Nonsteroid drug selectivities for cyclo-oxygenase-1 rather than cyclo-oxygenase-2 are associated with human gastrointestinal toxicity: a full in vitro analysis

Disturbance of peristalsis in the guinea-pig isolated small intestine by indomethacin, but not cyclo-oxygenase isoform-selective inhibitors

1. Since the cyclo-oxygenase (COX) isoform-nonselective inhibitor indomethacin is known to modify intestinal motility, we analysed the effects of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition on intestinal peristalsis. 2. Peristalsis in isolated segments of the guinea-pig small intestine was triggered by a rise of the intraluminal pressure and recorded via the pressure changes associated with peristalsis. 3. The COX-1 inhibitor SC-560, the COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 (both at 0.1 -- 1 microM) and the isoform-nonselective inhibitors flurbiprofen (0.01 - 10 microM) and piroxicam (0.1 - 50 microM) were without major influence on peristalsis, whereas indomethacin and etodolac (0.1 -- 10 microM) disturbed the regularity of peristalsis by causing nonpropulsive circular muscle contractions. 4. Radioimmunoassay measurements showed that SC-560, NS-398, indomethacin and etodolac (each at 1 microM) suppressed the release of 6-keto-prostaglandin F(1 alpha) (6-keto-PGF(1 alpha)) from the intestinal segments. 5. Reverse transcription - polymerase chain reaction tests revealed that, relative to glyceraldehyde-3 phosphate dehydrogenase ribonucleic acid, the expression of COX-1 mRNA increased by a factor of 2.0 whereas that of COX-2 mRNA rose by a factor of 7.9 during the 2 h experimental period. 6. Pharmacological experiments indicated that the action of indomethacin to disturb intestinal peristalsis was unrelated to inhibition of L-type calcium channels, adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels or phosphodiesterase type IV. 7. These results show that selective inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 does not grossly alter peristaltic motor activity in the guinea-pig isolated small intestine and that the effect of indomethacin to disturb the regular pattern of propulsive motility in this species is unrelated to COX inhibition.

Gastrointestinal toxic side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors

Conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to treat pain and inflammation but are frequently associated with gastrointestinal side effects, including life-threatening bleeding or perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers. Conventional NSAIDs are nonselective inhibitors of two isoforms of cyclooxygenase (COX): COX-1 and COX-2. The inhibition of COX-1 is believed to be responsible for inducing mucosal injury primarily by impairing prostaglandin-dependent mucosal protective mechanisms. The latest development in reducing the incidence of ulcers and ulcer complications associated with conventional NSAIDs is the use of recently approved COX-2-specific inhibitors (CSIs). This article critically reviews the data on gastrointestinal toxic side effects for conventional NSAIDs without as well as with prevention therapy. In addition, we compare these data with those for the CSIs, namely, celecoxib and rofecoxib. Finally, we offer recommendations on the clinical use of these drugs, emphasizing the need to balance clinical effectiveness with the avoidance of potential gastrointestinal side effects.

The role of acetaminophen in the management of patients with osteoarthritis

Both the incidence and prevalence of osteoarthritis increase with advancing age. Management of osteoarthritis in older adults focuses on reducing pain and other symptoms, minimizing functional limitation and disability from the disease, and avoiding the side effects associated with pharmacologic therapy. This article first briefly reviews the clinical pharmacology of acetaminophen and then summarizes the evidence supporting the use of acetaminophen in the management of patients with osteoarthritis. We conclude that acetaminophen, when given at full doses of 4,000 mg/day, is more efficacious than placebo and has comparable efficacy to ibuprofen in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee who have mild to moderate pain. Thus, acetaminophen merits a trial as initial therapy based on its cost-effectiveness and safety profile relative to NSAIDs.

Safety of a specific COX-2 inhibitor in aspirin-induced asthma

In a subset of patients with asthma, aspirin and several other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) that inhibit simultaneously cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) precipitate dangerous asthmatic attacks. We tested the hypothesis that in patients with aspirin-induced asthma the attacks are triggered by inhibition of COX-1 and not COX-2. In twelve asthmatic patients (seven men, five women, average age 39 years) oral aspirin challenge precipitated symptoms of bronchial obstruction with fall in FEV1 > 20%, and a rise in urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) excretion; also in five patients the stable metabolite of PGD2, 9alpha11betaPGF2, increased in urine. The patients then entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in which they received either placebo or rofecoxib in increasing doses 1.5-25.0 mg for 5 consecutive days, separated by a 1-week wash-out period. No patient on rofecoxib developed dyspnoea or fall in FEV1 > 20%; mean urinary LTE4 and 9alpha11betaPGF2 urinary levels, measured on each study day for 6 h post-dosing, remained unchanged. Two patients on placebo experienced moderate dyspnoea without alterations in urinary metabolites excretion. At least 2 weeks after completion of the study, all patients received on an open basis 25 mg rofecoxib without any adverse effects. NSAID that inhibit COX-1, but not COX-2, trigger asthmatic attacks in patients with asthma and aspirin intolerance. Rofecoxib can be administered to patients with aspirin-induced asthma.

Cyclooxygenase inhibitors--current status and future prospects

Prostaglandins are formed from arachidonic acid by the action of cyclooxygenase and subsequent downstream synthetases. Two closely related forms of the cyclooxygenase have been identified which are now known as COX-1 and COX-2. Both isoenzymes transform arachidonic acid to prostaglandins, but differ in their distribution and their physiological roles. Meanwhile, the responsible genes and their regulation have been clarified. COX-1, the pre-dominantly constitutive form of the enzyme, is expressed throughout the body and performs a number of homeostatic functions such as maintaining normal gastric mucosa and influencing renal blood flow and platelet aggregation. In contrast, the inducible form is expressed in response to inflammatory and other physiological stimuli and growth factors, and is involved in the production of the prostaglandins that mediate pain and support the inflammatory process. All the classic NSAIDs inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2 at standard anti-inflammatory doses. The beneficial anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects are based on the inhibition of COX-2, but the gastrointestinal toxicity and the mild bleeding diathesis are a result of the concurrent inhibition of COX-1. Agents that inhibit COX-2 while sparing COX-1 represent a new attractive therapeutic development and could represent a major advance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Apart from its involvement in inflammatory processes, COX-2 seems to play a role in angiogenesis, colon cancer and Alzheimer's disease, based on the fact that it is expressed during these diseases. The benefits of specific and selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently under discussion and offer a new perspective for a further use of COX-2 inhibitors.

