Reconsidering the effects of antiresorptive therapies in reducing osteoporotic fracture

A biomechanical perspective on bone quality

Observations that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures of areal bone mineral density cannot completely explain fracture incidence after anti-resorptive treatment have led to renewed interest in bone quality. Bone quality is a vague term but generally refers to the effects of skeletal factors that contribute to bone strength but are not accounted for by measures of bone mass. Because a clinical fracture is ultimately a mechanical event, it follows then that any clinically relevant modification of bone quality must change bone biomechanical performance relative to bone mass. In this perspective, we discuss a framework for assessing the clinically relevant effects of bone quality based on two general concepts: (1) the biomechanical effects of bone quality can be quantified from analysis of the relationship between bone mechanical performance and bone density; and (2) because of its hierarchical nature, biomechanical testing of bone at different physical scales (<1 mm, 1 mm, 1 cm, etc.) can be used to isolate the scale at which the most clinically relevant changes in bone quality occur. As an example, we review data regarding the relationship between the strength and density in excised specimens of trabecular bone and highlight the fact that it is not yet clear how this relationship changes during aging, osteoporosis development, and anti-resorptive treatment. Further study of new and existing data using this framework should provide insight into the role of bone quality in osteoporotic fracture risk.

Effects of osteoporosis medications on bone quality

In clinical practice, the quantitative evaluation of bone tissue relies on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) values, which are closely associated with the risk of osteoporotic fracture. However, only a small fraction of the antifracture effect of bone resorption inhibitors is ascribable to BMD gains (4% with raloxifene and 16-28% with alendronate and risedronate). Bone quality encompasses a number of bone tissue properties that govern mechanical resistance, such as bone geometry, cortical properties, trabecular microarchitecture, bone tissue mineralization, quality of collagen and bone apatite crystal, and presence of microcracks. All these properties are dependent on bone turnover and its variations. In populations, the decreases in bone resorption markers achieved with resorption inhibitors may predict in part the decrease in fracture risk. At the spine, however, this correlation exists down to a 40% fall in bone resorption markers; larger drops did not provide further protection against fractures in patients taking risedronate in one evaluation of this relationship. Osteoporosis medications can exert favorable effects on bone size and cortical thickness. Such effects have been documented with teriparatide (PTH 1-34), which is the unique purely anabolic treatment for osteoporosis available to date. More surprising are the favorable effects on bone size seen with some of the bone resorption inhibitors such as neridronate in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta. Similarly, estrogens and alendronate can increase femoral neck size in postmenopausal women. Preservation of the trabecular microarchitecture was demonstrated first with risedronate and subsequently with alendronate. In placebo-controlled studies, a deterioration in trabecular microarchitecture occurred within 1 to 3 years in the placebo groups but not in the bisphosphonate groups. Teriparatide, in contrast, improves trabecular microarchitecture, in particular by increasing connectivity and improving the plate-rod distribution. The minerals within trabecular or cortical bone can be evaluated using microradiography or synchrotron micro-computed tomography. Marked or prolonged secondary mineralization may result in poor bone quality. Increased bone mineralization is among the key effects of bone resorption inhibitors, most notably bisphosphonates. Prolonged use of the most potent bisphosphonates may lead to unwanted effects related to excessive mineralization. Microcracks may play a physiological role; however, a large number of microcracks may be deleterious via an effect on osteocytes. Excessive mineralization may promote the development of multiple microcracks. Studies of bone crystal and collagen properties with several bone resorption inhibitors, including risedronate and raloxifene, showed no harmful effects. An increasing number (several hundreds) of mandibular osteonecrosis associated with bisphosphonate therapy has been reported. The typical patient was receiving injectable bisphosphonate therapy for bone cancer and had undergone dental work shortly before bisphosphonate administration. The mechanism of this adverse effect is poorly understood.

Osteoporosis: how should it be treated?

Osteoporosis develops as a result of imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation. A number of effective and safe therapies for osteoporosis are currently available, most of which are inhibitors of bone resorption. However, because osteoporosis is a complex and heterogeneous disease with different pathogenetic factors, defining the role of the different factors in its development is important in formulating a more selective approach to therapy. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available agents used in the management of osteoporosis.

A method for vibrational assessment of cortical bone

Large bones from many anatomical locations of the human skeleton consist of an outer shaft (cortex) surrounding a highly porous internal region (trabecular bone) whose structure is reminiscent of a disordered cubic network. Age related degradation of cortical and trabecular bone takes different forms. Trabecular bone weakens primarily by loss of connectivity of the porous network, and recent studies have shown that vibrational response can be used to obtain reliable estimates for loss of its strength. In contrast, cortical bone degrades via the accumulation of long fractures and changes in the level of mineralization of the bone tissue. In this paper, we model cortical bone by an initially solid specimen with uniform density to which long fractures are introduced; we find that, as in the case of trabecular bone, vibrational assessment provides more reliable estimates of residual strength in cortical bone than is possible using measurements of density or porosity.

Biomechanical evaluation in osteoporosis: ovariectomized rat model

The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of ovariectomy on rat femur biomechanical parameters. Bone mineral density (BMD) and histological investigation were also evaluated. Fourteen female Sprague-Dawley rats (seven ovariectomized, seven control) were used. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorbsiometry. Bone biomechanical parameters were measured in femoral midshaft with tensile test using a biomaterial testing machine and maximum load, stiffness, energy absorption capacity (structural properties), ultimate stress, ultimate strain, and elastic modulus (material properties) were calculated. Diaphyseal cortical bone thickness was measured by using histological method. The ovariectomized (OVX) rat femur's BMD was 14% lower than control rats (p=0.006). Mean maximum load was 55% less than the control group's (p=0.0001). Stiffness was 72% less in OVX rats (p=0.05). Femurs of rats with OVX had 32% less absorbed energy than controls (p=0.09). From the stress-strain curve ultimate stress, ultimate strain and elastic modulus was calculated. Elastic modulus was 53% less than controls (p=0.05). Ultimate stress decreased 21% in OVX rats (p=0.097). Ultimate strain was 25% less than controls in OVX rats. Cortical thickness was significantly decreased in OVX rats than in controls (p<0.05). In conclusion, femur biomechanical parameters are decreased in osteoporosis.

