Results of two or five years of adjuvant tamoxifen correlated to steroid receptor and S-phase levels. South Sweden Breast Cancer Group, and South-East Sweden Breast Cancer Group

PIK3CA mutations correlate with hormone receptors, node metastasis, and ERBB2, and are mutually exclusive with PTEN loss in human breast carcinoma

Deregulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway either through loss of PTEN or mutation of the catalytic subunit alpha of PI3K (PIK3CA) occurs frequently in human cancer. We identified PIK3CA mutations in 26% of 342 human breast tumor samples and cell lines at about equal frequency in tumor stages I to IV. To investigate the relationship between PTEN and PIK3CA, we generated a cohort of tumors that had lost PTEN expression and compared it with a matched control set that had retained PTEN. A highly significant association between PIK3CA mutations and retention of PTEN protein expression was observed. In addition, PIK3CA mutations were associated with expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR), lymph node metastasis, and ERBB2 overexpression. The fact that PIK3CA mutations and PTEN loss are nearly mutually exclusive implies that deregulated phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP(3)) is critical for tumorigenesis in a significant fraction of breast cancers and that loss of PIP(3) homeostasis by abrogation of either PIK3CA or PTEN relieves selective pressure for targeting of the other gene. The correlation of PIK3CA mutation to ER/PR-positive tumors and PTEN loss to ER/PR-negative tumors argues for disparate branches of tumor evolution. Furthermore, the association between ERBB2 overexpression and PIK3CA mutation implies that more than one input activating the PI3K/AKT pathway may be required to overcome intact PTEN. Thus, mutation of PIK3CA is frequent, occurs early in carcinoma development, and has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Bringing Molecular Prognosis and Prediction to the Clinic

In the past 30 years, important advances have been made in the knowledge of breast cancer biology and in the treatment of the disease. However, the translation of these advances into clinical practice has been slow. With the advent of molecular-based medicine, it is hoped that the bridge between the bench and the bedside will continue to be shortened. Because breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with wide-ranging subsets of patients who have different prognoses and who respond differently to treatments, the identification of patients who need treatment and the definition of the best therapy for an individual have become the priorities in breast cancer care. This article will review the crucial role of prognostic and predictive factors in achieving these goals. A critical review of classical and newer individual molecular markers, such as hormone receptors, HER2, urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, cyclin E, topoisomerase II, and p53, was performed, and the preliminary results obtained using the new gene expression profiling technology are described along with their potential clinical implications.

Two years of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal patients with breast cancer: a randomised, controlled trial with long-term follow-up

Adjuvant tamoxifen treatment increases recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in early breast cancer, although in premenopausal patients the number of studies comparing tamoxifen vs no treatment are limited. We report herein the effect on RFS of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in a multicentre trial of premenopausal patients with stage II breast cancer patients randomised between 1986 and 1991 to 2 years of tamoxifen treatment (n=276) or no treatment (n=288). The receptor status of the tumour was known for 541 (96%) of the patients included. Tamoxifen treatment significantly increased RFS in patients with hormone receptor-positive (oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and/or progesterone receptor-positive (PR+)) tumours (Relative Risk (RR) 0.65; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.48-0.89, P=0.006), and the beneficial effect of tamoxifen was extended to patients with indicators of poor prognosis, such as young age and nodal-positivity. PR status was a significant predictor of response to tamoxifen in multivariate models with testing of interactions of hormone receptor status and adjuvant therapy.

A two-gene expression ratio predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen

Tamoxifen significantly reduces tumor recurrence in certain patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, but markers predictive of treatment failure have not been identified. Here, we generated gene expression profiles of hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancers in a set of 60 patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy. An expression signature predictive of disease-free survival was reduced to a two-gene ratio, HOXB13 versus IL17BR, which outperformed existing biomarkers. Ectopic expression of HOXB13 in MCF10A breast epithelial cells enhances motility and invasion in vitro, and its expression is increased in both preinvasive and invasive primary breast cancer. The HOXB13:IL17BR expression ratio may be useful for identifying patients appropriate for alternative therapeutic regimens in early-stage breast cancer.

