Epicardial substrate and outcome with epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Ablation strategies for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) has significantly evolved over the past decade. However, different ablation strategies showed inconsistency in acute and long-term outcomes.

Methods

We searched the databases of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library through October 17, 2019 for studies describing the clinical outcomes of VT ablation in ARVC. Data including VT recurrence, all-cause mortality, acute procedural efficacy and major procedural complications were extracted. A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis was further performed in comparative studies of endo-epicardial versus endocardial-only ablation.

Results

A total of 24 studies with 717 participants were enrolled. The literatures of epicardial ablation were mainly published after 2010 with total ICD implantation of 73.7%, acute efficacy of 89.8%, major complication of 5.2%, follow-up of 28.9 months, VT freedom of 75.3%, all-cause mortality of 1.1% and heart transplantation of 0.6%. Meta-analysis of 10 comparative studies revealed that compared with endocardial-only approach, epicardial ablation significantly decreased VT recurrence (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.30-0.85; P = 0.010), but somehow increased major procedural complications (OR: 4.64; 95% CI: 1.28-16.92; P= 0.02), with not evident improvement of acute efficacy (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 0.98-7.65; P = 0.051) or all-cause mortality (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.09-8.31; P = 0.90).

Conclusion

Catheter ablation for VT in ARVC is feasible and effective. Epicardial ablation is associated with better long-term VT freedom, but with more major complications and unremarkable survival or acute efficacy benefit.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Diagnosis

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, formerly called "arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia," is an under-recognized clinical entity characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and a characteristic ventricular pathology. Diagnosis is often difficult due to the nonspecific nature of the disease and the broad spectrum of phenotypic variations. Therefore, consensus diagnostic criteria have been developed which combine electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and histologic criteria. In 1994, an international task force first proposed the major and minor diagnostic criteria of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy based on family history, arrhythmias, electrocardiographic abnormalities, tissue characterization, and structural and functional right ventricular abnormalities. In 2010, the task force criteria were revised to include quantitative abnormalities. These diagnostic modalities and the most recent task force criteria are discussed in this review.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Right bundle branch block ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy more commonly originates from the right ventricle: Criteria for identifying chamber of origin

BACKGROUND

Right bundle branch block (RBBB) ventricular tachycardia (VT) morphology is a criterion for left ventricular (LV) involvement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and chamber of origin of RBBB VT in patients with ARVC and VT.

METHODS

We studied 110 consecutive patients with VT who met the diagnostic International Task Force criteria for ARVC and underwent VT mapping/ablation. Patients with ≥1 RBBB VT were identified. Right ventricular (RV) origin of the RBBB VT was determined based on standard mapping criteria and elimination with ablation.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (17%) had 26 RBBB VTs. Eleven of these 19 patients (58%) had 16 RBBB VTs from the RV, and 9 patients (47%) had 10 RBBB VTs originating from the LV, with 1 patient demonstrating both. RBBB VT from RV most commonly (13/16 RBBB VTs) had an early precordial QRS transition (V₂ or V₃), with superiorly and typically leftward directed frontal plane axis, consistent with exit from dilated RV adjacent to inferior LV septum, whereas all 10 VTs from LV had RBBB morphology with positive R waves to V₅ or V₆ and rightward axis in 6 VTs characteristic of basal lateral origin.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ARVC and VT presenting for VT ablation, RBBB VT occurs in 17% of cases, with most RBBB VTs (62%) originating from the RV and not indicative of LV origin. Precordial R-wave transition and frontal plane axis can be used to identify the anticipated chamber of origin of RBBB VT.

Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited heart muscle disease characterized by progressive fibrofatty replacement of the myocardium, right ventricular enlargement, and malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be seen in all stages of the disease and is associated with sudden cardiac death. In patients who failed anti-arrhythmic medical therapy, catheter ablation has become an attractive therapeutic option to reduce VT burden and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions. In this article, the authors aim to address the overall concepts of epicardial catheter ablation in ARVC, focusing on substrate characterization and ablation strategies.

Epicardial Ablation in Nonischemic Ventricular Tachyardia

In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, epicardial ablation is critical in targeting epicardial paravalvular substrate. Epicardial access and ablation can be performed safely with attention to epicardial structures, such as the coronary arteries, phrenic nerve, and epicardial fat. This review explores the indications, techniques, complications, and outcomes of epicardial ablation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Although epicardial ablation adds to the complexity and risk of the ablation procedure, it is a vital tool that, combined with endocardial mapping and ablation, improves outcomes in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy suffering from ventricular arrhythmias.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: A Sequential Approach

Background

It has been suggested that endocardial and epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) improves outcome in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. We investigated our sequential approach for VT ablation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia in a single center.