Vascular calcification and renal osteodystrophy relationship in chronic kidney disease

Cardiovascular disease and stroke account for 60-70% of all deaths in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), at a risk that is 10-20-fold the age- and sex-matched general population. There is also increased coronary artery calcification and increased cardiovascular mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients compared with the general population. Bone is similarly abnormal in CKD. There is an increased incidence of low bone mass and fractures in dialysis patients compared with the general population. Furthermore, a hip fracture in a dialysis patient is associated with a doubling of the mortality observed in nondialysis patients with a hip fracture. These two problems may be linked, as cross-sectional studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between osteoporosis and coronary artery calcification in the general population and in ESRD patients. In vitro and ex vivo, there is clear evidence that vascular calcification is an active cell-mediated process, made worse by disorders of mineral metabolism. Many factors known to be associated with cardiovascular disease in CKD patients can directly increase calcification in vitro. In addition, in CKD, there are many mechanisms by which bone may adversely affect vascular calcification including disorders of bone remodelling, altered secretion of parathyroid hormone (PTH), hyperphosphatemia, hypercalcaemia, use of calcium based binders, and excessive vitamin D therapy. The coexistence of vascular risk factors and abnormal bone represent a double threat to the well being of patients with CKD.

New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis

In the context of osteoporosis, bone quality--which encompasses trabecular and cortical micro-architecture, mass, and tissue mechanical & compositional properties--plays an important and as yet undiscovered role. Non-invasive assessment of bone quality has recently received considerable attention, as bone density alone has not been able to predict existing or future osteoporotic fractures, or to explain therapeutic effects of emerging treatments. The goal of this review, therefore, is to present imaging modalities and related analysis methods capable of assessing bone quality for improved diagnosis and care of osteoporotic individuals. The techniques described include quantitative ultrasound, quantitative computed tomography, peripheral quantitative tomography, micro computed tomography, magnetic resonance, radiographic texture analysis, as well as finite element analysis based on the above-mentioned imaging modalities. The performance of these techniques in predicting osteoporotic fracture and assessing strength indices are discussed.

Important Determinants of Bone Strength

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength that predisposes individuals to increased fracture risk. Bone strength is determined by its material and structural properties. Bone mineral density (BMD) is a useful tool for diagnosis; however, this parameter provides information regarding only the quantity of mineral in bone, which is only one component of bone strength. Osteoporosis treatments have been shown to have beneficial effects on bone turnover, microarchitecture, and/or mineralization, all of which can help account for the reductions in fracture risk above and beyond changes in BMD. Newer noninvasive imaging methods are being developed that assess bone strength independent of BMD, and these methods should improve the assessment of fracture risk and response to treatment. These imaging methods are not currently available for routine clinical use, and therefore, clinicians need to continue for now to rely on surrogate markers of bone fragility, including BMD, prevalent fracture, and other important risk factors for fracture.

Anti-vertebral fracture efficacy of raloxifene: a meta-analysis

In the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial, raloxifene reduced the risk of vertebral fracture. However, a systematic analysis of the anti-vertebral fracture efficacy of raloxifene, which includes the results of newly reported studies, has not been performed. A meta-analysis was carried out using all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to determine whether the reduction in the risk for vertebral fracture, reported with raloxifene, was consistent among studies, and to define more accurately the point estimate of the odds ratio. Three prevention studies, two arms of the MORE trial, and three additional treatment studies in which fracture data were available from prospectively scheduled spinal radiographs were included in the analysis. A systematic review of the literature (MedLine, EMBASE) confirmed that no studies with raloxifene had been excluded from this analysis. The effects of raloxifene 60 mg/day (RLX60) and 120 mg/day pooled with 150 mg/day (RLX120/150) were analyzed by intention to treat. There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies included in the meta-analysis. Odds ratio estimates (95% CI) were 0.60 (0.49, 0.74) for RLX60 and 0.51 (0.41, 0.64) for RLX120/150. From these data we infer that raloxifene consistently reduces the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women.

Examining the Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk Reduction During Pharmacologic Treatment of Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength that predisposes the patient to an increased risk for fracture. Elements of bone strength include bone mineralization, architecture, turnover, size, and bone mineral density (BMD). Measurement of BMD is the most readily available, noninvasive method for assessing osteoporotic fracture risk and is used by the World Health Organization for diagnostic purposes. Because low BMD is predictive of increased fracture risk, it was believed that changes in BMD during pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis would strongly predict observed fracture risk reductions. We examined the relationship between changes in BMD and reduction in fracture risk during pharmacologic therapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The correlation between BMD increases and fracture risk reduction during treatment is not consistent; larger increases in BMD do not necessarily correlate with greater reductions in fracture risk. Multiple factors, in addition to BMD, appear to contribute to the increased bone strength and decreased fracture risk achieved with approved drug therapies for osteoporosis. Until the exact relationship of these factors is fully understood, clinicians should continue to evaluate drug efficacy for osteoporosis based on the fracture risk reductions from well-designed clinical trials.

Alendronic Acid Produces Greater Effects than Risedronic Acid on Bone??Density and Turnover in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of alendronic acid once weekly relative to risedronic acid once weekly on bone mineral density (BMD), markers of bone turnover and tolerability in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-masked, double-dummy multicentre international study (75 centres in 27 countries in Europe, the Americas and Asia-Pacific). A total of 1303 women were screened and 936 with low bone density (T-score < or = -2.0 at the spine, hip trochanter, total hip or femoral neck) were randomised; 91% (n = 854) completed the study. Patients were randomised to treatment with either active alendronic acid 70 mg weekly (Fosamax) and placebo identical to risedronic acid weekly or active risedronic acid 35 mg weekly (Actonel) and placebo identical to alendronic acid weekly for 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in hip trochanter BMD at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included the percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck BMD; biochemical markers of bone turnover (including serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BSAP] and urinary type I collagen N-telopeptides [NTx]); and safety and tolerability as assessed by reporting of adverse experiences.

