Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases

Determination of itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole in plasma by use of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with on-line solid-phase extraction

In this paper a method for the simultaneous quantification of the anti-fungal drug itraconazole and its co-active metabolite hydroxyitraconazole in plasma employing liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry and automated solid-phase extraction is described. The method proved rugged, enables short turn-around times and is highly specific. Since there is growing evidence for the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring of itraconazole in the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections, the method described here is of interest for a large number of tertiary care hospital laboratories.

Prediction of human clearance from animal data and molecular structural parameters using multivariate regression analysis

The aim of the study reported here was to develop a method for predicting human clearance that can be applied to various kinds of drugs using clearance values for rats and dogs and some molecular structural parameters. The clearance data for rats, dogs, and humans of 68 drugs were obtained from literature. The compounds have various structures, pharmacological activities, and pharmacokinetic characteristics. In addition, molecular weight, c log P, and the number of hydrogen bond acceptors were used as possible descriptors related to the human clearance value for each drug. Three types of regression methods, multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis, partial least squares (PLS) method, and artificial neural network (ANN), were used to predict human clearance, and their predictive performances were compared with allometric approaches, which have been widely used in interspecies scaling. In MLR and PLS analyses, interaction terms were introduced to evaluate the nonlinear relationships. For the data sets used in the present study, MLR and PLS with quadratic terms gave the same equation and the best predictive performance. The value of the squared cross-validated correlation coefficient (q(2)) was 0.682. In conclusion, the MLR method using animal clearance data from only two species and using easily calculated structural parameters can generally predict human clearance better than allometric methods. This approach can be applied to drugs with various characteristics.

Effect of Food Consistency on the Pharmacokinetics of Ranitidine in Healthy Volunteers

Background

Food can affect the bioavailability of various drugs, and the consistency of food may also affect the bioavailability of drugs when they have to be given simultaneously. Alterations of ranitidine bioavailability due to food consistency have not been well documented.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of food consistency on the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine.

Methods

The study included 20 healthy volunteers. In the first phase, volunteers received oral ranitidine 300 mg after a meal of solid consistency (SC). Two weeks later (washout period), subjects took the medication after ingesting food of liquid consistency (LC); blood samples were drawn for both groups at the same intervals and were analyzed using HPLC.

Results

The AUC was nearly 30% greater with LC than with SC, maximum concentration was 665.81 ± 192.21 (SC) versus 1177.30 ± 588.19 ng/mL (LC). Mean ± SD volume of distribution was 5.93 ± 1.69 (SC) versus 3.76 ± 0.61 L/kg (LC). These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

It is evident that there are differences in drug availability due to the ingestion of foods with different consistency. It is possible that altered bioavailability of ranitidine affects its efficacy as an inhibitor of gastric secretion.

Determination of the time of onset of action of ranitidine and famotidine on intra-gastric acidity

BACKGROUND

No standard methods exist for determining the onset of action of gastric antisecretory agents in human subjects.

METHODS

Intragastric pH was measured when placebo, ranitidine 150 mg, ranitidine 75 mg or famotidine 10 mg were administered 30 min after the end of a meal.

RESULTS

When the onset of action was defined as the earliest time that mean gastric pH with active treatment was statistically significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the corresponding placebo value, the onsets of action of ranitidine 75 mg and 150 mg were 55 min, and of famotidine 10 mg, 90 min. When onset was defined in terms of a particular decrease in gastric acid concentration for the group as a whole or for individual subjects, there was an important variation in the relative times of onset of ranitidine 75 mg and famotidine 10 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

When administered after a meal, the onset of action of ranitidine and famotidine on gastric pH can be determined for individual subjects as well as for the group as a whole. When onset was determined for the group using statistical significance, which does not depend on arbitrary cut-off points, ranitidine 75 mg had an earlier onset of action than did famotidine 10 mg.

Ranitidine reduces ischemia/reperfusion-induced liver injury in rats by inhibiting neutrophil activation

We previously reported that ranitidine, an H(2) receptor antagonist, inhibited neutrophil activation in vitro and in vivo, contributing to reduce stress-induced gastric mucosal injury in rats. In this study, we examined whether ranitidine would reduce ischemia/reperfusion-induced liver injury, in which activated neutrophils are critically involved, in rats. We also examined the effect of famotidine, another H(2) receptor antagonist, on leukocyte activation in vitro and after ischemia/reperfusion-induced liver injury in rats to know whether inhibition of neutrophil activation by ranitidine might be dependent on its blockade of H(2) receptors. Ranitidine inhibited the activation of neutrophils in vitro as reported previously, whereas famotidine significantly enhanced it. Ranitidine inhibited the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in monocytes stimulated with lipopolysaccharide in vitro, whereas famotidine did not. Although hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-induced increases in hepatic tissue levels of TNF-alpha, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant, and hepatic accumulation of neutrophils were inhibited by intravenously administered 30 mg/kg ranitidine, these increases were significantly enhanced by 5 mg/kg i.v. famotidine. The decreases in both hepatic tissue blood flow and bile secretion and the increases in serum levels of transaminases seen after reperfusion were significantly inhibited by ranitidine, whereas these changes were more marked in animals given famotidine than in controls. These observations strongly suggested that ranitidine could reduce ischemia/reperfusion-induced liver injury by inhibiting neutrophil activation directly, or indirectly by inhibiting the production of TNF-alpha, which is a potent activator of neutrophils. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy of ranitidine might not be explained solely by its blockade of H(2) receptor.

Measurement of meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion by in vivo gastric autotitration

Measurement of meal- stimulated gastric acid secretion using manual intragastric titration is demanding in terms of personnel and specialized equipment. In the present study, we used a new method, in vivo gastric autotitration, to determine meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion. Gastric pH was measured every 4 s before, during, and after ingestion of a standard meal in 24 healthy subjects. Placebo, ranitidine (150 mg), ranitidine (75 mg), or famotidine (10 mg) was given 1 h after the beginning of the meal. Meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion was calculated from the amount of HCl required to titrate the homogenized standard meal to pH 2 in vitro (119 mmol) and the time required for the pH of the ingested meal to decrease to pH 2 in vivo. Values for pH were also converted to acid concentration (mM), and integrated acidity was calculated from the cumulative, time-weighted means of the acid concentrations for every fourth second of the postprandial recording period. Control meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion was 60 (40-71) mmol/h (median; interquartile range), and each histamine H(2)-receptor antagonist significantly decreased secretion by approximately 50%. Meal-stimulated acid secretion correlated directly with postprandial integrated gastric acidity (r = 0.72; P = 0.0001). Thus intragastric autotitration is a convenient, reproducible method for measuring gastric acid secretion after ingestion of a solid meal and offers several advantages over manual intragastric titration.

The AMOR study: a randomized, double-blinded trial of omeprazole versus ranitidine together with amoxycillin and metronidazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Besides antibiotics, additionally effective acid inhibition is necessary for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the significance of acid suppression and, in particular, treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) compared with H2 receptor antagonists (H2 RAs). The primary target parameter for the study was H. pylori eradication. In addition, the ulcer healing rate, speed of pain reduction, score for gastritis in the antrum and gastric body, and rate of side effects were recorded.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded, multicentre study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 456 patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcers were included in the study.

