Tocilizumab for the treatment of chimeric antigen receptor T cell-induced cytokine release syndrome

Updated Clinical Perspectives and Challenges of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy in Colorectal Cancer and Invasive Breast Cancer

In recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BC) has increased worldwide and caused a higher mortality rate due to the lack of selective anti-tumor therapies. Current chemotherapies and surgical interventions are significantly preferred modalities to treat CRC or BC in advanced stages but the prognosis for patients with advanced CRC and BC remains dismal. The immunotherapy technique of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells has resulted in significant clinical outcomes when treating hematologic malignancies. The novel CAR-T therapy target antigens include GUCY2C, CLEC14A, CD26, TEM8/ANTXR1, PDPN, PTK7, PODXL, CD44, CD19, CD20, CD22, BCMA, GD2, Mesothelin, TAG-72, CEA, EGFR, B7H3, HER2, IL13Ra2, MUC1, EpCAM, PSMA, PSCA, NKG2D. The significant aim of this review is to explore the recently updated information pertinent to several novel targets of CAR-T for CRC, and BC. We vividly described the challenges of CAR-T therapies when treating CRC or BC. The immunosuppressive microenvironment of solid tumors, the shortage of tumor-specific antigens, and post-treatment side effects are the major hindrances to promoting the development of CAR-T cells. Several clinical trials related to CAR-T immunotherapy against CRC or BC have already been in progress. This review benefits academicians, clinicians, and clinical oncologists to explore more about the novel CAR-T targets and overcome the challenges during this therapy.

A Pharmacovigilance Study on the Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Based on Spontaneous Reports from the EudraVigilance Database

During pre-approval clinical trials, the safety of axi-cel, a second-generation CAR-T-cell therapy directed against CD19, which dramatically improved the prognosis of intractable B-cell lymphomas, has been investigated only in about 400 patients. Therefore, additional information on this issue is urgently needed. In the present paper, we evaluated the 2905 ICSRs with axi-cel as the suspected drug that had been uploaded in the EudraVigilance database from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. About 80% of the reported adverse events were serious, and about 20% of them did not fully resolve or caused death. The adverse events most-frequently reported were Nervous system disorders (25.6%) and, among them, immune-effector-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, followed by Immune system disorders (23.1%), General disorders and administration site conditions (12.0%), Blood and lymphatic system disorders (7.2%), and Infections and infestations (5.8%). Disproportionality analysis showed that the frequency of reported adverse events related to the nervous system was higher with axi-cel than with the other approved CAR-T-cells, except brexu-cel. In conclusion, real-world pharmacovigilance data showed that nervous system and immune system disorders are the adverse events most reported in axi-cel-related ICSRs and suggest that axi-cel could be more neurotoxic than other CAR-T-cells.

Multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of CAR-T recipients in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed an unprecedented challenge on public health systems. Despite the measures put in place to contain it, COVID-19 is likely to continue experiencing sporadic outbreaks for some time, and individuals will remain susceptible to recurrent infections. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T recipients are characterized by durable B-cell aplasia, hypogammaglobulinemia and loss of T-cell diversity, which lead to an increased proportion of severe/critical cases and a high mortality rate after COVID-19 infection. Thus, treatment decisions have become much more complex and require greater caution when considering CAR T-cell immunotherapy. Hence, we reviewed the current understanding of COVID-19 and reported clinical experience in the management of COVID-19 and CAR-T therapy. After a panel discussion, we proposed a rational procedure pertaining to CAR-T recipients with the aim of maximizing the benefit of CAR-T therapy in the post COVID-19 pandemic era.

Effect of plant produced Anti-hIL-6 receptor antibody blockade on pSTAT3 expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

As a response to invasion by pathogens, the secretion of interleukin 6 (IL-6) which is a cytokine, activates IL-6/JAKs/STAT3 intracellular signaling via., phosphorylation. Over expression of pSTAT3 induces IL-6 positive feedback loop causing cytokine release syndrome or cytokine storm. Plants have gained momentum as an alternative expression system. Hence, this study aims to produce mAb targeting human IL-6 receptor (hIL-6R) in Nicotiana benthamiana for down regulating its cellular signaling thus, decreasing the expression of pSTAT3. The variable regions of heavy and light chains of anti-hIL-6R mAb were constructed in pBYK2e geminiviral plant expression vector and transiently co-expressed in N. benthamiana. The results demonstrate the proper protein assembly of anti-hIL-6R mAb with highest expression level of 2.24 mg/g FW at 5 dpi, with a yield of 21.4 µg/g FW after purification. The purity and N-glycosylation of plant produced antibody was analyzed, including its specificity to human IL-6 receptor by ELISA. Additionally, we investigated the effect to pSTAT3 expression in human PBMC's by flow cytometry wherein, the results confirmed lower expression of pSTAT3 with increasing concentrations of plant produced anti-hIL-6R mAb. Although, further in vivo studies are key to unveil the absolute functionality of anti-hIL-6R, we hereby show the potential of the plant platform and its suitability for the production of this therapeutic antibody.

Advances in adoptive T-cell therapy for metastatic melanoma

Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) is a fast developing, niche area of immunotherapy (IO), which is revolutionising the therapeutic landscape of solid tumour oncology, especially metastatic melanoma (MM). Identifying tumour antigens (TAs) as potential targets, the ACT response is mediated by either Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) or genetically modified T cells with specific receptors - T cell receptors (TCRs) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or more prospectively, natural killer (NK) cells. Clinical trials involving ACT in MM from 2006 to present have shown promising results. Yet it is not without its drawbacks which include significant auto-immune toxicity and need for pre-conditioning lymphodepletion. Although immune-modulation is underway using various combination therapies in the hope of enhancing efficacy and reducing toxicity. Our review article explores the role of ACT in MM, including the various modalities - their safety, efficacy, risks and their development in the trial and the real world setting.

Novel chimeric antigen receptor T cell-based immunotherapy: a perspective for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly aggressive and does not express estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone (PR), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). It has a poor prognosis, and traditional endocrine and anti-HER2 targeted therapies have low efficacy against it. In contrast, surgery, radiotherapy, and/or systemic chemotherapy are relatively effective at controlling TNBC. The resistance of TNBC to currently available clinical therapies has had a significantly negative impact on its treatment outcomes. Hence, new therapeutic options are urgently required. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is a type of immunotherapy that integrates the antigen specificity of antibodies and the tumor-killing effect of T cells. CAR-T therapy has demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy against hematological cancers. However, its efficacy against solid tumors such as TNBC is inadequate. The present review aimed to investigate various aspects of CAR-T administration as TNBC therapy. We summarized the potential therapeutic targets of CAR-T that were identified in preclinical studies and clinical trials on TNBC. We addressed the limitations of using CAR-T in the treatment of TNBC in particular and solid tumors in general and explored key strategies to overcome these impediments. Finally, we comprehensively examined the advancement of CAR-T immunotherapy as well as countermeasures that could improve its efficacy as a TNBC treatment and the prognosis of patients with this type of cancer.