RESULTS

Alendronic acid produced greater increases in BMD than did risedronic acid at 12 months at all sites measured. Mean percentage increases from baseline in hip trochanter BMD at month 12 were 3.56% and 2.71% in the alendronic acid and risedronic acid groups, respectively (treatment difference [95% CI]: 0.83% [0.22, 1.45; p = 0.008]). Mean percentage increases from baseline were greater with alendronic acid than risedronic acid at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck BMD at month 12 (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p = 0.039, respectively). Increases in BMD with alendronic acid compared with risedronic acid were also significantly greater at 6 months at the trochanter and total hip. There was a greater reduction in bone turnover with alendronic acid compared with risedronic acid: NTx decreased 58% with alendronic acid compared with 47% with risedronic acid at 12 months (p < 0.001); and BSAP decreased 45% with alendronic acid compared with 34% with risedronic acid at 12 months (p < 0.001). Overall tolerability and upper gastrointestinal tolerability were similar for both agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronic acid once weekly produced greater BMD increases at both hip and spine sites and greater reductions in bone turnover relative to risedronic acid once weekly. Both agents were well tolerated with no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal adverse experiences. Clinicians should consider these results when making treatment decisions for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Bone microarchitecture evaluated by histomorphometry

The increasing use of densitometric devices for assessing bone fragility has progressively strengthened the assumption that mass is the most important property determining bone mechanical competence. Nevertheless, structure and microarchitecture are relevant aspects of bone strength. The study of microarchitecture is based on the measure of width, number, and separation of trabeculae as well as on their spatial organization. There are several methods to assess bone architecture, particularly at the trabecular level. In particular, histomorphometry, based on the use of optical microscopy and on the principles of quantitative histology and stereology, evaluates microarchitecture two-dimensionally, even if these measures appear well correlated to the three-dimensional structure and properties of bone. In addition, new computerized methods allow the acquisition of more sophisticated measurements by means of a digitizer have been introduced to integrate the use of the microscope. These methods supply information on trabecular width as well as on its distribution and on the organization of the trabeculae in the marrow space. Microarchitecture seems to be a determinant of bone fragility independent of bone density and it is important for understanding the mechanisms of bone fragility as well as the action of the drugs used to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Several in vivo studies (on animals and humans) can provide an additional interpretation for the anti-fracture effect of such drugs. For instance, bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone seem to preserve or even improve microarchitecture. The challenge for the future will be to evaluate bone quality in vivo with the same or better resolution and accuracy than the invasive methods used today.

Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study

The unique noninvasive MRI technique was used to assess trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites in 91 postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving nasal spray salmon calcitonin (CT-NS) or placebo over 2 years. In the distal radius and lower trochanter of the hip, individuals treated with CT-NS exhibited significant preservation of trabecular bone microarchitecture compared with placebo, where significant deterioration was shown. MRI analyses of os calcis or microCT/histomorphometric analyses of bone biopsies did not reveal consistent differences in architecture between CT-NS and placebo.

INTRODUCTION

It is postulated that the reduction in osteoporotic fracture risk in response to certain antiresorptive osteoporosis therapies is caused less by effects on bone quantity than on bone quality (specifically trabecular microarchitecture). To test this hypothesis, the QUEST study was conducted to assess the effects of nasal spray salmon calcitonin (CT-NS) or placebo on parameters of trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites using noninvasive MRI technology and iliac crest bone biopsies by microCT/histomorphometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-one postmenopausal osteoporotic women were followed for 2 years (n = 46 for CT-NS, n = 45 for placebo); all women received 500 mg calcium daily. MRI measurements at distal radius, hip (T2 relaxation time [T2*]), and os calcis (obtained yearly), iliac crest bone biopsies with 2D histomorphometry and 3D microCT (obtained at study onset and conclusion), DXA-BMD at spine/hip/wrist/os calcis (obtained yearly), and markers of bone turnover (obtained at 2-week to 12-month intervals) were analyzed, with an analysis of covariance model used to assess treatment effect for parameters of interest.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

MRI assessment of trabecular microarchitecture at individual regions of the distal radius revealed significant improvement, or preservation (no significant loss), in the CT-NS-treated group compared with significant deterioration in the placebo control group, as reflected in apparent BV/TV (p < 0.03), apparent trabecular number (p < 0.01), and apparent trabecular spacing (p < 0.01). Also, at the hip, the CT-NS group exhibited preservation of trabecular microarchitecture at the lower trochanter (p < 0.05) as determined by T2* MRI technology. Significant deterioration of trabecular bone architecture was noted in the placebo group at the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and lower trochanteric sites. Apart from a significant increase in apparent trabecular number in the CT-NS group, significant changes within or between groups were not noted at the os calcis. Combined microCT/histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone biopsies did not reveal significant differences between treated and placebo groups. In the CT-NS group, regardless of the change in BMD (gain or loss) at the spine, hip, or distal radius, preservation of parameters of trabecular microarchitecture was noted, whereas in the placebo group, regardless of the change in BMD (gain or loss) at the spine, hip, or distal radius, loss or preservation was noted; however, changes in DXA/BMD (of the spine, hip, wrist, os calcis) between CT-NS and placebo groups were not significant. Serum C-telopeptide (S-CTx), a specific bone resorption marker, was reduced by 22.5% at 24 months (p = 0.056). The results of the QUEST study suggest therapeutic benefit of CT-NS compared with placebo in maintaining trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites and support the use of MRI technology for assessment of trabecular microarchitecture in clinical research trials. However, the results also highlight site specific differences in response to antiresorptive therapies and the importance of sufficiently large sampling volumes (areas) to obtain reliable assessment of bone architecture.

Aromatase inhibitors: rationale and use in breast cancer

Considerable data implicate estrogens in breast cancer carcinogenesis and progression. In the postmenopausal woman, estrogens are produced in breast tissues and many other sites throughout the body when androgen precursors are converted into estrogens via the enzyme aromatase. Inhibition of this enzyme with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has demonstrated reductions in systemic as well as intratumoral estrogens. These drugs have now been utilized in large phase 3 randomized trials and have led to greater improved clinical benefit than the "gold standard," tamoxifen. Questions remain about the long-term side effects and safety profile of AIs. They are associated with increasing incidence of osteoporosis and bone fractures. Nevertheless, AIs add to our armamentarium for therapy and possible prevention of breast cancer.

Femoral neck bone loss predicts fracture risk independent of baseline BMD

Whereas low BMD is known to be a risk factor for fracture, it is not clear whether loss of BMD is also a risk factor. In elderly women, greater loss of BMD at the femoral neck was associated with increased risk of fracture, independent of baseline BMD and age.