Methods and Results

We included 47 patients (44±16 years) with definite (81%) or borderline (19%) arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia between 1998 and 2016. Our ablation strategy was to target the endocardial substrate. Epicardial ablation was performed in case of acute ablation failure or lack of an endocardial substrate. Single and multiple procedural 1‐ and 5‐year outcome data for the first occurrence of the study end points (sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation, heart transplant, and death after the index procedure, and sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation for multiple procedures) are reported. Eighty‐one radiofrequency ablation procedures were performed (mean 1.7 per patient, range 1–4). Forty‐five (56%) ablation procedures were performed via an endocardial, 11 (13%) via an epicardial, and 25 (31%) via a combined endo‐ and epicardial approach. Complete acute success was achieved in 65 (80%) procedures, and partial success in 13 (16%). After a median follow‐up of 50.8 (interquartile range, [18.6; 99.2]) months after the index procedure, 17 (36%) patients were free from the primary end point. After multiple procedures, freedom from sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation was 63% (95% CI, 52–75) at 1 year, and 45% (95% CI, 34–61) at 5 years, with 36% of patients receiving only endocardial radiofrequency ablation. A trend (log rank P=0.058) towards an improved outcome using a combined endo‐/epicardial approach was observed after multiple procedures.

Conclusion

Endocardial ablation can be effective in a considerable number of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia patients with VT, potentially obviating the need for an epicardial approach.

Endo-epicardial ablation vs endocardial ablation for the management of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The pathologic process of ARVC (arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy) typically originates in the epicardium or subepicardial layers with progression toward endocardium. However, in the most recent ARVC international task force consensus statement, epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is recommended as a Class I indication only in patients with at least one failed endocardial VT ablation attempt.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of ARVC patients undergoing combined endo-epicardial VT ablation, as compared to endocardial ablation alone.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was performed for studies reporting clinical outcomes of endo-epicardial VT ablation vs endocardial-only VT ablation in patients with ARVC. Fixed-Effect model was used if I₂ < 25 and the Random-Effects Model was used if I₂ ≥ 25%.

RESULTS

Nine studies consisting of 452 patients were included (mean age 42.3 ± 5.7 years; 70% male). After a mean follow-up of 48.1 ± 21.5 months, endo-epicardial ablation was associated with 42% relative risk reduction in VA recurrence as opposed to endocardial ablation alone (risk ratio [RR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.75; P < .0001). No significant differences were noted between endo-epicardial and endocardial VT ablation groups in terms of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.03-47.08; P = .93) and acute procedural complications (RR, 5.39; 95% CI, 0.60-48.74; P = .13).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that in patients with ARVC, endo-epicardial VT ablation is associated with a significant reduction in VA recurrence as opposed to endocardial ablation alone, without a significant difference in all-cause mortality or acute procedural complications.

Patient Selection for Epicardial Ablation-Part I: The Role of Epicardial Ablation in Various Cardiac Disease States

Epicardial catheter ablation is most commonly performed following unsuccessful endocardial ablation. Given the frequency of epicardial substrates in certain cardiomyopathic disease states, however, a combined endocardial–epicardial approach should be considered as a primary treatment strategy. Although epicardial ablation is primarily deployed in patients with ventricular arrhythmias, the role of epicardial approaches in supraventricular tachycardias (eg, atrial fibrillation, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and—rarely—accessory pathways) is growing, with continued advances being made.

Catheter ablation of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia: 18-year experience in 284 patients

Aims

The study aims to describe the long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in a large cohort arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients.

Methods and results

Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 284 ARVC patients due to VT between July 2000 and January 2019. An endocardial approach was used initially, with epicardial ablation procedures reserved for those patients who failed an endocardial ablation. Activation, entrainment, pace and substrate mapping strategies were used with regional ablation applied. A total of 393 ablation procedures were performed including endocardial approach only (n = 377) and endo and epicardial combined (n = 16). Right ventricular basal free wall was accounted as the primary substrate of VT in 258 (65.6%) patients. There were 81 patients underwent redo ablation procedure (second time = 81; ≥3 times = 28). New targets were observed in 68.8% of redo procedures. There were 171 VT recurrences and 19 deaths occurred during the follow-up. Ventricular tachycardia-free survival rate of the first, second, and last ablation procedure was 56.7%, 73.2%, and 78.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed ≥3 induced VTs in the procedure was correlated with rehospitalized VT recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) 1.467, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.052–2.046; P = 0.024]. For all-cause mortality, rehospitalized VT and ≥3 induced VTs were the independent risk factors (HR 2.954, 95% CI 1.8068.038; P = 0.034; HR 3.189, 95% CI 1.073–9.482; P = 0.037).