METHODS

Using a randomization list, patients were assigned either to a treatment group receiving omeprazole 40 mg once daily, amoxycillin 750 mg three times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day (OAM), or to a group receiving ranitidine 300 mg once daily, amoxycillin 750 mg three times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day (RAM). The treatment period was 7 days in both groups. Long-term acid-suppressant treatment was not given.

RESULTS

The eradication rate was 87.1% (169/194, intention to treat [ITT]) in the OAM group and 77% (137/ 178, ITT) in the RAM group. The difference of 10.1% (95% CI 2.5-18%) is statistically significant (P= 0.0104). The ulcer healing rate was 93.3% in the OAM group (181/194, ITT) and 92.1% in the RAM group (164/178, ITT, NS). With regard to the speed and intensity of pain reduction, the OAM group was superior to the RAM group. In patients in whom H. pylori eradication was successful, the reduction in the antral and gastric body gastritis score was significantly greater than in patients without eradication. In the OAM group, 39.1% of the patients (n = 90) reported one or more side effects, compared with 44.7% (n = 101) in the RAM group (P= 1.5449, NS).

CONCLUSION

Omeprazole (40 mg once daily in the morning) is significantly more effective than ranitidine (300 mg once daily in the morning) with respect to H. pylori eradication when used together with amoxycillin (750 mg three times a day) and metronidazole (500 mg three times a day) for a 7-day treatment period.

Rapid determination of ranitidine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography without solvent extraction

A simple high-performance liquid chromatographic procedure was developed for the determination of ranitidine in human plasma. The method entailed direct injection of the plasma samples after deproteination using perchloric acid. The chromatographic separation was accomplished with an isocratic elution using mobile phase consisting of 21 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate-triethylamine-acetonitrile (1000:60:150, v/v), pH 3.5. Analyses were run at a flow-rate of 1.3 ml/min using a microbondapak C18 column and ultraviolet detection at a wavelength of 320 nm. The method was specific and sensitive, with a quantification limit of approximately 20 ng/ml and a detection limit of 5 ng/ml at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1. The mean absolute recovery was about 96%, while the within- and between-day coefficient of variation and percent error values of the assay method were all less than 8%. The linearity was assessed in the range of 20-1000 ng/ml plasma, with a correlation coefficient of greater than 0.999. This method has been used to analyze several hundred human plasma samples for bioavailability studies.

Influence of age on the steady state disposition of drugs commonly used for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

The success of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori might be affected by the age of patients.

AIM

To investigate whether disposition of drugs commonly used for H. pylori eradication is age-dependent.

METHODS

Trough steady state serum levels of lansoprazole or ranitidine, amoxycillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole were monitored in 232 patients during the last dosing interval of a 5-day quadruple H. pylori eradication regimen. Detailed pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 28 patients.

RESULTS

Linear correlations between age and trough serum levels were observed with lansoprazole (r=0.25; P=0.002), ranitidine (r=0. 38; P=0.001) and clarithromycin (r=0.36; P < 0.0001). These associations were also inversely dependent of creatinine clearance for ranitidine (r=0.36; P=0.001) and clarithromycin (r=0.30; P < 0. 0001). Multiple linear regression revealed age as an important factor influencing trough serum levels of lansoprazole, clarithromycin and ranitidine. There were significant inverse relationships between creatinine clearance and area under curve of ranitidine (r=0.88; P < 0.0001) and amoxycillin (r=0.56; P=0.002). Multiple linear regression revealed serum creatinine as the most important factor influencing the area under curve of ranitidine, clarithromycin and amoxycillin.

CONCLUSIONS

Age per se has little influence on pharmacokinetics of amoxycillin and ranitidine, which depend more on age-dependent decline in renal function. The influence of age, but not renal function was established for lansoprazole. Age and renal function have independent impacts on clarithromycin disposition.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

As Helicobacter pylori plays an important role in the aetiopathogenesis of peptic ulcer, therapeutic strategies aimed at maintaining long term remission have shifted from the control of intragastric pH to targeting H. pylori. According to recent international guidelines the clinical goals--rapid ulcer healing and prevention of relapse--can be best accomplished by combination therapy consisting of an antisecretory drug (proton pump inhibitor or ranitidine) and 2 antimicrobial agents (preferable amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole). When applying such multidrug regimens, possible synergy between the agents suggests that pharmacokinetic considerations might help to improve H. pylori eradication rates, which should be above 85 to 90% on an intention-to-treat basis. The present review summarises the pharmacokinetic properties and interaction potential of all drugs presently used in the various H. pylori eradication regimens, with emphasis on particular patient populations such as the elderly and those with renal impairment. The drugs considered are omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, ranitidine and ranitidine bismutrex, bismuth salts, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, roxithromycin, metronidazole, tinidazole and tetracycline. When addressing the clinically important questions of the efficacy, safety and costs of the recommended regimens, the impact of drug disposition on H. pylori eradication should not be neglected.

A review of eprosartan pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interaction studies

A series of clinical pharmacology studies was conducted to characterize potential interactions between eprosartan and other commonly prescribed drugs. Separate studies assessed the effect of eprosartan on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and the pharmacodynamics of warfarin and glyburide (glibenclamide), as well as the effects of ranitidine, HCTZ, fluconazole, and ketoconazole on eprosartan pharmacokinetics. Eprosartan had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin and HCTZ and the pharmacodynamics of warfarin and glyburide. Thus, no dosing adjustments are necessary during concomitant therapy with these agents. Ranitidine, HCTZ, ketoconazole, and fluconazole had no effect on eprosartan pharmacokinetics. Single or multiple oral doses of eprosartan were safe and well tolerated when coadministered with these agents.

Interspecies scaling of renally secreted drugs

The objective of this study is to predict pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance, volume of distribution at steady state, and elimination half-life) in humans from animal data for drugs which are renally secreted in humans. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ten drugs were scaled-up from animal data obtained from the literature. Using simple allometry (pharmacokinetic parameter of interest vs body weight), total, renal and nonrenal clearances, volume of distribution and half-life were predicted in humans. The predicted parameters were compared with the observed parameters. The results of the study indicated that it is likely that the predicted total and renal clearances from animal data will be underestimated in humans for renally secreted drugs. The prediction of renal clearance was improved by normalizing the renal clearance by a 'correction factor' for animals who exhibited renal secretion. The predicted volume and half-life were comparable with the observed values in man. Overall, the results of this study indicate that caution should be employed in interpreting the total and renal clearance of renally secreted drugs predicted by the allometric approach.

An Antibody From a Patient With Ranitidine-Induced Thrombocytopenia Recognizes a Site on Glycoprotein IX That Is a Favored Target for Drug-Induced Antibodies

Although thrombocytopenia associated with the use of histamine H2 receptor (H2R) antagonists has been described, a drug-dependent, platelet-reactive antibody has not previously been identified in such cases. We studied serum from a patient who developed acute, severe thrombocytopenia after exposure to the H2 receptor antagonist, ranitidine, and identified an antibody that reacted with normal platelets in the presence of this drug at pharmacologic concentrations. In flow cytometric and immunoprecipitation studies, the antibody was shown to be specific for the glycoprotein Ib/IX complex (GPIb/IX). From the pattern of monoclonal antibody (MoAb) inhibition and the reactions of antibody with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with GPIX and GPIbβ, we found that the patient's antibody is specific for an epitope on GPIX close to, or identical with a site recognized by the MoAb SZ1 that is a common target for antibodies induced by quinine and quinidine, drugs structurally unrelated to ranitidine. These findings provide evidence that immune thrombocytopenia can be caused by sensitivity to an H2 R antagonist and suggest that the SZ1 binding site on GPIX may be a common target for drug-induced antibodies. Further studies of the epitope for which SZ1 is specific may provide clues to the mechanism(s) by which drugs promote tight binding of antibody to a membrane glycoprotein and cause platelet destruction in patients with drug sensitivity.