INTRODUCTION

Baseline measurement of BMD predicts fracture risk. However, it is not clear whether short-term bone loss is an independent risk factor for fractures. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between changes in BMD and fracture risk in elderly women in the general population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 966 women > or = 60 years of age (mean, 70 +/- 6.7 [SD] years), who had been followed for an average of 10.7 years, were studied. Atraumatic fracture of the proximal femur (hip), symptomatic vertebral fracture, and other major fractures, excluding pathological fractures or those resulting from severe trauma, were recorded and confirmed by radiographs. Femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD was measured by DXA.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 224 had sustained a fracture (including 43 hip, 71 symptomatic vertebrae, 37 proximal humerus, 46 forearm and wrist, and 27 rib and pelvis fractures). The annual rate of change in BMD in fracture women (-2.1 +/- 4.2%) was significantly higher than that in nonfracture women (-0.8 +/- 2.8%; p = 0.005). In the multivariable Cox's proportional hazards analysis, the following factors were significant predictors of fracture risk: femoral neck bone loss (relative hazard [RH], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8 per 5% loss), baseline femoral neck BMD (RH, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7-2.7 per SD), and advancing age (RH, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4). The proportion of fractures attributable to the three factors was 45%. For hip fracture, the attributable risk fraction was approximately 90%.

CONCLUSION

Bone loss at the femoral neck is a predictor of fracture risk in elderly women, independent of baseline BMD and age.

The effect of risedronate on bone mineralization as measured by micro-computed tomography with synchrotron radiation: correlation to histomorphometric indices of turnover

The primary goal of our study was to determine changes in bone mineralization in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated for 3 years with risedronate or placebo. A secondary goal was to determine the relationship between mineralization and indices of bone turnover measured on the same biopsies. The degree of mineralization was measured by micro-computed tomography using Synchrotron radiation (Synchrotron microCT) in the trabecular bone of paired transiliac biopsies taken at baseline and after 3 years of treatment from patients receiving risedronate 5 mg daily (n=11) or placebo (n=8). In the risedronate-treated patients, the average mineralization (Avg-MIN) and peak mineralization (Peak-MIN) at 3 years were significantly increased from baseline by 4.7% (P<0.0001) and 5.4% (P=0.0003), respectively and showed significant negative correlation to turnover indices. In the placebo-treated patients, the increases in Avg-MIN (2.0%) and Peak-MIN (1.6%) were not significantly different from baseline and correlation to turnover indices was weaker. Risedronate significantly reduced the ratio of low- to high-mineralized bone fractions estimated by volume (BMR-V) and surface area (BMR-S) by 70.1% and 54.1%, respectively from baseline. These changes were consistent with the significant reduction of turnover from baseline assessed by reductions in mineralizing surface, MS/BS (-72.8%); activation frequency, Ac.F (-60.4%); and bone formation rate, BFR-BV (-63.6%) in the same biopsies in the risedronate-treated patients. Comparing the pair-wise changes from baseline, risedronate significantly reduced the low-mineralized bone fraction in comparison to placebo, as indicated by a larger reduction of BMR-V (P=0.015) and BMR-S (P=0.035). In the risedronate group, BMR-V and BMR-S showed significant positive correlation to MS/BS (R2: 0.83 and 0.92, respectively). The correlations to Ac.F and BFR-BV were also significant, with BMR-S showing a strong relation (R2: 0.77 and 0.79, respectively). The data suggest that BMR-V and BMR-S are markers of turnover of trabecular bone and may be used to assess treatment effect on turnover in bone biopsies. The results demonstrate that the reduction of turnover by risedronate increased the degree of mineralization and reduced the ratio of low- to high-mineralized bone fractions which may increase bone's resistance to fracture.

Tratamiento de la pérdida de masa ósea en la mujer postmenopáusica

In this revision, the results of different controlled clinical trials and metaanalyses on the efficacy in the increase of bone mineral density (BMD) and reduction of risk of fracture on postmenopausal osteoporosis treatments are summarized. Most of the drugs studied produce significant BMD increases but with significant differences regarding fracture risk reduction, especially regarding extravertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates and selective estrogen receptor modulators would constitute the first line of treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with previous fractures. Head to head studies would be necessary to know its true efficacy since some results are based on post hoc analysis. Possible side effects, risks, treatment comfort and price in addition to the demonstrated efficacy in fracture prevention must be considered in the selection of treatment.

Regulation of bone mass by mechanical loading: microarchitecture and genetics

For decades, the processes that couple bone architecture and mass to function have been investigated and characterized. It is well known, and now well accepted, that increases in exercise and loading of bone are associated with increased bone mass, and that disuse induces osteopenia. However, the mechanisms by which disuse leads to bone loss remain poorly understood, even in the 21st century. Clearly, the skeleton is able to perceive and respond to some general input(s) generated, or lost, as a consequence of mechanical unloading of bone that are distinct from habitual activity, so called functional adaptation. It is the focus of this paper to evaluate the evidence underlying roles for genetics, osteocytes, and interstitial fluid flow in mediating disuse osteopenia.

Gene variants for osteoporosis and their pleiotropic effects in aging

The prevalence of osteoporosis is raising worldwide as improving conditions of living and treatment of other common diseases continuously increases life expectancy. Thus, osteoporosis affects most women above 80 years of age and, at the age of 50, the lifetime risk of suffering an osteoporosis-related fracture approaches 50% in women and 20% in men. Numerous genetic, hormonal, nutritional and life-style factors contribute to the acquisition and maintenance of bone mass. Among them, genetic variations explain as much as 70% of the variance for bone mineral density (BMD) in the population. Dozens of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for BMD have been identified by genome screening and linkage approaches in humans and mice, and more than 100 candidate gene polymorphisms tested for association with BMD and/or fracture. Sequence variants in the vitamin D receptor (VDR), collagen 1 alpha 1 chain (Col1A1), estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) genes were all found to be significantly associated with differences in BMD and/or fracture risk in multiple replication studies. Moreover, some genes, such as VDR and IL-6, were shown to interact with non-genetic factors, i.e. calcium intake and estrogens, to modulate BMD. Since these gene variants have also been associated with other complex disorders, including cancer and coronary heart disease, they may represent common genetic susceptibility factors exerting pleiotropic effects during the aging process.

