Graft dysfunction mimicking autoimmune hepatitis following liver transplantation in adults

Phenotypic expression of recurrent disease after liver transplantation

Recurrence of the primary disease has become a major focus for transplant hepatologists both when investigating graft dysfunction and when tailoring immunosuppression to maximize graft survival. However, disease recurrence varies in penetrance, can be predictable or random, and does not always conform to the expected pattern of disease. The cholestatic hepatitis syndromes associated with hepatitis B and C are the most dramatic examples of phenotypic change. Being on immunosuppressive drugs may intensify the progression of infectious and malignant diseases, but this effect is not predictable. A significant minority of patients with each of the autoimmune diseases, counter-intuitively, get recurrent disease despite immunosuppression of a potency that is adequate to prevent rejection of the liver graft. Disease patterns emerge after liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis that shed light on the cause of the native liver disease, for example, nonalcohol-related fatty liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis. The phenotypic expression of disease recurrence can be modified by specific drugs used for immunosuppression and by HLA-antigen matching profiles. Understanding and modifying the phenotypic expression of recurrent disease after liver transplantation is a fertile area for research and continued refinement of clinical care.

Plasma cell hepatitis in hepatitis C virus patients post-liver transplantation: case-control study showing poor outcome and predictive features in the liver explant

Plasma cell hepatitis (PCH) is characterized by plasma cell infiltration seen in allografts of patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for conditions other than autoimmune hepatitis. We identified 40 PCH patients who underwent LT for hepatitis C virus (HCV) by searching our pathology database (1994-2006) for the keywords liver allograft, lymphoplasmacytic, and plasma cell(s). We selected 2 control patients who received LT for HCV for each PCH case. The control patients were matched according to date of LT and availability of biopsy material at the time interval to development of PCH in PCH patients. Explant and post-LT biopsy slides were blindly reviewed by 2 liver pathologists and the severity of the plasma cell infiltrate was scored. A score of 3 (plasma cells composing >30% of the infiltrate) defined PCH in allograft biopsies. Five random areas of dense inflammation were also examined in explant livers and the highest score was used. Poor outcome was defined as death or advanced fibrosis (stage >or= 4 of 6). We found that PCH patients were more likely to have worse outcomes than control patients (65% versus 40%, P < 0.01), including increased mortality (50% versus 30%, P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly worse survival for PCH patients from 4 to 10 years post-LT (P < 0.05). Explants from 40% of PCH patients had a score of 3 compared to 18% of control patients (P < 0.01). We found that the development of PCH is associated with poor outcome in patients undergoing LT for HCV. The association of significant plasma cell infiltrates in native livers of HCV patients developing PCH suggests that some patients may have a predisposition to developing PCH.

Diagnostic value and utility of the simplified International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) criteria in acute and chronic liver disease

Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have been created and revised by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG). Simplified criteria have been created, but remain independently unvalidated. We report on the diagnostic accuracy of the simplified criteria in patients across a range of diagnoses, including a subset of patients presenting with fulminant liver failure who required liver transplant. Patients with AIH and non-AIH etiologies of liver disease were identified from dedicated patient databases. Parameters relevant to the simplified and 1999 IAIHG criteria were recorded, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for scores of >or=6 (probable AIH) and >or=7 (definite AIH) were calculated. A total of 549 patients with chronic liver disease were evaluated, (221 with AIH, 26 with variant syndromes, and 302 with non-AIH). For scores >or=6, sensitivity was 90%, and specificity was 98% with positive and negative predictive values of 97% and 92%, respectively. For scores >or=7; sensitivity was 70%, and specificity was 100% with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 74%, respectively. Seven false positive diagnoses of AIH occurred, all with simplified scores of 6. Concordance with 1999 criteria was 90% for probable and 61% for definite AIH. The frequency of an overall diagnosis of AIH (probable or definite AIH) among the 70 patients with fulminant liver failure was 24% for simplified criteria and 40% for 1999 criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The simplified criteria retain high specificity but exhibit lower sensitivity for scores of >or=7. The explanations for this are unclear but may relate to loss of such discriminating information as response to corticosteroids. Prospective evaluation of these criteria is required to corroborate these observations.

Recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis and development of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplant: A blind histologic study

AIM

This long-term study aimed to evaluate recurrence and evolution of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

We reviewed "blindly" allograft biopsy specimens of women who underwent transplantation for PBC (n = 84), and women who received a transplant for chronic hepatitis C virus infection (CHCV ) (n = 108). All needle liver biopsy specimens obtained more than 6 months post-OLT were examined, including 83 specimens from 44 PBC patients and 152 specimens from 58 CHCV patients.

RESULTS

Granulomatous destructive cholangitis was found in five biopsies from four PBC patients (P = 0.0048). Non-necrotizing epithelioid cell granulomas were present in four biopsies from four PBC patients, and in two biopsies from one CHCV patient. Piecemeal necrosis (P = 0.0002), lobular necroinflammatory activity (P < 0.0001), steatosis (P < 0.0001) and fibrosis (P < 0.0001) were more prevalent in CHCV patients than PBC patients. Four PBC patients developed histologic evidence of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), at a mean time of 3.66 years post-OLT. One of these patients had histologic features of AIH/PBC overlap syndrome. All four patients developed bridging fibrosis (n = 2) or cirrhosis (n = 2). No other PBC patient had evidence of cirrhosis after OLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic findings indicative of recurrent PBC were present in 15.9% of the PBC patients undergoing biopsy in this series. However, this group of patients did not suffer significant bile duct loss or fibrosis, as compared to the control group, suggesting that recurrent PBC is a mild or slowly progressive disease. Histologic evidence of AIH was observed in allograft biopsies of some PBC patients.

Current and future treatments of autoimmune hepatitis

Corticosteroid therapy induces clinical, laboratory and histological improvements in 80% of patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Prednisone, alone or at a lower dose in combination with azathioprine, increases the 20-year life expectancy to 80% and prevents or reduces hepatic fibrosis in 79% of patients. The combination regimen is preferred and treatment should be considered in all patients with active disease. The duration of therapy is finite and the medication should be discontinued after resolution of all manifestations of inflammatory activity, including the histological changes. Relapse after drug withdrawal occurs in 50-79% of patients, and it should be treated with long-term azathioprine (2 mg/kg daily). Salvage therapies for individuals intolerant of or refractory to the conventional regimens include high-dose corticosteroids, with or without high-dose azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus or ciclosporin. Liver transplantation should be considered in patients with hepatic failure unresponsive to corticosteroid treatment, decompensated cirrhosis with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of at least 15 points, or hepatocellular carcinoma that meets transplantation criteria. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs after transplantation in at least 17% of patients, and it typically improves after adjustments in the immunosuppressive regimen. Future therapies are likely to include mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, adoptive transfer of T regulatory cells, and cytokine manipulation. The emergence of new treatments will require the development of a collaborative network of clinical and basic investigators, as the complexity and specificity of current management problems require solutions that exceed the capabilities of single institutions.

