Distinguishing persistent insulin autoantibodies with differential risk: nonradioactive bivalent proinsulin/insulin autoantibody assay

Reliable diagnosis of murine type 1 diabetes using a panel of autoantigens and "antigen surrogates" mounted onto a liquid array

Autoantibodies raised against β cell antigens are the most reliable preclinical biomarkers for predicting the imminent onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The most current detection platforms are technically challenging or are run on clinically esoteric equipment. Here, we present a straightforward approach to detect autoantibody biomarkers that employs highly PEGylated microspheres onto which are mounted various capture agents that include affinity-tagged antigens or small molecule "antigen surrogates." After incubation with small quantities of serum, the bound autoantibodies can be measured using a standard flow cytometer. By multiplexing this assay, we show that a panel of antigen and antigen surrogates reliably predicts hyperglycemia in a mouse model of diabetes without false positives.

Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association

Insights from prospective, longitudinal studies of individuals at risk for developing type 1 diabetes have demonstrated that the disease is a continuum that progresses sequentially at variable but predictable rates through distinct identifiable stages prior to the onset of symptoms. Stage 1 is defined as the presence of β-cell autoimmunity as evidenced by the presence of two or more islet autoantibodies with normoglycemia and is presymptomatic, stage 2 as the presence of β-cell autoimmunity with dysglycemia and is presymptomatic, and stage 3 as onset of symptomatic disease. Adoption of this staging classification provides a standardized taxonomy for type 1 diabetes and will aid the development of therapies and the design of clinical trials to prevent symptomatic disease, promote precision medicine, and provide a framework for an optimized benefit/risk ratio that will impact regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption of interventions in the early stages of type 1 diabetes to prevent symptomatic disease.

Type 1 diabetes: A predictable disease

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by loss of insulin producing beta cells and reliance on exogenous insulin for survival. T1D is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood and the incidence is increasing, especially in children less than 5 years of age. In individuals with a genetic predisposition, an unidentified trigger initiates an abnormal immune response and the development of islet autoantibodies directed against proteins in insulin producing beta cells. There are currently four biochemical islet autoantibodies measured in the serum directed against insulin, glutamic decarboxylase, islet antigen 2, and zinc transporter 8. Development of islet autoantibodies occurs before clinical diagnosis of T1D, making T1D a predictable disease in an individual with 2 or more autoantibodies. Screening for islet autoantibodies is still predominantly done through research studies, but efforts are underway to screen the general population. The benefits of screening for islet autoantibodies include decreasing the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis that can be life threatening, initiating insulin therapy sooner in the disease process, and evaluating safe and specific therapies in large randomized clinical intervention trials to delay or prevent progression to diabetes onset.

Electrochemiluminescence assays for insulin and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies improve prediction of type 1 diabetes risk

We recently developed new electrochemiluminescence (ECL) insulin autoantibody (IAA) and glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody (GADA) assays that discriminate high-affinity, high-risk diabetes-specific autoantibodies from low-affinity, low-risk islet autoantibodies (iAbs) detected by radioassay (RAD). Here, we report a further validation of the ECL-IAA and -GADA assays in 3,484 TrialNet study participants. The ECL assay and RAD were congruent in those with prediabetes and in subjects with multiple autoantibodies, but only 24% (P<0.0001) of single RAD-IAA-positive and 46% (P<0.0001) of single RAD-GADA-positive were confirmed by the ECL-IAA and -GADA assays, respectively. During a follow-up (mean, 2.4 years), 51% of RAD-IAA-positive and 63% of RAD-GADA-positive subjects not confirmed by ECL became iAb negative, compared with only 17% of RAD-IAA-positive (P<0.0001) and 15% of RAD-GADA-positive (P<0.0001) subjects confirmed by ECL assays. Among subjects with multiple iAbs, diabetes-free survival was significantly shorter if IAA or GADA was positive by ECL and negative by RAD than if IAA or GADA was negative by ECL and positive by RAD (P<0.019 and P<0.0001, respectively). Both positive and negative predictive values in terms of progression to type 1 diabetes mellitus were superior for ECL-IAA and ECL-GADA, compared with RADs. The prevalence of the high-risk human leukocyte antigen-DR3/4, DQB1*0302 genotype was significantly higher in subjects with RAD-IAA or RAD-GADA confirmed by ECL. In conclusion, both ECL-IAA and -GADA are more disease-specific and better able to predict the risk of progression to type 1 diabetes mellitus than the current standard RADs.

Novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for autoimmune diabetes--a prime time to treat insulitis as a disease

Type 1 diabetes is a progressive autoimmune disease with no curative treatment, making prevention critical. At the time of diagnosis, a majority of the insulin secreting β-cells have already been destroyed. Insulitis, lymphocytic infiltration to the pancreatic islets, is believed to begin months to years before the clinical symptoms of insulin deficiency appear. Insulitis should be treated as its own disease, for it is a known precursor to autoimmune diabetes. Because it is difficult to detect insulitic cellular infiltrates noninvasively, considerable interest has been focused on the levels of islet autoantibodies in blood as measurable diagnostic markers for islet autoimmunity. The traditional islet autoantibody detection assays have many limitations. New electrochemiluminescence-based autoantibody detection assays have the potential to overcome these challenges and they offer promising, cost-effective screening tools in identifying high-risk individuals for trials of preventive interventions. Here, we outline diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to overcome pancreatic β-cell destroying insulitis.

A plasmonic chip for biomarker discovery and diagnosis of type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease, whereas type 2 diabetes (T2D) results from insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. Previously, the onset of these two separate diseases was easily distinguished, with children being most at risk for T1D and T2D occurring in overweight adults. However, the dramatic rise in obesity, coupled with the notable increase in T1D, has created a large overlap in these previously discrete patient populations. Delayed diagnosis of T1D can result in severe illness or death, and rapid diagnosis of T1D is critical for the efficacy of emerging therapies. However, attempts to apply next-generation platforms have been unsuccessful for detecting diabetes biomarkers. Here we describe the development of a plasmonic gold chip for near-infrared fluorescence-enhanced (NIR-FE) detection of islet cell-targeting autoantibodies. We demonstrate that this platform has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of T1D and can be used to discover previously unknown biomarkers of T1D.

MAS-1 adjuvant immunotherapy generates robust Th2 type and regulatory immune responses providing long-term protection from diabetes in late-stage pre-diabetic NOD mice

MAS-1, a nanoparticular, emulsion-based adjuvant, was evaluated for its ability to promote Th2 and regulatory immune responses and prevent type 1 diabetes progression when given alone or as antigen-specific immunotherapy (ASI) using insulin B chain (IBC; MER3101) and its analog B:9-23(19Ala) (MER3102). MAS-1 formulations were administered to NOD mice at age 9 and 13 weeks and followed through 52 weeks. MER3101 and MER3102 provided long-term protection with 60% and 73% of mice remaining diabetes-free at week 35, and 60% and 47% at week 52. MAS-1 adjuvant emulsion by itself also provided protection with 60% and 40% of mice diabetes-free at 35 and 52 weeks, respectively. Higher levels of interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-2 positive T cells were detected among splenocytes by week 15 in MER3101 and MER3102 immunized mice, whereas MAS-1 alone induced higher levels of IL-10-positive T cells. Diabetes-free 52-week-old mice expressed significant levels of antigen-specific IL-10-positive type 1 regulatory T cells and FoxP3-positive T cells when stimulated ex vivo with IBC. Antibodies targeting IBC and B:9-23(19Ala) induced by MER3101 and MER3102 were overwhelmingly Th2 type IgG1 and IgG2b isotypes. Splenocyte cultures from 52 week diabetes-free, MER3101-treated mice secreted significantly increased levels of IL-4 and IL-5 Th2 cytokines. Based on these pre-clinical results and its clinical safety profile, MAS-1 has the requisite qualities to be considered for use in prophylactic or early stage disease settings to augment ASI to prevent disease progression in type 1 diabetes.