Immunomodulatory Agents for Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pneumonia

Morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 is due to severe inflammation and end-organ damage caused by a hyperinflammatory response. Multiple immunomodulatory agents to attenuate this response have been studied. Corticosteroids, specifically dexamethasone, have been shown to reduce mortality in hospitalized patients who require supplemental oxygen. Interleukin-6 antagonist, tocilizimab, and Janus kinase inhibitors have also been shown to reduce mortality. However, patients who have severe pulmonary end-organ damage requiring mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appear not to benefit from immunomodulatory therapies. This highlights the importance of appropriate timing to initiate immunomodulatory therapies in the management of severe COVID-19 disease.

Derivation and validation of a novel score for early prediction of severe CRS after CAR-T therapy in haematological malignancy patients: A multi-centre study

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is highly effective in inducing complete remission in haematological malignancies. Severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most significant and life-threatening adverse effect of this therapy. This multi-centre study was conducted at six hospitals in China. The training cohort included 87 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), an external validation cohort of 59 patients with MM and another external validation cohort of 68 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The levels of 45 cytokines on days 1-2 after CAR-T cell infusion and clinical characteristics of patients were used to develop the nomogram. A nomogram was developed, including CX3CL1, GZMB, IL4, IL6 and PDGFAA. Based on the training cohort, the nomogram had a bias-corrected AUC of 0.876 (95% CI = 0.871-0.882) for predicting severe CRS. The AUC was stable in both external validation cohorts (MM, AUC = 0.907, 95% CI = 0.899-0.916; ALL/NHL, AUC = 0.908, 95% CI = 0.903-0.913). The calibration plots (apparent and bias-corrected) overlapped with the ideal line in all cohorts. We developed a nomogram that can predict which patients are likely to develop severe CRS before they become critically ill, improving our understanding of CRS biology, and may guide future cytokine-directed therapies.

Towards a point-of-care test to cover atto-femto and pico-nano molar concentration ranges in interleukin 6 detection exploiting PMMA-based plasmonic biosensor chips

Point-of-Care tests based on biomarkers, useful to monitor acute and chronic inflammations, are required for advances in medicine. In this scope, a key role is played by pro-inflammatory cytokines, of which interleukin 6 (IL-6) is generally thought as one of the most relevant. To use IL-6 in real scenarios, detection in ultra-low concentration ranges is required. In this work, two IL-6 biosensors are obtained by exploiting the combination of the same antibody self-assembled monolayer with two different plasmonic probes. This approach has demonstrated, via experimental results, that two different IL-6 concentration ranges can be explored. More specifically, IL-6 in an atto-femto molar range can be detected via polymer-based nanoplasmonic chips. On the other hand, a pico-nano molar range is obtained by a surface plasmon resonance platform in plastic optical fibers. As a proof of concept, the detection of IL-6 at the femto molar range has been obtained in Saliva and Serum. The results show that the proposed sensing approach could be useful in developing Point-of-Care devices based on a general setup with the capability to exploit both the plasmonic biosensor chips to monitor the IL-6 in the concentration range of interest, to provide an important support for the diagnosis and monitoring of oral and systemic diseases.

Possible Pathogenesis and Prevention of Long COVID: SARS-CoV-2-Induced Mitochondrial Disorder

Patients who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection may experience chronic fatigue when exercising, despite no obvious heart or lung abnormalities. The present lack of effective treatments makes managing long COVID a major challenge. One of the underlying mechanisms of long COVID may be mitochondrial dysfunction. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections can alter the mitochondria responsible for energy production in cells. This alteration leads to mitochondrial dysfunction which, in turn, increases oxidative stress. Ultimately, this results in a loss of mitochondrial integrity and cell death. Moreover, viral proteins can bind to mitochondrial complexes, disrupting mitochondrial function and causing the immune cells to over-react. This over-reaction leads to inflammation and potentially long COVID symptoms. It is important to note that the roles of mitochondrial damage and inflammatory responses caused by SARS-CoV-2 in the development of long COVID are still being elucidated. Targeting mitochondrial function may provide promising new clinical approaches for long-COVID patients; however, further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of such approaches.

Tocilizumab-coated solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with cannabidiol as a novel drug delivery strategy for treating COVID-19: A review

Commonly used clinical strategies against coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), including the potential role of monoclonal antibodies for site-specific targeted drug delivery, are discussed here. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) tailored with tocilizumab (TCZ) and loading cannabidiol (CBD) are proposed for the treatment of COVID-19 by oral route. TCZ, as a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody and an interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor agonist, can attenuate cytokine storm in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. CBD (an anti-inflammatory cannabinoid and TCZ agonist) alleviates anxiety, schizophrenia, and depression. CBD, obtained from Cannabis sativa L., is known to modulate gene expression and inflammation and also shows anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory properties. It has also been recognized to modulate angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2) expression in SARS-CoV-2 target tissues. It has already been proven that immunosuppressive drugs targeting the IL-6 receptor may ameliorate lethal inflammatory responses in COVID-19 patients. TCZ, as an immunosuppressive drug, is mainly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, although several attempts have been made to use it in the active hyperinflammatory phase of COVID-19, with promising outcomes. TCZ is currently administered intravenously. It this review, we discuss the potential advances on the use of SLN for oral administration of TCZ-tailored CBD-loaded SLN, as an innovative platform for managing SARS-CoV-2 and related infections.

Diagnosis and Management of Adult Malignancy-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a syndrome of severe, dysregulated inflammation driven by the inability of T cells to clear an antigenic target. When associated with malignancy (mHLH), the HLH syndrome is typically associated with extremely poor survival. Here, we review the diagnosis of secondary HLH (sHLH) syndromes in adults, with emphasis on the appropriate workup and treatment of mHLH. At present, the management of HLH in adults, including most forms of mHLH, is based on the use of corticosteroids and etoposide following the HLH-94 regimen. In some cases, this therapeutic approach may be cohesively incorporated into malignancy-directed therapy, while in other cases, the decision about whether to treat HLH prior to initiating other therapies may be more complicated. Recent studies exploring the efficacy of other agents in HLH, in particular ruxolitinib, offer hope for better outcomes in the management of mHLH. Considerations for the management of lymphoma-associated mHLH, as well as other forms of mHLH and immunotherapy treatment-related HLH, are discussed.

Cancer, more than a “COVID-19 co-morbidity”

Patients with cancer represent a particularly vulnerable population at risk of adverse outcomes related to COVID-19. Collectively, the initial studies, including patients with and without cancer, confirmed that patients with cancer had a higher risk of complications and death related to COVID-19. Subsequent studies on patients with COVID-19 and cancer investigated patient and disease-related factors associated with COVID-19 severity and morality. Multiple interconnected factors include demographics, comorbidities, cancer-associated variables, treatment side effects, and other parameters. However, there is a lack of clarity on the contributions of any one factor. In this commentary, we deconvolute the data of specific risk factors associated with worse outcomes due to COVID-19 in cancer patients and focus on understanding the recommended guidelines to mitigate COVID-19 risk in this vulnerable population. In the first section, we highlight the key parameters, including age and race, cancer status, type of malignancy, cancer therapy, smoking status and comorbidities that impact outcomes for cancer patients with COVID-19. Next, we discuss efforts made at the patient, health system, and population levels to mitigate the effects of the ongoing outbreak for patients with cancer, including (1) screening, barrier and isolation strategies (2), Masking/PPE (3), vaccination, and (4) systemic therapies (e.g., evusheld) to prevent disease onset in patients. In the last section, we discuss optimal treatment strategies for COVID-19, including additional therapies for patients with COVID-19 and cancer. Overall, this commentary focuses on articles with high yield and impact on understanding the evolving evidence of risk factors and management guidelines in detail. We also emphasize the ongoing collaboration between clinicians, researchers, health system administrators and policymakers and how its role will be important in optimizing care delivery strategies for patients with cancer. Creative patient-centered solutions will be critical in the coming years, post the pandemic.