Conclusion

Endocardial ablation is effective to ARVC VT though it may require repeated procedures. Induced multiple VTs was correlated with worse outcomes.

Incidence, Predictors, and Success of Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (from the Nordic ARVC Registry)

Catheter ablation may reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients. However, little is known about factors predicting need for ablation. Therefore, we sought to investigate predictors and use of VT ablation and to evaluate the postprocedural outcome in ARVC patients. We studied 435 patients from the Nordic ARVC registry including 220 probands with definite ARVC according to the 2010 task force criteria and 215 mutation-carrying relatives identified through cascade screening. Patients were followed until first-time VT ablation, death, heart transplantation, or January 1st 2018. Additionally, patients undergoing VT ablation were further followed from the time of ablation for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. The cumulative use of VT ablation was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3% to 6%) and 11% (95% CI 8% to 15%) after 1 and 10 years. All procedures were performed in probands in whom cumulative use was 8% (95% CI 5% to 12%) and 20% (95% CI 15% to 26%). In adjusted analyses among probands, only young age predicted ablation. In patients undergoing ablation, risk of recurrent arrhythmias was 59% (95% CI 44% to 71%) and 74% (95% CI 59% to 84%) 1 and 5 years after the procedure. Despite high recurrence rates, the burden of ventricular arrhythmias was reduced after ablation (p = 0.0042). Young age, use of several antiarrhythmic drugs and inducibility to VT after ablation were associated with an unfavorable outcome. In conclusion, twenty percent of ARVC probands developed a clinical indication for VT ablation within 10 years whereas mutation-carrying relatives were without such need. Although the burden of ventricular arrhythmias decreased after ablation, risk of recurrence was substantial.

Catheter and Device Management of Inherited Cardiac Conditions

This state-of-the art review discusses sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification and prevention using implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy and the place of catheter ablation in the major inherited cardiomyopathies and primary arrhythmic syndromes. ICD therapy protects against SCD in many inherited cardiac conditions, particularly the cardiomyopathies in advanced stages, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). However, they are not usually indicated in most patients with cardiac ion channelopathies, particularly long QT syndrome, since medical management is safe and preferable for most cases. The general exception is the secondary prevention setting following a cardiac arrest, where guidelines mostly support ICD therapy. However, in the case of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), ICD therapy is less clear, with some studies indicating increased mortality when an ICD is used following a cardiac arrest, compared to optimal medical therapy alone. When ICDs are placed, they are commonly associated with morbidity, and do not reduce the burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), such that multiple ICD shocks can ensue. Catheter ablation has been shown to reduce VA burden, VA related symptoms and ICD therapy in correctly identified patients in each condition. Its role is particularly important in cases where monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is prevalent, such as Lamin-related dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ARVC. Evidence is growing to support the use of catheter ablation to treat premature ventricular contraction (PVC) induced VF in the setting of long and short QT syndromes, CPVT, idiopathic VF and early repolarisation syndromes. In Brugada syndrome, epicardial substrate ablation can even apparently eliminate the electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotype and reduce VA burden during follow-up.

Characterization of Structural Changes in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy With Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia After Ablation: Insights From Repeat Electroanatomic Voltage Mapping

BACKGROUND

Data characterizing structural changes of arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy are limited.

