) plans were clinically delivered using step-and-shoot IMRT. Acute gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) toxicity were recorded.

RESULTS

In all cases, the location of the GTV(MRI) corresponded with the site of the tumor containing biopsy cylinder. The mean and median distance of the GTV(MRI) to the anterior rectal wall was 3 and 2mm, respectively (range: 0-12 mm). For the GTV(MRI), its inclusion in the optimization led to a significant increase of all physical endpoints (P<0.01), without compromising the dose to the CTV, PTV and rectum. Mean GTV(MRI) dose was 78.3 Gy (IMRT-GTV(MRI)) versus 76.9 Gy (IMRT-CONV) (P<0.00001). All IMRT treatments were successfully delivered within 6 min. We did not observe grade 3 acute GI toxicity. One patient developed grade 3 GU toxicity (nocturia), that disappeared after administration of medication. Grade 2 GI and GU toxicity was observed in, respectively, four and six patients.

CONCLUSION

Using T2-weighted MR, the visualization of an intraprostatic lesion is feasible. The inclusion of the GTV(MRI) into planning optimization leads to a modest increase in dose, without compromising the dose to the CTV, PTV and organs at risk. The clinical delivery of these plans runs without problems. Acute toxicity is mild.

Impact of setup uncertainty in the dosimetry of prostate and surrounding tissues in prostate cancer patients treated with Peacock/IMRT

The purpose of this paper was to assess the effect of setup uncertainty on dosimetry of prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum, and colon in prostate cancer patients treated with Peacock intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Ten patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans using the "prostate box" for external, and an "endorectal balloon" for target immobilization devices, and treatment plans were generated (T1). A maximum of +/-5-mm setup error was chosen to model dosimetric effects. Isodose lines from the T1 treatment plan were then superimposed on each patient's CT anatomy shifted by 5 mm toward the cephalad and caudal direction, generating 2 more dosimetric plans (H1 and H2, respectively). Average mean doses ranged from 74.5 to 74.92 Gy for prostate and 73.65 to 74.94 Gy for seminal vesicles. Average percent target volume below 70 Gy increased significantly for seminal vesicles, from 0.53% to 6.26%, but minimally for prostate, from 2.08% to 4.4%. Dose statistics adhered to prescription limits for normal tissues. Setup uncertainty had minimum impact on target dose escalation and normal tissue dosing. The impact of target dose inhomogeneity is currently evaluated in clinical studies.

The GETUG 70 Gy vs. 80 Gy randomized trial for localized prostate cancer: feasibility and acute toxicity

PURPOSE

To describe treatments and acute tolerance in a randomized trial comparing 70 Gy and 80 Gy to the prostate in patients with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between September 1999 and February 2002, 306 patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy (153 patients) or 80 Gy (153 patients) in 17 institutions. Patients exhibited intermediate-prognosis tumors. If the risk of node involvement was greater than 10%, surgical staging was required. Previous prostatectomy was excluded, and androgen deprivation was not admitted. The treatment was delivered in two steps. PTV1-including seminal vesicles, prostate, and a 1-0.5-cm margin-received 46 Gy given with a 4-field conformal technique. PTV2, reduced to prostate with the same margins, irradiated with at least 5 fields. Dose was prescribed according to ICRU recommendations in the 70 Gy group, but adapted at the 80 Gy level.

RESULTS

All patients but one in the 80 Gy arm completed the treatment. In the 70 Gy arm, the mean dose to the PTV2 was 69.5 Gy. In the 80 Gy arm, the mean dose in the PTV2 was 78.5 Gy. Acute toxicity according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale during treatment was reported in 306 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the two arms: 12% had no toxicity, 80% complained of bladder toxicity, and 70% complained of rectal symptoms. Two months after the end of treatment, 43% of the 70 Gy level and 48% of the 80 Gy level complained of side effects, including 24% and 20% of sexual disorders. There was 6% and 2% of Grade 3 urinary and rectal toxicity. Five patients required a 10-29-day suspension of the treatment. Acute Grade 2 and 3 side effects were related to PTV and CTV1 size, which was the only independent predictive factor in multivariate analysis. Toxicity was not related to the center, age, arm of treatment, or selected data from dose-volume histogram of organ at risk.

CONCLUSION

Treatments were completed in respect to constraints. Acute toxicity was acceptable. Intensity of toxicity depended on target volumes.

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in the Management of Prostate Cancer

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is gaining widespread use in the radiation therapy community. Prostate cancer is the ideal target for IMRT due to the growing body of literature supporting dose escalation and normal tissue limitations. The need for dose escalation and the limits of conventional radiation therapy necessitate precise patient and prostate localization as well as advanced treatment delivery. The treatment of prostate cancer has been dramatically altered by the introduction of technology that can focus on the target while avoiding normal tissue. IMRT is evolving as the treatment of the future for prostate cancer.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer: Acute toxicity in 114 patients

INTRODUCTION

Dose escalation improves local control in prostate cancer. At Ghent University Hospital, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is used to increase the dose to the prostate and/or seminal vesicles. We report on acute toxicity in 114 patients who received IMRT for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was initiated after approval of our ethics committee. A class solution was used to plan all cases. Three beams (gantry 0 degrees , 116 degrees , and 244 degrees ) and anatomy-based segmentation were used to create an intensity-modulated dose distribution. Maximal rectal dose was set at 2 Gy per fraction. Detailed dose-volume histograms for all relevant structures were present. For all patients, we determined the pretreatment morbidity by a detailed preradiotherapy, in-house developed symptom scale. All patients were treated with 18 MV photons of an Elekta linear accelerator. Patients were seen on a weekly basis during treatment, and 1 month (M1) and 3 months (M3) thereafter. The registration of acute toxicity was standardized by a fixed questionnaire. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scale served as a basis, but additional symptoms, such as rectal blood loss, urgency, and incontinence, were scored as well.

RESULTS

All 114 IMRT plans were delivered successfully without any interruption or technical problem. Daily treatment time was always less than 8 min and less than 6 min in 90% of the cases. Grade 1 and Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were observed in 44% and 29% of the patients, respectively, during the whole period. If only the RTOG scale was used, Grade 1 and Grade 2 GI toxicities were noted in 39% and 27% of the patients, respectively, leaving 34% free of acute RTOG-scaled toxicity. Grade 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity was seen in 8 patients (7%), all but 1 during treatment. Grade 2 and Grade 1 GU toxicities were seen in 36% and 47% of the patients, respectively, leaving only 10% free of acute GU toxicity.

DISCUSSION

Anatomy-based IMRT to treat prostate cancer is incorporated into our daily routine without any problem. Acute toxicity is very low. Most of the recorded symptoms decrease over time, except for GI urgency and incontinence. The incorporation of additional symptoms makes the scoring more detailed.

Acute morbidity related to treatment volume during 3D-conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the relation between acute toxicity and irradiated volume in the organs at risk during three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January to December 2001, we treated 132 prostate cancer patients to a prescribed target dose of 70 Gy. Twenty-six patients (20%) received irradiation to the prostate only (Group P), 86 patients (65%) had field arrangements encompassing the prostate and seminal vesicles (Group PSV) while 20 (15%) received modified pelvic fields (Group MPF). A four-field conformal box technique was used. Acute toxicity according to the RTOG scoring system was prospectively recorded throughout the course of treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, radiation was well tolerated with 11%, 16% and 35% Grade 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity and 19%, 34% and 35% Grade 2 or higher genito-urinary (GU) toxicity in Groups P, PSV and MPF, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses treatment group was a significant predictor for Grade 2 or higher acute morbidity. In multivariate logistic regression, the rectum dose-volume histogram parameters were correlated to the incidence of acute Grade 2 GI toxicity, with the fractional volumes receiving more than 37-40 Gy and above 70 Gy showing the statistically strongest correlation. The fractional bladder volume receiving more than 14-27 Gy showed the statistically strongest correlation with acute GU toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-CRT radiation therapy to 70 Gy for prostate cancer was well tolerated. Only two of the 132 patients in the cohort experienced acute bladder toxicity Grade 3, none had Grade 3 rectal toxicity. Uni- and multivariate analyses indicated that the volume treated was a significant factor for the incidence of Grade 2 or higher acute morbidity.

Pion treatment of prostate carcinoma at Paul Scherrer Institute (formerly Swiss Institute for Nuclear Research (SIN)) from 1983 to 1992

BACKGROUND

- Between 1983 and 1992 a total of 55 patients suffering from prostate cancer were treated with pions (pi-mesons) at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Villigen, Switzerland. This form of therapy was used at only three centers world wide on 245 patients with this diagnosis. Since the last project in Vancouver, Canada, was closed in 1994, this form of therapy has been relegated to the realm of history.