Risk factors for developing de novo autoimmune hepatitis associated with anti-glutathione S-transferase T1 antibodies after liver transplantation

De novo autoimmune hepatitis (de novo AIH) is a rare form of graft dysfunction that develops after liver transplantation (LT) in patients transplanted for conditions other than autoimmune disorders. Although characterized by biochemical, serological, and histological features of AIH, de novo AIH is sometimes associated with atypical serum autoantibodies, many of which are directed against glutathione S-transferase T1 (anti-GSTT1). GSTT1 donor/recipient genotype mismatch has been suggested as a necessary condition for the appearance of autoantibodies and de novo AIH. However, clinically evident disease is not observed in all patients with anti-GSTT1 antibodies. We examined the incidence of de novo AIH and its conditioning (risk) factors in patients with anti-GSTT1 antibodies. Anti-GSTT1 autoantibodies were detected in 29 of 419 [6.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9-9.8] consecutive adult LT recipients with donor/recipient GSTT1 mismatch. Twenty of 27 assessable patients (74%) developed de novo AIH after a median follow-up of 26 months (95% CI, 19.2-32.8). The probability of de novo AIH was 11%, 44%, and 60% 12, 24, and 36 months after LT, respectively. No relationship emerged between de novo AIH and recipient gender, donor and recipient age, rejection episodes, immunosuppressive regime, allelic GSTT1 expression, human leukocyte antigen distribution, or cytomegalovirus infection. Multivariate analysis identified male donor [hazard ratio (HR), 3.3; 95% CI, 1.18-9.26; P = 0.018], nonalcoholic etiology (HR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.64-13.3; P = 0.002), and high anti-GSTT1 titer (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.04-8.57; P = 0.035) as independent predictors of de novo AIH. Most patients with anti-GSTT1 antibodies and donor/recipient GSTT1 mismatch developed clinically evident de novo AIH after LT. The risk of developing the disease was increased by male donor gender, nonalcoholic etiology of original liver disease, and a high anti-GSTT1 titer.

Chronic liver allograft dysfunction

Approximately 90% of liver transplant patients are alive after 1 year and 75% after 5 years with the majority leading full and near-normal lives. However, although early mortality rates after transplantation have fallen dramatically over the last 2 decades, the rates of late graft loss and patient death have remained constant. Thus, understanding of the causes of graft and patient failure is essential to improve long-term outcomes. In the early days after liver transplantation, ischemia and reperfusion injuries predominate, with acute cellular rejection relatively common in first 3 months. Thereafter, the causes of graft dysfunction are variable with disease recurrence as a major cause of graft loss. In this review, we discuss causes of graft dysfunction after 6 months.

Autoimmune liver diseases and recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation: what have we learned so far?

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may all recur after liver transplant. Diagnosis of rPBC is defined by histology; rAIH by serology, biochemistry and histology; rPSC by histology and/or imaging of the biliary tree and exclusion of other causes of nonanastomotic biliary strictures. Criteria for recurrent disease (RD) may differ from those used in similar disease in the native liver: frequent use of immunosuppressive therapy changes the pattern and natural history of RD and can co-exist with other transplant-related causes of graft damage. RD may occur in the presence of normal liver tests; the reported incidence will depend on the way in which diagnostic tests (especially protocol biopsies) are applied. The risk of RD increases with time, but does not correlate with the rate of graft loss. Treatment is largely unproven: ursodeoxycholic acid will improve serology and may slow progression of rPSC and rPBC; introduction or increased dose of corticosteroids may reduce progression of rAIH. Risk factors for rPBC include use of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine; for rPSC include absence of colon peri-transplantation and for rAIH possible associations with some HLA haplotypes have been suggested.

Idiopathic post-transplantation hepatitis following living donor liver transplantation, and significance of autoantibody titre for outcome

Idiopathic post-transplantation hepatitis (IPTH) is a common histology occurring late after liver transplantation. Its natural history and the effect of treatment have not been determined. This study is a matched case-control study that evaluates predictors, outcome and response to treatment for IPTH. Patients were divided by autoantibodies into high-titre (> or = 1:160) and low-titre (<1:160) groups, so as to evaluate clinicopathological differences between the two groups. IPTH was identified in 42 of 944 recipients (4.4%) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. They comprised 10 males and 32 females, having median age 6.0 (0-50) years. IPTH presented at a median duration of 5.2 (0.7-10.8) years after transplantation. Particular risk of IPTH was associated with acute rejection, late-onset acute rejection occurring later than 6 month post-transplant, and autoantibody positivity. IPTH was associated with dependence on steroids and frequent adverse outcomes: retransplantation in five (12%); relapse in four (9.5%); and progression of fibrosis in eight (19%). The high-titre group and low-titre group did not differ in their clinicopathological features, response to treatment or outcome. To prevent the development of IPTH, appropriate adjustment of immunosuppression and close follow-up is necessary for patients who suffer repeated episodes of rejection.

De novo autoimmune hepatitis following liver transplantation: a case report

De novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), a rare disorder first described in 1998, appears in patients with liver transplants due to autoimmune and nonautoimmune etiologies. De novo AIH occurs in 2.5% to 3.4% of allografts; children seem to have a predilection for this syndrome. We have present herein a case of a liver allograft recipient who developed chronic hepatitis associated with autoimmune features outlining the clinical course, liver histology, and response to treatment.