COX-2 inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis

The selective cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors have emerged as an important option in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Rofecoxib and celecoxib, the selective COX-2 inhibitors currently available, have shown efficacy in reducing symptoms of RA comparable with that of traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The primary advantage of selective COX-2 inhibitors relates to reduced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Gastroduodenal ulcers detected by endoscopy are markedly diminished in patients receiving selective COX-2 inhibitors versus those receiving NSAIDs. Moreover, unpublished data indicate that the risk of symptomatic and complicated ulcers is reduced by approximately half in patients prescribed rofecoxib or celecoxib. Despite these encouraging findings, selective COX-2 inhibitors have the potential for important adverse events such as impaired renal function, hypertension, and edema. Furthermore, clinicians must balance the competing demands of reducing GI risk while managing the increasing costs associated with selective COX-2 inhibitor use.

[Gastrointestinal sparing anti-inflammatory drugs--COX-2 selective inhibitors and NO-releasing NSAIDs]

The use of NSAIDs is associated with a wide array of alterations in the gastrointestinal integrity and function. Various approaches have been taken to develop NSAIDs with reduced gastrointestinal toxicity, and few have successfully reduced the incidence of adverse reactions. These include COX-2 selective inhibitors and NO-releasing NSAIDs. Much has been written about the potential of COX-2 inhibitors as antiinflammatory agents that lack the gastrointestinal side effects of traditional NSAIDs. COX-2 expression is most evident at sites of inflammation, while COX-1 accounts for most of the PG synthesis in the normal gastrointestinal tract. However, there are distinct examples of circumstances in which COX-2-derived PGs play a role in the maintenance of the mucosal integrity, and the differentiation of COX-1 and COX-2 is not quite as clear as has been suggested. On the other hand, the rational behind the NO-releasing NSAIDs is that NO released from the derivatives exerts beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal mucosa. The present article overviews the roles of COX and NO in housekeeping functions of the gastrointestinal mucosa in various circumstances and the effects of gastrointestinal sparing NSAIDs, such as COX-2 selective inhibitors and NO-releasing NSAIDs, on the ulcerogenic and healing responses in the gastrointestinal mucosa.

Aspirin promotes TFF2 gene activation in human gastric cancer cell lines

Trefoil factor family (TFF) peptides promote cell migration, heal the mucosa and may suppress tumor growth. In reporter gene assays we show that aspirin (1-12 mM) evokes a six-fold up-regulation of TFF2, but not TFF1 and TFF3 transcription in human gastrointestinal cell lines. 6 h after application up-regulation of endogenous TFF2 mRNA was observed. TFF2 transcription was enhanced by indomethacin and arachidonic acid but repressed by staurosporine, suggesting mediation via protein kinase C. We mapped an aspirin responding element -546 to -758 bp upstream of TFF2. Up-regulation of TFF2 by aspirin may partially explain the chemopreventive potential of low dose aspirin in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis.

Cyclooxygenase-2--specific inhibitors: are they safe?

The basic tenet of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) hypothesis rests on the fact that sparing of inhibition of COX-1 should result in greater safety than if both COX isoforms are inhibited. This increase in safety should be most evident in those organs and tissues in which COX-1 alone has important, necessary physiologic functions (e.g., the stomach and platelets). Data from large clinical trials are now available to support the superior gastrointestinal safety of COX-2 inhibitors, not only for endoscopic endpoints but also for clinically significant outcomes. Additionally, lack of effect on platelets has been demonstrated at doses many times higher than being used clinically. Unfortunately, the COX-2 inhibitors still retain some of the side effects seen with traditional dual COX inhibitors (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), namely, effects on the kidney that may manifest as an increased incidence of hypertension, edema, and associated clinical states. Similarly, effects on reproductive functions, endothelial function, and wound healing are theoretically possible but need to be evaluated in well-controlled clinical trials.

Review article: the gastrointestinal safety profile of rofecoxib, a highly selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, in humans

Highly selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2, such as rofecoxib, are hypothesized to have an improved gastrointestinal tolerability and safety profile compared with non-selective NSAIDs, which inhibit cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 non-selectively. This paper reviews data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies which investigated the effects of rofecoxib and NSAIDs on the human gastrointestinal tract. In healthy subjects, rofecoxib 25 mg and 50 mg daily had no effect on gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis, whilst naproxen 1000 mg daily caused a 70% reduction. Therapeutic doses of rofecoxib 25 mg and 50 mg daily did not increase intestinal permeability or faecal blood loss in healthy subjects, whereas increases in both measures were seen with indometacin 150 mg or ibuprofen 2400 mg. A supra-therapeutic dose of rofecoxib (250 mg) given daily for 7 days did not induce an increase in gastroduodenal erosions in healthy subjects, whilst increased numbers of erosions were found in subjects given ibuprofen 2400 mg or aspirin 2600 mg. The endoscopic findings in healthy subjects were confirmed in two 6-month clinical studies involving 1516 patients with osteoarthritis; the incidences of ulcers following rofecoxib 25 mg or 50 mg daily were similar to placebo and less than ibuprofen 2400 mg. The advantage of rofecoxib over NSAIDs in these studies appears to translate into clinically relevant benefits; an analysis of 5435 patients with osteoarthritis found a significantly lower incidence of gastrointestinal perforations, ulcers and bleeds in patients taking rofecoxib compared with patients taking NSAIDs. Overall, the findings from these studies suggest that, as a result of cyclooxygenase-1 sparing, rofecoxib is significantly less gastrotoxic than non-selective NSAIDs, and may not differ from placebo.