METHODS

- In a retrospective analysis, the data of 49 of the 55 patients, that was qualified for evaluation was brought up-to-date and evaluated. Median and mean age at the time of therapy was 65 years. Advanced stage tumors were overly represented, in respect to T-stages (35/49 stage T3 and T4) and differentiation (11/49 G1). The treatment volumes were between 67 and 1330 cm(3), and the mean delivered dose was 32.2 pion-Gray. Survival probability, the probability of metastases and the local control rate were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier.

RESULTS

- Seven of the 49 patients had already been diagnosed with metastatic disease before treatment began, 16 developed metastases during the follow-up observation period. Local control after 2 years was 89%, and after 5 years 83%. The survival rate after 2 years was 87%, and 66% after 5 years, excluding non-tumor related deaths. The rate of late toxicity was acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

- Seen in retrospect, pion treatment of prostate carcinoma proved to be an effective form of therapy with a low rate of late toxicity. But, in comparison to the possibilities offered by modern conventional radiation therapy, this method would certainly not be today's first choice.

An integrated two-level hierarchical system for decision making in radiation therapy based on fuzzy cognitive maps

The radiation therapy decision-making is a complex process that has to take into consideration a variety of interrelated functions. Many fuzzy factors that must be considered in the calculation of the appropriate dose increase the complexity of the decision-making problem. A novel approach introduces fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) as the computational modeling method, which tackles the complexity and allows the analysis and simulation of the clinical radiation procedure. Specifically this approach is used to determine the success of radiation therapy process estimating the final dose delivered to the target volume, based on the soft computing technique of FCMs. Furthermore a two-level integrated hierarchical structure is proposed to supervise and evaluate the radiotherapy process prior to treatment execution. The supervisor determines the treatment variables of cancer therapy and the acceptance level of final radiation dose to the target volume. Two clinical case studies are used to test the proposed methodology and evaluate the simulation results. The usefulness of this two-level hierarchical structure discussed and future research directions are suggested for the clinical use of this methodology.

Treatment outcomes of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study documented the implementation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and assessed the tumor control and toxicity of such treatment in a large, multisite community practice.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed their first 222 consecutive patients with clinically localized (N0) prostate carcinoma treated with a 6-field conformal technique from October 1993 through March 2000. Standardized target definitions, dose planning constraints, and gantry angles were utilized to develop the treatment plan. Patients were categorized by low, intermediate, and high risk. Low risk was defined as T1a-T2a disease, a Gleason score < 7, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level </= 10.0 ng/mL (n = 47 [21%]). Intermediate risk was defined as T2b disease, a Gleason score > 6, or PSA level > 10.01 ng/mL (n = 60 [27%]). High risk was defined as 2 of the above risk factors or as T3 disease, a Gleason score > 7, or a PSA level > 20 (n = 115 [52%]). Biochemical disease recurrence was defined in accordance with the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition. Urinary and bowel toxicity were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring system.

RESULTS

The median follow-up after radiotherapy for surviving patients was 47 months (range, 0-99 months). The 2 and 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates for all patients were 84% and 78%, respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, lower dose (< 75.6 gray [Gy] vs. 75.6 Gy; P = 0.006), higher risk group (P = 0.033), higher stage (P = 0.045), and higher PSA level (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with biochemical disease recurrence. Toxicity was not significantly correlated with a higher radiotherapy dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation to 75.6 Gy using a 6-field conformal technique was feasible in the authors' community practice and resulted in acceptable toxicity and early biochemical outcomes.

Clinical trial of endorectal amifostine for radioprotection in patients with prostate cancer: rationale and early results

Tolerance of the normal rectal mucosa to radiation injury limits the dose that can be safely delivered to the prostate gland with definitive external beam radiation therapy. The radioprotective agent amifostine (Ethyol; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) is approved for intravenous use. Laboratory studies indicate that rectal administration results in preferential accumulation of amifostine in the rectal mucosa, and in clinical studies, neither free parent compound nor free active metabolite has been detected in the systemic circulation. This trial evaluates the rates of early and late rectal toxicities in patients with prostate cancer receiving definitive or adjuvant three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy and concurrent daily endorectal applications of amifostine. Endpoints include Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute and late toxicity gradings, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite self-assessment questionnaires, and proctoscopic examinations with scoring of mucosal damage measured before, during, and after treatment. Eleven patients have been enrolled to date; 10 have completed radiotherapy and three have been followed-up to 6 months. Two patients received 66 Gy to the prostatic bed post-prostatectomy; five patients received 74 Gy and three received 76 Gy to the prostate gland. In all patients, daily fractionation was 2 Gy, and 1 g of amifostine (50 mg/mL in 20 mL reconstituted saline) was administered endorectally 40 minutes before radiation delivery. Daily endorectal administration was well tolerated. To date, six patients have experienced grade 2 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) acute toxicities, all but one because of frequent bowel movements relieved by loperamide. The initial trial will proceed until 18 patients are accrued, at which time an interval evaluation of both early and late toxicity endpoints will be conducted.

Clinical features and treatment outcome of Hispanic men with prostate cancer following external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Hispanic men compared with other groups who underwent radiotherapy alone for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 1987 and January 1998, 964 men who underwent full dose external beam radiotherapy alone for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer were included in the study. Patient medical records were reviewed for pertinent information.

RESULTS

Of the 964 men 810 were non-Hispanic white, 54 were Hispanic and 86 were black Americans. The most significant difference among the groups was in the proportion of patients who presented with initial prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 20 ng/ml (22% of Hispanic vs 11% of white men, p = 0.0012). In addition, 17% of Hispanic men had a Gleason score of 8 or greater compared with 11% of white men (p = 0.0265). A greater proportion of Hispanic patients also had a less favorable posttreatment PSA nadir of greater than 1 ng/ml compared with white patients, (44% vs 26%, p = 0.0214), which may have translated into a trend toward a lower 5-year disease-free survival rate in Hispanics vs white men (52% vs 65%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic men presented with higher PSA and higher grade prostate cancer than white men. Furthermore, a higher percent of Hispanic men had a PSA nadir of 1 ng/ml or greater after radiotherapy, which may have been responsible for their trend toward a decreased 5-year disease-free survival rate compared with white men. Improved screening and early detection may improve disease-free survival in Hispanic men with localized prostate cancer.

Predictors of Extracapsular Extension and Its Radial Distance in Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Tightly constricted isodose lines are generated using brachytherapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning systems for prostate cancer. Definition of margins that encompass subclinical disease extension is important to maximize dose escalation while attemptingto adhere to normal tissue dose tolerances. In this study, we attempted to find predictors of extracapsular extension (ECE) and its radial distance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pathological assessment of ECE and its radial distance was performed on 712 radical prostatectomy specimens. Preoperative data (initial prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, ultrasound volume, and biopsy Gleason score) were evaluated for their ability to predict the presence of ECE and its radial distance.

RESULTS

Measurable disease was noted outside the prostatic capsule in 185 of 712 (26.0%) specimens. All preoperative parameters except ultrasound volume were able to predict the presence of ECE. However, none of them was predictive of the radial ECE distance. In this group, the median and the range of the maximum depth of invasion (radial extension from the capsule) were 2.00 and 0.5-12.00 mm, respectively. The mean radial distance from the capsule was 2.93 mm, SD +/- 2.286 mm. All subgroups had some patients with radial extension ranging from 0-2 mm, 2-5 mm, to > 5 mm. Only patients with a prostate-specific antigen of 0-4 ng/mL had no extension > 5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series in the literature thus far that quantitatively assesses radial extracapsular extension. Coverage of subclinical disease must be addressed carefully before successful implementation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or prostatectomy in order to avoid geographical miss.

The impact of contouring uncertainty on rectal 3D dose-volume data: results of a dummy run in a multicenter trial (AIROPROS01-02)

PURPOSE

To estimate the impact of the uncertainty in contouring the rectum on rectal dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) in a prospective (AIROPROS01-02) investigation about rectal toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The participants in a prospective trial (18 observers) were asked to draw the external contour of the rectum of 4 sample patients (3 patients undergoing radical conformal radiotherapy, 1 patient undergoing post-prostatectomy) on CT images (0.5 cm spacing) using a 3D treatment planning system. A previously accepted definition of cranial and caudal borders of the rectum was applied. For each patient, four- and six-field 3D-conformal techniques (70-76 Gy, ICRU dose) were planned and DVH/dose statistics of the rectum were calculated. The impact of interobserver variability on rectal volume, cranial and caudal borders, mean, maximum, and median rectal dose, percentage of rectum receiving more than 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 Gy (V(40)-V(75)), and NTCP were investigated.