Testing two predictions for fracture load using computer models of trabecular bone

Aging induces several types of architectural changes in trabecular bone including thinning, increased levels of anisotropy, and perforation. It has been determined, on the basis of analysis of mathematical models, that reduction in fracture load caused by perforation is significantly higher than those due to equivalent levels of thinning or anisotropy. The analysis has also provided an expression which relates the fractional reduction of strength tau to the fraction of elements nu that have been removed from a network. Further, it was proposed that the ratio Gamma of the elastic constant of a sample and its linear response at resonance can be used as a surrogate for tau. Experimental validation of these predictions requires following architectural changes in a given sample of trabecular bone; techniques to study such changes using microcomputed tomography are only beginning to be available. In the present study, we use anatomically accurate computer models constructed from digitized images of bone samples for the purpose. Images of healthy bone are subjected to successive levels of synthetic degradation via surface erosion. Computer models constructed from these images are used to calculate their fracture load and other mechanical properties. Results from these computations are shown to be consistent with predictions derived from the analysis of mathematical models. Although the form of tau(nu) is known, parameters in the expression are expected to be sample-specific, and hence nu is not a reliable predictor of strength. We provide an example to demonstrate this. In contrast, analysis of model networks shows that the linear part of tau(Gamma) depends only on the structure of trabecular bone. Computations on models constructed from samples of iliac crest trabecular bone are shown to be in agreement with this assertion. Since Gamma can be computed from a vibrational assessment of bone, we argue that the latter can be used to introduce new surrogates for bone strength and hence diagnostic tools for osteoporosis.

Treatment with once-weekly alendronate 70 mg compared with once-weekly risedronate 35 mg in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized double-blind study

Once-weekly alendronate 70 mg and once-weekly risedronate 35 mg are indicated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. These two agents were compared in a 12-month head-to-head trial. Greater gains in BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover were seen with alendronate compared with risedronate with similar tolerability.

INTRODUCTION

The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, alendronate and risedronate, are available in once-weekly (OW) formulations for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A 12-month, head-to-head study was performed to compare these agents in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low BMD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1053 patients from 78 U.S. sites were randomized to OW alendronate 70 mg (N = 520) or risedronate 35 mg (N = 533), taken in the morning after fasting. Endpoints included BMD changes over 6 and 12 months at the hip trochanter, total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine (LS); percent of patients with predefined levels of change in trochanter and LS BMD at 12 months; and change in biochemical markers of bone turnover at 3, 6, and 12 months. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse experience (AE) reporting.

RESULTS

Significantly greater increases in hip trochanter BMD were seen with alendronate (3.4%) than risedronate (2.1%) at 12 months (treatment difference, 1.4%; p < 0.001) as well as 6 months (treatment difference, 1.3%; p < 0.001). Significantly greater gains in BMD were seen with alendronate at all BMD sites measured (12-month difference: total hip, 1.0%; femoral neck, 0.7%; LS, 1.2%). Significant differences were seen as early as 6 months at all sites. A greater percentage of patients had > or =0% (p < 0.001) and > or =3% (p < 0.01) gain in trochanter and spine BMD at 12 months with alendronate than risedronate. Significantly greater (p < 0.001) reductions in all biochemical markers of bone turnover occurred with alendronate compared with risedronate by 3 months. No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in the incidence of upper gastrointestinal AEs or AEs causing discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this 12-month, head-to-head trial of alendronate and risedronate, given in accordance with the approved OW regimens for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, alendronate produced greater gains in BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover than risedronate. The greater antiresorptive effect of alendronate was seen as early as 3 months, and the tolerability profiles were similar.

Skeletal Morbidity in Men with Prostate Cancer: Quality-of-Life Considerations throughout the Continuum of Care

OBJECTIVE

With current treatments, men usually survive many years after being diagnosed with prostate cancer. However, without supportive care, the systemic effects of prostate cancer and therapies such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can undermine skeletal integrity, resulting in skeletal complications that may erode quality of life (QOL). Prostate cancer patients are at risk for fractures from cancer treatment-induced bone loss. In addition, they are also at risk for pathologic fractures, severe bone pain, and other sequelae from bone metastases, which almost invariably occur during the progression of prostate cancer. This review investigates the incidence and pathophysiology of bone loss and skeletal morbidity in prostate cancer patients and reviews available treatment options for maintaining skeletal health throughout the continuum of care for these patients.

METHODS

Studies were identified through MEDLINE searches, review of bibliographies of relevant articles, and review of abstracts from national meetings.

RESULTS

Several supportive care options are available to prevent generalized and localized bone loss, including calcium and vitamin D supplements and bisphosphonates. Oral calcium and vitamin D supplementation alone, however, appears to be insufficient to prevent bone loss during ADT. Zoledronic acid administered every 3 months during ADT or every 3 to 4 weeks for patients with bone metastases can reverse bone loss and reduce skeletal morbidity, respectively, in patients with prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletal complications contribute to the erosion of QOL in prostate cancer patients. Palliative care can provide important benefits to these patients. Some agents, such as zoledronic acid, may provide skeletal health benefits throughout the course of prostate cancer progression. Further investigations of the QOL impact of these benefits are warranted.

Genetic determinants of osteoporosis susceptibility in a female Ashkenazi Jewish population

PURPOSE

To determine the heritability of low bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip in Ashkenazi Jewish families.

METHODS

BMD at hip was accessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in 166 female subjects from 61 families. Variance component analysis was used to estimate genetic contributions.

RESULTS

We observed significant genetic contributions to age-adjusted BMD at the femoral neck as measured by heritability 0.67 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is significant genetic determination in decreased BMD at the femoral neck in an Ashkenazi Jewish female population. These results warrant further gene mapping studies in this population to identify osteoporosis susceptibility loci.

Once-weekly alendronate 70 mg and raloxifene 60 mg daily in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis*

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly (OW) alendronate (ALN) 70 mg and raloxifene (RLX) 60 mg daily in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

DESIGN

This 12-month, randomized, double-blind study enrolled 456 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (223 ALN, 233 RLX) at 52 sites in the United States. Efficacy measurements included lumbar spine (LS), total hip, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) at 6 and 12 months, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and percent of women who maintained or gained BMD in response to treatment. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in LS BMD at 12 months. Adverse experiences were recorded to assess treatment safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, OW ALN produced a significantly greater increase in LS BMD (4.4%, P < 0.001) than RLX (1.9%). The percentage of women with > or = 0% increase in LS BMD (ALN, 94%; RLX, 75%; P < 0.001) and > or =3% increase in LS BMD (ALN, 66%; RLX, 38%; P < 0.001) were significantly greater with ALN than RLX. Total hip and trochanter BMD increases were also significantly greater (P < or =0.001) with ALN. Greater (P < 0.001) reductions in N-telopeptide of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase were achieved with ALN compared with RLX at 6 and 12 months. No significant differences in the incidence of upper gastrointestinal or vasomotor adverse experiences were seen.