Role of cyclooxygenase isoforms in gastric mucosal defence

A complex system of interacting mediators exists in the gastric mucosa to strengthen its resistance against injury. In this system prostaglandins play an important role. Prostaglandin biosynthesis is catalysed by the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX), which exists in two isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2. Initially the concept was developed that COX-1 functions as housekeeping enzyme, whereas COX-2 yields prostaglandins involved in pathophysiological reactions such as inflammation. In the gastrointestinal tract, the maintenance of mucosal integrity was attributed exclusively to COX-1 without a contribution of COX-2 and ulcerogenic effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were believed to be the consequence of inhibition of COX-1. Recent findings, however, indicate that both COX-1 and COX-2 either alone or in concert contribute to gastric mucosal defence. Thus, in normal rat gastric mucosa specific inhibition of COX-1 does not elicit mucosal lesions despite near-maximal suppression of gastric prostaglandin formation. When a selective COX-2 inhibitor which is not ulcerogenic when given alone is added to the COX-1 inhibitor, severe gastric damage develops. In contrast to normal gastric mucosa which requires simultaneous inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 for breakdown of mucosal resistance, in the acid-challenged rat stomach inhibition of COX-1 alone results in dose-dependent injury which is further increased by additional inhibition of COX-2 enzyme activity or prevention of acid-induced up-regulation of COX-2 expression by dexamethasone. COX-2 inhibitors do not damage the normal or acid-challenged gastric mucosa when given alone. However, when nitric oxide formation is suppressed or afferent nerves are defunctionalized, specific inhibition of COX-2 induces severe gastric damage. Ischemia-reperfusion of the gastric artery is associated with up-regulation of COX-2 but not COX-1 mRNA. COX-2 inhibitors or dexamethasone augment ischemia-reperfusion-induced gastric damage up to four-fold, an effect abolished by concurrent administration of 16,16-dimethyl-PGE(2). Selective inhibition of COX-1 is less effective. Furthermore, COX-2 inhibitors antagonize the protective effect of a mild irritant or intragastric peptone perfusion in the rat stomach, whereas the protection induced by chronic administration of endotoxin is mediated by COX-1. Finally, an important function of COX-2 is the acceleration of ulcer healing. COX-2 is up-regulated in chronic gastric ulcers and inhibitors of COX-2 impair the healing of ulcers to the same extent as non-selective NSAIDs. Taken together, these observations show that both COX isoenzymes are essential factors in mucosal defence with specific contributions in various physiological and pathophysiological situations.

Effects of prostaglandin E2 and cAMP elevating drugs on GM-CSF release by cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. Relevance to asthma therapy

Human airway smooth muscle (HASM) cells release granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and express cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 (resulting in the release of prostaglandin [PG] E2) after stimulation with cytokines. Because COX-2 activity can regulate a number of inflammatory processes, we have assessed its effects, as well as those of agents that modulate cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), on GM-CSF release by HASM cells. Cells stimulated with a combination of proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha each at 10 ng/ml) for 24 h released significant amounts of PGE2 (measured by radioimmunoassay) and GM-CSF (measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Indomethacin and other COX-1/COX-2 inhibitors caused concentration-dependent inhibitions of PGE2 concomitantly with increases in GM-CSF formation. Addition of exogenous PGE2 or the beta2-agonist fenoterol, which increase cAMP, to cytokine-treated HASM cells had no effect on GM-CSF release unless COX activity was first blocked with indomethacin. The type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitors rolipram and SB 207499 both caused concentration-dependent reductions in GM-CSF production. Thus, when HASM cells are activated with cytokines they release PGE2, which acts as a "braking mechanism" to limit the coproduction of GM-CSF. Moreover, agents that elevate cAMP also reduce GM-CSF formation by these cells.

Function of cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 in the ductus arteriosus from foetal lamb: differential development and change by oxygen and endotoxin

1. Prenatal patency of the ductus arteriosus is maintained mainly by prostaglandin(PG) E(2). Here we have examined the relative importance of cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX1) and cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX2) for PGE(2) formation in the foetal lamb ductus (0.65 gestation onwards). 2. Using fluorescence microscopy and immunogold staining, COX1 appeared more abundant than COX2 in endothelial and smooth muscle cells, and this difference was greater before-term. Inside muscle cells, COX1 and COX2 immunoreactivity was located primarily in the perinuclear region. Endotoxin, given to the lamb in utero (approximately 0.1 microg kg(-1)), caused COX2 upregulation, while an opposite effect with disappearance of the enzyme followed endotoxin treatment in vitro (100 ng ml(-1)). COX1 immunoreactivity remained virtually unchanged with either treatment; however, this isoform as well as any induced COX2 migrated towards the outer cytoplasm. 3. The COX2 inhibitor L-745,337 (1--10 microM) contracted the isolated ductus at term, the response being almost as high as that to indomethacin (dual COX1/COX2 inhibitor) over the same dose-range. Conversely, L-745,337 was relatively less effective in the premature. 4. Pretreatment of the premature in vivo with endotoxin enhanced the contraction of the ductus to L-745,337, while in vitro endotoxin had a variable effect. 5. The premature ductus exhibited a stronger contraction to L-745,337 following exposure to oxygen. On the other hand, the oxygen contraction, which is modest before-term, was enhanced by L-745,337. 6. We conclude that COX1 and COX2 develop unevenly in the ductus. While both enzymes contribute to PGE(2) formation at term, COX1 is the major isoform in the premature. COX2, however, may acquire greater importance before-term following physiological and pathophysiological stimuli.

Effect of rofecoxib on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteers

The authors examined the effect of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, rofecoxib, at steady state on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin following a single dose in healthy subjects. Each healthy subject (N = 10) received rofecoxib (75 mg once daily) or placebo for 11 days in a double-blind, randomized, balanced, two-period crossover study. A single 0.5 mg oral dose of digoxin elixir was administered on the 7th day of each 11-day period. Each treatment period was separated by 14 to 21 days. Samples for plasma and urine immunoreactive digoxin concentrations were collected through 120 hours following the digoxin dose. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were observed for any of the calculated digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters. For digoxin AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-24), and Cmax, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for (rofecoxib + digoxin/placebo + digoxin) were 1.04 (0.94, 1.14), 1.02 (0.94, 1.09), and 1.00 (0.91, 1.10), respectively. The digoxin median tmax was 0.5 hours for both treatments. The harmonic mean elimination half-life was 45.7 and 43.4 hours for rofecoxib + digoxin and placebo + digoxin treatments, respectively. Digoxin is eliminated renally. The mean (SD) cumulative urinary excretion of immunoreactive digoxin after concurrent treatment with rofecoxib or placebo was 228.2 (+/- 30.8) and 235.1 (+/- 39.1) micrograms/120 hours, respectively. Transient and minor adverse events occurred with similar frequency on placebo and rofecoxib treatments, and no treatment-related pattern was apparent. Rofecoxib did not influence the plasma pharmacokinetics or renal elimination of a single oral dose of digoxin.

Anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenases and other factors

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which for so many years have played major roles in treating inflammation, pain and fever, have had major recent boosts to various therapeutic aspects. These include the impetus generated by the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib, a greater understanding of NSAID non-prostaglandin modes of action and the use of NSAIDs in cancer and Alzheimer's disease. Many of these aspects are covered in articles in this issue of Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.