RESULTS

Concerning DVHs, 9/18 observers tended to have some systematic deviation. However, deviations from the mean values greater than 5% were found only in 1/9 because of a systematic discrepancy in the caudal limit assessment (mean deviation from the most frequently chosen slice: 8 mm). No other observers showed a mean deviation in the cranial or the caudal limit definition greater than 5.8 mm. For another observer, it was possible to clearly assess the cause of a relatively large systematic deviation for DVH parameters. In both cases, the observers were contacted to avoid these systematic deviations. When considering the remaining 16/18 observers, the average values of SD for V(40)-V(75) ranged between 1% and 4% and were found to be lower (<3%) for the 3 nonoperated patients. The average values of the SD were around 1.5-2 Gy and less than 1.5% for mean/median dose and NTCPs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concerning the uncertainty in rectum definition, the collection of rectal dose-volume data in multicenter investigations seems to be feasible after a clear and previously accepted definition of rectum is assessed. However, even with a general agreement on rectum definition, contouring appears to be a quite significant source of uncertainty. A dummy run procedure is useful in identifying possible discrepancies among single observers and in assessing reliable confidence levels on dose-volume constraints because of contouring uncertainty, making the dummy run mandatory in multicenter trials evaluating 3D dose-volume data.

A Randomised Trial of Cranberry Versus Apple Juice in the Management of Urinary Symptoms During External Beam Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

AIMS

The aim of the study was to assess whether the oral intake of cranberry juice cocktail compared with apple juice was associated with a significant difference in urinary symptoms experienced during radical external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twelve men with prostate cancer were randomised to either 354 ml cranberry juice or apple juice a day. Stratification was based on a history of a previous transurethral resection of prostate (TURP yes/no) and baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS < 6 or > or = 6) of urinary symptoms.

RESULTS

The maximum IPSS (MRT) and the maximum change in IPSS from baseline (DRT) are used to report the results. We analysed the effects of juice allocation on DRT and MRT using analysis of covariates (ANCOVA). We observed no significant difference for DRT (P = 0.39) or MRT (P = 0.76) related to the consumption of cranberry compared with apple juice. However, we found a significant relationship between the history of a previous TURP and both DRT (P = 0.01) and MRT (P = 0.01). The history of a previous TURP was associated with lower values for both end points. Baseline IPSS was significant for DRT (P = 0.004) and MRT (P < or = 0.001). We found a significant relationship between the baseline IPSS < 6 or > or = 6 cut point on MRT (P < or = 0.001) but not on DRT (P = 0.43). The use of neoadjuvant hormones had no significant effect on DRT (P = 0.64) or MRT (P = 0.76). The use of additional symptomatic medication during the study was not significantly different between the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows no significant difference in the urinary symptoms experienced during EBRT related to the consumption of cranberry juice compared with apple juice.

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is among the most common solid malignancies. A number of treatment alternatives exist for localized prostate cancer, including observation, prostatectomy, brachytherapy, and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). External-beam radiation therapy has changed dramatically during the past several years. Older techniques paved the way for 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (CRT), which in turn facilitated the introduction of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The prostate has served as a model disease site for the implementation of IMRT. As indicated by a growing body of experience, IMRT for prostate cancer represents a major technologic and clinical advance for radiation therapy. In this article, a review is provided of the evolution of EBRT leading to IMRT, the unique features making the prostate an ideal disease site for employing IMRT, the details of the clinical implementation of prostate IMRT and supporting technologic advancements, and the currently reported clinical outcomes of IMRT in prostate cancer. In addition, future directions of prostate IMRT, both technologic and clinical, are discussed.

Lymphocyte radiosensitivity correlated with pelvic radiotherapy morbidity

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that, before treatment, prostate cancer patients who demonstrate a high yield of ex vivo radiation-induced micronucleus (MN) in G(0) lymphocytes represent a patient population with a greater-than-average risk of developing radiotherapy (RT)-related morbidity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We prospectively conducted the cytokinesis-block MN assay of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) in 38 prostate cancer patients. Before the initiation of RT, PBLs from each patient were irradiated (1-4 Gy). The mean patient age +/- SEM was 68.7 +/- 1.0 years. The clinical stage was T1 in 17, T2 in 15, and T3 in 6. The preoperative prostate-specific antigen level was < or =4 ng/mL in 5, 4-10 ng/mL in 18, and >10 ng/mL in 15. All patients underwent standardized pelvic external beam radiotherapy (range 41.4-50.4 Gy) and boost (range 16-26 Gy). The mean follow-up +/- SEM was 32.8 +/- 4.6 months. At the end of follow-up, a radiation oncologist scored the GI or GU morbidity according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria without knowledge of the MN data.

RESULTS

We found that between the average reactors (n = 25; i.e., patients who had Grade 1 or less RT-related morbidity) and over reactors (n = 13; i.e., patients who developed Grade 2 or greater RT-related morbidity), the differences in the ex vivo radiation dose-response relationship of MN yield in PBLs were highly significant, especially at doses of > or =2 Gy. Also, the development of RT-related morbidity correlated with the radiation dose-response relationship of MN yield in PBLs before treatment, but did not correlate with any of the patients' clinical variables.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the pre-RT ex vivo radiation dose-response relationship of MN yield in PBLs may be a significant predictive factor for the development of GI or GU morbidity in prostate cancer patients after pelvic RT.

Hazard rates of disease progression after external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

We established hazard rates for disease progression at different intervals after external beam radiotherapy alone in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. We determined the likelihood of biochemical failure in those free of disease 5 years after radiotherapy and identified those at risk for early versus late biochemical failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 964 patients treated with full dose external beam radiotherapy alone for T1 to T4, NxM0 prostate cancer. Followup prostate specific antigen (PSA) was measured 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy and every 3 to 6 months thereafter. Yearly hazard rates for biochemical failure were calculated each followup year.

RESULTS

Median followup of the whole study group was 48 months. Overall 5 and 10-year biochemical disease-free survival rates were 63.7% and 53.6%, respectively. Patients had a peak overall hazard rate 2 years after treatment. The hazard rate then decreased until year 6, when it increased slightly and remained elevated even at year 10. This late increase in the overall hazard rate was associated with late increases in the hazard rate in men with favorable prognostic factors, namely pretreatment PSA less than 10 ng./ml., Gleason score less than 5, clinical T stage T1 or T2, posttreatment PSA nadir less than 0.99 ng./ml. or radiation dose less than 68 Gy. In 13 of the 307 patients (3.9%) with biochemical failure the failure occurred more than 5 years after initial treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The peak risk of biochemical failure is 2 years after radiotherapy. Patients are at slight but persistent risk for biochemical failure more than 5 years after treatment. Hazard rate calculations beyond the median followup of 4 years can underestimate the true hazard.

Biological-effective versus conventional dose volume histograms correlated with late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a matched pair analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine whether the dose-volume histograms (DVH's) for the rectum and bladder constructed using biological-effective dose (BED-DVH's) better correlate with late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity after treatment with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer than conventional DVH's (C-DVH's).

METHODS

The charts of 190 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were reviewed. Six patients (3.2%) were found to have RTOG grade 3 GI toxicity, and similarly 6 patients (3.2%) were found to have RTOG grade 3 GU toxicity. Average late C-DVH's and BED-DVH's of the bladder and rectum were computed for these patients as well as for matched-pair control patients. For each matched pair the following measures of normalized difference in the DVH's were computed: (a) deltaAUC = (Area Under Curve [AUC] in grade 3 patient--AUC in grade 0 patient)/(AUC in grade 0 patient) and (b) deltaV60 = (Percent volume receiving = 60 Gy [V60] in grade 3 patient--V60 in grade 0 patient)/(V60 in grade 0 patient).

RESULTS

As expected, the grade 3 curve is to the right of and above the grade 0 curve for all four sets of average DVH's--suggesting that both the C-DVH and the BED-DVH can be used for predicting late toxicity. deltaAUC was higher for the BED-DVH's than for the C-DVH's--0.27 vs 0.23 (p = 0.036) for the rectum and 0.24 vs 0.20 (p = 0.065) for the bladder. deltaV60 was also higher for the BED-DVH's than for the C-DVH's--2.73 vs 1.49 for the rectum (p = 0.021) and 1.64 vs 0.71 (p = 0.021) for the bladder.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering well-established dosimetric endpoints used in evaluating treatment plans, BED-DVH's for the rectum and bladder correlate better with late toxicity than C-DVH's and should be considered when attempting to minimize late GI and GU toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

IMRT for prostate cancer: defining target volume based on correlated pathologic volume of disease

PURPOSE

The intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning system generates tightly constricted isodose lines. It is very important to define the margins that are acceptable in the treatment of prostate cancer to maximize the dose escalation and normal tissue avoidance advantages offered by IMRT. It is necessary to take into account subclinical disease and the potential for extracapsular spread. Organ and patient motion as well as setup errors are variables that must be minimized and defined to avoid underdosing the tumor or overdosing the normal tissues. We have addressed these issues previously. The purpose of the study was twofold: to quantify the radial distance of extracapsular extension in the prostatectomy specimens, and to quantify differences between the pathologic prostate volume (PPV), CT-based gross tumor volume (GTV), and planning target volume (PTV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two related studies were undertaken. A total of 712 patients underwent prostatectomy between August 1983 and September 1995. Pathologic assessment of the radial distance of extracapsular extension was performed. Shrinkage associated with fixation was accounted for with a linear shrinkage factor. Ten patients had preoperative staging studies including a CT scan of the pelvis. The GTV was outlined and volume determined from these CT scans. The PTV, defined as GTV with a 5-mm margin in all dimensions, was then calculated. The Peacock inverse planning system (NOMOS Corp., Sewickley, PA) was used. The PPV, GTV, and PTV were compared for differences and evaluated for correlation.