An Antibody From a Patient With Ranitidine-Induced Thrombocytopenia Recognizes a Site on Glycoprotein IX That Is a Favored Target for Drug-Induced Antibodies

Although thrombocytopenia associated with the use of histamine H2 receptor (H2R) antagonists has been described, a drug-dependent, platelet-reactive antibody has not previously been identified in such cases. We studied serum from a patient who developed acute, severe thrombocytopenia after exposure to the H2 receptor antagonist, ranitidine, and identified an antibody that reacted with normal platelets in the presence of this drug at pharmacologic concentrations. In flow cytometric and immunoprecipitation studies, the antibody was shown to be specific for the glycoprotein Ib/IX complex (GPIb/IX). From the pattern of monoclonal antibody (MoAb) inhibition and the reactions of antibody with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with GPIX and GPIbβ, we found that the patient's antibody is specific for an epitope on GPIX close to, or identical with a site recognized by the MoAb SZ1 that is a common target for antibodies induced by quinine and quinidine, drugs structurally unrelated to ranitidine. These findings provide evidence that immune thrombocytopenia can be caused by sensitivity to an H2 R antagonist and suggest that the SZ1 binding site on GPIX may be a common target for drug-induced antibodies. Further studies of the epitope for which SZ1 is specific may provide clues to the mechanism(s) by which drugs promote tight binding of antibody to a membrane glycoprotein and cause platelet destruction in patients with drug sensitivity.

Gastrointestinal motility and gastric tube feeding in mechanically ventilated patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the fasted and fed gastrointestinal motility characteristics that are possibly responsible for gastric retention in mechanically ventilated patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, case series.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Seven patients who required mechanical ventilation for thoracic or combined thoracic-neurologic injuries and nine healthy volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Antroduodenal manometry was performed during fasting and gastric feeding with a polymeric diet in patients during mechanical ventilation, weaning, and after detubation. Gastric retention volumes were determined during gastric tube feeding. Motility data were compared with recordings from nine healthy volunteers. During the fasting state, under sedation and morphine, the migrating motor complex in patients was significantly (p < .001) shortened: median 32.0 vs. 101.0 mins in healthy volunteers. During gastric tube feeding, the motility pattern did not convert to a normal postprandial pattern until morphine was discontinued. An interdigestive or mixed interdigestive-postprandial pattern was seen during gastric tube feeding in most patients during morphine administration. Most (94%) of the activity fronts during gastric feeding started in the duodenum. Gastric retention percentages during gastric tube feeding were negatively correlated (r2=.44; p < .01) with antral motor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that morphine administration affects antroduodenal motility in mechanically ventilated patients. The gastrointestinal motor pattern involved in impaired gastric emptying in morphine-treated patients is characterized by antral hypomotility and persisting duodenal activity fronts during continuous intragastric feeding. The observed motility patterns suggest that early administration of enteral feeding might be more effective into the duodenum or jejunum than into the stomach of mechanically ventilated patients.

Effect of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered eprosartan, an angiotensin II antagonist, in healthy male volunteers

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of eprosartan in healthy male volunteers.

DESIGN

Single-center, randomized, open-label, two-period, period-balanced, crossover study.

PATIENTS

Seventeen healthy men aged 19 to 43 years.

INTERVENTION

In each period (separated by a > or = 7 d washout), subjects received a single 400-mg oral dose of eprosartan alone, or a single oral dose of eprosartan 400 mg and ranitidine 150 mg on day 4 after 3 days of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. Serial pharmacokinetic samples were obtained for up to 24 hours following eprosartan dosing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Plasma and urine eprosartan concentrations during each treatment session.

RESULTS

Eprosartan maximum concentration (Cmax), the AUC from time-zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and renal clearance (Cl(r)) values were approximately 7%, 11%, and 4% lower, respectively, when administered with ranitidine compared with eprosartan alone. The 95% CIs for the ratio of eprosartan plus ranitidine compared with eprosartan alone were 0.81 to 1.07, 0.77 to 1.03, and 0.64 to 1.43, for Cmax, AUC0-t, and Cl(r), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference between regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated doses of ranitidine did not have a marked effect on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of eprosartan.

Pharmacology of JB-9315, a new selective histamine H2-receptor antagonist

1. The histamine H2-receptor antagonistic activity and antisecretory and antiulcer effects of JB-9315 were studied in comparison with the standard H2 blocker ranitidine. 2. In vitro, JB-9315 is a competitive antagonist of histamine H2 receptors in the isolated, spontaneously beating guinea-pig right atrium, with a pA2 value of 7.30 relative to a value of 7.36 for ranitidine. JB-9315 was specific for the histamine H2 receptor because, at high concentration, it did not affect histamine- or acetylcholine-induced contractions in guinea-pig isolated ileum or rat isolated duodenum, respectively. 3. JB-9315 dose dependently inhibited histamine-, pentagastrin- or carbachol-stimulated acid secretion and basal secretion in the perfused stomach preparation of the anesthetized rat. In the pylorus-ligated rat after intraperitoneal administration, total acid output over 4 h was inhibited by JB-9315 with an ID50 of 32.8 mg/kg, confirming its H2-receptor antagonist properties. 4. JB-9315 showed antiulcer activity against cold stress plus indomethacin-induced lesions with an ID50 of 6.8 mg/kg. 5. JB-9315, 50 and 100 mg/kg, inhibited macroscopic gastric hemorrhagic lesions induced by ethanol. In contrast, ranitidine (50 mg/kg) failed to reduce these lesions. 6. These results indicate that JB-9315 is a new antiulcer drug that exerts a cytoprotective effect in addition to its gastric antisecretory activity.

Effect of cationic drugs on the renal secretion of ranitidine in the rat isolated perfused kidney

1. The rat isolated perfused kidney (IPK) was used to determine whether the renal tubular secretion of ranitidine is influenced by clinically relevant concentrations of other organic cationic drugs (amantadine, pseudoephedrine, triamterene and trimethoprim) that also undergo tubular secretion. 2. Ranitidine and [3H]-ranitidine were administered to the recirculating perfusion medium as a loading dose followed by a constant infusion to maintain clinically relevant perfusate ranitidine concentrations in the range 400-700 ng/mL. The renal clearance of ranitidine (CL[R]) was calculated, as was glomerular filtration rate (GFR), from the renal clearance of [14C]-inulin. 3. A total of 20 perfusions were performed and, in each case, ranitidine was administered for 80 min. In four control IPK, no drug other than ranitidine was administered. In the remaining IPK, amantadine, pseudoephedrine, triamterene or trimethoprim (n = 4 in each case) were administered to achieve low, medium and high concentrations during the 20-40, 40-60 and 60-80 min periods, respectively. 4. The mean (+/- SD) unbound fraction of ranitidine in the perfusion medium was 0.889 +/- 0.046 and was not altered (P>0.05) by the presence of the other drugs. 5. The CL(R)/GFR ratio for ranitidine in all kidneys was substantially greater than unity and had a mean value of 10.65 or greater in control kidneys, indicating extensive net tubular secretion. 6. The CL(R)/GFR was not affected (P>0.05) by amantadine, pseudoephedrine or triamterene at any concentration or by trimethoprim at the low concentration. However, medium (2000 ng/mL) and high (5000 ng/mL) concentrations of trimethoprim caused significant reductions in CL(R)/GFR of 20 and 28%, respectively (P<0.05). 7. The results indicate that at clinically relevant concentrations the renal tubular secretion of ranitidine is inhibited by trimethoprim, but not by amantadine, pseudoephedrine or triamterene.