Synthesis, characterization, and activity of metabolites derived from the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (MK-0966, Vioxx)

Metabolites of the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (MK-0966, Vioxx) were prepared by synthetic or biosynthetic methods. Metabolites include products of oxidation, glucuronidation, reduction and hydrolytic ring opening. Based on an in vitro whole blood assay, none of the known human metabolites of rofecoxib inhibits COX-1 nor contributes significantly to the inhibition of COX-2.

Treatment of osteoarthritis with acetaminophen: efficacy, safety, and comparison with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Osteoarthritis represents a major public health problem with limited effective treatment. Nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to alleviate symptoms such as pain and stiffness. However, these drugs are associated with an increased risk for the development of adverse sequelae, including serious upper gastrointestinal side effects such as symptomatic ulcers, perforation, obstruction, and gastrointestinal bleeding. The simple analgesic acetaminophen has been found to be effective in alleviating pain in patients with osteoarthritis in a placebo-controlled trial, and several trials have evaluated its efficacy and safety compared with NSAIDs. This article reviews data regarding the efficacy and safety of acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis from randomized, controlled, clinical trials, focusing on studies that compared acetaminophen with NSAIDs. In addition, literature on physician and patient preferences in this area are examined. In summary, judicious use of analgesic agents as pharmacologic therapy in patients with osteoarthritis will achieve satisfactory pain relief in most cases. Acetaminophen merits a trial as initial therapy in patients with mild to moderate pain, based on cost-effectiveness and safety profile.

Effects of diclofenac, aceclofenac and meloxicam on the metabolism of proteoglycans and hyaluronan in osteoarthritic human cartilage

1. Since nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may impair the ability of the chondrocyte to repair its damaged extracellular matrix, we explored the changes in the metabolism of newly synthesized proteoglycan and hyaluronan (HA) molecules produced by aceclofenac, diclofenac and meloxicam in human osteoarthritic (OA) cartilage. 2. Explants were sampled from the medial femoral condyle and were classified by use of the Mankin's histological-histochemical grading system. Cartilage specimens exhibited moderate (M) OA in 20 subjects and had severe (S) OA in 20. 3. Cartilage explants were pulsed with [-3H]-glucosamine and chased in the absence or in the presence of 0.3 - 3 microg ml(-1) of either aceclofenac, diclofenac or meloxicam. After papain digestion, the labelled chondroitin sulphate ([-3H]-proteoglycans) and [-3H]-HA molecules present in the tissue and media were purified by anion-exchange chromatography. 4. In cartilage with MOA and SOA, the metabolic balance of proteoglycan and HA was unaffected by diclofenac. In contrast, and in a dose-dependent manner, aceclofenac and meloxicam both increased the synthesis of proteoglycans and HA in explants with MOA and SOA; these two NSAIDs also reduced significantly the net loss of [-3H]-proteoglycans and [-3H]-HA molecules from cartilage explants. 5. The data obtained in short-term in vitro cultures indicate that, at the concentrations found in synovial fluid, aceclofenac and meloxicam may exert a favourable effect on the overall metabolism of proteoglycans and HA in cartilage with MOA and SOA.

Gastroduodenal mucosal defense

The gastroduodenal mucosa is a model system of defense with several structural levels and biologic strategies that are closely interrelated with each other to cope with the harmful ingredients of ingested food and the potentially deleterious effects of gastric acid and pepsin. Experimental and clinical research carried out during the review period added to the understanding of each component of the multiple mechanisms of gastroduodenal mucosal protection. In the first place, mucosal integrity is defended by the mucus gel barrier, the epithelial cell barrier, and the immune barrier. The properties of these barriers are maintained by adequate regulation of mucus production, bicarbonate secretion, mucosal microcirculation, and motor activity. These regulatory systems are alarmed by nociceptive neurons and the mucosal immune system which includes chemokine-secreting epithelial cells. The ultimate defense system is rapid repair of the injured mucosa under the control of several growth factors. Progressing insight into the network of mucosal defense not only will improve existing therapies of inflammation and ulceration but also will provide new leads for the management of functional diseases in the gastroduodenal region.

Coordinate up- and down-regulation of glutathione-dependent prostaglandin E synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in A549 cells. Inhibition by NS-398 and leukotriene C4

Recently, a microsomal protein with 38% sequence identity to microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1 was shown to constitute an inducible, glutathione-dependent prostaglandin E synthase (PGES). To investigate the relationship between cyclooxygenase and PGES, a time-course study on protein expression was performed in A549 cells after treatment with interleukin-1beta. The result demonstrated a tandem expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and PGES. The observed induction of PGES protein correlated with microsomal PGES activity. No comparable PGES activity was observed in the absence of glutathione or in the cytosolic fraction. In addition, tumour necrosis factor-alpha was found to induce PGES in these cells. Dexamethasone was found to completely suppress the effect of both cytokines on PGES induction. We also describe a quantitative method, based on RP-HPLC with UV detection for the measurements of PGES activity. This method was used to screen potential PGES inhibitors. Several nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, stable prostaglandin H2 analogues and cysteinyl leukotrienes were screened for inhibition of PGES activity. NS-398, sulindac sulfide and leukotriene C4 were all found to inhibit PGES activity with IC50 values of 20 microM, 80 microM and 5 microM, respectively. In conclusion, it appears that PGES and cyclooxygenase-2 are functionally coupled in A549 cells and that a required coordinate expression of these enzymes allows for efficient biosynthesis of prostaglandin E2.

Non-opioid postoperative analgesia

Although significant improvement has been made in the treatment of pain in the postoperative period, many patients still experience unnecessary discomfort resulting in distress, higher morbidity and prolonged stay in hospital. The standard pillar of postoperative treatment of severe pain is the use of opioids. However, adverse reactions to opioids make their use unfavourable. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of pain has helped clinicians to a more balanced approach to postoperative pain treatment. The development of the multimodal approach to postoperative analgesia, with the use of different drugs acting via different routes to give good analgesia, with minimal side-effects, represents a major development in the treatment of postoperative pain. Early, aggressive mobilisation and feeding must follow in order to restore normal conditions quickly. Alternatives to opioids should be used as extensively as possible. Local anaesthesia, used as regional blocks or as wound infiltration, is most beneficial. Paracetamol has good basic analgesic properties, and should probably be used in dosages higher than recommended today. The combination with a NSAID results in better and longer-lasting analgesia. The intravenous form propacetamol will increase the possibilities of its use. The new concept of selective COX-2 inhibiting NSAIDs will result in analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs with fewer side-effects. The well-known inexpensive group of corticosteroids have good analgesic and anti-emetic properties, and are especially interesting to use in patients who do not tolerate NSAIDs. The alpha2-receptor agonists like clonidine, when administered epidurally or intrathecally, are useful adjuncts, but their adverse effects on sedation and hypotension limit their use. NMDA-receptor antagonists are of limited value in the postoperative period. Adenosine and neostigimine are still on a research level but may lead to new, clinically useful analgesic drugs. In the future, cannabinoids, cholecystokinin-receptor antagonists and neurokinin-1 antagonists may become important analgesic drugs.