RESULTS

Extracapsular extension (ECE) (i.e., prostatic capsular invasion level 3 [both focal and established]) was found in 299 of 712 patients (42.0%). Measurable disease extending radially outside the prostatic capsule (i.e., ECE level 3 established) was noted in 185 of 712 (26.0%). The median radial extension was 2.0 mm (range 0.50-12.00 mm) outside the prostatic capsule. As a group, 20 of 712 (2.8%) had extracapsular extension of more than 5 mm. In the volumetric comparison and correlation study of the GTV and PTV to the PPV, the average GTV was 2 times larger than the PPV. The average PTV was 4.1 times larger than the PPV.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series in the literature quantitatively assessing prostatic capsular invasion (i.e., the radial extracapsular extension). It is the first report of a comparison of PPV to CT-planned GTV and PTV. Using patient and prostate immobilization, 5 mm of margin to the GTV in this study provided sufficient coverage of the tumor volume based on data gathered from 712 patients. In the absence of prostate immobilization, additional margins of differing amounts depending on the technique employed would have to be placed to account for target, patient, and setup uncertainties. The large mean difference between CT-based estimates of the tumor volume and target volume (GTV+PTV) and PPV added further evidence for adequacy of tumor coverage. Target immobilization, setup error, and coverage of subclinical disease must be addressed carefully before successful implementation of IMRT to maximize its ability to escalate dose and to spare normal tissue simultaneously and safely.

Localized prostate cancer: radiation or surgery?

The treatment of localized prostate cancer remains controversial because of the lack of conclusive well-controlled or randomized studies comparing outcomes of radiotherapy to outcomes of radical prostatectomy. A comparison of different therapies should include issues of cancer control, morbidity, quality of life (QOL), salvage of primary treatment failures, late effects, and cost. The available data suggest that these two modalities provide similar rates of cancer control at 10 years, and that except for the youngest patients, choice of therapy should be based on toxicity and QOL issues.

Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was suggested as a suitable technique to protect the rectal wall, while maintaining a satisfactory planning target volume (PTV) irradiation in the case of high-dose radiotherapy of prostate cancer. However, up to now, few investigations tried to estimate the expected benefit with respect to conventional three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (CRT).

PURPOSE

Estimating the expected clinical gain coming from both 1D and 2D IMRT against 3DCRT, in the case of prostate cancer by mean of radiobiological models. In order to enhance the impact of IMRT, the case of concave-shaped PTV including prostate and seminal vesicles (P+SV) was considered.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five patients with concave-shaped PTV including P+SV were selected. Two different sets of constraints were applied during planning: in the first one a quite large inhomogeneity of the dose distribution within the PTV was accepted (set (a)); in the other set (set (b)) a greater homogeneity was required. Tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue control probability (NTCP) indices were calculated through the Webb-Nahum and the Lyman-Kutcher models, respectively. Considering a dose interval from 64.8 to 100.8 Gy, the value giving a 5% NTCP for the rectum was found (D(NTCP(rectum)=5%)) using two different methods, and the corresponding TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) and NTCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) for the other critical structures were derived. With the first method, the inverse optimization of the plans was performed just at a fixed 75.6 Gy ICRU dose; with the second method (applied to 2/5 patients) inverse treatment plannings were re-optimized at many dose levels (from 64.8 to 108 Gy with 3.6 Gy intervals). In this case, three different values of alpha/beta (10, 3, 1.5)were used for TCP calculation. The 3DCRT plan consisted of a 3-fields technique; in the IMRT plans, five equi-spaced beams were applied. The Helios Inverse Planning software from Varian was used for both the 2D IMRT and the 1D IMRT inverse optimization, the last one being performed fixing only one available pair of leaves for modulation. A previously proposed forward 1D IMRT 'class solution' technique was also considered, keeping the same irradiation geometry of the inversely optimized IMRT techniques.

RESULTS

With the first method, the average gains in TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) of the 2D IMRT technique, with respect 3DCRT, were 10.3 and 7.8%, depending on the choice of the DVHs constraints during the inverse optimization procedure (set (a) and set (b), respectively). The average gain (DeltaTCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%)) coming from the inverse 1D IMRT optimization was 5.0%, when fixing the set (b) DVHs constraints. Concerning the forward 1D IMRT optimization, the average gain in TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) was 4.5%. The gain was found to be correlated with the degree of overlapping between rectum and PTV. When comparing 2D IMRT and 1D IMRT, in the case of the more realistic set (b) constraints, DeltaTCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) was always less than 3%, excepting one patient with a very large overlap region. Basing our choice on this result, the second method was applied to this patient and one of the remaining. Through the inverse re-optimization of the treatment plans at each dose level, the gain in TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) of the inverse 2D technique was significantly higher than the ones obtained by applying the first method (concerning the two patients: +6.1% and +2.4%), while no significant benefit was found for inverse 1D. The impact of changing the alpha/beta ratio was less evident in the patient with the lower gain in TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The expected benefit due to IMRT with respect to 3DCRT seems to be relevant when the overlap between PTV and rectum is high. Moreover, the difference between the inverse 2D and the simpler inverse or forward 1D IMRT techniques resulted in being relatively modest, with the exception of one patient, having a very large overlap between rectum and PTV. Optimizing the inverse planning at each dose level to find TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%)e level to find TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) can improve the performances of inverse 2D IMRT, against a significant increase of the time for planning. These results suggest the importance of selecting the patients that could have significant benefit from the application of IMRT.

Late rectal toxicity: dose-volume effects of conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To identify dosimetric, anatomic, and clinical factors that correlate with late rectal toxicity after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed the dose-volume histograms and clinical records of 163 Stage T1b-T3c prostate cancer patients treated between 1992 and 1999 with 3D-CRT, to a total isocenter dose of 74-78 Gy at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The median follow-up was 62 months (range 24-102). All late rectal complications were scored using modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force criteria. The 6-year toxicity rate was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. A univariate proportional hazards regression model was used to test the correlation between Grade 2 or higher toxicity and the dosimetric, anatomic, and clinical factors. In a multivariate regression model, clinical factors were added to the dosimetric and anatomic variables to determine whether they significantly altered the risk of developing late toxicity.

RESULTS

At 6 years, the rate of developing Grade 2 or higher late rectal toxicity was 25%. A significant volume effect was observed at rectal doses of 60, 70, 75.6, and 78 Gy, and the risk of developing rectal complications increased exponentially as greater volumes were irradiated. Although the percentage of rectal volume treated correlated significantly with the incidence of rectal complications at all dose levels (p <0.0001 for all comparisons), the absolute rectal volume appeared to be a factor only at the higher doses of 70, 75.6, and 78 Gy (p = 0.0514, 0.0016, and 0.0021, respectively). The following variables also correlated with toxicity on the univariate analysis: maximal dose to the clinical target volume, maximal dose to rectum, maximal dose to the rectum as a percentage of the prescribed dose, and maximal dose delivered to 10 cm(3) of the rectum. Of the clinical variables tested, only a history of hemorrhoids correlated with rectal toxicity (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that the addition of hemorrhoids increased the risk of toxicity for each dosimetric variable found to be significant on univariate analysis (p <0.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Dose-volume histogram analyses clearly indicated a volume effect on the probability of developing late rectal complications. Therefore, dose escalation may be safely achieved by adherence to dose-volume histogram constraints during treatment planning and organ localization at the time of treatment to ensure consistent patient setup.