Human drug absorption kinetics and comparison to Caco-2 monolayer permeabilities

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the drug absorption kinetics of three drugs and compare their resulting first-order intestinal permeation rate constants to their Caco-2 monolayer permeabilities.

METHODS

In vitro dissolution--in vivo absorption analysis was conducted on four formulations of each ranitidine HCl, metoprolol tartrate, and piroxicam to yield apparent and "true" human clinical permeation rate constants. Drug permeability coefficients through Caco-2 monolayers were also determined.

RESULTS

In vitro dissolution--in vivo absorption analysis revealed different relative and absolute contributions of dissolution and intestinal permeation to overall drug absorption kinetics for various drug formulations and yielded estimates of each drug's true and apparent human intestinal permeation rate constant [kp = 0.225 hr-1, 0.609 hr-1, and 9.00 hr-1 for ranitidine, metoprolol, and piroxicam, respectively]. A rank order relationship was observed for both the apparent and true permeation rate constant with Caco-2 monolayer permeability. The decrease in the true permeation rate constant relative to the apparent permeation rate constant was most significant (almost three-fold) for the least permeable compound, ranitidine.

CONCLUSIONS

There were marked differences in the permeation kinetics of ranitidine, metoprolol, and piroxicam. The possibility of an association between absorption kinetics from dosage forms in humans and Caco-2 monolayer permeability may allow for a direct kinetic interpretation of human oral absorption from Caco-2 monolayer permeability values.

Age-dependent eradication of Helicobacter pylori with dual therapy

BACKGROUND

Combined treatment using an acid-inhibiting drug with antibiotics can cure Helicobacter pylori infection. However, eradication rates are highly variable, especially if a proton pump inhibitor is used with amoxycillin. Therefore it is important to define factors/predictors of the clinical outcome.

METHODS

In a single-blind study, 60 H. pylori-positive patients prospectively matched for diagnosis (erosive gastritis, duodenal and gastric ulcer), age (above and below 50 years) and smoking habits were randomly treated (each group n = 20) for 2 weeks with amoxycillin (1 mg b.d.) and either omeprazole (20 mg b.d.), lansoprazole (30 mg b.d.) or ranitidine (300 mg b.d.). Intragastric pH and plasma levels of the administered drugs were monitored over a dosing interval of 12 h.

RESULTS

The overall eradication rates were 45% (intention-to-treat, ITT, 27/60) or 47% (per protocol 27/58); they did not differ (ITT) between omeprazole (50%), lansoprazole (40%) and ranitidine (45%). Median pH and time at which intragastric pH was above 4 was slightly lower for ranitidine (4.0 +/- 1.7; 51 +/- 25%) than for omeprazole (5.4 +/- 1.1: 77 +/- 25%; P < 0.05) or lansoprazole (4.4 +/- 1.6: 68 +/- 32%). Plasma concentrations of amoxycillin were comparable in all three treatment groups. Post-treatment H. pylori status was not dependent on those levels, or the drug-induced extent or duration of increased intragastric pH. However, H. pylori-eradicated patients were significantly (P < 0.05) older (56 +/- 13 years) than patients still H. pylori-positive (47 +/- 14 years). In addition, in patients older than 50 years (n = 33), eradication was higher (P < 0.01) than in patients (n = 25) below 50 years (65 vs. 24%). Eradication rate was highest (75-83%) in subgroups of patients (> 50 years and history of peptic ulcer or smokers). Neither activity/grade of peptic ulcer or erosive gastritis nor initial diagnosis were predictors for clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

The age of patients must be regarded as a major determinant of H. pylori eradication rate and may represent an important factor contributing to the highly variable clinical results.

Stability of ranitidine and thiamine in parenteral nutrition solutions

Our objectives were to ascertain the stability of thiamine HCl (3 mg/L) and ranitidine HCl (150 mg/L) at room and refrigeration temperatures in a central vein formula of parenteral nutrition (PN) solution (containing 6% amino acid, 25% carbohydrate, macro- and microminerals, and multivitamins) and to determine the effect of ranitidine on the stability of thiamine. Stability of thiamine and ranitidine in PN solutions was also compared with PN-salt solutions, which contained no amino acids or carbohydrates, to indirectly ascertain the impact of these macronutrients on the stability of these moieties. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods were developed to measure thiamine and ranitidine in the PN mixture. Stability studies were conducted in triplicate and each sample was assayed in duplicate using newly developed HPLC methods. Refrigeration provided stability for both ranitidine and thiamine for extended periods of time. At room temperature, ranitidine was also shown to be stable for about 188 h; there was, however, significant degradation of thiamine at 24 h with, and without, addition of ranitidine. The time required for 10% of thiamine to degrade was calculated to be 12.9 h for the PN mixture containing multivitamins and ranitidine; 11.1 h for the PN mixture containing multivitamins alone; and 33.4 h for the PN mixture containing only thiamine HCl. This work suggests that the concentration of thiamine in this central vein PN formula, with or without ranitidine, falls below the 90% acceptable stability within 24 h.

Gynecomastia with metoclopramide use in pediatric patients

Gynecomastia and galactorrhea stemming from hyperprolactinemia have been reported in adults after the use of metoclopramide. We describe the cases of an adolescent with gynecomastia and an infant with gynecomastia and galactorrhea that were the result of metoclopramide therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

In vitro-in vivo relationships of several "immediate" release tablets containing a low permeability drug

The objective of this work was to gain insight into the biopharmaceutical performance of four different but bioequivalent ranitidine hydrochloride tablet formulations. This analysis employed a recently described method1 to relate in vitro and in vivo data and aimed to facilitate an understanding of oral drug product performance. For each ranitidine formulation, dissolution was performed using the USP procedure. A four-way, single dose bioequivalence study (n = 14) was performed. The fraction of the total amount of dose absorbed at each plasma sample time was determined by the Wagner-Nelson method. Equation 1 (see below) was fitted to the in vitro vs. in vivo data. For all four formulations, this analysis suggests absorption was permeation-rate limited, where ranitidine exhibited a low permeation rate constant of 0.01/min.

Evaluation of sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in humans

A bioequivalence study of two oral formulations of 300 mg ranitidine was carried out in 16 healthy volunteers (8 men and 8 women), and the pharmacokinetics in both sexes were compared. There was bioequivalence of both formulations. The terminal half-life of ranitidine was 7% shorter and the oral apparent clearance 10.5% higher in women (1.44 L/h/kg) than in men (1.29 L/h/kg), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. No differences were observed in maximum concentration (Cmax) or the time of its occurrence (tmax). Sex, age, and weight did not correlate significantly with oral clearance. These results suggest that there are no sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine, or that any differences would not be of clinical relevance. It also should be emphasized that bioequivalence trials also can be used to study other pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic characteristics of drugs without damaging the main endpoint of the study.