Interface hepatitis is associated with a high incidence of late graft fibrosis in a group of tightly monitored pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation patients

Chronic graft dysfunction, manifesting with elevated liver enzymes and histological features of interface hepatitis (IH), is being increasingly recognized as a long-term problem after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to characterize our group of post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients with respect to clinical, laboratory, and histological signs of IH. A retrospective study of charts and liver biopsy specimens from patients transplanted between 1986 and 1999 was used. Histological features of IH were found in 29/119 patients at a median interval of 23.9 months (95% confidence interval -28.2 to 52.6) after OLT. All patients with IH had risk factors for chronic rejection, such as steroid-resistant rejection, acute rejection later than 3 months post-OLT, female receiver of male graft, or pretransplant cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive serology with a CMV-negative donor liver. None of the 29 had features favoring a diagnosis of de novo autoimmune hepatitis, but 4 had isolated hypergammaglobulinemia, and 4 had non-organ-specific autoantibodies without hyperimmunoglobulin G. Sixteen of 29 patients also had features of chronic rejection, such as foam cell arteriopathy, loss of bile ducts, or pericentral fibrosis. After abnormal biopsy, all but 1 patient were switched to tacrolimus. During a median follow-up of 12 years, death occurred in 5, retransplantation occurred in 7, and definite cirrhosis occurred in 4. In conclusion, IH was detected in 24.4% of our patients and was associated with a high degree of fibrosis development. Most likely, IH represents a form of chronic rejection directed against periportal hepatocytes.

Protocol liver allograft biopsies

Protocol liver allograft biopsies are liver biopsies carried out at specific time points according to predetermined guidelines, rather than in response to specific indications such as change in the patient's clinical status or biochemical tests. Use of protocol liver allograft biopsy has been declining over the last decade: an informal survey of 35 transplant units showed that whereas 65% of units undertake protocol biopsies for those grafted for Hepatitis C virus infection, only 25% do so for patients grafted for other indications. In this overview, we consider the arguments against and those in favor of liver biopsies in adult liver allograft recipients. Arguments against the use of protocol liver biopsies are that they biopsies put the patient are associated with a small risk of morbidity and mortality, are expensive, do not provide useful information and do not alter clinical practice. The estimated rate of major complications is 0.6% and the estimated mortality rate 0.02%. However, the argument in favor of protocol biopsies is that even when standard liver tests are normal, there is on-going inflammation in the graft which, if immunosuppression is not altered, will lead to progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis and even graft loss. Conversely, normal liver histology may allow for reduction in the immunosuppression and so lower the risk of the complications associated with immunosuppression. Currently available diagnostic techniques are not yet sufficiently sensitive or specific to provide an accurate reflection of the state of the graft and the presence or absence of graft damage. We conclude that, while there are no clear data showing that protocol liver allograft biopsies are cost effective and lead to improved patient and graft outcome, such biopsies still have a role in the management of the liver transplant recipient.

De novo autoimmunity after organ transplantation: targets and possible pathways

The development of autoantibodies to different tissue-specific antigens in patients without existing history of autoimmune diseases suggests that autoimmunity may develop de novo after organ transplantation. In addition to allo-specific immune responses, tissue-specific autoimmunity also appears contribute to the host anti-graft response, and thus may affect long-term graft function. As graft failure caused by chronic rejection is a major challenge in clinical transplantation, understanding de novo autoreactivity after transplantation has important ramifications. This review investigates this emerging concept by discussing target antigens and possible pathways.

Transplantation in autoimmune liver diseases

Liver transplantation remains an effective treatment for those with end-stage disease and with intractable liver-related symptoms. The shortage of organs for transplantation has resulted in the need for rationing. A variety of approaches to selection and allocation have been developed and vary from country to country. The shortage of donors has meant that new approaches have to be adopted to make maximal use of the available organs; these include splitting grafts, use of extended criteria livers, livers from non-heart-beating donors and from living donors. Post transplantation, most patients will need life-long immunosuppression, although a small proportion can have immunosuppression successfully withdrawn. Newer immunosuppressive drugs and different strategies may allow a more targeted approach with a reduction in side-effects and so improve the patient and graft survival. For autoimmune diseases, transplantation is associated with significant improvement in the quality and length of life. Disease may recur after transplantation and may affect patient and graft survival.

Posttransplant plasma cell hepatitis (de novo autoimmune hepatitis) is a variant of rejection and may lead to a negative outcome in patients with hepatitis C virus

De novo autoimmune hepatitis has been described in both pediatric and adult liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Studies of small numbers of patients have proposed it to be an alloimmune hepatitis or form of chronic rejection. We have recently noted an increasing number of patients with post-LT recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) developing this, with an apparent negative impact on outcome and survival. We term this entity posttransplant plasma cell hepatitis (PCH). A search of our institution's pathology database was performed with the terms "plasma cell(s)," "lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate," and "liver allograft." A histological scoring system was devised to more reliably diagnose PCH in the setting of recurrent HCV. Thirty-eight patients were identified, and their clinical data were analyzed. Sixty percent had a negative outcome as defined by the development of cirrhosis, need for retransplantation, or death. Eighty-two percent had recent lowering of immunosuppression or subtherapeutic calcineurin inhibitor levels; 58% developed PCH within 2 years post-LT. Histologic resolution of PCH was associated with good outcome (P < 0.001). Patients not receiving treatment had a negative outcome (P = 0.007) as did patients receiving corticosteroids as therapy (P = 0.02). Persistence (P = 0.007) or recurrence of PCH was associated with negative outcome. In conclusion, PCH is a histologic variant of rejection. On liver biopsy, PCH can at times be difficult to diagnose, and the use of a standardized scoring system is recommended to differentiate it from other forms of allograft dysfunction. Treatment by optimization of immunosuppression without the use of corticosteroids appears effective. The development of PCH in the setting of recurrent HCV is a negative prognostic factor for patient outcome and allograft failure.

De novo autoimmune hepatitis following living-donor liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis

Since first being described in 1998, de novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) after liver transplantation has been reported in several cases suffering from non-autoimmune liver diseases and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Glutathione S-transferase (GST) T1 genotype mismatches between donor and recipient have also been suggested to constitute a risk factor for de novo AIH. Here, we report a 33-yr-old woman who presented complaining of marked fatigue and jaundice four yr after living-donor liver transplantation for PBC. On examination, transaminase levels were highly elevated and ANA and antimitochondrial antibody M2 were positive. Histological findings showed zonal necrosis with lymphoplasmacytic infiltration closely resembling AIH. She had pretreatment AIH score of 16 and 19 points after relapse of de novo AIH. Two color fluorescence in situ hybridization with X and Y chromosome-specific probes clearly revealed that the hepatocytes were of donor origin and lymphocytes were of patient origin. The GSTT1 genotype of the patient and the donor were the same null type, suggesting that mechanisms other than GSTT1 mismatches may exist in de novo AIH development. In conclusion, recipient immune cells attacked the allogeneic transplanted liver of the patient via de novo AIH, although the exact participation of autoimmune mechanisms is unclear.