[Target-volume and critical-organ delineation for conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer: experience of French dose-escalation trials]

The delineation of target volume and organs at risk depends on the organs definition, and on the modalities for the CT-scan acquisition. Inter-observer variability in the delineation may be large, especially when patient's anatomy is unusual. During the two french multicentric studies of conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, it was made an effort to harmonize the delineation of the target volumes and organs at risk. Two cases were proposed for delineation during two workshops. In the first case, the mean prostate volume was 46.5 mL (extreme: 31.7-61.3), the mean prostate and seminal vesicles volume was 74.7 mL (extreme: 59.6-80.3), the rectal and bladder walls varied respectively in proportion from 1 to 1.45 and from 1 to 1.16; in the second case, the mean prostate volume was 53.1 mL (extreme: 40.8-73.1), the volume of prostate plus seminal vesicles was 65.1 mL (extreme: 53.2-89), the rectal wall varied proportionally from 1 to 1, 24 and the vesical wall varied from 1 to 1.67. For participating centers to the french studies of dose escalation, a quality control of contours was performed to decrease the inter-observer variability. The ways to reduce the discrepancies of volumes delineation, between different observers, are discussed. A better quality of the CT images, use of urethral opacification, and consensual definition of clinical target volumes and organs at risk may contribute to that improvement.

The use of rectal balloon during the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer: more than just a prostate gland immobilization device?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization and rectal toxicity reduction in patients receiving dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with localized prostate cancer who were undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy were treated in a prone position, immobilized with a customized Vac-Lok bag (MED-TEC, Orange City, IA). A rectal balloon with 100 cc of air was used to immobilize the prostate. The prostate displacements were measured using computed tomography (CT)-CT fusion on 10 patients who received radioactive seed implant before intensity-modulated radiotherapy. They were scanned twice weekly during 5 weeks of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and breathing studies were also performed. Rectal toxicity was evaluated by use of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring in 100 patients. They were treated to a mean dose of 76 Gy over 35 fractions (2.17-Gy fraction size). Dose-volume histogram of the rectum was assessed. A film phantom was constructed to simulate the 4-cm diameter air cavity that was created by the rectal balloon. Kodak XV2 films (Rochester NY) were used to measure and compare dose distribution with and without the air cavity. A fraction of 1.25 Gy was delivered to the phantom at isocenter with 15-MV photons by use of the NOMOS Peacock system and the MIMiC treatment delivery system (Sewickley, PA).

RESULTS

The anterior-posterior and lateral prostate displacements were minimal, on the order of measurement uncertainty (approximately 1 mm). The standard deviation of superior-inferior displacement was 1.78 mm. Breathing studies showed no organ displacement during normal breathing when the rectal balloon was in place. The rectal toxicity profile was very favorable: 83% (83/100) patients had no rectal complaint, and 11% and 6% had grade 1 and 2 toxicity, respectively. Dose-volume histogram analysis revealed that in all of the patients, no more than 25% of the rectum received 70 Gy or greater. As visualized by film dosimetry, the dose at air-tissue interface was approximately 15% lower than that without an air cavity. The dose built up rapidly so that at 1 and 2 mm, the differential was approximately 8% and 5%, respectively. The dosimetric coverage at the depth of the posterior prostate wall was essentially equal, with or without the air cavity.

DISCUSSION

The use of a rectal balloon during intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly reduces prostate motion. Prostate immobilization thus allows a safer and smaller planning target volume margin. It has also helped spare the anterior rectal wall (by its dosimetric effects) and reduced the rectal volume that received high-dose radiation (by rectal wall distension). All these factors may have further contributed to the decreased rectal toxicity achieved by intensity-modulated radiotherapy, despite dose escalation and higher-than-conventional fraction size.

Prostate biopsy status and PSA nadir level as early surrogates for treatment failure: analysis of a prostate cancer randomized radiation dose escalation trial

PURPOSE

A positive biopsy after external beam radiotherapy in patients free of any evidence of treatment failure is not synonymous with eventual recurrence. Although biopsy positivity is a predictor of outcome, the utility of biopsy status as a surrogate end point, the effect of radiation dose on biopsy status, and the interrelationships of these associations to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir level are not well-defined. These issues were investigated in a cohort of men with Stage T1-T3 prostate cancer who were randomized to receive between 70 Gy and 78 Gy and were prospectively biopsied at about 2 years after the completion of radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of the 301 assessable patients in the trial, 168 underwent planned sextant or greater prostate post-RT biopsies in the absence of biochemical or clinical failure; this group constituted the study cohort. Of the 168 patients, 87 were in the 70-Gy arm and 81 in the 78-Gy arm. Biopsies were classified into four groups: negative (no tumor), atypical/suspicious cells (not diagnostic of carcinoma), carcinoma with treatment effect (CaTxEffect), and carcinoma without treatment effect (CaNoTxEffect). Any diagnosis of carcinoma in the specimen was classified as biopsy positive. Freedom from failure (FFF) included biochemical failure and/or clinical failure. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated from the completion of RT. For those alive in the study cohort, the median follow-up was 65 months.

RESULTS

The rate of biopsy without tumor was 42%; with atypical cells, it was 28%, with CaTxEffect 21%, and with CaNoTxEffect 9%. The overall biopsy positivity rate (CaTxEffect + CaNoTxEffect) was 30%; 28% in the 70-Gy group and 32% in the 78-Gy group (p = 0.52). The distribution of PSA nadir levels was 73% <or=0.5, 20% >0.5-1.0, 5% >1.0-2.0, and 1% >2.0 ng/mL. Significantly more patients randomized to 78 Gy had a PSA nadir of <or=0.5 ng/mL (80% vs. 67%; p = 0.02). No relationship was found between PSA nadir level and prostate biopsy status. The 5-year FFF rate for those classified as biopsy negative was 84% and for those biopsy positive was 60% (p = 0.0002). Radiation dose did not significantly alter FFF rates by prostate biopsy status. Nadir PSA level correlated with FFF, although this was dependent on the inclusion of the 2 patients with a PSA nadir >2.0 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

For patients free of treatment failure at the time of prostate biopsy 2 years after RT, the prognosis of no tumor cells was the same as that of atypical/suspicious cells and CaTxEffect was the same as CaNoTxEffect. The biopsy positivity rate was not altered by dose, suggesting that most of the outcome differences between the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups were due to events occurring before prostate biopsy at 2 years and/or were not entirely dependent on biopsy status. Biopsy status is a strong prognostic factor, but, as an early end point, it may be misleading. PSA nadir appears to have little clinical value in patients treated to doses of >/=70 Gy who are failure free 2 years after RT.

The use of conformal radiotherapy and the selection of radiation dose in T1 or T2 low or intermediate risk prostate cancer – a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose was to develop a systematic review that would address the following questions: (a) when single-modality treatment external-beam radiotherapy is selected as the modality of choice, what is the role of three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy in treating clinically localized (T1, T2/NO, NX/MO) prostate cancer? The outcomes of interest are biochemical freedom from failure (bNED) rates, clinical recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival and acute and late toxicity; (b) what is the appropriate dose and fractionation prescription in this clinical setting?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the English published literature was undertaken to provide evidence relevant to the above outcomes.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial comparing conventional radiotherapy to conformal therapy with dose escalation reported bNED rates. Three additional randomized controlled trials reported acute or chronic late outcome assessments. Additionally, phase II studies of dose escalation in sequential patient cohorts and non-randomized comparative assessments of dose-response and bNED rates in controlled analyses were reviewed. There is convincing evidence from randomized trials that the use of conformal therapy reduces acute and late treatment-related morbidity. There is preliminary evidence suggesting that when external-beam therapy alone is used to treat patients, conformal therapy with dose-escalation is more efficacious than doses of 70Gy. The increased efficacy appears to be predominantly seen in the subset of patients with intermediate-risk disease (PSA 10-20). There is conflicting evidence of the efficacy of dose-escalation in patients with low initial PSA (<10) and in patients with initial PSA greater than 20. Conformal radiotherapy at a dose of 78Gy appears to be relatively safe with no increase in acute or late effects compared with conventional treatment (up to 70Gy) so long as appropriate technological principles are considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have external-beam radiotherapy should be treated using a 3D conformal technique. Patients with intermediate-risk disease (PSA 10-20) who are treated with external-beam radiotherapy alone should be offered doses of 75-78Gy in 180-200cGy fractions.