Advances in CAR-T Cell Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Surgery with the assistance of conventional radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy is the basis for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment. However, with these treatment modalities, the recurrence and metastasis of tumors remain at a high level. Increasingly, the evidence indicates an excellent anti-tumor effect of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells in hematological malignancy treatment, and this novel immunotherapy has attracted researchers’ attention in HNSCC treatment. Although several clinical trials have been conducted, the weak anti-tumor effect and the side effects of CAR-T cell therapy against HNSCC are barriers to clinical translation. The limited choices of targeting proteins, the barriers of CAR-T cell infiltration into targeted tumors and short survival time in vivo should be solved. In this review, we introduce barriers of CAR-T cell therapy in HNSCC. The limitations and current promising strategies to overcome barriers in solid tumors, as well as the applications for HNSCC treatment, are covered. The perspectives of CAR-T cell therapy in future HNSCC treatment are also discussed.

Modulation of inflammation by treatment with tocilizumab after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and associations with clinical status, myocardial- and brain injury

AIM

To investigate how the inflammatory response after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is modulated by blocking IL-6-mediated signalling with tocilizumab, and to relate induced changes to clinical status, myocardial- and brain injury.

METHODS

This is a preplanned substudy of the IMICA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03863015). Upon admission 80 comatose OHCA patients were randomized to infusion of tocilizumab or placebo. Inflammation was characterized by a cytokine assay, CRP, and leukocyte differential count; myocardial injury by TnT and NT-proBNP; brain injury by neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and Neurofilament Light chain (NFL), while sequential organ assessment (SOFA) score and Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) represented overall clinical status.

RESULTS

Responses for IL-5, IL-6, IL-17, neutrophil as well as monocyte counts, and VIS were affected by tocilizumab treatment (all p < 0.05), while there was no effect on levels of NFL. IL-5 and IL-6 were substantially increased by tocilizumab, while IL-17 was lowered. Neutrophils and monocytes were lower at 24 and 48 hours, and VIS was lower at 24 hours, for the tocilizumab group compared to placebo. Multiple correlations were identified for markers of organ injury and clinical status versus inflammatory markers; this included correlations of neutrophils and monocytes with TnT, NSE, NFL, SOFA- and VIS score for the tocilizumab but not the placebo group. NT-proBNP, NFL and SOFA score correlated with CRP in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with tocilizumab after OHCA modulated the inflammatory response with notable increases for IL-5, IL-6, and decreases for neutrophils and monocytes, as well as reduced vasopressor and inotropy requirements.

Interleukin-6 and cytokine release syndrome: A new understanding in drug hypersensitivity reactions

Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are historically thought to be because of immunoglobulin E (IgE) cross-linking, causing mast cell degranulation and release of mediators like tryptase and histamine. With the increasing use of monoclonal antibodies, it has become apparent that some patients present atypical features during immediate DHRs, including occurrence in initial exposure, a lack of urticaria and angioedema, and the presence of fever, chills, rigors and musculoskeletal pain as the predominant symptoms. This observation led to the recognition of a novel phenotype of immediate DHRs called cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Other types of immediate DHRs include infusion-related reactions (which present similarly to CRS), and mixed reactions (which share overlapping features of both type 1 reactions and CRS). Desensitization to culprit drugs can be a lifesaving option in patients who develop immediate DHRs to first-line treatment. Whereas robust data are supporting the safety and efficacy of drug desensitization, breakthrough reactions can still occur and CRS seems to be a more common cause than type 1 reactions. Tryptase has been the only available biomarker for immediate DHRs and is associated with type 1 reactions. Emerging evidence consistently found the association between increased serum interleukin 6 level and DHR-related CRS, suggesting that interleukin 6 can be a novel biomarker, in addition to tryptase, to distinguish various types of DHRs. In the era of precision medicine, phenotyping and endotyping hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies using validated biomarkers should be part of routine drug allergy care.

Natural killer cells in COVID-19: from infection, to vaccination and therapy

Natural killer (NK) cells are among the most important innate immunity members, which are the first cells that fight against infected cells. The function of these cells is impaired in patients with COVID-19 and they are not able to prevent the spread of the disease or destroy the infected cells. Few studies have evaluated the effects of COVID-19 vaccines on NK cells, though it has been demonstrated that DNA vaccines and BNT162b2 can affect NK cell response. In the present paper, the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the NK cells during infection, the effect of vaccination on NK cells, and the NK cell-based therapies were reviewed.

Impact of dexamethasone and tocilizumab on hematological parameters in COVID-19 patients with chronic disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The most effective way to control severity and mortality rate of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is through sensitive diagnostic approaches and an appropriate treatment protocol. We aimed to identify the effect of adding corticosteroid and Tocilizumab to a standard treatment protocol in treating COVID-19 patients with chronic disease through hematological and lab biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed retrospectively on 68 COVID-19 patients with chronic disease who were treated by different therapeutic protocols. The patients were categorized into four groups: control group represented the patients' lab results at admission before treatment protocols were applied; group 1 included patients treated with anticoagulants, Hydroxychloroquine, and antibiotics; group 2 comprised patients treated with Dexamethasone; and group 3 included patients treated with Dexamethasone and Tocilizumab.

RESULTS

The WBC and neutrophil counts were increased significantly in group 3 upon the treatment when they were compared with patients in group 1 (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). The comparison of C-reactive Protein (CRP) level at admission was higher in group 3 than in group 1 with p = 0.030. After 10 days of treatment, CRP level was decreased in all groups, but in group 3 it was statistically significant (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The study paves the way into the effectiveness of combining Dexamethasone with Tocilizumab in treatment COVID-19 patients with chronic diseases.

Impact of dexamethasone and tocilizumab on hematological parameters in COVID-19 patients with chronic disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The most effective way to control severity and mortality rate of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is through sensitive diagnostic approaches and an appropriate treatment protocol. We aimed to identify the effect of adding corticosteroid and Tocilizumab to a standard treatment protocol in treating COVID-19 patients with chronic disease through hematological and lab biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed retrospectively on 68 COVID-19 patients with chronic disease who were treated by different therapeutic protocols. The patients were categorized into four groups: control group represented the patients' lab results at admission before treatment protocols were applied; group 1 included patients treated with anticoagulants, Hydroxychloroquine, and antibiotics; group 2 comprised patients treated with Dexamethasone; and group 3 included patients treated with Dexamethasone and Tocilizumab.