Autoimmune hepatitis. Part B: diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria have been codified by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group, and a scoring system can quantify the strength of the diagnosis and over-ride the impact of absent or inconsistent features. The absence of a definable etiologic agent and precise diagnostic test, implies that the diagnosis may be missed or misapplied. Centrilobular (zone 3) necrosis may be an early form of autoimmune hepatitis and this pattern can transform to the classical pattern of interface hepatitis. An acute severe or fulminant presentation is possible, and different ethnic groups may have different manifestations and outcomes. Asymptomatic patients at presentation commonly become symptomatic, and treatment decisions must be based on objective features of disease severity and not the presence or absence of symptoms. Concurrent autoimmune diseases are frequent, and they may constitute an autoimmune polyglandular syndrome associated with a single gene mutation. Emerging autoantibodies of possible prognostic value are antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, actin, and liver cytosol type 1. HLA DRB1*03, *04, *03-*04, *07, *13 and DQB1*02 are associated with the occurrence, clinical phenotype and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis. Variant syndromes should be suspected if cholestatic features are prominent and conventional treatment is ineffective.

Sustained virologic response to therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is related to early virologic response and dose adherence

Sustained virologic response (SVR) after antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients is consistently lower than that achieved in non-LT patients. We evaluated efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in LT recipients with recurrent HCV and factors associated with SVR. All subjects with histologic evidence of recurrent HCV were intended to be treated for 48 weeks with full-dose pegylated IFN; target dose of RBV was 800 mg/day. Thirty-five LT recipients with recurrent HCV, median age 48.5 years, 77% genotype 1, and median pretreatment HCV RNA 6.4 log10 IU/mL were treated between January 2000 and February 2006. Antiviral therapy was discontinued prematurely in 15 subjects as a result of adverse events. Median overall treatment duration was 46 weeks. Early virologic response at week 12 was seen in 17 (49%) and an end-of-treatment virological response in 19 (54%) patients. SVR was achieved in 13 patients (37%), and all 9 patients followed for >1 year after treatment had durable response. Patients with SVR had significantly lower pretreatment HCV RNA (5.7 vs. 6.5 log10 IU/mL, P=0.003), more likely to have a week 12 virological response (85% vs. 27%, P=0.0009) and received higher cumulative doses of pegylated IFN (75% vs. 33%, P=0.029) and RBV (90% vs. 26%, P=0.016) compared with patients whose disease did not respond to therapy. In conclusion, SVR was achieved in 37% of patients with recurrent hepatitis C after LT. Similar to non-LT patients, those with lower pretreatment HCV RNA, a week 12 virological response, and pegylated IFN and RBV dose adherence were more likely to achieve SVR.

Cirrhosis after orthotopic liver transplantation in the absence of primary disease recurrence

Liver allograft cirrhosis is a relatively uncommon complication of liver transplantation. Most cases can be attributed to disease recurrence, particularly recurrent hepatitis C. Little is known about the frequency, etiology, and natural history of liver allograft cirrhosis occurring without evidence of recurrent disease. The aim of the present study was to review the clinicopathological features in this group of patients. We retrospectively reviewed data from all adult patients who were transplanted between 1982 and 2002 and survived >12 months after orthotopic liver transplantation (n = 1,287). Cases of histologically proven cirrhosis were identified from histopathological data entered into the Liver Unit Database. A total of 48 patients (3.7%) developed cirrhosis. In 29 of them, cirrhosis could be attributed to recurrent disease (hepatitis C, 11; hepatitis B, 4; autoimmune hepatitis, 4; primary biliary cirrhosis, 2; primary sclerosing cholangitis, 3; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, 4; alcoholic liver disease, 1). In 9 of the 19 patients without evidence of disease recurrence, another cause of cirrhosis could be identified (de novo autoimmune hepatitis, 4; biliary complications, 4; acquired hepatitis B, 1). In the remaining 10 cases, the cause of cirrhosis remained unknown; their previous biopsies had shown features of chronic hepatitis of uncertain etiology. Three patients in this group died, and the remaining 7 are alive with good graft function 3-12 years after cirrhosis was first diagnosed. The prevalence of "cryptogenic" posttransplant cirrhosis was significantly higher in patients initially transplanted for fulminant seronegative hepatitis (6%) than in those transplanted for other diseases (0.3%). In conclusion, posttransplant cirrhosis without disease recurrence is uncommon, but it is more frequent in patients transplanted for fulminant seronegative hepatitis. Chronic hepatitis is the most frequent underlying pathological process in cases where the cause of cirrhosis remains uncertain.

Natural history of unexplained chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation

Unexplained chronic hepatitis (CH) in the adult liver allograft recipient is not uncommon, but its natural history and clinical significance is unknown. A retrospective study was undertaken of adult liver allograft recipients to determine the frequency and natural history of unexplained CH. We evaluated only those patients who had undergone >or=2 liver biopsies after 6 months and were grafted for indications where recurrent disease could be confidently excluded (alcoholic liver disease [ALD] in those who remained abstinent and fulminant hepatic failure [FHF] from drug reactions). Of 288 patients who were transplanted for ALD or FHF, 30 fulfilled the above criteria. CH was first diagnosed at a median of 15.25 months after transplantation. A total of 24 patients showed mild necroinflammatory changes, and 12 had mild or moderate fibrosis. Liver tests did not reflect the presence or degree of inflammation or fibrosis. After a median of 4 years, necroinflammatory scores were increased in 5; new or progressive fibrosis was noted in 13%; 3 had developed cirrhosis; and 5 developed clinical evidence of portal hypertension. Progressive fibrosis was associated with a high titer of anti-nuclear antibodies (>1:1600) and a portal tract plasma cell infiltrate. There was a trend for correlation between necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis stage, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Serum alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.012) and female gender of the donor (P = 0.033) were associated with progressive fibrosis. Unexplained CH is not uncommon in the liver allograft and may progress to established cirrhosis in a subgroup of patients transplanted for ALD or FHF. Standard liver tests do not reflect the extent of these changes, so protocol liver biopsies may be required to detect these changes. We recommend careful history and follow-up in these patients.

