An assessment of the role of intradermal skin testing in the diagnosis of clinically relevant allergy to timothy grass

The importance of glycerin-containing negative control tests in allergy research studies that use intradermal skin tests

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess skin whealing with glycerin-containing control injections for intradermal skin tests.

DESIGN

Observational.

METHODS

Wheal sizes were measured at 0, 10, and 15 minutes after intradermal injection of 0.01 and 0.02 mL of phenolated normal saline and 0.5% and 5% concentrations of glycerin in the same quantity of phenolated saline.

RESULTS

Intradermal injection of 0.01 mL of phenolated saline produced an average 4.9-mm wheal, which expanded to 5.2 mm at 10 minutes and to 6.0 mm at 15 minutes. Intradermal injection of 0.02 mL of phenolated saline produced a 6.4-mm wheal, which expanded to 7.0 mm at 10 minutes and 8.0 mm at 15 minutes. The addition of glycerin produced proportionally larger wheals.

CONCLUSIONS

Because glycerin increases whealing beyond that with phenolated saline, skin tests containing glycerin must be compared with glycerin-containing negative controls. Intradermal skin tests that fail to compare findings in this manner contain an inherent methodologic flaw and are uninterpretable.

The reproducibility of the allergy skin test scoring and interpretation by board-certified/board-eligible allergists

BACKGROUND

Allergy skin testing is a cornerstone in the evaluation of the allergic patient. This seemingly simple test is subject to multiple variables that can affect the result.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the degree of variability among board-certified/board-eligible allergists in the scoring and interpretation of allergen skin tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of allergen prick skin tests were digitally photographed and a questionnaire generated. Approximately 70 board-certified/board-eligible allergists were asked to grade each test item and to interpret them as positive, negative, or indeterminate or if they desired a followup intradermal test.

RESULTS

Thirty-three interpretable responses were obtained. The majority of respondents (24) used a grading scale of 0 to 4. Agreement among physicians using a 0 to 4+ scale ranged from a standard deviation of 0.26 to 1.35, with greatest agreement on items with median/mode scores of 4+. The largest standard deviations were found on test items with median/mode scores of 1+ to 2+. Interpretation of the test items also showed greatest variation for those items with median/mode scores of 1+ to 2+. The number of intradermal tests requested ranged from 0 to 11 (of 22 test items).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate interphysician variation in the scoring and interpretation of epicutaneous skin tests. A questionnaire such as the one used here may serve a useful quality control instrument to ensure reproducible scoring of skin tests. In addition, the results highlight the need for greater study on the clinical utility of intradermal skin testing when epicutaneous tests are negative or equivocal.

Assessment of profilin as an allergen for latex-sensitized patients

BACKGROUND

The presence of the actin-binding protein, profilin, has been demonstrated in natural latex extracts; but the clinical significance of this molecule as an allergen for latex-allergic patients is not clear. We studied the allergenic relevance of isolated latex natural and recombinant profilin, by in vivo and in vitro techniques, in two populations of spina bifida children (SB) and adults allergic to latex (AL).

METHODS

Profilin is present in small amounts in latex extracts obtained from low ammoniated (LA) natural latex. Its purification by affinity chromatography resulted difficult due to Heb v 1 unspecific binding. Therefore a method was developed to obtain natural profilin from natural latex, combining affinity chromatography (PLP, poly-L-proline Sepharose column) and previous ammonium sulfate fractionation. Alternatively, latex c-serum containing a low amount of Hev b 1 and a relatively higher profilin content could be used. Recombinant latex profilin isoform (rHev b 8) was cloned by PCR amplification. The entire coding region of Hev b 8 was subcloned into the expression vector pKN172 and a non-fusion form of Hev b 8 was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Purified recombinant protein was obtained after a single passage through PLP-Sepharose column.

RESULTS

Natural and recombinant purified Hev b 8 were tested cutaneously by intradermoreaction (ID) in 17 SB and 14 AL patients. They were positive in 15 SB and 14 AL patients. No wheals were produced when tested in nonatopic control patients. Only 42% of sera from latex-allergic patients revealed specific IgE titers of class 1 or higher by enzyme immunoassay and only 39% of them exhibited IgE binding by SDS-PAGE immunoblotting with any natural or recombinant Hev b 8 forms.

CONCLUSION

It seems that profilin is a relevant allergen for both groups of patients from a frequency point of view, but with scarce presence in natural latex extracts and raw sources, with a subsequent low IgE induction capacity.

Evaluation of the wheezy infant

BACKGROUND

The infant with persistent or recurrent wheezing during the first 2 years of life poses a diagnostic dilemma, which can be a source of anxiety to both physicians and parents. A suggested diagnostic approach to the causes of infantile wheezing is outlined.

OBJECTIVES

1. To review the physiologic considerations of the infant's airways that predispose to wheezing. 2. To discuss the key physical findings, family history, and risk factors associated with wheezing in infants. 3. To develop a rational approach to the differential diagnosis and management of infantile wheezing.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE database as well as our clinical experience pertaining to infantile wheezing.