Serological autoantibody profiling of type 1 diabetes by protein arrays

The need for biomarkers that illuminate the pathophysiology of type 1 diabetes (T1D), enhance early diagnosis and provide additional avenues for therapeutic intervention is well recognized in the scientific community. We conducted a proteome-scale, two-stage serological AAb screening followed by an independent validation study. In the first stage, the immunoreactivity was compared between T1D cases and healthy controls against ~6000 human proteins using the nucleic acid programmable protein array (NAPPA). Genes identified with higher signal intensities in patients were challenged with a larger sample set during the second stage. Statistical analysis revealed 26 novel autoantigens and a known T1D-associated autoantigen. During validation, we verified the presence of AAbs to dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 2 (DYRK2) using the Luciferase ImmunoPrecipitation System (LIPS) assay (36% sensitivity, 98% specificity). The AUC for a combination of DYRK2A and the classical T1D AAb IA-2A was 0.90 compared to 0.72 for DYRK2A and 0.64 for IA-2A alone. This is the first systematic screening for seroreactivity against a large number of human proteins in T1D patients. We demonstrated the application of protein microarrays to identify novel autoantigens in T1D, expanded the current T1D "autoantigenome" and help fulfill the goal of searching for novel biomarker candidates for T1D.

BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Protein microarrays provide a high-throughput platform that enables the profiling of serum antibodies to a large number of protein antigens. The value of AAb biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment is well recognized in autoimmune diseases including T1D. We performed a systematic screening for new T1D-associated autoantigens by adapting the innovative protein array platform NAPPA. We believe that the discovery in this study will add information on candidate autoantigens that could potentially improve the diagnosis and help uncover the pathophysiology of T1D. The successful use of NAPPA for T1D AAb profiling will open the window for larger studies including more human antigen genes and other autoimmune diseases.

GAD65 autoantibodies detected by electrochemiluminescence assay identify high risk for type 1 diabetes

The identification of diabetes-relevant islet autoantibodies is essential for predicting and preventing type 1 diabetes (T1D). The aim of the current study was to evaluate a newly developed electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-GAD antibody (GADA) assay and compare its sensitivity and disease relevance with standard radioassay. The assay was validated with serum samples from 227 newly diagnosed diabetic children; 68 prediabetic children who were prospectively followed to T1D; 130 nondiabetic children with confirmed islet autoantibodies to insulin, GAD65, IA-2, and/or ZnT8 longitudinally followed for 12 ± 3.7 years; and 181 age-matched, healthy, antibody-negative children. The ECL-GADA assay had a sensitivity similar to that of the standard GADA radioassay in children newly diagnosed with T1D, prediabetic children, and high-risk children with multiple positive islet autoantibodies. On the other hand, only 9 of 39 nondiabetic children with only a single islet autoantibody (GADA only) by radioassay were positive for ECL-GADA. GADA not detectable by ECL assay is shown to be of low affinity and likely not predictive of future diabetes. In conclusion, the new ECL assay identifies disease-relevant GADA by radioassay. It may help to improve the prediction and correct diagnosis of T1D among subjects positive only for GADA and no other islet autoantibodies.

Novel diabetes autoantibodies and prediction of type 1 diabetes

Autoantibodies are currently the most robust biomarkers of type 1 diabetes and are frequently used to establish entry criteria for the participation of genetically at-risk individuals in secondary prevention/intervention clinical trials. Since their original description almost 40 years ago, considerable efforts have been devoted toward identifying the precise molecular targets that are recognized. Such information can have significant benefit for developing improved metrics for identifying/stratifying of at-risk subjects, developing potential therapeutic targets, and advancing understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. Currently, four major molecular targets ([pro]insulin, GAD65, IA-2, and ZnT8) have been confirmed, with approximately 94% of all subjects with a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes expressing autoantibodies to at least one of these molecules at clinical onset. In this review, we summarize some of the salient properties of these targets that might contribute to their autoantigenicity and methods that have been used in attempts to identify new components of the humoral autoresponse.

Autoimmunity against INS-IGF2 protein expressed in human pancreatic islets

Insulin is a major autoantigen in islet autoimmunity and progression to type 1 diabetes. It has been suggested that the insulin B-chain may be critical to insulin autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes. INS-IGF2 consists of the preproinsulin signal peptide, the insulin B-chain, and eight amino acids of the C-peptide in addition to 138 amino acids from the IGF2 gene. We aimed to determine the expression of INS-IGF2 in human pancreatic islets and autoantibodies in newly diagnosed children with type 1 diabetes and controls. INS-IGF2, expressed primarily in beta cells, showed higher levels of expression in islets from normal compared with donors with either type 2 diabetes (p = 0.006) or high HbA1c levels (p < 0.001). INS-IGF2 autoantibody levels were increased in newly diagnosed patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 304) compared with healthy controls (n = 355; p < 0.001). Displacement with cold insulin and INS-IGF2 revealed that more patients than controls had doubly reactive insulin-INS-IGF2 autoantibodies. These data suggest that INS-IGF2, which contains the preproinsulin signal peptide, the B-chain, and eight amino acids of the C-peptide may be an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. INS-IGF2 and insulin may share autoantibody-binding sites, thus complicating the notion that insulin is the primary autoantigen in type 1 diabetes.