A risk-benefit assessment of drugs used in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is the cause of chronic active gastritis and predisposes to peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Furthermore, H. pylori is linked to the pathogenesis of gastric lymphoma and gastric cancer. However, treatment of this infection has proven difficult. In the last decade, many antimicrobial compounds have been studied extensively as monotherapy as well as in combination with bismuth or acid-suppressive drugs. The individual drugs and the most important eradication regimens are discussed with special regard to their risks. In the past, highly complex multidrug regimens, fear of adverse effects and frequent eradication failures have hampered the broad acceptance of H. pylori-eradication therapies. Recently, new 1-week, low-dose combination regimens of 2 antibacterials with a proton pump inhibitor have consistently achieved eradication rates of 90% and more with an acceptably low rate of adverse effects. One week's standard triple therapy [tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (or bismuth salicylate plus metronidazole plus tetracycline or amoxicillin) has been shown to be highly effective and tolerated better in combination with a proton pump inhibitor. This regimen is, however, more complex and has more adverse effects. Therefore, it is not recommended as first-line therapy. Equipped with these therapies physicians can now be strongly encouraged to use H. pylori eradication as the therapy of choice for patients with PUD and even extend this treatment to other H. pylori-associated disease conditions.

Absence of tolerance in duodenal ulcer patients treated for 28 days with a bedtime dose of roxatidine or ranitidine

There is much experimental work on the occurrence of tolerance to the antisecretory effect of H2-receptor antagonists in healthy subjects, while data on its development in patients with duodenal ulcer are poor and conflicting. Moreover, this phenomenon has not been studied previously with 24 h gastric pH-metry in patients with active duodenal ulcer. For these reasons, we carried out a prospective pharmacodynamic investigation in 48 patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer using the well-established once daily dosing schedule of H2 blockers. They were studied by means of 24 h continuous endoluminal pH-metry which was performed before, on d1 and d28 after receiving an oral bedtime dose (2200 hours) of either roxatidine 150 mg or ranitidine 300 mg, given in randomized and single-blind fashion. Eight patients did not complete the study for various reasons and 82% of ulcers healed after 4 weeks of therapy. Gastric pH was higher (P < 0.001) on d1 and d28 than basal values during all time periods, but the evening, with both H2 blockers. There was no significant difference between pH values of d1 and d28 in any time interval with both roxatidine and ranitidine. There was also no difference in pharmacodynamic data between the two active treatments. We conclude that tolerance does not develop after 1 month's treatment with a bedtime dose of H2 antagonist in patients with active duodenal ulcer and therefore data gathered on this phenomenon in healthy subjects are not applicable to ulcer patients.

JB-9322, a new selective histamine H2-receptor antagonist with potent gastric mucosal protective properties

1. JB-9322 is a selective histamine H2-receptor antagonist with gastric antisecretory activity and mucosal protective properties. 2. The affinity of JB-9322 for the guinea-pig atria histamine H2-receptor was approximately 2 times greater than that of ranitidine. 3. In vivo, the ID50 value for the inhibition of gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats was 5.28 mg kg-1 intraperitoneally. JB-9322 also dose-dependently inhibited gastric juice volume and pepsin secretion. In gastric lumen-perfused rats, intravenous injection of JB-9322 dose-dependently reduced histamine-, pentagastrin- and carbachol-stimulated gastric acid secretion. 4. JB-9322 showed antiulcer activity against aspirin and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions and was more potent than ranitidine. 5. JB-9322 effectively inhibited macroscopic gastric haemorrhagic lesions induced by ethanol. Intraperitoneal injection was effective in preventing the lesions as well as oral treatment. The oral ID50 value for these lesions was 1.33 mg kg-1. By contrast, ranitidine (50 mg kg-1) failed to reduce these lesions. In addition, the protective effect of JB-9322 was independent of prostaglandin synthesis. 6. These results indicate that JB-9322 is a new antiulcer drug that exerts a potent cytoprotective effect in addition to its gastric antisecretory activity.

Fungal cultures on cyanoacrylate skin surface strippings as a dose-finding method for topical antifungals. A placebo-controlled study with 0.25% and 0.50% itraconazole cream

The antimycotic activities of 0.25% and 0.50% itraconazole cream were compared in the stratum corneum after once-daily applications for 1 week. Two groups of 12 healthy volunteers applied either itraconazole or placebo on the inner side of each forearm, in a double-blind design. Cyanoacrylate skin surface strippings (CSSS) were taken on days 8, 11 and 21. Conidia or yeasts of selected fungi (Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton metagrophytes, Microsporum canis and Candida albicans) were deposited on CSSS. Fungal growth on CSSS was assessed in time by computerized image analysis to derive the inhibitory effect of the previously applied antifungal preparations. Comparable antimycotic activity was found against dermatophytes for both concentrations. Itraconazole 0.50% appeared to be more active than 0.25% against C. albicans. The 0.50% concentration yielded prominent fungitoxic effect after 1 week of treatment, and showed a lingering effect in the stratum corneum for at least 3 days. This method could be useful in a pre-clinical setting and serve as a predictive tool for further clinical dose-finding studies with topical antimycotics.

Safety of acid-suppressing drugs

There is an extensive literature on the adverse effects of drugs that inhibit gastric acid secretion. This study presents a critical examination of interactions between antisecretory drugs and other compounds, the frequency of serious adverse effects relating to various body systems, the safety of antisecretory drugs in pregnancy, and longer-term safety data from postmarketing surveillance studies. While interactions with some other drugs, alcohol, and certain carcinogens are of potential concern, in practice clinically significant reactions appear to be rare if they occur at all. A small number of major side-effects have been documented, but they occur rarely, and postmarketing surveillance has not detected other longer-term sequelae. Safety of these drugs in pregnancy is not established, as data are so few. It is concluded that antisecretory agents, by comparison with most other classes of drugs, are remarkably well tolerated.

Lansoprazole. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and its therapeutic efficacy in acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is a benzimidazole derivative that effectively decreases gastric acid secretion, regardless of the primary stimulus, via inhibition of gastric H+,K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase). It provides effective symptom relief and healing of peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis after 4 to 8 weeks of therapy and appears to prevent recurrence of lesions when administered as maintenance therapy. When administered at therapeutic dosages, lansoprazole produced higher healing rates than ranitidine or famotidine in patients with duodenal and gastric ulcers. Lansoprazole heals duodenal ulcers more rapidly than ranitidine or famotidine. Relief of ulcer symptoms in lansoprazole recipients is at least equivalent to, and tends to be more rapid than, that in patients receiving histamine H2-receptor antagonists. In comparisons with omeprazole 20 mg/day, lansoprazole 30 mg/day produced duodenal ulcer healing more rapidly and reduced ulcer pain to a greater extent at 2 weeks, but overall healing rates were similar after 4 weeks of therapy. At therapeutic dosages, lansoprazole produces superior healing and symptom relief of reflux oesophagitis in comparison with ranitidine, and it tends to relieve heartburn more effectively than omeprazole, although both agents produce equivalent healing. Healing of peptic ulcers or reflux oesophagitis refractory to histamine H2-receptor antagonists occurs after 8 weeks in the majority of patients treated with lansoprazole, and lansoprazole and omeprazole demonstrate similar efficacy in patients with refractory peptic ulcers. In patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, lansoprazole effectively controls mean basal gastric acid output. Lansoprazole is generally well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of adverse effects is similar to that of omeprazole, ranitidine and famotidine in comparative studies. Combination therapy with lansoprazole and antibacterial agents such as amoxicillin, tinidazole, roxithromycin and/or metronidazole appears to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in 22 to 80% of patients with this organism. Limited data also suggest that lansoprazole may have superior activity against H. pylori in comparison with omeprazole, although the clinical relevance of this preliminary finding requires further confirmation. Thus, lansoprazole may be considered as alternative to existing antisecretory agents available for the treatment of acid-related disorders, particularly because it may provide more rapid healing and relief of symptoms.