NSAID gastrointestinal toxicity

Toxic effects in the upper gastrointestinal tract, primarily complicated gastric and intestinal ulcers, are the most common undesirable effects of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). During the last several years there have been several advances, both in the laboratory and clinically, toward reducing NSAIDs' gastrointestinal toxicity. Some of these important developments have been the delineation of mechanisms of NSAID-induced GI toxicity, identification of groups at highest risk for development of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications, recognition of co-therapies that could reduce NSAID toxicity, and, most recently, development of classes of NSAIDs that have an improved gastrointestinal safety profile. Many of these advances occurred during the last year. This review focuses on several of the important recent observations that have improved our understanding and the safety of NSAIDs in the gastrointestinal tract.

Postoperative analgesic effects of celecoxib or rofecoxib after spinal fusion surgery

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are recommended for the multimodal management of postoperative pain and may have a significant opioid-sparing effect after major surgery. The analgesic efficacy of the cyclooxygenase-2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, celecoxib and rofecoxib, have not been evaluated after major orthopedic surgery. This study was designed to determine whether the administration of a preoperative dose of celecoxib or rofecoxib to patients who have undergone spinal stabilization would decrease patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine use and/or enhance analgesia. We evaluated 60 inpatients undergoing spine stabilization by one surgeon. All patients received PCA morphine. The patients were divided into three groups. Preoperatively, they were given oral celecoxib 200 mg, rofecoxib 50 mg, or placebo. The outcome measures included pain scores and 24-h morphine use at six times during the first 24 postoperative h. The total dose of morphine and the cumulative doses for each of the six time periods were significantly more in the placebo group than in the other two groups. The morphine dose was significantly less in five of the six time intervals in the rofecoxib group compared with the celecoxib group. The pain scores were significantly less in the rofecoxib group than in the other two groups at two of the six intervals, and less than the placebo group in an additional interval. Although both rofecoxib and celecoxib produce similar analgesic effects in the first 4 h after surgery, rofecoxib demonstrated an extended analgesic effect that lasted throughout the 24-h study. We thus recommend that rofecoxib be used as a preoperative component of pain management that includes PCA morphine in patients undergoing spine stabilization surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

The cyclooxygenase-2-specific nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, celecoxib and rofecoxib, both demonstrate an opioid-sparing effect after spinal fusion surgery. Celecoxib resulted in decreased morphine use for the first 8 h after surgery, whereas rofecoxib demonstrated less morphine use throughout the 24-h study period.

Regulation of prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis by inducible membrane-associated prostaglandin E2 synthase that acts in concert with cyclooxygenase-2

Here we report the molecular identification of membrane-bound glutathione (GSH)-dependent prostaglandin (PG) E(2) synthase (mPGES), a terminal enzyme of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-mediated PGE(2) biosynthetic pathway. The activity of mPGES was increased markedly in macrophages and osteoblasts following proinflammatory stimuli. cDNA for mouse and rat mPGESs encoded functional proteins that showed high homology with the human ortholog (microsomal glutathione S-transferase-like 1). mPGES expression was markedly induced by proinflammatory stimuli in various tissues and cells and was down-regulated by dexamethasone, accompanied by changes in COX-2 expression and delayed PGE(2) generation. Arg(110), a residue well conserved in the microsomal GSH S-transferase family, was essential for catalytic function. mPGES was functionally coupled with COX-2 in marked preference to COX-1, particularly when the supply of arachidonic acid was limited. Increased supply of arachidonic acid by explosive activation of cytosolic phospholipase A(2) allowed mPGES to be coupled with COX-1. mPGES colocalized with both COX isozymes in the perinuclear envelope. Moreover, cells stably cotransfected with COX-2 and mPGES grew faster, were highly aggregated, and exhibited aberrant morphology. Thus, COX-2 and mPGES are essential components for delayed PGE(2) biosynthesis, which may be linked to inflammation, fever, osteogenesis, and even cancer.

Biochemistry of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and molecular pathology of COX-2 in neoplasia

Several types of human tumors overexpress cyclooxygenase (COX) -2 but not COX-1, and gene knockout transfection experiments demonstrate a central role of COX-2 in experimental tumorigenesis. COX-2 produces prostaglandins that inhibit apoptosis and stimulate angiogenesis and invasiveness. Selective COX-2 inhibitors reduce prostaglandin synthesis, restore apoptosis, and inhibit cancer cell proliferation. In animal studies they limit carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis. In contrast, aspirin-like nonselective NSAIDs such as sulindac and indomethacin inhibit not only the enzymatic action of the highly inducible, proinflammatory COX-2 but the constitutively expressed, cytoprotective COX-1 as well. Consequently, nonselective NSAIDs can cause platelet dysfunction, gastrointestinal ulceration, and kidney damage. For that reason, selective inhibition of COX-2 to treat neoplastic proliferation is preferable to nonselective inhibition. Selective COX-2 inhibitors, such as meloxicam, celecoxib (SC-58635), and rofecoxib (MK-0966), are NSAIDs that have been modified chemically to preferentially inhibit COX-2 but not COX-1. For instance, meloxicam inhibits the growth of cultured colon cancer cells (HCA-7 and Moser-S) that express COX-2 but has no effect on HCT-116 tumor cells that do not express COX-2. NS-398 induces apoptosis in COX-2 expressing LNCaP prostate cancer cells and, surprisingly, in colon cancer S/KS cells that does not express COX-2. This effect may due to induction of apoptosis through uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and down-regulation of Bcl-2, as has been demonstrated for some nonselective NSAIDs, for instance, flurbiprofen. COX-2 mRNA and COX-2 protein is constitutively expressed in the kidney, brain, spinal cord, and ductus deferens, and in the uterus during implantation. In addition, COX-2 is constitutively and dominantly expressed in the pancreatic islet cells. These findings might somewhat limit the use of presently available selective COX-2 inhibitors in cancer prevention but will probably not deter their successful application for the treatment of human cancers.