CONCLUSION

ALN 70 mg OW produced significantly greater increases in spine and hip BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover than RLX over 12 months. A greater percentage of women maintained or gained BMD on ALN than RLX. Both medications had similar safety and tolerability profiles.

Risedronate preserves bone architecture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as measured by three-dimensional microcomputed tomography

The deterioration of trabecular microarchitecture induced by elevated bone turnover is increasingly recognized as a factor in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures. We investigated the effect of the reduction of turnover with risedronate on trabecular architecture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Iliac crest bone biopsy specimens taken before and after 3 years of treatment from patients receiving risedronate 5 mg daily (n = 21) or placebo (n = 17) were analyzed using 3-D microcomputed tomography. We found a significant correlation between baseline bone turnover and bone loss in the placebo group, providing evidence that higher turnover induced higher bone loss leading to a greater degree of architectural degradation. When patients were classified into two groups based on baseline bone turnover (MS/BS less than or greater than the median value for the entire cohort), significant decreases in trabecular bone volume (BV/TV, P = 0.009) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th*, P = 0.008) and an increase in marrow star volume (Ma.St.V, P = 0.008), a measure of trabecular porosity, were observed in the higher turnover (MS/BS> median) placebo-treated patients. The trabecular structure shifted from plates to rods as shown by an increase in structure model index (SMI, P = 0.028) and bone surface to bone volume ratio (BS/BV, P = 0.006). The changes from baseline in the lower turnover (MS/BS<median) placebo patients were variable and not statistically significant. In the risedronate group, the bone volume and the architectural parameters did not change significantly from baseline values in either the higher or the lower turnover groups. Comparing the pair-wise changes from baseline in the higher turnover group, the placebo group experienced decreases in BV/TV (P = 0.071) and Tb.Th* (P = 0.012), and increase in Ma.St.V (P = 0.043), compared to the risedronate-treated women. Also, in comparison to the risedronate group, the trabecular structures in the placebo group were more rod-like, indicated by higher SMI (P = 0.009) and BS/BV (P = 0.02). The results demonstrated that trabecular architecture deteriorated significantly in the placebo-treated women who had higher bone turnover at baseline, and this deterioration was prevented by 3 years of risedronate treatment, presumably because of the reduction in bone turnover. The preservation of architecture may be a contributory mechanism by which risedronate reduces the risk of vertebral fractures in osteoporotic women.

Gaucher disease: alendronate disodium improves bone mineral density in adults receiving enzyme therapy

Symptomatic patients with Gaucher disease (GD) (acid beta-glucosidase [Gcase] deficiency) are treated with injectable human recombinant GCase. Treatment results in significant decreases in lipid storage in liver, spleen, and bone marrow, but the generalized osteopenia and focal bone lesions present in many adult patients are refractory to treatment. A double-blind, 2-arm, placebo-controlled trial of alendronate (40 mg/d) was performed in adults with GD who had been treated with enzyme for at least 24 months. Primary therapeutic endpoints were improvements in (1) bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) at the lumbar spine, and (2) focal lesions in x-rays of long bones assessed by a blinded reviewer. There were 34 patients with GD type 1 (age range, 18-50 years) receiving enzyme therapy who were randomized for this study. After 18 months, DeltaBMD at the lumbar spine was 0.068 +/- 0.21 and 0.015 +/- 0.034 for alendronate and placebo groups, respectively (P =.001). Long-bone x-rays showed no change in focal lesions or bone deformities in any subject in either arm. Alendronate is a useful adjunctive therapy in combination with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for the treatment of GD-related osteopenia in adults, but it cannot be expected to improve focal lesions.

Effects of a New Spinal Orthosis on Posture, Trunk Strength, and Quality of Life in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

One fourth of women > or =50 yrs of age in the general population have one or more vertebral fractures. The orthotic treatment modality in the management of vertebral fractures caused by osteoporosis remains subjective because no objective data from clinical trials are available. The objective of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of a newly developed spinal orthosis in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

DESIGN

We conducted a study that measured trunk muscle strength, angle of kyphosis, body height, body sway, and variables of quality of life such as pain, well-being, and limitations of daily living.

RESULTS

Wearing the orthosis for 6-mo period was associated with a 73% increase in back extensor strength, a 58% increase in abdominal flexor strength, an 11% decrease in angle of kyphosis, a 25% decrease in body sway, a 7% increase in vital capacity, a 38% decrease in average pain, a 15% increase in well-being, and a 27% decrease in limitations of daily living. The overall tolerability of the orthosis was good, no side-effects were reported, and the drop-out rate of 3% was rather low.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an orthosis increases trunk muscle strength and thus improves posture in patients with vertebral fractures caused by osteoporosis. In addition, a better quality of life is achieved by pain reduction, decreased limitations of daily living, and improved well-being. Therefore, the use of an orthosis may represent an efficacious nonpharmacologic treatment option for spinal osteoporosis.

Is bone mineral density predictive of fracture risk reduction?

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is a widely available noninvasive means of identifying individuals with osteoporosis and, possibly, those at high risk for fracture. This nonsystematic review examines the relationship between BMD increase and fracture risk reduction in clinical trials evaluating osteoporosis therapy. The trials examined here are predominantly in postmenopausal women. BMD increase correlates poorly with fracture risk reduction in clinical trials of osteoporosis therapy conducted in postmenopausal women. Although BMD may increase with therapy, the increase is not measurable until later, and the overall increase is too small to account for the timing and magnitude of fracture risk reduction. BMD is only one of many contributors to bone strength and fracture risk reduction. Bone strength is derived from bone quantity, which consists of density and size, and bone quality, which, in turn, consists of structure (micro- and macroarchitecture), material properties, and turnover. Data are beginning to accrue suggesting that changes in bone turnover markers may be an accurate predictor of fracture risk reduction. Future research will elucidate the link between changes in bone turnover markers and bone architecture as a measure of osteoporosis treatment efficacy. Until then, physicians will continue to rely on fracture risk reduction data from well-designed clinical trials when judging the efficacy of different treatments for osteoporosis.