METHODS

Patients presenting with left bundle branch block ventricular tachycardia in the setting of arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy with procedures separated by at least 9 months were included.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive patients (84% males; mean age 39±15 years [range, 20-76 years]) were included. All 19 patients underwent 2 detailed sinus rhythm electroanatomic endocardial voltage maps (average 385±177 points per map; range, 93-847 points). Time interval between the initial and repeat ablation procedures was mean 50±37 months (range, 9-162). No significant progression of voltage was observed (bipolar: 38 cm² [interquartile range (IQR), 25-54] versus 53 cm² [IQR, 25-65], P=0.09; unipolar: 116 cm² [IQR, 61-209] versus 159 cm² [IQR, 73-204], P=0.36) for the entire study group. There was a significant increase in RV volumes (percentage increase, 28%; 206 mL [IQR, 170-253] versus 263 mL [IQR, 204-294], P<0.001) for the entire study population. Larger scars at baseline but not changes over time were associated with a significant increase in RV volume (bipolar: Spearman ρ, 0.6965, P=0.006; unipolar: Spearman ρ, 0.5743, P=0.03). Most patients with progressive RV dilatation (8/14, 57%) had moderate (2 patients) or severe (6 patients) tricuspid regurgitation recorded at either initial or repeat ablation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy presenting with recurrent ventricular tachycardia, >10% increase in RV endocardial surface area of bipolar voltage consistent with scar is uncommon during the intermediate term. Most recurrent ventricular tachycardias are localized to regions of prior defined scar. Voltage indexed scar area at baseline but not changes in scar over time is associated with progressive increase in RV size and is consistent with adverse remodeling but not scar progression. Marked tricuspid regurgitation is frequently present in patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy who have progressive RV dilation.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of diseases of the myocardium that have a distinct proclivity to ventricular arrhythmias. Of these, ventricular tachycardias pose significant management challenges with the risk of sudden cardiac death and morbidity from multiple causes. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias is becoming an increasingly utilised intervention that has been found to have significant benefits with improving symptoms, reducing anti-arrhythmic drug burden and debilitating device therapies, thereby improving quality of life. Nonetheless, the approach to the ablation of ventricular tachycardias in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies is governed heavily by the disease process, with several distinct differences from ischemic cardiomyopathy including a preponderance to epicardial and deep intramural substrate. This contemporary review aims to present the various disease processes within non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, catheter ablation techniques which have been developed to target ventricular tachycardia and more novel adjunctive therapeutic measures.

Application of noninvasive signal-averaged electrocardiogram analysis in predicting the requirement of epicardial ablation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) provides not only diagnostic information but also the prognostic implication of ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the role of SAECG in identifying arrhythmogenic substrates requiring an epicardial approach in ARVC.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC who underwent successful ablation for drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmia were enrolled and classified into 2 groups: group 1 who underwent successful ablation at the endocardium only and group 2 who underwent successful ablation requiring an additional epicardial approach. The baseline characteristics of patients and SAECG parameters were obtained for analysis.

RESULTS

Male predominance, worse right ventricular (RV) function, higher incidence of syncope, and depolarization abnormality were observed in group 2. Moreover, the number of abnormal SAECG criteria was higher in group 2 than in group 1. After a multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of the requirement of epicardial ablation included the number of abnormal SAECG criteria (odds ratio 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5.4; P = .003) and presence of syncope (odds ratio 11.7; 95% confidence interval 2.7-50.4; P = .001). In addition, ≥2 abnormal SAECG criteria were associated with larger RV endocardial unipolar low-voltage zone (P < .001), larger RV endocardial/epicardial bipolar low-voltage zone/scar (P < .05), and longer RV endocardial/epicardial total activation time (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The number of abnormal SAECG criteria was correlated with the extent of diseased epicardial substrates and could be a potential surrogate marker for predicting the requirement of epicardial ablation in patients with ARVC.

Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Cardiomyopathies

Mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies remain a major challenge. The electroanatomic abnormalities are frequently inaccessible to conventional endocardial ablations. Diagnostic diligence with a thorough understanding of the potential mechanisms/substrate, coupled with detailed electroanatomic mapping, is essential. Careful procedural planning, advanced imaging, and unipolar recordings help to formulate ablation strategy, facilitate work flow, and improve outcomes. Inaccessibility of arrhythmogenic substrate and disease progression are important causes of ablation failure. Early intervention may help to improve outcome and minimize complications. Several novel adjunctive ablation techniques are capable of serving as alternative options in refractory cases.

Regional Strain by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Detection of Right Ventricular Scar Compared With Late Gadolinium Enhancement on a Multimodality Scar Evaluation in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by fibrofatty replacement of right ventricular myocardium resulting in reentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can noninvasively measure regional abnormalities using tissue-tracking strain as well as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). In this study, we examine arrhythmogenic substrate using regional CMR strain, LGE, and electroanatomic mapping (EAM) in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients presenting for VT ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-one patients underwent right ventricular endocardial EAM, whereas 17 underwent epicardial EAM, to detect dense scar (<0.5 mV) as well as CMR study within 12 months. Quantitative regional strain analysis was performed in all 21 patients, although the presence of LGE was visually examined in 17 patients. Strain was lower in segments with dense scar on endocardial and epicardial EAM (-9.7±4.1 versus -7.3±4.0, and -9.8±2.8 versus -7.6±3.8; P<0.05), in segments with LGE scar (-9.9±4.4 versus -6.0±3.6; P=0.001), and at VT culprit sites (-7.4±3.7 versus -10.1±4.1; P<0.001), compared with the rest of right ventricular. On patient-clustered analysis, a unit increase in strain was associated with 21% and 18% decreased odds of scar on endocardial and epicardial EAM, respectively, 17% decreased odds of colocalizing VT culprit site, and 43% decreased odds of scar on LGE-CMR ( P<0.05 for all). LGE and EAM demonstrated poor agreement with κ=0.18 (endocardial, n=17) and κ=0.06 (epicardial, n=13). Only 8 (15%) VT termination sites exhibited LGE.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional myocardial strain on cine CMR improves detection of arrhythmogenic VT substrate compared with LGE. This may enhance diagnostic accuracy of CMR in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy without the need for invasive procedures and facilitate the planning of VT ablation procedures.