Predicting continuous values of prognostic markers in breast cancer from microarray gene expression profiles

The prognostic and treatment-predictive markers currently in use for breast cancer are commonly based on the protein levels of individual genes (e.g., steroid receptors) or aspects of the tumor phenotype, such as histological grade and percentage of cells in the DNA synthesis phase of the cell cycle. Microarrays have previously been used to classify binary classes in breast cancer such as estrogen receptor (ER)-α status. To test whether the properties and specific values of conventional prognostic markers are encoded within tumor gene expression profiles, we have analyzed 48 well-characterized primary tumors from lymph node-negative breast cancer patients using 6728-element cDNA microarrays. In the present study, we used artificial neural networks trained with tumor gene expression data to predict the ER protein values on a continuous scale. Furthermore, we determined a gene expression profile-directed threshold for ER protein level to redefine the cutoff between ER-positive and ER-negative classes that may be more biologically relevant. With a similar approach, we studied the prediction of other prognostic parameters such as percentage cells in the S phase of the cell cycle (SPF), histological grade, DNA ploidy status, and progesterone receptor status. Interestingly, there was a consistent reciprocal relationship in expression levels of the genes important for both ER and SPF prediction. This and similar studies may be used to increase our understanding of the biology underlying these markers as well as to improve the currently available prognostic markers for breast cancer.

Neo adjuvant Tamoxifen in post menopausal patients with operable breast cancer

AIMS

Tamoxifen is widely used as adjuvant therapy in receptor positive post menopausal breast cancer. Little is known about its efficacy as neo adjuvant therapy in terms of breast conservation and improved survival.

METHODS

We analyzed the tumour response to 20-30 mg Tamoxifen for 6 months in post menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor positive tumours. Treatment included Tamoxifen for 6 months, surgical resection, and irradiation for post menopausal patients refusing initial mastectomy; aged > or =70 years; or with other factors delaying surgery.

RESULTS

Between April 1994 and June 1998, 102 patients, age 73+/-87 (54-90) were studied. There were 24 T1, 56 T2, 14 T3, and 8 T4 tumours. Clinical response to Tamoxifen was observed in all patients, with a median size reduction from 31+/-15 (9-70) to 16+/-9 mm (0-50), 15 clinical and 6 complete responses. 88/102 patients were treated conservatively. Radiotherapy was given to 80 and a flash technique to 8 patients. All patients but one are still alive.

CONCLUSION

Neo adjuvant Tamoxifen in operable post menopausal ER positive breast cancer is associated with a good clinical response rate and facilitates conservative surgery. Tamoxifen has a valuable role as neo-adjuvant treatment in terms of breast conservation and survival.

Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases

PURPOSE

To determine whether progesterone receptor (PgR) status provides additional value to estrogen receptor (ER) status and improves prediction of benefit from endocrine treatment among patients with primary breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical outcomes of patients in two large databases were analyzed as a function of steroid receptor status. The first database (PP), contained 3,739 patients who did not receive any systemic adjuvant therapy and 1,688 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. The second database (SPORE), contained 10,444 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. Biochemical ER and PgR assays were identically performed in two different central laboratories.

RESULTS

In univariate and multivariate analyses, the prognostic significance of PgR status among systemically untreated patients is modest. Among endocrine-treated patients, however, multivariate analyses, including lymph-node involvement, tumor size, and age, demonstrate that PgR status is independently associated with disease-free and overall survival. For recurrence, the reduction in relative risk (RR) was 25% for ER-positive/PgR-negative patients and 53% for ER-positive/PgR-positive patients, compared with ER-negative/PgR-negative patients (P <.0001, PP patients). Patients with ER-positive/PgR-negative tumors have a reduction in RR of death of 30% (SPORE patients) and 38% (PP patients), compared with patients with ER-negative/PgR-negative tumors (P <.0001). For ER-positive/PgR-positive tumors, the reduction of the risk of death was greater than 46% in SPORE patients and 58% in PP patients, indicating that ER-positive/PgR-positive patients derive more benefit from endocrine therapy (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

When accurately measured, PgR status is an independent predictive factor for benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therefore, PgR status should be taken into account when discussing RR reductions expected from endocrine treatment with individual patients.