Site-dependent small intestinal absorption of ranitidine

The site-dependent, small intestinal absorption characteristics of ranitidine were estimated by the intestinal steady state perfusion technique (triple lumen tubing system) combined with simultaneous measurement of serum concentrations of ranitidine. Ranitidine 150 mg.l-1 was perfused at 10 ml.min-1 for 180 min in different sites of the small intestine between 65-250 cm beyond the teeth. Each of 9 healthy, male volunteers was examined twice, using perfusion sites in different regions of the small intestine to permit intraindividual comparisons. The absorption rates (micrograms.30 cm-1.min-1) calculated from intestinal samples showed distinct site-dependence; the highest rates (medians 160-923 micrograms.30 cm-1.min-1) were found in the most proximal region (duodenojejunal junction), and the most distal perfusion sites (distal jejunum/ileum) showed median rates from 193 to 265 micrograms.30 cm-1.min-1. In both of these regions there was a significant positive correlation between the net intestinal water flux and the movement of ranitidine. Within the mid-jejunum, every subject showed marked secretion of ranitidine into the gut lumen (medians -338 to -124 micrograms.30 cm-1.min-1), and in this region there was no influence of water flux on ranitidine movement. The intraluminal results were confirmed by the corresponding site-dependent areas under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC), which decreased with the distance of the perfusion site from the teeth. After the more distal perfusions individual AUCs amounted to 64-16% of the AUCs obtained after more proximal applications. The results demonstrate the small intestine as the site of a gradient of absorption of ranitidine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Over-the-counter histamine2-blocker therapy

In determining whether a prescription medication should be granted OTC status, the risks and benefits of treatment with the medication must be weighed. Ultimately, the decision must be made with some degree of uncertainty. Pharmacists must take advantage of this uncertainty to demonstrate their professional expertise and value to society. The Rx-to-OTC switch for H2-blockers may benefit many, although not all, patients with acid peptic complaints, and it offers pharmacists an opportunity to demonstrate their willingness and ability to assist in the use of cost-effective OTC drug therapy.

Ranitidine bismuth citrate and aspirin-induced gastric mucosal injury

The aim of this study was to investigate the protective action of a new compound, ranitidine bismuth citrate, in the prevention of aspirin-induced acute mucosal injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract of healthy human volunteers. In a double-blind randomized three-way cross-over study 24 male volunteers received placebo, 900 mg aspirin or 900 mg aspirin and 800 mg ranitidine bismuth citrate at 12-h intervals for nine doses with a 2-week wash-out period between each treatment. The median (interquartile range) number of erosions seen at endoscopy when ranitidine bismuth citrate was given with aspirin (1 [0-4]) was significantly lower than aspirin alone (24 [16-32]) (P < 0.001) and not significantly different from either baseline or placebo (0 [0-2]). These findings were similarly reflected in the effects on microbleeding following the ninth dose: 12.1 (7.1-21.0) microL/10 min following aspirin alone compared to levels with placebo of 1.2 (0.4-2.9), and with aspirin and ranitidine bismuth citrate of 1.6 (0.8-2.6) (P < 0.005). Ranitidine bismuth citrate conferred substantial protection from aspirin-induced injury to the gastric and duodenal mucosa as determined by both endoscopic assessment and microbleeding rates, reducing injury to placebo levels.

Pharmacology of gastric acid inhibition

Gastric acid secretion is precisely regulated by neural (acetylcholine), hormonal (gastrin), and paracrine (histamine; somatostatin) mechanisms. The stimulatory effect of acetylcholine and gastrin is mediated via increase in cytosolic calcium, whereas that of histamine is mediated via activation of adenylate cyclase and generation of cAMP. Potentiation between histamine and either gastrin or acetylcholine may reflect postreceptor interaction between the distinct pathways and/or the ability of gastrin and acetylcholine to release histamine from mucosal ECL cells. The prime inhibitor of acid secretion is somatostatin. Its inhibitory paracrine effect is mediated predominantly by receptors coupled via guanine nucleotide binding proteins to inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity. All the pathways converge on and modulate the activity of the luminal enzyme, H+,K(+)-ATPase, the proton pump of the parietal cell. Precise information on the mechanisms involved in gastric acid secretion and the identification of specific receptor subtypes has led to the development of potent drugs capable of inhibiting acid secretion. These include competitive antagonists that interact with stimulatory receptors (e.g. muscarinic M1-receptor antagonists and histamine H2-receptor antagonists) as well as non-competitive inhibitors of H+,K(+)-ATPase (e.g. omeprazole). The histamine H2-receptor antagonists (cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, nizatidine and roxatidine acetate) continue as first-line therapy for peptic ulcer disease and are effective in preventing relapse. Although they are generally well tolerated, histamine H2-receptor antagonists may cause untoward CNS, cardiac and endocrine effects, as well as interfering with the absorption, metabolism and elimination of various drugs. The dominance of the histamine H2-receptor antagonists is now being challenged by omeprazole. Omeprazole reaches the parietal cell via the bloodstream, diffuses through the cytoplasm and becomes activated and trapped as a sulfenamide in the acidic canaliculus of the parietal cell. Here, it covalently binds to H+,K(+)-ATPase, the hydrogen pump of the parietal cell, thereby irreversibly blocking acid secretion in response to all modes of stimulation. The main potential drawback to its use is its extreme potency which sometimes leads to virtual anacidity, gastrin cell hyperplasia, hypergastrinaemia and, in rats, to the development of carcinoid tumours. The cholinergic receptor on the parietal cell has recently been identified as an M3 subtype and that on postganglionic intramural neurones of the submucosal plexus as an M1 subtype.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists in peptic ulcer disease. Efficacy in healing peptic ulcers

Duodenal ulcer healing depends on the degree and length of inhibition of gastric secretion and upon the duration of therapy, while gastric ulcer healing is dependent mainly on the duration of therapy. Currently marketed doses of the histamine H2-receptor antagonists heal between 77 and 92% of duodenal ulcers at 4 weeks, and adjuvant treatment to eradicate Helicobacter pylori increases this rate. Once-daily administration is as effective as more frequent dosing regimens and may even result in higher healing rates. Gastric ulcers heal more slowly, but 75 to 88% of ulcers heal after 8 weeks of treatment. While newer more potent acid suppressors such as omeprazole heal ulcers slightly more quickly, the H2-receptor antagonists have an unparalleled safety record of over 15 years. It is unlikely that the prostaglandin analogues can improve on the efficacy of the H2-receptor antagonists with as low an incidence of side effects.