RESULTS

The WBC and neutrophil counts were increased significantly in group 3 upon the treatment when they were compared with patients in group 1 (p=0.004 and p=0.001, respectively). The comparison of C-reactive Protein (CRP) level at admission was higher in group 3 than in group 1 with p=0.030. After 10 days of treatment, CRP level was decreased in all groups, but in group 3 it was statistically significant (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

The study paves the way into the effectiveness of combining Dexamethasone with Tocilizumab in treatment COVID-19 patients with chronic diseases.

Drug-induced liver injury following the use of tocilizumab or sarilumab in patients with coronavirus disease 2019

BACKGROUNDS

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) blockers including tocilizumab and sarilumab were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2021 for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. The use of sarilumab or tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients has been related to a reduction in mortality compared to standard care. Recent evidence has emerged concerning drug-induced liver injury (DILI) after sarilumab or tocilizumab applications in COVID-19 patients.

AIMS

The study aimed to estimate DILI associated with sarilumab or tocilizumab in treating moderate to severe patients infected with SARS-Cov-2.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance study by data mining of the FDA's adverse event reporting systems (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2021 in confirmed COVID-19 patients. We analyzed DILI cases associated with tocilizumab or sarilumab in treating COVID-19 patients from the FAERS during this period. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis of COVID-19 patients were utilized for case analysis, and we also next compared the onset time and fatality rates of DILI following tocilizumab or sarilumab.

RESULTS

A total of 275 cases of TCZ or SAR-related DILI reports were extracted. A total of 192 AEs cases were related to tocilizumab (TCZ), and 83 were related to sarilumab (SAR). In patients treated with TCZ, most were < 75 years old (51.57%), with more male than female (46.35% vs. 13.02%). The correlation between IL-6 receptor antagonists and DILI was stronger in SAR (ROR = 12.94; 95%CI 9.6-17.44) than in TCZ (ROR = 1.33; 95%CI 1.14-1.55). The onset time of DILI was different between TCZ and SAR, and a significant difference was observed in TCZ than SAR (P < 0.0001). A significant difference was observed in the mortality rate of TCZ and SAR (P = 0.0009). DILI associated with COVID-19 patients treated with TCZ appeared to have earlier onset-time (1(0-46) day) VS. SAR (3.5(0-27) day).

CONCLUSION

This study shows strict monitor ought to be paid for TCZ or SAR when used for COVID-19 patients with poor liver function.

Evaluation of the Tocilizumab therapy in human cancers: Latest evidence and clinical potential

Tocilizumab (Actemra®), as the first human interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonist, has been used in treating moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who were undertreatment with one or more disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and did not improve significantly. Tocilizumab also has been administrated and confirmed in several inflammatory-based diseases. Recently, tocilizumab has been prescribed to treat patients with advanced coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and is used as one of the effective drugs in reducing the increased inflammation in these patients. On the other hand, cancer treatment has been considered by researchers one of the most important challenges to human health. Regarding inflammatory-associated malignancies, it has been shown that inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) may play a role in tumorigenesis, thus targeting these cytokines as evidence suggested can be useful in the treatment of these types of cancers. This review summarized the role of the IL-6/IL-6R axis in inflammation-based cancers and discussed the effectiveness and challenges of treating cancer with tocilizumab.

Modern Advances in CARs Therapy and Creating a New Approach to Future Treatment

Genetically engineered T and NK cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) are promising cytotoxic cells for the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Despite the successful therapies using CAR-T cells, they have some disadvantages, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, or graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). CAR-NK cells have lack or minimal cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, but also multiple mechanisms of cytotoxic activity. NK cells are suitable for developing an "off the shelf" therapeutic product that causes little or no graft versus host disease (GvHD), but they are more sensitive to apoptosis and have low levels of gene expression compared to CAR-T cells. To avoid these adverse effects, further developments need to be considered to enhance the effectiveness of adoptive cellular immunotherapy. A promising approach to enhance the effectiveness of adoptive cellular immunotherapy is overcoming terminal differentiation or senescence and exhaustion of T cells. In this case, EVs derived from immune cells in combination therapy with drugs may be considered in the treatment of cancer patients, especially effector T and NK cells-derived exosomes with the cytotoxic activity of their original cells.

The role of IL-6 in coronavirus, especially in COVID-19

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infects both people and animals and may cause significant respiratory problems, including lung illness: Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Swabs taken from the throat and nose of people who have the illness or are suspected of having it have shown this pathogenic virus. When SARS-CoV-2 infects the upper and lower respiratory tracts, it may induce moderate to severe respiratory symptoms, as well as the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin 6 (IL-6). COVID-19-induced reduction of IL-6 in an inflammatory state may have a hitherto undiscovered therapeutic impact. Many inflammatory disorders, including viral infections, has been found to be regulated by IL-6. In individuals with COVID-19, one of the primary inflammatory agents that causes inflammatory storm is IL-6. It promotes the inflammatory response of virus infection, including the virus infection caused by SARS-CoV-2, and provides a new diagnostic and therapeutic strategy. In this review article, we highlighted the functions of IL-6 in the coronavirus, especially in COVID-19, showing that IL-6 activation plays an important function in the progression of coronavirus and is a rational therapeutic goal for inflammation aimed at coronavirus.

Cardiovascular effects associated with chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies confirmed the marked efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) in many hematologic malignancies, severe cardiovascular toxicities remain to be a major obstacle when incorporating this technology. Furthermore, previous individual investigations regarding the cardiovascular toxicities of CAR-T cell therapy also reported controversial conclusions. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to further evaluate the impacts of CAR-T cell therapy on cardiovascular toxicities.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for eligible studies up to April 2022. All analyses were carried out using the R 4.1.0 software.

RESULTS

Eventually, 25 related studies consisting of 2,059 patients were enrolled in the current meta-analysis. We discovered that the pooled incidence rate of the all-cause mortality rate was 14.1% and that the pooled incidence rates of overall cardiovascular (CV) events and CV events with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade ≥ 2 were 25.6% and 14.2%, respectively. The pooled incidence of hypotension was 28.6%. Further analysis showed that the incidence rates of arrhythmias, cardiovascular dysfunction, heart failure (HF), CV deaths, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest, and other CV events were 19.2%, 8.0%, 5.3%, 1.8%, 2.5%, 2.9%, 1.3%, and 1.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cancer patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy were at risk for cardiovascular toxicities, of which the most common cardiovascular events were arrhythmias, cardiovascular dysfunction, and heart failure. These findings would contribute to achieving more rational and individualized use of CAR-T cells in clinical treatment.

A Computational Model of Cytokine Release Syndrome during CAR T-cell Therapy

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a lethal adverse event in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, hindering this promising therapy for cancers, such as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Clinical management of CRS requires a better understanding of its underlying mechanisms. In this study, a computational model of CRS during CAR T-cell therapy is built to depict how the cellular interactions among CAR T-cells, B-ALL cells, and bystander monocytes, as well as the accompanying molecular interactions among various inflammatory cytokines, influence the severity of CRS. The model successfully defines the factors related to severe CRS and studied the effects of immunomodulatory therapy on CRS. The use of the model is also demonstrated as a precision medicine tool to optimize the treatment scheme, including personalized choice of CAR T-cell products and control of switchable CAR T-cell activity, for a more efficient and safer immunotherapy. This new computational oncology model can serve as a precision medicine tool to guide the clinical management of CRS during CAR T cell therapy.