Anastrozole as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer: implications of the ATAC trial

Tamoxifen has been the gold standard adjuvant therapeutic agent for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer for > 25 years. Although it continues to play an important role in treating premenopausal women, tamoxifen's association with some serious safety and tolerability issues, including increased incidence of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events, may be cause to limit its use in postmenopausal women. Anastrozole was the first drug to show improved efficacy and safety compared with standard therapies for first- and second-line therapy of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. This article provides a review of the results of the first major analysis of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) early-stage breast cancer trial, initiated in 1996, and discusses the implications for the use of anastrozole in the adjuvant setting. This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared tamoxifen (20 mg once daily) with anastrozole (1 mg) alone and in combination with tamoxifen, as adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal patients with operable, invasive, early-stage breast cancer. The results of the ATAC trial show anastrozole to be more effective and better tolerated than tamoxifen in this group of patients, and an updated follow-up suggests the therapeutic index for anastrozole will continue to remain superior to that of tamoxifen. Anastrozole is now emerging as a new standard for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early-stage breast cancer. New adjuvant trials are currently using anastrozole in the control arm.

A randomized trial of the effect of a plant-based dietary pattern on additional breast cancer events and survival: the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study

The Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study is a multisite randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a high-vegetable, low-fat diet, aimed at markedly raising circulating carotenoid concentrations from food sources, in reducing additional breast cancer events and early death in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer (within 4 years of diagnosis). The study randomly assigned 3088 such women to an intensive diet intervention or to a comparison group between 1995 and 2000 and is expected to follow them through 2006. Two thirds of these women were under 55 years of age at randomization. This research study has a coordinating center and seven clinical sites. Randomization was stratified by age, stage of tumor and clinical site. A comprehensive intervention program that includes intensive telephone counseling, cooking classes and print materials helps shift the dietary pattern of women in the intervention. Through an innovative telephone counseling program, dietary counselors encourage women in the intervention group to meet the following daily behavioral targets: five vegetable servings, 16 ounces of vegetable juice, three fruit servings, 30 g of fiber and 15-20% energy from fat. Adherence assessments occur at baseline, 6, 12, 24 or 36, 48 and 72 months. These assessments can include dietary intake (repeated 24-hour dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaire), circulating carotenoid concentrations, physical measures and questionnaires about health symptoms, quality of life, personal habits and lifestyle patterns. Outcome assessments are completed by telephone interview every 6 months with medical record verification. We will assess evidence of effectiveness by the length of the breast cancer event-free interval, as well as by overall survival separately in all the women in the study as well as specifically in women under and over the age of 55 years.

Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: an update

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen has been the endocrine treatment of choice for patients with breast cancer. The development of selective aromatase inhibitors has offered an alternative management approach for patients in whom a hormonal approach is indicated.

METHODS

The authors reviewed reports in which aromatase inhibitors were compared with tamoxifen for the treatment of metastatic disease, as well as information pertinent to their use as adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Both nonsteroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) aromatase inhibitors for metastatic disease appear to provide superior efficacy and a better toxicity profile in first- and second-line treatment of metastatic disease than tamoxifen. Early results from the ATAC trial suggest anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen for disease-free survival, particularly in receptor-positive patients, and in reducing the incidence of contralateral breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Aromatase inhibitors have important roles in optimal management of postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive metastases in both the adjuvant and advanced-disease settings.

American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2002

OBJECTIVE

To conduct an evidence-based technology assessment to determine whether the routine use of anastrozole or any of the aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant breast cancer setting is appropriate for broad-based conventional use in clinical practice. POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS: Anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefit.

EVIDENCE

A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for relevant topics and is detailed in the text. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed. BENEFITS/HARMS: The ASCO panel recognizes that a woman and her physician's decision regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy is complex and will depend on the importance and weight attributed to information regarding both cancer and non-cancer-related risks and benefits.

CONCLUSION

The panel was influenced by the compelling, extensive, and long-term data available on tamoxifen. Overall, the panel considers the results of the Arimidex (anastrozole) or Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial and the extensive supporting data to be very promising but insufficient to change the standard practice at this time (May 2002). A 5-year course of adjuvant tamoxifen remains the standard therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The panel recommends that physicians discuss the available information with patients, and, in making a decision, acknowledge that treatment approaches can change over time. Individual health care providers and their patients will need to come to their own conclusions, with careful consideration of all of the available data. (Specific questions addressed by the panel are summarized in Appendix 3.)

VALIDATION

The conclusions of the panel were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.