Epicardial Conduction Speed, Electrogram Abnormality, and Computed Tomography Attenuation Associations in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the association between contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CE-MDCT) attenuation and local epicardial conduction speed (ECS) and electrographic abnormalities in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT).

BACKGROUND

CE-MDCT is a widely available and fast imaging technology with high spatial resolution that is less prone to defibrillator generator-related safety issues and image artifacts. However, the association between hypoattenuation on MDCT and VT substrates in ARVC remains unknown.

METHODS

Patients with ARVC who underwent CE-MDCT followed by endocardial (n = 30) and epicardial (n = 21) electroanatomical mapping (EAM) and VT ablation were prospectively enrolled. Right ventricular (RV) mid-myocardial attenuation was calculated from 3-dimensional MDCT images and registered to EAM. Local ECS was calculated by averaging the ECS between each point and 5 adjacent points with concordant wave front direction.

RESULTS

A total of 17,311 epicardial and 5,204 endocardial points were included. In multivariable regression analysis clustered by patient, RV myocardial attenuation was associated with epicardial bipolar voltage amplitude (2.5% decrease in amplitude per 10 HU decrease in attenuation; p < 0.001), with endocardial unipolar voltage amplitude (0.9% decrease in amplitude per 10 HU decrease in attenuation; p < 0.001), and with ECS (0.4% decrease in ECS per 10 HU decrease in attenuation; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CE-MDCT attenuation distribution is associated with regional ECS and electrographic amplitude in ARVC. Regions with low attenuation likely reflect fibro-fatty involvement in the RV and may serve as important VT substrates in patients with ARVC who are undergoing VT ablation.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: An Updated Review of Diagnosis and Management

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is a condition caused by the replacement of the normal right ventricular myocardium with fibrofatty tissue. ARVC/D can present with a variety of clinical conditions including right ventricular dysfunction, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sudden cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Since the first report of ARVC/D in 1982, many advances have been made in the diagnosis, genetic findings for pathology, and treatment. The 2010 International Task Force diagnostic criteria distinguish between major and minor criteria and focus on gross structural changes, microscopic changes, repolarization defects, conduction defects, arrhythmias, and family history. Implantable cardiac defibrillators and catheter ablation of the endocardium and epicardium with electromagnetic mapping have emerged as successful tools in the treatment and prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD. This review discusses the pathophysiology, genetics, diagnosis, and treatment advances in ARVC/D.

Endo/epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias with contact force-sensing catheters in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

Objective:

To control ventricular arrhythmia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C), ablation may be required both from the endocardial and epicardial side. In this study, we analyzed the results of contact force–sensing (CFS) catheters in the endo/epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in ARVD/C.

Methods:

We included 17 patients with ARVD/C, 5 of whom had premature ventricular contractions (PVC), and the rest of them were admitted with a ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm, between September 2014 and October 2016. We divided patients into two groups: the PVC and VT groups. Irrigated CFS catheters (Smart Touch, Biosense Webster, Inc.) were utilized in all procedures.

Results:

In the PVC group, the mean ratio of PVC during the 24-hour Holter monitoring was 31.8±7.6%. The mean contact force during mapping and ablation in the right ventricle was 13±1.2 and 12.8±1.9 grams, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 15±3.1 months for the PVC group. The left ventricular ejection fraction improved in all patients (52.8±10%). All patients in the VT group underwent endo/epicardial ablation, except one. The mean contact force during the endocardium and epicardium mapping was 12.5±1.2 and 12.5±4.6 grams, respectively. The mean contact force during ablation for the endocardium and epicardium was 12.1±1.4 and 12.8±1.9 grams, respectively. All clinical and non-clinical VTs were ablated successfully, except in 2 patients who still had non-clinical VTs. The mean follow-up was 15.5±4.5 months. None of the VT patients experienced electrical storm or death. Two patients had single shock, and 1 patient had two shocks during the follow-up.

Conclusion:

Endo/epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias with CFS catheters in ARVD/C seems to be promising.

Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis With the Anterior Approach: Demonstration of the Precise Course With Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to confirm the precise course of a pericardiocentesis with the anterior approach using post-procedural computed tomography (CT).

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation has been increasingly performed. Although the inferior approach has been the common method, the feasibility of the anterior approach has subsequently been reported. However, the precise course of the anterior approach has not been presented.

METHODS

An epicardial ablation with the anterior approach was performed in 15 patients. At the end of the procedure, the epicardial sheath was exchanged for a drainage tube to monitor bleeding. Of those patients, in 9 procedures in 8 patients a CT scan was performed just after the procedure to confirm the course of the drainage tube and to rule out any complications. Epicardial ablation was indicated for a failed endocardial VT ablation in 7 patients and epicardial substrate modification in 1 patient with Brugada syndrome.

RESULTS

Volume-rendered images reconstructed from CT demonstrated each course of the drainage tubes and their relation to the surrounding organs. These images revealed that the tube had a curved trace, and did not penetrate the diaphragm or pass through the abdominal cavity. No injury to the surrounding organs was detected in any of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The precise course of the drainage tube placed along the trajectory of the anterior approach was able to be confirmed using post-procedural CT images. These images support the safety and feasibility of the anterior approach from the anatomic standpoint with a low incidence of abdominal viscera injury.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. This expert consensus statement provides the clinician with guidance on evaluation and management of ACM and includes clinically relevant information on genetics and disease mechanisms. PICO questions were utilized to evaluate contemporary evidence and provide clinical guidance related to exercise in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Recommendations were developed and approved by an expert writing group, after a systematic literature search with evidence tables, and discussion of their own clinical experience, to present the current knowledge in the field. Each recommendation is presented using the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence system formulated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association and is accompanied by references and explanatory text to provide essential context. The ongoing recognition of the genetic basis of ACM provides the opportunity to examine the diverse triggers and potential common pathway for the development of disease and arrhythmia.

Substrate Mapping and Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Structural Heart Disease: How to Identify Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been increasingly used over the past two decades in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). In these individuals, a substrate mapping strategy is being more commonly applied to identify targets for VT ablation, which has been shown to be more effective versus targeting mappable VTs alone. There are a number of substrate mapping methods in existence that aim to explore potential VT isthmuses, although their success rates vary. Most of the reported electrogram-based mapping studies have been performed with ablation catheters; meanwhile, the use of multipolar mapping catheters with smaller electrodes and closer interelectrode spacing has emerged, which allows for an assessment of detailed near-field abnormal electrograms at a higher resolution. Another recent advancement has occurred in the use of imaging techniques in VT ablation, particularly in refining the substrate. The goal of this paper is to review the key developments and limitations of current mapping strategies of substrate-based VT ablation and their outcomes. In addition, we briefly summarize the role of cardiac imaging in delineating VT substrate.

Three-dimensional myocardial scar characterization from the endocardium: Usefulness of endocardial unipolar electroanatomic mapping

Epicardial ablation may be required to eliminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with underlying structural heart disease. The decision to gain epicardial access is frequently based on the suspicion of an epicardial origin for the VT and/or presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate. Epicardial pathology and VT is frequently present in patients with nonischemic right and/or left cardiomyopathies even in the setting of modest or no endocardial bipolar voltage substrate. In this setting, unipolar voltage mapping from the endocardium serves to help identify midmyocardial and/or epicardial VT substrate. The additional value of endocardial unipolar mapping includes its usefulness to predict the clinical outcome after VT ablation, to determine the irreversibility of myocardial disease, and to guide endomyocardial biopsy procedures to specific areas of intramural scarring. In this review, we aim to provide a guide to the use of endocardial unipolar mapping and its appropriate interpretation in a variety of clinical situations.

Utility of ripple mapping for identification of slow conduction channels during ventricular tachycardia ablation in the setting of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Ripple mapping displays every deflection of a bipolar electrogram and enables the visualization of conduction channels (RMCC) within postinfarction ventricular scar to guide ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. The utility of RMCC identification for facilitation of VT ablation in the setting of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) has not been described.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to (a) identify the slow conduction channels in the endocardial/epicardial scar by ripple mapping and (b) retrospectively analyze whether the elimination of RMCC is associated with improved VT-free survival, in ARVC patients.

METHODS

High-density right ventricular endocardial and epicardial electrograms were collected using the CARTO 3 system in sinus rhythm or ventricular pacing and reviewed for RMCC. Low-voltage zones and abnormal myocardium in the epicardium were identified by using standardized late-gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity (SI) z-scores.