CONCLUSIONS

This review discusses the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of the wheezing infant. We suggest that infant pulmonary function testing may be used as one diagnostic aid in the workup of the wheezing infant.

Efficacy of a single diagnostic test for sensitization to common inhalant allergens

BACKGROUND

UniCAP Phadiatop is a single laboratory test designed to determine the presence or absence of specific IgE to a variety of common inhalants. Its purpose is to aid in the differentiation of patients with symptoms attributable to allergic disease from other common causes.

METHODS

Consecutive children and adolescent patients (n = 145) at two centers were examined by having their history and physical examination performed by two board certified allergists. Their conclusions along with skin prick tests and specific IgE measurements regarding seven common inhalants (mite, oak, ragweed, grass, dog, cat, Alternaria) were compared with UniCAP Phadiatop test results. This was done using concordance of all test results. Attempts to resolve test discrepancies, when found, included specific RAST inhibitions, total IgE values, and physicians' judgment after testing.

RESULTS

All patients with resolved diagnoses (143 of 145, 103 positive and 40 negative) were identified correctly by the UniCAP Phadiatop test. Skin test results and specific IgE measurements correlated well, but neither correlated well with the history by itself, suggesting a minimal false-positive component of the history of 23%. UniCAP Phadiatop results demonstrated a quantitative relationship between the patient's score and the amount of IgE specific to these individual allergens.

CONCLUSIONS

The UniCAP Phadiatop test was shown to be highly sensitive and specific in differentiating individuals who are sensitized to common inhalants from those who are not. This test is recommended to all physicians as an aid in diagnostic and referral decisions for patients suspected of having an inhalant allergic diathesis.

Quantitative IgE antibody assays in allergic diseases

During the past several years, immunoassays for specific IgE antibodies have been refined to permit reporting results in mass units. Thus quantitative immunoassays for IgE antibodies may be an adjunct to skin tests. In cases of food allergy among children with atopic dermatitis, cutoff values for IgE antibody concentrations to egg, milk, peanut, and fish have been derived to provide 95% positive and 90% negative predictive values. Food-specific IgE antibody determinations can also be used to predict which food allergies are resolving spontaneously. Elevated egg-specific IgE antibody levels in infancy are associated with significantly increased risk for development of inhalant allergies later in childhood. In cases of inhalant allergy, specific IgE antibody levels correlate closely with results of inhalation challenge studies in cat-sensitive persons. Also, mite-specific IgE antibody levels correlate significantly with the mite allergen contents of reservoir dust in the homes of mite-sensitive persons. Immunoassays for quantitation of specific IgE antibodies may be used to document allergen sensitization over time and to evaluate the risk of reaction on allergen exposure. However, immunoassays and skin tests are not entirely interchangeable, and neither will replace the other in appropriate circumstances.

A comparison of skin prick tests, intradermal skin tests, and RASTs in the diagnosis of cat allergy

BACKGROUND

Skin testing and RASTs are the most commonly used methods for the diagnosis of allergy. Questions remain, however, as to the accuracy of these tests, particularly with regard to the role of intradermal skin tests (IDSTs) in the evaluation of respiratory allergy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive value of skin prick tests (SPTs), IDSTs, and RASTs in the diagnosis of cat allergy.

METHODS

Patients were challenged with a well-characterized cat exposure model after evaluation by history, SPTs, IDSTs (if SPT results were negative), and RASTs. All patients were evaluated with respect to their upper respiratory responses, although only those patients with asthma were included in the analysis of lower airway responses. Challenge results were considered positive if the mean upper respiratory symptom score was 0.5 or more, the mean lower respiratory symptom score was 0.4 or more, or the maximum fall in FEV1 value was 15% or more.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients were evaluated. SPT values were positive in 81 patients; of the remaining 39 patients, IDST values were positive in 26 patients. RASTs were performed in 89 patients; the values were positive in 45 of 51 patients with a positive SPT value and were negative in all patients with a negative SPT value. When any positive challenge outcome was considered, positive challenge results were seen in 38 of 41 patients with a positive SPT score, in 10 of 39 patients with a negative SPT score, in 6 of 26 patients with a positive IDST score, in 4 of 13 patients with a negative IDST score, in 27 of 27 patients with a positive RAST score, and in 12 of 44 patients with a negative RAST score.

CONCLUSION

Although both SPT and RAST values exhibited excellent efficiency in the diagnosis of cat allergy, IDST scores added little to the diagnostic evaluation.

Prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens in California patients with respiratory allergy. Allergy Skin Test Project Team

BACKGROUND

The number of allergy skin tests required to evaluate patients with respiratory allergy has recently been challenged by the managed care community.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine which aeroallergens are prevalent in patients with respiratory allergy (allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma) in California.