Regulation of leptin release and lipolysis by PGE2 in rat adipose tissue

The role of eicosanoids formed by adipose tissue from rats was examined in the presence of the specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS-398. This agent totally blocked the release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) by rat adipose tissue over a 24-h incubation in primary culture. The final concentration of PGE2 after 24 h was 12 nM, and half-maximal inhibition of PGE2 formation required 35 nM NS-398. While inhibition of PGE2 formation by NS-398 had no effect on basal leptin release or lipolysis, it enhanced the lipolytic action of 10 nM isoproterenol by 36%. The in vivo administration of PGE2 doubled serum leptin. PGE2 also directly stimulated leptin release by rat adipose tissue incubated in the presence of 25 nM dexamethasone, which inhibited endogenous PGE2 formation by 94%. The inhibition of lipolysis as well as the stimulation of leptin release by PGE2 were mimicked by N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA). These data indicate that exogenous PGE2 can stimulate leptin release by adipose tissue when the basal formation of PGE2 is blocked by dexamethasone. However, while the endogenous formation of PGE2 does not appear to regulate basal lipolysis or leptin release, it may play a role in the activation of lipolysis by catecholamines.

COX-2 inhibition with rofecoxib does not increase intestinal permeability in healthy subjects: a double blind crossover study comparing rofecoxib with placebo and indomethacin

BACKGROUND

Acute and chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can increase intestinal permeability. Rofecoxib, which selectively inhibits cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), is a novel anti-inflammatory drug with the potential to produce minimal gastrointestinal toxic effects while retaining clinical efficacy.

AIMS

To assess the potential for rofecoxib to affect the intestine adversely, in comparison with placebo and indomethacin.

SUBJECTS

Thirty nine healthy subjects (aged 24-30 years).

METHOD

We performed a four period crossover trial to assess intestinal permeability before and after seven days of treatment. Permeability was measured by the urinary ratio of chromium-51 labelled ethylene diamine tetraacetate ((51)CrEDTA)/L-rhamnose (five hour collection).

RESULTS

Indomethacin 50 mg three times daily produced greater increases in intestinal permeability compared with placebo or rofecoxib (25 or 50 mg) (p< or = 0.001); rofecoxib was not significantly different from placebo. Mean day 7 to baseline ratios (95% confidence intervals) for (51)CrEDTA/L-rhamnose were 0.97 (0.82, 1.16), 0.80 (0.68, 0.95), 0.98 (0.82, 1.17), and 1.53 (1.27, 1.85) for placebo, rofecoxib 25 mg, rofecoxib 50 mg, and indomethacin groups, respectively. Rofecoxib was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

In this study, treatment for one week with indomethacin 50 mg three times daily significantly increased intestinal permeability compared with placebo, while treatment with rofecoxib 25 mg or 50 mg daily did not. The absence of a significant effect of rofecoxib on intestinal permeability at doses at least twice those recommended to treat osteoarthritis was consistent with other studies that have demonstrated little or no injury to the gastrointestinal mucosa associated with rofecoxib therapy.

NSAID-induced gastric damage in rats: requirement for inhibition of both cyclooxygenase 1 and 2

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors produce less gastric damage than conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), suggesting that NSAIDs cause damage by inhibiting COX-1. We tested this hypothesis in rats by using a selective COX-1 inhibitor (SC-560).

METHODS

The effects of SC-560, celecoxib (selective COX-2 inhibitor), or a combination of both inhibitors on gastric damage and prostaglandin synthesis were determined. Selectivity of the drugs for COX-1 vs. COX-2 was assessed in the carrageenan-airpouch model. A COX-1-preferential inhibitor, ketorolac, was also evaluated. The effects of these inhibitors on leukocyte adherence to vascular endothelium and on gastric blood flow were assessed.

RESULTS

SC-560 markedly reduced gastric prostaglandin synthesis and platelet COX-1 activity, but spared COX-2 and did not cause gastric damage. Celecoxib did not affect gastric prostaglandin E(2) synthesis and did not cause gastric damage. However, the combination of SC-560 and celecoxib invariably caused hemorrhagic erosion formation, comparable to that seen with indomethacin. Ketorolac caused damage only at doses that inhibited both COX isoforms, or when given with a COX-2 inhibitor. Celecoxib, but not SC-560, significantly increased leukocyte adherence, whereas SC-560, but not celecoxib, reduced gastric blood flow.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of both COX-1 and COX-2 is required for NSAID-induced gastric injury in the rat.

Limitations of NSAIDs for pain management: Toxicity or lack of efficacy?

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the management of arthritis and acute and chronic pain of many etiologies, including cancer-related pain. These drugs are indicated for use as single agents in mild to moderate pain and in combination with opioid analgesics or adjuvant analgesic drugs in severe pain. NSAIDs, which nonselectively inhibit the cyclooxygenase enzymes (isoenzymes 1 and 2), pose a potentially serious risk of gastrointestinal toxicity with acute and chronic use, hematologic toxicity with acute use, and nephrotoxicity with chronic use. Patients experiencing acute and chronic pain associated with serious and even life-threatening medical illness such as cancer and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) fall into a high-risk group with respect to the use of NSAIDs. This is so because the occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding and the masking of opportunistic infections related to the antipyretic effects of NSAIDs pose particular risk and might even cause lethal complications in patients who are neutropenic, thrombocytopenic, or otherwise immuno-compromised.

Nociception in cyclooxygenase isozyme-deficient mice

Prostaglandins formed by cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) or COX-2 produce hyperalgesia in sensory nerve endings. To assess the relative roles of the two enzymes in pain processing, we compared responses of COX-1- or COX-2-deficient homozygous and heterozygous mice with wild-type controls in the hot plate and stretching tests for analgesia. Preliminary observational studies determined that there were no differences in gross parameters of behavior between the different groups. Surprisingly, on the hot plate (55 degrees C), the COX-1-deficient heterozygous groups showed less nociception, because mean reaction time was longer than that for controls. All other groups showed similar reaction times. In the stretching test, there was less nociception in COX-1-null and COX-1-deficient heterozygotes and also, unexpectedly, in female COX-2-deficient heterozygotes, as shown by a decreased number of writhes. Measurements of mRNA levels by reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated a compensatory increase of COX-1 mRNA in spinal cords of COX-2-null mice but no increase in COX-2 mRNA in spinal cords of COX-1-null animals. Thus, compensation for the absence of COX-1 may not involve increased expression of COX-2, whereas up-regulation of COX-1 in the spinal cord may compensate for the absence of COX-2. The longer reaction times on the hot plate of COX-1-deficient heterozygotes are difficult to explain, because nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs have no analgesic action in this test. Reduction in the number of writhes of the COX-1-null and COX-1-deficient heterozygotes may be due to low levels of COX-1 at the site of stimulation with acetic acid. Thus, prostaglandins made by COX-1 mainly are involved in pain transmission in the stretching test in both male and female mice, whereas those made by COX-2 also may play a role in the stretching response in female mice.

Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by cobalt chloride-simulated hypoxia is mediated by persistent induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in a metastatic human prostate cancer cell line

Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression induced by hypoxia is crucial event leading to neovascularization. Cyclooxygenase-2, an inducible enzyme that catalyzes the formation of prostaglandins (PGs) from arachidonic acid, has been demonstrated to be induced by hypoxia and play role in angiogenesis and metastasis. To investigate the potential effect of COX-2 on hypoxia-induced VEGF expression in prostate cancer. We examined the relationship between COX-2 expression and VEGF induction in response to cobalt chloride (CoCl2)-simulated hypoxia in three human prostate cancer cell lines with differing biological phenotypes. Northern blotting and ELISA revealed that all three tested cell lines constitutively expressed VEGF mRNA, and secreted VEGF protein to different degrees (LNCaP > PC-3 > PC3ML). However, these cell lines differed in the ability to produce VEGF in the presence of CoCl2-simulated hypoxia. CoCl2 treatment resulted in 40% and 75% increases in VEGF mRNA, and 50% and 95% in protein secretion by LNCaP and PC-3 cell lines, respectively. In contrast, PC-3ML cell line, a PC-3 subline with highly invasive, metastatic phenotype, exhibits a dramatic upregulation of VEGF, 5.6-fold in mRNA and 6.3-fold in protein secretion after treatment with CoCl2. The upregulation of VEGF in PC-3ML cells is accompanied by a persistent induction of COX-2 mRNA (6.5-fold) and protein (5-fold). Whereas COX-2 expression is only transiently induced in PC-3 cells and not affected by CoCl2 in LNCaP cells. Moreover, the increases in VEGF mRNA and protein secretion induced by CoCl2 in PC-3ML cells were significantly suppressed following exposure to NS398, a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Finally, the effect of COX-2 inhibition on CoCl2-induced VEGF production was reversed by the treatment with exogenous PGE2. Our data demonstrate that VEGF induction by cobalt chloride-simulated hypoxia is maintained by a concomitant, persistent induction of COX-2 expression and sustained elevation of PGE2 synthesis in a human metastatic prostate cancer cell line, and suggest that COX-2 activity, reflected by PGE2 production, is involved in hypoxia-induced VEGF expression, and thus, modulates prostatic tumor angiogenesis.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy

By inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) compromise gastroduodenal defense mechanism including blood flow and mucus/bicarbonate secretion. This has led to NSAIDs being the most widely reported drug cause of adverse events. While NSAIDs also cause dyspepsia, inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis may reduce this from even higher levels that would otherwise prevail and mask ulcer-related dyspepsia, making anticipatory management difficult. On average, the risk of ulcer complications increases 4-fold, resulting in 1.25 additional hospitalizations per 100 patient-years according to one estimate. Older patients, those with a past history, and those taking anticoagulants or corticosteroids are at higher risk. Risk is dose dependent and is lower with ibuprofen at low doses than with other NSAIDs. It is unlikely that Helicobacter pylori increases the risk, and under some circumstances it may be protective. Selective inhibitors of the inducible cyclooxygenase 2 spare gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis and do not damage the gastric mucosa. Their place in therapy, compared with use of misoprostol or proton pump inhibitors, is currently emerging. Future competitors may include nitric oxide-donating, zwitterionic, or R-enantiomer NSAIDs.

Rofecoxib

Rofecoxib (Vioxx, Merck & Co., Inc.) is a new orally-effective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) approved for treatment of acute pain, fever, primary dysmenorrhea and pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis (OA). It is also being evaluated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and adenomatous polyps of the colon. Rofecoxib is a specific inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), thereby inhibiting prostanoid synthesis in cells that express COX-2, including inflammatory cells. As cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract principally express COX-1, a different isoform of cyclooxygenase, it is predicted that rofecoxib will have less GI toxicity than other less selective NSAIDs. In clinical trials, rofecoxib was found to be as effective as other NSAIDs for management of pain and inflammation. In trials that compare rofecoxib with ibuprofen, diclofenac and indomethacin, less GI toxicity has been observed, as assayed by a decrease in lesions visible on endoscopy, by GI blood loss and, in a meta-analysis, by frequency of serious adverse GI events. The presence of COX-2 in cells other than inflammatory cells results in side effects common among NSAIDs, including peripheral oedema and hypertension. These side effects are dose-dependent. Rofecoxib, together with other branded NSAIDs, are relatively expensive, which has led to concern regarding costs versus benefits. There is also concern regarding potential risks associated with the use of rofecoxib by populations that would otherwise not tolerate NSAIDs.

COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-Inflammatory drugs: do they really offer any advantages?

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality as a result of the complications associated with gastroduodenal ulcers, such as perforation and bleeding. The central mechanism leading to the gastroduodenal toxicity of NSAIDs is their ability to inhibit mucosal prostaglandin synthesis. Recent recognition that there are 2 isoforms of the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX) responsible for prostaglandin synthesis has enabled the development of drugs capable of sparing the gastric mucosa. The inducible COX-2 enzyme is responsible for some aspects of pain and inflammation in arthritis while the constitutive COX-1 enzyme appears responsible for most of the gastro-protective prostaglandin synthesis in the stomach and duodenum. Drugs selective for COX-2 probably act by binding to a pocket in the enzyme that is present in COX-2 but not in COX-1. As a result, drugs that have little or no COX-1 activity across their therapeutic dosage range have been developed. Two drugs that are claimed to be highly selective or specific in their ability to inhibit COX-2, rofecoxib and celecoxib, are now available on prescription in the US and rofecoxib is available in Europe. Short term volunteer studies of 7 days' duration and patient studies of 6 months' duration have shown these drugs to have a level of gastroduodenal injury that is similar or equivalent to that seen with placebo, whereas high rates of damage and ulceration are seen with nonselective NSAIDs. In addition, there appear to have been fewer perforations, clinical ulcers and bleeds in the phase III clinical trials of these agents, compared with nonselective NSAIDS. However, more experience will be needed before this promise can be confirmed. In addition, COX-2 inhibitors share the adverse effects of NSAIDs outside the gastrointestinal tract that are dependent on COX-2 inhibition.