Inhibition of estrogenic stimulation of gene expression by genistein

Two principle soy-derived isoflavones, genistein and daidzein, are believed to play a key role in inhibiting tumor growth. The molecular basis of the anti-tumor activity of these two isoflavones has not been fully established. To determine the mechanism of action of the above phytochemicals on estrogen-responsive genes, we tested the effect of the same on the expression of Estrogen-Regulated mRNA Stabilizing Factor (E-RmRNASF). E-RmRNASF is expressed in the liver in response to estrogen, and is responsible for estrogen-mediated stabilization of apolipoprotein II mRNA (Ratnasabapathy, 1995, Cell. Mol. Biol. Res, 41: 583-594). The estrogen-mediated hepatic expression of apolipoprotein II mRNA is regulated transcriptionally, and also post-transcriptionally in part by stabilization of its mRNA. E-RmRNASF protects the RNA from targeted endonucleolytic degradation. The hepatic expression of E-RmRNASF is also modulated by certain estrogenic and antiestrogenic nonsteroidal environmental xenobiotics (Ratnasabapathy et al., 1997, Biochem. Pharmacol., 53: 1425-1434). Roosters were administered estrogen, genistein, or daidzein parenterally and tested for hepatic expression of E-RmRNASF. Expression of E-RmRNASF in the livers was stimulated in roosters who received estrogen and genistein, indicating that they are agonistic at the chicken estrogen receptor. However, a lack of induction of E-RmRNASF expression in the liver was seen with control roosters treated with the vehicle and those treated with daidzein. To determine whether daidzein was anti-estrogenic, roosters were given combinations of estrogen and increasing concentrations of daidzein. Daidzein at concentrations ranging from 5-1000 micromole/kg failed to antagonize stimulation of E-RmRNASF by 5 micromoles/kg estrogen. To determine whether genistein or daidzein exerted partial agonistic effects, roosters were given increasing concentrations of genistein, daidzein or estrogen alone, or combinations of estrogen and increasing doses of genistein or daidzein. At low to intermediate concentrations genistein by itself failed to stimulate E-RmRNASF, and was agonistic only at high concentrations. Genistein at the low concentrations failed to antagonize estrogenic stimulation of E-RmRNASF. At the intermediate concentrations however, genistein blocked stimulation of E-RmRNASF by estrogen, even though by itself could not exert a stimulatory effect. At the higher concentrations genistein stimulated E-RmRNASF regardless of the presence or absence of estrogen. At the higher ratios, the lack of inhibition of estrogenic stimulation by genistein was most likely due to its own agonistic activity. Therefore, genistein appears to behave as a partial agonist; behaves as an agonist by itself, and as an antagonist in the presence of estrogen. However, daidzein did not display any estrogenic or antiestrogenic activity at the concentrations tested.

Prognostic and predictive role of proliferation indices in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer

In breast cancer, proliferative activity represents one of the biologic processes most thoroughly investigated for its association with tumor progression. In addition to the mitotic activity component of pathologic grading systems, several proliferation indices have provided independent information on prognosis and response to specific treatments in large retrospective studies. Recently, results from treatment protocols prospectively planned to test the clinical utility of proliferative activity have indicated that tumor cell proliferation markers identify two subsets among patients with lymph node-negative cancers: 1) those at a very low risk of relapse and 2) those who will benefit from regimens including antimetabolites. Future efforts should compare the prognostic accuracy of different proliferation markers, confirm preliminary evidence of a relationship between proliferation and response to specific systemic treatments, and standardize assay techniques to facilitate their transfer to general oncology practice.

S-phase fraction and urokinase plasminogen activator are better markers for distant recurrences than Nottingham Prognostic Index and histologic grade in a prospective study of premenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Histologic grade, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status, and tumor size have previously been shown to be important prognostic indicators for distant recurrence of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic value of these factors with flow cytometric S-phase fraction (SPF), urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) in premenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 237 consecutive premenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer and freshly frozen tumor material available, SPF, ER and PgR status, uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1, histologic grade, and NPI were evaluated.

RESULTS

SPF was univariately the most powerful prognostic factor for distant recurrence, followed by uPA, histologic grade, PgR, age, ER, NPI, and PAI-1, the latter being nonsignificant. Multivariate analysis revealed that neither NPI nor histologic grade was significant after adjustment for SPF, a fact that may be explained by the strong association between these factors. uPA was, however, an independent prognostic factor in addition to SPF, NPI, or histologic grade.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, SPF and uPA were found to be independent prognostic factors in premenopausal women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. We suggest that SPF, if performed under standardized conditions, can replace histologic grade as a selection instrument for adjuvant medical treatment. The value of the combination of SPF and uPA needs to be confirmed in an independent prospective trial.