Emerging approaches for preventing cytokine release syndrome in CAR-T cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have demonstrated remarkable anti-tumor efficacy against hematological malignancies, such as leukemia and lymphoma. However, patients treated with CAR-T cells frequently experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS), one of the most life-threatening adverse events of the therapy induced by systemic concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines throughout the body. Immunosuppressants such as tocilizumab are currently administered to treat the onset and progression of CRS symptoms. In order to reduce the risk of CRS, newly designed next-generation CAR-T treatments are being developed for both hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumors. In this review, we discuss six classes of interesting approaches that control cytokine production of CAR-T cell therapy: adaptor-based strategies, orthogonal cytokine-receptor pairs, regulation of macrophage cytokine activity, autonomous neutralization of key cytokines, kill switches and methods of reversible suppression of CARs. With these strategies, future CAR-T cell therapies will be designed to preemptively inhibit CRS, minimize the patients' suffering, and maximize the number of benefiting patients.

Limited efficacy of tocilizumab in adult patients with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Interleukin (IL)-6 is one of the key cytokines in the pathogenesis of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH); however, the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal IL-6 receptor antibody, in patients with sHLH is uncertain.

Methods/Results

This study included 64 adult patients who were diagnosed with sHLH based on the HLH-2004 criteria. Patients were classified into two groups based on treatment regimen at baseline: tocilizumab (TCZ group, n = 8) versus other treatments (control group), including HLH-2004 protocol (n = 35), chemotherapy (n = 7), glucocorticoid alone (n = 8), and with other immunosuppressants (n = 6). Primary outcome was overall 8-week survival. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. At day 56, one patient (12.5%) in the TCZ group and twenty-eight patients (51.9%) in the control group survived. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that TCZ significantly increased the risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio 5.55; 95% CI 2.13–14.49). The complete or partial response rate at day 14 was 44.6% in the control group, and nil in the TCZ group. In contrast, infectious complications occurred more frequently in the TCZ group than in the control group (14.3% vs. 50.0%).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that tocilizumab has limited efficacy in treating adult patients with sHLH and could increase the risk of infectious complications compared to the conventional treatments.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-022-02516-1.

COLAR: open-label clinical study of IL-6 blockade with tocilizumab for the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis and arthritis

Background

Immune-related adverse events due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not always effectively treated using glucocorticoids and it may negatively affect the antitumor efficacy of ICIs. Interventional studies of alternatives to glucocorticoids are lacking. We examined whether interleukin-6 blockade by tocilizumab reduced ICI-induced colitis and arthritis.

Patients and methods

Patients with solid cancer experiencing Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0) grade >1 ICI-induced colitis/diarrhea (n=9), arthritis (n=9), or both (n=2) were recruited and treated with tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks until worsening or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were not allowed to receive systemic glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive drugs within the 14-day screening period. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement of colitis and arthritis, defined as ≥1 grade CTCAE reduction within 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints were improvements and glucocorticoid-free remission at week 24; safety; radiologic, endoscopic, and histological changes; and changes in plasma concentrations of C reactive protein, cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, and IL-17), and YKL-40.

Results

Nineteen patients were available for efficacy analysis; one patient was excluded due to pancreatic insufficiency-induced diarrhea. Patients received treatment with pembrolizumab (n=10) or nivolumab (n=4) as monotherapy or ipilimumab and nivolumab (n=5) combined. Seven patients had been initially treated with glucocorticoids, and two of them also received infliximab. Ten patients continued ICI therapy during tocilizumab treatment. The primary endpoint was achieved in 15 of 19 (79%) patients. Additional one patient had ≥1 grade reduction at week 10, and another patient had stabilized symptoms. At week 24, ongoing improvement without glucocorticoids (n=12), including complete remission (n=10), was noted. Five patients had grades 3–4 treatment-related adverse events, which were manageable and reversible.

Conclusions

Tocilizumab showed promising clinical efficacy and a manageable safety profile in the treatment of ICI-induced colitis and arthritis. Our findings support the feasibility of randomized trials of immune-related adverse events.

Trial registration number

NCT03601611.

Recent advances and clinical pharmacology aspects of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cellular therapy development

Advances in immuno-oncology have provided a variety of novel therapeutics that harness the innate immune system to identify and destroy neoplastic cells. It is noteworthy that acceptable safety profiles accompany the development of these targeted therapies, which result in efficacious cancer treatment with higher survival rates and lower toxicities. Adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) has shown promising results in inducing sustainable remissions in patients suffering from refractory diseases. Two main types of ACT include engineered Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cells and T cell receptor (TCR) T cells. The application of these immuno-therapies in the last few years has been successful and has demonstrated a safe and rapid treatment regimen for solid and non-solid tumors. The current review presents an insight into the clinical pharmacology aspects of immuno-therapies, especially CAR-T cells. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of TCR and CAR-T cell immunotherapy with particular focus on the structure of CAR-T cells, the effects and toxicities associated with these therapies in clinical trials, risk mitigation strategies, dose selection approaches, and cellular kinetics. Finally, the quantitative approaches and modeling techniques used in the development of CAR-T cell therapies are described.

Investigation of the risk factors to predict cytokine release syndrome in relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients receiving IL-6 knocking down anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy has achieved remarkable results in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL). However, the cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was presented in most patients as common toxicity and severe CRS (sCRS) characterized by the sharp increase in interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be life-threatening. We conducted a phase II clinical trial of ssCAR-T-19 cells, anti-CD19 CAR-T cells with shRNA targeting IL-6, in 61 patients with r/r B-ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03275493. Fifty-two patients achieved CR while nine patients were considered NR. The median duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS) were not reached (>50 months). CRS developed in 81.97% of patients, including 54.10% with grades 1 to 2 (grade 1, 31.15%; grade 2, 22.95%) and 27.87% with grades 3 to 4 (grade 3, 26.23%; grade 4, 1.64%). sCRS occurs earlier than mild CRS (mCRS). A multivariable analysis of baseline characteristics identified high bone marrow disease burden and poor genetic risk before infusion as independent risk factors for sCRS. After infusion, patients with sCRS exhibited larger expansion of ssCAR-T-19 cells, higher peak levels of IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ, and suffered more severe hematological and non-hematological toxicities compared with those with mCRS.

Adverse Renal Effects of Anticancer Immunotherapy: A Review

Modern oncological therapy utilizes various types of immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) therapy, cancer vaccines, tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies (TT-mAbs), bispecific antibodies and cytokine therapy improve patients' outcomes. However, stimulation of the immune system, beneficial in terms of fighting against cancer, generates the risk of harm to other cells in a patient's body. Kidney damage belongs to the relatively rare adverse events (AEs). Best described, but still, superficially, are renal AEs in patients treated with ICIs. International guidelines issued by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) cover the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during ICI therapy. There are fewer data concerning real occurrence and possible presentations of renal adverse drug reactions of other immunotherapeutic methods. This implies the need for the collection of safety data during ongoing clinical trials and in the real-life world to characterize the hazard related to the use of new immunotherapies and management of irAEs.