Complement C5b-9-mediated arachidonic acid metabolism in glomerular epithelial cells : role of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2

In the passive Heymann nephritis (PHN) model of membranous nephropathy, complement C5b-9 induces glomerular epithelial cell (GEC) injury and proteinuria, which is partially mediated by eicosanoids. This study addresses the role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and -2 in C5b-9-mediated eicosanoid production in GEC. Unstimulated rat GEC in culture primarily express COX-1. When stimulated with sublytic C5b-9, COX-2 was significantly up-regulated, whereas COX-1 was not affected. Compared with control, complement-treated GEC produced 32% more prostaglandin (PG) E(2) in the presence of exogenous substrate, and the increase was abolished with the COX-2-selective inhibitor, NS-398. Release of arachidonic acid from GEC phospholipids via C5b-9-induced activation of cytosolic phospholipase A(2) was associated with a marked stimulation of PGE(2) production, which was inhibited by 60% with NS-398. The results in cultured GEC were extended to GEC injury in vivo by examining COX-1 and -2 expression in PHN. Glomeruli from rats with PHN expressed significantly more COX-1 and COX-2, as compared with normal rats. PGE(2) production in glomeruli of rats with PHN was about twofold greater than in control glomeruli, and the increase was partially inhibited with NS-398. Thus, in GEC in culture and in vivo, C5b-9-induced eicosanoid production is regulated by both isoforms of COX. The inducible COX-2 may be an important novel mediator of C5b-9-induced glomerular injury.

Pharmacological evaluation of the role of cyclooxygenase isoenzymes on the micturition reflex following experimental cystitis in rats

Prostanoids, generated from cyclooxygenase (COX) isoenzymes, play a role in the physiological function of the lower urinary tract and are important mediators of inflammatory hyperalgesia. The present work evaluates the effects of the COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor dexketoprofen as well as of a selective COX-2 inhibitor, NS-398, on urodynamic function following endotoxin (LPS) or cyclophosphamide (CYP)-induced inflammation of the urinary bladder. The application of arachidonic acid (330 microgram rat(-1)) onto the serosal surface of the urinary bladder in control rats elicited bladder contractions which could be blocked in a dose-dependent manner by dexketoprofen (0.1 - 3 mg kg(-1), i.v.) but not by NS-398 (0.2 - 6 mg kg(-1), i.v. ). Dexketoprofen (3 mg kg(-1), i.v.) decreased the micturition frequency and increased the pressure threshold for triggering the micturition either when administered within 15 min or 3 h following surgery in control animals. NS-398 (6 mg kg(-1), i.v.) decreased the micturition frequency and increased the pressure threshold when administered 3 h but not 15 min following surgery. Administration of LPS (2 mg kg(-1), i.v., 90 - 120 min) increased both the micturition frequency and the pressure threshold for triggering the micturition reflex. Changes in urodynamic parameters induced by LPS were prevented by doses of either dexketoprofen (1 mg kg(-1), i.v.) or NS-398 (2 mg kg(-1), i.v.) which were ineffective in control animals. Pretreatment with CYP (150 mg kg(-1), i.p., 48 h) increased the micturition frequency, pressure threshold, and the minimal intravesical pressure but decreased the mean amplitude of micturition contractions. In CYP-treated rats, dexketoprofen (1 mg kg(-1), i.v.) or NS-398 (2 mg kg(-1), i.v.) blocked the CYP-induced urodynamic changes with exception of the micturition contraction amplitude. These results indicate that COX-1 may be involved in modulating the threshold for activating the micturition reflex in the normal rats and also demonstrates that inhibition of COX-2 prevents or reverses the urodynamic changes associated with bladder inflammation induced either by surgery, LPS or CYP treatments.

Discordant effect of aspirin and indomethacin on intestinal tumor burden in Apc(Min/+)mice

Epidemiologic and animal studies indicate that sustained use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have a chemopreventive effect against the incidence of colorectal neoplasia and subsequent mortality. We previously demonstrated that sulindac significantly reduces intestinal tumor load in Apc(Min/+)mice and the tumor regression was not necessarily correlated with prostaglandin biosynthesis. In the present study, we further investigate the relationship of NSAID treatment and tumorigenesis in the Apc(Min/+)mouse model. We demonstrate that indomethacin (9 ppm) is a very potent chemopreventive agent, reducing tumor load by 85% and significantly inhibiting basal and ex vivo prostaglandin formation (P< 0.006 and P< 0.0001, respectively). Aspirin (400 ppm) has a similar impact on reducing prostaglandin levels, but in contrast to indomethacin, is uneffective in reducing the tumor load. The data indicate a discordance between the impact of different NSAIDs on tumorigenesis in Apc(Min/+)mice.

Release of GM-CSF and G-CSF by human arterial and venous smooth muscle cells: differential regulation by COX-2

In addition to their traditional contractile function, vascular smooth muscle cells can be stimulated under inflammatory conditions to release a range of potent biological mediators. Indeed, we and others have shown that human vascular smooth muscle release the colony stimulating factors (CSF) granulocyte macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF) and granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) as well as large amounts of prostaglandins following the induction of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2), when stimulated with cytokines. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, that co-induced COX-2 activity simultaneously suppresses GM-CSF release and potentiates G-CSF release by human vascular cells. Moreover, the differential regulation of GM-CSF and G-CSF release by COX-2 was mimicked by the prostacyclin (PGI(2)) mimetic, cicaprost. These observations suggest that PGI(2), released following the induction of COX-2, differentially regulates the release of GM-CSF (suppresses) and G-CSF (potentiates) from human vascular cells.

COX-1, COX-2, and COX-3 and the future treatment of chronic inflammatory disease

A new generation of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has been described that selectively targets the inducible isoform of cyclo-oxygenase, cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2). This isoform is expressed at sites of inflammation, which has led to the speculation that its inhibition could provide all the benefits of current nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but without their major side-effects on the gastrointestinal system (which are due to inhibition of COX-1). We have shown that COX-2 (identified by use of specific antibodies) is induced during the resolution of an inflammatory response, inhibition of COX-2 resulting in persistence of the inflammation due to the prevention of the synthesis of a range of anti-inflammatory prostanoids. We propose that there is a third isoform of this enzyme family, COX-3, a proposal that will have implication for the prescription of both existing and new generation anti-inflammatory drugs, and might represent a new therapeutic target.