METHODS

Utilizing aeroallergens thought to be relevant from recent aerobiologic and botanic data, 141 allergic and 17 asymptomatic control subjects were tested for the prevalence of 103 allergens. A standardized prick puncture technique and standardized interpretation of wheal/flare responses were utilized using the same lot of allergen for 13 allergy practices distributed throughout California. Frequency curves based on prevalence were established to determine the number of tests required to give up to 90% of positive responses for tree, weed and grass pollen, mold spores, and miscellaneous allergens which included house dust mite, cat, dog, and cockroach allergens.

RESULTS

Positive responses in allergic subjects for grasses ranged from 46% to 54%, for weeds 19% to 37%, and for trees 10% to 42%. For molds the range was from 11% to 22%. The response rate for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus was 53%, for Dermatophagoides farinae 42%, for cat pelt 39% and cat hair 37%, for cockroach 23% and dog dander 19%. Asymptomatic control subjects responded to only 4% of all allergens tested. Ninety percent of all positive tests required three miscellaneous allergens (house dust mite, cat, and cockroach), 9 molds, 2 grasses, 16 weeds, and 27 trees for a total of 57 allergens (56% of total tested). There was no clear relationship between locale and specific allergen response, probably related to the limited number of subjects tested and variability within the same geographic region. Several seldom tested tree and weed allergens showed a higher prevalence rate than several commonly tested for allergens.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study suggests that approximately 57 aeroalleroens might be adequate to detect 90% of all positive responses in patients with respiratory allergy in California. This study was limited by subject number and variability between study sites. It is hoped a standardized model can be developed from this pilot study to definitively determine which aeroallergens are relevant in the United States.

Noninfectious, nonallergic rhinitis (NINAR): considerations on possible mechanisms

Most patients who suffer from chronic noninfectious, nonallergic rhinitis (NINAR) cannot be assigned to a syndrome of known etiology. The symptomatology may well resemble that of allergic rhinitis; however, NINAR has lower prevalence of sneezing, conjunctival symptoms, and pruritus and higher prevalence of symptoms compatible with sinus disease. The triggers for the symptoms of NINAR are mainly irritants and changes in atmospheric conditions. Among individuals who develop chronic rhinitis symptoms, the percentage of nonallergic etiology increases steadily with age and is more than 60% beyond the fifth decade of life. Our strategy regarding the pathophysiology of NINAR should be to identify functional abnormalities of nasal mucosa that can potentially result in the alleged nasal symptoms. In this respect, comparison of patients with NINAR to patients with allergic rhinitis and to healthy individuals could shed light into the cause(s) of NINAR. Three potential functional abnormalities are discussed in this article: those associated with the aging process of the nasal mucosa, those resulting in various forms of nasal hyperreactivity, and those reflecting imbalanced neuronal control of end organs of the nose. The most interesting development in the therapy of NINAR is the use of capsaicin. Although placebo-controlled studies are scarce and participants have not been adequately characterized, it is possible that abnormal nociceptor nerve endings play a role in the generation of the symptoms of NINAR. Alternatively, NINAR may represent a condition of increased perceptual acuity to irritants and to environmental changes. This problem may also benefit from defunctionalization of nociceptors.

In vivo diagnostic procedures: skin testing, nasal provocation, and bronchial provocation

In vivo challenge procedures can be very useful in the analysis of allergic symptoms. Skin testing has a high degree of sensitivity and specificity for determining antigens that cause allergic disease. However, positive skin tests do not necessarily indicate that a specific allergen causes symptoms specific for a certain organ. Nasal and whole lung provocation testing can help define relevant allergens that cause rhinitis or asthma symptoms. These tests are safe when performed properly under close medical supervision and have predictive values that make them useful diagnostic tools.

Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy with short ragweed extract

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy, if proven safe and effective, could be an alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study investigated the clinic and immunologic effects of ragweed immunotherapy using a new microencapsulated, pH-sensitive, oral delivery system.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 23 patients with allergic rhinitis to short ragweed. Following a baseline nasal challenge with ragweed allergen, oral immunotherapy with encapsulated short ragweed extract or placebo was administered once daily, 6 days/week. Dosed began at 3 micrograms Amb a 1 per day and were increased by 3 micrograms every three days as tolerated, to a maximum daily maintenance dose of 24 micrograms. A nasal challenge was repeated 6 weeks, later, followed by the continuation of maintenance therapy through the natural ragweed season. Daily allergy symptoms and relief medication usage was recorded. A final nasal challenge was performed at the end of the natural season. Short ragweed-specific serum IgE, IgG, and IgG4 antibody levels were measured every 2 weeks during the study.

RESULTS

Maximum tolerated doses ranged from 6 to 24 micrograms Amb a 1 per day (74% reached 24 micrograms). Adverse events were not serious or different between the active and placebo groups. The active group showed increased in short ragweed-specific serum IgG and IgG4 antibody levels. Symptom scores during the natural season were numerically but not statistically lower in the active treatment group. This group also experienced a greater reduction from baseline in nasal reactivity as assessed by nasal challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

These pilot data suggest that the encapsulated, pH-sensitive oral immunotherapy delivery system was safe, induced a brisk serologic response, and attenuated the symptomatic response to both experimental and environmental ragweed exposure.