Proinsulin/Insulin autoantibodies measured with electrochemiluminescent assay are the earliest indicator of prediabetic islet autoimmunity

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated a novel electrochemiluminescent assay for insulin/proinsulin autoantibodies (ECL-IAA) as a new marker of the onset of islet autoimmunity and as a predictor of type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY) prospectively follows children at increased genetic risk for development of islet autoimmunity (defined as presence of autoantibodies to insulin, GAD65, IA-2, or zinc transporter 8 [ZnT8]) and type 1 diabetes (general population of children and first-degree relatives). Serial serum samples from subjects who progressed to type 1 diabetes and who had their first islet autoantibodies measured by age 18 months (N = 47) were tested using ECL-IAA.

RESULTS

Almost all prediabetic children tested positive for ECL-IAA (46 of 47, 98%) during follow-up. ECL-IAA was almost always the first autoantibody to appear (94% total; 21% very first [by itself]; 23% with only mIAA; 19% with another islet autoantibody [GAD or ZnT8]; and 30% with ≥ 2 other antibodies [mIAA, GAD, IA-2, or ZnT8]). Among the 46 subjects who were ECL-IAA positive, ECL-IAA antedated the onset of other islet autoantibodies by a mean of 2.3 years (range, 0.3-7.2 years). Both the age of appearance of autoantibody and IAA levels (but not GAD65, IA2, or ZnT8 levels) are major determinants of the age of diabetes onset.

CONCLUSIONS

This new ECL-IAA assay defines more precisely the onset of prediabetic autoimmunity and may help identify events triggering islet autoimmunity, as well as allow earlier intervention for type 1 diabetes. Nearly all young children progressing to diabetes are insulin autoantibody positive.

A simple and fast non-radioactive bridging immunoassay for insulin autoantibodies

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease which results from the destruction of pancreatic beta cells. Autoantibodies directed against islet antigens are valuable diagnostic tools. Insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) are usually the first to appear and also the most difficult to detect amongst the four major islet autoantibodies. A non-radioactive IAA bridging ELISA was developed to this end. In this assay, one site of the IAAs from serum samples is bound to a hapten-labeled insulin (GC300-insulin), which is subsequently captured on anti-GC300 antibody-coated 96-well plates. The other site of the IAAs is bound to biotinylated insulin, allowing the complex to be detected by an enzyme-streptavidin conjugate. In the present study, 50 serum samples from patients with newly diagnosed T1D and 100 control sera from non-diabetic individuals were analyzed with our new assay and the results were correlated with an IAA radioimmunoassay (RIA). Using IAA bridging ELISA, IAAs were detected in 32 out of 50 T1D children, whereas with IAA RIA, 41 out of 50 children with newly diagnosed T1D were scored as positive. In conclusion, the IAA bridging ELISA could serve as an attractive approach for rapid and automated detection of IAAs in T1D patients for diagnostic purposes.

Type 1 diabetes: primary antigen/peptide/register/trimolecular complex

Type 1A diabetes (autoimmune) is now immunologically predictable in man, but preventable only in animal models. What triggers the development of autoimmunity in genetically susceptible individuals remains unknown. Studies of non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice reveal that interactions between T-cell receptors of diabetogenic T cell and an MHC class II loaded with an autoantigen are key determinates of the disease. With insulin as the primary target in the NOD mouse, likely man, and possibly the RT1-U rat models, therapeutic targeting of the components of these anti-insulin trimolecular complexes we believe provide a fulcrum for development of preventive therapy. In particular for the NOD mouse model, there is extensive evidence that the dominant insulin peptide driving disease initiation is insulin B chain amino acids 9-23 (SHLVEALYLVCGERG) recognized predominantly by germ-line sequences of a specific T-cell receptor Valpha (TRAV5D-4), and small molecules or monoclonal antibodies directed at this recognition complex can prevent diabetes.