Beyond five years: long-term follow-up in pediatric liver transplantation

Pediatric liver transplant patients are now routinely surviving 10 years or more. Beyond the first year after transplant, surgical biliary or vascular complications are rare, and the incidence of acute rejection episodes falls precipitously. Attention is turning to minimizing the toxicity of immunosuppressive regimens and their potential negative impact on growth, bone health, cognitive development, renal function, and quality of life. Innovative combinations of immunosuppressive medications are being used as initial management after transplantation to minimize acute rejection and allow rapid weaning of corticosteroids and reduction in maintenance levels of calcineurin inhibitors. The substitution of potentially less toxic immunosuppressive agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin, is being studied in patients who develop renal dysfunction. A major current emphasis is on defining the natural history of long-term graft injury and elucidating histopathologic changes that mimic autoimmune chronic active hepatitis but are likely a form of chronic rejection due to production by the recipient of antibodies to foreign graft antigens. As patients survive longer, we are seeing various forms of immune dysregulation engendered by the presence of the graft and chronic immunosuppression of the host. By defining the resulting patterns of graft injury and understanding their immunopathogenesis, we can devise rational adjustments in immunosuppression that will preserve graft function and maximize graft life.

Antibodies against glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) in patients with GSTT1 null genotype as prognostic marker: long-term follow-up after liver transplantation

An objective to improve the evolution of transplants is to identify risk biomarkers of morbidity and loss of allograft. In liver transplant (LTX) recipients, an association has been demonstrated between the presence of mismatch for glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) and the development of de novo immune hepatitis (IH). In 419 LTX patients we analyzed, for a period of 1 to 14 years, the development of "atypical" autoantibodies directed against GSTT1 and their relationship with the mismatch for GSTT1 genotype and with the risk for developing de novo IH. A total of 6.9% LTX recipients had "atypical" autoantibodies and 24 showed mismatch (recipient/donor) for GSTT1 genotype. From this last group, up to 70% developed de novo IH and graft dysfunction after LTX (95% confidence interval: 17.4-37.5 months). In LTX recipients with a GSTT1 null genotype, the evaluation of "atypical" autoantibodies is useful for monitoring the development of de novo IH.

Rejection and steroid dependence: unique risk factors in the development of pediatric posttransplant de novo autoimmune hepatitis

Posttransplant de novo autoimmune hepatitis (d-AIH) is increasingly described as a long-term complication after pediatric liver transplantation (LT). d-AIH is characterized by graft dysfunction, the development of autoimmune antibodies and histologic evidence of hepatitis in liver transplant recipients without previous history of autoimmune liver disease. This study is a matched case-control, univariate analysis aimed at identifying risk factors for the development of d-AIH and evaluating response to treatment. From 1984 to 2003, 619 children received 788 LTs at a single center. Forty-one patients developed d-AIH and were matched with controls for year of LT, age at time of LT and diagnosis. The following variables were insignificant in the development of d-AIH: age, gender, race, initial diagnosis, ischemia time, graft type, Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus status, HLA typing and primary immunosuppression. Compared to controls, d-AIH patients were less likely to be on monotherapy immunosuppression or weaned off prednisone at the time of diagnosis. The d-AIH group relative to the controls had statistically significant greater numbers of rejection episodes. d-AIH was treated with prednisone and/or MMF in 39 of 41 patients and lead to significant improvements in liver function tests. Thirty-nine patients are alive at a mean of 4.0 years follow-up after diagnosis. Three have required retransplantation.

Current therapy for autoimmune hepatitis

The treatment of autoimmune hepatitis is evolving as the pathogenic pathways that underlie the disease are defined, new immunosuppressive agents are tested, and site-specific molecular interventions become feasible. Prednisone alone or at a reduced dose combined with azathioprine is the conventional treatment. Patients with HLA genotype DRB1*0301 have a poorer treatment response and a more frequent need for liver transplantation than those with HLA genotype DRB1*0401. Therapy to the point when liver test results and histological findings are normal reduces, but does not eliminate, the occurrence of relapse. Treatment failure warrants reassessment with regard to the accuracy of the original diagnosis and the exclusion of variant forms of hepatitis or concomitant alternative diseases. Ciclosporin might be effective as short-term, front-line therapy in infants and adults, and calcineurin inhibitors might salvage patients who are refractory to corticosteroid regimens. Mycophenolate mofetil can induce an improvement in laboratory test results and reduce the requirement for corticosteroids. Sirolimus is effective for treatment of de novo autoimmune hepatitis that develops after liver transplantation. Synthetic peptides that block autoantigen presentation, cytokine manipulations, oral tolerance regimens, T-cell vaccination, and gene therapy are all interventions that will be able to emerge after a reliable animal model of the human disease has been developed.

De novo autoimmune hepatitis following liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis

De novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare disorder first described in 1998. It appears in patients with liver transplants for non-AIH etiology. The few cases in the literature make it a little known entity due to mechanisms that are unclear. We present the case of a woman with a liver transplant whose graft developed de novo AIH. Diagnosed with primary biliary cirrhosis, the patient underwent liver transplantation for refractory pruritus. Sixteen months after transplantation, we detected alterations in the hepatic profile with hypertransaminasemia and elevated alkaline phosphatase, together with elevated antinuclear antibodies. IgG levels were normal. Histological findings indicated AIH. The patient responded rapidly to treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine. De novo AIH in patients transplanted for PBC may cause graft dysfunction. This report also analyzes the case with respect to the other four reported cases, discussing etiologic hypotheses.

Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction

Evaluation of needle biopsies and extensive clinicopathological correlation play an important role in the determination of liver allograft dysfunction occurring more than 1 year after transplantation. Interpretation of these biopsies can be quite difficult because of the high incidence of recurrent diseases that show histopathological, clinical, and serological features that overlap with each other and with rejection. Also, more than one insult can contribute to allograft injury. In an attempt to enable centers to compare and pool results, improve therapy, and better understand pathophysiological disease mechanisms, the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology herein proposes a set of consensus criteria for the most common and problematic causes of late liver allograft dysfunction, including late-onset acute and chronic rejection, recurrent and new-onset viral and autoimmune hepatitis, biliary strictures, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A discussion of differential diagnosis is also presented.