Three-dimensional conformal therapy versus standard radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of prostate: an update

This study updates technical principles and results of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in localized carcinoma of the prostate. Between January 1992 and December 1999, 312 patients were treated with 3D-CRT and 135 patients were treated with bilateral arcs standard radiation therapy (SRT) alone for clinical stage T1b-c or T2 histologically confirmed prostate cancer. None of these patients received hormonal therapy. Mean follow-up for patients in the 3D-CRT group was 3.2 years (range, 2-5.9 years) and for SRT patients, 4.7 years (range, 4-7 years). For 3D-CRT, 7 intersecting fields were used (cerrobend blocking or multileaf collimation) to deliver 68-74 Gy to the prostate. Standard radiation therapy consisted of bilateral 120 degree rotational arcs, with portals using 2-cm margins around the prostate to deliver 68-70 Gy to the prostate. The criterion for chemical disease-free survival was a postirradiation prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value following the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines. Symptoms during treatment were quantitated weekly, and late effects were assessed every 4-6 months. Dose-volume histograms showed a two-thirds reduction with 3D-CRT in normal bladder or rectum receiving > or = 70 Gy with 3D-CRT. Higher 5-year chemical disease-free survival was observed with 3D-CRT (75%; for T1b-c and 79%; for T2 tumors) compared with SRT (61% and 65%, P = 0.01 and P = 0.12, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in chemical disease-free survival in patients with Gleason score of < or = 4 (P = 0.85), but, with Gleason score of 5-7, the 5-year survival rates were 83% with 3D-CRT and 59% with SRT (P < or = 0.01). In 245 patients with pretreatment PSA of < or = 10 ng/mL treated with 3D-CRT, the chemical disease-free rate was 80% versus 72% in 98 patients treated with SRT (P = 0.21). In patients with PSA of 10.1-20 ng/mL, the chemical disease-free survival rate for 50 patients treated with 3D-CRT was 71% compared with 43% for 20 patients treated with SRT (P = 0.02). The corresponding values were 59% and 16%, respectively, for patients with PSA levels > 20 ng/mL (P = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for chemical failure were pretreatment PSA (P = 0.004), nadir PSA (P = 0.001), and 3D-CRT technique (P = 0.012). Moderate dysuria was reported by 2%-5% of patients treated with 3D-CRT in contrast to 6%-9% of patients treated with SRT. The incidence of moderate loose stools or diarrhea, usually after the fourth week of treatment, was 3%-5% in the 3D-CRT patients and 8%-19% in the SRT group. Late intestinal grade 2 morbidity (proctitis or rectal bleeding) was 1% in the 3D-CRT group in contrast to 7% in SRT patients. The 3D-CRT spares more normal tissues, yields higher chemical disease-free survival, and results in less treatment morbidity than SRT in treatment of stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Follow-up at > or = 10 years is needed to confirm these observations.

Dose–volume relationship for acute side effects during high dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine acute and late complications for bladder and rectum and to determine dose-volume correlations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-four patients received definitive treatment for prostate cancer between January 1995 and December 1998 using conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy. Doses ranged from 72 to 80Gy. The acute and late side effects were gathered retrospectively, and graded according to Radiotherapy and Oncology Group criteria (RTOG). The patients were divided into two groups: <or=72Gy (Group A) and >or=76Gy (Group B) and had a mean follow-up of 32 and 22 months, respectively.

RESULTS

No grades 3-4 acute, urinary or rectal toxicity was reported. Acute grade 2 rectal complications were seen in 10 and 18% of the patients in Groups A and B, respectively. They were observed at a mean dose of 38Gy. Acute grade 2 urinary symptoms were 33 and 47% for Groups A and B, respectively. They were seen at a mean dose of 43Gy. Acute rectal symptoms were dose-volume related. Patients without diarrhea had a mean rectal volume receiving a dose of 70Gy or more of 8.5 cm(3). However, patients with RTOG 2 diarrhea had a volume of 16.5 cm(3) (P=0.042). No dose-volume relationship for acute bladder symptoms or late complications were seen. Grades 1-2 late rectal and bladder complications were seen in 11 and 8% of the patients, respectively. None required hospital admission or transfusion.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy to the prostate can be given at 80Gy. No grades 3-4 acute, urinary or rectal toxicity was reported. Acute rectal symptoms are dose-volume related.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) decreases treatment-related morbidity and potentially enhances tumor control

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), a new form of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), optimizes the concept of computer-controlled radiation deposition in tumor (target) while sparing adjacent normal structures. A retrospective review was done on the initial 185 patients with tumors in different sites including prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, pediatric tumors, adult brain tumors, and previously irradiated recurrent tumors treated with IMRT. Preliminary findings indicate that IMRT is a new clinically feasible tool in radiation oncology. Treatment-related morbidity profile was favorable. Tumor response, local control, and the ability to palliate previously irradiated patients are encouraging. Intensity modulated radiation therapy will allow dose escalation, leading to better tumor control.

Relationships between DVHs and late rectal bleeding after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of a large group of patients pooled from three institutions

BACKGROUND

Accurate modeling of late rectal reactions needs the collection of individual 3D dose-volume data (i.e. DVH) as well as clinical information of large cohorts of patients. The possibility of collecting a large number of patients with many different dose-volume combinations is very suitable for this purpose.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to search for significant correlation between dose-volume histograms/dose statistics of the rectum and late rectum bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from three institutions for 402 patients previously treated for prostate cancer with three to four field techniques, were retrospectively pooled and were collected with a number of clinical and physical parameters, including DVHs of the rectum (including filling). Patients with large air/fecal content in the rectum during planning computerized tomography (CT) scan were excluded from the analysis (n = 74). Out of 328 patients, 229 patients received an ICRU dose between 70 and 76Gy and the current analysis is referred to this subgroup of patients (median follow up: 30 months, range: 12-85 months). Out of these 229 patients, 189 patients were treated with conformal techniques. Rectum was contoured from the anal verge up to the sigmoid flessure by one observer for each institution. Dosimetric and contouring consistencies between the three institutions were previously investigated and the impact on DVHs was found to be quite modest for the purposes of the study. Median/quartile values of all parameters were considered as cut-off values for statistical analysis. We considered as bleeders those patients who experienced grades II-III late bleeding (modified RTOG scoring scale).

RESULTS

Twenty two of 229 patients experienced > or =grade II late bleeding (30 months actuarial incidence: 10.7%). Significant correlation between a number of parameters and late bleeding was found (log-rank test). With regard to DVH, all median and third quartile values for V50-V70 were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of rectal bleeding, if excepting the median value of V70. Based on the results of univariate analysis, the patients were divided into two groups: 'high risk', with at least one value above quartiles in the range V50-V60 (V50: 70%, V55: 64%, V60: 55%); 'low risk', the remaining patients. The 30 months actuarial rates of bleeding were 19.2 and 5.9% for the 'high' and the 'low' risk group, respectively (P = 0.0003 log-rank test). A multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) including 'DVH grouping' and the main remaining variables (age, previous prostatectomy, diabetes, hypertension, adjuvant hormonal therapy, rectum volume and ICRU dose) showed that 'DVH grouping' is the most predictive parameter (P = 0.005) together with adjuvant hormonal therapy (P = 0.025) and ICRU dose (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the role of the rectal DVH in separating groups of patients having prostate radiotherapy in low and high risk of developing late bleeding. Based on these results, V50 below 60-65% and V60 below 50-55% seem to be the robust cut-off values to keep the risk of developing late rectal bleeding reasonably low. However, due to the 'heterogeneity' of the considered population, the results found should be applied with caution in 'more homogeneous' groups of patients. The association of adjuvant hormone deprivation seems to be associated with an increased risk of rectal toxicity; the mechanism for this effect should be a focus of further research.

Urodynamic findings 3 months after radiotherapy in patients treated with conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on urodynamic function 3 months after RT in patients with prostate cancer undergoing definitive external beam RT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were accrued into a single-arm prospective study. Sixteen of the patients completed a scheduled multichannel video-urodynamic study at baseline and again 3 months after RT; the urodynamic variables were then compared to assess the nature and extent of urodynamic change caused by RT. Correlations were assessed between these quantitative changes and those in self-assessed qualitative urinary function measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life assessment index (QoL) and urinary functional enquiry.

RESULTS

There were significant changes detected by the urodynamic study 3 months after RT in bladder volume at capacity (mean decrease 70 mL) and bladder volume at first sensation when supine (mean decrease 85 mL), and a lower postvoid residual volume (mean 50 mL). There was no significant change in the remaining urodynamic variables (including maximum flow rate and voided volume), nor in bladder compliance, bladder instability or bladder outlet obstruction. The self-assessed qualitative urological function measured by the IPSS, QoL and median urinary frequency/24 h showed no significant change after RT.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first quantitative study to prospectively evaluate the effect of RT on urodynamics in patients with prostate cancer. Only a few urodynamic variables changed significantly 3 months after RT, while most, including self-assessed qualitative urinary function, did not. This finding corresponds well with the notion that most patients tolerate RT well and that acute RT-induced urinary symptoms resolve successfully, with the return of lower urinary tract function to baseline levels by 3 months after RT.