Preventing osteoporotic fractures with antiresorptive therapy: implications of microarchitectural changes

Prospective studies have demonstrated that low bone mass correlates well with increased risk of osteoporotic fractures at various skeletal sites. Trials have likewise confirmed that enhancing bone mass with antiresorptive therapy reduces fracture incidence in individuals at risk. However, correlation of bone mineral density (BMD) increases with therapeutic risk reduction has proved less consistent than correlation of BMD decreases with greater fracture risk in the untreated. Indeed, various analyses have indicated that - even during treatment with potent bisphosphonates like alendronate and risedronate - BMD changes from baseline account for <30% of the reduction in vertebral fractures in treated women. It is clearly, therefore, that factors other than BMD are involved in the reduction of fracture risk achieved by antiresorptive therapies. According to recent micro-computed tomography imaging and other studies, antiresorptive therapy can help rebuild the microarchitecture of bone as well as strengthen the materials that go into it. When treating individuals with osteoporosis, these microarchitectural changes contribute to the reduction of fracture risk achieved by antiresorptive therapies.

Bone microarchitecture as an important determinant of bone strength

Structure and microarchitecture are determinant aspects of bone strength and essential elements for the assessment of bone mechanical properties. The main structural determinants of bone mechanical strength include width and porosity in the cortical bone; shape, width, connectivity, and anisotropy in the trabecular bone. There are several methods to assess bone architecture, particularly at the trabecular level. Two different approaches can be identified. The first is based on the use of optical microscopy and on the principles of quantitative histology, which evaluate microarchitecture two-dimensionally. The second applies the most modern diagnostic techniques, employing computed tomography and magnetic resonance to obtain and analyze three-dimensional images. From a clinical point of view, microarchitecture is an interesting aspect to study and define specific patterns, such as glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, or to evaluate bone alterations in transplanted patients. Microarchitecture seems to be a determinant of bone fragility independent of bone density. Moreover, bone microarchitecture seems to be important to understand the mechanisms of bone fragility as well as the action of the drugs used to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Several in vivo studies (on animals and humans) showed important findings on the effects of different treatments on microarchitecture. Bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone seemed to preserve or even improve microarchitecture. These observations can provide an additional interpretation for the anti-fracture effect of drugs from a structural viewpoint. The challenge for the future will be to evaluate bone quality in vivo with the same or better resolution and accuracy than the invasive methods in use today.

Relationship between changes in bone mineral density and vertebral fracture risk associated with risedronate: greater increases in bone mineral density do not relate to greater decreases in fracture risk

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is correlated with increased fracture risk. Whether greater BMD increases induced by osteoporosis drugs are related to greater decreases in fracture risk is controversial. We analyzed the relationship between BMD change and fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving antiresorptive treatment. The analysis combined data from three pivotal risedronate fracture end-point trials. Women received risedronate (n = 2047) or placebo (n = 1177) daily for up to 3 yr. The BMD and vertebral radiographs were assessed periodically during 3 yr. The estimated risk of new vertebral fracture was compared between patients whose BMD increased and those whose BMD decreased. Risedronate-treated patients whose BMD decreased were at a significantly greater risk (p = 0.003) of sustaining a vertebral fracture than patients whose BMD increased. The fracture risk was similar (about 10%) in risedronate-treated patients whose increases in BMD were < 5% (the median change from baseline) and in those whose increases were >/= 5% (p = 0.453). The changes in lumbar spine BMD explained only 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%, 26%; p < 0.001) of risedronate's vertebral fracture efficacy. Although patients showing an increase in BMD had a lower fracture risk than patients showing a decrease in BMD, greater increases in BMD did not necessarily predict greater decreases in fracture risk.

Pamidronate is an effective treatment for osteoporosis in patients with beta-thalassaemia

Osteoporosis in beta-thalassaemia is multifactorial; increased osteoclast function seems to play an important role in its pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pamidronate on the osteoporosis of thalassaemia. To this effect we studied 26 patients who received this drug in doses of 30 or 60 mg i.v. once a month over 12 months. The effects were monitored by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in association with markers of osteoclast function [soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (sRANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG)] and of bone remodelling [N-telopeptide of collagen type-I (NTX), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform-5b (TRACP-5b), bone-alkaline phosphatase (bALP), and osteocalcin (OC)]. Thirty healthy individuals were also studied, as controls. NTX, TRACP-5b, bALP and OC levels were significantly higher in thalassaemic patients compared with controls; in contrast, OPG levels were significantly lower, while the levels of sRANKL varied within normal limits. Administration of pamidronate was followed by a clear decrease of NTX, TRACP-5b, OPG, and OC, and by a significant increase in the BMD of the lumbar spine, which was similar in patients of both treatment groups. These data suggest that pamidronate, at a monthly dose of 30 mg, is an effective treatment for thalassaemic osteoporosis.

Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial

Prevalent vertebral fractures and baseline bone mineral density (BMD) predict subsequent fracture risk. The objective of this analysis is to examine whether baseline vertebral fracture severity can predict new vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk. In the randomized, double-blind 3-year Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial, 7705 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (low BMD or prevalent vertebral fractures) were randomly assigned to placebo, raloxifene 60 mg/day, or raloxifene 120 mg/day. Post hoc analyses studied the association between baseline fracture severity and new fracture risk in the placebo group and the effects of placebo, raloxifene 60 mg/day, and raloxifene 120 mg/day on new fracture risk in women with the most severe prevalent vertebral fractures (n = 614). Vertebral fracture severity was visually assessed using semiquantitative analysis of radiographs and categorized by estimated decreases in vertebral heights. Reported new nonvertebral fractures were radiographically confirmed. Baseline vertebral fracture severity predicted vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk at 3 years. In women without prevalent vertebral fractures, 4.3 and 5.5% had new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, respectively. In women with mild, moderate, and severe prevalent vertebral fractures, 10.5, 23.6, and 38.1% respectively had new vertebral fractures, whereas 7.2, 7.7, and 13.8% respectively experienced new nonvertebral fractures. Number of prevalent vertebral fractures and baseline BMD also predicted vertebral fracture risk, but the severity of prevalent vertebral fractures was the only predictor of nonvertebral fracture risk and remained a significant predictor after adjustment for baseline characteristics, including baseline BMD. In patients with severe baseline vertebral fractures, raloxifene 60 mg/day decreased the risks of new vertebral [RR 0.74 (95% Cl 0.54, 0.99); P = 0.048] and nonvertebral (clavicle, humerus, wrist, pelvis, hip, and leg) fractures [RH 0.53 (95% CI 0.29, 0.99); P = 0.046] at 3 years. To prevent one new fracture at 3 years in women with severe baseline vertebral fractures with raloxifene 60 mg/day, the number needed to treat (NNT) was 10 for vertebral and 18 for nonvertebral fractures. Similar results were observed in women receiving raloxifene 120 mg/day. In summary, baseline vertebral fracture severity was the best independent predictor for new vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk. Raloxifene decreased new vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk in the subgroup of women with severe vertebral fractures at baseline. These fractures may reflect architectural deterioration, independent of BMD, leading to increased skeletal fragility.