Comparing the Cytokine Storms of COVID-19 and Pandemic Influenza

Emerging respiratory viruses are major health threats due to their potential to cause massive outbreaks. Over the past 2 years, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused millions of cases of severe infection and deaths worldwide. Although natural and vaccine-induced protective immune mechanisms against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been increasingly identified, the factors that determine morbimortality are less clear. Comparing the immune signatures of COVID-19 and other severe respiratory infections such as the pandemic influenza might help dissipate current controversies about the origin of their severe manifestations. As such, identifying homologies in the immunopathology of both diseases could provide targets for immunotherapy directed to block shared pathogenic mechanisms. Meanwhile, finding unique characteristics that differentiate each infection could shed light on specific immune alterations exploitable for diagnostic and individualized therapeutics for each case. In this study, we summarize immunopathological aspects of COVID-19 and pandemic influenza from the perspective of cytokine storms as the driving force underlying morbidity. Thereby, we analyze similarities and differences in the cytokine profiles of both infections, aiming to bring forward those molecules more attractive for translational medicine and drug development.

Comprehensive Cytokine Profiling of Patients with COVID-19 Receiving Tocilizumab Therapy

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by immune activation in response to viral spread, in severe cases leading to the development of cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) and increased mortality. Despite its importance in prognosis, the pathophysiological mechanisms of CSS in COVID-19 remain to be defined. Towards this goal, we analyzed cytokine profiles and their interrelation in regard to anti-cytokine treatment with tocilizumab in 98 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We performed a multiplex measurement of 41 circulating cytokines in the plasma of patients on admission and 3-5 days after, during the follow-up. Then we analyzed the patient groups separated in two ways: according to the clusterization of their blood cytokines and based on the administration of tocilizumab therapy. Patients with and without CSS formed distinct clusters according to their cytokine concentration changes. However, the tocilizumab therapy, administered based on the standard clinical and laboratory criteria, did not fully correspond to those clusters of CSS. Furthermore, among all cytokines, IL-6, IL-1RA, IL-10, and G-CSF demonstrated the most prominent differences between patients with and without clinical endpoints, while only IL-1RA was prognostically significant in both groups of patients with and without tocilizumab therapy, decreasing in the former and increasing in the latter during the follow-up period. Thus, CSS in COVID-19, characterized by a correlated release of multiple cytokines, does not fully correspond to the standard parameters of disease severity. Analysis of the cytokine signature, including the IL-1RA level in addition to standard clinical and laboratory parameters may be useful to define the onset of a cytokine storm in COVID-19 as well as the indications for anti-cytokine therapy.

Interleukin Inhibitors in Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurotoxicity Secondary to CAR-T Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an innovative therapeutic option for addressing certain recurrent or refractory hematological malignancies. However, CAR-T cells also cause the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines that lead to life-threatening cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity.

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of interleukin inhibitors in addressing cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity secondary to CAR-T therapy.

METHODOLOGY

The authors conducted a bibliographic review in which 10 articles were analyzed. These included cut-off studies, case reports, and clinical trials involving 11 cancer centers and up to 475 patients over 18 years of age.

RESULTS

Tocilizumab is the only interleukin inhibitor approved to address CRS secondary to CAR-T therapy due to its efficacy and safety. Other inhibitors, such as siltuximab and anakinra, could be useful in combination with tocilizumab for preventing severe cytokine release and neurotoxicity. In addition, the new specific inhibitors could be effective in mitigating CRS without affecting the cytotoxic efficacy of CAR-T therapy.

CONCLUSION

More lines of research should be opened to elucidate the true implications of these drugs in treating the side effects of CAR-T therapy.

Biobehavioral Implications of Covid-19 for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Recipients

A growing body of literature has emphasized the importance of biobehavioral processes - defined as the interaction of behavior, psychology, socioenvironmental factors, and biological processes - for clinical outcomes among transplantation and cellular therapy (TCT) patients. TCT recipients are especially vulnerable to distress associated with pandemic conditions and represent a notably immunocompromised group at greater risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection with substantially worse outcomes. The summation of both the immunologic and psychologic vulnerability of TCT patients renders them particularly susceptible to adverse biobehavioral sequelae associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. Stress and adverse psychosocial factors alter neural and endocrine pathways through sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis signaling that ultimately affect gene regulation in immune cells. Reciprocally, global inflammation and immune dysregulation related to TCT contribute to dysregulation of neuroendocrine and central nervous system function, resulting in the symptom profile of depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and cognitive dysfunction. In this article, we draw upon literature on immunology, psychology, neuroscience, hematology and oncology, Covid-19 pathophysiology, and TCT processes to discuss how they may intersect to influence TCT outcomes, with the goal of providing an overview of the significance of biobehavioral factors in understanding the relationship between Covid-19 and TCT, now and for the future. We discuss the roles of depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep, social isolation and loneliness, and neurocognitive impairment, as well as specific implications for sub-populations of interest, including pediatrics, caregivers, and TCT donors. Finally, we address protective psychological processes that may optimize biobehavioral outcomes affected by Covid-19.

Therapeutic roles of CAR T cells in infectious diseases: Clinical lessons learnt from cancer

Cancer immunotherapy has made improvements due to the advances in chimaeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell development, offering a promising treatment option for patients who have failed to respond to traditional treatments. In light of the successful use of adoptive CAR T cell therapy for cancer, researchers have been inspired to develop CARs for the treatment of other diseases beyond cancers such as viral infectious diseases. Nonetheless, various obstacles limit the efficacy of CAR T cell therapies and prevent their widespread usage. Severe toxicities, poor in vivo persistence, antigen escape, and heterogeneity, as well as off-target effect, are key challenges that must all be addressed to broaden the application of CAR T cells to a wider spectrum of diseases. The key advances in CAR T cell treatment for cancer and viral infections are reviewed in this article. We will also discuss revolutionary CAR T cell products developed to improve and enhance the therapeutic advantages of these treatments.