Pharmacokinetic-interaction study of didanosine and ranitidine in patients seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus

The potential pharmacokinetic interactions between didanosine, an acid-labile antiretroviral agent, and ranitidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, were evaluated by a crossover study of 12 male patients seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus. Single oral doses of 375 mg of didanosine, formulated as a citrate-phosphate-buffered sachet, or of 150 mg of ranitidine were administered alone or in combination (ranitidine was given 2 h prior to didanosine). Serial blood samples and total urinary output were collected after each treatment and analyzed for didanosine and/or ranitidine by validated high-performance liquid chromatography-UV assay methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. There were significant increases in mean area under the curve from time zero to infinity and mean urinary recovery for didanosine given in combination with ranitidine compared with those for didanosine alone. There were no significant differences between didanosine coadministered with ranitidine and didanosine alone in the respective mean peak concentrations in plasma, times to peak, elimination half-lives, or renal clearances. The mean area under the curve for ranitidine given with didanosine was significantly less than that for ranitidine given alone. There were no significant differences between the mean peak concentrations in plasma, times to peak, elimination half-lives, renal clearances, or urinary recovery values for ranitidine coadministered with didanosine and values for ranitidine given alone. These data demonstrate that administration of didanosine 2 h after ranitidine will result in a minor increase in the bioavailability of didanosine. A modification in the dose of didanosine or ranitidine is not necessary if the dose of ranitidine precedes that of didanosine by 2 h.

Lansoprazole. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its therapeutic efficacy in acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is an effective acid pump inhibitor acting at the final enzymatic step of the acid secretory pathway of the parietal cell, decreasing gastric acid secretion regardless of the primary stimulus. Results of short term (less than 8 weeks) clinical trials have shown lansoprazole to be significantly superior to placebo and ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer, both in the rate of healing and in overall healing at 4 weeks. Lansoprazole appears to heal duodenal ulcer more quickly than famotidine, and demonstrates slightly greater efficacy at 4 weeks, although both drugs appear to have equivalent efficacy overall. Gastric ulcers and reflux oesophagitis are also healed by lansoprazole 30 mg/day for 4 to 8 weeks, with healing rates after 8 weeks of approximately 85 to 95% for both indications. Lansoprazole appears to be superior to ranitidine and comparable to omeprazole in treating reflux oesophagitis. Furthermore, lansoprazole has relieved reflux symptoms more quickly than either ranitidine or omeprazole. Preliminary data also indicate that lansoprazole may be effective in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and reflux oesophagitis refractory to H2-receptor antagonists, and in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. While direct comparisons with omeprazole are limited, results suggest that lansoprazole, used for short term treatment, is at least as effective as omeprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer and reflux oesphagitis. Lansoprazole has been well tolerated in short term clinical trials, with an incidence of adverse effects comparable with that of other agents in its therapeutic class. Trials assessing long term tolerability data are ongoing and will be required as part of the assessment of the safety profile, if lansoprazole is to be used prophylactically to prevent ulcer recurrence. Thus, by virtue of its ability to heal ulcers and rapidly relieve associated symptomatology, lansoprazole represents a useful alternative for the treatment of acid related disorders.

pH-feedback controlled infusions of ranitidine are no more effective than fixed-dose infusions in reducing gastric acidity and variability in antisecretory responses

1. The antisecretory responses to pH-feedback controlled (maximum dose 800 mg 24 h-1) and fixed-dose (0.25 mg kg-1 h-1) continuous infusions of ranitidine were compared in a randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in 10 healthy male volunteers. 2. To assess tolerance during repeated dosing with ranitidine, the same infusion regimens were given before and after 6 days oral dosing with ranitidine 300 mg four times daily. 3. With the pH-feedback controlled infusion of ranitidine the median % time (interquartile range) with pH greater than 4 in the 24 h period was 57% (45-76) before and 23% (17-34) after 6 days oral dosing (P less than 0.001). The respective values with fixed-dose infusion were 51% (38-63) and 26% (15-32) (P less than 0.002). 4. The median 24 h doses (interquartile range) of ranitidine given by feedback-controlled infusion before and after 6 days oral dosing were 675 mg (542-728) and 749 mg (709-760), respectively (P less than 0.01). The dose of ranitidine given by fixed-rate infusion was 423 mg (393-502) on both study days (P less than 0.001 vs feedback infusion). 5. Plasma gastrin concentrations remained slightly elevated after 6 days of oral ranitidine dosing, whereas pancreatic polypeptide plasma levels remained unchanged. 6. The antisecretory efficacy of infusions of ranitidine is significantly decreased by circadian stimuli and tolerance. Individually-adapted infusions of high doses of ranitidine were not superior to fixed-dose infusion of 0.25 mg kg-1 h-1 in overcoming this variability.

Medical Therapy of Peptic Ulcer Disease

The gastric duodenal mucosa normally is protected from the damaging effects of gastric acid and pepsin by ill-defined mechanisms. Ulcers may arise when there is an imbalance between the aggressive and defensive factors that renders the mucosa susceptible to damage. A variety of factors have been identified that may favor the development of peptic ulcers, but no single pathophysiologic defect applies in all ulcer patients. In duodenal ulcers, gastric acid hypersecretion is observed in as many as one third of patients; however, most patients with duodenal ulcers secrete normal amounts of gastric acid. Decreased mucosal bicarbonate secretion may be important in at least some duodenal ulcer patients. Use of NSAIDs may cause either gastric or duodenal ulcers, probably through the inhibition of mucosal prostaglandin synthesis and disruption of mucosal defenses. Finally, a recently identified bacterium, H. pylori, causes a chronic gastritis that is found in the overwhelming majority of patients with duodenal ulcers and non-NSAID-associated gastric ulcers. This bacterium may play a pivotal role in ulcer pathogenesis and, especially, in ulcer recurrences. A number of drugs of proved efficacy are available for the treatment of acute duodenal and gastric ulcers. The H2 receptor antagonists administered once daily remain the mainstay of ulcer therapy because of their efficacy, ease of use, and excellent safety profile. More thorough and long-lasting acid inhibition is afforded by the H+/K(+)-ATPase inhibitor omeprazole. This agent also promotes more rapid ulcer healing, but in most patients, this minor advantage may not justify the higher cost. It is not known whether more rapid healing will translate into lower ulcer complication rates. Until further data are available, this drug may be preferable in patients with large or complicated ulcers. In patients with refractory ulcers, omeprazole is clearly superior to other available agents. Agents that promote mucosal defense mechanisms are becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of duodenal ulcers but have undergone less testing than in gastric ulcers. Sucralfate 1 g four times daily is equivalent to H2 antagonists in the treatment of duodenal ulcers and, probably, gastric ulcers. Its requirement for multiple daily doses makes it somewhat less attractive at present to most patients. Low- to medium-dose Al-containing antacids are inexpensive and efficacious in duodenal ulcer therapy. They should remain as therapeutic options for the compliant patient in whom cost considerations are important. Colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg four times a day is comparable to other agents in the acute treatment of duodenal ulcers and likely gastric ulcers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Tolerance and rebound to H2-receptor antagonists: intragastric acidity in patients with duodenal ulcer