Low-dose intravenous pamidronate reduces fractures in childhood osteoporosis

Despite the proven efficacy of low-dose pamidronate in adults with osteoporosis, the efficacy of the low-dose regimen in children has not been studied. Pamidronate (1 mg/kg) was administered intravenously once every 3 months to 11 children with osteoporosis. Treatment was associated with reduced fracture rates and increased areal (BMD) and volumetric (BMAD) bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The mean annualized percent gain was 20.1 +/- 16.9 (4.7 to 59.1, n = 9) for spinal BMD and 15.1 +/- 18.1 (-11.0 to 40.2, n = 9) for spinal BMAD. Common adverse effects including fever, muscle aches, nausea and fatigue were self-limited and generally occurred only after the first infusion. Clinically significant hypocalcemia did not occur. Low-dose pamidronate appears promising in the treatment of childhood osteoporosis.

Design and methodology of the phase 3 trials for the clinical development of strontium ranelate in the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

The phase 3 program for strontium ranelate, a new oral agent in the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the daily oral dose of 2 g. This program was conducted in 12 countries, involved 75 centers, and was structured in 3 studies: FIRST (Fracture International Run-in for Strontium ranelate Trial), SOTI (Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention study) and TROPOS (TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis). FIRST, a run-in open study, was designed to start the normalization of the calcium and vitamin D status of the patients, check all entry criteria, and ensure inclusion of a sufficient number of well-motivated patients in either one of the two therapeutic intervention protocols, SOTI or TROPOS: FIRST included 9,196 patients. SOTI and TROPOS were prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing, in two parallel groups, the daily oral dose of 2 g of strontium ranelate with placebo, the patients of both groups receiving calcium and vitamin D according to their own deficiencies. The main objective of SOTI and TROPOS was to demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of postmenopausal women experiencing a new osteoporotic fracture (vertebral fracture in SOTI and nonvertebral fracture in TROPOS) over a 3-year treatment period, the total duration of the studies being 5 years. SOTI included 1,649 women with at least one osteoporotic vertebral fracture at inclusion and a lumbar BMD </=0.840 g/cm(2). TROPOS included 5,091 women with a femoral neck BMD </=0.600 g/cm(2). The phase 3 program for the clinical development of strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is a long-term program with the main statistical analysis after 3 years of treatment. Its aim is to demonstrate the effect of strontium ranelate on the axial and appendicular skeleton as well as its tolerability in osteoporotic patients with replete calcium and vitamin D stores.

A randomized double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of teriparatide [recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34)] with alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Teriparatide (rDNA origin) injection [recombinant human PTH (1-34)] stimulates bone formation, increases bone mineral density (BMD), and restores bone architecture and integrity. In contrast, bisphosphonates reduce bone resorption and increase BMD. We compared the effects of teriparatide and alendronate sodium on BMD, nonvertebral fracture incidence, and bone turnover in 146 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Women were randomized to either once-daily sc injections of teriparatide 40 micro g plus oral placebo (n = 73) or oral alendronate 10 mg plus placebo injection (n = 73). Median duration of treatment was 14 months. At 3 months, teriparatide increased lumbar spine BMD significantly more than did alendronate (P < 0.001). Lumbar spine-BMD increased by 12.2% in the teriparatide group and 5.6% in the alendronate group (P < 0.001 teriparatide vs. alendronate). Teriparatide increased femoral neck BMD and total body bone mineral significantly more than did alendronate, but BMD at the one third distal radius decreased, compared with alendronate (P < or = 0.05). Nonvertebral fracture incidence was significantly lower in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group (P < 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated despite transient mild asymptomatic hypercalcemia with teriparatide treatment. In conclusion, teriparatide, a bone formation agent, increased BMD at most sites and decreased nonvertebral fractures more than alendronate.

Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis and the relationship between bone density and fractures

We review the methodologic quality of the individual randomized trials and summarize the impact of different treatments on the risk of fractures and bone density. We present an estimate of the expected impact of anti-osteoporosis interventions on fracture incidence in prevention and treatment populations using numbers needed to treat. We also examine the relationship between changes in bone density and the relative risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures using regression analyses drawn from the results of the systematic reviews. We also outline other important facets of the decision-making process regarding osteoporosis therapy, including attitudes toward uncertainty, circumstances, and patients' and societal preferences.

What is the role of serial bone mineral density measurements in patient management?

The ability of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to monitor bone mineral density (BMD) has been well documented in epidemiologic and pharmaceutical trials. However, its application to monitoring of patients in clinical practice has been subject to recent controversies. Despite these controversies, most clinical centers rely on DXA for monitoring of patients, and therefore guidance is needed. In this article, we report the positions developed by an expert panel of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry on the use of densitometry for the serial measurement of bone mass for monitoring change in BMD. The panel found DXA to be a precise method of measuring change in BMD if used with an appropriate level of least significant change (LSC), at anatomic sites with good precision and response to therapy, and at 1- to 2-yr time intervals. Monitoring is acceptable for determining when therapy is indicated, and if an agent is not therapeutically effective (i.e., when bone loss occurs despite treatment). Each densitometry center should perform an in vivo precision study on individuals similar to the patient population at the center and determine LSC at a 95% confidence level. If such a precision study cannot be performed, benchmark precision might be used, although there was no agreement on what values should be used. The PA spine is the preferred anatomic site for monitoring. The total hip can be used when the spine study is technically invalid. We conclude with recommendations for further research.