RESULTS

A cohort of 20 ARVC patients that had undergone simultaneous high-density right ventricular endocardial and epicardial electrogram mapping was identified (age 44 ± 13 years). Epicardial scar, defined as bipolar voltage less than 1.0 mV, occupied 47.6% (interquartile range [IQR], 30.9-63.7) of the total epicardial surface area and was larger than endocardial scar, defined as bipolar voltage less than 1.5 mV, which occupied 11.2% (IQR, 4.2 ± 17.8) of the endocardium (P < 0.01). A median 1.5 RMCC, defined as continuous corridors of sequential late activation within scar, were identified per patient (IQR, 1-3), most of which were epicardial. The median ratio of RMCC ablated was 1 (IQR, 0.6-1). During a median follow-up of 44 months (IQR, 11-49), the ratio of RMCC ablated was associated with freedom from recurrent VT (hazard ratio, 0.01; P = 0.049). Among nine patients with adequate MRI, 73% of RMCC were localized in LGE regions, 24% were adjacent to an area with LGE, and 3% were in regions without LGE.

CONCLUSION

Slow conduction channels within endocardial or epicardial ARVC scar were delineated clearly by ripple mapping and corresponded to critical isthmus sites during entrainment. Complete elimination of RMCC was associated with freedom from VT.

Heterogeneous distribution of substrates between the endocardium and epicardium promotes ventricular fibrillation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

Aims

Whether the distribution of scar in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) plays a role in predicting different types of ventricular arrhythmias is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of scar distribution in patients with ARVC.

Methods and results

We studied 80 consecutive ARVC patients (46 men, mean age 47 ± 15 years) who underwent an electrophysiological study with ablation. Thirty-four patients receive both endocardial and epicardial mapping. Abnormal endocardial substrates and epicardial substrates were characterized. Three groups were defined according to the epicardial and endocardial scar gradient (<10%: transmural, 10-20%: intermediate, >20%: horizontal, as groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Sinus rhythm electrograms underwent a Hilbert-Huang spectral analysis and were displayed as 3D Simultaneous Amplitude Frequency Electrogram Transformation (SAFE-T) maps, which represented the arrhythmogenic potentials. The baseline characteristics were similar between the three groups. Group 3 patients had a higher incidence of fatal ventricular arrhythmias requiring defibrillation and cardiac arrest during the initial presentation despite having fewer premature ventricular complexes. A larger area of arrhythmogenic potentials in the epicardium was observed in patients with horizontal scar. The epicardial-endocardial scar gradient was independently associated with the occurrence of fatal ventricular arrhythmias after a multivariate adjustment. The total, ventricular tachycardia, and VF recurrent rates were higher in Group 3 during 38 ± 21 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

For ARVC, the epicardial substrate that extended in the horizontal plane rather than transmurally provided the arrhythmogenic substrate for a fatal ventricular arrhythmia circuit.

Open chest epicardial and transapical endocardial substrate ablation for ventricular tachycardia with left ventricular aneurysm in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Endo-epicardial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) as a first-line strategy has been shown to improve outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and validity of open-chest epicardial and transapical endocardial substrate ablation for VT with left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) applying to routine cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Porcine models of LVA with VT were developed and were divided into a study group (RFCA from the epicardium via direct-view and endocardium via transapical access) and a control group (endocardial RFCA via retrograde transaortic access). Substrate-based mapping and ablation targeting abnormal potentials were performed under thoracotomy. Outcomes, including procedural success and acute freedom from VT, were analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 35 (68.57%) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) pigs developed LVA with VT in a 6-week survival period and were randomly divided into a study group (n=12) and a control group (n=12). All animals in the study group successfully underwent endocardial mapping and ablation by transapical access. The scar size of the endocardium and the left ventricular chamber volume were similar in the two groups. Acute freedom from VT in the study group was remarkably superior to that in the control group (88.33% vs. 58.33%, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined, direct epicardial and transapical endocardial substrate mapping and ablation appeared to be feasible and effective for treating VT with LVA under thoracotomy.

Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy in 2018-2019: ARVC/ALVC or Both?