Progressive histological damage in liver allografts following pediatric liver transplantation

The long-term histological outcome after pediatric liver transplantation (OLT) is not yet fully understood. De novo autoimmune hepatitis, consisting of histological chronic hepatitis associated with autoantibody formation and allograft dysfunction, is increasingly recognized as an important complication of liver transplantation, particularly in the pediatric population. In this study, 158 asymptomatic children with 5-year graft survival underwent protocol liver biopsies (113, 135, and 64 at 1, 5, and 10 years after OLT, respectively). Histological changes we re correlated with dinical,biochemical, and serological findings. All patients received cydosporine A as primary immunosuppression with withdrawal of corticosteroids at 3 months post OLT. Normal or near-normal histology was reported in 77 of 113 (68%), 61 of 135 (45%), and 20 of 64 (31%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The commonest histological abnormality was chronic hepatitis (CH), the incidence of which increased with time [25/113 (22%), 58/135 (43%), and 41/64 (64%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001)]. The incidence of fibrosis associatedwith CH increasedwith time [13/25 (52%), 47/58 (81%), and 37/41 (91%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001)]. The severity of fibrosis associated with CH also increased with time, such that by 10 years 15% had progressed to cirrhosis. Aspartate aminotransfemse (AST) levels were slightly elevated in children with CH (median levels 52 IU/L, 63 IU/L, and 48 IU/L at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance compared with those with normal histology. On multivariate analysis, the only factor predictive of chronic hepatitis was autoantibody positivity (present in 13% and 10% of children with normal biopsies at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and 72% and 80% of those with CH at 5 and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001). Four children with CH and autoantibodies, who also had raised immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and AST greater than 1.5 x normal fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for de novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Another two were found to be hepatitis C positive. No definite cause for CH could be identified in the other cases. In condusion, chronic hepatitis is a common finding in children after liver transplantation and is associated with a high risk of developing progressive fibrosis, leading to cirrhosis. Standard liver biochemical tests cannot be relied on either in the diagnosis or in the monitoring of progress of chronic allograft hepatitis. In contrast, the presence ofautoantibodies is strongly associated with the presence of CH. The cause of chronic hepatitis in transplanted allografts is uncertain but may be immune mediated, representing a hepatitic form of chronic rejection.

Successful treatment of de novo autoimmune hepatitis and cirrhosis after pediatric liver transplantation

Over a 15-yr period of observation, among the 205 children who underwent liver transplantations, one of them developed a particular type of late graft dysfunction with clinical and histological similarity to autoimmune hepatitis. The patient had alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency and did not previously have autoimmune hepatitis or any other autoimmune disease before transplantation. Infectious and surgical complications were excluded. After repeated episodes of unexplained fluctuations of liver function tests and liver biopsies demonstrating reactive or a biliary pattern, without any corresponding alteration of percutaneous cholangiography, a liver-biopsy sample taken 4 yr after the transplant showed active chronic hepatitis progressing to cirrhosis, portal lymphocyte aggregates, and a large number of plasma cells. At that time, autoantibodies (gastric parietal cell antibody, liver-kidney microsomal antibody, and anti-hepatic cytosol) were positive and serum IgG levels were high. Based on these findings of autoimmune disease, a diagnosis of 'de novo autoimmune hepatitis' was made. The treatment consisted of reducing the dose of cyclosporine, reintroduction of corticosteroids, and addition of mycophenolate mofetil. After 19 months of treatment, a new liver-biopsy sample showed marked reduction of portal and lobular inflammatory infiltrate, with regression of fibrosis and of the architectural disruption. At that time, serum autoantibodies became negative. The last liver-biopsy sample showed inactive cirrhosis and disappearance of interface hepatitis and of plasma cell infiltrate. Presently, 9 yr after the transplantation, the patient is doing well, with normal liver function tests and no evidence of cirrhosis. Her immunosuppressive therapy consists of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. In conclusion, the present case demonstrates that de novo autoimmune hepatitis can appear in liver-transplant patients despite appropriate anti-rejection immunosuppression, and triple therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone could sustain the graft and prevent retransplantation.

Anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibodies and mycophenolate mofetil for treatment of steroid-resistant rejection in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Steroid-resistant rejection (SRR) results in significant morbidity and mortality from the adverse effects of rescue therapy and in graft loss from chronic rejection. In our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin (IL) 2r antibodies (daclizumab and basiliximab) for the treatment of SRR in adult liver transplantation has not previously been evaluated.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients received either daclizumab or basiliximab as rescue therapy for SRR. Outcome and biochemical parameters were recorded before and after treatment with an anti-IL-2r antibody.

RESULTS

The median time from transplantation to SRR was 25 days. Secondary immunosuppression included mycophenolate mofetil in 18 patients. Twelve patients (48%) had complete resolution of SRR. Aspartate transaminase levels normalized at a median of 37 days (range, 1-168 days). In 13 patients (52%) progressive hepatic dysfunction developed. Four of these patients received another transplant, and 6 patients had chronic rejection. Three patients died with graft failure. Of 16 patients with acute cellular rejection, 12 (75%) had resolution, 2 had chronic rejection, 1 required a repeat transplantation, and 1 died with graft failure. In contrast, all 9 patients with established chronic rejection in their pretreatment biopsy continued to have significant graft dysfunction, with 4 having persistent chronic graft dysfunction, 3 requiring repeat transplantation, and 2 dying with graft failure.

CONCLUSION

Twelve (48%) of 25 patients who received an anti-IL-2r antibody because of SRR were successfully treated. All successfully treated patients had ongoing acute cellular rejection at liver biopsy (75%), whereas patients with histologic evidence of chronic rejection responded poorly.

Autoimmune hepatitis, from mechanisms to therapy

In 1950, Waldenström was the first to describe a chronic form of hepatitis in young women. Subsequently, the disease was found to be associated with other autoimmune syndromes and was later termed "lupoid hepatitis" because of the presence of antinuclear antibodies. In 1965, it became designated by Mackay et al. as "autoimmune hepatitis" at an international meeting, at which the general concept of autoimmunity was endorsed by the scientific community. In the early 1960s and 1970s, the value of immunosuppressive therapy with glucocorticoids and/or azathioprine was well documented in several studies. The original association of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and HLA alleles, which has remarkably stood the test of time, was published in 1972. In the 1970s and 1980s, several autoantibodies were identified in patients with autoimmune hepatitis directed against proteins of the endoplasmatic reticulum expressed in liver and kidney and against soluble liver antigens. Subsequently, the molecular targets of these antibodies were identified and more precisely characterized. In the last two decades many additional pieces of the AIH puzzle have been collected leading to the identification of additional antibodies and genes associated with AIH and to the emergence of new therapeutic agents. Meanwhile, the immunoserological and genetic heterogeneity of AIH is well established and it has become obvious that clinical manifestations, disease behavior, and treatment outcome may vary by racial groups, geographical regions and genetic predisposition. Currently, the International Autoimmune hepatitis group is endorsing multi-center collaborative studies to more precisely define the features at disease presentation and to define prognostic indices and appropriate treatment algorithms. Given the importance of serological testing, the IAHG is also working on guidelines and procedures for more reliable and standardized testing of autoantibodies.

Autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease

Autoantibodies indicate an immune reactive state, but in liver disease they lack pathogenicity and disease specificity. Antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies constitute the standard serological repertoire that should be assessed in all liver diseases of undetermined cause. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, actin, liver cytosol type 1, nuclear antigens specific to primary biliary cirrhosis, and pore complex antigens constitute an investigational repertoire that promises to have prognostic and diagnostic value. These autoantibodies may emerge as predictors of treatment response and outcome. Antibodies to histones, doubled-stranded DNA, chromatin, and lactoferrin constitute a supplemental repertoire, and they support the immune nature of the liver disease. Final diagnoses and treatment strategies do not depend solely on serological markers. Autoantibodies are floating variables, and their behavior does not correlate closely with disease activity. There are no minimum levels of significant seropositivity, especially in children. Over-interpretation is the major pitfall in the clinical application of the serological results. New autoantibodies will emerge as the search for target antigens and key pathogenic pathways continues.

Post-liver transplantation de novo hepatitis with overlap features

The development of de novo autoimmune liver disease after liver transplantation (LT) has been described in both children and adults. Reported herein is a case that is best characterized as post-LT de novo hepatitis with features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)-primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) overlap. A 56-year-old man underwent LT for decompensated liver disease secondary to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. His liver function tests became markedly abnormal 8 months after LT. Sequential liver transplant biopsy findings were confusing and shared findings seen with both AIH and PBC. Although standard autoimmune serological tests were negative, a dramatic biochemical response was observed to a regimen consisting of prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil, and ursodeoxycholic acid added to maintainance tacrolimus. The donor was histocompatibility leukocyte antigen, DR4, positive, a haplotype associated with the development of AIH-PBC overlap syndrome. In conclusion the authors believe that this may be a case of post-LT de novo overlap syndrome of AIH-PBC, a novel 'autoimmune-type' response.

Chronic allograft dysfunction: diagnosis and management. Is it always progressive?

1. There are many causes of graft dysfunction post-liver transplant, but recurrent disease remains the most common cause. 2. Viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic and alcoholic steatohepatitis, and autoimmune diseases are the most common causes of recurrent disease. 3. Graft hepatitis occurs frequently and in many cases will not progress. 4. Cirrhosis in the absence of any identifiable cause develops in a minority. 5. Treatment is of the underlying cause but some, such as recurrent and de novo autoimmune hepatitis and recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis may not respond well, and regraft may be required.

Could post-liver transplantation course be helpful for the diagnosis of so called cryptogenic cirrhosis?

Cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) is diagnosed in 5-30% of cirrhotic patients overall and 7% of patients who undergo liver transplantation for cirrhosis. In our series of patients transplanted for CC, pre-transplant clinical and histological data and the post-transplant course were reexamined in an attempt to identify the aetiology. Among the 881 patients transplanted in our centre between 1987 and 2000, 28 patients with a median age of 46 yr (range: 18-69) at transplantation were initially classified as having CC. Two patients were excluded because of intense ischaemic lesions caused by chemoembolization prevented histological analysis of the native liver (n = 1) and because of cryptic HBV infection (n = 1). Among the remaining 26 patients, four groups were individualized: (i) patients with chronic inflammatory liver disease with autoimmune features (n = 14, 54%); (ii) patients with features suggestive of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 3, 11.5%); (iii); patients with incomplete septal cirrhosis (ISC) and vascular liver disease (n = 3), and (iv) patients with unresolved CC (n = 6, 23%). In the autoimmune liver disease group, the median International Autoimmune Hepatitis score was 12.5 (range: 11-19) after reevaluation and review of the post-transplantation course was helpful to confirm the diagnosis with the occurrence of active graft hepatitis in nine patients, with autoantibodies in five patients. The vascular group was characterized by lesions of obliterative portal venopathy and ISC in all native livers. Diagnosis of NAFLD was based on the clinical background of obesity and/or type 2 diabetes and the presence of steatosis or steatohepatitis in native livers and graft biopsies. A definite aetiological diagnosis can be achieved in the majority of patients initially diagnosed with CC. Autoimmune liver disease emerged as the main aetiology (14 of 26 patients, 54%) and frequently recurred on the grafted liver (nine cases). In all cases a precise diagnosis is obviously of practical interest for better management of post-transplant survey and treatment.

Antibodies against cytokeratin 8/18 in a patient with de novo autoimmune hepatitis after living-donor liver transplantation

Graft dysfunction mimicking autoimmune hepatitis rarely develops after liver transplantation for nonautoimmune disease. The mechanism(s) and causes of de novo autoimmune hepatitis are unknown. We examined autoantibodies serially in a patient with de novo autoimmune hepatitis and in patients without de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation. Anticytokeratin 8/18 antibodies were detected in the first patient's sera after the onset of de novo autoimmune hepatitis, whereas other patients without de novo autoimmune hepatitis were seronegative throughout the follow-up period even with acute cellular rejection or other cause of liver dysfunction. In conclusion, the changes in cytokeratin 8/18 in hepatocytes might be one of the sources of pathogenesis of de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation.

Mechanisms of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a progressive inflammatory liver disease with a female preponderance, responsive to immunosuppressive treatment. Two types of AIH are described: type 1 AIH is characterized by positivity for smooth muscle and/or antinuclear antibody, while type 2 AIH is positive for liver kidney microsomal type 1 antibody. The putative mechanisms leading to the development of this condition include genetic predisposition to autoimmunity through possession of specific human leukocyte antigen alleles, immune reactions to liver cell antigens, possibly triggered by a mechanism of molecular mimicry, where immune responses to external pathogens, e.g. viruses, become directed toward structurally similar self-components, and an impairment in immune regulation. AIH has been described to arise de novo after liver transplantation. The mechanisms leading to post-transplant autoimmunity remain to be defined.