The next big idea

George S. Eisenbarth will remain in our memories as a brilliant scientist and great collaborator. His quest to discover the cause and prevention of type 1 (autoimmune) diabetes started from building predictive models based on immunogenetic markers. Despite his tremendous contributions to our understanding of the natural history of pre-type 1 diabetes and potential mechanisms, George left us with several big questions to answer before his quest is completed.

Targeting the trimolecular complex: the pathway towards type 1 diabetes prevention

George Eisenbarth devoted his life to understanding the basic immunology of the autoimmune polyglandular syndromes and type 1 diabetes, while providing exceptional clinical care to individuals afflicted with these disorders. Over the last 5 years, I was privileged to know George Eisenbarth as a mentor, colleague, and friend. His enthusiasm for science and specifically understanding the basic immunology of type 1 diabetes was infectious. George was the first to initially hypothesize that type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disorder. He made diabetes a predictable disease by developing biochemical assays to measure islet autoantibodies and provided this technology worldwide to researchers and the medical community. His work identifying and detecting islet autoantibodies allowed for clinical intervention trials aimed at preventing type 1 diabetes. George worked fervently to prevent the disease. During my time as a fellow in George's laboratory and faculty member at the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, we focused our efforts for diabetes prevention at the trimolecular complex (human leukocyte antigen molecule, self-peptide, and T cell receptor), which plays a pivotal role in diabetes pathogenesis. It is our belief that targeting this complex with safe and specific therapies will lead to the prevention of type 1 diabetes and an improved understanding as to why diabetes develops.

Delivering on George Eisenbarth's visionary pursuit of understanding pathogenesis and prevention of type 1 diabetes

George Eisenbarth's pioneering and visionary research has provided a critical foundation that will be built on in the years ahead as we progress toward prevention of type 1 diabetes. His almost 30-year old model that type 1 diabetes was a chronic and predictable autoimmune disease with multiple identifiable progressive stages with a potential for interventions to prevent progression to symptomatic diabetes has stood the test of time. To deliver on the Eisenbarth vision and his "unfinished journey," the field needs: (1) to improve detection of risk of type 1 diabetes, (2) to improve staging and prediction of progression, (3) to perform smaller, shorter, practical, and an increased number of prevention clinical trials, and (4) to increase awareness of the potential for risk detection, staging, and prevention of type 1 diabetes and benefit/risk of prevention.

Humoral autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes: prediction, significance, and detection of distinct disease subtypes

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is an autoimmune disease encompassing the T-cell-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells and the production of autoantibodies against islet proteins. In humoral autoimmunity in T1D, the detection of islet autoantibodies and the examination of their associations with genetic factors and cellular autoimmunity constitute major areas in both basic research and clinical practice. Although insulin is a key autoantigen and may be primus inter pares in importance among T1D autoantigens, an abundant body of research has also revealed other autoantigens associated with the disease process. Solid evidence indicates that autoantibodies against islet targets serve as key markers to enroll newly diagnosed T1D patients and their family members in intervention trials aimed at preventing or halting the disease process. The next challenge is perfecting mechanistic bioassays to be used as end points for disease amelioration following immunomodulatory therapies aimed at blocking immune-mediated β-cell injury and, in turn, preserving β-cell function in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Challenges in diagnosing type 1 diabetes in different populations

Diabetes affects today an estimated 366 million people world-wide, including 20 million to 40 million of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). While T1D accounts for 5% to 20% of those with diabetes, it is associated with higher morbidity, mortality and health care cost than the more prevalent type 2 diabetes. Patients with T1D require exogenous insulin for survival and should be identified as soon as possible after diagnosis to avoid high morbidity due to a delay in insulin treatment. It is also important to present to the patient correct prognosis that differs by the type of diabetes. From the research point of view, correct classification should help to identify the etiologies and to develop specific prevention for T1D. This review summarizes evidence that may be helpful in diagnosing T1D in various ethnic groups. Challenges in interpretation of results commonly used to determine the type of diabetes are highlighted.