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is now commonly used to describe any form of non-hypertrophic, progressive cardiomyopathy characterised by fibrofatty infiltration of the ventricular myocardium. Right ventricular (RV) involvement refers to the classical arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, but left ventricular, or bi-ventricular involvement are now recognised. ACM is mostly hereditary and associated with mutations in genes encoding proteins of the intercalated disc. ACM classically manifests as ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death may be the first presentation of the disease. Heart failure is seen with advanced stages of the disease. Diagnosis can be challenging due to variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance, and is guided by established Taskforce criteria that incorporate electrical features (12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), features of ventricular arrhythmias), structural features (on imaging via echo and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), tissue characteristics (via biopsy), and familial/genetic evaluation. Electrical abnormalities may precede structural alterations, which also make diagnosis challenging, especially in differentiating ACM from other conditions such as benign right ventricular arrhythmias, channelopathies such as Brugada, or the Athlete's Heart. Genetic testing is critical in identifying familial mutations and initiating cascade testing, but finds a pathogenic mutation in only ∼50% of patients. Some critical genotype-phenotype correlations do exist and may help guide risk stratification and give clues to disease progression. Therapeutic strategies include restriction from high endurance and competitive sports, ß-blockers, antiarrhythmic drugs, heart failure medications, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and combined endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation. Ablation has emerged as the treatment of choice for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in ACM. This state-of-the-art review outlines the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of ACM in the contemporary era.

Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia Based on Etiology in Nonischemic Heart Disease: An International Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Center Collaborative Study

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to characterize ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation outcomes across nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) etiologies and adjust these outcomes by patient-related comorbidities that could explain differences in arrhythmia recurrence rates.

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of catheter ablation of VT in patients with NICM could be related to etiology of NICM.

METHODS

Data from 2,075 patients with structural heart disease referred for catheter ablation of VT from 12 international centers was retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics and outcomes were noted for the 6 most common NICM etiologies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 780 NICM patients (57 ± 14 years of age, 18% women, left ventricular ejection fraction 37 ± 13%), underlying prevalence was 66% for dilated idiopathic cardiomyopathy (DICM), 13% for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), 6% for valvular cardiomyopathy, 6% for myocarditis, 4% for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 3% for sarcoidosis. One-year freedom from VT was 69%, and freedom from VT, heart transplantation, and death was 62%. On unadjusted competing risk analysis, VT ablation in ARVC demonstrated superior VT-free survival (82%) versus DICM (p ≤ 0.01). Valvular cardiomyopathy had the poorest unadjusted VT-free survival, at 47% (p < 0.01). After adjusting for comorbidities, including age, heart failure severity, ejection fraction, prior ablation, and antiarrhythmic medication use, myocarditis, ARVC, and DICM demonstrated similar outcomes, whereas hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular cardiomyopathy, and sarcoidosis had the highest risk of VT recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation of VT in NICM is effective. Etiology of NICM is a significant predictor of outcomes, with ARVC, myocarditis, and DICM having similar but superior outcomes to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular cardiomyopathy, and sarcoidosis, after adjusting for potential covariates.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy

The number of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has increased by the years, however, there are no randomized studies of VT ablation in this population. Many studies have reported more mixed or inferior outcome after the ablation in patients with NICM as compared to in those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM)-likely because of the heterogeneous VT substrates in each etiology. While, various ablation strategies for substrate modification in the setting of ICM, including low voltage area ablation, late potential abolition, and local abnormal ventricular activity elimination, have been well established, it is still unknown which ablation strategy is effective for prevention of recurrence VTs in NICM patients. Therefore, this review will highlight the recent progress made in VT ablation in patients with NICM.

Feasibility of directional percutaneous epicardial ablation with a partially insulated catheter

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the feasibility of directional percutaneous epicardial ablation using a partially insulated catheter.

METHODS

Partially insulated catheter prototypes were tested in 12 (6 canine, 6 porcine) animal studies in two centers. Prototypes had interspersed windows to enable visualization of epicardial structures with ultrasound. Epicardial unipolar ablation and ablation between two electrodes was performed according to protocol (5-60 W power, 0-60 mls/min irrigation, 78 s mean duration).

RESULTS

Of 96 epicardial ablation attempts, unipolar ablation was delivered in 53.1%. Electrogram evidence of ablation, when analyzable, occurred in 75 of 79 (94.9%) therapies. Paired pre/post-ablation pacing threshold (N = 74) showed significant increase in pacing threshold post-ablation (0.9 to 2.6 mA, P < .0001). Arrhythmias occurred in 18 (18.8%) therapies (11 ventricular fibrillation, 7 ventricular tachycardia), mainly in pigs (72.2%). Coronary artery visualization was variably successful. No phrenic nerve injury was noted during or after ablation. Furthermore, there were minimal pericardial changes with ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Epicardial ablation using a partially insulated catheter to confer epicardial directionality and protect the phrenic nerve seems feasible. Iterations with ultrasound windows may enable real-time epicardial surface visualization thus identifying coronary arteries at ablation sites. Further improvements, however, are necessary.