The effect of tocilizumab on patient reported outcomes and inflammatory biomarkers in hematopoietic cell transplantation

Inflammatory physiology has been linked to behavioral and emotional symptoms in a variety of contexts and experimental paradigms. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) represents an intersection of significant immune dysregulation and psychosocial stress, and this biobehavioral relationship can influence important clinical outcomes. For those undergoing HCT with inflammation-related neuropsychiatric symptoms, using targeted agents such as the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab may be an effective therapeutic approach. We conducted an observational cohort study to explore patient reported outcomes (PROs) and inflammatory biomarkers among allogeneic HCT recipients who received tocilizumab compared to those who did not. Individuals on a larger trial of tocilizumab for prevention of graft-versus-host disease received a single dose of tocilizumab 24 h prior to stem cell infusion. Measures of anxiety, depression, pain, fatigue, and sleep quality and parallel blood samples for inflammatory cytokines were collected from participants and an analogous comparison cohort at baseline and Day 28 after stem cell infusion. Demographic and medical characteristics were reported; an analysis of covariance regression model was fitted to evaluate differences in PROs and distance correlation t-tests assessed for associations between biomarkers and PRO measures. For n = 18 tocilizumab-treated and n = 22 comparison patients, there were no significant differences between patient demographics, but the tocilizumab cohort had a different distribution of primary diagnoses (p = 0.009) with more patients with leukemias and a higher proportion of patients in their first remission (64% vs 28%, p = 0.024). Depression was higher at Day 28 compared to baseline in both groups (comparison group: +5.1 [95% CI 0.14-10, p = 0.045], tocilizumab: +8.6 [95% CI 2.3-15, p = 0.011]), though the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance. The tocilizumab group had significantly increased circulating IL-6 and decreased CRP at Day 28 (all p < 0.05). There was an association between collective baseline biomarkers and PROs (distance correlation dCor = 0.110, p = 0.005), but this same association was not present at Day 28 (dCor = -0.001, p = 0.5). In univariate analyses, a 10-fold increase in plasma IL-6 was associated with a 3.6-point higher depression score (95% CI 1.0-6.2, p = 0.008). In this exploratory analysis of PROs and inflammatory biomarkers in patients undergoing HCT, tocilizumab was not associated with favorable patient-reported symptom profiles. This finding is aligned with our prior work in the HCT population but diverges from hypothesized therapeutic effects of tocilizumab on depressive symptoms, thus highlighting the need for larger prospective translational studies in biobehavioral HCT research.

Neurotoxicity Associated with Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy is a milestone in the treatment of poor-prognosis pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is expected to improve treatment outcomes and reduce doses of conventional chemotherapy without compromising the effectiveness of the therapy. However, both chemotherapy and immunotherapy cause side effects, including neurological ones. Acute neurological complications occur in 3.6–11% of children treated for ALL. The most neurotoxical chemotherapeutics are L-asparaginase (L-ASP), methotrexate (MTX), vincristine (VCR), and nelarabine (Ara-G). Neurotoxicity associated with methotrexate (MTX-NT) occurs in 3–7% of children treated for ALL and is characterized by seizures, stroke-like symptoms, speech disturbances, and encephalopathy. Recent studies indicate that specific polymorphisms in genes related to neurogenesis may have a predisposition to MTX toxicity. One of the most common complications associated with CAR T-cell therapy is immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Mechanisms of neurotoxicity in CAR T-cell therapy are still unknown and may be due to disruption of the blood–brain barrier and the effects of elevated cytokine levels on the central nervous system (CNS). In this review, we present an analysis of the current knowledge on the mechanisms of neurotoxicity of standard chemotherapy and the targeted therapy in children with ALL.

Monoclonal antibodies used for the management of haematological disorders

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies Ab (MoAb) are increasingly becoming part of therapeutic armamentarium for haematologists and haemato-oncologists. This review brings together commonly used antibodies in one place for brevity and novel understanding.

AREAS COVERED

Pubmed and Scopus databases were explored focusing on MoAb in clinical haematological practice. Emphasis was given to current review articles. The data base was searched from 1997 till present. 24 different antibodies, most of which are in use were discussed. Antibodies are used for diverse conditions i.e. malignant and benign haematological conditions, treatment at various phases of stem cell transplantation. These antibodies were used both alone or in combination with various chemotherapy, targeted small molecules or as immunoconjugates. Some of the side effect profiles of these antibodies were common and some were unique. Unusual infections or organ dysfunctions were noted. Improved function of antibodies by protein engineering is also advancing rapidly. Dosage, frequency and route of administration depended on the convenience and condition for which the antibody is used.

EXPERT OPINION

: MoAbs are increasingly used in haematology practice either alone or in combination with other types of therapy for improved out come in various haematological conditions.

Does Tocilizumab Influence the Outcome of Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Compared to the Standard Therapy? Retrospective Analysis of Data Obtained during Phase I COVID Pandemic

BACKGROUND: No gold standard therapy was approved globally for COVID-19 pneumonia to the date of this study. The pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection displayed the predominance of hyperinflammation and immune dysregulation in inducing multiorgan damage. Therefore, the potential benefits of both immune modulation and suppression in COVID-19 have been extensively discussed as a modality to control cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Abnormally high levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) are a common finding in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome, so the use of IL-6 antagonist was tested as a therapeutic option in controlling the disease. Tocilizumab is a recombinant humanized anti-human IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody that can specifically bind the membrane-bound IL-6 receptor and soluble IL-6 receptor, thereby inhibiting signal transduction. Tocilizumab is currently FDA approved for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, giant cell arthritis, polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. This study is a retrospective analysis of data polled during Phase I of COVID pandemic, adopted by the isolation hospital of Kasr Al-Ainy Medical School, Cairo University, during the period from May to September 2020. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate tocilizumab influence in the outcome; in terms of reducing the hospital stay, risk and duration of mechanical ventilation (invasive and noninvasive), mortality, and the incidence of complications related to drugs use (secondary bacterial infection and GIT bleeding) in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study included adults (between 18 and 80 years) with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia, who were admitted to isolation hospital of Kasr Al-Ainy Medical School, Cairo University, between May and September 2020. We segregated the patients into two groups: Group A: In addition to the standard care protocol according to the local guidelines of the Egyptian Ministry of Health and Population in that period (supplemental oxygen, steroids in a dose of 1–2 mg/kg methylprednisolone for 5–10 days, broad-spectrum antibiotics, vitamins, and prophylactic dose of anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin, proton-pump inhibitor, and poly-vitamins), they received tocilizumab intravenously in a dose of 8 mg/kg bodyweight (up to a maximum of 800 mg per dose), divided in two shots 12–24 h apart. Group B: Those received the standard care protocol alone, noting that guidelines were adjusted later on according to the updated scientific publications and WHO recommendations. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the effect of different regimens in controlling the disease, the need for mechanical ventilation and its duration (either invasive or non-invasive), length of ICU stay, hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test. For comparison of serial measurements within each patient, the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. For comparing categorical data, Chi-square (2) test was performed. Exact test was used instead when the expected frequency was <5. Correlations between quantitative variables were done using Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: During this period, 166 patients were admitted to ICU, suffering from severe hypoxemia with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia, 10 of them were excluded (three were over 80 years old, other three had advanced stages of malignancy, two were on steroids therapy and non-invasive home ventilation due to chronic chest condition, and two were presented with MODs and deceased in <48 h from admission), thus, 156 were included in the study. Group A: Seventy-six patients (49%) received tocilizumab in addition to standard therapy, Group B: Eighty patients (51%) received standard therapy only. In Group A, the mean length of ICU stay was 8.96 days with mean length of hospital stay 13.76, compared to mean length of ICU stay 9 days in Group B (p = 0.57) and mean length of hospital stay 12.46 days (p = 0.117). In Group A, 35 patients (46%) needed non-invasive mechanical ventilation (MV),12 patients of the 35 needed invasive MV in later stage, compared to 26 patients (32%) in Group B, 14 patients of the 26 needed invasive MV in later stage (p = 0.16). In Group A, 14 patients (18.4%) needed invasive mechanical ventilation, compared to 19 patients (23.7%) in Group B (p = 0.213). In Group A, 6 (7.9%) of 76 patients died, compared to 13 (16.3%) of 80 in Group B p = 0.11. The incidence of secondary bacterial infection in Group A was 16 patients (21%) compared to 21 (26%) in Group B (p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: In this study, we did not detect statistical difference in both groups of patients coming during CRS-associated COVID-19 pneumonia, regarding (ICU stay, need for and length of MV, the incidence of secondary bacterial infection, and in-hospital mortality) for COVID-19 moderate-to-severe pneumonia.