[Hormono-radiotherapy of non-metastatic prostate cancers]

Patients presenting with non-metastatic cancer of prostate have a high probability of relapse if they are treated by either surgery alone or irradiation alone, when poor prognosis factors are present. Clinical stage (> or = T3a), Gleason score, and PSA level (> 20 ng/mL) are the more significant factors. It is likely that many patients can draw benefit of combined androgenic suppression and radiotherapy. However, despite results of European and American trials published the last decade, a number of questions remain without a clear response, especially on the modalities of treatment according to the characteristics of the disease.

Impact of biochemical failure on overall survival after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era

PURPOSE

To study the impact of biochemical failure on overall survival rates during the first 10 years after definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The analysis was performed on 936 cases treated at a single institution between 1986 and 1998 with definitive radiotherapy. The median age of treatment was 69 years (range: 46-86 years). Pretreatment PSA levels (iPSA) and biopsy Gleason scores (bGS) were available for all cases. The clinical stage was T1/T2A in 63%, T2B/C in 27%, and T3 in 10%. The median iPSA level was 9.6 ng/mL (range: 0.4-692.9 ng/mL). The iPSA was < or =10 in 53% and >10 in 47%. The bGS was < or =6 in 59% and > or =7 in 41%. Androgen deprivation (AD) was administered in 181 cases (19%) for a median duration of 6 months (range: 1-6 months). All 181 cases received AD neoadjuvantly, i.e., before and/or during the radiotherapy. No AD was delivered after the completion of radiation. The median radiation dose was 70 Gy (range: 60-78 Gy). The radiotherapy technique was conformal in 376 (40%) cases. The American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition of biochemical failure (bF) was used; 316 cases (34%) had failed biochemically, and 620 (66%) had not. The end point was overall survival (OS). Time to death was determined from the time of definitive radiotherapy. The median PSA follow-up was 58 months. The median follow-up times for bF vs. no-bF cases were 77 and 49 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis of factors affecting OS using the proportional hazards model was performed for all cases using the following variables: age (>65 vs. < or =65 years), race (African-American vs. Caucasian), clinical T stage (T1-2A vs. T2B-C vs. T3), bGS (< or =6 vs. 7 vs. > or =8), iPSA (continuous variable), use of AD (yes vs. no), year of therapy (continuous variable), radiation dose (continuous variable), radiation technique (conformal vs. standard), and biochemical failure (yes vs. no).

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rate for the entire group was 89% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 86-91%). The 5-year OS rates for bF vs. no-bF patients were 89% (95% CI: 86-93%) and 89% (95% CI: 86-92%), respectively. The 10-year OS rate for the entire group was 68% (95% CI: 61-75%). The 10-year OS rates for bF vs. no-bF patients were 65% (95% CI: 56-74%) and 77% (95% CI: 69-84%), respectively. The difference between bF and no bF was not significant in predicting overall survival in univariate analysis (log-rank test, p = 0.68). On multivariate analysis, bGS (p < 0.001), T stage (p = 0.003), radiation dose (p = 0.017), year of therapy (p = 0.031), and age (p = 0.020) were independent predictors of death. iPSA levels (p = 0.33), race (p = 0.80), radiation technique (p = 0.16), and use of AD (p = 0.09) were not predictive of OS. Biochemical failure (p = 0.052) showed only a trend for independently predicting overall survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Biochemical failure after definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer is not associated with increased mortality within the first 10 years after initial therapy, although a trend toward worse outcome was observed at 10 years. Longer follow-up from initial therapy is needed to fully understand the impact of biochemical failure on overall survival. With longer follow-up, significant differences might be observed at 15 or 20 years after therapy.

Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 GY at 2.5 GY per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results on late toxicity and quality of life

PURPOSE

To present our preliminary observations on the late toxicity and quality of life (QOL) of patients treated with short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-one patients were treated with SCIM-RT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between October 1998 and May 1999. The technique consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 5 static fields (anterior, 2 laterals, and 2 anterior obliques). Inverse plans were generated by the Corvus treatment-planning system. The treatment delivery was performed with a dynamic multileaf collimator. A total of 70.0 Gy was prescribed in all cases at 2.5 Gy per fraction to be delivered in 28 fractions over 5 and a half weeks. The location of the prostate gland was verified and adjusted daily with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system. The median follow-up was 18 months (range: 11 to 26 months). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scales were used to evaluate late toxicity. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was used to evaluate QOL. A total of 24 patients completed the EPIC questionnaire at approximately 2 years after therapy (median time from treatment to questionnaire administration: 24 months; range: 21 to 26 months). The results from the EPIC questionnaires were compared to scores from 46 patients treated during the same time period with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) to 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction.

RESULTS

The dose was prescribed to an isodose line ranging from 82.0% to 90.0% (mean: 87.2%). The range of the individual prostate mean doses was 73.5 to 78.5 Gy (average: 75.3 Gy). To date, only 1 patient had Grade 1 late urinary toxicity. To date, only 4 patients had Grade 1 late rectal toxicity. No Grade 2 or 3 late urinary or rectal complications have occurred. The actuarial rectal bleeding rate observed at 18 months was 7%. There were no differences in scores from the urinary, bowel, hormonal, and overall QOL domains between SCIM-RT patients and patients treated with CRT. The overall physical and mental QOL scores were also nearly identical to scores reported for the general U.S. population.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary late toxicity results up to 2 years after SCIM-RT are encouraging, with a median follow-up of 18 months (range 11 to 26 months). Late toxicity assessed by the physicians using RTOG late toxicity scores has been excellent. QOL reported by the patients using the EPIC questionnaire reveals no difference between patients treated with high-dose CRT at standard fractionation and patients treated with SCIM-RT. SCIM-RT is an alternative method of dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The proposed schedule significantly increases convenience to patients due to the decrease in overall treatment time.

Partial boosting of prostate tumours

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In this planning study we propose a class solution for partial boosting of prostate tumours. Treatment margins and rectum dose are similar to that of the conventional treatment and are supposed to have no direct link to the level of dose escalation. We also study the robustness of our class solution in the presence of geometrical deviations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

To study the specifications of the class solution ten patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer were replanned. Besides a conventional plan for each patient, different partial boost plans were produced with an inverse treatment-planning tool. We also simulated treatment geometrical deviations to estimate their effect on partial boost plans.

RESULTS

In our class solution we use three contours in our inverse treatment planning, which are based on the classical CTV. A three beam arrangement appeared to produce a dose distribution, which is comparable to that of a five or seven beam geometry. Comparison of partial boost plans and conventional plans indicated that all conditions for a partial boost plan could be satisfied with the proposed class solution. Simulation of treatment geometrical deviations showed that large random deviations have a minor effect on the overall dose distributions, while systematic deviations may decrease the boost dose and increase the rectal dose.

CONCLUSIONS

We presented a class solution for partial boosting of prostate tumours in which the level of dose escalation is dealt with separately from the margin size and the nominal rectum dose. The framework put forward in this study allows practical introduction of intensity modulated radiotherapy in routine clinical practice using current standards of imaging and position verification.

Locally advanced prostate cancer

Standard therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer includes radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or transperineal interstitial brachytherapy. Patients eligible for standard therapy are those with low risk features as defined by various risk group classifications, which generally include clinical stage T1 or T2a, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 10 ng/mL, and biopsy Gleason sum of 6 or less. Although there has been important evolution in the performance of these techniques, particularly with respect to functional outcomes, these approaches for low-risk disease are relatively mature, and the cure rates with each of these therapies are similar in this patient population; locally advanced disease is more difficult to cure, however. Biochemical disease-free survival rates in men undergoing radical prostatectomy are clearly related to the pathologic stage. Prognostic groups can be defined based on pathologic stage with increasingly worse outcomes based on extracapsular extension (ECE), margin status, and the status of the lymph nodes and seminal vesicles. In patients with low risk features, the positive margin rate is generally low, making the presence or absence of ECE the dominant variable in predicting the likelihood of treatment failure. These observations suggest that more aggressive therapy is needed to cure those who are likely to have ECE or other adverse histologic features. Several nomograms predicting the likelihood of ECE or 5-year biochemical failure rates are now in routine clinical use, and can be used to select men at high risk of failure with single modality therapy for more aggressive treatment strategies. However, the optimal form of aggressive therapy for these patients is unknown.