Glutathione S-transferase T1 mismatch constitutes a risk factor for de novo immune hepatitis after liver transplantation

A new form of autoimmune hepatitis referred to as de novo, has been reported after liver transplantation during the past 5 years. The features are identical to those of classical autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), but the facts involved in the onset and outcome of this type of graft dysfunction are still unclear. The identification of antibodies directed to glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) in the sera of patients with de novo immune hepatitis led us to the description of an alloimmune reaction due to a GSTT1 genetic incompatibility between donor and recipient. We analyzed a cohort of 110 liver transplant patients treated in the liver transplant unit of our hospital during a period of 1 year, from September 2002 to October 2003. We found the following distribution of the GSTT1 genotypes (recipient/donor): +/+ = 66, +/- = 23, -/+ = 15, -/- = 6. Six of these patients were diagnosed with de novo immune hepatitis; all of them belong to the group of negative recipients with positive donors, and all produced anti-GSTT1 antibodies. This genetic combination is associated with a statistically significant increased risk of de novo immune hepatitis (IH) in liver transplant patients (P < .0001 by the Fisher exact test). In conclusion, our results clearly establish the importance of the GSTT1 genotype from donor and recipient of a liver transplant as a predictive marker for de novo IH. At the same time, we confirmed our initial results that only this particular donor/recipient combination triggers the anti-GSTT1 antibody production.

Outcome and Risk Factors of De Novo Autoimmune Hepatitis in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft dysfunction mimicking autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) develops only rarely after liver transplantation for nonautoimmune liver disease. The long-term prognosis and risk factors of de novo AIH after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are unknown.

METHODS

We review our LDLT series to investigate the incidence and outcome of this form of graft dysfunction, focusing on follow-up histology.

RESULTS

Of 633 patients who underwent LDLT at Kyoto University from 1990 to 2002, 13 (2.1%) developed graft dysfunction with interface hepatitis resembling AIH (2 males, 11 females). The median age at LDLT of these 13 patients was 10 years (8 months to 26 years). All received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. The dysfunction presented at a median interval of 3.1 (0.7-9.5) years after LDLT. Nine had definite AIH, and four had probable AIH at the onset of hepatitis. Patients were followed after a median of 3.5 (0.1-8) years from the onset of de novo AIH. Of 11 patients who underwent follow-up histologic evaluation, 3 underwent retransplantation, and 8 continued to have similar findings on subsequent biopsies, with fluctuations in the amount of necroinflammatory activity and an increase in fibrosis despite treatment. In a multivariate analysis, acute rejection episodes and recipient age between 11 and 15 years at LDLT independently had predictive value for the development of de novo AIH. Human leukocyte antigen-A, B, and DR mismatches and sex mismatch did not influence the occurrence of de novo AIH.

CONCLUSION

This series highlights the more severe histologic outcome of de novo AIH with longer follow-up despite immunosuppressive treatment. De novo AIH may arise from alloimmunologic injury, marked by clinically obvious episodes of acute rejection.

An evaluation of long-term outcomes after liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis

Patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) comprise a significant proportion of liver transplant recipients. Poor outcome after transplantation has been reported by some centers, with fibrosis occurring in a significant proportion of patients. Outcome of 46 patients with CC who underwent transplantation between 1989 and 1999 at King's College Hospital London were compared with time-matched recipients who underwent transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (n = 58) and patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis (AC, n = 53) during the same time period. Mean follow-up was 46 +/- 37 months for CC patients, 41 +/- 31 months for AC patients, and 49 +/- 31 months for HCV patients. No protocol liver biopsy specimens were obtained, and biopsies were performed only for investigation of biochemical abnormalities. Acute cellular rejection occurred in 30% of CC, 26% of AC, and 37% of HCV patients (P = NS). Overall patient and graft survival at 1 year was 85% and 80% for CC patients, 87% and 81% for AC patients, and 91% and 82% for patients with HCV (P = NS). Five-year patient and graft survival was 81% and 77% for CC patients, 60% and 48% for AC patients, and 79% and 57% for HCV patients (Log rank; P =.369). Twenty-two percent of CC patients had inflammation on last evaluable liver biopsy, compared with 25% of patients who underwent transplantation for AC and 68% of patients who underwent transplantation for HCV. No patient who underwent transplantation for CC had histologic evidence of cirrhosis on last evaluable biopsy, compared with 2% of patients who underwent transplantation for AC and 16% of patients who underwent transplantation for HCV (Chi-squared = 13.053, P =.0015). These results suggest that CC is a favorable indication for OLT and that although a proportion of patients develop inflammation in the liver allograft, this does not result in significant graft dysfunction or loss.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis

Liver transplantation remains the only effective treatment for end-stage primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). It appears now well accepted that the disease recurs in the allograft. The diagnosis of recurrent PBC is made on the basis of a consistent history and demonstrating the histologic features of PBC on liver biopsy and exclusion of other causes of bile duct damage.

Recent advances in liver transplantation

Advances in liver transplantation continue to evolve but are hampered by continued increasing shortages in donor organs. This has resulted in a high incidence of patients dying while on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. Indeed, we continue to assess ways of expanding the donor pool by using marginal donors, living donor liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, domino transplantation, and hepatic support systems to prolong survival long enough for the patient to undergo liver transplantation. Changes in the liver allocation policy to reduce the number of people dying while waiting for an organ are discussed. Implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system should help alleviate the problem of increasing deaths of patients while on the waiting list. Recurrent disease, particularly recurrent hepatitis C, continues to be a major problem, and effective therapy is needed to prevent both progression of hepatitis C and recurrence in the graft and avoid retransplantation. The use of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin holds promise for improving the success in overcoming recurrent hepatitis C. Finally, advances in immunosuppression have reduced the incidence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection. However, these therapies have been fraught with metabolic complications that are now affecting quality of life and long-term survival. Tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient is discussed.

Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis

Liver transplantation is now the accepted treatment for patients with end-stage disease or intractable symptoms. The success rate is high. Those grafted for PBC are at greater risk of developing acute and chronic rejection and are less likely to be weaned from immunosuppression. Following transplantation, AMA persist and histological features of PBC may be seen in the allograft, in up to 50% by 10 years.