A Systematic Review Assessing the Underrepresentation of Cancer Patients in COVID-19 Trials

BACKGROUND

The new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has emerged as a global pandemic that threatens thousands around the world. Observational cohort studies have demonstrated that cancer patients have inferior outcomes due to underlying malignancy, treatment-related immunosuppression, or increased comorbidities. We aimed to examine the representation of cancer patients (hematological malignancies and solid tumors) in COVID-19 therapeutic and prophylactic interventional trials.

METHODS

In this review, all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between December 2019 and August 2021 were included. We included only trials evaluating medications that were recommended by NIH guidelines: steroids, tocilizumab, remdesivir, and REGN-COV2.

RESULTS

The search yielded 541 potentially relevant RCTs, 22 of which were considered suitable. All trials included patients with solid cancer and hematological malignancies in the formal reported inclusion criteria. However, only two trials reported the accurate number of cancer patients included. Ten trials excluded neutropenic patients and seven trials excluded thrombocytopenic patients. Eleven trials excluded patients that were treated with any immunosuppression treatment. None of the two trials that included cancer patients reported separate outcomes for this population.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review shows that cancer patients are underrepresented in COVID-19 interventional therapeutic trials, and evidence regarding outcomes are lacking.

Tocilizumab is useful for coronavirus disease 2019 patients: the key point is timing

OBJECTIVE

In coronavirus disease 2019, a rapidly progressive inflammatory process is considered to be the main cause of organ damage and mortality. Therefore, the importance of anti-inflammatory treatments such as tocilizumab is increasing.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients who received tocilizumab between March 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. The primary termination point was mortality. We compared surviving and deceased patients by the stage of the disease and where the drug was given (service or intensive care unit).

RESULTS

The mean age was 60.8±14.6 years (minimum 29 years, maximum 96 years). According to the WHO staging system, 16 (15%) patients had moderate, 47 (43.9%) patients had severe, 44 (41.1%) patients had a critical illness. Although all patients were admitted to the service, 26 (24.3%) patients received tocilizumab in the intensive care unit. Of 107 patients, 80 (74.7%) survived and 27 (25.2%) died. Mortality was found to be significantly higher in critical patients (96.3%), severe patients (3.7%), and moderate patients (0%) (p<0.001). Peripheral oxygen saturation measured at admission was found to be significantly lower in patients who died. The initial saturations (p=0.008) were found to have independent effects on mortality.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that tocilizumab is an effective treatment option for coronavirus disease 2019 disease and reduces mortality, but the key point is timing.

Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment of Glioblastoma: Where Are We to Date?

The clinical management of glioblastoma (GBM) is still bereft of treatments able to significantly improve the poor prognosis of the disease. Despite the extreme clinical need for novel therapeutic drugs, only a small percentage of patients with GBM benefit from inclusion in a clinical trial. Moreover, often clinical studies do not lead to final interpretable conclusions. From the mistakes and negative results obtained in the last years, we are now able to plan a novel generation of clinical studies for patients with GBM, allowing the testing of multiple anticancer agents at the same time. This assumes critical importance, considering that, thanks to improved knowledge of altered molecular mechanisms related to the disease, we are now able to propose several potential effective compounds in patients with both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Among the novel compounds assessed, the initially great enthusiasm toward trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was disappointing due to the negative results that emerged in three randomized phase III trials. However, novel biological insights into the disease suggest that immunotherapy can be a convincing and effective treatment in GBM even if ICIs failed to prolong the survival of these patients. In this regard, the most promising approach consists of engineered immune cells such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T, CAR M, and CAR NK alone or in combination with other treatments. In this review, we discuss several issues related to systemic treatments in GBM patients. First, we assess critical issues toward the planning of clinical trials and the strategies employed to overcome these obstacles. We then move on to the most relevant interventional studies carried out on patients with previously untreated (newly diagnosed) GBM and those with recurrent and pretreated disease. Finally, we investigate novel immunotherapeutic approaches with special emphasis on preclinical and clinical data related to the administration of engineered immune cells in GBM.

Clinical Significance of Haplo-Fever and Cytokine Profiling After Graft Infusion in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation From Haplo-Identical Donors

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation from haplo-identical donors (haplo-HSCT) has become a well-established therapeutic option for hematological malignancies. The fever of unknown origin (haplo-fever) early after the infusion of T cell repleted graft, which returned to normal right after post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), is a unique clinical feature in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT. In the current study, the characteristics of haplo-fever and cytokine profiles during haplo-fever were retrospectively analyzed in a cohort of 37 patients undergoing T cell repleted haplo-HSCT with PTCy as graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. In total, 33 patients (89.2%) developed haplo-fever from day 0 to day +7. Patients with high peak temperatures tended to have a lower incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) (p = 0.07), moderate to severe cGvHD (p = 0.08), and superior GvHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS, p = 0.04). During the haplo-fever, there were significant increases in multiple cytokines, such as interferon gamma, interleukin (IL) 6, IL2, IL2 receptor, IL8, IL10, IL17, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF). The increases in IL2 receptor (p = 0.037) and TNF (p < 0.001) on day +4 were correlated with the lower risk of cGvHD. Increased TNF > 1.8055-fold on day +4 was the best predictive threshold for cGvHD, and was correlated with a lower incidence of cGvHD (p < 0.001), moderate to severe cGvHD (p = 0.003), and superior GRFS (p < 0.001). These observations may reflect the early reactivation of donor T cells after haplo graft infusion, which would potentially be eliminated by PTCy. Further studies with larger independent cohorts of patients are warranted, to clarify the clinical significance of haplo-fever, and day +4 TNF as a potential biomarker to predict GvHD and GRFS.

Genetic Therapy and Molecular Targeted Therapy in Oncology: Safety, Pharmacovigilance, and Perspectives for Research and Clinical Practice

The impressive advances in the knowledge of biomarkers and molecular targets has enabled significant progress in drug therapy for crucial diseases such as cancer. Specific areas of pharmacology have contributed to these therapeutic outcomes—mainly targeted therapy, immunomodulatory therapy, and gene therapy. This review focuses on the pharmacological profiles of these therapeutic classes and intends, on the one hand, to provide a systematic definition and, on the other, to highlight some aspects related to pharmacovigilance, namely the monitoring of safety and the identification of potential toxicities and adverse drug reactions. Although clinicians often consider pharmacovigilance a non-priority area, it highlights the risk/benefit ratio, an essential factor, especially for these advanced therapies, which represent the most innovative and promising horizon in oncology.