Partial irradiation of the rectum

Data gathered from dose escalation protocols for the treatment of prostate cancers conducted in the past 10 years have shown that rectal toxicity can be controlled by the use of careful conformal techniques. The most severe complications of rectal irradiation (obstruction and fistula requiring colostomy) have been essentially eliminated. The most frequent gastrointestinal complications of conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer are now rectal bleeding associated with telangiectatic changes to the vasculature of the submucosa, and in severe cases, ulceration requiring cautery procedures and or transfusion. The benefits of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) are strongly technique dependent, with a strong dose response for single techniques for prescription doses over 70 Gy. Studies of rectal motion show that the anterior wall can move approximately 1 cm during treatment, so portions of the anterior rectal wall will regularly receive the full prescription dose if posterior margin sizes >/= 1 cm are used in designing the planning target volume (PTV). There is strong evidence that increased rectal shielding and posterior PTV margin sizes approximately 0.6 cm reduce rectal complication rates. Despite uncertainties due to rectal motion, studies of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) show that rectal toxicity is strongly influenced by the percent volumes of rectal wall exposed to doses approximately 70 Gy and higher. Recent data suggests that percent volumes of rectal wall exposed doses between 40 to 50 Gy, and the existence of a reserve of unexposed tissue may also play a role in determining rectal bleeding rates.

Radiation dose response in patients with favorable localized prostate cancer (Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason < or = 6, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen < or = 10)

PURPOSE

To study the radiation dose response as determined by biochemical relapse-free survival in patients with favorable localized prostate cancers, i.e., Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason score (bGS) < or = 6, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) < or = 10 ng/mL.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 292 patients with favorable localized prostate cancer were treated with radiotherapy alone between 1986 and 1999. The median age was 69 years. Sixteen percent of cases (n = 46) were African-American. The distribution by clinical T stage was as follows: T1/T2A, 243 (83%); and T2B/T2C, 49 (17%). The distribution by iPSA was as follows: < or = 4 ng/mL, 49 (17%); and > 4 ng/mL, 243 (83%). The mean iPSA level was 6.2 (median, 6.4). The distribution by bGS was as follows: or = 5 in 89 cases (30%) and 6 in 203 cases (70%). The median radiation dose was 70.0 Gy (range, 63.0-78.0 Gy). Doses of < or = 70.0 Gy were delivered in 175 cases, 70.2-72.0 Gy in 24 cases, 74 Gy in 30 cases, and 78 Gy in 63 cases. For patients receiving < 72 Gy, the median dose was 68 Gy, vs. 78 Gy for patients receiving > or = 72 Gy. A conformal technique was used in 129 (44%) of cases. The median follow-up was 43 months (range, 3-153).

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the projected 5- and 8-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates were both 81%. For patients receiving > or = 72 Gy, the 5- and 8-year bRFS rates were both 95% vs. only 77% for patients receiving < 72 Gy, p = 0.010. For patients receiving 74 Gy, the 4-year bRFS rate was 94% vs. 96% for patients receiving 78 Gy, p = 0.90. A multivariate analysis for factors affecting bRFS rates using Cox proportional hazards was performed for all cases using the following variables: age (continuous variable), race (black vs. white), iPSA (continuous variable), bGS (< or = 5 vs. 6), Stage (T1-2A vs. T2B-C), radiation dose (continuous variable), and radiation technique (conformal vs. standard). From the multivariate analysis, only iPSA (p = 0.017, chi(2) = 5.7), and radiation dose (p = 0.021, chi(2) = 5.3) were independent predictors of outcome. Age (p = 0.94), race (p = 0.89), stage (p = 0.45), biopsy GS (p = 0.40), and radiation technique (p = 0.45) were not.

CONCLUSION

There is a clear radiation dose response in patients with favorable localized prostate cancers (i.e., Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason score < or = 6, and iPSA < or = 10 ng/mL). At least 74 Gy should be delivered to the prostate and periprostatic tissues. With our cohort of patients, longer follow-up will be needed to assess the importance of doses exceeding 74 Gy.

Treatment planning using a dose-volume feasibility search algorithm

PURPOSE

An approach to treatment plan optimization is presented that inputs dose--volume constraints and utilizes a feasibility search algorithm that seeks a set of beam weights so that the calculated dose distributions satisfy the dose--volume constraints. In contrast to a search for the "best" plan, this approach can quickly determine feasibility and point out the most restrictive of the predetermined constraints.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The cyclic subgradient projection (CSP) algorithm was modified to incorporate dose--volume constraints in a treatment plan optimization schema. The algorithm was applied to determine beam weights for several representative three-dimensional treatment plans.

RESULTS

Using the modified CSP algorithm, we found that either a feasible solution to the dose--volume constraint problem was found or the program determined, after a predetermined set of iterations was performed, that no feasible solution existed for the particular set of dose--volume constraints. If no feasible solution existed, we relaxed several of the dose--volume constraints and were able to achieve a feasible solution.

CONCLUSION

Feasibility search algorithms can be used in radiation treatment planning to generate a treatment plan that meets the dose--volume constraints established by the radiation oncologist. In the absence of a feasible solution, these algorithms can provide information to the radiation oncologist as to how the dose--volume constraints may be modified to achieve a feasible solution.

Requirements for radiation oncology physics in Australia and New Zealand

This Position Paper reviews the role, standards of practice, education, training and staffing requirements for radiation oncology physics. The role and standard of practice for an expert in radiation oncology physics, as defined by the ACPSEM, are consistent with the IAEA recommendations. International standards of safe practice recommend that this physics expert be authorised by a Regulatory Authority (in consultation with the professional organization). In order to accommodate the international and AHTAC recommendations or any requirements that may be set by a Regulatory Authority, the ACPSEM has defined the criteria for a physicist-in-training, a base level physicist, an advanced level physicist and an expert radiation oncology physicist. The ACPSEM shall compile separate registers for these different radiation oncology physicist categories. What constitutes a satisfactory means of establishing the number of physicists and support physics staff that is required in radiation oncology continues to be debated. The new ACPSEM workforce formula (Formula 2000) yields similar numbers to other international professional body recommendations. The ACPSEM recommends that Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology centres should aim to employ 223 and 46 radiation oncology physics staff respectively. At least 75% of this workforce should be physicists (168 in Australia and 35 in New Zealand). An additional 41 registrar physicist positions (34 in Australia and 7 in New Zealand) should be specifically created for training purposes. These registrar positions cater for the present physicist shortfall, the future expansion of radiation oncology and the expected attrition of radiation oncology physicists in the workforce. Registrar physicists shall undertake suitable tertiary education in medical physics with an organised in-house training program. The rapid advances in the theory and methodology of the new technologies for radiation oncology also require a stringent approach to maintaining a satisfactory standard of practice in radiation oncology physics. Appropriate on-going education of radiation oncology physicists as well as the educating of registrar physicists is essential. Institutional management and the ACPSEM must both play a key role in providing a means for satisfactory staff tuition on the safe and expert use of existing and new radiotherapy equipment.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization: acute toxicity and dose-volume analysis

PURPOSE

To report acute toxicity and to evaluate the relationship between dose-volume effects and acute toxicity in patients with localized prostate cancer, treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Acute toxicity (both lower gastrointestinal [GI] and genito-urinary [GU]) in 100 patients treated with IMRT definitively to a prescribed dose of 70 Gy were assessed using RTOG scoring criteria. A rectal balloon was used for prostate immobilization. Mean doses to seminal vesicles, prostate, bladder, and rectum were recorded. Average irradiated bladder and rectal volumes above 65, 70, and 75 Gy were assessed. A relationship between dose volume and clinical toxicity was evaluated. All patients completed the full duration of acute toxicity assessment.

RESULTS

Mean doses to the prostate and seminal vesicles were 75.8 and 73.9 Gy. This represents a moderate dose escalation. Acute GI toxicity profile was very favorable. Eleven percent and 6% of the patients had grade 1 and 2 GI toxicity, respectively, while 83% had no GI complaint. For GU complaints, 38% and 35% had grade 1 and 2 toxicity, respectively, while 27% had no complaints. There was no grade 3 or higher acute GI or GU toxicity. Mean doses to the bladder were 22.8, 23.4, and 26.1 Gy for grade 0, 1, and 2 GU toxicity, respectively (p = 0.132). There is no statistically significant relationship between acute GU toxicity and the bladder volume receiving > 65 Gy, > 70 Gy, or > 75 Gy. In evaluating acute GI toxicity, there are very few grade 1 and 2 events. No relationship was found between acute rectal toxicity and mean rectal dose or irradiated rectal volumes receiving more than 65, 70, and 75 Gy.

CONCLUSION

The findings are important with regard to the safety of IMRT, especially in reducing acute GI toxicity. Dose escalation with IMRT using a prostate immobilization technique is feasible. The findings are also important because they contribute to the clinical and dosimetric correlation aspect in the use of IMRT to treat prostate cancer. A larger cohort may be needed to determine if there is a relationship between acute GU toxicity and (a) mean bladder dose and (b) irradiated bladder volume receiving > 65 Gy, > 70 Gy, or > 75 Gy. A larger cohort of patients treated to a higher dose may be needed to show a relationship between dose volume and acute GI toxicity.