Tolerance to the antisecretory effects of H2-receptor antagonists develops consistently in healthy volunteers. The aim of this study was to determine whether tolerance occurs with repeated dosing of H2-receptor antagonists in patients with duodenal ulcer. Continuous intragastric 24-hr pH measurements were performed in 12 patients with duodenal ulcer in symptomatic remission before, on days 1 and 29, and two days after receiving ranitidine 300 mg four times a day for 34 days. The 24-hr median intragastric pH (interquartile range) was 5.4 (4.4-6.1) on day 1 and 4.6 (4.0-5.2) on day 29 of dosing with ranitidine (not significant). Median nighttime pH was 6.8 (6.3-7.0) on day 1 and 6.8 (6.6-7.1) on day 29 (not significant). During the daytime, the median pH decreased marginally from 4.7 (3.8-5.2) on day 1 to 3.8 (3.0-4.6) on day 29 (P less than 0.03). There was no difference in median intragastric pH during 24-hr, day and night periods before and two days after ranitidine dosing. No significant tolerance or rebound to H2-receptor antagonists was observed in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. This contrasts with data gathered in healthy volunteers and may be due to defects in the regulation of acid secretion in duodenal ulcer disease.

Comparative tolerability profile of omeprazole in clinical trials

The tolerability of omeprazole was compared to control agents in 68 clinical studies that enrolled a total of 4846 patients, of whom 3096 received omeprazole. The incidence of adverse experiences was independent of omeprazole dose administered, the age of the patients, and the disease treated (duodenal ulcer or endoscopically verified gastroesophageal reflux disease). The most common clinical adverse experiences were headache, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. The most common laboratory adverse experiences were elevated aspartate aminotransferase and elevated alanine aminotransferase. Omeprazole was well tolerated, and the incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences was similar in patients receiving omeprazole, placebo, cimetidine, or ranitidine.

Roxatidine acetate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and its therapeutic potential in peptic ulcer disease and related disorders

Roxatidine acetate is a histamine H2-receptor antagonist which, after almost complete oral absorption (greater than 95%), is rapidly converted to its active metabolite, roxatidine, by esterases in the small intestine, plasma and liver. Roxatidine is a potent inhibitor of basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion in animals and humans and, like most other H2-receptor antagonists, has no anti-androgenic effects and does not interfere with the hepatic metabolism of other drugs. Large-scale trials have shown that roxatidine acetate 150mg per day is as effective as standard doses of cimetidine and ranitidine in the treatment of patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer, and that roxatidine acetate 75mg in the evening is likely to become a 'standard' regimen for the prevention of peptic ulcer recurrence. Preliminary data also suggest that roxatidine acetate may be useful in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and stomal ulcer, and in the prevention of pulmonary acid aspiration. Roxatidine acetate is an H2-receptor antagonist which has been well tolerated in clinical trials. However, broader experience is required before definitive statements about tolerability relative to other H2-receptor antagonists can be made, and before the role of roxatidine acetate in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and stomal ulcer, and the prophylaxis of acid aspiration pneumonitis, can be clearly defined.

Omeprazole. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Omeprazole is the first of a new class of drugs, the acid pump inhibitors, which control gastric acid secretion at the final stage of the acid secretory pathway and thus reduce basal and stimulated acid secretion irrespective of the stimulus. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers, omeprazole as a single 20 mg daily dose provides more rapid and complete healing compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or 300 mg at nighttime, or cimetidine 800 or 1000 mg/day. Patients poorly responsive to treatment with histamine H2-receptor antagonists respond well to omeprazole--most ulcers healed within 4 to 8 weeks of omeprazole 40 mg/day therapy. Omeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day has been administered as maintenance therapy for peptic ulcer disease for up to 5.5 years with very few ulcer recurrences. In patients with erosive or ulcerative oesophagitis, omeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day produces healing in about 80% of patients after 4 weeks, and is superior to ranitidine with respect to both healing and symptom relief. Healing rates of greater than 80% are achieved after 8 weeks in patients with severe reflux oesophagitis unresponsive to H2-receptor antagonists. Maintenance therapy with a daily 20 mg dose prevents relapse in about 80% of patients over a 12-month period. Omeprazole is considered to be the best pharmacological option for controlling gastric acid secretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Daily dosages of 20 to 360 (median 60 to 70 mg successfully reduce basal acid output to target levels (less than 10 mmol/h or less than 5 mmol/h in patients with severe oesophagitis or partial gastrectomy) during treatment for up to 4 years. Omeprazole is well tolerated in short term studies (up to 12 weeks); the reported incidence of serious side effects (about 1%) being similar to that seen in patients treated with an histamine H2-receptor antagonist. The longer term tolerability of omeprazole has been investigated in patients treated for up to 5.5 years. Slight hyperplasia, but no evidence of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell dysplasia or neoplasia or ECL cell carcinoids has been reported. ECL cell carcinoids have been observed in rats after life-long treatment with high doses of omeprazole or ranitidine, or in rats with partial corpectomy; the weight of experimental evidence indicates that this is a result of prolonged hypergastrinaemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Side effects of ranitidine

Ranitidine was first marketed in 1981; since then many patients have been treated such that much experience has been accumulated on the safety of this histamine H2-receptor antagonist in the treatment of gastroduodenal disease. A wide array of ranitidine-associated side effects has been described, but infrequently. As so much information is now available, the aim of this review is to assess the weight of evidence for a causal link between ranitidine and the reported side effects. Overall, ranitidine is well tolerated. The incidence of general side effects at less than 2% is very similar to placebo. Headaches, tiredness, dizziness and mild gastrointestinal disturbance (e.g. diarrhoea, constipation and nausea) are among the most frequent complaints, but have very seldom resulted in stopping treatment. Cardiovascular side effects are extremely rare and unpredictable with the usual doses of oral ranitidine (at most 1 in 1 million patients). They mostly comprise sinusal bradycardia and atrioventricular blockade, especially after rapid intravenous administration, receding after cessation of the drug. Clinical studies, however, have not shown a significant pharmacological effect of ranitidine on the cardiovascular system via H2-receptors, even though individual sensitivities cannot be ruled out in a few isolated reports. Ranitidine is unlikely to be directly hepatotoxic: a transient change in liver function tests has been noted in only 1 in 100 to 1 in 1000 patients. Several cases of mixed hepatitis have been reported, but very few were fully documented. The incidence of ranitidine-associated acute hepatitis has been estimated to be less than 1 in 100,000 patients. Neuropsychiatric complications may be less common and clinically quite similar to those reported with cimetidine, i.e. confusion, disorientation, hallucinations, delirium. These side effects have occurred especially in critically ill and multiple-therapy patients, or patients with chronic renal or hepatic failure, so that the direct causal link with ranitidine treatment was often difficult to ascertain. Even though an H2-receptor-mediated effect is an attractive hypothesis (since similar complications were noted with other H2-receptor antagonists), other mechanisms have been suggested to play a role, e.g. cholinergic or histaminic effects. The overall incidence of neuropsychiatric complications is probably markedly less than 1%. White cell injury (i.e. agranulocytosis) appears to be the most frequent haematological complication, even though case reports are very few and poorly documented.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)